| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | #YesAllWomenIn this instance it's dealing with the predominantly sexual violence women face, it is not to say that men don't experience this as well sometimes. (Although not a fraction as often). Both gender's have their concerns, #YesAllWomen simply deals with women's concerns. Think of them as two separate issues that do not invalidate the other. | /r/MensRights | 29/05/14 10:55 PM |
| – | #YesAllWomenThe fact that people think it doesn't exist is THE REASON it exists. | /r/MensRights | 29/05/14 10:52 PM |
| – | #YesAllWomenThe campaign is not trying to say that women have a monopoly on sexism, but it is pointing out how women face a culture of violence. Not all men perpetuate this culture, but all women are subject to it. It would be acceptable to start a #YesAllMen trend at another time, so that it is clear you are not trying to compete, as your rights are just as valid as a woman's. | /r/MensRights | 29/05/14 12:34 AM |
| – | #YesAllWomenIf I could offer my two cents - The #YesAllWomen trend is not specifically aimed at being a woman in general, but being a woman facing the culture of violence against women. It is a response to the "Not all men..." argument. It doesn't belittle any of the concerns in your example tweets, nor does it threaten them, it is discussing a specific issue. I find most of your points in those tweets to be quite valid, but they are not relevant to the #YesAllWomen trend. I hope you can see my point and kn… | /r/MensRights | 29/05/14 12:31 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter