TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

590264 Archive

View 0 posts and 83 comments by 590264 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-2

What little of it I get for myself? Lmao what does that mean?
/r/MGTOW19/11/19 05:34 PM
-3

Nah, I just saw a picture of you. Nothing to be jealous of. :)
/r/MGTOW19/11/19 05:30 PM
1

What? I disagree with you, so that makes me sensitive?
/r/MensRights04/11/19 05:48 AM
0

How can you compare your sensitivity to someone else? It’s subjective. Everyone experiences pleasure differently.
/r/MensRights04/11/19 05:29 AM
0

So that proves my point. Circumcision doesn’t reduce pleasure in every case. It’s a case by case basis.
/r/MensRights04/11/19 04:58 AM
1

It doesn't really matter. My head couldn't be exposed at all before. Sex was painful and basically impossible. This is way better than it was before. It's way more sensitive and pleasurable now.
/r/MensRights04/11/19 04:17 AM
1

It really depends on how and why you were circumcised. I was cut at 16 for severe phimosis. Compared to the painful phimosis I had, I experience much more sensitivity and pleasure now.
/r/MensRights03/11/19 09:19 PM
-2

That doesn’t mean sexual pleasure is always lost. Do you rub your penis against your underwear during sex?
/r/MensRights03/11/19 02:05 PM
-6

Yeah, apparently. Everyone here is doing nothing but putting words in my mouth. I’m against circumcision of kids. But the fact is that there’s no proof saying that circumcision universally causes sensitivity or pleasure loss. People are just using this as a reason to call cut guys names like “butchered”.
/r/MensRights02/11/19 11:21 PM
1

I didn’t say it’s no big deal. I said there’s inconclusive evidence that it causes sensitivity loss. I’m dealing with facts here, you’re being emotional. I’m against circumcision, but I don’t need to make up reasons to be against it.
/r/MensRights02/11/19 11:11 PM
0

100% of men who have their genitals butchered have less sexual sensation. The studies don't support that. They're inconclusive. Some men report less sensitivity, some report more, and some say it's the same. It varies.
/r/MensRights02/11/19 10:26 PM
0

I agree. When did I say otherwise?
/r/MensRights02/11/19 10:08 PM
1

Men circumcised as adults don’t universally report loss of sensitivity or pleasure. It’s inconclusive. There have actually been a lot of studies on the subject.
/r/MensRights02/11/19 07:34 PM
0

That can happen to some guys, yes. Certainly not all.
/r/MensRights02/11/19 07:22 PM
-17

I didn’t say any of that. Edit: Hey, thanks for the downvotes, morons!
/r/MensRights02/11/19 07:02 PM
1

The studies don’t universally show that. There’s no consensus.
/r/MensRights02/11/19 06:51 PM
1

I’m not defending it at all. But the studies are very inconclusive about reduced sexual pleasure. Most cut guys have no issues with pleasure at all.
/r/MensRights02/11/19 06:10 PM
1

Yes, some studies say it reduces pleasure, some say it increases pleasure, and some say it’s the same either way. That’s the point. There’s no consensus. It’s different for everyone. I agree, it’s wrong and unnecessary to force onto a child. I’m just saying it’s not like everyone who’s cut can’t feel anything lol. Most guys have no issues at all with sensitivity.
/r/MensRights02/11/19 05:49 PM
-1

But men who undergo the procedure feel less on average than those who didn’t. Actually, that's not what the studies show. It's inconclusive either way. Some men say they're less sensitive, some say they're more sensitive, and some say it's about the same. It's different for everyone.
/r/MensRights02/11/19 05:39 PM
0

This doesn't happen "often". This is very very rare.
/r/MensRights02/11/19 05:38 PM
-2

often results in complete inability to reproduce Um, what?
/r/MensRights02/11/19 05:31 PM
-7

It deadens your feeling. This lack of feeling can make pleasure during sex... less. For some guys, yes. Not everyone.
/r/MensRights02/11/19 05:30 PM
-7

Those are all risks, yes, but those things don't happen to everyone.
/r/MensRights02/11/19 05:29 PM
-18

That sucks, but that doesn't happen to everyone.
/r/MensRights02/11/19 05:28 PM
4

I would be interested to know what the difference is between men cut at birth and men cut as adults. There seems to be a significant difference from what I’ve seen.
/r/MensRights21/10/19 11:20 PM
3

It will happen eventually. It’s very unlikely for uncut fathers to want to circumcise their kids, and more uncut babies grow up to become uncut fathers, so it’s a cycle. It will take a few generations, but I think it will eventually die off for dumb cultural reasons or medical reasons based on shaky data.
/r/MensRights21/10/19 10:24 PM
-1

Yes, but it's not illegal in most places. Finland is unusual in that aspect. Most places don't consider it "child abuse" lmao It's unnecessary, and is falling out of popularity in North America, but no one seriously thinks its abusive. It's a medical surgery performed by doctors. You'd get laughed at calling it abuse.
/r/MensRights21/10/19 07:01 PM
2

Not all Americans do it, and it's becoming much less common here. Surveys of hospitals as recently as 2009 found that it was down to 50% on average in the US for newborns. It was 80% only a few decades earlier. It's heavily regional. The midwest is still 80-90% (very traditional and conservative area), while the west coast is 20% or lower in parts (very liberal area).
/r/MensRights21/10/19 05:23 PM
2

So you don't care about the environment, women, LGBT people, etc.?
/r/MensRights21/10/19 04:58 PM
1

Are you? This entire time you've been lecturing me about the severity of one vs the other without having experienced either yourself. Circumcision is wrong and unnecessary to force onto a child, but lets not pretend that most people who are circumcised experience the same issues as most people who are raped. It's very common to experience serious issues as a result of being raped. It's fairly uncommon to experience serious issues from being circumcised. Does it happen? Of course, but it's not th…
/r/MensRights21/10/19 04:38 PM
1

Yes, I did.
/r/MensRights21/10/19 04:26 PM
1

They aren't comparable in severity at all. It's not even close.
/r/MensRights21/10/19 03:43 PM
1

But you can’t compare the severity of them both. You already said you don’t know what being raped is like, so how can you compare it to something else?
/r/MensRights21/10/19 01:13 PM
0

No. Unless you’ve experienced both, you can’t possibly compare them. You clearly don’t know what being raped is like.
/r/MensRights21/10/19 01:48 AM
2

I'm sorry that facts seem to bother you so much.
/r/MensRights20/10/19 08:31 PM
1

What is the typical experience for a man who has been genitally mutilated at birth in your opinion? It's not really an opinion, it's a pretty clear fact. Most men in the US either don't care at all and don't give it any thought, and some are even happy to be cut. It's seen as "normal" in the US because most guys are cut at birth here. Of course there are exceptions to that, but it's definitely not typical. Check out this story of a man who also committed suicide after and getting cut as an adult…
/r/MensRights20/10/19 08:21 PM
1

but it was probably similar to depression after being raped Um, you're equating circumcision to rape? That's quite a leap. Do you know anything about what rape victims experience? I'm assuming not, since you said "probably similar". It's not. Having serious trauma from circumcision isn't common at all. Hundreds of millions of men are circumcised. Very few suffer from these issues as a result.
/r/MensRights20/10/19 07:59 PM
1

His may have been botched or something. His experience certainly isn't typical.
/r/MensRights20/10/19 07:49 PM
1

What?
/r/MensRights07/09/19 07:27 AM
6

Weeks without showering? ...why?
/r/MensRights06/09/19 06:16 PM
2

I agree... I was just saying that the study only talked about the impact on women. I’d like to see some data about male partners as well.
/r/MensRights16/07/19 04:26 AM
5

And his partner will be three times more likely to orgasm and eight times less likely to experience pain during sex. Not all guys have sex with women... Edit: Seriously? Why would I be downvoted for this?
/r/MensRights15/07/19 09:52 PM
1

the left doesn't even try to hide the fact that they are openly voting/supporting based on race/gender I'm part of "the left", and I don't do this. I don't agree with blanket generalizations about an entire group. They're never accurate.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 06:14 PM
1

But if you vote for someone based on their race or gender Who does this?
/r/MensRights31/05/19 04:27 PM
1

I will only vote for someone of a particular race and gender Who's saying that? Show me.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 04:14 PM
-3

Lmao you're the one who replied to me, but cool.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 03:43 PM
-4

I agree, but who's saying they support her only for the sake of diversity? Most people who support her do so because they agree with her views and think she's smart.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 02:54 PM
-5

Diversity is bad?
/r/MensRights31/05/19 02:39 PM
-2

And...? It's posts like this that make a lot of people consider this sub to be openly misogynistic.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 02:09 PM
1

My penis functions “properly” without one. It didn’t function properly with a foreskin.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 01:10 AM
-1

I’m one of those guys it didn’t impact in any way. Everyone’s different.
/r/MensRights30/05/19 01:16 AM
1

I'd be willing to concede that it's never necessary.
/r/MensRights14/05/19 05:09 PM
2

posthectomy Wow, I actually had to look that up. I didn't know there was an official term for it. I don't know, because I haven't studied those cases. I only can speak to what happened to me. Like I've already said, I understand that it's not necessary in most cases. I'd be willing to concede that it's never necessary.
/r/MensRights14/05/19 03:33 AM
1

In severe cases of phimosis, balanitis, and paraphimosis. Like I said, those are rare cases. Most of the time, you're right, it's not necessary.
/r/MensRights14/05/19 03:18 AM
1

The two most publicized, yes. But the movement was really about rape and sexual assault in general, not just among celebrities. It was about victims feeling more comfortable sharing their stories. I learned that several of my friends had been sexually assaulted (both men and women) during that whole thing. It got everyone talking about it, which is good. False accusations of any kind are terrible, but I'm not sure how that's the fault of the movement.
/r/MensRights14/05/19 12:36 AM
1

That was literally one of the Metoo cases. Says who? It's not like "#MeToo" is an organization lmao It was never a "case". It was just some idiots trying to claim that he raped her or something, which even the "victim" herself admitted didn't happen. She just felt uncomfortable. I don't know if you've seen this, but this is a really good response to all this, from a legal expert: https://youtu.be/y4bAULTwAJU a lot of the victim's of Metoo didn't Because most were justified... lmao. You really fe…
/r/MensRights14/05/19 12:25 AM
1

Yeah, my doctor unfortunately didn't give me the alternate surgical options.
/r/MensRights14/05/19 12:09 AM
0

Having an awkward date then regretting it after the fact a victim does not make. I agree, but who said anything about that? No one "Metoo'd" Aziz Ansari. A vocal minority may have tried, but as far as I know, he's still working and making lots of money. His career wasn't ruined. No one seriously equates him to Harvey Weinstein, for example.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 11:59 PM
1

more than feminists have Metoo'd people Bet you wouldn't be making jokes about male victims.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 11:13 PM
2

Yes. I already said that.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 11:03 PM
1

Yes, circumcision is largely cosmetic, except in the rare cases where it's medically needed.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 10:31 PM
1

why should any circumcision be performed by anyone who isn't a plastic surgeon? Because usually urologists deal with genital issues.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 10:16 PM
1

In my case, it wasn't, but it is in others. Either way, I'm much happier now than with painful phimosis.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 10:05 PM
2

you didn't need to get circumcised. I know. But unfortunately, my doctor didn't give me the other surgical options, because they're fairly obscure, and most doctors don't know about them. A preputioplasty is considered cosmetic, and is performed by a plastic surgeon, which means medical insurance doesn't pay for it.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 09:51 PM
1

can you explain what circumcision offers for severe phimosis that a dorsal slit does not offer? A dorsal slit usually provides poor cosmetic results. Have you seen the results from a dorsal slit? A preputioplasty is the best option, but it's a challenge finding someone who offers them. It's often done by plastic surgeons.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 09:41 PM
1

I was circumcised for medical reasons when I was 16.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 09:29 PM
1

So men with paraphimosis, a medical emergency, should do nothing?
/r/MensRights13/05/19 09:17 PM
0

Isn't true.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 09:06 PM
1

Severe phimosis, which can't be fixed other ways, and paraphimosis, which is a medical emergency. It's also commonly done in severe cases of balanitis.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 08:55 PM
1

False.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 08:41 PM
1

Who is “they”?
/r/MensRights13/05/19 06:34 PM
0

So, first of all, let's establish that by "they", you're also including me, which already proves you wrong, since I already said he's done some good things. They are against it. Citation needed. Show me some proof of negative articles being written (by liberals) about Trump doing this.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 05:42 PM
0

Nope, I'm directly quoting you. You told me that journalists should die, including my journalist family members. I can hear the claking So... that's a no, then. You're just assuming they'll be against it, but they aren't. Gotcha.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 05:32 PM
1

How can that statement sound even remotely serious to anyone with half a brain? Because you frequently seriously wish violence on people on here, and it's hard to know when you're being serious and when you're joking. You don't seem to care about wishing my family members were dead. Even if you don't remember saying that (which I doubt), your reaction was basically "Eh, yeah, sounds like something I'd say." Do you actually see liberals opposing this? Trump has objectively done a few good things,…
/r/MensRights13/05/19 05:18 PM
1

I only bring up what you've said before because you're claiming that your statement about wanting liberals to die of AIDS wasn't serious, when it sounded that way. People in that sub even agreed with you. You have a history of wishing violence on people who disagree with you. And yes, I do agree with many of the things that MRAs believe, but not everything.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 05:05 PM
1

I mean, I could try to go back and take screenshots of the messages, but then you'd just accuse me of Photoshopping them like you did the last time. "Hurr durr I never said that!" You repeatedly said that my journalist family members deserve to be killed, apparently because a journalist caused your friend to be killed or something.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 04:55 PM
1

You made a comment a while back saying that all journalists should die of "neck rope". When I told you that several of my family members are journalists, you stood by what you said, and said you thought all journalists should be killed.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 04:44 PM
0

How about when you said journalists, including my family, deserve to be killed? Was that a "joke" too?
/r/MensRights13/05/19 04:43 PM
1

all liberals should protest by purposefully infecting themselves with HIV then refusing antiviral drugs It's pretty clear what you're suggesting you want to happen here.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 04:40 PM
1

I've actually had many people agree with me in those subs when I echo (some) of the talking points. I'm sure there's plenty they'd disagree with as well. But that's sort of like saying liberal Twitter or liberal Reddit = the Democratic voter base in general, which simply isn't true. The Internet will get outraged over literally anything, and often the issues that liberal Twitter is outraged about, the general Democratic voter base isn't even aware of. They're just constantly looking for controve…
/r/MensRights13/05/19 04:38 PM
1

when I accurately point out that leftists cannot be MRAs Funny. You've often called me a "leftist" and yet I agree with the majority of this movement.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 04:34 PM
0

it's the thing that dangles between my legs that does it Nah, actually it's probably because you frequently say things like you want all liberals to die of AIDS, and all journalists (including my family) should be killed by "neck rope". You actively and frequently encourage violence against anyone who disagrees with you about anything. https://old.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/bnjole/wow_bigoted_literally_hitler_trump_now_wants_to/en6bldx/
/r/MensRights13/05/19 04:32 PM
3

They aren't the same in severity, but they're the same in that they're both medically unnecessary, and mostly done for dumb cosmetic/traditional reasons, and neither should be forced onto children.
/r/MensRights28/04/19 11:34 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter