TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

202700000000 Archive

View 25 posts and 260 comments by 202700000000 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
79

Feminism202700000000/r/MensRights06/07/18 09:21 AM
75

Discrimination202700000000/r/MensRights11/03/18 01:00 PM
54

Discrimination202700000000/r/MensRights24/09/19 07:55 AM
40

Feminism202700000000/r/MensRights27/03/19 07:03 PM
34

Social Issues202700000000/r/MensRights21/12/17 08:26 AM
28

Marriage/Children202700000000/r/MensRights02/08/19 12:27 AM
25

Social Issues202700000000/r/MensRights13/12/17 03:56 PM
18

Feminism202700000000/r/MensRights06/12/17 05:14 AM
17

Edu./Occu.202700000000/r/MensRights09/12/17 06:03 AM
17

Edu./Occu.202700000000/r/MensRights30/11/17 09:39 AM
17

Social Issues202700000000/r/MensRights13/12/17 03:52 PM
15

Social Issues202700000000/r/MensRights16/01/18 06:36 AM
14

Social Issues202700000000/r/MensRights21/01/18 10:02 AM
12

Humour202700000000/r/MensRights26/02/18 11:30 AM
11

Social Issues202700000000/r/MensRights13/12/17 02:51 PM
11

Humour202700000000/r/MensRights18/07/18 07:45 AM
7

Marriage/Children202700000000/r/MensRights11/12/17 08:58 AM
6

202700000000/r/MensRights01/07/18 12:56 PM
6

Progress202700000000/r/MensRights30/11/17 07:45 AM
4

Social Issues202700000000/r/MensRights10/11/17 02:22 PM
3

Social Issues202700000000/r/MensRights06/07/18 06:21 AM
2

Social Issues202700000000/r/MensRights24/10/17 03:16 PM
2

General202700000000/r/MensRights16/01/18 08:43 AM
1

Social Issues202700000000/r/MensRights08/12/17 12:16 PM
0

General202700000000/r/MensRights01/12/17 02:20 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Yeah but it's London so their fate is already worse than any prison.
/r/MensRights28/12/19 05:03 AM
5

Pretty sure it's because nobody likes dirty pinko commies—this is just the fake news trying to blame everything on men again.
/r/MensRights15/12/19 08:01 AM
2

Everyone can edit wikipedia. Are there examples of them banning people for these reasons? https://www.conservapedia.com/Examples_of_Bias_in_Wikipedia
/r/MensRights13/12/19 04:28 AM
2

Is there some indication this was caused by wikipedia itself? Edit: Seriously, wikipedia is editable by anyone. Is there a reason to blame wikipedia for this entry? Wikipedia controls who can edit—and guess what? If they don't like your politics or your wrongthink you won't be editing anymore.
/r/MensRights13/12/19 02:21 AM
12

Guess who's not donating to wikipedia this year. Get woke, go broke.
/r/MensRights12/12/19 01:46 PM
2

It speaks for itself. Why? You didn't see what happened in Sweden, France, UK, and Germany? You think Japan said no to taking in immigrants because they're stupid? Or do you think everyone in the world is just really nice and violent demographics don't exist? Is this utopia where everyone is perfect to each other? Or are there places in the world where you're more likely to get raped and killed?
/r/MensRights07/12/19 06:30 AM
2

Because she is a blatant racist with a track record of getting in trouble for saying stupid shit. Such as when she stated that African immigrants are bringing diseases into Australia and were of no benefit to us at all. Or when she claimed that all terrorist attacks in Australia were carried out by Muslims, and going so far as to announce policies that would ban the building of new mosques until there was a royal commission into whether Islam is a religion or a political ideology. Or that time s…
/r/MensRights07/12/19 03:15 AM
4

Why?
/r/MensRights06/12/19 03:30 PM
-7

Glad I'm not the only one that thinks they're bloody weird.
/r/MensRights02/10/19 06:24 AM
2

whiny rapists That describes male feminists pretty well.
/r/MensRights19/09/19 01:22 PM
3

I agree with all the others that have said document and film everything. What these cultural vampires hate more than anything is the burning spotlight.
/r/MensRights18/09/19 01:13 AM
2

male feminist Uh oh, start the clock.
/r/MensRights01/09/19 12:30 AM
18

Then why did they place the label to block their skinny arms?
/r/MensRights22/08/19 04:15 AM
1

Tell her she doesn't need to be excessively bitchy if she wants more than 10 cats one day.
/r/MensRights22/08/19 01:56 AM
1

The irony is they're probably a bunch of ANTIFA soyboys.
/r/MensRights06/08/19 01:02 AM
9

How can you just take the kid and run away to Japan, isn't that basically kidnapping? Also it's really sad that he keeps talking about money issues.
/r/MensRights02/08/19 12:27 AM
22

Getting paid in food instead of money still makes you a whore right? Because I'm pretty sure it's the getting paid part that makes you a whore not the currency.
/r/MensRights26/07/19 01:51 AM
5

I think we can assert that the nazis were the bad guys there. What metric are you judging by? Because the Communists killed 10x more people than the Nazis.
/r/MensRights24/07/19 01:20 PM
74

Might also have something to do with Britain bombing civilians. There are no good guys in a war.
/r/MensRights24/07/19 08:47 AM
1

Because your teachers are a bunch of raging feminazis.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 11:43 PM
3

I get what you think you see. I had your viewpoint when I was younger. I've shared memes like these before. Maybe get out of your bubble a little more and you'll develop a more complete worldview. So that's a "no" I guess, carry on.
/r/MensRights15/06/19 06:05 PM
2

The comic just highlights that you people don't get it. Has the possibility that you don't get it ever crossed whatever is left inside your skull? Think hard.
/r/MensRights15/06/19 05:23 PM
6

Furthermore, stem fields are often a boys club. Imagine seeing the comic and then posting something this fucking stupid.
/r/MensRights15/06/19 06:45 AM
-3

Honk honk.
/r/MensRights16/05/19 12:17 AM
3

Did you mention that mutilating kids is wrong?
/r/MensRights27/04/19 04:44 PM
6

She won't be allowed to speak in the future Sweden chose.
/r/MensRights14/04/19 04:14 AM
3

Teach her how to not kill children.
/r/MensRights24/03/19 01:28 PM
6

There are many cases where cutting the arm off is a better option, medically.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 10:52 AM
94

Too bad that's not a doctor, didn't he get kicked out of the program and now spends the rest of his miserable life posting mean things to Trump's twitter?
/r/MensRights11/03/19 08:33 AM
0

Stop posting CNN articles, this isn't r.politics.
/r/MensRights10/03/19 05:40 AM
56

It's almost like their entire lives revolve around the thing they keep saying is irrelevant...
/r/MensRights08/03/19 06:14 AM
3

What Come on use your head!... wait no, not like that... God damn it. Fuck it, here's a helmet, I'm moving on.
/r/MensRights03/03/19 12:58 PM
8

Oh yeah who needs vision anyway right? No wait, you're turning back around, go the other way!
/r/MensRights03/03/19 12:51 PM
4

And yes you do need your eyelids, without it your eyes will literally burn without moisture (eyelids moisturise your eye, I assume you have eyelids so you should know) it also prevents you from getting bacteria and dirt in your eyes. Idk why you guys compared removing someone’s eyelids to male circumcision. You're so close... just replace eyes with something else and you're there!
/r/MensRights03/03/19 12:49 PM
9

Yeah except you don’t need the foreskin and you need your eyelids. You don't really need anything, you'll be fine without eyelids. You’re more likely to get an eye infection without your eyelids what???? So what you're saying is that removing a protective layer of skin increases chance of certain infections? Yeah that makes sense. 🤔
/r/MensRights03/03/19 12:14 PM
16

Probs to decrease the risk of catching stds Try cutting off your eyelids to decrease your risk of catching eye infection. Yeah...
/r/MensRights03/03/19 11:14 AM
63

Just don't say anything about how this guy and the doctors tried to kill a child through mutilation! Or you'll be blocked!
/r/MensRights03/03/19 10:03 AM
48

The list should really just start and end with "don't mutilate babies".
/r/MensRights03/03/19 10:02 AM
3

Because mainstream media is bought and paid for propaganda.
/r/MensRights16/02/19 12:32 PM
8

I dont get this MGM thing. It is proven that men with circumcision have less chance of certain infections and are healthier overall. and our sexual pleasure is not impaired. What if I told you that was a lie? While with women being circumsized they lose sensitivity which is replaced by pure pain. I think this gotta be worse than MGM. That's funny, because those same women defend FGM just like you're defending MGM. Brainwashing is so sad.
/r/MensRights06/02/19 09:57 AM
4

Not even if they paid me.
/r/MensRights04/02/19 09:07 AM
118

Bernie about to learn first hand that apologising to the mob just makes it worse. This is what you wanted. Useful idiots get shot after serving their purpose.
/r/MensRights03/01/19 09:31 AM
51

The real injustice is that CNN hasn't gone bankrupt yet.
/r/MensRights01/01/19 01:14 PM
13

Shapiro also defended MGM on twitter, he's a massive hypocrite.
/r/MensRights29/12/18 08:42 AM
-32

"People keep calling me an incel for being an incel" What did the nasty girls do to you to make you so scared of them? When did you stop beating your wife?
/r/MensRights26/12/18 03:37 PM
205

You aren't breaking any rules because you're not linking to any "hateful" subs.
/r/MensRights26/12/18 01:24 PM
5

Genuine question: for people who think circumcisions are awful, why? I had one when i was a baby and so did most of my family's men. I don't have any pain, i don't remember anything, I have literally no issues related in any way, and the one person who didn't is my grandpa currently on oxygen. (For reasons unrelated but still the point is there.) I just don't understand the point, so can someone explain the logic behind it? This isn't an attack I'm genuinely curious. So you're asking why genital…
/r/MensRights24/12/18 08:24 AM
24

They did it because of their fascist government though. Found the quantum feminist.
/r/MensRights23/12/18 04:13 PM
30

Supremacy, not equity.
/r/MensRights22/12/18 12:17 PM
8

This is the type of thing that'll make the next generation the most red pilled ever.
/r/MensRights20/12/18 06:10 AM
2

ABC is too far gone to bother with complaints.
/r/MensRights25/11/18 09:13 AM
25

Still sued.
/r/MensRights18/11/18 01:54 PM
6

Start the clock.
/r/MensRights17/11/18 08:16 AM
13

Anyone can be hot with that much photoshop.
/r/MensRights16/11/18 01:06 PM
1

Interpretation != opinion That's just, like, your opinion.
/r/MensRights15/11/18 02:52 PM
1

The evidence is pretty weak and inconsistent either way. Some studies find beneficial effects, some negative, some neither. . That's what's so great about science. You don't have to agree. Your opinion doesn't matter. According to /u/ThotmeOfAtlantis your opinion doesn't matter though.
/r/MensRights15/11/18 02:45 PM
4

They probably just wanted to get rid of him.
/r/MensRights15/11/18 09:13 AM
1

That's what's so great about science. You don't have to agree. Your opinion doesn't matter. Hahahaha, okay, so how about those MGM studies that show it's beneficial? Or maybe the studies that show we're all dead from global warming?
/r/MensRights14/11/18 10:54 PM
1

what the fuck is your point then? Right here, maybe you missed it. https://old.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/9wwhec/scientists_conducting_the_worlds_largest_study_of/e9o6h4j/
/r/MensRights14/11/18 04:20 PM
0

In reality it's just another of the "muh scientists!" articles that are completely worthless. Above is what you said. It is indeed what I said. Nice quote, very accurate. When science demonstrates something that agrees with our life experiences and our instinctual and spiritual understanding of life, it is very likely to be true. Write a book. However, people who are dogmatic about equality of outcome are not going to ever agree with any proof that men and women are different. That's great, well…
/r/MensRights14/11/18 02:30 PM
-1

I don't need a science article to see that men and women are different. I never said they weren't different, I never said they were different, you're really having a hard time reading two easy sentences huh. Oh well, maybe you're just not biologically inclined towards reading comprehension. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
/r/MensRights14/11/18 02:14 PM
-1

Let's face it, you're only DISagreeing with this article because it says something you DON'T like Where does it say that I like or dislike what it says? You know it's possible to neither dislike nor like something, but to just see it for what it is. If it was the exact same article but had the opposite opinion, you wouldn't be arguing with me and you know it.
/r/MensRights14/11/18 12:57 PM
-9

Let's face it, you're only agreeing with this article because it says something you like. In reality it's just another of the "muh scientists!" articles that are completely worthless.
/r/MensRights14/11/18 09:07 AM
1

Oh, oh, two can play this game. People with autism also tend to exhibit terrible emotional control, like women.
/r/MensRights13/11/18 02:34 PM
3

How many are women?
/r/MensRights13/11/18 02:22 PM
2

Saw this statue online a while back, it's pretty cool. As usual feminazis ruin everything.
/r/MensRights08/11/18 10:47 AM
18

That implies there's a way not to botch a mutilation. Hint: there isn't.
/r/MensRights04/11/18 02:16 PM
1

Don't worry the British government will step in to help her remove it.
/r/MensRights25/10/18 10:39 PM
22

I don’t know if she’s a mother, but that’s Laura Loomer. It’s no wonder she says that, she’s a provocateur. [• ̷̱ •] Clearly a Russian bot who is out to destroy the universe.
/r/MensRights23/10/18 06:35 PM
4

Why is it still legal is the real question. Also defund the corrupt ABC.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 01:31 PM
2

Globalist money, probably.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 01:30 PM
13

If anyone tries to argue the legitimacy of gender studies: show them the door.
/r/MensRights03/10/18 08:03 AM
2

Are you sure? Did I stutter?
/r/MensRights21/09/18 05:56 AM
1

Islam makes women into basically slaves, so this isn't a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights20/09/18 12:16 PM
9

Probably every artist in the history of art has convinced someone to pose nude for them.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 07:00 AM
8

It's only defamation if it's not true. But she really is a cunt, you can prove it in the court of law no problem.
/r/MensRights10/09/18 02:01 PM
3

I'm getting concerned with the increase in Russian stories here. Remember to check under your bed for Russians before going to sleep tonight!
/r/MensRights06/09/18 08:07 AM
11

You have a good day too!
/r/MensRights30/08/18 11:39 AM
33

The world where nobody really cares about you.
/r/MensRights30/08/18 07:21 AM
2

What makes you think she'll ask about anything?
/r/MensRights27/08/18 06:03 PM
13

An estimated 150 marchers Didn't someone publish that it was over 500? This reads like fake news, expected better from SBS, looks like they're slowly being corrupted as well. <edit> So apparently it was written by a feminist, that also worked for VICE. Yeah, let's put a feminist SJW in charge of writing an article about a men's march. What could go wrong?
/r/MensRights27/08/18 12:30 PM
36

Can't have that, twitter shadow ban in 3... 2...
/r/MensRights26/08/18 03:45 PM
1

"I didn't have empathy before, but now I feel bad... for myself." K.
/r/MensRights21/08/18 01:43 PM
3

It's okay to be white and male. I think the best thing to know is that you're not alone in the middle of this bullshit, the majority is with you. Unfortunately the education system has been degrading for decades now, and we don't know if it's going to get better any time soon. Even after you leave, the kids behind you might get hit even harder with this nonsense. We're in the middle of a culture war, across the world, it's ridiculous, it's hilarious, it's sad, but on the bright side at least we'…
/r/MensRights20/08/18 04:44 PM
-2

Communist News Network cannot be trusted with anything.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 07:39 AM
4

Racist and sexist ABC, need to be completely defunded.
/r/MensRights09/08/18 08:15 AM
-3

Can you post this on /r/The_Donald as well? They have more reach than this place. Sounds about par for the course for the UN.
/r/MensRights08/08/18 11:13 AM
1

That socialism will die, again, just like it always does. What does it have to do with SJW feminists? Same people are pushing for both.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 11:36 AM
4

CNN is fake news.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 11:32 AM
8

Don't worry, women will be second-class citizens at best in the UK in a couple decades with the way things are going.
/r/MensRights16/07/18 11:38 AM
1

It might take a bit more for Australia, but if we look at countries like the USA and Italy, you can only push people for so long before they've had enough. Even people as easy-going as Australians.
/r/MensRights15/07/18 05:22 PM
1

You realize you are admitting that your fallacious argument was "primary school level" , right? no , I don't suppose you do.... If it was primary school level how come you kept asking what it was? Is primary school level too hard for you to understand?
/r/MensRights08/07/18 04:28 PM
1

That is a cute sleight of hand, which probably would have worked if you were talking to anyone else. Yeah, anyone with reading skills above primary school level. I don't blame you for running away. Your arguments are flimsy and easily refuted. You kept asking what my argument is, how can you refute it if you don't even know what it is? Just let it go.
/r/MensRights08/07/18 04:14 PM
1

"Just because feminists take everything up to crazy levels doesn't mean the basic idea doesn't have some truth to it." Calling feminists crazy is "defending" them? Let's continue. Let's not, your comprehension skills leave much to be desired in a conversation partner.
/r/MensRights08/07/18 03:59 PM
1

Where am I defending them? Not sure you're even reading anything. "Organised ploy" is a crazy feminist idea. "Some boys clubs" is a common, and completely normal idea, because it wasn't that long ago it was pretty normal. For that matter it was normal for men to be kicked out of many women's activities as well.
/r/MensRights08/07/18 03:52 PM
1

The point is it's a popular idea because it actually happened. Just because feminists take everything up to crazy levels doesn't mean the basic idea doesn't have some truth to it. Normal people usually stick to the basic concept, but see the modern world for what it is, feminists live in the past, or more precisely just in their own heads.
/r/MensRights08/07/18 03:41 PM
1

I've known many women that weren't feminists that made this argument. /u/sovietdartagnan You two do realise that not that long ago men-only groups were quite common, right? And historically men did make up the bulk of organisations, and they really did keep women out of the higher echelons. The only difference is that feminists take the whole notion to straitjacket levels and see it even where it doesn't exist.
/r/MensRights08/07/18 03:19 PM
1

Anyone who thinks CNN is communist is retarded. https://streamable.com/4h5l4 https://hooktube.com/watch?v=CMMJlXZFn84 https://hooktube.com/watch?v=Tn8zWYxE6_Q Enjoy.
/r/MensRights08/07/18 04:35 AM
-1

Don't link to the Communist News Network though.
/r/MensRights07/07/18 12:25 PM
20

Let's plaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay... whoooooooooooo's the biggerrrrrrrrrrrrrr victiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiim! Cue applause
/r/MensRights07/07/18 05:04 AM
8

I am curious why this idea is so common among women. It's not, feminists make up a tiny percentage of the population. They're just very loud and have the corrupt media's backing.
/r/MensRights07/07/18 03:37 AM
-1

"could you release it without making every gender studies charlatan, gynocentric editorial hack, and female with an eyebrow ring vomit with rage and don a vagina hat?". Of course not. But it'll sell like hotcakes for the same reason. Angry SJWs are the best advertising you could possibly have.
/r/MensRights04/07/18 05:50 PM
2

That's exactly it, they have a hierarchical structure. It's also amusing watching them trying to work out who is the bigger victim. It leads to them eating each other, because there can be only one.
/r/MensRights04/07/18 04:45 PM
9

I'm so glad people are starting to learn. Never apologise to these people, and they will keep making themselves look like the lying scum they are.
/r/MensRights04/07/18 02:47 PM
9

The sexist, lying ABC at it again, in just the first 30 seconds they manage to fit in more half-truths and propaganda than a Communist war poster. Leyonhjelm is one of the best, most honest and straight talking politicians we have.
/r/MensRights04/07/18 02:38 PM
1

I would argue it's not women focused either, where are the feminist outcries about women's slavery in Islamic countries? It's the complete opposite, they want women to be enslaved everywhere. Feminism is a cult, it doesn't have anyone's interests at heart other than their own power grabs. Feminists don't even mind attacking each other. Stop thinking feminism is a movement for women, it's not. SJWs don't care about anybody except themselves, and they'll happily throw their own mother under a bus …
/r/MensRights04/07/18 06:41 AM
2

What's the storyline? Ideas don't really matter, how you build it is what matters.
/r/MensRights04/07/18 04:47 AM
9

Honestly it doesn't sound like a bad idea, like a reverse Y: The Last Man (though I didn't read much of it). Hop to it female game developers, got to walk the talk, ideas are a dime a dozen.
/r/MensRights03/07/18 05:37 PM
2

Sue for what? People get fired all the time.
/r/MensRights03/07/18 04:09 PM
2

That's funny, considering carrying pepper spray is illegal in Australia. Maybe she just shouldn't shag men at all.
/r/MensRights03/07/18 11:34 AM
8

"Universities have said they can't determine guilt in sexual assault cases in order to excuse their inaction, but effectively that is what they are doing by discouraging survivors from reporting sexual assaults," she said. They're encouraging you to go to the police, but lying to the police is harder than lying to the public and university.
/r/MensRights02/07/18 01:27 PM
1

Stumbled on this by accident, but it's a really good podcast. The actual fight club rules start around 37 minutes in.
/r/MensRights01/07/18 12:57 PM
2

Is anyone really surprised that when SJWs scream about rape culture it is, as always, just projection?
/r/MensRights30/06/18 05:54 AM
0

They should, but at least it's a start.
/r/MensRights29/06/18 01:17 AM
12

Well of course, if these people don't lie, slander and libel, they won't have any stories to write because investigative journalism is an endangered career. The ABC doesn't care what Leyonhjelm actually said, they just want something that sounds good (to them). Mainstream media is a farce in the modern world, Australian media is no exception. Everybody needs to stop for a moment and realise you are not reading the news, you're reading someone's agenda.
/r/MensRights28/06/18 03:46 PM
29

It is, though they recently pulled a lot of the funding.
/r/MensRights28/06/18 01:47 PM
277

"Greens senator Sarah Hanson-Young interjected, saying something along the lines of all men being rapists," he said in a statement. "I responded by suggesting that if this was the case she should stop shagging men. The biased story writing isn't surprising from the racist, sexist ABC.
/r/MensRights28/06/18 11:59 AM
32

Next it'll be easy to line them up against the wall.
/r/MensRights18/06/18 02:37 PM
1

Gather some evidence first before making a break for it, just in case she tries for revenge later.
/r/MensRights16/06/18 12:58 PM
6

Examples of this are interviews with Cassie Jaye. But the public support for Cassie Jaye in Australia was huge, it's just the corrupt media, as usual. The silent majority is real.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 10:57 AM
7

The feminist propaganda machine has been churning in Australia for over a decade. Actually I think people are starting to get sick of it.
/r/MensRights26/05/18 03:36 AM
1

Yeah noticed that myself, sickening stuff.
/r/MensRights01/05/18 04:22 PM
46

https://www.change.org/search?q=Clementine%20Ford%20 There are, a lot, of petitions.
/r/MensRights01/05/18 08:02 AM
6

Sauce.
/r/MensRights01/05/18 05:38 AM
357

You mean that she bullied a disabled man wasn't enough? You mean that she was sexist towards school children wasn't enough? You mean writing propaganda for Fairfax Media wasn't enough?
/r/MensRights01/05/18 02:40 AM
8

I'm sure they'll get right on that, right after they recognise Easter. You're not dealing with people that can be petitioned, or reasoned with.
/r/MensRights11/04/18 01:33 PM
16

Should be made illegal.
/r/MensRights11/04/18 09:06 AM
18

Because mutilating babies is bad, okay?
/r/MensRights11/04/18 09:06 AM
6

You need empathy for that.
/r/MensRights01/04/18 05:26 AM
14

They all get weeded out and straight into Google.
/r/MensRights14/03/18 04:01 PM
3

"Shady presidents."
/r/MensRights14/02/18 04:44 PM
-8

Really disappointed in r/mensrights right now. You get upset about Men's Rights being misrepresented. But you're okay with misrepresenting Trump.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 02:56 PM
33

SJWs always project.
/r/MensRights05/02/18 03:21 PM
2

SMH was really different in 1998 it seems.
/r/MensRights02/02/18 03:44 PM
2

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mnzxGjzxdoQ
/r/MensRights22/01/18 01:12 AM
16

Sure, sure.
/r/MensRights21/01/18 01:11 AM
2

Thats dishonest, I'm saying the individual journalist - Clem whats her name and Ben Sharpio are both at the batshit end. Nope. They are both at the batshit end of it. In general daily wire is more like entertainment dressed up as news. You said "they are both" and then within the same context you said "in general daily wire" which means you were talking about the media outlets. Now you're trying to change it to "oh, I was actually talking about the two people". And the rest of what you say, or h…
/r/MensRights18/01/18 05:33 PM
2

They are both at the batshit end of it. Not only are you wrong, but you even just went against your own chart. You can't even keep your own ideas straight.
/r/MensRights18/01/18 05:08 PM
70

There's no point in even defending your stance, these people only see things in black and white. If anything bad has happened to you, according the SJWs you're supposed to be a victim for the rest of your life, and your children, and your children's children need to be victims by extension. Taking a horrible experience, getting stronger from it, and moving on doesn't seem to come into play. And really, they're only complaining because they likely never really had a traumatic experience at all, t…
/r/MensRights18/01/18 05:04 PM
3

but less - unreliable media outlet Did you just say that The Guardian, which employs Clementine Ford (the crazy feminist that bullied a disabled person) is less unreliable than Daily Wire whose editor is Ben Shapiro? If you're purposefully trying to get ignored on every topic for the rest of time, it's definitely working. Not to mention your chart has CNN, which fabricates stories practically for a living, is somehow in the "fair interpretation" box.
/r/MensRights18/01/18 04:47 PM
3

In the grand scheme of things there's always something going on, the best thing you can do is teach kids to stand up for themselves.
/r/MensRights17/01/18 02:37 AM
1

No, southern is no political analyst and the comments under the video are from ancaps, who promote economic fascism. So basically anyone that disagrees is a fascist, good to know we've gotten that out of the way. Quick video here, Chomsky explains the difference between libertarian and right libertarianism. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GUs_Q_rfl9I This video here from the same channel seems to be more inline with your comments. And it also shows that you're wrong about both Milo and Gavin, be…
/r/MensRights16/01/18 11:20 AM
1

Now you are linking to a youtuber that was a cosplayer and has little political knowledge that promotes economic fascism and is changing the definiton of fascism, to protesting against fascism. Here is a little video, it explains why this right libertarian movement is fascism. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ce7Dclr5ZHg I posted somebody that actually did research, unlike the video you posted which is being torn apart in the comments.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 11:00 AM
1

Ending all programs that benefit the less well off, giving maximum freedom to corporations, small government etc. That's not fascism. Though to be fair I tend to misuse the word as well.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 10:51 AM
1

The other guy is right libertarian, so is inline with the rise in fascism. Really? Gavin Mcinnes the nazi puncher is inline with the rise of fascism? Now I've heard everything.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 10:36 AM
2

I think you should watch this. And this.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 10:25 AM
3

Like google (deep state involvement ) blacklisting the left wing media or trump banning words in government reports You can't be serious. It's been proven time and time again that Twitter, Google etc... are perfectly fine with left-wing bullshit, but they attack conservatives right away.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 10:09 AM
2

But you used that in your own title? The title is from the link...
/r/MensRights16/01/18 10:06 AM
2

Umm, no. Yeah, he represents small government and the radical right. https://www.amazon.com/Dark-Money-History-Billionaires-Radical/dp/0385535597 "Working with" to what end? To include them in the alt right demographic and let them know they are being represented. I'm going to need some tin-foil for this. No, supremacists and neonazis hide what they are with language. "No we aren't nazis, we are identitarians" for example. Preserve western culture is code for preserve the white race and so on, I…
/r/MensRights16/01/18 09:37 AM
3

That just means a comment was deleted, it could have been done by the same person that posted it.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 09:31 AM
1

let the poor die in a ditch while we hand government over to corporations and make billionaires even richer. Umm, no. He was caught working with neo-nazis and white supermacists on his "ïntroducing the alt right" article. "Working with" to what end? Get a gay black husband? He probably did more damage to the neo-nazis than the other way around. The goal being to use crypto language that would appeal to neo nazi and other far right groups, while publicly distancing himself and the alt right from …
/r/MensRights16/01/18 09:28 AM
1

Milo was entertaining debunking feminists in the media for a while, the link to the far right is a more of a draw back than anything is in the longer term. He's more like a libertarian. "Far-right" are just pathetic attempts at slander.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 09:00 AM
1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poe%27s_law
/r/MensRights16/01/18 08:43 AM
5

Yeah the first one was great, at least it's as close to the comics we've come so far. I'd rate them as Deadpool comics > Deadpool video game > Deadpool movie.
/r/MensRights15/01/18 01:33 PM
2

Hasn't it already with what they did to Domino? Deadpool became a hit because nobody expected it, so they got away without making it politically correct. Now everyone and their dog wants to be on-board for Deadpool 2, which includes SJWs who are going to be pushing for more diversity and all the other things that will kill the franchise. Things aren't looking too good for Deadpool 2.
/r/MensRights15/01/18 12:40 PM
11

I like this new posting format and would subscribe to your newsletter.
/r/MensRights14/01/18 03:41 PM
2

Independent Man is in Australia, though not all his videos are about Australia.
/r/MensRights14/01/18 05:06 AM
3

Been thinking about this myself but google is so prevalent and before they became corrupted by SJWs their products really were the best. Android is still the best mobile OS for example. Google is pretty much like a small country, no matter what you do we're still on the same planet. No matter how hard you want to, I don't think we can cut them off at this point. So the only way is for there to be an internal google rebellion, the recent lawsuit might perhaps ignite one. Also SJWs destroy whateve…
/r/MensRights13/01/18 07:02 PM
5

Centralised structure is a weakness, read SJWs Always Lie and you'll see what works and what doesn't.
/r/MensRights13/01/18 06:51 PM
12

You would think after all this time humanity would have stopped repeating history. I'm starting to get seriously worried we're heading for WWIII.
/r/MensRights10/01/18 06:22 AM
9

We are doing our best to adhere to both the spirit and letter of the state’s anti discrimination laws which were clearly written to protect disadvantaged minorities from discrimination. I'm guessing it was written to protect everyone from discrimination, not to give certain groups more advantages just because of skin colour, that would be racist. Without this understanding of the law, tech will become even whiter and more male than it already is. First of all, will you go to Japan and complain t…
/r/MensRights09/01/18 06:43 PM
1

Money is involved in science. People like money. A lot of people will "science" about anything to turn a profit.
/r/MensRights09/01/18 05:01 AM
3

I have experienced gender dysphoria, and my whole life, I've acted very neutral to gender, liking lip gloss and action figures as a kid. The difference between snowflakes and non-snowflakes is that snowflakes are only doing what they do for attention and power. If SJWs didn't exist and you still liked lip gloss, then nobody can really say anything, that's just you. "Gender-neutral", (whatever that even means) people have existed since history began, they're called normal people, because normal p…
/r/MensRights05/01/18 05:47 AM
1

I wonder if it'll work on reddit.
/r/MensRights03/01/18 04:43 AM
2

That's a shame, this was a great PR move.
/r/MensRights02/01/18 01:01 PM
7

After what's happened in Sweden, it's not sexist or racist, it's realistic.
/r/MensRights01/01/18 09:01 AM
7

Although I haven't read she-hulk, she seems like her own character that's been going on for a while. This is just marvel blindly stumbling everywhere in a blind panic, knocking over the vase, the pot plant, scratching the painting, and breaking a mirror while trying to work out what they're supposed to be doing. Shitty female characters didn't sell so all female characters don't sell? How stupid can they get.
/r/MensRights29/12/17 04:01 PM
2

It's weird how this is the UK. If you say something wrong in public the police will come for you, but at the same time they've set up fines to make sure you can say something wrong in school. Good progress though.
/r/MensRights27/12/17 05:01 AM
4

On the bright side one day we'll get a better Star Wars remake, because this cash cow will never die and 3 SJW likes on twitter is not going to bring in the money.
/r/MensRights26/12/17 05:31 PM
109

It only seems like a good article on the surface, but it's just more virtue signalling. Though there are few cases of female sexual predators, women in executive positions should not think of themselves as immune to bad behavior. It's like "although women are close to perfect, let's look good by mentioning them anyway." Even if I cannot identify anything in my work history about which someone has ever taken offense, I should not take my clean slate for granted in the future. Yes, spread the fear…
/r/MensRights26/12/17 06:03 AM
2

This is either satire or projection.
/r/MensRights24/12/17 06:38 PM
2

Meanwhile... "Hi honey, I almost died again today, how are the kids?" "Oh that's awful! I read a magazine today that said a foot rub will make it all better!"
/r/MensRights21/12/17 05:19 AM
1

Ok, you have a meme. But have you ever read any serious political or economic analysis that isn't corporate media or far right propaganda funded by billionaires? https://www.politicalcompass.org/uselection2016 http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/noam-chomsky-donald-trump-doomsday-clock-midnight-close-nuclear-war-north-korea-a8014626.html So you've gone from saying MRM is being taken over by the far-right, to talking about nuclear war with NK? Really? By the way, I took t…
/r/MensRights19/12/17 05:34 AM
3

It doesn't matter if someone says they are not far right, its what they support in reality. Well in reality you're talking a bunch of nonsense, with no proof to back up any of your claims. Milo was working with neonazis and white supremasists on how to word the introduction to the alt right article to walk the line between publicly disavowing neonazis and white supremasists, so as not to commit political suicide while still appealing to them through dog whistles and so on. Few people on the far …
/r/MensRights18/12/17 12:34 PM
3

Don't you think your answers have a strong right wing bias? You tell me. I don't care about left or right. See above. I see nothing above. You said nothing. Milo, various right libertarian sources, Brietbart etc have all appropriated mens rights talking points. Cristine Hoff Sommers was hired by a far right think tank. The far right is all over this movement. Milo has said multiple times he's not far-right, and the far-right don't like him. You have nothing.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 11:51 AM
2

I'm just going to reply to one of your replies since I don't want to start fighting a hydra. Whats your opinion on Trumps corporate welfare, infrastructure scam that defrauds tax payers? Let me guess, you never heard about it and support it now that you have. My opinion is that I'm only replying to your statements. You didn't provide any examples, any proof, any references or any material at all. You started off saying that MRM has been appropriated by the right and now you're asking about Trump…
/r/MensRights18/12/17 10:21 AM
2

Why don't you look at these systems? Why do you support communism? The economic policy trump is for is known to create more poverty and instability. Are you typing this from North Korea?
/r/MensRights18/12/17 10:03 AM
2

As if a free market is a bad thing, try harder. A right free market system is bad for most men it. Yeah, you're just looking out for all these men, really overflowing with virtue signalling. "My acid attacks are totally for your benefit guys! Why don't you believe me!"
/r/MensRights18/12/17 09:53 AM
2

There is the small problem with the political bias of the movement. No, there isn't. Its been appropriated by far right No, it hasn't. free market types As if a free market is a bad thing, try harder. more corrosive to mens rights than feminism is Says /u/ee4m while spewing acid everywhere.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 09:48 AM
1

"Teachers" pushing cult ideology that depends on ignorance wonder why people aren't swallowing in an age of free and unhindered information.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 09:41 AM
1

I put this another way. Capitalist interests intentionally cut food supplies off the socialist and communist countries. North Korea, they destroyed the whole country with bombs. the cold war. Venezuela, Obama put sanctions on it because they are putting in moderate polices to help the working man. So do you really think capitalist countries installed communism in their own universities and corporations are helping communists destroy them from the inside out? SWJs are crypto capitalism, they prot…
/r/MensRights16/12/17 04:54 PM
0

If you look into the history of it capitalist foundations promoted and spread gender studies and postmodernism to protect capitalism. That doesn't make sense, SJWs literally kill capitalism, they're basically communists. They slowly destroy every capitalist organisation they're in.
/r/MensRights16/12/17 03:11 PM
1

Google are a corporation. This capitalism, sjwism was funded and promoted by capitalist foundations. Not really, capitalism was going pretty well, Google was going pretty well, the SJW is an infection. Notice how it's been quite a while now since Google actually produced anything worthwhile, they're grinding to a halt because of the internal culture destruction. Instead of producing software they're now busy producing hurt feelings. SJWs destroy every corporation they start replicating in. It's …
/r/MensRights16/12/17 02:12 PM
1

The following content has been identified by the YouTube community as inappropriate or offensive to some audiences. Oh here we go, the SJW infection at google seems to be getting worse. One of these days they'll just start deleting anything they don't like, first they came for the youtubers... In response to user reports, we have disabled some features, such as comments, sharing, and suggested videos, because this video contains content that may be inappropriate or offensive to some audiences. W…
/r/MensRights16/12/17 04:31 AM
8

This is no longer incompetence, happens much too often for that.
/r/MensRights15/12/17 07:05 PM
1

Yea everyone is against you, you are the only true holder of knowledge. All these other minds are below you and you alone can understand the vast knowledge that you display. A misunderstood genius that seemingly everyone you come across cannot keep up with. You are of cause right, it is everyone else. Not you. That isn't a lack of self awareness is it. To think that because everyone disagrees with you that you must be right. No it couldn't be. Well, thanks for the compliments. I see the white ho…
/r/MensRights14/12/17 06:48 PM
0

Understandable, seeing as that would take self awareness it can hardly be expected of you. Well no, self awareness refers to self-awareness, this would be reddit-name awareness maybe, but look I admit it, I find it difficult to keep track of every cow in a herd when they all moo the same. My bad, I'll just wait for the other one to repeat what you said and then it'll be relevant again.
/r/MensRights14/12/17 10:24 AM
-1

Yea you are right. You are so bright that you didn't even notice that I wasn't the person that said that... That actually is kinda embarrassing. Ah damn, you're right I didn't notice, you're all so alike I honestly thought you were the same person. It's not me that should be embarrassed about being a caricature though. I'm really starting to lose track though, maybe you can give me your factory ID.
/r/MensRights14/12/17 10:12 AM
0

I can't imagine a reality where acting the way you are would be considered by anyone to be an example of showing outstanding intelligence. Stop embarrassing yourself. Oh no, now look what you've done, everyone has now noticed how you said that people who posts videos about Sowell aren't very bright. I told you, you need to be quieter but you just didn't listen. Tsk, how embarrassing.
/r/MensRights14/12/17 10:08 AM
1

Why are you whispering? Wouldn't want anyone to hear us right, that's how we try and subvert those pesky people that post factual information. Now sssshhhh, not so loud.
/r/MensRights14/12/17 09:49 AM
1

Also why would you ask me to give an example of an SJW improving lives? Because that was your main argument, that SJW is useful in some way, so give an example. I asked you to stop using the word because it's a meaningless derogatory word that only exists as a sort of vague accusation or insult that you believe inherently describes negative traits. No. I won't stop using it. Social Justice Warrior is only derogatory because the people that are flying the SJW banner have themselves destroyed its …
/r/MensRights14/12/17 08:53 AM
1

Don't think I've ever watched anything by Sowell. However, I've noticed that the people who quote him or post his videos usually aren't the brightest. Hey, hey, psssst. You know that guy over there, he isn't the brightest. His name is /u/Late_For_Username Don't tell anyone though. It'll be our little secret.
/r/MensRights14/12/17 06:47 AM
7

Don't apologise, it just gives the crazies space to manoeuvre.
/r/MensRights14/12/17 06:09 AM
3

Welcome to Australia. The why is because of anti-male campaigns like White Ribbon.
/r/MensRights14/12/17 05:33 AM
2

I literally said it has nothing to do with being fair. Social Justice is functional. If implemented properly it improves the lives for everybody. Plain and simple. I'm quite certain that I just dismantled this idea. So continuing to push it is not going to work. I just gave you a description of how it makes everybody's lives terrible. The rest of your reply seems to be going on a tangent, if you can, give an example of SJWs improving lives that I haven't already discussed.
/r/MensRights14/12/17 01:22 AM
2

I'm not saying giving opportunities isn't fair, I'm saying that the prevailing opinion seems to be that it's undeserved or detrimental in some way and is sometimes called unfair for giving some an advantage. I think what you're saying is that it's okay to level the playing field, and some people think this is unfair. I would say it's not unfair, but it is detrimental. Take firefighters of instance, if you level the playing field, then the tests get easier for some people and then you get firefig…
/r/MensRights13/12/17 06:20 PM
2

The idea of social justice is to take members of society who otherwise wouldn't have gotten anywhere at all and give them opportunities to be useful instead of letting them drain welfare dollars. Yes, it might not be "fair" and people will complain that some people have an advantage but the reality is that, done right at least, Social Justice ideology benefits everybody in the end. What? What do you mean taking members of society and giving them opportunity isn't fair? That isn't what Sowell is …
/r/MensRights13/12/17 05:36 PM
7

A warning from 18 years ago, and yet here we are.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 03:59 PM
1

The Men's Rights bit starts at ~6:00, but the whole thing is interesting.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 02:52 PM
2

You know the world is going to hell when China is starting to look like one of the more saner options.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 01:35 PM
3

If hypocritical people cared about hypocrisy they wouldn't be hypocritical.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 09:44 AM
0

This should be interesting.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 08:59 AM
3

Probably something like this.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 08:43 AM
6

Looking at the Canada situation that people are posting about right now, the totalitarian regime seems well under way.
/r/MensRights09/12/17 06:04 AM
17

Welcome to the bubble. Things are really heating up right now, I thought that things would decline smoothly at first, but looking at the number of reprehensible agendas going on especially now that SJW indoctrination is pushing its way into schools, I am predicting that the decline will not be smooth at all. Right now we're in a balloon that is getting more and more air blown into it, I have no idea what will happen when it bursts but it'll certainly be quite interesting.
/r/MensRights08/12/17 06:03 PM
5

Speaking to the school is unlikely to change anything unless enough people do it, what they hate most is the spotlight, all this needs to be public knowledge. Even within the school, it should at least be knowledge among every parent. The school needs to be named, the sexist teachers need to be named. I know how schools operate, they're honestly bureaucratic cowards, one bad press report and they'll buckle. If you don't want to put your name out there, do it anonymously.
/r/MensRights08/12/17 05:08 PM
31

You said it's not bad, then in the same sentence talk about how people are pushing an ideological agenda. People need to know, don't worry, the school won't shut down from this, but if you make a fuss hopefully these radicals might get fired for not doing their job properly, which is really what should happen.
/r/MensRights08/12/17 04:58 PM
72

Name the school. Seriously, these posts that say "my <insert something here> is sexist" but don't say where aren't very helpful unfortunately. People need to know, parents need to know where to not send their children. There are websites that help rate schools to inform parent decisions, things like this are important for the public to know. One of the girls in my class after said that ‘the boys should get an assembly on not being sexist’. This is literally indoctrination.
/r/MensRights08/12/17 04:39 PM
1

Exactly. If he didn't apologise people would rally to help him. But after an apology I'm guessing most people would think something like "oh, it's already over".
/r/MensRights08/12/17 03:40 PM
3

The most important objection is that: sure women have very high standards of beauty, but they certainly are willing to compromise to sleep with men they consider to be so ugly. I'll have to disagree with that. There's a whole epidemic of single successful women right now precisely because they will not compromise under any circumstances. I think Japan might be the best example of women not compromising, even though they complain about "herbivore" men, they won't modify their own behaviour. And o…
/r/MensRights08/12/17 11:40 AM
4

Tinder and I think OKCupid both did studies into how each gender rates the opposite gender, they found that it was the female users that were insanely fixed on looks. And I really do mean insane, it's completely disproportional. https://theblog.okcupid.com/your-looks-and-your-inbox-8715c0f1561e There's been other studies as well, I think even before this. While I do disagree with the reasons behind it, a lot of people think it's biological, but I disagree, I think it's the culture that has produ…
/r/MensRights08/12/17 09:29 AM
3

This might be hard for men to get because men don’t see these three things of being roughly equal value. Men tend to think: looks, looks, and looks. I don't know about "man shaming", I think that phrase is stupid, but your article is just incorrect. In our current culture, out of the genders we have, men care least about looks. Your article is based on feelings rather than proper research.
/r/MensRights08/12/17 08:11 AM
15

I think walking around in high heels that are not only uncomfortable but also destroy your feet for pure vanity says a lot about somebody.
/r/MensRights08/12/17 07:39 AM
3

https://imgur.com/a/BGz9l
/r/MensRights08/12/17 07:05 AM
2

because I've heard that Louis didn't block the door, then it becomes really crazy. What do you do?" Good question, if a woman blocks your exit (which is legally abuse) and you're a man, what can you do?
/r/MensRights08/12/17 06:58 AM
3

Name the school. Name the administration involved. These kinds of injustices thrive on staying away from the spotlight.
/r/MensRights08/12/17 06:50 AM
1

Yeah the hypocrisy of it all is that those kinds of feminists are themselves often verbally abusing those they're trying to shut down. I don't think there's anything wrong with defining it as violence, it is violence, but it needs to have a sane and straightforward definition for it to be law. The reason the SJWs have survived this long is because there is some small bit of truth to what they're saying, it's just that they've taken it to insane extremes. If I recall there are already laws agains…
/r/MensRights07/12/17 01:57 PM
1

If people start seeing verbal abuse as violence (which it is, sound is literally used as one means of torture in the military), then I wouldn't be surprised.
/r/MensRights07/12/17 01:15 PM
3

... for response to misogynistic abuse ... The Guardian [of Hair Dye] just can't help themselves.
/r/MensRights07/12/17 09:19 AM
2

Terry's idea of feminism isn't what feminism is right now, but that doesn't make him a bad person, just not up to date. His heart is mostly likely in the right place, he just doesn't realise he's being used.
/r/MensRights07/12/17 06:38 AM
2

I was groped by two girls in year 12, my first thought was "do I tell someone?" My second thought was "I'm a guy".
/r/MensRights07/12/17 01:10 AM
4

Officials realised that clearing the main highways first benefited car drivers, more of whom tended to be men, rather than footpaths and cycle paths, more often used by women. So the city decided to start by snowploughing the streets and paths around daycare centres, then areas around the largest workplaces and schools, before moving on to office districts and main roads. The result? Gender-neutral snow clearing with fewer injuries, since pedestrians are more likely than motorists to be injured …
/r/MensRights06/12/17 06:19 PM
9

You know it's horseshit when there are no references given. There's just enough tiny bit of potential truth to each statement to make it seem like it might be true, but it's obviously not based on conclusive evidence. There's actually a pretty easy way to disqualify this entire thing: The question is vague and generalised. The answer is specific to the given circumstance (if it's even based on anything at all). For example: Men talk more than women. This is a completely vague question, it doesn'…
/r/MensRights06/12/17 05:01 PM
5

Well the hilarious thing is, the post they're replying to I'm arguing for feminism.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 08:48 AM
5

Good idea, I changed the link.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 08:02 AM
7

I did consider that, but I followed reddit rules, the link is no-participation and I warned people against brigading. If something does happen, I'll delete it. I think what extreme ideologies fear most is visibility. They don't need ammo because their foundation is built on lies, "ammo" is what reasonable people can use, they're not reasonable, so the best thing to do in my opinion is put them in the spotlight.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 07:55 AM
3

I wonder if you could contact https://heterodoxacademy.org/ and use their https://openmindplatform.org/ app, even the demo is quite good. https://openmindplatform.org/app-demo/ Or at least you could pick up some ideas from it. Because the question I'm currently struggling with myself is how to get people to actually be receptive to new information (Men's Rights or otherwise) in the first place, that I think is where the real battle lies.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 06:08 PM
1

She's been referred to as just "hulk" before, I'm not too versed on the Hulk universe but I know the red hulk has also been called just "hulk" when there are no other hulks around. This is not the battle you are looking for.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 04:55 PM
12

Here's your full statement Keep accusing everyone... No, the "full statement" is the complete sentence. Taking 3 words out of context and making up your own ideas about what I said is just outright lying. You are lying about my statements and then arguing against your own lies.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 03:38 PM
11

It doesn't really seem like you're talking to me, you're arguing against points I've never made. It's still not a good approach. Anyone who's willing to sacrifice the innocent for their cause really needs to re-think how they're approaching it. "The end justifies the means" is no justification at all, just an excuse for terrible behavior in the name of an ideal. Where did I say anything about sacrificing anyone? Where did I say anything about it being an "approach"? All you're doing is making th…
/r/MensRights05/12/17 03:05 PM
0

That's not what I'm saying at all. Okay let me re-write this in I guess simpler language, maybe English isn't your first. [If they] keep accusing (continue to accuse) everyone (people at random) and eventually you'll [they will] accuse somebody that can get shit done. (Eventually somebody will be accused that can make big changes because of their position.)
/r/MensRights05/12/17 02:04 PM
11

Keep accusing everyone and eventually You need to read the entire sentence to get the message, the first 3 words isn't enough.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 01:40 PM
23

On one hand it's horrific, on the other hand when the police get accused there's more chance that things will start changing. Keep accusing everyone and eventually you'll accuse somebody that can get shit done.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 10:55 AM
16

Document everything.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 06:46 AM
2

In the end, I believe that feminism, at its core, is an admirable movement, and we as men's rights activists should, while safeguarding our own rights, seek to work with them. It's kind of like Saruman. He too was once good, but was corrupted by the power of the Ring. Feminism has been corrupted by the power of... something, I haven't figured out what yet. But it is an essential part of equality, just as men's rights is. What you're saying is humans should seek to find peaceful coexistence with …
/r/MensRights04/12/17 05:12 AM
18

Of course the article tries to paint them in a bad light. "As these students come in, will they feel as welcome in these kind of social clubs?" Vinovskis asked. Nice loaded question, yes, the male students will feel welcome in an all-male club. Just like female students will feel welcome in an all-female club. And female students and male students will feel welcome in a co-ed club. But there are things that males feel more comfortable discussing among themselves, just like women feel comfortable…
/r/MensRights03/12/17 07:26 AM
1

Unfortunately going to college doesn't mean you'll come out educated. Or perhaps you'll be educated in some things but maybe not very useful things.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 04:55 PM
5

It's not feminists, it's really just uneducated or young people that have never learnt how to hold a discussion / argument. Their views don't often get challenged, so they never learnt to handle it, crying foul is the only thing they've been equipped with, like a child that starts crying when their toy is taken away, they haven't learnt how to give another response. Here's an example: https://np.reddit.com/r/australia/comments/7h2fav/senator_di_natale_tries_to_stop_me_visiting/ They have no idea…
/r/MensRights02/12/17 04:48 PM
45

Let them play in the dirt as well, the world would really rather not have more super viruses. If you don't want kids to have allergies and a weak immune system, they need to build resistance up through exposure.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 02:56 PM
15

Freud is turning over in his grave so fast he could power a city.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 12:46 PM
1

A bunch of emails between him and neo-nazis came out What did the emails say? the video of him singing to a bunch of saluting nazis in a bar is pretty damning, too. Damning for whom? Him or the nazis? Do you think the nazis are getting grilled for being seen with a gay person?
/r/MensRights02/12/17 03:48 AM
2

What's he done exactly?
/r/MensRights01/12/17 04:42 PM
84

Somebody comes up to a psychologist with anxiety and the psychologist makes them anxious about how they're expressing themselves? What kind of completely unprofessional bullshit is that?
/r/MensRights01/12/17 01:52 PM
6

There are plenty of women bigger and stronger than many men. Also raw physical strength isn't the only kind of strength. You'll notice martial artists do not go for pure muscle strength, speed and posture are just as important. Women have an inherent flexible strength that men have to work hard to achieve. This whole idea of what if black was white is so laughably one dimensional, we live in a world of grey, you can't boil everything down to X and Y. "You're X and so you must be Y" is the whole …
/r/MensRights01/12/17 07:03 AM
1

It's hard to watch because of all the noise, but it's worth it because what he says is a useful life lesson.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 04:26 PM
3

I could be wrong but I've noticed the threads here are getting many more upvotes and going up on r/all more often than a few months ago when I first discovered this sub. And the media is definitely shifting, not quickly but at least steadily. I think the other thing that's helping is a lot of people that were roped into these ignorant positions during their formative years are growing up and out of the bullshit they've been dieting on for the last few years.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 01:45 PM
2

Those that don't learn from history...
/r/MensRights29/11/17 01:27 AM
4

Our approach is based on the GAN (Generative Adversarial Neural Network) training algorithm, where the model attempts to imitate real data in order for the makeup to be as authentic as possible. Everything else aside, this is really cool.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 01:10 AM
15

You must not know much about White Ribbon. They don't campaign against violence towards women, they campaign against men's violence towards women, which according to their marketing strategies is the only thing that ever happens. They're pretty much the reason why domestic violence support for males in Australia is almost non-existent. They're a propaganda machine. They don't even really care about women either, just the easy money that comes from their activities. https://www.youtube.com/watch?…
/r/MensRights24/11/17 05:18 PM
2

Of course they don't, if somebody makes a Men's Day doodle they'll be immediately fired. /s Also apparently it was International Men's Day yesterday (Australia) and I had no idea.
/r/MensRights20/11/17 06:23 AM
2

Maybe, I can't really comment on what's going on in America. Here in Australia while feminism has been trying hard to get a foothold, the ingrained Australian culture is difficult to infect, generally speaking men and women are treated more or less the same at least on an interpersonal level*, the "mateship" of Australia extends to both sexes and anyone that can't handle the bordering-on-insulting and often sexist Aussie banter is going to have a hard time, for better or worse. You wouldn't beli…
/r/MensRights16/11/17 10:10 AM
18

The only female employees that don't seam to have all the conspiracy/drama that I've worked with are ex-military. This is exactly why I think it comes down to upbringing. Growing up, boys are taught not to complain. Girls are taught the exact opposite, that they should be vocal about everything going on in their lives. A boy comes up and complains, what he'll hear is "you're a boy aren't you?". Girls don't get this treatment, the expectations are different so the treatment is different. Of cours…
/r/MensRights16/11/17 07:25 AM
3

It's pretty typical for Australia. These sort of ads have been running for as long as I can remember, and it's always biased against men. The services for victims are completely biased towards women here as well.
/r/MensRights15/11/17 09:10 AM
2

I'm guessing the sort of (trashy) women that don't mind secretly taking creepy photos of unsuspecting strangers aren't going to produce a wide spectrum of taste.
/r/MensRights15/11/17 09:03 AM
3

But modern feminism is a hate movement, so /r/HateSubsInAction is anti-feminist. Will they be documenting themselves?
/r/MensRights15/11/17 08:55 AM
36

That's not an accident - contented and happy people don't revolt. Funny you should say this, I think it's basically all because of modern Feminism that Men's Rights is actually snowballing now. People in general love justice and the underdog, and because modern Feminists have absolutely no moral compass and are constantly on the attack, people are basically now changing their perception of who's the victim. If it wasn't for Feminists and their completely immoral onslaught against decent people, …
/r/MensRights11/11/17 11:56 AM
1

Some interesting things here, for starters the joke itself and whether it's a case of PC culture going mad again or not. But also this nugget: "This is the very thing that advocates for child safety and domestic violence are very concerned about; the legitimising of violence against women and children." From the chief executive of a domestic support group. She's showing exactly where their priorities lie, and as you might note men are not part of those.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 02:26 PM
1

Saw this randomly on youtube, thought it was a fairly good analysis, moral of the story is try not to become the thing you hate. That goes for some people here as well.
/r/MensRights24/10/17 03:17 PM
1

So either it's trying to be funny about domestic violence or it's using a child as a political message, either way not good.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 07:55 AM
5

Let me guess, Google will make a doodle for this, but still won't have one for International Men's Day.
/r/MensRights12/10/17 07:52 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter