TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

18cmOfGreatness Archive

View 3 posts and 731 comments by 18cmOfGreatness on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

This explains why you have to spend money on dating, lol.
/r/seduction02/09/24 03:05 PM
1

The reason is simple - Krauser and Janka are older guys who meet women 10-20 years younger than they are, usually in countries where they don't even speak the native language, lmao. Considering this, even 2% is awesome. It means it takes them, on average, 5 days with 10 approach every day to fuck a hot young woman. If we assume that they don't approach ugly women, but if they lied about hotness of their women they could've as well lied about their numbers, making them a few times higher. And to …
/r/seduction02/09/24 02:57 PM
11

There're two aspects to FWBs. How to fuck a new girl and how to make her stay for FWB. And for the latter you just need to work on your sex game. Learn how to make girls cum in different way, learn how to do massages, make them squirt, etc. If you can't give them "emotional" value by being a bf, you should give them physical pleasure they can't get from most guys.
/r/seduction26/08/24 04:50 PM
1

There's a big difference between "approach all the girls, fucking 1 out of 100" and "approaching only 7/10 or hotter, fucking 5 out of 100". Obviously you'll never get "most girls" with cold approach, just because of logistics and that cold approach isn't a socially accepted way to meet people. I'd also argue that "everyone knows that" because I'm pretty much sure that the vast majority of guys on seddit don't know most of it. But of course you can get all programs for free if you know where to …
/r/seduction26/08/24 04:47 PM
1

His cringe infields are old AF, even infields from his older programs like Women are solid. I know guys who get laid using his approach IRL, that's enough for me to know. He's an awkward nerdy guy and so his approach caters to introverts and nerds, with more technical explanations and so on. It's not as good as more natural approach to pickup, but it still works much better than "just be yourself bro and improve urself". And yes, cold approach pickup is based on volume, no shit Sherlock. If you …
/r/seduction26/08/24 04:40 PM
4

Lol, you're like, very wrong. I know many guys who had success after courses by former RSD guys like Todd, or just from good classics like Blueprint, etc. As well as those who had decent success from dating advice from online guys, including free advice from those who have paid products. There are definitely coaches who get laid a lot and can teach you how to do this as well, to a certain extent. But there are always "hard cases", just like there are "hard cases" in fitness who just can't do wha…
/r/seduction25/08/24 04:00 PM
12

How exactly did you conclud that you "were scammed"? Do you even understand what "being scammed" means? With dating couches you don't buy girls, or sex, you buy information. You aren't being scammed unless you didn't get what you were promised to. If they promised to you "three magic words to get you any girl" and didn't deliver, then sure, you were scammed. If they promised you to teach you how to approach a girl, what to say, and how to increase your chances with her, and they gave you the inf…
/r/seduction25/08/24 03:51 PM
3

Lol, do you understand that watching him approaching girls would be useless. To be honest, Luke SCB 1 sucks, but SCB 2 is solid as long as you understand what he's talking about. I'm pretty much sure you just didn't implement anything from the course. Inner game is the only game. And of course women are attracted to physical, just in a different way to men, and they're also attracted to a bunch of other stuff, that's the point.
/r/seduction25/08/24 03:47 PM
0

You sound more like cosmicmommy, than daddy.
/r/seduction25/08/24 03:44 PM
0

Very conceited of you to assume that you hold any kind of power over a hot girl, no matter how young she is, lmao. Power dynamics in dating depend on the amount of options a person has, so the vast majority of men doe't have much power at all when it comes to dating. And how exactly do you think you can hurt someone by "being in charge"? It's always up to you if you want to use your "power" for good or for evil. And having consensual sex isn't evil, lmao. A hot girl can easily "hurt" a guy by fr…
/r/seduction25/08/24 03:41 PM
1

This works if your interest is healthy, not what OP described, lol. Showing interest and being honest is excellent when you have high self-esteem and standards. When you treat every female as a queen, not so well. The problem with OP isn't what he does, but how he thinks. Wanting a woman sexually doesn't automatically make you beneath her. You should also understand that you always have options, they are walking on the streets all the time. You're as much of a chooser as she is.
/r/seduction13/08/24 04:49 PM
0

Lmao. It's actually easier to get older women. Significantly so. Younger women have more options, and thus the competition for them is higher. This is also why almost all good women are taken by the time they are 25. 90-95% of those women who're still single at their late twenties, let alone thirties, aren't that attractive or aren't relationship material. When there's a "resource" and there's a "competition" then of course you can consider getting this resource as a challenge. And this resource…
/r/seduction13/08/24 04:36 PM
3

Yeah, no beginner can hit gym 5x a week if he actually does anything there other than taking selfies, lol. For most beginners, fully body 2 times per week with some basic exercises will leave them sore for the entire time between each gym visit. And most splits are standard 3 days per week.
/r/seduction07/08/24 06:02 PM
9

While a girl can not sleep with a guy on the first date even if she's into it, that entirely depends on his game and experience. All those rules are easily broken when immediate attraction reaches a certain threshold. Also there's a very simple trick that makes those "excuses" go away, just treat each location as a new date, have fun with it. You can even say things like "I don't sleep with women on the first date, only on the third one at the very least... the first date is going in the park, t…
/r/seduction07/08/24 05:58 PM
0

It seems you went too far on the "religion" part, lmao. What is "temptation and lust" if you aren't a follower of some teaching of a book that's outdated by a millenia? And wdym, "using as a nightstand", you're giving pleasure to another person, giving a gift to them. It seems you miss how much your values are influenced by something that isn't even objective. LTR is cool, but so is sexual satisfaction.
/r/seduction07/08/24 05:51 PM
0

I can't have a conversation with many people of different ages because of their stupidity, it's not about age buddy.
/r/seduction07/08/24 05:48 PM
0

He has a lot to learn for someone who thinks that legal adults are "kids".
/r/seduction07/08/24 05:48 PM
-2

Most women reach adulthood biologically at 15-16, i.e. their puberty ends and they are adults by the biological definition. And they still have to wait for three years to be considered adults by law, and here you're, pretending that someone who's already a biological adult for 2-3 years is a "child". I think you have to grow up mentally if that's your mindset.
/r/seduction07/08/24 05:45 PM
1

It absolutely is, it requires a lot more skill and attraction to do this than banging older women. If you can still bang 18 y.o. when you're in your forties and using nothing but your wit and still attractive appearance then you're the goat. In reality, it doesn't matter that younger women are "less mature", it doesn't make getting in their pants any easier, only harder as they have way more options. They are more likely to be manipulated in an LTR, sure, but getting casual with them is harder.
/r/seduction07/08/24 05:43 PM
1

Lol, wtf are you talking about Japan, did you assume that they worship fatties because of ugly bastards in hentai?
/r/TheRedPill28/07/24 06:20 PM
1

Lol. By this logic you shouldn't approach women at all, because most of them aren't interested in you unless they get to know you at least for some time.
/r/seduction28/07/24 06:06 PM
1

You have to realize something. Those hotties fuck guys, they fucked guys before and they will fuck them in the future. And many of those guys are worse than you're. It doesn't matter how hot she is, if you're her best options, it's only rational for her to choose you. The same way it doesn't matter how hot a guy is, even if he's a 10/10 and a billionaire he'd still fuck a 6/10 clerk girl. Another point - getting girls isn't even about to be liked by them. It's more about compliance and obedience…
/r/seduction28/07/24 05:50 PM
4

This doesn't work with cold approach. For a simple reason. You can know if you like a girl by looking at her for 2 seconds. The same doesn't work for women, unless you're exactly her type / super hot. So you have to attract her with who you're rather than just your looks. Even girls "below your league" can react without interest initially just because they aren't in the mood or something.
/r/seduction28/07/24 05:45 PM
1

A very subjective term, at least use the 10 points scale.
/r/seduction28/07/24 05:42 PM
9

Have you ever heard of hentai? Hentai is porn, but no one traffics anyone for it. Just like for erotica. And no one traffics anyone for amateur home-made videos, either, get down from your high horse, lady. As for the reason why women prefer erotica - because they don't want just some jacked pornstar, they want a billionaire or a vampire, or any other cool guys that pulls their emotional strings.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 04:24 AM
1

The only expectations porn ruin is about themselves and your own dick size / muscles. Only over-masculine men are allowed in commercial porn like brazzers, except the sub-genre of "young boy fucks milfs" you see guys with giga-dicks and on steroids. When in practical reality, even 17 cm is already too much for many women. Women in porn are mostly average looking, though many are made less attractive by fake tits and whatever, only amateur porn sometimes has "unrealistic" babes with big natural t…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/24 04:19 AM
0

Lol, 15 women is a beginner numbers for someone who's actively dating different women. You can beat him in a month without putting much effort.
/r/seduction23/07/24 04:32 PM
1

Let me guess, by "taking action" you mean doing 5 approaches one time? Lmao. Seduction is a skill, you have to learn it by practice, which can take hundreds of cold approaches. Cold approach pickup is a numbers game, it's only to be expected that you'll only sleep with less than 5% of women you approach as a beginner.
/r/seduction23/07/24 04:26 PM
1

Lmao, what are you smoking. Statistically, an average man wants 3 times more lifetime partners than he has. While gays have 3 times more sexual partners on average than straight dudes... and surprise, their desired number of sexual partners aligns, unlike straight dudes. And, wait for it, the number of their actual sexual partners and desired sexual partners also completely aligns for most women. Proving a simple point that women are the gatekeepers of sex and men want to have more way more sexu…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/24 03:23 PM
3

The best way is to have both. Find a bisexual gf who's going to love threesomes and will encourage you to meet other women. Try open relationship or swinging if that's your thing and your ego isn't frail AF.
/r/seduction07/06/24 04:10 PM
1

Why would you want the same 1-2 girls for 10 years, lmao. And if you're good at sex then yes, they will still meet you from time to time after years, even when they are in a relationship. But that's not the point, the point is that most girls won't just disappear after single sex, getting one girl usually means that you're going to bang her for a while, a few weeks or months, while also meeting new women. I mean, he's right that really good players in this for the "game", which is meeting new pe…
/r/seduction07/06/24 04:08 PM
2

You need theory to be with people who are hotter than you and not a part of your social circle. You need theory to seduce strangers you just met. Most people date those they meet through their social circle or on dating apps, which limits the pool and also increases the threshold for your looks and social status. You need game to have higher success rate with hotter women, not to get laid at all. You can always settle for someone on "your level" you met through friends.
/r/seduction07/06/24 04:05 PM
2

Go to libgen and search for Swinggcat, or google his name and check posts summarizing his book on sosuave. That's the only game on pickup you need, and the author speaks exactly about attraction. Mark Manson is way too mainstream, and his advice is rather basic, and he also contradicts himself in his book. But he's a good choice if you want more basic advice instead of learning game.
/r/seduction07/06/24 04:03 PM
1

Who said about "every man", that would've been a ridiculous claim if treated seriously. There are asexual men, gay men, etc. There are too many variables. But the vast majority of men absolutely doesn't have as much sex as they want.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/24 04:00 PM
1

You can approach 30, even 50 women in a night / day if you really, really want to fuck. But that's going to be extremely rare, in most cases you'll sleep with a new girl within 15 approaches with 10% success rate. Using your example, in most cases you can expect to get heads 40-60 times out of 100, very rarely, if ever, going beyond this. Some worse players have 2% success rate and still have tons of options.
/r/seduction07/06/24 03:58 PM
7

They just try to impress you with social proof, treat it as such.
/r/seduction26/05/24 01:04 PM
1

Any introvert can learn how to ACT like extrovert. In the first place, scientifically, introvert is just someone who needs very little social interaction to feel completely "sated" socially. It's very different than being socially incompetent and anxious, which most people who self-identify as "introverts" are. An introvert can be charismatic, talkative, have high emotional intelligence, etc. Confidence isn't about engagement or signaling, but about not having a filter, not being a people-please…
/r/seduction26/05/24 01:01 PM
2

This post is about how to flirt, part 2 is about "techniques", aka "examples". You don't need techniques or examples if you understand the principle and have your own brain.
/r/seduction25/05/24 04:30 PM
3

Dude, are you serious? Do you realize that gay men have 2-3 times more partners on average than straight dudes? The main variable here is women, who're just more picky about sex. If you ask an average dude how many women he would've slept with if he was a 10/10 Giga-Chad, then the answer wouldn't be one, lmao. Most men definitely have far fewer options than they would like to have and far fewer sexual partners than they'd love to. If men wanted just to have one woman in their life, porn industry…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/24 04:23 PM
1

Lol, what you described is the opposite of good game.
/r/seduction25/05/24 03:51 PM
1

The number 4 is what anyone can and should master if they want to be good with women. Or rather, there's no such thing as "confidence based in reality and competence", at least not with women. In reality, no matter how hot you're, there are still going to be women that aren't into you. So you'll never be 100% confident like a guy who doesn't need external validation to be confident.
/r/seduction25/05/24 03:50 PM
1

There's no guaranteed sex with every woman, but your success rate can absolutely be high enough to have sex every time you go out or close to it. And game is absolutely real, women ARE attracted to certain behavioral traits that can be replicated one way or another.
/r/seduction25/05/24 03:47 PM
-1

Lol, they absolutely do. There's a lot of fish in the pond, so if you have 10% success rate you're going to always go home with a girl.
/r/seduction25/05/24 03:44 PM
1

There are many men who have this and more and don't get laid. He talked to thousands of people, which developed his social skills to a level not imaginable to most people.
/r/seduction25/05/24 03:41 PM
3

Lol, it totally does. Many guys have zero approach anxiety. It exists more because of your goals and mindset than anything else. With a wrong mindset it doesn't matter how many times you approached.
/r/seduction25/05/24 03:39 PM
5

Lol, he literally said how to flirt. Be playful and push-pull in sexual contest, that's it. What exactly you don't understand? You can't think of any examples of sexual push-pull said in a playful manner without being logical or serious? "You look cute, too bad you're blonde". Here you go, that's flirting.
/r/seduction25/05/24 03:25 PM
1

What advertisement, man? Those numbers are real for me and other guys I know. Just do some simple math. If you sleep with 5% of women you approach and approach 5 women per day, that's 150 approaches in a month and 7.5 lays on average per month. Which is 90 lays per year. That's just math, Mr. Adult.
/r/seduction20/05/24 04:24 PM
3

The problem isn't in showing interest, or not, but in having too much interest for no real reason. Of course if you're talking to her you're interested to some extent. For example you can be interested in testing if she's cool and fun to be around, and learn more about her.
/r/seduction14/05/24 01:56 PM
1

Lol, what a good tactic. You'll probably fuck ten women in a hundred years. Guys who're successful at cold approach and online dating can sleep with 50-100 women in a year using half the effort you do to build your social circle. If your purpose is objective results, then your approach is the worst. If your purpose is to get rejected as little as possible because you depend on other people's opinion of you, then that's a nice, safe choice.
/r/seduction14/05/24 01:44 PM
2

Not looking for signs of interest is exactly what the cold approach is. If there's a sign of interest, then it's a warm approach. What you described in the first few sentences is exactly how it should be, and there's nothing wrong with it. If you're a quality man, it shouldn't fucking matter if a girl "wants to be approached in this place". If a ten hits on you at a grocery store, then you sure as fuck won't be thinking "I don't want to have anything to do with her, I need to buy milk, what a st…
/r/seduction14/05/24 12:16 PM
5

Not really. Seduction has nothing to do with love. In a broad term, the definition is - something you do to make another person commit a certain action they aren't sure if they want to commit. Like Lucifer seducing Eve into eating the apple, or advertisement seducing people into drinking more Cola. In this sub, seduction means seducing women into having sex with you, that's it. You don't need a woman to love you to suck your dick. Throughout history, seduction was mostly applied to women seducin…
/r/seduction14/05/24 12:09 PM
3

Actually, it's very often that I see some upvoted thread with "I just approached a girl for the first time, and wasn't killed, wow". And there are only a few threads through the entire history of the sub where a guy actually shared his statistics after a couple of hundreds of approaches. Tells you a lot about how many people actually practice this, lol.
/r/seduction14/05/24 12:05 PM
9

Want another eureka moment? Just use damn push pull, for god's sake. Instead of trying to be some sneaky motherfucker who hides his intent, just show both interest and disinterest, both compliment and bullshit, validate and invalidate. And maybe, just maybe, you should become a guy whose interest should be earned with actions instead of pretty face alone?
/r/seduction14/05/24 11:34 AM
21

No, OP. You, like many guys, have another problem whatsoever. You put girls on a pedestal just because of their looks. Or, even worse, just because of their existence. I mean, why tf her being attractive gives her any status above yours? She's just a girl. Imagine a different context. She's your opponent in a box sparring, is she intimidating? Most likely you'll kick her ass. Imagine playing against in her some online game. She'll completely suck. Imagine arm wrestling with her, can she win? No,…
/r/seduction14/05/24 11:29 AM
3

Well duh, Sherlock. Tell you what, the reason why women even fuck men to begin with is just for validation. She'll bang you if she can get something out of it. Just learn how to take away the validation so that she chases it until fucking you will give her more validation than not fucking you. Also, a girl having a bf often doesn't mean shit. In your example, she didn't even reject you, you rejected yourself because you aren't the type of guy who goes for taken girls. There are other guys who wo…
/r/seduction10/05/24 04:25 PM
3

How can a random stranger like or dislike you objectively if they don't know you? They can be attracted to your looks or behavior, but those aren't really truly "you", just a small part of it.
/r/seduction10/05/24 04:21 PM
5

Lol, there's very little correlation between your finances and casual sex. In fact, it's better if the girl doesn't know how much you earn before having sex with you, even if you earn more than most people.
/r/seduction10/05/24 04:19 PM
1

You would be surprised how many women you can randomly see on the street have nothing better to do than to talk to a stranger. And if the stranger is attractive enough, come to his place. If she has time for instadate, she has time for instalay. Time is the only constraint as long as you know how to create attraction and some basic trust.
/r/seduction09/05/24 03:02 PM
1

Man, how can a woman "love you for you" before you even talked to her? Unlike men, women are attracted to masculine personality as much as they are to looks. So if your looks alone aren't enough, you have to, oh my gad, talk to her for a while for her to be attracted to your other qualities. Not being a Pavlov's dog is just a part of being a masculine man. IDK about you man, but I more associate "who I am" with my mind and personality than my body. A girl who finds you physically attractive don'…
/r/seduction09/05/24 02:59 PM
1

Not really, the word dating has a few very different definitions.
/r/seduction09/05/24 02:53 PM
1

Lol, no, you should't be getting rejected in 99% of approaches. I'd say that at least 5% of the approaches should lead to sex, and 20-30% to a date. If the "positive response" is what you're after, then 70-80% isn't that much of a goal. If you know what you're doing, most of the interactions will be fun and positive.
/r/seduction09/05/24 02:50 PM
1

Unless you're 100% her type, she won't be 100% into you from the first seconds of the interaction. Challenging or provoking will make her invest emotionally. The thing is, what matters isn't her immediate reaction, but how you deal with it. Have you ever heard of the Pavlov's dog? Most guys are like this. They try their best to do what leads to a reward - a woman's approval and positive reaction, and avoid anything that leads to a punishment, which is her negative reaction and disapproval. Inste…
/r/seduction09/05/24 02:44 PM
1

Frame is a rather broad concept. There's a deep type of frame, an inner frame, which is based on your beliefs and values, and then there's a more generic, outer frame which is closer to how you originally described your approach. To have a better inner frame you have to change your goals and values, first and foremost. This will make you a better man, more confident and charismatic. Losing a girl isn't a big deal even if you don't have one. A thing you have to understand - a truly high value per…
/r/seduction09/05/24 02:34 PM
1

The point of the instadate is that it leads to your apartment.
/r/seduction09/05/24 02:21 PM
1

Wtf are you talking about. It's a seduction sub, not "long term relationships" sub. You meet people on Tinder to hook up, not to marry them.
/r/seduction09/05/24 02:15 PM
1

Now this isn't to say I have a problem with the dating scene in the USA. In my opinion, it's just different. Man, just be honest. Of course there's a problem with the dating scene in the USA, no way for you to get the same level of success in the USA than in those other countries you visited. When your sexual value is high above average girls just throw yourself at you, which you experienced first hand. And in the USA and most other first-world countries the threshold is just way higher and most…
/r/seduction09/05/24 02:12 PM
12

Frame isn't a technique, it's something you assume as being true and sub-communicate. By trying to think of a witty response and asking us to help you out, you're already in the frame of trying to impress her, lmao. The thing about game - it's not what you say, it's not even how you say it, it's WHY you say it. As you're a beginner, you should start from STOPPING trying to impress her, not by trying to reframe anything, because it would just be incongruent with the rest of your behavior. Try to …
/r/seduction02/05/24 08:58 AM
1

Those LMR tactics are pretty outdated and bad, that's the problem. If you want to not have any serious LMR, frame the interaction as you being seduced by her, use more "push" than "pull", be the one who verbally slows things down while escalating physically, etc. It's her being so hot that you can't resist, that she's seducing you while you try to slow things down. Think about it from a woman's point of view - "he seduced me on the first date, I'm an easy woman", or "I seduced him on the first d…
/r/TheRedPill02/05/24 08:48 AM
1

That's a pretty bad approach, you're still following her frame and chasing her. Reframe the entire process to HER seducing YOU, and you'll barely see any resistance as long as there's some attraction.
/r/TheRedPill02/05/24 08:41 AM
5

Lol, wtf are you talking about dude. Coaching is a way to make money. It's the same as saying that a fitness trainer doesn't train. Of course they do, but training doesn't take much time and doesn't get you paid. "Gaming" doesn't really take much time if you're good, ten hours a week when you're starting, after some point you just have a rotation of girls with little to no effort.
/r/seduction02/05/24 08:39 AM
1

Okay, my bad. Probably mixed it up with another country's laws.
/r/seduction02/05/24 08:36 AM
2

It seems you think that there's just two ways to talk to girls - be funnyman, or ignoring them. While it's way more effective to actually provoke / challenge her with words. Ignoring her works only, and only when she's already very interested in you to begin with.
/r/seduction02/05/24 08:35 AM
2

Lol, it's definitely can be considered as shit test. She checks if you care, first and foremost, she makes you react and qualify you. The same way you can say that "knowing how much you earn is a genuine concern", but answering seriously to this question makes you qualify to a girl, and that's counterproductive to bedding her.
/r/seduction02/05/24 08:16 AM
13

Lol at "hard rule". Women tend to have a lot of "rules" - he should be tall, he should make six figures, he should be in my age bracket, he should be handsome, he should be athletic, etc. But when you can create attraction nothing will matter, those just end up transforming into "shit tests", if you even can call them that, that are ridiculously easy to "pass". Ofterntimes you end up banging the girl without her knowing your age, or even your name, so it's not some critical information for her t…
/r/seduction02/05/24 08:11 AM
0

What? No, normalization of rape doesn't exist in society, not in the western countries, what are you smoking? Lmao. What's going on is anti-normalization of casual sex, there're literally people who think that drunk sex equals rape. A girl drunk a single vodka? You can't fuck her, or else you're a rapist. What, you're more drunk that she is? You're a man, so there's no such thing as you giving consent, it's irrelevant. And "victim blaming" is usually reserved for women who are "raped" for benefi…
/r/seduction28/04/24 02:23 AM
0

So many excuses just because you're afraid of being rejected, lmao.
/r/seduction28/04/24 02:18 AM
1

Tried once, lol. Well yes, of course she's going to be with friends. Deal with it. And even if she's with friends, she isn't going to be with them 100% of the time, more like half the time. And dancefloor is where meeting girls is the easiest.
/r/seduction28/04/24 02:16 AM
-5

I mean, in the USA, you can't just record people without their consent and then post it without blurring their faces. That's pretty much illegal, lol. There are videos that aren't fake, but those aren't the type of videos OP describes.
/r/seduction28/04/24 02:11 AM
10

How about being a man who doesn't give a shit about "giving her adrenaline, exciting her"? There's no better excitement for a woman than a man who doesn't give a shit what she thinks, a man who does things for his own pleasure and amusement, and not to impress her. If you want some more excitement in YOUR life, have public sex. That fits the bill just perfectly, just don't get caught fucking in the park.
/r/seduction24/04/24 04:09 AM
1

Lmao. Qualifying a girl is a horrible example? Learn the basics, bruh. Stop being so afraid of offedning a girl.
/r/seduction23/04/24 05:16 PM
1

And guess what. Being playfully arrogant is what gets women wet. Not trying to please her in a "confident way".
/r/seduction23/04/24 05:15 PM
1

Women that are initially cold CANNOT be seduced, have you ever managed to SLEEP with a girl that was initially cold? To answer instead of him - yes, absolutely. Half of my lays, if not more, are like this. I know a guy who consistently "seduced" (I don't like this word) women who were offended at his approach, threatened to call their bf to kick his ass, or told him to fuck off. At some point he was recovering after a surgery and looked damn ugly, skinny AF, with his face covered in pimples, his…
/r/seduction23/04/24 05:10 PM
2

Not attention, but validation. And desire for validation = attraction. Didn't you realize it yet? Women (and humans in general) fuck for validation. And they are more likely to fuck hot guys because fucking a hot guy gives her enough validation to justify it. But not for every woman you're going to be "hot enough". And by default, just fucking a new person "for free" doesn't give a girl validation, but to a man it does. If women really had the same type of physical attraction men do and got vali…
/r/seduction23/04/24 05:04 PM
2

The more "safe" you act with a girl, the less "tests" she'll take. If you act like a friend, you won't get any. If you act like a high value man, always challenging and teasing her, she'll do it as well. You don't have to consider those as "shit tests", or think about anything cool to say in response. Instead, shit test her. Also, I'd like to know how many women you actually fucked out of 1000 you approached. I mean, no shit Sherlock, some women are DTF from the beginning. If you only want the g…
/r/seduction23/04/24 04:58 PM
0

Let me tell you a secret - I guarantee you that this friend has better game than you and 99% of guys. It's just that most people here have no fucking idea what a good game is. The guy making an example of a "good game" as a counter-example, what can you expect from this? Good game is not giving a fuck and showing it, not treating the girl or yourself serious. This isn't about what you say, but what you imply. Telling a girl "your farts smell rosey, unlike mine, let's exchange farts" would sound …
/r/TheRedPill23/04/24 04:48 PM
4

Trying to impress women with your jokes, or trying to impress them with your looks, you're treating her as the prize either way. You can be the hottest MF out there, but many girls will still tell you to fuck off, that you're not their type, etc. And if your face is ugly, gym and good clothes wouldn't get you anywhere, I know hot looking guys who still struggle with women. As long as you give a fuck what she think of you, as long as you rely on her validation, you're still the same beta. "Look o…
/r/TheRedPill23/04/24 04:40 PM
5

Lol, bruh. So much effort to entertain a girl, who's the prize, she or her? Entertain yourself, and use HER for your entertainment.
/r/TheRedPill23/04/24 04:32 PM
3

Like, there're like a million ways to respond to someone catcalling on your girl or hitting on her where you establish dominance with words alone. Fighting over someone saying that your girl has big boobs is beta AF.
/r/TheRedPill23/04/24 04:29 PM
1

What do you mean by "Even if your woman is being cat called"? Lol, is this a reason enough for a normal guy to start a fight? If someone sexually assaults her right in front of you it's another matter, but risking your life over damn words?
/r/TheRedPill23/04/24 04:27 PM
5

Also, in many countries, there's a high chance that you can punch someone to death in self-defense and end up in jail as a result.
/r/TheRedPill23/04/24 04:25 PM
27

That depends heavily on a girl. Club chicks, party chicks, etc, are way more likely to be more frivolous than other types. It's hard for some people to imagine, but there are people who never go out on parties, don't drink, etc. Some girls will cheat no matter how cool you're, and others will stay loyal no matter how lame their BF or husband is. Most are somewhere in the middle.
/r/seduction04/04/24 10:23 AM
24

What a success story, she probably fucked him for 4 months and then remembered about you after being dumped. :D
/r/seduction04/04/24 10:08 AM
1

Go to a bathroom? Why, if you're in a club or bar, just approach another set and then return to the girl whenever you want. If you want to get rid of the guy, just ask the girl if she likes him, tell her "wow, he's so hot, don't you think?", tell the guy "she's into you dude, c'mon, kiss her", in other words act like a matchmaker in a funny way that embarasses the guy. Most guys would run fucking away as soon as you put them in the spotlight. If you've already escalated with the girl far enough,…
/r/seduction04/04/24 10:05 AM
1

"So what did you do this weekend?" "I was fucking my sister, didn't you know I'm from Alabama?" That would be x10 more attractive than the "good" answer you posted. You're in the mindset of impressing women instead of creating emotions. That's not a game, that's just trying to meet women's standards. You should earn money and be successful FOR YOURSELF, not to impress women, bro. I earn a dozen times more than the average income in my city, but I won't tell this to a woman I didn't even sleep wi…
/r/seduction02/04/24 10:20 AM
1

??? If she invites you she's already attracted to you. Also, I literally know guys who're financially supported by their girl or just earn much less. And also, why should he worry about her having money to pay for herself? Are you from a Muslim country where men are expected to sponsor women? And none of this is relevant to attraction at the first stage of meeting each other and banging.
/r/seduction02/04/24 10:17 AM
1

You don't need to have "awesome lifestyle" to pickup women, it's not really relevant. Even if you have some objective "value" in the form of making a lot of money, having status and hobbies, it's a bad idea trying to use them to attract someone. Would you rather women like you for your confidence and personality, or because you make a lot of money? I think the answer is pretty obvious.
/r/seduction30/03/24 05:09 PM
1

I'm not living in the USA, bruh. So I don't experience this problem.
/r/seduction30/03/24 05:06 PM
0

If there were no people thinking like this, then this commercial wouldn't exist. I'm not concerned about anything man, in my country the word "creep" doesn't even have this meaning, lmao. Moreover, with a strong frame it doesn't even matter. I know a guy who picked up girls after getting treated from cancer, he looked ugly AF and people openly made fun of him, but he still got laid. It's just that most men don't have a game strong enough to be ready for cold approach. The fact that you mention t…
/r/seduction30/03/24 05:04 PM
-1

Man, we have a very different understanding of game. Simply put, attraction is born in breaking rapport, not building it. Talking to someone and being normal is just building rapport, the problem with that is that most likely a girl isn't interested in being friends with some random dude who just approached her. There's no value in it, you don't provide any fun or emotion to her. Attraction also doesn't depend on a girl's reaction, she can react "negatively", but be interested in you and then fu…
/r/seduction26/03/24 08:16 PM
-10

Bruh, have you watched Gillette's infamous ad? There, just trying to talk to a female stranger is framed as "not cool, bro". Just being called a creep for approaching a stranger is enough of emotional damage to make an average dude lose any interest in ever doing it again. Also, strong game doesn't suggest any advances to begin with, but most PUA coaches don't teach strong game, lol.
/r/seduction26/03/24 07:56 PM
1

The thing about DHV is that it's just self-qualifying, which is something low value people do to impress others, lmao. IDK who ever though that this was a good idea. Disqualifying yourself works so much better. Despite what most people would assume, in many contexts telling a girl "btw, I make six figures and have Phd" will decrease her attraction, while saying "btw, I'm a hobo and was kicked out of school" will increase it.
/r/seduction26/03/24 04:58 PM
1

The thing is, what creates attraction is very different from being friendly and very polite. Especially the "very polite" part. Attractive and charismatic people are usually very polarising and confident, which naturally can provoke some amount of tension and possibly conflict.
/r/seduction26/03/24 04:51 PM
6

The same can be said about "making billions", you're still a human, but it does mean that you "made it" by the definition that most people put into this phrase. Having sex with very hot women is as much of an achievement as making a lot of money or being renowned in something.
/r/seduction26/03/24 04:43 PM
8

Your friends is an outlier. Out of womanizers that I know almost no one is suffering any symptoms like this, though most of them are either naturals or have a more natural game with a strong frame instead of techniques. The problem comes when you seduce women using a fake persona and petty tricks instead of your real self. Banging a lot of girls doesn't make you depressed, realizing that they never wanted you, only the false image you created, does. And not for everyone as well.
/r/seduction26/03/24 04:39 PM
4

Wtf are you smoking, Tyler is still active on his YT channel and makes new programs, lol. The one who was accused was actually Julien, Tyler just took the blame for him as the leader of RSD. None of them are sex criminals, they didn't serve a sentence or anything, they were just some of the first guys who were cancelled by the #metoo culture when it just started. And even Julien is still earning $$$ as self-improvement guru. The real answer is that pickup is no longer profitable, self-improvemen…
/r/seduction26/03/24 04:37 PM
-18

It's the other way around. With #metoo and all the bs like "he told me I'm cute, that's harassment" making pickup less profitable. Of course, the vast majority of women are still okay with being approached, but just one crazy feminist is enough to ruin your reputation in the USA, where most PUAs from. People in Europe have it much better and here pickup is still not dead. In the USA most pickup gurus just turned to self-improvement.
/r/seduction26/03/24 04:34 PM
1

The thing is, what you described as a game for "9's and 10's" works as well for other women, you just have to give them some validaiton so that they feel that they have a chance.
/r/seduction25/03/24 03:58 PM
7

You don't need any game to get laid. You can be beta AF, do chores for a girl, treat her like a goddess, and still get laid. Game is required to increase your effectiveness. Also, most things you described are a part of having a good game, lol. Game isn't about having some canned lines or tricks, it's about your inner state, your frame and confidence.
/r/seduction25/03/24 03:54 PM
12

You forgot the most important point - the gym is a place with the highest concentration of girls with a top-notch body.
/r/TheRedPill24/03/24 04:04 PM
11

So what? Just own it. "You're so weird for talking to random women." "Yeah, so what?" Stop trying to prove yourself to others so much. Their opinion isn't that important unless it can realistically lead to any real consequences. Like, if you're doing it at your job, then it will matter, otherwise they can piss off. And the same goes for any other thoughts people can have about you.
/r/seduction22/03/24 06:29 PM
10

It's not about lust, but about neediness and self-esteem. Lust / desire is the main motivation for human males to seek new mates, if you remove it, then you become just less inclined to do so. I read a similar advice when I was in my late teens and it ended up in a long lasting dry spell for me - it's easy to stop "desiring women" and just treat them as people, what is hard is to actually pursue them with such a mentality. You don't need women to feel socially fulfilled or to enjoy your life. Th…
/r/seduction22/03/24 06:21 PM
3

Lol, it seems you missed the part of the post where he talked about sexuality. It's okay to be attracted to women and let them know, just don't be thirsty. And it's your part of the deal to take the first step as a man for the simple reason that you're more confident and proactive than most woman by nature.
/r/seduction22/03/24 05:36 PM
1

Yeah man, and how many times exactly you got laid using this "method"? Some sex will approach you if you're good looking enough, that has little to do with seduction.
/r/seduction20/03/24 04:32 PM
2

The thing is, based on what you said so far, your "man to woman" frame is "man chases, woman chooses", which is one of the worst ones you can impliment. Of course most women are going to reject you from get go, because most of them aren't interested in some random guy, even if he's decently attractive. If you follow the standard frame of sexual dynamics then the girl will enter in a "evaluation mod" and then you have to impress her and "win the competition", which is every man available to her. …
/r/seduction20/03/24 02:30 PM
2

Based on his post, his game is meh. Most likely his success rate is around 1-3%.
/r/seduction20/03/24 02:26 PM
1

You don't need a dick to make a girl cum. Learn how to use your fingers and tongue, learn how to make erotic massage and yoni. Also, from my personal experience, having 7 inches is a drawback if you're into shorter girls, it's too big for them and you have to control yourself carefully to avoid making it painful for them.
/r/seduction20/03/24 02:20 PM
1

He should change the way he views this topic, giving him a direct answer won't do anything to improve his game.
/r/seduction20/03/24 02:17 PM
0

Bruh, what a pathetic way to see things. "I won't joke around because it can backfire, it's a bad tactic". I have a good tactic for you. Just have fucking fun, make it fun for yourself, hold your frame, don't be reactive, don't seek validation from the girl, that's going to make you x100 more attractive than any "tactic" that "never fails". If you're joking for the girl, you already lost. Joke for yourself, your fun is the most important thing in dating. You're the one deciding if your joke is g…
/r/seduction07/03/24 04:36 AM
1

You don't have to "tick" the "is he stable" box to get laid. In fact, it's going to place you in the "bf material" category and for most girls that means that sex isn't going to happen anytime soon and that she's suddenly more choosy and expects you to invest more, both emotionally and not. I make x10 more than an average person in my city, so I'm sure as hell won't be telling a girl that at the first date, lmao.
/r/seduction07/03/24 04:34 AM
1

I mean, if a guy wants to have sex with a girl and she rejects him then he's going to receive EMOTIONAL DAMAGE (c) as well. Not her fault, though.
/r/seduction06/03/24 09:39 AM
1

They don't indicate interest / disinterest, they indicate that you don't know how to deal with a situation when a girl is anxious, embarassed, in a hurry, etc. To begin with, a girl can't be that "interested" in the first few seconds of a conversation, women aren't like men, they can't decide if they want to fuck you just from a single passing glance.
/r/seduction06/03/24 09:35 AM
1

Oh no. According to some women (and men, actually!) in the comments, hitting on someone in the gym is creepy, and just talking to someone is the same thing. Which means that woman is a creep, you should report her to the gym stuff and warn other gym bros to be aware that there's this predator lurking in the gym. Baiting guys to hit on her and then rejecting them with the "boyfriend" excuse to add that? That's just plain evil, why she isn't in prison, yet? If we're serious, though, then probably …
/r/seduction05/03/24 04:19 PM
0

I guarantee you that the guy who made the post does get laid. I get laid and my experience says that hitting on women in the gym is the best way to find a fit girlfriend or fuckbuddy. Though my "hitting on women" is more like "striking a conversation". The same you do with other guys in the gym. Telling a girl "you're so sexy, let's go on a date" as she squats is obviously a bad idea, well duh. Making some casual remark, then add some teasing and flirting, though? This will very likely led to so…
/r/seduction05/03/24 04:13 PM
1

We don't want an advice from women. We want an advice from men who are actually successful with women. There's a big difference. How many women did you seduce in your life? Why do you think that you understand something you never even did. :DD
/r/seduction05/03/24 04:10 PM
1

Yeah, women hate being hit on, because it can led to sex, which is terrible. Women hate all men, so stay away from women, guys.
/r/seduction05/03/24 04:09 PM
2

Lol at "subtle cues".
/r/seduction05/03/24 04:05 PM
6

That's a strange thing to hear, because from my experience the ratio of really hot women is just way, way higher in gyms than in any other location. I see more women with a 8-10/10 body in one hour in a gym than I do in a week on the streets. Gyms are perfect if you're looking for a long term sexual partner (GF or FWB) with a killer body. And in high end gyms they are also likely to be decently educated. The point about "people on this sub aren't proficient" is funny, because why are you here th…
/r/seduction05/03/24 04:03 PM
1

Nah, pretty much all the points about approaching in person are kind of bs. The reaction to your approach is only loosely related to your attractiveness for the girl, there're too many factors. Let's say we flip the sexes. If a guy does the following :"give short answers to your questions during your approach, not ask you any questions in return, make poor eye contact" does it mean that he doesn't like a girl? He's equally if not more likely to just be too shy or anxious, maybe he doesn't know h…
/r/seduction05/03/24 03:57 PM
0

Why so serious? "How dare you, I'm a virgin and I keep my purity for my future wife!" works every time. The more you look like a player, the funnier it is to pretend to be inexperienced or monk.
/r/seduction05/03/24 03:50 PM
1

Being "not easy" isn't some serious shit. It's a game. It doesn't have to make sense and be logical. Google what "cocky and funny" is, it's old school and still works wonders. Let's say you just kissed her. Physically push her away and blame her for squeezing your ass, say "sorry, it seems I made you too horny, but I'm not ready yet". Just flip the script in a playful way here and there. Being the initiator isn't a bad thing per se, just don't forget that you're a man, you're in command. As an e…
/r/seduction05/03/24 03:47 PM
1

If you think that sex with you is "at her expense" then you should learn how to be better at sex, lol. Your job is to make her attracted enough to have sex with you. Her job is to make you interested enough to date her. If you find the "right girl" you'll definitely want to date her at least for a while. And even "short term" flings usually last for weeks unless one of you really sucks.
/r/seduction05/03/24 03:39 PM
1

??? That's not how sexual dynamics work, man. Rarely any man is "only looking for a short term". Most men look for both. If you can sleep with a woman, you will. It's her job to impress you enough to get you interested in something serious. A man's job is to get woman interested in sex with him, a woman's job is to make a man interested in a relationship with her. An alternative for that is to "just be friends" for months until you two are SURE that you actually want to date, which most often is…
/r/seduction05/03/24 03:36 PM
1

You can circumvent Tinder bans, there're many ways. It's way easier to do than adapting to Instragram if you already got some results with Tinder.
/r/seduction05/03/24 03:28 PM
1

You should change your view of women. Like most guys you default to the "seller" mentality, which puts you in a position where you feel that you need to earn her attention and approval. Change it to the "buyer" mentality. You have your needs, and a girl's job is to satisfy them, you're looking for girls to satisfy your needs, the entire process of getting to know each other is for your own sake. You see sex and relationships as a prize that you have to win, thus all the neediness. Instead, see t…
/r/seduction05/03/24 03:24 PM
3

The heck you mean "frame" doesn't exist? It's a key concept in game and social dynamics as a whole, lol.
/r/seduction05/03/24 03:17 PM
1

Yes and no. Yes, looks matter on dating apps. Because looks matter for your photos. But so do many other factors. For example, on Photofeeler which closely replicates the dating app environment, the same guy can be 9/10 or 3/10 depending on the photo. Lighting, angle, quality, context, etc, all those things matter tremendously for how you're going to be presented in the photo. I partially agree with your overall message, but when your photos are good enough then the way you message does matter. …
/r/seduction05/03/24 02:59 PM
3

Bruh, you just don't know any guys with a lot of points in "charisma and confidence". There are different levels of game, some guys can create chimestry out of nothing within 5 minutes, making girls obsessed with them even if they are ugly. But those are probably even more rare than top 1% guys in looks. And there's just no competition, strong game trumps everything because it allows you to dictate social context, you don't compete for women, you make people compete for your validation. If you l…
/r/seduction15/02/24 07:31 AM
1

I mean, anyone who isn't blind should know this by the time they are 18. If you never saw a cassier who's hotter than 90% of top models, then you are just not very attentive or good at determining looks. The hottest girls are usually found in the gym, the girls who actually train their body and have that ass from doing a lot of squats. A cute face+squats+diet=top 5% girl.
/r/seduction15/02/24 07:20 AM
-1

Wow, a guide on kissing a girl on a date, what this sub has become. If there's enough attraction, you can kiss a girl within the first 5 minutes of meeting her before even exchanging numbers. And even if a girl rejects your kiss, it's not a big deal, just continue with the game, it doesn't mean anything. In fact, it will only make it easier for you the second time. The first dates are usually for fucking and most old school PUA are exactly about this - how to sleep with girls on the first date. …
/r/seduction15/02/24 07:16 AM
4

The best way to change other is by example. Are you successful with women? No? Then why the heck do you think your brother has a reason to listen to you? If you aren't what you preach then it's unreasonable to expect for people to believe you.
/r/TheRedPill04/01/24 03:49 PM
1

It's more about "why" you're doing something than "what" you're doing exactly. Technically, when you're meeting a new girl and she isn't into you initially, but after you talk for a while she becomes interested it, this can be considered as "changing her mind". This is what happens in most cases anyway, as girls are rarely super interested from the first second. What I'm talking about is the difference in perspective. If your goal is to change her mind, you're already putting yourself in a weak …
/r/seduction04/01/24 03:09 PM
2

You are right for the most part, but it's not your job to leave or to "accept rejection and move on", if you're doing everything right then there isn't going to be any rejection to begin with because you aren't chasing in the first place. If a girl doesn't like your "offer" then it's up to her to leave or to stop meeting you. Any surface level rejection is just a part of the game, a sort of "test" to check if a guy is "goal and performance oriented" or is just "being himself and doing what he wa…
/r/seduction27/12/23 05:43 PM
5

Seduction is similar to advertisement, it's NOT about trying to convince someone like in direct sales, it's about displaying qualities that are attractive without trying to convince the "buyer" to do anything. But the catch here is that guys try to change their "product" to fit every girl with their "performance" instead of having a frame of "here's who I am, take it or leave it". You should know what your product is and be confident in it, instead of trying to provide a product that fits every …
/r/seduction27/12/23 05:32 PM
0

That's objectively wrong, though. Or rather, girls need TIME to determine if they like you or not, unlike men, they can't be sure if they want to fuck you from just a single glance. Otherwise, just asking girls to fuck you from the get go would be as effective as a proper human communication. Trying to "perform" though is a problem, it's not about trying to impress a girl, seduction is different from direct sales and is closer to advertisement where you just display your positive qualities and t…
/r/seduction27/12/23 05:24 PM
1

Your definition of "social" is doing it together with a fucking crowd? Two or three people is a social interaction as well. And a hobby can connect you with other people even if you usually do it alone. Anime community is rather friendly and often has IRL meetings, they also intersect with some other communities like tabletop gamers. Girls who're into anime are some of my favorites for multiple reasons, it's just that not many of them are hot enough. There are also some highly successful guys wh…
/r/TheRedPill13/11/23 05:20 PM
16

There's another variable that's completely ignored in the studies. There's a positive correlation between a man's body count and his attractiveness, while for women there's a negative one. Which is kind of obvious. So a man with a high BC is going to be way more attractive than an average dude, unless he just was with a bunch of hookers. And when it comes to women high BC is more common among less attractive (but not too ugly, either) women and those who has some personality issues. And as you s…
/r/TheRedPill09/11/23 04:48 PM
1

Playing video games and watching anime can be as social as any other hobby.
/r/TheRedPill09/11/23 09:24 AM
1

You overcomplicate things and it seems to me that you don't clearly understand what a "frame" is to begin with. Simply put, a "frame" is an "assumption" behind your actions and words, your "interpretation" of reality, whether it's false or true. There's no single "frame of a person", frames are very situational and can change in every single moment. You're holding your frame as long as you act as if "X" is true. Even kids can hold their frame and do it perfectly, even if this frame is an absurd …
/r/TheRedPill09/11/23 09:23 AM
1

I have a simple question - why would you sleep with a 4/10 in looks girl who's fun and interesting to be around, when you can sleep with a 6/10 in looks girl, or 8/10 in looks girl, who's also fun and interesting? It's not like looks and personality are mutually exclusive.
/r/seduction09/11/23 08:25 AM
0

Their actions speak for them, not me.
/r/seduction06/11/23 01:28 PM
0

You sound like a guy who never hooked up and only ever was in a couple of LTRs and thinks that ONS are bad. And unlike your assumption, mine is completely believable and realistic. Most guys who were with 100+ women think like me, not like you. There's no point in sleeping with hundreds of women if the only thing you care about is "emotional connection" and whatnot. There's no point in any seduction if you only want to find your one-itis. There are people who actually enjoy having sex with stran…
/r/seduction06/11/23 01:25 PM
0

Whether you use any metrics or not, your brain always rates people based on their percieved social value, status, money, looks, etc. For women, their looks is the main variable of their status. Binary classification doesn't reflect any variables at all. 4/10 in looks isn't fuckable to me no matter how great her personality is, but it can be to you. And if I have a choice, what stops me from finding a 9/10 girl who also has an even better personality? I'd argue that instead of the "looks scale" w…
/r/seduction05/11/23 08:02 AM
1

He reduced people to numberical ratings as well, he just reduced them even further to just two numbers, lmao. I also assume that you're a woman.
/r/seduction05/11/23 07:55 AM
2

Not really. There are also girls you would like to fuck, but only if they make it really easy for you, or compensate you somehow, like by cooking for you, etc. Girls have similar rules - some guys they fuck just for the sake of sex and because they are attracted, then others they fuck out of pity, others to get self-validation, others only if the guy is ready to commit for a relationship, etc. Some girls you would like to fuck, but only once, or to continue fucking her only if she's really good …
/r/seduction05/11/23 07:54 AM
1

What many factors you need to consider to rate how physically attracted you're to someone? It's really simple if you aren't looking for an LTR.
/r/seduction05/11/23 07:50 AM
2

Not really. Even if you simplify everything, then there's at least 3 or 4 numbers. Never smash. Smash for cash (or any other benefit, for that matter). Smash for smash, but if it isn't too hard. Smash for smash and ready to heavily invest to achieve it.
/r/seduction05/11/23 07:49 AM
1

One girl won't satisfy you sexually for the rest of your life. Monogamy is fucked, humans aren't evolutionary adapted to be together for 20+ years, our ancestors rarely survived to their thirties, so why would we be? Unless you're a guy with a naturally low libido who only needs to fuck one time per month then you will likely spend the life unsatisfied, at least if you keep being "loyal". Most guys who stay with their wives until the end just cheat in secret with hookers. The best path for a red…
/r/TheRedPill22/10/23 12:23 PM
5

It's hard for me to even comprehend how a guy could want to sleep with only one woman in his entire lifetime. It sounds absolutely crazy and wise redpillers advice the guy to keep it going, lmao.
/r/TheRedPill22/10/23 12:19 PM
3

That's not always true, actually. Most guys would rather take an average DTF girl than chase the supermodel for the slim chance of getting with her. That's even more the case for women who play a more passive role. The basic determinant of the human behavior is how great the reward and how easy it is to get it, our brain basically calculates reward/effort ratio to guide our motivation. Using your Ferrari example—how many people are actually ready to put the effort needed to buy it?
/r/TheRedPill18/10/23 03:39 PM
8

The thing is—just ignoring isn't enough, you need to control the frame all the way and be able to deal with the potential aggression as well. Obviously that depends on where you're, but just ignoring a dude and treating him like he doesn't even exist is often a sure way to get into a fight you totally don't need. If you want the guy to lose the value, then the simplest way is to tell the girl that it seems that he likes her and there's a dozens of way to go from there to completely annihilate hi…
/r/TheRedPill18/10/23 03:35 PM
2

It's not about quitting sugar, it's about quitting being fat AF. A skinny guy won't see much difference if he stops eating sugar. In fact, it can backfire at him and make him lose the little weight he has unless he replaces the lost calories one way or another. Sugar isn't that bad, it's the main source of the energy your brain consumes, the fastest of them, too. I never encountered any scientifical proof regarding the effect of the carbs and sugars on negative thinking, I eat sugar without any …
/r/TheRedPill18/10/23 03:25 PM
8

Looool, that's really not true buddy. As someone who lived in Russia for the most of his life I guarantee you that while things are easier there, it's not to the point of girls chasing guys left and right. Men are still expected to do most of the work and hot girls still reject the vast majority of guys. Also, seeing all the hot girls, especially at a gym, really raises your standards, so there's still a lot of competition for really hot girls. And there's also a surprising amount of women expec…
/r/seduction20/09/23 09:37 AM
5

Butthurt old lady detected.
/r/TheRedPill12/09/23 06:10 PM
2

Depends on where he lives. The anti-age-gap movement is especially strong in the USA, but not so much in Europe.
/r/TheRedPill12/09/23 06:09 PM
2

Maybe she went to askreddit or whatever trash sub and people there told her that your age gap is tremendous and that you're a predator, lmao. Seriously, those people live in some alternate dimension or something, some even go to claim as far as saying that 18 and 21 is too big of an age gap and is creepy. But, of course, only if man is the older one. Otherwise no one cares if a 50-year-old woman sleeps with a 18-year-old boy, other than crazy moms.
/r/TheRedPill12/09/23 06:06 PM
1

Somehow you aren't aware of the fact that people had kids way earlier before than now? Having kids before 18 was extremely common throughout human history and stopped being the norm for less than 50 years.
/r/TheRedPill12/09/23 05:17 PM
1

You need to work on your looks, your style (including your haircut), getting better qualities of photos with good filters and light. Depending on your natural attractiveness it could be harder than for most, but getting to at least 8 is possible for most guys.
/r/TheRedPill06/09/23 05:59 PM
1

If all of your photos are only 4/10 on PF then it's surprising that you can even get dates online, lol. The same guy can get 4 or 9 on PF depending on the quality and context of the photos, body language, etc.
/r/TheRedPill30/08/23 03:03 PM
1

Didn't you know? No one hooks up in America, that's a very conservative Christian country where girls usually don't have sex until marriage. Definitely won't work there.
/r/seduction30/08/23 02:58 PM
2

His example is more about social proof than anything else. He's a part of a loud group that has fun, so he "passively" attracted some girls in a pro-social setting and then just didn't fuck everything up.
/r/seduction30/08/23 02:57 PM
1

Lol, yeah. What the actual F and how did it get so many upvotes. Probably most guys didn't even read the post, just saw that it tells people that their insecurities don't matter that much and that they should work on improving themselves anyway.
/r/TheRedPill24/08/23 07:29 PM
1

Even with 2 women per 100 approaches you only need to do 10 approaches a day to fuck 6 women in a month. An average man has 6 partners in his entire lifetime.
/r/TheRedPill24/08/23 07:28 PM
1

They SAY that they want. Though, according to actual studies, shorter women want relatively shorter men than taller women do, on average. Most women who say that they want a 6ft guy never even dated one and instead dated guys shorter than that, lmao.
/r/TheRedPill24/08/23 07:25 PM
2

Here's a thing though—the older you get past 30, the harder it is to get laid with women most men really like and the less it's socially acceptable in the west. Objectively speaking, hottest women are those in their early-to-mid twenties—good luck getting them when you're in your forties. So you definitely can miss out your best years, except they are your late twenties and early thirties, instead of the early twenties like some guys think.
/r/TheRedPill06/08/23 03:55 PM
2

And this guy call this "seduction" while this is the opposite of it, lmao.
/r/seduction06/08/23 03:45 PM
2

Not really true. Attraction is, for the most part, a result of your actions, i.e. your game. You definetely can attract girls who aren't interested in you just based on your looks alone. If you cold approached a girl, unless you're really physically attractive (which isn't even a guarantee) more often than not the girl won't be interested in you just yet. Flirting, push-pull, strong frame, bantering, etc, DO create attraction in those who wouldn't be interested in you otherwise, so I'm really no…
/r/seduction06/08/23 03:43 PM
6

In my native tongue the word "creepy" means the same thing it had always meant in English - something scary in an unsettling way, like a creepy cemetery. Using this word arbitrarily for people who show sexual interest in an off-putting way and making it synonymous to harassment is a rather new thing invented in the west, probably by some feminist, so it shouldn't be treated seriously to begin with.
/r/TheRedPill16/06/23 06:40 PM
35

Yes, and no. Guys definitely care too much about what women think of them, but the reason isn't only in the self-esteem, though it is connected. Most of us don't hold themselves back when we are with our friends even though we put a certain value in what they think about us, we also know that they will accept us for who we are and we usually don't have any hidden agenda when hanging around with friends. Also, women as well care a lot about what people think about them, but this doesn't affect th…
/r/seduction10/06/23 10:50 AM
8

Lol, for this to be the case you need to be VERY ugly, like VERY VERY UGLY. Unless you look like Gollum girls wouldn't accuse you of harassment for saying hello to them.
/r/seduction10/06/23 10:35 AM
1

You shouldn't mix together long-term improvement and short-term improvement. To learn game theory you only need a month or so, to get fit you need a couple of years. And learning social skills is something you do as you talk to more girls.
/r/seduction10/06/23 10:10 AM
1

Yeah, you just need to put 80% of effort to grow 1 foot if you aren't tall enough and replace your face if it isn't handsome enough and women will approach you constantly. Lol. Anyway, you need to improve yourself either you want to bang women or not, that will affect your quality of life even more than getting laid. But going out meeting women is one of the best ways to improve your social skills to begin with.
/r/seduction10/06/23 10:06 AM
2

Online game is only for the guys with either very high SMV (mainly in terms of genetics and muscle) or for those who are very good at tweaking their photos while still having at least somehow above average looks. Day game allows you to create attraction with your game and charisma, something that can't be used online at all. So an average looking guy with high social skill will slay it offline, but will have zero success online. And vice versa, if you have great looks but can barely talk to a wo…
/r/TheRedPill10/06/23 09:10 AM
2

Just because a woman asks you something doesn't mean you need to be serious about the answer. "Lying" is a very negative word, no one will consider you a liar when you say that your job is raising kittens (you're a damn pussy farmer!) when a girl asks what do you do for a living. When a girl asks you if you like her, tell her that you like her... as a friend. Don't be so damn serious, guys. A girl isn't entitled to your serious answers. If you feel bad about joking and having fun instead of answ…
/r/TheRedPill10/02/23 08:52 AM
2

My biggest realization about women was that what they want the most isn't the guy who "won the competition" for them by impressing them and being better than any other available guy. No, what every woman wants the most is to be the one who wins the competition for a man, to feel that she was chosen. And it doesn't even matter if there's an actual competition or if it's just a guy acting like he's hot shit and making HER work for his attention. In the end she wants to feel that it's you who prefe…
/r/TheRedPill27/01/23 05:21 PM
12

Somehow guys forget about things like social proof and social status. Back in our caveman days, the one who got to bang the girls wasn't the guy with the best genetics, but the one with the highest status. Back in high school some ugly short dudes fucked hotties just because they were a part of the "cool group". Your hot looks are just markers of your universal status, but they would still lose to your status in a particular group. When my chubby friend was in college, he was one of the three gu…
/r/TheRedPill04/12/22 01:11 PM
3

That's a really low standard. Anything above 5 is already concerning if she's under 30. So it should be 1/4 of her age instead of half.
/r/TheRedPill04/12/22 12:58 PM
3

I'm so surprised that this AWALT thing is still blindly believed even when it actually contradicts to science and facts. No, women aren't the same. And yes, THERE are people who have healthy life-long relationships. Most of them never even heard of Red Pill or whatever. Some women, the same as men, have beliefs and convictions that stop them from cheating or branch swinging. If a society can make a human male—who's biologically inclined to bang as many women as he can—to stay loyal even WHEN he …
/r/TheRedPill04/12/22 12:57 PM
10

Have you ever heard about making children? Marriage isn't about banging one woman for the rest of your life. It's about raising children together. Which, btw, is much cheaper and more pleasant doing while marrying, than when you're forced to pay alimony. If you want to bang different women, just find one who'll accept one-sidedly open relationship where you sleep with others and she don't. You can't? Then raise your SMV, game, etc. Because as practice showed, if you're high value enough, then th…
/r/TheRedPill04/12/22 12:49 PM
3

The difference is the age of those who will swipe and reply. Here's a study that shows that women, in general, prefer men a few years older than them. There're many other studies with the same results. That's it. https://metro.co.uk/2019/02/22/men-regardless-age-will-always-attracted-women-early-20s-8718590/ 65-year-old man would be able to close 60-year-old women, lmao. If you're forty you'll have way harder time banging 18-year-olds than an average 18-year-old. Let's say you want to bang an 18…
/r/TheRedPill09/11/22 07:18 PM
0

It's not his advice, he literally shares HIS REAL EXPERIENCE. A guy on YT can't break down something that's grounded in what people ACTUALLY EXPERIENCE IN REAL LIFE. You should go outside sometimes and see world for yourself, instead of spending all your time online. There are ugly dudes who fuck models because of their charisma, deal with it.
/r/TheRedPill09/11/22 07:14 PM
3

Dude, all your worldview can be destroyed by a simple fact—there are many men who sucked with women... until they didn't. A guy definitely can go from an incel to a pussy slayer in just a few years. And RP has a lot of posts from guys who come through it.
/r/TheRedPill09/11/22 07:12 PM
1

To be fair, this desirability ranking is based on the entire population. If you only rate how desirable a man to women who're 18-25, then you'll find that the peak is way lower. https://metro.co.uk/2019/02/22/men-regardless-age-will-always-attracted-women-early-20s-8718590/ In this study you can see that women, in general, prefer men a few years older than them. Sure, as a 40-year-old you'll have more women interested in you than when you were twenty, but those would be post-wall women in genera…
/r/TheRedPill09/11/22 07:08 PM
11

Naaah, you don't need IOI's. The only things you need is calibration and strong frame. Always assume attraction. It's her job to prove otherwise. You'd better think about what YOU want, not trying to figure out her thoughts and desires. The thing is, a girl can treat you coldly even when she feels extremely attracted to you. And most of the attraction is also born when you follow your frame even when she reacts negatively to your actions. If you only choose girls who are DTF from the get go, the…
/r/TheRedPill09/11/22 06:54 PM
11

Women are in control of selecting only if you allow them to. In humans, both males and females select their mates. Things work exactly like in sales - the one who thinks that their offer is the best wins. Society made people believe that women have more to offer, so both men and women by default accept this as truth. Except, there're guys who KNOW that they have choice as well. Guys who have PRIDE, who're choosy and who love themselves. It's not something a random professor can understand, but i…
/r/seduction01/11/22 05:40 PM
0

It's not about being a celeb, being a K-pop guy assumes that you're hot AF looks-wise.
/r/seduction01/11/22 05:29 PM
7

This depends on what you define as "being horny". If it's the pursuit of new partners then of course, men are winning by a large extent. If it's about enjoying sex and craving it from someone who's high value to you, then women are hornier. Female orgasm is way stronger than male orgasm. Also, sexual desire is hardly just about testosterone. It's also about estrogen. And men and women have different brains, so even with the same level of hormones we'll be different. In other words, if we compare…
/r/TheRedPill05/10/22 08:56 AM
7

Biologically different parts of the brain are responsible for pleasure and pursuit. For men, sex is mostly about dopamine, meaning variety and the chase, but the pleasure part, which is about stuff like endorphins, is kind of meh to us. For women it's the other way around, they are less motivated by sex, but they get much more pleasure from it. Btw, the Sperm Wars book is full of pseudo-science and dated theories. No, human penis isn't shaped that way to pull the previous guy's sperm out. In fac…
/r/TheRedPill05/10/22 08:52 AM
0

Lmao, dude. In most cases a girl isn't going to be interested from the get go. She doesn't even know you. Unlike guys, girls can't know if they want to fuck you or to get to know you just from a single look. In OP's case the girl was surprised and maybe even a bit scared. She really acted shy and confused, not acted "non-interested". The first thing anyone needs to learn to be successful at cold approach is how to talk to a girl for a while without putting any pressure on her. In fact, that's a …
/r/seduction17/09/22 04:59 PM
6

No matter how good are your fundamentals some/most women are still won't be interested within the first couple of minutes and will try to ignore/reject you.
/r/TheRedPill13/09/22 07:08 AM
2

Looks definitely matter. If you're good looking then some women will hit on you even without any effort from your part. You'll also have a much easier time with online game. But are looks everything? Nope. Are they necessary to get laid? Again, no, unless you're batshit ugly, which you can and should change. And even then, strong game can compensate for being ugly. I know a guy who was getting hot chicks even while being treated from cancer (he survived), he looked just terrible and people (men …
/r/TheRedPill13/09/22 06:04 AM
1

Lol, "scamming into a fwb". Let me reveal a shocking truth to you - women are gatekeepers of sex, men are gatekeepers of relationships. So men chase women to have sex with them, and after that women chase men to have relationships. FWB arrangement can happen either when a woman wants an LTR, but a guy is keeping her "friendzoned", or when she isn't interested in anything serious at the moment and keeps her FWB for sex as a lover, probably someone to cheat with when she finds an actual BF. There …
/r/seduction04/09/22 09:13 AM
7

In reality most women are like this, the only difference is how far are they ready to go and with whom. Male dominance is an aphrodisiac to women.
/r/seduction12/08/22 04:43 AM
0

Fear of commitment is a myth, just an excuse in 99% of cases.
/r/seduction12/08/22 04:27 AM
1

When girls acts like this she shows that she isn't a relationship material. Period. By our biological default, having sex for a woman means risking pregnancy and is a greater investment than dating. If a girl meets you for weeks, having sex and fun with you but doesn't even try to make things serious, then she's for the streets. Such girls are good to keep as FWB, but why would you ever date one?
/r/seduction12/08/22 04:26 AM
3

I wonder what your actual numbers based on which you estimated the chances? Especially for cold approach. My Daygame stats are pretty much like yours, which is interesting considering that most guys I saw online who share their numbers bed around 2-3 girls per 100 approaches.
/r/seduction12/08/22 03:33 AM
13

You'll be surprised, but many women actually want this type of roleplay, lmao.
/r/seduction12/08/22 03:31 AM
6

Self-esteem is how you treat yourSELF. There's no reason why you should look down on yourself and treat yourself like shit. Self-esteem isn't delusion, it's a CHOICE. You can always choose how to treat yourself and you're the only one who decides what you deserve in life. You don't need any reason to love yourself, you just need to make this choice.
/r/seduction12/08/22 03:27 AM
2

The thing is, there're different ways to be an ass. You can tease girls very hard, making fun of them in a very offensive way, and they would still forgive you everything as long as you're doing it for FUN, not to compensate for your low self-esteem. Assholes get girls, that's a fact, but not all types of assholes. Those assholes that consider women "below their league", those that treat hotties like they are fatties, those that think that women should work to deserve them, all those assholes ge…
/r/seduction12/08/22 03:21 AM
7

Actually, being black pill could actually be somewhat beneficial for physically attractive guys despite the fact that the view that "looks are everything" is factually wrong. You see, when you think that you're hot shit and women are either attracted to your looks from the get go or not, and that it can't be changed by "game" you stop trying so hard to impress women, which leads to more confidence and more lays. Because, can you guess it? Confidence is the key. Or, rather, being sure that you're…
/r/seduction09/08/22 01:18 PM
1

I hope you realize that in most states of the USA (and most western countries, for that matter) the age of consent is 16. So it's not unlikely that she's dated people your age before. It's not like she's "barely legal" or your age gap is that significant. Stop caring what others think, most people don't even give a F.
/r/seduction09/08/22 12:59 PM
7

Half of the time women fuck men for validation. If she wants your attention, you already did half of the job.
/r/seduction06/08/22 06:58 AM
1

It's cool that you're taking action unlike most other guys, but 25 to 18/19 is hardly could be considered an "age gap", lol. Try 45 to 18/19 and then it's something worth worrying about. Also, you don't really need to be fit to create sexual tension, it's more about your ability to lead a conversation, teasing the girl and show yourself as a man. Looks definitely help, but but I'd say that about half of the guys who I know are good with women are fairly average, some are even fat.
/r/seduction06/08/22 06:34 AM
2

This would've been a good advice if anyone could just follow it. Most people can't just stop worrying about what others think. And when you CAN do this, you become literally superhuman in social interactions. It's one thing to care and hide it, and an entirely another to REALLY don't care emotionally. I heard this advice over and over again over the years and even gave it to others, but only recently did I realize what it truly means in practice. As an example - someone makes fun of you, instead…
/r/seduction06/08/22 06:26 AM
1

Yeah, guy, you really don't get what I'm saying. When I'm talking to a girl, I'm just showing her who I am, showing her my personality and give her value. I don't care what her initial reactions are. I don't try to get her attracted to me, I'm just showing myself - take it or leave. But a girl needs time to get to know who I am as a man. It's not something that happens instantly. This is also why people give others shit tests - to see if the person they talk to is really confident and expressing…
/r/seduction02/08/22 12:25 PM
1

Because real game isn't word-sorcery or trickery, but who you are as a person, as a man. IF you have an attractive personality, can express yourself with confidence and charisma, then yes, women are going to be attracted to you based on that even if they aren't into you from the get go. Anyone who ever seen a guy who's natural with women knows that initial reactions mean shit. Simply put, OP is factually wrong.
/r/seduction30/07/22 04:22 AM
1

If you feel that you are throwing yourself and women then you just don't have real game. The real game isn't about chasing women, it's about being a man who provokes women to chase you by being challenging and having IDGAF attitude. You can approach women without chasing them. And yes, a really good game does create attraction even in women who have zero interest in your initially. And no, women aren't "ultimate choosers", no one stops you from being choosy and have your standards. Just because …
/r/seduction30/07/22 04:19 AM
8

You didn't screw anything, dude. You mustered courage and did something that the vast majority of other guys are afraid to do. Because they are pussies and you are not. You proved that you have bigger balls than the vast majority of men, what else do you need? You already won. You got something more valuable than anything that girl can ever give you.
/r/seduction30/07/22 04:14 AM
9

You probably need to up your sex game. Also, I'm pretty much sure that all your lays came either from clubs or Tinder, you're wrong to assume that all women are going to jump your dick, or anyone's for that matter, just because they "played the game right". Women are people, you shouldn't generalize them so completely.
/r/seduction30/07/22 04:10 AM
13

It has nothing to do with them seeing him as "relationship material" or not. It's simple, really. Those girls just don't feel emotionally invested/attracted to him. They fucked him because they are the type of girls that just hookup with hot guys in clubs/online. This is why cold approach daygame rules. You have time to actually make women attracted to you emotionally. Then you can lead it to an FWB arrangement or date them, whatever you want. You're wrong in assuming that there are just two ext…
/r/seduction30/07/22 04:04 AM
1

If you weren't sub par at best with getting girls you'd know that you would eventually get to a point where women just come to you. Having to go out everytime to get laid is amateur hour. Instead of calling people who disagree with you virgin incels and trying to bring them down you should focus on trying to bring yourself up. It seems you missed my point by a very large margin... I didn't mean that I need to go out to get laid every time, lmao. What I meant is that even when you have gfs and fw…
/r/seduction30/07/22 03:47 AM
1

Lol, wtf? Are you really such a try-hard that you need to know so much to just... really, actually... teasing women for fun? What you described isn't some sort of big brain technique. That's just push-pull/teasing/ cocky&funny, something PUAs already used 20 years ago. Something you naturally do, completely AUTOMATICALLY when you don't give a shit what a woman thinks about you and are just having fun. When you're really just expressing yourself and don't treat her - or yourself, for that matter …
/r/TheRedPill21/07/22 10:07 AM
2

The difference between striking up a casual convo with a stranger, and THIS is vast. Look at what these men are advocating for. For you to go and do this THOUSANDS of times. When you start thinking of women as practice and numbers, and how many times you can get a kiss or get your dick wet IT SHOWS. You treat us differently and we can tell this isn't your first or last time doing this. You are right about it, but also wrong. There's something you don't understand about men. All healthy men are h…
/r/seduction21/07/22 09:09 AM
5

You don't seem to be that into her at this point (which is kind of obvious, considering how much time passed), so juts move on. Are you ready to spend the rest of your life with her? Based on what you wrote, definitely no. If you aren't 100% FUCK YEAH about a girl, then you shouldn't be dating her seriously. Go meet new women, have casual sex, improve your game and experience. It's guaranteed that as you develop yourself you'll meet many women who are better than your current GF.
/r/seduction21/07/22 08:46 AM
1

The only thing you need to get the hottest girls is an extremely high self-esteem. That's it. Everyone else is just a bonus or a way for you to get a high self-esteem.
/r/seduction21/07/22 06:44 AM
3

Most popular spots for "sex tourism" in Eastern Europe were Kiev and Moscow, but I think now that would be quite problematic to get there, especially to Kiev...
/r/seduction21/07/22 06:42 AM
0

Porn reveals basic biological and psychological tendencies in people, men and women (for example women search for rough sex way more because most men are too blue pill for that shit). And no, most people who consume it are just regular guys. If you weren't a virgin, then you'd know that even when you have girls to fuck, sometimes you just feel too lazy to meet any of them. And guys in LTR watch porn and jerk off all the time because it's not possible for one girl to fully satisfy a guy with heal…
/r/seduction21/07/22 06:38 AM
2

If you feel uncomfortable and unsafe when an attractive person is hitting on them, then the problem is in you and you should change. If you're uncomfortable with someone breathing the same air as you, does it mean that people should stop breathing? No. Being negative about being approached by a man and him complimenting you or showing his interest otherwise is just you being weird. No, approaching women isn't creepy. Yes, cold approach does get men results they want to. And yes, most women do lo…
/r/seduction21/07/22 06:26 AM
2

Lmao, in most cases desperation has nothing to do with banging taken chicks. This shit is more about dominance and superiority, fucking someone else's chick automatically puts you above that guy, because the girl preferred your dick over his. This is primal shit like winning someone in a fight or at sport. Plus, immorality of the situation always adds to sexual excitement, just like outdoor sex. For this reason cheating porn is one of the most popular, the same as pseudo-incest. Sex with a taken…
/r/seduction20/07/22 05:46 AM
1

When it comes to pictures, there's more to it than them being professionally made or you having fun. I'd say that the fastest way to check if your photos are good would be using photofeeler and test dozens upon dozens of photos until you get some that put you at least at 9/10. Also, I would say that getting a lay on the first date isn't that hard or uncommon. It depends on a girl, some actually expect you to bring them to your place at the first meeting and/or even ready to go directly to your p…
/r/seduction20/07/22 05:35 AM
2

Online dating is less effective than cold approach. Especially if you aren't that good-looking and don't have amazing photos.
/r/seduction20/07/22 05:32 AM
2

PUA movement was destroyed by feminism. It started from the fall of RSD and now pickup is replaced by "self-development", which isn't a bad thing actually. There a lot of resources on youtube.
/r/seduction20/07/22 05:31 AM
3

That's not really an advice. Not much different from "just be yourself and you'll get laid" or something. If it wasn't "that complicated" then most guys wouldn't have any problem getting laid as much as they want. The actual process of getting girl isn't hard, what hard is the inner or outer change. You need to be either naturally confident and charismatic, and/or good-looking (which includes your body and style). Developing either of those qualities or both requires some hard work.
/r/seduction20/07/22 05:29 AM
7

None of that push pull, neg, shit testing, Dhv story pick up stuff. Those are just tools that imitate what high value guys do. Negs are mostly used to open chicks that would simply ignore you otherwise. Shit testing is something that girls do, not you, and they're going to do it either you know about the concept of ST or not. In the same way you don't even need to know about them to pass them, as long as you're a cool guy you'll pass all tests without any effort. Push pull, a real one, is just a…
/r/seduction20/07/22 05:26 AM
2

Cold approach is the easiest way to get a lot of women. And probably the only way if you aim for the quantity and quality all at once. It's not the easiest way to get a girlfriend, though, sure. Any loser can get a gf from his social circle, if he has one. But cold approach and online dating are basically the only two ways to sleep with dozens if not hundreds of women. You'll just need to take a lot of action. Online dating isn't for everyone, though, you should be at least above average in look…
/r/seduction29/06/22 07:05 AM
1

learning curve is so steep that it would take me years to even get a number, and I doubt any dates I would get from it would be any more attractive than what I'm used to getting from apps, which usually weren't anything to write home about Lol, where did you learn this kind of bs? Learning curve isn't steep. If you're lucky enough, you can get your first number from your first approach. The real problem with cold approach is that if you aren't attractive and confident enough, you'll be bedding l…
/r/seduction29/06/22 07:01 AM
1

Well yeah, an exception. And OP approached many women before he met this one reporting him. No one said that all women are like this.
/r/seduction29/06/22 06:56 AM
10

You should learn the actual definition of the word harassment if you think that saying "hi" or giving a compliment is considered one. That, and also a therapy session probably won't hurt.
/r/seduction27/06/22 09:09 AM
1

Not really. "Help with dating, with a focus on how to get something started up, whether the goal is casual sex or a relationship. "
/r/seduction27/06/22 09:00 AM
6

Also, just a hint, but try to avoid women who are too old or below 6/10 in looks. Below average girls are insecure, especially fat ones. And so they would rather use your approach to boost their self-esteem by humiliating you in one way or another.
/r/seduction27/06/22 08:58 AM
6

You are what is wrong with the western world, Sarah. You ARE the problem.
/r/seduction27/06/22 08:57 AM
7

Lmao, there was a guy who literally helped a girl to fix her car and she falsely accused him of sexual harassment. She was ugly, too. Some people have a screw loose and will use any opportunity to flex their social power. In OP's case imagine how powerful the girl feels by making a guy restricted from visiting a mall just because of her whim.
/r/seduction27/06/22 08:54 AM
1

There are guys that don't use any strategies. They just do what the heck they want - they tease women because it's so damn fun, they touch them because they want, and they lead towards sex because that's what their instincts tell them. If you think that you need some kind of tactics, you're already in the wrong frame of mind.
/r/seduction16/06/22 10:39 AM
1

Have you ever thought that there are men who are attractive by themselves, their personalities? And that many of them don't "treat women with respect", by which you just mean pretending that you don't want to fuck women, from what I read. Women totally love to be seen as sexy and they totally love being sexually desired, as long as they find the man attractive. There are men who just have casual sex with many women and are LOVED by them. And among them, a lot of guys don't treat women particular…
/r/seduction16/06/22 10:37 AM
1

Show YOURSELF, not your intent, not your attempts to chase. Just show you WHO you are as a man by expressing yourself in the way that YOU like. The problem isn't women, the problem is men who try too hard to sell themselves to them, leaving women with no choice but to be choosy.
/r/seduction16/06/22 10:28 AM
1

Dude, I'm not speaking about my personal experience, but about countless studies and statistics gathered by the online dating apps.
/r/seduction11/06/22 02:33 PM
2

You don't quite understand evolutionary biology of humans. She got high quality genes from the OP. In the wild that would mean that now she needs to find a cuck to give her parental care. IDK why, but somehow many guys in the TRP community think that women just want to date high value men. . . Well, that would be a great but completely unrealistic reproductive strategy, which is why it's not as biologically grounded as "alpha fucks, beta bucks". The girl feels good at getting high quality genes …
/r/TheRedPill11/06/22 02:30 PM
0

Are you from Atlantis or Narnia? That would make sense why your world is so different from the real one, then. . .
/r/seduction11/06/22 02:08 PM
2

If your advice for guys is to looksmax using cosmetics for online dating then you aren't wrong. But from your post and replies it can be easily misunderstood that you're just whining that "without being born with good genes you have no chance as a man".
/r/seduction11/06/22 02:06 PM
0

I aleady called 911 to you, don't worry I won't leave you without help
/r/seduction11/06/22 02:03 PM
2

Except, being attracive as a man isn't about your looks alone. Not even close. To get girls with your looks alone you need to be like top 1-2% in terms of looks, which is obviously impossible for most guys. But being a real man instead of a pussy like most of the males is going to put you in the top 1% in terms of attractviness just based on your personality. And when it comes to Tinder, your style and the type of photos you do (their context) is more than half of the success. As long a you're a…
/r/seduction11/06/22 01:37 PM
0

Boy, just think for a moment. . . if most women aren't sluts, it means that they don't sleep with every guy who hits on them. And as a result, they reject most guys who make advances on them. . . Which leads to a very obvious and logical conclusion that nope, most guys aren't getting laid left and right. Because most women have standards and are choosy, okay? I only state obvious facts, proven by literally hundreds of social studies and statistics. If you find real world facts embarrassing, then…
/r/seduction11/06/22 01:15 PM
0

Mm. . . So you're implying that most women are sluts who sleep with all random guys they met? That's the only explanation I can think of why you think that most men can easily get hookups whenever they want, lmao. Pro tip: whenever someone mentions incels, it makes others think that he's one himself. Some of them go as far as lying to others that they and everyone they know can easily get laid, while it can't be further from truth.
/r/seduction11/06/22 08:11 AM
1

You can work to improve yourself to stop being a loser, or you can work on yourself just to be a better man, a man you want to be. There's a big, very big difference. In the first case, you are doing this out of desperation and low self-esteem. In the second, you're doing it out of self-love and respect, because you KNOW that you deserve to be the best version of yourself. You will never feel good enough with your mentality. Self-love and self-respect should come first. Your "loser self" isn't r…
/r/seduction11/06/22 08:03 AM
1

Lmao, I don't blame anyone and I get laid more than an average guy. And I worked on myself to achieve this. For a man to succeed at dating he NEEDS to be way above average, that's just a fact of life. Most guys are desperate to get sex and / or gf and it's hard for them that's just common sense, denying it is no different from denying that Earth is a geoid. When it comes to getting sex, women have it about ten times easier, period.
/r/seduction11/06/22 08:01 AM
1

That just means that you're 1% of guys, lmao. Well, only if it was an actual truth.
/r/seduction11/06/22 07:54 AM
0

IDK, in which country men have 100+ women on average? I never heard of such countries. And this would be the case in any country where men can "easily get hookups". Nope. Only top 5% of men can get hookups "somewhat easily". Just google "data is beautiful reddit tinder" to see real-world statistics for guys in online dating. It's like 1 date per 1000 swipes if you're lucky.
/r/seduction11/06/22 07:52 AM
6

I'm not sure where you get your confidence while spouting such ridiculous claims. Most guys definitely aren't looking for love at first date, lmao. Not even when they are fifteen. And most women neither. When it comes to online dating, then I'd say that 95% of men and 70% of women do, indeed, search for someone who's pretty and fun to be around. Heck, the same is true for dating IRL as well. No one in their right mind expects to fall in love within 3 dates. In most cases, love is something that …
/r/seduction07/06/22 05:15 PM
7

Your explanation doesn't make sense considering that she was enthusiastic just before the meeting and literally nothing changed. She felt the chemistry after the first date, so the spark was there. And your assumption is almost certainly wrong. In 99% of cases a guy isn't going to lose his attraction because of something abstract like "chemistry". A girl needs to seriously fuck up to lose a guy who didn't even sleep with her yet, at least if he finds her physically attractive. I never heard of a…
/r/seduction07/06/22 05:08 PM
2

Let me reveal a secret to you. The greatest commodity that all women need is emotions. Not your perfect abs, or your wallet. The guys who get the most women aren't those who try to compete for them. They are those who act like buyers instead of sellers. Which gives women powerful emotions. Those are guys for whom women NEED to compete if they want to get them. If you make a woman actually put effort into proving herself to you and seducing you, she'd be happy to be fucked by you. She would feel …
/r/seduction07/06/22 04:28 PM
1

It seems you didn't get my point, dude. I never said anything about stopping self-improvement. Just, instead of working on improving your "mask" that you show people, you should work on improving your real self. Which are completely different things. And you can't even start working on your real self if you never show it to others. It's like improving yourself as a professional vs improving yourself at being good at interviews. If you're a high level professional, you don't even need to go to in…
/r/seduction07/06/22 03:44 PM
1

It's a choice. You can choose to define yourself based on the outside things like success with money, women, whatever. It's 100% a choice people make. Not a necessary one. There are other people, for example religious zealots, who define themselves on other factors. For them, being a billionaire isn't cool. For them, if you are sleeping with many women, you're just a pitiful loser who's going to be tortured in afterlife. . . As you see, this shit is completely subjective. You don't need to have …
/r/seduction07/06/22 03:41 PM
1

You can be yourself in some aspects and still hold yourself back in others. For example, you're probably hiding your sexual interest from girls and don't try to get closer to them. Pursuing what you want is a part of expressing yourself.
/r/seduction05/06/22 02:36 PM
1

Yes and no. If your current self sucks, like you have low self-esteem, are grumpy, and can't have fun, then yeah, you need to change yourself. But you should make the real change instead of trying to pretend to be someone who you are not. And you should make this change for yourself, to become a better person and have a more enjoyable life, rather than to get acceptance from others. And even then, if your current self sucks, you'll still have many people attracted to you, girls who're as boring …
/r/seduction05/06/22 02:33 PM
1

It's actionable, but probably not to people with low self-esteem or distorted worldview. If you have a normal self-esteem and think that you deserve the best in your life, then you just need to change your values a bit. From pursuing sex at any cost to screening for women who accept you for who you are. It's just a choice you can make if you want to. It's the same like some people choose to pursue relationships while others pursue casual sex.
/r/seduction05/06/22 02:29 PM
1

Being an abuser isn't about being yourself. In fact, most bad things people do result from the fact that they aren't being true to who they are. Let me explain—why people abuse their partners? Because they are insecure and jealous. They don't follow my advice, which is—screening people, instead of chasing them. If a guy follows my advice and, let's say, he tells his gf that she shouldn't party at night with her male friends, then it would be the end of their relationship. She went against the bo…
/r/seduction05/06/22 02:26 PM
5

A very good addition to the post. Yeah, maybe I should make a post about this as well. I think that self-esteem IS A CHOICE. Most people base their self-esteem on "real things" like their job, status, looks, etc. While, in reality, nothing stops you from loving and accepting yourself RIGHT NOW, whether you have all those things or not. You can pursue money, athletic body, and women because you think they'll add to your personal value, which you currently lack. Like "I'm a loser now, but if I get…
/r/seduction05/06/22 02:17 PM
1

You shouldn't treat dating like an interview for a job. Or rather, you can, but if you view yourself as the one who does the interviewing and decide if the girl is cool enough to be a part of your life. Money, muscles, proper hygiene, etc, are things you should do for yourself. No one enjoys being stinky. BTW, if you're sure in your skills, then yeah, you'll also be the one who's choosing where he wants to work. And guess what, when you're needy for a job and is ready to do everything you're ask…
/r/seduction05/06/22 02:12 PM
2

I don't study anything and do zero adjustments. I'm always me. The same I'm with my friends and family, for the most part. If a girl isn't attracted to that, then I don't need her in my life, period. That's literally what I wrote in the post. There's no such a thing as "being rejected" because I'm not offering anything. I'm just showing her who I am and she either accept it or not. It's "my way or highway", no compromises. When I'm with a girl, I'm having fun and enjoying myself, getting in her …
/r/seduction04/06/22 04:00 PM
13

I don't think so. Most people don't even know how to be themselves with their friends, let alone with women. To express yourself freely you first need stop caring about what others think, which is something impossible for most. Any guy who's actually doing it is instantly more attractive than 95% of men.
/r/seduction04/06/22 03:52 PM
5

Proper natural game will give you way more than any technical game ever will. Most outer game guys don't even believe when you share with them the actual statistics natural guys have.
/r/seduction04/06/22 03:41 PM
1

Todd actually does, at least for his online courses.
/r/seduction04/06/22 03:39 PM
2

This is why he mentioned personal coaches. A high level personal coach can easily cost you more than $4500 for three days, especially if you want him to make a personalized program for you. Todd is basically the most famous (among the active ones) outer game PUA in the world. Very famous famous fitness coaches take like ten times of what he's asking for. The only thing what matters is if his bootcamp actually gives results. And if it, let's say, allows you to sleep with 10 women in a year, havin…
/r/seduction04/06/22 03:38 PM
2

To his defense, it is a very, very old video and his game has changed completely since then. But yeah, the outer game approach is extremely flawed at its core.
/r/seduction04/06/22 02:54 PM
9

That's probably the biggest bs I ever read on this sub, lmao. If you know how to interact with people without being needy and chasing it doesn't matter if they "reject" you because there's nothing to reject, you're just having fun. All of it depends on how you frame their reactions. If you're a cool guy, there's no such thing as a rejection, just incompatibility.
/r/seduction01/06/22 08:23 AM
4

Who cares if a woman considers that sex is "free or not", it's always up to you what you give or don't give her. Nothing stops OP from just continuing using her for sex only. If he doesn't have any feelings it doesn't matter at all. It's not like he cares about her having a BF, he's more shocked about her being a cheating bitch who feels zero guilt for her actions. To me it seems more about empathy towards the other guy than about "oh no, she found someone new". Him being jealous towards a cuck …
/r/TheRedPill01/06/22 08:09 AM
3

There's no actual equality when it comes to marriage and children, though. Not even close.
/r/TheRedPill01/06/22 07:51 AM
13

Allows, yes. Because it was (and to some extent, IS) a war-focused religion and after a war there are more men than women, so obviously there would be men having more than one wife. But a man was still obliged to provide for his women and women had no right to sleep with other men under a threat of death, often. The strategy to "just fuck and then hope that she'll find a cuck to provide for your children" was almost completely obliterated. Just, instead of providing for one woman and her kids, y…
/r/TheRedPill28/05/22 03:59 PM
32

https://psmag.com/environment/17-to-1-reproductive-success I'm not OP, but that's a common fact. Except, it wasn't "during the last 8k years", but rather just 8k years ago. Obviously, after Christianity and Islam became dominant religions things changed a lot as society started to actively enforce monogamy.
/r/TheRedPill27/05/22 12:51 PM
2

Because that fat guy is confident and fun to be around, he makes girl feel strong emotions and challenges them, making them strive for validation. Real Chad is someone who has BOTH looks and right attitude, men like that are extremely rare. And most of them don't even feel the need to approach or fuck too many women, they fuck maybe 10 girls per year, but those girls are of the highest quality.
/r/seduction19/05/22 10:02 AM
2

Sorry to disappoint you, but in humans there's competition both for female and male partners. Both men and women participate in selection. The problem with most guys is that they pre-select women just based on their looks without having any higher standards.
/r/seduction13/05/22 01:44 PM
0

The most successful guys don't even have rejection as a concept. To be rejected you should offer something first. If you're just expressing yourself then there's nothing to reject to begin with.
/r/seduction13/05/22 01:42 PM
2

Let me guess - you live in a hood?
/r/seduction13/05/22 01:41 PM
2

Sorry, but if looks were everything that matters then my fat friend (and I, for that matter) would have zero success. Except he does fuck model-looking women and so do I.
/r/seduction13/05/22 11:20 AM
7

Attachment to the outcome comes from your ego. If you believe that fucking hot women adds to your value as a man and being rejected by hot women decreases it, then you will be attached to the outcome emotionally. If your motivation for sex is to get validation and raise your self-esteem, you'll stay attached no matter what kind of mental shenanigans you do or how many plates you're spinning. That's probably my biggest and most important realization in the game. When you pursue sex and women not …
/r/TheRedPill07/05/22 06:27 AM
2

Okay, go approach 100 random women on the street and ask them if they want to bang you, don't forget to share your results later.
/r/seduction07/05/22 05:29 AM
1

Have you read my post or only the first two sentences you quoted? If you, as a complete stranger, approach a random woman and ask her if she wants to go out with you, she'll see you as a crazy person. You need anywhere from a few minutes to a few hours to show her who you are to trigger any significant attraction. And, if you have actual standards, to figure out if SHE is going to be worth your time, either. Attraction isn't instant as long as your standards are more than just looks.
/r/seduction07/05/22 05:28 AM
2

Read my post again, you missed the point. Women aren't attracted to men from the get go because there's nothing to be attracted to initially other than your looks, which alone aren't enough. She needs to know WHO you are as a man and as a person to feel emotional and, yes, physical attraction.
/r/seduction07/05/22 05:25 AM
21

Yes and no. Unlike men, most women need some time to figure out if you're attractive to them. Especially if a guy doesn't have a solid game that could show his confidence and personality in the first couple minutes of the interaction. For an average guy it takes at least half an hour for a girl to start feeling attracted. Even if you have great looks, a girl still wants to figure out if you're wimpy or needy before investing in you emotionally. It's not about chasing women, but about giving it e…
/r/seduction06/05/22 01:38 PM
3

First of all, check PlayingFire, the only decent Tinder advice I've seen. Second, your opener doesn't matter that much, your profile is like 80-90% of success.
/r/seduction04/05/22 05:49 AM
1

There's something that should be added—women have actually two objectives. One to secure good genes, another to secure a man who is going to take care of her and the offspring. And not always those men are the same. In fact, ideally for her, they would be different people. And men have two jobs as a result, as well. You either go high risk high reward by fucking many women and hoping that they find someone else to take care of them and children, or you secure a long-term partner who can be trust…
/r/seduction04/05/22 04:49 AM
3

That's not a very effective approach for one simple reason—you try to sit on two chairs, and fail to secure either. You should either go full sociopath with technical game, detaching yourself emotionally for the sake of effectiveness, or go full natural game and become actually attractive man, saying FY to techniques and tricks. Most guys who succeed with technical game are on the spectrum. "Self is shining through" only when you're actually try to stay yourself while using techniques, if you're…
/r/seduction04/05/22 04:34 AM
1

Because women aren't making conscious choice. They are lead by their emotions. And it's up to you to make her feel attracted to you. If she's attracted to you, right now, then she won't care about a "better guy" who isn't talking to her at that moment. Also, charisma is way rarer than good looks. I'd say less than 1 men in 100 is actually somewhere close to having attractive confident personality.
/r/seduction04/05/22 04:31 AM
2

Dude, I tasted LITERALLY a male model photo on Photofeeler and it got only 4/10 in attractiveness rating because it was shirtless bathroom selfie. Then I tasted a proper photo of the same guy and got, like 9.7/10. Yeah, all men can optimize lightning, angles, body language and context. But 99% of them don't because they either don't know what's attractive or don't even realize that those things matter. I myself have 3/10 photos and 9/10 photos.
/r/seduction13/04/22 09:11 AM
1

It's not about a photo being blurry, it's more about context and body language.
/r/seduction12/04/22 07:48 AM
3

There's no secret in "getting laid like a normal person". I.e. being attractive enough to find a girlfriend or let's say sleep with 5 average girls per year. If you want more than that, then you need to learn how to be confident, hold frame, all this stuff along other things. To get above average results you need to be an above average person in something.
/r/seduction23/03/22 02:21 PM
1

This has nothing to do with female/male, just biology.
/r/TheRedPill09/03/22 03:03 PM
15

There's no such thing as design, only biology. And biologically women do love high value men. End of discussion. The problem here is that love is rarely mutual because you should place someone on a pedestal to love them romantically/passionately. It's different from family love, obviously.
/r/TheRedPill09/03/22 12:23 PM
3

Getting laid is never the actual goal. It's just a means to an end. What end do you pursue? Getting your dick wet? Having fun time with women? Perhaps getting your basic needs met so you could pursue your ACTUAL life goals and passions? Before starting going out and meet women you should first understand why you're doing this in the first place. And your motivation is better not to be something pathetic.
/r/TheRedPill09/03/22 12:19 PM
2

No, that's not about only the quality of a photo but even more about your expression. And that's also how women actually rate men on Tinder, so what do you mean by "no point using"? The fact is - for women your attractiveness is as much about the context of the photo and its quality as your looks.
/r/seduction03/03/22 07:43 AM
1

The thing about the studies that display that women find 80% of men unattractive is that for a woman to consider a man as attractive she needs more information than a man needs to decide if a woman is hot. Actually, according to studies women consider 80% of men below average, 15% average and 5% above average, but those are studies done in social media with women rating photos. What does it mean? It doesn't mean that women consider most men ugly fuckers and that they only want to fuck the 5% of …
/r/TheRedPill21/02/22 06:14 AM
9

The thing about the studies that display that women find 80% of men unattractive is that for a woman to consider a man as attractive she needs more information than a man needs to decide if a woman is hot. Actually, according to studies women consider 80% of men below average, 15% average and 5% above average, but those are studies done in social media with women rating photos. What does it mean? It doesn't mean that women consider most men ugly fuckers and that they only want to fuck the 5% of …
/r/TheRedPill21/02/22 06:13 AM
1

There's a thin line between teasing a guy and using him for your self-amusement and being a dick to him. Being a dick assumes aggression and insecurity, teasing assumes playfulness and confidence. Just put the guy in whatever frame you chose for him.
/r/seduction15/02/22 06:57 AM
1

It's better to ask the guy "are you into her? do you find her cute? I think she's not half bad, what about you? how would you rate her? etc, etc", those sort of questions that require him to "confess" what he thinks of a girl (protip: guys like that never going to be straightforward about their feelings, they are friends for a reason), that is going to put him in a super awkward position, lmao.
/r/seduction15/02/22 06:54 AM
2

Depends on what you consider "rude". If you're a confident guy with a strong frame then such situations would pose zero problem to you. You can tease the guy, involve him in the conversation, put him on spotlight. In most cases he'd leave you alone in a hurry as soon as you start teasing him, lmao. But then again, if you know how to hold your frame and be confident then you don't need to ask anyone for advise. You always know what you need—want—to do. In OP's case that was a male friend, btw, bu…
/r/seduction15/02/22 06:50 AM
0

Bruh, you seriously have mental problems go see a therapist. I mean therapist, not THE rapist, btw. Don't get it wrong or else your wife's boyfriend would be sad. Also the real win for a man is to be a sexfriend or a casual fling, even incels don't dream of being a boyfriend. You, of all people, should have known it from the experience.
/r/seduction10/02/22 08:23 AM
5

Many people who self-identify as gay are actually bisexual. I never heard of a real gay man wanting to "experiment with a woman"—his dick doesn't even gets hard at a woman, so this would be meaningless. The same goes for bona fide lesbians, you can't make them wet.
/r/seduction08/02/22 01:17 PM
0

Good luck deluding yourself, dude. I hope the boyfriend of your wife will give her the time of a day. Unless her bf is me, then I'll make her break up with you for spouting nonsense, lmao.
/r/seduction08/02/22 12:24 PM
0

LMAO, I have way more sex than an average man. More than this, I know the reason why most men struggle and how they can solve it. I guarantee you that my romantic life is better than yours. Of course people can have "quality", this is what "having standards" mean. I can afford having standards, as most "high quality" men do. I don't need to accept each woman with her problems, I can just choose someone who already suits my preferences. I don't need to date a 35-year-old overweight single mother …
/r/seduction07/02/22 11:39 AM
0

Let me guess, you're either a high body-count woman or someone who dated one?
/r/seduction05/02/22 06:07 AM
2

Lol. 99% of questions are asked because people are so frigging lazy that they don't read top posts in the sub. Pretty much everything you need to know about seduction is already here. There are guides for EACH step, just use the search! All questions are already answered! Those genuine questions wouldn't have existed if people weren't too lazy to actually read the sub. Instead, they are going to ask the same question for 100th time and receive the same answer.
/r/seduction04/02/22 03:40 AM
2

It depends on what kind of porn you watch. Some male actors DO show how to have good dominant sex (but unless you are in decent physical form you won't be able to repeat their feats) which most women love and even crave. And yes, oral sex is also often depicted in porn as well, including eating pussy. But the thing is - most guys just skip foreplay when they watch porn. They just find a scene they like and get themselves to orgasm in a couple of minutes. Porn can be used to learn how to last lon…
/r/seduction04/02/22 03:17 AM
-4

Porn can cause addiction. The same as alcohol. But alcohol also can be good for your health in right doses. The same as porn.
/r/seduction04/02/22 03:05 AM
0

Lol, my point is the same from the beginning, it's just that for some reason it's too hard for you to comprehend simple logic.
/r/seduction04/02/22 02:47 AM
1

Of course she can. And a girl can be a trans despite having big tits. Everything is possible, but you claimed that there's no correlation and everything is random, which is not the case.
/r/seduction03/02/22 02:35 PM
0

Yeah, a conservative girl from a religious family who tries her best to keep her virginity until marriage is totally going to dress like a slut. Yeaaaaah... This is definitely not a random factor, lol. Your style definitely reflects your worldview and values more often than not.
/r/seduction03/02/22 02:25 PM
8

Barely any porn has proper verbal submission/domination, but often it does show how to have physically dominant sex. What I described is about attitude, but you can continue with your "I'll be a good boy to please my queen" mentality if you wish. No one stops you.
/r/TheRedPill03/02/22 02:23 PM
10

Lol, no. Being good in bed isn't about "putting a woman first". It's about making her react and ENJOY those reactions. You still put yourself first. But if you are in touch with your inner masculinity then making a girl cum using your mouth or fingers does give you the sense of power and dominance. And this is the way women want it to be done. Not with the attitude "let's please my queen by sucking her dick clit". But with "I'm the boss of your orgasm, call me daddy if you want to cum and then I…
/r/TheRedPill03/02/22 09:01 AM
0

If your girl is a starfish then just TELL her what you want her to do. Command her, if you wish. If she doesn't follow your lead and still does nothing then it means she's just not that much into you. In fact, I'd say that in practice submissive girls are the best in bed, way better than proactive ones. But only if you, as a man, is actually know what you're doing. If you yourself are inexperienced then a proactive girl is going to be better because you can't take the lead properly.
/r/seduction03/02/22 06:25 AM
2

Being a freak in the bed and having a high body count is only loosely related. If at all. A girl being good in bed is more about her actually making efforts to improve and learn. And this is something more easily done in a long-term relationship. A girl who's hooking up a lot has less opportunity to learn how to be good at sex than a girl having a loving relationship.
/r/seduction03/02/22 06:23 AM
-1

It's about probability not absolutes. Everything is possible, but a girl who dress like a complete slut has a much higher chance of being an actual slut. Well duh. Everything is possible, but looks do reflect personality and life choices to a certain extent.
/r/seduction03/02/22 06:20 AM
2

Statistically, the hotter a woman is the lower her body-count. The main reason why women end up having high body count is that they try to win a lottery of getting a really attractive guy above their league by casually fucking him. There are women who actually enjoy casual sex just for the experience alone, but those are the minority and usually are nymphos. Or fatties who do it to improve their self-esteem. In most cases, though, it's just a lottery. She doesn't have a reason to not try because…
/r/seduction03/02/22 06:19 AM
2

Having the guts to invite girl to your place or ask for sex from the get go is already a display of your confidence, which, guess what, is an attractive quality. But if you do this not because you have high self-esteem and confidence but because you read that this can help you get laid on reddit then of course it would be different.
/r/TheRedPill28/01/22 05:28 AM
2

The main reason is that you and them have fundamentally different mindsets about women. If this sort of guy tries to approach and do the same, he'd treat it as a "trick" to get laid that's going to either work or not. Most guys unconsciously know that they have no value to women by themselves, so they need something to compensate. Some compensate with friendship, some with "game". On the other hand, it's obviously not the best way to interact with women for a simple reason that she doesn't truly…
/r/TheRedPill28/01/22 05:03 AM
3

You don't understand why this work, aren't you? It works because you show that you are a bold and confident man who doesn't hide his intentions. Most guys are little bitches terrified of women, they want validation and can't be true to themselves. What you show to women with making "convenient excuses to touch them"? That you are insecure, that they can control you with their approval/disapproval, that you are a weak male and, as a result, weak genes. Being direct with women, inviting them to yo…
/r/TheRedPill28/01/22 04:58 AM
2

Yeah. Just don't be nervous and tryhard. Change your mindset from trying to impress them to showing them who you are, your personality, express yourself. And then leave it to them to decide for themselves if they find you attractive. It doesn't matter if they like you or not if your purpose isn't to get laid or seduce them, but to express yourself and leave the rest to their own will. Just show them your personality and then it's up to them if they find your attractive. Why would you need a pers…
/r/seduction28/01/22 04:46 AM
2

It makes me sick and i feel like the only way to change peoples perception of me is to be successful. More than them. LMAO, good luck trying to prove yourself to people who don't respect you instead of actually letting them know their place by standing up for yourself.
/r/TheRedPill28/01/22 03:11 AM
1

Depends on what you define as chasing. If we talk about her chasing you to have sex at any cost, then of course it's not gonna happen so fast. But she's totally gonna chase you for validation if the way you act and treat her invalidate her value. In practice it looks like you approach a girl, tease her to hell just for self-amusement, and then she isn't going to let you just leave even if you try, lol. She will try to talk to you, often with her weak attempts at humor and teasing you back(though…
/r/TheRedPill26/01/22 01:38 AM
6

You can take initiative without chasing. Take initiative to meet people, women included. Take initiative to approach women and tease them, showing your confidence and IDGAF attitude. Chasing isn't as much about actions, as it's about sub-communication of you NEEDING her and her vagina to feel good about yourself. Men are basically conditioned to treat sex as a prize and doing whatever women want or expect them to do to get this tasty pussy. Which obviously isn't what makes women wet and horny fo…
/r/TheRedPill25/01/22 06:24 AM
14

Have you missed the thing about "expressing yourself with confidence"? I'm not gigachad by any stretch of the definition, but I fuck more than anyone else I know IRL. And, even more importantly, I never feel bad when interacting with women. This approach is the only real way to achieve true outcome independence, self-respect, standards, and enjoy interacting with women. Instead of feeling pathetic after each "rejection" and trying to find the best way to trick women into sleeping with you. Or de…
/r/TheRedPill25/01/22 04:17 AM
59

Let me share some secret potent shit with you. If you want to get real results and don't suffer from all the "rejections" then you need to completely change the way you view interacting with women. You don't approach them to get laid, or to prove yourself, or to impress her with how cool you are. No. Approach women to show them who you are (by expressing yourself with confidence) and give them the chance to chase YOU. And then you just choose among those who chases you. CHOOSE, DON'T CHASE. Ther…
/r/TheRedPill25/01/22 03:44 AM
8

Have you read so much outer game nonsense that you started to believe that "what you say" matters more than your frame, mood and overall attractiveness? You can open girls with literally anything, it doesn't matter. What matters is who you are as a person and how you present yourself overall.
/r/seduction22/01/22 12:45 PM
3

It's not really true, most women who have casual sex don't know what makes them choose a guy other than him being "fun" and "hot". She can tell you to be fun but she doesn't know how teasing works. She can tell you to have great photos on Tinder but she doesn't know what it entails. So you can get a lot of generic "mostly right" advice that is just not practical.
/r/seduction19/01/22 01:50 PM
3

It depends on what you want to know. If you want to know how to have casual sex with a lot of women then listening to one is stupid. No woman can know what it takes for a man to have a lot of casual sex other than basic things like looks. If you want to ask them for relationship advice or for sex advice then it is indeed possible that a woman would know the answer.
/r/seduction19/01/22 01:43 PM
4

Confidence also means having the courage to go for what and who you want. So... being too scared to approach girls isn't confident by default.
/r/seduction19/01/22 12:37 PM
1

I live in Eastern Europe. One of my high school classmates was from a family with a lot of children. His father was alcoholic and had no job. His mother was working full time while also doing most of the chores and taking care of children. And you know, their situation isn't that unique. Another my friend lived with a girl who earned twice as much as him (he caught up to her later, though). I know at least three couples like this. IDK for sure how things are in the west, but it's not uncommon he…
/r/seduction19/01/22 12:32 PM
1

This post would have been more popular 5-10 years ago when this was still sub about pickup and when most guys here weren't blue pill simps.
/r/seduction19/01/22 12:16 PM
3

Do you realize that there ARE women who don't sleep around, right? Including those who don't use Tinder, lol.
/r/seduction17/01/22 05:01 AM
6

Emotional investment is a skill. If you want you can make yourself invested in most girls you meet. Or uninvested as well. It's something that comes with experience and understanding of your own preferences and emotions.
/r/seduction16/01/22 04:56 AM
6

Also, she might have sex with you because you teased the hell out of her and got her so worked up that the sex was the only way for her to get relief. She might have sex because she feels even unconsciously that you are better than her, and this is a way to "even the playing field." Or something. Or, you (or someone else, even unrelated to anything sexual) otherwise made her feel like shit, and sex is a way for her to feel better. All of this makes her physically attracted to you, though. By def…
/r/TheRedPill16/01/22 04:50 AM
11

He also should do DNA test, especially for the last kid.
/r/TheRedPill16/01/22 04:39 AM
-5

Sex is as monotonous or varied as you make it to be, though. Check Sex God Method to see some common ways to make sex more interesting both for you and the girl emotion-wise. Then there's tantra and all sorts of interesting techniques. And of course the length of your sessions plays an important role, too. If I had a boring vanilla 5-10 minutes-long sex with every girl I'd be disappointed in sex, too.
/r/seduction16/01/22 04:29 AM
-1

And those who need all of this just go for hentai and games.
/r/seduction16/01/22 04:22 AM
1

Why? Because we know if a girl is attractive just from one look. For a girl, our looks is just a part of what's women considered attractive. Of course it doesn't mean that you should be "yes" from the start, have your own standards. But doing the first step is your job anyway.
/r/seduction15/01/22 05:56 AM
1

The easiest way to get a woman to "fuck yes" is to "maybe" her to oblivion, lol. Qualify, disqualify, and flirt until she chases you.
/r/seduction15/01/22 05:54 AM
2

When it comes to casual sex, most of your partners are going to start at "maybe" and in most cases it's going to take you only 1-2 dates to turn it into "yes" if you know what you're doing. Heck, you yourself should start from "maybe" if you have any serious standards. Only sleeping with those who are DTF from the start will severely limit your options. More or less the same goes for relationships. High quality partners are usually more choosy. They'd want to get to know you better before commit…
/r/seduction15/01/22 05:50 AM
5

This phrase can be interpreted in some retarded ways. Like, if a girl isn't "fuck yes" about everything from the first five minutes of your meeting then move on. Being "not sure" at the initial part of an interaction is natural and a part of flirting. Why would you be extremely interested in someone you barely know? Usually the reason is in your neediness and desperation. Something more common for men than for women. If a guy is ready to date a cute girl he knows nothing about it doesn't mean th…
/r/seduction15/01/22 05:47 AM
0

Lol, are you new here? Most girls are going to fuck you on the first day if they are into you. More than this, often it's easier to sleep with a girl at the first date than at the second or third. And mathematically it doesn't matter on which day a girl is going to fuck, you still get one girl for 10 approached done in a day. If you get a new girl every day for a week, it doesn't matter if each of them is going to sleep with you at the same day or a week later, it's still seven girls you banged.…
/r/TheRedPill15/01/22 05:28 AM
1

Dude, the problem with this post is that it's too obvious and overexplained. Well duh, everyone knows that cold approach allows men to get laid. That's the whole point of cold approach pickup and half of the seduction sub is about this. But you wrote is as some sort of genius revelation.
/r/TheRedPill15/01/22 05:24 AM
0

Be honest, are you a virgin?
/r/TheRedPill15/01/22 05:18 AM
1

For that you need to: Live in a big city. Be in the top 5% in terms of looks/tinder photos. Which many guys can't achieve no matter how hard they work. You'll still fuck less women than from cold approach. Getting women IRL is more fun and also improves your social skills in general.
/r/TheRedPill15/01/22 05:17 AM
0

Lol, dude. No one in the world gets more sex than rejections from cold approach. You are already considered a master at 10%. And no, for most men the goal is to have sex with as many hot women, who gives a flying fuck about rejections other than little bitches with their weak ego? If you can get 1 girl out of 10 you approach it means that you can fuck a new woman every day just by approaching 10 of them, which takes at most an hour. You can "have sex more than you get rejected" through social ga…
/r/TheRedPill15/01/22 05:15 AM
0

It's not what I think, but my personal experience and experience of other guys who have been with many women, lol. It's not a theory.
/r/seduction11/01/22 08:56 AM
-1

Generalization is a whole point when we try to figure out how things work in general. It's obvious that there's an exception to every rule. In most cases, though, as long as a girl really likes you she'd be ready to at least go to your place and make out. Sex depends on how good you are at seduction and how open minded she is. Most of my first dates end with sex and I'm from a more conservative country than the USA.
/r/seduction10/01/22 11:18 AM
2

There a lot of Japanese videos like this. Except they use masks for anonymity and existed even pre-covid.
/r/seduction10/01/22 09:29 AM
0

With a guy she really likes a girl would be ready to have sex on the first date, let alone just kissing.
/r/seduction10/01/22 09:28 AM
1

This being more intimate is a whole point. What next, you'll save having sex for someone you're dating more seriously? Lol.
/r/seduction10/01/22 09:27 AM
1

Covid isn't fucking common cold. It destroys your lungs even if you had no symptoms. It affects your kidneys and heart even if you weren't hospitalized. If it is going to become like "common cold" then most people won't be able to live to their seventies with all the accumulated long-term damage.
/r/seduction10/01/22 09:26 AM
1

While your point about them already breathing at each other without a mask is valid, this "covid bullshit" shouldn't be ended. In fact, if all people followed the safety protocols and wore actual respirators (which give you ten time more protection than masks AND are easier to breath in) then there would have been no pandemic in the first place. Hospitalization and infection rates are all times high, so thinking about covid safety is only rational. But in this case you'd better avoid any dates i…
/r/seduction10/01/22 09:24 AM
0

Yeah, by your "beta male" logic, the most mature thing in the world is to be a cuck. Because you just become above biological instincts and have a perfect control over your emotions and have complete trust in your partner. You aren't afraid that she'll leave you for someone else even if she sleeps with them, what can be a more adult thing to do? From SJW leftist point of view, being the cuck is the most empowering thing ever. This is a true victory over those lowly instincts and the true way to …
/r/seduction09/01/22 03:15 PM
4

My girlfriend just broke up with me a week ago; she said she felt like she wasn’t ready to be in a relationship, felt a deep desire for freedom, felt like something was required of her and that she couldn’t just be herself, but she had to be my girlfriend. Sounds like she hooked up with someone and wanted to do it again without feeling guilty about cheating. WTF is freedom, LMAO. The only thing people aren't free to do in a relationship is sleeping around. As for love, I'd advise you to study wh…
/r/seduction08/01/22 06:55 AM
1

A guy with 6/10 in looks can fuck 7/10+ girls without lowering his standards. If he's proactive and has game, that is. I mean yeah, if you are 9/10 chad then even some decent women are going to orbite you. But you still will fuck more if you actually approach first.
/r/TheRedPill08/01/22 06:47 AM
1

I hope that you realize that the ratio of genetic parentage was 1 male to 10 females around 10k years ago. I.e. 1/10 of men had children with 9/10 of women. Now, it's only 1 to 2, according to your sources and only if we consider casual sex itself. Well duh, Sherlock, the minority of men have a lot of partners while most struggle. It's just what expected evolutionary. This statistic is different if you consider only long-term relationships though. Pretty much all men at some point are going to g…
/r/seduction08/01/22 06:33 AM
1

It's not that big of a difference, all things considered. It would be strange if men, who are supposed to be the ones who actually TAKE ACTION have more issues than women, who just need to exist and filter among those who approach them. More and more men just give up on dating.
/r/seduction03/01/22 10:24 AM
2

I mean, dude... this sub has a lot of great posts, just filter them by all-time highest rated and choose the ones that actually come with advice. Everything you need to know is already here. Here, I even made a link for you. https://www.reddit.com/r/seduction/top/?t=all
/r/seduction03/01/22 10:20 AM
1

The post was deleted so I haven't seen what data he was talking about. I commented only based on the post's title and this comment in particular. As about more men being celibate, it's kind of expected with Covid. Meeting people IRL is harder than ever and online dating favors looks above anything else. Though if this statistics actually don't show decrease in sexual partners among women then it shouldn't be considered seriously. After all in the past 2 years people are having less sex overall, …
/r/seduction03/01/22 10:09 AM
1

And? An average is going to be the same. Statistically if 1 guy fucked 50 women and 99 men fucked 50 women, an average is still going to be one woman per one man. It always was the case that the best guys get more sex than an average dude.
/r/seduction03/01/22 09:53 AM
1

Because the handsome rich guy won't marry her and definitely won't take care of her children. He's just going to fuck her like a toy and then find someone new. For this reason smart women don't sleep around.
/r/seduction03/01/22 06:16 AM
1

On average you'll sleep with at least 1-2 women out of 100 if you are an average dude who just started cold approaching. If you can't get any success after hundreds of attempts then you are doing something seriously wrong. First of all, start setting up a date from the get go instead of just taking the number.
/r/seduction03/01/22 06:13 AM
1

Do you realize that this is mathematically impossible for men to have less sex than women, right? Unless 2/3 of sex women have is lesbian sex, which is not.
/r/seduction03/01/22 06:11 AM
1

Nah, women find 80% or more of men as unattractive...so how does she get into the triple digits? By making a Tinder profile? Even average women can get THOUSANDS of matches in a month, do your math pal.
/r/seduction28/12/21 06:44 AM
0

Well yeah. But this competition is local. So if you approach a woman in a bar you aren't competing with every guy she knows or every guy who swiped on her on Tinder. Only with the other guys in the bar. Her ancient brain can't think further than this. One of the reasons why pre-selection and social proof work.
/r/seduction27/12/21 04:21 PM
1

I wonder when this black pill bullshit is going to stop? Try being needy and desperate on your date as a man. You are going to get rejected no matter how physically attractive you are. Try to do the same as a woman. Most guys would be glad that you are so into them. The same goes another way around. For men most of the success is based on our behavior and confidence not our looks. Looks do matter, but to a much lesser extent.
/r/seduction27/12/21 06:43 AM
5

Pro tip. It's bullshit. Women are physically attracted to waaaay more men than they sleep with. Most men are filtered not because they lack attractiveness but for many other reasons. And for those same reason a physically unattractive guy can suddenly make her pussy wet. If a pretty girl is going to sleep with each physically attractive guy who hits on her then her number of partners is going to be triple digit in a couple of years. Which rarely happens. More than this - a man's behavior is dire…
/r/seduction27/12/21 06:37 AM
1

If she considered you ugly she wouldn't have been sleeping with you in the first place. The thing is, women have different standards than men. It would be strange if they didn't as we are biologically very different and have different sexual strategies and evolutionary goals. Though men with a lot of options also have standards beyond physical attractiveness. Well duh. I for one would never seriously date a girl who smokes or is friends with ex cons/addicts among many, many other things. Heck, i…
/r/seduction27/12/21 06:31 AM
13

OP has this equality mind set that if he had a lot of causal sex in the past it's okay to date a girl who did the same. The reality is that there can't be the same standard for men and women as we are different biologically, but it's not something that you can openly say in the current social climate. Most people are brainwashed to think that double standards are wrong, what else do you expect?
/r/TheRedPill26/12/21 04:58 PM
2

From his post on seddit he's 24 and she's 21. If they are Americans then marriage isn't even an option at their age, lol.
/r/TheRedPill26/12/21 04:52 PM
13

I want to surprise you, but usually if you're good in bed most girls would rather fuck only you while accepting the fact that you're going to sleep with others. If you're better than anyone she could get on the side then she'd rather meet only you, even if it's casual. Just because she doesn't meet anyone else doesn't mean that you two are a good match and that it's going to last. The better you get, the more common it's going to be for the girls to ignore other guys while meeting you. Even if y…
/r/TheRedPill26/12/21 04:51 PM
2

No, not everyone has a past. There are many, many girls and guys who never engaged in casual sex and only dated seriously, if at all. Usually, if someone is casual about hookups, they are also casual about cheating hookups. You both are young, I very much doubt that someone who had a "hoe phase" just a year ago would want to settle for life at 21, lol.
/r/seduction26/12/21 04:36 PM
1

It doesn't matter to me. My height is below average which doesn't stop me from sleeping around with attractive women. And I know other guys like me. What you think matter and what actually matters in practice is different. Many guys prefer girls with big boobs, in theory, but it doesn't really affect the actual choice in practice. A cute girl with small tits is still going to be super popular.
/r/seduction23/12/21 04:21 PM
7

You just described an average man, lol
/r/seduction23/12/21 10:18 AM
1

Value isn't objective. It's subjective. The core of the game is confidence. For it to be genuine you need to have your own values and understand what you want from life and from women. You need to have a strong frame. There's outer game and inner game. The former is indeed just puts you further from being the best version of yourself. But it doesn't mean that it doesn't work. It can bring you results. Your confidence isn't something that you "either have or don't have", it's entirely in your hea…
/r/seduction23/12/21 10:16 AM
1

Not really. You don't become more experienced from having sex a couple of times. For there to be a real difference in your behavior you'd need to have sex dozens if not hundreds of times. And some people are just naturally more confident than others. Moreover, most men are so bad at sex that just learning how to eat a girl online is going to put you above most of her EXes and a girl would never guess that you were a virgin. So no, it's not obvious at all if a man is a virgin or not. It's not 195…
/r/seduction23/12/21 10:09 AM
0

Before, a woman would be ashamed if her bf found out that she wasn't a virgin. Now men are called creepy for caring about sexual past of their partner (and if you care about her virginity then you're predator) and still everyone shames men for being a virgin and a girl can instantly lose her respect if she finds out. We live in a curious time, lol.
/r/seduction23/12/21 10:07 AM
-1

Most tall guys don't get DMed by girls. More than this, many tall guys struggle with girl a lot. No man in the world is getting laid just because he's tall. You need more than this to get success, like attractive face, muscles, game, etc. Height is something most women just talk shit online but it doesn't really affect your success with women that much unless you are, like 5'5. Most likely his brother is both more handsome and charismatic.
/r/seduction23/12/21 10:02 AM
6

Doesn't change the fact that there're literal children who made millions per year, like child actors or youtubers. Though usually they also have rich parents.
/r/seduction23/12/21 10:00 AM
8

It's a wonder why replies like this are upvoted on the seduction sub, lol. It isn't called "relationship advice" for a reason. Most young men want to have sexual abundance with different women, not being locked in a single relationship.
/r/seduction23/12/21 09:58 AM
12

This isn't really another side of the coin. His brother having shitty job doesn't really have anything to do with his success with women. Being good with women doesn't automatically make you poor, lol. In fact more often than not it's the other way around. Surprise, but there are people who are better than you in everything. Not only they are loved by women but they are also rich, successful and happy. There's no "other side of the coin".
/r/seduction23/12/21 09:55 AM
23

Dude, your brother having low-end job has nothing to do with him being good with women. It's like comparing a pianist and bodybuilder. Herpes is something almost all adults have, but it depends on its type. Your story also proves that you can be poor, live with your parents, and still be popular with women and that this isn't about looks. Instead of learning from him and how his personality attracted women you are just trying to find satisfaction in his misfortune in other areas of life.
/r/seduction23/12/21 09:52 AM
3

No matter how "alpha" you are, you're never going to sleep with 30+ women in a year with this approach unless you go out a lot. More than this, most of "alphaness" comes from your behavior, this is especially the case for guys who didn't won the genetic lottery. Unless you are in the top 5% in terms of looks, which can't be achieved with "hard work" alone, you won't have that many girls "orbiting" you. Going for what you want is one of the alpha qualities, there's nothing beta in approaching a g…
/r/TheRedPill23/12/21 09:42 AM
1

The world isn't black and white. Alpha fux beta bucks is actually not the best sexual strategy for a woman. It's in her best interest to secure alpha because women need resources but they also need protection. So yeah, they want to actually be with alpha not just being his cumdump. But if they can't secure him they'd rather get his genes and trick beta into providing for them. In a way women who follow this code are failures. Most successful guys here on TRP actually have relationships with wome…
/r/TheRedPill12/12/21 03:19 PM
30

You should have at least linked the Huberman's video you summarized. His podcasts have a lot of gold.
/r/TheRedPill12/12/21 03:15 PM
3

You just don't know what to do while talking to a girl if you aren't needy. The answer is simple - amuse yourself.
/r/seduction20/11/21 04:38 PM
1

Men have a rather low chance to catch even without a condom, though.
/r/TheRedPill20/11/21 03:47 PM
2

I think you're missing some reality-checks. Just look at the actual body language of Bezos or let's say Musk when they are around people, especially the latter. You can be the richest man in the world and still be insecure. Many rich and famous men still pay for sex because they still have deep blue pill beta mentality. I can explain why from evolutionary biology perspective your behavior is more important than your actual status, but I hope you already understand this at least to some extent. T…
/r/TheRedPill12/11/21 05:53 PM
35

Most women would still choose to fuck Leo over Bezos or let's say Elon Musk. Female instinct doesn't tell them to chase objectively most valuable men. Bill Gates and Elon Musk aren't sex symbols or particularly attractive to them. Actors and sport stars are way more desirable, for one simple reason—their success is closer to what ancient female instinct perceives as good genes. From objective and male perspective Bezos, Gates, and Musk are extremely high value. For females these are just good re…
/r/TheRedPill11/11/21 03:43 AM
2

The problem is guys only do the above things IN THE HOPES THAT SHE WILL LIKE YOU MORE WHICH MEANS THAT IS YOUR INTENTION AND YOUR ACTIONS ARE NOT GENUINE. Nah, it doesn't matter for which reason you act like this. You can be 100% genuine "nice guy" who truly just respects women a lot and it truly a very nice. In fact, most nice guys are exactly this, they were taught that women are princesses instead of actual people who are mostly equal and in some aspects inferior to you. If each man was 100% …
/r/seduction05/11/21 03:14 PM
7

No, she won't run away. As a rule of thumb a girl doesn't even need to know what you do for life and how much you earn until after you've banged her. And yeah, most guys would totally bang a jobless 35-year-old as long as she's hot. Don't mistook long-term relationships, which are often based on cold logic, and sexual attraction. People evolved to determine each other's attractiveness based on more obvious traits. Men mostly care about looks, women mostly about confidence, though looks and statu…
/r/seduction05/11/21 03:08 PM
1

Of course they are white. It's just that many Russian girls want to find a rich foreign guy.
/r/seduction20/10/21 01:05 PM
7

Masturbating on a hot woman feels x10 better than fucking an ugly one. Unfortunately, talking from the experience in my younger days. Fleshlight feels as good or even better than a pussy (more so if you use condoms) if you are in it for physical pleasure alone. But the best thing about sex is emotional satisfaction from being intimate with someone you find physically attractive, that's the whole point. And this is the main reason why real sex is better than fucking a fake pussy. Maybe your whole…
/r/TheRedPill03/10/21 12:40 PM
20

-Kissing a woman’s neck feels amazing for her, but only with wet lips. Run your tongue along your lips to wet them first before kissing her. Here's a lifehack—try to hug her gently (push her to the wall for better effect) and just BREATH at the side of her neck (right above shoulder) for 5-10 minutes, most women get seriously excited from that alone.
/r/seduction03/10/21 12:28 PM
7

There a bunch of books and courses about this topic. Just simple google search is going to help you learn the basics - how to eat a girl, how to last longer, etc. The best piece of advise which you won't find easily is that you should make a girl as excited as possible from words and non-sexual touching. I.e. by just talking and caressing her in the zones that aren't sexual like ass/tits, etc. Sexual excitement for women isn't just about genitals, it's about her whole body and about her emotiona…
/r/seduction03/10/21 12:26 PM
5

The reason 'be yourself' is such bad advice is because what it should really say is 'be better than who you are right now.' You don't need to change your personality to alter aspects of your behavior - Your personality is not equivalent to your behavior. Nah, it doesn't mean "be better", it means be true to yourself. Because most people aren't. Being yourself means expressing your thoughts and desires without giving a fuck about being judged by others. Let's say you see a cute girl and want to a…
/r/seduction03/09/21 05:06 PM
14

Nah, the right advice is to not chase women in the first place. Instead, you should choose women based on their behavior. It's shocking the difference in how I am getting treated now, the women who were nasty and hard to talk to before are now sweet, feminine and inviting. There are a lot of skinny guys who are treated well. It's just the difference in your own attitude. Initial reactions don't really matter, a girl can "look down" on you because of your looks, but it can be changed literally in…
/r/seduction03/09/21 04:49 PM
2

difficulty to date down and up (why date a 5-7 because of my lack of game when I have escorts A girl who's really into you is going to give you way better sex and many other bonuses as well, like cooking, cleaning, etc. If she has a matching personality and a similar level of education then you can also enjoy communication with her, all this stuff. If you are shameless enough to not care about being a cheater, you can still fuck your escorts without losing anything, really. Most girls are fine w…
/r/TheRedPill03/09/21 04:46 PM
16

I was confronted with the harsh reality that my genetics just aren’t very good for bodybuilding or muscle building in general… I mean this was a solid year of 6X a week working out with no days off and all I could do was 165-170 bench while bulking??? Lol, wtf, duuuude. . . Those are absolutely NORMAL results for working out for a year. In fact, working out 6x a week is meaningless for a newbie, he'll get the same or even better results by training twice per week. You should have done some decen…
/r/TheRedPill03/09/21 04:39 PM
2

I 100 percent feel my height (5'7) automatically turns off girls that would be interested if I was just a little taller, and thats so unfair to me. I didn't ask to be this short. My friend is only 2 inches taller but gets noticed and hit on all the time. Man, are you joking, right? 5'9 is an average height for a man, some consider it short. If your friend who's 5'9 gets hit on it's not because of his height, but IN SPITE of it, either because he has style, handsome face, muscles, or charisma. Yo…
/r/seduction30/08/21 01:16 PM
1

If most men were given a choice, they would prefer to have a harem than being with a single girl. Having sex with many women isn't just about sex but also about emotions. Most men settle for relationships because they don't have a choice, stop generalizing people based on your views that are probably related to religion (or maybe you are a woman). It's a seduction sub, not find your soulmate and wife sub.
/r/seduction30/08/21 01:11 PM
3

The problem is in the community - they think that to get women you need knowledge. They think that you need to know what to say, how to act, etc. The facts are - guys who are naturally attractive and know what they are doing understand that this all doesn't fucking matter. It's not something you should be thinking about. ALL concrete advice like "you should tell girls this and that in such situations" is bullshit. Because seduction isn't about what you say, but how you think and feel. You should…
/r/seduction30/08/21 01:04 PM
1

It helps you to understand what NOT to do which is 90% of the work done already. Don't learn techniques and tricks, don't try to prove women how cool you are, don't try to impress them or "get laid", don't try to "buy them" with gifts or tricks. Instead, know your worth. Here's a secret guide: to make a woman feel desired give her a sincere compliment, to make her feel romance be a little choosy so that she could chase you as well, to make her feel love be caring, and to make her cum learn how t…
/r/seduction30/08/21 12:55 PM
7

Except women don't want a buddy. They want a daddy who will tell them what to do and set the frame. If he decided to be playful like he's with his buddies, she'll accept it. But, in the end, he's someone who's the leader. A younger sibling would be a better comparison than a male friend.
/r/TheRedPill30/08/21 12:05 PM
1

You need all - looks, money, status and game to keep model tier girls around. For "normal cute girls" you can lack on a area or two. Why would you need to? Model tier isn't just about looks, but about status and finances. Obviously you can't keep a really reach girl with you for long if you are poor as heck. On the other hand, a model-looking girl can be a poor student and fuck other poor students just because they are "cool guys" in her social circle. Women are really simple, if they consider y…
/r/TheRedPill25/08/21 10:19 AM
4

The guys do this not because they want to, but because they don't have a choice.
/r/TheRedPill12/08/21 04:49 AM
5

So? All the countries from the top 30 are very close in terms of social mobility. And when it comes to the rest, you can just change your country or work online.
/r/TheRedPill12/08/21 04:08 AM
3

There are photos with his face and girls at the bottom. There's also a short vid with him.
/r/TheRedPill12/08/21 04:04 AM
13

It's definitely the case for the USA because it has a very high ratio of overweight people. So being athletic already puts you in the top percentage. It isn't the same in Europe, let alone in Eastern Europe, though.
/r/TheRedPill12/08/21 03:58 AM
5

If a man is a fat video-game-console-owning- douche, he should take what he's given and be grateful. My friend is exactly like this, but he still dates hot women. Because he was a cool kid in high school and since then learned how to flirt with women and be confident. So yeah, it's exactly like the OP said - men can compensate their looks easier than women.
/r/TheRedPill12/08/21 03:56 AM
6

There's a difference between being able to get in the top 1% in terms of finances (anyone can do it in the west) and to get in the top 0,00000001% like the families you were talking about. Not anyone can become a billionaire, but almost anyone can make 200k a year if they work hard enough. And this is more than enough for most women to consider you wealthy.
/r/TheRedPill12/08/21 03:53 AM
2

But the thing is - guys don't want to settle with women at their own level. We want to bang girls who're 7+. So your post doesn't make a solid point. As if someone here should be glad that some 5-6 would be glad to settle with him because of his dancing skills. . . I still think that you don't need to be good-looking to bang hot chicks. Just your example with those two women is irrelevant to this point. Each woman has her own "frame" which defines her standards. But if you have a stronger frame …
/r/TheRedPill12/08/21 03:50 AM
6

This is why guys need game. You can attract women with your looks alone only if you are above average in terms of genetics.
/r/seduction12/08/21 03:38 AM
3

Have you ever thought that some women actually enjoy sex for the sake of sex? Lol, prostitution is when you are being paid for having sex.
/r/seduction03/08/21 10:45 AM
1

Inner game = high self-esteem and confidence. Sorry to tell you this, but I have a fat short friend who dated more than one hottie (i.e. 8-9 in looks). I myself not a good looking and rather skinny, I also always looked younger than I actually am and didn't get much success from online dating. Inner Game (i.e. strong frame, self-confidence, self-amusement, etc) was a "game changer" for me and I've gotten from getting zero girls to fucking a new one each week without much effort. But you can lie …
/r/TheRedPill03/08/21 10:32 AM
2

The guy with the best game I know had picked up hot girls even when his whole face was covered by acne and he looked like a hobo. Sure, girls didn't react well to him initially, but he didn't give a fuck and continued entertaining himself and being self-confident AF, five minutes later girls started to touch him and fight for his attention. And by game I don't mean pickup mumbo jumbo, but being confident in himself, having strong frame, being able to make other people react while he stays absolu…
/r/seduction29/07/21 05:16 AM
1

As a girl you attractiveness is 98% about your looks, just work on them. Unlike guys you don't need to both work on your looks AND game, only on your looks.
/r/seduction25/07/21 04:04 PM
0

What it has to do with having issues? Most 20 y.o. guys would totally want to sleep with a 40 y.o. woman as long as she's hot enough. It works the other way around, too.
/r/seduction25/07/21 03:24 PM
12

Advanced Pua Fucked 30 girls in 5 years Lol, okay bruh. I'm 25 and it's normal for me to show sexual interest to a 22 year old . If you are like 40 then you need to understand that you might creep her out . Is your advice for 40 year olds is to stick to banging 35+ single mothers? You can definitely meet women in their twenties even as a 40-50 year old. Sorry dude, but from what you've written you aren't even a PUA (which is not a bad thing, btw), just a good-looking guy who meets DTF girls in c…
/r/seduction24/07/21 04:16 AM
7

No, dude. The result isn't the same. Sex is vastly different on emotional level when you bang a hottie who wants you and begs you to fuck her and when you bang a hooker who doesn't give a shit about you. Sex is as much about emotions as it's about physiology and you are never going to get the same emotional satisfaction from a hooker.
/r/TheRedPill18/07/21 10:21 AM
1

Everything becomes very obvious with cold approach at day. Try doing it - if you have the balls - and you'll find out that without game most women will reject your ass from the get go.
/r/TheRedPill18/07/21 10:19 AM
1

The right mindset is actually way simpler than that. A girl is there for your satisfaction, so you make the rules. If she doesn't follow them then you find someone who will. You don't need to think about what she wants or how to make her more invested, etc. If you think like this and is less emotionally invested than she is, then most things you mentioned would be automatic.
/r/TheRedPill15/07/21 04:23 PM
1

Lol, bruh. If this meal existed, it would be highly illegal. Anyway I guess you was too dense to get his joke.
/r/seduction14/07/21 04:13 AM
1

A child is objectively beneath an adult because a child needs an adult to survive. You can change the word "child" to the word "dog" and nothing changes in this quote. "And there is a dog who is energetic, full of life, joyful, and playful." Does it mean that dogs are superior to humans? Well maybe form some point of view, but here we talk about hierarchy.
/r/TheRedPill14/07/21 04:03 AM
1

It's the same as saying "you can't consider children inferior to adults and still love them". Sorry, but children are objectively lower in the hierarchy than adults and very lacking compared to them, this is why adults should protect children and this is what makes you love them in the first place. If they are at the same level then they don't need your help.
/r/TheRedPill14/07/21 04:00 AM
1

Have you ever heard about prostitution? Lol. Sex by itself isn't valuable. You can fuck a girl 9/10 in looks for 200$ or so.
/r/seduction12/07/21 01:57 PM
1

Who said anything about relationship? If you want to have regular sex with different women then there are some objective "same for most people" qualities that are going to attract them. Most women do have very similar taste on a basic level the same way most men would want to fuck a hot girl.
/r/seduction12/07/21 01:55 PM
1

It's normal but not for someone who's naturally attractive.
/r/seduction12/07/21 01:51 PM
1

Lol, bro. Do you realize that only guys with a penis WAY above average can become porn-actors? Depending on your race your average could be from 10cm to 14cm, or so. If girls tell you that your dick is big then you're at least at my level, otherwise they don't even notice.
/r/TheRedPill24/06/21 05:04 PM
2

Do you really think that any man is "hitting on you" by being friendly? Sorry to disappoint you, but a man with standards, at the start, isn't really "interested" in you, he just wants to find out who you are or is just being friendly.
/r/seduction24/06/21 03:29 PM
1

Surprisingly most of this advice you called "gold" is actually legit. “Never talk about heritage or growing up on a date, keep it really light. For example talk about the weather” It's true. You don't need to discuss any deep topics. Weather is boring, but talking about movies and hobbies is a great choice. “Never call or send a girl a voice message, that’s creepy” Anyone who has some experience in online dating knows that voicemails are the most effective way of communication and a girl is way …
/r/seduction21/06/21 07:16 AM
3

Yeah, he's someone who claims to have sex with 100+ women and he thinks he doesn't have herpes... HAhahahahaha... Just because, unlike her, most people don't test for herpes it doesn't mean that they don't have it. She's really wrong in the head if she thinks that it's something she needs to tell people.
/r/TheRedPill15/06/21 09:59 AM
1

Everything you said in this post is right... Except those are absolutely useless things to know. Because most of this you should do AUTOMATICALLY without even thinking about it, if your perception of yourself and of a girl is the right one. It's not something you can study and then just repeat. Well yeah, you can do it, but it would be "faking it" and, in the end, many girls would see through your bullshit. And keeping so many things in mind and doing them - all just to get laid - would take awa…
/r/TheRedPill15/06/21 09:54 AM
6

Lol, this is just "social proof". Something that was common sense in the pickup community since the last century, really. It's not "fear of missing out", it's much simpler - you being friendly with a lot of people shows your social status. It's why the most active and cool guys in the school/college get laid the most, but only if they are confident enough to actually "close the deal" by isolating the girls while they are interested. It's not the best way to meet women, LMAO. It's too situation-d…
/r/seduction15/06/21 09:50 AM
2

This shit is just your most basic concept of "social proof". It was talked about more than 20 years ago in the seduction community... Lol.
/r/seduction15/06/21 09:45 AM
0

The girls who ended up sleeping with me disagree with you. As long as you aren't needy and clingy it's completely alright to continue talking to a girl even if she shows no interest. Unless you are a super model then there's no reason why random women would be DTF from the start.
/r/seduction14/06/21 07:36 AM
35

There’s some weird idea that a man should keep creepily trying until a woman gives in to his charms I guess. So it’s just easier to say to you have a bf. This idea wouldn't exist if it didn't actually work. When you are approached by a stranger at a street you know nothing about him and his looks alone aren't enough to determine if you're interested unless he's plain ugly or just your type. Half of the women I've slept with from approaching at day have "rejected" me in one way or another when I …
/r/seduction13/06/21 12:27 PM
16

SURPRISE! But saying that she has a boyfriend is an automatic reaction for many women when they are approached by a stranger. It's a way for them to keep their "status" as a woman who isn't in need of a man and also a way to reject guys without hurting their feelings. I'd bet that about half of the girls who told you that they have a bf doesn't have one.
/r/seduction13/06/21 12:24 PM
2

This is literally what you said the only time I can ever see it being useful for most men is if the demographics came to be in our favor, or at least 50-50. Also I don't really agree what men would be as choosy if given a choice. Most of us would fuck each and every more or less cute girl. You can never guess if this 6/10 girl would be a freak in the bed or if she's looking better IRL than on her photos. Also, unlike most women, we are more than eager to fuck a hundred girls per month. The thing…
/r/TheRedPill13/06/21 11:48 AM
2

It's simple - you have zero game. So the only women you can get with daygame is those who are DTF from the start. Try inviting them straight to your place to "play playstation" and you'll see increase in success rate... simply because this shows more "balls" from the start that makes you more attractive. Most women are just confused when you approach them at day. They rejections have nothing to do with you. Rather, they just try to keep their "value". Most of them lie about having bf or being no…
/r/seduction12/06/21 06:27 PM
4

But didn't YOU tricked the tinder algorithm to get "staggering results"? And wouldn't those results would be even more crazy if you, actually, was exactly this "model-looking guy"? By this logic you can just learn how to cheat the algorithm or how to look like a model, at least on photos. If you are at least in the top 30% then you have a decent change on Tinder if you don't play by rules. Of course offline approach is still the best, but you yourself proved that OD isn't completely useless.
/r/TheRedPill11/06/21 11:05 AM
2

It's only you who decides which feedback is negative and which is not. The first step is to stop treating rejections personally. Second step - starting to see it as a "win" because you are progressing as a seducer with each rejection. And the last step - the highest level - is to realize that rejections don't really exist. That there're only girls who can give you what you want and those who can't. ​ Don't approach to "trick a girl" into giving you something. Approach to see if she can provide y…
/r/seduction11/06/21 10:57 AM
1

We live only once. Each woman is different and sex with each is a different experience. It's hard for a woman to understand because men and women are just build differently. For most of us the goal isn't just bang a lot of women, but bang a lot of women AND find the one who's perfect for us. You can't do it without a lot of experience, sorry. And also it feels amazing.
/r/seduction11/06/21 10:53 AM
1

Now, 300/10000 = 0.03. This means he fucks around 3% of the women he approaches (he's handsome. And there's no PUA theory that you know that he doesn't, so expect worse results than him lol). But in the rest of his sales copy he states that he has “secrets” and “critical things” that you must do to be as successful as him. The problem with PUAs is that their theory is bullshit. They don't understand that by relying on tricks and theories and trying to be an "artist" they decrease their own chanc…
/r/seduction11/06/21 10:48 AM
1

How many conventionally attractive men do you guys know? I'd assume that zero. Because they face almost as much rejection as other guys if they actually try to approach. This is especially true for cold approach daygame. I know a very hot guy who literally worked like a model and women totally love his looks. He still fucked only 5 women out of 200 he approached at day. And I, who's less good looking, fuck on average twice that many. The idea that physically attractive guys don't get a lot of re…
/r/seduction11/06/21 10:45 AM
1

I've been in a club with a guy who's 170 cm tall and 100kg heavy (because of fat) and he hooked up with a hot girl right before my eyes more than once. And I've been in a club with a guy who has close to perfect body and nice face who didn't fuck any girl in all this time - because he's either too shy to approach women, or puts them off with his neediness/creepiness. If you can't change the default perception people have of you then, simply put, you have zero game. I know a guy who've fucked his…
/r/seduction11/06/21 10:10 AM
2

Loooool, you don't know what you are talking about, like, AT ALL. In one of the posts there's a guy with literally disfigured face, he still gets laid. My face is below average, but my results are FAR above average. Go figure.
/r/seduction08/06/21 04:38 AM
0

In the beginning you said that "attraction for sex is 100% about looks" which is bullshit and I just debunked why it is. And I literally said in my post that "money, looks, power, etc" are all forms of social power, lol. It's just enough if you have just one of those.
/r/seduction08/06/21 04:37 AM
1

I've checked your profile. He seems to be larger than you on his photos because he has way lower bodyfat than you. Another thing - as he cut sugar from his diet his body holds way less water. I'd say that he would be at least 10lbs heavier if he still ate sugar - while looking absolutely the same. His physique is 100% better than yours, objectively. Because weight isn't everything. Jeff Cavalier is about his weight and he has one of the best bodies a natural can achieve.
/r/TheRedPill06/06/21 04:59 PM
1

Yeaaaah, how many women you actually fucked? If zero then it's not because of your small dick. I never heard about any guy who'd give a woman a powerful orgasm with his fingers or mouth and then get rejected by her for having a small dick. It's ridiculous. Most men completely suck at sex and their women never orgasm. Women tolerate it. Only 1/3 of women experience orgasm from penetration, statistically. Do you really think they give a fuck and that it's their favorite part? And when it comes to …
/r/seduction06/06/21 04:24 PM
0

I guess you don't earn that much many, lol. Before I started to get laid regularly I've bought sex more than once. There are a fair number of advantages to it - you don't need to waste time on a woman or invest in her emotionally. If you earn more than average than sex is super cheap. When you understand it you no longer as needy and desperate for sex as before. Most women can't see a difference between 5'5 and 5'7, lol. Wtf are you even talking about? In "height queenz" eyes anyone below 5'10 i…
/r/seduction06/06/21 04:20 PM
1

Small penis is probably the last thing that can affect your success with women. Because a woman usually learns about it when you are already about to fuck her. And it's a good reason for you to learn how to actually be good at sex, unlike 90% of men who SUCK at giving oral. You don't need a dick to make a girl cum like crazy. In fact, some bisexual women prefer lesbians to men in terms of sexual satisfaction. Go figure.
/r/seduction06/06/21 04:13 PM
1

Not really true. By default an ugly man has lower chances that's true. But on practice an ugly man have more things he can change because women consider way more factors than just your looks.
/r/seduction06/06/21 04:06 PM
0

Life isn't fair, deal with that. The same is true for money - you'd need to have to try 10 times as hard to earn your first million than a son of a billionaire. You can't choose your starting point, but you can choose what to do next. You also don't need to put effort into "winning women", you need to put it into getting confidence and improving what you can improve. Many men with a height similar to yours are popular with women. I'm 5'7 myself and fucked my fair share of more than eager hotties…
/r/seduction06/06/21 04:03 PM
1

Nah, attraction for sex is almost 100% based on social power. In high school pretty much all girls are attracted to bullies and athletes who socially dominate everyone else. This is the best example of how instincts work because teens are less conditioned by society and rules. Your looks are a part of your social status/power, that's true. If you are tall, muscular and handsome you are already above most guys by default... unless you show obvious weakness in your behavior and/or allow others tre…
/r/seduction06/06/21 03:59 PM
1

Those same women then are fucked by 5'5 dudes with enough balls to keep their frame. Height doesn't really affect attraction, rather, it affects how high is your perceived value. If she considers you as someone above her in status she wouldn't care about your height. I've fucked my fair share of women taller than me so I know what I'm talking about.
/r/seduction06/06/21 03:46 PM
1

Maybe you need to broad your social circle.
/r/seduction06/06/21 03:43 PM
1

Other than your height everything else is pretty much within your control. It's up to you to create a body of your dream, to earn money and to establish social status. Other than that, social skills are about 70% of success.
/r/seduction06/06/21 03:43 PM
2

But how you imagine they are going to learn any of that if you don't put yourself out there and take the initiative? They don't.
/r/seduction02/06/21 04:48 PM
1

If you need to know if a girl wants you or not and try to observe her to find out then you aren't better than those guys who chase girls. Just instead of chasing you are searching those who already interested in you. Guess what, in 90% of cases a woman doesn't know if she likes you or not before talking for some time. It's not something predetermined beforehand. You can be active in meeting women while not chasing them like a horny teenager. You can be a man who knows what he wants and expects w…
/r/seduction02/06/21 04:46 PM
2

If you want to know how to properly text the girls then check playingfire dude.
/r/seduction02/06/21 04:39 PM
11

Yeah, there're so many guys who are like "if she tests you, she isn't worth your time". Well bro, you are a complete stranger to her, of course she's going to check your boundaries and personality, lol. All people do this in some sense. BTW, by reacting to her "I have a boyfriend" you acknowledge that you tried to hit on her or make her your gf. I personally talk to female strangers not for any of this, but to find the right girls. My usual reactions are "no one is perfect, don't worry about it"…
/r/TheRedPill29/05/21 04:30 PM
6

My friend fucked more than one girl after they said to him "fuck off" not so politely. He just likes making bitchy girls fall for him. So yeah, even "fuck off" is a shit test. Not in a way that you need to keep pushing, but in the way that even this can tell her if you are a bitch or a real man. And guess what? Even if you have no intention to fuck her after that, but you acted like a man, she'd still feel attraction.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/21 04:28 PM
8

Lol, it's not RA, dude. Who cares about "red flags" when you are just going to make her your plate or fuckbuddy? People lie all the time, especially women, especially to complete strangers. Unless you want to find a wife, it shouldn't worry you.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/21 04:26 PM
-7

You aren't very good with logic, are you?
/r/seduction16/05/21 01:30 PM
6

So what? Does it contradict anything I said? Nope.
/r/seduction16/05/21 01:23 PM
8

Lol, he does. There's no person in the world who could get more than 20% of random women from daygame cold approach into his bed. I doubt even a celebrity could achieve it, let alone some random "chad".
/r/seduction16/05/21 12:42 PM
-2

I'm white 5'7 from Russia and I've fucked more hot girls than any "hot" guy I know. I also know a fat guy who's my height and he still fucks hot women regularly. If you are confident and love yourself, but don't look like a Chad then sure, some people would tell shit like this "what the fuck is wrong with you? stop being retarded!", this is nothing but a shit test, and as long as you hold your frame you are golden. If you think that there's no short skinny east asian who bangs hot women with his…
/r/TheRedPill16/05/21 12:15 PM
2

Both.
/r/seduction15/05/21 11:02 AM
3

Yeah, you need to screen girls, but most of your post isn't about screening. Or is very specific to getting into an ltr. It's deeper and more fundamental than that. You need to know what you want and then choose women who can give it to you. And if a woman can't give you what you want, then she isn't worth your time. So it's not even about her having certain qualities, it's more about her behavior. As long as she delivers on what you expect from her - she gets your attention and appreciation. If…
/r/TheRedPill14/05/21 03:57 PM
5

Actually you can directly say to women that you want sex and nothing else. It's all about how you handle her reaction and how you deliver your intentions. It also depends on context and how far you are with the girl.
/r/TheRedPill14/05/21 03:46 PM
65

You wanted to fuck her. And you failed. Her words mean nothing, don't look at her words - look at her actions. She was almost at your place, sucking your dick and then you just ruined it, lol. Most girls aren't going to directly say that they want to bang even if they do. And even if they really don't want to bang, they are still going to bang you out of hope of something more. Even if you directly tell them that this isn't an option. Your problem is that you took her bullshit seriously and reac…
/r/TheRedPill14/05/21 03:43 PM
1

She can do whatever she wants with whoever and the same goes for me. What's there to be mad at? It means that you aren't having an LTR in the first place. In an LTR boundaries are necessary.
/r/seduction14/05/21 03:33 PM
1

If you remove all the games then the only thing men would do is directly tell you from the start "I find you attractive, let's come to my place to have amazing sex". And then women like you would be the first to say how strange and creepy it is, even if it's how 99% of men would act if they were 100% honest with you (and themselves) from the start. Women, including the grown ones, are who really need all those stupid games. If women didn't play stupid games but were straightforward like men, the…
/r/seduction14/05/21 03:28 PM
2

Most men are attracted to about 30-40% of young women, lol.
/r/seduction14/05/21 03:20 PM
1

The stereotype of alpha and beta is related to one's sexual success purely, infact, we are all here to crack a female's mysterious mind so that we get rejection proof but this is not possible. Not really, there's something major you misses. Alpha and beta is also about how you TREAT women and sex. You don't need to crack a female mind if you don't consider yourself as a "chaser" of women. Be a chooser, instead. Don't treat sex as a reward, treat it as a value a woman should provide you to be wor…
/r/TheRedPill13/05/21 06:22 AM
10

In my country there's a lot of people who train in martial arts. They die in the street fights all the time because of their overconfidence. No, just because you know how to fight doesn't mean that you can "give a battle". If your opponent has a gun or a knife, you are going to be dead or hurt badly no matter how weak they are. And if there's more than one of them, then chances are - your skills won't help that much. It's good that it's legal here to own a pepper spray - it's probably the most e…
/r/TheRedPill13/05/21 06:00 AM
2

The question arises.How do I know they were fake? You didn't need to explain — if they weren't fake, those guys wouldn't be expelled, they would be jailed. But yeah, women can be fucking disgusting when they try to hide the fact that they cheated on their bf. It's probably the most common reason for fake allegations.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/21 09:50 AM
1

Lol, I got banned from reddit for 7 days for this comment about chloroform. People are idiots, so you are risking by making jokes like that.
/r/seduction10/05/21 09:21 AM
3

She said that they also need to have looks. So her standards for a relationship is for him to both be more attractive and earn more than she. And, apparently, she was lucky enough to get a guy like this and now thinks that every woman should do the same.
/r/seduction28/04/21 03:14 PM
8

Like 80% of adult men fit your description... those same men get zero matches on Tinder and the ones she compares to 300 pounds women.
/r/seduction28/04/21 03:13 PM
38

If you can fuck 75% of the women you randomly approach on the street then you are the most successful cold approached in the world, lol. Maybe it would be 75% if you meet a random girl... late at night.. and use chloroform. Getting 10% lays from cold approach day game is already top level. It's already enough to have sex every day if you wish to.
/r/seduction28/04/21 03:12 PM
31

Bullshit. Most guys are average, normal. They are of equal value to an average woman. But women don't want men on their own level. They want only the best available ones. They'd rather bet that this top-quality guy won't cum dump them, but become their long-term boyfriend, than even to waste one minute of their time to talk to a guy who's at her level or even slightly better than her. Your "low quality attention" thing is bullshit, because most women ignore the guys from their first message. It'…
/r/seduction28/04/21 03:07 PM
32

Nah, rather... " Online dating for women is like dying of dehydration in the midst of a river with a perfectly drinkable water because she wants to drink only the highest quality water. "
/r/seduction28/04/21 03:04 PM
29

You basically compare average common guys on your own level to overweight girls who are at the 1% bottom of the population. An equal to a 300 pound heavy girl would be a 300 pound heavy fat guy who's also homeless, uneducated and desperate to get laid to the point of creepiness. Guys like this as rare as female whales. You are looking for the top 5-10% of men, calling the rest "low quality", even if objectively most of them are at the same level as an average girl. It's the problem with online d…
/r/seduction28/04/21 03:02 PM
1

It doesn't matter if you are 6'5 and handsome if you are a simping for women you are still pathetic loser.
/r/seduction28/04/21 02:14 PM
2

Not everyone, most people are just normal... but not you, that's for sure. All your behavior just screams "simpcel".
/r/seduction27/04/21 02:32 PM
2

Lol, you go around insulting complete strangers for no reason, so if you show the same amount of respect to women, then I have a piece of bad news for you... Also, just because you are a simp doesn't prove that you are not an incel. Most SJWs and simps are incels at the same time, they just don't identify themselves as one. By definition, anyone who can't get sex for a few years even if they try is an incel. Even women can be incels. Maybe you aren't an incel and fuck some fat girl, I believe th…
/r/seduction27/04/21 02:21 PM
1

You have some real problems with your memory, dude. The comment to which I answered stated that "there's nothing to risk, as long as you are respectful no woman would find it creepy". So yeah, any example proves that this statement is wrong. I never talked about "women" in general, only about radical feminists and other minorities with a screw loose. My example proves that they are real. You can find a bunch of such articles online, it's more common than most people think. Your replied with "inc…
/r/seduction27/04/21 02:19 PM
12

There's no reason to talk about politics or any complex topics over which there can be "disagreement". You are on a date to have fun, not to prove your opinion. We have reddit for that.
/r/seduction27/04/21 02:11 PM
12

Check some older posts, lol. This sub always was about picking up women and having casual sex with them. It never was about "exchanging stories" and definitely not about "both male and female" as it was mostly male exclusive until a year or two ago. And yeah, there's a way to become an "alpha male", but it's definitely not something that can be achieved by cheap tricks or reading. Rather, it's about how you treat yourself and others. There're some good posts in the "Top" section about developing…
/r/seduction27/04/21 02:07 PM
0

Good luck denying the reality we live in. That's some next level of delusion. https://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/woman-who-accused-man-of-assault-after-he-fixed-her-car-admits-making-it-up/ICUS5UJMOCGFC664ROSQXIFZZ4/ Some retarded women can falsely accuse you even after you HELP THEM, let alone asked for them for your number. Usually those are ugly though, so if you only approach hot ones, you are rather safe.
/r/seduction27/04/21 02:03 PM
1

Oh yeah, those who worship women are chads and those who don't are incels? It's the other way around, bruh...
/r/seduction27/04/21 01:58 PM
11

You don't even need to be high value for women to think that you are high value. They are programmed to assume your value based on your behavior, not on objective reality.
/r/TheRedPill27/04/21 01:39 PM
8

Have you ever heard of radical feminists?
/r/seduction27/04/21 04:46 AM
1

There're always women who're going to think that it's creepy. Some of them think that ANY cold approach at day is creepy. Many others, though, will be flattered even if you are somehow stiff and strange, as long as you aren't catcalling them or being overly sexual from the get go.
/r/seduction27/04/21 04:45 AM
2

It's not about being good at something, but about having a high social status in your group. In the vast majority of cases if you are a loser, then you act like one. As about your question... Imagine that a scrawny guy acts overly aggressive and confident, as if he isn't afraid of anything. If you assume that he's just faking it, then you'll be stupid because he could have a gun/knife with him, or a large group of friends nearby, or influential parents. In cases like this it's safer to guess tha…
/r/TheRedPill27/04/21 04:30 AM
1

It could be your photos, then. If you are tall and decently handsome, then you can still get decent success online with right photos.
/r/seduction27/04/21 04:23 AM
4

Lol, dude... Women spend years with losers like criminals and scumbags because they can't differentiate between overconfidence/arrogance and real high value. And, honestly, most women don't give a fuck. For some of them a homeless drug addict who acts like he owns her and the world would be as "alpha" as a CEO billionaire. In fact if you act like a little bitch, women will treat you like one no matter how successful you are objectively. Elon Musk is a great example.
/r/TheRedPill27/04/21 04:22 AM
1

That's true... only for online game. IRL, if you act like a king, women try to test if you are really so-confident in yourself and if you are, they just accept it. This is the power of a strong frame. This shit works both with men and women, btw. If a person doesn't know you, but you show real confidence, they assume that you have something to back it up.
/r/TheRedPill26/04/21 11:08 AM
3

Only if by personality you mean being a nice person. Confidence though trumps looks any day.
/r/seduction26/04/21 10:52 AM
3

Looks don't matter when you have true confidence and charisma. But most guys don't, so for them yeah, looks matter. And the worse are your social skills, the more important is your appearance. I know a short and fat dude who fucks hot girls just fine. And a really handsome dude who simps for women way too much, getting even those who were initially interested lose their interest.
/r/seduction26/04/21 10:49 AM
5

There're two types of guys who say shit like this. Those who actually never screwed lots of girls. And those who did, but who failed with the rest of their lives. As someone who experienced all types of relationships, getting 3-4 hot fuckbuddies with whom you share a decent emotional connection is the best. Basically, having a harem of trusted girlfriends is better than having just one or than fucking a bunch of strangers.
/r/seduction26/04/21 10:46 AM
1

Your body language mostly determined by your feelings and values. If you are confident and love yourself, it shows.
/r/seduction26/04/21 10:42 AM
3

That's not how you "flip the script", bro. Here's how you do it: " Don't go into an interaction with a girl thinking any of the following things: - Am I good enough? - She's out of my league/will she like me? - I don't have a chance with her. - I hope she likes me." Instead, think: - If she good enough? - Can she give me enough value for me to waste my time on her? - She has a chance with me, if she pleases me enough. - I hope I'll enjoy my time with her. Choose, don't chase. Being sexually char…
/r/TheRedPill26/04/21 10:33 AM
10

Nah, it's just the fact that IRL who you are as a person - your personality and your social status relatively to her - matters. Online it's only about your looks and photos. Online, if you are an average, the girls who'd be more than interested in you IRL would just ignore you. Because there they are to meet the best guys available to them, not to get guys on their own level.
/r/seduction26/04/21 10:25 AM
9

You obviously haven't checked his ig...
/r/seduction25/04/21 09:31 AM
7

It doesn't work if you don't care about her being taken...
/r/seduction21/04/21 03:47 AM
1

WTF are you talking about? Women are afraid of rejection a few times more than men are. Moreover, for her to like you enough from your looks alone, it should mean that she considers you hotter than herself. I.e. if you are 9, you can expect girls who are, at most, 7 would be interested from the get go.
/r/seduction20/04/21 04:39 AM
10

You really think you can make a girl who thinks you're really ugly desperately wanna rip your clothes off because you negged her or made her laugh or had good eye contact or whatever school of thought your particular game guru is from?!! haha) 90% of girls would be neutral to you no matter how hot you are. If you are ugly, it would be maybe 50-60%. In the vast majority of cases you'll be fucking those you attract with your confidence and charisma, not with your looks. The problem with negging an…
/r/seduction20/04/21 04:24 AM
1

I wrote my post for people looking for committed relationships only. I suppose I can start saying its not for people stuck in the "I only want a 20 yr old" mentality. For sure its harder to manipulate/game/seduce a mature woman who has worked on herself. Lol, not really harder. It's just that with age women become more into gold digging. They are no longer as interested in romance and emotions, but rather in building family with someone who wouldn't leave them and will have enough money to suppo…
/r/seduction19/04/21 05:28 PM
1

This rule is 100% true. Sorry. There would be no this sub in the first place if women weren't less focused on looks than men are. Also, you don't really need to know if a woman is interested beforehand or not. It doesn't fucking matter if you really have any game. Even if you are a godlike level handsome and have perfect body, most women you randomly meet wouldn't show any of those signs. Definitely not the best ones. The hottest women I fucked weren't initially interested in me, that's the case…
/r/seduction19/04/21 05:09 PM
1

He has more upvotes than you, now...
/r/seduction19/04/21 05:01 PM
1

There's no reason to "draw a line". It's always better to assume attraction. Better than that - you need to know that you are awesome. And if a girl isn't interested it's her loss. You don't really need to know beforehand which girls are interested or not if you have strong game. It doesn't matter. About half girls you'll end up sleeping with would be the ones who weren't interested initially. At least if you are charismatic and has strong frame. Trying to only approach those who are interested …
/r/seduction19/04/21 04:56 PM
5

Girls date to have fun, not to discuss politics. Sorry. The problem with 'dancing monkey" is that he tries to amuse a girl, not himself. Enjoy yourself, entertain yourself. Why the hell would you "challenge her intelligence"? You want to fuck her, not her brain. At least I hope so.
/r/seduction13/04/21 02:22 PM
7

Another blackpill basement dweller? I hope you are at least not an anti-vaxxer.
/r/seduction13/04/21 01:57 PM
19

Criminal scums who fuck dozens of hot girls per year laugh at your first two points. Game is super easy - as long as a girl considers you at her level or above, she'll like you. The so-called outer game is just an imitation of a man who actually thinks that he's not just good enough for a girl, but maybe better than she deserves. In the end, your self-esteem is the thing that matters the most and it isn't necessary need to be based on something objective. I met guys who live with their parents a…
/r/seduction13/04/21 01:17 PM
21

If you think that his example is negative, then you don't truly understand the game.
/r/TheRedPill07/04/21 10:45 AM
1

Why so enthusiastic? And why do you care about her reaction?
/r/seduction03/04/21 05:22 AM
1

Nah, you can learn all of this if you listen to my advice, that's the whole point. Change your mindset, change how you view the world and the women.
/r/seduction03/04/21 05:20 AM
1

Dominance isn't about aggression, it's about control. It's shown through your confidence, your body language, posture, strong voice, etc. By telling people what to do and not being subservient to others. To be dominant without any aggression you need to use humor. In the end, though, it's all about your confidence and frame.
/r/seduction03/04/21 05:18 AM
3

Just make her understand her place and then cum dump her, what's the problem?
/r/seduction31/03/21 04:01 AM
2

You should be the one to evaluate the girls. Don't treat women too seriously and you'll "pass" all shit tests without even thinking about it.
/r/seduction31/03/21 04:00 AM
1

A really experienced guy just doesn't care about details like this, dude. And doesn't care if she finds him boring. The most attractive men aren't those who are good at doing everything right so that they were liked. Those are guys who just establish such a frame of communication that it's a woman who tries to get liked by them. They don't even have such a thoughts like "what she thinks about me? what can I say to impress her?". Everything in this thread is a novice advice, including yours.
/r/seduction31/03/21 03:35 AM
2

What if she made her ass awesome by squatting in a gym?
/r/seduction31/03/21 03:32 AM
1

I'll say even more - there's no really a point in complimenting. A compliment implies that you try to win a person over, make obvious effort to be liked. Instead, you should praise. You compliment your boss or mother, but you praise your best buddy instead. Praising comes from an equal standing and complimenting, almost always, from a lower position.
/r/seduction31/03/21 03:31 AM
4

Yes, and no. Most women don't workout or diet, they just have fast enough metabolism to stay not too fat. Those with a truly athletic body are extremely rare because, as you said, it requires a lot of effort.
/r/seduction31/03/21 03:28 AM
1

it's not like anybody choose their appearances I'm pretty much sure that an athletic body can be chosen. A simple rule of thumb is to compliment someone based on what they achieved with some effort. Most women care about their style, that's true, but for many men someone else choses their clothes, lol.
/r/seduction31/03/21 03:27 AM
1

Properly managing a conversation means being able to establish your frame, your power. This has nothing to do with being good at talking with friends or even being able to have an interesting conversation. Polarization shows that you don't give a fuck, it shows your higher status and this is why you have it better than him.
/r/TheRedPill30/03/21 06:07 PM
1

No one is equal. Moreover, there's no objective equality, you can't be inferior or superior in a vacuum, there should be some kind of measurement. Men are physically superior to women, women are emotionally superior to men. What's superior - a car or a tank? For everyday life car is superior, but not if you wage a war. Anyway, your basic premise is wrong - men rarely cheat because the other woman is more attractive. She's just new. Why do you think porn is so popular? Men need variety, we don't …
/r/TheRedPill26/03/21 02:52 PM
1

If man who has a wife with a good personality cheats it will usually be with a woman who is more attractive than their spouse, just like a woman with a nice guy provider of a husband might cheat with a more dominant, alpha-like man. And here is where you get it wrong. A man could cheat even with a less attractive woman - it happens all the time. Moreover, he could hold zero respect for this woman, for example she could be a hooker. More often than not, men cheat for variety, not because the othe…
/r/TheRedPill26/03/21 02:38 PM
5

1/5? Nope. More than half of the population and if you exclude kids and virgins then almost all sexually active population. Oral herpes should be the last of your worries if you are sexually active. And the genital one is hard to catch as a man.
/r/TheRedPill17/03/21 03:48 PM
23

Say what you want, just don't treat girls seriously when it comes to man-to-woman interactions. As soon as you start arguing, you show that you care and if you care it means that you're two equals instead of "daddy and his lil girl". Don't accept her frame.
/r/TheRedPill17/03/21 03:43 PM
14

There're only two steps to get a woman: Invalidate her a lot. Validate her a little. And you can get the first step done either by showing dark triad traits, i.e. being harsh, unfeeling, manipulative, etc. Or by just amusing yourself, not treating her seriously. Both works. Basically, if she feels you are below her - she's interested. If she feels you are her equal - she's going to consider you relationship material with all those long boring mating rituals that require your commitment. And only…
/r/TheRedPill17/03/21 03:38 PM
0

There're only two steps to get a woman: Invalidate her a lot. Validate her a little. As long as she feels that your value above hers, she's attracted. The main variables here are her ego and self-preservation instinct - if she feels that you're dangerous to her in any way (physical or emotional) she'll avoid you even if attracted, unless she's bipolar or utterly masochistic. You basically just invalidated her and now she tries to get more validation from you. If you give her too much, she'll los…
/r/TheRedPill17/03/21 03:33 PM
1

Sorry, but there are many studies that prove that when it comes to men choosing their partners, a woman's social and financial status doesn't matter at all. But for women, a man's status and financial success are extremely important. Of course, men want to be with successful women, but it's just plain logic and doesn't really affect our emotions. More or less all men would rather be with an averagely attractive jobless girl than with an unattractive CEO millionaire.
/r/seduction15/03/21 04:52 PM
0

It doesn't debunk anything, there are bunch of studies. Of course being 9/10 in looks would get you laid even if you suck at everything else. But so is being a multi-millionaire or ultra-charismatic. But I would argue about "lots of pussy", on average a really good-looking guy fucks 11 women through his whole life. Which is above average, but isn't even close to how many women a real player or PUA can fuck within just one year.
/r/seduction02/03/21 05:07 AM
5

This works differently for men and women. As a man, you determine a woman's attractiveness mostly based on her appearance. For women though, at least IRL and not online, it's more about how you present yourself. Just try and check out any female romance novel. Considering yourself a prize isn't about insulting a woman or looking down on her. It's more about having standards and IDGAF attitude, flirting without worrying about reaction. And yeah, most people don't want to be with their equals, but…
/r/seduction01/03/21 05:46 AM
1

Genital herpes is hard to get if you use condoms, most people have the oral one, with which you'll get infected by kissing, usually.
/r/TheRedPill01/03/21 05:32 AM
3

Can't you see how the fifth point contradicts to most of the points? You don't need to make any conscious efforts to give any value if you consider yourself as someone of high status, i.e. alpha. Just leave the fourth mindset and forget about everything else.
/r/seduction27/02/21 04:35 PM
2

If you are afraid of herpes then you should just stay celibate, dude. More than 50% of humanity already has it, so there's 50% chance that any girl you fuck has it, hooker or not.
/r/TheRedPill27/02/21 04:29 PM
3

Sexual orgasm literally makes your body release addictive drugs in your system, wtf are you smoking bro? xD
/r/seduction25/02/21 07:15 AM
2

It's not about sex as a process, but about sex as a proof of your attractiveness. You prove it to yourself, not even to others. The same way that you prove that you aren't a loser by fighting back when someone treats you like shit. If you accept abuse your self-esteem would suffer, if you accept your inability to get sex you'll become a woman-hating incel. It's really simple, as a man, you prove that you are attractive to women by having sex with them. Unless you are famous and have female fans …
/r/seduction25/02/21 07:08 AM
4

Everyone who's had unprotected oral sex with 3 people or more already has herpes. And some people are just born with it. This is why there's "no kiss" rule though.
/r/TheRedPill25/02/21 05:56 AM
8

It's literally safer to bang a hooker in a condom than a prude girl without one. What diseases? Also, most of them regularly check for STDs.
/r/TheRedPill24/02/21 04:15 PM
4

Your advice is valid only if a guy still in the mindset of chasing women. When he can get sex easily he no longer has a reason to interact with women, for he always only chased sex and nothing else. By hiring escorts you basically skip a stage in game to being disillusioned with sex. And if you still haven't changed your self-perception from chaser to chooser then it'll stop you from any progress. But if you do, it could save you a lot of time. If you are still a virgin in your twenties then thi…
/r/TheRedPill24/02/21 04:11 PM
31

IDK man, it helped me to get disillusioned about sex. After fucking your first 9/10 for some measly $ you can no longer value pussy as much as you did before. That is, as long as the price you paid for sex isn't considered high for you. I'm from Russia and here you can get model looking girls for less than 50$ per hour. If anything, it was the starting point for me in getting laid. You no longer can be easily controlled by sex when you can just buy it. The problem with virgins is that they overv…
/r/TheRedPill24/02/21 04:03 PM
21

Wait, it's illegal to BUY escorts in the USA? Now I understand why people like to riot out there. This is really a war against men when you can't even buy your basic animal right to have sex with attractive women.
/r/TheRedPill24/02/21 03:57 PM
4

What about "legal teen" isn't clear enough for you?
/r/TheRedPill20/02/21 04:58 AM
3

You wouldn't see a difference between a 17-year-old and a 18-year-old unless they tell you, so this is bullshit. Moreover, many 16-year-olds (male or female) legit look like they are in their mid-twenties. And vice-versa.
/r/TheRedPill20/02/21 04:57 AM
3

What about it? Why can't a 23-year-old adult fuck whoever they want?
/r/TheRedPill20/02/21 04:55 AM
18

The first thing I want to ask those who claim that "teens are dumb" is when was the last time they've talked to a post-wall woman? There's literally zero difference, lol. Most people don't really get much smarter with age. The personal differences are way bigger than the age differences. A smart 18-year-old would be smarter than a dumb 40-year-old, duh.
/r/TheRedPill20/02/21 04:53 AM
84

Many studies prove that men with Dark Triad personality traits, i.e. psychopaths, are getting laid way more than an average man. They literally use women as objects to satisfy their lust or other desires. But they also follow your advice - they don't use women for validation. If you talked to any guys like this, you'll find that they don't have respect for women and you can't get validation from someone if you aren't even consider them as your equal. You advice isn't really about "treating women…
/r/seduction07/02/21 09:58 AM
1

If you have a decent level of awareness of what’s going on around you, then you probably already noticed that men who obsessively spam approach women – like pickup artists - don’t get laid as much as high value “naturals”. This is bullshit. It seems that you don't really have this "awareness" you are talking about. When it comes to the NUMBER of women, then PUAs outperform "naturals" by far. Because most naturals don't even chase numbers. They are more than content with having a couple of hot fu…
/r/TheRedPill07/02/21 09:49 AM
13

There are people who earn more than 300k$ a year, so why would they give a fuck about spending 20k$ on a car? If it is too much money for you, then learn how to earn more, lol. Stop assuming that everyone is in the same financial situation as you. It wasn't even financial advice.
/r/TheRedPill02/02/21 02:29 AM
1

This is not what you say, but why you say that. Attractiveness is about social dynamics. And social dynamics are more about a non-verbal communication than a verbal one.
/r/seduction28/01/21 03:56 PM
2

Just because you are somewhat attracted to someone doesn't mean that you should have sex with them. You can be somewhat attracted or you can be FUCK YEAH attracted. The difference is huge.
/r/seduction28/01/21 03:54 PM
1

I guess your point is that a 9/10 for one person is a 6/10 for another. Which is true. Or that a person one night is a 9 and another night is a 6. Which is also true. Ratings can change, as well as binary choices (0 or 1). They are all subjective if that's what you mean and I agree. 9/10 is still 9/10 for about 80% of people. According to many studies, personal differences in perceived attractiveness aren't that high. Also, hotness of a woman doesn't fluctuate that much, especially when it comes…
/r/seduction28/01/21 03:51 PM
0

Why is this bullshit upvoted? Obviously attraction isn't binary. Moreover, there are both social and biological aspects to beauty standards. Attractiveness is subjective only for about 20%, everything else is objective and there are even AI networks which rate it rather accurately.
/r/seduction28/01/21 03:48 PM
1

So if you are working and a hot girl shows that she is interested in you, you'll be pissed off at her? It just means that you are a shitty person.
/r/seduction24/01/21 04:32 AM
1

Rather than just being an asshole you should be overconfident, narcissistic and socially dominant. Those are qualities that are attractive for many women and they also very likely to make you an asshole.
/r/seduction08/01/21 12:56 PM
1

This is not a valid point, lol. Don't have high standards? They do, just those standards are different than those of other women. Those are women who want strong emotions, be they negative or positive, in their life. They would reject a guy with a good job who respects women, but is boring, and yet they would date a drug addict who is an asshole and can make them feel strong emotions. If you are looking just for casual sex then there are only two standards of quality for women you meet - their l…
/r/seduction08/01/21 12:52 PM
3

And you were still puzzled with the fact that women can only carry 1 man's seed at a time. The man who is supposed to be the winner. Funny you have 0 refute for this, and no, saying "the harvard degree I got in a happy meal" isnt an argument. Well, no shit Sherlock. A woman also needs someone to take care of the children. There is no contradiction to what I said. I even explained in detail why it works the way it does. Women aren't programmed to be promiscuous and fuck every guy they can. They a…
/r/TheRedPill08/01/21 12:06 PM
3

Sorry, but, when it comes to women in their twenties, assholes win both long and short games. Nice guys win women in their thirties (and older) and single moms. Not much of a win if you ask me.
/r/seduction08/01/21 03:57 AM
1

I’ve never seen or heard of an instance where a woman complains about being poorly treated by a man and yet continues to seek out the same guys who are assholes and/or manipulative fake nice douchebags. Eh, I guess you don't have much life experience then. Many women stay in a toxic relationship for YEARS. I would say that majority of women who are still single at 30 are exactly like this. Or maybe it was just a sarcasm from your side and I missed it? p.s. I'd read your post to the end, yeah, de…
/r/seduction08/01/21 03:54 AM
4

They have the right to be frustrated when they are being nice and women reject them while other guys, who openly don't treat women with respect or care, still get laid way more than them. The nice guys wouldn't be so frustrated if only "genuinely good men" got the girls. Also, most "nice guys" I know don't really attack women in any way, rather, they just become self-deprecated after rejection and feel like shit. It was the case for me when I was one of them as well. Objectively, there is nothin…
/r/seduction08/01/21 03:50 AM
4

You should learn about biology. There's a reason why a woman can only carry ONE man's seed at a time. Nature counts on her to pick the absolute best partner available to her, and simp for them HARD. Their brains literally get rewired when theyre in love. You ever seen a HOT girl go back to some cheating scumbag 1000 after he beats and treats her like dog shit? That's the average woman's pairbonding taking over their existence. It is you who should learn about biology. I completed Harward's cours…
/r/TheRedPill08/01/21 02:18 AM
5

Looool... What do you think is women's biological "hardwiring"? Monogamy? Nope. A human female has two reproductive objectives - to get the best genes she can and to get the best provider she can. But those objectives contradict each other because a man with the best genes available to her wouldn't be willing to provide. This is how it always was, this is why monogamy requires SOCIAL ENFORCEMENT to work. No one wastes billions to turn women into sluts. On the contrary, through the history of hum…
/r/TheRedPill07/01/21 05:08 AM
1

What do you mean by "frankly impossible standard"? Having sex at the first date? It is the norm if you get girls from Tinder or daygame. If you think that it isn't possible instead of something that should happen all the time then you really don't understand seduction well enough. In most cases, it is easier to have a sex at the first date than at the third. The longer you wait, the more variables there are. If you are looking for casual sex then the first and second dates are the only ones you …
/r/seduction05/01/21 05:53 PM
1

I want them to impress me instead of the other way around and once I feel like they are someone I want to get involved with, I kiss them. If they reject me, I don't care, they are 1 person in 7 billion. This is spot on. But the vast majority of guys would never understand this without this sub or without experiencing this first-hand like you did. So your "you don't need this sub" claim is a lie. Also, this is just one realisation, you are still not quite there at the highest level of understandi…
/r/seduction05/01/21 05:28 PM
1

Dude, I fucked my first girl when I was 15, and here you are, a virgin, trying to teach me how to get laid? Lol. BTW it is laughable that you are proud of making out with four girls, I made out with more girls when I was, like 13... wtf are you smoking? If you think that I use "Mystery method" then you are wrong. But I know guys who do and get results. Do they get results because this is the best way to get laid? No. They do because it is enough to just approach women and as long as you don't fu…
/r/seduction02/01/21 05:23 PM
4

Lol, there enough proof in the net, you just don't care. Even if I record everything from approach a girl to sleeping with her you always can use an excuse "she is just a hooker, he paid her" or "he is actually good looking", etc. There are many videos from PUAs on youtube, but you always can say that all of them are staged. You can find many "success journeys" on forums like sosuave, but it wouldn't matter to you. I don't have a reason to prove anything to you, I don't give a fuck about the fac…
/r/seduction02/01/21 06:02 AM
-1

This post has 0 upvotes for a reason, dude. Because it is bullshit. I personally know 2 guys who got laid with mystery method, I don't care if he has any proofs or not. I personally fuck hot women even if I'm below average in looks. And at the beginning I even lived with my parents - still got laid more than you'll ever will. Please start to teach people after you actually fucked your first 9/10 girl. Then we'll talk.
/r/seduction02/01/21 05:50 AM
14

Guys who upvote this nonsense, wtf is wrong with you? This guy just acknowledged that he is a virgin lower in the comments. Fuckboys don't need this because 90% of them get laid just because they are lucky - physically attractive and have a lot of positive experience since they were little boys, have broad social circle while in high school and college. The same fuckboys then can't get laid outside of Tinder soon after they hit their mid-twenties. Or, even more likely, they marry to some party s…
/r/seduction02/01/21 04:52 AM
3

And I may be a virgin but I am not kiss less. The girls I’ve hooked up with at parties never did any of those “head games” you mentioned. Lol, you have no right to give any advice here, dude. This "my friends can get laid without pickup tactics so they don't work" is such a bullshit. Making out with party sluts isn't achievement, dude. Anyone can do it. You shouldn't learn from guys who are naturally good with girls (though you friends are not, I guarantee you that without parties and social cir…
/r/seduction02/01/21 04:46 AM
2

Good for you, unfortunately I live in Siberia and right now there is -30 celsius on the outside, lol.
/r/TheRedPill02/01/21 04:40 AM
1

The main difference is - when you watch a movie or TV-series your brain is relaxed, it doesn't work that much. It works more when you are playing a video-game (depending on a game, though). And it works even more when you are reading books. If you just want something to spend your free time, then reading a book is better. But if you want to relax after a hard day then it is counter-productive. Your brain needs to rest.
/r/TheRedPill01/01/21 05:40 PM
1

You can't self-improve non-stop. Your brain needs to relax, a lot. There is just not enough neuro-mediators to help you concentrate your attention on important tasks or to help you doing boring shit.
/r/TheRedPill01/01/21 05:37 PM
6

For a girl to be truly into someone she needs to meet them first. Unless you are a celebrity or have totally awesome looks/photos then it is unlikely for a girl to be "totally into you". When it comes to online, then the only level of interest you need is for her to be interested to meet you IRL.
/r/seduction31/12/20 01:13 PM
-1

This just doesn't work like this online. This is why you need to take set a meeting within 10 messages or so. It is almost impossible for a girl at your level or above to become emotionally invested in you just from online.
/r/seduction31/12/20 01:11 PM
1

This is the most important thing guys need to learn about "online text game" : if you didn't get her number within 10 messages then you are wasting your time.
/r/seduction31/12/20 01:09 PM
1

So? Nothing you said contradicts anything I said, other than the difference in taste in women. A woman's personality matters when it comes to sex because some women are harder than the others, it is objective truth. You meet and fuck girls from your social circle? Good for you, so? There are different ways to be successful with women, the difference is - my is way more universal, while you rely more on luck than anything else. A girl's personality doesn't matter if you just want to fuck her once…
/r/seduction29/12/20 05:38 AM
1

You overthinking all of this. In reality, making people react is just about amusing yourself with their help. And non-reacting is just about ignoring their attempts at "qualify" you, i.e. either to diminish you or to praise you. I "use" the girls to amuse myself, as a result, they start to have fun eventually, too.
/r/seduction29/12/20 05:26 AM
1

If you think that men and women work in the same way then you are more than delusional. On the other hand, a fatty still can get a man who is in the top 5% of men in terms of financial success and status, just by being charismatic, proactive and knowing what she is doing. You'll be surprised how many successful men are desperate enough. Some of them are just fat admirers, there is such a thing as well.
/r/seduction28/12/20 09:52 PM
0

It isn't about "seducing girls", lol. There is no such a thing. You are just showing her who you really are and then it is she who seduces you. DTF girls are those who have low standards, the girls to whom your looks are enough to make them attracted. Those are the lowest quality girls you can get. A girl with enough self-respect wouldn't be ready to fuck a guy just because he is physically attractive. There are only 3 types of DTF girls: 1. Below average and fatties who are desperate, they bang…
/r/seduction28/12/20 09:36 PM
2

And for negging that's fun and NOT mean (more like teasing) once you've found that common value, you can call back to that fishing story with something like "So what other boring hobbies do you have?" As long as you're laughing, winking, smiling, follow up with a "just kidding just kidding" it works. You are obviously don't have much actual experience in doing this. Because if you did, you'd knew that the key here is HOW you do this, your non-verbals. The tone of your voice, your facial expressi…
/r/seduction28/12/20 08:49 PM
0

It's never happens to losers without any charisma or game, yes. So you are completely right, it would never happen to you.
/r/seduction28/12/20 08:15 PM
3

Yeah, Musk is such a chad. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B2wRvhbJIQQ&ab_channel=JimBeam
/r/TheRedPill28/12/20 08:14 PM
1

I wouldn't call this "put in work". If this is real you, then it wouldn't take any efforts. In fact, very often, it is just boring when a girl is DTF from the start. This is why many guys who did both daygame and Tinder "game" prefer the former. It is just more fun when a girl isn't interested at the start or even aggressive, but then becomes yours anyway.
/r/seduction28/12/20 05:46 AM
63

To anyone who thinks that success in life will automatically bring him success with women I advise to learn about sexual life of Johnny Depp and Elon Musk. You can also can try and ask people with low socioeconomic status (like ghetto dudes) about guys who slay with women - you'll be surprised how common it is for guys without any proper job to bang hotties. You can go very far just with pure confidence, strong frame and clear understanding of women's mind.
/r/TheRedPill27/12/20 06:28 PM
1

Are you blind or something? The guy is legit 9/10 while the girl is 6/10 at best. I really can't see any point in discussion, I say how things are in reality, something I know from my experience. I don't care what anyone else says because I fuck hot girls regularly thanks to my "game" and personality while being below average in looks. And the best guys I know who are good with girls aren't goodlooking either. This is also supported by evolutionary biology and studies, so no point to argue here.…
/r/seduction27/12/20 10:56 AM
2

My point isn't overstated in the slightest when it comes to daygame cold approach. Even on Tinder you'd need to have high quality photos from right angle, with attractive nonverbals, to show what you have hobbies, etc. But yeah, the more you look like a cool high value guy the less tests you'll get from people. Let's take two charismatic confident man - one ugly, one hot. The ugly one would need to take more social pressure, he would meet more resistance because people wouldn't believe him that …
/r/seduction27/12/20 08:29 AM
3

Obviously, if your personality sucks, then women wouldn't care about it. Women get what they can from you. If you can only offer your looks, you'll be with women who like you only for them. If you can only offer your money, then only women who need your money would be with you. There is no contradiction.
/r/seduction27/12/20 04:15 AM
3

Dude, don't you realize that you contradict yourself? Reality face-slaps you and proves you wrong, but you can't even see it. If you, as you said, is ugly and it was the only thing that mattered then you wouldn't make out with a girl or "get a blowjob from a 9/10 slut". If it was the case then a guy being creepy PUA wouldn't change anything, as long as a girl was into him. The only guys who are more delusional than bluepills are blackpills.
/r/seduction27/12/20 03:38 AM
0

So? There is no contradiction. If you are hot or famous you'll have some women interested. But only women below your league who have self-esteem issues. I can guarantee you that if this guy try to approach random women on the street 90% of them will reject him straight away, if he is as boring as you said. Except you can be both charismatic and boring, because charisma isn't about being entertaining, it is about being socially strong. If you think that men and women work the same way then you're…
/r/seduction27/12/20 03:30 AM
1

We don't have hoods where I'm from.
/r/seduction27/12/20 03:27 AM
0

Many men who struggle with women seek advice from really handsome, charismatic ladies men. Don't ask handsome ladies men. Ask ugly ladies men, they'll have the best advice. Advice from ladies men is often generic, over-simplified and rarely effective when applied to a struggling man. There is no advice that could help a struggling man because what he needs to know isn't "what he should do", but how he should change himself inside, change his worldview and understanding of dynamic between men and…
/r/seduction26/12/20 03:59 PM
47

My one friend recently got engaged. He spoke about how his now-fiancee hits him and threatens to report him for abuse, despite him never touching her, making arguments out of thin air, keeps her money from him while taking his money, and always takes her family's side; her mother hates him by the way. Additionally, he's trapped because they already have a child together. I can't imagine what his life will be when he officially gets married. This isn't the case where you should have any hope. In …
/r/TheRedPill26/12/20 03:57 PM
33

Nah, it doesn't work this way. The real game isn't about "negs and techniques", but about your charisma, frame and social skills. In 90% cases a girl isn't going to be interested in you just because of your looks, even if you are attractive, at least this is the case if you both are just strangers. But if she experiences that you have social power, that you can take social pressure effortlessly, that you are non-needy and fun to be around - guess what, she would start to feel the attraction. I w…
/r/seduction26/12/20 03:51 PM
10

Sure maybe working on your game can increase your attraction but that puts the pressure on you to come off right. If you see it from the start she's pretty much there for you to grab. All you have to do is carry on a regular conversation. This is the wrong way to look at "game". Really solid game isn't about techniques. It is about you as a person. You don't make girls attracted to you by saying the "right thing". You do it by having attractive personality and strong frame. If a girl is interest…
/r/seduction26/12/20 03:42 PM
13

Some men here want to actually have children and/or to be in a somehow long-term relationship. You should be delusional if you think that in this case her sexual history doesn't matter. If you are still at the stage of spinning plates, getting FWBs and ONS then of course it shouldn't matter to you at all.
/r/TheRedPill26/12/20 06:46 AM
1

Something like this is posted here each month and each time it gets upvoted and yet guys still struggle. Unlike what some of you think, not all guys in this community are nerdy incels who live in their parent's basement. Many men who struggle with women have ALL of the things you mentioned and more. Hell, men like Elon Musk and Johnny Depp still suck with women even if they are at the level most of us would never achieve. Being successful in life wouldn't make you fuck. I know more than one guy …
/r/seduction25/12/20 08:30 AM
2

Not all married women have casual sex with many men before finding their husband. Women who treat relationships seriously only date seriously and only break up when there is obvious incompatibility.
/r/seduction23/12/20 12:59 PM
1

What language is that?
/r/seduction23/12/20 02:35 AM
3

Their time will come when a girl is tired from having casual sex with more exciting guys and decides to settle with a safe guy who makes her comfortable. Don't be this guy. You literally would be the one who "finish last" because everyone else is already done with this girl and your turn is the last one.
/r/seduction23/12/20 02:32 AM
0

Or you can learn how to effectively cold approach, it works even better and you don't even need to have the looks as much.
/r/seduction23/12/20 02:29 AM
16

Honestly, I agree with that and think that the post itself, most likely, fake. But the comments are 100% real and you can see from them how people really think about situations like this.
/r/TheRedPill22/12/20 02:52 AM
7

Honestly, I think that the post is most likely fake, but the comments are real and they are the real point.
/r/TheRedPill22/12/20 02:51 AM
1

Let me be straight with you. Among all the answers in this thread, none of them would be helpful to you. Because you aren't scared of women. Unlike everyone else tells you, you aren't really putting women on a pedestal. It is all about you. This is always about you. You idolize attractive women because they can give you something you crave with all your soul. I'm not talking about sex. What I'm talking about is validation. In the end, women and sex are just tools for you even if you are probably…
/r/seduction21/12/20 03:43 PM
1

If you'd just reread my first two messages a couple of times you'd be able to learn so much and improve with women a lot. But you can't even understand my point even after I stated it directly. You shouldn't be "motivated by women and sex" in the first place. You shouldn't consider "women will like it" as a factor worth of your consideration. The vast majority of men could never be truly good with women because they are in a loop of chasing sex and validation. Instead of allowing women to chase …
/r/TheRedPill21/12/20 03:13 PM
2

Dating is harder? Lol, no. It is easier than it ever was. But it is the case for attractive men only. 50 years ago it was nearly impossible for one man to have sex with 100+ women, now almost anyone can achieve it if put enough efforts into it. We have literally zero things to worry about on a date, and they have an endless list going as far as worrying about their physical safety. Do you realize that according to statistics men become victims of sexual harassment almost as often as women do? An…
/r/seduction21/12/20 03:12 AM
0

Sorry to tell you this, but this sub is both for those who need an advice and for those who are here to give advices. It isn't some sort of sub for incels or virgins. It is both for successful men and for those who aren't there yet.
/r/TheRedPill21/12/20 03:07 AM
11

" ‘I’ve literally been pissed on and shitted on so many times I just don’t understand why they like it (after the third time you get shit on you get used to it). I’ve had to have sex with a German Shepard dog in front of [Saudi Royalty]. I’ve got paid to eat shit. I’ve got paid to get beat up. I even had to stick a live salmon in some 65 year old man’s ass. I’ve had sex with 14 year old boys to make them men. I’ve smeared my face with their shit. So to all of you ladies that are going to bash me…
/r/TheRedPill20/12/20 07:42 AM
40

skinny fat, low-testosterone, porn-using losers Do you mean an average everyday man who is 20-50 years old? Because this describes the vast majority of them. You need to realize that 90% of men aren't redpilled. So when he said that those are just normal, everyday guys he was 100% right. The so-called "basement dwellers" don't even have money to pay to those girls.
/r/TheRedPill20/12/20 07:24 AM
3

There are men who earn money on OnlyFans, too. For example amateur porn stars. Why should you allow a girl to earn all those money on her own, when you can be a part of it and earn with her? If you are good with women then you definitely can find a girl who'll be more than willing to do it and get a share of half of your income, lol. So all guys who are dissatisfied should remember that they can do the same thing if they really want. Also there is something you forgot - while she is not exactly …
/r/TheRedPill20/12/20 07:12 AM
1

No, being aware doesn't solve the problem. To REALLY stop putting women on a pedestal you first should stop putting sex on a pedestal. Incels who hate women still put them on a pedestal, even if they think they don't. In fact, they hate them exactly because they consider them as above themselves. Changing yourself for the sake of women is just a consequence of putting them on a pedestal. You treat women as a prize to win, can't you see it?
/r/TheRedPill20/12/20 07:01 AM
1

You can't compare a 20-year-old adult to 14-year-old teen, it is just retarded. BTW, I'm a 25-year-old, so there is no nerve to "struck", I only pointed out how flawed your logic here. Though I doubt that you care about such a thing as logic, considering your answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/20 06:58 AM
0

In this context, the word creep is just a stupid label. This is the same as saying "women should just marry one person and always be loyal to them instead of being sluts who suck everyone's dick". There is no justification or logic here. You just arbitrarily chose to put a label on someone even if it isn't right. Calling older men "creeps" for wanting younger women instead of actually being a creep by definition is the same as calling women "sluts" for wearing exposing clothes or having more tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/20 12:30 PM
1

Why are you on this sub if you don't even know the basics of Red Pill? Until you chose to settle just spin plates. Also, do you realize that you infantilize adults in their twenties? Many of them are guaranteed to be smarter than you.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/20 12:23 PM
2

You don't need a supermodel to date, you can probably find a cashier girl who'll be prettier than 90% of "supermodels". Leagues are somehow real only when it comes to financial leagues and status. And then again, it is only about LTRs. A hot girl from an affluent family is unlikely to date seriously someone poor, but it wouldn't stop her from banging a handsome charismatic guy from McDonald's.
/r/seduction19/12/20 03:38 AM
2

The truth though - the vast majority of men aren't "nice guys", actually they are closer to "good guys" and still don't get laid as much as they want. Most men who struggle with women are just regular guys, not some kind of incel basement dwellers.
/r/seduction19/12/20 03:32 AM
1

If there are situations with women you consider as "rejections" then you already failed at having the right perspective and mindset. There are no rejections, only women who aren't going to give you what you expect from your woman.
/r/seduction19/12/20 03:29 AM
2

So many words and so little essense. Good luck trying to find a "nice guy" who fits all or at least most of the traits. The core problem is that men think that they can BUY a woman's interest and sex by acting in certain ways, be it "being nice" or using techniques. The solution? Don't treat sex as something that you should "buy" by being a good boy. Be yourself and it would be either your way or highway. Don't try to get sex, instead try to find women who are worth your time.
/r/seduction19/12/20 03:24 AM
0

Lol, there is no contradiction. AWALT exist to make you remember that even the most awesome woman is still "like this" and that there is always the risk. And no, age of a man barely affects pregnancy and children's health. And the correlation that exists is mostly related to the fact that older men are more likely to engage with older women. Moreover, no one is risking their life, unlike a pregnant 45-year-old woman. Expecting childbirth from a woman older than 40 is just unethical considering a…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/20 03:14 AM
2

I think it should be obvious, but 27 is the average age of first marriage in MOST FIRST WORLD WESTERN COUNTRIES. In third world countries the average age of first marriage is around 18-20. In Eastern Europe (Russia, Ukraine, etc) it is 23-24.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/20 03:09 AM
1

The point was - that it is a good news for men and proves that all those "it can't happen, young women don't need you old assholes!" is bullshit. As long as you are above average you can get women in their twenties even if you are past your forties.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/20 02:56 AM
1

If everyone here were starting from 0 then there would be no people to help them, lol. I mean, yes, if you are an average dude then your best bet is to find girls through social circle and to achieve that you need hobbies where you can meet women. But this is a little bit different than just pursuing hobbies women find cool. You don't do this to be cool for women, you do it to have more chances to meet them. The thing is - this mindset that makes you so fixated at getting women, doing what THEY …
/r/TheRedPill19/12/20 02:55 AM
1

Lol, dude. Just google statistics https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nsfg/key_statistics/n.htm An average man fucks less than 7 women in his whole life, fucking think about it - 7 women! And this is counting dudes like me who fucked 100+ women, this is also counting dudes who buy hookers (actually you can see that in some countries an average number of partners can be as high as 15 - usually those are countries where prostitution is legal) and counting dudes who fuck a lot in college. A socially active ma…
/r/TheRedPill18/12/20 03:08 PM
2

Women in general don't think in terms of "sexual purity". For example, when their man cheats they don't really care how kinky sex was or with how many women he cheated. From my experience they, on the contrary, care about how invested he was in her emotionally and financially. In general, it is easier for women to forgive random sex with a hooker than a serious long-term relationship with a mistress. Women care about emotional aspect of cheating, how invested he was in this other woman. But for …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/20 02:18 PM
1

Most men either don't have enough options or too brainwashed by feminism to really go for quality women. This is why "women 30+ are still doing fine". But how is this even related to the discussion? Each thing I said is a fact. You can't just claim that objective facts are "mindset", sorry.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/20 02:04 PM
1

This is the actual level of any "argument" against dating younger women, lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/20 01:51 PM
2

People don't realize that you just proved that this DOES happen and very much possible. You also didn't mention details like how rich he is and how much he pays for child support.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/20 12:03 PM
1

The main reason is that there is no decent (for an LTR) woman who is still single past 30. Almost all women who are single in their thirties or forties are either divorcees, "businesswomen" or sluts who suddenly decided to settle. Just by the method of elimination 99% of them can't be considered for a long-term relationship by any man with options. Just the fact that the chances of successful childbirth without any health complications decrease exponentially after a woman hits her thirties is en…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/20 11:51 AM
0

Here are the main reasons why RP men want to settle: They want to have children. They are tired from managing multiple women. They found someone who is too awesome to miss. Let's see... Childbirth is something women are supposed to do before their thirties, after that the chances of negative outcomes raise exponentially. If you want to have one woman instead of many, you'll make sure that she is at least as good-looking as other women you banged on average, otherwise you wouldn't feel sexual sat…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/20 11:40 AM
1

27 isn't "only". This is already past the average age of first marriage in most countries. Anyway, it is common to lose social circle when you are getting in LTR or just outgrow those people.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/20 11:29 AM
1

Unless the man is literally a millionaire, he's not going to date women in their 20s when he is in his late 30s or 40s. Loooool... do you realize that the vast majority of redpill men in their forties date women in their mid-twenties? First of all you need to point out in which way men in their 30s worse than men in their 20s. Statistically this is the age women find the most attractive. Because this is the age when men are at their peak both in terms of looks and in terms of status. Forties? Ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/20 11:28 AM
3

Men with an aversion to sluts always talk about not wanting to be compared to the men in her past. Lol, didn't see any arguments like this from any redpilled man, ever. This is the same as stating that people don't like when their spouse cheats on them because they don't want to be compared. The aversion to promiscuity is the same as the aversion to being cheated on, in essence, those are the same feeling. On the fundamental level, people hate being cheated on because it is a form of disrespect …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/20 11:10 AM
-1

The word slut is considered insulting because its meaning always was insulting. It doesn't indicate any shit, it is the same as the word "fat". Just because you calling someone fat doesn't mean that you insulting them. You are just stating the truth in not-so-respectful-and-tolerant way. There are people who acknowledge that they are fat and women who acknowledge that they are sluts and don't feel ashamed.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/20 10:45 AM
-1

Nah, show me a man who slept with more than 30 women and who is willing to marry a girl with the same body-count. The vast majority of guys who are completely fine with marrying a woman who slept around a lot are either desperate simps or desperate simps who already married such a woman, lol. No one in TRP community hates sluts (maybe with some exception), we just don't consider them as an LTR material. Because they are not. BTW I think that those reality TV case is either a lie or this guy just…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/20 10:37 AM
3

Yes, the statistic shows that men who are good-looking fuck less attractive women. In my experience, the women who care about appearance of a man the most are, actually fatties. When I was a teenager one of my friends did have a really nice body, but he couldn't get laid. Why? Because he only wanted hot girls. And the ones attracted to his body were fatties and other below-average girls, they were very open about their attraction. And do you know who fucked the hottest girls? Bad boys, bullies a…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/20 10:30 AM
3

This all happen only in fantasies. Or maybe it is experience of unattractive bottom 20% of girls who think that they fell for an asshole because of his manipulations and not because this asshole is way more attractive than they are and, honestly, out of their league. He probably wouldn't even try to get in her pants if he wasn't as desperate as many other men.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/20 10:15 AM
8

Only a woman can think like this. The fact is - many guys pay PUA to learn how to manipulate girls and they still fail miserably. Manipulations don't get you laid easily. In most cases, manipulations are good at keeping long-term relationships while cheating. Moreover, the attempt to manipulate itself makes most men less confident, makes them too much in their head to be natural. The best manipulators are natural ones. Aslo, try to manipulate a girl who isn't interested in you from the get go. W…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/12/20 10:11 AM
3

Well, technically, by law, you can't share videos containing other people without their permission even if those vids aren't porn. Moreover, the first paragraph states the following " Intentional distribution of non-consensual porn", the problem here though is how to prove if it was consensual and that in most places they just don't care if the porn was consensual as long as a female (I hope there is no one who doubts that this law only works if a victim is female) in question didn't agree to di…
/r/TheRedPill18/12/20 09:58 AM
1

I don't care about most guys, I only care about the best. And the best guys never choose their hobbies based on women's preferences. Period. There are many reasons why we lift, it isn't even about "having hobby", it is about being in shape. Women aren't attracted to you because you "lift weights as a hobby", if you are fat or skinny and tell women that you lift they wouldn't give a fuck. They only care about the results - and those results you need for yourself as well. Doing everything for wome…
/r/TheRedPill18/12/20 09:46 AM
5

The thing is - most women aren't really into the so-called "normal sex" even if they don't watch porn as frequently if at all. Almost all of them want to be dominated hard, even those who don't know it yet. Because this is how evolution programmed them. Moreover, unlike how things are in porn, to really make your girl orgasm strongly you'd need to be super slow with prelude, like 20-30 minutes before even touching her pussy. It doesn't matter if you are watching porn or not, you'd need to either…
/r/TheRedPill18/12/20 09:17 AM
7

Nah, decent girls DO exist, it is just a matter of proportion. The thing is, most of them are already taken when they are 20-22. There are two types of "stupid girls" - those who marry early and those who fuck around. Then they evolve to "divorced with kids" and to "I tired from the cock carousel and want to find a husband" respectively. If you only go for the older women whose "stupid girl" phase was years ago then of course the chances that you'll find someone dateable is really low. I'll tell…
/r/TheRedPill18/12/20 09:13 AM
1

Most guys who are good with women don't get laid from their hobbies. They get laid either from their looks, personality or both. You don't need any hobbies to get laid. A girl you found on Tinder or approached in club wouldn't care about this as long as you are attractive enough. In case of Tinder you can make a couple of photos that show them an illusion of you having those "super interesting hobbies". I never heard of any guy who fucked 50+ women by taking lessons in yoga. I guess your standar…
/r/TheRedPill18/12/20 05:58 AM
1

By definition "normal" means average or majority. And the vast majority of guys aren't comfortable approaching women or being alone in a club. Most people, men or women, are rather wary of strangers. And when it comes to clubs and bars it depends on how often you are going there.
/r/TheRedPill18/12/20 05:52 AM
1

If she thinks you're not physically attractive or whatever, I know there's not special words (as you say) to turn her on and make her want to sleep with you (feel free to give examples that we can all test though lol) There are no special words. There can only be SPECIAL YOU. You who don't gives a fuck, you who can self-express naturally, you who can tease and have fun, you who can self-amuse, you who can take any amount of social pressure, you who is charismatic and charming. Those aren't words…
/r/seduction15/12/20 03:42 AM
2

When it comes to high schools, then this is rarely about "social skills". It is more about your willingness to escalate a conflict. Which will end in a fight very often. So basically hierarchy between boys in a high school usually created like this: there are physically (and/or mentally) weak boys without a group to back them up and then there are athletic guys and/or a group of aggressive boys who'll support each other and gang up on their victims. And then the aggressive group raises its own s…
/r/TheRedPill15/12/20 03:26 AM
1

There is a proverb in my country, Russia. "When you meet a man, you judge him by his clothes; when you leave, you judge him by his heart. " Even if this 5'2 doesn't get any interested looks he will still be immensely attractive if he is charismatic, can take social pressure effortlessly, has solid frame and is "socially invincible". If you have rock-solid frame then everything you say and do elevates your social status, moreover, all attempts to "shut you down" will end up in your status raised …
/r/seduction14/12/20 05:57 PM
7

It depends on a person, really. Some Chads are cool dudes, but some guys are at the same time are both assholes and Chads. It is especially the case for high school where bullies and jerks are the ones who get the most action with girls (there are multiple studies that prove it). The difference though - they rarely end up in a high-end college. Usually, being an aggressive asshole is associated with lower intelligence and different social values. Often those guys end up being those "criminal bad…
/r/TheRedPill14/12/20 05:37 PM
0

You don't need to be objectively successful to be good with women. You don't need to use pickup tricks and techniques. The only thing you truly need to learn is how to express yourself in an genuine and high value way. It means being non-reactive emotionally and having a chooser mentality. But to achieve this you need to shift your paradigm, to understand how wrong some of your basic motivations are.
/r/TheRedPill14/12/20 05:16 PM
1

The trick is to have your interests align with what women find attractive- interests so personally fulfilling that if you never get laid again they become spiritual quests. Lesson: The only way to be successful is to first, genuinely and authentically, live for yourself. You try to adjust your interests with what women find attractive. This is the opposite of "living for yourself". Your conclusion and lesson are right, but the example isn't. If you live for yourself, if you choose instead of cha…
/r/TheRedPill14/12/20 05:11 PM
9

This is what I expected from OP's post when I read the first part of it. And then he goes and tell us to imagine that a girl has sperm on her face, lol. I mean, his advice only deals with the symptoms (not very effectively, mind you), not the core reason. The core problem the guys have with women is that their purpose is to get sex and all their efforts are concentrated to achieve this by doing the "right" thing what they think will lead to this result. And, of course, as sex is something that a…
/r/TheRedPill08/12/20 03:39 PM
1

Most women try to look their best even when they are at work. So nah, it doesn't work like this. Sure, a girl can lose a point or even two if she is in a really bad state, like being sick and alone at home early morning. Then again, it depends on a girl. Most girls who are 8-9 are like this even without any makeup. If a girl has tight body and cute face you'll see it in most types of modern clothes. If a tight dress and a lot of makeup can raise a girl's attractiveness so much for you then maybe…
/r/seduction01/12/20 04:20 AM
7

I mostly agree with you, though if a girl wears a cardboard box on her head then it would be hard to determine her attractiveness, lol.
/r/seduction01/12/20 04:12 AM
1

Okay, bro. https://i.ytimg.com/vi/QAC3BZpXXXI/hqdefault.jpg
/r/TheRedPill01/12/20 03:41 AM
1

The study didn't include men on steroids with their unnaturally looking muscles.
/r/TheRedPill30/11/20 04:36 PM
2

Just tell her that you aren't really interested in hearing this, but do it in a flirty and non-serious way to avoid being seen as asshole. Just keep her as a side-fuck, but don't commit - why should you, if she didn't commit to you either? Meet other girls at the same time, don't wait for her to dump her bf for you. If she cheated on him, then guess what will happen if you'll ever start dating?
/r/seduction27/11/20 03:24 AM
2

Strange advice, why should he turn down a "free sex ticket" and what it has to do with "self-respect"? If she cheats with you on her bf, then just don't commit and meet other girls at the same time. His question was how to stop hearing this shit without losing her completely.
/r/seduction27/11/20 03:21 AM
6

Nah, women only benefited from it, but they can't exploit the benefits because they are "bugged". You see, by default, women aren't supposed to get alpha men, those who are "above their league". They are supposed to find a loyal provider at their own level or close to it. Maybe, if she wants to get the max benefits, she can try to cheat on her hubby with someone better and get the best genes while still having commitment, but it is risky (high risk high reward evolutionary strategy). The problem…
/r/TheRedPill26/11/20 03:47 PM
14

A person can be competent in one area of life and completely helpless in another. The same goes both for men and women.
/r/TheRedPill26/11/20 03:41 PM
2

Lol. If you are a girl then you only need to be physically attractive and, in case there is a particular guy you want to pursue, to be 1% more proactive than other women. If you have this question then you are either aren't attractive enough or interested in a guy who has way too many options, probably both. In general, an average looking woman has many men of her level or above to choose from, especially if she uses online dating or clubs/bars to get more exposure. As to your questions - most r…
/r/seduction23/11/20 12:40 PM
5

I call bullshit. Unless you fcked up Tinder algorithm somehow (like swiping on literally everyone) it isn't possible to get 0 likes with 98% photo. I more than tripled my likes by changing 3/10 photo to 8,5/10. Other guys have the same experience. The photos were of the same quality btw. The same goes for the photos I linked before. Most likely you are just making things out to prove your point dude.
/r/seduction15/11/20 03:21 PM
6

Dude, I and many other people tested it. Just read the comments. You didn't test it and know nothing. Its rating has nothing to do with "pic quality" - you can get 30-40% with professional photos and get 90% on a photo from your phone. It is about your image and context more than anything else. The things that make women perceive you as more attractive.
/r/seduction15/11/20 03:10 PM
3

A guy with the same quality of photos gest 44% or 96% depending on the context. https://photofeeler-blog.s3.amazonaws.com/dating-site-app-profile-pictures-rated-on-photofeeler.jpg This is exactly the app about rating attractiveness, they also rate smartness and trustworthiness - this is as well only about quality of the pics? Lol.
/r/seduction15/11/20 02:54 PM
1

He invited them to his place and promised he wouldn't do anything...and then chloroform did the rest.
/r/seduction15/11/20 02:50 PM
18

This is only true for men and not for women. Notice - women rate a man on a better photo as a more ATTRACTIVE. While men - don't really. There a bunch of studies about this. Men rate women the same way even if the photo is a bathroom selfie, while women can rate the same man as either 3/10 or 9/10 depending on the context. When it comes to your attractiveness to women your image is everything while your facials aren't SO important. On photofeeler people don't rate the photo, they rate the attrac…
/r/seduction15/11/20 02:46 PM
5

Nah, bullshit. You can get significantly deeper with right exercises. Moreover, you can make your voice more melodic and pleasant to hear.
/r/seduction10/11/20 02:53 PM
2

And then, after the college, he'll find out that being a popular frat guy in college is better than being an above average guy past college. He'll find out that meeting new girls at college is much easier than doing it outside of it. He'll find out that your degree and wealth mean nothing in a club or on dating apps and your looks don't stand out as much when there many guys better than you anyway, no matter how much you work for it (unless you are lucky with your genetics). In the end, getting …
/r/seduction10/11/20 09:03 AM
14

Do you understand that more 90% of women your age far from being "power women" and are at the same mental level they were in their teens? For many men relationships with women aren't about talking about politics or science, but exactly about having great sex. And maybe about being respected, admired and having a certain control over a girl. And of course it is about a possibility of having children. Younger girls win in all of those aspects, by far. Then again, do you really think that many wome…
/r/TheRedPill24/10/20 11:32 AM
19

When you really look at the actual numbers it is fucking scary. https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/317861#Risks-of-delaying-pregnancy-until-age-35-years-or-older "While the rate of an embryo having Down syndrome at the 10-week mark of pregnancy is 1 in 1,064 at age 25, this rises to 1 in 686 at age 30 and 1 in 240 by the age of 35 years. At the age of 40, the Down syndrome rate increases still to 1 in 53, and down to 1 in 19 embryos at age 45." "The risk of miscarriage climbs gradually wi…
/r/TheRedPill21/10/20 06:18 PM
1

Lol. Death rate at 4% is an official statistic, IDK where you found this bullshit, probably US government tries to do the same things as the Russian. https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/ "30,785,112 (96%) Recovered / Discharged 1,133,166 (4%) "
/r/TheRedPill21/10/20 05:59 PM
1

" Get angry at your lazy self. Get angry at fatness. Get angry at weakness. Get angry that others are successful and you are not. GET ANGRY." It seems that you missed the meaning of "anger phase" completely. The anger phase is about being angry at women for their hypergamous and two-faced nature. It isn't about being angry at yourself or your own weakness. A typical example of being in anger phase is feeling anger towards women when they start to show obvious interest in you after you improved y…
/r/TheRedPill21/10/20 05:53 PM
2

The real unconditional romantic love that makes people crazy is only possible if you are idealize someone. The older you are and the more you experience the harder it is to idealize someone. When you start to see humans for what they are (animals created by evolution), it is almost impossible for you to truly fall in love with someone. But on the other hand it is easier for you to make someone else to be in love with you. Mutual love isn't really sustainable because a man in love becomes weak an…
/r/TheRedPill13/10/20 04:56 PM
1

You should learn your knowledge from scientific sources and not from random posts you find in the internet. Corona is a few times more deadly than your "regular flu" (4% vs less than 1%) and, unlike flu, it has long-lasting effects even on those who survive it just fine. Moreover, corona has a faster spread-rate, there are more people infected by it than by flu even with all the precautions, mostly because of those who have no symptoms even after being infected. The thing is - if you infected so…
/r/TheRedPill08/10/20 08:34 AM
35

Nah, you'll end up in the friendzone if a girl isn't sexually interested. Do you realize that a girl can develop a crush on your before actually having sex? You get friendzoned if there is no chemistry and you don't develop any attraction. It isn't necessary to fuck each girl at the first date, especially if you are looking for something more long-term. Don't be so desperate to get laid as soon as possible.
/r/seduction05/10/20 06:31 PM
3

Who said that this is a risk to you? Do you realize that by not wearing a mask it isn't you who are in danger, but other people? Just because the virus isn't deadly to you doesn't change the fact that you can infect other people, including those over 50 y.o., without even knowing. "I can't die from corona so I don't need to give a fuck" is an epitome of being an immature little shit.
/r/TheRedPill05/10/20 06:22 PM
2

Do you realize that you can get the full package? A girl who is both physically attractive and has a great personality? What you are talking about here is just being friendly, you can do the same thing with guys as well. But when it comes to sex and dating, you can't ignore how much you are sexually attracted to someone. It isn't only about validation either. We are evolutionary programmed to be more attracted to hot people. You are very right about not treating people as high value just because…
/r/seduction03/10/20 08:31 AM
2

Nah. You can treat sex as a reward and then you'll chase. Or you can treat sex as something you want and that the girl's value depends on it (i.e. if she isn't going to have sex with you, then she has no value to you). Simply put, you either can be "if I get sex I'm cool, if I don't get sex I'm a loser" or you can be "if I get sex then this girl is cool, if I don't get sex then this girl is lame". This is why assholes often are so good with the girls. They are just too self-centered to feel that…
/r/seduction03/10/20 08:19 AM
10

Not necessary, some guys are looking for LTR from the start and they indeed can care about inner qualities. After banging 10+ girls you realize that sex by itself isn't so great. It is especially the case if among those 10 girls were some who are really bad at it. The worst sex in my life was, surprisingly, with one of the hottest girls I fucked. Of course OP is still wrong because the guys who are the best with girls are actually in most cases shallow and self-centered. I would even say that th…
/r/seduction03/10/20 08:16 AM
1

Lol, dude. It isn't about being "shallow", it is about having higher standards. In any case you wouldn't want to date a girl who is physically unattractive to you. You shouldn't lower your standards when it comes to looks. But you should also have standards when it comes to a girl's behavior as well. At the initial phase when you are just interested in sex you don't really care about your personality or achievements in life because you aren't going to date her, for now. In fact, there are many g…
/r/seduction03/10/20 08:09 AM
1

Why you brought porn here though? It doesn't validate anyone, lol. Sorry, but satisfying your sexual urges while you have no access to fresh pussy doesn't make you a simp. If it did, then 95% of single men would be considered as such. Also, women still take care of themselves and try to improve, because it is what would help with getting the best men. Women don't really care so much about simps or low value men. Just look at Japan. More than 30% of adult men there are virgins and they just ignor…
/r/TheRedPill02/10/20 04:29 AM
10

I doubt that many guys dream about dating milfs. Young guys want to fuck them though. Because society teach us to respect older people and fucking someone like they are your bitch is a form of dominance. So, in a way, it gives a younger man power when he can make an older woman his. More or less like banging your boss. You can see that in porn milfs mostly play the role of mothers, teachers, bosses, etc. I.e. it is just a power fantasy more or less. You don't feel so fulfilled by dominating a sh…
/r/TheRedPill02/10/20 03:39 AM
-3

Just look at how many people don't wear masks while the risk of deadly virus is real and you'll understand that the vast majority of people, men or women, stay at the mental development level of teenager through their whole fucking life.
/r/TheRedPill02/10/20 03:36 AM
1

Nah, dude. You can feel comfortable and confident in a ring even if you have zero experience. If you just don't really care about the outcome. If there is nothing to lose either you win or not then there is no reason to worry. And when it comes to dating then all stakes are in your head. Guys feel anxiety when they talk to women because they treat it way too serious, they put way too much importance into outcome. The top athletes feel anxiety before important matches as well. When stakes are hig…
/r/seduction01/10/20 06:09 PM
0

Lol, dude. You are so wrong in so many things. Having sex with someone who is 12 or younger is considered as statutory rape even if it was a 13-17 y.o. who did it. This is how things are in most countries. Prepubescent children can't consent to anyone, even to minors. Because they are yet to hit their puberty, obviously. 13-15 y.o. can consent to other minors and 16-17 y.o. can consent to adults (at least in most countries/states). Moreover, molesting someone isn't equal to raping them. Sure, it…
/r/MensRights01/10/20 03:37 AM
-1

Actually, yes - you will be desperate as long as you treat sex as a reward and the girls as those who give it. It doesn't matter by how many girls you are surrounded, lol. In high school there were 6 guys and 20+ girls in my class, it didn't change anything. Having a lot of female friends wouldn't change much for most guys. The issue is deeper than that. Practically speaking, if you can do a cold approach then you have unlimited number of options. Let's say there is a guy who is insecure about h…
/r/seduction25/09/20 01:52 PM
5

Lol, dude. With cold approach you can fuck a new girl each week with 1-2 hours of effort. With a lifestyle like this it would take you about 10 hours a week to sustain it on a regular basis. Cold approach and online dating save you a lot of time and allow you to just get sex without wasting time on social shenanigans you don't need or enjoy. You need to have this ultra-social lifestyle only if it is something you want in itself. You don't need it to get laid or to have sex with new girls consist…
/r/seduction25/09/20 11:56 AM
1

Why is this trash upvoted? It is the same as saying "to be rich you should earn money". The neediness could and should be killed by the so-called "mental gymnastics" and "abundance mentality". Building your whole fucking lifestyle around getting girls is an epitome of neediness and just pathetic. Let me tell you something simple - the more you invest in something, the more you value it. If you invest so much time and efforts into girls then guess what - they would be fucking important to you, yo…
/r/seduction25/09/20 11:50 AM
5

Then all married men are losers. Especially those who lose a lot of money because of divorce. It is better to buy sex and fuck young hotties with no strings attached than to waste even more money on one girlfriend like some men do. Of course, the best way is to get free sex with multiple hot women who want you and not your money, but most guys aren't good enough for that and it requires a significant effort achieve it. Before I became relatively good with girls I fcked some hookers and I would s…
/r/seduction23/09/20 09:16 AM
1

Lol, no. I know at least two guys other than myself who are short (+-170cm) and fuck hot girls regularly. Your charisma is the most important thing when it comes to getting laid as a guy. Looks could help, especially athletic body and handsome face, but they are just there to create an initial attraction. Or to help you on dating apps.
/r/seduction23/09/20 09:15 AM
7

The fattest girl in my class from high school was the first to get married, it should tell you something about dating. Even below average girls have it easier than most guys. The reason why women have any problems in dating life is that they are picky and more often have one-it-is on guys who are either taken or wouldn't be interested in anything but sex. Many girls want to have a serious committed relationship with someone "above their league", this is the only reason why they struggle. If a gi…
/r/seduction23/09/20 09:12 AM
381

There is something else you missed. People in general are nice to those they consider as above them like their boss, teacher, etc. And if a girl senses that you put her above yourself, then she automatically treats you as below her and loses all her interest. And when you need something from another person you also put them above you. Simply put, you try to make a good impression and to have good reactions instead of just being true to yourself. Think about how you treat your best buddy - this i…
/r/seduction23/09/20 08:44 AM
6

Who the hell gives a fuck about yachts and followers? The number scale for women is only about appearance. A girl working as a cashier in McDonald's can be 9/10 in looks. Just because a girl is hot doesn't mean that she will be a model or an actress. Then again, I'm from Russia and maybe in the USA hot girls are so rare that each one of them can earn from her looks, lol.
/r/TheRedPill23/09/20 07:16 AM
1

For men sex and romance aren't the same. If you initiate fwb and casual sex then most guys would just put you in a "sex only" territory forever. They would definitely love it, but you can forget about turning it into something more than casual sex. It turns on them sexually, but turns off them romantically.
/r/seduction23/09/20 06:38 AM
0

This rule is for first dates and for those who just want to have sex with as many girls as fast as possible. If you have 10+ numbers from girls you met from cold approach or in club then you'll just waste your time trying to texting them all a lot. You just use messaging to set dates and then try to fuck the girls on the first date. This is what you do to have sex with many girls. If you just want to find a girlfriend then of course you can talk to girls as much as you want. If getting a girlfri…
/r/seduction23/09/20 06:32 AM
3

No, I can't see where they are coming from. Until this post I didn't even know that you need to pay for a WOMAN and not for kids in the western countries. It is a joke? Why the hell someone should owe their financial support to a healthy adult? It is literally treating women as children on a legal level, lol. He gifted her his money because he wanted, she should be grateful and not obliged for anything more than he gives her. Imagine a situation where you donated to charity once, but courts deci…
/r/TheRedPill12/09/20 06:17 PM
2

If you know how to "outframe" people then everything is easy. You need to do two things: Outframe the guy without directly attacking his ego. Praise him, or give him so face. (don't mistake for "backing off") After those two steps 99% of guys would want to be your friend and not enemy. The last 1% is the case when they decided to attack you beforehand (if they were paid for that or just wanted to rob you and not to prove their status) and nothing you do could change it even if you was completely…
/r/TheRedPill12/09/20 06:12 PM
12

If a girl does drugs regularly - run. Always, run.
/r/TheRedPill08/09/20 07:21 AM
8

" The relationship was already over before she stepped into his home, so the only reason for the whole setup was so that this simp could get a one up on her after his heart was obviously broken. " Well, exactly. He cared about her, this is why he was so hurt. If he didn't give a fuck about her and just dated her while being this "cool alpha guy" it is unlikely for her to cheat on him in the first place. He was emotionally invested and it is one of the things that made his life fulfilling. It is …
/r/TheRedPill08/09/20 07:09 AM
2

You should reframe your game and your purpose in talking to girls in a way that there would be no such a thing as "rejection" in the first place.
/r/seduction03/09/20 01:16 PM
1

Check the age of consent laws for where you are, in some countries/states it is illegal to have sex with a 17-year-old if you are older, so of course it would be a problem.
/r/seduction03/09/20 01:11 PM
2

There is a new summary of this book about 5 times per year, lol.
/r/seduction03/09/20 01:08 PM
6

You should read more of comments. It is ridiculous, but many of them seriously think that an adult can't consent if she is drunk. I say "she" because, obviously, if two equally drunk people of the opposite sex have consensual sex then it is a man raping a woman. By law, unless a person is blackout drunk they can consent, but it is something most people don't know. And this is why women can accuse anyone of "sexual assault" on twitter after any drunk hookup, even if the court would tell them to f…
/r/TheRedPill03/09/20 01:01 PM
12

Anyone could talk to a girl. Making her chase you and being obsessed with you solely because of your charisma and frame? I would say that maybe 1 man out of 1000 can do this. Most guys fail with women. And they fail on a deep fundamental level of their mindset. This post isn't even about conversation skills or any "manipulation tips", but about a deeper level of subcommunication. You don't need to think about any of this while talking to a girl. You should solve your inner conflicts and shortcom…
/r/TheRedPill31/08/20 04:20 PM
2

I liked the post for this: " Basically, no matter how hard you try to “make a girl like you” using some tactic, it won’t work because using a technique to attract a woman is in itself a form of overcompensation. " But everything else is irrelevant and, to some extent, contradicts to this. Trying to get money, status or "skills" all are just other different ways of "overcompensating". Contrary to what everyone says, getting women isn't about providing them with any physical value (of course you c…
/r/TheRedPill28/08/20 06:48 PM
1

If you never met any short dudes who date or casually fuck hotties then you should go out more often.
/r/TheRedPill28/08/20 06:40 PM
4

Value is subjective and people determine it more on what YOU think of yourself than what you really achieved. Those girls didn't realize that you "don't have achievements", they realized that you are, on a fundamental level, still insecure and just faked confidence to get laid.
/r/TheRedPill28/08/20 06:37 PM
1

The point is - the way you "think differently" is the whole thing that leads you to the results you have. This is why it is so hard for you to get any results - you are very defensive about your world-view. The world-view is a fundamental thing that separates men who get sex effortlessly and the ones who can't get it at all. If you want to change your situation then you need to start to think differently.
/r/seduction23/08/20 01:42 PM
1

Getting a hooker is legal in most countries (including the USA) and will help you lose your virginity within a day. It will help you realise that sex is not a big deal. "Not interested in escorts" is just a bullshit. You aren't interested in sex, you are interested in your status of a virgin, you want to be a "cool guy who gets laid". If you really cared about sex itself you'd lose your virginity a long time ago. You already proved my point that all your problems are from a shitty world-view whi…
/r/seduction23/08/20 05:41 AM
1

Have you read my post? I said that many men are completely satisfied with all aspects of their life other than women. This is why they have "no bigger purpose". Because everything else is either fine or awesome. And women is the only aspect of their life they aren't satisfied with.
/r/seduction23/08/20 04:47 AM
1

" Look at all your wealthy and powerful men. " Yes, look at Elon Musk and Johnny Depp. Look at all those rich and powerful men who still suck with women. Getting women is about your personality and appearance rather than about your success in life. Women wouldn't love you for your success or your money. And even if they did - would you want it? To be loved for your status or money? The point isn't in having a purpose, but in not overvaluing women and not putting them on a pedestal. There are man…
/r/seduction22/08/20 01:08 PM
2

Society doesn't want you to have casual sex, it wants you to have a family. It is advantageous for society if people are monogamous because it is the safest way to raise offspring. Human children are very long to grow up so they need someone to take care of them. And, society needs more people, not less. Promiscuous sex became more of a thing not because society forces it, on the contrary, because it started to restrict people less and less. By default humans aren't purely monogamous, pure monog…
/r/TheRedPill22/08/20 12:59 PM
1

Not really, you are literally contradicting me in this post, lol. If you just want to have sex with someone attractive then "one sexy person" is definitely can be easily replaced by another. It is one of the things that could make you less dependent on outcome and, as a result, more confident. Even when it comes to personality, it is the same. You just can't see deeper. What you mean by "not just their body, but something more" is just the fact that other than sex they could provide you with som…
/r/seduction21/08/20 05:47 PM
1

It seems you missed the point of the article. The so-called objectification wasn't initially considered as something negative or offensive, but as a part of sexual courting. Men sexually attracted to physical appearance rather than "a person", it is a fact. The vast majority of men would be more aroused by a literal sex doll with attractive appearance rather than by a woman they consider as physically unattractive and no amount of personality could change it. It is just how sexuality works on bi…
/r/seduction21/08/20 05:34 PM
1

Maybe you should try something other than Tinder. Also, just because a guy "just looking for a hookup" doesn't mean that he wouldn't accept your terms and rules. Most guys can't get laid on command, even if they think that they want a hookup they'll gladly enter in a relationship if a girl is attractive and have nice personality. Unless you are in a very small town then online is your best choice. Hell, when I was 15, I got my first GF by talking to her online almost exclusively, we met only two…
/r/seduction21/08/20 05:22 PM
0

You said that you "aren't looking for Adonis", but how high was your "swipe left" rate when you used online dating? If you are in a relatively big city then there literally tens of thousands of guys to choose even if your photos aren't the best. Moreover you can also meet people on Facebook or dating apps that are less about hookups like OkCupid. Chasing someone is always a bad idea, be you a girl or a guy, but as a girl it would be even worse to you. The best way for you to get a boyfriend is t…
/r/seduction21/08/20 05:18 PM
2

Yeah, this part of his story even made me doubt if the whole post is fake. If you are trying to improve yourself in seduction then it would be ridiculous to not try to improve yourself in bed. And the first thing you'll learn is that to consistently make girls orgasm your tongue and fingers are much better suited than your dick, even if you have above average stamina. Most girls wouldn't even care if you can't get hard if you already make them cum...probably, after all I never got this problem e…
/r/seduction21/08/20 04:54 PM
2

Your anxiety is created on a deeper level than "what you should to say/text". It is created from the wrong mindset and from the wrong worldview. You don't truly consider girls as your equals. You think that stakes are very high while they are non-existent. You put way too much importance to the outcome rather than enjoying the process. You should cure the primal reason for your anxiety - the wrong way you perceive relationships and women. Changing your view of a situation, acknowledging that you…
/r/seduction21/08/20 04:45 PM
31

So many rules to follow when you actually should just do one single thing - put your interests above hers while having no fear of losing her. It is my way or highway. The relationship with her exists for your satisfaction, you know that you are the prize and that it would be her loss if the relationship ends. Trying to do "the right cool high value thing", trying to "do what alpha should" is just another form of betaness and neediness. Instead of trying to not be needy so that she didn't left yo…
/r/TheRedPill19/08/20 11:44 AM
1

Bro, you are downvoted for one simple reason. By a definition, slut is a woman who has low standards and fucks many guys. It isn't a woman who loves sex. Most women love sex and they love it rough. You said it yourself - they don't want to be dominated by a random nobody, they want it to be a dominant and confident man. Most women do have standards and those are higher than men's. "Women love sex and they love it rough, it means that they are sluts and have no self-respect" - this is how you por…
/r/TheRedPill19/08/20 04:19 AM
2

It isn't really hard to understand - if you are really great in sex and confident in yourself then sharing your woman wouldn't be such a scary thought anymore, it would be just your choice to do it or not.
/r/seduction17/08/20 04:17 PM
2

It is cheating.
/r/seduction17/08/20 04:15 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter