TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

5tar_k1ll3r Archive

View 0 posts and 89 comments by 5tar_k1ll3r on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Yeah a lot of these arguments are so stupid. Just because one of my ancestors did a crime, doesn't mean I should repent for it. It's like if a murderer lives their entire life without consequence, then when they're caught, they die, and people prosecute and punish the murderer's children. It's unfair and unjust practice. But to be fair, a lot of this stuff is significant in Eastern and Developing countries.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 12:10 PM
6

I think there are subreddits for that, this isn't really a server made for venting, unless it pertains to a Men's Right's issue
/r/MensRights01/09/22 05:06 AM
22

How is this a Men's Rights issue...
/r/MensRights31/08/22 10:56 PM
4

I think you either used former and latter incorrectly, or contradicted yourself
/r/MensRights30/08/22 02:53 PM
7

I don't think it's really discrimination... it's pretty weird to want to bring someone to your home on your very first date. At the very least, I know I'd be hella uncomfortable with that Like it seems like you want the first date to end in sex, which is really odd, imo
/r/MensRights28/08/22 12:12 AM
4

This has to be the dumbest thing I've read. A drunk driver is a danger to everyone around them, including themselves. A drunk flirt is a danger to themselves. It has nothing to do with feminism or "anti male" crap. Moreover, a drunk flirt requires another consenting human being to actually do anything dangerous to themselves, which is why others, especially someone who's sober, is held accountable. A drunk driver just needs a car and a key.
/r/MensRights26/08/22 04:37 PM
19

If any two people marry without discussing children they're both pretty stupid imo (no offense)
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/22 01:25 PM
4

Ok, yeah... then that's fucked up, especially the "men like you" part (assuming the woman in the post almost never interacted with that guy). And, like you said, the "men know nothing" part is stupid, it just ends up making things into "oppression olympics"
/r/MensRights24/08/22 01:21 PM
4

What was the original post about even (if you don't mind my asking)? Because depending on that, your response to the comment may have been unnecessary. All in all, though, both of yall devolved the argument for no reason pretty quickly, and you did kinda get too triggered for no reason right at the start. Anyone's credibility immediately plummets when they resort to name calling, unless it was warranted in some way (the ad hominem argument).
/r/MensRights24/08/22 06:13 AM
0

That's a form of toxic gender norms. By trying to enforce those ideas ("comics are for boys!" and "romance novels are for girls!") you're actually doing quite a bit of harm
/r/MensRights04/08/22 12:05 PM
0

As I said I thought it was the replacement of an original male character with a female replacement for no reason other than "girl power" in the style of the female ghostbusters. Incredibly incorrect. Batgirl's purpose throughout DC Comics has never been to "replace" Batman, but instead to support him, much the way the Robins do. Her creation back in the 80s was more of an attempt to appeal to a female audience to gain more readers, and also to "spice things up" as these female versions of charac…
/r/MensRights04/08/22 12:01 PM
-1

How is a Batgirl movie an attempt at undermining male achievement?
/r/MensRights04/08/22 07:05 AM
-2

???? Bro your argument here has no head or tail what
/r/MensRights04/08/22 07:04 AM
-1

What does that have to do with comics?? What???
/r/MensRights04/08/22 07:01 AM
-2

How are comics and comic book movies "male spaces"?
/r/MensRights04/08/22 06:46 AM
5

OCD doesn't always present itself as cleaning, that's a harmful stereotype for the mental illness
/r/MensRights04/08/22 05:01 AM
1

I agree, it was a bullshit show, like most CW shows, unfortunately. At least Doom Patrol was better.
/r/MensRights04/08/22 01:16 AM
-43

The context of it implied that it wasn’t good when Bruce was using it, since he’s not a woman. I haven't watched that scene in a while, but from what I remember, that's not really true with the context. It could be true, but wasn't necessarily true. At the very least, I, as well as my friends who watched it, didn't get that idea. Spider man could have just as easily sat on his ass and played with Lego or Pokémon cards and not bothered fighting crime. Interesting. And Barbara Gordon couldn't have…
/r/MensRights04/08/22 01:15 AM
-24

You bringing it up as proof that the show was awful points to you saying it's bullshit
/r/MensRights04/08/22 12:59 AM
-3

How's this an MRA issue, exactly?
/r/MensRights04/08/22 12:51 AM
-80

Alfred: “it’s [the bat suit] perfect” Batgirl: “it will be, when it fits a woman” How is that bullshit though? She's a woman, the suit isn't gonna be perfect for her until it fits her. You can argue that she's saying "oh it's not perfect unless it's made exactly for a woman", but you can just as well argue that she's saying "oh it's not gonna be perfect for my use until it fits a woman" She says this as she is wearing the suit designed by Bruce Wayne and is using his resources to fight crime… So…
/r/MensRights04/08/22 12:51 AM
3

Oh lmao Yeah it's stupid AF People were hating on the girl that plays Kamala Because in an interview She gave her opinion on the MCU Like gtfo yall were fine fucking Paul Rudd or Tom Holland did that shit
/r/MensRights31/07/22 03:54 PM
0

Then you must reject all definitions of things like "true", "real", "factual", etc.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 02:58 PM
0

Moreover you aren't defining terms, you're choosing which definitions you count as valid
/r/MensRights31/07/22 02:41 PM
1

And trans woman does meet the definition I gave. The definition of "woman" doesn't include the words "at birth" anywhere in it. It simply requires female sex. The definition of gender/sex reassignment surgery is that it changes the person's sex. Ergo, the definition matches
/r/MensRights31/07/22 02:40 PM
8

"women take care of kids, men don't" That means women usually win the custody battle, and men don't. Ask any parent, this is a really harsh sentence for them, as it means they don't get to see their child(ren) nearly as much as they'd like, if at all.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 02:35 PM
1

I didn't ask what the gender theorists define "trans women" as. Interesting. The same exact source is giving you definitions for "woman", "trans woman", and "gender reassignment surgery", and yet you're choosing to only use the definition of "woman", which, alone proves your statement. In science, this is called a "confirmation bias". You're choosing to devalue and outright ignore evidence that contradicts your argument. In these cases, unfortunately, not much can be said to change your mind. Ed…
/r/MensRights31/07/22 02:20 PM
1

She wears dresses and wears makeup. She likes "girly things". Now you're adding the sociological gender expectations to the mix. So were the Ancient Greek and Roman men actually women? Many of them wore "dresses" (togas), many of them wore some form of make-up. I'm pretty sure there was an Emperor who shaved his body hair and wore makeup. Was he not a man? Also, by your definition, any woman who chooses not to wear makeup, not to wear dresses, and doesn't like "girly" things isn't a woman at all…
/r/MensRights31/07/22 01:31 PM
1

This turns into a "Ship of Theseus" problem You're right, it does. Now you need to ask, how much "female" do you have to be in order to be considered a woman? If a man had very feminine features and put on make up, a wig, a dress, painted nails, etc., did everything to look like a stereotypical woman, all so that the man would look as womanlike as possible, is that man a woman? If you were to put that man on the street and ask random people, a majority of them would likely say that the man is in…
/r/MensRights31/07/22 01:22 PM
1

The first and second definition contradict each other Not really The first definition doesn't include "at birth" A sex change operation, or sex reassignment surgery, or whatever it's called, is: a surgical procedure by which a transgender person's physical appearance and function of their existing sexual characteristics are altered to resemble those socially associated with their identified gender It's defined as transitioning someone to their "desired gender" Which, if you take the Merriam-Webs…
/r/MensRights31/07/22 01:11 PM
2

Pardon?
/r/MensRights31/07/22 01:04 PM
0

The definition of "trans woman" literally includes the word "woman". It's not circular reasoning if it's the literally fucking dictionary definition
/r/MensRights31/07/22 01:01 PM
-3

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/woman an adult female person https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/trans%20woman a woman who was identified as male at birth It seems to me that by dictionary definition, a trans woman is, in fact, a woman https://www.oed.com/viewdictionaryentry/Entry/247649 Designating a person whose sense of personal identity and gender does not correspond to that person's sex at birth, or which does not otherwise conform to conventional notions of sex and gender…
/r/MensRights31/07/22 05:20 AM
1

Are they the same thing? No, they are not. They are linked, yes, but they aren't the same thing. A car or a dog can be male or female, but a cat or a dog cannot be a man or a woman. Yes, the linked however they are not, in any way, the same term. It's very important to make that distinction
/r/MensRights31/07/22 04:00 AM
2

Ok? I didn't say that there is?
/r/MensRights31/07/22 03:39 AM
-2

No, they really didn't. Then General Ross keeping his intelligence is appealing to MRA? Amadeus Cho keeping his intelligence is appealing to MRA?
/r/MensRights31/07/22 02:51 AM
4

You're putting words in my mouth. No where did I say they dont matter. I said wokeism doesnt belong here because it takes away from men's rights. The issues of transgender men do belong in a subreddit for men's rights. By complaining about them talking about their issues in this subreddit, moreover, by comparing the difference between "wokeism" and men's rights to complaining about a wrong fastfood order while people are starving, you're invalidating them and claiming those issues are inconseque…
/r/MensRights31/07/22 02:49 AM
0

I did mean dysphoria, I apologize, I don't know why my phone put dismorphia Gender dysphoria doesn't change gender but it does lead people to want to undergo a sex change surgery. I'm assuming that when you said "you can't change gender" you actually meant sex because changing gender, the neurological identity of man or woman, doesn't really fit with your post and what I'm gathering as the theme of it is. No one is attacking or murdering trans people in this post just because science has been pr…
/r/MensRights31/07/22 02:22 AM
-8

Gender is not "male or female", that's sex Gender is man or woman. That's more of a neurological/social concept. While a sex change operation doesn't alter the bones, it does introduce new hormones and stuff like that to change other parts of the biology I think wokeism is cancerous and distracts from what's really going on. Its like someone complaining about how mcdonalds got their order wrong, when other countries are starving. That's not an accurate comparison at all, considering that people …
/r/MensRights31/07/22 01:56 AM
1

?
/r/MensRights31/07/22 01:45 AM
1

In the Avengers movie he said "I tried to shoot myself I put a bullet in my mouth and the other guy spit it out." That implies he can't be knocked unconscious, not really. And I'm not saying that maybe he dragged her out (it's very odd that your only two ideas are that either he saved her or she saved him, btw), but maybe they both got out by themselves, with no saving needed
/r/MensRights31/07/22 12:03 AM
1

He doesn't look barely conscious to me And the sling looks pretty professionally done, ion know why it matters in any case?
/r/MensRights30/07/22 09:39 PM
0

It doesn't really show that... you're more assuming that it shows that, not without cause, but you can make a case for her not pulling him out
/r/MensRights30/07/22 09:29 PM
1

Could you give me a link to that?
/r/MensRights30/07/22 09:16 PM
1

Where did you get they're changing her origin?
/r/MensRights30/07/22 09:12 PM
6

Yeah, She Hulk was always physically weaker than Bruce Banner Hulk (to some degree, I think), but still had her regular "human" knowledge and stuff as She Hulk And before anyone says "Oh but they still did that to appeal to feminism!" Please note that She Hulk was first created in the 80s, and while there was a feminist movement back then, it wasn't nearly as widespread or popular as it is now. I think the real reason they did that was because, originally, She Hulk was the one who would break th…
/r/MensRights30/07/22 08:15 PM
2

Nah this has got to satire. Jit must be tripping
/r/MensRights30/07/22 06:56 PM
3

My guy... that's... that's directly from the comics...
/r/MensRights30/07/22 06:44 PM
3

Haven't seen Lightyear but uh ... Dr. Strange 2 characters are taken more or less right from the comics, you know? America Chavez) And the entire plot of Dr. Strange 2 is Wanda trying to gain the power to travel between dimensions... America Chavez is one of the only people in Marvel Comics who can travel between dimensions, and moreover, has the lack of other powers (and training with the ones she does have) to make her running away from Wanda make sense. Maybe Lightyear does have some weird mi…
/r/MensRights30/07/22 06:44 PM
4

I mean she's a celebrity, celebrities in general get so much special treatment. In India, there's an actor, Shah Rukh Khan, whose son was found guilty of possessing and doing drugs in a party, but he got off scott free. Justin Bieber did some similar crimes in the mid 2010s and got off pretty easily.
/r/MensRights26/07/22 07:31 PM
1

I mean, you don't have "calories kill" notices on food, while you can't buy tobacco, at least in the UK/US without images and text about that. Actually they recently passed a law in Canada stating that most foods that are sugary, fatty, etc., will require a warning label. Moreover, while some foods may or may not have warning labels, social media and entertainment more than make up for it. In a majority of shows, video games, etc., the fat character tends to be the butt of many jokes, regardless…
/r/MensRights19/07/22 11:33 PM
1

Not really. Where I live, you rarely see any messages that condemn smoking or drinking, unless it's drinking and driving. Instead, you see both used to make a character seem "cool", like a rebel.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 10:54 PM
2

Then why not tell people who smoke that they're ruining their lives, too? And why not do the same to people who drink?
/r/MensRights19/07/22 09:38 PM
1

Fake story?
/r/MensRights27/06/22 12:36 PM
5

I personally, am an average sized girl, I can’t control my fucking height! I AM MORE THAN JUST MY HEIGHT! Dude switched teams halfway through the post 💀
/r/MensRights27/06/22 06:37 AM
1

I like it. It's fair and gives everyone equal rights
/r/MensRights27/06/22 06:26 AM
-2

Simple, those aren't really feminists, they're misandrists that use the label of feminism to justify their sexist actions and thoughts, same way so many racist POC use things like BLM to justify their racist actions and thoughts. They're discriminatory assholes who've found a way to play the system by taking a group originally made to do good and promote equality and perverting that group's message and goal.
/r/MensRights23/06/22 03:44 PM
1

How is it not playing God? We decide which creatures live or die. We decide what land should stay the same or be turned over and razed as we see fit. We bring people back from the brink of death - in fact, many times, we have brought people back from "death" (heart palpitations have stopped but we utilize electricity to restart the heart). We alter the genetic code of plants and animals every day. Hell, we have even created life: Dolly the Sheep, for example, and A.I., depending on what you cons…
/r/MensRights22/06/22 08:34 PM
1

Could you give me some examples of this happening?
/r/MensRights22/06/22 08:18 PM
0

So, if a person is 17 years old and they know they want to transition, they wouldn't be allowed, but the same person only 2 months later, once they're 18, would be? Do you truly believe they'd undergo some massive self realization or whatever in that small span?
/r/MensRights20/06/22 06:37 AM
-2

You don't seem to understand that the want to transition is a neurological want. I suggest you do some research into transitioning and transexuality as a whole. A very brief summary is this: neurological, you are either a man or a woman. Biologically (chromosomally, if you will) you are either a male or a female. Transexuality is a want to ensure that the neurological and the biological "match up", so to speak (if you are a biological female but a neurological man, you will also want to be a bio…
/r/MensRights20/06/22 06:35 AM
-7

Almost no one pushes teenage boys to be chemically castrated, they neurologically identity as a woman, so they willingly take the medication for that
/r/MensRights20/06/22 06:26 AM
-6

A lot of what you're saying is false. The terms "men" and "women" are neurological terms. The terms "male" and "female" are biological terms. A person is transexual when the neurological term and the biological term don't "match up", so to speak (they are biologically female but neurological a man, in this case). These people are actually historically oppressed. Like, a lot. They're oppressed because of this discrepancy between neurology and biology, and many people who don't have the same discr…
/r/MensRights20/06/22 06:22 AM
0

How the hell is it "biology?
/r/MensRights09/06/22 09:39 PM
0

Sure
/r/MensRights09/06/22 08:34 PM
1

Sure
/r/MensRights09/06/22 08:34 PM
1

Furthermore, even if we accept this definition of "patriarchy" & assume that "men" (as a group) somehow "control" society. Exactly how is that a bad thing? And... when did I say it's a bad thing? I said it existed, and it's not right to say it doesn't exist... whereas institutions dominated by men like STEM do not show anti-female bias Based on my real world experiences as a man in STEM, I really have to disagree with that statement. I've seen a lot of my male colleagues make some pretty disgust…
/r/MensRights09/06/22 08:33 PM
0

That makes zero sense with the definition you just provided. You claim when men are held to harmful standards by virtue of being male, it's "toxic masculinity". That's... not the definition I gave... another user, the one I was replying to, said that... except, of course, I'm also including the gender bias against women that was also created around the same time that was primarily made to depower them in our society. So... yeah... Basically no one thinks that. Maybe in the Western world (not rea…
/r/MensRights09/06/22 07:43 PM
3

It's mostly been people I know IRL who have said that kinda stuff, and I'm sure as hell not gonna give any info about them. There was one instagram post but I don't remember the exact account. Here are a tweet https://twitter.com/ifod_net/status/1527656060735078405 And here's an article talking about the founder of the MeToo movement and her opinion. Not direct support, but it is directly countering the view a lot of radicalists seem to have that Depp's victory is a "lose" or "setback" for the M…
/r/MensRights09/06/22 07:21 PM
-4

What, are you asking me to tell you their name or something like that?
/r/MensRights09/06/22 06:32 PM
1

If your definition of patriarchy is that loose, then surely one must concede that stating a global patriarchy exists is not reasonable. Pray tell, what's your definition of patriarchy? Your definition specifies related families, implying that it's a family group Related families can mean an entire population or practitioners of a religion. Biologically, we're all descended from the same ancestors and we're related by being humans. Socially, people who are natives of a specific country are relate…
/r/MensRights09/06/22 05:32 PM
-16

Actually, I've seen quite a few feminists that are happy that Amber Heard lost because they recognize she was guilty
/r/MensRights09/06/22 04:50 PM
-1

It's not a lie, there is proof of it. Does it mean that feminists use it"correctly" (as in, correctly calling out male bias)? Not really, unfortunately, but it does exist in many parts of the world
/r/MensRights09/06/22 11:45 AM
0

They're all definitions of "patriarchy", but some contain more or less requirements. For example, here's the Oxford Dictionary definition: a society, system or country that is ruled or controlled by men And now here's the Merriam-Webster definition: social organization marked by the supremacy of the father in the clan or family, the legal dependence of wives and children, and the reckoning of descent and inheritance in the male line And also, some redditors here seem to be saying that the decisi…
/r/MensRights09/06/22 05:27 AM
-1

Men dying in mines made life easier for men? Stop and think about what you're saying. The class distinctions determined who was toiling and profiting, not the sexual distinctions. Women worked, men worked, the division of labor was usually dependent on realities. By that logic, men dying in thrones didn't make life easier for men. In Ancient Greece and Rome, life was entirely based around the needs of men. I can give you so many hundreds of examples. Hell, the fact that men died in those mines i…
/r/MensRights09/06/22 05:14 AM
1

People were often forced up into roles, but based on necessity of their abilities and limitations, not "patriarchy". The jobs themselves arent the point here. The point is that those societies were INCREDIBLY patriarchal. If you wanna take your definition of patriarchy, which includes putting down women for some reason, then in the Ancient Greek and Roman societies, women were basically second class citizens. The only people they were above in their society were slaves, and even that was barely.…
/r/MensRights09/06/22 04:12 AM
-6

And amazingly, this the gender norms forced upon men causing us psychological harm Is what I'm talking about when I say that toxic masculinity is real, except, of course, I'm also including the gender bias against women that was also created around the same time that was primarily made to depower them in our society. But yeah, I'm not saying "toxic masculinity" as "any idea that even goes slightly against a woman or the views of a woman" or whatever, I'm talking about things like "men shouldn't …
/r/MensRights09/06/22 03:50 AM
-7

And amazingly, this the gender norms forced upon men causing us psychological harm Is what I'm talking about when I say that toxic masculinity is real, except, of course, I'm also including the gender bias against women that was also created around the same time that was primarily made to depower them in our society. But yeah, I'm not saying "toxic masculinity" as "any idea that even goes slightly against a woman or the views of a woman" or whatever, I'm talking about things like "men shouldn't …
/r/MensRights09/06/22 03:49 AM
0

Explain to us which part of patriarchy sent men into dangerous jobs? Interesting. So, in the 50s, men still worked very dangerous jobs, and arguably, the jobs were even more dangerous. So by your logic, was that not a patriarchy? Or say Medieval Europe? Or Ancient Greece and Rome? Describing that situation as "a system to empower men at the expense of women" is pointless and ridiculous. Please, provide me a definition of a patriarchy that says "a system to empower men at the expense of women". I…
/r/MensRights09/06/22 03:17 AM
-3

No but multiple dictionaries have very similar definitions with some key differences
/r/MensRights09/06/22 02:44 AM
0

Lemme turn that on its head for a second here What data can YOU provide to support YOUR claim that it doesn't exist? By the Oxford dictionary, a patriarchy is A community of related families under the authority of a male head called a patriarch So let's take religion. A majority of the population of India practices Hinduism. As per the 2011 Census data (this is unfortunately the most recent data I could find), almost 80 percent of the population of India practices Hinduism. Why does this matter?…
/r/MensRights09/06/22 02:43 AM
-1

I don't get how someone could hate their own gender, but whatever, I'm not gonna argue about that shit. How the hell does me saying that a patriarchy exists mean I hate men? Am I saying men don't deserve power? Am I saying men should be under women? No, I'm simply stating something that, in my real-world experience, is true
/r/MensRights09/06/22 02:13 AM
0

Brother I'm a dude, I got an X and a Y chromosome, I got a dingaling, not sure what else I can say here... how can you go from me saying that there is a patriarchy, in some parts of the world if not everywhere, to me hating men 💀
/r/MensRights09/06/22 02:00 AM
-1

There is actually a patriarchy in some parts of India, if not the entire country, same with Pakistan and Bangladesh
/r/MensRights09/06/22 01:50 AM
-2

Before I respond in any way to this, do you mean "hate" instead of "gate"?
/r/MensRights09/06/22 01:43 AM
1

Alright then, doesn't change the very real fact that a patriarchy is still very real in many Asian countries, if no where else. But my point is that while it is real, it's also overused in arguments by feminism, and we do need to recognize both things
/r/MensRights09/06/22 01:40 AM
-11

A patriarchy isn't as real in the Western world, but it is incredibly real in lots of Asian countries like India. Also, depending on how you define a patriarchy, it is actually very real in Western countries, too.
/r/MensRights09/06/22 01:20 AM
-39

Not really. Sometimes, yeah, they are, but those are valid points a lot of times. The thing is, though, there are feminists who overuse it, they call anything the result of toxic masculinity and the patriarchy
/r/MensRights09/06/22 12:31 AM
1

Funny pun
/r/MensRights08/06/22 01:14 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter