TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

34Mbit Archive

View 1 post and 71 comments by 34Mbit on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

That's called bottling. Verb, to bottle. John was bottled in the face at the pub.
/r/MensRights17/05/16 12:37 PM
1

Forgive me if I don't understand what you've said. I'm suggesting that women have an x propensity to act violently towards their partner. In lesbian relationships, this x value is more readily reported because the partners in said relationship are more ready to report acts of violence to the police. In heterosexual relationships, the receiver of x violence is male, and feels a stigma to reporting female acts of violence. So, I theorize that women demonstrate a particular level of violence, x, an…
/r/MensRights01/01/16 04:06 AM
1

My theory as to why lesbians have such a high reported rate of domestic violence is because women, lesbian-or-otherwise, have no shame in reporting acts of violence against themselves. Conversely, men are reluctant to report instances of violence against them by their female partners. That is to say, lesbian women themselves aren't more violent per se; it's just that when women are on the receiving end of other women in domestic settings, there's little holding back to the true rate of violence …
/r/MensRights31/12/15 12:53 PM
2

You avoid regretful sex, you reduce your risk of rape. I thought this was about tea?
/r/MensRights10/11/15 07:33 AM
1

What happens when you have an FtM trans person that has taken on all the hormone therepy, etc. Does that person compete in the female games, because that person was born female despite having testosterone therapy? I suppose you could call hormone therapy a form of doping and be banned from competing, but that seems somewhat unfair.
/r/MensRights31/10/15 09:10 AM
7

A friend of mine has an ongoing situation like this; deranged woman franticly trying to win the attention of him leading to stalking and other weird things. They were never really more than acquaintances but she managed to string this fantasy world together, based on little more than trying to return this old scabby jumper to him (he found a hoodie in a bar and let her have it because it was cold). Years later, she's constantly texting him from a rotating battery of SIM cards, begging to return …
/r/MensRights13/08/15 06:34 AM
2

I thought psychopaths were meant to be generally quite intelligent people.
/r/MensRights13/08/15 06:23 AM
2

Smartphone maps are unreliable at pinpointing the exact location of places. The pushpin above a building could be four doors wrong or an entire street. Phone batteries die 3G/4G signal still doesn't have 100% penetration in populated areas. Offline maps are a feature of 20/20 Hindsight: 2015 Edition (and only cover a specific area). Online maps can't find sites not included in their index. Cell phones can't tell you which featureless white-box building on a street is the one you need. Ask any co…
/r/MensRights29/05/15 03:54 PM
44

The idea of getting my dick covered in dozens of other guy's jizz doesn't push any buttons for me, I'm afraid.
/r/MensRights13/04/15 05:32 PM
1

Interesting, there's no provision like that in the UK.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 05:04 PM
6

I've been saying this for years. Write a will, write your advanced medical instructions, appoint each other with power of attorney, write a living together agreement (UK), set up a trust or two for your kids and you're sorted. All the stuff you should do anyway once married ultimately confers the same legal standing as marriage. The difference is you can do it at your own pace, in a way that suits both of you. For a few £/$100.
/r/MensRights10/04/15 11:08 AM
23

Just say you identify as a woman. What are they going to do, get your pull your pants down?
/r/MensRights14/03/15 12:07 PM
1

If you've got the ripped physique, then you can own a bald head quite confidently. Just another reason to stay in shape.
/r/MensRights10/01/15 09:50 AM
2

That might be the demographics of this sub speaking (young men?), but it's not as straight forward as that. The innate sexual dimorphism in our psyches puts a value on younger, fertile women. Conversely, older and more capable men tend to be valued more (in some ways) as time goes on. So the adage of men aging like wine and women aging like milk might be true. Once a woman goes above 25-30, they might find it very difficult to maintain superficial appearances of attractiveness.
/r/MensRights10/01/15 09:46 AM
0

'Patricia Craven' has also opted-out of Nominet's mandatory WHOIS address database.
/r/MensRights08/01/15 08:53 PM
1

Just say you're female. What are they going to do?
/r/MensRights24/11/14 09:23 PM
2

Sitting around not doing anything for to long. You might actually be right!
/r/MensRights24/05/14 06:19 PM
2

What exactly is going on there?
/r/MensRights04/01/14 03:57 PM
0

Except we're not subjects of the Crown, and we do have rights to self-defense. In all civilizations, every person is subject to the law and the UK is no different. There is no modern (i.e., in the last two, three hundred years or so) jurisprudence that indicated citizens of the UK are subjects of the Crown. The Crown is completely and utterly neutered, beyond the power any reasonably influential member of the Glitterati holds. As for self defense, any can use any reasonable force to defend thems…
/r/MensRights24/11/13 02:31 PM
2

That's interesting. Trespassing (to land) is a civil tort in the UK. There's not much a landowner can do about someone standing on his land (in and of itself) other than suing then later.
/r/MensRights24/11/13 10:07 AM
13

Hit Facebook, get a Credit Union, join a lawyer, delete the gym.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 06:49 AM
1

Really? Assault, I always thought, was the 'fear' of battery
/r/MensRights03/09/13 06:46 AM
7

http://25.media.tumblr.com/98f682b8f6a9c9dd6638c2b39c66c39f/tumblr_mj9q4bDtoU1s4cvq7o1_500.jpg The benefits
/r/MensRights22/08/13 09:58 PM
3

You are anti-rape because you have not been raped? Why does it matter to you? Honestly how does other people get a bit of dick in a hole without consent affect [sic] you in any way, shape or form?
/r/MensRights22/08/13 09:50 PM
10

kidding Too far.
/r/MensRights07/08/13 07:10 AM
1

I hear what you're saying, and most of those items don't 'gross' me out in that sense (I think it's quite a juvenile response to something). Blood would obviously stir panic in some people, puss and shit are understandably unhealthy and we are cultured to avoid it (part nature, part nurture I'd imagine), piss is lumped together with shit despite the fact it is mostly harmless but smells unpleasant. I can understand someone not wanting someone else's breast milk on them as it's invasively intimat…
/r/MensRights16/07/13 06:07 PM
2

How is it gross, really? No shit, no piss, no blood, no puss, no rotting flesh, no reproductive fluids. It's just a baby trying to feed. How do people get so worked up about this? The physiological benefits of breast feeding are crystal clear, and the more that can be done to encourage the practice the better it is for society.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 02:45 PM
2

Still had to go to a schoolhouse environment, eh?
/r/MensRights01/07/13 07:45 PM
11

Because girls can get raped and boys can't, duh.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 12:06 PM
7

Thing is, the judge sentences you to a few years in jail, not a few years of being raped.
/r/MensRights20/02/13 04:29 PM
7

Part of a Hooters job description is theatrical, and so is excluded from sex discrimination requirements. Same goes for actors/actresses and strippers
/r/MensRights09/02/13 09:22 AM
1

Fruit of the tainted tree only applies to government evidence gathering, I think.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 02:50 PM
4

Mothers can just give their kids up. There are several civil faculties that take kids in, no questions asked, such as the fire service.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 04:18 PM
10

I'd just park there anyway. If I'm asked, I'd say I was a woman. Beard or no beard, how are they going to determine something as nebulous as gender from a two minute conversation in the dark? I could be like that Sikh woman on the front page the other day. More to the point though, what makes that car park any more safe than the alternatives?
/r/MensRights05/10/12 07:51 AM
13

In that case infant labiaplasty must be a-ok, in the interest of whatever opinion the parents have dreamed up...
/r/MensRights13/07/12 07:37 PM
0

I wasn't suggesting circumcision is a type of positive punishment, rather you said that positive punishment (and thus assumed smacking) is normal in society. As we all know from this subreddit, just because something is normal in society doesn't make it right or fair. My original point was that smacking must hurt the child, otherwise why do it? Would you stroke a child's head in order to punish it, or shake its hand? Smacking is used because it hurts. You wouldn't bend your geriatric parent over…
/r/MensRights03/07/12 07:04 AM
1

Circumcision is a pretty normal thing too...
/r/MensRights02/07/12 06:28 PM
0

Then what purpose does smacking serve?
/r/MensRights02/07/12 05:38 PM
8

For a start, you can stop referring to it as Africa. There are dozens of countries on that continent; each with their own achievements and issues. The longer you keep referring to Africa as some kind of giant homogenised country, the longer people will keep thinking that downtown Cairo or Khartoum are mud-hut backwaters.
/r/MensRights18/05/12 03:31 AM
3

I'd love to see anyone try to enforce that beyond a restaurant policy. Each person ordered the food separately, by speaking individually; who is responsible for the outstanding debt? The only legal remedy is to sue them really. When the judge hears that each individual (obviously not in this article's case however) tried to settle each of their debts with legal tender, the whole thing will get thrown out.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 09:27 AM
2

Call the cops and then what? If I don't pay my credit card bill at the end of the month, is Visa going to call the cops on me? It's a civil matter.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 09:06 AM
4

It's not theft; the restaurant gave them all the food voluntarily. The fact payment wasn't made is breach of contract and an outstanding debt; it's a civil matter. I can't understand why the police are involved. Theft would be the guy strolling into the kitchen, and taking a load of food.
/r/MensRights17/04/12 09:05 AM
13

Wait, wait wait. If I get a circumcision, does that mean I can stop washing my cock every morning in the shower, and still be clean down there? I'm booking my appointment already!
/r/MensRights06/03/12 07:07 PM
0

OK, so you spend a few years ferociously studying and pontificating these ardent questions; then you get exactly the same kind of job and lifestyle as everyone else. I've see so many Phil grads get a job in a cubicle farm, settle down with a partner and have a kid or two. Whatever high-octane philosophy goes on in those college years doesn't appear to have much of a net change in people.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 10:25 PM
1

There is a lot of CCTV, but it is owned by private shops and businesses. The local councils will have cameras in local shopping high streets and such, but they operate in the same way a shop would have a camera trained on the shelves and door and stuff.
/r/MensRights25/01/12 09:49 AM
2

Oh right, this is from the child's father then? In the UK the mother of every child gets around £50/month from the government paid into her bank account per child. If the parents are separated then the person who doesn't have custody can pay something similar to what you described.
/r/MensRights20/01/12 02:31 PM
2

How much do parents get in the US as Child Support? What kind of income can you actually expect if you fit the architype layabout?
/r/MensRights20/01/12 09:32 AM
1

Well, shit, of course some people are going to die. It's one of the things that define us as human; our awareness of mortality and that everyone must die. We ration our care (as we have to), but we still care.
/r/MensRights17/01/12 07:50 AM
3

I imagine if that situation were to play out, your brazen approach to survival would be met by lethal mob rejection of your own safety.
/r/MensRights16/01/12 08:17 PM
5

You'd be surprised. The unconditional protection parents typically provide their children has been demonstrated to carry over to less closely linked 'relatives' too.
/r/MensRights16/01/12 08:10 PM
4

That's not how it works in human nature. By mutual reciprocation of care, compassion and effort, we have inherited a society where you have survived and developed enough to write that message. We are social animals, and our instinct (by-and-large) is to execute care through empathy for our fellow cousins. It's nature.
/r/MensRights16/01/12 08:08 PM
2

I'll tell you who ISN'T protecting our liberty; members of the military, from top to bottom and their superiors. The military hasn't defended us from a legitimate threat in over twenty years. The last time the armed forces served us in an active role was decades before even that. I'll tell you who IS protecting our liberty; grassroots political groups, the integrity of SCOTUS, the Constitution, and the general political/philosophical awareness of citizens.
/r/MensRights10/10/11 02:35 PM
2

Capital idea!
/r/MensRights03/10/11 09:26 AM
1

Don't want my car scratched!
/r/MensRights26/09/11 12:24 PM
9

I heard that people who worked in protected industries (farming, etc.) that couldn't be conscripted were often socially stigmatised by, among other things, receiving anonymous letters in the post containing a single white feather. My granddad was apparently given a lot of grief during the war as he worked as a farmer.
/r/MensRights19/09/11 07:53 AM
12

And surrogate fathers! The lack of reproductive organs is not something we should let cloud our minds in the 21st century.
/r/MensRights12/09/11 02:37 PM
1

Registered keep and policy holder are different things. Your parents can buy a car for their kid and put the dad as the registered keeper, but if the son/daughter is the main driver (ie get the most regular use out of it) then they need to be the policy holder of an insurance policy for it. Fronting is indeed frowned upon by insurance providers, so much so they will invalidate your policy in the event of a claim. It is fraud, like saying you're a student for council tax purposes (when in actual …
/r/MensRights28/07/11 01:31 PM
1

The statistics actually show a huge amount of insurance fraud (rear ending people etc), and inflated whiplash claims. Everyones insurance is on the up, except the multiplier for young men is larger because of the margin of error involved with the higher risk group.
/r/MensRights28/07/11 06:23 AM
1

And we pay around $8.50 per US gallon for fuel.
/r/MensRights28/07/11 06:18 AM
1

I should add that doing what is suggested in this post can and will (if you are caught) get your policy cancelled, which has the effect of banning you from driving (almost forever).
/r/MensRights28/07/11 06:15 AM
-6

If wealth isn't a personal trait like skin colour, why isn't there a large turnover in wealthy/poor people generation to generation? What's the deal with 'Over-X yrs' nights, too.
/r/MensRights11/06/11 03:50 PM
-10

Or a non-zero priced drink night. Not everyone has money, so it is discriminatory to charge for drinks. Think of all the working poor who are objectively refused access. Wealth begets wealth, too. So don't say money isn't a personal trait.
/r/MensRights11/06/11 03:44 PM
2

Marriage is a property sharing contract. What was yours becomes theirs, and vice versa. In fact, marriage isn't much else.
/r/MensRights03/05/11 07:03 AM
1

Fuck you, I'm a young driver that drives sensibly, more sensibly than the guy in his late thirties going through a midlife crisis. Either allow discrimination on ALL characteristic, or none.
/r/MensRights01/03/11 09:16 PM
9

Not to mention living longer than men results in more long term mental health treatment.
/r/MensRights01/03/11 09:11 PM
7

With such good knowledge of the incident (knowing the gender of the murderer), perhaps she should be taken in for formal questioning?
/r/MensRights09/01/11 06:18 PM
1

I'm not sure, sexual assault I would suppose.
/r/MensRights05/11/10 08:41 AM
3

Women are technically incapable of raping men (or women). In the UK at least, the definition of rape is the forcing of a penis into the vagina, anus, or mouth of a person. You need a penis to rape someone.
/r/MensRights05/11/10 08:18 AM
1

How is that image encouraging genital mutilation? I'm raising awareness of how a particular mother both felt pride and pain at inflicting pain on her son.
/r/MensRights18/07/10 11:18 PM
-3

Yeah and I requested that your comment be deleted to protect the rest of us from being exposed to your anti-fredom of speech rhetoric.
/r/MensRights18/07/10 11:11 PM
5

I find it amazing how a mother can put their son through something they admit as physically painful, for superstitious reasons.
/r/MensRights18/07/10 10:19 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter