TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

6658 Archive

View 0 posts and 66 comments by 6658 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

uh, they won't start endless wars. what's your source? I think you're a little swept up in election drama. Trump will make life worse for basically everyone, including men.
/r/MensRights05/11/24 04:16 PM
4

I've seen all-male groups of politicians try to argue against abortion and struggle to explain biology. The demographics of congress being more male, old, and conservative than the total US population means many decisions and task forces are made by and up of old, conservative white guys, but men AND women elect them. Business decisions can be abortion-related, but many more higher-ups in business are men, too. It has to do with the factors that enable and draw men more to positions of power ove…
/r/MensRights29/10/24 01:09 AM
2

yeah, it's sexist. people often don't see their own double standards, but feminism encourages holding them. they don't get that they aren't under attack as much as they are told they are, so they think unfairly blaming men and/or being assholes is justified
/r/MensRights21/10/24 07:31 PM
13

It's not Harris being anti-man and Trump being pro-man. Republicans won't admit to men being disadvantaged, either. You could plainly state the same for him. Out of the recent presidential candidates, Andrew Yang kind of started, but he changed his mind and wasn't a realistic choice for other reasons. Trump doesn't exactly appeal to men. I find nothing appealing to him after all this time. His followers have this weird macho image of him, but he will sell out both men and women citizens for basi…
/r/MensRights21/10/24 05:13 PM
5

Trump got 3 appointees, even going against McConnell's own made-up rules. Even if you like Trump, it is kind of unfair that a president that didn't get the popular vote got to select 1/3 of the Supreme Court for the next few decades.
/r/MensRights21/10/24 04:54 PM
1

There are too few teachers as it is. Yeah, Ideally make every teacher have a PhD, but not in this reality.
/r/MensRights11/08/24 08:56 PM
1

the guys who have to strap down the people who get violent?
/r/MensRights11/08/24 08:51 PM
4

Too many people believe there are cartoonishly sexist 1950s managers everywhere. It's easy to start a 50/50 sex quota when nobody has to spend time or money into researching it because it SEEMS like it makes sense, and that's enough for uninvolved social media feminism activists. The fact that women have the freedom to be stay at home moms (I know no men who forced their wives into it) perpetuates the male breadwinner setup that they were so against before they dropped out of the workforce.
/r/MensRights20/07/24 01:20 AM
0

I mean, the whole thing guts basically the whole country for only the benefit of politicians, churches, and billionaires.
/r/MensRights19/07/24 03:41 AM
-1

you could address anything wrong with IQ tests or answer anything I said. got any sources there or counterargumenta? didn't think so. you're an immature windbag
/r/MensRights10/07/24 02:59 AM
-13

I'm asking you questions that you should be able to answer. Don't just run with seeing a graph and then pull stuff out of your ass to justify your assumptions. Be honest: Are you an expert in this field? Do you know why it is only a hypothesis? Do you maybe overestimate your knowledge of statistics, biology, and society? There are savants, yes, but the idea that there are supermen whom society relies on for things we decide are great is totally ridiculous. Privilege and people stealing credit ar…
/r/MensRights09/07/24 07:29 PM
-8

So are you saying there are only 5 contemporary Norwegian inventors? 0.3 Icelandic ones? Stupid people make stuff all the time.
/r/MensRights09/07/24 05:32 PM
-13

I don't think it's this. You don't have to be the smartest person to, say, invent the paperclip. And a lot of very smart people had their brains wasted by being forced to be slaves or other manual laborers. Poor people did invent things, but rich people had more education, opportunity and incentive. Given how small the upper class population was historically, there might not have been enough smart, upper class people to invent all those things if inventions are directly tied to innate ability. I…
/r/MensRights09/07/24 04:09 PM
-4

IDK what to tell you, but the orange man is a rapist pedophile who doesn't care when Americans die.
/r/MensRights22/04/24 07:17 PM
2

imo no athlete should be insanely rich anyway, but if pay has to factor into it, then the most famous and best athletes should get more money. I don't know the names of any female league players and they are objectively usually worse than men.
/r/MensRights17/11/23 04:34 PM
3

my hips are more comfortable if my legs are slightly farther apart. -OMG stop "manspreading" and congratulate ne on my period
/r/MensRights08/11/23 06:16 PM
0

we can definitely fix different things, but if you want to stop the worse problem caused by sexism, it seems like being made to die expendably in war would come before better banking norms. Edwardian men had some issues women did, but the feminists existed to fix problems according to the gender that was impacted. Social attitudes didn't just stop women from being free, it also did the same but in different ways to men.
/r/MensRights07/11/23 08:08 PM
6

The same sexism that made millions of men get drafted and killed, yes.
/r/MensRights06/11/23 09:40 PM
2

isn't it 7/8 of all men?
/r/MensRights06/11/23 09:30 PM
7

Where are they forcing you to be gay? Sociology is a reasonable place for this.
/r/MensRights30/07/23 02:45 AM
0

what about critical race theory?
/r/MensRights29/07/23 05:02 AM
16

Women also have the option to wear a non-standardized dress and shoes based on their mood, but men have to wear unfun and uncomfortable dress pants, dress shirt, tie, and dress shoes. Women only have to do anything to their body hair and toes if they choose to show them and they can have short head hair.
/r/MensRights08/06/23 05:20 PM
4

It's worse overall overturned. Even in this narrow focus, you could say it's worse for men because now more kids are born who would get child support.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 03:50 PM
1

There isn't an exact synonym because the term is for something that doesn't really exist. There are parts of the concept of "the patriarchy" that are real, but some parts of the concept need you to believe in untrue things in order to agree with it. A feminist could try to sway others by stating the real issues and defining it as part of "the patriarchy." Then they add the made-up parts to the definition as if it's them knowing more about the truth. If you're looking for terms to replace "the pa…
/r/MensRights20/05/22 07:14 PM
7

Yeah, there are people who want women to have more rights and women to have extra power. Then there are people who want women to have more rights because everyone should have more rights. It sucks that the first group can influence the second one.
/r/MensRights18/05/22 10:49 PM
7

I'm glad you care about these issues. Just something to note, the term "patriarchy" is sexist on it's own and the way feminists use it vilifies male-ness while giving feminists a vague evil to feel obligated to act against. An actual patriarchy is neither for nor against any certain cause, nor is it intrinsically malevolent or benevolent. This feminist usage just denotes men as being bad, and by relation, women as being good. If enough people think that for long enough and are exploited, we get …
/r/MensRights18/05/22 10:39 PM
1

The more diverse this is the better. I'm glad all kinds of people are coming around.
/r/MensRights16/08/21 01:19 AM
3

and governments that needed armies, they'd take the men while the women remained home. some of those men gained status this way in way women couldn't, but only because they're stronger, couldn't get pregnant, and house skills were already traditionally learned by women. being conscripted doesn't seem like privilege, but if you weren't a cannon fodder peon, you could become socially important. sometimes there were women fighters, though.
/r/MensRights13/08/21 12:01 AM
2

What you wrote seems to make sense, but I don't know if we have the same idea of what you call the start of the nation-state. Just to clarify, how would define it on its own without using context?
/r/MensRights12/08/21 10:21 PM
10

Do you think rape is okay if they're unconscious, too?
/r/MensRights27/07/21 05:33 PM
7

Disposability Genital mutilation Sexist school practices Sexist court rulings Not being allowed to be feminine
/r/MensRights23/06/21 08:50 PM
1

If you really want me to cite every statement I made, I suppose I could. I'm not being mean towards you or anything and I have helpful things to say if you'll listen and I'll answer any questions about the subject respectfully. Just to start off, what's your history with men's rights or feminism? I used to call myself a feminist until I realized the double standards over time that weren't being addressed. I know that there double standards with any groups, but I distinctly remember reading about…
/r/MensRights10/02/21 08:33 PM
1

can you go over specific points of mine? I think I covered a lot and captured the situation well. The people who started the movements weren't supremacists. Ostensibly they wanted a group of people to have better lives. Eventually man-haters and women-haters joined on, but as it is now, popular feminism is anti-male in several ways that, because feminism is considered to be good, negatively affect men. Part of men's rights is just trying to have people notice that, but because men are assumed to…
/r/MensRights10/02/21 05:41 AM
3

There are problems for everyone, including issues with just women's rights and issues with just men's rights. I think we should work on the largest issues first, no matter if they are about men or women. Feminism now ignores basically all problems of men. That's the problem with people being for feminism instead of equality. Mens rights isn't saying that the original message of feminism isn't important. It exists as a movement because half of the population's unique problems aren't addressed. Fe…
/r/MensRights09/02/21 08:43 PM
8

I hear people saying how it objectifies women, so what about if it's two guys? I never hear that brought up.
/r/MensRights09/02/21 03:02 AM
23

There are more options for women who would become homeless and teachers favor girls over boys. Last time I checked, dying wasn't really an option, either.
/r/MensRights28/12/20 11:44 PM
8

In American culture, the pro-cutting reasoning assumes the pieces removed have zero function and zero sensation, which is incorrect. Parents will sue if they cut too much penis off, but the parents are just basing "normal" on what the common result is, and since there isn't a dotted "cut here" line when someone's born, the decision of how much is too much to remove is too much is not objective and is arbitrary. You could cut the whole tip off so it's an easier shape to clean and to reduce sensat…
/r/MensRights28/12/18 05:51 PM
1

Yeah I'm just concerned an outsider will look it up and take it literally and think we're primarily concerned with insulting based on sex styles. Like if we posted a lot about women being whores, feminists wouldn't even look into what we are
/r/MensRights10/11/17 05:43 PM
-4

the easiest way to describe him is by using a sexual fetish word that became popular this year? it reads like an incel post. part of feminism I didn't like is their overspeculation and doublespeak and I don't want to see it here because whenever I read it in their comments, I don't take them seriously.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 02:14 PM
8

Calling people cucks on here makes me think you're all 13
/r/MensRights10/11/17 03:40 AM
1

We need one more like Wonder Woman and less like Ghostbusters II. Once there's a good one, we can not be bigots for pointing out the flaws in the other.
/r/MensRights29/07/17 03:37 PM
5

I don't think one random comment on a Facebook thread means that much to say anything. There are better examples out there.
/r/MensRights26/07/17 06:20 PM
1

Because the standards can tell them to. It's not going on, but it could.
/r/MensRights29/06/17 02:25 AM
1

I'm saying overregulation and underregulation can be issues. There is a hypothetical possibility that businesses are trying to make the world better, but the government makes them pollute more and pay their workers less.
/r/MensRights28/06/17 07:20 PM
1

I don't know if there's anti-capitalist indictrination, but the level of laissez-faire economics is making things worse in America. The concept of not having regulations is a good idea, but instead of the government basically having a monopoly on everything, there are corporations that monopolize and then bribe officials. In theory, cable company monopolies should suck less because a better service by a new competitor should have come along and either become more powerful or have pushed the exis…
/r/MensRights27/06/17 09:21 PM
4

anti-capitalism indoctrinating the west's children?
/r/MensRights27/06/17 12:06 PM
2

Does anybody relate to the characters in word problems? Whenever I see Hispanic female names in questions I think "somebody obviously pushed for this name." They should do a survey of what races and genders think what I did, don't acknowledge the name, or who get warm and fuzzy inside.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 05:39 PM
3

Extremism isn't all lonely guys finding a violent cause to believe in. Salafism has a lot of people thinking that if someone isn't a certain kind of conservative Muslim, they should be killed. God said so. A happy person can believe it as true if they think god said so.
/r/MensRights06/06/17 07:57 PM
6

Reduces cancer and infections, reduces chances of oversensitivity, easier to clean, less smegma, reduces self-esteem problems from being different from parents or peers who have had it done, aesthetically pleasing in a society in which it is common, doing it early prevents the hassle of getting it done later, procedure is fast and had a short recovery time, procedure is affordable, carries the traditional customs on, some people are adamant about how patents have a right or obligation to do it t…
/r/MensRights05/03/17 09:44 PM
2

Equal rights issues are going to be important in any community of the side that isn't being treated fairly. However correct you are, there are a lot of disgusting women's groups who are in favor of respectable social change. The actual alt-right doesn't care about actual equal rights.
/r/MensRights17/12/16 07:55 AM
3

Someone presented as a random twitter user is mentioned as if she has authority and then her words are taken as common knowledge when they are not. That's a lazy way to get to say whatever you feel like and feel justified.
/r/MensRights17/12/16 07:47 AM
12

There are a lot of things I don't care about, but you have a shitty excuse for this issue
/r/MensRights27/11/16 06:42 AM
2

Game design is a pretty useless degree iirc. Like employers don't care if you have it or not. So they're in a male field, but not one of the lucrative ones. Then they'll count themselves as being in CS and blame their earnings on sexism. Its narcissistic to need every fucking bit of media furthering their agenda
/r/MensRights27/01/16 12:45 AM
0

Without a comma after "times," the title reads that they shot him ten times, waited to see if he was dead, and then shot him ten more times.
/r/MensRights16/01/16 07:45 PM
1

It isn't necessarily the whole clitoris and way more area is removed on men. Women still can feel inside whereas men without the gliding mechanism lose all mechanical functioning. In both sexes, the most sensitive stuff is removed. I dont feel anytjing unless I use the foreskin, but maybe that's me. It'll always be a subjective comparison because it requires experience and we're different enough that our urethras don't come from the same place.
/r/MensRights25/11/15 05:31 PM
-1

Actually no, but that shows it's not that good. Anyone could find the video and think it means something it doesn't.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 04:56 AM
3

Sort of hard to understand what he's trying to get across. Tens of clips of women saying "objectification" doesn't mean or do anything, but he treats it like some big exposé. I don't think the clips of women being abusive and childish help the video. It makes it seem like the only instances of that happening are random stealth youtube videos, ignoring the fact that they are superficial complaints.
/r/MensRights24/09/15 04:25 AM
4

It seems like something the person making it thought looked cool but didn't have anything to put it in. The colors of the piece were made superman-like, but why is it even there? More importantly, why is it fingers? I'm pretending their logo was some reference to countering someone doing the shocker move on you by you doing it to them, because it could count as stopping sexual assault.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 05:26 AM
6

Ever wonder how any phenomenon like this with a name starting in "man" is always hateful against men? It's just man-hating culture being encouraged. It doesn't have to make sense. As long as men are involved, it's bad. Not every interaction with a man is over your sex. If you do thirty push-ups wrongly and you don't seem to realize it, you could use advice. When a man notices a woman with bad form, for some reason whatever the man says is apparently an attempt to rudely call women weak and stupi…
/r/MensRights10/09/15 10:56 PM
1

It says it's hosted by UQU, so seriously bring it up to the board. People are supposed to review events like this so either the planner or the reviewer are in trouble. Also, I think it would be funny to see only a swarm of Indian men show up for the Bollywood movie.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 08:57 AM
5

This is kind of cool since it can stimulate women questioning genital mutilation. Maybe some'll realize that any adult should be free to alter their appearance, but that it's not okay to force stuff on kids. The author does have a point that more women are choosing to circumcise themselves in hospitals. I think it's good if, for at least this article, MGM and FGM are similar.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 04:11 AM
2

Some critiques I've read about the studies that's based on makes me think it's not necessarily true, but IF the information is correct, it doesn't go from 0% to 60% reduction. It's from about 1% to 1.6%. If they circumcise a large number of men, you'd expect at least one guy to think it makes him and his partners immune, and in fact there have been (incidentally necessary) warnings in Africa that remind people of how it isn't a cure. You can imagine that it's easier for a woman to get HIV from a…
/r/MensRights31/03/15 07:51 AM
1

It also seems like somehow women showing skin, wearing regular clothes, and wearing burqas all oppress women.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 06:36 AM
1

The idea that only women belong in rape centers is sexist to begin with. Also ending the comic with a man crying is funny because men shouldn't cry. But when women cry it's okay because women get to be human enough to have emotional reactions when bad things to happen to them.
/r/MensRights31/03/15 06:21 AM
2

What can I do with the hate I feel for those mods?
/r/MensRights29/03/15 03:57 AM
1

I would choose 1. circumcision, 2. domestic violence 3. legal surrender, 4. male disposability, 5. self image, 6. draft. I figure this because if you wanted to stop one of them right this second, 1 would save boys for life, 2 would stop deaths and injury, 3 would affect families, 4 is pretty culturally-ingrained, so it will take time regardless, 5 I think would be pretty simple and as such shouldn't take priority over the others, and 6... well, just personally, I got to opt out of selective serv…
/r/MensRights11/02/15 09:29 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter