TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

17b29a Archive

View 1 posts and 2,592 comments by 17b29a on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Discussion17b29a/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/15 03:42 AM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 2,592 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

wtf dude you can get eye herpes??? from cold sores??? why has no one told me about this O__O
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/16 05:59 PM
1

Reality is behind it. :/ You should try doing some research...
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/16 05:53 PM
3

Coming up with something on your own doesn't entail that it's different from pre-existing ideas
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/16 04:19 PM
2

I would say those women know better than the researchers whether or not they were actually raped. Why? Do you think almost all women would agree on the definition of rape?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 02:00 AM
2

If a woman doesn't feel she was raped, that is extremely important information. Important to what? It has no bearing on whether she was raped, which is the point of the study
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/16 12:37 AM
2

:)
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 06:11 PM
3

But I backed up my points!! :(
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 02:39 PM
2

As many as you want
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 01:49 PM
4

Yeah
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 01:44 PM
4

Sure, just imagine some bisexual or gay people
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 04:07 AM
4

The article you linked talks about the median
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/16 03:50 AM
0

The mental gymnastics are pretty clear: Use the word's actual definition instead of its connotations
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/16 01:25 AM
6

happy new year woman haters ^-^
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/16 05:51 AM
1

pretty vague information, but I guess it'd reflect poorly
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/15 05:15 AM
1

wot?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 09:19 PM
2

28, 20 yo woman, non-native. a lot of the female expressions puzzled me
/r/PurplePillDebate29/12/15 08:24 PM
7

he's pretty attractive
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/15 06:27 PM
0

It's pseudoscience to say that what happened in the womb is the most important thing The article that I'm reading doesn't claim it's the most important, it just lists it among other proxies
/r/PurplePillDebate27/12/15 12:03 AM
3

2 4 6 7 3 2
/r/PurplePillDebate26/12/15 05:26 AM
1

What's the context? Are there people claiming TRPers don't want to be around women?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/15 01:36 AM
1

Who gave you that impression?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/12/15 09:00 PM
2

trite expression of outrage
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/15 04:41 AM
1

I'd tell him to ask someone else because I probably don't have any actionable advice
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/15 10:26 PM
1

I pity them and their retarded overlords, whom all abide by a set of rules so contradictory it makes studying shit like modern RSA or ROT13 cyber encryption easy. if you find rot13 complex, it's not surprising you're having comprehension issues
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/15 06:11 PM
2

we haven't done anything, i've never talked to you before in my life
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/15 09:41 PM
2

because severity is part of the definition of psychosis
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/15 03:38 AM
1

solipsism has a separate meaning of self-absorption apart from philosophy
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/15 12:52 AM
0

okay? it's still the case that no one stops to think about other random previous cultures before claiming their current one is xyz
/r/PurplePillDebate13/12/15 02:54 PM
-1

yes it is o.o no one care about the mongols
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/15 08:15 PM
-2

that's generally how words work
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/15 05:12 PM
5

if your ostensible view is that women freezing up entails chaperonage, and you agree that women freeze up, but don't think we should start chaperoning women, it doesn't seem that it's your view
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/15 05:09 PM
2

So this isn't your view?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/12/15 04:50 PM
4

so men are dumb is what you're saying?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/15 06:59 PM
9

what a dumb analogy
/r/PurplePillDebate08/12/15 04:54 PM
7

Most of the comments didn't seem particularly mean
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/15 02:55 AM
12

Why do you even care that some men are disgusted by sluttery? It's sort of the entire point of your thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/15 04:28 PM
5

Discuss, and I'd invite those so inclined to challenge my view. you haven't really presented any pertinent arguments, so I'm not sure what to challenge
/r/PurplePillDebate19/11/15 04:24 PM
2

Mhm?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/15 03:04 AM
1

No
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/15 02:27 AM
2

As in whether it's creepy or not is not arbitrary or unpredictable according to what you said
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/15 02:19 AM
1

No
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/15 02:12 AM
2

Sounds pretty consistent to me
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/15 02:04 AM
4

Don't be creepy, duh
/r/PurplePillDebate17/11/15 02:00 AM
1

yeh, that's what I'm saying '-'
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/15 06:19 PM
2

yep, world affairs, history, politics, etc. super boring
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/15 04:27 PM
0

yeh i know, i've acknowledged both of these things
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/15 08:20 PM
1

trp believes the rp things and believes they're uncommon, and so does bp -> u r the deluded minority here...
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/15 08:13 PM
1

as in purple pill would be some medium level of agreement, not everyone who doesn't wholly disagree
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/15 08:06 PM
4

i can see that, i'm telling you the notion that rp beliefs are uncommon isn't restrictwed to bpers, it's the point of the whole dumb matrix metaphor, u r in the minority tbh
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/15 07:55 PM
3

if you only agree with like half of rp beliefs, u could be purple pill '-'
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/15 07:14 PM
3

One of my favorite BP delusions is that most people are like them. that's what RPers believe as well '-'
/r/PurplePillDebate15/11/15 06:59 PM
1

it's part of sexualized culture?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/15 01:55 AM
3

stop posting
/r/PurplePillDebate14/11/15 12:05 AM
0

"sexualized culture" = "culture where sexual violence is normalized"? itt: rape culture
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/15 09:56 PM
-1

wut that has to do with sexualized culture?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/15 08:58 PM
1

To blame a sexualized culture for rape shows an inability to think critically or logically about simple observable metrics. who's blaming a sexualized culture for rape? o__o
/r/PurplePillDebate13/11/15 06:09 PM
1

I'd beat the shit out of them
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/15 03:36 PM
2

Key phrase being "outside of the U.S." there, peanut. mhm? i mean, she just said she thought it was british english Also, if you want to try and correct someone else's English, trying capitalizing sentences and using at least SOME punctuation. e e cummings you are not. i'll definitely trying that, hun
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 11:36 PM
2

that's the origin of the noun "spelt," hun. here are two other links from your link: Outside the U.S., the two forms are interchangeable in these uses, and both are common. spelt \ (chiefly Britain) simple past tense and past participle of spell
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 11:10 PM
0

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/spelt? o.o
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 10:49 PM
1

obnoxious to read
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/15 02:09 PM
9

i'm just telling you to stop posting
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 08:03 PM
10

stop posting, insane person
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 07:47 PM
1

She never admitted that!
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 06:00 PM
1

... I don't think you're right about that
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 05:04 PM
1

Hmm! I imagine tricyclics are more likely to kill you in a 1-2 hour span than MAOIs?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/11/15 01:54 AM
1

What kind of antidepressants did he have? AFAIK most of them are ineffective as a suicide method
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/15 11:00 PM
1

still not making progress towards explaining what you mean by free speech
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/15 10:51 PM
1

... I still don't think you follow
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/15 10:43 PM
2

Right, I read those too hun, the issue at hand is more what sort of right free speech gives you, "the right to communicate one's opinions and ideas without fear of government retaliation or censorship," as Wikipedia would tell you, or the right to hold a job as a radio show host no matter what you say?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/15 09:19 PM
5

But don’t curb basic free speech The notion that a job can't be taken away because the poor quality of your output as long as your output is the stuff you say seems more like advanced free speech to me
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/15 08:30 PM
4

Chomsky wasn't defining it in any of the links you gave
/r/PurplePillDebate09/11/15 07:56 PM
5

Well you're not single anymore so it's fitting!
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/15 05:35 PM
3

are there actually people upset over an article about beetles
/r/PurplePillDebate08/11/15 11:04 AM
2

wats the science
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/15 07:19 PM
3

What begets a feminist? a woman who cannot find a man she is wild for. Actually feminists are just people that think people are women
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/15 02:05 AM
-1

well you're right in the fact that my post was a bit misleading. I would've used the word "stupid," but I guess that works too If you were machiavellian and did not care about online validation why would you spend your time helping others and looking for validation when you've mastered the art yourself? maybe they want to help people, maybe they just find it really interesting! I do not know! You should ask them
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/15 02:03 AM
-1

no that wasn't point two. The two were mutually exclusive. Apart from the fact that "point two" doesn't suggest they weren't, you did say "that suggests two things," not "one of two things," and there's no reason you can't both want to help people and enjoy validation at the same time. If you are machiavellian and you spend your time online helping others it's obviously for the online validation. Not really, but I guess if that were true, you might be narcissistic in addition to Machiavellian. O…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/15 01:48 AM
-1

I just don't understand why people call themselves "Machiavellian" and then completely contradict themselves. Clearly you do understand that, see point 2 in your post: You are possibly machiavellian
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/15 01:16 AM
3

<3
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/15 12:17 PM
3

No
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/15 01:10 AM
2

Systemizing quotient isn't about reasoning skills, it's about interest in systems vs people
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/15 10:47 PM
4

Is there a point to your confused post?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/15 10:41 PM
12

Don't cut yourself!
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/15 03:31 PM
4

Why would she have to find a new partner?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/15 03:19 PM
1

Given how many victims know their rapist, clearly the best advice is "never trust men"
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/15 03:05 PM
4

Not relevant
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/15 02:47 PM
9

The only reason today that we’ve come to the conclusion that men cheating on women is as bad is due to man’s natural folly of thinking in patterns. No, it's because it's hurtful to both genders
/r/PurplePillDebate04/11/15 02:36 PM
3

the shooters are all losers dude, wat r u talking about
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/15 07:24 PM
5

Right, Bill Maher, the non-mainstream media
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/15 06:45 PM
1

To prevent people from using shitty logic, we should require them to at least be able to put the argument in symbolic form. It doesn't have to be a formal logical argument ... wat does informal symbolic logic look like?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/15 01:10 AM
2

Why? It's nonsense
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/15 12:01 AM
1

Hasn't this been poste dlike 5 times
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/15 02:01 PM
2

That's not an argument, silly!
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/15 01:19 AM
2

What's the argument? And why would demands be arguments?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/15 11:29 PM
2

as in, is she saying that you should support the legal right of any woman to have an abortion, or that you should think any decision to have an abortion is justified or morally right
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/15 10:19 PM
3

What? You mean you acknowledge she wasn't trying to make an argument?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/15 09:48 PM
1

Is she talking about supporting the right to abortion or supporting any given choice to have an abortion?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/15 09:42 PM
4

What argument? She didn't make any
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/15 09:40 PM
2

I refer to my earlier post
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/15 11:46 PM
2

I think it's more that it doesn't need a day for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/15 11:35 PM
1

This is a scandal? o__O
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/15 10:09 PM
1

do people regularly get thrown out for things like that...? o__o
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/15 09:58 PM
8

I'm a big fan of the one that says women suck
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/15 09:45 PM
5

Yes, I believe the argument was that the whole men's day thing is less relevant in a room that is 1 person away from being entirely male
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/15 09:39 PM
6

That would only be a measure of the reports even if it were valid, not of the total rapes
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/15 09:27 PM
2

Seems like what she was opposing was having an entire day dedicated to discussion of men's issues in whatever that place is
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/15 09:18 PM
2

he knows, he just wanted excuse to write 12 paragraph post
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/15 03:51 PM
0

ah! good thing throwinout found a better study for you then
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/15 01:35 PM
0

That's for both genders, and yes, it'd be under half anyway, 40-50% afaik. What's the very specific type of feminist?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/15 01:19 AM
0

About half of millennial women identify as feminists; all of the women at that dude's university are attending a liberal university, and universities in general are liberal; and I don't know what majors are useless to you, but I'm guessing it's not rare among women. This isn't an exhaustive list of red flags, so I imagine RPers must have to reject a lot of women, lest they get falsely accused of rape...?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/15 01:03 AM
2

Any Terper would have told a guy to stay away from that girl cause she would pull shit like that. Why? What were the warning signs for that?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/15 12:08 AM
2

What's a WF?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 09:38 PM
1

There are no outliers? :F
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 09:36 PM
2

Well, point proven
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 08:13 PM
2

It absolutely does; I've changed my views in light of this overwhelming piece of evidence
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 08:07 PM
1

Good point!
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 07:13 PM
3

because everyone here's so mean to her, look at all the people calling her ugly :(
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 05:10 PM
1

So what you're saying is that trans people ought to have horror novels written about them?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 01:46 AM
1

oh wow trp = owned
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/15 12:27 AM
1

Definitely not
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/15 06:59 PM
1

What if I don't have any vices? :V
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/15 06:16 PM
1

animals in the Lynx genus
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/15 06:12 PM
1

if you scroll down, you'll see views like they describewd
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/15 06:07 PM
1

u like lynx?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/15 05:54 PM
1

got em
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/15 05:53 PM
25

my conclusions: that site sucks ur gf is annoying so i only watched like a minute
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/15 05:51 PM
2

New towel?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/15 04:09 PM
1

You're a dork.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/15 03:59 PM
1

nice dude 8) i hope ur next baader-meinhof experience is more interesting
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/15 02:55 PM
2

Are you cute IRL?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/15 09:58 PM
1

yeh
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/15 04:27 PM
2

<3
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/15 11:46 AM
3

Only evil misogynists. http://i.imgur.com/yUh8kbj.gifv
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/15 10:16 AM
2

You like red pandas?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/15 08:27 AM
3

Mhm! ^__^ Tools like puush or gyazo are useful for this, by the way.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/15 12:43 AM
18

TBP like to speak about "nature" often. They speak about how women are the "selectors" in "nature" and therefore should be allowed to be selfish with militant sexuality because well its "nature". Are you talking about some "look at this random biology factoid, haha oh how the biotruths betray you twirpuhs" thing from /r/thebluepill? Otherwise I don't know what you mean, I've never seen this here
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/15 12:12 AM
9

I can't see the post you linked to; it's been removed. Though, if they didn't give you any details about the ban, I don't know why you would be making grand assertions about their reasons anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/15 11:59 PM
12

how is that link supposed to tell me why you were banned?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/15 11:49 PM
2

You're confusing "predictive power" with "good results". I said that truth is predictive power. Yes, you certainly did, just before you went on to say this, aligning truth with positive results: So you can't really separate "what gets us laid" and "what's true".
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/15 11:34 PM
2

First of all, truth is predictive power. So you can't really separate "what gets us laid" and "what's true". Of course you can. To use the gun analogy TRP likes so much: "All guns are loaded" is obviously not true.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/15 10:11 PM
1

*prostration*
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/15 04:24 PM
1

what would you say the men's rights movement has accomplished, then?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/10/15 02:53 AM
1

Because reality is not entirely subjective upon my own perception of it, that's incredibly self-absorbed. I'm aware of that, but actual reality doesn't directly affect your decisions and the conclusions you can draw from your decisions, your perception of reality does. To you, do I lack self control? I would assume you understand that it's a bad decision, in which case I'd say yes, but if you genuinely don't, no. I'm p much just repeating myself.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/15 01:40 AM
1

If you genuinely don't believe that, no, it wouldn't. Why would it?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/15 01:25 AM
42

Perhaps one idea for moving forward is to make posts people are going to read
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/15 11:51 PM
1

No, I don't think so
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/15 02:08 PM
3

they totallya re, apart from genital surgery
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/15 01:08 AM
6

No I mean what if they get fancy ideas and stage a violent uprising? Mad Max Fury Road was a cautionary tale if I've ever seen one
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/15 11:04 PM
2

Doesn't quite have the same ring to it
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/15 10:53 PM
5

But then, keeping track of an entire harem is even harder
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/15 10:53 PM
5

ugh, fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/15 10:44 PM
5

You acquire THINGS, not people
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/15 10:18 PM
8

"Obtaining"? She's a person -__-
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/15 10:08 PM
3

They don't stop being negative consequences, but only things the person believes to be negative consequences are relevant. If you don't believe some behavior has negative consequences, then you don't have any reason to believe that you need to control it, and so doing it can't indicate a lack of self-control.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/15 10:07 PM
0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PsFHkZjQfR8 hahaha thats the most blatanted scripted video ive ever seen
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/15 08:43 PM
4

only if you believe it has negative consequences. if you don't believe being a slut is a negative thing, you have no reason to restrain yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/15 07:53 PM
9

Did you actually play Depression Quest. That shit was groundbreaking. lol okay now you're taking the act too far
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/15 07:34 PM
8

If there's no motive for controlling some drive, indulging it doesn't indicate a lack of self-control
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/15 06:07 PM
1

are you even disagreeing?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/15 08:00 PM
1

nothing is stopping you from arguing with them
/r/PurplePillDebate22/10/15 07:59 PM
1

I wish ):
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/15 09:19 PM
1

ur mom
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/15 08:23 PM
2

you mean there are people that don't understand what the lock and key analogy is communicating?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/15 06:38 PM
6

O__O THE PERFECT 15/15 SCORE! The prophecies were right!
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/15 06:28 PM
5

what's the point of the analogy then?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/15 06:24 PM
6

yeah, knowing who lyell and dalton are isn't even a vocab thing, just random trivia I thought that analogy notation was fairly ubiquitous though
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/15 06:22 PM
2

I haven't paid attention to any of the MBTI threads but didn't every pill have an overrepresentation of rationals?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/15 06:17 PM
1

http://i.imgur.com/AFYz02l.png 2 is confusing, a:b::c:d is supposed be a is to b as c is to d, not a is to c as b is to d
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/15 05:32 PM
0

thats not wat she said
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/15 02:33 AM
3

y did you bring it up in your op then?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/15 07:55 PM
2

qed
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/15 07:33 PM
13

is tru, women don't have thoughts, they're just imagining them
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/15 12:38 AM
4

I dunno. You could put a joke there or something.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/15 06:15 PM
3

Can you change your flair? It's really creepy.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/15 05:57 PM
6

Being a crybaby
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/15 04:09 PM
1

The blue line (the world) is at 2, are you blind? The projected 2050 point is indeed, the 2015 point seems to be at 2.5. It's really flat You can surely see that the red line is around 1.65 in 2015 and that all lines but the yellow one have their projections converge around 2. Between the minimum at 1.5 in 1995 and the 2 in 2050, it's clearly going up. Again, the overwhelming majority of countries are in decline. Assuming you're american, you can see ours is in decline as well (see the last colu…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/15 09:49 PM
1

It's not "2.5" It totes is o.O highly developed economies You mean the red line that is going up?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/15 08:57 PM
1

Global rate is like 2.5, no? What is issue?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/15 08:44 PM
1

lol
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/15 08:32 PM
1

rape is illegal but yeh it's generally just a dumb edgy attitude they drop whenever something disturbs them or they have to fellate some fag with a flair
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/15 08:18 PM
2

Yeah totes
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/15 06:56 PM
1

the comment is more about how genius is more prevalent among men It definitely appears that way when people like you keep minimizing women's achievements!
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/15 06:03 PM
1

grisly, but not a spree killer. Not a serial killer, you mean? Well, certainly not one of the same class; she has him beaten eightyfold
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/15 05:41 PM
4

Not a lot of information to go off there!
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/15 04:35 PM
3

Nah. I'm sure ~some~ women do, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/15 04:06 PM
2

Optical illusion
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/15 12:46 PM
1

we have no female Jobs because we have no female Jack the Ripper. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amelia_Dyer
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/15 12:45 PM
2

ur gay
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/15 06:07 PM
1

u r a 2
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/15 04:24 PM
14

Most of the successful women tech entrepreneurs I know are actually just business-women. They have men working under them that actually do all the creative programming and technical work that design their new innovative products. Isn't that the exact case with Steve Jobs?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/15 03:24 PM
1

What does this have to do with polyamory?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/15 09:10 PM
2

You so cute, bot ^__^
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/15 11:09 AM
1

Look up! Space is cool! :)
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/15 11:02 AM
3

Look if men and women have different brains on average then it's reasonable to say that traditional gender roles have a basis in biology. Why's that
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/15 11:01 AM
2

Child support seems like a pretty good demotivator
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/15 10:00 PM
0

wat deflection, i'm 100% srs
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/15 05:26 PM
1

ELIZABETH Bathory? You bring up the most random things
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/15 07:37 PM
1

I agree, we need to be more explicit for our autisti... cognitively differently-abled friends.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/15 07:28 PM
1

people will have another dumb insult to use!
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/15 06:13 PM
3

Probably not!
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/15 06:44 PM
9

yeah, who on earth would want to marry someone who takes pictures of themselves
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/15 02:14 PM
4

Neither being in a sexual relationship with them or not going to the police immediately seem particularly inconsistent with being raped
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/15 06:22 PM
2

There was ample, compelling and irrefutable evidence that the sex between the two of them was fully consensual. What's the irrefutable evidence?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/15 06:02 PM
11

While your tu quoque is well taken, it does not address the question presented in the OP. It's entirely relevant when his OP is based on that comparison: When people say to just teach women how not to get raped, it's easy to implement. ... I just don't see how to mimic that for avoiding false accusations. I take it you would answer that both men and women cannot be educated to avoid all risk in not getting raped/not being accused of rape. If he were asking if it's possible to effect literally ze…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/15 05:37 PM
19

It took you that long to come up with a new goalpost?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/15 05:09 PM
9

No, I'm saying responding favorably doesn't entail taking it as literally true
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/15 04:54 PM
8

Bloops at TBP responded very favorably to that shitpost. Meaning, they took it very seriously. Not really, no!
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/15 04:44 PM
25

Even if a guy is the most courteous, feministic, careful, consent obtaining guy possible, she can still accuse him of rape. And a woman who takes every possible precaution can still get raped. Your point?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/15 04:21 PM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DpRUKLKCY-w
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/15 03:56 PM
3

it's evidently important to plenty of people
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/15 05:40 PM
3

I would marry her
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/15 07:45 PM
7

Maybe you should google the infidelity rate among women these days. Or the divorce rate stats. Maybe you should make a thread about the infidelity rates instead of this garbage if you wanted people to discuss them
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/15 06:34 PM
9

Nice strawman argument. Verbatim from your OP, in case you forgot: Does her going out "partying" all night with "bad boys" while taking coke a common experience for beta bucks husbands?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/15 06:33 PM
2

stop oppressing wazzup :'(
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/15 05:23 PM
1

ESFJ
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/15 05:17 PM
1

And, like a conservative from my analogy, women are livid. But why? Why can one say that women owe men nothing and then act shocked when men decide they owe women nothing? do women have an obligation to have sex with men when they don't want to? or how is this supposed to be analogous?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/15 01:42 AM
5

seems like he's just claiming that your view is antisocial
/r/PurplePillDebate04/10/15 12:44 AM
8

why would attraction ever have anything to do with rationality
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/15 04:01 PM
4

insistence on linguistic precision???
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/15 11:28 PM
13

But that's not true
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/15 08:14 PM
2

source??
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/15 07:49 PM
3

So, RedSovereign says because I'm a women (which I'm not) he shouldn't expect rationality. A literal use of AWALT but TRP's not a monolith, right? That's not a literal use and has no relation to whether rpers are uniform in their beliefs
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/15 07:04 PM
4

RP Poster: This is perfectly natural behaviour. (Please note in doing so this poster is not committing the naturalistic fallacy. He is describing reality.) Depends on the context, "actually, this is completely natural" in response to "this is wrong" sounds much more like an appeal to nature
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/15 06:37 PM
6

hes an r9k poster
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/15 09:57 PM
1

Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/15 11:30 PM
9

strange that you brought it up then
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/15 04:52 PM
4

The only difference in the pizza example and the relationship one is the unspoken nature of the latter. hence "covert"
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/15 04:01 PM
2

OOOOOOOOOOOH YOU GOT HER THERE
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/15 12:35 AM
2

I don't think the linked person thinks that's immoral in the first place
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/15 11:23 PM
3

She wants to stop online "harassment", which basically includes anyone who exposes her for being the fraud that she has become. what makes you think that
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/15 02:19 PM
2

eh, he's old
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/15 05:36 PM
6

He's pretty cute tbf
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/15 03:01 PM
1

How many do you think the average gay man has?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/15 09:23 PM
1

Early twenties?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/15 09:15 PM
0

:D-|-K
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/15 02:54 AM
3

perhaps it's an indicator of some kind of mental illness...? crazy idea, i know
/r/PurplePillDebate23/09/15 12:50 AM
1

Reductio ad absurdum isn't a fallacy
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/15 11:10 PM
1

Sure, why not
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 11:42 PM
3

they just whine a lot
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/15 12:34 AM
2

lol
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/15 11:27 PM
1

philosophy and it's fact? Inconceivable, that
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/15 07:47 PM
3

Why were they ineffective?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/15 07:12 PM
2

I don't care, it never occurs to me. I don't wear makeup. I only ever notice it when it's a woman that usually does.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/15 07:11 PM
16

Logic is a field of philosophy, the pareto principle is neither inherently associated with economics or a theory, and evo-psy isn't science eta: I do agree with you that a lot of RPers will tell you that TRP is thoroughly supported by science though, although it's no longer en vogue on PPD
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/15 06:53 PM
12

logic & Pareto principle & evo psych none of those are related to science o-o
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/15 06:43 PM
1

single dads are deadbeats who says that? :o
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/15 05:00 PM
2

Is it... quantified in another way? o__O
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/15 04:57 PM
2

Do you know?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/15 03:41 PM
1

So do they ever quantify the impact of this?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/15 01:52 PM
3

I think they just want attention.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/15 02:20 PM
2

You are looking at report that states: Women watch monkey have sex and a turned on and then -you- insert some BS reason-: the sky is blue, evolution, or whatever 'neat' theory that you can come up with to explain the issue away, etc. I don't care about that rape hypothesis. What the studies on this demonstrate is that while women have increased bloodflow to their genitals while viewing these thigns, they don't report being sexually aroused. I'm just pointing out that, although, they're often con…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/15 02:01 PM
6

Many times I have seen bloops say that if a terp dates with AWALT in mind he will find nothing but AWALTS, or that a confirmation bias will make him see nothing but AWALT qualities. Confirmation bias != self-fulfilling prophecy
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/15 11:31 PM
3

is that the book that talks about how men are totally into transsexuals
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/15 11:25 PM
1

Nonsense!
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/15 10:42 PM
5

most morning wood comes from a full bladder... i.e. a physical response to physical problem. That's the point: Men experience physical response in this case, but they're not turned on. Thus, physical arousal doesn't entail being turned on.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/15 06:10 PM
0

lol ok
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/15 09:22 AM
6

https://i.imgur.com/pPVvPuF.gifv
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/15 12:37 AM
4

What there am I supposed to be concerned about?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/15 12:12 AM
2

awoooo
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/15 09:50 PM
2

Men are pretty hateable, to be fair
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/15 09:50 PM
1

ok? what's a better concrete example of whatever it is you're complaining about, then?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/15 09:33 PM
3

To which of course she started playing victim and semi-jokingly asked a coworker "can I smack him?" to which I didn't reply because of the suck-up-to-females society we live in. is this what you're upset about? lol
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/15 09:09 PM
6

But all women are bisexual!
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/15 04:29 PM
-1

because it's rly hard and unnecessary to prove that you didn't rape someone
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/15 09:58 PM
5

Delhi Commission of Women find that 53.2% of rapes reported in India are false How they obtained this number is never explained, but ~50/50 "true/false" rate is nonsensical In the same article, it is shown that 78% of rape cases were found false in all of 2013. This is merely the acquittal rate though: In all, in 2013 there were a total of 1,559 cases of rape in Delhi, where the acquittal rate was 78%.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/15 09:23 PM
0

what the fuck they changed the color
/r/PurplePillDebate08/09/15 05:19 PM
1

it's full of fags~
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/15 07:31 PM
0

u guys should make me mod! i feel like i'd be p good at it tbh
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/15 07:28 PM
1

you sure got him there
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/15 07:07 PM
2

wat a weirdo
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/15 07:00 PM
0

That's silly
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/15 11:17 PM
0

Who cares if they're working different jobs?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/15 11:00 PM
-1

But I can be on both sites at once! Also, you didn't even respond to my argument. That's like a fallacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/15 10:54 PM
-1

Seems fair enough to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/15 10:49 PM
3

I think it's subjective.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/15 10:33 PM
-2

I'd feel even more grateful when he pays, I guess? Try to stay on topic.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/15 10:30 PM
-2

Well, women are poor. Gender pay gap and all.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/15 10:28 PM
-1

I'm poor
/r/PurplePillDebate01/09/15 10:15 PM
3

My central idea is that, sexual attraction is based off of biological and emotional reactions to other people, and is not fostered or developed with rational or logical thinking. Most things in the world aren't the product of rational thought, that has never stopped anything from being rationally understood
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/15 11:52 PM
12

If you want to know why any particular person objects to AWALT, you should probably ask that person. If you want to know why people "care" or question you about what you believe, it's because you're on a debate subreddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/15 06:50 PM
3

even with the fake accounts plus making it free for women iirc, the gender ratio was still like 6:1
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/15 06:39 PM
0

why trp have a tenant about windows? o.O
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/15 05:52 PM
0

how do you "misuse" a tenet?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/15 05:04 PM
1

i have now!!! it's good ^__^
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/15 03:55 PM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8jtzqNd_J1M
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/15 03:52 PM
1

jesus christ
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/15 02:59 PM
3

Have you listened to this?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/15 01:37 AM
1

oh man, my mistake Then again, if you're not a fucking idiot like valid_concept you'd be able to tell from context, duh! Lurk more maybe.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/15 01:29 AM
1

I'm conflating nothing at all; I made a clear distinction. Can't you read?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/15 01:21 AM
1

It's not about the one post: You generally can't expect TRP to represent TRP well. Which is totally unsurprising, of course! We're talking about TRP, not TRP.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/15 01:08 AM
1

it seems like more reasonable posters such Taiboworks who back their views with studies get a lot of downvotes Yeah, that guy is one of my favorite posters, very rational. Maybe they just can't handle facts, science and graphs?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/15 01:03 AM
2

yeah, read the sidebar! except the "sexual strategy is amoral" one that obviously doesn't represent trp. or any of the ones that aren't even meant to be true
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/15 01:02 AM
2

Yeah, as this person explains with immaculate rhetorical clarity, they made the mistake of looking for TRP within TRP, not knowing that TRP is just a vehicle for peddlling misogynist lies to idiots that generally doesn't adequately represent TRP. What an idiot!
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/15 12:30 AM
1

You're an idiot
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/15 12:18 AM
1

I think you're taking it too seriously, it's not like they're trying to make any actual argument
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/15 11:54 PM
1

cool evasion!
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/15 06:36 PM
2

It is a putting down of the general male population, essentially a shaming tactic. Do you have a fit every time you look at a PSA? Like, do you look at this and go oh wow it's talking to down to me like gosh I'm not a child, ad, I know it's never ok, and oh my god what an atrocious generalization, I can't BELIEVE this RUDE ADVERTISEMENT would INSINUATE I'd drink and drive!!! The nerve!
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/15 10:57 PM
2

wat
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/15 10:23 PM
4

lol wat
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/15 10:21 PM
1

yes
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/15 02:15 PM
1

what on earth do those have to do with sympathy o.o
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/15 04:50 PM
0

I'm not sure any of those are common feminist positions
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/15 11:22 PM
-1

couldn't have said it better (:
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/15 10:20 AM
0

pointing out specific forms that are common here would be useful, not just having lists of garbage like ad hominem and strawman, that's 100% worthless
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/15 10:13 AM
4

What's the point of posting some garbage article to a choir of RPers repeating your editorialized headline? Like, why does this belong on PPD?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/15 10:44 AM
2

WTF this is why I need feminism
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/15 11:37 PM
2

totes
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/15 11:11 PM
1

ok
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/15 11:09 PM
1

No. How on earth would you argue for something prior to knowing what it is, anyway? Your previous comment is equivalent to me linking you a definition of God and you going "circular logic! that's not an argument for God!" I know hun -- it wasn't supposed to be
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/15 10:10 PM
1

No, "the term exists to imply that only men condescend" about its definition/usage
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/15 10:03 PM
1

Not only is our discussion not about arguments for the existence of mansplaining in the first place, the text you quoted is a definition in any case. There's no logic to be found, and it's not "circular logic" because you invented an argument in its absence.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/15 09:58 PM
1

What logic?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/15 09:50 PM
1

how's this relevant?=
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/15 09:39 PM
1

I was actually just asking you why you thought that, but sure, there's definition here
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/15 09:26 PM
1

'__' is therea point to this
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/15 08:46 PM
1

that it's in some way unlike other kinds, ijust said that
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/15 08:41 PM
1

rhetorical precision...?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/15 08:38 PM
1

to distinguish it from other kinds of condescension
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/15 08:32 PM
2

=__=
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/15 08:12 PM
1

oh I think I misread your post as "tolerated," in the sense of socially accepted, that makes more sense now sry edit: actually it's really weird for you to mkae a post like that wtf
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/15 08:09 PM
1

naturally only men mansplain, but not only men condescend. why would you think that?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/15 08:02 PM
1

you forgot the s
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/15 07:40 PM
1

pretending it's something only men do.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/15 07:02 PM
1

who told you that?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/15 06:07 PM
1

it's just a script gathering TRP/MR/etc. posters and forging RES tag entries, SRSers have been doing this kind of thing for ages to spot ppl, it's hardly very interesting
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/15 03:07 AM
0

Yes but htat's not how it tends to be used
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/15 12:06 AM
2

how come ur disclaimer doesnt pop up like other options
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/15 12:34 AM
2

http://i.imgur.com/nVUBpVl.png There you go hun, view changed!
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/15 06:04 PM
0

Get surgery
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/15 05:56 PM
7

Is there a point to your strange hypothetical?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/15 12:56 AM
5

So, why the accusations of older RP men grooming or taking advantage of these 18 year olds? Because there are plenty of RP men literally saying you should go for very young women because they're easily impressionable Not that you seem to be even trying to make an argument that 18 yos aren't immature
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/15 12:49 AM
0

Lol, yeah
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/15 11:34 PM
0

Sure, as long as they were around my height, and 0%
/r/PurplePillDebate16/07/15 11:22 PM
-5

I dunno dude
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/15 11:58 PM
1

What do you mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/15 11:21 PM
1

What?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/15 10:40 PM
3

When they say that parts of the sidebar are there to bait the feminists , how can I take them seriously ? You shouldn't
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/15 09:20 PM
0

:D
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/15 06:49 PM
-1

spatial/logic tasks You keep saying that, but AFAIK only the spatial part is well-supported, and only the logical part is relevant Gender roles revolve around the optimization of division of labour based on our dimorphism. Women are the only ones that can get pregnant and give birth, and are also better suited to nurturing a young infant. Men are better are spatial/logic tasks and are also larger, so the task of provision and protection went to men. Sure, that doesn't mean the consequences are b…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/15 06:46 PM
0

Sorry, rectified
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/15 06:44 PM
-2

Well there can e.g. be a biological reason for a nondescript religion emerging in that scenario, but that doesn't mean it's true, in the same way there can vaguely be a biological reason for gender roles, but that doesn't entail that any particular part of it, like women's disinterest in comp sci, is directly biologically caused
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/15 05:27 PM
-2

it was weirdly phrased sorry, b ut why wouldn't separate cultures develop similarly?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/15 05:07 PM
-4

uhhh, so question-begging aside, you agree that cultural ideas don't necessarily vary enormously?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/15 04:44 PM
-2

Because cultural ideas vary enormously based on circumstance and environment. There are plenty that don't, like sexism
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/15 04:31 PM
0

Differences in food preference...? XD If it weren't biological, you'd see huge variance. Why?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/15 04:04 PM
2

Yesa
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/15 03:59 PM
-4

Think of it this way: it'll take the average person 2.5 hours to read a psych review paper on why men and women choose different professions. Lol what paper takes 2½ hours to read? That's not the content of the doc anyway, and I'm p sure I could read that in much shorter time
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/15 03:56 PM
-4

I dunno, why?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/15 03:34 PM
1

You guys love doing anything but acknowledging hard facts presented before you. I have no problem acknowledging that women have more interhemispherical connections in their brain than men, WHAT I WAS TELLING YOU is that that alone says nothing about gendered preferences, nor about how they come to be
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/15 03:29 PM
5

100% agree
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/15 03:17 PM
-3

Cool 40 mins long documentary!
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/15 03:15 PM
0

A link showing that gendered brain differences exist is irrelevant to a discussion about gendered differences in preferences? Yes? "Gendered brain differences exist" doesn't entail "gendered differences in preferences exist," nor does it entail "gendered differences in preferences are innate"
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/15 03:13 PM
-4

Cool completely irrelevant link!
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/15 03:02 PM
1

None of this has any relevant implications
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/15 01:50 PM
8

Wonder if you'll chime in with the study that demonstrates having many sexual partners causes psychological damage! Oh wait, it doesn't exist
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/15 02:38 AM
1

Nineteen*
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/15 02:34 AM
12

No, /u/PurpleDiesel420 just said it 4 times, titled his thread with it, and didn't mention any other reason. It's entirely possible there's something else! edit: I really feel like I should apologize! Sometimes I just talk before thinking, with no consideration of all the lovely people here with autism spectrum disorders. I'm terribly sorry /u/pakleader.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/15 02:33 AM
11

AWALT - Found out my younger sister is a whore, and I can't even look at her anymore. I don't even want to be seen with her anymore, I don't even really want a good connection with her anymore. I don't even want to talk to her anymore, I have zero respect for her. Just concerned about her health! If I found out she's been with 15 dicks with no concern for her safety A cool premise that doesn't relate to that post at all! Maybe you should make a different thread like, "BPers, do you think you sho…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/15 02:27 AM
0

There's no reason to think that
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/15 12:41 AM
0

This isn't the TRP demographic
/r/PurplePillDebate15/07/15 12:37 AM
0

is there a point you're trying to get to, hun?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/15 08:56 PM
0

who cares if they let you know, doesn't let you escape rape charges
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/15 08:38 PM
-1

i don't like your girlfrieeeend
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/15 08:20 PM
2

don't do dat
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/15 02:44 PM
0

what are you even talking about LOL
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/15 01:26 PM
3

the only obvious conclusion I can see is that you shouldn't fuck drunk girls, no idea what you're babbling about
/r/PurplePillDebate12/07/15 01:18 AM
14

I bet they wouldn't find it "weird" or "hostile" if it were Brad Pitt PMing them
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/15 05:31 PM
-1

half of ppl wear glasses? nowai
/r/PurplePillDebate11/07/15 03:06 PM
0

lol 18 yo women are more mature than 26 yo guys, totes, good article, its ok its not supposed tro be scientific truth or true at all
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/15 09:09 PM
4

TRP posts are best viewed as philosophy and collective experiences. The focus is on useful beliefs rather than truthful (highest correlation to reality) beliefs. The field in which you're most likely to encounter statements that are intended to be useful to believe instead of true isn't science, philosophy, or "collective experiences," it's shitty self-help books
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/15 09:04 PM
9

If I moderated a debate forum, <I'd set up an auto-delete filter for "Dunning-Kruger"
/r/PurplePillDebate10/07/15 05:17 PM
0

ur not responding to the post o.o
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/15 09:27 PM
1

no, theyre just pussies
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/15 10:46 PM
0

You didn't seem to know what "neoreactionary movement" meant, so I gave you a link
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/15 08:39 PM
-1

https://www.google.com/search?q=neoreactionary
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/15 08:21 PM
5

wasnt that the organization that got banned from pride?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/15 08:14 PM
3

I'm not against prostitution.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/15 07:49 PM
3

taiboworks please!
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/15 09:36 PM
1

I love you
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/15 09:15 PM
6

wtf
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/15 09:15 PM
2

aww, pics so cute!!!
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/15 03:30 PM
1

cute!!
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/15 03:24 PM
3

People should have that right in the appropriate circumstances, terminal diseases and stuff like that. I don't feel qualified to comment on the linked person's situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/15 01:49 PM
1

I think the answers would be different if the question were explicitly like that
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/15 01:36 PM
1

I don't understand why she would expect equal representation of issues if she doesn't think men have more or as many issues as women
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/15 01:35 PM
6

Like I said previously, I don't think your question was clear, and the responses of BPers here and in the other threads consistently demonstrate that you're not talking about the same thing
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/15 01:08 PM
2

Hey it is! Rad
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/15 11:10 AM
2

It doesn't really matter what the right interpretation is, it's clear that people are talking over each other
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/15 09:53 PM
0

In fairness, the example in that thread was very extreme It seemed pretty ambiguous to me actual,ly, a lot of the women seemed to take it to mean every facet of his personality was a conscious act and he might as well have been flipping through a script during every interaction, and all the RPers are taking it to mean any form of change is completely hopeless
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/15 07:29 PM
1

the latter if you just mean physical attractiveness o.o
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/15 05:43 PM
0

lol how are you even supposed to answer that
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/15 05:39 PM
1

I don't think "faith or science" is a true dichotomy
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/15 11:41 AM
2

I was going to do something like that, but lost interest when I noticed how many people didn't have flairs
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/15 03:03 PM
9

Didn't you already make another dumb thread like this
/r/PurplePillDebate30/06/15 12:39 AM
-1

http://www.reddit.com/r/SubredditAnalysis/comments/2horkt/rmensrights_drilldown_september_2014/ the "similarity" measure is .17, and 612 of 3699 users is .165 o.o
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/15 02:35 PM
2

seems to be 15%-20% from the ones i can find, which is really high, comparatively
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/15 12:37 PM
6

for what?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/15 09:57 PM
1

You seem in tune with your sexuality, which is good. I still don't know what you mean, or why you think that Why are you waiting until marriage? Because it's a sin to have sex premaritally
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/15 07:57 PM
2

Are you waiting till marriage or something? yea You come across as pretty sexual. lol how so
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/15 11:02 AM
2

0
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/15 12:37 AM
1

a white male?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/15 11:21 PM
10

lol i mean what do you expect when ur that kind of person? don't be a hypocrite
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/15 08:53 PM
1

yea true realism
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/15 07:29 PM
2

lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/15 11:29 PM
1

"they're broken people, damaged in some way and being abused by/abusing others because they are psychologically damaged by thier broken nature". is not wat he say at all o.O
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/15 05:23 PM
-3

why the mod keep deleting my posts??? wtf
/r/PurplePillDebate25/06/15 05:20 PM
3

because its relevant maybe lol
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/15 03:54 PM
1

lol he literally just went to bed, gr8 timing
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/15 03:49 PM
1

wow their sex drive 15x as strong !! no wonder gay guys are such sluts
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/15 11:58 PM
2

if only there were some sort of statistics on this issue T^T
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/15 11:21 PM
1

lol i thought your flair was a joke at first but ppl actually use that
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/15 11:20 PM
-1

No, but you can still distinguish genuine personality traits
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/15 09:16 PM
0

yepyoure being pedantic
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/15 03:31 PM
2

intp, 100% introvert
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/15 01:22 AM
0

ur being pedantic about hte "complete accuracy" thing -__-
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/15 09:42 PM
1

my POINT is that we can predict events at macro scales extremely well and claiming the uncertainty principle refutes that is a blatant fallacy of composition. to say that we can't even theoretically know the outcome of a coin flip beyond that it has 50% probability of each outcome is completely preposterous
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/15 09:13 PM
3

"everything about us is designed" is sth creationists say, not evolutionary biologists
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/15 09:08 PM
1

the halting problem is a thigng
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/15 09:04 PM
0

you weren't talking about precise measurements of electrons, you were talking about coins, and you can obviously still predict those p well
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/15 09:03 PM
2

Women today apply "trigger warnings" to damn near everything. Curious how you've managed to completely escape notice of this supposedly ubiquitous phenomenon until you went on a forum that posts only the most absurd feminist content to laugh at. The vast majority of people in the real world don't care at all about anything discussed on this subreddit. You're exaggerating to say the least.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/15 02:00 AM
-1

Do you mean to say there's been some demonstration that you can give young boys barbies and they'll reliably turn out more feminine than a control group, or literally just that boys who play with barbies turn out more feminine? Because the latter doesn't really say much if it's just random boys doing so of their own volition.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/15 01:43 AM
1

I don't actually exactly know what you mean by "trigger warnings," even with your edit. If you mean warnings about topics like rape or abuse that can definitely be PTSD triggers, I don't see how it makes someone particularly weak-minded. If you mean tumblr-esque trigger warnings for everything, I don't think that's common. They aren't meant to apply to the general population at any rate, so I don't know how it can relate to a general statement.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/15 01:35 AM
-1

well there you go!
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/15 11:33 PM
1

Why are you guys making up random definitions for a word that already has one?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/15 11:25 PM
1

reminds me of this song, gives u the same "looks like trp but just makes ur head hurt" effect
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/15 05:40 PM
-1

gives me headaches trying to make sense of it
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/15 11:20 PM
-1

ok first off THEY DO YOU DUMMY second there are lots of things on tumblr ok!! dont say that
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/15 09:09 PM
0

dude tumblr is cool i dont know why people say things like this
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/15 09:05 PM
2

its pretty cool o.O edit: no i dont think trp should be banned and i dont know why youre worried tbh lol
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/15 08:27 PM
3

imguessing it hasn t improved since the last time iw as there
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/15 01:54 AM
1

What does that mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/15 09:54 PM
2

tia is the other way
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/15 08:44 PM
-1

lol did u intentionally pick the most ridiculous rp comments
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/15 04:10 PM
2

Is there a point to any of this?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/15 11:29 AM
3

idk why they did it this way anyway, it wwouldve been more effective to just increase the score hidden time, like how femradebates has it at like 12 hrs or sth like that
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/15 08:35 PM
-3

i don't have anything against the gays, all i meant was that i don't like it tbh.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/15 10:57 PM
2

He doesn't make a million accounts to post dum questions on reddit tbh
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/15 10:55 PM
-5

It's sorta gay.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/15 10:46 PM
-1

According to the prevailing wisdom in social science ?__?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/15 12:26 PM
3

Stupid terms like mansplaining, manspreading, the patriarchy, ally, "privilege", and all that sexist bullshit? Are they not the equivalent to terms like hypergamy, AF/BB, shit-testing, and the like? no not really lol Hope that helps!
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/15 12:02 PM
1

it one of the big unsolved problems of bp theory, no one knows ?__?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/15 11:57 AM
1

but those not same thing o.o
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/15 11:53 AM
1

Thanks for the input
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/15 10:14 AM
0

but that's super beta
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/15 11:19 PM
1

he just said thats not the point!! -__-
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/15 09:32 PM
-1

this is srsly why I need feminism, wtf.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/15 02:12 PM
-1

... is this because I'm a girl? is that why you're targeting me, hyperreal?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/15 11:00 AM
-1

wha? that was nice
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/15 10:48 PM
-1

ohh. gosh. I'm sorry. I'll try to use something else like "idiot" or "retard" in the future chazzALB. thanks for pointing it out :)
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/15 08:17 PM
1

what? I didn't say anything related to that claim
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/15 08:16 PM
-1

nah it was pretty autistic
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/15 07:29 PM
2

that literally means nothing Of course it means something: A trans person is not a cis person. The willingness to pick up idiotic terminology that literally means nothing in order to segregate groups of people into neatly packaged boxes is astounding. What, the willingness to have words for things?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/15 05:29 PM
0

People who call themselves feminists are not necessarily anything
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/15 12:08 AM
0

which is what he was responding to in his first post
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/15 08:01 PM
3

I can see why you have that flair now!
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/15 12:41 AM
1

Also WTF is wrong with your name??? The mixture of snake case and pascal case drives me CRAZY
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/15 09:14 PM
3

You said women are children, and if you treat them like that, you don't treat them like adults.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/15 07:29 PM
1

If the first part is the understanding by which you treat women, the second part is false
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/15 06:32 PM
7

it's a pretty clear contradiction, figured you'd be able to see that but w/e!
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/15 03:21 PM
8

women are like big overgrown children with logically inferior feelz-based brains, lower raw IQs, and are never ever held accountable for anything they do (like little spoiled children) that need to be trained like dogs if you want to turn one of them into a halfway decent woman Us men who actually try to treat girls like actual adults
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/15 01:38 PM
2

I don't really feel like it, I was mostly just pointing out how your post i9s completely pointless anyway
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/15 01:01 PM
12

Possibly because they say hateful things about women, and you're not even responding to that
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/15 11:18 AM
0

who cares if they have less
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/15 09:11 PM
0

men usually reject negative generalizations or anything seeming like it, #notallmen and stuff women rarely say blunt, offensive things anyway, that's not a bp or rp thing
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/15 08:06 PM
0

What? No one treats men like that
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/15 12:34 PM
2

so it's like focusing on all the negative parts to negate the positive bias people have with women and form a more balanced view overall?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/15 12:35 AM
7

there was a similar thread previously, everyone just went "but thermodynamics!" or "but i have a RIGHT to shame fat people! this is america!"
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/15 12:10 AM
8

no one who does it cares about whether its constructive, its just an excuse so they can be adick
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/15 11:33 PM
3

that he's into bdsm, i guess? are bald bearded dudes supposed to be attractive? cuz theyre not
/r/PurplePillDebate24/05/15 06:45 PM
1

Well, if you stopped being such a combative idiot, you might learn stuff, like what 'false dichotomy' means, and it'd be fun and constructive!
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/15 10:39 PM
1

I persuade people all the time, QED
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/15 10:36 PM
1

ah u dont know what false dichotomy means, neat. u surprise me all the time!
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/15 10:33 PM
1

"here's a true dichotomy by definition!" "no ur wrong, look how petulant im being XDD"
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/15 10:25 PM
1

lol bertrand russell, i assume you mean? like yeah u can reject logic, i dont care
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/15 10:21 PM
1

jesus christ youre painful to talk to
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/15 10:12 PM
1

which means that vast swaths of arguments don't actually do what we thought they did in the first place: prove their conclusion from the premises. Not really, just not from the premises inthe example.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/15 10:10 PM
1

He claims that's how I formed my opinions, I'm rejecting that. It's a true dichotomy.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/15 10:06 PM
1

Nope, I am rejecting his claim and so it's p and ~p.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/15 09:37 PM
1

What you can say/believe demonstrates nothing valuable about the claim that argumentation is necessarily unconstructive.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/15 09:35 PM
1

You're defending a person who's "attacking the process by which I formed my opinions" and has repeatedly told me that must be how I formed my opinions, but there's absolutely nothing in this conversation to suggest that's true. Agreeing with me is disagreeing with him and conceding the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/15 09:30 PM
1

Sure thing you sophomoric idiot
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/15 09:26 PM
1

No, we're not fine until you either concede the point or tell me how anything he said relates to my top-level comment. You haven't even gotten close to demonstrating that.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/15 09:20 PM
1

ROFL
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/15 09:17 PM
1

because he's attacking the process by which you formed those opinions. he even agrees that people who experience trauma act weirdly so obviously he won't argue against it. I didn't mention any such process. I made a claim -- that this behavior is not unusual for rape victims -- and provided pretty much only one argument for it: That it follows a fortiori from the fact that this is true about trauma. we do not know if she is a victim. so you can't say she is a victim. that's what this guy is sayi…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/15 09:15 PM
1

Well, I guess even an analogy about a rake is an improvement from "maybe try rereading." Maybe one day you'll even get to the point where you're actually making some kind of constructive argument!
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/15 08:57 PM
1

what's hilarious about this is that you think your interaction between you and that dude ends up being a difference of opinion. What? I said he's not responding to anything I believe or have said, which is clearly true
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/15 08:53 PM
1

sure thing. maybe you'll grow up in the intervening time and learn a little bit about the real world. that's the actual mechanism that would occur, instead of this "magic" you allude to. Well, me "growing up" significantly enough to change my view on something I'm completely certain on in the span of two weeks would be magic. But sure, maybe I just need some real-world experience of ??? to help me understand how he's responding to anything I've said or believe. I guess we'll have to see what hap…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/15 08:35 PM
1

I read it again! didn't change my mind, but oh well, maybe if you remind me in 2 weeks time again I'll magically change my mind just by rereading it
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/15 07:14 PM
1

I didn't say anything about women, only about feminists.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/15 10:45 PM
3

That documentary is not the first usage of the term, and it's mostly about rape of women by men anyway. How about 50 Shades of Grey? Why isn’t that considered a source of Rape Culture? It is. Feminists have been saying that all the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/15 09:35 PM
4

Men are habitually assaulted for the most frivolous of things, "delusion" is perfectly apt if you ever thought otherwise. I can't imagine why an ambiguous comment about some dude who's intentionally trying to be physically threatening would ever be the worst of your concerns.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/15 08:08 PM
1

You can be super religious and still not do that, it's more about being judgmental or whatever you'd call that personality dimension
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/15 07:21 PM
6

very very few inventions are done with no initial basis in general
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/15 12:48 PM
1

trans girls are the hottest and least crazy women, it's scientomologically proven
/r/PurplePillDebate20/05/15 12:45 PM
3

Ah, well, point proven I guess. Didn't expect those two thigns to be connected bu t what do you know o.OL
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/15 08:28 PM
-2

Can one be sure of anything? *shrugs*
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/15 07:57 PM
-2

Really? Are you sure?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/15 07:50 PM
5

I haven't seen older women making better LTR choices than younger women. Well, marrying young increases divorce rate IIRC, so it would seem that they do
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/15 05:28 PM
4

They associate misogyny with having no actual experience with women, as in only some bitter person with no knowledge of women could hold those views or w/e
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/15 05:24 PM
1

Yes, that's how Taytay intended to write it, it's satire o___O
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/15 02:02 PM
1

to respect women!
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/15 12:09 AM
1

I haven't said that
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/15 02:30 PM
1

I know she said "he's not her type" but, fuck. They all say that. There's nothing surprising about a guy who's sexually attractive for whatever reason but not your type otherwise. This is a pretty standard RP scenario. That he needs to be dominant and minimally attractive? Sure. Maybe it ain't enough for a lot of fucks. Maybe after a few she goes back to BB. Maybe she made a poor, impulsive decision and regretted it.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/15 09:31 PM
1

Well, more RP than that would be if the guy had a significant number of alpha qualities and could help himself from falling for her. As it is, it seems pretty normal and uninteresting to me. I guess it's AF to the vague extent she wants a dominant guy...? o.o
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/15 09:07 PM
1

this seems a good case for our model Most of your post consists of things like "oh maybe he's 6'2 or confident or xyz," "I guarantee he's doing so-and-so," "he doesn't understand what she wants," just random things that are never stated in the post. It's a good case for your model only when you make assumptions to make it fit and plainly reject things like her claiming she doesn't even really want to have sex with the other dude, etc. There's nothing that requires RP theory to explain, and it do…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/15 07:19 PM
1

If you weren't already RP, would you think all those things about that thread? Because I'm more interested in whether someone can look and it and point out places that are TRP in action, which would actually make it a good RP example, rather than just look at the few vague commonalities available and make RP extrapolations and assumptions, rejecting anything she says that contradicts the theory out of hand
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/15 06:12 PM
0

:(
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/15 05:07 PM
1

Along swings a guy who can provide that alpha in the way she desires it, this is the BDSM complication, she branch swings to him... The only 'alpha' trait is that he's sexually dominant, there's pretty much no other indication. She even plainly says at one point she's not physically attracted to him (and didn't even have sex), she just liked the BDSM, and thought he was nice to be around otherwise. Discovers the AF has no interest in providing her Beta. She broke up with him because he was falli…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/15 03:40 PM
1

And there really isn't correlation (perhaps negative) between polygyny and women's rights. She didn't claim there was
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/15 01:32 PM
2

That has nothing to do with what she said o__O
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/15 11:04 AM
-1

Wtf, you don't get it?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/15 10:54 AM
-1

All of it!
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/15 10:54 AM
5

Don't forget intelligent, sexual success correlates positively with IQ as everyone knows
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/15 11:08 PM
2

Black people marrying is a choice as well
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/15 10:52 PM
7

Only the vast majority of them. It's more of a heuristic, tbh.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/15 10:00 PM
5

All of them? No
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/15 09:41 PM
2

This thread? Almost none of the details fit your narrative
/r/TheRedPill16/05/15 07:10 PM
2

It's an unfair generalization, but eh, modding gets difficult I guess *shrugs*
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/15 03:24 PM
2

Clearly, these guys are fine with using deadly force to achieve political ends. The article never claims that The Wikipedia article on GamerGate starts off making more openly biased remarks against it than the Wikipedia article on Adolf Hitler makes about its subject. People don't have the same investment in pushing a particular view about Hitler, there's not as much value in that So I'm just asking: why? I don't know, why does /r/tumblrinaction exist? How is this confusing to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/15 11:22 PM
8

Would you stick it out with a guy... ya Do you expect to be taken out on dates... i wouldnt sleep with anyone the first datye Would you mind if your man if skinnier than you, or do you prefer someone who lifts? (AKA hypergamy) THIS IS NOT HYPERGAMY -_________- Do you often turn mountains into molehills... no i don't start arguments Do you prefer a man to be submissive rather than dominant? (AKA ???) no i like dominant guys -__- i guess this makes me ???, AWAL???
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/15 09:01 PM
4

Possibly
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/15 06:15 PM
6

Many things! One practical thing is that I've become p. skeptical that guys with a high count are good LTR partners
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/15 04:53 PM
1

Not to mention the massive moneymaker games are commonly very macho, action and violence-orientated. Because of that the protagonist/main characters tend to be men. A woman in that role is not believable or relatable to a 90% male audience. Have the tons of women chars included in games since forever been consistently met with disapproval from gamers? I can't see how anyone could justify bullying game devs to serve their bullshit agenda, and then sending an angry hatemob to them if the game does…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/15 04:07 PM
1

how are they made worse?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/15 03:22 PM
1

it's whatevs
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/15 07:11 PM
1

it's not
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/15 07:11 PM
8

yep, as a bi person, women are 100x more physically attractive
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/15 10:24 PM
1

Because, even falsificiation of details are a significant error correction compared to a system of no such correction. you can disagree about the details of religion too. I'm not sure what the difference there is, then.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/15 04:50 PM
1

Well, we disagree.... Because I see "Help RP, tried this and it failed" stories all the damn time. As I said above... on MRP at least... They are about 50% of all posts ! I wasn't really making that claim, just drawing a conclusion from your previous statements that TRP posters are not indicative of people who have tried RP, that is right. They are indicative of people who tried RP and had some success. Just that, because of our error correction... as imperfect as that is... We are much more lik…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/15 03:22 PM
1

I get that you have a standard, that's not the point though, I was just wondering if you actually believed that accepting TRP is comparable as a standard to using the scientific method. You can see how one of those is a sizable worldview and the other is the most basic methodology, right? You don't have to accept any part of mainstream theory in whatever field to get accepted into a journal necessarily, you just need valid methodology, cogent reasoning, etc. OTOH, if I posted a story about my co…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/15 03:08 PM
1

The witnesses are a self selected sample of people who saw the crime and are willing to take the stand. Would you disbar witnesses from a court case due to confirmation bias ? That's not really confirmation bias. If you agree that people who don't have success with TRP aren't going to post, the stories on there are obviously going to confirm TRP. A better analogy would be admitting that witnesses who disagree with whatever claim couldn't possibly participate, but still claiming it's a fair trial
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/15 02:41 PM
1

Just like you only get in a peer reviewed scientific journal if you have some minimum level of agreement with scientific method Posting in TRP without agreeing with TRP is like wanting to get submitted to a journal without believing in the scientific method? Like, you believe this? Surely I'm misunderstanding you
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/15 02:30 PM
3

ppl mess up basic things all the time on the internet, idk how this is new to you!
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/15 10:35 PM
1

lol
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/15 10:33 PM
1

Ladder isd correct there
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/15 10:28 PM
5

there was post about it recently actually
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/15 07:13 PM
1

same results have been found for trans people not on hrt
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/15 01:08 AM
1

Sure, I was just curious if you actually believed that, it seems uncommon. What would prove otherwise?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/15 08:01 PM
1

Right, but 68% and all are pretty far apart
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/15 07:49 PM
1

Only 68%?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/15 07:42 PM
50

also, for women, why do you place men in the friendzone? Why do women what, not have sex with anyone who wants it?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/15 07:15 PM
2

Its a 50/50 gamble if you think about it. Don't think that's how probability works!
/r/TheRedPill10/05/15 11:46 PM
0

http://np.reddit.com/r/TheBluePill/comments/3491zz/are_blue_pillers_really_as_unattractive_as_red/
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/15 08:29 PM
0

i think you're maybe wasting your time with her
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/15 05:43 PM
14

because /r/thebluepill tends to have nonsensical, unrealistic ideas about what trpers are like
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/15 09:39 PM
2

This is a great change! Without flairs, how am I supposed to know who to upvote?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/15 08:53 PM
0

Okay, that The Talk episode, a satirical song, and whatever other MGTOW talking points just aren't very persuasive
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/15 07:34 PM
0

oh sorry I forget you don't write complete posts, when I saw you edited in that random parody video you changed my mind completely! edit: jesus christ terrence popp is the most annoying person ever
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/15 06:57 PM
0

I've seen this clip referenced like a billion times now, it's not really demonstrating much of a pattern
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/15 06:33 PM
0

Idk, I don't know any "tween" Taylor Swift fans, but everyone else seems to know it. Do tweens closely analyze the lyrics (or pay attention to them at all even) and internalize them because they think it's great life advice? When Cosmo promotes criminal damage and arson, and The Talk laughs at a man suffering GBH for ending a relationship; when daily talk shows of the Loose Women type promote women lying to their SOs about contraception and deliberately having an "oops" baby.. ?? What
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/15 06:19 PM
-1

What? It's explicitly satire, I don't know what the point is of mentioning it
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/15 06:03 PM
1

Blank Space is satire
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/15 05:50 PM
1

Just scares me when we see bipolar behaviour promoted heavily through Taylor Swift. What?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/15 04:56 PM
1

What?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/15 11:07 PM
1

It's not neat, it's counterintuitive and pointless
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/15 10:48 PM
0

Who cares?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/15 10:41 PM
1

shouldnt we encourage taking part in both activites that are considered 'masculine' and 'feminine' for young kids so their brain will be more developed? What sort of activities? I'm not sure playing with Barbie dolls is a necessary piece of intellectual diversity for boys.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/15 10:22 PM
2

jesus christ dorks and their compulsive 0-indexing
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/15 09:55 PM
0

And concerns about labelling herself that way, in error, and screwing her life up by doing so. I guess I'd just imagined the "things that ruin your life" category would be stuff more like "getting addicted to crystal meth" than "thinking you might be asexual," but what do I know of the latent dangers of sexual orientation labels I am not afraid to express my doubts and concerns on the internet. WELL YOU SHOULD BE.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/15 02:46 PM
2

Who seems keen to give up on figuring out the whole deal as she's labelled herself an "aesexual" (at 19 with only 2 previous partners). or she just thought that was the accurate label, which it seems to be
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/15 01:49 PM
0

I won't. I'm glad (:
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/15 01:17 PM
1

Dude, just don't say it. I'd rather you not.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/15 01:00 PM
2

men who are.. fit and not short or ugly, i guess? idk, men not very physically attractive
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/15 12:45 PM
1

Yeah yeah, I feel you. OR you could not be a douchebag, wtf. This is why I need feminism.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/15 12:43 PM
0

well it's clearly not perturbing you so no, doesn't seem like that's the case
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/15 11:10 AM
1

i said nothing, and women totally are more worried because of victim blaming
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/15 10:54 AM
1

Yeah. OR you could just not say it and say something else if you want.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/15 10:48 AM
1

What would pushing through be, holding a knife to her throat?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/15 11:43 PM
1

Sounds like you're not responding to the point
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/15 11:18 PM
0

I don't smile a lot and am often off in my own world, so I hear this on a not-entirely-infrequent basis. Maybe you look like a girl sometimes? TIL that women actually relate to being social and making small talk is inappropriate behavior. Nono, just not say this
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/15 10:58 PM
2

Suggesting a women to smile, no matter the context, is wrong and sexist. I'm glad you understand (:
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/15 10:57 PM
2

Do you... not want to respond to what I'm saying or is it unclear or...?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/15 09:50 PM
0

Being uncomfortable is a subjective feeling Indeed, one that many women feel when you tell them to smile. Did you know?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/15 09:35 PM
-2

The first one is weird. The second one is small talk. Both of them make women uncomfortable And I meant the equating everything they don't to sexism because that is exactly what the chick is doing. People don't say this to men, so it's sexist
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/15 09:08 PM
3

Off topic, but do people really think like this? Yep, women don't like it. Don't do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/15 08:52 PM
2

;_____;
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/15 06:27 PM
1

the op does look like such an autistic thought process tbh, that people are educated into empathy or work to gain it rather than naturally acquiring it
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/15 06:06 PM
1

please stop... :(
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/15 06:05 PM
1

Divorce strategy is amoral
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/15 04:39 PM
0

nah when rpers are honest their women laugh at them and leave... i wonder why.......
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/15 10:53 PM
0

Again, people make insults to be hurtful. They say things that hurt the person. Not things they personally despise.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/15 10:21 PM
1

Commitment should never be assured if you want to manipulate her with it, and the same holds for sex
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/15 08:36 PM
1

No, but that's not the same thing
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/15 08:25 PM
1

There's no difference between an analysis of an abstract group two things share and an analogy
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/15 06:05 PM
1

ok
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/15 12:00 AM
1

Shitty people are still people, doesn't make them "inferior." It seems like an insignificant distinction at that point I spent 6 years working in a super-maximum security facility and I can tell you that there are a lot of very bad people in there. But they're also broken and either don't know a better way or feel like they're too far gone to learn. Don't know what this is supposed to demonstrate you are still constantly attempting to equate the two even after I explained my concept of what make…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/15 11:28 PM
-1

people make insults to be hurtful, don't know what the surprise is
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/15 10:59 PM
2

Concepts of inferiority between sexes/races are patently rediculous, as evidenced by people like Neil DeGrasse Tyson or Lydia Litvyak. That is about generalization, which is immaterial, you can change it to "most women are inferior" or whatever you find more agreeable There's shitty people, and good people. Yes, and most people would readily put disloyal and dishonest people in the former category Men and women just have different methods of distinguishing to which camp they belong. What?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/15 10:44 PM
3

I think you're leaving out the "your value system" part
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/15 10:31 PM
3

if it's a negative value for you, are they inferior for you, in your value system?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/15 09:52 PM
3

from a contradiction, not from a false premise edit: that was poorly phrased, explosion obtains if 2+2=4 and 2+2=5, not if merely 2+2=5
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/15 08:50 PM
1

Nice. Are there any emotions you care about anymore then?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/15 06:48 PM
0

Oh. Did you stop needing other things, like happiness?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/15 06:26 PM
1

and logically the need for validation also goes out of the window. Did you "logically" need validation before, whatever that means?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/15 05:59 PM
1

Relationships aren't a feminine thing?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/15 01:55 PM
1

Because women are by default assumed to be incompetent, while men are expected to be competent. ... at relationships?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/15 01:44 PM
15

How DO people manage to write so much about so little
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/15 11:31 AM
2

Are you like a rapist or something?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/15 08:21 PM
1

I see. Good post!
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/15 07:32 PM
1

What doesn't?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/15 07:13 PM
0

It's a very important issue, but I'm sure both are worthy of glorious Twitter campaigns.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/15 05:28 PM
1

Well, that's very different.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/15 04:57 PM
2

I don't care whom some politicians in the UK speak to, and I don't know that Muslim women in the UK are habitually forced to wear it but it's definitely awful and sexist if anyone's forcing them
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/15 04:50 PM
1

No o___O But it seems like ppl are objecting
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/15 04:25 PM
1

I don't know, but it sucks if they feel pressure from them to wear it.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/15 04:18 PM
0

Like, you post this picture as if I'm supposed to chime up whenever I see a woman in a hijab and it's really strange to me. Do you get outraged whenever that happens?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/15 03:49 PM
0

If they're wearing it of their own accord, I'm not sure what the issue is.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/15 03:43 PM
1

I dunno? Why do you ask?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/15 03:23 PM
1

Am I supposed to say something critical about some random women's clothing?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/15 03:07 PM
2

So, women are like children? Yep, that's the belief under patriarchy
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/15 02:37 PM
3

Curious sudden change of topic, but they dominate in the same way adults dominate, yet are expected to take care of their children
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/15 02:16 PM
2

The term denotes a social structure where men dominate. How that structure manifests doesn't seem to be the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/15 02:07 PM
3

I don't know that it needs to be enforced by men to be patriarchy
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/15 10:00 AM
-1

The women that have sex drives equal to or higher than men's don't have 17x+ as much testosterone
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/15 01:46 AM
2

No it's not. It can be easily refuted. Analogies aren't really refuted, they're not arguments for something other than a relation
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/15 01:29 AM
5

:(...
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/15 01:12 AM
6

But that kills the baby
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/15 01:05 AM
3

Why
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/15 12:58 AM
4

Women would just have meaningless sex until they die if not for those factors you mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/15 12:44 AM
1

What about it?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/15 12:21 AM
8

Now let's look at the red pill. We've spent two years saying that women are useless sluts who act like children and can't do basic shit. They'll never be productive in the workforce and they'll never love you in a way that you'd actually want to be loved. These are some mean things to say but nothing like Sally Miller Gearheart and we don't try to infringe on women's lives. First off, TRP would definitely never say any such thing. I've been assured that it's strictly about sexual strategy. Even …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/15 11:20 PM
1

But then if you bring up the draft, family court system, or anything else MRA's talk about, feminists will often say "that is also the patriarchy, the patriarchy hurts men as well as women." This doesn't correlate with the definition given by feminists, and is blatantly shifting goalposts. They're the result of gender roles, which are the result of patriarchy. Seems pretty common-sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/15 08:59 PM
22

You've changed my view completely, I'm not supporting gay marriage anymore
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/15 06:48 PM
4

:(
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/15 06:13 PM
5

Everyone likes turtles.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/15 05:58 PM
6

Yeah, I think this is one of the big philosophical issues here, that RPers can't figure out how to do analogies right. Try using like cats or turtles or something instead.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/15 05:30 PM
-2

That is the worst example ever LOL
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/15 05:25 PM
7

Is this real life
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/15 02:55 PM
1

nah ikyts just a placebo
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/15 12:29 AM
1

Yeah I'm fucking retarded sorry
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/15 12:20 AM
1

If it wasn't clear, point I was trying to make with the latter claim was that the 'proper way' to do relationships isn't necessarily the way you did them before
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 11:56 PM
1

Ah, I see. This is a common misconception among women, as well. This would have to be an extremely common misconception among absolutely everyone Women often assume that by "holding out", they are sorting out the "relationship-minded" men from the "players". There are plenty of men on this sub alone that have suggested having sex soon implies that you're slutty or lack self control. Why you might make that connection seems pretty clear to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 11:17 PM
0

You're wrong, your current experiences aren't <that> Asserting it to be a complete placebo is a strange claim I don't recall seeing but it's not exactly that You're wrong, your current experiences are worse than your past experiences. I think most ppl will admit positive aspects to trp that you'd be missing before
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 11:14 PM
1

Basically, there were a few people with several upvotes each who basically said TRP (the methodology) was either a placebo or a substandard strategy that's strictly inferior to 'the proper way' to have relationships. You must have seen these sorts of ideas floating around too by now, surely. Sure, but they're not claims that you experienced something other than what you said
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 10:58 PM
1

I don't think I've ever seen such a claim outside of the people that will doubt FRs and such, and the two examples you mentioned don't follow that pattern
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 10:46 PM
2

There are different BP attitudes to RP results that range from "You only think it's because of TRP, it's actually just that you expect results so you think things are better now" to "Well, BP relationships are better". right, which are issues with how well it works "I don't think the reasons TRP works is the same as the reasons you think it works" - in other words, it's not actually disproving TRP as a methodology. no, but if you think e.g. only the obviousp arts of it make any difference, that'…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 10:32 PM
2

But other people don't think it's because of the pattern you used. Whatever TRP makes you change is the pattern in this analogy, so surely it is, the question is just which part of it. "But wait!" You hear them cry. "We have disproved your theories, and now you must accept that we were right and you are using your box wrong!" Not sure what this is specifically supposed to represent, but it's not necessarily that you haven't experienced results, just that parts of it could be superfluous or detri…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 09:53 PM
1

I don't know what my post has to do with MGTOW or what it is you're trying to communicate in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 07:06 PM
1

I don't follow
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 05:56 PM
3

What a worthless definition.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 05:34 PM
2

As in, I'm female
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 03:25 PM
0

Doesn't look particularly high anyway
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 01:52 PM
0

Female, yes, as long as you don't have children
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/15 11:59 AM
1

oh. well. okay, I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/15 10:27 PM
3

Well, people usually have justifications for the crimes they commit.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/15 10:26 PM
0

the objective truth of the matter would be the most useful thing ever if it were directly accessible. if you're not trying to figure out the truth by experimenting with what works, I'm not sure what it is
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/15 10:08 PM
-1

I'm concerned with what works, not what is true. If it works, it's "true." If it doesn't, it's "false." That is empirical reasoning. So, I'm having a hard time defending a position that I don't really hold. I'm having a hard time figuring out your position. If someone tells me they are happy, that works for me. Can I state, objectively, whether or not they are actually happy? No, I can't. But I've found that taking people at their word is the most workable position to take, whether they are bein…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/15 07:34 PM
-2

Getting the truth from what? When do I need to ask someone to describe emotions I don't know, in connection with this topic?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/15 07:10 PM
0

Tautologies are not evidence
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/15 07:08 PM
0

But it can't be described in empiricist terms. What's the significance? Psychology cannot measure happiness. You can ask people. :0)
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/15 06:51 PM
1

You seem to lack the vocabulary for whatever it is you're trying to express, but happiness, for instance, is measured in psychology all the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/15 06:37 PM
4

If the meanings aren't obvious, OP's position is hardly warranted
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/15 05:37 PM
-2

The issues TRP discuss cannot be objectively, systematically and empirically approached, it's basically just like looking at art?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/15 05:34 PM
3

It's exactly four stone, and apparently the heavy weight in weight throwing
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/15 05:28 PM
2

I think anecdotes are more like science than philosophy, but maybe that's just me!
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/15 05:22 PM
0

What's the difference, that it's more like artwork than science?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/15 05:20 PM
0

It's very hard to resist making a joke about how TRP is cancer
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/15 05:20 PM
-2

The worldview supposedly proven by how it works is more philosophy based (as opposed to being objective, I guess), I see
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/15 05:17 PM
-1

If you can listen to someone say "it's not really an OBJECTIVE slash empirical truth, more an ontological one," and not fall over laughing, I not think you know what these words mean either
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/15 05:14 PM
1

Yeah, accusations tend to be of the weakest definitions and defenses the strongest, so someone'll be claimed sexist and end up defending themselves from (what they view as) charges of deeply and categorically hating women, and so people talk past each other.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/15 05:01 PM
6

if only i knew what you were trying to describe
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/15 04:54 PM
2

What is missed in this, however (IMO), is that TRP truths are much more ontological truths than they are empirical/objective truths. i not think you know what these words mean
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/15 04:36 PM
0

maybe not the best example but misogyny has hardly destroyed prosperous societies as a rule
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/15 03:45 PM
4

Definitions don't necessarily derive from etymology, but okay. This still isn't clear. Middle Eastern societies are said to be fraught with misogyny by almost everyone, but that has hardly destroyed them. Your first paragraph seems to be using the absolute strongest definition of misogyny, inconsistent with even conservative ideas of it. Anyway, I don't see the relevance when most accusations of misogyny are essentially about sexism
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/15 02:47 PM
0

A definition of misogyny would probably be helpful.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/15 01:37 PM
-1

the flaw in sirnemesis' post would be that it's contradicted by a post on the sidebar
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/15 08:42 AM
1

pls
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/15 10:56 PM
0

newbie redpiller on the issue
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/15 10:55 PM
2

It's not like anyone's going to argue that the guy is guilty, why do people make these posts?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/15 10:05 PM
0

good to know
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/15 12:21 PM
6

Feminists merely state something is incapable of being argued and beg people to take them at their word. Sure. It's not like TRP tends to think debating feminists is a productive thing either. This attitude is ubiquitous in debates of every kind, not sure what the surprise is.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/15 02:47 AM
0

And you can't say it's not censorship when that is precisely what it is used for. Putting a warning on something is hardly censorship.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/15 12:42 AM
0

totes, 7 paragraphs could never be enough for all the circlejerking you could produce around "ever consider caring about the truth, guys?"
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/15 11:59 PM
1

Thanks for this post, very helpful, had never considered accepting reality instead of denying it before
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/15 11:39 PM
1

It's not about "being nice all the time," it's about having a observing a minimum of respect when your SO tells you they feel marginalized.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/15 09:41 PM
8

The bots are fighting :O
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/15 09:11 PM
1

We're both giggling at the expense of me being slightly cocky and her having been teased. Who would ever be giggling in that situation? It sounds intensely disrespectful to me
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/15 04:10 PM
2

Asian women are occasionally stereotyped as submissive
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/15 09:07 PM
1

I understand.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/15 09:25 PM
2

I would hope so
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/15 06:04 PM
5

No, but it is close. Kind of a fine line between that and a fantasy of rape. Which is why I didn't really want to use the term rough sex, since that really isn't as much of a rape fantasy. Well, you didn't describe a rape fantasy, so Yes, they do..? Attractiveness can vary. A person doesn't have to have a pretty face to be attractive only in that case. You obviously find something attractive about them so you want to fuck them. Being attractive to a girl doesn't mean she will always want to have…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/15 04:57 PM
2

I'm done here. No use trying to have a civil, rational discussion with hateful man children who have such disdain for reality. You are all bottom of the barrel losers. Human trash that no one desires. No matter how much you sit in front of your computer (which is a lot, concerning most of you have zero social lives) trying to convince the world of female degeneracy and male surpremacy to boost your very well deserved low self esteem, you're still a nothing. You're still angry, pathetic no bodies…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/15 04:49 PM
4

In other words: forceful consent. That just sounds rough sex, which is distinct from consensual nonconsent. In rape, it is someone you don't want and would never want to fuck otherwise. It's definitely someone you don't want to have sex with at that moment, but they don't have to be unattractive. When a woman is desired by many men, to most she is not that attractive. ??? Sometimes, people that were abused before (especially at a younger age) will crave abuse later in life afaik, it can also be …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/15 04:28 PM
2

I agree, I was just taking issue with what the person I originally replied to said
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/15 01:58 PM
1

Why? His complaint (page 5) indicates it was a random remark before they had ever even had sex. Even if it were a serious message sent half an hour before the supposed rape, it doesn't prove consent. even TRPers say women change their minds all the time.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/15 01:32 PM
1

Rebut what? He didn't elaborate and it's a non sequitur as it is
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/15 12:41 PM
0

You think this is a major contributor to transition?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/15 11:50 PM
1

iirc women divorce men more often when they lose their jobs, and men divorce women more often when they get cancer
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/15 11:44 PM
0

women being more manipulative seems a strange thing to assume when that's pretty much the topic. I guess it's not strictly begging the question, but still.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/15 11:34 PM
2

I didn't downvote you, but I can definitely sympathize with whomever did.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/15 07:50 PM
0

Do you want to elaborate?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/15 07:44 PM
0

How does it make sense?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/15 07:41 PM
0

Does it make more sense then?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/15 07:33 PM
0

Almost no men need to study manipulation whereas absolutely no women do, therefore women are naturally better at manipulation? I don't follow
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/15 07:25 PM
-1

Enlightening!
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/15 06:37 PM
-2

Why?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/15 04:53 PM
1

I'm not talking to them, I'm talking to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/15 12:41 PM
1

Read about the "women are wonderful" effect. That's too vague to be relevant The "I am a woman" posts aren't helpful. Why would you want them clogging up useful information? You've said that, but why would you want the same worthless post except without the gender identification? Why would me posting some story without it be fine when it's just as useless?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/15 09:02 AM
1

TRPers can't manage to look past it, you mean? It would absolutely be better without the, "As a woman" part. If female perspective isn't useful, wouldn't that part be helpful?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/15 10:24 PM
1

But regardless, neither that, nor the, "I am a woman and this is my perspective" are very valuable for male dating advice. Would it be better without the "as a woman" part? The ideas in, "I am a woman" posts are almost invariably not helpful, as I've explained repeatedly. Cool, then you could judge the ideas rather than her gender
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/15 10:01 PM
1

If your idea is sound, why does your gender matter? Not a TRP reader, but I'm guessing there aren't many "As a woman, 2 + 2 = 4" or whatever analytical statement, and more "As a woman, here's my perspective on whatever" where gender is relevant. You don't seem to be making that distinction. That's how the "attitude" aspect and the managing the sub aspect come together. Well, I guess I could ask you what her attitude matters if her ideas are valid?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/15 09:24 PM
1

I quoted you talking about attitude, and you respond with something about how managing a large sub is difficult, and female perspective is worthless? I don't follow. On a different note, why is it fine for women to talk abvout their experiences/perspective as long as they don't mention they're women if female perspective is worthless?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/15 05:44 PM
1

That's why it's funny!
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/15 05:23 PM
1

It was a joke, hun
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/15 03:51 PM
2

because they come off as a woman coming in and basically saying, "You! Men who do not understand the women. I am a woman, and I will teach you the holy path". why is this relevant?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/15 03:18 PM
1

wtf? Is it because I'm a woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/15 09:15 AM
11

"Natural urges to rape" and "fantasies about rape" are different things
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/15 09:57 PM
1

Society at large isn't obligated to do anything about this matter. There are bigger problems. Doesn't society already concern itself with more trivial things? Like, it couldn't really get worse, could it?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/15 09:55 PM
2

Nope, all white people here. But I don't actually recall seeing an asian guy in any media that I found attractive. There are plenty of attractive black girls, though. o.O
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/15 09:52 PM
2

Yes, it is. If that special treatment is only please take higher note of these views concerning females as they come from a female. I don't know what you're trying to say here, sorry. If you want to post female personal experience do so on RPW that's exactly what it's there for. You are saying the equivalent of "aw come on, why can't I post my ask science question in ask historians. I wanna post in ask historians". Go fucking ask science with a science question or comment. I don't mean talking a…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/15 09:44 PM
2

why'd you remove the science tag? ;~;
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/15 07:27 PM
1

No, but you did say that it hasn't worked on you. Which is tantamount. Oh, that's cool then.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/15 07:08 PM
10

I don't know, not a TRP mod.... No, but you did claim pointing out you're a woman is necessarily asking for special treatment But your supposition must be incorrect, because you are perfectly able to post any views over there you want. I'm not capable of posting any of my personal experiences because they are rarely coherent without the context of me being a woman I suspect it's just to cut down on drama and the need for vigilant modding.... You can't put 100,000 red pill males together, a good …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/15 06:53 PM
8

"TRP is explicitly setup like x" and "they prefer their sub like x" doesn't provide much reason as to WHY their sub being like that is a good idea. The only reason I could imagine is that they find women's perceptions on any issue completely irrelevant, but then why would you want them to post at all?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/15 06:40 PM
0

I didn't say it doesn't work! Just maybe like you should be nice and care about women, wtf.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/15 06:30 PM
0

I'm not promoting anything! I'm just saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/15 06:27 PM
0

Exactly what?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/15 06:22 PM
0

None.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/15 05:55 PM
0

sigh.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/15 05:39 PM
0

You're being silly. Have you TRIED?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/15 05:34 PM
9

Now.... Post and identify yourself as female... Well, thats asking for special treatment isn't it ? Are all statements about yourself like this? Are you asking for special treatment if you mention you're 35?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/15 05:31 PM
0

Well, you could stop acting like women are a monolith, treat her like an individual, and ask her! Jesus Christ.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/15 05:30 PM
0

An appropriate situation would be when she doesn't mind it
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/15 05:13 PM
0

I'm sure there are such women, I've just never seen anyone make the statement from the OP and it certainly isn't common
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/15 10:32 AM
3

sry just dropping some uncomfortable truths~
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/15 10:30 AM
3

That the men are so pathetic and miserable that even TRP helps them
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/15 12:46 AM
1

If there are no "bad times," how can there be good times? Good relative to what?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/15 12:45 AM
1

You certainly would after your situation changed, until you got used to it. That's my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/15 12:08 AM
2

I don't think I've ever heard someone suggest the reason they don't want to be hit on in inappropriate situations is because they "don't get with guys without compatibility first." Anyway, what's the contradiction supposed to be? Is niceness supposed to be equivalent to compatibility?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/15 11:40 PM
0

Coldness doesn't tend to make women scared and possibly angry?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/15 11:34 PM
1

I think I was thinking about something more subtle, but generally people are more likely to find aggressive behavior acceptable in men and use gendered slurs for that behavior in women
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/15 10:47 PM
7

I don't particularly hate anyone, but they do say some crazy things occasionally!
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/15 10:45 PM
1

What's the difference between that kind of coldness and telling her you'll leave if she won't have sex with you?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/15 10:44 PM
1

Whether it's possible isn't relevant, only whether it actually provides adequate perspective
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/15 10:30 PM
0

I think the point was more that it depends on difference, there aren't any highs without lows since that pleasurable, high state would just become your new normal otherwise
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/15 10:11 PM
1

How does dread help?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/15 09:17 PM
2

People interpret the same sensory data differently in many cases, but that's not really relevant. There are a lot of studies demonstrating people interpreting the same behavior differently based on the actor's gender, even if there aren't actual people involved, just a body of text with differently gendered names attached.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/15 11:46 AM
1

Oh it's some weird implicit marriage thing in specific American states? Haha sorry I'd never heard of that and I really couldn't decipher what you meant Anyway I wouldn't mind not getting married
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/15 10:57 AM
1

Couples without kids get that too though, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/15 10:55 AM
3

Why should men who want to have children marry? o.O
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/15 10:50 AM
1

What does "not living together in a common law state" mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/15 10:49 AM
1

What I'm observing is absolute, the same to everyone. What you observe is completely dependent on how you interpret it and is very liable to bias
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/15 09:03 AM
2

Oh.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/15 08:29 AM
4

That women in this scenario are more likely to want a proper relationship with the man, I guess? I dunno, was just wondering why he thought that implied there are no single men in affairs
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/15 11:45 PM
6

That's a good point.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/15 10:53 PM
5

just means I don't dislike anyone who's not a douchebag? o__O I don't really personally know many RPers so I don't get a chance to dislike them. well I know they're really stupid, otherwise they wouldn't be RPers, but I wouldn't dislike them for that, that'd be ableist.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/15 10:48 PM
5

I don't dislike anyone who's not a dick
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/15 10:31 PM
0

Your horizontal bar things are asymmetric
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/15 10:16 PM
4

If it's a representative sample, how can there be more married women doing that?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/15 09:53 PM
5

If they cheat at the same rate, how can there be more single women having affairs?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/15 09:47 PM
3

All the studies I'm aware of suggest men and women cheat at nearly the same rate
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/15 09:34 PM
2

Perhaps that points to a different issue?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/15 09:32 PM
0

Nah, I don't know what you mean.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/15 07:59 PM
1

If you mean not 100% of the sub is constant hatred, sure, but it's not really relevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/15 07:31 PM
1

Really? o.O
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/15 07:08 PM
1

What? No!!!!
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/15 07:06 PM
1

Um, I not sure what you saying, but I don't think that right. Contracts would cool.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/15 07:01 PM
1

What?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/15 06:59 PM
0

Well, it should.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/15 06:54 PM
6

Yeah, men are disgusting, and not just on a visual basis.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/15 05:40 PM
0

Animals aren't pills, silly.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/15 05:40 PM
0

I'm glad we could come to an agreement.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/15 05:38 PM
1

They're a lot alike
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/15 05:32 PM
1

how's that relevant?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/15 01:39 PM
1

the ones on reddit clearly don't. where are the terfs that think that? edit: seriously, where are you finding the radical feminists that think gender roles are great for women? lol
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/15 01:16 PM
1

Who thinks that? I haven't said anything to that effect
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/15 01:03 PM
1

Sex goes beyond the shape of your genitals but that's off topic anyway
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/15 12:55 PM
1

I have no idea what you're talking about, being a "real woman" just means your sex is actually female and you're not calling yourself a woman just because you're somehow convinced you are one
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/15 12:49 PM
1

Whether it's binary has nothing to do with thinking that AMAB people can't really be women
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/15 12:42 PM
1

There is gender in the sense of gender expression, just not such a thing as 'gender identity.' Sex being on a spectrum isn't really relevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/15 12:38 PM
1

It doesn't betray anything other than that they believe they're immutable, biological categories, or at least not ones changed by hormones or w/e If you look at /r/gendercritical or /r/gender_critical, the only TERF subs on reddit that I know of, it should be clear what they believe edit: on the other hand, if you listen to most trans narratives that go sth like "i knew early cuz I was playing with dolls/liked skirts/had a lot of female friends/whatever" it betrays lots of sexism
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/15 12:23 PM
1

In radical feminist theory of the sort used to attack trans women, trans women are not transgressing these gender norms by being women instead of men; they are, instead, reinforcing them. That is, the act of not being men is itself not challenging the basics of patriarchal power and is not an act of defying gender roles. I didn't read most of that post, but that's what I mean. They believe trans people are trans because they're feminine/masculine, which is reinforcing gender roles, not challengi…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/15 12:01 PM
1

nahg, terfs definitely do... o.o
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/15 09:46 AM
1

all of them sorta do... o.o
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/15 09:43 AM
1

who do care about gender roles They definitely care about getting rid of gender roles if that's what you're trying to say
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/15 12:01 AM
8

Contracts signed while intoxicated aren't valid either AFAIK, and it seems like it should be obvious why that is
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/15 11:56 PM
2

How many fucking accounts have you made dude? Jesus christ lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/15 09:28 PM
0

can't women get convicted of something else then? this girl got convicted for "indecent assault of a man" instead
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/15 07:52 PM
1

Ok!!!
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/15 10:07 PM
1

I have no idea
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/15 08:48 PM
1

so there's no difficulty in avoiding a woman's manipulation? plenty of material on trp seems to be dedicated to that
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/15 08:06 PM
2

you were talking about the more general "manipulating men," not just manipulating men to get sex also complexity would prolly be a more accurate word than skill
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/15 07:11 PM
0

here they are attacking their clients calling men who use escorts "shitheels." it was referencing the study
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/15 06:06 PM
3

you need an entire sub to figure out something that has no skill to it?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/15 06:01 PM
1

Why? Because of their wealth? eta: is there a gender bias in divorce laws? o__O
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/15 05:53 PM
1

I was just clarifying why I asked that question o.o? what bias?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/15 03:49 PM
0

"some frequency? o.o i mean its predictive power is only as good as how often people actually figure it out and give you the answer and it matches up
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/15 03:41 PM
0

aren't threads like that generally unresolved, like there's usually not an update with the answer?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/15 07:46 AM
-1

o__O You really don't see a distinction? Ok, w/e Is this like a popular book inthe US because I've never heard of it outside of this sub (and it was probably oyou mentioning it again)? Looks like there's plenty of controversy about it
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/15 10:16 PM
-1

?__? why is the rules the same as training a man like a dog, idgi, just looks like a lot of "play hard to get" which is silly but not equivalent
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/15 10:04 PM
0

how so?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/15 09:24 PM
-3

id on't know what that has to do with training men like dogs or women as a whole
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/15 09:19 PM
-2

ya very rarely and theyre still not common
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/15 08:53 PM
-2

theyre not common things lol
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/15 08:42 PM
3

wtf mods why do you hate redpillers???
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/15 07:34 PM
5

Ok, CMV tag was in error, then? It's not really an accurate portrayal of the article anyway with the parts you left out... o.o
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/15 07:29 PM
11

your title is about intelligence but the body seems to be more about idk careers and an abrasive personality? what's the view you want changed, exactly?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/15 07:23 PM
0

They simply cannot accept that people can freely make these choices and not be useless sacks of shit. based on tthat it'd make sense that it'd be called misogyny/hatred of women cuz they'd think women are "useless sacks of shit" if they actually are naturally making those choices
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/15 06:56 PM
1

"the fact that it's even called sexism ... showcases the raw hatred that feminists have for women" doesn't really make sense to me
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/15 06:49 PM
0

ok then, but he was referring to hatred anyway
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/15 06:28 PM
2

The fact that it's even called misogyny to think that women just make these choices and that's not a problem showcases the raw hatred that feminists have for women. is it called misogyny? o__O i think itd just be called sexism that trpers think its natural
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/15 06:02 PM
4

Does "all women are shit" mean anything at all? Can you not do anything but wait for an elaboration?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/15 05:08 PM
1

a) yes b) no c) no d) how would i know e) no
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/15 10:20 AM
0

"Repeating sarcasm without indicating it was sarcasm" is #34, not sarcasm
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/15 12:49 AM
-1

CHECKMATE REDPILLERS!
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/15 12:24 AM
2

"a kid pulled down my pants once so yeah I'm basically an authority on rape victim psychology" +57824017 gilded x5 "there's massive stigma against male rape victims like srsly guys im practically arguing the mra case for you!! :((((" -1280549238750
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/15 05:16 PM
1

You clearly took the virgin legbeard thing as an insult. You alluded to as much in your posts. No, I just referred to it as an insult, the same way you did when you asked if it were an ineffective insult. Why wouldn't it sting? I dunno, I just get the impression "loser" is mostly an insult directed at men. I don't recall hearing it directed at a woman. Maybe that's just me.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/15 04:38 PM
-1

Just because you see those words strung together doesn't mean you're being insulted. I didn't say that I was and you didn't answer my question :o And/or that calling a woman a loser or virgin is an ineffective insult? Yeah!
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/15 01:53 PM
1

I didn't say it was an insult directed at me, just that if you call someone a neckbeard, it's obviously an insult
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/15 01:45 PM
0

"loser virgin neckbeard" isn't a derogatory phrase? :V anyway point was just that you don't really call women losers or virgins like you do men
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/15 01:44 PM
0

lol :D
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/15 01:37 PM
2

20, 5'10", 160 lbs, straight, dark hair down to my chest, sickly pale skin and massive circles under my eyes :0)
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/15 01:32 PM
5

Also, your forgetting that men are naturally more aggressive, and are more likely to want to do something to punish those who do mean things like rape. Yet men don't report it more often than women do.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/15 11:59 AM
-1

Neutral? Judging by your flair you're obviously going to side with the RPer!
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/15 11:20 AM
2

loser virgin neckbeard is obviously an insult, but whatever your addled self wants to call it, it was poorly reversed :V
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/15 11:18 AM
-6

Did you own me? I mean, be honest with yourself. Yeah, I really feel like I did. I've thought about it and I think so.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/15 11:16 PM
-9

Understandable. I wouldn't enjoy the sub if I were getting owned over and over either. :V
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/15 10:53 PM
-4

Nah, it is. You're just being manipulative. o.o
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/15 10:39 PM
1

Because they hate women!
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/15 09:29 PM
2

makes sense, thanks for the elaboration ^-^
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/15 09:09 PM
1

I can't imagine that happening in a serious relationship, but I guess I'd be pretty upset...? :v
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/15 08:49 PM
3

she's learned a valuable lesson about vetting/choosing a partner. What's that?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/15 08:35 PM
2

That's cool, but not really relevant to the topic :9
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/15 08:11 PM
3

Do you think they say things like "TRP is toxic" because the entire sub is so obviously, unbelievably misogynistic and full of constant anger or because confidence isn't going to help you? do you just take any criticism of TRP to be like a claim that absolutely nothing there would help you?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/15 07:50 PM
-2

I'm not sure what sitting around and going "to me, this already well-defined word means <random, unrelated concept>" is really accomplishing, as though words are like paintings or something
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/15 07:46 PM
7

Have I bashed confidence or staying in shape? Do other BPers do that regularly? Or did you mean something else?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/15 07:30 PM
6

confidence, fitness, etc. are attractive, sure. still don't see the point. do you mean you'd need to only be attracted to fat, insecure, boring men to be BP?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/15 07:22 PM
2

you did a pretty poor job reversing that insult :V anyway, not knowing who you're going home with seems like a pretty natural risk of meeting random people for one night stands in general. wats the point of this thread?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/15 06:29 PM
27

I think it's clear that the solution is to proclaim AMALT and never have sex with men ever
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/15 05:39 PM
13

So your hypothetical daughter is in a relationship with a man whom you know to have cheated on her with multiple other women and lied to her about the entire premise of their engagement and your advice for her is to stay with him and up her "girl game" or w/e because he's high SMV and your default assumption is that he's not genuinely committed to her because she's too boring to be around?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/15 04:23 PM
2

like a normal person o.o
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/15 05:07 PM
2

lol he looks like a billion times cooler in his cartoon pic on his twitter than irl
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/15 05:03 PM
7

However, in a normal debate between disagreeing parties like the one in this sub, nobody has the "burden of proof" because nobody from the outside sets the rules that somebody "wins" if they do something. well, debate forums tend to have rules and I guess it depends on whether you want a sub where you let people make random assertions without providing any evidence at all or a sub where posts are actually expected to be constructive For example, we could say that RPers' position is "women and me…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/15 11:59 AM
6

wat
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/15 11:49 PM
2

whether the world "actually" exists or not concerns whether or not our intuitive conceptions of the substrate producing our experience of reality are accurate, whereas when you're trying to model or describe the world, it concerns whether the model accurately maps to our experience of reality. it can't really in any sense be the case that e.g. quantum mechanics is false yet the world acts as though it's true, because the claim is literally about how the world acts. just like if someone claims "x…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/15 09:20 PM
1

Christ. Why do so many of you think this is going to happen? Because it did happen. TRP in a nutshell
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/15 01:58 PM
1

I agree with that so I'm not sure what I missed
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/15 07:31 PM
2

o.o its say "automatically alpha to some extent" o.o whatever this means
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/15 06:48 PM
4

but ur more likely to be alpha o.o
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/15 06:36 PM
2

okay o.o
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/15 06:23 PM
6

but your behavior is shaped by how people treat you o.o which has a lot to do with your looks o.o
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/15 06:01 PM
3

It has nothing to do with TRP theory, and it surely can't be an argument against it. Did the OP claim it is?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/15 05:52 PM
0

Was that the methodology of the research referenced?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/15 10:56 PM
1

well that part of the article suggests women doing the same thing as men gives them worse results
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/15 10:25 PM
2

no, dude!!!!! nothing is going well!!!!!!!!!!! -____________-
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/15 09:28 PM
-1

Just asking a question. Your OP wasn't clear.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/15 09:17 PM
5

So nothing actually suggests women can't negotiate as well as men, just that it won't necessarily get them the same results?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/15 09:08 PM
2

obviously depends on the guy :V
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/15 08:49 PM
0

You're not really answering my question o.o
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/15 08:20 PM
2

I'm confused, do you want a charitable and convincing presentation of their arguments or do you want something that you would believe a red piller wrote?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/15 05:09 PM
2

His show sounds pretty disgusting so yeah!
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/15 01:11 PM
-2

You realise you are in that very same corner of the internet yeah? no i think this is the subreddit for laughing at them, trp is the other way, maybe you took a wrong turn
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/15 12:09 AM
-1

What?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/15 11:25 PM
-1

yeah? it's the other way around
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/15 08:11 PM
-1

it's the other way around
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/15 08:01 PM
0

You must be since that wasn't the distinction
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/15 09:55 PM
0

no i liked good omens tho............
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/15 09:15 AM
0

what of it????????????????????
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/15 09:04 AM
0

wat???
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/15 12:34 AM
14

nice post! you've made me think about the subject a lot and i've changed my mind tbh
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/15 11:39 PM
2

it's like..... established fact by now that trp is group therapy for angry, socially awkward teenagers.... you take it too srsly i think...
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/15 11:38 PM
5

-465!!! winner???? Is it fair for privileged BPers to criticize the "very disprivileged" among RPers? ur not oppressed lol
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/15 11:32 PM
1

not taking me seriously cuz I'm a woman? this is why I need feminism tbh
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/15 10:22 PM
-1

women earn 70% less and you won't even pay for a dinner or a children? omgf
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/15 03:19 PM
5

I'd think sex 20 times a month easily beats sex once a month as long as the girls are decently attractive? the same question but with a similar amount of sex for each choice would be more interesting imo
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/15 10:14 PM
2

that's not what those quotes say o.o
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/15 10:02 PM
-1

you could just post it on /r/GenderScience or wherever
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/15 01:16 PM
0

oh! that makes a lot more sense, you should've added that to the op haha
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/15 08:45 PM
0

why would you make the title about men?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/15 07:42 PM
1

You mean erections don't "just happen" when you're awake as well?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/15 07:12 PM
2

only if youre insecure manlet tbh
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/15 09:45 PM
0

correlation isn't causation so yeah o.o
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/15 09:04 PM
-1

idk what context that was in but its pretty relevant when he pwomises a relationship...........
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/15 08:00 PM
0

maybe you should go tell them then instead of the bpers that don't care o.o
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/15 09:27 AM
-1

so what is awful about that ad or whatever it was? o.o
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/15 12:17 PM
-6

why do you link to the duke case?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/15 08:57 PM
-4

so wut does it demonstrate
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/15 06:40 PM
-1

not even most men in this thread seem to agree
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/15 08:39 PM
2

That's her fiancee though, he's 5'4"
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/15 04:34 PM
1

yeah i got that
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/15 09:24 AM
-1

yes ^-^
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/15 09:04 PM
0

if she consents to the scenario beforehand, doesn't that count? o.o
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/15 08:35 PM
1

he's not attractive o.o
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/15 07:00 PM
1

Whether it appears they will is the only relevant thing
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/15 03:25 AM
-1

female humans*
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/15 12:57 PM
2

Aww, thank youuu! You're a lovely person too.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/15 11:35 AM
-5

beep boop
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/15 11:32 AM
0

expression is only thing relevant to self-control (:
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/15 07:07 AM
1

nah, it was a separate question. he talked about her behavior, not about needing to defend himself from anything. Self defense is always justified. beating someone with a bat is not justified cuz they're slapping you o.o
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/15 06:50 AM
2

http://www.reddit.com/r/BDSMcommunity/comments/23ow82/what_are_your_thoughts_on_the_red_pill/
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/15 09:26 PM
2

They're pretty cute. I spend far too much time at my friend's place just to play with her kitten ^__^
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/15 09:09 PM
2

Why do you ask?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/15 09:07 PM
4

Sure! It's on my mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/15 08:47 PM
4

I don't know! 5-10 years seems like a good range.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/15 08:43 PM
5

Yeah, they are. I remember when I was 8 or something like that and was talking to my grandmother, and she was telling me about how her cat had too many kittens and she had to get rid of most of them. So I was like "Oh, what'd you do with them? Who'd you give them to?" and she goes "we *downwards motion with both hands together*" a few times, which, on further inquiry, turned out to be the gesture for drowning small animals. It's a curious way to kill a living thing. Even if you were an elderly l…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/15 08:42 PM
3

People that have too many, I guess.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/15 08:15 PM
3

Well if you don't succeed at first, you can always drown him like an unwanted kitten and try again
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/15 08:02 PM
2

I'll totally have a lovely daughter sometime!
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/15 07:52 PM
2

maybe just sees a different side than you do (:
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/15 07:49 PM
-2

what are you saying then ?__?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/15 07:17 PM
-2

Commitment minded men most certainly do make their feelings known by not committing to sluts. some small amount of the small amount of attractive men just don't enter relationships with promiscuous women, they don't really announce it I get the feeling you're trying to take me down a path that proves some point you're trying to make, but I can't tell what that is. sure, that women often don't see promiscuity as negative, i told you that o.o
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/15 07:06 PM
-1

well you claimed the consequence was male aversion to commitment but then said they won't see that. what would be the other reason?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/15 06:52 PM
-2

okay, so if you agree women don't tend to see it as a serious consequence, why would they need low self-control to be promiscuous?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/15 06:46 PM
-4

I thought you said that, to a woman, it would seem like promiscuity isn't often seen as a negative thing
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/15 06:37 PM
-2

well I mean, if it doesn't seem like promiscuity would be an issue, which you seemed to agree on, why would it feel like something you'd need to control?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/15 06:27 PM
-1

why would you feel the need to control your sexuality as a woman then?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/15 06:18 PM
0

so the vast majority of men will appear to be open-minded cuz they're beta, the majority of the remainder of alpha men will appear to be open-minded too cuz they're just looking for sex or are just lying otherwise. I guess it wouldn't seem like there are a lot of men that mind promiscuity?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/15 06:11 PM
-2

i thought those guys would pretend to be open-minded too, cuz it gives them more options for sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/15 06:01 PM
-2

if they give the impression they're "open-minded," it shouldn't be hard for women to get the idea that they are, no? :O
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/15 05:44 PM
0

so "aversion to commitment by a lot of men" means only really a small subset of men that don't express it very clearly? o.o is there a reason you should care a lot about that?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/15 05:31 PM
-1

most men don't express much aversion o.o
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/15 05:23 PM
1

what consequences?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/15 05:15 PM
2

why would they have low self-control?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/15 04:44 PM
2

qq!
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/15 04:39 PM
-1

That there's not a lot of reason to marry? Sure
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/15 02:54 PM
-1

that would be the point
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/15 02:50 PM
-1

How is it wrong? proof? We just discussed this! The divorce rate (which is what you'd probably mean by "there's x% chance you'd divorce me") is not 72%
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/15 02:45 PM
-1

Yes, that the 72% figure is wrong, inconsistent with other RPers, and that any total rate can't be accurate for any well-thought-out decision to marry. No need to answer my question or anything if you're uncomfortable by the way, you def seem confused.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/15 02:40 PM
-1

Did you have a point?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/15 02:32 PM
-1

Yes, that's the relevant statistic. That's my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/15 02:25 PM
-1

How is it relevant? 100% of divorces could be initiated by women and it wouldn't matter as long as the divorce rate were low enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/15 02:12 PM
1

is that the only thing, that family members can't deny you from seeing them?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/15 02:04 PM
-1

how did you get that from his comment? o.o it's not how I interpreted it and it's not relevant in that context
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/15 01:58 PM
2

With the amount of women refusing to take on their husbands name, the ''easier access at hospitals/emergencies'' also no longer applies. That isn't the only reason you get easier access, is it? I thought it was used as one of the arguments for gay marriage
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/15 11:11 AM
-3

did you delete a comment...? o__O
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/15 10:07 AM
-1

Okay, we're going to make out, but I'm not ready for sex. No way are we having sex today. I don't want to be a slut after all. That's totes it! Rape culture, basically.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/15 09:54 AM
-4

well, ask any rper that claims it to be 50%, i guess? o.- i assume you'd know the source of it, considering you've claimed it's like a coinflip for half your possessions several times previously
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/15 07:29 AM
-6

Honey, there is a 72% chance you are going to divorce me in 10 years. It's fact. It's documented. The CDC keeps records on this shit. It's well known. you guys can't even keep your exaggerated statistics consistent o.o
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/15 07:02 AM
0

The bat thing was just a crazy example but my point is why should he care about her safety? because he doesn't have much reason to worry about his own, and you shouldn't hurt people? o.-
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/15 08:26 PM
0

it's not different, but you probably don't need to give her a concussion to make her stop slapping you, nor do you need to hit her with a bat
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/15 07:59 PM
0

Do you think it's also justified to hit women because you don't like their attitude?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/15 07:21 PM
0

depends where you are, but sure ^^
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/15 08:16 AM
0

slapped her back if she kept following me around like that, I guess?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/15 07:28 AM
1

I don't see why you would need that amount of force
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/15 07:10 AM
1

I agree
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/15 09:22 AM
1

INTP
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/15 08:01 AM
3

yeah, not sure what was going through /u/fizolof's head when he made this thread
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/15 12:55 AM
3

gorgeous and ripped
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/15 12:08 AM
2

Isn't it like joining /r/fatpeoplehate? it's more like /r/TumblrInAction. which is a good analogy because neither of the subs are at all funny or interesting. And I know I haven't delved deep enough into TRP, but do you guys actually advocate rape? they do :(
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/15 05:37 PM
4

it's horribly imprecise and emotionally charged
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/15 05:28 PM
1

hugs are nice!!! they're not sexual OMG
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/15 12:48 PM
2

do any of the political disadvantages against men not count cuz people are supporting them? o.-
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/15 04:17 AM
0

because it's still a disadvantage o.-
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/15 03:56 AM
0

that isn't really relevant o.o
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/15 03:36 AM
0

Meaning it's not split by gender who believes what about the issue. It's still a disadvantage to women
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/15 03:03 AM
1

Why would she be shadowbanned?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/15 03:02 AM
5

You cant help but wonder if they might be socially stunted for having to put so much consideration in to these non-existent scenarios. that's pretty much the entire point, they have no idea how to deal with social situations so they need threads like these
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/15 12:33 AM
5

[start singing or loudly humming Gold Digger by Kanye West] LMAO
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/15 11:45 PM
-1

cya
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/15 12:38 AM
1

That isn't a horrible situation. That's a horrible DECISION. they're not mutually exclusive No one calls her out on this, they closest they come is saying she could have left. calls her out? does she say something else in the op?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/15 12:28 AM
-1

the rational part of you want to stop cuz you know you'd lose any actual argument, but your ego can't manage to stop and goes on tangents to brag about your extramarital affairs to compensate for how hopelessly intellectually mediocre you are :/ it's ok hun, maybe if you're lucky, your wife will 'let' you go on the computer for an hour when you get home too, so you can have some more 'unconstructive' arguments with me \<sup>-</sup>^ you can go bak to work
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/15 12:23 AM
-1

Not worth arguing because there is no point. At the end of the day nothing will change and I'm gonna go home and bang my wife. you're the one who just went "ok" and avoided any constructive argument... o.o Then this weekend, she's gonna let me bang some other girl. what a beta way to think \<sup>-</sup>^ btw why you hate the cat face??? o.o;;
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/15 12:08 AM
-3

A girl knows she can post about how she fucked a guy for a place to sleep then robbed him and still be upvoted and victim of the situation because she's a women. that's because it was a horrible situation for her, not because she's a woman o.- Alternatives to paying with sex for a place to sleep that she didn't use and no one in the comments mention. well yeah, she didn't ask for alternatives. there are plenty of people that mention that she could have left but not to be upset about not doing so
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/15 11:43 PM
-1

glad we agree \<sup>-</sup>^
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/15 11:35 PM
-1

that's cool but doesn't have much to do with safe spaces o.o
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/15 11:03 PM
-3

no o.o what does disagreement have to do with safe spaces
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/15 10:21 PM
1

o.o it is
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/15 10:17 PM
1

It does
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/15 10:17 PM
1

sure he could
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/15 10:16 PM
1

I'm sorry you feel that way
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/15 06:38 PM
0

rite, male privilege totally doesn't exist at all ^-^
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/15 06:21 PM
3

flowers are pretty and romantic
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/15 05:45 PM
7

because they don't want people harassing them in their space
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/15 05:33 PM
-1

Well you just said feminism was about changing the world, so we clearly don't disagree!
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/15 05:32 PM
-1

it's about women's rights, hth
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/15 05:16 PM
1

ehh not really, volatility def not attractive
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/15 07:30 AM
1

Feminism is all theory. There's nothing that they can actually use for personal development. wtf, the women's rights movements isn't about personal improvement? next you'll be telling me the civil rights movement wasn't about fitness TRPers are logical robots. not sure that's the impression i get from your sub :0)
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/15 07:14 AM
-3

I'm totally talking about subway trains! Your reading comprehension is amazing :/
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/15 02:18 AM
-4

No, I'm just making clear what you're saying
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/15 02:06 AM
-1

oh yeah i don't disagree that men are unpredictable and dangerous and you should stay away from them, I'm just saying it's not consent
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/15 01:55 AM
-5

If women go to a frat house and get smash-drunk with a house full of horny college men, she is implicitly (though not explicitly) communicating to those men that she is there, open to the idea of releasing her inhibitions to have sex with one (or more) of them. Yeah, why stop at "going to a man's room is consent to sex"? Being around men at all is consent to sex, obviously!
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/15 01:42 AM
1

o, well, that's not a lot better o.o
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/15 10:48 PM
5

was mostly just wondering if the scene where he ignores her safeword is in the movie too
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/15 09:33 PM
-1

"to go to a man's room is to consent to sex"? o.o all of it is obvious victim blaming o.o
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/15 08:37 PM
3

It doesn't change the fact that not only is feminism still making women question their sexual inclinations Only in the sense they wouldn't be questioning it if it were still the 50s, I'm sure submissive men have the same doubts
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/15 06:31 PM
3

Bodies are still pretty unique
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/15 06:18 PM
2

I'm sure there are women that feel an initial contradiction between wanting to be strong and independent or w/e and bdsm, but the number of feminists that will actually tell you that bdsm is harmful or degrading or bad is pretty low!
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/15 05:37 PM
3

does he rape her in the movie too
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/15 05:31 PM
2

well yea nowhere in there does she say feminism told her not 2 be a sexual submissive
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/15 03:51 PM
2

okay, sex-positive feminists that constitute the vast majority of feminists don't, but radfems do Most things you'll find on it these days is women asking how to reconcile their beliefs with their sexual desires. that isn't really about feminism o.O
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/15 03:13 PM
4

feminism doesnt say dat
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/15 05:22 AM
6

but... none of it is true... o.O
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/15 05:06 AM
7

like what
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/15 04:42 AM
6

feminists don't like the movie because it depicts an abusive relationship, hth
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/15 04:40 AM
5

So saying that the only reason people don't like it is because of a abusive relationship that everyone recognizes is just not true. considering that is the actual stated reason feminists are opposing the movie, it seems to be true! more likely than them just being afraid cuz its bdsm or w/e
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/15 04:29 AM
5

... do you seriously believe that?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/15 04:08 AM
9

yea emotional abuse and rape is great and healthy
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/15 03:31 AM
6

yea thats def the reason, not the abus ive relationship it depicts
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/15 02:58 AM
-1

100% agreed
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/15 02:41 AM
1

TRPers definitely seem to have an obsession about sex with trans people
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/15 02:18 AM
-5

once every two days on average maybe, somethng like five times a day before starting hrt pornfree is good, it degrades women... o.o fapfree i dont know, the jury is still out
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/15 02:11 AM
-5

not touch her pls -__- omg
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/15 04:01 PM
-2

not pre op trans men but possibly otherwise, either gender :V
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/15 04:01 PM
2

rip ;~;
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/15 03:49 PM
1

I wouldn't think anything of it
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/15 06:15 AM
2

idk i don't ask men to do things and then think less of them for complying so i can't answer, don't rly want people to open doors for me but i wouldnm't complain
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/15 05:41 AM
-3

why you would touch her?? o.o creepy
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/15 05:34 AM
5

haha bpers r dum
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/15 05:33 AM
1

A lot of the time, gender identity is conflated with gender roles. which is unsurprising when people use "gender" for both things
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/15 05:31 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter