TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

1PettyPettyPrincess Archive

View 0 posts and 70 comments by 1PettyPettyPrincess on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

“We really are all just fucked huh” Brother, think about the source material of what you’re hearing right now. You’re on a subreddit specially about and for divorced men. Imagine going on a subreddit specifically about dog bites and deep cat scratches and saying “we really are all just fucked with our pets huh”. Well… no lol. Some people have been fucked and some people will be fucked, but that doesn’t mean we all are fucked and it doesn’t mean that you will be fucked. Talk to your fiancée about…
/r/Divorce_Men14/08/26 07:04 PM
3

It’s her last name too. Just as much as it’s yours. That’s the point.
/r/Divorce_Men06/03/26 09:16 PM
7

Consuming media is a hobby. You might not personally enjoy it or even respect it, but your subjective opinion about which hobbies are better doesn’t determine what is or is not a hobby.
/r/seduction01/03/26 09:55 PM
1

I’m just curious, what do you believe is a sufficient answer that would convince you that she has “substance”?
/r/seduction01/03/26 09:52 PM
21

Tbh when she’s single you’re also competing with her too unless she is actively looking as much as you are
/r/seduction30/12/25 05:33 PM
1

I didn’t portray all heterosexual relationships as a blanket positive. In fact, I’ve never seen anyone who has a shred of reasonability promote a blanket positive portrayal of heterosexual relationships. We know that these relationships can and often do go south, so saying that “heterosexual relationships are a positive” would be absurd considering how subjective that would be. Just like all forms of relationships, heterosexual relationships can be a positive addition to someone’s life or a nega…
/r/ExRedPill30/09/24 03:44 PM
3

The answer to your question depends on what you mean by “promote”?
/r/ExRedPill26/09/24 08:06 PM
5

The thought process isn’t necessarily “this raw deal isn’t that bad,” it’s often more of a “XYZ good part makes ABC bad part worth it” thought process. What I think is more common than women “gaslighting themselves” into thinking that their raw deal isn’t that bad is women thinking “this raw deal is very bad but that’s just how it is for women.” I think that’s why we’re seeing more and more women steering away from seeking out relationships with men (at least where I am). In my opinion, the only…
/r/ExRedPill26/09/24 06:02 PM
3

I have wondered why women keep getting into these relationships and stay in them if it’s such a raw deal. My entire point is that the “raw deal” seems like a raw on paper but there are inarticulable and immaterial positives that can outweigh the “raw deals.” Especially if a woman is lucky enough to understand the raw deals”, empathize with the “raw deals”, express gratitude/appreciation, and try to mitigate/remedy the disparities that lead to those “raw deals” as best as possible. Men underestim…
/r/ExRedPill26/09/24 04:03 PM
4

What do you mean by “institution of relationship”? Are you talking about the institution of marriage? The material burden on women comes from cohabitating with a male longterm romantic partner regardless of material status; the marriage part just makes it slightly less of a risk for women (depending on how you do it). You know that saying “don’t give husband privileges to a boyfriend”? Theres a reason for that. I can say for a fact that my life would not be better off without my boyfriend. I kno…
/r/ExRedPill25/09/24 10:57 PM
10

In general, most love is conditional and the sooner you realize that, the easier it will be to build strong relationships. Pretty much all love is conditioned on what people do or don’t do; and yes, that includes men loving women. An exception to this might be the love a parent feels for their children, but at a certain point even that has limits most of the time. Men’s love is also conditional on what can be provided, it’s just that women tend to be more likely to meet those conditions. If a wo…
/r/ExRedPill25/09/24 08:10 PM
10

It’s quite paradoxical, but effective as long as you truly do believe it It’s not really paradoxical if you think about it. It’s because knowing we can back out if needed makes us feel safer to engage. This applies to all sexual interactions just FYI, not just hook ups or ONS; that’s why “pressure free” make out sessions in a longterm relationship are a good way to get (some) dying bedrooms back on the right track. Being a woman in a man’s room is an extremely vulnerable situation to be in for o…
/r/seduction23/09/24 09:33 PM
1

Of course I don’t mind! :)
/r/seduction18/09/24 07:44 PM
3

Honestly, that’s still somewhat of an avoidant response. You basically said “drink things, see things, have fun drinking and seeing” without specifying much else. In my initial comment I implied that avoidant answers would normally give me the creeps but that does not apply here since she is the one who brought up meeting up. It would be weird for a guy I don’t know to be like “meet me in this general area” and then be super broad and avoidant with the details, but that is not what is going on h…
/r/seduction18/09/24 07:32 PM
3

Correct! And to add to this, women let some of her friends/loved ones know about the date for safety reasons. What you’re doing on the date is important information to relay back. If I don’t get a text/call/update from a friend after 2-3 hours of “just getting a couple drinks” then I’d be worried and start trying to figure out what is up. If I don’t get a text/call/update from a friend after 2-3 hours of “dinner and a movie” then I wouldn’t think much of it.
/r/seduction18/09/24 06:42 PM
1

We can tell by the type of date, what was “put into” the date, the time the date is, how soon you want to go on the date, etc… It’s more of a balancing test than a bright line test; sometimes when things are all put together it is easy to tell.
/r/seduction18/09/24 06:36 PM
2

I must be missing something. It seems like you’re confused about why someone would want to know plan details before committing to a time/day for said plans. Can you clarify what you think is the “shit test”? I’m assuming asking for plan details isn’t what you think is the “shit test”. As a woman, if a guy I didn’t know responded to me asking about date details in a flippant and “funny” way I’d not go on that date. It would seem like he was avoiding the answer and that’s a really weird thing to a…
/r/seduction18/09/24 06:31 PM
3

I agree with most of the comments here, but I’ll add an explanation that is missing: it’s to keep down-on-their-luck men single and lonely. Redpillers only maintain a following and make money if there are lonely men who feel like they’re “failing.” It’s incredibly rare for a guy who feels like he has things going for him at the moment to fall into redpill ideology. If “women’s value decreases dramatically” as soon as she hits 25/30/35 while “men’s value dramatically increases” each year after 30…
/r/ExRedPill17/09/24 03:43 PM
1

“If you don’t get penile stimulation during sexual encounters, have you tried just rubbing one out yourself while you sexually satisfy her?” That’s exactly how you sound and you’re perfectly proving my point. Imagine if you were risking your physical safety every time you had sex, carried almost all of the material risks/burdens of sex, don’t experience much spontaneous arousal so you’re rarely so randomly horny that you feel like you need a random release, AND (on top of all that) you’re expect…
/r/seduction09/09/24 07:31 PM
1

“If you don’t get penile stimulation during sexual encounters, have you tried just rubbing one out yourself while you sexually satisfy her?” That’s how you sound. And you just proved my point.
/r/seduction09/09/24 06:41 PM
1

You’re eating pussy with ONS and random hookups (which is the topic of the conversation)? Most men aren’t.
/r/seduction06/09/24 03:38 PM
1

Men are well aware that penetration alone is never enough for the vast majority of women; they just don’t care. The issue is the “main act” of sex being centered around male pleasure and sex being done whenever he is satisfied regardless of how the woman is feeling. The problem is apathy and selfishness, not ignorance. Most men know what it takes and just won’t do it, especially in hook ups and ONS. Also, have you ever tried “teaching” (lol) a man how to be decent in bed? Most men don’t react we…
/r/seduction06/09/24 01:07 AM
3

The reason it’s not like that for women is because (1) women just aren’t nearly as horny in day-to-day life because women tend to have responsive arousal rather than the spontaneous arousal that men tend to have, (2) women still carry the larger burden/risk of sex, (3) sex with a random man is still much more dangerous for women than it is for men, and (4) on top of all that, sex with men isn’t nearly as satisfying for women as it is the other way around (or even sex with men among men). Women a…
/r/seduction05/09/24 10:30 PM
1

I don’t really care either way, tbh.
/r/ExRedPill04/09/24 05:33 PM
1

My explanation is directly related to your comment. Also for the record, OP mentioned other traits as well. If you’re not here to debate definitions, then don’t misuse words like you did.
/r/ExRedPill04/09/24 04:38 PM
1

Eugenics is the controlled selective breeding of humans with the intent of “improving” the population with “better” genetics and “breeding out” the “undesirable” traits by prohibiting those with “undesirable” traits from procreating. That is not inherently racist or race-based. Well meaning people hear the “breed out undesirable traits” part of eugenics and (ironically) assume it’s always about racial minorities, but that isn’t correct; a generous explanation of that assumption is rooted in the …
/r/ExRedPill04/09/24 03:53 PM
1

Eugenics isn’t necessarily racial or race-based.
/r/ExRedPill03/09/24 09:34 PM
1

So you don’t have a single example of a “general” “nice car” that a majority of women would see as a positive bonus? That’s exactly what I thought lol
/r/seduction29/08/24 11:00 PM
1

My specific request didn’t have the word “everyone” in it and you still ignored it. You seem bothered by my use of the word “everyone” in passing even though it had nothing to do with my request, so I’m going to request the same exact thing again as I did above and I’ll be sure not to mention the forbidden word anymore: Just give me an example of a “nice car” and list a few features of that “nice car” that are objectively important enough to be used to determine that the car is an objectively ni…
/r/seduction29/08/24 10:49 PM
1

Why won’t you just tell me, then? You claim it’s so simple and objective, so it shouldn’t be difficult. Just give me an example of a “nice car” and list a few features of that “nice car” that are objectively important enough to be used to determine that the car is an objectively nice car.
/r/seduction29/08/24 09:16 PM
1

What is a “nice car”? You haven’t defined it. Women like things that align with the type of man and lifestyle that envision for themselves. If your car doesn’t align with that, they will see it as a negative no matter how “nice” you think it is.
/r/seduction29/08/24 09:04 PM
1

Objective facts like what? What “objective facts” are used to determine whether a color is “nice.” And what “objective facts” makes a vehicle “nice”? Keep in mind that the “delusion” that I’m “defending” is the fact that people have different tastes and have differing beliefs regarding what they think is “nice.” Hahahah
/r/seduction29/08/24 08:51 PM
1

Lmao what are you talking about? Do you have reading comprehension issues? I explicitly said that just because someone thinks something is good/nice, doesn’t mean that thing is good/nice. I’m shocked that you don’t get this concept. Do you know what the words “objective” and “subjective” even mean? How are you defining those words? All things are subjective when discussing what your individual tastes and personal preferences are. Whether or not a color is “nice” is a matter of opinion, correct? …
/r/seduction29/08/24 08:21 PM
0

Yikes. Your logical reasoning skills are lacking here (which is expected, I must’ve forgot that I was on Reddit as well). Can you show me where I said that or tried to “prove” that? Reread my comments. That is literally the exact antithesis of what I’m saying. My entire point is that what is “nice” to one person isn’t necessarily “nice” to another person. My point was never that “one person thinks it’s nice, therefore it must be objectively nice.” You clearly agree with me since you understand t…
/r/seduction29/08/24 07:34 PM
0

Lol I was using specific scenarios as an example to illustrate my broader point. My entire point is that the interests that people choose to invest their time, energy, and effort into will almost always give some insight into that person or at the very least, onlookers will assume that it’s giving accurate insights into that person. That is common sense. Cars are no different. It’s not a “specific scenario” or “special case”; it’s literally just human behavior. You already admitted that people m…
/r/seduction29/08/24 05:12 PM
1

I didn’t say that having a “nice car” is always a negative. I’m saying that having a “nice car” could very easily be a negative if that “nice car” has some sort of subculture, hobby, or personality trait associated with it. What is or is not a “nice car” is subjective. A lot of what men consider to be “nice cars” might illicit a “oh, he’s one of those guys” reaction. Think about those big expensive lifted pickup trucks (I know we’re talking about cars, but this example still holds). Only a speci…
/r/seduction29/08/24 04:24 PM
1

If you love cars, talk about it on dates as an interest! The example I used on another comment is think of cars like makeup. There are probably more women who know a lot about cars than there are (straight/bisexual) men who know a lot about makeup, but other than that it’s pretty damn similar as far as the reactions you might get from the other sex and the potential (or lack there of) for judgment. Also, generally, women who aren’t into cars view the type of car you drive similarly to how most m…
/r/seduction29/08/24 03:14 PM
1

It’s not the nice ride, that’s actually bonus points. I’m genuinely curious where men get this from. I hear it all the time (only from men) and it comes off as “well I like cars like that so women must like it too!” Unless she’s into cars, what makes you think it’s a bonus? This is exactly like when women swear that men think a specific shade of lipstick is a bonus. I’ve watched a friend stress for hours over whether they should wear MAC’s “PDA” lipstick or MAC’s “Spice It Up!” lipstick on a fir…
/r/seduction29/08/24 11:33 AM
1

I said the nice car can be more of a detriment, I didn’t say that it is always a detriment. A “nice” car says a lot about the driver. For example, I’m not really a huge lifted truck kind of girl (I know you said “car” and not “truck” but this is just an example). I just don’t like those trucks, how people look at those trucks, the culture where those trucks are popular, and the issues that come with those trucks. If I showed up for a first date and I saw the guy had a huge, expensive, pristine t…
/r/seduction29/08/24 11:15 AM
1

First, you’re talking about traits that your personal traits that you see as positive but you didn’t mention how the dates actually go. Theres a joke/meme that women tell to each other that goes something like this: ”Wow! That date was great! I can’t wait to see her again” -every man who just spent an entire date only talking about himself and his interests How did the conversation go? Did you show any interest getting to know her at all? Second, see if not kissing them on the first date helps. …
/r/seduction28/08/24 11:22 PM
10

How does that math works in your in mind? “Average” means something. How is it possible that 80% of all men are below average? Are you saying that 20% of men are just so good looking that it skews everything? Are you saying that women think that 80% of men are 4s and 20% are 9s?
/r/ExRedPill05/08/24 08:43 PM
2

A lot of reasons, but it mostly comes down to (1) that not being generally true for the super majority of men and its unlikely that you’re the exception, (2) it implying that everything else about you is near perfect, and (3) it getting dangerously close to “women are shallow and only care about looks” territory. It is just off putting for some. Even if that’s not your intention, some will interpret what you’re saying as basically saying women are shallow and that’s the only thing holding you ba…
/r/ExRedPill05/08/24 08:37 PM
6

If being completely honest about your intentions sounds creepy, then maybe your intentions are creepy.
/r/seduction20/07/24 05:01 PM
1

Yeah. Just because someone laughs at your jokes doesn’t mean they want to date you lol.
/r/seduction17/07/24 08:46 PM
1

I don’t mean this to be mean, you very well could be all those things listed, but men grossly overestimate their intelligence and sense of humor. I have never met a man who didn’t think he was funnier than most men. Every man that I ask if he’s smarter than the average man says “yes.” Men tend to underestimate their looks and over estimate their abilities. Women tend to do the opposite.
/r/seduction15/07/24 11:52 AM
1

Again, if you have nothing else to offer, then those things are not secondary. That’s with everything; where you lack, you need to make up somewhere else. Where you lack in one category, you need to make up on another.
/r/seduction14/07/24 01:06 AM
1

That’s kind of the other side of the same coin; you’re upset because women don’t like you or want you as much as you like/want them. But your complaint about your lack of results shouldn’t turn into “women suck” or “it’s unfair that I’m not getting women”. Your lack of success is not indicative of the morality of women around you
/r/seduction13/07/24 01:13 AM
1

That’s kind of the other side of the same coin; you’re upset because women don’t like you or want you as much as you like/want them. But your complaint about your lack of results shouldn’t turn into “women suck” or “it’s unfair that I’m not getting women”. Your lack of success is not indicative of the morality of women around youz
/r/seduction13/07/24 01:12 AM
1

Rules for dating? Lol no you don’t. Trust me, you don’t. You don’t want to deal with the burden of female reproduction. I know it doesn’t seem like it to you, but you are getting the good end of the deal. What you’re probably trying to say is that you wish that women were as immediately interested in men as much as men are immediately interested in women. That’s really the root of your issues, here. Because you want women more than they want you, you’re the one who has to initiate the interactio…
/r/seduction10/07/24 11:24 AM
1

Then be more selective and start talking to your male friends about being more selective. You’re the one talking about trying to approach random women; selective people don’t do that. If you want men to be more selective, start with yourself. Nothing is stopping you or other men from being selective. Also, wishing that women you don’t find attractive are treated “poorly” (or more accurately, treated in a way that you personally believe is treating someone poorly) just became you don’t think they…
/r/seduction09/07/24 04:36 PM
1

The issue with cold approaches is that we don’t know if your approach will be kind and polite until after it’s over. Our “only difficulty” isn’t picking which man because our primary difficulty is being safe. The difficulty women have in dating is male violence. You want women, women want safety. Neither really get what we want, but the latter is significantly worse. Your dream is to be Mr. Handsome, my dream is not getting sexually harassed.
/r/seduction08/07/24 02:45 AM
1

I say it based on women bragging about being cold-approached on social-media, not women who particulary was cold-approached by me. ???? There are women that like to be cold approached and there are women that don’t. We aren’t a hive mind. The fact that you see a couple women bragging about it online doesn’t negate the fact that it makes plenty of women uncomfortable. Anyway i don't have properly a social-circle to beggining with, few friends who left are married, i work on an office with three m…
/r/seduction07/07/24 02:29 PM
1

Like A Henry Cavil look-a-like with a very childish approach would be better results than a very polite, educated man who isn't handsome. Are you talking about cold approaches? If so, of course. Why wouldn’t it? Looks are the only thing the person has to go off. That’s why I’ve been saying to get to know people and meet partners that way. So the problem isn't that looks sometimes are fundamental, it's more like they ALWAYS are fundamental. Circling back to the original point, it is attractive th…
/r/seduction06/07/24 10:06 PM
1

Why it's not just equal for us men? Because you want us way more than we want you. Simple. If we wanted you equally, then it’d be equal but we don’t. This is one of those times were shitty and mediocre men make it a bit harder for good men. The fact of the matter is, we’re just generally better off without most men right now. It’s not worth the hassle, risk, and liability to be partnered a mediocre or “eh” guy. For that reason, mediocre men are suffering. That’s like saying “why do I have to app…
/r/seduction06/07/24 01:07 PM
1

But having a girfriend it's kinda related and not independent from having friends? Can't i just simply choose one instead of another? If you already had a girlfriend and we’re a great partner, then maybe. But getting a girlfriend? No. If you don’t have time to make a new friend, you don’t have time to have a girlfriend. You want a meaningful social? You need to seek out meaningful social connections. figuring out that women have it easier without needing to do nothing and i having to hear advice…
/r/seduction04/07/24 01:37 PM
1

“For the feminist view” lol Reread my previous comment. You can’t make friends for whatever reason but you expect to get a romantic partner? Again, whatever issue you have with making friends is the same issues holding you back from getting a girlfriend. That’s is the root of your issue. So why can’t you make friends? Start there. Start at the root. Because even if you find a woman to date you, it won’t last long because whatever is holding you back from having meaningful social connections in g…
/r/seduction03/07/24 08:31 PM
1

If you’re in a stage of life where it’s unpractical to build platonic social connections, then you’re in a stage of life where it’s unpractical to build romantic social connections. You’re saying “I’m not in a position where I can have a new friendship or build social bonds! I’m 35! But I am in the position to have a new girlfriend and build romantic bonds.” Whatever is stopping you from meeting people or strengthening connections with the people you already know is what is stopping you from get…
/r/seduction03/07/24 03:15 PM
1

If you think having friends and going outside to engage with other people is impractical, then that may be worth looking into. Why can’t what be easier? Finding women who want to date you?
/r/seduction02/07/24 05:00 PM
1

Hahaha I never said those places are just for men looking for hook-ups; I explicitly gave an example where it’s not. And those aren’t the only social places. Join a local meet up group, frequent a local board game shop, volunteer, join a running group, get to know some coworkers and form a friend group, go to a trivia night, join an intramural sports team, take open dance classes, take a pottery class, take a gardening class. Again, when someone doesn’t know you at all and you just randomly appr…
/r/seduction29/06/24 11:55 AM
1

Okay, so I’ll explain it another way. If you’re just trying to meet women for quick one-off hookups or on dating-apps, then all you have to offer them is looks and that’s how they will base their willingness to engage with you. I have a few good friends that I originally met at bars but I wasn’t going in thinking “I’m just going to pump and dump.” If my mindset in any irl social interaction is just to fuck someone instead of finding friends, getting to know people, or even building small group t…
/r/seduction27/06/24 11:19 PM
1

Be more social irl.
/r/seduction26/06/24 10:23 AM
1

If there’s nothing else to offer besides looks, then yes. That will always be the case. That doesn’t negate what I said unless your only contact with women is in scenarios where looks matter more than usual (e.g., dating sites, clubs, and bars). If that’s the only time you’re in contact with non-familial women, then this advice isn’t for you and you should probably work on the other glaring issues in your life.
/r/seduction17/06/24 08:05 PM
1

“The only time women will care about personality is when she actually knows him!” Yes. You’re finally getting it.
/r/seduction17/06/24 08:00 PM
-1

If you genuinely think that is at all comparable then you fundamentally misunderstand lol. Buying dinner isn’t a trait and the fact that you reduce traits that a woman may like in a partner to someone buying her $47.50 worth of dinner says a lot. Keep only putting stock into your looks instead of actually trying to be a person women want to be around long term. Let me know how that works in the long run. EDIT: yikes. Just took a look at your profile. Explains a lot. I wouldn’t have wasted my tim…
/r/seduction12/06/24 12:36 AM
5

This is 100% it. When I try to explain this to men looking for advice, they almost always push back on it. At first I thought it was projection considering that most men place looks above almost all else, but then I realized that it’s probably more of a cope. Or possibly a mixture of the two. It’s easier to throw up your hands and go “I’m not getting the women I want (or maybe even any woman at all) because I’m not 6’3” or extremely wealthy” than it is to come to grips with the fact that its mos…
/r/seduction11/06/24 09:33 PM
-1

Women view looks differently than men. For example, men generally view someone’s physical attractiveness as stagnant whereas women generally view physical attractiveness as fluid. A woman can meet a guy and initially think he’s a 7 in physical attractiveness but then a few hours after meeting him think he’s a 4 in physical attractiveness because of some cringe/awkward/off-putting behaviors. How he looked never changed but how she views him did; how we view men is the foundation of our physical a…
/r/seduction11/06/24 09:27 PM
1

I’m not saying that your standards are too high (keep your high standards!!!!!), I’m saying that you may be thinking of yourself in the wrong way and you response shows that you are. You’re “leveling” yourself and others based on only looks. That’s not nearly as important for women. You’re thinking of your level from a male perspective even though you’re trying to get with women. Two perspectives might help (of course I’m speaking in generalities here and not every woman/man is the same): (1) Me…
/r/seduction01/06/24 01:51 PM
0

All of the ones on my level ended up ghosting I don’t know how to say this nicely, but this is a sign that you probably over inflate your “level.” Maybe rethink your “level,” or better yet just drop the whole “leveling” bullshit all together.
/r/seduction01/06/24 01:23 PM
1

When you block on reddit, I think all it does is make it so you can’t see their posts. They can still see yours.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy28/04/20 05:58 PM
2

He also wanted you to know he still has them. It’s a power thing and that has happened to me far too many times.
/r/FemaleDatingStrategy26/04/20 05:18 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter