TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

3RADICATE_THEM Archive

View 8 posts and 495 comments by 3RADICATE_THEM on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
7

The manosphere would probably die in month or two without female content creators continuously posting gender war rage bait.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/07/26 08:42 AM
1

It's really strange that ppl seemingly are still taking game advice from a near geriatric Xoomer who hasn't been relevant for at least a decade at this point.
/r/seduction19/07/26 06:15 AM
1

Netherlands has the tallest people in the world. How tall are you?
/r/seduction13/07/26 04:05 AM
5

What age do you feel like you really started hitting a noticeable stride? It's been really up and down throughout my 20s.
/r/seduction12/07/26 10:05 PM
1

I think doing so triggers the spam filter, but let's see: https://m.youtube.com/shorts/blTJO2NELiI
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/07/26 06:41 AM
1

Perception vs reality.
/r/seduction12/07/26 03:08 AM
2

Bit tangential here, but anyone else notice how so many women persecute men for doing anything for their mother? It's like if the guy does a single then for his mom, then women are automatically interpreting that as the man being a mama's boy and deprioritizing their wives.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/07/26 02:45 AM
3

I don't have a strong opinion on what the best course of action is—I used 'evidence based' here to try to guide the overall objective. I think regulations are nuanced—some are bad; some are necessary. I also think some regulations are well-intentioned but poorly executed (e.g., social media bans requiring users to submit government IDs to verify age). Ultimately, what we really need are experiments that measure cognitive faculties based on phone usage to inform these guidelines. What I don't lik…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/07/26 08:43 PM
1

I wonder how they would react if we start saying 'misogyny is a response to misandry' as they claim 'misandry is a response to misogyny'
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/07/26 10:50 AM
15

The focus should've always been on class—not identity. Neoliberals deliberately infuse identity politics to distract the masses away from this reality.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/07/26 08:23 AM
8

I'm in my late-20s so can't comment, but is it actually an active occurrence that staff of a coffee shop is actively cockblocking you? I just can't seriously envisioning that happening so repeatedly.
/r/seduction05/07/26 02:04 AM
3

Yes, I'm planning on posting about this here, but Kamala didn't even try to appeal to the demographic—and these morons are somehow Pikachu facing + raging at Gen Z Men as a result? Say what you want about Trump, but he went to where that audience was while Kamala avoided it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/06/26 09:48 PM
16

No, I am not suggesting they shouldn't have jobs. I'm suggesting that a more equitable way to implement it would've been one where workers now only need to work 20-25 hours a week. It's not an accident that we now live in a world where both sexes are working 40-50 hours a job each—a world where you're expected to be deeply thankful to your employer just for letting you have a job (even if they treat you like absolute shit)—and a world where an individual's salary's growth is being continuously o…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/06/26 08:10 AM
3

"the manosphere should be called out more for ragebait" Most of the rage bait in the manosphere is literally some manosphere grifter reacting to ragebait that women post, lol.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/06/26 07:57 AM
28

Feminism is an oligarch's delight: rapidly increase the labor force leading to decreasing wages, less power / greater desperation among workers, and putting money directly in the pockets of women which facilitates reduction in time to consumption (no longer need the 'middle man' of the husband). Cherry on top? Our brilliant economists generally only track incomes by households rather than by worker, so they get to scream how 'real incomes are up' in the process. And what do you know? Every centr…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/06/26 10:13 PM
19

Once you realize Democrats are intentionally invested in culture war (including gender war rhetoric) propaganda as smokescreen to avoid discussing the obvious blatant class divides in the US—with the objective to maintain the neoliberal economic model—it all makes much more sense.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/06/26 10:07 PM
27

A lot of women seem to have the need to be seen as an altruistic martyr or somehow rationalize victimhood for their any situation it's convenient with the main basis for the premise simply being that they're woman (and whatever contextualization they want to add). Ever met a woman who's an oldest sibling? They tend to exhibit this behavior a lot.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/06/26 06:53 AM
42

Some people might claim 'cope' in response to this, but I genuinely think most of these articles are written as a coping mechanism for women who are single / struggling with dating—while also strategically positioning something that makes for good engagement (i.e., nothing better than rage bait gender war slop). I literally looked at her IG and saw a post referring to this article, and literally three women I know liked it (they're all in their 30s, single, and at least two I know have had bad b…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/06/26 08:31 AM
6

I think Colttaine did a video on this like a decade ago.
/r/MensRights26/05/26 03:13 AM
14

Kuwait and Iran are at sub-replacement levels.
/r/MensRights18/05/26 04:49 AM
0

Well sorry, the marketing seems eerily similar to every other marketing ad I've seen targeted towards men struggling with common problems modern men are going through (of which seems to have arisen roughly around the time Tate became popular). How much is he charging for his services?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/05/26 09:55 PM
-1

It's fine to criticize therapy but all this just to be what appears to be an advertisement grift for some masculinity men's camp?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/05/26 04:53 AM
38

Is this some European term? Literally have never heard of it lmao
/r/seduction03/05/26 02:56 AM
2

If she's not clearly interested If she's clearly not interested Do you view both functionally equivalent?
/r/seduction02/05/26 02:57 AM
2

> Trust me, I attract no one. Even my girl friends who have known me most of my life have said that they cant think of anyone ever liking me. Curious - how did you go about retrieving this information?
/r/seduction02/05/26 02:56 AM
1

It’s not a rethoric, we can see it in the suicide rates of both, and in the marriage satisfaction reports. If you care about men the first step is admitting our issues One group copes better than the other. The algorithm proposes you the content with which you engage, that conveniently is the one that induces anger in you to keep you on the platform. Your personal experience is not a good sample of the truth ESPECIALLY seen through the extremely distorted lens of social media What does this have…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/04/26 12:20 AM
7

Sure, that's part of it, but I simply don't think it would be getting the attention and reach it does if it weren't at least somewhat representative of how a lot of women feel.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/04/26 07:33 AM
3

The only PhDs who should be referenced as "Doctors" in any sort of clinical or health sense should be PhD MDs, in my opinion.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/26 10:42 PM
1

I think the "advice" has thankfully died down over the past several years, but there was a meme that was floating around in the 2010s regarding 'being persistent'—I think some men unfortunately internalized that far too strongly. The other explanation would be that some men have oneitis / limerance, and they just can't shake the desire they have for one specific woman.
/r/seduction21/04/26 09:42 PM
-5

I wonder what this guy would think if he watched a few Clavicular clips.
/r/seduction21/04/26 09:39 PM
41

1:30 to 2:35: Feminists are always saying this nonsense. Where they ironically equating misogyny with being gay. Bit of a tangent (am willing to write a post expanding on my thoughts here if received well), but it's honestly been irritating seeing ppl say clavicular is just a dude who's in the closet. Like they couldn't possibly fathom that women are visual and ever increasing intrasexual competition among men in addition to increasing selectiveness of heterosexual women is pushing men to expand…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/26 03:59 AM
7

Because a lot of very overly online ppl have convinced themselves age gap relationships are inherently bad—yet they somehow ignore how misogynistic it is to indirectly attempt to restrict women who do have those preferences.
/r/seduction16/04/26 03:37 AM
9

I think one of the major points of seduction in the modern era needs to be doubling down on not believing what women say at face value. I used to do that a lot when I was younger, but I've learned over the last few years that it's blowing smoke / talking shit for the sake of talking shit.
/r/seduction16/04/26 03:36 AM
3

Just be yourself is terrible advice.
/r/seduction11/04/26 05:11 AM
0

Yeah, didn't miss a beat—just hemorrhaged 20+% of the user base and a huge portion of valuation. Totally doesn't explain why Elon had to spam the very website with tons of bots to artificially boost figures.
/r/MensRights21/03/26 09:54 PM
1

Blue collar chuds celebrating this is unironically one of the most moronic things they can do. They still aren't going to date you—if they're attractive and educated—they're mostly going to be dating people who are of the same SES. Girls who are pretty will almost always land on their feet—stop trying to hope for some delusional revenge fantasy. All of these headlines are going to create a massive push for people to enter trades, which will inevitably cause labor surplus leading to stagnating or…
/r/MensRights21/03/26 09:49 PM
1

The US really needs to go the way of Europe in terms of dating expectations, in my opinion. In much of Europe, there is nowhere near the same amount of pressure that a relationship much lead to marriage as it is in the US.
/r/MensRights02/03/26 01:39 AM
2

If you're going to have pfp, why not just make it a picture of yourself?
/r/seduction27/02/26 08:50 PM
1

Give her a time and a place.
/r/seduction22/02/26 05:59 PM
2

Try joining a meetup group to meet more social ppl
/r/seduction22/02/26 02:56 AM
15

What does f.ex. mean?
/r/MensRights21/02/26 09:57 PM
2

OP, spend a few months making friends to go out with—it'll make the process way easier.
/r/seduction21/02/26 09:08 PM
1

You might get lucky and find a girl who gets to a venue first waiting for her friends.
/r/seduction21/02/26 09:08 PM
3

Lmao - it's like he picked this up from some 2000s - early 2010s PUA guide.
/r/seduction20/02/26 02:44 AM
18

This needs to be upvoted more. It's just another tradcon buffoon spewing his own opinions / preferences as 'facts' or how the world ought to behave.
/r/MensRights16/02/26 04:10 AM
2

How old are you?
/r/seduction14/02/26 10:25 PM
2

I like staying detached—it makes me feel like I'm in control (or at least the perception of it). Anytime I fell deep into attachment, I found myself losing the woman I was developing attachment for in the not too distant future. Staying detached let's me extract the benefits without incurring the costs.
/r/seduction12/02/26 03:30 AM
-1

Are you going to act like this subreddit doesn't have a clear partisan bias itself?
/r/MensRights29/12/25 06:36 AM
2

Pretty standard beliefs for a boomer, tbh.
/r/MensRights06/12/25 10:28 PM
1

The only places I feel like this can work are: bullshit jobs professional YUP, white collar jobs that are filled with very social ppl primarily <35 (think consulting or ib)
/r/seduction30/11/25 12:29 AM
129

It's actually much simpler than that: many of them are grifters.
/r/seduction24/11/25 06:12 AM
3

Good listening / communication skills.
/r/seduction23/11/25 12:07 AM
2

Absolutely agree - I do think they prefer a woman who is dim-witted because: They themselves are not too bright They know dumber women are easier to control and manipulate
/r/seduction22/11/25 10:30 PM
2

Well, in the US, quite a sizable proportion seem to think an educated woman is 'unattractive'.
/r/seduction22/11/25 10:24 PM
35

Meh, it's a bit of both. I never got looked at before I started lifting. Now I'm not even consistent with going to the gym, but every girl I get with compliments my arms. Having some semblance of a v-taper, larger / broader shoulders, and defined arms definitely can be a sexual trigger for women. The one nice thing about being short/shorter is that you can fill out your frame pretty quickly relative to taller / lankier dudes, so clothes can fit really nicely if you can find one that isn't too lo…
/r/seduction22/11/25 12:00 AM
1

I think a good middle ground: attempt to come up with your own idea, then let the bot critique / refine, and you can tailor to your style as needed.
/r/seduction16/11/25 10:37 PM
2

My big issue with Scott is pushing the narrative that men are completely in need of relationships with women while also saying women are better off without men.
/r/MensRights14/11/25 07:33 AM
7

Why overthink it so much? If the date has been progressing smoothly, then the kiss will actually feel pretty easy. The hardest part is getting your foot in the door and opening the date positively.
/r/seduction04/11/25 12:49 AM
22

Case of better to ask for forgiveness than permission
/r/seduction04/11/25 12:48 AM
3

This is just fucking hilarious to read honestly. Let's unpack this for a moment—which sex in heterosexual relationships invariably gives the other sex an ultimatum if the relationship doesn't end in marriage? EDIT: I was agreeing with the person I was replying to.
/r/MensRights31/10/25 04:26 AM
3

Oh, I completely understand. Everyone is flawed, and I was not trying to imply European women were without them. However, there are two really important caveats that stand out to me regarding American vs European dating: Going dutch is much more acceptable in Europe whereas it's met with all sort of misandrist views in the US. There is FAR less pressure / ultimatums given about a relationship needing to strive towards marriage in Europe relative to the US.
/r/MensRights27/10/25 11:19 PM
36

What I find strange is why it appears Europe adopted a much more egalitarian version of feminism relative to the US. The US version is basically attempting to retain all of the selective benefits women experiences from traditionalism while having all of today's modern freedoms. Dating in Europe seems much less pressure, much less transactional, and it does seem like they do want relationships out of desire of companionship rather than having a man effectively be a daddy who completely subsidizes…
/r/MensRights26/10/25 10:40 AM
2

From what I've read, dating in Europe is just much better overall—much less pressure, expectations, and people are dating because they actually like someone rather than just trying to extract something of value in turn.
/r/seduction25/10/25 08:42 AM
1

Have you gone to a Vipassana meditation retreat?
/r/seduction21/10/25 11:27 PM
11

Not true, I've matched with plenty of girls many in their early 20s (granted I'm only late-20s). Take care of yourself and have a good fit.
/r/seduction20/10/25 04:44 AM
1

Here's some valuable piece of advice I constantly need to keep relearning in life: When in doubt, don't think.
/r/seduction10/08/25 10:25 AM
2

Stringing them along is a new level of game itself.
/r/seduction09/08/25 10:32 PM
-1

Therapy is ultimately not about problem solving. It's about giving you coping mechanisms for problems that are largely unsolvable or beyond your influence / control.
/r/MensRights09/08/25 02:11 AM
4

Cardi B
/r/MensRights30/07/25 07:31 AM
1

How many women have you dated?
/r/seduction29/07/25 06:42 AM
11

That's what's funny about it. Like certain claims are objectively false, I'm pretty sure the last time I checked the evidence suggests men are much more likely to be attacked in public than women are.
/r/MensRights18/07/25 04:59 AM
2

I don't think it's accounting for 401k contributions, but yeah—not a good sign to see.
/r/MensRights13/07/25 09:20 AM
2

Reddit sux w/ bullet points and lists.
/r/seduction11/07/25 05:28 AM
2

Hey - I'm not familiar with that term, can you explain?
/r/seduction06/07/25 08:03 AM
17

What do you do if you're not really into the girls who are super into you, but the girls you're really into aren't into you?
/r/seduction06/07/25 01:35 AM
10

Detached.
/r/seduction05/07/25 11:59 PM
-3

Need to be 'mysterious'
/r/seduction04/07/25 11:22 PM
6

My former company has been performing layoffs on-going throughout the year (which I was a part of), and they seemingly have been only letting go of men (hard to tell, because not everyone updates their LinkedIn).
/r/MensRights04/07/25 09:09 PM
7

For better or worse too, women are much more likely to move out of home and live in more expensive cities. Anecdotally, I've yet to meet a woman who's not obsessed with traveling, which can get exorbitantly expensive.
/r/MensRights01/07/25 02:29 AM
12

Yeah, there's a very real reality that female mate preferences quite literally necessitate the very elements they cite as evidence of a 'patriarchy'
/r/MensRights01/07/25 02:28 AM
28

Bro it really is wild. I've been coming to a major inflection point in my late-20s, but I'm realizing all the female relatives in my family basically rehash each other's dirt to each other and their mothers all while pretending to be best friends. Now my sister tells me she doesn't trust any of them and doesn't give them personal details 🤣. I've had old friends (guys) be mistrustful with me too leaking details of their life to ppl they've known for very little while not being transparent with me…
/r/MensRights30/06/25 01:13 AM
1

Sure. Socialism is a left-wing ideology. Paternity leave is a form of socialism. Men who are fathers / planning to be fathers benefit directly from (and even someone like me who doesn't plan on having kids would rather have a society that has paternity leave available than not) said socialist policy. Therefore, you cannot say that socialism / left-wing ideology is unilaterally against men's interest.
/r/MensRights29/06/25 11:37 PM
3

The problem with assigning very partisan political ideologies to a movement based on identity is presupposing that no one from said identity's demographic benefits from said partisan political ideology (and that no one of said identity is harmed by the opposing partisan political ideology).
/r/MensRights29/06/25 06:34 AM
1

I meant to say I could definitely see an American girl dating this jokingly to see how you react. If they are truly being srs, that's another matter.
/r/seduction22/06/25 05:02 PM
22

The enemy of your enemy is actually usually just another enemy. If what Trump is doing right now escalates as expected, a lot of young men are going to be sentenced to die for no justified reason.
/r/MensRights22/06/25 01:11 PM
8

Could very easily see this happening in the US.
/r/seduction22/06/25 01:00 PM
1

The housing costs are included in A. B is referring to giving a child a downpayment on a home. I personally think it's incredibly unethical to force someone into the world where they will be effectively locked out of home ownership their entire life and where they will likely be forced to live check to check most of their life simply by being born in the wrong generation. Even if you think the college numbers are inaccurate, you're maybe only shaving 10-15% off of the total estimates mentioned, …
/r/MensRights17/06/25 04:47 PM
10

Wait, what about muh misogynistic 'emotional labor'?
/r/MensRights17/06/25 02:13 PM
57

It's not like the alternative isn't loneliness either.
/r/MensRights17/06/25 02:13 PM
1

So, you make more than 360k a year? /u/AcanthaceaePrize1435
/r/MensRights16/06/25 11:36 PM
1

Key phrase is 'put them in a position to succeed'. The cost of college and housing is based on historical growth rates. Even if you remove the cost of college, you're still looking at upwards of 700k.
/r/MensRights16/06/25 11:20 PM
19

It really isn't. The reality is neither side is really offering anything of actual value. There are idiots on the left who are incredibly moronic with their messaging, but truly neither side is really giving anything that appeals to young men.
/r/MensRights16/06/25 05:12 AM
41

I'm glad some ppl in this subreddit realize this. Oftentimes, I feel like a large portion of this subreddit is captured by tradcon grifts that try to pretend the right is somehow magically better for young men. cc: /u/KalashnikovParty
/r/MensRights16/06/25 04:50 AM
1

Curious, are you from EU?
/r/seduction15/06/25 05:54 PM
1

Yeah I think most of what you said basically needs to be harbored / facilitated through a university exchange program
/r/seduction15/06/25 05:48 PM
3

I really don't see what difference there is between 28 and 30, 31, 32—especially as a dude. Early 20s are maybe a preface but otherwise, backpacking / traveling abroad may be easier in your late-20s / early-30s.
/r/seduction15/06/25 05:43 PM
5

This is really purely speculative. Having kids in today's economy for the majority of ppl in reproductive age is financially deleterious. I calculated the costs, and it comes out to 7-figure territory to put a kid in a position to succeed (if you have them today). Here's a breakdown: Childcare costs to raise to 18 (2024): 350k Childcare costs to raise to 18 (2042~, adjusted for scaled projected inflation - 20% increase): 420k (A) Cost of Median Home in 2045 (conservative estimate according to cu…
/r/MensRights15/06/25 05:12 PM
0

I'm hoping /u/SarcasticallyCandour is being sarcastic.
/r/MensRights15/06/25 04:06 PM
-2

How does that functionally change your day to day life because one argues semantics better than the other? /u/pargofan EDIT: If you're going to downvote, make a position against the argument. If you really think about it, none of it matters and if you really think it does—you are way too online and need to touch grass. These are all ultimately semantics—a concoction of random sound vibrations to form a repeated pattern for identifying concepts and ideas.
/r/MensRights13/06/25 01:05 AM
1

Just let the dude do what he wants man, nothing wrong with playing the field.
/r/seduction09/06/25 07:30 AM
5

So she's the next Taylor Swift?
/r/MensRights07/06/25 08:25 PM
9

Transitional moments. Greeting: hug Getting up: lightly grazing arm Walking: carefully moving them out of the way, softly bumping / touching their arm It should almost be like second nature and not something you're deeply thinking about imo, but it may take a good bit of practice to get to that point. Every positive reception in each touch allows you to escalate to a more riskier / vulnerable touch. I'd say probably towards holding hands but depends on what you want from a first date. I would al…
/r/seduction26/05/25 04:28 AM
21

Easiest way to initiate: when you first meet, give her a warm embrace.
/r/seduction25/05/25 10:21 PM
12

It's really crazy when you think about early humans. There was no organized verbal language like we have today—it was all raw physical interaction, facial expressions, and body language. A lot of these core faculties have atrophied quite severely for a lot of ppl since COVID.
/r/seduction25/05/25 10:18 PM
40

Remember guys, if you don't touch her at all (appropriately obviously), she'll make assumptions about you accordingly (too reserved / insecure, maybe gay).
/r/seduction25/05/25 09:50 PM
23

They might claim something like: "He's not putting in enough energy / giving enough investment" Don't underestimate the girl's friend group's ability to keep her single (if you're texting her, you're also texting her closest friends).
/r/seduction25/05/25 02:15 AM
1

Curious, what would you tell them before?
/r/seduction25/05/25 02:12 AM
78

I've noticed a lot of chicks nowadays are so insanely self-centered and self-absorbed that they'll play these games just to gauge overall interest. Like if you ask the average 20-something girl advice on dating. They'll unironically say shit like "be obsessed with me" and think there's nothing wrong with literally thinking that. It's a catch-22 though with most of them. You double text? "Hmm, he must be really desperate and low value then" You don't text them? "Oh, he must've not really cared fo…
/r/seduction24/05/25 09:13 PM
-2

So, is it better that both the mother and child die? Are you willing to pay higher taxes to support all the additional children who are going to be born into poverty as a result of abortion becoming illegal? https://www.texastribune.org/2024/11/27/texas-abortion-death-porsha-ngumezi/ /u/lu5ty
/r/MensRights21/05/25 02:19 AM
2

Doctors don't want to touch it because of legal liability / grey area: https://www.texastribune.org/2024/11/27/texas-abortion-death-porsha-ngumezi/
/r/MensRights21/05/25 02:10 AM
3

Feminism has arms that are very overgeneralizing and vindictive rhetoric against men. This went out for years, and RW pundits saw an opportunity to capture an audience with anti-feminist content, which made many men become de facto conservative.
/r/MensRights21/05/25 02:05 AM
11

Imagine thinking Trump actually cares about young men. "outside labor" Did you conveniently ignore how pro-H1b Trump and Elon are? Beyond just general tech positions too? Elon literally fired thousands of American engineers last year to replace them with H1bs to save a few thousand a pop.
/r/MensRights08/05/25 11:46 PM
22

If that's true, why do I read multiple entries of unions no longer accepting apprenticeship applications?
/r/MensRights08/05/25 11:34 PM
7

Being old definitely makes you guilty when you're part of the generation that has the greatest concentration of political power, wealth, and voting concentration during the most malleable period of the nation's history.
/r/MensRights08/05/25 11:33 PM
4

People change their mind. Most high career positions in today's world basically require investing most, if not all of your 20s. For some women, the status seeking chase is achieving that is something they can't live without trying to achieve at before they get tied down in a career. Doubly so if it's a career which is highly esteemed + high time investment like physicians.
/r/MensRights05/05/25 06:45 AM
43

My guess is they're thinking IVF + surrogate?? Got to be loaded to do that though.
/r/MensRights05/05/25 12:06 AM
5

If they're using IVF with a surrogate maybe
/r/MensRights05/05/25 12:06 AM
3

I remember a situation like this when I was younger. I started ignoring, then they started trying to talk to me and what not. So dumb.
/r/seduction16/04/25 04:15 AM
24

Endless amounts of bitching and moaning... it's a negotiating tactic (or at least that's the only way I can rationalize any sense of it).
/r/MensRights28/03/25 07:27 PM
29

This reminds me of this post I made (nearly 500+ upvotes) which what appears to have been taken down with no recourse from a female moderator: https://imgur.com/a/l5kxIbP Tl;dr: society enables women to be in a constant state of complaining—this state causes them to be in a constant state of distress and negativity and the effects leach into other areas of their life.
/r/MensRights29/05/24 04:22 PM
10

This reminds me of this post I made (nearly 500+ upvotes) which what appears to have been taken down with no recourse from a female moderator: https://imgur.com/a/l5kxIbP Tl;dr: society enables women to be in a constant state of complaining—this state causes them to be in a constant state of distress and negativity and the effects leach into other areas of their life.
/r/MensRights29/05/24 04:22 PM
67

I hate how porn has become the scapegoat/Boogeyman behind all of men's problems rather than it being correctly identified as a symptom as opposed to a cause. It's obvious why though. Why put actual investment in helping resolve men's issues when we can pull out a scapegoat out of the scapegoat hat and blame the scapegoat and men for problems instead of actual real world socioeconomic disenfranchisement and reduced mobility? That stuff is hard to fix (and if you believe as I do, has been worsened…
/r/MensRights26/05/24 07:25 PM
5

Got to start tracking in spreadsheets🤣
/r/seduction22/05/24 03:12 PM
3

Well, some hate their fathers as well so...
/r/MensRights22/05/24 04:17 AM
1

This is not exactly related to the post, but this works as a good rebuttal to people claiming someone is 'too online' or 'needs to touch grass'. The sorts of sidebars on social media definitely do transcend down to day to day interactions with younger demographics.
/r/MensRights22/05/24 04:17 AM
5

Rejection is much different for men and women.
/r/seduction21/05/24 07:23 PM
1

I made a similar post a few days ago, and it got removed from what appears to be a female moderator. https://imgur.com/a/qjGHup4
/r/MensRights21/05/24 07:20 PM
2

That's presupposing a patriarchy even exists in the first place.
/r/MensRights20/05/24 11:48 PM
5

They actually just double down on the same maladaptive behaviors leading to them making the same mistake. Misery lives company.
/r/MensRights20/05/24 11:48 PM
3

Many women seem to complain about every self-imposed problem they have. There seems to be a fundamental leach of understanding that there are no idealistic optimums — only tradeoffs and varied equilibriums.
/r/MensRights20/05/24 11:43 PM
4

Interesting, now I want to hear it lmao
/r/seduction19/05/24 10:41 PM
-2

What about your voice? Very deep and low toned?
/r/seduction19/05/24 10:31 PM
26

Referring to the part with MIT graduation rates.
/r/MensRights19/05/24 07:35 PM
149

There is very strong evidence to show that women grade men more harshly than women. This especially becomes clear when you realize women teach more subjective subjects (i.e. humanities) where they can fabricate a reason why a valid response is wrong.
/r/MensRights19/05/24 04:42 PM
76

Could it be because women have over double the acceptance rate at MIT than men do?
/r/MensRights19/05/24 04:39 PM
5

That's actually not mutually exclusive, and I never said all women.
/r/MensRights19/05/24 02:07 AM
1

You're taking it too personally. If you saw their optionality, you'd realize how much of an afterthought it is for them.
/r/seduction17/05/24 04:22 AM
3

Curious, how old are you?
/r/seduction17/05/24 01:44 AM
1

How are you meeting ppl?
/r/seduction12/05/24 09:41 AM
1

Hard to say. Honestly, women just have so many options that they're going to bounce around the moment a better offer comes around. I'm pretty good at staying detached.
/r/seduction10/05/24 05:52 PM
6

I've gotten love bombed a lot in the beginning stages. A girl is very into me, and how much I like her grows steadily overtime. Then, oftentimes, once I'm really into her, I'll get ghosted or dumped.
/r/seduction09/05/24 08:07 PM
60

take female sex hormones
/r/MensRights09/05/24 03:37 AM
2

Women have much more market exposure now and have exponentially increased optionality as a result.
/r/seduction08/05/24 08:45 AM
1

https://archive.is/hIh9x
/r/seduction08/05/24 08:42 AM
1

"Genocide isn't a problem; it's a response"
/r/MensRights08/05/24 07:41 AM
1

Women don't like actual 50-50 relationships.
/r/MensRights07/05/24 03:29 AM
10

I have a female relatives who's at a top consulting firm and is getting a top 5 MBA. She told me she lets the man pay if she really likes him. The reality is the more successful a woman is the more picky/selective she becomes. Her money is her money; your money is 'our' money.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 04:42 PM
1

Being traditional in a very untraditional environment makes no sense to me. Look at all these women on TikTok and social media. Basically demanding all of the privileges and entitlements that traditional housewives received in the past while not providing any of the value housewives gave in return. To each their own, but I am really sick of tradcon grifters brainwashing young men into Gynocentric propaganda that is arguably ironically more Gynocentric than feminism.
/r/MensRights06/05/24 04:37 PM
12

"Well, an actual human male would have red and killed her, so bears are less harmful!"
/r/MensRights06/05/24 02:40 PM
17

Believe this is happening in China as well.
/r/MensRights05/05/24 06:19 PM
1

"Coffee dates are misogynistic!"—online female dating gurus
/r/seduction05/05/24 04:34 PM
3

Very well said.
/r/seduction28/04/24 05:34 AM
1

My friendships and relationships both improved significantly when I made my focus much more about me and my desires rather than theirs. Most chicks nowadays will think you're weird and low value for taking them seriously and caring about them too much (and tbh it's kind of true).
/r/seduction26/04/24 08:53 PM
1

Relevant YouTube short: https://youtube.com/shorts/W5rgy66LMj8?si=oK4jgCOVhhdmBN4P
/r/seduction24/04/24 01:50 AM
2

I've seen dudes your height literally have decent looking women approach on their own.
/r/seduction24/04/24 01:47 AM
2

It's really hard to say without knowing you, honestly. What about friends of the extended social circles (like the girlfriends' friend groups)? Have you ever tried asking a girl out? If you've ever been on a date, did you ever try escalating? Optimizing physical attractiveness is simple, but not easy: Have some consistent skincare routine Maintain 12-16% bodyfat (whatever is sustainable in that range for you) Lift weights 4-5x a week Wear clothes that fit correctly and suit you Get a haircut tha…
/r/seduction19/04/24 11:47 PM
2

Curious, how old are you?
/r/seduction19/04/24 11:07 PM
2

That's good. How often are you talking with women? Roughly what % of your guy friends have girlfriends?
/r/seduction19/04/24 05:27 AM
3

What's your social circle like?
/r/seduction19/04/24 03:26 AM
16

It depends on what your goals are. Emotional connection is not that important for getting FWBs/hookups, at least no where near as close to the attractiveness component is. There's no shortage of men who have lot of female friends but can't bag a chick. Sometimes it's personality issue—sometimes it's a raw attractiveness issue.
/r/seduction18/04/24 07:43 PM
–

I have platonic female friends and am relatively close with a lot of my female relatives. If you really think what I'm saying is an anomaly for women, then I'm not really sure who's the one stretching the truth here.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 07:29 PM
–

What bonds men together is a clearly identified common issue or enemy. We need to score more points than the other team to win We need to neutralize the opposing belligerent country to protect ourselves We need to increase market share to corner the market and maximize our earnings On the flip side, women naturally being 'friends' with every and any girl makes it so it's a lot harder for them to have real friend between the sort of superficial friendships the majority of them form. You factor in…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/24 07:14 PM
3

Yeah showing way too much interest, she doesn't even have to work for it.
/r/seduction14/04/24 11:34 PM
1

How long do your first dates last typically?
/r/seduction14/04/24 03:00 AM
3

If you saw your dream man at a grocery store or gym and he approached you there, are you really going to turn him down simply because of some arbitrary rules fabricated within the last five years surrounding acceptable settings?
/r/seduction14/04/24 12:48 AM
–

Yeah, I'm not mad—it is what it is really. I think 80% of the posts on this subreddit wouldn't even be made if so many women here didn't debate 'on the margins'.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 10:18 PM
–

Lol you're funny. I agree women aren't a monolith, but I'm willing to guess I (and quite a few other men here) see plenty of women who claim to be perpetually single yet they're actually fucking around and have a rotation of dudes going. Maybe it's more of a young millennial + Gen Z thing, but this is not at all uncommon from what I've seen—especially if the girl is even half-decent looking.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 09:58 PM
–

Most single women I know are dating like 3 different guys every week. They just haven't met their perfect knight in shining armor yet so they'll entertain situationships in the mean time—because they still want dick.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/24 09:56 PM
4

AJAC is a Twitter masculinity grifter who sells programs based on BB splits people have posted on Reddit. He masquerades as someone who is much more intelligent and competent than who he is in actuality. Much better people to reference than him.
/r/seduction10/04/24 09:40 PM
5

I'll probably get downvoted, but if this is in a white collar setting—she has all the leverage. You can make general small talk and banter and maybe ask her for drinks after work or coffee on the weekend if that goes well, but as far as attracting girls at work? They've basically got to come to you for the large part for you to have plausible deniability.
/r/seduction08/04/24 12:49 AM
2

I partially agree with what /u/LettuceRound6170 said. There are plenty of BBLs that don't look great or have gone wrong. The reality is the type of girl to get a BBL is probably social media obsessed and was going to be pickier due to all the mainstream dating advice women are given there regardless of the girl's respective optionality.
/r/seduction07/04/24 09:44 PM
2

What is your YouTube channel?
/r/seduction07/04/24 08:42 PM
7

You just have to be willing to try and risk failing. You have to think if a girl is willing to spend that much time with you alone late at night—there's a good chance they probably like you.
/r/seduction07/04/24 08:07 PM
2

Yep. In some cases it's to still maintain high optionality while in a relationship too. About 50% of married women have an Option B man.
/r/seduction07/04/24 07:49 PM
1

Yep. In some cases it's to still maintain high optionality while in a relationship too. About 50% of married women have an Option B man.
/r/seduction07/04/24 07:49 PM
3

Could be delivery related too
/r/seduction06/04/24 08:16 PM
20

It's interesting how women want to spend so much time interacting with men they just see as friends.
/r/seduction06/04/24 08:15 PM
2

Interest tests definitely do exist
/r/seduction06/04/24 04:12 AM
1

50% of married women have a backup option.
/r/seduction05/04/24 07:35 PM
2

50% of married women have a backup option.
/r/seduction05/04/24 07:35 PM
1

I mean sure if you completely ignore the nuance in upbringing. If you're brought up in a conservative religious household, an image of an idealized woman is affixed and imprinted upon your mind. You get to the point where it's hard to break out of subconscious delusions because you want something to exist but you rationally know it doesn't.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/24 05:42 AM
2

Sure maybe, I don't disagree with you. I think part of coming to adulthood is growing in awareness of certain realities of the world. You're also not really arguing in good faith. Look at how many women on this subreddit and all throughout social media claim it's due to one's personality as to why a man is struggling with dating. Hell, I bet 70% of the posts here wouldn't have even been created if women didn't try to rationalize to themselves against the fact that they too also have shallow tend…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/24 01:07 AM
2

Some men literally were told that growing up though. Hell, you even get guys like Jordan Peterson who allude to it as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/24 12:47 AM
6

No one is looking out for young men at all. Mothers sugarcoat women to their sons (which creates quixotic expectations). Fathers are either absent or more or less amplify what is told by the mother. The only real hope is a man has an older brother who can show him the game from the ground-up with game that is adapted to the modern environment (not benzo-addicted boomers like Jordan Peterson who hasn't been on a date since the 80s). But what if you have no big brother figure in your life? Regardl…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/24 11:50 PM
–

It's a lot of work, but think about what's happened if men who are getting it offered on a silver platter, and they're still not getting after it. This was pretty much unheard of until very recently.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/23 06:50 PM
–

Becoming the new normal.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/23 06:48 PM
–

When are people like you going to wake up and realize that we are not in the 1980s and the world has drastically changed — likely permanently?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/23 06:47 PM
–

My son and his friends, who are athletic and outgoing, don't seem to put a lot of emphasis on dating. They play a lot of online video games, and have boys outtings. Once in a while one will hook up with a random girl they met on an app. Rarely does one have a girlfriend. But PPD told me this phenomenon was only exclusive to terminally online autistic neckbeards. ​ https://www.reddit.com/r/NoStupidQuestions/comments/18kg3e3/my_20_year_old_son_doesnt_date_his_friends_dont/
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/23 06:25 PM
1

"Evolutionary psychologist" isn't a real thing. Spoken like a true ignoramus. Pretty much anyone delving into the fields of neuroscience, psychiatry, or cognitive science etc will study to a significant degree on how evolution explains a large set of behaviors/conditions observed in human populations. ​ Even psychiatrists and PhDs who are very 'not RP' — like Dr. K (HealthyGamerGG) & datepsych (growing in popularity cogsci student who studies human dating dynamics) frequently point to evolutiona…
/r/ExRedPill01/09/23 04:48 PM
–

And I'm telling you this is where I disagree as someone who actually experienced things as a young adult two decades ago. I think when it comes to height, frequency and enforcement is the same. It was also just as much a requirement vs. preference back then as it is today. Again, I say this as someone who has lived and dated young women in both time periods. I know people your age, and I know what they looked like then (and even worse so now to be fair). Of them, some were nerdy, short guys who …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/23 08:55 PM
–

You're caught up on broader life experience, which is obviously different today vs. when I started college in 2004. I'm specifically responding to the comment on "the sudden insistence that any guy must be at least 6 feet". That's it. I'm telling you that the "6 foot requirement" is the same today as it was then. I know because I was a single guy then and I'm a single guy again now. I'm basing my experience on young women then and young women now. The idea that the strong 6 foot + preference is …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/23 03:03 PM
1

You're in your 40s. Absolute buffoonery to think your experience is anything on par with the average 20-something year old today. Hell, even from an economic POV, 2008 had a very lasting impact on multiple different sociological aspects of society. Case in point, you went to college back in a time where you could major in absolute bullshit at a no name college and still get a very good job from going to college. Also, I'm not denying there are general preferences that women have that have been r…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/23 09:54 PM
1

You and /u/Salt_Mathematician24 are completely missing the point. It's actually comments quite literally like what Salt_Mathematician24 wrote that gives insight into the general zeitgeist of how the attitudes and how women think in younger generations. The constant complaining and moaning over every arbitrary thing and how everything is 'sexist' by practically every 20-40 something woman is much more telling than some random podcast. It's pretty obvious those girls are just after the bag — this …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/23 04:29 AM
1

Ah another Gen X'er/Boomer pretending things were exactly the same back in their day. Next you'll be going on about how you had Online Dating back in your day too!
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/23 04:26 AM
–

Agreed. It's annoying how people in the comments are trying to invalidate this person's experience though. A lot of men have felt this sensation throughout their whole lives, we've simply become adjusted to it, because we've experienced it our whole lives — women live in a completely different reality, so it makes sense why she has such a bewildered experience as a result.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/23 06:35 PM
–

https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/1667327987681722369 ​ Aside from what's discussed in the video, I just got to say — TRT is a hell of a drug. This woman literally is more masculine than a significant proportion of post-pubescent men.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/23 05:29 PM
2

(My bet is I'll get a link to a TikTok or a female dating strategy post from three years ago.) Let me guess, you're some older Millenial/Gen X woman who likes to pretend she understands every single social nuance regarding Zillenials/Zoomers, because you're too afraid to come and accept the reality of how much you've aged. ​ I don't know who needs to hear this, but social media is very representative of how people in younger demographics (i.e 18-30) think and what much of their general opinions …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/23 05:22 PM
–

Isn't this in direct contradiction with all of those posts showing average looking/below-average looking men who have lots of sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/23 05:07 PM
1

Demographics of men that are in low socioeconomic cohorts find this appealing. I don't know why we call fat women 'plus size', but fat men are simply referred to as 'fat'. I mean how sensitive can people be that we can't just use plain descriptors of reality to describe someone?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/23 05:06 PM
6

People like you and /u/way_motion completely miss the obvious nuance when this advice is given. If a man does what he's SUPPOSED to do in his 20s (hit the gym and scale his career/earnings), then he will almost certainly have more options in his late 20s/early-to-mid 30s. Nobody is saying a man just magically becomes more attractive just by getting older. There is almost no case in which a woman actually gets more attractive as she gets older (only case is if she was fat and then became not fat …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/23 05:01 PM
1

I haven't read it, what specific claim(s) did he make that you disagreed with?
/r/ExRedPill02/06/23 08:02 PM
1

What advice did he give that was 'the worst you ever heard'?
/r/ExRedPill02/06/23 04:40 PM
–

It's a nice story they like to tell themselves...
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/23 04:16 PM
–

That's a nice coping mechanism, but when you have no control over who directly controls the housing or money supply — you don't really have much control over the primary levers that actually shape the situation itself.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/23 04:03 PM
7

If you choose to live at the same level as someone in the 1960s, you will have plenty of spare cash. But you won't be able to comment on here unless you go to a library, as you won't have a mobile phone, a pc or even a colour TV. You're just woefully conceited and stubbornly ignorant. Dude, smart phones, computers, and TVs are fucking CHEAP — they are not the reason people can't afford rent or a house. A guy can literally buy a serviceable phone, TV, and laptop/computer all under 2k and they wil…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/23 07:13 PM
5

I didn't deny this at all, I stated — "There can be multiple causes to a phenomenon." ​ I don't think it can purely be explained by socioeconomics, but it is a huge (probably the most significant) component. The other component, as you're alluding to, would be the erosion of values and culture, which is something third world countries still have.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/23 07:08 PM
–

You don’t care about the health and wellness of women. You care that fat women are happy which you find appalling. You care that you don’t have the eye candy you grew up with anymore because the adverts aren’t catering to your tastes anymore. Actually porn has been more accessible than ever before, so this argument isn't even true. Imagine thinking it's empowering and beneficial for women to tell them to become as fat, unhealthy, and unattractive as possible. ​ Yes, obesity increases the risk of…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/23 07:05 PM
3

Sure does pay for more military equipment to ship off to Ukraine...
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/23 07:00 PM
6

I think it is multi-factorial. It's really funny reading these threads seeing the boomers come out of the woodwork and regurgitate the same bullshit they've been regurgitating for over a decade though.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/23 06:59 PM
6

There can be multiple causes to a phenomenon. ​ And actually, yes, /u/BigOleGreenTrees seems to be making a pretty obvious point. If people can't afford to move out and have their own places, that means it is effectively much harder to date. Even if you can afford your own place, you can't spend nearly as much on dating costs — which there has been a significant, notable increase: https://thehustle.co/the-economics-of-dating-during-high-inflation
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/23 06:59 PM
6

Ah, the same old boomer apologist rhetoric from you. You do realize that the standard of living has actually been DECLINING by most metrics over the last 30-40 years, right? ​ If you lived with the same standard of living as the average wage gave you 60 years ago, with the average wage of today, you would be able to save most of your income. ​ You clearly have no idea how purchasing power even works, classic. And no, the point you're trying to illustrate is literally not true at all. The 60s wer…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/23 06:55 PM
3

Uh, what are you talking about, even just basic dating has had a notable increase and uptick in costs associated with it. /u/bread93096 is correct in pointing it out, and there's even multiple bits of chatter in media discussing it: ​ https://thehustle.co/the-economics-of-dating-during-high-inflation/#:\~:text=85%25%20of%20respondents%20said%20dating,they%20go%20on%20the%20date.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/23 06:43 PM
12

More or less this, I wrote about how the maladaptive effects of Boomer hegemony on modern society here. ​ Effectively, things probably won't get better until most boomers die off, and even then there's a strong chance that won't actually improve anything as the damage is done and will have lasting effects — including second and third order effects that we likely won't be able to predict or are fully aware of.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/23 06:41 PM
–

America is filled with pathetically incompetent and obese people. All you have to do is look at the commonly trending Twitter thread (like the one linked below) and see this. The United States of America — land of the oligarchs; home of the obese. https://twitter.com/punishedmother/status/1662201562931015680 ​ And for people saying, "Oh but they do have EDs!" — that's not the point, I'm referring to people who can't even accept the basic, clinical definition of what obesity is at a fundamental l…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/23 06:19 PM
–

That's actually something you guys do as a form of intra-group competition with other women. Men actually don't care that much about all the overpriced cosmetics you use to be honest. What would move the needle far more for you gals (particularly American women) is if you focused on losing weight — like seriously, that's far more important than getting your nails and hair done professionally. ​ Why do you need to be provided for if you're a strong, independent women? We literally do not have tra…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/23 06:17 PM
1

I'm talking about in relative proportion. Obviously, there are kids in the cities.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/23 06:46 AM
2

Honestly? It just seems like yet another avenue in which women will complain about something, blame men for something they did or didn't do, and then talk about how women are the victims. Women LOVE attention. It's why they spend all day glued to their phones checking TikTok and Instagram. It's why they'll literally make TikTok's complaining about how no men is approaching them or asking them out (of course, the devil is in the details and it's not the one Chad guy asking them out that they want…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/23 06:45 AM
1

I'm not really sure what you're referring to. What I've experienced going to big cities, is you're primarily seeing a lot of young adults (20-35) in high density there. Sure, you might see the occasionally parent-child combination, but it's relatively rare in comparison. Almost feels like playing in a GTA game where effectively all pedestrians/NPCs are adults.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/23 09:57 PM
–

There's a direct correlation between the household income of the house a girl grew up in and the amount of times she says she's experienced 'harsh trauma'. For all the talks of mental health and therapy, why do girls never seem to learn gratitude? Because for all the talks surrounding 'privilege', it definitely seems like some of the most privileged women lack even the slightest inkling of gratitude. My estimation? It's just female nature to be in a perpetual state of bitching and moaning as lon…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/23 06:46 PM
1

Singlehood rates are rising as well. Morgan Stanley is predicting 45% of women aged 25-45 will be single and barren by 2030.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/23 06:27 PM
1

You completely missed /u/FakeNewsFredo 's very obvious implied point. Men protected you not only from other men, but the elements, saber tooth tigers, have literally built and engineered civilization and all modern infrastructure that provide protection, comfort, hygiene, and long life expectancies. There are several female matriarch tribes in Africa that only allow women in, but they still need men from neighboring tribes to build the mud huts for them. Effectively all hunter-gatherer tribes re…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/23 06:25 PM
–

Of course I'm not him, I've sparred with taller guys who are off balanced and out of shape (which most tall guys in the US are), and it's by no means some deal breaking advantage as what you're trying to suggest. The higher center of gravity is GENERALLY a weakpoint. Reach is an advantage, but if you are fighting a skilled grappler, then all of a sudden they have an advantage in closing off gaps, which takes away the reach advantage.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/23 05:08 AM
–

Where did I say untrained? And what does it say that a trained 5'9" demolished a trained 6'6" person. Height can become a detriment in athleticism and explosiveness after a certain threshold (for most people, it's after 6'2").
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/23 09:16 PM
2

Oh I agree with the generalization, the problem is believing it's a hard and fast rule. The ideal height is probably somewhere around 5'11-6'2" depending on which martial art is being practiced. I'm referring to tall guys who are lanky, don't lift (therefore have poor balance) or do any sort of training at all. They would likely be outclassed by a 5'9" guy who has some level of physicality, yet subconsciously the taller guy is always perceived as stronger and a better combatant.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/23 10:06 PM
–

Eh, not really, and it scales to wider society as well. Why do you think so many people are glued to their smartphones? They don't want to come back to reality, and they want to stay distracted away from it. ​ If you can, I'd like to hear your thoughts on this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z57BxN4ZQ40
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/23 10:02 PM
–

There is a lot more individual variance among men as opposed to women, both in terms of personality and just general interests. Women tend to act a lot more in a hive mind, because they have a 'strength in numbers' type of mentality whereas men are more individualistic and prideful.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/23 09:56 PM
–

You and /u/LillthOfBabylon are missing the implied scope of my original comment. I'm primarily referring to the ever-growing population of forever alone men who will need to rely on various sedations to help cope with their life and not go off the rails. What was also implied and not explicitly stated is that women don't seem to realize how much all of these sedations that men indulge in help and protect women themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/23 09:54 PM
–

Isn't this mostly based off of mobile app games you download on your phone? lol
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/23 09:49 PM
1

Look up pre-historic hunter-gatherer heights and note the deviation/range cited.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/23 09:48 PM
–

Do you think the boomers who control everything and are riding off into the sunset as they destroyed and pillaged society for all they could care about ANY of that? The left still thinks the biggest problem with men is 'toxic masculinity' — not the total lack of masculinity much of the young male population exhibits today.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/23 08:22 PM
–

https://twitter.com/dieworkwear/status/1608211197425496064?lang=en ​ Dressing tailor-fitted and nice clothing? You're gay then, just lol. ​ Like what an insanely inept and stupid comment. He grew up in London (most people in EU have far better fashion sense than fat ass low-class Americans — this is coming from an American too) and was in his late teens/early 20s around the time he was there too, so it would make sense that is what played a role in influencing his fashion sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/23 08:18 PM
–

For all the negative complaints against them, I don't think people realize how much mainstream male vices (e.g. porn, videogames, weed) has helped sedate the male population to keep them in a dormant status, which downstream has helped maintain a peaceful and stable society. Men will need MORE sedation with the trajectory society is going on, not less.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/23 08:14 PM
–

Mind linking the thread? I have seen a number of women arguing semantically that 'ackshually men don't have higher sex drives than women! wahmen just have better self-control'! It's like they just make up bullshit in their head whenever any sort of gendered statement (no matter how robustly demonstrated by reality it is) to argue semantics.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/23 08:12 PM
–

All advice is only as useful as the individual case it's being tailored to. This sort of advice is given to those men who have too much anxiety to even approach a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/23 08:10 PM
3

Many people on the left are against bodyshaming, homophobia/prejudice against homosexuals, and will claim all humans have value. Yet they have no problem saying all men they don't like have small dicks, use 'Ben Shapiro is a manlet' as their main argument against him, claim that all men are trash (or that all men should be killed), and will even imply Andrew Tate as fruity for dressing well. Just because you can suppress and somewhat change your perspective on these things does not overcome the …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/23 07:53 PM
7

You're not going to really outdo 6 million years of hominid evolution (technically even beyond as far as pre-hominid species evolution worked down stream). Our lizard brain (i.e. lymbic system) is a very primal part of our brain that is responsible for subconscious thought and emotional reasoning. Yes, you can technically rewire your brain with various psychoactive compounds, therapy (which again are external environmental factors) and other practices to change your beliefs about certain thing, …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/23 07:50 PM
–

To be fair, a leading feminist author and public figure said this. And no surprise, all of her marriages ended in divorce, despite being very educated and blue-pillers constantly citing how education helps mitigate much of the risk of divorce.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/23 07:05 PM
–

Sheryl Sandberg: ​ “When looking for a life partner, my advice to women is date all of them: the bad boys, the cool boys, the commitment-phobic boys, the crazy boys. But do not marry them. The things that make the bad boys sexy do not make them good husbands. When it comes time to settle down, find someone who wants an equal partner."
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/23 06:51 PM
7

Less and less people are going about dating this way though, may explain why there seems to be more complaints about dating though.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/23 12:51 AM
6

It doesn't matter how good your personality is if said person's looks are not sufficient enough to make it to a first or second date.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/23 10:58 PM
2

I'm a decent looking guy, but short. Over about a year of using OLD apps, I've gotten about 500 Likes and/or Matches with women across different dating apps (which I think is pretty decent considering I never used them consistently and that I'm short). With that being said, I once turned my Tinder account to search for women and men, in a 12 hour time period — I happened to get 250 likes. I think men who are into men are much more permissible with looks than women are to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/23 09:47 PM
1

Indicators of interest are pretty much the only invitation for men to approach women they don't know in public. Guess which kind of men are given those strong indicators of interest?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/23 09:44 PM
2

I don't think /u/Teflon08191 realizes it, but he's highlighted a flaw in your general narrative. Most societies that are Gynocentric do as such in order to put women in the most optimal position to provide back for society. The problem is when a society becomes so Gynocentric that it leads to the host population no longer reproducing, which is literally what we are seeing across all Westernized nations right now. ​ The Western governments don't ever plan on proposing a solution, why? Because the…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/23 09:42 PM
5

Women in this subreddit* ​ But yes, everything else is spot on, and it very much is projection on their part. Like I'm getting way more fucking attention at 26 than I ever did 18-21, yet according to them that's impossible. My older cousin said his best years dating was 29-34, and he mostly dated women 5-10 years younger than him. ​ Honestly, probably the most damaging thing men can do on this subreddit, especially younger men, is listen to what women here say. Almost none of it is actually usef…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/23 09:33 PM
3

The myth is believing that the woman is only interested in the Michael B Jordan guy. If we're being honest, most of the time 'type' is used is really just a proxy for race or features associated with race (eye & hair color) etc. But if you look at the broad consensus of what women want, their are very common patterns that are statistically significant as to what women prefer. They almost invariably prefer taller partners, partners who aren't fat, partners who have a higher Shoulder-to-hip ratio,…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/23 09:29 PM
4

Maybe because it isn't actually relevant at all to how online dating works with premier apps today? On most apps today, you can't message someone at all unless you match with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/23 09:24 PM
1

. BUT the other survey that showed who was messaging who showed that women were still messaging men that are rated as less attractive meanwhile men sent the majority of their messages like 70+% to the top 20% of women. Maybe because it isn't actually relevant at all to how online dating works with premier apps today? On most apps, you can't message someone at all unless you match with them. The fact that women keep bringing this up really shows they have no strong counter-arguments to the consis…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/23 09:23 PM
13

Unpopular opinion, but I don't think it actually matters. We saw from the pew research data that for the 18-29 age cohort — almost double the amount of men were single compared to women. This, in conjunction w/ less women being on apps, pretty much tells us that women have all kinds of options whether they're using apps or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/23 09:21 PM
5

Fat tall dudes don't seem to have much problem pulling.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/23 08:18 PM
4

A Westernized nation does not refer to its geographic location — more so its socio-cultural and socio-political values. Most of Western EU is in the Eastern hemisphere.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/23 08:16 PM
3

Nope, this has been shown to be demonstrably false multiple times. If what you were saying is true, we would see a more equal distribution of men's profiles getting liked — instead, we see the opposite — a proportionally few men get all of the likes on online dating profiles.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/23 08:09 PM
2

Can you elaborate? These two situations: Situation A: You see a girl you like at the bar. How are you opening her? Situation B: You see a girl in your friend group that you thought was cute. How are you going about it?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/23 10:52 PM
5

Don't base your impressions of women based on the minority who are active on social media. ​ https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2017.1819
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/23 10:49 PM
-1

But we continue to do it because we do it for ourselves and NOT for men. I'm curious if there is symmetry in this regard. You don't do it for yourselves — you do it to signal status and need for validation/acceptance from other women in the FSM. If you did it for yourselves, you wouldn't have the need to post it on social media to get attention there, as almost all women do. ​ Answer this 👉 Guys, what is something that you've heard time and time again women find unattractive, and yet you continu…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/23 10:47 PM
2

Just curious. Why isn't trying a different country an option listed?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/23 09:37 PM
–

I'm not sure what's funnier. The truth of the reality this meme depicts, or the people reee'ing and bitching about it in the replies. ​ Just lol ​ https://twitter.com/LocalBateman/status/1649515140528627717?cxt=HHwWioCzrfzRoOQtAAAA
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/23 09:24 PM
1

How many years into lifting did you do before taking steroids? ​ Do you feel like steroids had any changes for you mentally?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/23 09:12 PM
4

What you and /u/KayRay1994 are conveniently overlooking is that women are attributed social status just by existing. You get into clubs and parties without needing anything versus guys will need to either pay a cover charge and/or bring multiple women with them. Women have superficial friendships, but the advantage in this is it allows them to quickly navigate in and out of social circles by being able to quickly make friends with just some random chick in the club bathroom (e.g.).
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/23 09:08 PM
0

That's also using the flawed screening metric of BMI, which underestimates obesity in the general population.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/23 09:01 PM
2

Where are you from? Do you realize that less than 10% (probably closer to 5%) of Americans can actually afford to live in these cities? Toronto is even worse. ​ In the Greater Toronto Area (GTA), almost half of young adults live with parents (47.4%), much higher than the Canadian average of just over a third (34.7%).
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/23 09:00 PM
2

You were probably just in a major city which was one of the pockets which had a huge percentage of attractive women.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/23 08:59 PM
4

You said it's a red flag "for a lot of women". I feel a lot of women would be happier if a man doesn't have female friends, that way it weeds out any potential side ho3s or girls he might be piping.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/23 08:49 PM
2

I'm always curious about people who give this sort of advice. If you're truly direct and upfront as many people tend to suggest, you're almost certainly going to scare away a significant portion of girls. If you're not direct enough though, you will default into the friendzone. What's work best for me is somewhere in between.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/23 08:48 PM
1

Are you doing anything besides OLD? Cuz the numbers for OLD don’t make sense unless you’re one of those top tier guys. 70% of OLD users are men. The volume of matches that women get is overwhelming, so of course they’re going to try to limit it to only the “best” men. Why do people conveniently ignore the other implication of these distributions? If the majority of women aren't on online dating apps, that likely means they have more than enough abundance of options in real life and don't have to…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/23 08:42 PM
1

Just because it's a red flag to you doesn't mean it'll be a red flag for others. Women who constantly complain about red flags is generally a huge noticeable red flag of themselves.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/23 08:39 PM
1

Why didn't we see such high levels of discrepancies in previous pew polls studying the same exact thing? It's hilarious how much people on this subreddit want to deny the basic principle of Occam's Razor when trying to analyze anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/23 08:24 PM
3

their league
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/23 08:23 PM
1

The dudes who say this kind of stuff almost always are well above-average looking and/or tall and overlook how those factors play a huge interaction effect in how you're perceived to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/23 08:22 PM
1

Lol all of that goes out the window for a man they have strong attraction for. Then they can't stop themselves from trying to place themselves in the guy's orbit. It's hilarious girls here are acting like the average woman is sexually modest, when even the good little church girl with bible verses in her IG bio has an n-count >= 15.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/23 08:20 PM
4

45% of women aged 25-45 are expected to be single and childless by 2030. We are seeing multiple venues in the wedding industry having massive loses over the past few years. I think /u/DeshaunWalt will be just fine quite frankly.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/23 08:17 PM
6

Why do women get so emotional over basic things like /u/DeshaunWalt is saying? You guys literally made an entire trillions of dollar sociopolitical movement dedicated to put the genders in opposition in each other, and now you're mad men don't want to have platonic friendships with women (where oftentimes they will be exploited to do everything a boyfriend has to do with none of the benefits). ​ Men and women are different. We generally do not share similar interests, and our brains are wired co…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/23 08:15 PM
6

I mean it kind of makes sense. Men and women can barely tolerate each other in the context of a romantic relationship or marriage. Now you're removing the one thing holding them together (i.e. sex and intimacy) and expecting them to actually enjoy spending time with each other? Most actual male-female friendships are surface level at best. What /u/DeshaunWalt is saying makes complete sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/23 08:13 PM
1

When things are comfortable and women have no outright dependency on a single entity, they will freely and openly complain. It's just their nature. Them always finding a way to be the victim is one of their bartering chips to get leverage in their favor. You should read the 48 Laws of Power, much of manipulation and leverage-shifts happen by the one who seems the least powerful. Just think of the horse and the chariot. The horse is full of vigor, strength, and might, but ultimately it is the pas…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/23 05:10 AM
2

np.reddit.com/r/AskMen/comments/12s5ois/why_are_so_many_men_against_marriage/ ​ Damn, love it when AskMen drops the hammer like this.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/23 05:07 AM
5

Why does it matter? It's pretty common in Europe for people to have kids and not be married. IIRC, the majority of kids are already born out of wedlock in the US.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/23 05:06 AM
3

/u/averageredditoralt already debunked the perpetual myth of the constant moaning we hear from women about 'domestic labor'. There is a massive disparity in house hold maintenance in marriage, and men don't hold up their end despite women and men working about the same number of hours. Even if we were to take your argument. There's a statistically significant disparity, on average, in how much money the husband makes versus the wife. Why don't the wives 'hold up their end'? ​ end despite women a…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/23 04:56 AM
3

Meeting people is considerably harder now than it was in the past, particularly now that we've accommodated anti-social social standards (for women's protection of course) that even trying to strike up a conversation with a stranger in a third place is considered 'wrong'.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/23 04:44 AM
6

Japan and South Korea have obesity rates around 4.5%. They also have lifespans that are longer than the United States to a statistically significant degree (over 7 years b/w the US and Japan).
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/23 09:14 PM
1

If that were true then all women would get less and less interested in having relationships as they got older, which is demonstrably not the case. How so? Ever heard of the 7-year itch? Women divorce what are otherwise perfectly fine husbands all the time precisely because they get bored. ​ Not everyone shares the same views as you. People grow and change throughout their lives. At least, they’re supposed to. Some people fuck up relationships in their youth and then learn how to navigate them. P…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/23 09:10 PM
2

GDP/capita is not really the best way to measure the relative standard of living, particularly in a country where wealth and income inequality is so high. For example, here's the homelessness rate for Japan, South Korean, and the United States: South Korea: 2 (per 10k) Japan: 0.3 (per 10k) United States: 17.5 (per 10k) Sweden: 36 (per 10k) Not to mention, every country has a different relative cost of living. ​ Traditionalism, historically, is about forcing a way of life onto people. Progressivi…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/23 09:09 PM
3

Well you've made a completely false claim, so I figured I'd point that out since that claim is the foundation of your equilibrium argument, which is just as misguided given that the most progressive societies are the ones with the best human rights, social services, disability services, medical care, etc. Is that a result of progressiveness or because of the human and/or general resource capital that they have? Correlation does not equal causation. South Korea and Japan are not really progressiv…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/23 07:39 PM
3

I think shaming works for women as well in the correct environment, just look at most Eastern cultures.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/23 07:31 PM
4

I think I agree with everything you've said and that ultimately individual cases have their own individual nuances, but I don't think it's wrong to make generalizations — especially if they're backed by data as well. I'm curious what specific aspect of my comment you disagreed with.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/23 07:30 PM
3

I never said I knew what the exact best configurations are to find the optimal balance in society. I'm very live and let live as far as my politics go — what's being discussed here is what's deemed most optimal for society at large, which oftentimes compromises on individualism (i.e. see collectivist nations, such as what we see in East Asia). Obviously, I think the best equilibrium is somewhere in the middle of the two, but we've definitely swung way past that point in the opposite direction. C…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/23 07:22 PM
3

Obviously, I think the best equilibrium is somewhere in the middle of the two, but we've definitely swung way past that point in the opposite direction. ​ Did you conveniently not read this part?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/23 05:31 PM
10

Shaming doesn't work because one lives in a very socially atomized environment, where nobody really has any concern of what other people think (which has positives and negatives). If we lived in a tribal environment, and your survival and well-being depended on you holding a good reputation in that society. You can very well bet that shaming language would work, and it's why you see a lot of traditional cultures are much better at mitigating negative human behavior than overly liberal 'do whatev…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/23 05:21 PM
8

Shaming is simply one incentive in a given environment. Ironically, if you think about what /u/TurtleDickSlap is saying — it's following suit as a progressed reaction. How so? Men have seen over the past 20-30 years how women have never been told 'no' once in their life and have never been shamed for the countless mistakes they've [deliberately] made. A lot are starting to realize how one-sided the shaming language is, and they're simply opting out from giving a fuck as a result. Speaking of inc…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/23 05:19 PM
16

that’s totally fine - but make sure your reasoning isn’t brought on from a spot of dehumanization (ex. single mothers are damaged, want to make baby daddy jealous, was fucked by chad and now i have to take care of it, etc etc) In the majority of cases, the red pill reasoning tends to be consistent with the actual reality of why many single mothers ended up in such a situation. For example, there are quite large discrepancies in single mothers vs non-single mothers in socioeconomic status: Single…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/23 05:12 PM
5

ITT: people reverting back on their femboy supremacy stances, lulz ​ But yeah OP, as others have said, sexual dimorphism is the name of the game. Traits that make an attractive female will likely make an unattractive male. It's kind of why most models have very androgynous/neutral features as well. They're not supposed to be the best looking women per se, but they need to have the figure that best portrays detailed cues a designer wanted to include in their piece. Pornstars (natural ones) have f…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/23 05:05 PM
1

Yeah, I mean Chads will be chased to some extent or another — don't think I said anything against that.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/23 05:00 PM
1

wait til you read the research on married women dying earlier than their single counterparts Which is literally a bullshit claim. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352827320302792?via%3Dihub
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/23 04:26 PM
1

How many people are actually forward about not looking for a relationship though? I think most people who aren't serious about trying to find a long-term relationship just want to see where the relationship goes, if anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/23 04:21 PM
2

Research also shows that the happiest demographic group of the population is single women without kids. /u/HazyMemory7 has evidence that this isn't really true. Among other things he's compiled, response bias and expectation bias are likely confounding factors here. ​ Maybe some men should reevaluate how they act in a relationship. Women are tired of bad relationships, so it is better not to be in one. It makes a lot of sense. "Men by and large put in the bulk majority of the effort in the initi…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/23 04:20 PM
2

thats because most relationships drain us lmao. if you’re actually adding value to our lives Men by and large put in the bulk majority of the effort in the initiation, building, and maintaining of the courting phase and relationship itself. Men have to initiate the conversations, drive the conversations, plan the dates (oftentimes pay for them), be charismatic, be seductive, and lead/direct the course of the relationship. If one party should be complaining about how 'draining' the process is, it…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/23 04:16 PM
1

Attraction is on a spectrum; some girls are shy and/or lack sociosexuality. Very few men are going to be directly approached by a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/23 04:10 PM
1

Most people complete puberty at 23 at most, even if your argument is masculinizing, for majority of males this is over at their mid 20s Many men don't develop full beard growth until their 30s. Then there's also the amount of time it takes to actually put on muscle where your body is hormonally primed to do so. That being said, prettyboys indeed get laid. It's delusional to claim some of the most succesful males are prettyboy type. I don't think it's useful to say X group gets laid or not; it's …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/23 04:08 PM
11

The reality is you don't, and the other reality is that it genuinely doesn't matter. What I've seen in various adjacent peer circles is people tend to move to bigger cities where they know mutual friends or direct friends they had from college, and then they expand their social circles from there on with other people they meet in the city. Most of the people I know are very high-achieving, career-driven people, and many do not seem to have any elaborate hobbies (they probably don't really have t…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/23 05:33 AM
8

Lol. Most of those are not good hobbies per the context of how hobbies are usually discussed here (i.e. a medium to join a social group around).
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/23 05:29 AM
3

t’s not helpful for men to internalize that women don’t want relationships. More helpful to say they only want good ones. As far as this discussion is concerned, I'm not really concerned with what is helpful, more so what is best descriptive of reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/23 05:27 AM
2

The average neonate breastfeeds 8-12 times per day. 8 is actually the absolute minimum. Feeds take a minimum of 30 minutes and can take up to an hour. Baby doesn't sleep for more than 4 uninterrupted hours if parents are LUCKY, it's often much much less than that. And if breastfed, it's always the breastfeeding parent who gets up. Not to mention at 3 weeks post partum you're probably still passing golf ball size clots. If you've had a c section, you have to be careful that your stitches don't bu…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/23 05:26 AM
11

​ The percentage of single Americans who are looking for a relationship or casual dates is lower than in 2019, especially among men. This number dropped from 49% in 2019 to 42% in 2022, 61% to 50% among single men and 38% to 35% among single women. Many women do not care much about commitment at all until they hit their late 20s.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/23 05:17 AM
0

You completely missed /u/RStonePT 's point. The main point is criticizing how most supposed 'trad wives' on Twitter are nothing more than LARPers trying to chase internet clout, and that in reality their relationships are very functionally similar to how men's relationship with a standard feminist is. ​ But what does a a Red Pill man bring to the table? Just a paycheck and "protection" (which means little in this day and age) and I guess mowing the lawn once a month and doing some basic car main…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/23 11:43 PM
10

I believe that most women would genuinely like to be in an equal and loving relationship, they just see how rare those are/how easy it is to end up in a bad relationship and chose not to put in the massive amount of effort and risk actively dating can take. That energy is often better spent on your career/hobbies/friends and if you happen to find someone along the way then it works out well. Therefore, many women would probably respond to a survey saying dating isn’t a priority for them when, in…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/23 10:00 PM
4

They are complaining about that today. It's very interesting when you get guys like Scott Galloway , a NYU Professor of Business , who doesn't seem to understand that if you want to change the behavior of people — you need to change the corresponding incentives for said people. Boomers have created a system which is virtually impossible for younger people to progress through, and they're pikachu-facing why more and more younger people (particularly men) are dropping out.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/23 09:26 PM
0

What's driven most of male work ethic and innovation in civilized societies has been the general availability/accessibility (perceived or real) of women to have a family with. The whole 'hobbies' fascination most women have on this subreddit is kind of amusing. Just think about it, you only have to go back a few generations to where we can see the vast majority of people didn't have hobbies, because they were focused on increasing wealth or just preparation for general survival. ​ Even today, mo…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/23 09:24 PM
4

Not everything has to do with autism. There are plenty of people who have good social skills, but since they had a lack of exposure to those situations — they don't really know the best way to navigate them.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/23 09:14 PM
18

{insert argument of the decline of third places, community; rise of ghosting, social atomization, faux-autistic behavior, accessibly of options for women} as to why it's not 'always how it's been for average men'.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/23 09:12 PM
63

The most hilarious bullshit I've read on this subreddit has to be the overestimation of how interesting and adventurous the average person is. The average American who works full-time is working 45-50 hours not to mention any implied time lost in commute or other work-related time sinks. Most people absolutely do not have the mental bandwidth or time to actually be invested in a social group or hobby to any extent of what's advised here. ​ Adding on to this, the average American woman in their 2…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/23 09:09 PM
50

Actually the data kind of shows that most women don't really care about having relationships, and it's no where near even a top concern for them. Anyways, I have somewhat of a nuanced take on this. Women generally do give poor dating advice to men, but the advice they give will 'technically' work if it's a man they have very strong attraction to. This is probably why women think the advice they give works well, because it works well for them under perfect conditions.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/23 09:05 PM
1

A man becomes more attractive if you do the right things in your 20s. Most men simply aren't able to have that great of a physique at age 20, because their bodies have only been primed for hypertrophy for about two years. There's also the fact that a lot of men's faces mature and develop a lot from age 18 to 25. While most women might find femboy baby faced guys fun to look at, it usually doesn't actually greater sexual tension or lust in many of them compared to a more masculine looking man. An…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/23 09:02 PM
–

He appeals and has reached a much wider audience than that. He was all over TikTok, Snapchat, and twitter, that reaches out to even older millenials. It's hilarious people want to act like the red pill is still some obscure thing. And who cares if it's predominantly just younger demographics? They're the future and will dictate the future outcomes of the West.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/23 05:01 PM
–

Yeah, the guy who was also interviewed by Piers Morgan and Tucker Carlson truly has such negligible exposure and/or it's limited to 'underage boys'. Do you realize what you're even saying? Hell, even on /r/dating_advice and other mainstream dating related subreddits you see very manosphere-esque takes and opinions.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/23 04:50 PM
4

The Red Pill is not nearly as obscure as you're making it out to be. Something has happened in the past 2-3 years (perhaps COVID was an inadvertent catalyst with everyone spending more time indoors and online), but redpill/manosphere content has completely exploded. There are multiple red pill content creators at 500k+ subs on YouTube etc — let alone guys like Andrew Tate.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/23 06:54 PM
22

Lmao, I'm not exactly the neatest or most organized guy by any means, but half of the girls I've dated place's were a fucking mess (clothes all over, everything out of place) and couldn't cook at all. I know people love to generalize men as being completely dysfunctional in basic life skills, but the reality is that's more so just the average American than anything to do with sex/gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/23 06:23 PM
8

What income threshold would your man need to be at for you to consider him? Start there.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/23 06:19 PM
8

Tell me where I'm wrong that a person without any real plans towards a good job, actually having a good job, or financial self-sustaining plans where it is not a sign of deeper flaws. I'm seriously open to knowing. ​ Wait, doesn't this exactly describe yourself if your plan is to become a stay at home mom though? ​ Only way this isn't so is if you specifically mean only men.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/23 06:18 PM
1

Throughout our evolutionary history, men were primarily assessed by their propensity to acquire and provide resources. This is something that is internally ingrained in women's subconscious whether they want to admit it or not. ​ Though the power of wealth has lost a lot of its influence over the past few decades in terms of a man's overall attractiveness, it's still a very relevant factor. For example, this study: Females are four times more sensitive than males to economic status cues when rat…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/23 06:17 PM
1

People should look at what most bodybuilders look outside of the few weeks surrounding contest prep. Many are at 12-14 body fat percentage and would hardly be considered 'unattractive'
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/23 05:21 AM
1

https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2017.1819 From the study: The results show that most male bodily attractiveness stems from cues of formidability and physical strength, and that strength increases attractiveness in a linear fashion. The rated strength of a male body accounts for a full 70% of the variance in attractiveness. ​ Shoulders aren't even the most important muscle group to work on either.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/23 05:20 AM
1

- Masculine man overrating Multiple studies showed that the most masculine looking faces had the most success in short-term mating strategies. Contrary to 'popular' belief (as in regards to what women say here), most women may have general attraction to pretty boys due to the manicured and symmetrical features, but the pretty boys oftentimes lack sexual polarity to create true sexual desire and tension. Alexander Grace covered this in this video. ​ I don't care about outliers. I don't care that …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/23 05:19 AM
3

(I consider myself to be feminist in that I support women's empowerment and equity, as everyone should, and I see this as distinct from the unappeasable splinter of pseudo feminists who rally under the banner but are really just motivated by personal grievance and misandry not equality, and do the overall movement a great disservice. ​ I'm not even going to address your post, because I think other people have said pretty much everything I wanted to say, but I strongly disagree with this. ​ First…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/23 06:25 PM
1

I wonder what's the fatality rate between child birth and all-out war.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/23 12:25 AM
1

I don't have much to add to this discussion, but I tried to make a post addressing socioeconomic concerns surrounding dating and socioeconomic mobility for younger generations here if you're interested in reading (since you mentioned it's rarely discussed here).
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/23 12:23 AM
0

The average American doesn't even have enough money to cover a $1000 emergency. For people to think an average dude struggling to get laid (who's almost certainly on the younger end of things) is resourceful enough to have enough money to pay for a plane ticket (not to mention additional transportation and lodging) and afford a hooker at a $500/hour rate is absolutely laughable.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/23 12:20 AM
13

I mean sure, but those are margins and cost of doing business? You're far more likely to lose a girl by giving her too many compliments and attention.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/23 07:39 PM
9

This is why I don't get all of the deep throating a lot of dudes have for Jordan Peterson. The guy is a drug crazed and drug addicted boomer who had to beg his wife to marry him and hasn't been on a date since the late 80s. Why do people actually think he's a subject matter expert on dating in the 2020s? I'm not exactly a fan of Tate, but Tate's message on dating is far better and useful to young men trying to date in today's landscape than JP's.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/23 07:36 PM
11

Have you read Robert Greene's Art of Seduction? ​ The problem is game is more necessary than ever, but it's also the least effective it's ever been in modern history. Why is that? Well, it's because looks have taken the forefront of dictating whether relationships happen or not. And due to overexposure to social media (and the respective deception via filters and professional lighting/makeup etc) — the expectations trend more and more towards perfection than reality. So, going to your point, men…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/23 07:34 PM
26

Women say everything you say, but then they find a guy they're super attracted to and all of that goes out of the window. ​ The whole 'this only works on insecure women' is not a very useful statement. Why? It's because most women are pretty insecure to begin with. Even the loudest, most arrogant and delusional ones that you see on social media who seemingly have the utmost confidence on their outer shell have the weakest internal strength and are actually quite insecure once you go a bit deeper…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/23 07:27 PM
–

It's humorous, you're practically almost slut shaming.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/23 08:32 PM
14

Because these women aren't acting? We have multiple converging lines of evidence to suggest that it is genuinely what they believe. If it was all a joke too, why does nearly all of the comment section respond as if it's a serious take? Look you can call me silly or whatever, I'm not even saying AWALT based on what we see on social media, but the reality is as more and more Gen Z becomes of age, you're going to see greater and greater aversion towards women, because they GREW up on social media f…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/23 08:29 PM
5

There are plenty of women who think like this, and it only takes a few seconds of browsing social media to find them.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/23 08:28 PM
13

I think most of men's complaints actually tend to be more rational and factual if looked at on face value. The problem a lot of people, especially younger men, here don't understand is that humans are fundamently just animals who act accordingly to their nature and biological impulses. It's not some logical, conscious decision being made most of the time, but female behavior is treated as such. ​ Case in point, I rarely hear men complain about ghosting (it's just an expectation nowadays that mos…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/23 08:27 PM
7

They talk about all kinds of shit. Do I understand why people reveal so much about their personal lives and what not to millions of strangers online? No idea, but they've very comfortable with doing so. ​ Here's one I just saw today: ​ https://twitter.com/Rich\_Cooper/status/1640668808070176769
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/23 08:21 PM
3

That's a pretty interesting point I've been thinking about recently. I'm curious why do you think it's the case? I think the education system—and its very feminized associations, plays a critical role. The education system is what pushed the idea of equality so hard, that a lot of young men are trying to barter with women since a lot of them literally think we are the 'same & equal'. As a result, a lot of younger men have witnessed women doing as such and probably think, "Oh women are strong and…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/23 08:14 PM
3

Seeing what women explicitly say on the internet is akin to making shit up in their head? Who has time to go and approach 10000 women even? I'm not even sure how the hell you would find 10000 women to go and approach in a relatively short timespan so you can't rule out other factors were the cause of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/23 08:07 PM
7

You have no idea what you're talking about. There are millions of girls on Tiktok, aged 18-34. When a guy sees these videos of women talking shit about men or talking about their preferences that weed out at least 95% of men in existence, and then you see it get 80k+ likes with millions of engagement views among other things, see all the women go "YASSS QUEEN" in the comment section or in response reels, you really don't think that's at least somewhat indicative of the general zeitgeist of how w…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/23 08:06 PM
4

You realize there are plenty of 30+ women on TikTok as well?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/23 08:03 PM
–

It becomes harder and harder for people to change the older they get. Very few people are actually capable of real, sustainable lifestyle/behavioral change as well.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/23 07:57 PM
–

Depends how much you limit your own market, more and more men are doing the CBA and seeing that going abroad works better for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/23 07:56 PM
–

Yeah, I agree with this. It's very rare to actually see what /u/Incel_Finder claims most men here are doing.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/23 07:55 PM
2

The issue is that these guys here who call themselves 'alpha' have never left their rooms, yet somehow they feel entitled to a young beautiful '10/10' woman. How does the work? Yeah, that's stupid, I don't agree with that. Anyone who is a self-proclaimed alpha or not using it ironically is usually on the spectrum.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/23 10:43 PM
0

I really highly doubt this is as common as you're making it seem among high n-count women in all fairness. Most women who got up there got up there because they 'wanted' to.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/23 10:39 PM
1

This post overlooks so many things that have contributed to the rise in prices. Thinks like taking us off of the gold standard and allowing fiat currency to be printed out of thin air (monetary inflation) which devalues the currency and makes things cost more (price inflation), environmental regulations that drive up homebuilding costs, loss of good-paying manufacturing jobs to overseas labor, etc. So, while that overseas iPhone costs $1k it would cost $3k if it was made domestically in union fa…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/23 10:38 PM
0

At the end of the day, we are a social animal, and throughout our species' existence, it was absolutely imperative to protect one's reputation. It's natural for other people to judge and trying to just wish it weren't so isn't going to change that reality, whether it is right or wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/23 10:33 PM
1

Oh, that wasn't the point of my comment. ​ I was wondering why /u/plumtastic was assuming a woman who has a promiscuous past had one as such due to trying to be intimate with someone she thought would be suitable for as a long-term partner. This usually isn't the case, not in the West at least, and all those questions I gave were examples of how I wouldn't expect it to be as a result of what she's claiming.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/23 10:31 PM
6

The person you're responding to is a bisexual or homosexual man, so I think that would explain most of 'deviance' from the mean.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/23 10:29 PM
3

Homosexual and heterosexual men do not have the same selection criteria for what they look for in a mate. Heterosexual men are notably much less sex-positive in terms of evaluating potential long-term mates, which is probably obviously explained by gay men not having a pregnancy risk.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/23 10:29 PM
1

I've read the report, this apparently only includes subscription fees. They can receive (and oftentimes do) the majority of revenue from other OF streams. I remember seeing a case on YT where this borderline obese woman was getting 3k a month as a 'financial dominatrix'.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/23 10:27 PM
8

Marrying someone who has major red flags based on the impulsive flames of infatuation makes me think the man has either low self-esteem or a lack of impulse control, perhaps both.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/23 10:25 PM
7

I know a lot of women claim they can just 'sense' the misogyny oozing out of a man, but for men who have some level of emotional intelligence, charisma, game, and looks — you really won't be able to tell. Being able to tell a autisticel is misogynistic based on his poor mannerisms, revealing antagonistic body language/facial expressions, and speech doesn't mean you can tell it with a man who can actually pull (while also holding similar beliefs).
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/23 10:21 PM
3

Whether or not it's fair to be judged upon your past, it's going to happen either way. This is kind of a fundamental problem within therapy. People think any sense of shame or guilt felt is automatically bad, but that's not necessarily true. You should (assuming you're well-adjusted and don't have some anti-social personality disorder) feel a sense of guilt and shame when you do something that actually was your fault. It's our brains way of trying to dissuade you from making poor choices again i…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/23 10:18 PM
2

What if she was just fucking because all the girls around her were (e.g. college)? What if she has an addictive personality? What if she has a 'roster' (as many girls on social media talk about)? What if she just travels and hooks up a lot? I think it's very strange to assume it's all due to her happening to want sex in a romantic context.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/23 10:13 PM
20

There is no reason or real rationale as to why someone does or does not have a preference in a romantic or sexual context. Almost all preferences are a manifestation of our subconscious, limbic system, various childhood and prenatal factors, and we largely have no control over what we're attracted to (though there are environmental conditions that can alter them overtime, e.g. heavier exposure to a population you don't see often). Almost all rationales people give are post-hoc rationalizations r…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/23 10:11 PM
1

That's nice Eradicate Them. You took my entire post and pulled out one sentence and proceed to proof me wrong. You still haven't won any hearts. Gotta be honest anytime I read something that blames Boomers on their misfortunes, I just tune it out. I'm in my 20s, make six figures like you. Also six figures wealth like you. So you began your original comment with a lackadaisical tone that implies you are disinterested in discourse. You're already doing better than most people ever did, Boomer or M…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/23 12:09 AM
1

More competition = more even playing field = more opportunities for prosperity. More competition equals lower salaries and less roles available to be filled. Silicon Valley was already more or less a meritocracy as far as technical roles go. There are plenty of people who either have no higher education or had no relevant higher education but were able to self-teach themselves sufficiently to get into a technical role. The thing is, as you seem to be alluding towards, if the skill ceiling for a …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/23 11:54 PM
2

My depression symptoms increase when I’m unemployed. I’m not someone who can just be without a purpose. I need something to work towards outside of hobbies. This has much more to do with the American zeitgeist of making your occupation your identity. Also, it’s not like you get more time to socialize when everyone else is working. So you just end up alone. Rather be working and making money. It’s nice to take a break from time to time. But you’ll get tired of it if it lasts more than a few weeks…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/23 11:46 PM
1

Hmm, very interesting. I wonder if any of it has to do with some working hours being undocumented, kind of like you work 40 hours on paper, but in reality you're doing work related stuff for closer to 50-60 hours a week. ​ Reading threads like this seem to suggest as such: ​ np.reddit.com/r/todayilearned/comments/3r3eyv/til_americans_work_137_more_hours_per_year_than/ ​ Just knowing what I've read about Japanese/Korean working culture, they're oftentimes just expected to come into the office on …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/23 11:44 PM
1

Everyone forgets inflation. Minimum wage for 4.25 or 4.5 an hour when I entered the work force. I think 4.50. I stopped reading here. I pointed out multiple times throughout my post that even when accounting for inflation that salaries are close to about half or less than half of what they should be, and that houses are close to over double. https://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/cpicalc.pl?cost1=3.35&year1=198001&year2=202302 ​ Minimum wage was $3.35 in 1980. Plug that in and see what number it gives you…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 07:17 PM
1

Frankly, if anything your example shows that dumb people can get by no problem in current society. Your very own story is contradictory to your claim, lol. If you are actually as dumb as you come across and you are making six figures, I think society is doing just fine. The fact that you are unable to actually put a six figure net worth and six figure salary to good use is only indicative of your financial illiteracy. Net worth is at ~95th percentile by age bracket yet I'm somehow financially il…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 07:11 PM
2

Just because you've asserted you've debunked an argument doesn't mean you've actually done so. ​ I mean if they're on your intellectual level they wouldn't recognize opportunity if it hit them in the face. Nothing whatsoever would be advantageous to them. They're like flotsam, with no ability to alter their fate. It's hilarious you need to include a dubious ad hominem in each paragraph. Take what you said for a moment though, if someone who managed to get a six-figure salary, six-figure net work…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 05:56 PM
1

$65,000 — the median income at the time was $24,720. Per 2021, it’s 430k (almost 7x as much) for the median price of house and $55,477 for the median income. ​ No, my point is why didn't you do the same inflation calculation for the income listed here. ​ https://www.usinflationcalculator.com/ ​ Hint: It show wages are down by almost a factor of 2 if not more. For example, there's a difference between household income and per capita income, but the $55k is closer to household income — while media…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 05:09 PM
1

*takes blood pressure medication* ​ THOSE DEM LAZY MILLENIAL AND ZOOMER FUCKS!
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 04:56 PM
1

Eh, well if you were a man, you probably wouldn't be getting anywhere near the same attention you are today then lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 04:55 PM
2

Meanwhile so many young people I know around me spend money like it's free on Credit, something Boomers didn't do on such a large scale. This is objectively wrong though. As I pointed out in my post, boomers were the ones who pushed consumerism and materialism into mainstream culture. It's literally why many of them are at retirement age but are still working full-time. The reason they are poor isn't due to lack of socioeconomic opportunity or slow growth in economy (shit, just look at the S&P 5…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 04:54 PM
1

Well, one of your last paragraphs says it all. Envy. So you are not going to make your boomer bosses rich, do you say? You may fail to realize that some think a job is rewarding when you produce more than your salary. That attitude leads to being first laid off when times get tough. Has nothing to do with me, I was simply stating I understand where people who decided to just drop out are coming from. Lol @ the corporate simping too. Anyone who works for anyone is going to produce more than their…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 04:51 PM
1

I love how you and /u/NoTea4448 conveniently ignore the income comparisons, which were in the next sentence of the post — very convenient.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 04:48 PM
1

Who cares if it's unattractive? Like why do you think that's even remotely relevant here?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 04:44 PM
1

More illogical nonsense. You need to compare their monthly payments to their income, not to what you're paying. Please use your brain. Banks use the same metrics for affordability that they used generations ago. I did. Can you not read the bit about take-home pay? Why are you wasting my time if you struggle with basic reading comprehension?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 04:43 PM
1

/u/RegTextoffender ​ Nah, this isn't correct. Gen X was the FIRST generation to get fucked over by the boomer's economic policies, corporate exploitation, and parenting (or lack therof), but hardly the most. Many of you guys still had the luxury of decently affordable housing and education costs. I think the reality is the 'American Dream' is kind of a time capsule view of the late 70s to mid-late 90s where as long as you worked hard you could afford everything you need and then some. Nowadays, …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 04:42 PM
1

I think everything you said is true but the last line. Where is the evidence for that? Japan is kind of known for notoriously having some of the worst working cultures and highest suicide rates ever (same with South Korea).
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 04:33 PM
1

Lol wtf, was that your manager or something?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 04:31 PM
1

Furthermore, op has no understanding whatsoever of AI or machine learning, while it's literally my field of expertise. Yes, AI is accelerating technological progress, but it's accelerating it beyond any human's ability to adapt, which includes even the conventionally thinking smartest top minds, because convention is being broken. What that means is that it creates chaos and leaves plenty of room for merit. The lowest of the low would be able to rise to the top through adaptability. Every techno…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 04:31 PM
3

Boomers didn't push for college, milennials used college as a bandaid to substitute for hard work. Particularly women. People act like getting a degree mean automatic economic success. That's why online college blew up the way it did. The lack of plans and intentional career choices is what killed us, not boomers and not college. Feminism is largely to blame too. ​ Objectively false. College was pushed pretty heavily on pretty much anyone who went through public schools in the past 15-20 years. …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/23 06:43 PM
2

https://twitter.com/TikTokInvestors/status/1638543699411087360 ​ LOL. If you say anything confidently enough, no matter how inaccurate it may be — you'll get a lot of people to believe your bullshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/23 06:21 PM
2

They grew up in an era of unprecedented growth and prosperity… precisely because their parents’ generation had effectively destroyed so much of the global competition in WWII. The US was the only major economic power that hadn’t been bombed to pieces or lost millions of productive young men. As a result, the US had a major economic boom, and faced extremely reduced competition (for example, for factory jobs) from Europe, Asia, and even the Soviets. They just don’t have a frame of reference for u…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/23 05:41 PM
4

I don't think I neglected it — it just wasn't really a central point of my post overall. I think just like the current dating scene, there are multiple causes behind the political polarization we see today.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/23 05:34 PM
3

You're venturing into centralized, government control of housing development and allocation, which is obviously going to spark the whole capitalism vs socialism debate in that area. Good luck on that debate! No, I really don't think this is what I'm asking for. I don't think the boomers had a 'socialist' housing allocation. I cited the stats in my original post. Boomers had housing prices that were about double the annual income — what occurred to cause that to completely go away? I mean sure we…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/23 05:28 PM
1

The wealth gap will widen in due course but then again that's not necessarily a bad thing. I really think the government is intentionally gonna cause a huge financial crisis that is going to help women revert back to their intended gender roles. Not sure if it'll be the government, but I think AI/ML will likely drive this forward. With that being said, I do think it will render many men unemployed/deemed useless, so it will be interesting to see what the government does to 'take care' of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/23 04:51 PM
4

Most likely cash and other assets that are hard to categorize (e.g. a car). I think boomers generally weren't as investment savvy as younger generations, because many were coming to adulthood in the 80s where they could get extremely high returns with just a savings account (effectively 0 risk).
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/23 04:47 PM
5

Nah you're just a lazy millennial, get back to work piggie! /s
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/23 04:42 PM
3

You keep going back to zoning, but that's largely controlled at the municipal level, not the federal or state one. You're talking about the city council and mayor. I can't speak for other cities, but there are a lot of Millennials on city councils here in the Dallas/Fort Worth metro area. They aren't really doing anything any differently than the Boomers did. Homeowners will complain, if you zone to allow anything next to them, that they don't want. City council meetings get pretty heated around…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/23 04:40 PM
15

lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/23 04:33 PM
3

The boomer generation is the most populated voting block compared to all other generations. I don't disagree with you overall, but you can't overlook this.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/23 04:17 PM
13

I don't completely disagree with this. Whatifalthist did a video on this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C4KIaQaEuOM He basically argues all of the boomers' children are effectively extensions of themselves to some degree. The thing I will point out though is that boomers basically set the precedent with their parenting (or lack thereof) and placement of the cultural, social zeitgeist we see today. The other point, perhaps most important of all, the boomers have had the largest population share…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/23 04:12 PM
1

I don't think you realize this, but you do have some level of survivorship bias. I'm in my mid-20s, also studied STEM, have a low six-figure salary and a low-six figure net worth — I'm still able to be honest about the general macroeconomic trends.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/23 03:56 PM
6

The average boomer worked in a factory or some entry-level service-level job, was far less educated than their children, and had far better socioeconomic mobility. ​ You admit all of these things are true, yet somehow I'm wrong for pointing it out as an explanation for the dating and marriage trends we see today?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/23 03:53 PM
1

As a Gen-X-er myself, I hate to break this to you, buddy, but most of what you’re complaining about, came about as a result of technological change or competition, not policy. Explain zoning laws then. ​ Improvements in communications and transportation made it easier to offshore factory jobs. Email and internet made it easier to offshore white collar jobs. Those things were GOING to happen, nobody could stop them. Competition drove more people to college, along with the glamorization of the “pa…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/23 03:50 PM
2

I can't say what lever has a larger cause in the development of the current dating scene, but I'd say they're both quite significant and prominent. The main reason I made this post isn't that I don't think things like social media and the current cultural/social zeitgeist play a huge role in the dating woes a lot of people have today, but rather that it seems very rare that people mention the socioeconomic component to things. ​ As you say, it’s impossible to have a good living from one income n…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/23 03:44 PM
5

It's funny how many of the things you've outlined are quite conceptually simple, yet out education system would rather spend more time focusing on gender pronouns than any actual useful life skills.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/23 03:35 PM
5

I think that may be an effective mental model, but the reality is the future looks fairly bleak for most younger men. Of course the boomers on here with their heads completely up their asses will tell you otherwise, but the reality is I don't see any positive outcome for most men in the future. Yes, people should be outcome independent, but if someone never achieves success in a specific domain — it's very likely they will end up not trying to pursue it after a certain point.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/23 03:34 PM
14

Do you think there is zero association between generation and wealth?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/23 03:29 PM
4

Let's say the east end of a village needs bread. The ruling class of that village enforces a ruling that bread production should not be increased despite the growing demand for it. ​ Should the east end of the village not have contempt for the ruling class?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/23 03:19 PM
6

If you lived with the same standard of living as people back then, you could pay off the mortgage in 13 years. Perhaps in 8 years, if you rented out the spare rooms to your friends. This literally does not make any sense at all. People afforded their house on a single income back then. House hacking is a relatively new phenomenon that got popularized in the late 90s. The standard of living has not actually improved much substantially since the 80s, especially in terms of housing. Most of the sta…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/23 03:15 PM
6

People who can’t live within their means still want the $1300 iPhone and to be treated and kings and queens. Notice how this doesn't have anything to do with addressing rising healthcare and housing costs that have increased by 200% (after accounting for inflation). ​ Most Americans live a life of extreme luxury compared to a farmer in India. Yet they bitch about everything online. As more and more remote options open up in the job market, we are going to see more and more people leave the US. W…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/23 03:05 PM
-1

Effectively all mainstream relationship advice subreddits are incredibly Gynocentric and biased. There have been plenty of experiments doing a gender reverse of the same exact post, and as predictable, you see the exact opposite advice when the genders are reversed.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/23 02:24 PM
1

https://twitter.com/proetrie/status/1638610928328667136?s=20
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/23 02:23 PM
1

Do you live in Russia?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/23 05:18 AM
1

I think I mostly agree, though I don't really feel that passionately I suppose? I think at the end of the day, most beliefs and values are formed from perceived self-interest. What you view as marxist and anti-family is what a female feminist views as empowerment. My only qualm in this case is that people like /u/EulenWatcher should just pick a side instead of trying to have this identification that is truly overly agreeable and sidestepping, because they want to try to appease both sides. You k…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/23 04:46 AM
1

The people who can best hack the algorithms, which usually rewards people for saying the most sensationalist or controversial statements.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/23 04:05 PM
1

In reality, they're not that different. Due to high agreeability, they tend to latch on to the same trends that they see many other women latching onto, exceptions don't disprove the general trend.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/23 02:12 PM
1

You're making the assumption that most people are reasonable.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/23 02:11 PM
1

They're going to be the most exposed to the various FDS-esque dating advice that has become popularized on social media over the past few years, which is pretty much a selective hybrid of choosing the most convenient traditional and feminist narratives that best suit them, without any of the ones that actually bring responsibility on to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/23 02:10 PM
1

Someone complaining about the principle of $3 cheese on a first date is even worse. There were multiple people who reacted to this, including YouTubers who have hundreds of thousands to millions of subscribers. There were plenty of people on Twitter who live in NYC themselves pointing out how ridiculous it is. I make six figures, and even I would find it a bit ridiculous. Makes sense. If she’s broke, she literally can’t afford to date someone else who is too broke to afford $3 cheese. Yet she de…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/23 02:07 PM
1

Yes, I did. Attraction is literally the only reason anything even occurred in your given scenario — hence, why it only reinforced my point. If you had no attraction to him in the before or after scenario, nothing happens. Hence, none of his personal beliefs or views matter at all (which was the central point). The only way your scenario would have demonstrated otherwise is if you cited a scenario in which a guy you were not attracted to started hitting on you, you rejected him, but over time he …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/23 02:04 PM
1

Look, the reality is the majority of people who live in NYC shouldn't be living in NYC, especially this woman. ​ Here's the first follow-up to that video she made: ​ https://youtu.be/\_DyIF1QrmWE?t=216
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/23 02:01 PM
2

The fact there's another women in this comment thread complaining to you about how that's 'penny pinching' is very telling to say the least. The girl in the TikTok also did a follow-up video admitting she's basically broke as fuck and over half of her take-home goes to rent alone.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/23 08:03 PM
0

The first time I met my partner, I thought he was cute Wait, doesn't this literally just prove my point? Lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/23 08:02 PM
2

Younger women are also the biggest consumers of social media.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/23 08:00 PM
5

Not wanting to pay $3 additional for an add-on cheese is not penny pinching; it's almost certainly more about principle than the money itself. If you watch the other videos she posted, the girl is actually broke as fuck pretending to live a boss babe life and admitted over half of her take home goes to rent alone. ​ How old are you and what is your net worth?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/23 07:59 PM
1

I think another caveat people overlook is that a lot of people back in the day got married, because they felt a pressure to get married with everyone else in their peer group getting married. A lot less people will be getting married in the future and/or have less of a peer group in general, so there won't be as much of an external pressure to settle down and get married as a result.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/23 07:21 PM
7

that's misogyny
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/23 07:19 PM
3

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PXlqk2sFm0s
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/23 07:07 PM
6

Anyone else notice this? It seems that nearly all women aged 18-35 are the most likely to push feminist narratives when convenient (i.e. women should be free and do whatever they want and have no expectations of them), but also push the need for traditional roles when convenient (i.e. shaming any man that tries to split a bill or isn't willing to get $3 slice of cheese on a hamburger). /u/Mrs_Drgree — I think this is a major reason why many women aren't identifying as feminists nowadays. They st…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/23 06:59 PM
6

bless up! women are literally queens and angels who aren't even aware of the decisions they make, because the patriarchy has bamboozled them!
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/23 06:54 PM
1

Granted, part of it is being demi, but I still only want him even 15 years later...I have no lust for anyone else. I'm confident that this is partially due to a lack of cohabitation. A lot of women, and men too, in longterm committed relationships will talk about how they begin to see their spouse in the roles of parent/housemate so often that they kind of "forget" about the lover role. Or even stop picturing themselves as one. Whereas in my relationship, being lovers is literally half of what w…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/23 05:34 PM
3

Most women not identifying as third-wave feminists doesn't mean they don't agree with the majority of the ideology.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/23 05:27 PM
5

Uh, you realize neurotransmitters and hormones are pretty much involved in every human experience and action, right? The specific neurotransmitters categorized towards pair-bonding and mating are literally what cause the rush and sensation of emotion to come from engaging in said activities — it's not the activities themselves, i.e. two actors could act out said actions in a movie, it doesn't mean they are necessarily having the rush of emotions (and neurotransmitters/changes in the brain) assoc…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/23 07:10 AM
3

Look, I'm not even disagreeing with you that there is some truth to what you're saying. The problem isn't what you're saying, but what you are claiming as the primary reason behind men's dating struggles. Attraction is pretty much based on the first few seconds of seeing someone. If they're not good looking or tall enough to be satisfactory to one's liking, then it really doesn't matter at all what said person's worldview or perspective on something was, was it?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/23 07:08 AM
4

Actually /u/Ordinarydude7212 does have a point. Neuroscientists have likened being 'in love' to be very similar to a euphoric, drug-induced high. Once those neurotransmitters and endorphins return back to their natural states and configurations, the sensation of the experience will dissipate, and this happens pretty routinely and causes people to divorce.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/23 07:05 AM
2

Just got to wake up at 4 AM, take a cold shower, and hit the gym bro, sleep in a factory you bought too!
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/23 07:03 AM
11

An 'egalitarian feminist' just sounds like a fairy tale of someone who has too high of agreeability to be too polarizing while also being too religious.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/23 07:02 AM
3

Forming a family unit Feminists said the nuclear family is toxic, patriarchal, and that fathers aren't shit, so is this still a benefit, especially when more and more women state they do not want one? ​ company in old age, ​ But the caveat is assuming you'll both live to old age together — people don't seem to realize how rarely this actually happens, and it's not always just divorce that's the defining reason as to why.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/23 07:01 AM
7

This is the problem with post-modern absolutism. Anyone that makes a claim that there's even a somewhat mild difference between the sexes always has to be called out as either outright false, or they deliberately give an outlier anecdote proving the exception.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/23 06:57 AM
2

replace 'unless' with if
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/23 06:56 AM
11

Yeah, women can just read your mind through your tinder photos — if you believe the wrong thing, it'll totally make them swipe left instead of right, that's how initial attraction works.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/23 06:55 AM
1

https://goat.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/stanford-graph.jpg ​ You have to do at least one of the following: show that today's young adult generation's dating is less looks focused than it was in 2008/9 demonstrate in some way why it would only hold relevant then and not true today, null hypothesis would be to assume whatever data we have in place today is the accepted standard until new evidence contradicts it
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/23 06:52 AM
8

The most unattractive feature of the men here is not their height, weight or looks. There is absolutely no way you can know this if you haven't even seen them before. Also if I remember correctly, there was a study showing that only about 38 percent of married women think their husbands are alluring or attractive. Just goes to show you, just because someone is married, doesn't actually mean someone is attracted to them — just see DeadBedrooms. I still don't think you've provided a reason as to w…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/23 06:47 AM
12

Considering most Americans will spend close to half of their life in noticeable bodily decay, then yes, it seems impossible.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/23 06:46 AM
1

A blog post made via statistically sound methodology and findings and has a sample size larger than any study that will ever be posted here. You seemed to understand my original comment too. It's not that the blog post itself even matters — it's that women will routinely show and say, "See! Women give ugly guys a chance on apps too!" — when it's no where even remotely scalable. But if you want more modern statistics, then women only swipe right on about 1-2% of dating profiles, so I think my ove…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/23 01:19 AM
1

What happened to your dad going to Harvard and all that?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/23 01:10 AM
1

Can you actually counter what I said or are you just here to shoot the shit like the rest of the boomers/Xers who shit post on here all day?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/23 01:01 AM
1

The blog showed that a higher percentage of women reached out to a much larger variety of men compared to men reaching out to women. I really don't know why women keep bringing this point up in 2023, because it's not relevant at all for any modern dating apps nowadays. Back then, in OkCupid, you could message people even without matching (in fact, there wasn't really a matching system, just profiles you could message) — you CAN'T DO that on pretty much any major dating apps nowadays. It's just s…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/23 12:47 AM
1

If they're obvious, then. you should be able to easily state them, but you aren't.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/23 12:43 AM
1

Yet you can't provide an example or way in which relationships are self-serving to men exclusively or any predominant way.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/23 12:32 AM
2

Therapy doesn't actually solve any problems. It's just teaching you mental tricks to make the problems feel more manageable or at least less burdensome. Honestly, you can get 90% of the benefit of therapy without any of the costs by just doing 10-20 minutes of meditation everyday. I'd study stoicism on the side as well (basically the core philosophy on which CBT was developed upon). Even if therapy is effective for some, it usually isn't for most, and just because someone has the correct licensi…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/23 12:29 AM
1

You really have no idea what you're talking about, like at all. I admire the delusional self-confidence though, but that's not how this data is collected at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/23 12:27 AM
1

Do you date mostly interracially?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/23 10:00 PM
1

Pretty much, and the period of eye-contact can be as long as a fraction of a second too.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/23 10:00 PM
1

Relationships are self-serving for women, that's why they're constantly trying to do value valuations of a man to see if it's worth even being in a relationship with them. Many/most men, probably guys like /u/usatman falling in with them, just want a relationship for the sake of having a relationship. The reality is the only thing women really do give in turn for everything a man gives is sex. Not saying there's anything necessarily wrong with that, but that's the fundamental reality that everyo…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/23 09:56 PM
1

Based on talking with women here, they define approaching men quite a bit more differently than how men would define themselves approaching women. For example, a lot of women consider smiling and making eye contact with a guy as them 'approaching' the man.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/23 09:51 PM
1

My friend at Amazon told me even AWS is getting hit. I would've thought they would be the last people to get hit.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/23 09:48 PM
1

You're not understanding my point. The problem with this 'everyone has types' theory is it tries to imply that people actually have a type for clearly negative/defective traits. Effectively nobody is attracted to morbid obesity, basing this on the absolute fringes of outliers is not evidence of it other than it being evidence of the existence of statistical noise. ​ By the way, guess what? Said people being married does not actually mean their spouses are attracted to them. Just look at the Dead…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/23 09:25 PM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dsg8PY28bmc ​ I think everyone should check out this podcast done by Thinking Ape (Stardusk) and alex.datepsych, very insightful.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/23 08:30 PM
1

I'm going to guess Canada or UK
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/23 08:29 PM
1

I think there's a couple caveats to this in my opinion. In my personal opinion, Brazilians tend to have a very athletic body type (naturally) and have very good facial aesthetics. On top of this, they assimilate well into what is considered the attractive feature by having darker olive to lighter wheatish colored skin. Secondly, it's my understanding that many Brazilians have lots of exposure to high degrees of violence and other criminal activity (strong drug usage and exchange) at a fairly you…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/23 08:27 PM
1

Everyone has preferences and no one is in every single persons preferences. ​ Stardusk recently did a podcast with alex.datepsych on YouTube, and they pretty much debunked this all-too-commonly stated narrative. There is much less variation in what people think is generally physically attractive than what people tend to think.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/23 08:23 PM
1

LOL
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/23 08:22 PM
1

Latino?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/23 08:13 PM
0

Women wouldn’t be spending thousands to get fake tits and fake asses if their face is what mattered most to men. Find any group of guys and show them a group of women and there won’t be full consensus on which woman is the most attractive unless one is significantly better looking than all the rest. ​ Wait, so women get boob jobs and extensive plastic surgery and wear expensive makeup to impress men? All this time feminists were telling me they just did it for themselves... ​ A tall skinny woman…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/23 08:12 PM
1

This is what's stood out to me the most about recent times and how things have differentiated between now vs. say 2016-2017 (early/proto/pre-black pill era as it was just emerging). The fact that dudes who are tall and attractive are struggling nowadays really just goes to show you how real the things that are discussed on this subreddit are.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/23 08:07 PM
1

Math is hard for Americans, trying to get them to calculate a relative risk or percentage change is basically rocket science to them! ​ /u/1Here4Bach — very rarely in epidemiological studies do scientists care about absolute change, the more important indicator to test the effect of a treatment (e.g. clinical trial for a new medication or measuring the health risk of a certain type of food) is the relative risk (i.e. how much does X treatment cause a change relative to the default state). ​ If i…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/23 07:59 PM
0

That's a great point, also debunked her general narrative in this comment of mine: ​ https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/11w8ml3/comment/jcz8jj5/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3 ​ As I said in my comment /u/Adultthrowaway69420 , does it really make sense for a man who's 5'7" to weigh the same as a woman who weights 5'7".
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/23 07:51 PM
1

I think you hold the record for asserting the most misleading and/or outright false population statistics. ​ On average men in the US are fatter than women. ​ Yeah, the raw percent of population for men being overweight may be higher, but that's also because a lot of dudes can have a BMI of 25.5-27 and be classified as overweight. In reality, they've got tons of LBM and have a more athletic build. Guys like Mike Tyson would be considered severely obese, but he was cut as hell. For the average du…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/23 06:07 PM
1

How is that an autistic characteristic though? It seems more like the person either didn't understand you or wasn't listening to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/23 04:38 AM
1

I think going back to your friend, it really depends how short and how ugly. If he's like 5'7" and a 4/10 it's different than being 5'5" and a 4/10, for example.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/23 01:55 AM
1

What kind of things will you repeat? I'm partly asking because I feel I may be on the spectrum myself. I have ADHD.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/23 01:54 AM
1

Nobody has used 'sex' in a life and death type of context, literally ever. ​ The way men talk about sex here is akin to how women talk about their own emotional/sexual 'needs' on here.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/23 01:53 AM
1

Nope you’re 100% right women are evil harpies and no one including other men want to hear about it because something something feminists./s ​ What? ​ Why does he think it’s unfair his dating pool is someone short and unattractive if he’s short and unattractive? Did you read what you just wrote? It’s literally why none of this is taken seriously. No one cares uggo jimbob wants to date a hottie. ​ Did you even read the post? His point is that people shouldn't jump to just criticizing a man's chara…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/23 01:50 AM
0

AMS Who is AMS? For instance I have a tendency to ramble, repeat the same statements over and over, and have one sided conversations. SO basically you will try to dominate the conversation and never give the other person a chance to speak? What type of statements would you repeat over and over?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/23 01:14 AM
1

Is your friend in the same town as you?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/23 01:12 AM
2

People can say what they want about it, but I actually find it really helpful. I’m not “changing” my personality, ​ Can you expand on this by chance? Were you told you needed to change your personality? ​ I think my overall take is while there is some likelihood that he may have a personality defect interfering with his ability to get dates — it is very likely that being short and unattractive are explanatory factors as to him being unable to find one willing to date him — i.e. it very well coul…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/23 12:53 AM
1

As I already said people especially strangers can only take so much self loathing. Funny how nothing is ever the woman's fault in 90% of AITA or RA type of posts. It's okay to coddle grown women, but if a man just points out a pretty obvious reality — it's somehow self-loathing. ​ It’s abnormal to spout incel rhetoric It sounds like anything that someone finds disagreeable is 'inc3l rhetoric'. I think it's just basic common sense that a man who is short and facially unattractive is going to have…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/23 12:44 AM
1

That reminds me, there's a user on here who's an attorney and dyslexic. Really curious how he does his job.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/23 10:41 PM
1

I don't understand what's the point of being on this subreddit terminally just to troll. I will say though, until the cohort of people (and it seems that most women on this sub seem to fill said cohort) obtain the awareness and humility to come to the realization that humans — let alone themselves — aren't special and that in reality we're just another animal roaming this planet together — I don't expect to see too much of anything actually interesting debated antagonistically. It's usually just…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/23 10:38 PM
1

Why are you on a debate subreddit if you can't do 30 seconds of reading?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/23 10:35 PM
3

I completely understand that. That's why I feel most of the responses to him are performative virtue-signaling instead of actually attempting to have a real conversation. The very real reality is if you are short, especially on the threshold of having over 30%+ of women be your height or taller, then it very accurately is and can be a reason why you as a short man can't find a partner. ​ I'm a short dude who's had a decent amount of success, but I have decent facial attractiveness and also had t…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/23 10:35 PM
2

You're right of course. Unless you're at least somewhat attractive you're gonna have a hard time dating. There are plenty of women in the same situation. Just gotta find the one that's right for you ​ I'm glad you quoted this piece, because here's the key piece of nuance — this is fundamentally false, and there's a plethora of data to show that it's false. Even notably overweight/obese or generally unattractive women still have plenty of options (many of which are their equivalent socioeconomic …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/23 10:31 PM
6

np.reddit.com/r/TrueOffMyChest/comments/tk6eg0/society_needs_to_stop_telling_ugly_short_guys/ ​ Man tries to voice his concerns/troubles on a public forum No one even tries to recognize his perspective, instead? The man gets shamed, downvoted, rebuked, gaslit that his experience is not reality, almost none of which are even attempted to be done in a respectful way [Individual Hypothetical] Man ends up going into deeper pockets of the internet in which his experience is validated In turn, we see …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/23 10:01 PM
1

Yes, anyone trying to scientifically examine human origins and the cause of how/why human behaviors came to be are 'retards'. ​ Also, /u/chancetolive, Rob seems to only be descriptive, not prescriptive. I don't think he actually thinks anyone 'needs' (i.e. kind of like how women use the phrase 'emotional needs') anything. ​ But yeah, it's rather hilarious that so many people here think you can be a completely sexless man and be completely content, even if everything else in your life is going ri…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/23 09:53 PM
–

The opinions of random people on TikTok have nothing to do with anything. You can find people saying anything you want if you seek out that specific content - so what? And in any case, men here frequently refer to their own alleged experiences in the real world - not random people on the internet. So your attempt to deny any responsibility for the things people here say because they're "just reacting" to others directly opposes what the actual men say they are doing. ​ Well, sure you're technica…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/23 08:46 PM
1

I believe in the wall which is why I expect a man to pay for everything. He’s using my best years. The bare minimum he could do is pay for dates. ​ As /u/Radiant_Specific6542 pointed out, are you a traditional woman? How beautiful are you relative to other women? ​ I'm asking this because having these sorts of expectations and standards in today's world may only hurt you. ​ He wants to spend 5 years with someone before marriage and having kids. 2-3 years is basically enough time, but he’s willin…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/23 01:36 AM
1

I don't mind people, but I think I need some alone time and my own space. I guess that's why McMansions became a thing? Too bad you have to live in the middle of bum fuck no where at least an hour out from any sort of social event.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/23 08:07 AM
2

I'm living with my parent right now to help save for a down payment on a house, but the thing I don't get is why would anyone want to be married for the long-term? Like I'm saying in terms of the day to day lifestlye. Sounds absolutely horrific having to sleep with someone in the same bed and constantly disturbing your sleep for the rest of your life. Not to mention, don't people actually like living by themselves, or are they so scared of loneliness they'd rather have their partner with them al…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/23 07:58 AM
2

I like it too when it's well-maintained and kept clean. For all the talks about men having poor hygiene, sometimes the moment a chick takes her thong/panties off is the moment the room has some weird sniff to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/23 07:56 AM
3

Is it really more so a matter of preferring the women who are willing to date your vs. the ones who aren't?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/23 07:51 AM
-4

But if you don’t marry her you essentially wasted her best years. Nobody is entitled to anything. I don't know why the people who say this on repeat to men seem to forget it applies to those who are not men also. ​ The irony in saying you 'wasted her best years' kind of inadvertently confirms the wall.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/23 07:50 AM
0

So many guys here frame everything in terms of being "good enough." They insist on ignoring compatibility so they can claim victimhood and hate women. It's really pointless and silly. I wasn't "not good enough" for my ex. We just have different goals in life. The only groups I've seen consistently outputting hate (oftentimes calling for societal destruction, because any form of modern society is always 'patriarchal') has been from women. Literally 99% of manosphere content is just reacting to st…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/23 07:48 AM
0

Why is this sub exhausting? You do realize the consistent usage of anecdotes to argue one's point on this subreddit is simply nothing more than survivorship bias, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/23 07:45 AM
4

women NEVER gone for nerds and there is a plethora of perfectly justifiable reasons why. Our astrology signs say were not compatible, so I had to next him even though he was a great guy. ​ And this is a far more indicative of your mating choices than women as a whole quite frankly. Women want men who have advanced education — not all nerds are engineers or work in tech — they can be on wall street or medicine as well. ​ The other reality /u/Swimming-Energy-4456 should've pointed out is that if y…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/23 07:42 AM
1

My guess is you don't have to carry the conversation on your own AS much.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/23 07:38 AM
7

It's funny how so many counter-arguments on this subreddit are formulated off the basis of outliers.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/23 07:36 AM
1

Why is it so hard for women to admit that they have shallow preferences? I don't think it's a bad thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/23 06:14 AM
1

This doesn't have anything to do with what I said? I also wouldn't trust anything written as far as celebrity training regimens, especially if they never mention the fancy pharmaceuticals they have access to.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/23 06:09 AM
2

This all depends on your baseline value. Being not fat is a good goal for woman, but it hardly makes you stand out as a guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/23 07:19 PM
1

You somehow managed to completely warp what he said to mean something else.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/23 07:17 PM
5

There's a couple caveats though. As far as everything I mentioned in my original comment, there's enough statistical evidence to suggest that this isn't all a psyop or social media simply skewing our perception of reality — there has been a drastic shift in sociocultural elements regarding dating and marriage in the last 20-30 years. ​ Secondly, at no fault of her own, the OP is a woman. I'm not trying to start some sort of rage war by saying this, but I think the very fundamental reality is — w…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/23 02:32 AM
43

What is average even? Morgan Stanley is forecasting 45% of women aged 25-45 will be single and childless by 2030. Keep in mind, this is likely going to be more top/old-heavy, as the US is an aging society. On top of that, a significant portion of the women who will get married and have children will feel regret, because they'll feel they had settled when they compare the lifestyles of women they see on social media. The fundamental problem with older people who comment on this subreddit is they …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/23 10:32 PM
–

Woman responded to me and then blocked me without giving me a chance to follow-up, so I figured I'll follow up here: ​ Wrong and it's legal in nevada. You're saying it's such a need, if it's that big of a need or an actual need buy a prostitute. I never stated sex was a need. The term 'need' is used very liberally — just look at how it is defined in Psychology via Maslow's Hierarchy of needs. Hell, even women will say things like, "Oh, he wasn't meeting my needs" — why is this definition of 'nee…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/23 08:29 PM
1

Women want all of the benefits of traditionalism and feminism without any of the responsibilities tied to each arrangement.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/23 08:24 PM
2

There's a lot of different factors that go into it, they ultimately had far better socioeconomic mobility than any of the following generations. I mean for one thing, there was no where nearly as much of a push or need for academic accomplishment. You could literally have Boomer Bob with IQ 75 who barely passed grade school was able to easily obtain and perform a job that afforded him a new house, new car, wife, and 3+ kids. Nowadays? We have well-educated working professionals who are effective…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/23 08:06 PM
0

But these things don't exist in a vacuum, no where near as much anymore. There was a much more one-to-one relationship type arrangements in a more traditional society, because those societies incentivized monogamy for child rearing (which in turn grew economies and societies, which seems to be the central thesis of OP's post). Quite frankly, men (even ones who would be considered quite attractive by boomer generation standards) aren't getting access to their looks matched equivalents anymore. Wh…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/23 01:33 AM
1

I don't believe you can be arguing in good faith here. It's pretty clear /u/stonkkingsouleater is merely postulating that what drove men to produce high quality (and high volume) work in whatever domain/industry a given man may be in is due to having to provide for a family. This gave a sense of purpose, urgency, and responsibility — in turn, Western civilization was the result of it. It's really interesting to me that people don't seem to understand that we're ultimately just animals at the end…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/23 12:50 AM
2

The two greatest motivating factors for men in human existence were survival and mating. At the end of the day, even though no one wants to acknowledge it — we are all animals, and we have a primal limbic system that subconsciously dictates our aspirations and desires. For you and /u/Definitely-Butter to completely gloss over this is only more so a tell tale of how much you lack understanding of human psychology, in particular to understanding motives and incentives. ​ Just because you value X a…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/23 12:36 AM
0

I think this has more to do with woman being extremely overweight nowadays than anything else.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/23 12:32 AM
11

Ah, the classic "just take a shower bro!"
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/23 03:15 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter