TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

3sheets2IT Archive

View 0 posts and 99 comments by 3sheets2IT on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Feminist basket weaving, and I can make a hell of a hemp thread menstrual cup. Unfortunately, I made too much money doing that, so I switched to a lower paying and less stressful career in tech.
/r/MensRights19/03/20 03:58 PM
-1

One of the original MRA fights was against the structural inequities and injustices in the family courts. a fight I might add, that I believe is worth fighting because those inequities create a great injustice. But somehow, the structural inequities and discrimination for women in STEM fields are always viewed a fairy tail, in fact they aren't just a non-issue, it's the opposite. It's actually men who have it harder as the fascists feministas have taken over and it's open season on anything with…
/r/MensRights19/03/20 03:49 PM
-6

The fuck? No one encourages boys to go into STEM? What reality do you people live in? This sub is now 93.65% whiney bitches who weep and wail about non-issues or ginned up hysteria. Come to think of it, since that actual feminist subs banned me for being rational, I think this is might be the most feminist sounding subreddit that I'm still subbed to. On a related note, the screenshot for this post reads like a made-up bunch of bullshit that is coming from a source as credit as anything from Info…
/r/MensRights18/03/20 06:22 PM
88

If everything is as you say, you need to push back, but in the correct way. First, document everything, and then organize it into a coherent narrative. This must be devoid of any opinions or emotions, just facts. Then, summarize that into a brief and bullet pointed email and send it to your supervisor, and someone else. That someone else should both have some vested interest and reason to be engaged on this, has influence, and ideally someone who you consider an ally. Your employee is creating a…
/r/MensRights10/03/20 07:32 PM
6

Because it is. This is terrible advice on how to treat another human being. Basically it's saying that you should filter out anyone with any self-respect, or who isn't already damaged, right off the bat. Then, anyone who's left is probably sad and damaged enough to let you break them down further. Score. Brother. Score..? Just....Jesus, wtf...
/r/seduction30/12/19 07:10 PM
1

This feels more like a personal story about OP's love life, or maybe lack thereof, then a real question. I'm don't swallow any pills I find online, red, blue, or otherwise, but I don't think the RP isn't about not loving women. Well I think RP it's flawed in many ways, and relies on pseudoscience, I think they would say that they are giving men the tools to love women in the way that women understand love. Or with RP considers a woman's version of love. Again, not saying that I agree with that, …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/19 06:24 PM
1

Why do you say that? No really, would you mind compiling the evidence and sending it to the mods of askfeminism? It could help me get my ban lifted for being an alleged pro-MRA moron who had the audacity to point out similarly weak posts and bad arguments on their end. Honestly, I used to consider myself the world's foremost expert on the type of idiot that I am. However, in light of recent events, I'm willing to consider other's may have a better grasp. At least, you certainly seem to think tha…
/r/MensRights14/12/19 09:22 PM
1

Oh right, because I clearly don't browse this sub, have definitely never posted, and couldn't possibly have alt accounts that I've used in my many years of being around Reddit. You're a real sharp shooter with your profound levels of insight. Wouldn't want to run afoul of you in a dark alley, or trivia night. Might find myself with a thousand paper cuts of death from the blades of your edge.
/r/MensRights14/12/19 06:22 PM
2

This sub has become a literal circle jerk of pearl clutching.
/r/MensRights13/12/19 08:52 PM
-16

This sub has become a giant circle jerk. But hey, what do I know.
/r/MensRights13/12/19 08:51 PM
-35

Clearly a post on Reddit should be taken as Gospel. Unless it doesn't align with our perspective or viewpoint, then we should rightfully point out that it lacks the credibility to repost and rally behind.
/r/MensRights13/12/19 08:12 PM
2

What the fuck are you talking about? Did I say anything about previous partners, or only dating virgins?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/12/19 06:01 AM
-2

Impressive, 2 for 2. You're clearly a god amongst men. I bet your career and dating life are on fire.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/19 08:07 PM
5

This is sarcasm right? Modeling takes a lot of work and anyone who invests time into their career shouldn't be dismissed because you don't see value in it. But they are just born with good looks Yeah, so what? Elon Musk was born a genius, but he had to put in a lot of work to reach his status. How many other smart people just coast by on their natural ability to be smarter then most, but don't actually reach their full potential?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/19 07:12 PM
1

Correct. For someone I want something more with, a woman I see the real possibility/potential for an LTR, I will hold off for a lot longer. I find these women typically want to wait a bit longer as well. Sex muddies feelings and attachment. I don't wait to be physically close however, kissing, cuddling, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/19 06:02 PM
-4

Super insightful. If you have a girlfriend, well...let's just hope you don't.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/19 05:59 PM
1

I don't think they are mutually exclusive. Maybe a better way of putting it would be that men should understand how to handle their emotions in a manner that is consistent with their masculinity. As someone who has lost great relationships for not being open with my emotions enough, it's tough. Especially since I learned that behavior from being too emotional in my youth. It's just a matter of balance.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/11/19 07:36 PM
1

I mean, "Red Pillism" does a lot more than that. It also weaves in psuedo science and broscience that fits its narrative, much like radfems do on the inverse. Although, I would agree that on a high level, you can start with your statement. It just becomes less true as you work your way through the community and the entirety of it's literature.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/19 07:13 PM
1

HIV was originally thought to be a gay-only disease, which was evident both in it original name and how the Regan administration dealt with it, or rather, didn't deal with it. We later learned how different possible vectors carried much greater risk for transmission e.g. unprotected anal (due to tearing) and IV drug use (shared needles). Also, women are much more likely to contract HIV through PIV sex than men are.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/11/19 07:03 PM
10

Is this r/insanepeoplefacebook?
/r/MensRights21/06/19 03:05 PM
13

It's ... daytime TV...and not the local news. Should I post a gif of Cruella Deville to make the point that women want to make coats out of Dalmatian puppies?
/r/MensRights12/06/19 01:30 PM
-8

I'm not talking about those two "comics" who agreed to watch him jerk off. That's definitely consensual, and they are attention seeking shit bags. Look up what he did to EMPLOYEES working on his sets.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 06:09 PM
-14

Yes, those specific allegations were bullshit. However, he also preyed on women that worked for his company in completely nonconsensual ways. So....yeah, fair and accurate to call BS on those attention grabbers, but maybe not so much to ignore the other things.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 04:43 PM
12

What. The. Fuck. Semen retraining?
/r/BlackPillScience16/05/19 01:59 PM
2

The implication of your comment being that you studied it in a lab and concluded that in fact, no, these men aren't being creepy? Sarcasm aside, social interactions aren't not generally judged on objectives merits. Yes, being subjective does mean that some people are being judged on things like appearances. However, the common assertion that they are all stellar communicators otherwise and their only mistake was being born ugly or awkward, does not align with my experiences - as subjective and a…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/19 02:43 PM
15

According to socially adept humans. Speaking as a man, I've usually have an easy time judging when an interaction will be deemed creepy. Do some people judge others unfairly? Sure, but speaking as someone who has been around a bit, I've seen more guys than I can count act creepy as fuck to women, but who had no idea and just thought she was being "stuck up" or a "bitch".
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/19 02:18 PM
16

No shit. "Excessive number of dad's have a beer after work." I'd also add that microdosing is probably healthier then moderat alcohol consumption. This is from someone who dislikes mushrooms, but enjoys alcohol.
/r/MensRights03/05/19 03:41 PM
1

Email? Do you mean like text or OLD messages? Either way, just keep it short and lead the conversation, don't follow their lead. That doesn't mean you ignore what they say, or disregard them, just that you drive the outcome you want in a manor that allows them to feel comfortable following your lead. That may sound vague, but that's because it's a framework for a process. Each conversation and each person is different. The best you can do is be consistent in who you are, and your actions.
/r/seduction27/04/19 04:42 PM
2

Does your friend want out of it?
/r/askTRP23/04/19 02:02 PM
1

I don't know man... His curve ball on trans people in the end was a pretty solid closing argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/19 04:28 AM
2

Did you just say Domestic Free Trade? Do you mean shopping? Like at Walmart?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/19 04:15 AM
1

If not speaking in absolutes, definitely. Would you prefer people pass off generalizations as a universal rule?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/19 03:51 AM
1

Sex was there to procreate. Our biology did not a sign that roll simply for monogamous relationships. But now modern medicine and technology has enabled us to engage it primarily for pleasure, or intimacy sans procreation. While it's perfectly reasonable for you to place sex on a pedestal, it's not reasonable to assume that no one is capable of having sex outside of raising a family and without becoming damaged goods or unlovable/incapable of a loving relationships. Can that happen? Sure. People…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/19 09:32 PM
1

Alt account for who?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/19 07:52 PM
5

Geez. Between you and OP, it's a miracle there's any fish left in the sea for the rest of us bums.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/19 04:36 PM
9

Used by another woman? I don't understand what you mean by that. Do you mean because he's no longer a doormat current and future partners will feel as if he's not giving them something?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/19 04:32 PM
27

Nice! Taking not the just high road, but the rationale road as well. Carry on soldier.
/r/MensRights01/02/19 02:46 PM
4

Yeah, because no one in STEM fields would benefit from socialization. just like how the vast majority of parents who home-school their kids are not religious fundamentalist.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/19 03:53 AM
16

Especially those social skills that kids learn when homeschooling. everyone knows the homeschool kid is the most sought-after date for prom at the local high school. Hell I always pray that my next boss was homeschooled.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/01/19 03:06 AM
2

How do you not know someone is too drunk when they end up with alcohol poisoning? I'm not defending the accusers, but nor will I defend him. His fraternity told him that he couldn't have her over as she was a risk....
/r/MensRights01/01/19 05:31 PM
5

As long as you're okay with her banging other dudes, because that's what an open relationship is.
/r/askTRP01/01/19 05:25 PM
1

Conflict is sometimes necessary, but conflict doesn't always mean physical confrontation. The ability to stand up for yourself when being picked on or otherwise mistreated in almost inherently confrontational. Now, how you choose to engage in that confrontation can vary quite a bit. Your response could be done in a means that invites further confrontation, or even violence. Or it can be done in a way that decreases those odds and that proceeds to deescalate the situation after initial confrontat…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/18 06:54 PM
2

Experience helps. But even two experienced partners need to find their rhythm together. Especially if both have an idea of what they like and it's different. More sex followed by more communication will generally get you there though. Variety is fine. But you should still not focus on one night stands to find your preferences or get confidence in your sexual abilities. I've had more ONS then I can count, and now avoid them like the plague. You don't need to add notches once you stop counting. No…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/18 09:20 PM
1

People generally respect others who are competent and stand up for themselves. In a relationship, that needs to be tempered with being caring, supportive, and compromise (within reason).
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/18 07:06 PM
5

I didn't even read most of it because I already know what your problem is going to be: You're in your head way to far. Yeah, kiss her. Yeah, see if she's receptive to touching. If she is, proceed. But overall, just relax and have a good time. First time with any new partner is going to be lackluster. That's true if you're a virgin, or sexually experienced. Sex is best when done repeatedly with the same partner. Every woman is different. Hell, I've been with a lot of women, but im still figuring …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/18 07:04 PM
1

That's not casual sex. That's committed or monogamous sex, but outside the confines of marriage. Casual is non-committal, possibly nonmonogamous. I can casually see, and sleep with, multiple women, but I can't if I have a committed girlfriend. I can casually have a one night stand, but not if I have a committed girlfriend. Of course those last 2 change if it's an open relationship, or if your swingers.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/18 05:40 PM
2

Looks matter. But personality can overcome a lot of initial looks deficit. Confidence matters, but charm, charisma, and humor matter more. And if you have those 3, you're likely also very confident.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/18 05:37 PM
2

Charm, confidence, and humor will overcome almost any physical preferences IMO. Sure, looks will get you looks from across the room. But if you have those 3 and can engage with women, it's pretty damn compensating for deficits in the looks, height, or weight department. But yes, also be clean and dress well enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/10/18 05:35 PM
1

Sorry, didn't mean you don't have the right to be upset about it. That's fine and understandable. Even looking at the RP belief in stoicism, the best approach is to contain your emotional state and not show that to this person. From there you can cut them off, show them the door, etc. But I would argue that by remaining calm, the optimal next step is to be supportive and find out what the issue is. From there, you can try and resolve it, to both secure future sex, and be a decent human being.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/18 02:35 PM
1

What the fuck. You can express emotions. But if someone withdraws consent, you should find out why, and work to resolve it. If only from the perspective of that will help ensure more, and better, sex in the future with this person if they trust you. Why did they withdraw it? Are they sick? Are they in pain? Did you finger their ass after they asked you not to? Find out why and help them get past it, if only for your own sake. That's not BP, I'm not advocating for constant affirmative consent. I'…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/18 01:55 PM
3

Do what you want to do. Frankly, you seem like a reasonable person, so humor me for a minute. If you've had 100 partners and exponentially more sexual experiences, do you think it's not possible that at least once someone would have preferred it stop, for any reason?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/18 06:01 PM
5

I think you haven't had enough sex to pass that judgement or if you have a high partner count, aren't very attuned to your partners. I could be wrong, but in my experience of 15 or so years and countless partners, is that sometimes if you feel them pulling back, and check with them, that they'd like to stop. Don't get me wrong, I'll regroup and see if I can get them back in the mood. But by being supportive and get them aroused again. But maybe I'm just hyper-aware of body langauge and non-verba…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/18 05:53 PM
2

Your loss. I'm great in bed. Or at least, that's what my mom tells me.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/18 05:46 PM
1

I love using the word 'cunt', and feminists and the politically correct can pull it from my cold dead tongue. But even thinking your partner is a cunt, to me, means you shouldn't be sleeping with them. Unless you're British, then I suppose it doesn't have the same connotations as it does here in the States. How often do you have ONS? Not judging you for it, but if that's what you were referring to, move onto casual dating. Sex is so much better with regular partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/18 05:45 PM
2

Safe in that my comment history isn't objectionable or in that you are assuring me you aren't my GF? Because that's exactly what my GF would say... lol... But seriously...
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/18 05:38 PM
9

Not cool? It sucks, sure. But I'd agree it's more important to be a supportive partner and a decent human being then to get your rocks off at all cost. Especially with someone you hope to sleep with again, but I do also mean any partner, including ONS.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/18 05:35 PM
6

Dick move to withdraw consent? Let's start with a choose your own adventure game from the perspective of the person not withdrawing consent First thought: It sucks. I was in the mood, had what I thought was a good thing going, and they want to stop. Or Fuck this bitch. What a total cunt. Second thought: Okay, bummer. But I'm going to support their decision. I'll let them know it's okay, and I hope we can work on whatever issue got in the way. Or Fucking dick move. I'm gonna sulk, guilt trip them…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/18 05:33 PM
3

New account? Posts in this sub? Says BF does exactly what I do? Have my not-worst, but not ideal, fears been realized and my GF has found my new account? Excuse me while I make sure I didn't say anything stupid in my comment history....
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/18 05:24 PM
6

Clearly I like to engage people, especially those I disagree with. But yeah, they aren't even responding to any reasonable interpretation of what I was saying. I responded incase anyone else actually was inclined to agree with their response, but am done now. Thanks for the insight.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/18 05:21 PM
6

... you are someone who responded to a troll incase any other Redditors were inclined to agree with their shit post. Also one who has a decent sized wang.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/18 04:59 PM
4

Guess I don't come here enough. Nor did I even check the post history. Thanks confirming that.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/18 04:53 PM
7

Healthy sexual dynamics of communcating so I dont rupture my partners cervix or having them lose circulation from being tied up during sex. Not to mention being respectful to people I'm ramming my dick inside, and not always gently. Total feminists propaganda. As for hedonism, yeah that's all well and good, but I also derive a lot of pleasure from giving my partner pleasure. And none from seriously injuring them during sex. However, I'm fairly confident now that you're just messing with me. Beca…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/18 04:46 PM
12

You are trolling, right? Nothing I said should lead you to the conclusions you are drawing. So if you're not trolling, I have to assume one, or more, of the following: Haven't had enough partners to understand healthy sexual dynamics, around consent or much else. Don't believe people can change their mind about consent at anytime (which needs to be communicated) Have no sense of respect for your partners, or yourself. Have only vanilla or boring sex and don't need to check because it's always by…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/18 04:30 PM
14

ROFL. No, I'm advocating for exact the opposite of that. I DON'T ask for consent before kissing or moving to have sex. I DO make my moves slow enough that she can turn away or decline my advances. I DO check in with my partner if I have them tied up in a new position or restraint. I DON'T keep asking, or pestering them, about consent if they have already given it to me and don't give me any indications they are feeling differently. I have a large dick. If I am using a new position and I feel the…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/18 04:14 PM
16

Yes, it's okay to feel disappointed. It's not okay to guilt trip them. And it's not cool to be visibily upset. Be calm and supportive. When appropriate, have a conversation about what happened and how to better address that in the future.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/18 03:02 PM
29

It's always okay to withdraw consent, period. If I'm doing something new and adventurous with a partner, I'll periodically check in and make sure they are enjoying it, and if they want to keep at it. To be clear, I'm not one to harp on always asking permission verbally. I generally seek initial consent through non-verbal, deliberate, and slowly escalating physical actions. But sometimes, you just need to ask. Like when trying something new, or you get non-verbal cues that they may be hesitant or…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/18 02:57 PM
1

Yeah, I do take the time to listen and I consider my self pro MRA. Where I get off the bus is when people here make blanket statements about Feminists, as if feminists are a monolithic group and have a single mind about everything. Just as many, but not all, feminists say all MRA's are misongnists. Neither are true or, in my view, a productive to frame it that way. That was my entire point. Which it appears you don't disagree with.
/r/MensRights09/10/18 02:35 AM
0

Abandon everything and advocate for women???? Where did you come up with that? Did you mean abandon blanket hatred and counterproductive circle jerking of said hatred? If that's "everything" you believe MRA's are about, or even a core tenant, I feel pity for you because if blind hatred on an entire group of people is so linked to the MRA move you imagine it to be, I don't see MRA's gaining any real traction to make the changes that need to be made.
/r/MensRights09/10/18 01:06 AM
0

You admitted there were good feminists, but then tried to dismiss them as not being 'real feminists' because others turned on them. Some real mental gymnastics there. Proving a couple of my points: there are good feminists and you're intellectually dishonest. Nothing else I can say, you've done my work for me. Thank you.
/r/MensRights09/10/18 12:55 AM
1

Oh. Now there are good feminists who support MRA's now? That's a pretty sudden about-face.
/r/MensRights09/10/18 12:28 AM
-1

Say it's only a few. That still disproves this common attitude I see in here that they don't exist. I'd argue that when discussed on an issue by issue basis, you'd get a lot more support. But when you have these MRA's becoming the equivalent of man hating radFems, it's easy for them to dismiss legitimate issues on the basis of them being attached to MRA's. Just like so many are doing in here when it comes to issues on the other side that are reasonable concerns.
/r/MensRights08/10/18 11:36 PM
0

No. I support the lion share of MRA causes. What I don't support is blind hatred of a group of people that is based on a belief that isn't even statistically possible. I've been around here long enough to see posts about feminists who come out in support of MRA's. They generally make it here because they are also about how the radFems turned on them. I figured since you were so sure yourself that you would have done the requisite work to come to your conclusions. Guess not. Ultimately I don't se…
/r/MensRights08/10/18 11:34 PM
-2

Oh got it. You can't even do a search of this subreddit to find the posts about feminists who have spoken up in support of MRA's, much less a Google search.
/r/MensRights08/10/18 10:50 PM
1

Why aren't MRA's marching in support of the 'good feminists'? There are plenty of examples of 'good feminists' sticking up for MRA's. But your barrier of entry for 'good feminists' is marching in the streets?
/r/MensRights08/10/18 08:26 PM
1

I'd like to see studies showing rates that high. I'd question any study showing that 70% or rapes were false allegations... You also aren't factoring in that most sexual assaults go unreported. Anecdotally, I've had mutliple girlfriends who were either raped or molested by family or family friends and they never reported them for one reason or another. Again, not saying false allegations aren't a problem. I've had friends who've had that happen to them as well.
/r/MensRights08/10/18 06:56 PM
-3

Not being an absolutest on the need to eradicate feminism. For shame. For shame....
/r/MensRights08/10/18 05:02 PM
-3

Jesus Christ. What woman pissed in your Cheerios?
/r/MensRights08/10/18 05:02 PM
-4

It's not even being equal. It's that they seem to form their opinions based on only reading about the horror stories of feminism run amok, and there are plenty. But if I only based my opinions on anything from selective bias in my information sources, I'd be just as jaded as them. Again, not saying there aren't legitimate grievances to be had with modern feminism. Just that blanket statements like this post aren't helpful, nor even statistically possible.
/r/MensRights08/10/18 05:01 PM
6

Maybe you aren't looking hard enough or your biases preclude you from finding one? I'm not arguing for the road mainstream feminism has taken lately, but I know plenty of feminists that are not only receptive to MRA concepts, but agree with them. I also know the other kind. Just saying that blanket statements like this are not statistically possible and are not productive. They are just a circle jerk.
/r/MensRights08/10/18 04:10 PM
3

Men are like water.... What a shit post.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/18 02:57 PM
2

That's the state of American political discourse in a nutshell.
/r/MensRights08/10/18 01:29 PM
1

Yes, I just wish more MRA's would acknowledge that purely on a statistical level, rape is a more prevelant problem. Not that they aren't here to advance their own causes, but to dismiss or ignore that fact does them no favors in my view. Just as mainstream feminism advances issues that both simultaneously advocate for female agency (abortion rights), but then discount it when it suits them (alimony is always just).
/r/MensRights08/10/18 01:26 PM
8

Correct, it is difficult to prove. However, we do have a definition. The problem is the radical Left wants to redefine it to remove all meaning of the term (1:4 women campus college study), and the Right seems to not care and "boys will be boys". Seriously, I've been in a lot of locker rooms and work in a male dominanted industry of conservative men and I've never heard anyone brag about sexual assault (grab em by the pussy). My point is I see too many posts on MRA forums where the consensus see…
/r/MensRights08/10/18 01:08 PM
0

The same can be said about rape, except it's a weapon used much more freely. Don't misunderstand me, I'm with MRA's on the majority of issues e.g. College Kangaroo Courts, family courts, alimony, etc. But I see a lot of "pics or it didn't happen". That just flies in the face of our history or understanding of sexual violence, and I don't mean the radical SJW attempts to redefine the term to mean regret after consent, or anything else like that.
/r/MensRights08/10/18 12:52 PM
2

You have put her on this pedastal, but are still sure you're going to cheat?
/r/seduction07/10/18 10:35 PM
1

I don't want to minimize whatever it is that you're experiencing, or wanting to experience, to help you talk to women better. But that example was horrible and that man was emotionally unstable. If that's your reaction 15 or 30 seconds, into a conversation, I don't think it's the other person, woman or man, that's the problem. Women are people, men are people. They are of different gender sure, but it's not reasonable to assume you'd talk to your male boss or something guy you just met the same …
/r/seduction07/10/18 10:32 PM
5

What the fuck did I just read? That's a horrible example of any conversation, much less as an example of common differences in gender differences in conversational styles.
/r/seduction07/10/18 08:41 PM
1

Be honest. How many times a day do you sniff your own farts? Jokes aside, you're clearly a superior intellectual being and I bow before you. Thanks for bringing my head out of the clouds.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/18 07:10 PM
1

Logical fallacies bad when you percieve them being used again you. Logic fallacies are good when you use them. I'm sorry that either you're full of so much hatred and that you believe that you're actually hurting my feelings with your childish insults. I hope one day you will be less of a self-loathing prick and come to understand that you don't know everything. But also that even if you are right, you won't win any respect by being such a dismissive asshole.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/18 06:21 PM
3

Incels have definitely taken to this hard. Like shit on a stick that can't even attract flies.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/18 05:59 PM
1

No, it's a general observation from reading through Incel forums, within the context of my professional and personal experiences of meeting and getting to know a wide variety of people. Regardless, for someone who likes to call out percieved logical fallacies, you have used at least one in all of your responses. Including, using an ad hominem fallacy to respond just now.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/18 05:44 PM
1

*Pseudo-science is a collection of beliefs or practices mistakenly regarded as being based on scientific method. The content or core of my responses have had nothing to do with American values, or whatever else you want to throw out there to discount any real discussion that challenges your worldview. You didn't cite cite psuedo-science per se. But my response would be that you very likely cited bad science. The study referenced in the article I linked questions the scientific method used by neu…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/18 04:44 PM
1

I don't think you understand what psuedo-science is. And you're not using the argument against the "hard work" trope in the right context, which is when it's used in the economic sense. Just about anyone can work on themselves, but it's hard. It takes a constant effort to critically look at your behavior in relation to how others react to it. From there you have to then decide what either to change or accept. It looks to me like you aren't just accept everything about how you are currently behav…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/18 03:41 PM
1

Interesting. My value system is based on my life experiences. I expect you're similar. However, I don't think you've established free will doesn't exist. To me, it seems like you are looking for external factors that are outside of your control in order to rationalize you're own short comings with women. Why do you do that? Because it's easier then the hard work it takes to critically look at yourself and do the necessary work to become a person that attracts a wide range of other people, not ju…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/18 03:27 PM
1

I don't understand the context of using that word to refute my statement. Here's another article. This time about a study on numerous studies that were done by neuro scientists who have claimed to disprove free will. https://news.ncsu.edu/2018/03/free-will-review-2018/
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/18 02:55 PM
1

Huh? Sorry, I honestly don't understand what you're trying to say.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/18 02:40 PM
2

LOL. Oh no! Some PhD VICE found told me I have no free will! I know PhD's who believe in Big Foot and chemtrails. Does that make it all true? Mind....blown... Kidding aside, you're just appealing to authority and it's not very effective.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/18 02:34 PM
1

Lying to anyone is generally bad... But for personal gain? Almost always falls into the manipulation category and is almost exclusively bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/18 02:21 AM
14

Stupid women having agency and free will. Why can't they recognize that I'm all they deserve?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/18 10:14 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter