TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

2bobk Archive

View 1 post and 68 comments by 2bobk on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

she and Dani are “always in communication” about each other’s needs. Bullshit. I've met poly women like this, and "communication" is just another term for manipulation and control. I'd love for them to publish a transcript of this mythical form of communication that makes everything ok. 'I want a family, I need a man, and we need to make this happen.'" Seems like pretty one-way communication to me.
/r/TheRedPill26/07/15 10:37 PM
5

Considering that the other major parties - Liberals and NDP - voted 100% against the Equal Parenting Bill while the Conservatives were split 60/40 in favour of it, I don't think changing the governing party would have a positive impact on custody laws.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 11:08 PM
0

Males being selectively murdered for going to school is a men's rights issue. I can't fathom how you could think otherwise, or what being a "winner" has anything to do with it.
/r/MensRights27/02/14 04:56 PM
1

Men and boys' access to education is being violently targeted by a terrorist group. Sounds like a men's rights issue to me.
/r/MensRights26/02/14 05:03 AM
4

How can you tell fraudulent accusations against staff and students from legitimate ones, when the claims are anonymous and don't require any corroboration? People who go to the police dishonestly to make false accusations should go to jail. Nobody is saying people who use this form dishonestly should go to jail. The lesson is that when you have an anonymous avenue to report sexual assaults to a college without any kind of vetting process then that system is by nature open to abuse. The fact that…
/r/MensRights23/12/13 02:38 PM
3

All they did was make it harder for anonymous rape claims to be taken seriously, which is a good thing because it's a terrible system. Nobody thinks that saying "Occidental College raped me" anonymously on a form is a crime.
/r/MensRights23/12/13 02:09 PM
4

You mean "Want prison for people who deliberately bring false accusations to the police, which isn't what the system at Occidental does."
/r/MensRights23/12/13 02:00 PM
1

Yeah, maybe if he's Houdini.
/r/MensRights29/11/13 01:24 PM
1

If you can convince a group of people that the wealth of others was not earned but bestowed by some unfair conspiracy, then they will be more amenable to the idea of taking that wealth by force. If Feminists can convince young women that men don't really deserve the money they earn because it was given to them by the Patriarchy, then those young women will more likely support appropriating that money through courts, laws, and regulations, and spending it on programs that benefit women.
/r/MensRights08/11/13 04:43 AM
2

Which school?
/r/MensRights27/10/13 02:57 AM
2

I, for one, was thoroughly entertained. Bonus points for referencing Afghanistan without mention of bacha bazi culture or the rape and torture of men.
/r/MensRights19/10/13 07:09 PM
2

I'd take it one step further: discrimination against men is almost always framed as something positive and beneficial to society. It is never actually identified as discrimination, but as "equality" or "protecting children" or "protecting women" or some such feel-good sentiment. We are conditioned to believe that discrimination against men is acceptable and necessary in society.
/r/MensRights17/09/13 04:38 PM
1

You could always do that. We're talking about a facility that has women's only hours and classes that bans men from participating, using the facility, and even watching their daughters. That is discrimination based on sex.
/r/MensRights02/09/13 05:41 PM
1

And all of the time devoted to women's only classes and swim sessions that are part of daily operations and don't require private booking?
/r/MensRights02/09/13 05:39 PM
1

That's not what the policy was made for or how it is is being enforced in this facility. Unless they have an organized list of members and have registered their private group with the city, "muslim women" are a sex and religion, not a swim group. There are numerous women's only classes and swim hours in which men are not only barred from using the pool, but from watching their sisters, daughters, etc. These are not private bookings, they are regularly scheduled "no men" times that happen numerou…
/r/MensRights02/09/13 05:15 PM
1

No, they aren't. You're family is a private group. A group of friends is a private group. A private business (owned and operated by citizens) is a private group. An innumerable group of people identifiable only by their skin color, or their sex, is not a private group.
/r/MensRights02/09/13 05:09 PM
1

Accommodation of religious law (Saria) which is a personal belief and not a REAL LAW undermines the REAL LAW here in Canada which says you can't discriminate based on sex. The government isn't telling you that you can't share public facilities with men, your own personal belief system is telling you that. And unfortunately your own personal belief system (Islam, in this case) contradicts the principles of equality and nondiscrimination that the government is legally required to practice in order…
/r/MensRights02/09/13 05:06 PM
1

Go to the City of Toronto Parks, Forestry and Recreation website and read the process for getting a permit to host a private event at a city factility. You need to register your organization and list the attendees. "Females only" isn't a list of attendees.
/r/MensRights02/09/13 04:55 PM
3

You don't seem to understand what a private event is. Let me illustrate: Private event: My Church of 30 members rents the pool on Thursday for an hour. Not a private event: My Church rents the pool and says that only white people can swim for an hour. Edit: Also not a private event: Having 5 registration classes and two drop-in sessions a week where all facilities are closed off to men to accommodate muslim religious law. A private event is for a private group of people. Men and women aren't pri…
/r/MensRights01/09/13 06:54 AM
2

Hahaha is that the best you can come up with? Sad. Here's a hint: "men", "women", and "muslims" are not private groups. That's why we have laws prohibiting discrimination against them. Riddle me this: if it's just a matter of renting the space, why did they have to introduce new facilities and policies to satisfy the demands of muslims? Could it possible be that "we want women's only facilities" is completely different than renting the pool for an organized group with a list of attendees?
/r/MensRights01/09/13 06:36 AM
2

http://www.toronto.ca/parks/prd/facilities/complex/2012/ Hey look, women's only swim hours. Also, saying "I want part of the facility closed off for women only this weekend" is segregation, and not the same thing as booking a private event.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 05:48 AM
3

Religious law means jack here in CANADA. You follow religious law because you choose to. Religious law in Canada is a relevant as the laws of Neverland or the Jedi Code. Here's what the ACTUAL law in Canada says: "For all purposes of this Act, the prohibited grounds of discrimination are race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, age, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, family status, disability and conviction for an offence for which a pardon has been granted or in respect of which…
/r/MensRights01/09/13 05:39 AM
1

If you listen to what Pam McConnell says about the development of this feature, it was made for muslim women not for private parties.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 05:07 AM
1

http://podcast.cbc.ca/mp3/podcasts/intersections_20130618_37690.mp3 Muslim women can't exercise without denying public facilities to men, muslim or otherwise? Sorry, zero sympathy here. Buy your own pool, rent a private one, or maybe find a new religion.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 05:05 AM
1

In the spirit of tolerance, we're going to let open public facilities be closed off and made exclusionary at the behest those who wish to practice their intolerance! But only when it's a variety of intolerance that we consider to be politically fashionable! We're so progressive! Closing off part of a public pool so you can swim without a gender you don't feel comfortable around, or maybe without a religion you don't feel comfortable around, or hey why not a skin colour you don't feel comfortable…
/r/MensRights01/09/13 04:58 AM
0

There are plenty of people who live here who might not share the same opinions as you. I guess I'm one of them.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 04:52 AM
5

Nope. Par for the course in Canada. Equality and freedom in a secular society don't mean jack when you have other "cultures" to accommodate!
/r/MensRights31/08/13 04:45 PM
6

Are they going to allow muslim men to book male-only swimming facilities so they don't have to swim with non-muslim women? I get the feeling that wouldn't result in nearly as much political back-patting.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 04:30 PM
10

The classes are restricted by gender, not by religion. And barring men from public facilities in the name of religion or gender is discrimination.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 04:20 PM
1

Even cursory interaction with feminists shows that the two definitions of "patriarchy" you present are constantly conflated. For proof, here's http://www.reddit.com/r/Feminism/comments/1epvmm/dear_rfeminism_what_are_your_opinions_on_the/
/r/MensRights11/08/13 02:10 PM
2

Well then you're in good company, because nobody here does either! If you don't believe in Patriarchy then Feminism as a social or political movement kind of loses its momentum. Feminism seeks to fight Patriarchy, but if Patriarchy isn't really the source of gender inequality, then how can Feminism really be promoting gender equality?
/r/MensRights11/08/13 05:38 AM
4

It isn't an interpretation, Patriarchy Theory has been the cornerstone of Feminism since its inception. Without Patriarchy Theory there is no Feminism. Contrary to what some claim, simply saying "I want everybody to be equal" isn't actually what feminism is about. Feminism is about dismantling Patriarchial institutions which seek to oppress women.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 05:30 AM
9

MRAs don't blame women as a whole for men's issues. They blame a culture that sees men as disposable and women as valuable, and political groups such as Feminists who exploit this for their own gain at the expense of men.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 05:25 AM
5

All feminism is based on Patriarchy Theory. All feminist believe that: Men have most, if not all of the power in society, that they have this power because they are men, and because they have this power they make life worse for women. MRAs reject patriarchy theory as the explanation for gender issues in society, which is why their goals are incompatible with feminism.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 05:13 AM
5

Feminism isn't half of the population... Feminism is a political ideology that is based on Patriarchy Theory; the theory that men - as a class - conspire to systemically oppress women in every facet of life in order to keep them subservient. According to this hegemony, all men have power and privilege by virtue of being men and all women are victims and are actively being oppressed in their daily lives by virtue of being women. Patriarchy Theory is a belief. Being against feminism means being ag…
/r/MensRights11/08/13 05:08 AM
3

Feminism nowadays isn't about equality. I'd say it isn't really even about women. It's about manufacturing outrage in order to 1) get money into the pockets of feminist activists and their organizations, 2) pass laws that give women economic and legal power at the expense of men, and 3) censor anybody who disagrees with them.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 05:02 AM
7

Welcome the r/MensRights, there are two links on the right called "Discussion on why feminism is not the solution to men's problems" and "anti-male legislation roundup" that both show that feminists and MRAs absolutely are not striving for the same goal.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 04:54 AM
10

This doesn't prove that Feminists are working on men's rights issues; this proves that a Feminist on the internet can type.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 07:10 PM
1

http://www.avoiceformen.com/activism/about/ is a pretty good rundown. Also there's a FAQ on the right. Hope this helps.
/r/MensRights15/05/13 03:11 PM
2

Image taken from a Japanese plastic surgeon's site: http://www.otsuka-biyo.co.jp/bc/case003.html Story is fake, and has gone viral over the internet without any primary sources. Edit: Some versions of the story cite Irish Times, but a search on Irish Times for "Jian Feng" returns no such story.
/r/MensRights15/05/13 10:32 AM
0

It's fake. Google is your friend.
/r/MensRights15/05/13 06:51 AM
3

Those who can, do. Those who can't, make documentaries.
/r/MensRights11/05/13 01:36 AM
2

I agreed with the author right up until "epidemic of sexual violence against women" That there is an epidemic of sexual violence, and that it is primarily perpetrated against women, is one of the core feminist claims that enable false accusations. The others being that women never lie about sexual assault, and that men are naturally sexual predators by patriarchal socialization.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 12:25 AM
44

Jenny Graves is the creator of the "shrinking Y" hypothesis, and she's been promoting it for years. She's been pretty thoroughly debunked by other geneticists.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 11:38 PM
2

"Rape culture is when a group of athletes rape a young girl, and the town is more concerned with preserving their football program than the fact that their children are attacking others without remorse." What, did the whole town get together and hold a vote? Were they given a ballot and asked to fill out their concerns in order of significance, with "football program" and "children attacking others without remorse" being on the list along with things like taxes, employment, and personal health?
/r/MensRights22/03/13 04:55 AM
2

Author is asked the question: "“What is ‘rape culture’ anyway?" Answers with 100 examples that aren't rape culture. Seriously though, Daniel Tosh is rape culture? Even though he has never raped anybody, and there is no evidence that what he said actually caused anybody to be raped, or affected rapes being reported or prosecuted? Telling a college student to stop defaming her ex-boyfriend who was found NOT GUILTY of rape is promoting rape culture? Two teenage athletes GO TO PRISON FOR RAPE, and t…
/r/MensRights22/03/13 04:49 AM
9

But but but... she said that Super Mario Bros 2 was really Doki Doki Panic! And she used some old time-y movie clips that everybody recognizes, and dropped some video game history that most people who were around in the 80's and 90's already knew. That must have taken at least $20,000!
/r/MensRights15/03/13 04:37 PM
11

You've done a pretty good job of explaining the problem! Pop Culture Critics (or, feminists with degrees in finding misogyny in pop culture) claim to analyze their subject in order to expose sexist attitudes for the betterment of society, or in this case, the video game industry. In reality what they do is use the medium to validate their own personal, often political, biases. Anita Sarkeesian does this by capitalizing on the "tropes" that irk her. The reason she uses tropes and not characters, …
/r/MensRights15/03/13 04:32 PM
125

Brilliant. Sarkeesian's deliberate ignorance of the very medium she claims to research is astounding. I have no idea how anybody can take her seriously, especially the way she introduces herself. "I'm a Pop Culture Critic"... yeah you and everybody else with a TV, computer, or radio.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 05:04 AM
12

Feminists criticize "radscum" for being classist, transphobic and racist... But not for being misandric. "Radscum" who preach hatred of men are accepted, even celebrated, so long as they follow the feminist liturgy on class, race, and gender.
/r/MensRights31/12/12 03:26 AM
5

CBC? Good luck. CBC has a long standing pro-union bias. The fact that CUPE has their hands in this means that CBC won't touch it except to further slander Farrell.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 02:38 AM
1

Men did not have to be married before they could own property. Neither did women. Cis men don't have access to chemical contraceptives because none have been developed for them yet. What's your point? I asked what rights feminists afforded women that would have otherwise only belonged to men. Chemical contraception was illegal for both men AND women prior to 1969 so it's not an issue of inequality. After 1969 men still don't have access to male chemical contraception. Women gaining something tha…
/r/MensRights02/08/12 01:15 PM
1

This sounds like a list that was copy/pasted from a feminist website or brochure. I asked you what rights you have that would otherwise only belong to men if it weren't for feminists. You listed several examples of women receiving benefits and legal protections that don't extend to men, or didn't exist for men, or required some great sacrifice that women were never obliged to share. The right to own property (1859) Women already had the right to own property. What you are referring to is the Act…
/r/MensRights02/08/12 05:30 AM
1

What I'm saying is you can't maintain the virtue of the "equity feminist" label based on historicity because the history of feminism has been so far removed from "equity" as to render such a label contradictory at best, and insulting at worst. The suffragette movement unabashedly benefited from the wholesale slaughter of conscripted men. Feminist advancements over the past few decades in Canadian courts have not been made in the interest of equality of the sexes before the law, but rather in the…
/r/MensRights02/08/12 02:50 AM
2

I have held on to the term equity feminist over egalitarian precisely for the historicity of the term:I would not be here, with my rights and freedoms, without the work of feminists come before. As a fellow Canadian, I don't think you could possibly be more wrong. You do not have rights and freedoms because a handful of brave old gals fought for them. You have rights and freedoms because millions of perfectly average men died for them, largely to the cheering applause of "historical" feminists, …
/r/MensRights02/08/12 12:47 AM
1

This is what I'm wondering. She's obviously no prize fighter. If the man she struck was really a crazed psychopath rapist, are we seriously being led to believe that being struck by a woman caused him to see the error of his ways? And that he just let her go on her merry way?
/r/MensRights11/07/12 04:40 PM
1

The usual feminist response: You can't sympathize with a male assault victim if it undermines a woman's completely unproven allegation because RAPE CULTURE
/r/MensRights10/07/12 08:17 PM
29

Wait, so the murder rate of men in Juarez is like 8 times higher than that of women, and this is a "femicide"?
/r/MensRights30/05/12 05:01 AM
18

Feminism is an ideology, and Feminists are followers of that ideology. Not all women are Feminists, and not all Feminists are women. But really you aren't arguing about principle, you're just saying that you can make statements about certain large numbers of people but not other large numbers of people.
/r/MensRights30/05/12 04:46 AM
25

Feminists blame most things on the patriarchy because patriarchy theory is the cornerstone of feminism.
/r/MensRights30/05/12 04:35 AM
31

Stop making sweeping statements about MRAs making sweeping statements about Feminists making sweeping statements, you hater!
/r/MensRights30/05/12 04:32 AM
16

And most MRA's don't say they were for equality, but that they are for men's rights as a result of decades of Feminist influence on government that has produced many legal benefits and protections for women squarely at the expense of men.
/r/MensRights30/05/12 04:30 AM
14

I don't call myself a Men's Rights Activist. I don't engage in activism. Calling BS on biased Feminist gender deconstructions does not make me a member of any particular group.
/r/MensRights30/05/12 04:27 AM
5

Then they either have no understanding of what Feminism is or has stood for in North America, or they are complete liars. But by all means, send them to this reddit so they can tell me how I've got Feminism all wrong and how Feminism isn't really about blaming men for everything, and that Feminists are marching in the streets for men's rights and men's health. I'll be waiting. Question for you, though. If they are egalitarians, why do they identify as Feminist? The word Feminist itself female-ce…
/r/MensRights30/05/12 04:16 AM
66

Funny how the poster only mentions stereotypes about males being knowledgeable, strong, competitive, and none of the stereotypes about men being violent, destructive, stupid, or uncultured. However it takes aim at the stereotypes of females being weak, unintelligent, over-sensitive. See? Feminism is only interested in exploding stereotypes when it benefits women.
/r/MensRights30/05/12 04:06 AM
8

Feminism has nothing at all to do with equality. Feminism is the belief that 1) Men have most, if not all, the power in the world, 2) They have this power because they are men (patriarchy), and 3) They use this power to make life worse for women. That is the core basis of Feminism. Everything else is just varying quantities of sophistry and strategy. Feminism is about getting more money and more power for women. Equality has nothing to do with it.
/r/MensRights30/05/12 03:56 AM
-10

So in other words guys, it's OK for you to admit that you are weak, weepy, not knowledgeable, have your desires dictated to you, and rely upon women's liberation in order to find true freedom. It's just another version of the tired old feminist argument that the only way for men to free themselves from patriarchal oppression is to admit just how much men suck. Sorry, but I don't buy it. Especially not coming from a "Gender Subversion Kit"
/r/MensRights30/05/12 03:45 AM
-32

That's right, the world would be so much better if boys would just be more like girls! /sarcasm
/r/MensRights30/05/12 03:35 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter