The actual article since op is only showing the clickbait title https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3363227/New-trial-ordered-Denver-man-imprisoned-28-years.html
All she asked was that he Brings in some of the groceries which he could do. She does the rest of the chores and you were probably banned from aita because it is for am I the arsehole situations not commentary on other situations that have happened on there
Actually it states out of all the women killed they are most likely to be killed by a partner or ex partner. You really should put up the full story and stop twisting things
No you were trying to say that the people who are diagnosed have been misdiagnosed and don't actually have it which is not what this says and you shouldn't read journals you don't understand
Additionally, substantial variation exists in ADHD diagnosis between boys and girls, with boys often presenting with more stereotypical symptoms. And it is the norm that males exhibit more of the stereotypical symptoms which is why they are diagnosed more and that is the norm
No the fact that well behaved people who listen get higher grades than those who don't and the fact that people would call out people who were disrupting them
They were trying to state that the phone call to the police didn't provide proper evidence and the fact that she died before she could be prosecuted meant that you could only say that she was accused of domestic abuse
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-7821117/Caroline-Flacks-ex-fianc-Andrew-Brady-shares-lengthy-Instagram-post-year-recovery.html you can read what was said in the 999 call here
It wasn't horrible. They were bringing attention to a lesser known issue that always happens that way when a man is accused of assault of a woman. Also it won't bring any attention to the issue of female on male violence because if you read everything that is being said it is not being mentioned at all
So twelve guys are accused of being rapists and you think being imprisoned for ten days for each accusation is fair Edit just realised that the sentence was suspended so she won't even serve the ten days per accusation which is even worse
Funny how you try to label me as a sjw when I am sticking up for the man when you have commented on his appearance and not made a contribution. That is the case of someone who doesn't have a proper argument
Imagine how stupid the argument sounds if someone who was on a diet who worked in a cake shop wouldn't serve people cake as they believed that if they don't eat cake nobody else should either
There is when you spread false articles to further your narrative and the fact you don't like being called out proves that you know what you did was wrong
According to the actual story it is within their rights to deny based on their beliefs. She is suing because if they deny they are meant to recommend somewhere else to get it which they didn't
Except that isn't what this story is about. You are twisting a story to fit your narrative. She isn't suing because they denied her due to religious beliefs
It doesn't matter what happened in the past when your screenshot relates to this case which is a totally different case that isn't down to people refusing because of religious beliefs but the fact that they didn't do what they are legally supposed to do
Yes you are as said before she isn't suing because they denied birth control because of their beliefs but they refused to give her the details of a pharmacy that would let her get her prescription which they are legally required to do
Yes you are. She isn't suing because the workers wouldn't provide birth control because of their beliefs but the fact that they didn't give her the details of an alternative pharmacy after denying her prescription which they are legally required to do
The story actually states that she isn't suing because the pharmacist refused to give her the pill because of their beliefs but the fact that if they refuse to provide it they have to give the details of a pharmacy that will which the two pharmacists refused to do
So because you don't like something it shouldn't happen even when there can be a benefit to it. People didn't like people of colour mixing with white people. People didn't like gay people being able to get married. How is this any different to that