TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

380-mortis Archive

View 2 posts and 45 comments by 380-mortis on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

I mean, some dude got hit by lightning 7 times so you’re not really invalidating anyone’s point, not saying feminists are right but this doesn’t prove feminists wrong at all as this is 1 case. edit: if people are curious the name of the guy who got struck by lightning his name if Roy Sullivan. 6 of the strikes happened in 8 years.
/r/MensRights11/08/21 07:56 PM
2

Unpopular opinion: I disagree. A relationship, even with respect from both parties doesn’t always work out due to one reason or another. People have criteria for a reason. Respect is something the vast majority seek but it is not the only thing that a relationship is built upon. Being respectful helps, but is not the only thing. This isn’t just for dating, it’s for relationships in general. Stuff like personality is also important, and mutual love matters a lot too.
/r/MensRights31/05/21 06:59 PM
31

Didn’t say that was the only charge. Should’ve gotten far more than 2 years though.
/r/MensRights28/04/21 06:58 PM
2

Still, using something that’s unreliable as evidence isn’t a very good idea.
/r/MensRights23/04/21 03:40 PM
3

Fun fact: polygraph tests are not completely reliable. Unrelated to subject matter but I’d thought I say it. They only work and guess accurately 87% of the time, so they shouldn’t be used as evidence.
/r/MensRights23/04/21 12:59 PM
1

No true Scotsman fallacy.
/r/MensRights15/04/21 01:31 PM
1

This info graphic isn’t bad, but you posted it without sources, so please post stuff with sources, otherwise, no one is going to be convinced.
/r/MensRights03/04/21 10:13 PM
3

I don’t see any swearing (I could be blind but idk) Even if there’s swearing, you don’t have to mark it nsfw.
/r/MensRights24/03/21 10:48 PM
6

double standard is really unfair
/r/MensRights26/09/20 10:01 PM
1

Source?
/r/MensRights26/08/20 05:46 PM
-9

Some of these points are partially wrong.
/r/MensRights23/08/20 08:32 PM
2

troll account btw, dont take this seriously
/r/MensRights20/08/20 05:35 PM
1

they aren’t serious, it’s a troll account
/r/MensRights20/08/20 05:34 PM
3

can someone just link the article
/r/MensRights19/08/20 07:41 PM
1

men and women should be equal in a relationship. both pay their share of the bills, both help raise their child equally.
/r/MensRights14/08/20 11:55 PM
1

I’m not saying this definitely didn’t happen just saying that like most stories on the internet it is highly likely this is fabricated.
/r/MensRights09/08/20 07:35 PM
-5

hot take that’s going to get brigaded: this person is probably lying. swap the guy and the girl around in the story and you’ll call bullshit. I’m all for men’s rights but this story is probably fake and y’all acting like it’s real because confirmation bias. this COULD HAVE happened in which case yeah that’s bullshit, but it probably didn’t. just look at r/amitheasshole and you’ll see how many fake stories there are on the internet
/r/MensRights09/08/20 05:01 PM
2

I thought it was satire.
/r/MensRights09/06/20 08:35 PM
2

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pierre_Curie I know, it’s Wikipedia but it is somewhat reliable when it comes to anything non political
/r/MensRights29/05/20 01:32 PM
1

fun fact: Pierre got the Nobel prize, but she didn’t, so he gave her some of the credit, and refused to take it if she didn’t get it too.
/r/MensRights29/05/20 01:34 AM
2

the cub scouts sell popcorn so if you don’t want to sell that and you hate camping and want to sell cookies then Girl Scouts is the better option.
/r/MensRights29/05/20 01:30 AM
2

If you are curious, a rattan cane is a bundle of bamboo which are dipped in varnish on one end, the varnish hardens and that’s the cane. I don’t know what a LIGHT rattan cane means but you can find them commercially from 1/4-3/4 of an inch. The end that doesn’t have the varnish is used as a whip.
/r/MensRights27/05/20 09:40 PM
1

not to mention, you 100% don’t have one. it’s idiotic to make a new channel and start from scratch. even your not that dumb. instead of uploading on my new channel and get vastly more money, views and subscribers I am going to make a new channel and have 10 subs. It’s not hard to make these either. Use a program to churn out the robot voice, copy paste text in, and overlay what is essentially a google slides presentation over it.
/r/MensRights25/05/20 08:12 PM
1

it doesn’t take a genius to know that there are 100s of these identical channels and the chances of getting views is slim.
/r/MensRights25/05/20 08:06 PM
2

what is your other channel called then
/r/MensRights25/05/20 07:01 PM
1

also little tip, this may be a bit mean but it’s the truth. the reddit commentary market is already oversaturated. you’ll never get more than 100 views because so many people are doing this. your channel isn’t distinct at all. there are 100s of channels with extremely similar thumbnails, same style, same stories. most of the flow comes from the recommended and you won’t reach there. Even searching your channel up, you don’t come up. your videos are essentially unlisted.
/r/MensRights25/05/20 06:27 PM
1

wait a minute, these are your videos? bruh you are desperate for views if you are going onto this subreddit to get views.
/r/MensRights25/05/20 06:21 PM
1

isn’t every political sub an echo chamber? isn’t every political party an echo chamber?
/r/MensRights25/05/20 06:20 PM
1

Well it’s so ridiculously obvious who the bad guy is, “this guy isn’t your wallet” “oh boy, I wonder if I am the bad guy by saying that!” You’d have to be blind to not figure it out.
/r/MensRights25/05/20 05:57 PM
1

do you really think they are real?
/r/MensRights25/05/20 05:54 PM
1

Bruh those stories are very fake, it’s probably a karma farming attempt and the creator of the video is spinning it into a reality, and gets money from views. Pretty unbelievable story, and most of the stories on there are fake anyways.
/r/MensRights25/05/20 05:04 PM
4

in my opinion it’s not the girls fault. the parenting is the root.
/r/MensRights11/05/20 04:07 PM
9

votes for men, and gets annoyed that the men are in power seriously, most women are voting for men, so if you want to have more women, then go ahead! not my fault your voting for men.
/r/MensRights11/05/20 04:03 PM
3

Discipline? Girls undergo LESS discipline. They do better. Girls undergo LESS harsh punishments. They do better. They hardly follow the directions much to, the follow them as much as boys.
/r/MensRights09/05/20 04:18 PM
1

I wasn’t taking a side or anything? I was asking what would come up. I was implying that the search results are probably less worse.
/r/MensRights01/05/20 11:01 PM
1

what
/r/MensRights01/05/20 10:35 PM
1

now search women
/r/MensRights01/05/20 03:13 PM
2

well not as much as removed as permabanned.
/r/MensRights21/04/20 04:00 PM
2

how does this have anything to do with marxism? the “patriarchy” doesn’t exist in the western world. did I say women were their slaves? I did not. I am saying they are abused. stop jumping to conclusions.
/r/MensRights25/03/20 03:40 PM
1

“Heavily protected” ah yes, getting away with someone raping you means they are very protected and getting stoned to death, can’t even go outside unless if they are with a male, being forced to wear religious clothing, so protected. I know, women didn’t want suffrage because they would have to join the draft but they didn’t, I do disagree with that, they should be in the draft. I am no feminist, I got banned from r/feminism within a week. Women were “more protected” I guess you could say, but ha…
/r/MensRights25/03/20 02:24 PM
1

Feminist version? This is the version I read in schools DECADES ago, where the feminist movement practically didn’t EXIST. Men could vote for 100+ years before women. And you are telling me that the Middle East isn’t the worst place in the world for women? They couldn’t even drive in Saudi Arabia until a few years ago!
/r/MensRights25/03/20 01:39 PM
0

how. are you really that blind. you really think history was changed and is all fake? there is so much overwhelming evidence, women’s suffrage, being stoned to death in the Middle East, being denied many rights back in the day? that’s as ridiculous as the flat earth theory.
/r/MensRights25/03/20 01:01 AM
2

only some women. saying women are a certain way is literally proving their point.
/r/MensRights24/03/20 11:17 PM
0

May I show you Rome, Greece, China, Japan, Middle East (including today)?
/r/MensRights24/03/20 11:16 PM
1

neither, depends on the person. personality is not heavily linked to gender.
/r/MensRights24/03/20 11:13 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter