TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

700horses Archive

View 0 posts and 249 comments by 700horses on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

No, sweetheart, that fear is the result of feminist indoctrination. In the real world, most men don’t leave their women… vast, vast majority of divorces are actually initiated by women (80%, which jumps to 90% if the woman is college educated). As long as he protects you, provides for you, doesn’t beat you or lie to you… He’s a keeper.
/r/ExRedPill01/09/23 04:08 AM
1

The fact that you think that you need to compete with podcasters and his family indicates that your heart is not in the right place. And if you truly love him, a prenup shouldn’t be a problem… You’ll be together forever, so why are you worried about divorce??
/r/ExRedPill30/08/23 04:50 PM
2

Look at that grin… You know damn well she put a condom on that thing and tried it out.
/r/AllPillDebate26/07/23 09:50 PM
2

💯facts. It’s just nature.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/23 12:25 PM
-1

Not quite, I’m just a realist.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/23 03:24 AM
0

White couples? Are you projecting? Black couples had almost identical rates of marriage in the 1940’s and early 1950’s… Until hyper feminism and woke liberal Democrats went to war with the black community, which lead to their marriage rates to fall further behind white couples.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/23 02:14 AM
-6

If only they also had the number of sexual partners displayed on their forehead 😉
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/23 02:09 AM
-1

Incorrect. Women who out-earn their husbands are typically the ones who file for divorce (men typically don’t leave their wives).
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/23 02:08 AM
0

Vast majority of women don’t want to have to contribute 50% of the financial burden into a household, yet want to control the household finances. This is how nature designed women (to secure resources to assure survival). Number of partners is typically not important to women, but is the absolute most important to men because it is instilled by nature as measure of assuring paternity. This is why men can tell if a woman had many partners by the little red flags they display.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/23 02:07 AM
–

Who am I defending? What cult? And it sounds like you still don’t know the definition of “misogyny” 😁 Edit: @Mlem6 Once you realized you are wrong and your argument is illogical, you blocked me and erased all of your nonsensical comments, so I can’t respond to your last comment, so you can get the last word 😂typical bigot. Too funny.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/23 07:10 PM
–

Nope. I love women. My point is that men get arbitrarily labeled as misogynists by default, especially by people who don’t even know the definition of the word.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/23 03:40 PM
–

Lol misogyny is simply a hate or contempt toward women… Which I certainly don’t have. Thanks for proving my point though 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/23 03:10 PM
1

I’d say social media enabled it, but hyper feminism initiated and justifies it. There is a demographic of women who don’t partake, albeit very small, along with some women who realize how troublesome it is once they get older.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/23 03:09 PM
2

Feminism has indoctrinated women into thinking that “50/50 relationship” means the man pays most of the bills, protects and provides, while the woman keeps her options open on social media, and justifies leaving when she finds a better predicament.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/23 01:46 AM
4

Sophia Loren (in her prime).
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/23 05:46 PM
0

Haha you’re talking about men, I see what you did there. However, men in their 40’s and 50’s can still attract a younger woman for commitment, while women in their 40’s and 50’s can typically only get sex (commitment not so easily), especially from the (HV) men they desire.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/23 08:39 PM
-1

You contradicted yourself and simultaneously proved my point. Well done.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/23 08:36 PM
-5

OP is right, but key words are “in their 20’s and 30’s.” Once they hit late 30’s and 40’s, they will yearn for commitment, and regret not having a family.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/23 07:55 PM
1

Older women like this, who still dress like they’re in their 20’s are weird imo, and come off as desperate for attention. Most men who are interested in a long term commitment to a woman, also want kids, so if she doesn’t want any, that automatically eliminates the majority of men who would otherwise be interested in her. Being fit is baseline and her only chance to actually land someone of substance. Her one and only truly positive attribute is a low body count. This is rare (and if true), goes…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/23 01:32 AM
1

Being successful doesn’t always mean intelligent or socially calibrated. Many successful people think they’re getting what they want, but actually getting finessed. This is why the majority of billionaires end up in divorce, and why the richest women in the world got that way only through divorce (except for Oprah). The richest, most successful men can’t seem to retain their women… yet, people who taste a little success all of a sudden think they can? Success does not equal game.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/23 06:42 PM
5

10/10 means no room for improvement. It’s like a unicorn, technically it doesn’t exist. It comes around only when a man is highly infatuated with a woman… or telling her she’s a 10 to try to win her over.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/23 04:40 AM
5

Wow, you really are a genius, aren’t ya. Rihana’s overweight runway model, Steven G is the very first in world history, and you know very well it’s not the tradition, but rather a new and unique exception to the status quo.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 04:07 AM
2

You keep referring to statistically insignificant exceptions like that one celebrity or that one athlete, yet completely missing the point. There are sections called BBW everywhere, but NONE called BBM (men). That’s the point. The height response is an analogy 🤦‍♂️ Vast, vast majority of women will always choose the taller man. This is a fact. This has been studied. Women are the custodial parent most of the time because the courts are skewed toward women, regardless of how hard the man fights f…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/23 11:53 PM
5

Pretty much all of your responses are either irrelevant, untrue or pure and utter nonsense. “I agree that a bigger woman is definitely a preference men have” Nonsense. The only men who pursue “bigger women” are sexual deviants, fulfilling sexual gratification (not relationship). And the ones who get into LTR with overweight women are settling because they aren’t capable of getting a fit one. This is why you don’t see ANY tall, affluent men with overweight women… It’s almost always younger, thin …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/23 10:05 PM
21

Examples… sure. There is no male version of Lizzo because men who are overweight are deemed as losers by society, while overweight women are celebrated. This is also why you can find obese female models on covers of fitness magazines, yet no overweight men. It’s socially acceptable for women to reject men based on their height or monetary income, yet when men have preferences (i.e. weight), they are deemed as shallow or misogynistic. If a woman divorces a man, she is deemed as brave and powerful…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/23 08:54 PM
10

Yet, if a man rejects a woman for being too fat, he’s labeled as a misogynist.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/23 08:25 PM
12

Mainstream media, woke pop culture, generally accepted Western society at large.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/23 08:24 PM
2

Sounds like you’re conflating “redpillers” with a few content creators in the manosphere. “Red pill” is simply the willingness to learn a potentially unsettling or life-changing truth (by taking the red pill) OR remaining in the contented experience of ordinary reality (with the blue pill).
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/23 08:22 PM
0

So all of RP ideology is toxic because of the viewpoint of a few “lonely men, grifters?”
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/23 07:57 PM
0

Okay, so it’s no longer “10+ times”, now it’s “at least once” for the majority of women? Are you by any chance just basing these stats off of your own feelings?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/23 02:54 PM
8

You’re not a minority? So, you’re a majority? You’re saying more than 50% of all women have been sexually assaulted 10+ times, and their ass smacked by strangers in public?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/23 04:56 AM
29

Right. Because that statistic is BS.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/23 12:56 AM
12

Can you post the studies from where you got those statistics? We talked about this in one of my stats classes, and even the professor determined that the protocol to achieve those numbers was highly flawed.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/23 12:56 AM
1

Ah okay, any chance you could explain why it was removed? What rule was broken?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/23 06:03 PM
1

Appeal what?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/23 05:36 PM
1

What do you mean? Can you explain?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/23 04:54 PM
1

Invite him to your home, cook him dinner and give him sex (or at least a BJ if you don’t want to go all the way).
/r/RedPillWomen03/03/23 11:06 PM
1

Please let this sink in; he accepted dates with you because he wants sex. It sounds like he doesn’t consider your personality a perfect match, but like most men, willing to put up with it long enough to get sex. The longer you make him wait for sex, the more interest he will lose.
/r/RedPillWomen03/03/23 10:52 PM
1

Give him space, but be on-call and available for when he reaches out.
/r/RedPillWomen03/03/23 10:42 PM
6

I’m banned from r/dating because I’m in some RP subs. It seems like it just comes down to how much BluePill rage the mods have, or how bigoted they are toward people who have different viewpoints.
/r/RedPillWomen03/03/23 10:41 PM
51

Although that may be a workaround, doesn’t address the OP’s point. Women are stigmatized for stepping outside of the woke BP narrative, just like men.
/r/RedPillWomen03/03/23 06:43 PM
1

I guess you are responding to the other person? (I didn’t mention celebrities, but they did). Either way, sure of course some plastic surgery may help someone look younger for a while, but what retains beauty in the long run is being able to age gracefully. This is achieved by simply living a healthy lifestyle and smiling a lot.
/r/RedPillWomen03/03/23 09:03 AM
1

Conversely, if you had elected to settle down with a man when you were younger, you could potentially now fallen into the trap that you missed on living it up while single, dreaming of divorce to live out those missed experiences. The grass may always seem greener on the other side. The choices you made, made you who you are, so although it’s insightful to living in objectivity, it’s better to use it to focus on the future, instead of dwell on the past. I personally think you made the best choic…
/r/RedPillWomen03/03/23 09:00 AM
2

Same! That feel-good logic can actually hurt someone by retaining them on a path of delusion, instead of absolute objectivity, which would otherwise lead to corrective lifestyle choices and more accurate self perception. To answer few more of the points you made in your OP…. As someone reaching mid 30’s, you can rest assured that you did NOT miss out anything crucial in your early 20’s by being a bookworm (which many believe is actually much sexier and more attractive than going out, drinking an…
/r/RedPillWomen01/03/23 07:45 PM
1

Exactly! This is precisely what I mean!
/r/RedPillWomen01/03/23 07:19 PM
-4

That’s the point, those stats are in fact reflective of real life dating, taken from General Social Survey data and online dating apps match data. It’s your personal experience that is skewing your perception. Conversely, I’m just hitting my mid 30’s and all of the women I’ve always dated are in their early to mid 20’s. This is also true for vast majority of my friends and peers, who typically date women at least 8-12yrs younger than themselves. My older brother met his girlfriend when she was 1…
/r/RedPillWomen01/03/23 05:24 AM
-2

I mentioned those stats to illustrate that youth is one of the major of points of sexual attraction of men toward women because it is a primary indicator of fertility. Further, studies show that vast majority of women in their 20’s prefer men 4-7yrs older. This range increases as they age. Most women start drastically losing eggs after 30, and considered high risk pregnant (AMAP) after 35. Meanwhile most men can stay virile and fertile until their senior years. So this age difference dynamic doe…
/r/RedPillWomen01/03/23 04:05 AM
2

Fair enough, however it wasn’t removed for that, but rather because it “wasn’t useful” 😁 I do see your point though, and I don’t disagree. I meant dangerous in the sense that not living in reality can result in a more unfavorable situation later in life by steering someone down the wrong path. Indeed I could have been more specific and selected a better choice of vocabulary.
/r/RedPillWomen01/03/23 03:53 AM
-3

On a balance of probabilities, younger women are more attractive to men than older women. Vast majority of men (18-80) find women 21-24 the most attractive age group. This is a fact. This has been studied. Of course this does NOT mean that older women are ugly or unattractive, there are plenty of very beautiful women into their 40’s and beyond, but vast majority of even these women wouldn’t be able to compete with their younger self. And comparing what you’re attracted to in a man (wrinkles/hair…
/r/RedPillWomen01/03/23 03:25 AM
2

Sadly, most modern women will feel insulted and triggered by this. They don’t need no man giving them life direction when they can find their own direction because they are strong and independent. Oh the misogyny!
/r/RedPillWives01/03/23 12:30 AM
-1

Bravo. Well said.
/r/RedPillWomen28/02/23 09:51 PM
2

Of course she has time. 26 is at the tail end, even the peak of her prime. I didn’t mean to insinuate that she’s hit the wall. She still has great chances to find a man/husband. My comment re: advice being dangerous is that promoting a mentality that she will always continue to get the same amount of attention in her 30’s is unrealistic and disingenuous. Perhaps I could have provided more detail. I’ll be more mindful.
/r/RedPillWomen28/02/23 09:48 PM
5

Appearance/youth/beauty are the primary attributes that attract men to a woman. Personality retains the man, it doesn’t necessarily attract him initially. No man ever approaches a girl they find unattractive thinking “she might have a great personality.”
/r/RedPillWomen28/02/23 08:39 PM
1

This is really dangerous advice to a woman, especially one facing the obstacles she’s facing.
/r/RedPillWomen28/02/23 08:02 PM
-2

If you hated women, you were never Red Pilled.
/r/ExRedPill17/02/23 01:41 AM
-2

Is this really a surprise? Romania is known as having literally the worst record for unfair trials in the European Union.
/r/RedPillWives16/02/23 10:34 AM
1

Only during extreme scenarios is it not true, which make those scenarios statistically insignificant.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/23 05:16 PM
1

I got it from Iceberg Slim, but he was RP before RP was a thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/23 04:54 AM
5

Female friends are also liabilities, and don’t provide much utility. This is why even many women put men into “friend zones” as opposed to making female friends… Men make better friends. Women are designed by nature to be professional resource extractors.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/02/23 06:56 PM
3

Short answer… yes.
/r/RedPillWomen30/01/23 11:10 PM
3

Thank you for continuing to prove my point. Yes, men will overlook promiscuous past if they’re convinced they can’t do better, which is why they secure the woman they got (by the skin of their teeth), by professing that they love them for them… yet, if given a choice, they would commit to a woman without a past. And yes, precisely… Men will even overlook physical appearance if it means the woman hasn’t been ran through. They will marry an ugly woman if it means she wasn’t a hoe. That’s how impor…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/23 06:43 PM
1

I never said she wasn’t a human being. She might be very nice as a person. But being beautiful, lovely and a kind person is irrelevant. If a man can attract a woman with all those traits, he will find one who hasn’t been ran through. Period. Just like a vast majority of women wouldn’t even look at a short, lazy, broke drug addict to give him a chance because they can do better now. Thanks for proving my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/23 05:43 PM
1

Just like you wouldn’t settle for a short, broke and lazy man who justifies his circumstance with the trauma of being yelled at by his boss… Men won’t settle for a woman who has been ran though… Unless they have no other choice.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/23 05:15 PM
-6

No excuse for being a hoe. Your husband has turned his circumstance into a virtue by saying he “loves you for you”, in other words… He “loves” you because he can’t do better.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/23 07:52 AM
0

Average looking virgin 💯
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/23 07:49 AM
2

I can see how it may have come off that way through txt, but it’s honestly not meant to be sarcastic at all. It seems that most women hyper-sexualize themselves so much these days as a form of “empowerment” to the point where it becomes their identity. The term “bag lady” gets a bad wrap only by women who sexualize themselves in hopes of attaining validation from men, or by men who want to physically sexualize the woman. I just think ultra modesty to the point of being considered a bag lady is a…
/r/RedPillWomen27/01/23 07:34 PM
1

Bag lady look is indeed super duper ultra sexy. Marriage material. Just tell him how many men approached you when you went bra-less… He’ll wake up.
/r/RedPillWomen27/01/23 07:05 PM
0

Lick her asshole. Don’t ask permission, just do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/01/23 08:54 AM
3

There are plenty of ways to get to someone which do constitute the traditional sense of a date (meals, drinks).
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/23 07:45 AM
11

Simply, stop “dating”… Don’t spend money and time on women who you haven’t smashed (or aren’t actively smashing). Time and money are valuable, stop giving it out in hopes of getting sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/23 09:28 PM
1

Fair enough, but in that case you are a rare statistical minority, therefore your circumstance is statistically insignificant, and doesn’t apply to a vast, vast majority of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/01/23 05:43 AM
1

As you wish. The consequence will be that you will grow old alone, unmarried with no kids. You’re not the only one; Morgan Stanley forecasts that 45% of women aged 25-44 will be alone, unmarried/no kids by 2030 at current rate of women adopting your ideology. This is unprecedented in human history.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 11:57 PM
2

Then, you share that house with your cat, not a husband.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 11:49 AM
0

Lol nope… that’s not what I said 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 10:02 PM
2

Underrated comment!!
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 08:44 AM
14

I wonder how many “strong and independent” 30+yr old single mom styled dolls will sell compared to the “inexperienced Barely 18” dolls 🤔
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 08:43 AM
4

The truth is women can feel entitled to dating taller men as a “preference”, while it’s not socially acceptable for men to have preferences on weight, age or body count.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/01/23 04:46 AM
5

This post is so LOL Women just want their cake, and eat it too… And will bend over backwards to retain authority, while absolving themselves of responsibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/12/22 09:12 AM
1

If the man is working to provide resources for her to be able to do all that “work”, then yes… it technically is her job.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/22 07:01 AM
1

Exactly. Super red-pill statement by a Blue Pill Man. Good on you!
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/22 06:55 AM
1

No, 30 is pretty much the cut off for women to be taken seriously for a long term relationship and kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/22 06:54 AM
1

Well said. That’s a super red pill mentality btw.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/22 06:52 AM
2

Short answer… yes. Being over 30 for women is kinda like being over 50 for men. Only certain partners will take you seriously, but mostly the desperate ones who can’t get someone younger.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/12/22 06:51 AM
3

Because it makes you feel good by reinforcing behavior that usually stems from laziness or immediate gratification.
/r/TheRedPill28/12/22 06:45 AM
0

I don’t cry, I’m a strong Ukrainian man… We don’t cry. We fight.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/22 12:15 PM
-1

Lol huh? I didn’t say anything about Hunter’s laptop. I’m just speaking about personal knowledge from my home country. It’s crazy to me how easily Americans slurp of propaganda to idolize someone they know nothing about, except what they’ve seen on the news.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/22 12:14 PM
-8

Zelensky is an organized criminal, his Presidential campaign was funded by one of the most violent mobsters in Europe (Igor Kolomoisky). He’s now President of the most corrupt country in Europe (and top 3 most corrupt in the world, excelled only by Brazil and Colombia in corruption). So, of course women will be attracted to him… Most mobsters get that type of clout and validation from women.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/12/22 05:47 AM
0

Definition of bigot: Someone intolerant of those with opposing views or opinions. You sir, fit this definition perfectly 🧐
/r/ExRedPill18/10/22 07:26 PM
-1

LOL... I guess you just come on here to argue, name call, downvote comments and shame people with whom you disagree. Such class.
/r/ExRedPill17/10/22 08:26 PM
1

Agreed, being aggressive for no good reason is not an optimal way to handle anything.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/22 12:56 AM
2

You come on a public forum asking for advice, I gave it to you, and now you sound upset that you didn’t hear what you wanted. Lol. I apologized in advance to be as gentle as possible. I’d love to hear a more gentle way of assessing someone’s lack of social aptitude and emotional intelligence. And nobody assumed that you have time for them, even in your scenario… Your narcissism is starting to show 😬🫢
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/22 12:55 AM
1

No, I’m saying that part of being an adult is dealing with consequences of your actions, and a consequence of leaving your house is that strangers may talk to you. Nobody can read your mind to know that you’re antisocial if you’re in a social setting.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/22 12:52 AM
1

Yes, blatantly ignoring someone as if they’re a ghost is super rude. It’s what kids or socially inept people do. If you “don’t want to be talked to”, stay at home, or even wear some headphones. And if someone is persistent, you can calmly, respectfully tell them you don’t want to talk. Respectfully, you sound like you have very low EQ (emotional intelligence), and I apologize in advance as I’m not trying to belittle you. “I don’t understand how that’s productive” … It’s not productive, clearly t…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/22 12:46 AM
-1

Thanks for pointing out my grammar mistake (I’ve corrected it). Although, how you chose to do this says more about you.
/r/ExRedPill17/10/22 12:37 AM
3

It’s rude to ignore people in the civilized world, and some people react aggressively to be treated rudely.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/22 12:23 AM
0

Both false, I like how you’re changing it up now. Where did you learn your version of these events?
/r/ExRedPill15/10/22 10:17 AM
-2

More nonsense. He was never charged with trafficking. And he said he moved to Romania to start a girl’s webcam business, not traffic women. Jesus, do you just live in your own little bubble of male believe and fake new?
/r/ExRedPill15/10/22 10:01 AM
1

Did you really just spew a bunch of unsubstantiated cliche talking points? I think you are toxic… Should we ban you? See how that works? Absolute power corrupts absolutely.
/r/ExRedPill15/10/22 09:59 AM
-1

I find it so funny, people who can’t rebut with something coherent, so they just downvote 😂
/r/ExRedPill15/10/22 07:54 AM
-5

So, you prefer a homogeneous community where everyone agrees on everything, as opposed to an environment where complete diversity can meet with open discourse?
/r/ExRedPill15/10/22 07:22 AM
-1

Andrew Tate is a danger to society and needs to be cancelled at all costs. Seriously? Your intolerance for someone with whom you disagree is so high that you would pay “all costs” to have them cancelled? Should we just round up all the “Tates” who are deemed unfit “threats to society”, and put them into ovens and gas chambers? Bigotry is defined as intolerance to those with whom you disagree… How are you different from this? Because you are righteous? Beautiful things happen when you mix diversi…
/r/ExRedPill15/10/22 07:20 AM
3

… they don’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/10/22 06:58 AM
-5

Bar for men to be good partners in relationships is super low? If that were true, 80% of divorce wouldn’t be initiated by women. So, on the contrary, the bar is actually super high… hence many women think they can do better. The problem is that most modern women assume “healthy” is a one way street on many of the things that end up making you unhappy.
/r/ExRedPill15/10/22 06:56 AM
-2

LOL you really just proved how narrow minded you are by assuming that he meant “dumping” his girlfriend as literal, and conflating the “studies” with how he feels.
/r/ExRedPill15/10/22 06:45 AM
-4

The OP didn’t state they feel that way… They referred to “studies” which purport that women are less happy without a relationship, and asked a question. Trying to make it personal about them and painting a narrative that the OP is narrow minded is disingenuous at best.
/r/ExRedPill14/10/22 08:49 PM
0

This doesn’t answer the OP’s question. OP stated that studies show that women are happier without a relationship, so by that logic your advice would make women less happy.
/r/ExRedPill14/10/22 08:48 PM
1

Agreed. Our goals change as we grow and evolve, but we have to change our behavior to achieve these goals. And if we’re at point in life where our main goal is learning to pull chics, then we need to learn to change our behavior and circumstances to accomplish this goal. After all, like the saying goes… If men could smash girls in cardboard boxes, they wouldn’t buy/build houses.
/r/TheRedPill11/10/22 06:26 AM
1

This is just another example of people who don’t understand what RP is all about, painting a negative narrative about it. Typical RP suggests young men avoid committed relationships, while pursuing sex… not to avoid women or social interactions with women. “Working on yourself” means building skills… Social calibration skills and leadership skills included.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/22 01:13 AM
1

You really want to paint some kind of negative narrative here, huh? Men help protect women all the time without expecting sex in exchange, it’s in male’s nature to do so. Men fight entire wars to protect women. The fact is that maintaining male/female friendships results in an asymmetrical liability for men within that relationship, which does not exist for women. Respectfully, why is this so difficult to understand? Otherwise, I’d love to hear an example of what asymmetry exists in favor of men…
/r/ExRedPill11/10/22 12:38 AM
1

Well, the definition of “misogyny” is hatred/contempt for women, which simply isn’t the case here. Could it sound sexist? Yes. Misogynistic? No. And I never said that men are “losing” something by being friends with females. I said that females in male/female friendships typically expect uneven (sexist) treatment to their favor, while such asymmetry does not exist on the male side of male/female friendships. Hence, being friends with a female presents the same liability as protecting their lover…
/r/ExRedPill10/10/22 10:56 PM
0

Thank you for your thoughtful responses. Your willingness to see different perspectives to potentially learn uncomfortable or unsettling truths is the core definition of being red pilled. So, congratulations… You are a true red piller 🙂 “Society lets us be more emotional and it discourages men being emotional.” This is incorrect (for the most part). While it may be true that other men oftentimes ridicule men who exhibit emotional tendencies, correlation is not causation. Being emotional does not…
/r/ExRedPill10/10/22 09:19 PM
1

That sounds beautiful on paper, however in reality, most men can easily beat up most women. It’s just a fact of nature. Of course, most men would step in to protect their male friends as well… however, the point is that the likelihood that they would need to do so is far more unlikely since a man is far more likely of holding their own in a fight. I realize that mainstream media likes to show movies/shows of tiny girls using karate moves to beat up big muscular bullies, but it just doesn’t work …
/r/ExRedPill10/10/22 08:20 PM
1

Of course, firstly, to assume that women can’t be logical or that men can’t be emotional is nonsense. We’re both human and capable of both. Women however, are naturally equipped with the ability to be more emotional and socially calibrated, while most men stumble in this area, and have to learn how to do so. So, it’s not about the validity of a woman’s decision to be left alone, when rejecting an on comer; what many women don’t realize is that between men exchanging words, there is always an uns…
/r/ExRedPill10/10/22 07:00 PM
1

Respectfully, did you miss the part where I said that “they’ll never admit it?” “Most attractive women end up doing a bunch of party drugs”, this is a reach.
/r/TheRedPill10/10/22 06:37 PM
1

Lol went right over your head, huh? “Never change your behavior to impress girls?” So learning game, learning nutrition/fitness to be in shape, developing discipline to workout consistently to become strong, aren’t ways of “changing your behavior to impress girls?” Yes, you should do all these things for yourself to maximize any traits your can control in order to become a better man, but if you think that we strive to become better men NOT to impress girls, you’re lying to yourself.
/r/TheRedPill10/10/22 06:34 PM
1

Lol did you just want to copy/paste that the entire time? What crimes has Tate or his “group” committed at his behest? 😂
/r/ExRedPill10/10/22 06:19 PM
1

Ya I caught that (that she’s a smoker too), however you also mentioned being high value, and to me that means maximizing any trait you can control, so quitting smoking is at the top of the list for many reasons. Btw to answer your actual question from your OP… Correct me if I’m wrong, but do you lag on smashing chics after meeting them? Why do you keep them around for months if you haven’t smashed?
/r/TheRedPill10/10/22 12:54 PM
0

Scammy, perhaps… but, I’d more say disorganized and/or misguided.
/r/TheRedPill10/10/22 12:15 PM
-1

I never insinuated you weren’t familiar with organized crime, but assuming that Tate is an organized criminal is absurd.
/r/ExRedPill10/10/22 12:11 PM
-2

I stopped reading your comment when I realized that you don’t understand the definition of “misogyny.” And you’re so full of hate and bigotry that every sentence you write is full of SIGN language (Shaming, Insults, Guilt, Need to be right), not anything of actual substance.
/r/ExRedPill10/10/22 12:10 PM
-1

Respectfully, if you think Tate is an organized criminal, I’m not sure if we can have a rational conversation.
/r/ExRedPill10/10/22 12:05 PM
1

If you want to become high value, stop smoking cigarettes… It’s a deal breaker for most girls, even though they’ll never admit it. And even if they have sex with you, they won’t see you as long term material… Most (attractive) women don’t want the father of their future kids to be a smoker.
/r/TheRedPill10/10/22 11:49 AM
0

Banning and cancelling people is not good. Beautiful things happen when true diversity meets open discourse… but, this can’t happen if you’ve homogenized the community through banning and cancelling people you deemed unfit.
/r/ExRedPill10/10/22 11:40 AM
1

I’d argue that most women want commitment, not just sex. Hence, most women would like to meet a man to someday have kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/22 11:22 AM
1

How would getting a vasectomy make what easier?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/22 11:14 AM
1

Women will never “wake up to it”, it’s in their nature to be pursued, hence they have the luxury and obligation to be choosy with whom they allow sexual access. However, women’s abundance in sexual attention is oftentimes their downfall; all that attention deludes them into thinking that all these men want to give them commitment, when in fact all these men only want sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/22 11:02 AM
1

Could you cite a link to this study? And “getting laid” once isn’t the same as having continuous sexual access. You’re not also arguing that it’s equally easy for men to get laid as women, are you?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/22 10:57 AM
-5

She’s spot on?? “The RP doesn’t believe that women are people” This is pure nonsense. “People can simply spend time with one another and bond as platonic relationships” NOT MEN… Vast majority of males don’t approach females we’re not sexually attracted to, and only befriend them at the decision of the female in hopes of maybe later getting sex. And, the term “red pill" refers to a willingness to learn a potentially unsettling or life-changing truth (by taking the red pill), rather than remaining…
/r/ExRedPill10/10/22 10:46 AM
1

I absolutely agree… The traits that make a man attractive to most women take years/decades to develop, while women are simply gifted almost everything they need to attract a man when they hit puberty.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/22 10:43 AM
1

Still a bit rough, but I think I get what you mean 🙂 Yes, I’d agree… High value men are the prize, they have the leverage since there are much less of them compared to how common beautiful women are, hence why the top 10% of men have so many women chasing that same archetype (taller, stronger, smarter, higher socioeconomic status).
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/22 10:40 AM
-2

Ahh I found another typo too! I had accidentally written that a “woman would feel obliged to step in” (it was supposed to be a “man”)… Hence why understandably I think the downvotes. Is this what you found confusing and sparked your question as well?
/r/ExRedPill10/10/22 10:35 AM
-3

You think of women as lesser? Why? I certainly don’t agree. Men and women are vastly different in many ways, but we each have strengths where the other has weaknesses, and fit like ying and yang to compliment each other. Absolutely, I’d agree that a man would typically be better equipped to fight off an attacker (hence my original point), so I wouldn’t expect an attacker to listen to a woman stepping in to try diffusing a physical altercation. This is just nonsensical fantasy purported in mainst…
/r/ExRedPill10/10/22 10:33 AM
-9

Bingo. The one thing I’d add is that even as “equal” plutonic friends, the female still reserves the right to expect certain uneven treatment. Example: If two platonic (male/female) friends, walking down the street get attacked, most women would still expect the male to step in and protect her (something a male friend would likely not expect), and most men would feel obliged to do so (I know I would). So, men take on the risks associated with protecting the female, just as if they were lovers, b…
/r/ExRedPill10/10/22 03:02 AM
-14

Lol this is the typical kind of nonsense that mainstream media uses to smear the RP movement… none of it is true. Your rant sounds personal.
/r/ExRedPill10/10/22 02:56 AM
1

Facts! Top of the list for sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/22 02:45 AM
2

shouldn't be men the price then ? what would a woman may have to offer then rather than their affect, love and sex ? Any chance you could please rephrase or rewrite your comment? I’m having a difficult time understanding what you mean here.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/22 02:40 AM
-1

Women are typically naturally blessed with the skill of social calibration, but indeed it’s unrealistic to hope that they would use this skill to help younger men who are only trying to figure out how to navigate male/female dynamics.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/22 02:37 AM
0

98% of people in the US get laid? Did you just make that up? 😂 Some fun facts for you… Approx 1 in 4 men under 30 are virgins. 1 in 3 men under 28 haven’t had sex in at least a year. And overall the amount of men NOT having sex has tripled in the last 10 years.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/22 02:27 AM
3

Yes… Maximize all of the traits you can actually control; fitness, finances, game, personal development. Most women care less about physical appearance or dick size, but are attracted more to confident, honest, ambitious, successful, respectable men.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/22 02:19 AM
1

Why the name calling though?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/22 02:10 AM
1

Right, and the men who attain high wealth/socioeconomic status, even if short/fat themselves, not uncommonly go for the taller/sleek model type women.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/22 02:06 AM
0

Youthful Sexually loyal Fit/in shape Feminine Truly submissive Enjoys cooking Enjoys taking care of kids Doesn’t wear sexualized/tight clothing Doesn’t seek attention/validation from other men
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/22 01:21 AM
2

I’d say every single one of your points are mostly untrue, except (technically) the first one… However, first one is also nonsensical because in reality, it’s the women who don’t want to date men shorter than them.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/22 01:18 AM
1

Cool, thanks!
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/22 03:01 AM
0

Well, no. You refuse to acknowledge natural facts in order to retain your current worldview, which is fine. I don’t need to convince you of anything. On the contrary, I would rather you stay blue pilled. And “horrible” is a subjective term, whereas, most men and women throughout world history admire and respect men who are able to attain abundant sexual access… you don’t because it doesn’t fit your worldview of good and bad, nor your personal/subjective experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/22 12:50 AM
0

Your personal experience is subjective, and can potentially be an exception to the rule (at best). Nothing I said relies solely on my word. Everything single thing I said can be verified by various studies and factual data. The truth is out there… If you seek, you shall find.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/22 12:40 AM
1

You don’t have to buy anything, that’s the definition of being blue pilled… to remain in contented ignorance (respectfully, for lack of a better term), rather than accept the willingness to learn potentially unsettling or life-changing truths. And contrary to what many of these so called “red pillers” profess, there is absolutely nothing wrong with being blue pilled, and leading a content, and happy life.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/22 10:48 PM
1

It’s impossible to “blame” nature. Nature takes no mercy and doesn’t care about our feelings. Fact is that the human reproductive process is much more taxing on the female body (9 months pregnancy, 12-18 hours of painful labor, months of caring for an infant, plus much more)… While males only have to ejaculate, that’s it. Therefore, a female needs to be highly selective to make a good choice, hence they aim for the strongest and the brightest, and value quality. One baby per year maximum (maybe …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/22 10:18 PM
1

I didn’t insinuate that you care whether women in porn look different than you; my point was to illustrate a man’s thirst for variety and high quantity (even at cost of quality) VS a typical woman’s appreciation of quality (and low quantity). And no, you are using female metrics to assume that because men are different from women, it makes them “trash human beings.” Men and women have a different mating strategies as programmed into us by nature, so you are assuming that because a woman would be…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/22 10:04 PM
1

Hmmm I definitely didn’t assume neither one of you is jealous, nor desperate (respectfully, you definitely sound like neither, rather very content actually). I was also generalizing, not to make it personal. However, my points stand. If most husbands got an opportunity to lay a different younger/attractive girl every single day, yet still retain their wife, family, kids, home, they would gladly do it (just not at the cost of those things). While most women would not, and typically value love to …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/22 09:51 PM
1

Of course they say otherwise… How would you react if your man told you that no matter how perfect you are, there is no chance of you being able to satisfy is thirst for variety? Most women probably wouldn’t be married very long, or would argue that you want variety too. Do you really think he doesn’t watch porn? And do you think all the women look just like you? Men value peace above solitude. So, he is playing the best hand he has in order to secure (among other things) continued sexual access,…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/22 08:41 PM
1

Exactly… Because “normal men” would not dare say how they really feel and risk getting a response that you are “revolted.”
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/22 05:54 PM
1

Precisely! “what most of us can get.” Most women can get sex whenever they like. A vast, vast majority of men cannot. It is incredibly difficult for men to get sex, even for attractive, intelligent, high earning, high socioeconomic status men… sex access is difficult to come by. Therefore, they must work on themselves and study women to attain sexual access… neither of which women need to do.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/22 05:52 PM
1

Ok, thank you for clarifying. Btw I didn’t mean to make things personal… I was just answering her personal question “What is my husband then?” Is this also not okay? I can just delete my response to this if it is somehow inappropriate?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/22 05:44 PM
1

They’re not excuses. There are no excuse for lying, doing so is an indication of weakness (imo). You’ve just indicated that that you find blue pill men revolting, but are attracted to actual red pill men.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/22 05:39 PM
1

All men are naturally desperate for sex, starting at puberty. Even if we get it regularly and abundantly, we will want more, and from a variety of women, it’s how nature designed us… To spread our seed. The only men who don’t behave desperately, are ones who have conditioned themselves to live in a life of abundance to not have to act desperately… these are red pill men. Thanks for proving my point 🙂
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/22 05:37 PM
1

Well, I was referring to the previous respondent’s shaming and name calling (“little boy” comment) And, no… You didn’t quote me verbatim (I never said “what a cuck, she’s definitely cheating on him.”), you just made that up. And I never said he was a cuck. You made that up too. It seems like you’re the one who can’t handle an objective opinion (or perhaps you misread?).
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/22 05:32 PM
1

Ok, so the only thing about TRP that you find “revolting” is you think it promotes men to lie to women? Well, I’d say that you are wrong. Most men choose to lie to women because 1) they are not high status enough to be able to tell a woman the truth and still get sex, or 2) they know the woman can’t handle the truth and will shame the man for their preferences. Neither one is an indication of TRP mentality, on the contrary it teaches to overcome these. It seems to be a common smear tactic by peo…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/22 04:58 PM
1

Nope, I’m not arguing that. I never said anything remotely close to that. You, as a woman will be attracted to the same archetype that all other women are attracted to… there is nothing you can do about it, you are not special or unique in that regard. If given a choice, all else equal… you will choose someone taller, stronger, smarter, higher socioeconomic status.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/22 04:50 PM
1

Right, but nobody cares what you are attracted to (respectfully), men can only work in generalities of what most women are attracted to, since if you’re not in that category, chances are most men wouldn’t want you anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/22 04:46 PM
1

LOL a lady asked for an opinion on here, and when she got it… people like you who can’t handle it, resort to insults and name calling 😂 Thanks for proving the OP’s point 😁
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/22 04:44 PM
0

Ah got it, since you quoted only that word byte, it was easy for me to perceive it out of context.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/22 09:07 AM
-5

So, the fact that 80% of all divorces are filed by women (90% if the woman is college educated) is just coincidence? Or is it all the men’s fault? If so, given that most men are Blue Pilled… wouldn’t Blue Pill be to blame for the unsavory treatment of women, leading them to divorce?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/22 08:43 AM
2

That’s the thing… Women typically don’t reject those type of men, even feminist women. Recent studies show that even feminist women are attracted to traits that are commonly labeled as sexist, and now more specifically referred to as “benevolent sexists” Here is an article on the matter: https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/women-who-stray/201812/feminists-think-sexist-men-are-sexier-woke-men?amp
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/22 08:38 AM
2

All men need help getting laid… some just learn faster than others, and some have better guidance/support systems as they become men. This is something many women don’t understand because women have the luxury of naturally inheriting everything they need to attract men (youth, beauty, fertility)… Meanwhile, the traits that men need to attract women take years/decades to acquire (leadership skills, social calibration, self discipline, financial management, nutrition, exercise, game). So, it’s eas…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/22 08:34 AM
0

Who said “most red pilled men don’t read books?” That is nonsense. I’d argue that true red pilled men do in fact read many books.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/22 08:29 AM
0

Are you one of those ladies who thinks TRP is about lying to women, cheating, womanizing, and forcing them to chase their validation? Or could you provide your definition of TRP?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/22 08:26 AM
1

You are correct. Your husband is a blue pilled man. It’s likely a matter of time before your sentiments change, and you cheat on him, cuck him and/or divorce him… You’ll justify it with your need to keep growing, or boredom, or not being appreciated, or to live your life, or perception that you can do better, or you just don’t feel it anymore. I hope I’m wrong, but this pattern seems to repeat so much among those types of relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/22 08:24 AM
2

Just look anywhere in pop culture, mainstream media, modern rom-come, movies, shows, etc. it’s literally almost everywhere.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/22 08:17 AM
9

Respectfully, like most women here… It sounds like you don’t have a clear understanding of what it means to be “red pilled” Common mistake women make about RP is to assume that it’s based on lying to women, “tearing down their ideas”, making them chase their validation or flirting with other women in front of you. This is all pure nonsense, and is how BP media smears the RP community. The term "red pill" refers to a choice to willingly learn potentially unsettling or life-changing truths (by tak…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/10/22 08:06 AM
1

Respectfully, pretty much everything you just wrote is a nonsensical word salad of mental gymnastics. If women didn’t care about height, fertility clinics and sperm banks wouldn’t reject sperm from men who are below 5’8”, and charge more for men 6’0” and taller. Question… If you could choose from two identical men, both having every single attribute you’d want in a partner, however, one was shorter than you, and the other taller than you. Which would you choose?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/22 04:52 AM
1

Respectfully, the fact that you question a concept as well known as women preferring taller men, indicates that you are likely far removed from many other realities of male/female intersexual dynamics. Anyway… here are some links for ya ;) https://www.sharecare.com/relationships/study-find-women-prefer-taller-men https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886913000020 https://www.eviemagazine.com/post/theres-a-scientific-reason-why-women-are-attracted-to-taller-men https://blog.u…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/22 04:11 AM
1

Of course, most men lay who they can, women lay who they want. But, again… Most men only want sex, and will do/say whatever it takes to get it. Assuming that attention from men is equal to commitment attention is a cardinal mistake most women make, and then wonder why they get ghosted after sex, or can’t find a man for long term relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/22 01:00 AM
1

Options for what? There are two main types of attention a man can give to a woman: sexual attention (based on her looks/age), and commitment/relationship attention (based on how she behaves). Women who don’t understand this concept struggle to understand why men ghost them or don’t want to commit to them long term. Men and women view sex differently because the primary agency of their mating strategies are completely different.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/22 10:31 PM
1

Men control who they commit to, who they give a ring to, and who they give their last name to… Who they share their resources with, who they protect.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/22 08:20 PM
1

True, both men and women can say yes/no… However, most men will say yes to ANY sex offered to them (even with unattractive women with whom they don’t want a future), while most women will say no to mindless sex with someone they consider a loser. Why is this? Women can afford to be more picky. Sex is much easier for a woman to attain, they’ve had sex offered to them non-stop since puberty. Meanwhile, sex is much more difficult for men to attain because the attributes that make men attractive to …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/22 08:18 PM
1

Could you specify what you question as not being factual? Do most women not want a man who is superior to them? (taller, stronger, smarter, higher socioeconomic status) Or do most women want a man who is weaker, shorter, dumber, lower socioeconomic status? If this didn’t exist, the best genes from the human gene pool would be bread out within a few generations. It’s how all mammals reproduce. It takes a human female approx 9 months to birth a child, no? Do you need a link to prove this? Men are …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/22 08:07 PM
1

Well, I never said I know everything about nature, nor did I say nature is not mysterious. Perhaps you’ve assumed these things? You’ve also still not mentioned anything beyond your personal experience to rebuttal anything I’ve said.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/22 07:53 PM
2

Right. It’s not so much what is actually said, but rather how it’s said; emotional response without considering logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/22 07:50 PM
1

Once you’ve studied nature enough, it’s not so “mysterious.” I’d love to hear a rebuttal with actual facts, not just basic SIGN language. And just because you personally have never seen a woman do something, doesn’t mean it’s not true for a vast majority of women. Your personal experience doesn’t make the rule. Respectfully.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/09/22 04:06 AM
3

Red Pill = Hate/contempt toward women??? Hmm, perhaps I’ve read up on different Red Pill content.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/22 09:15 PM
0

Meeting women is one thing… but, attracting them, and compelling them to have sex with you is another. Women control access to sex, men control access to marriage/commitment. Nature has designed women to choose the strongest and the brightest (they have one shot to choose wisely). Nature has designed men to spread their seed (they can impregnate hundreds of women in the time it takes a woman to birth just one). Are you seeing a pattern yet?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/22 08:21 PM
4

So… pretty much, become a Red Piller? 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate09/09/22 07:40 PM
-15

Lol this post is simply wrong, and misguided. Firstly, you don’t “neg” someone by insulting them. Calling someone bitch, whore, cunt or fat is an insult… it is NOT a neg 😂 I’m not defending the redpill community, but it sounds like you don’t know what you’re talking about. Just calling a spade a spade. Respectfully.
/r/ExRedPill09/09/22 06:23 AM
1

Exactly, it’s because women look to other women for advice on how to dress. Also, these days… a man being explicit with how a woman should dress is easily perceived as misogyny, sexism, or toxic masculinity, so men have learned to stay quiet. Most women never figure these things out, and wonder why they’re single.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/22 11:54 PM
3

The best way is to be FEMININE and SUBMISSIVE. Men have to fight battles and compete our whole lives; we spend decades going to school and/or developing skills, careers… The last thing we want to come home to is a “boss chic” This might sound harsh, but… Feed me, fuck me… shut the fuck up. Don’t argue. Learn to take “no” for an answer. We didn’t spend half our lives becoming great men to jump into a 50/50 partnership, lol. If that’s what you want or think is “fair”, then go find an average middl…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/22 11:49 PM
1

Well, that’s the problem… What women view as “attention getting” is irrelevant (respectfully). Men will be men, and if a woman doesn’t want to face that reality, then she will live with those consequences.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/22 11:00 PM
1

Jeans (tight) are a form of clothing trickory, and change your shape/figure. Men are visual and will cold approach for sex only (not relationship). This is just the reality we live in.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/22 10:20 PM
1

I never said hot women are evil… you did. If a woman doesn’t want to get approached, then she should dress accordingly by not sexualizing herself. Men are primarily attracted to what they see, while women primarily to what they hear/know about a man. This is why men lie (to get sex), and women wear make-up and clothing trickery to enhance their figure/looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/22 09:23 PM
5

The hot girls got approached every day. If you’re over 30 and/or overweight, then likely not.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/08/22 08:47 PM
2

I’d disagree on both of those points. Most men would be more attracted to a girl if they found out she’s a virgin, while women would likely feel conceded and question the man if they find out he’s a virgin. Women are attracted to experienced men, while men are attracted to inexperienced women. And you can absolutely tell a woman’s body count… Not necessarily an exact count, but there are subtle signs that indicate whether a woman is ran through (even when she pretends not to be).
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/22 04:31 AM
3

It’s different for men than it is for women. A promiscuous man has a higher sexual market value, while a promiscuous woman has a lower sexual market value. This is why men are interested in a woman’s past (is she ran through), while women are interested in a man’s future (can he provide). It’s designed by nature.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/22 04:07 AM
14

Technological advancement and chemicals in our environment are the primary to reasons for these developments. 1) Testosterone amongst men is dropping at an increasing rate, and has dropped over 25% in the last 20 years alone. Abundant use of endocrine disrupters (many of which are estrogen mimickers) in our toiletry products (namely laureth sulfate and laurel sulfate, and 4 others), is causing lower sex drive amongst men, and earlier puberty age among women. 2) Technology has made the world smal…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/22 04:37 AM
2

Indeed, he was annoying to listen to, especially when shouting during normal conversations, but indeed that doesn’t justify marginalizing/censoring him.
/r/ExRedPill23/08/22 09:33 AM
0

Thank you for downvoting all of my comments, I hope it makes you feel more accomplished. And my feelings are not hurt at all, nice attempt at gaslighting though. You just keep proving my point… IT DOESN’T MATTER WHO IS RIGHT. That’s the point. Everyone deserves a voice, even those you have deemed to be marginalized. “Hate speech around the world is not to be tolerated” is a clear confession of your bigotry. And that’s where we differ… I tolerate everyone, even people I disagree with… and if some…
/r/ExRedPill23/08/22 09:14 AM
0

When they rip out your tongue, it’s because they are afraid of what you might say.
/r/ExRedPill23/08/22 08:20 AM
0

You think “game” is based on lying to women? And using your logic of action and victim… Wouldn’t people you destroy be victims of your actions? But that’s okay because you are the righteous one? Thanks for proving my point.
/r/ExRedPill23/08/22 08:12 AM
0

Ok, so when your logic is deconstructed, you resort to SIGN language? (shaming, insult, guilt and need to be right) You’re still missing the point. Your tactics are exactly what the Nazi party did in the 1930’s when they burned books they didn’t like once they deemed them as “hate speech.” Where YOU come from is not where others may come from, but they’re not okay because YOU say so? So you destroy them? You don’t see how that’s a slippery slope? If you believe someone is hurting others, why not…
/r/ExRedPill23/08/22 08:09 AM
1

That’s YOUR opinion, that’s the point. And generalizing all “Red Pillars” so you can justify being prejudiced against a certain group of people is also okay because it’s based on YOUR view of what’s right and wrong? Again, what’s endgame? Everyone is homogeneous, thinks exactly the same, otherwise they can get cancelled, downvoted, destroyed because your way is superior? You know how else wanted that?
/r/ExRedPill23/08/22 06:46 AM
1

Do you not see how Andrew Tate (for example - whom I don’t support btw) could say the exact same thing? He is “paying the price” for the viewpoints being spread about him (factual or not). What’s the endgame? Everyone kills/cancels each other? Why not welcome diversity with open discourse? Share ideas, agree to disagree at the very worst?
/r/ExRedPill23/08/22 05:13 AM
2

I’ll never understand the mentality to want to destroy/cancel people just because I have a different worldview. Doing so would be bigoted.
/r/ExRedPill23/08/22 03:55 AM
1

This is how most women are, the let’s the bad boy blow their backs outs… Then find the beta nice guy to pay the bills and introduce to their family.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/22 06:58 PM
0

You have to understand that a man can give a women TWO types of attention: Sexual attention (based on how you look) and commitment attention (based on how behave). Most men will eagerly smash ugly, overweight women if presented with the opportunity to do so because attaining sex for most men is much more difficult than for women. The longer you wait, the more resentment = Higher chances he’ll dump you afterward, unless you have a really good personality.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/22 06:54 PM
1

Women control access to sex, while men control access to relationships/marriage and long term resources. The human mating dance is where women leverage sex for resources (money, love/commitment, attention, validation, etc), and men leverage said resources to try to get sex. “Love and relationship” happens when both parties are satisfied with their value exchange.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/22 03:04 PM
0

Ahh okay, so men can still answer, though? Right? Or no? How to reply under the Automod?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/22 09:11 AM
0

Could you clarify? Did I do something wrong?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/22 09:04 AM
1

Well, you’re not wrong, but eating sugar is absolutely unnecessary, while avoiding carbs will help stay in caloric deficit. And avoiding both will help with battling insulin resistance.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/22 08:19 AM
1

Right. I’d argue it would solve a vast majority of any personal or dating problem a woman could be having.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/22 04:27 AM
1

There are no genetics that prevent you from getting in shape. Period. And respectfully, height is a horrible example; men can’t control height… women can control weight.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/22 04:26 AM
1

And to address your post further, it’s actually super rare for a woman to ever disclose why she is rejecting a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/22 03:55 AM
1

You mean losing weight and getting healthy wouldn’t solve everything?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/22 03:54 AM
1

Go to the gym Not trying to be rude, just being honest.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/22 03:45 AM
2

Lol attacking the person, not the argument, is a clear admittance of losing the argument. Feel free to actually write something of substance, otherwise gtfoh 😘
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/22 03:06 AM
2

Actually, none of what I wrote is cynicism. All men who have abundant sexual access, play those options. The ones who can’t, turn their necessity into a virtue and call it faithfulness.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/22 02:43 AM
4

Save your breath bro, they probably live in a rom-com Disney fairytale land where men are capable of being sexually satisfied by one woman. She is in her 20’s, and probably doesn’t realize that men are only as faithful as their options, and will always sleep around if given the opportunity. At least he is being honest with her. Respect to him. If she wants sexual monogamy/loyalty, she should secure an average height, middle class man, who is desperate enough to stay loyal to her. All successful/…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/22 02:18 AM
1

You need a source to clarify that sleeping around with multiple men lowers the chances of any one of those men being the father? Do you need a lesson on how probabilities work? Or is it the part about majority of world cultures throughout world history prioritizing virginity before marriage? This is a novel concept to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/22 06:40 PM
1

Maximize every trait you can control… Physique, knowledge, wealth, game, frame.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/22 06:31 PM
1

Well, I'm flattered to hear that I remind you of you daddy ;) but, simply put... You are not correct. Respectfully, your "lawyer husband" doesn't know what he is talking about, and unless he is an insurance salesman (or licensed to do so), he isn't any more qualified to speak on this than you or me. Insurance policies have evolved a lot in the last several years, and no longer require individual plans within the same household (even if unmarried) to get on family plans. Literally everything else…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/22 05:53 PM
1

So, prior to DNA testing… How could a man determine if the child was actually his? Meanwhile, if your woman slept around with multiple partners, this increased the likelihood that any child she had was not yours. That’s why throughout every culture/religion in world history, men preferred to marry virgins. What part are you missing?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/22 02:55 PM
1

Oh, and which part did I make up? And you snooped into my profile to check other posts? You’re too cute. I’m flattered 🥰
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/22 08:02 AM
1

Well, your healthcare response doesn’t apply (or outdated). Unmarried biological, step-children and/or adopted children are all eligible for TRICARE (military insurance) until age 21 (or 23 if in college). Unmarried partner/parent can also quality. This goes both ways men/women, even if you are pregnant and unmarried. Getting angry is a typical response I receive when asking this very simple question. Next is response is typically SIGN language (shaming, insults, guilt, need to be right), or rag…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/22 12:57 AM
1

Decisions can be made via Medical Power of Attorney, it’s one simple document. Extra paperwork for parentage is simple and quick. Healthcare has changed a lot in the last 5-7yrs. Now most healthcare/insurance policies allow unmarried partners and kids to be covered. And respectfully, you are mentioning benefits to the woman… Still haven’t mentioned a single one that would benefit the man.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/22 12:18 AM
1

Respectfully all of those are nonsense, and can very easily be achieve without a government contract. What estate does the average 18yr old have? Hospitals will always allow loved ones to visit, no marriage license required. Parentage can easily be established with birth certificate (courts always support living parent). Marriage license is not required to share healthcare, this has been proliferated even more due to unmarried same sex couples (which applies to hetero couples as well). Any benef…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/22 11:57 PM
1

Agreed, but at that point… Why involve the government into your relationship/union? What is the benefit of doing that? As opposed to living happily together otherwise?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/22 10:37 PM
-1

Why would a well off 40yr old ever want to marry an 18yr old? Respectfully… Why buy the cow, if he can get the milk for free?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/22 07:26 PM
1

Picture finding out on your wedding day that your soon-to-be husband had a stint in the porn industry when he was 18-19yrs old, and recorded some sex scenes having sex with 3 or 4 girls simultaneously. You might be surprised/shocked, but likely wouldn’t call off the wedding. Now picture if a man found out that their soon-to-be wife had a similar stint at 18-19yr old, having sex with 3-4 men simultaneously… Wedding is off, sweetheart. It’s an extreme/unlikely scenario, but illustrates how differe…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/22 07:06 PM
2

Exactly. Most women don’t care about a man’s body count, and are rather attracted to experience, as they look toward a man’s future. It’s men who are typically more concerned with a woman’s body count, as they prefer less experience, and look at a woman’s past. From an evolutionary standpoint, committing to a promiscuous woman is not a safe bet for a man. While a promiscuous man must be in the top percentile to be able to have sexual abundance, hence women are drawn to him.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/22 06:37 PM
6

True, it seems like it shouldn’t matter to us, but in reality it does matter much more to men. Just like women look toward a man’s future for compatibility, men look at a women’s past. Further, the more accomplished and successful a woman becomes, the more difficult it will be for her to find a partner; as her pool of candidates gets smaller (women tend to date up), she prices herself out of the dating market. This is partly why Morgan Stanley forecasts that 45% of working age women (age 25-44) …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/22 09:07 AM
2

Oops I misspoke, I meant to write 40% *aren’t able to reproduce (so 60% have children), while 80%+ of women have children. https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/library/publications/2019/demo/P70-162.pdf https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr113.pdf
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/22 08:56 AM
4

Indeed, median is more resistant to outliers, but not impervious. If the mean was used, it would show that women have far more partners than women. I’d imagine that the men who have 15+ partners are just having casual sex, and these are the men who are in the top 10%-20% in terms of attractiveness, who’s partners are all across the board on the women’s side.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/22 08:53 AM
13

Women have more partners at every tier (almost tied for 10-14), except the highest tier (15+), where men’s partners far outnumber the women’s. This is enough to skew the median datapoint toward men overall, but in actuality, it’s only a small percentage of men who have more partners than the average woman. It would be really interesting to feed this data through Stata software and run a few analytical regression models to narrow these results down even further.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/22 08:20 AM
19

You’re misinterpreting the data. The data shows that women do have more sexual partners than men overall. The median average data is skewed toward men because as the data shows, the men who have a lot of partners (15 or more), far outnumber the women. This makes sense. Sexual access is difficult for men (easy for women), so only the top tier men have true sexual abundance. Women date up, they all aim for the cream of the crop (aim for strongest and brightest), therefore those top tier men have t…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/22 08:05 AM
8

Just like women look toward a man’s future to measure compatibility, most men look toward a women’s past.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/22 12:17 AM
8

Things would be better if women had an indicator of how many sexual partners they’d had in their past.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/22 11:02 PM
2

Thank you. Exactly right!
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/22 11:33 PM
1

Well, anything is possible; I’m talking about what is probable. Postpartum depression typically only lasts a few days. Some research suggests it’s related to hormones balancing out after the hormonal rollercoaster of pregnancy. Usage of antidepressants increased by a staggering 65% in just 15yrs, and women are twice as likely as men to use them, while married women are less likely to report symptoms of depression than unmarried women. Meanwhile, the median age of marriage is steadily trending up…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/22 11:29 PM
-1

Hmm, well I disagree. Women don’t need to look for sex. It’s easy for them to attain, even with men far out of their league comparatively. However, they strive to find commitment. And if you look into what brings women deepest happiness/fulfillment, it is bearing and raising children. And during the same time frame that women have been told to pursue their careers/adventures instead of family life (at the cost of squandering their peak opportunity to secure a man), the usage of antidepressants/p…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/22 11:01 PM
1

I said “throughout world history.” Finding a virgin who is ready for commitment in modern times would be quite unlikely. That’s the paradox women face. Hence, why rate of marriage is falling, and more women are increasingly unable to find a man: Morgan Stanley forecasts that 45% of all working age women (25-44) will be alone by 2030. This is unprecedented. But yes, you are right… From an evolutionary stand point, having sex with a woman will ultimately lower her market value in relation to other…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/22 10:49 PM
5

No. I’m saying that increasing the amount of partners a woman has, lowers her sexual market value to be considered for long term commitment. I know this is a tough pill to swallow for most women, but men like promiscuous women for sex, we just don’t wife them .
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/22 10:36 PM
6

The more partners a woman has had, the less attractive she will be (for commitment, not sex), especially to men who have the option/ability to attract a woman with less “mileage.” Ask any man… If they had the option to choose from two identical women to commit to, one having more previous partners, most men would choose the one with less partners. Women know this is inherently true, hence why most women get uncomfortable/apprehensive when asked how many men they’ve slept with, yet no matter how …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/22 10:28 PM
4

Of course sex itself does not devalue women; simply put, having more partners lowers their market value for long term relationship. Men don’t wife s-l-u-t-s (for lack of a better term). And yes, women do go for the strongest and brightest. Ask any woman, they will likely consider themselves as above average, and will likely believe they deserve an above average man. Women date up.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/22 10:13 PM
11

Of course. A promiscuous/experienced woman is not safe bet for man to commit to, since from an evolutionary perspective, there is a much lower chance that the baby will actually be his. This why throughout world history, in every culture/religion… Men preferred to only marry virgins, it was the only way to truly be sure that the baby was his.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/22 09:30 PM
6

Incorrect. Sexism is a form of asymmetry; asymmetrical aspects exist all throughout nature by evolutionary design. Women’s mating strategy is completely different from men; women choose the strongest and the brightest (quality/commitment), while men are designed to spread their seed (quantity/sex). Hence, women control access to sex. Men control access to commitment/relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/22 07:35 PM
17

Promiscuous women lose sexual market value, while promiscuous men gain sexual market value. It’s unfair, it’s a double standard, but nature is sexist and immoral. This is why women are picky (for sex), and men screw anything that has a pulse (while being picky with who they commit to).
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/22 07:02 PM
107

Women are offered sex everywhere they go ever since they hit puberty. It’s less important because it’s easy to attain.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/22 04:43 PM
0

Marriage should be prioritized at your peak attractiveness, which is different for men and women. https://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/showthread.php?t=2633989
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/22 09:19 AM
2

How many babies can a woman make per year: 0001 How many babies can a man make per year: 1,000? Men and women have completely different mating strategies. Men want quantity (spread our seed), while women want quality (find one strong protector/provider). 10,000yrs of evolution is still influencing our behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/22 04:27 AM
2

I never said women are in the wrong, it is just the way society has evolved, especially in recent times due to social media. Most women consider themselves over average, and therefore all aim for the top 20%, yet don’t know what men actually want, hence why so many of them increasingly end up alone (as proven by marriage/divorce statistics and forecasts). Also, the higher above average a man is, the more options he will have, therefore he will play the field, hence why that top 20% is able to at…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/22 05:00 PM
0

Average women believe they deserve above average men. Therefore, average men are invisible to average women. This is why, according to forecasts by Morgan Stanley, 45% of all working age women (25-47) will be alone/single by 2030. This is unprecedented, and moving higher as feminism continues to mislead women, and kill chivalry and traditional relationship roles.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/22 01:50 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter