TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

22IsThisIt22 Archive

View 0 posts and 487 comments by 22IsThisIt22 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

And don't shoot people for nothing.
/r/PussyPassDenied13/05/23 03:13 PM
5

I know a woman who fucked her way into a career as a university professor. She was pretty smart, but so where some of her male colleagues who never became professors because they couldn't offer a vagina.
/r/PussyPassDenied04/05/23 04:07 PM
8

There's a new trend of women jumping into the manosphere to get a piece of the action (money). They never experienced the issues they talk about, since they are women talking about men's issues. So they have no skin in the game. Men just love to feel like women are finally getting what it means to be a man. How hard it can be. So, these female grifters can get an audience really easy. It's all fake. BetterBachelor on Youtube did a video exposing one of these more famous female manosphere types, …
/r/PussyPassDenied04/05/23 03:45 PM
–

You should learn how to use a dictionary. It could save you from embarrassing yourself further in the future.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/23 05:27 PM
4

I believe in music, blueberry muffins and ice-skating.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/23 02:57 PM
5

Keep on pretending like you are in a position to label others. You might actually start to believe it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/23 02:47 PM
2

Sigh, you are confusing responsibility with accountability. Responsible is having a job to pay your own bills. Accountable is making an error at that job and owning up to that mistake/fixing that mistake yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/23 02:43 PM
6

There's still a debate about climate change. While it is actually happening and everyone who is older than 15 has personally experienced the changes. I don't doubt there is a debate. My point is that people like you or companies like Shell, will debate for debating's sake. Not because there is any doubt about what is actually happening.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/23 02:38 PM
5

Getting AIDS or terminal blood cancer won't be an issue then. 👍🏻
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/23 01:23 PM
9

Hey, isn't that something. If you change misogyny in misandry, you have just put in words the perfect advice to give to yourself. I'm doing just fine with the ladies. Thanks very much for assuming. Only issue I have isn't finding companionship. It's finding companionship that is actually worth to take seriously. Women at large behave as attention seeking whores. Side effect of social media, I guess. And like the great philosopher Dr. Dre has said: "You can't make a hoe a housewife." Thanks for y…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/23 01:19 PM
5

That's why there are scientists doing research. So they can show us things that are happening, but we don't see ourselves. Your stance seems to be: "If I don't see it myself, it didn't happen." Because OP has gathered the science and you still reply with not real to me/don't care/haven't seen it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/23 01:09 PM
0

to them woman aren’t adults That's dumbing it down. Women aren't seen as adults, not because they are women, but because they can't handle accountability. And being able to deal with accountability is what separates children from the adults. You just have to spend two seconds on this subreddit and watch women deflect and deny anything that detracts from the "women are wonderful"- effect, to know that redpill is clearly on to something when they claim that women are like children.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/23 01:50 AM
4

Well done, on this subreddit that's really hard to do. That's like finding a needle in a haystack.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/23 01:32 AM
12

So, when can add "being cowards" to the long list of female qualities.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/23 12:46 AM
7

as a man you should know that you have to restrain yourself. Because women aren't capable of restraint? Because women are like children and you can't blame children? Why, oh why? Let me fix that for you: As an adult, regardless of gender, you should know that you have to restrain yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/23 12:43 AM
5

Ah, the Socratic method, I see. Very well, cary on. Maybe you can teach her something.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/23 12:38 AM
8

I'm a lawyer. Oh boy, I hope nobody in real need of legal representation ever has to depend on you. In a thread about domestic violence, where OP has the sources to back up the claim that women are bigger instigators of DV than men, you mention two things that have nothing to do with DV as a rebuttal: Men overwhelmingly commit the vast majority of all violence, and men commit 98% of homicides worldwide. So, what's you freaking point counselor? Violence isn't the subject. Homicide isn't the subje…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/23 12:35 AM
4

So...... ......women are like children according to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/23 12:22 AM
8

You would deny consensus exists when it is hitting you in the face with a sledgehammer.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/23 12:21 AM
8

Of course. Always deny. Always gaslight. Never acknowledge. Deflect all accountability. Women truly are like children...
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/23 12:19 AM
3

As soon as I see It's right there in OP's post. You only have to read and not deny the evidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/23 12:16 AM
3

No. Equal rights, equal lefts. You are either an equal and get treated like one all the time. Or you are not an equal and are never treated like one. Choosing when you would like to be treated like an equal and when not, isn't equality that's privilege.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/23 12:07 AM
5

All his links work (I just verified them all). Instead of screeching "your links don't work", you could have used your eyes and notice that at the end of some of OP's URL's there is a point or a comma getting formatted into the URL. Just drop the . or the , at the end. Women, anything to not take accountability. This is precisely why there is a post in the redpill's sidebar with the title "Women, the most responsible teenager in the house". Lack. Of. Accountability.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/23 11:59 PM
3

Equal right, equals lefts. Let's spread some equality around.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/23 11:21 PM
16

Anything debunking the "women are wonderful"-effect should be encouraged. Thanks for making this post.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/23 09:12 PM
1

Stop whining. You will never be as young as you are today. And you are wasting it on thinking about how you were younger yesterday.
/r/TheRedPill01/05/23 06:13 PM
1

Theres a million and 1 places on the Internet like that for men. No there aren't. And the few places were men come together get labeled misogynistic and have action taken against them. R/Braincells, r/incels, r/MGTOW and several other male oriented subreddits are banned. R/redpill is quarantined. And then we have FDS, which is an extremely sexist subreddit, even when compared to those banned male subreddits. And that place, with all it's hate and sexism, is left alone because "it isn't sexism wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/23 04:48 PM
2

And FDS is a bunch of hurt women connecting over their shared misandry.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/23 06:40 AM
1

Is 'family' the word you use when you are talking about a walking ATM?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/23 06:34 AM
3

You are reporting me for being uncivil? Really? Lol. Where are the insults? Saying that your reading comprehension isn't on par, is no insult when you are not capable of reading what was written. That's just pointing out the truth. You are just insulted by hearing the truth. That's a "you" problem. Growing up can solve that problem for you. And you are here saying uncivil stuff like:"it’s very hard to view men as good people". Like men are all murdering psychopaths. How uncivil of you.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/23 05:01 PM
4

If you are a man, then you are a very brainwashed one. Because you are spreading nonsense that is against your own best interest and that of your fellow men. Can't imagine why you believe that it's a good thing to do.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/23 04:52 PM
6

insulting my reading comprehension skills. I'm really sorry if your feelings are hurt by me pointing out how you aren't reading what was written. But you must admit that there's a big difference between me saying that someone else thinks men are awful and me agreeing with men being awful. (maybe read this twice before you respond. It's a long sentence). Nobody hates men. But when you go on RP forums and read how awfully men treat women, it’s very hard to view men as good people. And you accuse m…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/23 04:47 PM
9

I must admit you are funny. If you had mentioned one or two untruthful things, I would bother to point them out and correct you. But since this comment of yours contains nothing but BS and is fairly long, I won't bother. It's however also really nasty how you are telling men that advice that other men give them, is "a cult" and something vile. Like men should be only allowed to receive advice from women or do what an exploiting society wants them to do. Imagine if men started telling women that …
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/23 04:24 PM
6

I will quote myself because your reading comprehension isn't strong. Maybe reading it a second time will make you understand that I don't think men are awful. I'll even put the part in bold that could clarify things for you. and not date men anymore if you think they're so bad. If you hate men it is always a good idea to go WGTOW. Especially for the men that you won't bother with your misandry.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/23 04:03 PM
8

Really? Where are they meeting? What uniform do they wear? What rituals do the perform? What initiation rituals do you have to go through to be accepted? What are the rules? Who enforces the rules? Redpill is as much a cult, like someone giving you the advice that "brushing your teeth is a good idea" is a cult. In other words it isn't. It's advice for men, by men. All the rest is just trying to vilify men that aren't choosing to be a slave for society and women.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/23 02:15 PM
1

Women over forty have all come down to earth. Pricey long dates is overkill at that age and might just scare away some of those women. Because a man trying that hard at that age is probably compensating for something else. It's fun to visit subs like dating, datingoverthirty, datingoverforty or even datingoverfifty one after the other. You can clearly see female entitlement and unrealistic expectations turn into more realistic expectations and finally into desperation and willingness to compromi…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/23 02:04 PM
5

Completely missing the point.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/23 01:35 PM
25

Men need to change. No they don't. You just need to put your money where your mouth is and not date men anymore if you think they're so bad. That would be better for you and it sure as hell is better for all men.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/23 01:34 PM
13

A movement that sells itself as a cure should do exactly that. Redpill isn't a movement. Redpill doesn't present itself as a cure. Redpill is friendly advice by men for men. You are free to take from it what you need or to ignore it all.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/23 01:27 PM
7

Anger has nothing to do with it. I'm calm and collected enjoying a nice cappuccino at home while I type these words. You are on purpilldebate asking about the meanings of "all these pills". That's like going to a car subreddit and asking what a car is. Maybe educate yourself before you come here asking irrelevant questions.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/23 03:36 PM
16

Why does a clueless person, like yourself, come to a debate sub that is about the subjects you are clueless about? It screams pointlessness.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/23 03:21 PM
7

If half assed coffee meetup is the best you can do, you'll have a lot of first dates. But you won't end up dating a golddigger. And that's more important than having some extra first dates.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/23 10:00 AM
6

That's exactly why I gave those examples. Women will have a bigger issues with their men giving commitment to other women (giving them his time or resources), than their men having sex with other women. Because to women sex is the trivial part of being in a relationship (they can find plenty of guys to fuck them, not so many guys commiting to them). For men it's the opposite. If their women give time or resources to other men, that isn't merely as bad as having sex with other men. Because to men…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/23 03:18 PM
2

Sigh. I said resources without getting sex. That much is true. So, when I buy my mate a beer and he isn't going to give me a blowjob in return, that means I'm a simp? Buying your dad a birthday gift is simping behavior? (I assume your dad isn't getting freaky with you.) You guys are probably on the spectrum. Talking about simping and saying that a guy, who was giving his resources to a woman without getting any affection in return, is a simp, is not the same as saying that if you don't fuck ever…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/23 02:39 PM
1

Since when is not fucking every woman you go on a date with the same as simping? I'll wait.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/23 12:55 PM
1

This is what I said: A guy who confesses to his new girlfriend that he used to give away his resources to women who he wasn't even allowed to kiss or sleep with, will definitely be seen as a loser or a simp. This is what you said I said: TIL if you don't fuck every woman you go on a date with where you pay, you're a loser and a simp. If you don't see the discrepancies between what I said and how you summarized it into an TIL, then you definitely need a brain swap.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/23 12:43 PM
1

If you think what you said I said was the same as what I actually said, then you definitely need a better functioning brain.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/23 12:26 PM
13

Your reading comprehension needs work or you need a better functioning brain. My guess is on the latter.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/23 12:14 PM
36

Do women consider a guy who has bought too many meals for other women as "run through?" A guy who confesses to his new girlfriend that he used to give away his resources to women who he wasn't even allowed to kiss or sleep with, will definitely be seen as a loser or a simp. Because that's exactly who he is. Just like a woman who is sleeping with guys that aren't commiting to her, will be seen as a slut. Because that's exactly who she is.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/23 10:32 AM
3

That you are dating a person, who doesn't have the mental capacity to figure out how washing dishes works, says more about you than about him.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/23 10:16 AM
2

You can't even name any differences. You are a funny dude, although unintentionally. I'll quote myself: Men and women have different brains, different bodies, different instincts, different sexual strategies, different ways of communicating, different hormones running in different quantities through their different bodies,...... Literally everything is different.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/23 01:29 PM
1

but overall they are more similar than different in personalities and traits. You couldn't be more wrong. Men and women have different brains for starters. But here you are, claiming that those different brains are working the same and produce similar personalities and traits. Assuming that different brains work exactly the same, is a pretty stupid assumption. Because evolution made male and female brains different exactly because men and women are different and require different thinking machin…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/23 01:05 PM
3

There's the problem. You think they're different. I don't think they are different. I'm not interested in what you think. I'm interested in reality. And in reality men and women are very different. And no amount of wishful thinking on your part will ever change that fact. The fact that you think they are not different will not help a man give birth to a child or make it easy for a woman to piss standing up without getting her shoes wet. Men and women have different brains, different bodies, diff…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/23 12:27 PM
11

Female solipsisism. Their dating life is not trash, so how can anybody else's dating life be trash?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/23 12:02 PM
2

In that case, it's ok for women to also be obsessed with sex Why? Because men and women are the same? Because they aren't, so assuming that what goes for one also goes for the other, is completely not logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/23 11:52 AM
5

Most women pay their own bills Most women in a relationship do not pay all of their bills. For a man dating a woman will cost money. It always does.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/23 11:37 AM
2

Ok, math isn't your strong suit.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/23 10:40 AM
3

women who work the same amount as their husbands or even work more ...are very rare. According to U.S. census data, men spend an average of 41.0 hours per week at their jobs, while women work an average of 36.3 hours per week.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/23 11:52 AM
2

Men -> women -> children -> pets. Men love women. Women love their children. Children love their pets. Just as nature intended it to work.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/23 10:22 AM
2

She gets her stats about men from her personal experience as a woman. Therefore it must be very very accurate. /s
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/23 10:30 AM
4

That woman in that clip is not right in the head and needs therapy. Just don't take advice from nutcases and live your life. It's not that complicated.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/23 10:27 AM
0

hence paternal certainty wasn’t a dire need. All living organisms care about spreading their genes.Not the genes of their friends or fellow tribe's people. Their own genes. But apparently not male humans. They are apparently fine with just hoping they have procreated. At least according to you. It takes an ungodly amount of misandry to deny that men have a drive for reproduction just like every other living organism on the planet.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/23 03:28 PM
0

Have you considered that it goes against a healthy man's natural instincts to not care about sexual exclusivity? Men had no way of knowing if a child is actually his child. Therefore it became ingrained into their DNA to care about sexual exclusivity. You may ignore it but sex wasn't the goal, procreation was. And having sex without sexual exclusivity only guarantees the mother procreation. It guarantees nothing to the several men who are "candidate fathers". Those few years with contraceptives …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/23 01:29 PM
1

Maybe you should use some more "fake laughing" to give your answer credibility. I only count one "lol" in there...
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/23 12:42 PM
1

You are completely wrong about that. A promiscuous man, is per definition a man with options. And such a man will not date a promiscuous woman himself. Men prefer the women they date, not to be hoes. And a man with options can choose a non promiscuous woman for his long term partner. Any man actually dating a promiscuous woman is therefore almost always a man without options.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/23 12:34 PM
1

Your boyfriend is still a simp. If he was a man with actual options why would he date an OF girl? He could be dating a woman just as good looking that he doesn't need to share with the world through her OF activities. The answer is: he has no other options or he is insecure and afraid to go for other options or he is a pimp benefitting financially from your OF activities. If you take two identical women, both just as fun and just as beautiful, the one who has an OF is the lesser one of the two. …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/23 12:05 PM
0

a man who was a hoe himself ...is per definition a man who has options. And men who have options will fuck hoes, but will not commit to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/23 11:44 AM
2

Tell that to the one who's name rhymes with 'tea'.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/23 10:53 AM
2

Men could do the same. No they could not. For the millionth time: men and women aren't the same. What works for one doesn't automatically work for the other.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/23 01:38 AM
1

She's trying to be funny and delegitimize OP's claims in doing so. Might as well, no real debate going on in this sub anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/23 01:36 AM
16

How is any actual debate possible when the women on this sub still pretend like established concepts like female hypergamy aren't real?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/23 01:30 AM
2

Take that moderator I was referring to. Look what gets deleted by that moderator. Use 'unndit' to recover the comments. Categorize them as blue or redpill. And add them up to their totals. Come back after you've done that and tell me what you find. I already did this little experiment. Clearly you won't believe me, so do it yourself. See what you find.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/23 01:17 AM
1

So you didn't look into it as deeply as I have. Take that moderator I was referring to. Look what gets deleted by that moderator. Use 'unndit' to recover the comments. Categorize them as blue or redpill. And add them up to their totals. Pretty obvious there is bias going on.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/23 01:12 AM
2

When there's a 80/20 split, there will still be some feminists getting banned. But that doesn't make it non-biased moderation. You should use unndit.com to retrieve deleted comments. To see what stance they were taking. I bet you didn't bother to actually look this far into it. A certain mod who's name rhymes with 'tea' almost exclusively removes redpill leaning posts or comments.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/23 11:44 PM
30

Why do starving people go dumpster diving for food? They are extremely hungry....
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/23 11:38 PM
8

You should use unndit.com to retrieve deleted comments. To see what stance they were taking. I bet you didn't bother to actually look this far into it. A certain mod who's name rhymes with 'tea' almost exclusively removes redpill leaning posts or comments. I started to look into it when I got banned for "being uncivil," while I only was disagreeing. In the same thread the other party was hurling insults and was left alone. Once you actually start to retrieve deleted comments, you will be surpris…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/23 11:35 PM
3

Her gender is not relevant when she is just a mentally unstable human being talking crazy.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/23 09:31 PM
3

That woman from that tiktok video belongs in a straightjacket. There's nothing wrong with approaching another human being (man or woman) in a respectful way. Don't take advice from crazy people and live your life.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/23 08:15 PM
26

The moderators on this subreddit are very biased against anything male/redpill. Therefore it is impossible for this subreddit to lean over to the redpill side of things.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/23 08:01 PM
1

but the terminology alone makes it blatantly obvious that’s not the case. What terminology? There's no redpill terminology. It's just advice for men, by men. Redpill has no uniform, no guidebook, no vocabulary, no clubhouse, no nothing. You are making it a lot bigger than it is. It's just men giving other men advice. FDS calls men 'scrotes'. Redpill doesn't call women 'vags' or something like that. A frustrated incel calling women bitches, is not redpill. I think you are mixing up some things.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/23 08:32 PM
1

a very specific view of women Again, that is not Redpill. Redpill has no negative view on women, because that would be counterproductive. But it also doesn't sugarcoat women and doesn't participate in the "women are wonderful" effect. Redpill is actionable advice based on reality. FDS isn't comparable. That place is truly sexist and bitter. Never saw those radfems talk about improving themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/23 07:07 PM
1

I'm still certain about my stance. What are you on about? Redpill is no ideology. You are rambling. And you do it from a position of "I'm so experienced. I'm telling you how it is". Pathetic. Learn some modesty you muppet.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/23 02:41 PM
1

Nothing more annoying than a know-it-all. I'm no young buck, "son", keep your arrogance to yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/23 02:25 PM
0

You never bothered to actually investigate redpill, that's pretty obvious. You are just regurgitating what you heard about it. Redpill is advice for men, by men. That's all it is. Redpill is no more an ideology than a bunch of cooking tips are an ideology.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/23 01:04 PM
0

Redpill is advice for men, by men. That's all it is. Redpill is no more an ideology than a bunch of cooking tips are an ideology.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/23 01:00 PM
0

redpill is no ideology.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/23 03:58 AM
1

Crazy and proud about it.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/04/23 11:50 PM
1

Sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/23 03:10 AM
1

tirelessly care for men ...because of what those men provide. Stop providing and see what happens to all that "care" you talk about. Women would risk their lives for their children (where their love really lays). Plenty of stories of mothers risking it all for their children. But they don't love men that same way. Men would risk it all for their woman. Hierarchy of love goes from men to women, from women to children and from children to their pets.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/23 01:40 AM
1

A man with high numbers has 0 RMV, his SMV is pretty meaningless at that point. A man with high numbers is still desirable both sexually as relationship wise. Because you need to be a man of high value to be able to sleep around. All the most desirable men in the world have high numbers (athletes, rock stars, movie stars, miljonairs, famous men,...) and they still have women lining up to both date them and sleep with them. Do you think many women will say no to a guy like Brad Pitt? Of course no…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/23 12:07 AM
5

hierarchy of love: men -> women -> their children -> their pets. Men love women, women love their children, children love their pets. Never heard the saying that the only woman who will truly love you, who will love you just for being you, is your mother? There are a lot of anecdotes about men risking their lives for their women or dying for their women. There are almost no stories about women doing the same for men, only for their children. Women don't love men. Nature intended them to look out…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/23 10:00 PM
1

If a woman's SMV decreases with every man she sleeps with, the same applies to men. Such a simplistic view and easily proven wrong. Men and women aren't the same. You assuming that what goes for one, automatically also goes for the other, is a word we cannot use anymore starting with an 'r'. From an evolutionary point of view women should be selective with who they have sex with. Because the consequences and investment are much bigger for women. While men's best strategy is to have sex with as m…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/23 03:41 PM
14

something better to strive for Women are hypergamous.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/23 03:31 PM
17

Basically proud to be a cum dumpster.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/23 09:18 PM
7

Agreeing with God-Hand here. Most men aren't attracted to rollable women and will only fuck them out of desperation.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/23 09:13 PM
2

Ah, the good old "asking a fish, how to catch a fish" and then complain that the fish wasn't giving good advice. Ask a fisherman.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/23 12:34 PM
1

Sure, keep doing what you do since it is clearly working for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/23 10:57 AM
1

And why do you think this guy got so worked up and started to rant?
/r/PussyPassDenied28/03/23 06:20 PM
1

Everytime one of you radfems tries to be edgy, you add fake laughing into your comments. It's almost as if you all took the same writing class and someone convinced you that a 'hahaha', 'lol' or 'ROTFL' is a convincing argument. No wonder redpill sees women as children when they behave like infants. It's comical that someone who can't even communicate as a grown-up, is accusing others of immature behavior. Now I come to think of it, this whole paragraph is pure projection: You are immature and y…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/23 01:41 PM
2

Stop taking everything that was said to the extreme. Are you autistic be any chance? It doesn't take a normal man 3 months to make up his mind on wanting to sleep with a woman. Even if you are an outlier and require more familiarity before sleeping with a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/23 01:13 PM
1

Yep, good luck to you too. For someone who is so content and happy, you sure have a strange way of showing it. Seeing you spent your time bitching and moaning about those "evil men" online. There's a saying in my country: "What the heart is full off, will spill out of the mouth". Keep fooling yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/23 01:09 PM
2

It doesn't take a healthy man (both physically as mentally) 3 months to make up his mind on wanting to have sex with a woman. A heterosexual man that isn't attracted to women needs to go see a doctor or a psychiatrist. Because something is definitely amiss.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/23 12:57 PM
5

to go back to oakland Let me translate that for you. That is racist speak and it means: "Your black ass doesn't belong here. Go back to where I think other black people are living (Oakland), because your presence is not wanted in my white neighborhood." She deserved what she got.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/03/23 12:52 PM
4

The naturals just don't put women on a pedestal. Like not even a tiny bit. Whenever you actually don't care about getting the girl, getting her becomes trivial. And even when you don't succeed, the failure doesn't even register and you turn right around and the get the next one. There isn't anything exceptional about women. Except that knowledge and you will have no trouble getting women. It's your outcome dependence that is ruining your game. Naturals just don't give a fuck and that's why they …
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/23 12:43 PM
1

and women are exhausted. Shouldn't be so busy riding the cock carousel and pretending to be victims of the imaginary patriarchy then. That would definitely save some energy.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/23 12:36 PM
0

He sounds like a guy who has had a decent amount of real life experience. https://youtu.be/qae0GEwmA6I (yeah, that's right 300+)
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/23 12:20 PM
9

Calling a hoe, a hoe is not disrespectful. It's being truthful. Calling a hoe, a lady is disrespecting reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/23 12:16 PM
5

No she wasn't: But which hoe is unlocking which? The man or the woman? Seems they're unlocking each other.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/23 12:08 PM
1

A guy who doesn’t want sex for three months should not be going on dates. He should visit a doctor and maybe a psychiatrist too.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/23 11:30 AM
5

And birds can also fly. But I'm no bird.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/23 10:59 PM
1

So, the men are using the women for companionship An uninterested woman is horrible companionship. and to bolster their reputations as being successful. What are you on about? Do you think paparazzi are waiting to photograph regular guys going on diner dates? And share those photos with the world? No one will know you are taking out and feeding a hungry parasite. And if they did, it would hurt your reputation, not bolster it. A free meal doesn't remotely compensate women for all the expenses and…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/23 10:31 PM
1

Women's interest in men certainly determines whether or not those men will be successful at dating. A lot of douchebags are successful at dating. Doesn't make them decent human beings. And giving someone a free meal demonstrates a man's generosity and prosperity. Giving a leech free food, shows you are a bad judge of character or shows that you have no self-respect. We aren't talking about feeding the needy or the homeless here. We are talking about women using men for free food.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/23 10:02 PM
1

1/3 of women only dating for free food, doesn't equal to 1/3 of men. Women's interest in men doesn't determine if those men are good human beings. And giving parasites a free meal can hardly be qualified as contributing. I know you are trying to be insulting, but it would be more effective if what you wrote wasn't complete nonsense.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/23 07:38 PM
3

If you work full-time, then you aren't staying in the most expensive hotels, driving luxury cars and drinking champagne like it's water.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/23 04:34 PM
1

Exactly my point. They aren't influencing anybody, but still travel the world and live a life of luxury. Someone is paying for all that and they ain't doing that without expecting something in return.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/23 04:32 PM
1

I threw them all of my Instagram feed. So now Instagram doesn't suggest them to me anymore. Good riddance.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/23 04:30 PM
1

True, but most of them clearly show famous landmarks in different locations.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/23 04:19 PM
4

She is very sex positive and probably isn't going home with guys she doesn't think are attractive. But, yeah, it's not my cup of tea either.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/23 04:18 PM
4

Trick question. So, I'll respond with a question in return. What is a "legit influencer" according to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/23 10:48 AM
17

No it doesn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/23 10:46 AM
17

Yeah, when you are already famous, you can leverage that fame to earn money through product placement and stuff. Most "influencers" who present their life of luxury, have no big audience and no fame. They definitely are "working" for their money. They just do their work horizontally and lie about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/23 10:44 AM
4

Most influencers are not exceptional by any stretch of the imagination. That's what makes this whole "influencer" business so ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/23 10:34 AM
23

Yep. Also how influencers end up in all those exotic locations, without having a real job or source of income.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/23 10:24 AM
0

My female friends aren't that exceptional. Just take a look at all the female influencers, who have no real job, but plaster their Instagram with themselves in one exotic location after another. How do you think they pay for all their travels, luxury hotels and fancy restaurants? Or better, who do you think pays those things for them and what do they do in return for receiving that generosity? Disingenuous and predictable. You know very well that responding by what a heterosexual women can do, b…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/23 10:23 AM
2

I think you will get cancelled before you can even utter the first syllable of the word bestseller...
/r/PussyPass27/03/23 07:51 AM
25

Average enough that I have several female friends who did similar things. One of them goes on holiday without ever paying for a hotel. She just finds men to sleep with (= free lodging) and repeats the process as much as needed when traveling around in a country.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/23 07:31 AM
23

The option to not pay for a hotel, get free food, a free guide and some sexual fun with guys she is attracted to.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/23 07:28 AM
36

A friend of mine used to go on holidays without booking any hotels or anything. She just went to a bar, picked up a guy and stayed in his place for the night. She would repeat the same process if needed or when traveling around in a country. Try doing that as a man. You will be sleeping under a bridge somewhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/23 07:24 AM
1

You shouldn't make claims about things you aren't knowledge about. Foodie calls are pretty common in today's dating landscape.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/23 12:26 AM
1

Wait a minute, you wrote this in relation to the claim that women use men for free food: One anecdotal example doesn’t make a trend. But you didn't even hear about "foodie calls"? The term "foodie call" is a commonly known term. If you never heard of that term, you have no idea about what happens in modern dating. Yet, you make claims as if you are knowledgeable about the subject.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/23 11:12 PM
1

I'm not worried about getting used for free food, because I never do food on the first date. That's not the point. The point is: women here denying that a lot of uninterested women still go on diner dates, just to use men for free food. While this is such a common occurrence that any man with an active dating life, will sooner or later stop going on diner dates until he knows where he stands with the woman he is trying to date. They have even coined a term for it: a "foodie call". But you and ot…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/23 10:10 PM
3

Uninterested women don't stop going on "dinner dates" once they reach the age of 25. Age is no cure for being a parasite. I never do food on a first date, so I don't have to pick better. That wasn't the point.The point was some women here pretending like women never use men for free food.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/23 08:43 PM
3

I am serious. Women going on dinner dates and not even being interested in the person at the other end of the table, isn't some rare occurrence. You shouldn't need any articles at all to know shit like that is common. Any man having an active dating life will sooner or later revert to just a walk or a coffee as a first date. Precisely because this is so common.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/23 08:18 PM
1

https://www.google.com/amp/s/nypost.com/2019/06/21/a-third-of-women-only-date-men-because-of-the-free-food-study/amp/
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/23 06:31 PM
-1

One anecdotal example doesn’t make a trend Good that there's more information out there than one anecdotal example: https://www.google.com/amp/s/nypost.com/2019/06/21/a-third-of-women-only-date-men-because-of-the-free-food-study/amp/
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/23 06:30 PM
7

Yep, do something that you can easily walk out on if she happens to be a catfish or boring. Expensive dates need to be earned.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/23 06:26 PM
0

More than you have fingers.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/23 12:27 AM
2

If I could give you more upvotes, I would. Respect.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/23 09:06 PM
6

Yeah, you are right. If even low value women have inflated egos and higher demands, probably all women have them. Which would raise the bar to qualify as a top percentage guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 11:57 AM
15

Hoeflation is kind of the opposite. It is the increased price men have to pay for lower value women. Because social media made everyone with a vagina, a queeeeen.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 11:35 AM
20

Inflation. The demands for what qualifies as a high value man go up.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 11:29 AM
3

Get over yourself. Redpill is advice for men, by men.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/23 12:32 AM
14

I never paid anything for redpill information. It's all freely available. You guys have no idea what you are talking about. Redpill is advice for men, by men. And that's all it is. It's not an ideology. It's not a marketing scheme.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/23 12:29 AM
5

What a bunch of meaningless drivel. Redpill is just actionable advice for men, by men. If it's popular, it's because it works. There's nothing else to it. You wrote a whole bunch of words only to demonstrate you have no idea what you are talking about.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/23 12:25 AM
20

Your vagina is losing fluids.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/03/23 08:45 PM
18

That's 3 emoji's in two comments. You definitely belong in r/TwoXChromosomes. Tell the lesbians over there, that you were calling men 'neck beards' and score some extra bonus points.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/03/23 08:37 PM
20

Look at mister self-righteous over here. Judging from the number of downvotes you are getting, the only one who is wrong is you. Maybe go play with the other ladies on r/TwoXChromosomes where your whiteknighting might be appreciated.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/03/23 08:22 PM
42

Do you really think this is the right sub to do some good ol' whiteknighting?
/r/PussyPassDenied19/03/23 07:31 PM
-2

You still didn't do your homework. Go google examples of circular reasoning. Also I'm a dude. That makes it even more pathetic. You white knight in shitty armor.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/23 03:02 PM
0

Redpill is right, women truly are like children. Thanks for demonstrating that once again. Can't make this shit up, lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/23 02:49 PM
1

Female solipsisism.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/23 02:25 PM
1

There's nothing "incels" about that comment. You are just being your normal biased self.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/23 04:31 AM
1

Prove that their lives are fulfilled.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/23 04:16 AM
–

We weren't talking about what maybe might happen in the future.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/23 03:10 AM
–

Women make up around 14% of construction industry professionals This means 86% are men. And of those 14% women that work in the construction industry, almost all of them are limited to desk, design and secretarial roles.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/23 02:54 AM
–

people in this subreddit act like engineers, architects and construction workers are a huge subset of men. Most men don't do these jobs, True, but completely besides the point when almost all people who do those jobs are men.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/23 02:06 AM
–

Interesting thought. A bit depressing, but it's not like I was still under the impression that monogamy still works in today's society.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/23 01:58 AM
1

Now it’s equal No, it isn't. There are no more restrictions on female sexuality. And there are restrictions on male sexuality. You are literally saying that inequality, is equality. I guess when inequality is in women's favor, it stops being inequality.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/23 01:28 AM
13

It's because OP sees men as horn dogs. And since men prefer women who are less promiscuous, OP thinks that this preference has to do with men getting turned on more by these women. It's completely ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 03:46 PM
6

Right on, brother. Less promiscuous women are better, more loyal partners. It's not as complicated as OP is making it.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 03:44 PM
1

lol
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 08:48 AM
1

You can even make me sound good with autotune (it automatically hits the notes for you, you don't have to be able to sing in tune). And in the "live" version he was doing playback (his voice was on tape and he was pretending to sing). I'll try to find some clip where he is actually singing live (if he ever actually does that). But when he even uses playback during his live performance on his own world tour, I doubt that he can actually sing.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 03:05 AM
2

I followed your advice and gave it a listen. The studio version of that song is all autotune. So, not really possible to judge his voice on that. No worries, let's check out a live version. Found him doing that song on his 'Carpe Diem World Tour'. And he isn't actually singing. He is playbacking the damn thing. Jumps to a lower part of the stage, while jumping completely moves his microphone away from his mouth, while his voice keeps on singing like he is still holding a mic in front of his face…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 02:33 AM
1

Thanks for voicing your opinion.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 02:16 AM
2

Would be a lot worse if only blue pill ideas were around.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 02:16 AM
4

You would expect that beating up your partner, would cancel out the money bit.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/23 10:29 PM
8

She should change 'friendly' into 'hypocritical'.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/23 09:27 PM
0

Might need to artificially create some drama once in a while. I truly believe that women need more emotional variety to be content with their relationships. Even if it means having ups and downs.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/23 09:15 PM
11

Maybe they also will do a lot better if they become famous women beating pieces of shit. Maybe get some neck tattoos to go with their well trained uppercut as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/23 09:07 PM
0

Don't mean no hate. But have seen a lot of guys in your situation get burned and have been in your situation and got burned myself. Hope I am mistaken, best of luck to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/23 09:05 PM
12

Everyone has a chance for happiness and what they desire. You should go tell that to the one third of young men who didn't have sex in the past year. See how they respond to someone telling them this BS. And I can imagine how they feel when they see a piece of shit like Chris Brown drowning in female attention. If they compare themselves to a guy like Chris, than the major differences are that they don't hit and abuse women and they aren't rich and famous. That's no confirmation bias, that just …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/23 08:53 PM
14

all he proves is that stupid women exist All he proves that a lot of women are stupid. He has thousands and thousands of women who want to be with him. Maybe even millions of fans. And that guy is more famous for his left hook, than for his singing skills. Meanwhile there are millions of men, who would never beat their partners, not getting any attention from women at all. Just because they aren't rich and aren't famous. It's pretty obvious that you will do better as a man, being rich and famous…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/23 07:47 PM
9

Men who have looks, height and fame are all doing extremely well with women. Seems like these traits are what women universally are attracted to.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/23 07:38 PM
2

Talent is questionable when it comes to Chris Brown...
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/23 07:36 PM
5

It's not sexist because all he is saying is: men don't take women's careers into account when they decide if they like you.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/23 07:29 PM
2

Redpill is successful because it is very specific information. There's nothing generic about it. You won't find "just be yourself" or some other platitudes in redpill. Maybe you shouldn't talk shit about things you don't know anything about.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/23 07:09 PM
6

What you are referring to, is people exploiting men in the name of redpill. But that's not redpill. Redpill itself is free advice by men, for men. I never paid anything to get the redpill information that helped me. Redpill promotes thinking for yourself. Men who pay money to other men for information, are doing the opposite.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/23 07:06 PM
2

Any sane man isn't getting married anymore. There's nothing to gain from it and a lot to loose.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/23 05:24 PM
33

I like how you say “one type of cheating doesn’t matter” Yeah, and of course it's a "coincidence" that the cheating that doesn't matter, is the one done by women. The women on this sub are real gems.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/23 05:22 PM
10

And I find it rather intellectually dishonest to pull some numbers out of thin air. Either you show your sources or you are even worse than the person you responded to. Because not only are you intellectually dishonest by not showing scientific sources to back up your numbers, you are also a hypocrite for pointing your finger at others for things you are doing yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/23 05:19 PM
-1

No worries. Modern women are promiscuous. Why buy the cow when you can get the milk for free?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/23 05:11 PM
1

If your boyfriend is enthusiastically wifing up older women, he isn't someone who has his shit together or took care of himself. Because those men have better options than dating old hags. Good for you, at least now you can make him feel like he is getting something special. Bet he doesn't know any better and thinks he's finally getting lucky, the poor bastard.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/23 04:43 PM
0

I'm in your age bracket. Therefore know you are full of shit. Men your age, if they took care of themselves and have their shit together, aren't frothing at the mouth at the prospect of dating women their age. You are already lucky if they still want to sleep with you. Guess the delusion is strong im you.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/23 03:53 PM
0

I responded to a beta bux claiming he has a perfect thing going on, when he is just a comfortable resource. This isn't the gotcha you think it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/23 03:50 PM
-1

You seem like a perfect, stable, safe match to go through daily life with to your wife. None of what you described talked about passion or sexuality. In fact the opposite. Everything is a flatline. No instabilities. You are basically bragging about being the best beta bux ever. Which will make the contrast even bigger when a tall, muscular, non nerdy guy with white teeth starts hitting on your wife and opens up the door to some emotional excitement and passion. If your wife isn't asexual and isn…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/23 01:43 PM
1

A bell curve like distribution of what they find sexually attractive. Instead of all being attracted to the top 20% of men. If you look at what men find attractive women, you will get a bell curve. Where most women are average,some are below average and some above average. = A normal distribution. If you do the same for men. You have women rating most men as below average and same minority as above.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/23 01:20 PM
4

Better for women and a small minority of men though. For most men some restrictions on female sexuality who be more beneficial.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/23 01:16 PM
-1

Which would be a good thing to that half of the population that is getting fucked over by divorces.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/23 01:10 PM
2

and usually say that If you do, I commend you for it. But there's a reason why things like "don't ask a fish, ask a fisherman" exist. Women usually don't admit that physical attractiveness, confidence, and status are what gets you laid. If you ask a woman what she wants in a man, you'll get a lot of: "He needs to make me laugh", "I want a considered man", "I need a man that can open up about his feelings". While all these things are at best secondary details that only come into play when a man i…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/23 12:47 PM
7

Dating advice is completely generic, No it isn't. Women's dating advice for men is completely generic ("Just be yourself", "Treat her like a human being"). Go to the redpill or talk to successful men and ask them for advice and you will get very specific, result bringing advice. And the biggest ones are be attractive and confident. Again, you are being so generic that what you say is always right, because you aren't actually saying much. What does "be attractive" mean? How does being attractive …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/23 12:20 PM
6

You are talking to someone who hasn't got the mental capacity to understand what a double standard means. You are waisting your time talking to her. You'll have a more rewarding discussion with a 6 year old.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/23 12:12 PM
7

Let's just say something generic and hope nobody notices that we are avoiding the question. Slow clap, that was actually impressive.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/23 12:09 PM
13

As if Chris Brown is the only piece of shit that is highly successful with women.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/23 12:04 PM
10

Jordan Peterson and Tate aren't beating up their male fans nor are they dating them. What a pointless comparison. Seems like finding an equivalent example is just as difficult for you as trying to grasp the concept of a double standard.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/23 12:01 PM
1

Men sexuality is not restricted by society, it's restricted by women's attraction. If we go back to times were society wasn't enforcing rules on men, men would just take the women they wanted. Regardless if that woman was interesting or not. Women can't enforce only having sex with men they are attracted to by themselves due to being the physically weaker gender. They need society to do that for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/23 04:03 AM
2

Yeah, but how many of those "options" want to seriously date you? How many of them are going to push your wheelchair if you happen to have an accident and need time to recover? Seems you are 40 and still haven't learned to distinguish between a man's willingness to sleep with you and his willingness to be a caring partner to you. There will almost always be men who are willing to put their dicks in you. That doesn't even mean they actually like you.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/23 01:01 AM
1

women have the same ‘restrictions’. No, they don't. You are ignoring biological reality. A woman can walk up to any given man and proposition him with a high degree of succes. Only requirement is not having obvious birth defects. If a man tries to do the same, his chance at succes is maybe 1%. If he doesn't get arrested for trying that in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/23 12:38 AM
5

So women used to be restricted by laws and by social pressure to not sleep around. Yes. But no longer in today's western society. There’s no laws in place to keep men from sleeping around as far as I know. Men are not allowed to take what they want. There are laws against rape. If there was no society with laws, men would just take what they want. Again, I don't want men to rape. But we are discussing if male sexuality is as unrestricted as female's. So, I have to mention this restriction. Becau…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/23 12:34 AM
0

What do you think unrestricted male sexuality looks like? Do you think men would need to be rich, maybe famous, have game, have a nice car,.... in a world where male sexuality is unrestricted? Needing to be financially successful in order to be sexually successful, is a restriction placed on men by society (I'm not saying that this is something bad, mind you.) There are social constructs that men need to follow. Men aren't allowed to take what they could take. Again I'm not saying that I want me…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/23 12:08 AM
1

You really do think that the silly thoughts running through your brain are the general consensus? Wow, that's actually impressive. If there was a Nobel prize for arrogance, I would be nominating you.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/23 11:54 PM
5

No, that's not what I'm saying at all. Women's sexuality has no more restrictions. Because society took those away. Men sexuality is still restricted. Leaving women to do as they please, while a lot of men are left behind. Those men will sooner or later opt out of society (look at Japan where a lot of young men don't even leave their rooms anymore) or attack that society.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/23 11:50 PM
8

You can't apply the same rules to different people and call it equal. That's like having a fish and a bird do a swim test and calling that an equal fair test. If there were no rules for men, men would just take the women they liked the best. As long as they are strong enough to fight of their competition, this is what would happen. But there are rules for men. And this means that most men are walking around sexually frustrated most of the time. If there were no rules for women, they would behave…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/23 11:46 PM
11

a genuine attempt to make it equal It's not equal and I have serious doubts about your genuity.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/23 10:26 PM
2

I wouldn't kick them out of bed for farting, but I don't think Victoria Secret's models are hot. I like feminine women, not wooden planks. They are to tall and to skinny for me. Fashion models have gorgeous faces, but their bodies are not attractive to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/23 10:19 PM
2

and we all know where we stand more or less. You know where you stand. You can't know where anyone else stands (that's exactly why it is subjective). And that's exactly why you can't advise "unattractive" men not to approach. Because your tastes are not everyone else's tastes. We all like different things, that's what makes life interesting.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/23 10:03 PM
1

I'm an older guy and have learned the hard way. There are no more restrictions on female sexuality these days (at least in the west). You have to be careful and protect yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/23 09:58 PM
5

Yep indeed, female reproductive strategy got better. But at the cost of male reproductive strategy. This situation wil lead to a conflict. And it wont be pretty.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/23 09:44 PM
6

Women have the same freedom of men Women have unrestricted sexuality. Men's sexuality is still very restricted. It's not the same. There's no equality here.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/23 09:23 PM
7

It's fortunate but also unequal. There are no more restrictions on female sexuality. But men's sexuality is still very much restricted. Conflict is inevitable.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/23 09:22 PM
2

Women have made it abundantly clear they don't like being cold-approached. My last two girlfriends came from cold approaches. I don't know what planet you are living on.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/23 09:00 PM
4

when she is hot and he is, well, a 4 And who is giving these ratings? Who determines what hot means and what a 4 is? Right, that depends on who you ask. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Ever heard of that expression? There is no universal "beautiful". What is attractive to you, might be unattractive to you best female friend. So a man that you like and your best friend thinks is unattractive, should he approach or not? Beauty is subjective. 'Subjectivity is overrated' is complete nonsense. …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/23 08:43 PM
3

Spot on.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/23 05:46 PM
2

You should be careful what you wish for. Attraction is highly subjective. Your wish might end up in no man ever approaching any woman. And we all know women aren't willing to do the approaching. There wouldn't be any romance anymore. Just humanity divided into two separate groups, based on gender, that only engage platonically with each other.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/23 05:40 PM
1

You make a lot of assumptions and put words in my mouth that I never said. Typical bad faith actor.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/23 05:12 PM
5

High n-count women are used to (and usually need) male validation. Their validation seeking behaviors will shine through. You can't easily change your behavior. A lot of it is also unconscious. Consciously trying to hide part of you, will not stop what you do unconsciously. And then there also is all the indirect information. The remarks their friends let slip, about all the crazy things they did. Or the dodgy stories that end with "you know how she is....". While you don't understand what they …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/23 12:31 PM
2

c o m m o n k n o w l e d g e
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/23 09:51 PM
3

Most men agree that a ho is for fucking only. There are even songs made about this. Like de great philosopher Dr. Dre said: "You can't make a ho a housewife".
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/23 06:40 PM
3

Simps do exist. This doesn't mean that most men won't look down on those women and their simp male partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/23 06:36 PM
10

You don't ask, because you won't get an honest answer anyway. You sit back and observe. She won't be able to keep her true nature hidden for long.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/23 06:33 PM
4

You can't turn a ho into a housewife. Ignoring this common wisdom will end badly. Unless you are just talking about sleeping with her, that's fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/23 06:30 PM
5

incentivizing a man to do something. You have a weird way of saying 'weaponizing sex'.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/23 06:13 PM
2

So, the other guy was right. You do believe that physical activity will stop men from obsessing over sex. Going to the gym causes an increase in testosterone production. So, you get even more horny from doing that. And every military base has brothels close by, because military personnel gets sexually frustrated. And a lot of sexual frustration doesn't mix well with having weapons laying around.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/23 05:50 PM
1

Why can't men? You should transition. Once you have all that testosterone raging through your veins, your question would be answered automatically.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/23 05:43 PM
2

Healthy alternatives are obviously physical activity. Healthy alternatives to what?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/23 05:39 PM
2

What would happen if men reduced the amount of sexual media they consume? A lot more rapes and other forms of sexual assault. Be glad that men are controlling their urges with porn and masturbation.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/23 05:37 PM
2

"If you would do more chores, you might get lucky".
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/23 05:32 PM
3

Society is already collapsing. It's just happening so gradually, that we aren't panicking yet. The boiling frog analogy.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/23 05:25 PM
3

If they find you attractive, the less you say the better it is. Their imagination will fill in the blanks. And their imagination will almost always be better tailored to what they specifically like, than what you could tell them.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/23 05:22 PM
1

You need help.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/23 03:46 AM
2

I guess you live in America?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/23 03:00 AM
7

Yeah, but he could surf without a surfboard. That's got to count for something.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/23 10:25 PM
-1

A whole comment in which you do nothing but cry and complain, ends with you telling others that they are crybabies? Hey, if you are allowed to be one, you shouldn't complain when others do it too. That makes you seem like a hypocrite.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/23 09:52 PM
0

You'd end up with a 30 year old, short, balding guy who's physically ripped, well dressed, masculine, smelling good, and focused on a goal. A guy like that doesn't have to make love to his hand if he doesn't want to. He can get women to date and to sleep with. Being top 5% is not realistic when you are short and bald. But who cares about top 5%? Just be the best you can be and enjoy your life.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/23 09:11 PM
0

like you think all men are only led by women. What is pathetic and sad is that you don't seem to understand the difference between 'women are a big component of what drives men' and 'women are the only thing that drives men'. I said the former, not the latter.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/23 09:04 PM
-1

You don't even share the same gender as people in blue collar jobs and you are still talking shit. So, who are you to point fingers?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/23 08:56 PM
1

No, because the answer is always a mix of several elements. They would like shelter and food to. But they also would like to date and maybe have a family. Men who don't want to date will have a tendency to go for less demanding careers.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/23 07:53 PM
-4

You are misinterpreting what I said. I never said that sex is the only drive, I said that it's an important drive. It's wel known fact that castrated men are lacking in ambition. MGTOW display a similar diminished drive, just because they do not desire to get with women anymore. That doesn't mean they won't do anything anymore, it just means they will not put in that extra effort that other men will put in motivated by their desire to attract women.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/23 05:46 PM
-1

Once a men's desires are met, he has no motivation to work any harder or more hours. For most men, women are a big component of their desires. So yeah, OP has got a point.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/23 05:21 PM
1

Once a men's desires are met, he has no motivation to work any harder or more hours. For most men, women are a big component of their desires.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/23 05:15 PM
0

People are motivated by survival, avoiding suffering and their instinct to reproduce. You can avoid pain,hunger and can survive on a low paying job. There's no need to work harder and earn more money to do those things. You will however have a hard time as a man, trying to attract a woman to be the mother of your children, when you aren't financial successful. When men work 60hours a week or very stressful careers, they are trying to attract a mate or trying to keep the one they have happy. Jobs…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/23 04:57 PM
0

OP has got a point. A lot of men who belong to the MGTOW movement, take stress-free but low paying jobs. Or work part-time. A man on his own doesn't really care about luxury goods and interior design. They often live in a sparsely decorated house and use garden furniture in their living room. So it makes sense when you see men going the extra mile in their professional careers to attribute this to their desire to attract women or to provide for their family.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/23 04:41 PM
8

He isn't talking about the money needed to survive. We all need to survive. But when men are working 60hours a week or choose to do dangerous work or work with a lot of stress, this isn't just needed to survive. Hell, you could survive on a part-time job. Men that go the extra mile in their careers are almost always men who are trying to give their family a good life or who are trying to attract a woman. Look at the MGTOW movement. A lot of stress-free but low paying jobs there. A lot of parttim…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/23 04:38 PM
1

OP has got a point. A lot of men who belong to the MGTOW movement, take stress-free but low paying jobs. Or work part-time. A man on his own doesn't really care about luxury goods and interior design. They often live in a sparsely decorated house and use garden furniture in their living room. So it makes sense when you see men going the extra mile in their professional careers to attribute this to their desire to attract women.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/23 04:33 PM
1

Born with a brain suitable to do engineering work.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/23 04:27 PM
11

Same here. All my worst experiences in life, where direct results of a woman's behavior. I won't work for a female boss anymore and will avoid having women as colleagues. If a man has a problem with you, he will try to hit you in the face. If a woman has a problem with you, she will try to destroy your life.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/03/23 10:26 PM
1

Men go for youth and beauty. If a women doesn't get any attention she is almost always lacking one or both of these.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/23 09:52 PM
2

You aren't saying anything new or anything I disagree with, which makes me wonder what the point is you are trying to make.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/23 03:36 PM
6

Yep, if you keep in mind that a very big chunk of the women here are lesbians, asexual or have a hate for men to the point that they don't even want to be with a man, the crazy comments here become less crazy. Basically, see the women here and what they say as a form of entertainment. It's just comic relief. Women in the real world are not represented by the small subset that can be found on this subreddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/23 01:25 PM
1

Let's see if I can convince a moderator to actually apply the subreddit rules to your rude choice of words.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/23 01:57 PM
4

If feminists want true equality, they should fight for financial abortions for men. Everything else is an obvious double standard, blatant hypocrisy and clear evidence that feminism is a female supremacists movement.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/23 01:29 PM
1

You also had the option not to That's precisely the whole point, you genius. The man does not have the option to escape the financial consequences. Only the woman does.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/23 12:02 PM
1

And that's the definition of a double standard, if a woman has to option to not deal with the consequences.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/23 11:47 AM
0

I was just thinking about the possibility that she might have cheated, but if you want to call her a ho, I'm not going to stop you. You know her better, it's your mom.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/23 11:23 AM
1

If women can't opt out, then I have no problem with men also not having this possibility. Because that would be, you know, actually fair. What you defend is an unfair situation, where only women can opt out and men can't. Which reinforces the fact that feminism isn't about equality, but about female supremacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/23 11:19 AM
0

I hope he didn't just take your mom's worth for it and got a test done.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/23 11:02 AM
1

A woman taking accountability for her own decision not to abort, would be even wilder. Because it would mean that the redpill is wrong and women aren't just like children.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/23 11:00 AM
1

Oh so, that's where your man hate comes from. Daddy was mean to your little sister. Maybe he isn't sure your little sister is biologically his daughter. I wouldn't pay either for another man's child.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/23 10:41 AM
1

This conversation is always so interesting to watch unfold. Women who take unilateral decision, seem to think other people should bear the consequences for those decisions. Almost like they are children who can't be made accountable for what they themselves decide and do.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/23 10:37 AM
0

Nobody disagrees you should pay child support I do. When a woman unilaterally decides to keep the baby, the man who had no say in this decision, should not be made to pay for the consequences of said decision.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/23 10:34 AM
0

You see, women are capable of logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/23 10:30 AM
1

So.... ....that's a yes on the double standard then?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/23 10:20 AM
6

I don't define a man's nature because I never had to try to understand men. I never dated men or had sex with men or got confused by how men act or how they perceive the world. Men are obvious to me. They make sense. They are easy. They are like me. Asking what a man's nature is, would be like asking myself what my nature is. Which would be weird because I already know myself. I already know how I perceive the world and why I do things. So, if I talk about female nature, it is because that was t…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/23 07:21 AM
11

I was referring to women being hypergamous. And to the fact that women love their children, not their men.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/23 06:46 AM
16

Women don't owe you anything. I didn't say they did. Your response is akin to "all my exes are crazy" I have some lovely exes and some crazy ones. I still talk to all of them if we happen to bump into each other. And what the crazy ones did to me, I don't hold against them. They just acted on their female nature. My mistake was not being aware of what that nature is.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/23 06:21 AM
2

Yep, you are completely right.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/23 05:44 AM
1

I gave you the answer already, you just don't like it. The answer is nothing. Because relationships are transactional and women are hypergamous. And those things makes it not worth to me to invest into anything serious with any given woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/23 05:41 AM
1

Yep it is. So can be a man's, but he has to work for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/23 03:04 AM
21

Being blind to the realities of female nature, would make me want to "squeeze" again. But that's impossible, it's one of those "can't be unseen" things. Long ago when I was still young and very much in love, an old man told me "Men can love women or they can understand women. But they'll have to choose". I didn't understand what he meant back then, but I do now. And I think a lot of men have come to understand women, with the redpill knowledge becoming more mainstream.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/23 03:00 AM
4

Women work with a binary system, not with tiers. You are either a Chad or non-existent. Men have tiers. Non-fuckable. Fuckable when drunk. Fuckable. And the top category: datable.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/23 02:34 AM
2

Yeah the money is 90% of his attraction. But if I compare the before, I would rate him maybe a 3. Receding hairline, typical nerd with no fashion sense. I would give him a 6 with the new hair, the beauty treatments (beter skin etc) and designer clothes. A 6 is workable. A 3 is pointless. He has doubled his attractiveness based on looks alone. Take the money into account and he probably steals my girl if he wants to :)
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/23 01:32 AM
2

Before the money -> no punani After the money -> the guy has children with 3 or 4 different women and went from stereotypical basement dwelling nerd to at least half decent.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/23 01:17 AM
9

You literally have to be able to walk into a bar and be able to show interest by making eye contact. In most cases that will be enough. If you are able to speak to a man, your succes rate will even be much better. And if your able to speak directly, your succes rate will go up to 90% or more (with single guys).
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/23 01:11 AM
2

Yep, there aren't many things that can't be made better with some good old money.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/23 01:01 AM
10

There are no "chubby chasing" women, while some men are indeed attracted to chubby or even obese women.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/23 12:59 AM
4

Average and below average men are all invisible to women. Women date up, so even an average women will go for an above average man if she can. And she can (at least for sex).
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/23 12:57 AM
12

"You aren't ugly, you are just poor". Look at Elon Musk before the money and after. It's a world of difference.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/23 12:54 AM
11

Go to a bar or club. Easy peasy. Two of my ex- girlfriends assured me that at any given night they can walk into a half decent bar and pick up a man if they wanted to. And I saw several of my female friends do that exact same thing. My first girlfriend ever had a fantasy of having sex with a black guy. So, when she saw a black guy she liked at a party, she went up to him, had a chat, took him home and slept with him. This was after we were broken up, but were still friends and still talked. So t…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/23 12:38 AM
4

There is a big discrepancy between the attention a woman receives when she is young and the attention she receives when she is getting older. The wall isn't "no man will want you". The wall is: "the men you want and who pass your threshold, don't want you anymore and are going for younger girls". A woman will reach an age that she can choose between lowering her standards or being alone. That's when she has reached the wall. The manosphere talks about this because the world really is her oyster,…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/23 11:31 PM
1

Then don't. Nobody asked you to. Apparently you are incapable of reading. I responded to a person that wrote the following in a thread about sexless women: But one of you guys should step up.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/23 10:39 PM
9

You aren't making sense here. A man masturbating isn't comparable to a woman having sex with a random dude. So the fact that men aren't satisfied with masturbation, says nothing about women sleeping with randoms.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/23 10:32 PM
62

The juice just ain't worth the squeeze anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/23 10:11 PM
16

We all know that any woman that isn't hideous can easily get sex. I'm not stepping up to help Quasimodo's sister get her rocks off.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/23 10:08 PM
-1

Maybe you two should get a room.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/23 09:57 PM
19

Long term sexual strategy is a myth. Women get bored faster than men. Which is evident in them initiating 70-90% of divorces.
/r/TheRedPill28/02/23 06:01 PM
2

Which isn't fair. If both work, both should share the household jobs. Were do you live? I want to move there. Over here in my country, we are very liberal. Both partners work and both partners do the chores.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/23 02:57 AM
1

Of course they are. People will do what they can themselves to save money. I remember my dad fixing our roof when I was a kid. And he was a salesman, not a handyman.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/23 02:55 AM
1

That's good to hear. And fair. He helps with the "female" jobs and you also help with the "male" jobs.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/23 02:50 AM
1

But realistically both of us should be splitting other tasks so we have a similar amount of free time, and time to spend together as a couple. Completely agree. Never said it should be unfair.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/23 02:48 AM
1

You are dragging society into a discussion about what the league of an individual is. What an individual woman's league is, is determined by the level of men who want to commit to her. What an individual man's league is, is determined by the level of the women who are willing to sleep with him. Society has nothing to do with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/23 02:26 AM
2

Women being expected to work and provide for the family: Shrug, totally irrelevant! I started this discussion on the basis that when we are talking about the responsibilities that need to be divided, we are talking about other things than working and paying bills. Since almost all people I know do those things regardless of their gender. We get a whole different discussion if you want talk about couples where only one of them works. If only one works, the other should compensate by doing most of…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/23 12:45 AM
3

I live in Western Europe. Being a stay at home parent has become the exception, not the rule. Life has become to expensive to get by on one income. And people aren't willing to be depend on their partner anymore, seeing that there is a very big chance that the relationship will fail someday. So no, over here working is no longer a man's job. It's expected of both genders.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/23 12:02 AM
1

if a dating dynamic doesnt lead to a functioning society in large, its not a valid dynamic to consider. As if an individual human has a functioning society at mind. We are born, we die. Nature only cares about reproduction. Not about society.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/23 11:57 PM
1

Don't know where you live, but were I live there is still a gender attached to those others. Considered to be more a woman's job than a man's job are: cooking, cleaning, decorating.... While physically more demanding task or "dirty" work, are considered to be more a man's job than a woman's job: garden work, fixing the car, unclogging a toilet, moving a heave piece of furniture, mowing the grass,....
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/23 11:55 PM
2

Giving birth is the only one that's exclusive female that I can think of. Others that are considered to be more a woman's job than a man's job are: cooking, cleaning, decorating.... While physically more demanding task or "dirty" work are considered to be more a man's job than a woman's job: garden work, fixing the car, unclogging a toilet, moving a heave piece of furniture, mowing the grass,....
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/23 11:52 PM
-1

How convenient of you to draw a line at cooking and cleaning, while in reality I am talking about all responsibilities outside of work and paying bills. Cooking, cleaning, buying groceries, fixing a leak, cleaning the rain gutter, mowing the grass, car repairs, installing a new floor, doing the heavy lifting when things have to be moved,... My partner and I only have other things than work and bill paying to divide. Since we both do those. Like it has been in every other relationship that I have…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/23 11:33 PM
0

Both genders are suspected to work nowadays. Therefore I don't include working and paying bills in a discussion about gendered roles. The only thing left to divide between my partner and me, are all other responsibilities outside of work and paying bills. Since we both do those anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/23 11:29 PM
2

Your league is who you can realistically get in a reciprocal relationship with True for women, since securing the means and protection of a man gives them a higher chance at successful reproduction. Not true for men, since their optimal reproduction tactic would be to have sex with as many women as possible. Therefore a woman's league is who they can secure a relationship with and a man's league is who they can have sex with.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/23 11:25 PM
2

When having a job and paying bills is expected from both genders (like it is in the western world of today), it is indeed no longer an exclusive male role. Therefore I was talking about the division of the other responsibilities that life throws at a couple.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/23 11:13 PM
-5

If outsourcing male tasks wouldn’t be as common there wouldn’t be literal bussinesses centered on that. There are literal businesses centered around outsourcing female tasks to. Taking care of the kids (babysitting), cooking (take out services), cleaning (household help),.... What's your point? Also women work and financially contribute to the household so they already took on the traditionally masculine roles. When having a job and paying bills is expected from both genders (like it is in the w…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/23 11:11 PM
1

When having a job and paying bills is expected from both genders (like it is in the western world of today), it is indeed no longer a male role. I therefore assumed it is clear we are talking about dividing the other responsibilities that life throws at us.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/23 11:04 PM
7

Dating up in the social hierarchy of physical beauty. Lol, look at you struggling to make it make sense. "The social hierarchy of physical beauty" could be some kind of fringe research paper's title. When people are talking about dating up, they are talking about social standings. A millionaire, dating a very beautiful woman who works as a cleaning lady, isn't dating up. He is dating down. Because female beauty is abundant in society, while millionaires are far les common in society. Men aren't …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/23 10:54 PM
1

Repairing the house yourself -> is doing a task. Hiring someone else to repair the house -> is outsourcing a task. The task gets done in both cases, but in only one case you are the one doing it.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/23 10:45 PM
-4

If you outsource the male tasks. Which I don't agree with that it is as common as you think, but let's pretend it is. And you divide the female task between both genders. Then all the work gets done and it is evenly divided. So far, so good. But there is still only one gender taking on the other gender's roles. And it ain't the women.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/23 10:42 PM
-3

You are proving my point with your cop out about "paying other people to do traditionally male tasks.” The result is still that women aren't doing traditional male tasks. While men are indeed doing traditional female tasks. And let's be honest, you and your partner might hire others to do the male tasks for you, but this is not something common. At least where I live most men still do the male tasks (while also doing their part of the female tasks). Only if the task requires specialist knowledge…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/23 10:16 PM
-6

Both genders have jobs. But men are also expected to do traditional female tasks (cooking, cleaning,....). While women aren't expected to do traditional male tasks (fix the roof, change the oil in the car, chase burglars, ...)
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/23 09:58 PM
1

I don't protest that rape is bad. I do protest against your comment, that makes it seems like men are raping animals. The fact that you still can't make the distinction between the two (after having it explained twice to you already), shows me you probably are on the spectrum.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/23 09:53 PM
0

Which debate exactly?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/23 09:41 PM
3

No one at Brad Pitt level is desperate to sleep with any woman. I never said they are. But they are still men, who aren't going to turn down some easy pussy when horny.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/23 09:38 PM
3

You answer the question: "What changes would you like to make to your gender", by saying "Men should stop raping". If that's the first and only thing you mention, it logical to assume that this is the biggest issue with men. Otherwise you would have mentioned other bigger issues. Which you didn't. If anyone ask what I would like to change with Vladimir Putin, I'm not going to mention how I wish that he would stop pretending like he is good at Judo. Because there are bigger issues at hand, like h…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/23 09:35 PM
6

Dudes date down, not up. Average Joe isn't in danger of getting an inflated ego from having sex with Ariana Grande, because that's never going to happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/23 09:25 PM
1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_by_gender "A NVAW Survey found that 0.1 percent of men surveyed had been raped in the previous 12 months, compared to 0.3 percent of women." I'm sure you can find sources with different numbers, just like you can find sources to prove almost anything. The link above was the first thing that popped up when searching for the numbers. Since it is Saturday evening and I don't want to spent my whole evening scientifically researching rape statistics, I went with the…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/23 09:08 PM
5

why would you think anyone else is implying it’s the majority. Because that's the first and only thing you mention, when asked what you would like to change about your own gender. Since it's the only thing you mention, it's only logical to assume it's the most common fault that men display. I'm not the only one who feels this way about your comment. One of the first replies you got was a sarcastic: "yeah, all men rape" from another redditor. Or even have an issue with it wanting to stop. I have …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/23 08:54 PM
2

Maybe they get triggered because the numbers for both genders aren't that far apart. His comment makes it seem like there is an epidemic of male rapists going on. 0.3 percent of women get raped, 0.1 percent of men get raped.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/23 08:20 PM
0

As a dude who doesn’t rape I don’t see why As another dude who doesn't rape, you saying that you wish men would stop raping women, makes it seem like there is an epidemic of male rapists going on. Which isn't the case. 0.3 percent of women get raped, 0.1 percent of men get raped. The numbers are not that far apart.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/23 08:17 PM
7

but like how common is that phenomenon actually in women overall? An average looking woman makes a Tinder profile -> gets swamped by guys messaging her. Average looking woman posts some cleavage on Instagram -> same thing happens. With all that attention it is hard not to get an inflated ego. This phenomenon is very common, that's why they made a category for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/23 08:09 PM
8

Once a woman has sex with someone who is at "Brad Pitt" level, she'll actually starts believing that she deserves a man at that level for a partner. While the Brad Pitt level guy had no intentions to actually date her and used her for sex because he didn't feel like masturbating. It happens all the time. Women just don't seem to get, that their actual level is echoed in the men that want to date them, not the men that just want to have sex with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/23 08:03 PM
1

I know what she was trying to say, it was just a stupid way to try and say it. Blue balls are not just "more sexual frustration", there is a physical component to it as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/23 03:25 PM
4

TIL that women can get blue balls. Tomorrow some other genius is probably going to tell me that men can get pregnant.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/23 06:34 AM
1

You can’t accuse women of loving assholes who treat them like garbage while simultaneously arguing that women aren’t capable of love Those women have such low self-esteem that they only feel like they are being treated right, if they are being treated like garbage. That's not the "being capable of love" that you think it is.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/23 06:03 AM
14

The effort isn't relative to the reward anymore. Simple as.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/23 05:59 AM
1

they just dont base their whole personality about their sex or lack of sex. Not because they are somehow better, but because sex to women is easy to get and therefore carries less weight. Women do base more of their personality around having a relationship or lack thereof. Because that is more difficult for them to secure than dick.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/23 05:41 AM
5

Finally someone with some common sense. OP's premises are just plain wrong. It's not that attractive men are mean, they have more options and are probably going to pump and dump, not commit (especially since women date up). Those men can do better, so that's what they usually do.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/23 05:35 AM
0

Celibate isn't the same as single.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/23 05:27 AM
38

Concise and to the point. No further discussion required.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/23 04:45 PM
1

But men value looks above all else for the most part, so if a woman isn’t attractive to him, she won’t even register on his radar, let alone become his GF. You forget that women are the ones that can be picky about their partners (since they drown in options), while men just take what they can get, so they don't end up married to their hand. This means that even though youth and beauty are what men are interested in, if an ugly woman has at least one sexy quality (ugly woman who has a nice ass, …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/23 02:51 PM
1

It’s concrete evidence men don’t give a flying fuck who women are Like my daddy used to say: "A hole is a hole".
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/23 01:05 AM
3

If AI learns to be proficient at blowjobs and there's an option to turn speech off, women will be the ones struggling to date. So, yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/23 12:59 AM
1

But seriously, if you actually want to reach redpillers you need to stop approaching them as if they are stupid and you hold all the answers. Nobody likes a know-it-all.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/23 12:52 AM
1

A mod came to tell me to be civil. While we both continued the conversation without either one of us being offended. Strange moderating in this sub.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/23 12:49 AM
1

I take option number 3: casually dating, not committing. The juice ain't worth the squeeze when it comes to relationships and being single is also no bueno.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/23 12:47 AM
1

No, it's your enormous arrogance. Last time we had a lengthy interaction, where you acknowledged you should try to connect more with the people you want to reach. And yet, here you are again making assumptions and looking down on others. Might be a good time to acknowledge to yourself that making yourself feel good, by looking down on others, is your game. Trying to reach redpillers is the excuse.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/23 12:38 AM
-1

Luckily for the mortals, you in your infinite wisdom are here to look down upon them, oh perfect deity.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/23 12:27 AM
1

Might have approached this to much from my point of view. I'm usually the one holding off on a relationship. But you are right about guys who have a hard time getting laid. They would do anything for some regular access to sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/23 05:04 AM
1

Respect is a feeling, not action. It's you who should learn how to read. I didn't say respect is an action. I said respect manifest itself in the way people treat you. You have to actually achieve things to gain admiration and behave a certain way to gain respect. This is what I responded to. If you manage to actually read what is said, you will see that the person I responded to talked about admiration and respect.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/23 04:57 AM
1

Relationship is rarely worth it for women, while it's almost always worth it for males You are seriously mistaken here. Men are the gatekeepers of relationships, while females are the gatekeepers of sex. If relationships would always be worth it for men, they would not gatekeep relationships. They would be handing them out like candy.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/23 04:40 AM
0

No one respects women for having a vagina. Oh, but they do. Respect manifest itself by people treating you better. Women without vaginas would get a whole different treatment. One far less positive. Therefore it's obvious that having a vagina commands at least some respect. And it definitely gives women adoration. Men adore pussy and therefore by extension also women. Which is the other half of what was said. Which you conveniently ignored.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/23 04:15 AM
1

Love when people are"nerding out" on a subject. Thank you. Enjoyed reading it.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/23 02:16 AM
2

You have to actually achieve things to gain admiration and behave a certain way to gain respect. Not if you are born with a vagina.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/23 02:05 AM
5

Are we going to pretend that most women on here aren't men hating lesbians or femnazi's? Go talk to some women in the real world, this place really attracts a special subcategory of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/23 08:52 PM
4

You can literally google fairly extensive studies across the eu showing you’ve got it wrong. Plenty of studies show he's got it right. So now what? Make piles of each category and measure which pile is the biggest?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/23 08:46 PM
0

Seen it happen enough to believe it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/23 08:44 PM
5

they simply take what they can get. Men always simply take what they can get. That's completely unrelated to age.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/23 08:38 PM
2

I’ll be sure to completely ignore it. I don't think writing a 3 paragraph response can be classified as ignoring. But you do you of course.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/23 03:34 AM
3

Hillary Rodham Clinton — 'Women have always been the primary victims of war." And no, this is not a joke.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/02/23 03:21 AM
1

All relations except those between a parent and a child, are transactional.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/23 07:04 PM
1

What would you do when you are young and the only attention you receive at home is negative attention? You look for validation in other places. Guess where she found validation and how that might connect with her cheating on me?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/23 05:45 PM
1

That's possible, but what is your point with this remark?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/23 05:20 PM
2

That's very possible but also not very relevant to me, a man who has been cheated on and who has never cheated himself. But thanks for sharing that piece of general knowledge anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/23 04:08 PM
1

A person cutting family members off shows that they are aware of these issues and have standards for themselves. The things you witness as a child, leave far more of an imprint than you think. You can consciously cut out family members and still resort to the same conflict resolution tactics that are imprinted in your subconscious. Trauma doesn't go away because you decided never to talk to daddy again. It's just not that easy.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/23 04:02 PM
1

You choose to not believe me when I say that she had a tough family life. I'm not going to go into all the details of her bad home situation. I still cared for her and would feel like breaking trust if I shared what she told me in confidence. You'll need to get your "disaster tourist" fix somewhere else.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/23 03:56 PM
1

I never said I was right. I was merely giving an opinion. And your opinion was that "we guys" are wrong (sex isn't what you guys think it is). Implying that you know what is right. Implying that you hold the answers, answers that eluded the rest of us. Maybe your intentions are pure. But the way you bring your message, will have a lot of people reject it. If you want your message to get across, connect with those you want to reach. Placing yourself in a separate category (there is you and there …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/23 01:00 PM
2

For example AWALT How you took AWALT is on you. Don't know when you found redpill, but I found it around ten years ago. Back then AWALT came with the added info that it isn't absolute. They compared it to a gun. Are all guns loaded? No, of course not. But you treat every gun like it is loaded, until you know for sure there isn't a bullet in the chamber. Same for women. AWALT just means women globally share the same instincts and behaviors (just like men share their instincts and behaviors). But …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/23 12:52 PM
0

No, you.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/23 03:12 AM
1

You don't pay a hooker for sex, you pay her to leave when it's done.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/23 02:54 AM
-4

bad investments You mean marrying a woman and being forced to give her the kids and half of your possessions when her hypergamy decides it's time for a change...
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/23 02:52 AM
1

I called BS. That's not me attacking you. That's me saying I think what you are saying is incorrect. You have a very different idea about redpill than I do. All I took from redpill was knowledge about how the world and women actually operate and self-improvement. Did I became more successful in every area of my life ? Yes. Was it easy? No, it was damn hard work, but having guidelines that actually made sense to me (none of that "just be yourself" crap) and that delivered real results, is what ke…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/23 02:27 AM
0

BS, as if reading some advice turns you into some kind of robot.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/23 12:59 AM
0

Oh, don't worry, bud, I do pay on dates. I know how offended women get if you show them actually equality. So, I pick up the check. My point wasn't that I don't pay. I just pointed out that if the rule is that he who asks, also pays, then the man will always pay. Because women also expect men to do the asking.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/23 12:53 AM
4

they are part of a cult. Let's not be dramatic. Redpill isn't a cult. It's just a bunch of advise by men, for men. If you don't agree with something, don't apply it to your life. There are no rules, no leaders, no uniforms, no nothing. It's just information, it's up to you to decide if you find that information valuable and if you want to use none, some or all of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/23 12:26 AM
6

A person who looks the part on the outside is still hollow due to not having concentrated on what lies inside, Yep, but he will get laid. Let's not pretend like women are selecting for wholesomeness.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/02/23 12:18 AM
0

If he asks you out he should pay. So basically men always pay, because men are also expected to do the asking out.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/23 11:58 PM
1

Stop focusing on her damaged neural pathways, silly, do like the rest of us and focus on her body.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/23 11:54 PM
-1

There's a saying that as we age we become more and more like our parents. And there's some truth to that. Also there's at least a partial genetic component to alcoholism. Cutting off your toxic family is no guarantee that you won't be displaying toxic behaviors yourself. People often apply the same conflict resolution tactics that they saw their parents use. I'm not saying that you are definitely going to be toxic, if you come from a toxic family. But the chances are definitely higher than if yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/23 11:43 PM
0

OP asked this: Is having a bad relationship with one of your parents or with your parents that much of a deal breaker? He is not asking about bad relationships with family, he is asking if those had relationships are a deal breaker. So, I talk about my experience dating a woman who was in such a situation and how I learned that this should indeed be a deal breaker.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/23 10:56 PM
0

I did an experiment on this. Started dating a woman who came from a pretty fucked up family and who didn't have an easy youth. Normally I would dismiss somebody with a past like that, but I thought those stories about people like her are probably exaggerated. And I felt shallow for not giving her a chance. She seemed perfectly normal to me, why not give her a chance? Big mistake. She couldn't deal with a normal relationship with a non-abusive partner. Not enough excitement compared to being slap…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/23 06:02 PM
-1

I'm not surprised that a woman places the word valid between quotation marks, when it is combined with the word criticism and aimed at women. The idea itself that women aren't perfect and that valid criticism (no quotation marks) exist in regards to them, is probably too much to handle. I'm sorry (actually I'm not) to burst your bubble but your shit stinks just as much as ours.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/23 04:22 PM
1

Thought it was the same person replying to me. Didn't check the usernames. I already thought what the hell is she saying here, this doesn't make any sense, lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/23 03:46 PM
-1

"Not all men" or "not all women" has nothing to do with being solipsistic. Do you even know what solipsistic means?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/23 03:41 PM
1

Does that brain tumor of yours hurt? YOU are the one who started talking about "all women" It’s peak solipsisism to make a claim about ALL women and then expect people to accept it as valid criticism. While I'm the one pointing out that nobody ever actually makes a claim about all women. But women attack any claim made by men, by using "not all women are like that" as their defense. It's a pathetic trick to derail any discussion aimed at women in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/23 03:37 PM
4

In every patriarchal system in history, men have done the vast majority of the fighting and the dying. A patriarchy is supposed to be a system built by men, for the benefit of men. If the men are doing all the dying, it's pretty obvious that whatever system is in place, it isn't benefitting men. You are so close to realizing there isn't a patriarchy. A patriarchy that uses the men to defend all others (women and children) would be a pretty pointless patriarchy.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/23 03:19 PM
-3

It’s peak solipsisism to make a claim about ALL women Nobody ever makes a claim about ALL anything. Because there are exceptions to every rule. Women just use this "not all women" to derail any discussion that points out valid negatives shared by most women. You got your genders wrong, it's women not men, who are solipsistic.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/23 03:09 PM
-2

I’m biologically wired to be a cheating whore You could be an exception.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/23 02:43 PM
-6

When the redpill said that women are like children, this behavior is part of what they meant. It's impossible to have a constructive discussion with the women here. A man points out a valid criticism of common female behavior. Women here: I don't do that. My friends never do that. You are just a male chauvinist pig. Reee, reeee, patriarchy! The redpill made me understand women, purplepilldebate made me lose respect for women. I'm holding on to the thought that the women here are the lowest of th…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/23 02:41 PM
7

They have no clue and they wouldn't be able to get a clue if they tried. Women are solipsistic, they can't place themselves in a man's shoes. It's just their nature, they, by design, are incapable of feeling empathy for a man. They can only do that for themselves, other women or their children. It's the way it is. Can't blame them.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/23 10:10 PM
1

The fact that we would organize a separate competition for DCD people, is already evidence that they aren't doing the same thing when riding a bike as non-DCD people. If they are doing the same thing, we would organize one race for everyone. Not a separate competition. Same goes for promiscuity. A group of random women will win every promiscuity competition against a group of random men. You can't just repeat "they are doing the same thing" without explaining how this massive difference in diffi…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/23 05:13 PM
1

You literally compared a group that has a handicap that makes it difficult for them to engage in an activity, to a group without that handicap also engaging in that activity, to be able to say that two groups are doing the same thing and experience differences in difficulty. Following this line of thinking of yours, why do we even organize the paralympics? A person without legs and one with legs participating in the 100m sprint are doing the exact same thing, no? It's called running for both gro…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/23 04:49 PM
1

Your comparison only works on an individual level. When you extrapolate it to most men and most women, it doesn't work anymore. Most men will find riding a bike just as hard as most women. The fact that you, one individual woman finds it hard, isn't relevant. I'm sure there are men who find it even harder than you. When we are talking about promiscuity in men and women, we aren't talking about the individual level. I'm sure Brad Pitt finds sleeping around the easiest thing in the world. This doe…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/23 04:04 PM
2

They are doing the same thing. Explain how the same thing can be very difficult and very easy at the same time, you genius.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/23 03:22 PM
8

emotional opinion If you got any other emotion than mild amusement from my comment, than you are just projecting.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/23 03:21 PM
1

Oh, I know they are not the norm. It's just they aren't nearly as big of an exception as people would expect them to be either.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/23 03:02 PM
10

lol, this makes literally no sense to you. Which says more about you, than about what was said.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/23 02:57 PM
5

Hypocrisy is condemning a behaviour and then participating in the same behaviour. But it isn't the same behavior. A man sleeping around isn't doing the same thing as a woman sleeping around. As is very clear when you think about the difference in difficulty. It's really hard for men to be promiscuous. While it's real easy for women to do. If sleeping around was the same behavior regardless of gender, then it would be easy for both men and women or it would be hard for both men and women. But thi…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/23 02:51 PM
22

And wearing makeup isn't a substitute for basic hygiene either #fishmarketpussy
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/23 02:35 PM
14

No, it doesn't. It shows that men judge women's attractiveness like it is actually distributed in nature. Which is to say a normal Gaussian distribution, where there is a small number of ugly women, a small number of gorgeous women and the biggest chunk of women are situated somewhere in between. While women judge men's attractiveness in a way that it isn't distributed by nature. Where a small number of men is gorgeous and all others are below average. The only thing this tell us is that women h…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/23 02:27 PM
3

Doing things better looking people get away with.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/23 05:12 PM
1

Any woman actively using Tinder for hookups is sleeping with at least one new guy each month. That's 12 notches added to the tally each year. 10-15 for a 25 year old woman are statistics of a bygone era. 30-50 is realistic. I have two friends who had triple digits before they were 30 years old. And they didn't even use hookup apps. Imagine the numbers for those who do use the apps.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/23 01:29 PM
1

That sentence is OBJECTIVELY a complete lie Which one, you genius? When someone writes more than one sentence, it would be helpful to point out which particular sentence you have a problem with.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/23 01:20 PM
1

Time to date some non-violent dwarfs then.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/23 01:04 PM
5

I'm more interesting than 99% of humans. And probably also more humble?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/23 11:41 AM
0

I should have listened to my grandfather. He always used to say: "Son, don't trust anything that bleeds for a week each month and doesn't die". Grandfathers are always right.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/23 06:02 PM
2

Luckily the use of the word "genius" was sarcasm on my part.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/23 04:39 PM
1

If men can love women OR can understand women. And I say I understand women. What does that tell you about me, genius?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/23 04:17 PM
3

I went from loving them to understanding them.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/23 03:52 PM
6

Your eyes are open. Good.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/23 02:57 PM
4

A) Asking won't get you the truth anyway, so you never ask. You observe and read between the lines. If she is fucking you 10 minutes after meeting you, well guess what, you ain't special and she did the same with other guys. You got your answer. B) Not for sex, but plenty of times for a relationship. Why is it okay for dudes to rack up numbers and not women? (DING DING DING) Because it's hard to do for dudes and can only be achieved if they are an accomplished man in the eyes of society (be tall…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/23 12:01 PM
1

He ended the relationship over her being more than one man's Valentine (and rightfully so). There is no relationship anymore. So no need for relationship advice.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/23 11:37 AM
0

Flowers alone from a co parent is fine. Of course, leave out the important stuff. Flowers from a co-parent on fucking Valentine's day are inappropriate. She is dating someone new and that new guy is the only one who should be getting her flowers for Valentine. If you are multiple people's "Valentine", then something clearly isn't right.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/23 11:33 AM
0

Who says it has to be romantic? It’s thoughtful and women love receiving flowers. Women, really, can you stop the silly games for once? Flowers on Valentine's day is different from "just receiving flowers". You know there is a romantic meaning when you receive flowers on Valentine's day. So, why pretend to be obtuse? Why the "who says it has to be romantic?", like you never even heard about Valentine?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/23 11:26 AM
1

When females get their fee-fees hurt, factual truth isn't relevant.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/23 11:19 AM
0

Only a little bit?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/23 10:31 AM
5

That's because we men have to chose. We can either love women or we can understand them. But we'll have to chose between those two.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/23 10:17 AM
3

few women set out to effectively prostitute themselves with full premeditation That's only because women are incapable of self-reflection
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/23 10:13 AM
2

lol
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/23 10:06 AM
0

You are the one who began talking about the "real world", but I should ask the guy you were talking to what you mean with "real world"? How would he know? Those are your words, not his.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/23 05:52 PM
3

So, you pay for at least 50% of the first dates to start your egalitarian relationships off on the right foot?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/23 04:00 PM
2

Someone claimed the majority of women are non-hypergamous. What I point out is that it is the opposite. The majority of women are hypergamous. If you didn't even understand what point I made, why are you even joining the conversation?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/23 03:15 PM
1

Everyone wants the best they can get, this isn’t some foreign concept. Hypergamy isn't wanting the best they can get, it's wanting better than you are doing yourself. Most men date women who are financially doing worse than them and who have a lower social standing. So, they aren't exactly displaying hypergamous tendencies. And since they are dating down, their partners are per definition dating up.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/23 03:01 PM
2

I already quoted you in my first reaction to your post. But since your memory seems to be short, I'll quote you again: That's where red pill fails, it takes traits of a subgroup of women and tries to extrapolate it to 99.999% instead.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/23 02:18 PM
1

My 99,999 was only used to counter your 99,999 (you are the first one to pull this 99,999% out of thin air). It never was meant to be an exact number, it just was used to express that the vast majority of women are hypergamous. Which they indeed are.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/23 02:05 PM
2

There are far too little examples of non hypergamous women to say they make up 40% of the female population. Like you are claiming. 40% is only 10% less than half. Do you see almost half the couples around you consisting of a SAHH and a working wife? Do you see almost half the couples around you consisting of a woman marrying an unemployed man? If you are honest, the answer to both those questions is no. I personally don't know any SAHH. Every couple I know, the man works. And I live in a progre…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/23 01:45 PM
1

Society is eager, happy, and willing to place blame and see failure in us at every turn. Rightfully so. Society does the same to men and women aren't more faultless than men are.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/23 01:04 PM
3

This is as realistic to the real world You aren't the chosen representative of the "real world". You don't know what the "real world" thinks. You are only sure about your own thoughts. What even is the "real world" to you? Others who share the same thoughts as you?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/23 01:02 PM
16

it takes traits of a subgroup of women and tries to extrapolate it to 99.999% instead. Hypergamy is good for the species. That's how we evolve in a positive direction, because women are attracted to men who are doing better than they are doing themselves. And when it's good for the species, it will become more prevalent the longer you let evolution do it's thing. So, let a few thousand years of evolution do it's magic and it's easy to see that almost all women have hypergamous instincts. So you …
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/23 12:49 PM
6

and then parlays those truths into some incredibly toxic beliefs (i.e. every woman is a ruthless harpy waiting for her chance to leave you and steal everything you have the moment she thinks she can do better). You make claims that redpill doesn't make and attribute them to redpill. You either never studied redpill or are willingly spreading misinformation.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/23 12:33 PM
1

Didn't know projecting had an age limit.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/23 06:11 PM
2

You really aren't the sharpest tool in the shed.... I know why you women inject all those acronyms in your replies, you don't need to explain it to me. I just pointed out how childish it is to have to pretend to be fake laughing in an attempt to get the upper hand. And that I don't bother with women who play this childish game.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/23 05:33 PM
0

L O L Sorry, didn't read further than that. Grow up. Leave the LOL's and the ROFLMAO"s for other kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/23 05:21 PM
3

Every woman already believes they are top class, because they get a neverending stream of male attention through dating apps. Women don't need their self esteem raised, they need their entitlement lowered.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/23 04:59 PM
4

Does a bear shit in the woods? Unless you want to be single there will always be a woman having these expectations from you. Try going on a first date for instance, without paying for the both of you, see how many second dates you will get.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/23 04:40 PM
2

but they can also see right through the people trying to be something they aren’t. No, they can't or fuckbois wouldn't have any succes.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/23 03:53 PM
9

"Never going to be happy" is also an absolute.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/23 03:49 PM
3

You don’t get to just look at them then demand money You should teach other women. A lot of women think having a vagina means other people are paying for your drinks, meals, cars or whole life.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/23 03:47 PM
5

And women aren't something special. Even when all gets well and you get the girl, before long you will be wondering why you ever chased her in the first place and what you can do to get your life without her back.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/23 03:42 PM
1

Good catch. It always surprises me how women can be so blind to their own behaviors. Here is indeed a prime example. She literally says women reject promiscuous men in her first sentence, to contradict that in her second sentence by claiming that women don't place value on the sexual purity of men. And then women get angry because redpill teaches men to treat women like children? How else are you supposed to treat a gender that can't even be consequent from one sentence to the next? Isn't that c…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/23 02:17 PM
1

Lizzo is obese. If you don't have a fat fetish, you ain't going to go for a Lizzo body.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/23 01:47 PM
1

I like it because it shows female delusion, victim mentality and hive mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/23 02:48 AM
5

Projecting much?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/23 12:43 PM
2

Yeah women in that age bracket usually have more disposable income to spend on beauty treatments. Lucky for them, 'cause younger women don't even need those treatments.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/23 12:43 PM
2

You forgot to mention femcels...
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/23 12:35 PM
2

Women on here claim that 5-7 partners is a normal bodycount for a woman. It isn't. See OP's example (that is in line with my personal experiences by the way): she spends 4 months on Tinder, she slept with 3 different dudes. Any woman on Tinder is communal pussy and you should expect her bodycount to be at least as high as the amount of months she has spend on Tinder.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/23 06:06 PM
1

When youth and beauty are what attracts the opposite gender, time is not your friend.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/23 06:01 PM
6

Aha, some good 'ol simpin'.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/23 05:59 PM
6

The hate only comes from women who did the exact same thing when they where young. And that thing is: leverage their youth and beauty to date a man who best satisfies their hypergamous tendencies. Once they are too old to get the results they want, they just can't stand other women still getting those results. It's just virtue signaling coming from a place of envy. And it's pathetic.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 04:54 PM
3

Depends on how famous he is and how rich he is.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/23 02:41 PM
1

Here, a tinfoil hat. You need it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/23 03:48 AM
1

You really want to roll yourself around in that female victim complex, don't you? Boss bitch simply means actually being assertive No it doesn't. It's clear by the choice of words (boss & bitch) that the term "boss bitch" is referring to negative behavior. Politely voicing your opinion or being assertive isn't negative behavior. It's only when a person becomes overassertive that they qualify for the term "boss bitch". Because being overassertive is negative and can be seen as rude. In the end, I…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/23 12:25 AM
1

You automatically assume someone acting like a “boss bitch” is going to be rude and cause commotion. That's what boss bitch means. Being a boss bitch doesn't mean politely voicing your opinion. Think for just one second. If boss bitches were politely voicing their opinions, would people use the word "boss" together with the insulting word "bitch" to describe them? Of course not. They are being called "boss bitches" because they act like they are in charge and their opinion is the only one that m…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/23 12:03 AM
2

I’m saying that it’s not something that one needs to request. Depends. No self-respecting man will put up with a disagreeable woman. So, normally you don't date any disagreeable people. But people can change. If my partner has been reading to much girl power bullshit and thinks she needs to start acting up, requesting she stops acting like a disagreeable bitch would be a first step I take. If that doesn't help, you can still kick her disagreeable ass to the curb. If she once was a complement to …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/23 11:43 PM
2

I think this is a very American way of using alpha and beta. Alpha here in Europa is more used for a successful man. Not some pretend tough guy wannebe.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/23 11:19 PM
2

I’ve never seen a person in a healthy relationship ask that their partner be agreeable Maybe that's because healthy relationships don't exist between disagreeable people, you genius.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/23 11:17 PM
1

That's possible, but your question was regarding the value of women in dating. What women like, doesn't factor in when answering that question.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/23 11:15 PM
1

You are writing a lot of words in response to something you apparently "don't care about". Who are you trying to convince that you don't care? Me or yourself?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/23 11:12 PM
1

You are funny. Saying that you are right, doesn't automatically make you right. You have to make a valid argument first. I can't believe I even have to explain this to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/23 11:04 PM
0

You are right, you definitely should submit your writings for a short story prize. I would suggest to try your luck in the category fantasy or science fiction.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/23 09:30 PM
0

Splitting the check is the definition of equality when it comes to paying. Women should stop defining the meaning of words based on how they feel about a subject. At least if they want to be seen as logic respecting creatures, who you can have an actual discussion with.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/23 09:27 PM
2

but when meeting women who are more than willing to pay for dates, Where can we meet those mythical women who like to pay for dates? Aha, so your telling me I can find them to the left of the women who don't initiate divorces and a little to the right of the women who are non-hypergamous? Cool, thanks.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/23 09:19 PM
1

Almost all promiscuous people are also people who like to go out a lot. They don't have to bond over their sexual habits, they can just bond on partying, doing drugs and getting STD tests.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/23 09:03 PM
2

You should stop thinking. People won't notice the difference anyway with what's already coming out of your mouth right now.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/23 09:00 PM
27

Men are biologically programmed to be attracted to youth and beauty. Youth because it gives better chance at reproduction and beauty because it signals good genes, which means good candidate to reproduce with. So of course older women are less valuable. Was this meant as a rethorical question?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/23 08:55 PM
1

Alpha and beta are just words. You shouldn't take them to literally. Alpha in this context could just as well mean that a woman is attracted to a man because of the man himself and not because of what he could provide for her (which would be the beta).
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/23 07:06 PM
3

If they want the dude, actually the dude and not his material possessions, then they definitely don't see that dude as a beta.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/23 06:20 PM
1

A pipe dream. Modern women are proud to be "boss bitches" who "need no man". And then they wonder why they share their life with a pet in stead of another human. Modern women are even so deluded, they think that being disagreeable is a positive quality.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/23 05:51 PM
3

Sure, all women are completely unique special princesses with brains that function completely different from the brains of all other women./s
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/23 05:42 PM
9

Or like redpill said it: women make rules for betas and break them for alphas.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/23 05:35 PM
10

Of course you do, but where do you think a saying like: "hell hath no fury like a woman scorned" comes from? If you google that saying you will also see this explanation of it: a woman who has been rejected by a man can be ferociously angry and vindictive. Women aren't used to taking the initiative and assume (rightfully so in most cases) that men are always "up for it". When you reject a woman as a man, watch your back from that time on. I have had everything from verbal abuse ("are you gay?", …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/23 05:24 PM
3

You should have asked what contradictions do you NOT see in women... The way you asked the question, receiving a concise answer is going to be difficult.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/23 05:03 PM
2

A lot more than you see men as people, you hypocrite.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/23 01:48 PM
2

Today I learned that in order to be considered "good people" as a man, you need to have a fat fetish. If you don't you are not good people.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/23 04:36 AM
1

Because women can't cooperate with other women. It always leads to jealousy, conflict and in the end the inevitable implosion of their society. When women say they "don't need no man", they aren't talking literally. Because they definitely need men for all the minor details like roads, electricity, plumbing, cars, buildings, providing security, etc...
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/23 03:42 PM
1

I want everyone to feel amazing about themselves. That's how we get to this ridiculous situation, where massively overweight people are getting praised for being big, brave and stunning, while they are eating themselves into an early heart attack and diabetes. You want people to feel amazing, I want people to actually do amazing and that means that they sometimes have to feel bad about themselves so they can make better choices.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/23 03:16 PM
0

You do realize that no FDS member ever was in danger of being confused with being a "femme fatale", do you? A femme fatale is the epitome of seductiveness. While FDS consists of elder, undesirable women, who flock together in the FDS community precisely because they can't get a man. Or did you add that tag to your name for the humoristic effect?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/23 03:06 PM
0

But why are there communities of men who can't get women? Because there's not enough women to meet all of their over inflated egos. Or because those women all think they are top tier and therefore deserve a top 10% man. Which would leave those other 90% of men without options, regardless if they have an inflated ego or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/23 02:51 PM
1

Oh yes! Another one of them saying something not even remotely funny and still putting a "lol" or an "ROFL" behind it. Psychotic people telling on themselves! lol! Oh, so funny! Basically, anytime you see "lol" being used in a not even remotely funny context, you are dealing with a pretentious human being who finds something not funny, funny because it makes them feel better about their own miserable lives. It usually goes something like this: "Maybe I'm an overweight, butch, carpet munching les…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/23 02:49 PM
1

Depends what the man's goals are: Just fucking -> the beautiful ho. Serious relationship, maybe even raise a family -> the average one.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/23 02:12 PM
2

Why not go for a nickel anytime misandristic shit flies out of your mouth? You would be even richer!
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/23 02:06 PM
8

Good shit test. Any men interested in you will ask about you. It was always a super long time or rather they would never ask about me. If this is true, then none of them were actually interested in you. Makes you wonder why those men actually bothered to talk to you in the first place? Do you usually go out with better looking friends? That could explain it.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/23 03:47 PM
3

Having regular access to sex, was one of the only benefits that was left to motivate men to commit to a woman. And even that was apparently a lie. Commiting long term to a woman means you are willing to commit to being sexless and trapped in a dead bedroom. Guess there's really no reason anymore to commit. Life your life freely, fuck them when they are still eager, leave them before intimacy dries up and demands become plentiful.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/23 03:41 PM
3

What you don't know can't hurt you? That's a prime example of flawed logic, you got there.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/23 12:02 PM
1

Not just his experience. Most men who are dating are sharing that experience. You are so different from all the other entitled women, who have dropped all traditional gender roles but still expect men to organize and pay for all dates, that it's hard to believe you aren't trolling and are actually a man pretending to be a woman. If you aren't a troll, thanks for existing. You are a small beam of light in a sea of entitlement darkness.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/23 05:03 PM
1

She always used to send memes shitting on famous men who date younger women (even though I'm more than a decade younger lol) though, It's shit like this that proves women are immature ("most responsible teenagers in the house"). They just can't handle being accountable for their own actions. This woman is completely blind to the fact that she is a cougar dating a man a decade younger than her, but attacks famous men for doing the same thing. At least those men did have to work hard and become fa…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/23 04:49 PM
1

How is telling someone who is rambling, that they are rambling, making things personal? It's not like I'm insulting them or attacking their person. Someone should take a look at how you are moderating this sub. You coincidentally always seem to pick out men's comments to moderate. Even when they aren't even insulting or remotely personal. How can a debate sub have any actual debate with biased moderation?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/01/23 03:48 PM
9

Women hate age gaps, especially younger women. Age gaps are not common. Lol, I dated a 25 year old when I was 40. I'm not rich and she was the one who came on to me. Most of my female friends have had relationship with an age gap. I live in Europe by the way, over here age gap relationships are pretty common. What you say about women hating age gaps is only true for those women who are being passed over by younger women. Women who can benefit from age gap relationships, are perfectly fine with t…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/23 12:51 PM
1

You are rambling, calm down and take a breath. This is Reddit, not real life, no need to get overexcited.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/23 12:31 PM
0

The same reason income offsets bad looks for a woman as well. Don't agree with this. Most men don't care about a woman's career or her income. That's why women can be hypergamous. If men cared about these things then relationships between men and women would become an impossibility. Because for one party to be able to date up, the other party has to be willing to date down. An ugly woman can be rich, but she will have trouble dating. While a pretty woman can be dirt poor and she will have no pro…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/23 12:27 PM
1

It's that being 6'+ makes men feel they are somehow magnetic to women (it doesn't) Again why are you bringing stuff up that isn't relevant? I never said that i feel like I'm magnetic to women for being 6 feet tall. But you feel the need to talk about men who apparently do this. Why do you keep bringing up irrelevant stuff? Just like you felt the need to start talking about 6 feet tall men shitting on smaller men, when I wasn't shitting on smaller men and men shitting on other men wasn't part of …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/23 09:46 AM
2

Just as creepy as women using men as walking ATM's. There's a reason why income offsets bad looks for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/23 09:25 AM
14

And they are both true, so we can't pick one. When women are young they don't mind age gaps, because they reap the benefits from dating a wealthier,more experienced older guy. When those same women become older, they notice men their age aren't interested in them and are going for younger women. Suddenly those same women who were ok with getting attention from older men when they were younger themselves, are claiming how disgusting age gap relationships are. It's real simple: Young women benefit…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/23 09:11 AM
12

You are going to get crucified, lol. Holding women accountable for their role in age gap relationships is a big no no. Let me rephrase that. Holding women accountable for anything is a big no no. Even when a woman is the cause, a man will get blamed. That's one of the reasons why the redpill says that women are the "most responsible teenager in the house", because they can't deal with accountability.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/23 08:57 AM
1

Agree with you that shared interests or shared humor is the basis of friendship, that's why men are better off with male friends and women with female friends. People share more with others that have the same gender, than with others who have a different gender. But if you disregard that people who share your gender make better friends and still form friendships with men, who are you going to ask to help you move your heavy stuff? I bet it will be your male friends (physically stronger) and not …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/23 08:47 AM
0

Men who are 6" need it to make them special so they shit on men who aren't a whole 3" above average height. Euh, ok, I guess? Why are you bringing this up? I didn't shit on any man's height, so is this you accusing me of something I didn't do or is this you just saying stuff because you like the sound of it? First you accuse me of projecting (while I'm 6 feet myself, so there isn't a height problem for me to project). Now this weird unrelated remark about men my size and how they supposedly shit…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/23 07:34 PM
2

What part of "you still have selected a tall guy" don't you understand? You even admit it yourself: Which I consider tall But you still claim ambition is why you are dating that man. Everytime a woman says she doesn't care about height, you can prove her wrong be asking her to show you pictures of her boyfriends. But they still think it's just a coincidence they always have to look up when they want to kiss their partners. Complete lack of self awareness. You can't seem to connect the dots even …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/23 06:49 PM
0

Yes. Try it out yourself. If you are open to your male friends about the fact that nothing sexual will ever happen between you and them, you will suddenly see your friends group seriously reduced. And you can't even blame those guys for being like that. Being friends with a woman means the a man does a lot of giving and will not be doing a lot of receiving. If she moves, you are the one caring all her heavy furniture. If she has boy trouble, you will be her shoulder to cry on. If she needs prote…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/23 06:11 PM
3

I wasn't specifically looking for someone tall, he just ended up being tall. Says every woman who almost exclusively dates tall guys. I didn't chose a tall guy, he "just happened to be tall". I date him for his ambition, him being six feet plus is "just a coincidence". Not realizing that you wouldn't even have given him the chance to show you how ambitious he is, if you weren't attracted to him and how tall he is in the first place. Incredible, being self aware and accountable is apparently some…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/23 05:39 PM
1

It's a warning to the youth of today. Didn't know you were appointed as protector of people's youths. Or was this a self-appointed thing? You assume that others will make the same mistakes you made. Which is an arrogant way of seeing the world. "I made those mistakes, so all those other stupid people will definitely do the same things, probably even worse. Better come down from that mountain of wisdom I'm sitting on and warn those poor bastards." I specifically said how I lament every day on how…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/23 07:34 PM
6

Just because you are fourty doesn't make you qualified. What even is the point of your post? All I get from this post is the feeling that you paint yourself as someone who has figured it all out and therefore is in a position to tell others what they should do and where they are wrong. That's called having a god complex. Except the majority don't realise it. Implying you have seen something those people don't even realize. Which makes you better than that majority. Because there's a lack of crit…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/01/23 02:13 PM
-2

Yeah, I guess it's still better for a man to marry a woman younger than he himself is, than marrying one his own age, if an actual young woman is out of the question.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/22 06:51 PM
1

He still ended up marrying a 40+ single mom, so that doesn't sound like he was spoiled for choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/12/22 05:52 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter