TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

1BlackKnight Archive

View 11 posts and 81 comments by 1BlackKnight on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

This is literally the stupidest fucking piece of propaganda I've ever seen ever.
/r/MGTOW31/05/14 05:10 AM
2

Except we won't be building computers out of rock.
/r/MGTOW31/05/14 05:07 AM
5

Sort of like 01 in the Animatrix, but with men instead of robots.
/r/MGTOW29/05/14 06:14 PM
4

This post has been brigaded.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 09:39 PM
3

Tragic.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 09:38 PM
3

The term "skeptic" here is to be extraordinarily loosely applied. You can't be a skeptic of religion yet guzzle the feminist kool-aid and call yourself a "skeptic" in general.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 09:34 PM
1

Sometimes more is never enough.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 09:27 PM
1

Who is downvoting this?
/r/MensRights09/05/14 09:22 PM
1

Naw. It was completely legit.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 12:55 AM
6

If she starts bragging about her fuckbuddies and one-night-stands Strangely enough, this happens.
/r/MensRights23/04/14 02:02 PM
7

My ex is my worst enemy.
/r/MensRights23/04/14 01:55 PM
2

Strawman, anyone?
/r/MensRights23/04/14 01:54 PM
1

I say we find those women and give them their 7 cents back. I'm tired of hearing this crap.
/r/MensRights30/01/14 06:10 PM
1

I have dated a few Germans. German women are a little crazy but upfront. American women are sadistic and wicked. Both are caused by feminism, but they have different expressions.
/r/MGTOW30/01/14 06:12 AM
2

Yes. My bad. Glass Floor.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 04:20 PM
3

If by "hilarious" you mean "epic," then I agree.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 04:20 PM
11

There is no practical reason to implement "systemic discrimination" against women. By sheer numbers alone, if it were possible to pay women .77 or even .97 on the dollar for exactly equal work, the operations research departments of every company on the planet would fire every man they had on staff and fight over the women. Think about it. The gender gap claim is ludicrous at its base.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 04:21 AM
2

You seriously want to fight over less than ten cents?
/r/MensRights29/01/14 04:19 AM
35

Women don't want to become surgeons and engineers because the ROI is so low. For most women, and especially above-average looking women of above average intelligence, it is more reasonable to take a less-stressful lower-stakes job and seek out a man to provide the financial remainder of her desired lifestyle.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 04:19 AM
2

Attempting to dissolve the existence of gender roles is a waste of time.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 04:15 AM
122

What I want feminists to get to work on is the Glass Bottom. We need more female homeless, laborers and prisoners.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 04:14 AM
1

Confirmed. Same thing, UCLA physics. The three hot girls (believe it or not, we had a rollercoaster fan and two premeds) would always try to seduce me into doing their homework. Blech.
/r/MGTOW25/01/14 08:12 PM
16

Don't even really know how to react. Just one more nail in the "equality" coffin of feminism, I guess. Also hamsters gonna hamst.
/r/MensRights19/01/14 05:37 AM
2

nearly sh*t myself.
/r/MGTOW15/01/14 10:25 PM
1

There are a lot of angry, hurt men on here. I'm one of them. So you're going to hear a lot of emotional stuff and hardened opinions you never hear out of the mouths of men talking to your face.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 06:08 PM
-1

No, our whole culture is designed to produce juicy victims for the society of technologically advanced vampires living below Epcot center to suck the blood out of. Afterwards the bodies are converted into robots and sent back into society to search for more victims.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 12:23 PM
-1

Ah, but you forget your postmodernism! What we need to do is create an argument here that discussing objectification is in itself a form of objectification because it points to the idea the objectification once occurred. Now we have a lovely dialectic where nothing is right and the more we try to solve something the worse it gets!
/r/MensRights18/12/13 12:19 PM
-6

You're giving them too much credit. Critical Theory draws its name from the Frankfurt school, but those guys were serious academicians. The people you see today are really just Derridan postmodernists feeding at the nihilistic trough of entropy. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_theory#Postmodern_critical_theory to take the fluff out of what I just said, modern "Critical Theory" is really "Postmodern Critical Theory" which, how can I say it clearly... which is a specialism in a school of sem…
/r/MensRights18/12/13 12:15 PM
1

Criminal Procedure Rules 2013 The answer is to be found in Rule 1.1(2) (c) which indicates that one of the requirements of the overriding objective 'recognising the rights of a defendant, particularly those under Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights'. The relevant rights of a defendant in this context are: the presumption of innocence the right to silence and the privilege against self-incrimination the 'fundamental human right' to legal professional privilege (as per Lord Hoffma…
/r/MensRights18/12/13 12:02 PM
1

You and I are in total agreement and to your later statement I completely agree. I was not saying "just trying to get laid" actually I think it's a pure form of blue-pillism, they are fighting to protect the system that oppresses them.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 01:35 AM
6

Yes, I need a trigger warning for her. :)
/r/MensRights17/12/13 05:50 PM
3

Uh, the neologism "Black Knight" is the antithesis of white knight. Let's call a spade a spade. It's all white knighting, these guys are attacking other men (see cracked article on MRA) because they see women as defenceless bon-bons that need male aggression in the fight.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 05:47 PM
3

feels, not reals.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 05:44 PM
-2

I'm sorry but fuck no: Andresen v. Maryland, 49 L.Ed. 2d, 627, (96): S.Ct #2737 (1976) You can invoke the 5th against any Kangaroo Court and are fully empowered by the 14th.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 05:37 PM
0

The Judges Rules, Update Criminal Procedure Rules 2013 supercedes: The Court of Appeal in R v K [2006] EWCA Crim 724 at paragraph 6, [2006] 2 All E.R. 552
/r/MensRights17/12/13 05:31 PM
6

Obviously because the model is called "plus-size" it makes out-of-shape harpies feel like they've got stake in the beauty game. Look at the pictures, and I see a healthy, normal woman that is physically larger in frame than the average woman. Is it really just the label "plus-sized" that puts these porkers into paroxysms of self-loathing? Do they really believe that a woman's dress size is somehow a mark of beauty? Only the mirror tells the truth. I've known tiny women with gross potbellies and …
/r/MGTOW17/12/13 07:46 AM
8

You know, there's a perfectly legitimate reason why humans hate promiscuity. Most cultures do, even aboriginal cultures. There are a tiny number of island based cultures or highly isolated groups that do not. Why? Wanna know what it is? Yes, paternity is part of the issue. There's a bigger reason that no one pays attention to, though. uncontrolled STDs = birth defects, barren wombs and impotence. And always have. The end.
/r/MGTOW17/12/13 12:15 AM
6

And the important thing is that we all need to worry about what she "likes." Not what is right, not preserving relationships or building trust. You exist to serve her needs. Princess needs her bonbons dusted.
/r/MGTOW15/12/13 09:43 PM
3

The preclinical work is promising; despite moderate clinical success, I don't feel the work is as supported and promoted as it should be. (No I don't work in viral vectors or cancer) Atherton, M. J., & Lichty, B. D. (2013). Evolution of oncolytic viruses: novel strategies for cancer treatment. Immunotherapy, 5(11), 1191-1206. Cancer J. 2012 Jan-Feb;18(1):69-81.
/r/MensRights14/12/13 08:10 PM
1

Yes, true. I suspect medical tourism in Europe will become a reality in 10 years.
/r/MensRights14/12/13 07:54 PM
2

THEY'RE STILL DOING IT!
/r/MensRights13/12/13 10:25 PM
6

Medical scientist here. This actually is true. Viral engines as custom cures for cancer have been around now for years and the FDA is dragging its feet, while the NIH does little to promote them.
/r/MensRights13/12/13 10:22 PM
1

[references]
/r/MensRights13/12/13 10:20 PM
6

Somebody is downvoting this thread. Why, I wonder?
/r/MensRights13/12/13 10:19 PM
1

A lot of guys are getting mad about this. :D Not sure if its really insulting or so hyperbolic that it's funny.
/r/MGTOW13/12/13 10:10 PM
1

Now you suddenly agree that the image is perfectly acceptable? I didn't say that. I said I'm not angered by it. Images and links in this forum are under study as being examples of what MGTOW/MRA stand against. It doesn't mean we are full of rage. You then tell me that the message it sends is what matters; whereupon I must assume that it is the message that makes the image stupid and blackwash-y. The message is what matters. It is a subject under study and analysis. You seem not to understand why…
/r/MensRights10/12/13 10:31 PM
1

First joke reference: "Modern empowered women" are promiscuous sluts. This stereotype has strong basis in reality, BTW. I've known several MEWs who have numbers well over 50 and into the hundreds. They scratch their heads and wonder why men don't want to marry them and love them for life.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 10:25 PM
1

Just saw this. Oh, my sides.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 10:20 PM
1

A. You asked me a question. B. I don't see any rage in this thread. I see some sneering and laughter. I'm certainly not angered by this image. I'm used to hearing/seeing stuff like this.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 09:00 PM
1

The message clearly puts forward the idea that the messages on the hearts are reflective of the experience that "men" have in a relationship. Historically, candy hearts are given to a person you are interested in, suggesting something you'd like to do with them. The messages on the hearts are callous and highly sexualized, particularly focusing on self-gratification and a consumer attititude towards the recipient. There are layers of meaning to that. In the end, what is important is that "men" a…
/r/MensRights10/12/13 08:05 PM
0

http://imgur.com/CHu9dbP
/r/MensRights10/12/13 07:29 PM
1

Read the giant thread of comments. Wild.
/r/MGTOW10/12/13 07:05 PM
1

The individual responsible for creating the image is irrelevant. The context in which it is used and the message that it sends is what is important.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 06:56 PM
1

Yeah, I'm calling bs on you, here niggelplease. WADR, If it doesn't piss you off even slightly or at least interest you academically that the femistazi spends their time blackwashing men with stupid images like this, then I question whether you belong in this sub.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 03:21 PM
4

Yes, now bend over.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 06:49 AM
2

Beat me to it.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 06:49 AM
1

"Although Polly is not Bob's genetic daugher, I can prove that Bob and I concieved her "in-fact". We lived together as roommates for 2 years and during that time I concieved Polly in a drunken night stand with a man who I could not pick out in a lineup. Bob helped me after that. We shared expenses during that time and Bob loved Polly. One time we kissed and Bob told me he loved me. Although I later moved out and had sex with 20 other men since then, I feel like Bob is Polly's father in spirit. I…
/r/MensRights09/12/13 10:28 PM
2

"The war is not meant to be won, it is meant to be continuous. Hierarchical society is only possible on the basis of poverty and ignorance. This new version is the past and no different past can ever have existed. In principle the war effort is always planned to keep society on the brink of starvation. The war is waged by the ruling group against its own subjects and its object is not the victory over either Eurasia or East Asia, but to keep the very structure of society intact."
/r/MensRights09/12/13 09:26 PM
1

To admit that there was a conflict would be to invite the hatred of legions of votebrigaders and hijackers.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 06:29 PM
1

How is this not an elaborate joke? Is life imitating art, here?
/r/MensRights09/12/13 06:20 PM
1

For reference, see the Occupy movement.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 06:18 PM
7

Your sense of rejection and need is artificial. Your loneliness is a perception; a belief that somehow anything is better than being alone as you are. MGTOW is the realization that these feelings are just unimportant. In a sense, it is a lifestyle, an ascension to a spiritual plane of existence free of dating norms. You will find that as you let go of your norms and stop caring, women will ironically become attracted to you. Then you will have the freedom of choice you do not feel you have now. …
/r/MGTOW09/12/13 10:21 AM
5

Word.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 08:28 AM
1

This article was just rife with radfem pap. I love how they take to the sexual shaming angle right at the beginning.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 05:42 AM
5

Yeh. :)
/r/MensRights09/12/13 05:39 AM
1

I hear the word "feminist" from the mouths of women and men that call themselves that. I don't live attached to my computer, I know and love people who are feminists - active feminists - and I hear all the same crap from all of them and call them on it.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 05:38 AM
2

This thread is a bloodbath. Votebombing, sockpuppets, false flags and misdirection everywhere.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 05:37 AM
4

It would be awesome if you really were Anita S.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 05:35 AM
12

Meh. I've heard this out of the mouth of liberal female friends, complete with the "thousands of years" argument for any kind of hatred or suffering men anywhere have.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 05:32 AM
6

Dude qwepisbest is either a mega-troll or a sockpuppet account. No history?
/r/MensRights09/12/13 05:29 AM
0

Check your privilege, cis-scum.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 05:27 AM
5

AGREED. I think qwepisbest is brigading. Big time. Possible double black-flag operation?
/r/MensRights09/12/13 05:26 AM
3

I don't understand what this means.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 05:24 AM
-3

Doubt it big time. I see this stuff go on all the time in SJW settings.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 05:21 AM
6

MGTOW is sort of post-gender rights, and not organized. It's really a culture. MGTOW here. I am not a MRA, but I support them.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 05:18 AM
7

This. When women face the realities we have been born and lived with half a century, they balk.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 05:16 AM
6

There should be an expedited appeal procedure for two-party recapture of paternity. That's a no-brainer. Opt-IN to affirm paternity claim in 1st 2 trimesters Seek-and-recapture post-partum paternity claim that requires two-party validation. Affidavit of paternity claim if two-party validation is denied by mother. It's on the record and the kid can find it later.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 05:11 AM
9

There are several companies testing a general anti-STD lubricant gel that should be available soon. Also vax procedures for the big 3 are on their way. AIDS too, maybe.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 05:08 AM
2

The late Betty Friedan and her followers. The rest of radfem is pretty quiet. I bet my life there are conferences going on right now between feminist academics about how to redefine paternity once this happens.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 05:06 AM
3

This.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 04:56 AM
3

Extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence. The only thing I see out of anybody calling themselves feminist is anti-male pap and mass hysterical butthurt.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 04:55 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter