19041904 Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	What would happen if men collectively took a day off Yeah probably man, I don't know. But what we can say is, that they DID loose 14,000 in One year. So 5,000 in 2 years doesn't seem like much of a stretch. But again, who the fuck knows? Everything you say is right, hang a plaque on your wall, get yourself a trophy for all I care. You want me to re-write the article using the numbers you provided from 2008? Then you can read it and find your next pointless argument? Nobody here is against women holding those professions. They just simply DON'T. Me…	/r/TheRedPill	10/03/17 09:34 PM
1	What would happen if men collectively took a day off That link says it was last modified in 2014. So unless you can provide a link that shows definitively what she saw on the day she published. Then your efforts are pointless man, let it go EDIT: and like I said so many times. I'm not here to argue 100%, 9%, or less than 1%. I'm sorry I'm not as adept as you are in so many fields; statistics analyst, server expert, power plant operations manager, and no I don't have my black belt in google-fu. Plug the numbers from 2008, it doesn't matter. It'd be…	/r/TheRedPill	10/03/17 08:52 PM
1	What would happen if men collectively took a day off 2008: 55,000 2009: 41,000 2016: 44,000 In one year they lost 14,000 employees, that's a fact. And you're trying to convince me that it's unlikely women took a big hit? Even IF 3/4's of that group were men, that's still 3,500 out of 5,000 women being let go. So you covered 2008... now what happened between 2009 and 2013? I don't know what she saw on the page that she cited in her article back in 2013. A source that is regularly updated, a source that now says "Last Modified Date: February 8, 2017…	/r/TheRedPill	10/03/17 07:35 PM
1	What would happen if men collectively took a day off I used your numbers from 2008. Yet her argument is still pretty valid. Huh? Do you know what numbers were there from 2013 when she referenced the source? The source which is regularly updated. No? Yeah, me either. So is she full of shit? I don't know... Maybe? And to be fair, her entire statement was "First up, the entire power grid is down. 100% of power plant operators, distributors, and dispatchers are men. Now, it’s possible that there are a few women working in these occupations, but howeve…	/r/TheRedPill	09/03/17 08:38 PM
1	What would happen if men collectively took a day off So the stats are wrong? Maybe, maybe not. She cited the source back in 2013. The source is regularly updated. So who knows what it said back then. Fair enough, but as I said several times before, I'll use the numbers from the source you provided. X can neither be true or false because what she wrote is a thought experiment. But one could easily assume that If you have 100% of something and you lose 92% of it, it would probably be adversely affected or maybe not even function at all. So how is th…	/r/TheRedPill	09/03/17 07:24 PM
1	What would happen if men collectively took a day off I know that. I was keeping it simple. Yet you're still missing the bigger picture and the whole point entirely. There's about 7,658 power plants in the United States. Take your 5,000 employees and do the math...	/r/TheRedPill	09/03/17 06:00 PM
1	What would happen if men collectively took a day off Yes I know how to read a table. I even went so far as to plug the stats YOU provided from 2008. Her speculation on a highly unlikely hypothetical situation is still pretty damn plausible even with those numbers. 0 employees vs. 5 employees isn't really gonna change much of the "possible" outcome of this thought experiment. Not to mention, those 5 employees would be spread out amongst 3 different job titles If you want me to say she provided false info. I don't know, maybe she did. The source she…	/r/TheRedPill	09/03/17 03:39 PM
1	What would happen if men collectively took a day off Are we even talking about the same article here? Her whole speculation on what would happen if men didn't show up to work only made up the last third of the article. So no, that wasn't her opening statement. I read the whole thing because I was already two thirds of the way through by that point. She cited BLS.gov for her statistics. (Bureau of Labor Statistics) which is part of the DOL website (Department of Labor) which YOU gave me. The link she provided was last modified last month. Yours was…	/r/TheRedPill	08/03/17 10:47 PM
1	What would happen if men collectively took a day off The original source as in the author? Yeah she cited her source in the article which was from the BLS. You cited the DOL. Are you going to argue the differences between those 2 as well? As for the OP, I don't know because it's deleted now. You bring up cancer treatment... yet we were talking about employment here. In that situation, of course every percent matters. No denying that As far as servers go, you're absolutely right I have no knowledge about how servers are run. I was merely trying to …	/r/TheRedPill	08/03/17 07:28 PM
1	What would happen if men collectively took a day off So I used YOUR source and applied it to the original article and yet somehow it automatically invalidates everything? You're arguing a completely different point here. No one needed statistics in order to understand the message the author was trying to convey - that was just the garnish on a plate. DOL even lists those jobs as non-traditional (male-dominated occupations). Speaks for itself It's a thought experiment. Nothing more. I'll try and break it down for you one last time. If 55 employees …	/r/TheRedPill	08/03/17 06:39 PM
1	What would happen if men collectively took a day off You're pretty dense. Nothing was plagiarized. He reposted an article. Simple as that. I don't recall him calling it truth either. As I said earlier, it's a thought experiment. Even WITH your "figure breakdowns" and having only 5 out of 55 people showing up for work on any given day would be pretty shit. That goes for ANY company/industry. I don't understand what's so hard to understand. I appreciate the troll though, I thought it would be fun to converse with you. But boy, what a let down. I'm n…	/r/TheRedPill	08/03/17 03:24 PM
3	What would happen if men collectively took a day off OP didn't write the article... a woman did. So they were not "his statistics" they were HER statistics. That was the first point I was trying to make. Second point is - this was a thought experiment and even WITH the numbers provided from your source. It would still be a shitty day if men didn't show up for work. Lastly, the author even links to her source IN the article... All information taken from Bureau of Labor Statistics, United States Department of Labor, 2013, except where noted. http://…	/r/TheRedPill	08/03/17 12:06 AM
3	What would happen if men collectively took a day off Pretty sure it was a woman who wrote the original article. But if you would have kept reading, it clearly states: "Now, it’s possible that there are a few women working in these occupations, but however many there are, they do not make up even 1% of the total workforce, so statistically, 100% of the workforce is male." You really should finish reading next time before you come in guns blazing. On second thought, just keep doing you. Thanks for the input	/r/TheRedPill	07/03/17 09:58 PM
5	Instagram Game Personally I don't have a Facebook, Twitter, or Instagram. Like you said, women get plenty of free validation on social networks. Don't be another +1 for their ego boost.	/r/TheRedPill	15/09/14 05:09 PM