~ archived since 2018 ~
~ archived since 2018 ~
| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | Want a divorce but want to keep the last name of the husbandIt’s her last name too. Just as much as it’s yours. That’s the point. | /r/Divorce_Men | 06/03/26 09:16 PM |
| 7 | “What you say” doesn’t matter to girls. THIS does | The 3 Layers Of CommunicationConsuming media is a hobby. You might not personally enjoy it or even respect it, but your subjective opinion about which hobbies are better doesn’t determine what is or is not a hobby. | /r/seduction | 01/03/26 09:55 PM |
| 1 | “What you say” doesn’t matter to girls. THIS does | The 3 Layers Of CommunicationI’m just curious, what do you believe is a sufficient answer that would convince you that she has “substance”? | /r/seduction | 01/03/26 09:52 PM |
| 21 | Finally approachedTbh when she’s single you’re also competing with her too unless she is actively looking as much as you are | /r/seduction | 30/12/25 05:33 PM |
| 1 | How often is it the case that a woman adores her man?I didn’t portray all heterosexual relationships as a blanket positive. In fact, I’ve never seen anyone who has a shred of reasonability promote a blanket positive portrayal of heterosexual relationships. We know that these relationships can and often do go south, so saying that “heterosexual relationships are a positive” would be absurd considering how subjective that would be. Just like all forms of relationships, heterosexual relationships can be a positive addition to someone’s life or a nega… | /r/ExRedPill | 30/09/24 03:44 PM |
| 3 | How often is it the case that a woman adores her man?The answer to your question depends on what you mean by “promote”? | /r/ExRedPill | 26/09/24 08:06 PM |
| 5 | How often is it the case that a woman adores her man?The thought process isn’t necessarily “this raw deal isn’t that bad,” it’s often more of a “XYZ good part makes ABC bad part worth it” thought process. What I think is more common than women “gaslighting themselves” into thinking that their raw deal isn’t that bad is women thinking “this raw deal is very bad but that’s just how it is for women.” I think that’s why we’re seeing more and more women steering away from seeking out relationships with men (at least where I am). In my opinion, the only… | /r/ExRedPill | 26/09/24 06:02 PM |
| 3 | How often is it the case that a woman adores her man?I have wondered why women keep getting into these relationships and stay in them if it’s such a raw deal. My entire point is that the “raw deal” seems like a raw on paper but there are inarticulable and immaterial positives that can outweigh the “raw deals.” Especially if a woman is lucky enough to understand the raw deals”, empathize with the “raw deals”, express gratitude/appreciation, and try to mitigate/remedy the disparities that lead to those “raw deals” as best as possible. Men underestim… | /r/ExRedPill | 26/09/24 04:03 PM |
| 4 | How often is it the case that a woman adores her man?What do you mean by “institution of relationship”? Are you talking about the institution of marriage? The material burden on women comes from cohabitating with a male longterm romantic partner regardless of material status; the marriage part just makes it slightly less of a risk for women (depending on how you do it). You know that saying “don’t give husband privileges to a boyfriend”? Theres a reason for that. I can say for a fact that my life would not be better off without my boyfriend. I kno… | /r/ExRedPill | 25/09/24 10:57 PM |
| 10 | How often is it the case that a woman adores her man?In general, most love is conditional and the sooner you realize that, the easier it will be to build strong relationships. Pretty much all love is conditioned on what people do or don’t do; and yes, that includes men loving women. An exception to this might be the love a parent feels for their children, but at a certain point even that has limits most of the time. Men’s love is also conditional on what can be provided, it’s just that women tend to be more likely to meet those conditions. If a wo… | /r/ExRedPill | 25/09/24 08:10 PM |
| 10 | What do you say when a woman asks for clarification about what you'll do in your room?It’s quite paradoxical, but effective as long as you truly do believe it It’s not really paradoxical if you think about it. It’s because knowing we can back out if needed makes us feel safer to engage. This applies to all sexual interactions just FYI, not just hook ups or ONS; that’s why “pressure free” make out sessions in a longterm relationship are a good way to get (some) dying bedrooms back on the right track. Being a woman in a man’s room is an extremely vulnerable situation to be in for o… | /r/seduction | 23/09/24 09:33 PM |
| 1 | Is this a shit test?Of course I don’t mind! :) | /r/seduction | 18/09/24 07:44 PM |
| 3 | Is this a shit test?Honestly, that’s still somewhat of an avoidant response. You basically said “drink things, see things, have fun drinking and seeing” without specifying much else. In my initial comment I implied that avoidant answers would normally give me the creeps but that does not apply here since she is the one who brought up meeting up. It would be weird for a guy I don’t know to be like “meet me in this general area” and then be super broad and avoidant with the details, but that is not what is going on h… | /r/seduction | 18/09/24 07:32 PM |
| 3 | Is this a shit test?Correct! And to add to this, women let some of her friends/loved ones know about the date for safety reasons. What you’re doing on the date is important information to relay back. If I don’t get a text/call/update from a friend after 2-3 hours of “just getting a couple drinks” then I’d be worried and start trying to figure out what is up. If I don’t get a text/call/update from a friend after 2-3 hours of “dinner and a movie” then I wouldn’t think much of it. | /r/seduction | 18/09/24 06:42 PM |
| 1 | Is this a shit test?We can tell by the type of date, what was “put into” the date, the time the date is, how soon you want to go on the date, etc… It’s more of a balancing test than a bright line test; sometimes when things are all put together it is easy to tell. | /r/seduction | 18/09/24 06:36 PM |
| 2 | Is this a shit test?I must be missing something. It seems like you’re confused about why someone would want to know plan details before committing to a time/day for said plans. Can you clarify what you think is the “shit test”? I’m assuming asking for plan details isn’t what you think is the “shit test”. As a woman, if a guy I didn’t know responded to me asking about date details in a flippant and “funny” way I’d not go on that date. It would seem like he was avoiding the answer and that’s a really weird thing to a… | /r/seduction | 18/09/24 06:31 PM |
| 3 | What’s the hate towards older women?I agree with most of the comments here, but I’ll add an explanation that is missing: it’s to keep down-on-their-luck men single and lonely. Redpillers only maintain a following and make money if there are lonely men who feel like they’re “failing.” It’s incredibly rare for a guy who feels like he has things going for him at the moment to fall into redpill ideology. If “women’s value decreases dramatically” as soon as she hits 25/30/35 while “men’s value dramatically increases” each year after 30… | /r/ExRedPill | 17/09/24 03:43 PM |
| 1 | Why is sex such a taboo? Imagine if we could just simply ask the person if they sex like "hey we should have sex sometime?" instead, we play these games and make it complicated“If you don’t get penile stimulation during sexual encounters, have you tried just rubbing one out yourself while you sexually satisfy her?” That’s exactly how you sound and you’re perfectly proving my point. Imagine if you were risking your physical safety every time you had sex, carried almost all of the material risks/burdens of sex, don’t experience much spontaneous arousal so you’re rarely so randomly horny that you feel like you need a random release, AND (on top of all that) you’re expect… | /r/seduction | 09/09/24 07:31 PM |
| 1 | Why is sex such a taboo? Imagine if we could just simply ask the person if they sex like "hey we should have sex sometime?" instead, we play these games and make it complicatedYou’re eating pussy with ONS and random hookups (which is the topic of the conversation)? Most men aren’t. | /r/seduction | 06/09/24 03:38 PM |
| 1 | Why is sex such a taboo? Imagine if we could just simply ask the person if they sex like "hey we should have sex sometime?" instead, we play these games and make it complicatedMen are well aware that penetration alone is never enough for the vast majority of women; they just don’t care. The issue is the “main act” of sex being centered around male pleasure and sex being done whenever he is satisfied regardless of how the woman is feeling. The problem is apathy and selfishness, not ignorance. Most men know what it takes and just won’t do it, especially in hook ups and ONS. Also, have you ever tried “teaching” (lol) a man how to be decent in bed? Most men don’t react we… | /r/seduction | 06/09/24 01:07 AM |
| 3 | Why is sex such a taboo? Imagine if we could just simply ask the person if they sex like "hey we should have sex sometime?" instead, we play these games and make it complicatedThe reason it’s not like that for women is because (1) women just aren’t nearly as horny in day-to-day life because women tend to have responsive arousal rather than the spontaneous arousal that men tend to have, (2) women still carry the larger burden/risk of sex, (3) sex with a random man is still much more dangerous for women than it is for men, and (4) on top of all that, sex with men isn’t nearly as satisfying for women as it is the other way around (or even sex with men among men). Women a… | /r/seduction | 05/09/24 10:30 PM |
| 1 | Do you think the manosphere has a eugenics agenda?I don’t really care either way, tbh. | /r/ExRedPill | 04/09/24 05:33 PM |
| 1 | Do you think the manosphere has a eugenics agenda?My explanation is directly related to your comment. Also for the record, OP mentioned other traits as well. If you’re not here to debate definitions, then don’t misuse words like you did. | /r/ExRedPill | 04/09/24 04:38 PM |
| 1 | Do you think the manosphere has a eugenics agenda?Eugenics is the controlled selective breeding of humans with the intent of “improving” the population with “better” genetics and “breeding out” the “undesirable” traits by prohibiting those with “undesirable” traits from procreating. That is not inherently racist or race-based. Well meaning people hear the “breed out undesirable traits” part of eugenics and (ironically) assume it’s always about racial minorities, but that isn’t correct; a generous explanation of that assumption is rooted in the … | /r/ExRedPill | 04/09/24 03:53 PM |
| 1 | Do you think the manosphere has a eugenics agenda?Eugenics isn’t necessarily racial or race-based. | /r/ExRedPill | 03/09/24 09:34 PM |
| 0 | Dating is so draining. Never get second dates.Yikes. Your logical reasoning skills are lacking here (which is expected, I must’ve forgot that I was on Reddit as well). Can you show me where I said that or tried to “prove” that? Reread my comments. That is literally the exact antithesis of what I’m saying. My entire point is that what is “nice” to one person isn’t necessarily “nice” to another person. My point was never that “one person thinks it’s nice, therefore it must be objectively nice.” You clearly agree with me since you understand t… | /r/seduction | 29/08/24 07:34 PM |
| 0 | Dating is so draining. Never get second dates.Lol I was using specific scenarios as an example to illustrate my broader point. My entire point is that the interests that people choose to invest their time, energy, and effort into will almost always give some insight into that person or at the very least, onlookers will assume that it’s giving accurate insights into that person. That is common sense. Cars are no different. It’s not a “specific scenario” or “special case”; it’s literally just human behavior. You already admitted that people m… | /r/seduction | 29/08/24 05:12 PM |
| 1 | Dating is so draining. Never get second dates.I didn’t say that having a “nice car” is always a negative. I’m saying that having a “nice car” could very easily be a negative if that “nice car” has some sort of subculture, hobby, or personality trait associated with it. What is or is not a “nice car” is subjective. A lot of what men consider to be “nice cars” might illicit a “oh, he’s one of those guys” reaction. Think about those big expensive lifted pickup trucks (I know we’re talking about cars, but this example still holds). Only a speci… | /r/seduction | 29/08/24 04:24 PM |
| 1 | Dating is so draining. Never get second dates.If you love cars, talk about it on dates as an interest! The example I used on another comment is think of cars like makeup. There are probably more women who know a lot about cars than there are (straight/bisexual) men who know a lot about makeup, but other than that it’s pretty damn similar as far as the reactions you might get from the other sex and the potential (or lack there of) for judgment. Also, generally, women who aren’t into cars view the type of car you drive similarly to how most m… | /r/seduction | 29/08/24 03:14 PM |
| 1 | Dating is so draining. Never get second dates.It’s not the nice ride, that’s actually bonus points. I’m genuinely curious where men get this from. I hear it all the time (only from men) and it comes off as “well I like cars like that so women must like it too!” Unless she’s into cars, what makes you think it’s a bonus? This is exactly like when women swear that men think a specific shade of lipstick is a bonus. I’ve watched a friend stress for hours over whether they should wear MAC’s “PDA” lipstick or MAC’s “Spice It Up!” lipstick on a fir… | /r/seduction | 29/08/24 11:33 AM |
| 1 | Dating is so draining. Never get second dates.I said the nice car can be more of a detriment, I didn’t say that it is always a detriment. A “nice” car says a lot about the driver. For example, I’m not really a huge lifted truck kind of girl (I know you said “car” and not “truck” but this is just an example). I just don’t like those trucks, how people look at those trucks, the culture where those trucks are popular, and the issues that come with those trucks. If I showed up for a first date and I saw the guy had a huge, expensive, pristine t… | /r/seduction | 29/08/24 11:15 AM |
| 1 | Dating is so draining. Never get second dates.First, you’re talking about traits that your personal traits that you see as positive but you didn’t mention how the dates actually go. Theres a joke/meme that women tell to each other that goes something like this: ”Wow! That date was great! I can’t wait to see her again” -every man who just spent an entire date only talking about himself and his interests How did the conversation go? Did you show any interest getting to know her at all? Second, see if not kissing them on the first date helps. … | /r/seduction | 28/08/24 11:22 PM |
| 10 | Why is there always so much pushback to young men who claim that the reason they can’t get a date is 100% the way they look?How does that math works in your in mind? “Average” means something. How is it possible that 80% of all men are below average? Are you saying that 20% of men are just so good looking that it skews everything? Are you saying that women think that 80% of men are 4s and 20% are 9s? | /r/ExRedPill | 05/08/24 08:43 PM |
| 2 | Why is there always so much pushback to young men who claim that the reason they can’t get a date is 100% the way they look?A lot of reasons, but it mostly comes down to (1) that not being generally true for the super majority of men and its unlikely that you’re the exception, (2) it implying that everything else about you is near perfect, and (3) it getting dangerously close to “women are shallow and only care about looks” territory. It is just off putting for some. Even if that’s not your intention, some will interpret what you’re saying as basically saying women are shallow and that’s the only thing holding you ba… | /r/ExRedPill | 05/08/24 08:37 PM |
| 6 | Girls who say they “don’t kiss” on first datesIf being completely honest about your intentions sounds creepy, then maybe your intentions are creepy. | /r/seduction | 20/07/24 05:01 PM |
| 1 | We all know a couple with average looking and hot girl.Okay, so I’ll explain it another way. If you’re just trying to meet women for quick one-off hookups or on dating-apps, then all you have to offer them is looks and that’s how they will base their willingness to engage with you. I have a few good friends that I originally met at bars but I wasn’t going in thinking “I’m just going to pump and dump.” If my mindset in any irl social interaction is just to fuck someone instead of finding friends, getting to know people, or even building small group t… | /r/seduction | 27/06/24 11:19 PM |
| 1 | We all know a couple with average looking and hot girl.Be more social irl. | /r/seduction | 26/06/24 10:23 AM |
| 1 | We all know a couple with average looking and hot girl.If there’s nothing else to offer besides looks, then yes. That will always be the case. That doesn’t negate what I said unless your only contact with women is in scenarios where looks matter more than usual (e.g., dating sites, clubs, and bars). If that’s the only time you’re in contact with non-familial women, then this advice isn’t for you and you should probably work on the other glaring issues in your life. | /r/seduction | 17/06/24 08:05 PM |
| 1 | We all know a couple with average looking and hot girl.“The only time women will care about personality is when she actually knows him!” Yes. You’re finally getting it. | /r/seduction | 17/06/24 08:00 PM |
| -1 | We all know a couple with average looking and hot girl.If you genuinely think that is at all comparable then you fundamentally misunderstand lol. Buying dinner isn’t a trait and the fact that you reduce traits that a woman may like in a partner to someone buying her $47.50 worth of dinner says a lot. Keep only putting stock into your looks instead of actually trying to be a person women want to be around long term. Let me know how that works in the long run. EDIT: yikes. Just took a look at your profile. Explains a lot. I wouldn’t have wasted my tim… | /r/seduction | 12/06/24 12:36 AM |
| 5 | We all know a couple with average looking and hot girl.This is 100% it. When I try to explain this to men looking for advice, they almost always push back on it. At first I thought it was projection considering that most men place looks above almost all else, but then I realized that it’s probably more of a cope. Or possibly a mixture of the two. It’s easier to throw up your hands and go “I’m not getting the women I want (or maybe even any woman at all) because I’m not 6’3” or extremely wealthy” than it is to come to grips with the fact that its mos… | /r/seduction | 11/06/24 09:33 PM |
| -1 | We all know a couple with average looking and hot girl.Women view looks differently than men. For example, men generally view someone’s physical attractiveness as stagnant whereas women generally view physical attractiveness as fluid. A woman can meet a guy and initially think he’s a 7 in physical attractiveness but then a few hours after meeting him think he’s a 4 in physical attractiveness because of some cringe/awkward/off-putting behaviors. How he looked never changed but how she views him did; how we view men is the foundation of our physical a… | /r/seduction | 11/06/24 09:27 PM |
| 1 | Why will women respond positively to flirty/teasing messages and the soft close for the date but then ghost you as soon as you ask for their availability (“When are you free?” Or “Whats ur schedule like this week?”)I’m not saying that your standards are too high (keep your high standards!!!!!), I’m saying that you may be thinking of yourself in the wrong way and you response shows that you are. You’re “leveling” yourself and others based on only looks. That’s not nearly as important for women. You’re thinking of your level from a male perspective even though you’re trying to get with women. Two perspectives might help (of course I’m speaking in generalities here and not every woman/man is the same): (1) Me… | /r/seduction | 01/06/24 01:51 PM |
| 0 | Why will women respond positively to flirty/teasing messages and the soft close for the date but then ghost you as soon as you ask for their availability (“When are you free?” Or “Whats ur schedule like this week?”)All of the ones on my level ended up ghosting I don’t know how to say this nicely, but this is a sign that you probably over inflate your “level.” Maybe rethink your “level,” or better yet just drop the whole “leveling” bullshit all together. | /r/seduction | 01/06/24 01:23 PM |
| 1 | Weekly FDS Chat, Check-In, Quick Questions Answered 4/20/2020When you block on reddit, I think all it does is make it so you can’t see their posts. They can still see yours. | /r/FemaleDatingStrategy | 28/04/20 05:58 PM |
| 2 | Sending nudes is a terrible ideaHe also wanted you to know he still has them. It’s a power thing and that has happened to me far too many times. | /r/FemaleDatingStrategy | 26/04/20 05:18 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter