TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

1TrueScotsman Archive

View 4 posts and 196 comments by 1TrueScotsman on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
10

I always notice the unspoken disparity: intimacy. We dont talk about it directly or when we do (as a society) we blame the men. Male intamacy needs are portrayed as predatory, controlling, immoral. Even regarding them as needs gets you called entitled. Men need unconditional love and physical intamacy. We can't dance for it forever...it is exhausting. Evedience is rising that involuntary celibacy (as defined by social scientists, not the online hate movement) is on the rise for men but not women…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/07/20 01:42 AM
0

I have no problem with the right on male issues. I have a problem with the alt right. I do want to exclude feminists unless they are liberal feminists. I dont think sexists should have a say in a movement that advocates for rights for all sexes. Feminism is a sexist movement and so is the alt right. And finally, we have a right of association. I dont have to accept nazis in my group. That isn't cancel culture or even call out culture. That is just my right not to associate with fucking nazis. Th…
/r/MensRights21/07/20 07:22 AM
-3

Antifeminis. is a noble pursuit and connected direct ri mens rights but I agree with you that it attracts the nut jobs and altrighters. That's why we had to make another sub that excludes alt righters. This sub refuses to face the truth.
/r/MensRights21/07/20 01:31 AM
5

Btw, technically all feminists subs on reddit are radical. It's a brand of feminism not a degree. Liberal feminism doesn't really exist as an activist ideology anymore, it is all radical feminism or some brand derived from radical feminism now. Most feminist deny they are radical feminists because they don't understand thier own ideology. TERFs are "Trans exclusive radical feminists" as opposed to Trans inclusive radical feminists. Most of reddit is the later. Extremist feminism is the word you …
/r/AntiFeminists26/06/20 07:07 PM
13

I've been thinking that a huge component of racism is actually just misandry amplified by the otherness of superficial racial and cultutal differences. That's why I find the radfem BLM.org so dangerous as it low key supports the misandrists beliefs about black men just like racists overtly do.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/06/20 03:06 AM
2

Lol...where the fuck are you from? They are pronounced exactly the same.
/r/MensRights08/06/20 09:39 AM
6

Lol...yes they are.
/r/MensRights06/06/20 01:03 PM
2

Most vegan diets depend on international trade. That is swapping meats for far away vegan based substance. This has a very real environmental impact on animals and causes them grief. In fact it can be argued that agricultural practives that allows a vegan diet causes more suffering to animals than husbandry. If morally it is wrong to eat a cow because the cow might suffer then it is immoral to eat wheaties because of the billions of vertebrates that die from making wheat happen. I know..you want…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/05/20 09:47 AM
3

Horseshit
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/05/20 09:01 AM
0

Horseshit.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/05/20 09:01 AM
0

No it is not. It's a bunch of religious freaks painting all animal hiabandey as abuse. Fucking chickens are vile creatures.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/05/20 09:00 AM
1

Pathedic. But I give a tour think you are the same as a chicken so lol...ok.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/05/20 08:59 AM
2

u/acutepresence should be banned as they are clearly trolling the sub based on a resent viral feminist meme that insists that being vegan is being feminist. They havnt made any supporting arguments for their position that hold up and are just throwing ad hominins out.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/05/20 08:43 AM
2

Once agian..you are clearly trolling. No link to unbiased sources or actual arguements. Just "you are wrong cause...you are wrong". Typical.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/05/20 08:40 AM
1

I notice you didn't bother to actually counter anything or even attempt to make a good faithed arguement. I now think you are a troll.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/05/20 08:38 AM
1

Lol. Is that all you got. Are you like 14?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/05/20 08:35 AM
2

VEGAN ACTIVISM IS IMMORAL. CHANGE MY MIND.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/05/20 08:27 AM
2

No, they are food. Your moral reasoning is weak and is based only on an over active mistargeted empathy responce that you should instead be focusing on your fellow humans. Chickens are not innocent dolls... they are predators that will eat your eyes out given half the chance. They do not have sapience... are barely senscient. You are literally saying nature itself is immoral. But morality is clearly an human social trait whose entire basis is socialization within a social species. Yes, we can ex…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/05/20 08:08 AM
1

Please enumerate my factoids so I can counter your claim that they are factoids.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/05/20 07:54 AM
3

I'm a consequencialist. What is your moral philosophy? Also dont care weather the Male or female chicken gets killed. They are not sapient.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/05/20 07:47 AM
2

It's a religion. It's not based on facts, just feelings and is based on an emotional belief that prey animals have souls and that the natural world is inherently evil and we as moral creature should atrive to be more christ like in order to be saved from eternal damnation. It really do be like that. Same with feminism and its version of original sin, virtue testing, patriarchy (nature is evil), etc. These are belief systems that those that have eschewed traditional religions flock to.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/05/20 07:46 AM
5

Please no. This is fucking ridiculous. We are a sapient species evolved to eat meat. We do not normally eat meat from other sapient species nor do we even normally eat meat from other predators like us. You can argue that we should treat all our prey species humanly without trying to shoehorn in your gender war politics or advocate for bullshit vegan religion....and it is a religion. Feminism is also a religion. It will be a cold day in hell before I believe in any religion. You are welcome in t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/05/20 07:00 AM
-32

Meh...much ado about nothing. The boy was not abused. She is trashy. Who cares? Yall sound like a bunch of pedopanicing sexually repressed feminists. People are horn dogs, they going horn. I agree the double standard is wrong, but I don't agree that teenagers who willing have sexual relations with older people are victims. They are not. Consent laws are in place to keep much older people from using thier authority over younger people to actually rape and abuse them. But that means that some cons…
/r/MensRights27/04/20 07:06 AM
3

Feminism mandates this...it is what feminism is...the dehumanizing of males.
/r/MensRights19/04/20 07:41 AM
3

Hating radical feminism isn't sexist. Disagreeing with a philosophy or psedoscientific theory isn't hate. But dont expect them to see it that way as they are a hate movement themselves. Full stop. Fuck 'em.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/04/20 01:50 AM
-3

Reread....I did not say that you fucking retard
/r/MensRights17/04/20 10:29 AM
-7

To be glad that women cant have abortions just to own the feminists means you hate women.
/r/MensRights17/04/20 08:43 AM
-3

Anyone agianst abortions just to pwn the feminists is a sexist. Get out of here.
/r/MensRights17/04/20 06:12 AM
5

r/history and r/askhistorians regularly deflate patriarchy narratives. Hold on...I may have a thread saved as an example.... Edit...nvm. apparently all I ever save is porn.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/02/20 09:34 AM
14

It's such a bad hypothesis that even the history subs that refuse to say a bad word about feminism refuse to to play along...they are just really careful not to use the f word and call them out. The feminist patriarchy metanarrative is easily disproven but they won the war and so write the texts.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/02/20 08:44 AM
5

I guess that too...we can both be right....I mean left...whatever. it did get extra bad when the dumpster fires started posting.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/02/20 08:22 AM
10

Fyi r/mensrigjts didnt use to be like that. It always had a problem with redpillers and traditionalists but the majority were left leaning. That all changed during the lead up to the 2016 election. Its calmed down a bit but the damage is done. Oh well. It's the price they paid for being so absolutist about free speech.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/02/20 06:42 AM
1

Oh no...I had a typo...clearly I am wrong then.
/r/MensRights01/02/20 01:41 PM
0

You said some untrue things. Please look outside your intactivist bubble...but you won't. Hell I linked to things that disprobe you...just wow.
/r/MensRights01/02/20 01:36 PM
-1

Gross..freak! Lol. No where did I say that....bit you are gross for thinking the way you think....its clear you have a problem with your nastly flap of skin...not me.
/r/MensRights01/02/20 01:17 PM
-15

No..its not just about hygiene. Hold on let me edit this......https://slatestarcodex.com/2019/12/10/acc-is-infant-circumcision-ethical/ That's is the finding of both an intactivist and nonintactivist rationalists joint statement. That is your best starting point in a debate about infant circumscion sans the argument of body autonomy (which was not covered).
/r/MensRights25/01/20 08:47 AM
-21

These folks are crazy...give up. I stopt argueing with these folks a while back...they just dont want to admit that cut dicks are better for them cause they need to compete with the severe forms fgm. Its oppression Olympics.
/r/MensRights25/01/20 07:02 AM
14

Women get pregnant, men dont. That is why. Women have a hightened fear response to strange men because if that man has sex with her he might get her pregnant with an unwanted child. This is an unconscious primal response. Men who are not strangers want to keep men that are strangers away from the women they know or would like to know. This includes any competition. This isnt just competition however, it's a protective responce to thier women's fear/safety. Society amplifies these things through …
/r/MensRights01/01/20 01:01 AM
-1

People have the right to breed or not breed. Infantisize is natural.
/r/MensRights05/12/19 08:43 AM
0

Still doent make sense that you cant empathize and see how these posts are just trying to capitalize on human tragedy for a bull shit culture war. I'd never kill my wife and son but I've been there where murder and suicide was a real thing I could do. I just didn't focus on my family. Others... myself. Yes. But there really wasn't much different from me and this women. Nothing at all really. And I can have empathy. Something this sub is severely lacking in.
/r/MensRights03/12/19 01:33 PM
-7

Ugh. Are you 12?
/r/MensRights03/12/19 12:54 PM
-27

Maybe dont post crap like this. That poor woman was hurting in ways that we cant understand or if we can we refuse to acknowledge publically. To use this very human tragedy to score points agianst the other side just because "they do it too" is to demean ourselves and lower ourselves to thier level. Posts like this need to die. So I stand by what I said. She was right to kill those children. It's just as valid as this post is.
/r/MensRights03/12/19 12:03 PM
-34

Sigh...my sarcasm was just too on point.
/r/MensRights03/12/19 11:32 AM
1

I believe that when men do this they are morally justified. I dont change my opinion when it's a woman. In most of these cases (man or woman) the one performing the justifiable homicides was cheated on and left for garbage. I condone the mercy killings. You have a right to end your life. A right to kill cheaters and adultwrwes and a right to off the offspring of the unfaithful. Yeah. I'm a bit extreme. Lol. Quit posting this crap. The rabbit hole goes deep.
/r/MensRights03/12/19 10:36 AM
2

Radical in the context of feminism means that they believe that society needs to be upended entirely. Most feminists believe this now as they believe thatbpatruarchy is so woven in everything only radical change an undo it. Not all radical feminists are extremists, but only extremist feminists are honest about what radical feminism must do to realize thier goals.
/r/MensRights03/12/19 10:19 AM
0

Yes/No. No. They are entitled to intamacy in a relationship. Once you stop giving it or withholding it you are abusing them that's not the same thing as entitled. But yes, in a relationship you are obligated to try to meet your partners intimacy needs as best you can. That's literally the definition of a romantic pair bond.
/r/MensRights29/11/19 05:05 AM
-7

That person is an idiot. It's not violence, its emotional abuse via neglect. It only applies to committed ltr and only if done intentionally. It happens when one partner is using sex to control the other, or in cases of infedelity where the unfaithful ceases being intimate with thier partner or when one partner just stops trying because they are selfish a d or abusive in other ways. Intimacy is a human need and in a committed relationship it is an obligation to try your best to meet each others …
/r/MensRights28/11/19 05:07 AM
6

Trump is a fucking joke and a traitor.
/r/MensRights20/11/19 05:56 PM
0

Read a little. We are done. Also, try dating and get off reddit...lol.
/r/MensRights18/11/19 04:33 AM
1

Ha...I felt earlier reports were way too high to make sence.
/r/MensRights15/11/19 05:59 PM
-5

Sigh. Go back to r/the_quarantined and circle jerk to your conspiracies there. Traitor.
/r/MensRights15/11/19 05:26 AM
3

This comment is stupid. There is no conspiracy. It's just plain old sexism. That said there is a conspiracy out in the open of Russians stoking our culture wars to divide us so they can expand thier national interests. So not globalists.
/r/MensRights15/11/19 01:55 AM
10

Yup. She makes the curry I do most everything else. Also, no hurricane when I cook. Ironically we are having curry.
/r/MensRights08/11/19 04:14 AM
1

Dude..I said most not all. Our biology is different. If your SO touches your penis while asleep and you freak out and start ranting about consent you have issues bro. Or maybe you shouldn't be with someone you dislike so much. Women don't like being touched on the genital until after they are turn on typically, men are not like that If you are a man and mind that you are an outlier. Iys the reason it's so damn hard to make a female viagra. We just work different. Women also have a lower toleranc…
/r/MensRights06/11/19 10:46 AM
11

No he didnt. He said fml...could just be saying his prank didn't go the way he wanted. Not very convincing.
/r/MensRights06/11/19 10:21 AM
48

Meh. Consent in a relationship is a huge grey area. There are differences between men and women in this regard. Most men don't mind getting a surprise blow job from the SO, most women dont like surprise PIV. Hell most women dont like to have thier gentials touched at all while asleep....most men do. I'd have to say this supposed victim here didnt likely really feel victimized at all. And most women dont feel victimized when their SO gets a little too handsy even if they dont like it. They just c…
/r/MensRights06/11/19 07:27 AM
1

Credible doesnt mean proven. Dude lied to Congress. She did have collaboration in the form of therapy notes predating his nomination by years. The FBI wasn't allowed to do a proper investigation. Just because people dont recall a party they weren't assaulted in doesnt disprove the allegations. I certainly dont remember parties 30 years ago. Hell the guy who was in the room doesnt deny it, he doesnt remember it because he was a raging blackout drinker. His lies to Congress about it should have be…
/r/MensRights04/11/19 05:59 AM
3

I was going to comment when I saw it but it was already locked. Here are my points: 1. Regularly on that sub they call men around 22 years creeps for dating "of age" girls younger than them. 2. How is it that 22 year old young men have agency in those situations but a 22 year old young woman doesnt have agency in this situation? 3. How come it is alright for a 22 y/o woman to get gang banged for a porn video by middle aged men, but not ok for them to date them? 4. How come boys have agency at 16…
/r/MensRights01/11/19 10:01 AM
1

False accusation? This is about doxing not the accusation, which appears to be very credible.
/r/MensRights30/10/19 06:26 AM
6

I'm not even an mra but holy crap...I couldn't resist pointing out the hypocracy.
/r/MensRights16/10/19 08:05 AM
15

Check your privilege. How dare you enter our safe space and invalidate OP's lived experience with your socially constructed femsplaining.
/r/MensRights16/10/19 06:56 AM
1

lol.
/r/MensRights02/11/17 07:14 AM
1

please, 70% of this sub is hate. when I first came here it was like 5% That was three years ago. Most all of the the comments are from racists now.
/r/MensRights02/11/17 07:02 AM
1

I just think Michelle has more testosterone then berry...............always has. um......
/r/MensRights02/11/17 03:58 AM
1

I don't feel the need to proclaim what I'm not into. That's what marks you.
/r/MensRights02/11/17 03:45 AM
1

You do racist you.
/r/MensRights02/11/17 03:39 AM
1

Without context you can not make that claim.
/r/MensRights02/11/17 03:34 AM
1

Snoo snoo is hot, especially ebony snoo snoo. You just envious of Berry.
/r/MensRights02/11/17 03:32 AM
1

Since no one has any context for these statements I'm going to be charitable and assume she is talking from her own experience within the black community. A community that is still mired in an honor culture where black women do in fact coddle the men as the men have to survive in the honor culture. An honor culture requires hyper masculinity and the women help maintain that. I think this is the charitable interpretation and frankly it is not wrong.
/r/MensRights02/11/17 03:20 AM
8

Any one got a transcript of the part of the interview in question? context matters. Or at least find the time stamp in the interview? thank you.
/r/MensRights02/11/17 02:54 AM
3

Everyone needs to down vote this garbage or this movement is done.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 09:29 AM
2

wtf do you think this crap post is?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
/r/MensRights28/09/17 09:27 AM
1

Nazi. EDIT: sorry I meant Comrade...
/r/MensRights28/09/17 09:25 AM
2

racist.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 09:24 AM
-1

the post is literally white supremacist propaganda.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 09:23 AM
1

ugh. Truth hurts. No one else bothered to call this out for what it is.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 05:41 AM
2

this video's whole premise is that Star Trek Discovery is anti-Trump so for some reason the MRM should care. Quit your bullshit...this is a political post.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 04:42 AM
2

Just because SJW's like something doesn't mean it is SJW. It may just be good old fashion decency. And since when was everything progressive SJWISM? This sub has been traditionally dominated by left libertarians and progressives. Are we /r/The_Donald now? Are we Stormfront? Is the woman's place in the home? Are colored folk not allowed to exist? Is the future we are striving for white? What the fuck is wrong with the moderators of this sub that they allow this white supremacist take over to cont…
/r/MensRights28/09/17 03:59 AM
1

Not fair enough. The video's whole point was somehow Trump = white men so fight back by making more babies, killing some coloreds, building some walls, and for some strange reason advocate for trans inclusion in the NFL. It is thinly disguised white supremacist propaganda that is meant to appeal to Trump supporters/alt-light. OP is probably a Russian.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 03:49 AM
3

how so?
/r/MensRights28/09/17 03:39 AM
1

Piss off back to stormfront. Oh yeah...lol.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 03:38 AM
-1

Piss off back to stormfront. Oh yeah...lol.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 03:32 AM
1

What did you know? Have you watched it?
/r/MensRights28/09/17 03:31 AM
2

Watch the video folks...this is thinly disguised white supremacist propaganda. It makes no good arguments, is full of fluff and half of it is about the NFL. It even proves itself wrong in the middle by rightly pointing out that in the furure white are a minority because even now we are a minority...it is a call to defend white people. I guess the message is : make more white babies and kill the colored folk?
/r/MensRights28/09/17 03:29 AM
1

watch the video...it is the only argument they make that has any validity to it. This is a racist Trump alt-right post. That it is getting over 50% up-votes here means this sub may be done. We are an alt right sub now. This video needs to be removed...it is white supremacist propaganda.
/r/MensRights28/09/17 03:25 AM
2

who the fuck cares if he is trump...this isn't /r/The_Donald.
/r/MensRights27/09/17 11:10 PM
-1

Spoilers...the captain is a white male. quit your bullshit. Go back to /r/The_Donald. We really don't need this crap. All you are doing is deconstructing the same way feminists deconstruct everything to prove their bullshit. Also, this is fucking Star Trek. Of course there are strong female characters and diverse races portrayed.
/r/MensRights27/09/17 09:11 PM
36

Mods...please delete this stupid. It makes us look like morons.
/r/MensRights02/09/17 04:07 AM
1

Is your penis also deformed? I'm so sorry.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 08:01 AM
1

babies aren't people. done. Also sorry your penis is deformed..truly i am...that's gotta suck.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 07:33 AM
1

kind of. Tired of intactivism. Not nearly the big deal it's made out to be and every sob story about their penises just sounds like unfortunate penis. I suck enough dick to have a valid opinion and it is just over blown. cut/uncut...both work and are fine. I'm more concerned with bad circumcisions. That is the only issue for me. I do not believe in body autonomy.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 07:01 AM
1

LOL. I really wish this sub would ban intactivist crap. Your dick is gross and broke and you mad. Doesn't matter if you cut or not, you are an intactivist because your dick is dysfunctional. You lie, exaggerate and make excuses for your smeg covered dick over a piece of useless skin. Let it be already. Advocate for safer circumcisions or choice. But quit your bullshit that safe circumcisions are not a plus for most all boys. Don't link me to your lies either. Y'all just a pathetic as feminists.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 06:40 AM
2

the comment I posted above explains that. women in ltr are often not aroused first like men. desire comes first then arousal. Men arousal then desire. It's a rule of thumb, not true always or for everyone. The desire isn't "he's hansom" it's "I feel safe and want to bond with that person who makes me feel safe". In a stressed environment a woman won't feel safe enough to bond...no bond desire no arousal. This isn't quite right though...women do get aroused outside this framework...in new relatio…
/r/RedPillWomen21/07/17 10:45 AM
18

I think you are confusing desire and arousal. Men and women tend to be different. Especially women in long term relationships as opposed to new relationships (they are more like men then). You are letting the stress of modern life affect your bonding desire with your mate. The stress is sending a signal that all is not well. Women in ltrs tend to feel a desire to bond first, not sexual arousal...that comes after. Intellectually you need to divorce the stress of life from your desire to bond with…
/r/RedPillWomen21/07/17 06:24 AM
1

They took over everything. Sad. Was a time hardly anyone in this sub supported Trump...same thing with Kia and similar sjw critical subs. Now it's all full time Trump ass-lickers.
/r/MensRights01/04/17 05:15 AM
8

You logic is impeccable. Have you considered applying to MENSA?
/r/MensRights19/03/17 02:50 AM
0

It should be burned to the ground.
/r/MensRights11/10/16 07:21 AM
0

You weren't raped, you are just a sloppy drunk slut.
/r/MensRights03/10/16 10:25 AM
1

trying hard to create a narrative
/r/MensRights03/07/16 12:02 PM
5

We've reached the height of alt-right intellectual theory: Your momma insults.
/r/MensRights29/05/16 01:44 PM
9

You sound like a guy with small hands.
/r/MensRights29/05/16 01:16 PM
10

LOL. The only thing I hate more than sjws are retards like you. We only let you freaks post here because we don't like to censor.
/r/MensRights29/05/16 11:49 AM
13

Did I trigger you?
/r/MensRights29/05/16 11:44 AM
13

You are an idiot.
/r/MensRights29/05/16 11:40 AM
7

This. Please stop with the pussy pass posts and post this. fuck I'm tired of this sub. Post this.
/r/MensRights13/05/16 12:49 PM
3

The reality is that if the draft is ever used again they will not draft women for combat. This is a false victory.
/r/MensRights13/05/16 11:34 AM
-4

I don't like the community here anymore. Way too conservatard and angry at stupid shit. It's bizarro feminism. I blame Trump and small handed red pillers. I think literally everyday one of the top posts is about supposed pussy passes and the comments are calling for public executions of women. I stay for the lols.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 09:30 AM
-6

I don't know what to say. You are a raging idiot.
/r/MensRights25/04/16 05:21 PM
-6

30 years in prison keeps her out of society, protecting the rest of us from being her future victims. Infanticide is a different phenomena than other types of homicide. One does not go from killing your new born to shooting folks on the streets. She should have received the death penalty, which I think is compassionate for someone as disturbed as her. Infanticide is a well documented common, and likely natural behavior in humans, not an anomaly perpetrated only by disturbed individuals. Access t…
/r/MensRights25/04/16 04:52 PM
-4

Um..no.
/r/MensRights25/04/16 04:13 PM
-16

I'm all for gender equality in sentencing....but I'd rather it go the other way: more compassion, not less. 30 years is just too long for killing your own new born baby. I really shouldn't have to spell out why. Nor should I have to spell out why sending this women to prison for 30 years accomplishes absolutely nothing good for anyone. This is just a judge with no compassion and no understanding. These 'pussy pass denied" and "pussy pass" posts are getting old. In the first case we sound like a …
/r/MensRights25/04/16 03:47 PM
26

My wife was there today too. This type of activism can be very effective if you do it right. Come prepared with facts. Be polite. Know who you are talking to (rep names, stances, etc). Bring a friend or a dozen. Say what you are for, not what you are against.
/r/MensRights19/02/16 10:18 AM
2

It really does look like these men formed gangs for the purpose of sexually assaulting and robbing women. "Taharush" or "rape game". I believe it. I'm not going to pretend that uneducated men brought up under strict sexual repression and placed in a situation where they have little to no healthy access to women won't in fact cause some of them to act out. I expect it. Let's not go down the feminist road and start denying when our sex does something wrong. We aren't angels. If you want to take a …
/r/MensRights15/01/16 07:52 AM
1

I have my doubts. Sorry...but this sounds like cheating. Cheaters will often tell their friends that something else is the cause of the troubles. They tell themselves stories to justify their infidelity and often use their friends as sounding boards to reaffirm how they are the victim. You sound like a sounding board. He either cheated on her or she is a legit psycho. What is more likely? (I guess there are some other god awful thing he could have done). You need to realize that your desire to s…
/r/MensRights29/12/15 08:03 AM
1

Past wrong doing? You mean cheating? I'm sorry, but cheaters should lose custody and should pay child support and alimony. I also can see why she acted the way she did. Sure, it's not ideal, but it is understandable. Cheating is abuse. Take a moment to read up on the effect cheating has on the one cheated on and you might be a little more understanding. If his "past wrong doings" were in fact cheating, you are taking a feminist position in being mad that he is having to face the consequences of …
/r/MensRights29/12/15 07:37 AM
3

Now everyone can know what a shitlord I am!
/r/MensRights01/10/15 06:30 AM
6

Women are more objectively attractive. Men and women mostly agree on what traits are attractive in a women. On the other hand, women do not agree on what physical attributes make a man attractive (at least not to the same extent men and women agree with women's attractiveness). Here's the study which explains it better: http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2009-06/wfu-ra062609.php Relevant "red pill" like explanation: These differences have implications for the different experiences and strate…
/r/RedPillWomen01/10/15 01:55 AM
9

I decided to give him a pass on this months ago. I mean, I seriously doubt that whoever ends up with the republican nomination is going to touch this either. And even if they did that wouldn't be enough to earn my support. Sad as it sounds, I'm all for Bernie licking feminist assholes if it turns them away from Clinton. In the end this isn't even an issue that a President can even do anything about. And just like Obama, Bernie's advisers (once in office) will lay out the truth (if they haven't a…
/r/MensRights28/07/15 04:03 AM
10

Why do MRAs attack feminism?
/r/MensRights18/07/15 05:36 AM
14

I think this was written with young women in mind, which is why I like it. Instead of the typical MRA/Anti-feminist research driven article she instead tells a story of a night out clubbing using the language, imagery and stereotypes young women are familiar with to argue against the feminist narrative without once saying the "f" word. That is, you are not the audience.
/r/MensRights05/06/15 05:05 AM
7

It all depends on what Reddits sjw admins deem as "reasonable"...we are screwed.
/r/MensRights15/05/15 08:31 AM
7

And that counters my argument how?
/r/MensRights12/04/15 10:24 AM
2

That's why I said I have a problem with teachers having sex with students...but even then it's not worthy of more than a year in prison...just fire them and make sure they can't get back into education. No need to take decades from their life over sex. We are a sick people.
/r/MensRights12/04/15 08:57 AM
13

No it isn't. EDIT: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_consent_in_Africa http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_consent_in_Asia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_consent_in_Europe http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_consent_in_North_America http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_consent_in_Oceania http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ages_of_consent_in_South_America
/r/MensRights12/04/15 08:01 AM
14

We too often lose sight of the fact that we are pointing out hypocrisy. I too feel that most all of these "rapes" of young boys by teachers are only a big deal because they are teachers. The teachers should be fired and get a slap on the wrist. It's the fact that male teachers are not treated like that that bothers me. I feel the government has some, but not much cause to interject itself into the affairs of folks sex lives. Our hyper sensitivity to youth having sex, and especially female youth …
/r/MensRights12/04/15 07:47 AM
5

I couldn't read it...after a few sentences I started seeing red. I just can't do this anymore. I'm becoming a hateful person. I'm taking a break.
/r/MensRights28/03/15 11:17 AM
3

I forget which state(s) have this fucked up law, but a women can be charged with murder of her unborn fetus if they believe she miscarried due to not taken care of herself during pregnancy or something like that... http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2011/07/misc-j06.html
/r/MensRights27/03/15 09:41 PM
6

Well...this is targeted toward developing nations rather than western nations like the U.S. There are a lot of social-economic reasons girls in many of these nations do not have access to a proper education. And if I recall correctly, providing girls educations goes a long way to decreasing overall poverty, lowering birthrates (etc etc) in developing countries. Still, we know the track record of programs like these from our own experience. At some point the boys well be ignored and societal pres…
/r/MensRights04/03/15 01:22 AM
1

Doing the same thing as feminists is in fact not why most of us are here. One ad was a joke..it was actually funny...I'm not going to make a big deal out of it because I know that most folks know its just a fucking joke. The other? One sided but valid points...to sell tampons. to sell fucking tampons. I don't give enough of a shit...poking fun is fine...making a point, even if misguided when looked at in whole, is not worth my time. I don't want to be the men's equivalent of the women's victim m…
/r/MensRights07/02/15 07:17 AM
1

That's the joke.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 12:01 PM
5

Where have you been the last 2 months?
/r/MensRights05/02/15 10:33 AM
8

I'm ambivalent. On the one hand it was blatantly sexist...on the other I'm not a Bizarro feminist. (I just stole this term from someone else...it's awesome!) It's all well and good to point out hypocrisy...quite another to take the position of the hypocrite.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 06:32 AM
1

Equality has been achieved! We can all go home now rest assured journalistic integrity is secured the next time nothing happened frat bros gang rape.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 05:29 AM
1

Bizarro Feminism I'm stealing this. But yeah. Lots of folks here put down (vote down) so called "concern trolls" but this is exactly why they should be listening to them.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 02:48 AM
1

Fuck man...there is nothing wrong with this. The idea that men have heart attacks and women don't is real. My mother had a heart attack in the fucking doctors office in front of the doctor and he still refused to believe she was having a heart attack because women her age 'don't have heart attacks." This is a real problem. Women hardly ever think they are having a heart attack...it's deadly. Fuck guys, why did you up vote this? Damn it Men's Rights you sound like feminists.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 02:09 AM
3

1Y deleted as soon as it was posted.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 09:47 PM
4

The Patriarchy works in mysterious ways. Just quoting you so I remember to use this someday.
/r/MensRights27/01/15 10:29 AM
7

Why is this anti-gay Christian "family values" crap being posted on /r/MensRights? Are we a Christian anti-gay sub now? That's one hell of a biased article. But this is not the sub to debate that. Push your traditionalist garbage elsewhere I say. EDIT: Or, less harshly, please explain to me how this is relevant to us? And could you possibly link to a less biased "news" site if you have an actual good argument why we should be discussing this?
/r/MensRights22/01/15 10:22 AM
8

He's commenting on the fact that even a pin-prick to a girls' vulva is considered to be "serious harm" in the eyes of the law, whilst an infant boy can have a very large part of his penis amputated for no medical reason, as that is seen as OK. Yeah, that's certainly a valid point in law.
/r/MensRights15/01/15 01:40 PM
2

Um...a judge is not capable of making that determination. Judges are not scientists. Past judges have ruled many ridiculous things. Just because you agree with one judge doesn't mean he based his ruling on facts. It is not the place of the judiciary to decide matters of science. Just saying...edit...no matter how much you want it to be relevant, it just isn't relevant to your moral argument.
/r/MensRights15/01/15 12:25 PM
1

It is what it is.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 10:08 AM
1

Headline: "Suspected Boko Haram Militants Kidnap 40 People In Northeast Nigeria" Text: "Gunmen abducted 40 boys and young men from a remote village in northeast Nigeria in a raid that residents and a security source blamed on Boko Haram, the Islamist group that has gained worldwide notoriety for mass kidnappings."
/r/MensRights05/01/15 12:22 PM
6

Married non-religious MRA man here. There is nothing wrong and everything right with the concept of marriage. It is a promise to your spouse and the community that you will care for each other. It affords you specials rights and dispensations to help you raise the next generation. It is lovely that she is my wife and not just my old woman....and I am her husband, not just her old man. no one respects the old man/woman, but they do respect wife/husband (yeah some don't, but they should be shamed …
/r/MensRights29/12/14 07:59 AM
-1

Well that's just flat-out incorrect. People die from botched circumcisions every year. You lose functionality and sensitivity of the penis. folks die or suffer from foreskin issues. Most botched circumcisions are done by unregulated folk (usually religious...something I already agreed needs to stop). Overall, properly done, there is a net benefit on top of cultural preference. Do you mean you don't want parents to be educated about adverse effects of circumcision? No, they should have facts...bu…
/r/MensRights21/12/14 01:11 PM
1

I think their is too much unknown about the infant brain to know what effect the trauma has I have heard of no evidence that the trauma is any more severe than any other single incidence pain trauma. That is, it makes no sense to me that this would be a special case with long lasting consequences. This always struck me as a weak argument. The belief that people suffer long lasting psychological damage from things like these is very Fruedonian...and not part of modern psychology. I find this a ba…
/r/MensRights21/12/14 12:54 PM
0

My compromise is parental education....I see it as a cultural thing with no real statistical harm with some statistical benefits. Mandates either way are wrong in my opinion. I do not believe in body autonomy for children as a separate right.
/r/MensRights21/12/14 10:41 AM
1

I'm pro-circumcision. But I don't mind seeing intactivist posts here. Just disagree. I do like the knots feminists have to tie themselves into over this issue...but still...I do not believe that this is an important issue for us. I am the extreme minority here...so if I don't care you are good.
/r/MensRights21/12/14 10:14 AM
12

I still hate the fact that all these articles have to start with insisting that there is a particular problem with rape on campuses. Perpetuating this lie means that we leave the door open for continued hysteria.
/r/MensRights08/12/14 08:01 AM
-2

Um...but the libertarians and republicans did try to take abortion rights away from women...so kind of their fault. Remember they are the ones that thought it a good idea to force women seeking abortions to shove a wand up their vaginas. Just saying...
/r/MensRights20/11/14 08:18 AM
4

It is true that had Lena been a he, she would have faced the torches and pitchforks of feminists everywhere. Her career would be over and nothing short of her suicide would satisfy the mob. It is fair to point out the hypocrisy. It is wrong however to form a mob of our own. Unlike feminists I do not feel that every indiscretion someone makes in life is proof of some kind of -archy or oppression or culture. I do not feel the need to seek vengeance over something that happened in someone's childho…
/r/MensRights19/11/14 12:59 AM
2

resign.
/r/MensRights05/11/14 09:30 AM
9

Yeah, they ban generalizing feminists too. Frankly I'm sick of that too. Address individuals and groups and their stances, along with issues. These kinds of rules are always used in a biased manner. That's the problem. Also, here's the quote from their female feminist moderator that tells the truth, who commented below in case you missed it: The core issue is really that we want the subreddit to not be /r/rantaboutthegenderpoliticsgroupyoudontagreewith. See? Controlling what men talk about IS th…
/r/MensRights31/10/14 07:23 AM
16

Who the fuck are you to tell men what they can and cannot talk about?
/r/MensRights31/10/14 06:58 AM
3

I firmly believe that if you were already subscribed to a sub, you can and should vote even if it was brought to your attention from another sub. Just saying. The post is in contest mode and removed anyway...but that's the rule I follow.
/r/MensRights26/10/14 10:35 PM
-2

I sincerely believe the practice evolved culturally as a means to combat problems with a part of an organ that is becoming, if not already is, vestigial, during ancient times when infections were terminal or at the very least, ruined ones ability to procreate. I am not convinced that circumcised men experience less pleasurable sex or indeed suffer any ill effects. I do not believe in the body autonomy of children in regards to their parents choices absent a clear harm as defined from their parti…
/r/MensRights26/10/14 06:34 AM
2

I hate throwing up in my mouth.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 05:52 AM
9

My wife minus the cheating.
/r/TheRedPill08/10/14 07:00 AM
0

Thank you. I was really worried you thought I was a bad person. I was raped by knife point, my wife was raped by my brother. I thank you for informing me and my wife what appropriate humor is in regards to rape...otherwise I'd have no idea.
/r/MensRights30/09/14 06:34 AM
1

I looked at a lot of laws a while back (when looking into the whole drunk debate) and no...it's not rape in most all places (UK, USA, Australia and Canada at least). But some places have vaguries that instead of being fixed are being widened...such as we are seeing with this law.
/r/MensRights30/09/14 06:27 AM
1

exactly...and me also..too damn tired...but I struggle threw it because she wants it (she's a morning type) and it's not the worst thing for sure...just so damn tired.
/r/MensRights30/09/14 06:19 AM
1

We should form a support group. A safe space to discuss in detail how the love our life betrayed us with surprise morning wood blowjobs. On second thought...never mind...TMI
/r/MensRights30/09/14 05:19 AM
5

No I'm not. But...and this is important...college students are adults and there should not be special laws about their sexual behavior that don't apply to everyone. It makes no sense. And if this law is acceptable then next we'll pass one for high schools, then the military then for government workers. Soon we will be policing everyone's bedroom behavior. Theft, murder, battery: they are all defined the same no matter who you are or where you commit the crime. This law seeks extra-judicial punis…
/r/MensRights30/09/14 01:48 AM
3

I added a trigger warning. I'm not going to bother to explain to you the role humor and sarcasm plays in human communication when making a point. If you want to psychoanalyze what I wrote to imply that I take rape lightly you are more than welcome. You'd just be wrong. And honestly you know you are wrong and are just trying to score points by attacking my character.
/r/MensRights30/09/14 01:18 AM
6

No. This is me pointing out that this law is a joke.
/r/MensRights30/09/14 12:52 AM
4

The existence of a dating relationship between the persons involved, or the fact of past sexual relations between them, should never by itself be assumed to be an indicator of consent. Affirmative consent must be ongoing throughout a sexual activity (4) A policy that, in the evaluation of complaints in the disciplinary process, it shall not be a valid excuse that the accused believed that the complainant affirmatively consented to the sexual activity if the accused knew or reasonably should have…
/r/MensRights29/09/14 09:03 PM
71

[TRIGGER WARNING: MAY CONTAIN HUMOR AND/OR SARCASM ABOUT "RAPE"] My wife raped me 2 days ago. Woke up to her blowing my morning wood then she put it in her...I'm filing a report in the morning now that I know I was raped. I feel so dirty.
/r/MensRights29/09/14 09:07 AM
1

I'd say that gearing up for a Hillary campaign is pandering. Just as republicans pander to the religious right and tea party folk, dems pander to the feminists et al. It's just politics.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 09:48 AM
2

I think it's just pandering. I don't believe in conspiracy. Especially when stupidity and ignorance can easily account for it.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 06:32 AM
1

is 1000 comments an hour common? (looking at 20 hour from post 21000 comments)
/r/MensRights20/09/14 08:46 AM
7

I've likened the whole ordeal to a Holier-than-thou family values republican getting caught balls deep in a twink. She was caught objectifying herself in an industry that she criticized for objectifying women. She's a hypocrite. She used her platform as a feminist crusader to get attention to her games...to make money...she is a sell out and fake...simple as that. Also, misogyny in the gaming community don't real, that's why so many gamers were ready to pounce on her whore ass.
/r/TheRedPill17/09/14 11:47 AM
8

I was active in my local Occupy. Can confirm. The feminists hijacked the whole thing...everybody left after they instituted the "safer spaces" rules. If you were a female you were to be chosen over a male...you were to talk first..and last...if there was a working group position to fill..women first. Drove all the male leaders away because EVERY TIME they tried to do something they were accused of misogyny or not listening to or allowing a women to...fuck...it was just fuckered. Everything becam…
/r/MensRights09/09/14 06:23 AM
1

...true..maybe if I said instead you wouldn't want the repercussions to be that every sub that happens to have a pro MRA user base is banned from being a default.
/r/MensRights08/09/14 01:12 AM
1

If someone is going through all your posts and down voting them all an admin will stop that...but that's it. Doxxing is when someone tries to find out who you are and publishes that info. If someone threatened to do that to you report them. Go through your posts and delete sensitive info...or delete your account and start over. Other forms of harassment are also against the rules. Report.
/r/MensRights07/09/14 09:04 AM
25

This is short game thinking. The admins will not respect the result. The petition itself will be called misogyny. You are playing their game. Most folks on Reddit subscribe to the current zeitgeist as presented by feminists, even if they don't call themselves feminists. Even those redditors that may be sympathetic to anti-feminists points won't necessarily see that that sub is a feminist front...that sub simply censors...the thing about censored content is folks don't see it! Just looks like gir…
/r/MensRights07/09/14 06:36 AM
15

The problem is they aren't entirely wrong. Bothers me too...but the truth is they are being practical (just not nuanced) about the situation they personally face in life. They are a symptom...an immune response. Sometimes immune responses mis-target or over-react or even unknowingly attack their own self interests....but sometimes it is helpful, especially for an individual man's life. They are not the root cause of the disease. They are an angry, disillusioned response to being treated like shi…
/r/MensRights04/09/14 05:06 AM
8

Wife let me post to /r/MensRights. Thank you wifey!
/r/MensRights03/09/14 06:00 AM
2

Ok that's just funny.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 05:36 AM
0

And how does this differ from any other connected person, president, senator's wife, CEOs wife, church conglomerate whore, etc? How would you view Bill Clinton's influence if Hillary were president?
/r/MensRights02/09/14 05:33 AM
1

Probably. But that would imply that that goes on regardless of sex...so this isn't a "win".
/r/MensRights02/09/14 05:28 AM
-1

True that. But we really don't know the specifics....the why. I would also like to note that most people in our society now are operating under false assumptions. I honestly don't blame folks who engage in these types of "affirmative actions" because they honestly think they are doing the right thing. Here, in this thread, we are demonizing folks (the prez and his wife) because they too have bought into some feminist BS....maybe...at least we can pretend to know. And on top of this it isn't all …
/r/MensRights02/09/14 03:08 AM
3

Noted.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 02:06 AM
2

I've never seen a First Lady interfere with the runnings of our country. She is a citizen with celeb status and thus has a platform. She also has duties that likely require staff such as hosting, acting as an envoy for the president (yes that is allowed), public out reach, traditional events and other diplomatic duties. 10 sounds reasonable to me. She can also be considered part of the administration as clearly a president would otherwise have to appoint someone to fill her duties. During electi…
/r/MensRights02/09/14 01:56 AM
18

This is a rather petty thing to be discussing. Although I am curious as to why they are all women, it could very well be that mostly women applied rather than men (isn't that an argument we use in regards to certain male dominated industries? Hypocrisy anyone?) and it is highly likely that some of the positions require they be women (naked first lady anyone?) Also...folks...back to reality. The first Lady does in fact have duties AND a traditional role in our presidency. This is nothing new with…
/r/MensRights02/09/14 01:15 AM
2

In other countries, the paternity leave is split however the couple wants so that the woman can take it all or the man could take it all if they want. Is a good thing all around.
/r/TheRedPill30/08/14 09:02 AM
-9

It is unacceptable to be anti-gay. The only reason it should concern you is if you are actually afraid of gay people. If you are afraid of gay people you have an irrational fear that you should try to do something about it (therapy) or keep it to yourself....or you are a religious zealot in which case keep it to yourself....or you are gay and hate that about yourself....in which case stop hating yourself and suck some dick.
/r/TheRedPill30/08/14 06:45 AM
4

I seriously doubt many MRAs watch Fox News. As a letfy I got tired of the Left calling Fox News out on everything...they are retards...they aren't news...we all know that already. It is more important that we call the Left out for their misandry, not some right wing crack pots who are wrong about everything.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 04:40 AM
9

This is why you should have mandatory paid paternity leave rather than maternity leave. By simply not discriminating against men you help women.
/r/TheRedPill30/08/14 12:23 AM
1

touché :)
/r/MensRights28/08/14 08:31 AM
0

We are a democratic republic. The terms are not mutually exclusive.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 01:42 AM
1

Legally if she can still utter the words or can still,through action, indicate consent, she has consented. If she is incapable of doing that then she is incapable of consenting. However, woe to you if she doesn't remember in the morning.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 11:09 AM
-1

Sorry for the second reply...to explain as best I can why we didn't say anything: Not that long before this happened my dad caught me and my brother "playing doctor"...the beatings and anger after that taught us that this type of thing gets you in trouble. EDIT: MY ACCOUNT WAS BRIGADED...THIS VOTE COUNT IS WRONG :-)
/r/MensRights23/08/14 08:28 AM
0

young, large knife to the balls. He climbed through my window (my room was in the basement) put a knife to my balls and told me he would cut them off if I made a noise. H e then told me he would kill my brother if I said anything....then went to my brother' room. After about a 1/2 hour I crept out of my room and upstairs...It was dawning now...my little brother was sitting on a kitchen chair in the middle of the living room hugging his knees. We hugged and we both decided we'd get in trouble if …
/r/MensRights23/08/14 08:20 AM
4

Anecdotal. My brother and I were raped by a knife wielding older male intruder when I was 11-12 and my brother 7-8. We didn't report it. My roommate was raped by a woman (a radical feminist no less) didn't report it. There's 3 unreported rapes right there. EDIT: MY ACCOUNT WAS BRIGADED...THIS VOTE COUNT IS WRONG :-)
/r/MensRights23/08/14 07:17 AM
1

Go with it...poly-amorous feminists love it. It'll be like you're in disguise.
/r/TheRedPill09/08/14 11:03 AM
8

Typically, Tumblr is a joyful place of gifs, weirdly relatable/profound thoughts... ...and I'm done.
/r/MensRights16/07/14 08:20 AM
2

There was a recent case similar to this hypothetical. No condom...blow job...it was ruled that the man gifted his sperm by virtue of cumming I guess...the woman used the sperm to impregnate herself without his knowledge. I would assume then that unless you take the condom after sex with you you are gifting it to the women.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 02:50 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter