TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

3MinuteHero Archive

View 0 posts and 129 comments by 3MinuteHero on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

You're proposing the possibility that she's just misinformed. That she didn't maliciously finger the guy as a rapist (I got jokes), but that she was simply mistaken about the definition of rape. If that's true, I'm saying that the real problem is therefore that the ever-expanding definition of rape is what led to her misinformation.
/r/MensRights30/10/13 03:08 AM
2

Isn't the bigger problem that she somehow (/s) got the idea that this was rape?
/r/MensRights30/10/13 02:40 AM
3

That was me. As others have said, it's in the Captain America trailer thing I posted but I think it was over a number of comments and replies. Lots of good stuff going on in that thread. Feel free to ask me what I think anyway! Simple concept, really/
/r/TheRedPill26/10/13 11:35 PM
39

Nah, warning others will be useless. People in their early 20s are incredibly short-sighted and anti-authoritarian. They either won't believe you, or perceive the events you're speaking of as too far away to ever materialize the way you say, hoping instead for some nebulous chain of events to happen between now and then that will allow them to have everything they want, exactly as they want it. That's just the plight of the current short-sighted 20-something American. Combine that with the wall …
/r/TheRedPill25/10/13 02:42 PM
8

Ah, see there's the thing. You're not friends with girls like you're friends with guys.
/r/TheRedPill25/10/13 04:36 AM
0

How are they your friends. Do you ask them to hang out
/r/TheRedPill25/10/13 04:27 AM
1

Why not
/r/TheRedPill25/10/13 04:19 AM
8

From James Watson's book, it appears Rosalind Franklin held a key piece of evidence and he had to absolutely pester her to get a look at it. It doesn't seem like she did any of the thinking that helped integrate all the small hints of evidence they had into the full model of DNA. But apparently her x-ray diffraction work was very, very good and that's why they sought her out for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/13 03:10 AM
5

if one (or more) of the parties involved felt violated When alcohol affects someone's judgement to a significant degree This isn't an answer, but it does well to highlight the problem. Both of these things are wildly subjective. What someone ends up "feeling" is more a product of their individual personalities, not the situation. And knowing when someone's judgement is "significantly" affected is impossible unless you're dealing with people are aren't even buzzed (not affected) or who are fallin…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/13 04:56 AM
8

Of course it's rigged against him but he didn't do a good job. When he said, "I know it with my gut," and then two sentences later berated the other dude for his anecdotal evidence, it made him look really bad. Edit: spelling
/r/TheRedPill23/10/13 01:57 AM
1

I think you need to think about the long game with things like these. Remember that no single action determines what someone thinks of you. If you combine this type of response with a set of other behaviors that demonstrate you are busy, then that's the impression they walk away with. Now I'm not saying the impression is built up over days or anything like that, but in those early moments when someone is trying to get a fix on you, you will unknowingly demonstrate a range of several behaviors th…
/r/askTRP18/10/13 11:49 PM
16

The comments are ridiculous. Holy shit, but an early 20-something women who reads anything on Jezibel must be the worst, most hypocritical walking shitstain Western society has ever seen.
/r/TheRedPill18/10/13 11:41 PM
3

I need to point this out because I see a bunch of people do this in all sorts of arguments and it bugs the hell out of me. When someone says something to the extent of, "This group tends to behave this way," or "Most members of group X engage in Y behavior," you aren't saying anything by proclaiming that you aren't one of those people. If I tell you that 90% of redditors are neckbeards, it literally makes no sense for you to shout, "Well I'm not one so you're wrong!" No sense. It's okay to gener…
/r/TheRedPill18/10/13 11:14 AM
2

"Of course. Don't you?" If she doesn't, then she probably won't be into you anyway.
/r/TheRedPill18/10/13 07:09 AM
5

The boy-men of the subreddit should stop being so butthurt by this evaluation and learn to live with it. You aren't your own person if you're living in your parents' house. You lack a level of control over your life that independent men have in theirs. Period. Alpha has everything to do with control. Women want men who have the capacity to control their environments. Girls may settle for less.
/r/TheRedPill18/10/13 06:16 AM
1

Is there a problem with flat out telling them, "Hey you need to get back to me quicker." I'm actually too busy for that kind of shit.
/r/askTRP17/10/13 10:13 PM
1

After trying to actually find out what comment she made that the TRP responded to, I've come to the conclusion she's not interested in the aforementioned conversation. She just wants to be confrontational.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/13 08:42 PM
2

I remember that exchange. I was actually confused about what he thought you should reel in. So I went into your comment history to try to find the original comment, and instead got reminded that yesterday you replied this to me: Scientific journals are not objective because the experiments and statistics can be easily manipulated to get the result that the scientist wants. Many journals have been accused of publishing such studies. When I tried to tell you that documentaries are the biased garba…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/13 08:25 PM
1

You're right, but whereas TBP will produce a predictable echo chamber of lulz, someone might actually be able to have a conversation with her about it here.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/13 08:20 PM
2

Then how does any science work? How have we made any advancements? How come we aren't still dying at 30 years old? How does medicine work? Are you serious with this argument? What you are talking about is deviations from the norm, RARE deviations. In the event that fabricated data is published, we have a really great way of knowing that it's fabricated. It's called IT DOESN'T WORK. If no one can replicate you results, then it's as if your results never happened. Regardless of what we "want." And…
/r/TheRedPill17/10/13 07:29 AM
2

Scientific journal articles are very objective. Reading the studies that those statistics were derived from and taking time to decide if the methods used were suitable or flawed, that would be objective. If you don't believe in objectivity, then you are the one that needs to question your beliefs.
/r/TheRedPill17/10/13 07:17 AM
5

Personally, I despise documentaries. They aren't objective looks into subjects so much as the agenda of the filmmaker and cherry-picked statistics. I don't bother with any political documentaries. But what documentaries are superbly good at is creating emotion. You think they are there to give you information, but it's the emotion that makes them powerful. The only thing a documentary is good for is making you feel good about the beliefs you already hold. not changing your mind. Unless it's some…
/r/TheRedPill17/10/13 07:13 AM
1

The find another girl fast advice?
/r/askTRP16/10/13 01:33 AM
0

What, you don't like the animal analogy once it points out unappealing behaviors? Hey man, I'm just following the rules. That's where the whole alpha/beta terminology came from in the first place. And I'm telling you that there's nothing alpha about sneak-fucking a taken girl. There is too little information here to make you infer ANYTHING about the bf. And the big variable staring you in the face that you're ignoring is that our sucker OP here has something the bf by the very nature of his posi…
/r/TheRedPill16/10/13 01:31 AM
0

I say leave it. It's testament to the brainwashing we're constantly being assaulted with. And I don't mean that in any sort of condescending way. I would have probably put it exactly the way you did if I didn't have anything to contrast it with first.
/r/TheRedPill15/10/13 03:20 AM
3

Guys, guys. The fundamental flaw here (other than reading into a fictional comedy sketch) is the inability to recognize that females and males see opposite sex encounters differently. Females don't jump to sex as soon as males do. That's the whole point of this sub right? How to get her to go from, "I don't mind him around," to "I need to be in bed with him" right? Do guys ever have the "I don't mind her around" moment? Do guys honestly believe in "just friends" without pretense? NO! Unless the …
/r/TheRedPill15/10/13 02:59 AM
4

Don't be so concerned with labels. If you are curious what is wrong and have some time, ask. If you don't care and are busy, don't ask. Seriously, fuck doing or not doing anything because of what label you MIGHT obtain from it.
/r/TheRedPill14/10/13 01:25 AM
1

Yeah, she's not a dumb girl. But to be sure I've also explicitly stated that that's my career path and that any woman has to expect that of me. She has family who are in medicine, so she knows what's up. If she wants me as a provider, she needs to play a very long game.
/r/askTRP13/10/13 05:32 PM
-1

Her spermjacking me doesn't make any sense. I'll be in serious mortgage-level debt for at least 15 years. I won't start making more than $50k for at minimum another 5 years, at maximum another 8, and that depends on the specialty I choose. Besides, if she wants my genes to make a baby isn't that more in line with RPT? Worse she can do is milk me for child support (which I won't be obligated to pay since I still have no income), but she'll still need someone to take care of her in the interim. Sh…
/r/askTRP13/10/13 05:04 PM
2

You might've wanted to reply to the OP I think.
/r/TheRedPill13/10/13 11:22 AM
37

As someone in medicine, I can definitely say there are very highly competent women in the field who I would have no trouble trusting with my life. The ones I'm thinking of, I can't see them doing anything you mentioned. Keep in mind you're in a first aid course. As far as the medical totem pole goes, that's the very bottom rung. You're not going to see a whole lot of professionalism. You should, but you won't.
/r/TheRedPill13/10/13 09:53 AM
2

This is the internet, man. I'm pretty sure reactions here are nothing like what they would be in real life. If anything, this is just stream of thought.
/r/TheRedPill13/10/13 06:31 AM
13

Not sure if this should be treated as a truth, although it does seem to be supported by that blue pill virgin story that's up. Dude told one chick he was a virgin and every other woman at work then knew about it.
/r/TheRedPill13/10/13 06:29 AM
2

There aren't a lot of states left that still take common law marriage seriously. And I'm gonna have to ask where you got that 6 month number because that's ridiculous, even for politicians. As far as child support, it serves a purpose. Deadbeat dads are a big problem. Mothers misappropriating child support funds is also a big problem. I think a reasonable solution is to have child support go into a separate fund that is in trust for the child. The paying parent's payments then go toward things t…
/r/TheRedPill13/10/13 04:20 AM
5

Marriage? Was once worth it. Not anymore. No. Love? Yes. Nature of shit-testing Subconscious until you realize what it is, then conscious. It's got the negative connotation and called "shit-testing" but all it is is people trying to determine who their partner is and how they fit into the scheme. So therefore- Necessary? Yeah. A lot of our traditional boundaries evaporated like 70 years ago, so those are things we need to feel out every single time today. Sure, people are unique and therefore re…
/r/TheRedPill13/10/13 03:45 AM
7

I don't agree with the future actions. There's no going back. We're in this world now. Our main problem is that when the old institution of marriage and husband/wife roles were destroyed, they weren't replaced with anything. It was just, "This is bad, let's do away with it," and it was done away with. That type of solution to a problem (and yeah, the old roles may have indeed been a problem) NEVER works. It's analogous to the mess in Egypt, where the people just keep overthrowing everything with…
/r/TheRedPill13/10/13 12:34 AM
2

I've had friends who I've gone drinking with who seemingly remained at the peak of their mental capacity, retained all their wit, and barely slurred or staggered claim the next day that they didn't remember a thing and were blackout drunk. So what's your solution? Not have sex with anyone who is drinking any alcohol? That's going to eliminate a huge number of sexual options. More importantly, it means I have to delete myself from the culture of nearly every 20-something that involves finding sex…
/r/TheRedPill12/10/13 08:20 PM
3

I don't think anybody cares about the reasons here. I don't care if it's socioeconomic status that determines crime, not race. You're still not getting me to walk alone through the predominantly black neighborhood in Detroit at 1AM. It doesn't mean I hate black people. It doesn't mean when I meet a black colleague at the office, I'm worried he's going to rob me. So when my life is at stake, when everything I've earned is on the line including my money, my property, my reputation and less tangibl…
/r/TheRedPill12/10/13 04:55 PM
3

Thank you. One thing insecure girls do is to seek attention anywhere they could find. Very valuable information here. Thank you. I'm in medical school. I'm only going to have less time as time goes on. I might experiment with setting a baseline attention level that I can achieve easily and that will keep her going. Make an arrangement with her. Lay down the rules. I've developed the impression that this never works. It seems like doing these types of things at the head of any kind of relationshi…
/r/askTRP12/10/13 04:41 PM
31

Such an important point. I can't tell you how many times I've let my guard down after the 1st success. You have to be VIGILANT.
/r/TheRedPill12/10/13 07:24 AM
1

Maybe. But I can't see how. I'm super inaccessible most of the time.
/r/askTRP12/10/13 05:46 AM
-3

I'm getting caught up on the fact that she's only had two partners in that last 6 years.
/r/askTRP12/10/13 05:33 AM
3

Indeed, she has tried to make sure that I'm into her many times over. She has tried to present the worst of herself because she is afraid of me finding something out later and then deciding it's not for me. But, by worst, I mean stories of her past. Her demeanor is submissive, agreeable, understanding. I don't think I'll ever let her feel secure enough to feel like she's in control because I have too much going on for her to ever be the center of my world. What are some of the risks you see?
/r/askTRP12/10/13 05:27 AM
-3

I'm cool with my unreasonable standards.
/r/TheRedPill11/10/13 10:36 PM
7

Not intentionally trying to shatter you, but I don't like this chick. She comes off as dominating and already has you doing a lot more than she's doing. She's already got you on her schedule numerous times. In fact, now that I think of it...she does a lot of the stuff I see being advised in this sub. Interesting!
/r/TheRedPill11/10/13 10:13 PM
3

To be perfectly clear about expectations, statistical research will never produce cause and effect results. It is purely observational in nature. The only thing we can observe is the effect. The effect we're looking at is sentencing. We're trying to see if there is a statistically significant difference between the way men and women are sentenced. If there is, then there is. It says only little about why that is.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/13 04:56 AM
3

I'm always cautious when I see some studies finding the effect and other studies not finding the effect. This is not the same as one study finding an effect and the other study finding an opposite effect. Low power is the primary suspect when a study fails to find an effect. The lower the power, the higher the likelihood that you'll miss the effect. Low power is often a limitation in studies like these. However, low power does not lend itself to finding false positives. It's primarily a problem …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/13 03:11 AM
9

As a white guy who grew up in a big Korean area, I always knew you guys were geniuses. I'd used strategy 2 before just coincidentally, but you made me realize how great it is for maintaining frame so I'm going to consciously add it to the repertoire. Also, what I think is super important is how you told her you'd meet her after you hung with friends and it was the truth. Even the best fabricated game can't compete with the genuine shit. There are just too many nuances in behavior to keep track o…
/r/TheRedPill09/10/13 03:17 AM
6

They fuck the younger girls that think it's totally cool and normal until those girls finally get with real men and realize what it's actually like. Then all those little shits can do is come on the internet and bitch. That's probably who OP is, some insecure 20-something with an average full-time job who buys expensive sneakers but doesn't know how to conduct an apartment hunt because he never got out of the house.
/r/TheRedPill08/10/13 05:21 PM
6

My title must be said with a british street rat accent. ;) So, Nazees? No, but seriously, saved. Enlightening.
/r/TheRedPill08/10/13 05:46 AM
14

Once assaulted, a victim is borne. Period. If I park my expensive sports car in the middle of the poorest neighborhood of Detroit with the keys in it, doors unlocked, windows open, wallet and phone in clear view on the seat and then I come back to find the car or anything within it missing, I am absolutely a victim of theft. I have a right to feel like a victim because I am. I can be a victim and an idiot at the same time. I can also be an idealist and a victim and an idiot at the same time. I c…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/10/13 10:02 PM
5

This is a stupid post. How does this ONE female suddenly remove our "more dangerous gender" status? Don't even mistake this reply for a defense of the other side. I'm just tired of seeing bullshit ignorant stuff like this. Go back to /r/mensrights
/r/TheRedPill04/10/13 06:27 AM
1

Hey, thought you should look up at my response. I couldn't get to it sooner because I was busy studying a bunch of other shit. Turns out my stats was really great. Here, in the future use this so you don't make the same mistake again.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/13 06:30 AM
0

Sorry for taking so long to respond. I got caught up in studies. The reason I'm coming back to this is because it's important I review my previous analysis. I need to make sure I know my stats so if there's gaps in my understanding I need to know. They first found the mean age of menarche (first period) among their sample. And their sample is consistent with the age of menarche found in every other study, indicating that it's an accurate sample of the population and the number is representative …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/13 06:29 AM
1

Absolutely agree. And this: made it all positive spins would've made all the difference in the world.
/r/TheRedPill21/09/13 04:27 AM
3

You wanna know what I get from this guy, buried real deep in all that text? Fear, desperation, and exhaustion. Fear. A 25 question FAQ with I'd say about 15 of them having to do directly with him trying to prevent situations in which he has to make compromises after meeting someone and perhaps hitting it off. He is afraid of having to say "no", he is afraid of having to assert himself in person, and he is afraid of getting stuck with a woman whose behaviors he has no idea how to modify, should t…
/r/TheRedPill21/09/13 12:31 AM
2

Nah no harm. I'm sure it will be a learning experience. But I think he's making the same huge mistake that a lot of women make in that they think what they're saying matters more than how, when, and why they're saying it. The biggest improvement I ever made to myself was learning to infer information from those three qualities in any message, and in that order.
/r/TheRedPill21/09/13 12:04 AM
10

This isn't a very good example. It's too stiff. He gets high marks for asserting dominance and displaying value, but I don't think he's going to produce any sort of chemistry. This is the sort of dude that gets played while he's at work, and consequently, produces a hole in the theory. There is one very important question you need to ask yourself: do you see this guy sitting and laughing with a girl? Do you see the girl having anything near what you could call fun? Don't just fall back on the ma…
/r/TheRedPill20/09/13 10:57 PM
1

Nah. See my response to /u/SpermJackalope above.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/13 05:09 PM
1

These preferences also only exist in statistically signficant intensity in women who had early-onset puberty[1] . No, that's incorrect. They found significant results in woman who they defined as having "early-age menarche." This is different than the precocious puberty that you're implying. They first found the mean age of menarche (first period) among their sample. The mean is a single number. I tried looking for it but couldn't find it, but it's fine because I don't need to know it to make my…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/13 05:06 PM
7

This is a weird post. I'm just gonna say that correlation doesn't imply causation and that there are a whole slew of things that could be tied up in both those traits that just so happen to overlap at a few points and produce the correlation. I don't see how this is useful info at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/13 04:42 PM
1

The top scoring post in the sub has net 387 upvotes, with the gross split of 558/171 of Up/Down. I don't think 10% of the max to date is significant.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/13 04:36 PM
1

If people are trying to memorize a script or follow any sort of structure, then they're not getting laid. Shit is see-through and you lose your ability to adapt to the person and situation. Having said that, unless your argument is that words themselves don't matter, this is a bad example. Body language and tone of voice, if I had to put a fake percentage, count for 80%. I.e., it's not what you say, it's how you say it. But we can't judge that one way or the other with his examples. Instead, we …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/13 04:29 PM
3

Hooooold on a second. I just see the abstract and I'm not paying 12 bucks for the full text. You wrote a summary on a summary. It's impossible to evaluate the statistical and research methods this study used to determine if it's bullshit or not. I really wanted to dig into this, but it's impossible to make an argument without knowing the methods.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/13 03:55 PM
1

Are you honestly saying that whining about shit that's true makes it a a higher quality whine somehow? It doesn't. Yes, your observations are true. Yes, this site favors the likes of SRS and co. more. Yes, they will get treated better as a result. See, I don't need to refute that. And I don't want to refute that because it's irrelevant garbage. My point isn't that you're wrong about the content of your whine. My point is that all that shit you say doesn't matter. That's what makes you a whiner v…
/r/TheRedPill12/09/13 08:56 AM
2

It's whiney because there are no realistic measures you can take to change them. You aren't informing anyone of something they don't know. So when you complain without offering a solution and without hoping to expand others' knowledge, you are just complaining for the sake of complaining. And that's whining.
/r/TheRedPill12/09/13 02:50 AM
1

FYI, everyone, and I do mean everyone, recognizes the way you speak as immature. If you need to feel like you've won this exchange -or feel like to need to "win" exchanges- then Godspeed and I hope TRP can teach you something about how to be better. In the meanwhile, stay the fuck out of the way and keep your mouth shut.
/r/TheRedPill11/09/13 09:07 PM
1

Wrong again, bud. A lot, actually. Here are the ways you are wrong: 1.) I am not in college. I am in medical school. And I am an older med student than average too. 2.) I was not trying to intimidate you. You should not have felt intimidated. 3.) I am not whining. I am telling you to shut the fuck up. I am correcting your behavior because you are supposedly on the same team as me and you make us look bad. 4.) *You're, x 2
/r/TheRedPill11/09/13 08:57 PM
1

Ha, second time in two days I've heard the carrot and stick idiom. Never heard it before in my life. Anyway, no I don't think we're going to be missing the stick. All it takes it a simple field report and people can let us know what they think we did wrong. I like TRP because I don't need to use soft language here and I don't expect others to with me. I don't want to hear, "Here's what I think you could have done better," office-politic style bullshit. I want to hear, "That was a bad move," or "…
/r/TheRedPill11/09/13 08:49 PM
0

Another immature, whiny bitch kind of thing that we saw a lot in the (bad) old days of /r/atheism, and that we see today in SRS, TBP, and the like: if someone disagrees with you, then they MUST be on the other side. I'm a dude. A man, in fact. You're a boy. Boys needs to shut the fuck up and pay close attention when men speak so that, you too, can one day be a man. That's how one gets to the enviable position of not fucking whining anymore.
/r/TheRedPill11/09/13 08:36 PM
1

God, this is frustrating to see. Not this post, the comments. I've got a count of about 1 in 3 comments that are basically this: "But they get to do it! Wahh! Waahh!" Grow the fuck up you insufferable brats. You're all whining about not being able to go and make fun of people. What in the fuck. Seriously. Reddit is not a valid cross section of the world you live in. It does you no good to see blue pill examples here. Aside from considering selection bias and that perhaps this site is not actuall…
/r/TheRedPill11/09/13 04:22 PM
1

You're supposed to find beta examples from your own past experiences and from the people you see in real life. Field reports are 10 times more effective in this way and offer a wider sample than just this website. If you are interested in truth, don't use one site full of message boards because there's an inherent selection bias. And, seriously, you know this site has a feminist bias. What good does it do you to point that out? Would you claim the world hates men based on what you saw at a femin…
/r/TheRedPill11/09/13 04:08 PM
-1

This is a little kid's defense. Just deal with it.
/r/TheRedPill11/09/13 04:03 PM
0

Intelligent people see through the whole "relax, man" thing. Intelligent people know how to evaluate things on their own, not by what a single person says. This is a really sophomoric attempt at public opinion manipulation. But hey, on the upside, you'll do really well in office politics. Make sure you really come down on that guy who overhear make the kinda-sorta-sexual joke, k?
/r/TheRedPill11/09/13 03:56 PM
-4

Stop whining. Accept it and move on.
/r/TheRedPill11/09/13 03:51 PM
-2

Stop whining about fairness. It doesn't matter.
/r/TheRedPill11/09/13 03:50 PM
13

I'm for lessening the BP examples. Because that's what's turning this place into a circle-jerky psuedo-cringepics style sub. And honestly, it makes you all look like a bunch of gossipy girls. Better yet, keep your BP examples but have them only be submittable by text post. This allows the poster to identify the many points of contrast in his/her example to TRP, so that we can learn why it is so, so good of an example of what not to do as opposed to having the quick one-liner as your headline. An…
/r/TheRedPill10/09/13 07:22 AM
2

Hey, I'm interested in your story. I'd mainly like to know a few specific things you did to re-frame, because I think I'm there now with my live-in LTR. I definitely caught this one with my alpha traits, and I think she's a good RPW, but I may be shitting the bed because I'm in med school now and no longer very entertaining while home studying all the time. I'd like to bust out some quality game with the little time we do have together, but don't know where to start really. If you could either p…
/r/TheRedPill10/09/13 03:56 AM
1

This is a shit post.
/r/TheRedPill09/09/13 01:54 AM
3

Wow how timely. I've been feeling the exact same way. I've realized that MR is just the response to the weird internet feminism and is therefore borne if it. One thing we can do is stop appropriating the SJW language and tactics. Dont utter the word "shame" as a verb and never appeal to authortity to solve your problems for you. And that's just a basic start.
/r/TheRedPill08/09/13 06:38 PM
6

00:52 girl is single, but 00:34 may not be
/r/TheRedPill07/09/13 11:09 PM
2

I'm going to go against the typical advice given here and say two things: 1.) Get mad, don't be docile and 2.) Don't appeal to a higher authority like your teacher. I've been noticing and have gotten increasingly turned off by this place because not only does it more and more seem to just be a reaction to the other side, but it has also appropriated the other side's tactics. Not only will this not work, but it's not the right thing to do. In fact, I want to put #2 in the overall category of don'…
/r/MensRights05/09/13 08:36 AM
1

Of course it's about facts. You fucking idiot. Do you know what the fact is right here? It's that making someone defensive by being a complete asshole is NOT how you win them over to your side.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 04:38 AM
3

This is a good point, one that I have in mind whenever I engage in a serious argument. You're talking to one person who is stubborn enough in their ways to be loud about it (just like you), but you've got potentially dozens if not hundreds of others also reading what you say. Talk to them without them knowing it.
/r/TheRedPill27/08/13 08:13 AM
1

What that says is that you're ready to accept information based mostly on who gives it to you, not your own critical evaluation of the information itself.
/r/TheRedPill27/08/13 07:48 AM
1

That wasn't for you. That was for the people using the "disagree" button. The former spits in the overwhelming reality's face that nearly all sexual-assault is not committed in an alley with a knife. It's people that were trusted, and people who would not call themselves 'rapists.' We can't say "nearly all." It's 38% of rapists who are friends or aquaintences. The report also states that nearly 2/3 (so less than 66%) of rapes are committed by someone "known to the victim." The highest number is …
/r/MensRights25/08/13 09:21 PM
1

You know, I'm glad you're here because I have serious questions about this that I know will get buried in the feminist subreddits. I've seen the "avoiding risk" angle get belittled and mocked by people like you (only using "like you" because I don't know what to actually people who share your opinion as a group, not meaning it in a "you people" or pejorative sort of way). Maybe you can help me understand what sets it apart. The traffic accident analogy is a bad one. A very good analogy, however,…
/r/MensRights25/08/13 10:00 AM
48

My favorite novelty account, easily. Consistent 10/10 performances. Bravo.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 07:29 PM
21

He is part of the problem. A LARGE part. People often overlook that the majority of troubling trends aren't equally maintained and propelled forward by all the perpetrators. Rather, there are a very select few that take the lion's share of the blame. And he's one of them. What he's guilty of is perpetuating the trend of hypersensitization in America. Looks like he got burned by the fire he keeps stoking.
/r/TheRedPill21/08/13 04:52 PM
3

That type of blind idealism could have gotten him put away for much longer. Yes, blame the justice system, but don't blame banks OR his lawyer. Blame the system for allowing someone to be convicted on so little evidence. Banks and co. were smart enough to realize he didn't stand a chance in front of a jury.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 08:36 PM
–

Save button.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 06:10 PM
1

Speaking from personal experience, the gifted and talented group I was in while in grade school had an even split or popular to non-popular for BOTH genders. It's a small sample size of about 12 total, but I'd still put it a notch above anecdotal.
/r/MensRights06/08/13 08:41 PM
15

It's people like this who think they are making a point when you say something like, "80% of people do X" and they respond, "Well I don't do X."
/r/TheRedPill20/07/13 07:37 PM
8

To be fair, no one knows what they're doing throughout the completion of puberty. Coming to your senses at 23 isn't all that bad, really. It's the precipice of adulthood.
/r/TheRedPill28/06/13 11:44 PM
5

That's actually a good alpha power move by the beta, refusing to maintain contact if she's with a bf. You have to respect that. I'd be surprised if she didn't begin to develop an attraction to the "beta" after this move. Edit: word
/r/TheRedPill28/06/13 05:53 PM
8

But the pictures here aren't about, "Don't rape." They're basically, "She is absolutely helpless and needs a daddy right now." It makes the woman seem like a child who is incapable of handling anything on her own.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 12:05 PM
2

I don't watch TV anymore and know even less about the current children's programming. If I had to guess based on touch-and-go experiences, I'd say children's programming is probably the worst offender in the media propaganda campaign against masculinity. The advice OP is receiving reeks of stuff non-parents would say. I'm not a parent myself, but I'm going to assume if you could replace the TV easily with yourself, it would have been done. So that means it's not easy. You may be able to use this…
/r/TheRedPill15/06/13 08:24 AM
24

I ran into a situation like this some years ago, of which I was at the center of. I was working at a job, in my early 20s, dumb and fresh out of a long term relationship. I got into shape because of it and was partying it up like no body's business, so my TRP characteristics were in really high gear. Long story short, I attracted the attention of my British boss lady who was married, and whose husband worked at the same place but in a different department. So we started going off to make out in …
/r/TheRedPill13/05/13 12:18 PM
3

Even this title made me dizzy.
/r/TheRedPill12/05/13 01:53 AM
3

The premise of Hancock was much the same. If he gets her, he loses his powers. It's not that she no longer wants him, though. It's that he then becomes the world's bitch. It's even said in the movie how he always gets his ass kicked by an angry mob somewhere for no reason when they're together.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/13 02:16 AM
1

It's not, though. Everything you read about is meant to impact the feeling of satiety, which can make you crave more or fewer calories. So we'd like to prevent an insulin rush by not binging on sugar not because it somehow makes a calorie worth more than a calorie, but because it will end up making you feel hungrier and possible lead to increased caloric intake. Telling people to eat more fats, proteins, and fiber all has the same effect of increasing the time food stays in the stomach, thus slo…
/r/TheRedPill08/05/13 04:41 PM
1

Of course they should. But to do that you need to learn what each is and then form a plan that includes both. You should always have the correct information. Always. In this case, knowing what causes weight loss and what promotes health are two separate topics that must be learned about individually and then brought together when you decide what to do.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/13 04:33 PM
2

Yeah, I do. Know why? Because ignorance does damage. When you spread misinformation, it hurts people. So people who are ignorant, people who think their 2 hours of internet research is enough, people who get their information from others who are just trying to sell books and promote fads, these people ought to be shamed into shutting the fuck up.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/13 04:31 PM
1

Of course. But we first need to establish what weight loss is, and then continue from there. Without beginning at calories out > calories in, you are lost. You are either calorie cutting without realizing it by partaking in whatever fad diet is in or are getting frustrated and not losing weight.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/13 02:04 PM
0

I really don't like documentaries. They tend to fog up the facts with interesting camera angles and carefully chosen music, crafted for one reason, to give you bias. It's the eating the 2000 cal/day that worked, not the <100g carbs.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/13 02:02 PM
2

you can consume 2500 calories of sugar a day and you will be ALOT more fat than when you would by 2500 calories of protein That was your silly, misinformed "point," not that insulin increases fat production. See, the way you used the word "fat" was to mean big, overweight, while I talked about fat as the biomolecule. To say insulin increases lipid production is to state a scientific fact. But that fact alone does not predict whether insulin levels will cause someone to gain weight (as fat) over …
/r/TheRedPill08/05/13 08:21 AM
0

It probably also resulted in a significant calorie deficit. Think of how many things on the McD's menu don't have carbs. Not many. So if he was trying to restrict going only by that, he would have to cross off most of the menu. And if you take the buns off a regular 300 calorie McD's cheeseburger, you've knocked at at least half the calories, and the bun is also mostly carb.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/13 04:17 AM
5

Insulin also increases muscle production. Things the 3-paragraph internet article never told you. It's ridiculously simple. If your body needs 2000 calories a day to fucking live, to keep you breathing, to maintain ion gradients, to keep your heart beating, then it's going to USE those calories wherever they come from. If you eat 2000 calories of sugar, the sugar will be converted into a more stable long-term energy source -fat- and then, now listen carefully, your body will use that fat so it c…
/r/TheRedPill08/05/13 04:15 AM
3

Don't try. Most of these people have never seen a chemical metabolism chart.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/13 04:11 AM
8

You're mixing up "health" and "weight loss" which is what tends to happen in these mind-numbing conversations of people who have science backgrounds vs. people who read shit on the internet. In terms of WEIGHT LOSS calories in<calories out is perfectly sensible and works In terms of HEALTH not all sources of calories are created equal, and some will give you diabetes and heart disease better than others.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/13 04:10 AM
4

Yeah except all that stuff doesn't change the capacity for energy those calories contain. The only bro-science is happening right now when you're trying to violate the law of conservation of energy AND mass. If you're body uses X amount of calories a day, and by use I mean needs those calories to live, if you consume less than that you force your body to go into fat and protein stores. It's that simple.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/13 04:08 AM
5

Don't listen to what women say, look at what they do. This is like commandment #1.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/13 10:04 AM
4

Rosy-cheeked beta
/r/TheRedPill01/05/13 10:01 AM
8

Yeah, you did really good from what it sounds like. Understand that you were fighting an uphill battle from the beginning. Trying to turn on your non-interest was sort of working against you, but there was really no other reasonable path to take. From what you're describing, your other actions seemed to work well. But geez...waiting at the door? Poor guy. It's going to happen to him at some point, but that doesn't have to be you. It's headaches you don't need.
/r/TheRedPill30/04/13 05:24 AM
0

If the circumstances begin that way, then yes, but rarely are things so in your favor from the outset.
/r/seduction23/04/13 11:36 PM
3

No, I think there's a point to that and a greater life lesson. You're always doing something you don't want to do to get to something you do want to do. Sticking with the baseball example: If TheIslander829 wants results and enjoys results, then he is getting what he wants in the end. If he has to throw a less comfortable way to get to what he really wants, then that's called a sacrifice. However, if TheIslander829 is seeking to be the most comfortable at playing his sport and worries about resu…
/r/seduction23/04/13 11:29 PM
1

Orthopedic surgeon ain't nothing to fuck with man. Just saying. Any surgeon, actually. Scalpel jockey. Alpha as fuck.
/r/TheRedPill22/04/13 02:32 AM
-2

Then that's not a "starting" doctor. That's an experienced doctor.
/r/TheRedPill22/04/13 02:12 AM
-3

Didn't see the link the first time. New doctor's as in residents? No shit, they make like $50k. Starting nurses make more. Medical field is actually a great example of nerd-alphas.
/r/TheRedPill22/04/13 02:04 AM
-3

Shit. 3x?
/r/TheRedPill22/04/13 01:35 AM
-5

Generic nerd makes 2x your paycheck in ~5 years.
/r/TheRedPill22/04/13 01:30 AM
12

You're kidding. Any time a women starts doing a stereotypically male job, she is praised to no end.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 11:14 PM
1

LAMFF made a decent point down there that you didn't respond to.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 11:12 PM
6

You started out decently enough, asking for this and that, and when it was handed to you, you responded like that. WTF?
/r/MensRights20/04/13 11:11 PM
1

Yeah totally correct. After several days of no-carbs, your liver goes into ketone and gluconeogenesis overhaul. The glucose transporters in your brain are extremely sensitive as well (very low Km, for your biochem review) pretty much guaranteeing that if anyone gets the glucose first, it's the brain.
/r/MensRights11/04/13 03:50 AM
4

I'm saying the dichotomy is worse. Either way, the male is fucked. If promiscuity is bad, then the females are just playing by the males' bad rules. If promiscuity is good, then it's the females' turn to finally engage in it as guiltlessly as the males.
/r/TheRedPill07/04/13 11:48 AM
0

You are so fucking autistic.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 07:27 PM
3

I'm a casnova, and she doesn't look like the type who is used to talking to boys. You're too overbearing and she was too shy. You need to worry less about your schtick and more about the other person. This whole thing happened because you failed to properly read signals. And get the fuck away from the shy ones. They aren't looking for someone like you man.
/r/seduction05/01/13 09:49 AM
2

So, let me see if I understand the logic correctly. Men are susceptible to this problem, therefore men must have caused the problem. By that thinking, wouldn't it also follow that women have caused their own problems as well?
/r/MensRights19/12/12 01:23 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter