| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Feminists argue that sexism against men does not exist.Again, the same facile comparison. You are repeating yourself, and with no apparent self-awareness of the fact. | /r/MensRights | 18/09/17 12:51 PM |
| 1 | Feminists argue that sexism against men does not exist.Again, the bill provides additional legal protections and funding for victims of domestic violence of any gender. You have not refuted this in any way, so your imitation of Moynihan is ironic. Your implication that you are the sane one in this conversation, however, is merely amusing, maybe a little sad. | /r/MensRights | 18/09/17 12:26 PM |
| 0 | Feminists argue that sexism against men does not exist.There is a fundamental difference between a law which explicitly lays out a legal framework for discrimination and one which explicitly affirms legal equity. The comparison is therefore, again, facile. The two are not comparable, and doing so seems like an attempt to bluntly tar the latter with the historical baggage of the former, while understanding neither. As your original point (if it could be called that) was to scoff at the very idea that a bill with "women" in the title could be gender n… | /r/MensRights | 18/09/17 08:37 AM |
| 0 | Feminists argue that sexism against men does not exist.Plessy v Ferguson explicitly enshrined a dual system, whereas the language in VAWA explicitly affirms no distinction, so this is a facile comparison. | /r/MensRights | 17/09/17 06:32 PM |
| 0 | Feminists argue that sexism against men does not exist.The violence against women act is gender neutral? The criminal provisions are written with gender-neutral language, and the gender neutrality of VAWA is literally written into the text of the law: (8) Nonexclusivity.--Nothing in this title shall be construed to prohibit male victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking from receiving benefits and services under this title. And the DOJ itself has affirmed the provisions of VAWA are gender neutral: It is true that th… | /r/MensRights | 17/09/17 05:27 PM |
| 1 | Americans calling themselves "feminist" has dropped from 28% to 18% in the last two yearsBut to imply the majority of original Feminists were just trying to get basic rights to release some sort of main plot is ridiculous. I don't understand this. What does this mean? | /r/MensRights | 31/05/15 04:31 AM |
| 4 | [xMODx] We are not spamming you.They've also targeted SRS posters, which seems... counterproductive to their cause, to say the least. | /r/seduction | 23/06/12 10:15 PM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter