2Weird2Live2Rare2Die Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
7	On double standards - why is it considered hypocrisy if a promiscuous man is more attracted to women with low partner counts, but it's acceptable for a poor woman to be more attracted to wealthy men? Wow. Thank you. I usually get annoyed at shit like this, but you've transcended simple misogynist horseshit into true absurdist comedy. You have genuinely made my world a better place by rendering views like yours -- if only for the moment -- utterly, blissfully dismissable as the silly doggerel that they are. I could almost give you gold.	/r/PurplePillDebate	27/01/15 02:56 PM
7	The Reaction Of Feminists To A Male Rape Victim To be fair, going to Tumblr to debate feminists is like going to a preschool to play chess. Edit to add: Here on Reddit, on the other hand, I've found the vast majority of feminists to be truly egalitarian and sympathetic. In fact, when I brought my story of being a male-identified rape victim of a female rapist to the feminist and MRA subreddits, it was the feminists who gave me unconditional support and encouragement. I got that from the MRAs too... right up until I refused to sign on to the p…	/r/MensRights	29/04/14 07:25 PM
3	Male victims get a voice. Montreal march for male victims of sexual violence. ‘The more we talk about it, the better. People will know they are not alone’ http://i.imgur.com/cn1SPsM.gif	/r/MensRights	08/04/14 11:31 AM
1	Male victims get a voice. Montreal march for male victims of sexual violence. ‘The more we talk about it, the better. People will know they are not alone’ I lose my shit that it's necessary on a regular basis.	/r/MensRights	08/04/14 11:28 AM
4	Male victims get a voice. Montreal march for male victims of sexual violence. ‘The more we talk about it, the better. People will know they are not alone’ Feminist here. I'd be marching with them if I were within driving distance. Nobody deserves to be abused, and I consider it my duty as a feminist to spit in the blind eye that society turns upon male victims and survivors.	/r/MensRights	08/04/14 11:27 AM
-23	Feminists at Occidental College created an online form to anonymously report rape/sexual assault. You just fill out a form and the person is called into the office on a rape charge. The "victim" never has to prove anything or reveal their identity. Shh, you're getting your facts in the way of the circlejerk. Women are never actually raped, when they bring their false reports to the police they're automatically believed and treated like queens, and this webform is explicitly intended solely for the false accusation of poor downtrodden men who will, without trial, be beaten into submission, castrated, and forced to learn to walk in high heels by cartoonishly evil feminazi feeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeemales.	/r/MensRights	17/12/13 08:00 AM
1	Highly biased child protective services interview Look, I agree that this interviewer appears quite clearly to be an ignorant blowhard who talks over and down to people to subject them to a will guided by a Dr. Phil-esque tenuous-at-best grasp of things like 'science' and 'medicine'. I will even grant that there is little which could possibly appear in the unedited version that would redeem these qualities. What I will not agree is that the man is clearly in the right, that his being treated so hostilely is necessarily unwarranted, or that it's…	/r/MensRights	10/09/13 05:33 AM
2	When Aaron Gilmore told police he had been sexually abused by a woman, the police officer's first response was: "I'm failing to see a crime here." Assuming you are male I find it hard to believe your abuse gets treated with more respect by feminists than by MRA's. I honestly don't know what to tell you. When I bring it up in feminist-aligned fora I get taken at my word, treated with respect and sympathy, and generally not challenged on my take on my life. When I bring it up in MRA-aligned fora I tend to be initially applauded for fitting the MRA narrative, but the moment I do anything other than use my abuse and rape to demonize women I ge…	/r/MensRights	10/09/13 12:18 AM
-1	When Aaron Gilmore told police he had been sexually abused by a woman, the police officer's first response was: "I'm failing to see a crime here." Shit like this is a big part of why, though I started out calling myself an egalitarian, I've drifted away from the MRA movement and toward feminism. In feminist circles the repeated sexual abuse, sexual assault, and outright rape I've suffered in my life is appropriately regarded as a tragedy and a failure of the system under which we struggle. In MRA circles they are treated more as an inconvenient truth, useful in the abstract as a talking point against feminists but swept under the rug and o…	/r/MensRights	08/09/13 11:16 PM
1	Any Penny Arcade or PAX fans out there? I find this completely bizarre, and dangerous for free speech. I have now pressed the 'do not let other people see what this person said' button to teach you a lesson about respecting free speech!	/r/MensRights	06/09/13 11:10 PM
1	Since When is Sexualization of Gender Wrong?: Robin Thicke - Blurred Lines (Feminist Parody Edition) the guys in that video aren't portrayed in an attractive way. Speak for yourself. Mm.	/r/MensRights	04/09/13 10:57 AM
2	Northwestern university diversity council rejects candidate....for being a white male. Want to try reading my post this time? I addressed that. Here it is again. You, however, are counting in the indeterminate 'Non-Resident Alien' and 'Unknown' students (which I omitted and pointed out as an indeterminate margin for error) as being definitively nonwhite. You're no longer refuting my point but making your own, and since you're ladling in hefty helpings of language far more loaded and prejudicial ('dreaded' 'oppressors' 'evil') than the 'sea' you're quibbling over, I think you're ju…	/r/MensRights	26/08/13 11:43 PM
1	Northwestern university diversity council rejects candidate....for being a white male. No, actually, I just forgot to say 'Asian Americans'. I factored them in my math. You, however, are counting in the indeterminate 'Non-Resident Alien' and 'Unknown' students (which I omitted and pointed out as an indeterminate margin for error) as being definitively nonwhite. To put my math where you can see it: 5,374 white male students minus an average of five percent (269) for queer students equals 5105 straight white males. 967 African American, 28 American Indian, 2753 Asian American, 16 Pa…	/r/MensRights	26/08/13 11:22 PM
1	Northwestern university diversity council rejects candidate....for being a white male. I'm looking at Northwestern's 2011 demographic data. Subtracting five percent for the most generous of the realistic estimates of the instance of homosexuality, the straight white male population still exceeds the male and female members of the American Indian, Pacific Islander, Asian American, Hispanic, and African American populations combined1. I absolutely grant that 'sea' might create a misleading implication of utter uniformity across the entire student body and I apologize for unintention…	/r/MensRights	26/08/13 10:49 PM
0	Northwestern university diversity council rejects candidate....for being a white male. TIL that hiring someone with first-hand experience of minority-role issues for a position whose chief duty is understanding and dealing with minority-role issues is a 'self-serving, hypocritical, undemocratic carve-out'. Thanks for the education.	/r/MensRights	26/08/13 06:48 PM
1	Northwestern university diversity council rejects candidate....for being a white male. I am not on the faculty or board of Northwestern University, but I would imagine that the intended yield selecting against the mainstream traits of being straight, white, and male for a post on a diversity board would be to put someone with first-hand experience of minority-role issues in a position which calls for understanding and dealing with minority-role issues. In other words, in this instance a straight, white, male candidate could be considered not to be as qualified for the position as …	/r/MensRights	26/08/13 06:45 PM
1	Northwestern university diversity council rejects candidate....for being a white male. If anyone is misusing the concept of diversity it's the person who spuriously claimed that selecting against bias is antithetical to diversity. If diversity is unimportant, why did this subreddit decide that a (contradictory, nonsensical, illogical) comment about diversity should be the top comment in this thread? Apparently diversity is very important when it can be (clumsily, fallaciously) used to call SJWs hypocrites, but suddenly it 'doesn't matter in a democracy' when someone who isn't drin…	/r/MensRights	26/08/13 06:38 PM
1	Northwestern university diversity council rejects candidate....for being a white male. Please explain for me how pointing out a heavily-upvoted instance of bad logic is evil. I hadn't realized that saying 'I don't think that word means what you think it means' was the path to the Dark Side.	/r/MensRights	26/08/13 06:32 PM
1	Northwestern university diversity council rejects candidate....for being a white male. See, you're talking about the merit of diversity. I commented only on the meaning of the word, since I found it egregious that the most upvoted comment in the whole thread was someone sarcastically saying 'Nothing says <word> like <the meaning of the word>!' That's all I've commented on. I have not, nor do I intend, to get into an argument with the fine folk of this subreddit over the merits of putting someone who's experienced minority-role issues first-hand in a position which requires the rec…	/r/MensRights	26/08/13 06:31 PM
-6	Northwestern university diversity council rejects candidate....for being a white male. Your comment is the first time in this thread of discussion that 'equality' has been mentioned. I replied to someone who apparently doesn't know what diversity is. I commented only on that apparent lack of comprehension. If you want someone to get pedantic about 'equality' you'll have to get someone else to say something stupid about it.	/r/MensRights	26/08/13 11:42 AM
-21	Northwestern university diversity council rejects candidate....for being a white male. Er... when the gender/skin color/sexual orientation combo is statistically dominant, selecting against it is definitively diversity. You can make whatever arguments you want about whether it's fair or right or whatever, but wanting a little she/brown/queer in the sea of he/white/straight does actually 'say' diversity.	/r/MensRights	26/08/13 10:20 AM
1	Feminist writer urges women to not ignore the "misogynist" trolls. "To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticizethreaten to rape" - VoltaireZimbaZumba	/r/MensRights	30/07/13 10:17 PM
2	Banned from /r/feminism: Close-minded, irrational, unavailable to dialogue. I'm sorry, when I said the pregnancy is harder on the woman than the man I was talking about the pregnancy, not whatever unrelated issues the man happens to be suffering. By your rationale my own pain and psychological issues mean that your pregnancy is being just as hard on me, a stranger thousands of miles away. I'm sorry your husband has bad shit. Unless any of it is the result of having a human being growing inside of him, however, it's completely irrelevant.	/r/MensRights	17/07/13 01:42 AM
5	Banned from /r/feminism: Close-minded, irrational, unavailable to dialogue. Mmhm. 'Just as life-changing.' When that baby's ripping its way out of you (congrats, by the way) what will his odds of dying on the table be? Which of his orifices will need to be sewn back together? I'm speaking of the act of giving birth here, not the shared burden of actually raising the kid. You get to spend nine months getting fatter, suffering mood swings, spasms, doctor's visits, cravings, all that great stuff, culminating in excruciating agony and post-partum depression. I'm sure your h…	/r/MensRights	17/07/13 01:04 AM
6	Banned from /r/feminism: Close-minded, irrational, unavailable to dialogue. I'm sorry, but for a woman having a child is a tremendous, life-altering physical struggle. For a man it's a familial windfall. When the guy has to carry and squeeze out a nine pound parasite then he can have a say. The only right guys should get with regards to the child is in being allowed to give up all rights thereto.	/r/MensRights	17/07/13 12:52 AM
2	[xMODx] Recent Drama, Reporting and Message to those linked here from viral campaigns All I did is laughingly reduce the language of the defense to its simplest terms. If the philosophy of PUAs is to err on the side of ignoring rather than accepting consent I think it's pretty disingenuous to start clutching your pearls when someone mentions rape. You don't have to waste your time with me. I didn't come here to troll per se, but I couldn't resist that little gem. I came here to do a spot-check on this subreddit as I do from time to time to make sure, when I rail against PUAs, tha…	/r/seduction	20/06/13 08:23 PM
1	The R Word: How do you deal with a girl that may have been previously raped? Like the man said, the most important thing is sincerity. Once you can fake that you've got it made.	/r/seduction	08/05/13 02:33 AM
3	The R Word: How do you deal with a girl that may have been previously raped? Confessed rape survivors are either liars or damaged goods and should thus be treated as relationship pariahs too fucked up even to hit it and quit it. Got it.	/r/seduction	08/05/13 02:29 AM
3	[NSFW] Oglaf accidentally describes why women love Submission fantasy. Damn funny Oh wait, you're serious.	/r/MensRights	18/09/12 05:13 AM
0	My 'Diet Caffeine-Free Rape' - even when women lie and say sex is alright when it's not, men are still in the wrong? I wouldn't call sobbingly telling someone to hurry up and finish 'enthusiastic consent'. I'm not sold either way on whether or not this constitutes some form of rape (being as it exists in that uncomfortable space where personal agency meets being a decent fucking human being), but fervently humping away despite screams of agony isn't un-rapey, and anyone who has no problem finishing in spite of a partner's pained tears is a festering sack of shit in my book.	/r/MensRights	06/09/12 06:26 AM
2	Eileen Creamer appeals seven year sentence for killing husband who forced her into kinky sex. Creamer, 54, was acquitted of murder but found guilty of defensive homicide in the Supreme Court last year and Mr. Morrissey said she was only one of three women convicted of the crime in Victoria. Which part gave you the impression that she could have said no? Was it where the article said he forced her to have sex? Was it the part where he spent the weekend physically abusing her? Yeah, what a dumb cunt. Everyone knows you can just call a time-out on a wife beating and stroll on out of there.	/r/MensRights	25/07/12 07:57 AM
1	Female rapist is arrested, released, and goes on to imprison and rape another man for 36 hours only a few weeks later. Then sent for psych observation. More in comments (from German news site). We release people who're presumed innocent by imposing a ransom upon them, essentially making them put down a hefty deposit on themselves. These ransoms are typically paid by firms of very stern persons who make it their business to recover anyone who manages not to show up to court in order to recover their investment. I'm not saying that I'm a fan of the system, I'm just explaining the basic function and philosophy of it; technically nobody in a position to go out on bond is thought to be guil…	/r/MensRights	01/05/12 04:03 PM
-1	Or...you could try being honest. Just a thought, Cosmo. Thank goodness this colossal threat to men's rights has been brought to light.	/r/MensRights	28/03/12 05:15 PM
2	If we lived in a 'rape culture,' how would the rape claim against a BU athlete be covered? How was it really covered? I haven't seen so much "straw man" since Dorothy met up with Ray Bolger on the Yellow Brick Road. Ohoho, my sides. That would've been more clever if I'd actually employed a straw man, though. Perhaps you'd be a more effective debater if you put more study into logical fallacies than into old MGM flicks. Generally, one of the most important requirements of a reply is that it actually address the comment. Strike one on you. I don't see any response to my pointing out your 'no true scotsman' here, …	/r/MensRights	21/02/12 04:45 PM
5	If we lived in a 'rape culture,' how would the rape claim against a BU athlete be covered? How was it really covered? Huh. Really? It seems like the OP is setting up two scenarios ('this is a rape culture' OR 'accused men are treated unfairly') and saying that the two are mutually exclusive. That seems like a false dichotomy to me. Is there some higher reasoning of false causation which leads its conclusions to be exclusive rather than correlative? Sorry the OP was too rabid to read poster names (or even the content of posts, judging by the continued argument) and went tilting at your windmill. I appreciate you…	/r/MensRights	20/02/12 11:47 PM
2	If we lived in a 'rape culture,' how would the rape claim against a BU athlete be covered? How was it really covered? No rational true person scotsman So you're saying it's not a rape culture because only bad people engage in the rape culture, and they can be dismissed because they're bad people? I guess St. Louis doesn't have a very high crime rate at all because all of its crimes are committed by criminals and they can be dismissed because they're bad people. What a handy little bit of denialist illogic.	/r/MensRights	20/02/12 11:41 PM
8	If we lived in a 'rape culture,' how would the rape claim against a BU athlete be covered? How was it really covered? I see what the article's getting at, but it does so cheaply. Its entire premise is a false dichotomy. 'I say that in a rape culture X would happen, and since X isn't happening this can't be a rape culture'. That's like if I said 'if you're a man then you must like football, and since you don't like football you can't be a man'. FYI, Mike Gonzales saying that the thing rapists (or is it the accusers?) need to be concerned about is the school and its team's reputation rather than, y'know, the rape…	/r/MensRights	20/02/12 07:00 PM
0	RP mentions the "epidemic of suicide" among veterans: "When I see these young men coming back my heart weeps for them." Legally, yeah. Actually? Tell it to Iraq and Libya. I do agree that this shit has no place here, though.	/r/MensRights	09/01/12 05:28 AM
1	RP mentions the "epidemic of suicide" among veterans: "When I see these young men coming back my heart weeps for them." Not snark, honest question: how is our being involved in wars which do not employ a male-only draft specifically a men's rights issue?	/r/MensRights	09/01/12 05:27 AM
1	Am I wrong to think women shouldn't be prison guards for men, and men shouldn't be prison guards for women? Ya, I was just joshin'. I dunno what the system is here in the US, whether the guard just ticks a box that says 'extend sentence' or if a judge is involved.	/r/MensRights	24/12/11 05:01 PM
3	Am I wrong to think women shouldn't be prison guards for men, and men shouldn't be prison guards for women? How much did they add onto your sentence?	/r/MensRights	24/12/11 04:24 PM
9	Am I wrong to think women shouldn't be prison guards for men, and men shouldn't be prison guards for women? Having talked with a friend who's a CO about situations exactly like this I can tell you that this isn't 'AH HA! Caught you masturbating!' These are instances of prisoners deciding to fuck with the boss by masturbating at the guards. They do this to male guards too, it happens all the time, and they deserve to get punished for such deliberate dipshittery.	/r/MensRights	24/12/11 03:31 PM
0	Male cheerleader gets his team disqualified because he's..... a boy. So's your old man.	/r/MensRights	18/12/11 07:47 PM
1	Male cheerleader gets his team disqualified because he's..... a boy. Mmkay. Looks like we've got a difference of opinion on what constitutes a valid contribution to the progressive process. That's all right. Personally I think that having someone say 'you know, this table wobbles' is entirely valid and helpful without that person needing to be Bob Vila. Does that reference date me? Haven't seen him around in a while. Anyway, goodnight for reals this time, my friend. It was good talking with you.	/r/MensRights	18/12/11 10:11 AM
2	Male cheerleader gets his team disqualified because he's..... a boy. Why would I have a plan? I don't. Fortunately not having a plan doesn't diminish the validity of my perception of what the problem is. One needn't be a carpenter to diagnose that a table wobbles, and one needn't know how to make a better world to know precisely what's shit about the one we've got. I'm going to pry myself off of the reddits now, but if you'd like to continue this tomorrow night I'd be glad to. Have a beneficial daycycle, fellow sapient.	/r/MensRights	18/12/11 09:57 AM
0	Male cheerleader gets his team disqualified because he's..... a boy. The way so many ugly modes of thought have been eliminated; you shine a light on it, don't let it wriggle away, and let everyone see just how small and worthless it truly is. Like so many of humanity's demons, it will simply die of shame.	/r/MensRights	18/12/11 09:42 AM
6	Male cheerleader gets his team disqualified because he's..... a boy. As I said elsewhere in this thread, I and the feminists with whom I agree on the matter define it as a systemic bias which benefits patriarchs at the expense of non-patriarchs. That doesn't just mean women, but any men who aren't themselves in positions of power or wealth. Patriarchy sends young men to war just as surely as it sends young women to the kitchen. It casts men as slavish 'bread-winners' just as it casts women as second-grade employees. Patriarchy keeps Brandon Urbas from going to fi…	/r/MensRights	18/12/11 09:18 AM
2	Male cheerleader gets his team disqualified because he's..... a boy. So... not considering cheerleading a sport -- thus denying its predominantly female participants legal coverage, medical support, and life-saving regulation -- is a feminist plot meant to keep boys from somehow playing more of the staggeringly ubiquitous sports which dominate every level of academia? I... suppose that's a theory. Mine is that it's one of the many effects of a society which seeks to delegitimize any feminine pursuit which treads upon traditionally masculine toes. Honestly, though…	/r/MensRights	18/12/11 09:06 AM
2	Male cheerleader gets his team disqualified because he's..... a boy. I hate to spoil a moment of peace when I can get it, but to be clear about things I didn't put any quotes around patriarchy. I don't blame patriarchy for everything, but it's a serious problem for men and women alike (just to be further clear, I and the feminists with whom I agree define patriarchy as a system which benefits patriarchs (not just men but powerful and wealthy old men) at the expense of everyone else (including unpowerful unwealthy unold men), not as a system which benefits men at …	/r/MensRights	18/12/11 08:28 AM
1	Male cheerleader gets his team disqualified because he's..... a boy. patriarchy hurts men too. ... I have a post i can copy/paste into here to show the so called "patriarchy" that apparently gives men benefits, but completely puts them down too. So... we agree, then? People as a whole denying cheerleading as a sport doesn't hold up in a court of law. Because some random kids say it isn't a sport, doesn't mean crap. It is documented as a sport, personal beliefs are allowed of the person, but cheerleading is considered a sport in legal terms. Oh, really? on July 21…	/r/MensRights	18/12/11 08:02 AM
-5	Male cheerleader gets his team disqualified because he's..... a boy. Except, of course, that if people would stop denying cheerleading recognition as a sport (what would be considered an issue of 'women's rights') then it would be covered by Title IX which would then force them to allow this boy to compete. As the feminists say, patriarchy hurts men too. When you're driving on four flat tires you don't just fix the ones on your side of the car.	/r/MensRights	18/12/11 07:22 AM
3	Male cheerleader gets his team disqualified because he's..... a boy. Personally I think that feminism and the MRM should be abandoned to the misandrists and misogynists. It seems to me that anyone who truly cares about gender egalitarianism on either side should just call it that instead of obfuscating true equality with needlessly, detrimentally gendered names for it.	/r/MensRights	18/12/11 07:11 AM
-1	Male cheerleader gets his team disqualified because he's..... a boy. I wish more MRAs would acquaint themselves with the 'waves' of feminism. It seems to me that the MRM is in the equivalent of feminism's second wave, when activists were more interested in making noise and taking down the other side than actually making progress. When the MRM gets to the equivalent of feminism's third wave -- put simplistically 'trying to actually make things better instead of simply raging against the things that are wrong' -- maybe we can all move into what I dearly hope is the…	/r/MensRights	18/12/11 07:09 AM
1	Male cheerleader gets his team disqualified because he's..... a boy. Unfortunately Title IX can't touch this because cheerleading isn't generally recognized as a sport. One of those cases of 'patriarchy hurts men too'. Poor kid.	/r/MensRights	18/12/11 07:02 AM
0	According to a new study, people can't tell the difference between quotes from British "lad mags" and interviews with convicted rapists. I suppose it is a redefinition, but I never intended it to be such. That's the definition of rape culture as I've learned it by taking the truth of feminist arguments (gender egalitarianism) and rejecting the gender bias. If I might be forgiven for employing an analogy, it's the way interpreting 'all men are created equal' as meaning 'all people are equal' isn't considered a redefinition even though the people who penned the phrase meant 'all land-owning white males over a certain age are create…	/r/MensRights	11/12/11 08:27 PM
3	According to a new study, people can't tell the difference between quotes from British "lad mags" and interviews with convicted rapists. I'm with the limbo man. The bit he quoted is rape culture. If rape is based in a fundamental lack of respect for the agency of the victim, then any demonstration of that fundamental disrespect is an implicit encouragement of rape. I wish MRAs would lay off of the rape culture hate, since it's far from exclusive to male rape of women; indeed, 'rape culture' isn't always explicitly about rape. Any atmosphere in which systemic disrespect for the agency of the individual is fostered -- especially in…	/r/MensRights	11/12/11 07:58 PM
2	Feminist splits mans head open with purse, presses SEXUAL ASSAULT charges on him. Why? He held the door for her. Naked, in a hot tub eating sushi with Leonardo DaVinci!	/r/MensRights	03/11/11 02:51 PM
1	Feminist splits mans head open with purse, presses SEXUAL ASSAULT charges on him. Why? He held the door for her. I'm not a lurker, I'm just late! Uphooves all around! (Though as a poster and supporter of both this subreddit and 2XC (and their affiliates) I feel that I must stress that loving and tolerating each other is the only way we're gonna defeat the Discord of sexism!)	/r/MensRights	03/11/11 02:46 PM
2	Family law judge beats own daughter for using the internet, please spread (this video will absolutely make you sick) The problem with both sides of this entire approach ('she's innocent!' 'no, she should be punished too!') is that both of them are guilty and both of them are victims. Both of them need to go away not to prison, but to a secure mental care facility where they will be kept until they have healed enough and learned enough to treat children correctly. As with so many other things, we need to set aside satisfying but counterproductive vengeance and try to actually make things better instead of just …	/r/MensRights	02/11/11 03:15 PM
1	Family law judge beats own daughter for using the internet, please spread (this video will absolutely make you sick) So between two ignorant, brute-force methods of abusive parenting (beating and shouting), the one that actually backs up its abuse with more abuse sees more results. No surprise there, but that doesn't make either of them healthy or conscionable. You've erected a false binary in your mind; your parents had options which weren't beating or shouting, options which I guarantee you work as well or better than child abuse. Have fun rationalising your abusers, though, and I hope to all fuck that you g…	/r/MensRights	02/11/11 03:02 PM
1	Wanted to make sure this graph made its rounds. Ah, got it. Anyone posting here is a misogynist because this is a place where only misogynists post and you can tell because (loop back to the beginning). Really, friend? I grant that r/mensrights has plenty of fuckheadery (as does any forum on the internet, to varying degrees), but by no means is everyone here a misogynist. You know what'd be a great tactic to make sure that it is only populated by misogynists, though? Paint everyone who posts here with the same brush so that people who aren't …	/r/MensRights	26/10/11 07:33 AM
5	Wanted to make sure this graph made its rounds. You had a valid point about adequate context (assuming that you simply missed the context being posted in comments), but then you resorted to conjecture about the poster's vile motives and lowered the bar of discourse dramatically. You're obviously free to say what you like, but decrying someone for being hateful instead of caring about the facts seems rather hypocritical when you slander the poster without anything in the post factually supporting said slander.	/r/MensRights	26/10/11 05:46 AM
1	Wanted to make sure this graph made its rounds. So if 24% live with a single mother then that means that the bias of single mother prevalence would be removed by taking the current number of maternal abuses as equaling X times 1.24 and solving for X, right? That drops the 44.3% comprised by 'mother' and 'mother and other' down to 35.7%, which is still double the 19% of abuses comprised by 'father' and 'father and other'. Can someone check my math for me? This stuff isn't my strong suit. To anachronic's statement, I'm certainly not saying that…	/r/MensRights	26/10/11 05:19 AM
5	The Gender Gap: Boys Lagging - CBS News Congratulations, you've found the only context in which a link to Louis CK will get downvoted on Reddit.	/r/MensRights	06/10/11 09:51 AM
6	[Hero] Ireland bans advertisement for implying that only men abuse children Holy fucking shit, I am very not okay with this ad being on television at all. The stark depiction of a child being beaten is, in my opinion, the sort of thing that should be behind a warning splash screen or at least in a movie/episode of something in which you'd expect it. The same goes for those disgusting anti-smoking commercials that show rotting jaws and tumorous throats; why the fuck do people feel they have a right to display inappropriate images in the name of a good cause? As for the g…	/r/MensRights	27/09/11 08:36 AM
1	Are the MRA antagonists mentally unstable people? Like I said, it's the worst era in human history except for all of the other ones. Flawed as hell but it's the best it's been. That alone is reason enough, in my opinion, to move forward to new and better solutions instead of backward into old and inadequate ones.	/r/MensRights	17/09/11 08:22 PM
1	Are the MRA antagonists mentally unstable people? And of course now I'm lecturing you again. You'll have to forgive me. Not at all. For once it feels like you're actually responding to me. :) I strongly disagree with your analogy's characterization of the relative sizes of the blue and pink masses, but that's really beside the point. If a boat is going to capsize due to an uneven distribution of weight you don't shout 'get to the other side of the boat!' Too many people will bloody-mindedly focus only on that side of the boat and soon enough yo…	/r/MensRights	17/09/11 07:44 PM
1	Are the MRA antagonists mentally unstable people? And what else is Patriarchy Theory than a belief that gender roles were constructed by men for their own benefit? In my case it's a belief that gender roles were constructed by patriarchs for their own benefit. It oppresses men too. I'm not saying that a bunch of old men gathered around and hatched an evil scheme, but it's more like the 'social evolution' that you speak of, guided by the best interests of the old men in power (be it over countries or households). I'm assuming from your very fema…	/r/MensRights	17/09/11 04:39 PM
1	Are the MRA antagonists mentally unstable people? I called bullshit on the claim that women are physically incapable of doing 90% of "men's work", citing the fact that women do "men's work" all the time while caring for children. You go off about men being oppressed and social evolution and what is or isn't fair to expect of whoever, then tie it all up with the implication that I've hypothesized a 'horrible agenda of oppression on behalf of men'. FYI, continuing to put words into my mouth over the course of fifteen paragraphs that have nothing …	/r/MensRights	17/09/11 07:49 AM
1	Are the MRA antagonists mentally unstable people? And that difference in muscle mass doesn't make a bit of difference when there's a crop to get in. I'm not saying there aren't physiological differences, I'm saying that they're not so wildly significant as you seem to think. Do you think that the situation I cited doesn't happen? Do you really think that starving peasant women play Suzy homemaker and vacuum the hut while their husbands go out and toil? People in desperate enough situations not to afford the luxury of sexist labor division work …	/r/MensRights	16/09/11 05:43 PM
-1	Are the MRA antagonists mentally unstable people? It always tickles me when people talk about the radically-differing capabilities of men and women as though we were some alien race in which the males are hulking behemoths encased in chitinous armor and the females are these wiggling, limbless larvae that would die outside of the gooey environment of the royal hive. Look at any third-world country if you want a glimpse at history. The difference between men and women in a poverty-stricken agricultural society is that one of them is harvesting c…	/r/MensRights	16/09/11 05:11 PM
1	Man rapes Female Would-be Thief: "HOW DARE HE?". Woman rapes Male Would-be Thief: "HOW DARE HE COMPLAIN?" Meh. I'm not about to deny that the popular (or, at least, populist) perception of male rape is as a joke (and that that is unconscionable). I'm just not sufficiently jaded to call the dregs of internet discourse a representative sample of any culture's status quo. Besides, 'I feel like it sums up' means you had a preconceived notion of what the 'status quo' is and, finding something that fit said notion, dubbed it representative. That's called 'confirmation bias', my good fellow.	/r/MensRights	04/09/11 02:40 AM
0	Man rapes Female Would-be Thief: "HOW DARE HE?". Woman rapes Male Would-be Thief: "HOW DARE HE COMPLAIN?" Ohhh, I thought that you were talking about the tone of the articles, not the comments. I didn't realize anyone actually read any of that idiocy, much less pointing to it as anything worth drawing a conclusion from. Morons say moronic things, usually in tabloid comment sections. Nothing remarkable here.	/r/MensRights	04/09/11 02:28 AM
-4	Man rapes Female Would-be Thief: "HOW DARE HE?". Woman rapes Male Would-be Thief: "HOW DARE HE COMPLAIN?" Who exactly are you quoting in the title? Jesus, people can't even wait 'til the body of the post to start straw-manning.	/r/MensRights	04/09/11 01:52 AM
2	Jon Finkel Dodged a Bullet Heh. Redditors make posts commenting upon other redditors' posts all the time, but when it's a link to MRA it's FEMINAZI CONSPIRACY TO STEAL MAH INTERNET POINTS!	/r/MensRights	01/09/11 08:22 PM
-1	How to slap your way to slavery That green box should just say 'TLDR: Bitches got it coming, amirite?'	/r/MensRights	14/08/11 04:00 AM
2	Female babysitter admits sex with the child she was hired to look for That... would actually be amazing to see. I'm not sure of the logistics, but if one were somehow unable to stop being raped yet did have the physical capability to shove something up the assailant's ass and really get to work. Perhaps it's meant as a deterrent. Perhaps it's meant as revenge. The real question is whether the first rapist will be sufficiently put off by being raped in turn to actually stop raping the second rapist, or would said rapist persevere if only out of spite? Who'll break …	/r/MensRights	11/08/11 03:39 PM
-2	According to this NZ Police video, if a woman goes out, gets blind drunk and wakes up with a guy she doesn't know, YOU are responsible! Beautiful dickery on the bartender's part to pour the drinks and then torpedo the rapist. 'Sorry mate. That'll be $30. Enjoy.' I thought the vid was pretty good (though the first run-through takes for-fucka-ever), definitely educational as to ways one can intervene in situations where we tend to just sort of frown and wonder what we're supposed to do. I saw the expected points of intervention and, particularly with the bartender and the guy in the line outside, thought 'You can't just speak up, …	/r/MensRights	11/08/11 03:07 PM