TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

205013 Archive

View 0 posts and 13 comments by 205013 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

If you are talking about the USWNT, way more than “literally no one” watches them, and they do generate a respectable amount of money. I’m not saying they should or shouldn’t be paid more, the financials are complicated and to honest both sides usually have a bunch of illogical dumb arguments. And to be fair, it’s not a problem that the open market can really solve, because national team players can’t attempt to switch teams if they think they are underpaid.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/06/21 02:50 PM
1

So what? Let me know when the FC dallas academy team sells out a stadium. The best women tennis players in the world would lose to the 500th ranked man, but that doesn’t mean they don’t legitimately generate more money than the 500th ranked man does.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/06/21 02:43 PM
1

But soccer has grown very significantly in the last 20 years. It’s way more popular than it used to be. And the MLS is doing way way better than 20 years ago.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/06/21 02:36 PM
2

I don’t come here all that often, but when I do, it feels like at least half the content is just “how is this pussy pass denied?” A lot of it is either jokes like this that are fine, or negative things about women / a woman in general, where they didn’t try and use a “pussypass” (as opposed to a good example, like the drunk belligerent girl who slaps a man for no good reason, yells “what are you gonna do, hit a girl?”, and then gets hits).
/r/PussyPassDenied06/06/21 06:56 PM
1

That's not really how evolution works, and the ancestral environment is sometimes different than the modern one. Of course we can generalize that that is MOSTLY true, but it's not a guarantee. I'll trust medical experts over just common sense. Of course we do need to make sure the medical experts are just being scientific and not socially / culturally influenced.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 03:56 PM
11

I don't know enough about the supposed medical advantages of circumcision to know if the procedure is legitimately justified for everybody or not. That's an issue for medical scientists to work out, and I will go with what they say. That being said, medical reasons should be the ONLY acceptable reasons to ever do something like this! The religious freedom argument is fucking BULLSHIT. You have religious freedom for YOURSELF, not to permanently cut off part's of OTHER PEOPLES bodies. Infants aren…
/r/MensRights27/03/17 07:47 AM
9

That's such a bullshit defense. The only possible reason for circumcision to be performed on minors is legitimate MEDICAL use. Freedom of religion gives you freedom FOR YOURSELF. It doesn't give you the "freedom" to permanently cut off part of the body of a non-consenting third party. Infants AREN'T RELIGIOUS. They don't even know their ABCs... They don't comprehend the idea of the town they are in, and possibly not even the room they are in. It's ridiculous to claim they have strong legitimate …
/r/MensRights25/02/17 06:30 AM
2

I love this quote What makes the case so unusual, compared to others that have come before the courts and are public, is the sheer number of important procedural protections denied to the accused. In most cases, courts have found one or two things wrong, for example, inadequate access to witnesses or a failure of a school to adhere to the letter of its own written procedures. In this case, the OCR found virtually everything wrong and, therefore, a violation of Title IX’s protections against disc…
/r/MensRights16/10/16 10:04 PM
1

If I understood the article, the student was accused of helping set up the video, and does not actually appear in it. It's also complicated because apparently the sex was consensual, but not the video (so it's not like a video of someone being raped or something).
/r/MensRights16/10/16 10:01 PM
2

Yeah, almost everybody else in this thread is being pretty unreasonable. Now don't get me wrong, it seems really really really unlikely that it's MURDER, but it doesn't sound like "clear cut guy is 100% guilty of nothing, end of discussion." Also, if I understand it right, does he not immediately call the cops after locking her out there? If he doesn't call the cops right after locking her out there, that's where I start to ask more serious questions.
/r/MensRights16/10/16 09:54 PM
2

Who the hell would let a school use corporal punishment on their child of either sex?
/r/MensRights16/10/16 09:35 PM
5

I hate the stupid fucking argument of "child support is for the child, not the mother, so it doesn't matter if it's unfair to the father. People actually use this shit to defend even the most ridiculous edge cases, like the boy who was statutory raped and still found responsible for child support. By that logic, anytime a child has no father (either dead or unknown identity), the state should RANDOMLY ASSIGN a man to be the "father" for financial purpose. After all, whatever is best for the chil…
/r/MensRights30/08/16 03:38 AM

I'm sure that if you tell a woman "then she should have just never had sex ever," people will say you are slut-shaming her.
/r/MensRights30/08/16 03:23 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter