6data Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
0	Q4W: Can you name five important ways in which women are inferior to men? Are you confusing "syllabus" with "curriculum"? Is that the issue?	/r/PurplePillDebate	14/04/25 05:37 PM
1	Q4W: Can you name five important ways in which women are inferior to men? Yes they do. In the sense they are free to plan assignments, outings, tests/quizzes and set the grading percentages within guidelines. At least in Canada, I might be ignorant of your system. That's not the curriculum, so sure. Maybe you don't understand what "curriculum" means? And Canada's educational system is provincial, not national. Our curriculums are set provincially.	/r/PurplePillDebate	14/04/25 08:03 AM
1	Progressive spaces shit on lonely men. I agree with reframing from “normal” to a better descriptor, OK, but what do you think "heteronormativity" implies? Should we not have movie characters with glasses? Or black skin? The point is that LGBT relationships or characters don't need to make up the majority, but we shouldn't associate cis/hetero with "normal" or always assume cis/hetero. Especially since the more we evolve as a society, the more we realize that sexuality is a spectrum and more and more people realize that they're not ac…	/r/MensRights	30/08/24 03:22 AM
-1	Progressive spaces shit on lonely men. It’s perfectly logical. Being LGBT is technically not “normal” because most people aren’t LGBT. I mean, most people don't wear glasses their entire lives, but we still consider them "normal". The fact that you associate the "majority" with "normality" implies an inherent discrimination. It’s a statistical reality, If we consider everyone who is intersex, non-binary, androgynous, trans, gay, bisexual, pansexual, gay and lesbian, they make up a larger percentage than: The LGBT community : Is large…	/r/MensRights	30/08/24 02:23 AM
-3	Progressive spaces shit on lonely men. telling my gaming group (that was predominantly LGBT) that I didn’t think heteronormativity was a problem because being liberal is about accepting people who are different. This is not actually a logical statement to make. progressives were recently sharing a fake Tim Walz tweet saying “ask Ann Coulter why all her fiancés left her”. It was being shared in a positive light. I asked why is it not okay when conservatives shame women for lack of family, but we praise a fake tweet of Tim Walz doing t…	/r/MensRights	30/08/24 12:54 AM
1	“American University believes women can revoke consent after sex” ... This is absolutely sick and disgusting . What are you guy’s thoughts on this ? That's a circular link referring to the stuff that you just linked to. It's not from the university. Also Washington Examiner isn't exactly known for being reputable.	/r/MGTOW2	25/08/20 10:54 PM
1	“American University believes women can revoke consent after sex” ... This is absolutely sick and disgusting . What are you guy’s thoughts on this ? ...but none of these are actually links to the material or university policies?	/r/MGTOW2	25/08/20 09:30 PM
-2	What is the difference between the Redpill and Feminism? Epic archived post on Askfeminists. In which feminists dance around a simple request: Name one time that feminists have ever held women accountable for their actions. Perambulation and fish throwing ensues. No, they accused you of being a disingenuous misogynist who's just trying to stir shit up. Nothing to do with the archived thread.	/r/MensRights	23/01/20 03:40 AM
0	What is the difference between the Redpill and Feminism? Epic archived post on Askfeminists. In which feminists dance around a simple request: Name one time that feminists have ever held women accountable for their actions. Perambulation and fish throwing ensues. The thread the OP linked is definitely archived (not locked, which is an entirely different thing), but the thread where OP was banned and received that comment is most definitely not.	/r/MensRights	23/01/20 03:38 AM
-2	What is the difference between the Redpill and Feminism? Epic archived post on Askfeminists. In which feminists dance around a simple request: Name one time that feminists have ever held women accountable for their actions. Perambulation and fish throwing ensues. It's a locked thread. Downvotes, upvotes, comments are all locked. It's read-only. I don't understand how that's shit stirring. I guess I should've posted the archived link. That's a lie.	/r/MensRights	22/01/20 10:40 PM
6	"Don't worry about openers" is bullshit when you're a beginner, How do I start a conversation? As a woman, one of the things that bothers me the most is when someone approaches me and "forces" me into inane conversation. I like the opportunity to not respond. The "pick up lines" that have worked on me are: Starting up a topic that really interests me. Such as politics. Or whatever else. Do not take this literally! Take this as "say something that is engaging to the person you want to talk to". This generally requires some level of relationship, so Crack a joke or make a witty comment that…	/r/seduction	05/01/20 11:46 PM
2	More career-oriented women were more likely to also prefer career-oriented, well-off male partners. Ah yes. So glad you were able to enlighten us all PURE_ARYAN_GENETICS. Your insight has been super helpful.	/r/BlackPillScience	27/11/19 04:44 PM
2	Is dating hard for woman or are woman just playing victim? If I can choose between five cookies while ones poisoned, and you can choose between 2 cookies, while ones poisoned, we both have every right to complain about foregoing eating any cookies because we're waiting to figure out which one is poisoned. In my experience with online dating, I have 1500 guys to choose from (Tinder now notifies you of this...? I apparently have 1000 waiting in my so-called queue), and 1460 are already in a relationship, entirely unlikable (prison tats on their face, morb…	/r/PurplePillDebate	10/05/19 11:16 PM
1	Women who hit "The Wall" often due so out of neglect for their mental and physical health. The main reason why women's SMV "drops" in the late 20s is because women of that age who still are single have (and always had) lower value. This is a pretty sweeping statement. And it might trend that way, but it's certainly not an absolute.	/r/PurplePillDebate	10/05/19 10:35 PM
0	Women who hit "The Wall" often due so out of neglect for their mental and physical health. I mean, you're a braincels user so you might not get this, but I see anyone under the age of 25 as a child. Something similar to how you would see a 10 y/o. I can acknowledge beautiful people, but I do not find them attractive in any way.	/r/PurplePillDebate	10/05/19 10:33 PM
0	False sex assault reports not as rare as reported, studies say The NCVS is one source of many that RAINN extrapolates to produce their statistics. Why is it that elsewhere on their site, they specifically state Rape & Sexual Assault? Not to mention differentiating between "completed" and "attempted" rape?	/r/MensRights	11/01/19 03:12 AM
1	False sex assault reports not as rare as reported, studies say If that was the case, then why would they specifically take the time to include their exact definition of rape, and specifically say that it is different than sexual assault? And why wouldn't they say 40%? No, I assume that it is a mistake or over-simplification. Based on your interpretation of a single sentence that doesn't even reflect the statistics that they've linked?	/r/MensRights	11/01/19 02:49 AM
0	False sex assault reports not as rare as reported, studies say That report is talking about the prevalence of crime... the 23% isn't written directly anywhere in there, it needs to be extrapolated. And the conviction rates aren't in there either. From the RAINN website: From 2005 to 2014, 30% of NCVS rape and sexual assault victimizations were classified as completed rape. Attempted rape or other sexual assault accounted for nearly 50% of rape or sexual assault victimizations. About 1 in 5 (18%) were verbal threats of rape or sexual assault. Which is pulled…	/r/MensRights	11/01/19 02:13 AM
1	False sex assault reports not as rare as reported, studies say Though the final part of your quote does seem to agree with the premise that it’s much easier to prove the “against their will” part of the definition with assailants unknown to the victim. Or victims are just much more likely to report. I have no data on this but would also imagine that with “stranger attacks” the attack is more aggravated/serious vs someone known to the potential victim where they could have just felt that a line was crossed (beyond their consent) but describing exactly where …	/r/MensRights	11/01/19 01:23 AM
2	False sex assault reports not as rare as reported, studies say The RAINN statistics are pulled from the NCVS. You can read more about it here. You're mixing up talking points. You're thinking of the college campus sexual assault statistic that's constantly being misreported as rape instead of clarifying the difference. The statistics that I linked are from the NCVS and and they're specifically & exclusively referring to rapes reported to the police.	/r/MensRights	11/01/19 01:06 AM
1	False sex assault reports not as rare as reported, studies say Look, you got caught using an ex recto reporting rate to massage some conviction rates to suggest that somehow the rape convictions need to be increased. "Doesn't it seem like the actual rape convictions are disproportionately low?" to wit. Own up to it and move on. OK. So why is it that it's so much higher in Canada? About 1 in 10 (12%) sexual assaults reported by police led to a criminal conviction, and 7% resulted in a custody sentence. This is compared with 23% and 8%, respectively, for phys…	/r/MensRights	11/01/19 12:57 AM
-2	False sex assault reports not as rare as reported, studies say This article says that instead of the 2% (I often see 2-8% given) false reports, it may be as high as 40%. May be that high. It provides no sources to back that up. I am the only one that is providing sources in this entire discussion. Unless you think that the 10% number is credible? You said conviction rates of rape accusations are low compared to that of assault and battery. And I explained how that difference is quite explainable and understandable. Except that it's significantly higher in C…	/r/MensRights	11/01/19 12:47 AM
1	False sex assault reports not as rare as reported, studies say Seeing as how both consensual and nonconsentual sex often happens in private, there is often little proof either way. Of course we feel bad for people who were actually raped, but with no proof, what do we do? Just lock people away because of an accusation? Yes, but that is exactly what this article is implying that happens. So I guess you agree with my overall premise?	/r/MensRights	11/01/19 12:27 AM
2	False sex assault reports not as rare as reported, studies say I was hinting at digital penetration (or the vernacular “3rd base”), I believe this if non-consensual would be considered rape. The statistics that I originally posted are from RAINN, who pulls their statistics from NCVS, and both of them describe rape as the following: Rape is the unlawful penetration of a person against the will of the victim, with use or threatened use of force, or attempting such an act. Rape includes psychological coercion and physical force, and forced sexual intercourse m…	/r/MensRights	11/01/19 12:15 AM
0	False sex assault reports not as rare as reported, studies say You made this claim with no supporting data or sources. Because you can't prove a negative. Your assertion, your responsibility to back it up with credible data. I'm responding to the assertion made in the article, which cites zero statistics. And again, I've looked. I haven't been able to find anything other than the [speculated] 2% that has already been discussed.	/r/MensRights	11/01/19 12:05 AM
2	False sex assault reports not as rare as reported, studies say The RAINN statistics conflate all of those things as rape. According to the page I linked, RAINN is getting their statistics from NCVS. And here is where they specifically mention how rape is different than sexual assault.	/r/MensRights	10/01/19 11:56 PM
-4	False sex assault reports not as rare as reported, studies say Did you read the article? They cite a few examples, no statistics. And since I can't prove a negative, you're welcome to prove me wrong instead of just giving a trite response.	/r/MensRights	10/01/19 11:41 PM
0	False sex assault reports not as rare as reported, studies say The ambiguity of the act can make it very difficult to determine if a set of actions actually constitutes a crime. If you mean that it's very difficult to prove that a crime has occurred, I agree. But what constitutes a crime is very clear. It covers everything from a couple making out on couch and at the time (say) the woman is a little uncomfortable with what’s happening but doesn’t really resist (“date rape” for want of a better term) "Making out" or even "forcibly kissing" is not commonly re…	/r/MensRights	10/01/19 11:27 PM
-7	False sex assault reports not as rare as reported, studies say In fact, using your numbers, a higher percentage chance of conviction at trial exists for rape than for assault. That's a great statistic for lawyers, probably not a great statistic for actually keeping people safer. Either way, there's zero evidence that false rape accusations are a statistically relevant occurrence.	/r/MensRights	10/01/19 11:13 PM
15	False sex assault reports not as rare as reported, studies say A recent study supports this assessment. The Pentagon issues an annual report on sexual assaults in the military. Nearly one-quarter of all cases last year were thrown out for lack of evidence, according to a report released in May. Women’s advocates say that an unfounded case doesn’t necessarily mean the accuser was lying. Which is absolutely true. Keep in mind that the bar here is that we're not talking a verdict of "Not Guilty", we're talking that during the court case it is proven that the v…	/r/MensRights	10/01/19 10:03 PM
4	A woman is about to take half of Jeff Bezos' wealth. Her reward for divorcing the world's most successful man. 1) is a novelist and mother of four children worth half his fortune? She was Amazon's first employee and has been heavily involved since the very begining. Also, she's the mother of his children. 2) can you prove that Bezo would not have gained his stature if he did not have his wife present? He hired her as Amazon's first employee and her salary kept the household running while he was starting up, so I would say no. 3) is the divorce based on infidelity or just incompatibility? Both. But if any…	/r/MensRights	10/01/19 07:26 PM
4	A woman is about to take half of Jeff Bezos' wealth. Her reward for divorcing the world's most successful man. All I was saying is unless she was doing considerably more than him and I do mean considerably more then there should be no possibility for take over. Right. And I basically agree that she shouldn't be awarded control, but in a scenario where she was around since the beginning and [hypothetically, this isn't the case here] invested their joint family savings into the company (making it 50/50), but at some point Jeff sells some of his shares (and for some reason doesn't sell hers), it would be po…	/r/MensRights	10/01/19 06:35 PM
3	A woman is about to take half of Jeff Bezos' wealth. Her reward for divorcing the world's most successful man. There's a difference between both investing huge amounts and one investing considerably more. But they essentially co-founded Amazon. By the time it was profitable enough to sustain their family, she quit her job and was the very first employee. How do you think he invested more than she did?	/r/MensRights	10/01/19 06:20 PM
3	So I Threw My Neighbors Daughter Right Under the Bus Yesterday. I think you’re getting too hung up on gender of the people cited. It’s not about woman bad, man good. I'm not. I'm literally just trying to find out what some poor old man ending up with a drug addict for a daughter has to do with MGTOW. I mean, if it was his ex-wife or gf, I could definitely understand, but it's not. You can't choose your children. If this was /r/childfree I'd also understand... but again, it's not. If I wasn’t MGTOW, (i.e. married or otherwise involved with a woman), I would b…	/r/MGTOW	11/12/18 05:32 AM
3	So I Threw My Neighbors Daughter Right Under the Bus Yesterday. Parastitic thots have a tendency to bring trouble everywhere they go. Their cunt worshipers act as muscle to execute their evil - he is the henchman. Cool. So if it was an elderly mother, her son and his gf, we'd still blame the gf? Or would we just ignore the abuse that the mother is facing? You, 6data are playing a game of whataboutism. Nope. I'm just trying to understand your methodology. That's not the focus here, these are just field reports of things we talk about and see in the media comi…	/r/MGTOW	11/12/18 12:37 AM
1	So I Threw My Neighbors Daughter Right Under the Bus Yesterday. Yesssss... but wouldn't you do that no matter which gender was involved? Say a mother and her son?	/r/MGTOW	11/12/18 12:02 AM
-7	So I Threw My Neighbors Daughter Right Under the Bus Yesterday. I wouldn’t do it if it was an able-bodied female. I’m sure they are fully capable despite the ladder being designed by the patriarchy. ...just like you probably wouldn't for an able-bodied male? Honestly, I don't quite follow what distinction you're trying to make. I help people who either need help and/or who [aren't shitty] ask for help...? Either way, I'm still not sure what this has to do with OP's story.	/r/MGTOW	10/12/18 09:06 PM
2	The year is 2068... Well, maybe not 70 years ago, but they sure did 50 years ago. You've heard of Woodstock, right?	/r/MGTOW	10/12/18 08:00 PM
-3	So I Threw My Neighbors Daughter Right Under the Bus Yesterday. Can someone explain what this has to do with MGTOW?	/r/MGTOW	10/12/18 07:49 PM
1	Is This The Correct Definition of "Mansplaining"? There's a difference between being explained how to care for your child, and being explained how to use an application that you designed. The first one is annoying, but largely without consequence, the other is annoying and makes her look incompetent. So yes, the opposite exists (and is also sexist), but it doesn't come with the same consequences.	/r/MensRights	16/09/18 08:54 AM