TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

210101210 Archive

View 0 posts and 195 comments by 210101210 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
11

Account made less than 2 weeks ago posting backhanded rhetoric. Seems that there are many accounts upvoting this with the same purpose as you.
/r/MensRights28/10/22 05:44 AM
0

This is exactly what I thought too but didn't know the political affiliation of the daily mail. This is more about a terf creating issue about single sex spaces and stuff.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 08:34 AM
3

You wouldn't be wrong if you extend that to all terfs which is exactly why we should be fully pro trans rights movement.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 08:17 AM
5

Are the terfs lurking this sub to get some allies from here? I don't get how can someone be pro mrm and be a transphobe or homophobe.
/r/MensRights20/10/22 08:14 AM
6

Adding on what others have explained. From the local MRAs I had interacted with, I have gathered that according to the official data from there, around 55-60% of reported rape cases are "rape on the pretext of marriage" which is exactly what others have suggested in their comment. So this is a huge ruling. Obviously the aim would be to take this provision down but this is still a move in the right direction. I hope that clears it out. It's unusual as we don't consider this type of consensual env…
/r/MensRights17/07/22 03:18 PM
1

Oh yes, the supreme court doesn't know it's happening that's why they ruled this. Come on... you can do better!
/r/MensRights17/07/22 02:36 PM
5

New account but you still haven't changed your rhetoric. Come on, it's too easy and predictable at this point.
/r/MensRights17/07/22 02:27 PM
8

More women are graduating college than men and they are graduating with higher grades when they do. Degree vs degree a woman is going have higher grades and a better understanding of the subject matter/discipline and get hired more often. Male vs female a woman is more likely to have a degree and meet even minimum requirements more often than a man. Then why is there a need for gender quotas? Why can't women get through merit? Surely as a business owner who is paying, you would be hiring women w…
/r/MensRights12/07/22 04:58 PM
3

So loving the kid was his mistake? Because if he didn't love the kid, you and the guy in this case are same, ie both aren't biological father. With how much you care of the kid, I hope you have started the search for the kid. Then finding out you didn't like the mother anymore so you completely abandon the kid. Oh come on. You can do better than that. The account is new but you gave away yourself so easily.
/r/MensRights12/07/22 03:32 PM
58

Since draft is on the line for women, just like last year expect views like "draft should be abolished for everyone." If you are not aware, that's Nirvana fallacy. Don't engage with them.
/r/MensRights16/06/22 04:47 AM
10

Leave it to feminists to take an issue that is based against men and spin it as if the exact opposite were true. They are playing from both the sides using the boogeyman "patriarchy" The sentencing gap exists because patriarchy considers women as weak. If women are punished, again that's proof of patriarchy as it's there to oppress women by sending them to prison.
/r/MensRights12/06/22 05:35 PM
5

There's a reason why Indian expats race back to India and file for divorce there, rather than in the UK So you are just assuming here. The reality is that it's women running back to India for divorce. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/hyderabad/courts-vs-court-nri-woman-fights-divorce-with-hope/articleshow/91357909.cms Hyderabad: The Telangana high court and the family court in in Secunderabad have come to the rescue of an aggrieved married woman who was worried about the move of her UK-b…
/r/MensRights12/06/22 04:47 PM
6

No there isn't and I don't want to give you any false hope. My suggestion is don't marry and this is coming from a married guy. Most of the MR issues stems from there which is completely avoidable.
/r/MensRights20/01/22 02:58 AM
8

Not even the dv laws are gender nuetral in India. Stop being ignorant of the situation there. Not only the wife can also rape her husband, she could also file case against husband on the grounds of impotency if he refuses to have sex with her. Also the rape conviction in India is around 30% compared to 2% in UK which shows that there is a significant number of innocent men who are falsely accused and punished just on the basis of testimony of women there. If a gendered martial rape law gets pass…
/r/MensRights20/01/22 02:38 AM
6

You should make feminists understand that and show them that we aren't living in a patriarchy. Then the rest would fall in place. Also don't pretend to be ignorant of not knowing the patriarchy conjecture of feminists.
/r/MensRights19/01/22 02:04 PM
1

I really don’t think we should make these male feminists a victim. Just because they are a men shouldn't mean we should be biased towards them. Would you show similar bias towards women? I would guess no, so why for these men?
/r/MensRights19/01/22 01:50 PM
2

It's his fault that he hates men. No one else should take the responsibility of a male feminist when they themselves are always trying to show them as the exception to the other men. You just can't group them with other men whenever you feel like.
/r/MensRights19/01/22 01:44 PM
1

Shouldn't you be knowing why a male feminist would say it?
/r/MensRights19/01/22 01:39 PM
3

Well now after reading this it makes sense why you are having problem with the post. Feminist isn't a gender and being a feminist is a choice unlike being men. Stop equating feminists to women.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 03:31 PM
1

How are those views influenced towards certain groups of people?
/r/MensRights11/01/22 12:00 PM
2

And what determines having opinions on which groups of people would get you backlash?
/r/MensRights11/01/22 11:52 AM
7

women or minorities You racist Why are you still being racist even after reading the well written article
/r/MensRights11/01/22 11:36 AM
7

Never happened even once, and even if it does, it only prove the statut quo by pointing the exception. You sure don't play with knifes too but even if you do it's only the exception. *And twit it. To gape your hole very large and put your big head in it if it can fit. No thanks. I accept defeat. These stunts can only be pulled off by you.
/r/MensRights03/01/22 09:46 AM
4

How can you cope so hard by just saying incel. Atleast give me the address of your dealer and then call me incel how many times you want. Not the knife dealer, that type of stunts can only be pulled off by you and your buddies.
/r/MensRights03/01/22 09:39 AM
3

Projection?
/r/MensRights03/01/22 09:15 AM
3

Is this is the best you have got?
/r/MensRights03/01/22 09:14 AM
8

And men also can't do anything when they're raped and made to pay child support. And yes, it has happened. Put a knife in your ass. Does equality hurt you more than a knife would?
/r/MensRights03/01/22 09:13 AM
3

You're a stupid twat you can't understand abortion is a woman right. To those who are privileged equality feels like oppression. You're a machist incel. Haha! I am an athlete. I have had a great chunk of action than you would ever get.
/r/MensRights03/01/22 09:09 AM
3

Why don't you just give me the address of your dealer instead of exhibiting your stupidity.
/r/MensRights03/01/22 09:03 AM
9

It's getting rid of you child responsibility The mother has the choice to abort the child. If she can't handle the child independently then she can abort the child. if you don't want a child have protected sex or a vasectomy. If you don't want a child keep your legs closed. Equality for both men and women!
/r/MensRights03/01/22 08:59 AM
3

Exactly. That's equality. Because you can't understand what LPS is.
/r/MensRights03/01/22 08:56 AM
3

"The very few women getting justice in religious extremist countries have their rapist tortured." I didn't quote that because I didn't want to further display any of your stupidity. But here we are. Wait so in a patriarchy (normal or moderate) rape of women is ignored but in religious extremists countries (extreme patriarchy) rapists are tortured. Can I get the adress of your dealer?
/r/MensRights03/01/22 08:55 AM
3

Not at all. It make sense. Both are direct contradictions of each other. It doesn't make any sense. But I understand it might be very hard for you to comprehend. Well yes, because I know that what is meant by contradiction.
/r/MensRights03/01/22 08:41 AM
8

You should have just said that you don't know what Legal parental surrender is.
/r/MensRights03/01/22 08:40 AM
4

Why Texas elected a male you mean ? Do you even know how a law is passed? No nation with a female leader condemn abortion. And no nation with a male leader gives special priority to men regarding abortion restrictions. Equality.
/r/MensRights03/01/22 08:38 AM
9

Men need abortion because consent to sex is not consent to parenthood.
/r/MensRights03/01/22 08:37 AM
4

Wait...so is the patriarchy about ignoring the rape of women or condemning rapists to torture? Both cannot be true at the same time as they are direct contradictions of each other.
/r/MensRights03/01/22 08:32 AM
5

Then why did in Texas pro life feminists won. In the hypothetical scenario of all the countries being lead by a women, the pro life woman can be elected as they have more than enough influence and support.
/r/MensRights03/01/22 08:20 AM
5

I am talking about financial abortion or legal parental surrender. So if anything, pro life feminists are fighting for equality.
/r/MensRights03/01/22 08:17 AM
5

Then why a man raping, killing etc, a woman should be punished if patriarchy was about benefiting men at the expense of women.
/r/MensRights03/01/22 07:50 AM
5

That's what you think. Even I didn't say they would definitely win. I said you can't be sure of it and make a claim just like what you feel so. Also you are just straight up ignoring everything else in many of the comments.
/r/MensRights03/01/22 07:48 AM
8

Are you really idiot or are you pretending to be? You are just ignoring everything and reapeating the same crap again and again. I meant even cis men don't have the access to financial abortion.
/r/MensRights03/01/22 07:45 AM
13

Seriously speaking there is no financial abortion for men in those states too. That's no laughing matter. Well, they are female. And you are saying patriarchy is transphobic.
/r/MensRights03/01/22 07:19 AM
6

It's getting repetitive in engaging with you. The fact that no country lead by a woman have abortion bans is a proof of patriarchy. How many countries are there lead by a woman to come to this conclusion. Hypothetically if every country was lead by a woman, you can't be sure of it as even the pro life feminists could also win like they have in Texas. Additionally abortions in USA is womens rights but in India it's female foeticide. So why do you think those pro choice feminists wouldn't change t…
/r/MensRights03/01/22 07:15 AM
13

Are...you being transphobic?
/r/MensRights03/01/22 07:08 AM
4

That's silly, of course the patriarchy put men in prison. It's male nature to fight each other to gain power. Isn't patriarchy about benefiting men at the expense of women? A man killing a men should be punished because it's male nature to fight each other (ignoring that it's sexist) But why a man killing, raping, etc a woman should be punished if we are living in a patriarchy.
/r/MensRights03/01/22 07:04 AM
11

If what you are saying means we are living in a patriarchy. Then what I am saying means we aren't living in a patriarchy. There are way more countries which has criminalized rape of women by men over the countries which has banned abortions, if anything it proves that we aren't living in a patriarchy.
/r/MensRights03/01/22 06:58 AM
8

Because it's men who choose women rights, like you said. I am assuming that you are talking about non democratic government. Also correction it's feminists men. And it's not very effective seeing the USA still have abortion bans. First of all they were voted to the power by a majority of women. Secondly in the states which you are referring to pro life feminists have won instead of the pro choice ones. I don't see any sign of patriarchy in here which you are trying to show.
/r/MensRights03/01/22 06:52 AM
12

I also agree that every country lead by a man has criminalized rape of women by men. What are you even trying to show?
/r/MensRights03/01/22 06:45 AM
14

"0 place lead by a woman have abortion bans." And 0 place lead by a man gives special priovision to men regarding abortion laws. So, how are we living in a patriarchy with no special priority given to men. Abortions are also restricted for men the same way it's for women. Did you even think through it?
/r/MensRights03/01/22 06:41 AM
9

Exactly. By those feminist men winning you have just showed that even in those years we weren't living in a patriarchy. Then why does it matter if the country is lead by men or women when it's feminists men in power in countries like USA, Canada, France etc... Come again how are we living in a patriarchy?
/r/MensRights03/01/22 06:26 AM
11

Do you even know that in USA abortion was legalized by a majority of men.
/r/MensRights03/01/22 06:12 AM
8

No it means we live in a patriachy because there's no all women gouvernement but all men gouvernement is something very current around the world. Are you talking about non democratic countries? If we didn't live in a patriarchy, no woman who go to prison for a miscarriage, like it happen in the US. If we live in a patriarchy, no man would go to prison for any crimes. But the stats show that men are punished 63% more harshly than women for the same crime.
/r/MensRights03/01/22 06:06 AM
14

Do you even read what you are replying. Indeed they are pro abortion, you want to prove my point that zero gouvernement lead by a female is against abortion ? You were the one who said this. It means there's no country with a woman leader that condone safe abortion.
/r/MensRights03/01/22 06:02 AM
11

In a democracy the government is voted to power by the general population which also includes women and in USA women are the majority of the population. If you referring to Texas restricting abortion laws, there wasn't too big of a difference between men and women supporting it. If you are not aware there are also pro life feminists. So instead of your group winning, the other group of feminists have won there. From when did government listening to feminists equal to patriarchy.
/r/MensRights03/01/22 05:55 AM
4

By calling you a pickme they think that it would affect you in the same way it does for men when they are called whiteknights or simp. But the truth is that there are way more incels who are men than women. So, a woman doesn't need to side with men if her aim is to get "picked up." My suggestion is don't get annoyed by it because that's the best they could do as even they know the truth, they just want to get into your head and make you change your stance.
/r/MensRights02/01/22 05:51 PM
1

Why did you needed "someone" to explain to you when it was OP who posted it here? You said "why are people celebrating this behaviour" when OP was the one celebrating. You compared this post being posted in FDS with genders reversed and FDS is a sub. The comparison is happening between FDS and this sub. With you additionally commenting that it's embarrassing. And I did not make this post to get karma. Exactly what I expected you to say. /s Wasn't it obvious?
/r/MensRights02/01/22 03:19 PM
2

Your comment karma is very low. This post was created by OP so that you could regain some karma back by your concern trolling. Also what about you generalizing this sub on the basis of one post without even knowing the reaction of this sub towards this post. From the upvotes your comment got it doesn't seem like people are celebrating this behaviour.
/r/MensRights02/01/22 03:01 PM
4

What? Are you even following or not? The troll's comment would have made complete sense if the first guy said "This shows that women are more violent" I meant there was no need to comment what the troll did when no one was even talking about men or women being more violent or not. This is ignoring that the troll only had commented "clearly women are more violent" before editing it to misguide others.
/r/MensRights01/01/22 10:43 AM
15

The misogynistic patriarchy enforcer has deleted their comment.
/r/MensRights01/01/22 08:17 AM
9

then he provided information to prove the point They didn't provide it when their comment was published. They have edited their comment to misguide people like you. The comment only read "clearly women are more violent" when it was published. The downvoted show that this is a woman hating sub They were downvoted because of the dirty tactics they use to misguide others. Their comment wasn't even required in the first place. Their comment would have made sense if the first guy said "This shows wom…
/r/MensRights01/01/22 08:02 AM
21

You went right to your incel overlords to get support and help. First of all many here are in relationship. And why are you using the term incel? Isn't that misogynistic as it means that the only thing that a woman could offer to a man is sex? Seeking fellow angry, misogynists to support your propaganda garbage. I don't think anyone here thinks that a man's self worth is tied to having sex with a woman. If anything your misogyny is showing. As I am an ACTUAL man, your pathetic ways make me sick.…
/r/MensRights01/01/22 07:53 AM
3

That's not the complete picture. By what you said they are only going to reap the rewards on one side. Then what about the other side of feminism,equality, making disadvantages towards men sexism against women, misogyny, patriarchy...etc which can only be achieved by their virtue signalling. That's why while it's just for verbal purposes they would go with equality but when it's time for taking on responsibilities they use their gender. If they don't virtue signal then they can't show that the o…
/r/MensRights01/01/22 07:18 AM
17

They are a troll who wants to make it seem like this is a women hating sub.
/r/MensRights01/01/22 07:04 AM
10

The first guy nor did anyone else said "women are more violent" EnvironmentalWar is a well known troll in this sub and they just wanted to stir shit up by their comment. It seems like they are atleast successful in misguiding one. Additionally, before their comment was edited 11 hours ago, it only read "Clearly women are more violent." The remaining sentence was added later to spew their backhanded rhetoric. In my opinion if banning isn't the appropriate thing to do, atleast flair EW as a Troll …
/r/MensRights01/01/22 06:56 AM
22

Women are much more likely to die of breast cancer than men. Men have always been primary victims of breast cancer. Men lose their wives, mothers and daughters in combating breast cancer.
/r/MensRights31/12/21 08:35 PM
11

Using gender when it benefits them (such as this, holding doors open, paying the dinner date bill etc). However when it's something directly not benefiting then it's all about "equal rights". If only it was this simple. It's using gender when it's your turn to do things but when it's time to virtue signal then all this is turned into misogyny. This there by creates a cycle of them not doing anything for equality and at the same time they could point out that this is because of misogyny and there…
/r/MensRights31/12/21 07:34 PM
9

Does that mean the murder is his fault? Absolutely yes, if only your scenario was similar to this one. If only the man did what he should have done and be faithful Your scenario would be similar to this one if the woman (with whom the man was cheating) killed the wife when she was confronting him or her, as the issue was started with the man's side (the man cheated) and ended with the woman's side (the woman ended up getting killed) just like in this case which was started by the woman's side (t…
/r/MensRights31/12/21 06:09 PM
7

Which is what OP has said. Why do you feel the need to be redundant? Is this something new that has been added to your contract along with concern trolling?
/r/MensRights31/12/21 05:25 PM
9

2 men fighting over a shotgun and posturing for 10 minutes... but somehow it's the woman's fault? If only the woman did what she should have done... those two men wouldn't have done what they did. That's some serious mental gymnastics that I'm having trouble understanding. I am having trouble understanding what mental gymnastics is being done.
/r/MensRights31/12/21 05:09 PM
2

I don't think OP is going to be easily offended by your reply. /s
/r/MensRights31/12/21 04:49 PM
-1

Because I'm not a feminist. Why aren't you a feminist?
/r/MensRights18/12/21 05:55 PM
2

Sure, but it's held up all these years right? That's exactly why there should be affirmative action because women have been deprived of that just like education and many other things and they have got reservation there, so how much percent should be reserved for women? I'd totally be fine if women get the draft, equality and all that but hey, you take what you can get. Where is all the outrage when Republicans voted on not drafting women by justifying women should take care of children? Why did …
/r/MensRights11/12/21 07:28 AM
2

It's not. Don't you want to dismantle the evil patriarchy which reinforces the misogynisitc beliefs that men are stronger while women are weaker and fragile so only men should get drafted? In this already misogynisitc patriarchical world I don't want to oppress women more by not letting them die for the country. There should be affrimative action for women in draft so that they could catch up with all the inequality which they have been deprived of by these misogynistic privileged men in this pa…
/r/MensRights11/12/21 06:55 AM
7

Where were you when combat roles were opened for women? Now just shut up and take your anti male crap out of here. Males are biologically programmed to be Taller, Stronger (more muscle mass, higher bone density), Fight Through Adversity better (Higher Testosterone Levels) when compared to Females. This would work here because women are getting an advantage here. Bring this up somewhere else to deprive them of something, just like EmirikolWoker has pointed out, then it would become misogynistic a…
/r/MensRights11/12/21 06:47 AM
8

What are you trying to show? With the overlap of MensLib, OP was wondering how a sub centered for men has overlap with women centered subs. If I am not wrong the name of this sub isn't WomensLib that the above mentioned overlap of this sub makes it comparable.
/r/MensRights10/12/21 12:36 PM
27

I don't get why you are still here concern trolling like it's your job.
/r/MensRights08/12/21 06:03 PM
21

Why not be intelligent instead of wilfully engaging in admittedly stupid logic? Didn't you recently find a sub full of intelligent people? Why don't you go over there so that ThisisTheEnd of your interaction with this sub?
/r/MensRights08/12/21 05:50 PM
9

There's nothing in this article to suggest the women were feminists. She attended pro choice rally and no one is saying that she is a feminist just because she was pro choice. So whether you are trying to discredit feminism by misleading people or you legitimately think that all women you don't like count as feminists, it's better to stop. It looks bad. Where are you getting the info that all women we don't like are feminists? For instance, there were conservative women who voted against women g…
/r/MensRights08/12/21 05:23 PM
1

They had enough power and influence to oppose the gender nuetral rape laws... https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/activists-join-chorus-against-gender-neutral-rape-laws/articleshow/18840879.cms https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/cabinet-nod-to-make-rape-gender-neutral-riles-womens-groups/articleshow/15049606.cms
/r/MensRights06/12/21 07:53 AM
10

Let's see who is the one opposing gender neutral rape laws. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/activists-join-chorus-against-gender-neutral-rape-laws/articleshow/18840879.cms https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/cabinet-nod-to-make-rape-gender-neutral-riles-womens-groups/articleshow/15049606.cms Check what Flavia Agnes and Vrinda Grover had to say about making rape laws gender-neutral. They both are women's rights lawyers and along with women's groups opposed the rape laws being made…
/r/MensRights06/12/21 07:44 AM
6

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/cabinet-nod-to-make-rape-gender-neutral-riles-womens-groups/articleshow/15049606.cms Mumbai Advocate Flavia Agnes said, "I oppose proposal to make rape laws gender-neutral. We had opposed it when the government made child rape laws gender-neutral. Interesting that the patriarchy itself wants to dismantle but then you got women's group wanting to uphold it. Both Flavia Agnes and Vrinda Grover along with women's groups have opposed gender neutral rape laws…
/r/MensRights06/12/21 07:40 AM
6

You aren't seeing what they are doing. They are seeing a vulnerable young person who is fluctuating between mens rights and feminism which is evident as you were trying to defend this sub and convince them that we aren't bad. They aren't on our side, what they are trying to do is enter your mind by showing that there is only this thing specific thing that they disagree with. As I said in my previous response, after that they are only going to increase their demands. You were vulnerable enough fo…
/r/MensRights30/11/21 12:56 PM
7

it's because from an outside perspective people see us and extreme feminists as hate groups, The people from an outside perspective which you are referring to associates anything negative to extremist feminists while they are associating a comment on an anonymous account found in this leniently moderated sub to MRAs. You were the one who said they are seeing "us and extreme feminists as hate groups" How can you not see that those people whom you are trying to impress would only agree with you if…
/r/MensRights30/11/21 12:22 PM
22

Since you have found a new sub with actual intelligent people, I would assume that ThisisTheEnd of your journey with us.
/r/MensRights28/11/21 03:19 PM
3

Is this good enough? Did they randomly decided to share this specific user's post which only got 20 upvotes? Check the last comment of ThisisTheEnd6 where they have stated that they got banned from this sub. The first comment of EnvironmentalWar only came after the ban of their previous account. They started this new account to comment their backhanded rhetoric but then later they got back to their true form of concern trolling. I would even say that there are some more new accounts of them irre…
/r/MensRights25/11/21 05:20 AM
2

What type of evidence could you get? You could identify them with their comment history of previous account.
/r/MensRights25/11/21 05:08 AM
2

That's a ban evasion account. I am pretty sure the mods could report it to the admins to get them a site wide suspension.
/r/MensRights25/11/21 04:58 AM
7

To anyone reading, this is a troll account.
/r/MensRights25/11/21 04:33 AM
3

You have commented this assuming things which I don't even know where you did infer from. You are not better at all in regards to that 16 year old girl…..it’s funny how your values waver. I am still repeating that I was just clearing the issue regarding age of consent with that other user. Additionally in this case the rape was proven in the court and the victim also had to pay child support. And in the Maradona case, the accusation came after he was dead which in itself makes it different. Ther…
/r/MensRights24/11/21 03:02 PM
6

drunken sex I didn't see that post but I would assume that this is why they said it was rape. Again I am not sure of the context of the post so I can't comment anything further on it. You know exactly that you only care if it’s a male. No. That's not true at all. Why do you think that is the case? If that's because of my reply, I have brought up the age of consent because the other user had some misunderstanding regarding it.
/r/MensRights24/11/21 11:10 AM
7

In Maradona's case, the age of consent was 16 and the girl was 16. In Olivas' case, the age of consent was 15 and the boy was 14. What is that you are unable to understand?
/r/MensRights24/11/21 09:33 AM
3

Hmmmm. I dunno. You aren't as smart as you think you are. Well, it was the patriarchy that got all this oppression and gender theory, right? Yes, males are above females in the oppression hierarchy. Transphobhia!!!!!!!!! Not males but transwomen as they have to face transphobhia which obviously a ciswomen won't face. Do you want a job being the spokesperson for radfems? Are you resigning? Shooting the shit. Your plans would only work in conservative spaces, not here. Never thought that a strong …
/r/MensRights24/11/21 06:30 AM
14

I was pro choice but now from your responses about taking the responsibility of their own actions and not crying like a kid has turned me to pro life. Also why are you saying to man up? Isn't that toxic masculinity
/r/MensRights24/11/21 05:49 AM
3

Oh, so you're also a terf. And this is how you are coping... This is exactly where you have gone wrong. In the oppression hierarchy transwomen are above women, so it's obvious that the mainstream feminism would continue to throw women under the bus just like how it was done all this time for men. "What goes around, comes around." Seems like the patriarchy was one step ahead of everyone. Now how are you going to turn even this into the fault of patriarchy? And what are you doing in this sub? I wo…
/r/MensRights24/11/21 05:14 AM
3

Would it be ok if OP identifies as a woman?
/r/MensRights24/11/21 04:42 AM
7

Every country needs this law. It would be ironic seeing men in huge numbers, who are the privileged gender, using this to become more oppressed. Any guess on who would fight against this law and for whom?
/r/MensRights23/11/21 04:54 PM
19

Outrage happens when male perpetrators are treated how female perpetrators are routinely. Don't they say that men should be brought up to women's level rather than bringing women down to men's level for equality when you bring up the fact that men are punished more harshly than women for the same crime. Interstingly they also want to close prisons for women. Want to know the reason why men are punished more harshly than women? It's because of misogyny...benevolent sexism...patriarchy, you know t…
/r/MensRights22/11/21 04:23 PM
1

I am glad that I was able to bring back atleast one who lost their way into darkness. OP just wants to fight the evil misogynistic patriarchy.
/r/MensRights19/11/21 09:13 AM
0

Oh yeah Op is a real feminist who honors a woman’s choice. At this point, I don't even know whether you are serious or not. „Women said they where „strong independent women“, so we should let them suffer the consequences…..“ This IS fighting the patriarchy. If OP was misogynistic and wanted to uphold the patriarchy, they would say something along the lines, 'Women said they were strong independent women... but we know that they aren't. We know they don't know how to deal with responsibility beca…
/r/MensRights18/11/21 05:02 PM
0

Because we all know how strong feminism is in third world countries. Exactly. It even makes sense why OP wants to dismantle the evil patriarchy, as it's stronger there, by not upholding the patriarchy (helping women) and violating a women's choice (calling the police). As I said before I don't even know who OP is. I am just giving some reasons on why OP might have said what they did. Another reason could be women don't want to get into legal trouble as every women don't have time and resource or…
/r/MensRights18/11/21 03:19 PM
2

that’s the reason why op advocates for not even calling the police. Yes it is, in a patriarchy women doesn't have any choice, even if they have it's taken for granted. So, here OP doesn't want to have their choices applied on a women who doesn't even want to take legal action, which could be due to various other reasons. You don't know OP and even I don't know. Maybe OP had experiences of them getting in trouble because of calling the police. If I am not wrong in third world countries where corr…
/r/MensRights18/11/21 02:13 PM
3

Agreed it's not the women's fault but you are completely missing the aim of the post, which is to dismantle the patriarchy... the same patriarchy which reinforces misogynistic beliefs that men are strong while women are weak and fragile so men should protect women. I assume you don’t have any problem with dismantling the patriarchy but only with placing the blame on women in that post. Anyways they are just poor men who are fighting the evil patriarchy.
/r/MensRights18/11/21 10:08 AM
3

Read your own comment slowly and then check again what the post is about.
/r/MensRights18/11/21 05:23 AM
1

Weak troll.
/r/MensRights17/11/21 11:55 AM
0

"you should never hit a women" This is exactly what happens in a patriarchy. Those who say that just wants to uphold the patriarchy. It's really shocking that people who claim to fight the patriarchy also say these things.
/r/MensRights08/11/21 07:39 AM
8

7 days old account with comments in a similar pattern. Maybe it's time for another new account since this one is easily recognizable.
/r/MensRights05/11/21 12:08 PM
20

Why is it a MANS responsibility to save YOU? She is reinforcing the misogynisitc patriarchical beliefs that men are strong while women are weak and fragile so men should protect women. Is it toxic femininity or internalized misogyny. Ironically the other men who didn't do nothing were the ones who were fighting the patriarchy. Fighting the so called non existent "patriarchy" hurts women too.
/r/MensRights05/11/21 06:29 AM
5

Just checked OP's post history. They are most likely a bot.
/r/MensRights01/11/21 09:37 AM
4

Agreed as long as you aren't changing your stance when the accused is a man.
/r/MensRights01/11/21 09:07 AM
40

Exactly what is happening now when compared to 5-10 years before. More and more men would start supporting mens rights, mostly when they have faced the inequality from these anti men laws and policies. Then these men would start questioning feminism. The feminists would then respond with something along the lines, "See that's because of patriarchy...misogyny. Patriarchy hurts men too. This is why you should be a feminist" While they were the ones who was involved in those laws and policies. Thes…
/r/MensRights27/10/21 05:11 AM
1

I am pretty sure there are also other things in this world created by men which you are not against. Equality is not like a buffet. If you want affirmative action for women to cover up for the past years of inequality then there is no reason for you to be against this unless you are a hypocrite.
/r/MensRights25/10/21 04:37 AM
1

As it should be.
/r/MensRights21/10/21 04:44 PM
2

That's why I said most likely. Not disagreeing with you but those are just the enforcers. You obviously wouldn't blame a judge, a lawyer, or a police officer who are doing what they are supposed to do, for ex, when rape is defined as forced to penetrate. What people in this sub need to realize is that other male feminists are way more destructive than even those extreme feminists.
/r/MensRights21/10/21 04:08 PM
3

Better to call them TERF - Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminist. Somehow it actually pisses them off more..🤣🤣 Maybe it has do something with their opinion having no value as a TERF. That's even better but they could also be a tradcon who are worried about the poor women. The best thing for us to do is to support Transwomen in everything because they don't harm men in any way (Terfs and tradcons are worried it would harm women in various ways) and secondly more and more feminists would become terf…
/r/MensRights21/10/21 05:46 AM
8

Agreed. But only those type who apologize for their gender because of whatever some man did to some random women in another part of the world. These are the same people who would say women being considered weak is misogyny but then would say to cross the road to make the women feel safe, as if that itself isn't misogyny as it considers women as inferior...patriarchy...benevolent sexism. They don't have any problem with misogyny here because that's for the benefit of the women and these male femi…
/r/MensRights21/10/21 05:32 AM
11

Now, women are crying foul! They are saying that these, "synthetic" women should not be allowed to compete against the real women in these events. Don't engage with them. Call them transphobic and leave it there. Here in this case the support is with you and not with those women.
/r/MensRights21/10/21 05:12 AM
2

I get that you might be trying to support TheColdHardTruth. But that's a 9 day old account with consistently negative comments about women. Most of the comments are basically asking EnvironmentalWar to call them out. Most likely another alt used by ThisistheEnd6 to show that MensRights = Women hating.
/r/MensRights21/10/21 04:12 AM
1

I edited my comment because it had a lot of typos. Pre edited comment didn't have sub in it. You were pointing at the comment to gaslight others and now when asked you are backtracking. And gaslighting? Lol. Speaking truth is considered gaslighting now. Lovely. Why was it necessary to say by other men and then say thus could help instead of blaming everything on women while you are the one who is playing blame game. If you are so interested in truth you should be knowing that fgm is done in the …
/r/MensRights17/10/21 05:51 AM
1

It wasn't directed at that comment. You edited your comment. I've been frequenting thus sub for a while now To comment "By other men" when nothing was even mentioned. there's so much vitriol against women it's disheartening. So you are here to gaslight others.
/r/MensRights16/10/21 05:28 PM
46

good job re-enforcing oppressive gender roles And don't forget to blame everything on the non existent patriarchy to show how patriarchy hurts men too.
/r/MensRights16/10/21 12:26 PM
0

I am pretty sure they are trying to justify the exclusion of male equivalent by those "good post" which was in response to the title of the post saying "However, women can still..."
/r/MensRights16/10/21 10:46 AM
2

Ahh no buddy. What do you disagree with. It’s out-and-out female worship lol. That's what I meant from my second sentence. I just used feminist buzzwords to say feminists do what's beneficial for them and then call it benevolent sexism and blame it on the non existent patriarchy.
/r/MensRights16/10/21 10:00 AM
0

You didn't get it. This situation is an example of benevolent sexism which is caused by misogyny. Atleast that's what feminists would reply with when they would receive backlash. So, if feminists are against misogyny they should only be supporting the law which considers both male and female equivalent as illegal. The user whom I responded to is a troll who has said in their previous comments that patriarchy is the enemy and feminism is the cure. What was said in this comment section by them was…
/r/MensRights16/10/21 09:53 AM
-7

Do not hold women accountable for birth control, do not trust them, do not deny your agency in this. That's misogyny. That's what feminists are trying to tell you. And this seems like what a patriarchy would want. Aren't feminists fighting the patriarchy? Or are they being the non existent patriarchy, which they always blame, when it benefits them?
/r/MensRights16/10/21 08:40 AM
1

But thus could help instead of of blaming everything on women. Where did the comment blame women?
/r/MensRights16/10/21 08:30 AM
17

I assure you I’m educated but that’s okay if you don’t agree. Sure and it's clearly showing. At best you would have memorized the definition from the dictionary so that you could gaslight.
/r/MensRights14/10/21 03:16 PM
21

I’d never heard of this professor koss. Is this a joke? I wonder how popular she is among feminist. Actually she is someone who goes on reddit and says that she is the true feminist unlike you. Let me dive in and I can give you my informed thoughts once I’ve read these resources you’ve shared. Please stop trolling and go educate yourself about the movement before believing "feminism is about equality because it says so in the dictionary."
/r/MensRights14/10/21 02:50 PM
19

I constantly see people saying that men need to go out of their way and make women feel safe and protected. That's actually misogyny as it considers women as inferior. But why only women? As if men aren't in more danger... Because those same people who say this doesn't have any problem as long as their misogynistic beliefs leads to benevolent sexism.
/r/MensRights14/10/21 09:45 AM
6

A law which could be easily abused and does not even consider the male equivalent as illegal is not anti male? Is this a serious question? This is similar to anti male rape laws being defined as made to penetrate and your reply being, "You think a law that says you can't penetrate a women without consent is 'anti male'? Wtf?" Even from a feminist perspective, this could be explained. Remember patriarchy? Yes, the same patriarchy which enforces that men cannot be victims of rape by women. This la…
/r/MensRights11/10/21 04:20 AM
38

When this law (just like other anti male laws) starts getting abused and receives backlash from men, feminists would reply with the same thing, "It's male privilege firing back. Patriarchy hurts men too."
/r/MensRights10/10/21 06:16 PM
0

From a feminist perspective benevolent sexism is a result of misogynistic patriarchical beliefs. So what you have to do is call out those men as misogynistic by connecting it to patriarchy. Thanks to feminists, they have already done this work for you. Men being against women being drafted? Connect it with misogyny and patriarchy. And this would also work with feminists. Feminists wanting special laws to protect women from sexual assault, harassment, etc...? They are misogynistic as they are rei…
/r/MensRights10/10/21 05:30 PM
24

That's really a weak attempt at victim blaming.
/r/MensRights02/10/21 05:30 PM
45

I mean, not sure what he expected. But what did he do?
/r/MensRights02/10/21 05:04 PM
8

Men that feel the need to defend women from attacks and insults are the worst. You are absolutely right because that's misogyny. Those men are reinforcing the patriarchical beliefs that men are strong while women are weak and fragile so they need protection from men. Feminists have been fighting against the patriarchy all these years. I don't get why these misogynistic men are making the feminist efforts go in vain.
/r/MensRights02/10/21 03:22 PM
1

Most people in this sub are logical. Logical people exist. I think you got it wrong. I didn't mean the people in this sub aren't logical. I meant we are here in this sub called mens rights because feminists aren't standing up to their words. If they did there wouldn't be a need of this sub and hence we wouldn't be here. But most of those feminists arent logical. But feminists are the ones with power and influence. So, the only thing we can do is to show their hypocrisy by using their own tools o…
/r/MensRights25/09/21 06:04 AM
1

The user (EnvironmentalWar4627) which I responded is the whiteknight/troll. I can see how you might think I am a troll.
/r/MensRights25/09/21 06:00 AM
0

Aren't we fighting against the misogyny and patriarchy which harms men? Misogyny - Men are strong while women are weak and fragile. Patriarchy - Men are getting paid way more than women in sports. So, let women play with men and if they perform better than men they would get paid more. Why not play the feminist blame game and give them the taste of equality?
/r/MensRights25/09/21 05:53 AM
1

If you didn't get it. I was showing the hypocrisy of feminists. Misogyny - Men are strong while women are weak and fragile fragile. Patriarchy - Men are getting paid way more than women in sports. So, let women play with men and if they perform better than men they would get paid more. Why not play the feminist blame game and give them the taste of equality?
/r/MensRights25/09/21 05:51 AM
1

Agree with you. I was using the feminist ideology to show how hypocritical they are.
/r/MensRights25/09/21 05:39 AM
1

Then dont speak with them. Are you serious? Feminist theory literally relies on patriarchy. You must be really drunk if u actually want to iniciate with beings who dont have the word 'logic' in their english dictionary If something like logic existed in this world then we wouldn't be here in this sub.
/r/MensRights24/09/21 05:37 PM
1

That's the exact same response you would get if you ask a feminist anything related to men getting disadvantaged in the society. For ex: male only draft.
/r/MensRights24/09/21 05:27 PM
12

The patriarchy enforces the misogynistic belief that, men are strong while women are weak and fragile so they should be given special protection, which hurts men. But what should be done if feminists want special laws to protect women from sexual assault, violence against women, etc... Men have to fight the patriarchy as well as the feminists who are enforcing it. What to do if feminists themselves have internalized misogyny.
/r/MensRights24/09/21 04:45 PM
-3

OP has no reliable contributions in this sub. This is just a misogynistic trolling here. Most of the people for mens rights are in favor of integrating men and women in sports.
/r/MensRights24/09/21 04:01 PM
2

How's equality working out for you ladies? What? This is not the sub to spread your misogyny. If you are against misogyny and patriarchy, you should be supporting the integration of men and women in sports.
/r/MensRights24/09/21 03:53 PM
76

Laws to specifically protect women from sexual assault is misogynisitc as it reinforces the patriarchical beliefs that men are strong while women are weak and fragile so they need special protection. I thought UN were against misogyny...
/r/MensRights23/09/21 11:58 AM
29

Don't approach this with misandry and equality. Approach this from the perspective of misogyny and patriarchy as that's the reason feminists claim that women aren't being drafted. Anyone who is against this, tell them that they are misogynistic who are enforcing the patriarchical beliefs that men are strong while women are weak and fragile.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 05:27 AM
15

Wait, the patriarchy is misogynisitc which enforces the beliefs that men are strong so they should be drafted while women are weak and fragile so they shouldn't be drafted. That means who are against this, is the patriarchy. Finally we would get to see the patriarchy in action which the feminists claim to be fighting against.
/r/MensRights21/09/21 05:07 AM
45

Feminists claim that they are fighting the patriarchy. But they are favoring the patriarchy when it benefits them and whenever they receive backlash from men they put the blame on patriarchy without realizing that it's only them who were against it. There is no "patriarchy" which is forcing them to be positively discriminated. It's only them who are unwilling to give up their privileges. In other words, feminists are in favor of positive discrimination and then dodge the blame by saying they are…
/r/MensRights19/09/21 07:24 AM
1

what's happening here is exactly what this sub typically argues should happen when genders are reversed. The sub has only argued that the accused shouldn't be punished without proof beyond reasonable doubt. There are also comments calling OP out as he had reported without any evidence.
/r/MensRights17/09/21 03:20 PM
4

That's kind of messed up. Unfortunately the justice system is built around the legal principle of presumption of innocence. So, the cases which only get proven should end in conviction. Seems rapists and false accusers aren't punished in the vast majority of cases. Well, there are punishments for rapists if they are found to be guilty but it isn't the case with false accusers and that's what's messed up. Edit: this is just math. What's with the downvotes? Maybe get back to your whiteknight dutie…
/r/MensRights17/09/21 02:24 PM
5

Don't think like this. If they wanted they could have gone by their day without caring about anything. Even if it's about personal gains, this isn't the time where that would outweigh the backlash they would receive for supporting mens rights.
/r/MensRights09/09/21 04:16 PM
0

Exactly. They dont care about it because it affects men.
/r/MensRights09/09/21 03:29 PM
2

No worries!
/r/MensRights09/09/21 07:29 AM
2

US Mens team brings way more in revenue as compared to the womens team. In Football there is a huge revenue difference between mens and womens team even in the case of USA. If you didn't know US womens team (best womens team in Football) were beaten by Dallas FC under-15 boys, that just shows you there is a massive difference between mens and womens division in terms of competition. As a result of this there aren't many who would watch womens matches which in turn affects the revenue. But still …
/r/MensRights09/09/21 07:20 AM
2

women should be paid less because they are weaker? Because they bring less revenue. You get paid how much you are worth.
/r/MensRights09/09/21 06:11 AM
4

the fact that a women can be raped and impregnated and if she tries to get an abortion her rapist could get her arrested and get $10k for it. Abortions from rape is only around 1%. And then the percentage of your specific scenario happening in Texas is negligible. If you are looking at the extremes "an outdated practice of cutting a little bit of skin off a newborns penis" has also lead to the death of many newborns.
/r/MensRights09/09/21 05:56 AM
1

And they are the same ones who would say false rape accusations are rare to downplay them.
/r/MensRights09/09/21 05:27 AM
1

Again you are pretending to not know anything. Check your last reply. And that's why I had to be repetitive. The fact that nobody started the conversation with "should the draft exist?" and nobody responded with "no," which would have been the end of the whole conversation. Because it's not going to end anytime soon as women aren't going to be drafted. You need to be practical not live in your feminist fantasy world, saying, "men are down so to ensure equality you don't need to drag women but br…
/r/MensRights02/09/21 04:27 AM
1

From the past 12 hours, this is exactly what I have been saying. The other user is just ignoring my points and just repeating, "Women are weaker than men so they shouldn't be drafted." It's surely misandry by only drafting men, but at the same time using the reason "Women are weaker than men" in other areas where women are getting advantaged by equality would result in it being misogynistic. Textbook discrimination and crystal clear hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights01/09/21 05:24 PM
1

I don't understand what that person is arguing about. I am against only men being drafted. I'm not for war or anything because its a waste of lives and money Even I am not for war. But if there is draft, then women should also be registered along with men. but some jobs require certain physical characteristics like agility or strength or being a multi tasker. Yes some jobs require, but this isn't about "job." This is about men getting forcibly drafted and left to die. It's not "discrimination" u…
/r/MensRights01/09/21 05:09 PM
1

Not once did I say that. I didn't even say anything close to it. Then what are you saying? You are against women being drafted. Then who is going to get drafted? Some, sure. Others they will staff in other jobs, which I've said before, those positions can be reasonably split. And who are those some men who wouldn't get drafted? Wouldn't most of the job want a safe job. Why would they want to die? Again, I haven't said that. Then who are going to get drafted? If women aren't, then who? You should…
/r/MensRights01/09/21 04:22 PM
1

I favor equal opportunity Equal opportunity to get drafted in war? But you're delusional if you think drafting filling 50% of front line combat jobs with women is a functionally sound idea, let alone that you could find enough women physically capable of doing the tasks the typical infantrymen use (let alone spec ops type stuff). It's really funny that you think all men are strong enough. So are they going to leave out those men who are not strong enough? NO And I don't get how you think that fo…
/r/MensRights01/09/21 12:26 PM
1

Sorry I don't pass your purity test dude, What? I wanted to know what type of person am I conversing with, you could have been someone who was never in favor of women getting into those organizations. your attitude is fucked. Aww...thank you. The bottom line is not all situations require the same response. All situations with genders reversed should require the same response. But it's pretty obvious that you would have different responses considering that you have different definitions of equali…
/r/MensRights01/09/21 10:54 AM
1

No room for nuance, eh? The reason I asked that was to know whether you are atleast consistent or not. But you just showed your true feminist colors which others would refer to as "fake" feminist. That's how you know when someone is arguing in bad faith. You realize that your second reply was just saying that I am free to vote for sabotaging future war attempts. You are just deviating from the subject which you are best at. And this is how you know that you don't care about the men who are discr…
/r/MensRights01/09/21 10:00 AM
0

If you want to sabotage all of our future war efforts, Since war is your priority over equality, are you against women getting into those same organizations? I mean you should atleast be consistent. Not scream equality when it benefits you but then play the women card when it puts you at a disadvantage. In case of draft, obviously you are just someone who cares about war, but when you say this same thing against women getting into those same organizations, you are just a misogynistic who thinks …
/r/MensRights01/09/21 08:41 AM
1

In most cases yes. In an organization largely geared towards combat and killing... Less so. Yes, but this is the year 2021, where women are getting into those same organizations in the name of equality. So why are you against equality when it comes to drafting women. Is this a serious question? You realize we're talking about war, right? Not computer science or diesel mechanics. Yes, I realize it's war but again this is 2021. At best, we can try half of the military's noncombat positions be wome…
/r/MensRights01/09/21 08:23 AM
0

Well... Yeah, we want to win the war ideally Well... ideally we want equality, right? Or are we against equality? And why do you think women aren't as capable as men? You are just being misogynistic at this point. We should be doing better than the feminists that we complain about.
/r/MensRights01/09/21 05:22 AM
8

Waiting for that "true" feminist (majority but less vocal), whom everyone refers to when misandry is called out, to call out this discrimination employed by UK government. Obviously nobody cares when women are positively discriminated. The question now is do they want the same treatment as men or better treatment than men in each and every area.
/r/MensRights17/08/21 03:52 PM
45

Wait... but I was told by feminists that women are equal to men. A woman can do whatever a man can do. Where are all the "true" feminists. The UK government is misogynistic as they are not treating women equal to men. They think that woman are not as capable as men. How dare they...
/r/MensRights17/08/21 11:46 AM
2

I am a man. Been on earth for 69 years so far. And what I've come to realize over time? While the overwhelming majority of men are decent, thoughtful, and loving human beings, there is definitely still something terribly wrong with male genetics that cause a certain percentage of males to be a complete scourge on societies around the globe: The overwhelming percentage of every type of violence in the world is committed by? Men. Overwhelming percentage of mass murders in the world? Men. Overwhelm…
/r/MensRights17/08/21 05:32 AM
2

Did I get it wrong? I meant the child comments which says death is worse than rape are in response to the parent comments saying that they would rather be dead than get raped. The parent comment is the one which is not contributing anything to the conversation while forcing others to say that men have it worse which you were referring to. If that's not the case then sure we are agreeing.
/r/MensRights16/08/21 04:55 PM
10

There aren't many who are openly saying that in the parent comment. And considering the context of this post, it's pretty clear that they just want the men to be helped along with women as none of them said men should be prioritized because they have it worse. They are arguing against the narrative that women have it worse so they should be prioritized. Actually there are child comments (saying death is worse than rape) responding to the parent comment which goes something along the lines "I wou…
/r/MensRights16/08/21 04:31 PM
9

But we aren't saying that men should be prioritized as they are having it worse unlike those saying women should be. We are just forced to nitpick and say that even men have it bad so please help them along with women.
/r/MensRights16/08/21 03:53 PM
6

Now, we will get to see those "true" feminists (majority but less vocal) ,whom everyone refers to when misandry is called out, fighting for true equality rather than those feminists (minority but way more vocal) who are misandrists.
/r/MensRights16/08/21 03:38 PM
16

That OP is a troll who was banned from this sub. Also they had a previous account with the username "throwawayyo" which you might be more familiar with.
/r/MensRights12/08/21 05:35 AM
5

But how does that make male circumcision legal?
/r/MensRights11/08/21 06:46 AM
10

There is no barrier to men becoming nurses. There is in India. If you want to be a nurse no one is stopping you because because you're a man. The reservations and the female nurses supporting those in India are. In India, in AIIMS institutions (#1 medical institution in India) 80% of nursing jobs are reserved for females. https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/news/national/male-nurses-against-gender-based-quota-in-aiims/article34792525.ece However, female nurses are tacticly supporting the provis…
/r/MensRights09/08/21 06:27 AM
12

Why is there a push for women in STEM but not men in Nursing? Do you know what's even worse than that? Preventing men from getting into nursing. In India, in AIIMS institutions (#1 medical institution in India) 80% of nursing jobs are reserved for females. https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/news/national/male-nurses-against-gender-based-quota-in-aiims/article34792525.ece However, female nurses are tacticly supporting the provision saying it is welcome given the nature of the job. The reservati…
/r/MensRights09/08/21 06:24 AM
1

If you want to say I'm wrong for saying that one or 2 people can ruin a whole community id accept that im wrong. Do you realize that terrorists aren't 1 or 2 people who are Muslims. Also they are way more destructive than what even an incel could do? Also here taking the ratio of Muslims to terrorists doesn't make it fair as the destruction they could cause to the society isn't anything small.
/r/MensRights05/08/21 08:12 AM
1

With 1.9 billion Muslims in the world, almost a fourth of the total population, the most terrorist attacks we've gotten in a year is around 60. But you were the one who said that one little incel poses more threat to the society than the whole fds but here it's clearly more than 1 terrorist who are way more destructive than what an incel could do. So, ban Muslims I guess. As a matter of fact I'm about to go on wayback machine to see if I can take a look a the state of the sub before it was banne…
/r/MensRights05/08/21 06:42 AM
1

Im saying if there's one person infiltrating a community who is part of a group linked to violent crimes, that's more danger than anything in fds. There are clearly more than one terrorist who are part of Muslim religion and are also linked to violent crimes which is more danger than anything in fds. So, what do you think should be done to the Muslim religion? No heres a better example of my logic. Say you have a regular bowl of cereal this morning. Perfectly normal cornflakes except for one thi…
/r/MensRights05/08/21 05:17 AM
1

There was a member of a "community" that has been linked to violent crimes infiltrating the sub. That one little incel still represents more danger to society then anything in fds. Are you even serious or a troll? That "one little incel" represents the mgtow community the same way terrorists represents Muslims. Which means neither of them represents mgtow nor Muslims. By your logic Muslims should be banned because "many terrorists" are Muslims. And even one terrorist still poses more danger to t…
/r/MensRights05/08/21 03:59 AM
1

Did you even read what I said? Well apparently you didn't read what I said. By that logic femaledatingstrategy is about helping women find dates with good men. how is not having relationships with women because of hatred worse than hating men and still having relationships with them so that they can use them? I have clearly said it. Mgtow is "a tool of hatred" so they don't want relationship with women while fds is a sub hating men but still they want to have relationship with men so that they c…
/r/MensRights04/08/21 03:46 PM
24

Can't you even see the difference between mgtow and fds? Mgtow is about not having relationships with women but fds is about hating men and still having relationships with them so that they can use them. Even if mgtow is "a tool of hatred", how is not having relationships with women because of hatred worse than hating men and still having relationships with them so that they can use them?
/r/MensRights04/08/21 06:38 AM
13

Because in America most men have the rights to not get sexually accosted at 2AM while they're alone?
/r/MensRights03/08/21 04:52 PM
11

Is this an American only thing? because from where I am there aren't any rights for men to go outside themselves at 2AM without being accosted.
/r/MensRights03/08/21 04:43 PM
11

Which place is that where you don't have the rights to go outside by yourself at 2AM?
/r/MensRights03/08/21 04:32 PM
1

Next best option is called "equality" where everyone also have to follow the rules and responsibilities which put them at an disadvantage. Even women. They aren't invincible to the responsibilities which they put them at an disadvantage.
/r/MensRights02/08/21 05:02 AM
1

who ever said women can do anything a man can? Are you even serious? but maybe 8f they had stayed to help the girls with babies n shit, nobody wouldve died. Keyword "maybe". At that point of time you don't even have time to think about protecting others. The only goal is to protect yourself. Also, it's no guarantee that nobody would have died. So why take the risk when you only got one chance. youre not ever gonna convince me tgat men should trample women and children to save themselves. Are you…
/r/MensRights02/08/21 05:00 AM
1

He's not even simping. But he is being clearly biased towards the women. Should women be made invincible from all the responsibilities that leave them at a disadvantage? Since the logic here used is that the women shouldn't be dragged down to the standards of men. women shouldn't be dragged down to the standards of men They aren't even dragged. They just have to follow the laws and responsibilities which everyone does. But if it puts them at an disadvantage, they are being dragged down. What log…
/r/MensRights02/08/21 04:21 AM
1

that italian cruise ship that sank and all the dudes bailed, took the boats, and all the casialties turned out to be women and children. Wait... so you mean, the women who can do whatever a man can do should be helped? It's not even the question of men or women, why should someone help strangers by risking their own life? What are you even trying to say? Men should have died instead of women? thats the future mra groups like this seem to be pushing toward. and its not a good one Wow... women dyi…
/r/MensRights02/08/21 04:09 AM
1

it isnt seeking to elevate the standard, It is but it looks far from possible. If that's not possible what's the next best option then? And women aren't being brought down to mens standards. That are the laws and responsibilities which everyone has to follow. Even women. They aren't invincible to the laws and responsibilities which put them at a disadvantage.
/r/MensRights02/08/21 04:00 AM
6

they haven't been "CoNvICTeD" It's because they haven't been proven guilty. Ever heard of presumption of innocence?
/r/MensRights01/08/21 05:02 PM
5

If we support this asswipe because "HeS NoT gUiLTy" but then he ends up going down for it later and turns out he was a rapist the whole time, we lose credibility the next time we support someone who might actually be innocent. Let me rephrase it for you If we support the accused because "HeS NoT gUiLTy" but then he ends up going down for it later and turns out he was a rapist the whole time, we lose credibility the next time we support someone who might actually be innocent. Because "this asswip…
/r/MensRights01/08/21 04:53 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter