TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

4e351d81-7956-461a Archive

View 1 post and 57 comments by 4e351d81-7956-461a on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
16

Eastern Culture4e351d81-7956-461a/r/MensRights20/05/18 09:21 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

That's an interesting statistic. Can you share the source?
/r/MensRights24/11/18 08:02 AM
4

https://www.indiatoday.in/india/north/story/false-rape-cases-in-delhi-delhi-commission-of-women-233222-2014-12-29 About 50 % according to this link. It depends on the definition of false accusation and rape though.
/r/MensRights14/10/18 01:10 PM
2

On a tangential note, can anyone elaborate on the genetic effects of doing this? Wouldn't genetic diversity be hugely hit? Taking this to the extreme of eliminating all men, Isn't a being as sophisticated as a human possible only from sexual reproduction? Even if enough care cannot be garnered for men to survive, wouldn't doing increase the risk of elimination of humanity from the world? If anyone has read those things, any of these problems discussed there?
/r/MensRights04/09/18 06:53 PM
1

that doesn't mean you get to flagrantly violate the rules. In India, for some of the laws, it is the case that majority violates the law. (Example: Driving laws). The real problem is which laws are going to be implemented / checked for, and where? When you notice that everyone around you is violating a law, would you be an outcast and follow the rules? It might be that they don't know how to read / didn't read that it's a woman's only compartment. It's so crowded there, that someone might just h…
/r/MensRights01/09/18 05:27 PM
8

This empowerment (more like treating one class as superior) in the name of equality is the main issue with feminism. No matter what you say, being poor is less privileged than being a girl. When you're poor, you're far more likely to have lesser access to any opportunities. You're far more likely to stay poor throughout the life. Being female, and not being poor puts you so much better. No matter how much your life sucks because of your gender, you still have resources. However feminism portrays…
/r/MensRights26/06/18 03:02 PM
3

Thanks for the post! After seeing this it's not very hard to understand why despite of the act being so cruel, the Nazi soldiers did what they did. Like these feminists think all men are bad, they were drunk on the idea of Jews being bad. They definitely must have thought at some point: Why can't we hate Jews? Think of this, everyone around you yelling the same thing. You lose sight of what's true, and just do whatever everyone else is doing around you, trying to fit in. It's sad that even after…
/r/MensRights10/06/18 02:47 PM
1

OP if this is the case, we'd all like to hear counter arguments. Maybe there's some truth to them. This subreddit supports free speech and won't ban you for discussing your ideas.
/r/MensRights09/06/18 02:53 AM
2

I know you are being sarcastic, but I've seen people not able to convincingly answer anyone claiming the above. Also femsplain feminism-splain Why, of course, because society (misogynist, patriarchal, oppressive,...) is telling them to try too hard in order to get into positions of power from which they will dominate women! Why do you think men have inherent interest in dominating women? What good does it do to anyone? Couldn't it be because that women seek out men higher in the hierarchy? Just …
/r/MensRights09/06/18 01:58 AM
10

Why should STEM be any different? Before checking, for ensuring fairness, even for subjective questions, we list the things which have to be specified in order to get X marks for a question. This is public, and everyone's answer sheets are public. If anyone sees discrimination, it's easily known, and can wreck havoc over the career. It's not like you're writing an essay where there could be room for unquestionable bias or favoritism. Edit: Late submission penalty is coded in the application used…
/r/MensRights06/06/18 10:50 AM
2

And I'd bet dimes to dollars a lot fewer girls are given the benefit of that training relative to boys. I don't have data, they are privatized institutes, but the place I went, had at least 25-30% girls. What decides whether you can go to the institutes is whether you have money or not. From amongst my family and relatives, there was no discrimination based on gender. Though I am pretty sure that it would exist significantly to explain this gender gap. Or encouraged to see it as a thing worth pu…
/r/MensRights06/06/18 01:31 AM
1

Your example of rich girl/poor boy is, IMO, an argument for intersectionality. To consider gender alone and not financial class is to miss the bigger picture, is it not? I fear to include balanced economy or anything financial, because then it moves to the socialism. Though what we are discussing, the equality of opportunity, is completely different from distribution of income, but still, the fact that not disproportionately investing in our future (like we're doing now) may result in a non-diff…
/r/MensRights06/06/18 12:33 AM
2

It's awfully hard to do it, and the effects of doing it wrongly may be damaging enough to warrant not doing it. Why is it hard? The sheer number of categories. If we consider factors like gender, race, religion, language, we'd have (please feel free to correct numbers here, they're from the first google search I could make) : 63 x 4 x 6500 x 4,200 ~ 6.8 billion. To do it correctly for all these categories we've to collect data on the performance, and appropriately correct for discrimination for …
/r/MensRights05/06/18 10:51 PM
3

Restarting your modem should do it (if you have fiber then both devices). If it doesn't use a proxy or one of the free VPNs.
/r/MensRights05/06/18 09:43 PM
4

Could you make it more clear? What words would you like and what does USA law say?
/r/MensRights05/06/18 09:42 PM
2

Really nice to see that feminism hasn't taken over this subreddit.
/r/MensRights04/06/18 06:35 PM
1

Any updates?
/r/MensRights04/06/18 06:27 PM
1

duplicate.
/r/MensRights04/06/18 06:00 PM
1

duplicate.
/r/MensRights04/06/18 05:59 PM
10

Why men keep doing this? Why whites keep doing that? Why blacks keep doing this? Why Muslims keep doing that? Collective punishment is a war crime according to Geneva convention. Collective blaming, what is being done here is the logical precursor to the collective punishment. How is it even legal to teach this BS? Ask the teacher (anonymously, if possible) how far is this from racism?
/r/MensRights04/06/18 05:56 PM
6

There may be other factors influencing. Maybe someone reported your post. Could you please arrange a third test, where it's reported too. I'll (and probably everyone) be grateful for the complete analysis. This would strengthen anyone using this as an argument. Though facebook still may have other factors, but then we can say we did all in our power to test.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 09:50 PM
1

How much time did it take for your ban?
/r/MensRights03/06/18 09:43 PM
-1

Why aren’t we doing this already? There's a school of thought which says that we should consider the circumstances into consideration while deciding the punishment. Ethnicity, gender, religion etc. may explain reason why a crime ought to be sentenced harshly or leniently. Even the laws give a range of sentencing. The jury is expected to follow the specified guidelines to decide the exact sentencing, however as you said it is difficult to be unbiased, which is why we have the difference of punish…
/r/MensRights03/06/18 09:40 PM
9

Can you / someone else run one more test? Just do "All men are pigs, literally!" This is to ensure that it wasn't because of the first one.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 09:04 PM
3

it's driving me crazy that something so simple should be so controversial to them. I think I have an explanation for this. If you want general public to follow you, you have to show a black and white world. Only if people see something easy to call bad or wrong, they would agree to work for change. If the people realize that the reality is actually a grey area, they would have to think harder for the right way, which isn't very appealing to people.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 08:58 PM
1

The idea that people shouldn't be judged for the things they do is preposterous. Judgments are how human beings operate in a socially complex world. Judgments are necessary to stop being friends with druggy losers and start being friends with people who are healthy and good for you Totally agree, but the thing is men are judged differently for doing the same thing. Judging should be correct. She wants judgement irrespective of gender (I'm not saying I totally agree with this, I find this against…
/r/MensRights03/06/18 10:05 AM
5

Divorce cannot happen unless you marry. If marriage rate goes down, divorce will go down automatically. The graphs are for 1000 people not for 1000 married people. If you look at the slope from 1980 to 2010, you'd find that marriage rate was more steep than the divorce rate. Let's first look at "What we should look at?": We should look at divorce for every marriage. If they go up, the chance of being divorced in a marriage goes up, if they go down, chance of being divorced goes down. If marriage…
/r/MensRights02/06/18 11:27 AM
0

First of all she's not saying that. She's (Priyanka) saying that the problem with feminism, and why it has a bad name because it says "give us the ability to make our own decisions, without being judged, the same way men have for years" Second of all what those (Indian) feminists mean there is: An act like drinking, coming late back to home etc, wearing short clothes, a girl is usually "judged" (by judged, it means other people form opinions) to be not responsible and not traditional by the elde…
/r/MensRights02/06/18 12:27 AM
29

These cases would help the cause. This reinforces the fact: Some woman may be too dangerous, and that is sufficient reason to keep every kid away from the mom, like it is kept away from dad until the matter is decided in the court. The law / generic assumption that it is safe to keep with female is not true.
/r/MensRights02/06/18 12:02 AM
3

Yeah... so fuck off troll! Let OP enjoy free speech. Not many subreddits where they don't delete your post.
/r/MensRights01/06/18 04:09 PM
7

Maybe, but can you link to any post or any comment related to race, that is causing you to believe this? I would like to see. Thanks in Advance
/r/MensRights01/06/18 03:40 PM
5

The stupid amount of white supremacy I've seen on this subreddit. Could you cite? I didn't find anything close to it.
/r/MensRights01/06/18 03:34 PM
0

This is nice. I saw in this video (data for India) at t=890: https://youtu.be/1_2gl7lz25E?t=890 That the (India) married male / female suicide ratio has increased from 1.66 to 1.98 from 2000 to 2012. Can anyone point to the latest source for the same graphs? How does the theory that say that men are more violent, and hence successfully commit more suicides explain this? Did men get 20\% more violent than women got in a decade? Or is it because the laws are getting misused (false accusations) to …
/r/MensRights29/05/18 11:32 PM
2

Here's the thing. The law is intended to work like a computer program. It has to be this way, because otherwise we may add our own biases to the judgement. How do we implement this is the question. How do we draw the line? How do we identify that someone is intimidating enough. Is 1.25 x weight bar enough to say that? No, now this man weighed 100 <units> at the time of incident, and was intimidating for this 70 <units> woman and shouldn't have made any possibly sexual comments. He should be sent…
/r/MensRights29/05/18 02:10 AM
1

They're talking out of their ass, mostly. I agree for myself. I was trying to understand the viewpoint. I now understand why it's wrong, and what are the deadly implications of this rule. However, I like to think with a free mind, and I tried to entertain what was meant. Entertaining the enforcement of such a law made me realize the error which I was making. I hope you understand my situation.
/r/MensRights29/05/18 01:57 AM
2

I think what you're trying to say is: Whatever I and /u/msleeduon said cannot be used as a law, as it would allow anyone sweeping powers to ruin lives and send anyone to jail. Law should be very precise in manners like these to avoid misuse, but at the same time we risk ruining our interactions with the opposite genders, if we make such a law.
/r/MensRights29/05/18 01:44 AM
2

I can't tell beforehand what the reaction is going to be. I can't see the future. Yes, you cannot see the future, it's just a safeguard for you if you'd like to interact. We're not defining the law right now. Of course anyone can be outraged over anything, even if it's normal. We're talking about sexual comments here. Why would I ever say anything sexual to my son or daughter. Yes, (b) is just to allow non-sexual comments wherever there's (a) conflict of interest. Because you question "Why would…
/r/MensRights25/05/18 05:41 PM
1

Did you want one of us to post this and take it somewhere to wrongly express this subreddit? Here you go: "Consider me to be Alice, and my friend to be Bob. Alice identifies as a woman and Bob as a man, your statement implies Alice is better than Bob. The next instance, everything else remains the same except Alice identifies as a man and Bob as a woman, your statement implies Bob is better than Alice. Alice is better than Bob and Bob is better than Alice from your statement. This is self-contra…
/r/MensRights25/05/18 04:15 PM
3

Define "good". Or it would be easier if you give me a non-constant function which maps a person to a real number, which measures their "goodness"
/r/MensRights25/05/18 04:01 PM
1

I'll post updates under this comment and ask my friend what happened in the court. Trials don't happen fast in India. The above linked trial took 20 years :)
/r/MensRights25/05/18 01:02 PM
2

"Pass" means whatever the comment you can say it. The criteria of "Pass" determines what you're allowed to say without outraging someone for sexually suggestive comments. The criteria should satisfy these rules: (a) The listener should not have any conflict of interest, that is if she actually wants to say "No", but she has to say yes, because you're going to tip her, or you're strong and intimidating and might physically harm her, and she's scared of saying "No" because of that. In cases where …
/r/MensRights25/05/18 12:26 PM
3

Thanks! I think I got what you're trying to say.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 12:08 PM
1

r/India discussion on the topic
/r/MensRights25/05/18 11:12 AM
1

Although not referred to by "suspended sentence". There's a system of "bail" which I couldn't find much different from a suspended sentence. If you're the defendant you've to pay a sum of money and agree to some conditions. You can refer to this news report if you're interested:https://www.khaleejtimes.com/citytimes/bollywood/Salman-Khan-gets-bail-in-blackbuck-case-2-TLDR: An actor whose crime finally lead to 5 year jail sentencing after 20 years, got out "on bail" after spending 2 nights in the…
/r/MensRights25/05/18 10:29 AM
1

You forgot that males cannot be raped in India. So it's not child rape. It might classify as abuse or assault under the laws.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 10:08 AM
3

In most circumstances it's this simple: it's okay if it makes it easy or desirable to say yes. It's not okay if it makes it hard to say no. Could you explain this sentence to me? I find it really hard to understand (especially what to subsitute for "it" in every place)
/r/MensRights25/05/18 09:48 AM
2

She's not just a child rapist She's not a rapist. A women cannot be a rapist in the eyes of Indian Law.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 09:40 AM
1

It will be nice to see what happens. I'm from the city where this took place, and I know a friend who has attended a few sessions of the city's court. He described the judges as "strongly feminists". We weren't even talking about the subject when he brought this up. Bias in the judgement would be there for sure, but I think it's likely that the accused would be punished.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 09:38 AM
6

Not directly related to post, but from the same article in 2015: (India now has) "a law mandating at least one female member on the board of publicly-listed companies" Unless MRAs + (equality seeking non-man-hating feminists, if they exist?) do something worldwide as strong in magnitude as modern feminism, India would never change. All laws, right from the preamble of constitution are copied (with slight differences to account for India) from other countries. This article might actually result i…
/r/MensRights25/05/18 12:02 AM
10

For those wondering why no mention for India, see this article for what is not allowed in India: http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/widespread-job-restrictions-on-indian-women-world-bank-report/article7635949.ece Restrictions for women are on "work in mining or in jobs that require lifting weights above a certain threshold or working with glass." The law also prohibits women from jobs “involving danger to life, health or morals“.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 11:54 PM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/worldnews/comments/8kr6gt/france_to_fine_men_up_to_750_for_wolfwhistling_or/ Are you talking about this law? This law is gender neutral, any of men or women or any gender could get fined for catcalling any of genders. The news discusses the side only because if you're a contemporary feminist, you get $$$, and if by any chance you mention equality you get screamed at, lose $$$ and lo you're a hate group, better run off to another country before they shoot you.
/r/MensRights21/05/18 07:02 AM
1

I don't think this is true. In fact it's the reverse, more people = more of people who are alive World is no longer a zero-sum game. If someone invents a cheap cancer cure, there's a possibility that someone you care about gets benefited from it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rvskMHn0sqQ
/r/MensRights20/05/18 10:41 PM
5

Relevant discriminatory law (See point 4): https://www.kaanoon.com/indian-law/crpc-46/ Congratulations Indian lawmakers! Now Indian women can commit any crime after sunset with low probability of being arrested, and leave the country before sunrise! (It's possible to arrest without breaking the law but it requires "exceptional circumstances", see the link for more details)
/r/MensRights20/05/18 09:32 PM
1

Gynocentrism, for females.
/r/MensRights20/05/18 09:23 PM
2

Could you please cite "their theoretical frameworks and explanations for sexism"? majority of feminists are gynocentrists Then I'd say that those who do femogynism in the name of feminism aren't feminists but femogynists, though I've not personally met enough feminists to draw the conclusion that majority of feminists do femogynism.
/r/MensRights20/05/18 10:54 AM
5

Thanks! It's one of the fundamental flaws with feminism I think it's better not to associate it with feminism's flaw. It's Gynocentrism's flaw. Feminism started with the aim of achieving equality. Most of the people who wanted to be feminists went for equality and not for female Gynocentrism. Achieving equality without swinging the pendulum to the other side is a difficult job, after all we're humans and can be biased (or reverse biased) towards one ideology without fully understanding and mathe…
/r/MensRights20/05/18 10:33 AM
2

How about we convince feminists to go for true gender equality instead of the modern feminism, where there are exclusive things for one gender? To convince them to go for their real aim behind, which is equality, which got them there in the first place?
/r/MensRights20/05/18 09:42 AM
10

You could claim that thinking from just female perspective is female equivalent of misogynist (Let's call that "femogynist", though it's not a word), and if we want to achieve true equality we can't have femogynist as our base ideology. That would just lead to equally shitty world with genders swapped. Only if we always argue for true equality of opportunity for all, we can ensure that this doesn't happen. my "first" concern is for men, is proof that society is still misogynist and we need more …
/r/MensRights20/05/18 09:28 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter