TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

30percentAlpaca Archive

View 0 posts and 54 comments by 30percentAlpaca on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

To be fair, I think that women are generally excluded from physically high-risk jobs because those jobs are typically seen as men's work - jobs that require physical strength. I'm thinking about work like mining (as per the article), various construction, logging. These sorts of places generally do not want to hire women because because women generally have less of the desirable traits like physical size, strength, and stamina than men. Because of that, I would expect the workplace death numbers…
/r/MensRights20/08/10 04:48 PM
0

I would have given you woman, but not child.
/r/MensRights20/08/10 04:36 PM
1

One time my (male) friend told me "Women are worse drivers than men, they cause half the accidents you see on the highway!" My answer to that was "And men cause the other half."
/r/MensRights16/08/10 08:45 PM
1

Early in my driving experience, I could parallel really well, but not front in for the life of me. I seriously hoped for parallel on my road test, but feared the end of it, hahaha.
/r/MensRights16/08/10 08:44 PM
8

More likely to share common interests This one... just seems really odd to me. The other ones I can kinda nod and go "yeah, I can see that", but this one? What the heck? BOTH men and women have more in common with male bosses than female bosses? I'm not sure how that one even makes sense. It's either a non-gender related basis, OR female employees would expectedly have more in common with female bosses.
/r/MensRights12/08/10 05:57 PM
4

If it's something like school, other parents and teachers should recognize you as a parent or similar. Did you ever carpool to school as a kid? Not every child carpools with an adult that is the same or similar-looking race. I don't think adoption is as big a deal as most people make it out to be. It probably is for those who never knew they were adopted but only learned about it later in life, but if I adopt a child (I have seriously considered this), my child will know that he/she was adopted,…
/r/MensRights11/08/10 08:30 PM
-1

Why is this a men's rights issue? For all we know, the siblings of this person are his sisters.
/r/MensRights09/08/10 03:50 AM
2

I just imagined she would probably have used the same or similar defense if her partner was a woman. Shrug.
/r/MensRights04/08/10 11:09 PM
3

I don't see that as much as a Men's Rights issues, really, just that she used him as a convenient scapegoat. Shouldn't we rather be Hooray-ing that she got the sentence she deserved?
/r/MensRights04/08/10 10:42 PM
1

It alarms me that their mother would have them even for 2 of 14 days with these descriptions. Would it be possible to get full custody with them with no overnights (maybe visitations)?
/r/MensRights30/07/10 03:21 AM
1

In case you haven't realized, Reddit is teeming full of people. Nerdy people for the most part, yeah, but still people.
/r/MensRights30/07/10 03:19 AM
5

Man, that sucks... but just remember you got your kids. That's the most important thing. At the end of the day, money is still just money, but your kids are your kids.
/r/MensRights29/07/10 08:53 PM
1

There is another precedent when it comes to lying about something fundamental about yourself in order to get someone to do something with you: it's called an annulment. A marriage can be annulled if either party deceives the other person in such a way that should the deceived have known the truth he or she would not have married the deceiver. This does not care or account for what the reasons are, religious, racial, whatever, it doesn't matter.
/r/MensRights22/07/10 05:36 PM
1

Yes, because she would have presented herself under false pretenses. And should she conceive, the father should not be responsible. I'm not saying that's actually what happens, but that's how it should be.
/r/MensRights22/07/10 05:33 PM
6

I feel like the friend/accomplice got the real bum rap here. He shot his friend in order to help him. I would think a person would only ask a most-trusted friend to do that, so this most-trusted friend had a difficult task that he executed out of loyalty and gets pinned for murder at the end. I'd say it was manslaughter at best.
/r/MensRights15/07/10 07:38 PM
6

A great capacity for love does not equate to the ability to be a good dad. One may have the best of intentions, but completely lack the knowledge or skill to execute any number of given tasks.
/r/MensRights15/07/10 07:36 PM
2

My life sucks. I can't leave her because she needs me more than ever right now because her schooling is stressful and she can't work. I have to support her, but she takes out all her stress on me. Your life sucks because you let her walk attack you physically and get away with it. Yes, you are letting her get away with it, AND you are making the excuses for her. What an easy ride she's getting! Get out, and do it now (or at least begin the planning now, if right now is not an opportune time).
/r/MensRights14/07/10 07:32 PM
1

Well, you see, the thing is - people at home see the athletes faking dives and false injuries so much, people at home catch on too after watching a game :P (This is more a jab at the wussy/drama-queen athletes than domestic abuse.)
/r/MensRights08/07/10 03:12 PM
2

I'm happy for you that you got your kids (mostly). But at the same time, I'm sorry I don't know what you can do regarding this month :( I have nothing helpful to say, except to let you know that you have a little bit of distance, digital emotional support here.
/r/MensRights06/07/10 05:12 PM
8

Well, as I said before, even if in this instance the person is a troll (or just an angsty teenager), the internet is a big, searchable resource for future time to come. The possibility that someone may stumble upon it some day and genuinely need it is worth it to me.
/r/MensRights23/06/10 09:53 PM
10

People think you're a troll because they don't believe that you can't do anything for yourself in this situation (ie call him from a friend's house or payphone). But abusive relationships typically involve overbearing control over a person and create a sense of powerlessness in the victim, so I can buy it. This is the men's rights subreddit, which fights the abuse of women using "the system" against men; I don't see why others have forgotten this? Anyway, from what you're saying, your dad just s…
/r/MensRights23/06/10 07:28 PM
8

Possibly troll, but even if so, this could be helpful to a kid somewhere in a similar situation. These things happen all the time - one parent (I'd say usually the mother, simply because usually the mother gets custody) turns the children against the other parent. Anyway, the most important thing now is to remind yourself that your dad loves you, and to keep believing in him. Even if you KNOW different, it's possible for propaganda to sway your beliefs after extended exposure. When you get the c…
/r/MensRights23/06/10 06:59 PM
5

Actually, payphones have been largely phased out in my city. I actually could have a hard time finding one here too, depending on where in the city I was.
/r/MensRights23/06/10 06:47 PM
1

This idea that is similar to a reverse-dowry is... very strange and dumbfounding to me. I think part of the problem is how materialistic Chinese culture is, often holding status and reputation in higher regard than interpersonal relationships. This leaves space for people to say "you're not good enough for me unless you have XYZ commodities/wealth". If people valued people more than material items, I think there'd be less of this sort of thing.
/r/MensRights22/06/10 08:21 PM
4

I'd just like to point out I recognize that men and women get both the long and short ends of the stick in different situations in society. The same goes for people of different classes, different races, different anything really. People need to work together to reconcile so that there are no ends of any stick. Anyway, I'm going to stop responding to you (both that thread and this one) because it's obvious to me that you have a pretty big chip on your shoulder that stems from something beyond wh…
/r/MensRights22/06/10 08:05 PM
7

Reddit has more than its fair share of bad cop stories, but what does this have to do with men's rights?
/r/MensRights22/06/10 02:03 PM
9

I think you may be reading too much into it. Woody and Buzz are the uncontested main characters and heroes of the Toy Story series, and they are male characters.
/r/MensRights19/06/10 03:23 AM
2

Ya dude, you're right. We're arguing from the same side of the coin, really. Wins for all?
/r/MensRights17/06/10 08:20 PM
2

My prof always asked at the beginning of class if there was anyone who 1) didn't have access to a computer at home, and 2) if anyone didn't have access to internet at home. They can't force you to use the internet (for, say, an online quiz at X time) because they can't force you to have it either. Edit: Er, for some reason, reddit formatted my age of 24 to 1...? >_> Edit edit: I'd also like to note that none of the activities you listed are necessary for raising a child either. Sure, they're nic…
/r/MensRights17/06/10 07:16 PM
2

The school would likely have internet access, as would the local library.
/r/MensRights17/06/10 06:45 PM
2

Also, cable television (and internet) are not necessary for raising a child.
/r/MensRights17/06/10 06:40 PM
21

You left out the part where the woman is a 59 year old grandmother, and he sucker punched her hard enough to break her jaw on the other side. That plus his rap sheet started nearly 10 years ago. He deserves 21 years. but yes, you're right, the woman didn't deserve 13 months, minimum 13 years.
/r/MensRights16/06/10 01:54 AM
4

Doesn't the word harassment sum it up?
/r/MensRights15/06/10 05:08 PM
5

This is just as sexist too. Historically, men have had the opportunity to invent almost everything useful to civilization. It's only in recent times that women have been allowed to become academics, till such a point, a woman would not have had the education, and thus capacity, to come up with inventions. It goes both ways - men are (typically, at least on the greater scale) not afforded the opportunities to demonstrate how awesome they are as parents. I'm thinking of a scenario of a custody bat…
/r/MensRights14/06/10 01:14 PM
2

This title is misleading - young women are just as "more likely" to have mothers employed outside the home, fathers absent (etc.) "than past generations".
/r/MensRights12/06/10 04:46 PM
3

If what this article says is true, my relationship with my ex suddenly makes a lot of sense now. Thank you, /r/MensRights and OP, for shedding light on the matter. It couldn't have saved our relationship, because there was more to it than communication and hurt feelings, but I will certainly keep this in mind the next time I meet a guy.
/r/MensRights08/06/10 01:41 AM
4

I think in this case, it's less about a false report than simply how bizarre the case is. There doesn't seem to be a motive or reason for his false report, at least not from this article. Usually when we read about false reports, we learn that the person making the report is seeking some sort of revenge by ruining the accused's life.
/r/MensRights11/05/10 07:35 PM
3

I hope the guy sues for slander and pain and suffering too.
/r/MensRights11/05/10 07:28 PM
3

I have a friend that is not only friends with AN ex, but ALL exes, and all the exes are also friends with each other. While definitely not the rule (gosh, I think it's a really weird situation!), it definitely can happen. Edit: Although I suspect that a good portion of this is because prior to break ups, the ex(es) got well integrated with the circle of friends, and so it wouldn't have just been not friends with the one person, it would have to not be friends with everyone. Myself, after a dude …
/r/MensRights30/04/10 08:33 PM
1

Mm, I concede to you on the grounds of "playground" (as opposed to park). Although for softball leagues, the league needs to pay the city in order to rent the park.
/r/MensRights30/04/10 08:28 PM
2

I see what you're saying, but there are sensible reasons for the things you've mentioned. And besides that, there isn't actual "discrimination" happening in either given situation. A school is meant for children's education, there usually isn't a good/legitimate reason for an adult to roam the hallways unless he or she has been invited to take part in some specific activity. But anyone can send their school-aged child to a public school, not only people of a certain gender, family structure, rac…
/r/MensRights30/04/10 06:03 PM
9

This is why I stopped reading many feminist blogs. This article is ridiculous. The author is celebrating the diversity of these models and the fashion industry? Yea, there is a TON of diversity, all different types of very thin, very tall, very young white women with child like features. All while chastising men for looking at women in "men's magazine". My thought exactly. This writer is full of hypocritical WTF.
/r/MensRights29/04/10 02:47 PM
7

I came specifically to WTF this. SERIOUSLY, what the heck?! As soon as only adults who have children's taxes go towards paying for the upkeep of public parks, I'd let that slide. But they're PUBLIC parks, and EVERYONE'S tax dollars go into them. WTF??????
/r/MensRights28/04/10 05:02 PM
10

Uhhh, lady here, and even I think those are non-reasons. Seriously, I feel bad that men are circumcised for no reason. If 20 years from now a lady thinks his penis is weird and won't do the deed with him because of it, then he probably shouldn't be with that girl anyway.
/r/MensRights21/04/10 08:17 PM
3

And this goes hand in hand with the notion that man around children = perverts. It baffles my female mind that a father should be looked at with suspect bringing his own children to the park....
/r/MensRights09/04/10 10:01 PM
3

I agree with PierceHarlan. If the definition of rape is sex minus consent and against their will, then the person in question in this scenario consented to sex with a condom only and did not consent to sex without the use of one. However, in the case of passing STDs (e.g. HIV/AIDS without informing the partner), I believe (at least here) it is aggravated sexual assault. Following that precedent, I would categorize it similarly.
/r/MensRights06/04/10 10:35 PM
2

I think aggravated sexual assault otherwise.
/r/MensRights06/04/10 10:30 PM
2

Except for hippies.
/r/MensRights06/04/10 01:06 AM
1

Look of Boxapproval.
/r/MensRights05/04/10 10:42 PM
1

Unfortunately, I do not have the character set on this computer for the look of disapproval... so it just looks like [ ]_[ ] to me. I miss the look of disapproval :(
/r/MensRights05/04/10 10:35 PM
6

What about in-bred alpacas? I have some cousins, LOL
/r/MensRights05/04/10 08:31 PM
23

Thought it might encourage you all to know a younger lady here, 23.
/r/MensRights05/04/10 03:44 PM
1

All the best to you, dude.
/r/MensRights01/04/10 08:31 PM
6

I suggest seeing a psychologist if possible, to attest to the fact that you are not mentally ill. He (or she) could speak to your character and give his opinion on whether or not he thinks you are (morally) capable of harming your wife or children. I'm really sorry all this crap is happening to you... I'm sure you never deserved even a minute of it.
/r/MensRights31/03/10 10:52 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter