TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

6-8_Yes_Size15 Archive

View 0 posts and 29 comments by 6-8_Yes_Size15 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
20

Thank you for using common sense. Stats can be wildly misused to make a point.
/r/MensRights14/04/24 03:44 PM
49

WTF
/r/PussyPassDenied26/02/17 12:06 PM
1

No, we're good, man!
/r/MensRights11/06/15 06:36 PM
4

Honstly, I don't see how your anecdote has anything to do with negotiation. One of the best, hardest working people on our team (I work in publishing), is a woman. She's a self starter, etc. But that has nothing to do negotiating — for work, with a mechanic, buying a car or any transaction. So, I do not think you answered my question or addressed my point about you and I getting paid differently just because one of us was a better talker during the interview. I never thought they were below me i…
/r/MensRights11/06/15 06:20 PM
2

what advantage does my Penis give me when presenting the following as my new hire Job Pitch I think you're focusing a lot on her comment that men are better negotiators and finding a reason to get outraged. I know this sub is about defending the rights of men and about not allowing men to be wrongfully painted as aggressors, etc. But, to deny that the genders are in fact different and tend to be better at some things and worse at others, I think is disingenuous. Before we continue this discussio…
/r/MensRights11/06/15 05:55 PM
3

First, much of what I have seen from her I really dislike. Second, I am not being a dick. I would actually agree, that if you think that is all you need to be a good negotiator, then you are right, you are not a good negotiator. Saying, basically, I did X so I deserve Y and someone else agrees doesn't mean you automatically get Y no matter how true it is. Also, she is specifically talking about recruiting new hires (if I am not mistaken) and your ammo won't fly in a new hire interview, where rea…
/r/MensRights11/06/15 05:41 PM
4

Am I crazy that, even as a generalization, this is not THAT insane of a statement?
/r/MensRights11/06/15 05:26 PM
1

Of course the subhead is the real story. Women who lack emotional intimacy with their partner are likely to experience more pain in his presence
/r/MensRights22/01/15 02:29 PM
1

I actually agree with that final point. It is very, very reasonable. But, there sometimes tends to be a lot of rage and irrationality shown on this sub. Sometimes the rage is justifiable. Overall though, the idea of killing to protect oneself does not bother me. My only real outrage is how violence toward women in self defense is viewed by society.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 03:28 PM
1

But, here is an interesting thought. There is NO WAY a man killing a woman in self defense (even accidentally), unless maybe a gun was pulled on him, would ever receive the kind of hero's response by society. This is the problem.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 03:05 PM
1

My only real counters are — I THINK, and I may be wrong, I could be perfectly fine with killing someone to defend myself and especially to defend my child. I am not sure it has to be intentionally a "last resort". The way men and women view violence is so different. Most women do not grow up with the same fear that if I "mess with this dude, I could absolutely get my ass kicked". But I know, if I pick a fight or m too much of an asshole, I may get beat up. Well, if someone assaults me, all bets …
/r/MensRights16/10/14 03:02 PM
2

Yes, but often, both men and women in abusive relationships (especially with kids) find it psychologically difficult to do so. I get what you are saying, but the fact is, some people stay in abusive relationships for any number of reasons (none good) and usually because of mental issues. That is real. For men and women both. It's like telling a alcoholic — just stop drinking. No, oftentimes they need help and need to hit rock bottom. I think the same is true for some in abusive relationships. So…
/r/MensRights16/10/14 02:38 PM
1

I support men and women doing whatever they have to do to protect themselves and loved ones from an attacker. It should not be posed as only a problem for women. But, I have no issue with a battered wife or husband killing their attacker.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 02:21 PM
7

Thanks to this sub, I am learning a lot about it. I understand exactly what you are saying. Because I don't feel the outrage, is not a reason for me to perpetuate it. You make a great point.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 08:26 PM
8

I am circumcised. I have absolutely no ill will or bad feelings about it. I love my penis. I understand the desire to not do it to your kid and I may or may not. But I don't personally get up in arms over it.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 07:45 PM
7

I did not know that it touted itself as "all-inclusive" either. Today I learned.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 06:11 PM
2

You mean dad's aren't all clueless, bumbling idiots who cannot responsibly manage finances or raise children? /s
/r/MensRights13/06/14 06:05 PM
5

Yeah, I have been "learned" if you follow the thread. Glad this is a fact. It does not make it bad, though, if the MR sub tried to focus its discussions on MR only while not denying the need for rights of all, is what I am saying.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 05:38 PM
3

I can admit I was ignorant of that stance. Thank you for clarifying. I assumed it was more focused as a special interest group. It is a shame that overall rights stance is not more of the norm. I am still learning.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 05:03 PM
0

I don't think I made my point well. One can be in favor of gay rights, african american rights and rights for all. But I think it's a little silly to be a part of a gay rights group and expect them to discuss and champion african american rights, even if everyone is in favor of rights for all. Does that make sense? In essence, all these groups are special interest groups, which is not inherently bad. But it makes sense to expect a group to focus on the issues most important and pressing for that…
/r/MensRights13/06/14 04:59 PM
2

Fair enough. If that is the case then I am mistaken. I still think it's fine for a MR group to focus on the topics specific to MR without denying our disputing rights as a whole. It's more about focusing on the topic at hand, it's what I meant.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 04:35 PM
-6

That's fine and I do not disagree, though there is some hatred and closed-mindedness on both sides. I believe more on their side, but I digress. But if I posted here about clitoral circumcision (as opposed to somewhere fighting to end all forms of genital mutilation) would it receive positive feedback? Why should it? This is not he forum. It's not about always picking a fight between feminists and the MRW. Sometimes, it's just common courtesy and what is right.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 03:52 PM
54

I hate how close-minded certain feminists can be. But to be fair ... what did you expect? If you joined a MR group on campus and wanted to discuss women's rights topics, it likely would not go over well. Not saying they'd be hostile. This can be applied to any group in which someone wants to discuss a topic that does not apply to that group's agenda.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 02:54 PM
4

This is complete dreck. You should be ashamed of posting this.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 12:55 PM
10

That's pretty damn funny. But then, I have a pretty sick sense of humor.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 02:25 PM
2

I don't even know what to say here. But it's acceptable to ban bikini tops and booty shorts. There's a line that keeps being crossed and not many seem to care. I have been stating this EXACT point to you this entire time and you keep leaping to assumptions I am a clothes Nazi. Find anywhere in our discussion where I was not making the exact reasonable point you just made. As for your argument about men being blamed, I still think it is dishonest to assume a woman wearing booty shorts and a reall…
/r/MensRights29/05/14 06:25 PM
2

I'm not suggesting we shame women. Also there's a lot of gray area between dressing non sexually and forcing women to be hot. Distraction and lack of control are two different things. I appreciate your struggles with ADHD. I also empathize and understand that struggle. You should have help to battle this. And, I empathize with the realities of nature that women dressing provocatively is also a distraction. I favor limiting that. But I also think it's overboard to pretend that it is distracting t…
/r/MensRights29/05/14 04:45 PM
3

I don't know — that seems to be a leap to an extreme when someone calls it a "distraction". And, we all are sexual objects. To deny that is silly. A woman with a plunging neckline, showing a lot of leg, wearing tight clothes, showing a lot of cleavage IS a distraction to me and the majority of men. It just is. And, it would be less of a distraction to women than men, by and large, but still a distraction. I think it's best to save the outrage for when it makes sense. if they started labeling all…
/r/MensRights29/05/14 03:42 PM
3

I agree with your sentiment, but I think revealing clothing is a distraction. I get distracted by it still. And it would especially be distracting in a school setting, just as boys wearing revealing clothing would also be a distraction. Did you not get distracted on some level by girls in short skirts when you were 13? I think this is not a battle worth fighting.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 03:25 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter