TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

414RequestURITooLong Archive

View 0 posts and 126 comments by 414RequestURITooLong on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
10

It's more like Jealous woman kills her boyfriend=mental issues/self-defense Jealous man kills his boyfriend=crime of passion Jealous woman kills her girlfriend=mental issues Jealous man kills his girlfriend=feminicide, she died for being a woman
/r/MensRights01/01/22 12:02 PM
7

There are many possibilities here. FTM? MTF who decided not to change her name for some reason? A cis woman whose parents chose to name her Peter?
/r/MensRights17/10/21 08:17 PM
9

H0w cAN rAp3 b3 r3aL 1f p3n1S fULL 0f bl00D Ar3nt R3aL????? That's you. That's what you sound like.
/r/MensRights14/10/21 09:22 AM
4

wat
/r/MensRights30/08/21 04:15 PM
14

So i was watching Money Heist Don't.
/r/MensRights26/08/21 08:15 PM
12

Please don't call anything the Taliban do "men's rights".
/r/MensRights19/08/21 06:05 PM
5

It apparently comes from http://wondermark.com/1k62/
/r/MensRights02/08/21 10:25 PM
6

What is a man? A miserable little pile of secrets! But enough talk! Have at you!
/r/MensRights02/08/21 08:46 PM
13

A non-transexual, heterosexual person.
/r/MensRights02/08/21 06:37 PM
34

It means you politely disagree with them and are, therefore, a troll.
/r/MensRights02/08/21 05:04 PM
7

Deirdre was "a homemaker". She’s a grandmother to seven. She didn’t know about her husband’s secret life involving cash, guns, travel, a gangster funeral and a mistress. [...] She had, however, eight bank accounts, four of which were joint accounts with Declan. Over three quarters of a million euro (€770,499) was laundered through these accounts. Sounds legit.
/r/MensRights01/08/21 02:50 PM
2

Penetrative sex was an impossibility for me before circumcision (very severe phimosis), so unfortunately I can't compare. I remember masturbation felt more nuanced before, but not sure if it was better. I miss my foreskin somewhat, just because it was a part of my body. But I don't regret having been cut in my circumstances, it needed to be done. I like the fact that I had a choice. Even if you know that a child will positively need a circumcision before he can fully function sexually, you shoul…
/r/MensRights01/08/21 01:58 PM
67

I understand that circumcision entails medical personnel touching the patient's penis quite a bit. I was circumcised myself - willingly, for actual medical reasons, as an adult. But your description of a boy that's going to be mutilated against his will, while his family openly mocks him, records it all and shares it so that more people can enjoy his suffering... That just sounds too fucked up.
/r/MensRights31/07/21 08:41 PM
204

Sounds like extremely depraved stuff, bordering on child porn. I don't think I need to see it.
/r/MensRights31/07/21 06:59 PM
1

this is a fair claim They claimed that the courts lacked impartiality because they were blindly following the Conseil d'État's case law. That sounds very weak.
/r/MensRights11/07/21 12:35 AM
0

The ECHR is not part of the EU. EDIT: Why would you downvote that?
/r/MensRights10/07/21 11:55 PM
1

But their allegations were all about the right to a fair trial (article 6) and so on, right? There was nothing regarding discrimination.
/r/MensRights10/07/21 11:54 PM
13

Does Spain have a draft? Or some other form of compulsory service that is male specific? Not anymore. However, the criminal code provides for much harsher sentences for certain crimes when the perpetrator is a man and the victim is (or used to be) his female spouse or romantic partner.
/r/MensRights01/07/21 06:48 PM
6

Piercing babies' ears is bad, but genital mutilation is just barbaric.
/r/MensRights24/05/21 09:26 PM
37

AB, for instance, included such statements as part of an art exhibit in 2018 The whole thing was apparently a game for her. She is a piece of shit. he’d had a consensual, romantic affair with AB lasting over two years I'd expect him to be able to prove this.
/r/MensRights09/04/21 09:09 PM
45

So it's actually method acting. She needed to be a lying, abusive piece of shit in order to prepare for her role in... whatever bullshit she's doing.
/r/MensRights06/01/21 08:11 PM
50

How can this: Dada back to digging & you best believe im gonna dig up all the skeletons in this court's closet. turn into this? I was afraid something bad was going to happen to myself or my children That judge was full of shit.
/r/MensRights18/12/20 08:42 PM
7

but The Times is reporting this has been denied, with the judge saying it did not have “a reasonable prospect of success,” Wait, is that the same judge that ruled against him? How is that supposed to work?
/r/MensRights26/11/20 09:35 PM
6

What did she do? She tempted a Negro. She was white, and she tempted a Negro. She did something that in our society is unspeakable: She kissed a black man. Not an old Uncle, but a strong, young Negro man. No code mattered to her before she broke it, but it came crashing down on her afterwards. The witnesses for the state [...] have presented themselves to you gentlemen, to this Court, in the cynical confidence that their testimony would not be doubted, confident that you gentlemen would go along…
/r/MensRights20/09/20 12:10 PM
4

That's not fair. They are also mercenaries.
/r/MensRights24/08/20 10:16 AM
2

He should end the relationship anyway. A BPD sufferer doesn't love you. They may need you as a caregiver (aka favorite person), but they can't possibly love anybody. You can expect to be discarded at any time, out of the blue, as soon as a better caregiver appears. Whatever they may tell about how much they love you and how you changed their lives and how they want to be with you forever means exactly nothing. Most of them tend to say the same stuff. They don't really have personalities, for the…
/r/MensRights23/07/20 11:27 PM
1

What will we do with a false accuser? What will we do with a false accuser? What will we do with a false accuser? Early in the morning! Way hay and free she goes Way hay and free she goes Way hay and free she goes Early in the morning! Let her keep lying with complete impunity Let her keep lying with complete impunity Let her keep lying with complete impunity Early in the morning!
/r/MensRights23/07/20 10:26 PM
7

But, they say, Ripley wasn’t done, and, an hour later, she took him to another canal where there was no one was there to save him. It was no accident.
/r/MensRights26/05/20 05:19 PM
1

I'm playing The Sun's advocate here, but what if Epstein's link with these specific people, who happen to be women, was more tenuous?
/r/MensRights07/05/20 12:07 AM
14

To be fair, those sadistic fucks would probably mutilate girls, too, if they could get away with it.
/r/MensRights03/05/20 10:54 AM
15

I think Amber Heard is doing a lot for men's rights awareness, bless her heart or lack thereof.
/r/MensRights12/04/20 10:15 AM
5

To be fair, that was probably a joke.
/r/MensRights22/03/20 04:12 PM
6

Off-topic, but neither the MRM nor feminism are "anti-sex". Nobody says "anti-sex" when they mean "anti-sexism". That should not be a disambiguation page.
/r/MensRights19/03/20 02:21 PM
1

I don't consider domestic violence on women by men to be the most common thing ever, either.
/r/MensRights08/03/20 08:39 AM
0

Poor Karl Marx was a good man who worked for the betterment of the working classes. Paraphrasing Kipling, many tyrants have twisted the truth he spoke to make a trap for fools. I don't think it's fair to associate his name with feminism, too.
/r/MensRights07/03/20 08:18 PM
10

The whole idea of a fourth Toy Story movie sounded like a cash grab to me, so I haven't looked into it that much. Could you explain how feminism ruined it?
/r/MensRights07/03/20 07:36 PM
3

Under the current laws, men go to jail automatically if accused, even without evidence. Men can be convicted without evidence- the only evidence required is for the woman to maintain her testimony. The law provides for the punishment of "gender violence" (defined as domestic violence (or threats, etc.) on a woman by her male partner or former partner), special "gender violence" courts and all kinds of benefits for the victims of "gender violence". These benefits do not necessarily include perman…
/r/MensRights07/03/20 06:58 PM
15

So he wants to prevent women from attending school? Sounds like something a misogynist would do. I don't understand why you are getting downvoted here, by the way.
/r/MensRights06/03/20 08:59 PM
4

"Feminicidio". It's funny how the media forces certain words into our heads to shape the way we think. We don't use that word very often in Spain, but it's probably coming.
/r/MensRights06/03/20 08:41 PM
24

That's a ban alright. It's not a "shadow" ban, though. What were they saying?
/r/MensRights06/03/20 08:26 PM
8

Be ignored. ???? Don't profit.
/r/MensRights04/03/20 08:19 PM
7

So they handpicked a couple comments with two upvotes or so, and present that as "evidence" that the MRM is essentially the KKK by a different name. No, you didn't hunt shit, Mr. Longtime Journalist.
/r/MensRights28/02/20 07:27 PM
1

And a very unsubtle one at that.
/r/MensRights03/02/20 11:48 PM
64

3 in 4 homeless people aren't people.
/r/MensRights02/02/20 06:16 PM
5

That settles it, then. If she accused him, he did it. If she accused him, he did it. If she accused him, he did it.
/r/MensRights12/01/20 09:47 PM
4

Do you identify as a woman?
/r/MensRights12/01/20 09:19 PM
8

I will believe he wants to fuck kids as soon as a woman, any woman, says he does.
/r/MensRights12/01/20 06:44 PM
7

it's supposed to be 8 days after birth According to Jewish custom, yeah. But you don't have to be a Jew to want to mutilate your kid for no reason. I personally like it, it helps cleanliness You know, millennia ago, when plumbing was still science fiction, most people weren't circumcised, and yet some of them managed to survive.
/r/MensRights09/01/20 09:44 AM
43

Confirming stereotypes about journalists and knowing jack shit about whatever they are writing about.
/r/MensRights16/12/19 12:29 AM
16

They caused a fellow human being an extreme amount of pain for no real reason. I'd say they deserve to be subjected to an extreme amount of pain too. Now, as I am against both torture and the death penalty, I believe they should just rot in prison forever, but 'deserving' has nothing to do with that.
/r/MensRights03/12/19 01:35 PM
3

The thing is, most people here probably aren't celibate, and for most of those who are celibate, it probably isn't involuntary.
/r/MensRights25/10/19 03:27 PM
38

Bless her heart.
/r/MensRights23/10/19 07:28 PM
17

you have to sit next to a girl in order to improve your brain This man is not just a bigot, he has to be mentally ill.
/r/MensRights23/10/19 09:12 AM
4

I understand why she felt uncomfortable, but there's quite a distance between that and feeling that he "had hindered her application to Oxford University". BTW, the piece of garbage who said that was not a prosecutor, but a judge.
/r/MensRights11/10/19 02:16 PM
4

this heavily I fail to see why he should be punished at all.
/r/MensRights11/10/19 12:30 PM
3

Their belief system is convoluted to hilarious degrees. I wouldn't call that barbaric. However, this specific part is pretty barbaric and needs to be banned everywhere ASAP.
/r/MensRights06/10/19 09:41 PM
21

Reminds me of this classic: Women have always been the primary victims of war. Women lose their husbands, their fathers, their sons in combat.
/r/MensRights30/09/19 08:11 AM
2

That specific woman? For sure. But your comment sounds more like "all women are cheaters", and that's not what the MRM stands for.
/r/MensRights28/09/19 05:43 PM
2

Just like there's a difference between saying "niggers found in the streets after curfew will be shot" and saying "niggers found in the streets will be shot". Both are still horrible.
/r/MensRights25/09/19 01:01 PM
1

The lawyers always win.
/r/MensRights22/09/19 04:19 PM
13

And people should just snap out of depression. And cancer. And being assholes.
/r/MensRights22/09/19 04:18 PM
6

Their body, their choice.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 07:41 AM
6

It's not "logic", just ignorance. Which is a good thing, because ignorance is usually easier to fix than bad "logic".
/r/MensRights28/07/19 07:19 PM
1

No, it doesn't. But if you call them sexist, that's not a false accusation. Accusing someone of doing X, when they didn't actually do X, is a false accusation. Saying that having done X means they are Y, when they did do X, is not a false accusation, whether or not it's true that they are Y.
/r/MensRights26/07/19 08:03 AM
0

It would be a false accusation if you hadn't actually said that. The fact is that you did. They believe that comment makes you sexist, which it doesn't, but that's a matter of interpretation, not a false accusation.
/r/MensRights22/07/19 06:20 PM
5

in the garment of faux feminism. r/iamverysmart
/r/MensRights22/07/19 06:16 PM
38

It's not even about "being against circumcision". Adults should be free to have as many unneeded surgeries as they want, and to randomly remove whichever parts of their body they want removed. If circumcision is so awesome as they apparently believe, their children will absolutely jump at the first opportunity to get their penises mutilated. They should just give them circumcision vouchers for their 18th birthdays.
/r/MensRights14/07/19 09:43 PM
28

Stop restricting programs and classes to certain genders or races. Discriminating just to increase the representation of women in tech is as misguided and biased as mandating increases for women’s representation in the homeless, work-related and violent deaths, prisons, and school dropouts. Speaking up without the fear of being harshly judged is central to psychological safety, but these practices can remove that safety by judging unintentional transgressions. Triggered. EDIT: which they then pr…
/r/MensRights05/04/19 08:11 PM
4

I'd consider that a confession.
/r/MensRights31/03/19 12:51 PM
5

Does that mean FGM isn't mutilation, either? I'm pretty sure people who mutilate their baby daughters don't do it because they hate them and want them to suffer.
/r/MensRights06/02/19 12:13 PM
47

Trans women who compete as women are either insanely deluded or major assholes. Forcing cis women to compete against trans women is just massively unfair.
/r/MensRights03/02/19 08:14 PM
140

Here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x_HL0wiK4Zc
/r/MensRights21/01/19 03:05 PM
5

"My whatever was taken out of context" ALWAYS means "I am an asshole as well as a liar".
/r/MensRights24/12/18 12:26 PM
2

electing genitals It's not as if electing a cunt were any worse than electing a dick.
/r/MensRights05/12/18 05:28 PM
61

If society/your moral framework/an inner voice/etc. expects you to "choose" to give someone your seat just because they are female, that's not compatible with equality.
/r/MensRights07/11/18 10:12 PM
9

She's a piece of shit, but her ideas should be laughed at, not banned.
/r/MensRights25/10/18 08:03 PM
1

His becoming POTUS was not a consequence of having been accused of sexual assault, and his hypothetical death in prison won't be a consequence of his becoming POTUS, anyway. So nope, having been accused of sexual assault hasn't ruined Trump's life. Not that that means that other men's lives haven't been ruined, or that the disgusting bullshit contained in that tweet has any actual merit.
/r/MensRights08/10/18 04:26 PM
29

I want to believe these rules were intended to be a joke. Otherwise, this is one of the creepiest things I have ever seen.
/r/MensRights26/09/18 01:38 PM
3

Academic censorship is fucked up in all of its forms. A government can decide what kind of degrees may be offered by public universities, or what kind of degrees can be recognized for official purposes, without it necessarily being censorship. It's part of the government's job. I'm not commenting on whether or not Orban is a fascist, just saying that this specific policy is not necessarily fascist in nature.
/r/MensRights22/09/18 12:37 AM
4

That's a different matter. You shouldn't be able to force a woman to keep a fetus inside her body, much less to abort it. I'm all for 'economic abortion' for men, though.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 12:54 PM
7

I haven't wished I didn't have a foreskin one day in my life.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 12:48 PM
1

Do they report every single time a man does something bad to a woman? Anyway, I don't think mass hysteria is something to strive for.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 11:42 AM
4

It's not like a male rapist would (or should) have been sentenced to death. This was a fair sentence. At least this time, the court system worked, so I don't really know what you are complaining about.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 10:12 AM
2

I'm sure you could come up with some bullshit medical justification for it By removing any incentive to have sex, you are actually saving them from sexually transmitted infections and unwanted pregnancies. See? Genital mutilation is a good thing! Obligatory /s, lest they use this comment to compare r/MensRights with that incel bullshit.
/r/MensRights21/07/18 11:33 AM
59

Some humans are. It just happens that only female humans can pull this one off.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 08:58 PM
3

You can just snap out of it, just like you would with depression, cancer or bullet wounds.
/r/MensRights27/04/18 11:28 PM
3

And he would have gotten away with it, too, if it weren't for that meddling mom.
/r/MensRights26/04/18 05:06 PM
0

Nope. What the post says is that believing "She is beautiful, so this not-so-beautiful person should be glad to be with her" is wrong. At no point does the post say or imply that he "deserves" her, or that he is entitled to "demand" her love.
/r/MensRights14/04/18 06:19 PM
1

Except that is not what the post says.
/r/MensRights14/04/18 10:57 AM
27

being a lawyer and therefore with some level of intellect You haven't met many lawyers, have you?
/r/MensRights09/04/18 12:01 PM
4

Hang on, I thought we just established that forcing someone to kiss you is sexual harassment? Forcing them to kiss you (as in physically) is not sexual harassment. It's sexual assault.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 04:32 PM
2

The real /r/relationships is in the comments.
/r/MensRights08/04/17 05:18 PM
2

Exactly this. If they are not punished because of some technicality, or even because there was no proof, it doesn't mean they are innocent. If they are sentenced but they hadn't actually done it, the sentence doesn't make them guilty. If a court says that what they did was against the law, but you think it was morally right (not talking about rape here), then the fact that it was illegal (according to the court) doesn't make it morally wrong. Don't believe a person is guilty just because the all…
/r/MensRights09/10/16 12:07 AM
3

The fact that most of the economic and political decision-makers are male does not mean that men in general are the economic and political decision-makers, nor does it mean that those male economic and political decision-makers are particularly interested in catering to the issues of non-powerful men over non-powerful women. The male economic and political decision-makers are certainly different from the disposable males.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 08:10 PM
2

Men's rights are not about that. I hope you are a troll and don't really believe such disgusting bullshit.
/r/MensRights17/07/16 11:17 PM
20

I'm sure some 14 year old girls dream of having sex with a 28 year old teacher, too. However, it is always disgusting when a teacher, no matter the shape of their genitals, abuses their position for sexual gratification from a 14 year old student.
/r/MensRights30/06/16 10:15 PM
3

I don't think it's fair to blame every woman in the world for the actions of a single woman. I understand if it's hard for you to see it like that, though.
/r/MensRights28/02/16 08:33 PM
4

You seem to be a gender flip of the stereotypical lesbian man-hating feminist. Either that or a troll, I'm not sure.
/r/MensRights28/02/16 08:02 PM
-1

What I meant was that it's unfair to call people "dumb and blind" just because they agreed to get married. Sorry my comment wasn't insightful enough.
/r/MensRights07/02/16 01:16 AM
30

It's easy to believe she is "not like that". And it's easy to be wrong.
/r/MensRights06/02/16 07:28 PM
3

1 in 4 sounds quite low for this "logic" or lack thereof.
/r/MensRights30/12/15 05:11 PM
3

I don't.
/r/MensRights20/12/15 05:44 PM
1

And you are apparently glad I don't know you.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 05:01 PM
1

Never said there is a law against taking pictures of kids in public. There was, however, an angry woman against taking pictures of kids in public.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 05:01 PM
1

No, you probably wouldn't have. Which is a good thing, because that would have ended badly.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 10:27 PM
9

"Way too old for me."
/r/MensRights04/12/15 10:25 PM
18

And respond they will. And then they'll laugh.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 10:22 PM
12

Crazy, uh, finds a way.
/r/MensRights31/08/15 06:15 PM
14

CJ381 Recognising the nature of the female prison population, with high levels of mental illness, experience of being a victim of crimes such as sexual assault and domestic violence, and caring responsibilities for children, the only women who should be in custody are those very few that commit serious and violent crimes and who present a threat to the public. Yeah, that's fucked up.
/r/MensRights04/07/15 06:21 PM
7

Is it really called Femsoc? That sounds too close to Ingsoc.
/r/MensRights14/06/15 07:15 PM
5

It's called a practical demonstration.
/r/MensRights13/06/15 01:04 PM
12

They were practically begging to be tortured! If they disliked torture for some reason, they just had to confess their crimes and tell on their family. You wouldn't understand because you are a cis-privileged heresy apologist.
/r/MensRights01/05/15 05:49 PM
2

According to /r/shittyadvice, yeah.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 02:55 PM
9

I'm all for men's rights Wrong. I'm not a sexist Sexism means discrimination on the basis of gender, so that's also wrong. I wouldn't let a female mechanic do any significant work At least you hold prejudice against both men and women. That's gotta count for something.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 08:06 PM
-2

Nobody is saying he was raped, but what they did to him was still wrong.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 06:09 PM
1

Why would she have to be a man to be a rapist? Don't give her ideas.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 10:27 PM
4

It was the Constitutional Court. Rough translation of a fragment of one of their rulings (STC 59/2008, in Spanish): It is a reasonable distinction because it aims to increase protection of women's physical, psychological and moral integrity in a scope, that of the couple, where they are inadequately protected, and because it pursues said legitimate aim in an adequate way, by means of the (by itself reasonable) recognition of the increased gravity of the differentiated behaviors, which takes into…
/r/MensRights07/06/14 02:45 PM
23

Just like murderers can't be prosecuted because then other murderers might kill the witnesses too.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 05:00 PM
4

Beta Gamma O brave new world that has such people in it.
/r/MensRights09/11/13 10:08 PM
10

It's only rape if she's a man FTFY. As far as I know, they are usually treated the same whether they are ugly or not. Also, I'd say that most rapists are crazy for some reasonable definition of "crazy".
/r/MensRights23/08/13 09:45 PM
4

I know it's a reference to rape. I'm just saying that, in general, you should both help would-be-victims directly and prevent those that would harm them from doing so. When it comes to the problem of "trapping" men with a pregnancy, you should "tell women not to trap", as it seems to be too accepted, and maybe you need to educate men on how to avoid being "trapped", too. However, rape is not accepted at all (at the very least in Europe and the US), so there is no need to "tell men not to rape". …
/r/MensRights11/06/13 07:49 PM
1

Why not both?
/r/MensRights11/06/13 05:38 PM
5

Affair began when she entered 16-year-old's room to discuss driving lessons The "kid" is 16.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 12:26 PM
2

The Spanish Criminal Code is full of stuff like that: "Whoever does something that should be considered a misdemeanor at worst to his wife or former wife, or woman with whom he has been bound by a similar emotional relation even without cohabitation..." For example, if a man "lightly intimidates" his wife or former wife, he "shall be punished with a sentence of imprisonment of six months to one year or community service from thirty-one to eighty days and, in all cases, deprivation of the right t…
/r/MensRights27/05/13 09:31 PM
3

An international publication.
/r/MensRights04/04/13 06:23 PM
41

A criminal is going to fuck you out of 25 years of your life FTFY His temper doesn't help, though.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 07:08 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter