TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

70sJungleBush Archive

View 0 posts and 280 comments by 70sJungleBush on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

Damn. Guess that while believe all women thing was bullshit then.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/26 05:40 PM
–

I mean the videos are definitely real. You’re saying they’re just lying?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/26 05:09 PM
0

Tell that to all the videos I’ve seen of women complaining that no one hit on them at the gym in their cute outfits even when they were trying to flirt. Make up your minds ladies.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/08/26 02:33 PM
1

What a waste of time then.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/26 01:43 AM
1

Hard disagree. I think anyone behaving like that is obviously not all there mentally. No degree required to determine that. I suppose you’d need a plumber to tell you your toilet was clogged before you’d stop using it? Why did you offer actually being talked to by demons as a potential explanation when you don’t even believe theyre real? You can literally never prove a negative. I suppose you also believe there could be a Flying Spaghetti Monster who created the universe and human life? Ya know,…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/26 07:40 PM
1

And you wouldn’t call deriving enjoyment from that activity and making people uncomfortable in that manner a strong sign of mental illness along with believing you’re in communication with demons? Basically all the other options you have seem like symptoms of mental illness. So now you believe in actual demons? You’re trying to shift the subject. You asked for proof and I gave you a reasoned and logical explanation for my position. Please do the same.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/26 07:23 PM
1

Gender dysphoria is in fact a mental illness listed in the DSM 5. So just calling something what it isn’t is hate speech to you? Does that apply to everything or only transsexuals? There never really was much of a discussion with you. Have a wonderful day.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/26 07:01 PM
1

I understand perfectly well. But it does depend on how you yourself understand it. If it means social roles or stereotypes historically associated with each sex, then “gender identity” simply tracks conformity to those stereotypes. Declaring oneself the opposite gender is then just preference for the opposite set of stereotypes. Not a new ontological category. If it means an internal, subjective sense of self, it is unfalsifiable private experience. Private experience does not alter gametes, chr…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/26 05:45 PM
0

I don’t think anybody is entitled to anything really. You can keep your time and friendship lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/26 05:16 PM
1

A female is a woman and a male is a man. Gender and sex are the same thing essentially. Just because a man puts on a dress and a wig does not mean he suddenly becomes a woman. Please answer my question about the person who wants to cut off their perfectly healthy arm. Are they in their right mind?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/26 04:25 PM
1

The question isn’t a dodge. It’s the same logic transsexuals use. They identify as something they are not, and are willing to cut off healthy body parts because of it. You just won’t answer the question because you know it destroys your position. Ok then. Humans are a gonochoric species. Individuals produce either small gametes, sperm, or large gametes, ova. No third gamete type exists. Thus we are binary. Prove me wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/26 03:49 PM
1

I don’t believe it is “hate speech” to acknowledge reality. But can you define “hate speech” for me?
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/26 03:46 PM
1

I didn’t make the claim. The vast overwhelming majority of human history and knowledge states as much. It’s on you to prove it wrong as you disagree with a consensus that has stood the test of time for thousands of years. Sex and gender are the same. Women are females and men are males. You cant even define the difference yourself or at least you refuse to attempt to. You don’t need to engage deeply with the concept. It’s readily apparent. And it isn’t scarcely examined. It’s been examined for t…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/26 04:01 AM
1

There are only two genders. Man and woman. Prove me wrong. Provide your evidence for it. And it classifies transsexuals as mentally ill. Which they are. Any man who wants to cut off his non diseased penis is mentally ill. Would you say that a person with two fully functional and non diseased arms who wants to cut one off because they identify as a one armed person is within their right mind? Please provide the distinction between the two. Because regardless of what you identify as, you’re still …
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/26 03:35 AM
0

No, I’m arguing that every time period has its freaks with wrong ideas that should be stigmatized. These “gender diverse” people were always wrong in every time period. It’s not unsupported. Even the DSM5 classifies transsexuals as mentally ill. It’s not unsupported that “gender diverse” people are in fact one gender, man or woman, despite their claims. See all of the science we call biology. There is literally hundreds of years of research and mountains of evidence supporting this.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/26 03:23 AM
1

lol ok.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/26 03:19 AM
2

I don’t believe anyone in this conversation is angry. I am certainly quite calm. At no point have I sworn at, insulted, or gone on an all caps rant against anyone taking part in the conversation. Acknowledging truth and reality is not hate. I can accept that others have different idea. It does not make their ideas correct though. There is in fact only one truth. Not my truth and your truth. I also noticed you didn’t even try and contend with my argument. If you are so sure it’s wrong, then prove…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 09:02 PM
5

Agreed
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 08:58 PM
2

Your doctorate doesn’t change the definition of sex. Sex in humans is defined by the type of gamete the reproductive system is organized to produce. Sperm = male, ova = female. There is no third gamete. That is the binary. The Scientific American piece you linked does not claim otherwise. It catalogs developmental variations, DSDs, mosaicism, and gene network complexity in how sex is determined and how secondary traits can vary. Those are real. They do not create additional sexes. Claire Ainswor…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 08:58 PM
2

Should be easy for you to answer and explain then.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 07:59 PM
2

Biology does not support the existence of more than two sexes in humans. Sociology, anthropology, and psychology suffer from such an extreme replication crisis that they might as well be pseudoscience.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 07:23 PM
–

New* Intersex is not some kind of third gender. They don’t have some third category of gamete. They are in fact the exception that proves the rule. Trans people are literally mentally ill according to the DSM5. I believe they can change their gender as much as I believe the schizophrenic is communicating with aliens and demons.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 04:59 PM
1

Romans also knew it was a bunch of lunatics spouting nonsense. A lot of them had people who claimed to be gender diverse. There’s always been freaks, weirdos, and mentally ill people. It just wasn’t adopted and believed by a sizable segment of society until recently. And it doesn’t mean it’s actually true. They were all still either a man or a woman even if they claim to be something else. If I claim to be a cat, am I a cat? If I’m white and I claim to be black, am I black?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 04:57 PM
3

If I get banned for telling the truth so be it.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 04:52 PM
3

It is new for it to be a widespread idea. You’ve claimed 3 ancient cultures had examples. What are these examples? What about the thousands of cultures that don’t have examples? I am not from the 70s.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 03:14 PM
3

Just because we’ve known that there are only two genders for a long time doesn’t make it outdated. We’ve also know the Pythagorean theorem for a long time. Still just as applicable today.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 02:20 PM
0

There are not traditionally tons of genders. There are two.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 01:43 PM
3

Because there is no argument to be had
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 12:35 AM
3

Disagree
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/26 12:10 AM
1

The term non-binary only exists because it is in fact binary. And they are still either a man or woman even if they claim not to be. How can someone be both? That seems completely incoherent.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 11:07 PM
6

What are genders C and D?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 10:30 PM
1

No. We do not.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 05:53 PM
1

I didn’t and you do not know how quotes work
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 04:26 AM
–

Yeah it kinda went crazy earlier and said it wasn’t posting then posted like 3 times. Thats my bad
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/26 12:35 AM
1

I never made that deflection. I gave you a direct answer. Just pointed out that women pester men all the time by your definition. I’m also not sure you know how quotes work because I never said that.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 10:19 PM
–

Nails and hair sure for my wife I would. Never surgeries.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 10:03 PM
1

It wasn’t apparent as you already argued they’re the same scenario. So in your third scenario, he’s just supposed to read her mind or he’s a rapist? He could just be inexperienced and not know she isn’t being super enthusiastic as long as she’s going through the motions. It wouldn’t be rape because she wouldn’t have sex with him in that scenario. She would go to the police who would go arrest him because blackmailing someone into sex under the threat of death is very much illegal.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 09:52 PM
–

I didn’t have a problem answering the question.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 09:48 PM
–

You did refuse to answer as that is not what I asked. If someone is mildly annoying you, are you justified to respond with deadly force? Because you are justified to do so if they’re threatening to kill you with a gun. I would say no, you are not justified to use deadly force to stop someone from mildly annoying you as these are vastly different scenarios. I agree that if a man says have sex with me or get shot with a gun pointed at her head, and a woman says yes, she has not consented. There is…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 08:33 PM
2

You did refuse to answer as that is not what I asked. If someone is mildly annoying you, are you justified to respond with deadly force? Because you are justified to do so if they’re threatening to kill you with a gun. I would say no, you are not justified to use deadly force to stop someone from mildly annoying you as these are vastly different scenarios. I agree that if a man says have sex with me or get shot with a gun pointed at her head, and a woman says yes, she has not consented. There is…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 08:31 PM
2

You did refuse to answer as that is not what I asked. If someone is mildly annoying you, are you justified to respond with deadly force? Because you are justified to do so if they’re threatening to kill you with a gun. I would say no, you are not justified to use deadly force to stop someone from mildly annoying you as these are vastly different scenarios. I agree that if a man says have sex with me or get shot with a gun pointed at her head, and a woman says yes, she has not consented. There is…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 08:31 PM
2

”But you agree that saying yes to avoid a negative consequence does NOT mean it’s consent.” I do not agree to that as it is written. I think that is a far more nuanced discussion than you are making it out to be. The degree of negative consequence is not irrelevant. I know that, because you refused to answer me when I asked if being mildly annoyed justified deadly force against the person annoying you. Of course the degree of negative consequence matters.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 08:04 PM
–

Being asked a question is not in the same universe of level of consequence as being shot in the head. One involves death and the other involves mild annoyance. Following your line of reasoning, if someone is mildly annoying you, should you be allowed to respond with deadly force? Because you are claiming they’re the same scenario.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 07:46 PM
–

Oh, then women pester men all the damn time. To see if she changed her mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 07:30 PM
–

No. But that is nowhere near the scenario presented by OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 07:29 PM
–

“If a man asks a woman to have sex 10 times and the woman says "no" 9 times before finally saying "yes" on the 10th, did she consent?” That was the only question OP asked. The answer is yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 07:28 PM
–

Ok well, the question in the post was, “did she consent?” Seems like we agree.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 06:35 PM
–

I didn’t. I literally answered you directly. Go back and read what you responded to. Then please define pestering as that was not included in your original question.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 06:32 PM
–

I agree with everything you said. It in no way means that she didn’t consent though.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 06:32 PM
–

I wouldn’t personally, no. But that doesn’t change the fact that they consented…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 06:31 PM
–

Define pestering. Because he wanted to have sex with her. Why did she say yes if she didn’t want?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 05:21 PM
–

Yes. She consented on the tenth. How is it not consent?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/07/26 05:08 PM
7

Men dismiss older women if they want to start a family. Men dismiss trans women because they aren’t attracted to men. Men dismiss disabled women because it will make life and a relationship much more difficult. There are many men who are attracted to fat chicks, myself included.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/26 04:51 PM
–

So in other cases where there is a group based on immutable characteristics that is disproportionately committing violent crimes, you would also leap to biology as the explanation?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/26 05:10 PM
–

No you asked, “Which women do men (you) like/love more? Women who give them (you) sex, or women they (you) are in a ltr/marriage with?” The only thing I know in this scenario is some woman gave me sex and another woman was good enough to fall in love with and marry and still have sex with. Obviously I love the one I chose to marry far more.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 06:58 PM
1

In this scenario I’m guaranteed to get laid at least once a month with a woman I love otherwise I wouldn’t marry her. Some random woman who just gives me sex at unspecified intervals which could be never isn’t loved at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/26 06:20 PM
0

There’s not even a debate to be had here. You are obviously wrong. There are literally billions of men throughout history who have remained loving and committed partners through decades of a marriage that only ended when one partner died.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/26 12:59 PM
1

What makes you think you should have all the rights listed? Or why anyone should have them? Where do you think rights come from? Also, red pill did not decide who is and isn’t a woman. Biology did that a long time ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 05:45 PM
–

No you absolutely do not have to be comfortable with it. You can leave because of it at any point.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/07/26 05:42 PM
3

I disagree entirely. First, certain economic principles can definitely be applied to dating, relationships, and sex. Second, you say these men are exploiting the poor women. Why is it not the beautiful women who are exploiting these otherwise romantically unsuccessful men? How is it imperialism? My understanding is that imperialism is usually not completely voluntary.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/26 05:11 PM
0

Yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/26 04:03 PM
1

What exact controls are correct and how did they play into your conclusion that men are biologically more violent than women? I’ll need an exhaustive list of what you think would qualify data as legitimate to be able to get you what you need to be convinced.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/26 07:48 PM
–

KC Johnson & Stuart Taylor Jr., The Campus Rape Frenzy: The Attack on Due Process at America’s Universities (Encounter Books, 2017): Book-length analysis of post-2011 federal guidance pressuring universities to adopt victim-centered procedures that sacrificed due process; extensively covers alcohol-related cases where incapacitation standards and low proof burdens led to findings against accused men on thin evidence. Samantha Harris & KC Johnson, “Campus Courts in Court: The Rise in Judicial Inv…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/26 06:01 PM
–

I actually bet we do see it across multiple societies with regard to race. If I can provide you data to back that up, would you admit that outsized crime by blacks across multiple societies points to a pretty major biological factor?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/26 05:51 PM
–

So then why do you jump straight to biology when talking about men but you provide excuses and confounding factors when it’s race?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/26 05:30 PM
0

Idk I haven’t tried. I was using the same logic as the post I responded to.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/26 05:29 PM
–

It is definitely a mainstream feminist opinion. It’s how most universities and a lot of the judicial system actually operate.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/26 05:22 PM
–

I mean if women can’t consent to sex when drunk because they cant understand their actions and potential consequences……then why do we pursue any crime anyone commits while intoxicated? I mean if her judgement is impaired due to alcohol, but mine is as well, then I’m good to have sex with her right? Because I’m also impaired and can’t use my judgement right? The logic of the entire position on being unable to consent or be responsible for your actions while intoxicated is fucking ridiculous. Eith…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/26 05:21 PM
–

Do you think the huge difference in rates of violence between blacks and whites in America points to a pretty major biological factor as well?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/26 05:11 PM
1

That’s not really an argument. I can just say no they don’t. I’ve offered as much as you have with that statement, which is nothing. They can definitely be in their feminine as a mother but I wouldn’t describe that as carefree. Agreed. Agreed. Agreed. I kind of agree with everything you’ve said except the first point. You’re right. Dumb and loyal women are in fact the best. I’ll do damn near everything for you if you’ll just be loyal and easy to get along with and occasionally think I’m funny an…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/26 05:36 PM
0

How are you defining mature?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/26 05:22 PM
1

How much money we talking?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 05:44 PM
2

Oh it must be so difficult to be a pretty girl and just have members of the opposite sex actually approach you and want to take you out on dates and pay for things for you and be willing to provide for your entire life so you never have to work again if you don’t want to. Yeah that sounds way worse than what I got lol
/r/PurplePillDebate16/06/26 05:40 PM
2

Just because they feel like they have no other option doesn’t mean they actually have no other option though. Those are two completely different activities. The penalties for buying a personal use amount of drugs vs dealing drugs are wildly different for a reason. Because they’re two completely different activities with completely different potential consequences. Same as watching porn vs creating it. Two completely different activities with completely different potential consequences. Same as s…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 07:27 PM
2

I don’t think there are any circumstances where a woman has to willingly become a prostitute or porn star….there are plenty of poor women out there who don’t become prostitutes or pornstars. What specific circumstances are you referring to? It’s not a contradiction. Watching porn vs creating it are two completely different activities.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 06:29 PM
2

Not actively trying to date. Not on dating apps. Not asking out women in real life. Would never try to find a partner in the cesspool that is Reddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 05:26 PM
1

I don’t think women are capable of solving male loneliness or sexual frustration. Obviously I don’t think there should be a “moral obligation” as I don’t even think it’s possible for them to do. Not sure where that morality would even come from.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/26 12:57 PM
–

Ok, good to know. I’m not so sure about that claim. I’ve never spoken with a man with a strong opinion on keeping it illegal honestly. I’ve spoken with several libertarians who are very adamant all voluntary transactions should be legal. Most libertarians I’ve met also just so happen to be men. But I don’t have any sources to cite so I’m not super committed to that position. I think the majority of women would vote against it. The issue is that just because some people get away with a crime does…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 07:58 PM
–

Ok you didn’t really answer. Would you support legalizing prostitution nationwide? Well some get away with it. Obviously there are plenty of people who commit crimes and never get caught. But they’re still paying for sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 07:42 PM
3

I didn’t ask you to explain why. The only question I asked was, can we not have parades of naked dudes sucking and fucking in the streets please?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 07:11 PM
–

Yeah that’s not really a feasible solution for all the horny lonely men in America to congregate in one location with a max of a couple dozen courtesans. Would you be in favor of legalizing it nationwide if it came to a vote? Nah the whole point is you’re paying for the sex. Maybe companionship as well, but not without putting 20 toes at the end of the bed. There are plenty of women all around that will be your friend and hangout with you. They just won’t touch your wiener.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 07:09 PM
–

At least in America, that’s illegal outside of a couple very select locations. Maybe you should start a campaign to be the change you want to see in the world. Other than that though, I completely agree with you. Professionals are the only women being honest and upfront.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 06:23 PM
2

Society does function best when the norms of conventional gender roles and heterosexual marriage are emphasized. Pride month is annoying as fuck honestly and people are getting sick of it. No one cares if you’re gay. But can we not have parades of naked dudes sucking and fucking in the streets please?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 05:37 PM
1

Do you have proof of a god or multiple gods existence?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 05:20 PM
3

I’m sure they’re out there. I believe it. We probably just really disagree in the percentages.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 01:22 PM
–

Agreed. I’m fully ready to admit there are some men out there that are horrible people. I’m just not sure why we can’t acknowledge that there are also some women out there that are horrible people. And most importantly, idk why we can’t all agree that most men AND women are decent people who are just trying their best even if they fuck up sometimes.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/26 02:55 AM
–

And what exactly are you basing that opinion on? A handful of personal experiences?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 09:38 PM
–

So you think most women are decent pleasant people. Do you think most men are decent pleasant people? Ask a bunch of divorced guys. There are plenty of women who will do far more than just mild gossip in an attempt to destroy your relationships with your family, friends, and children.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/06/26 08:24 PM
1

Ok
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/26 06:15 PM
4

I agree. There is essentially no benefit to men in getting married.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/26 05:15 PM
1

You never intended to have a good faith conversation. Have a wonderful day.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/26 05:11 PM
1

And what do reasonable people agree on in this scenario? Because there actually seems to be a lot of disagreement between reasonable people on all sorts of things.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/26 03:39 PM
1

Finally something thank god. That took forever holy shit. So there is no objectivity and it basically comes down to if a woman perceived it as sexual then it was?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/26 11:34 AM
1

This isn’t a relationship. This is a look from a stranger in public. You’re now resulting to personal insults because of your inability to explain your own rationale and logic.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/26 11:19 AM
1

If it’s so obvious then it should be really easy to explain and yet you just refuse to do so. It’s obvious that women don’t have or want an objective standard for these types of things so they can use them to bash men when convenient.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/26 11:03 AM
1

I have no idea what it is and apparently you don’t either because I’ve asked multiple times at this point and you either cannot or will not explain it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 09:34 PM
1

No. Still not my kid. I still won’t ever be her priority.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 03:26 PM
1

What makes it obviously sexual looking? You seem to think it’s very obvious but you can’t describe it at all so it must not be very obvious. Just reread the comments for the questions you haven’t answered. There mostly asking for actual definitions, standards, and explanations that you cannot or will not provide.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/06/26 03:25 PM
1

So the women who go at in nothing but a bra and skin tight spandex to the gym are getting upset because a man “sexually” glanced at them for a couple seconds in a mirror? How do they know it was sexual? How do you immediately tell the difference between a sexual glance and just a normal look? I also notice you aren’t actually answering anything I’m asking.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 08:55 PM
1

Ok so it’s different. What is the difference between the two looks? How do you know when one crosses into the other? Plenty of women are upset at men for just looking. There was no shortage of tik toks and social media posts where women tried to call guys out for looking at them in the gym or somewhere for literally two seconds. You can be offended all you want but you are just flat out wrong. Plenty of women get upset at men for just looking.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 07:07 PM
1

I’m not being disingenuous. I’m trying to understand the actual standard for this and you don’t seem to actually understand it either or there isn’t one and it’s just based on however someone feels at a given moment.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 05:30 PM
1

No one is a sexual predator for looking at someone.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 05:06 PM
1

Yeah but you can’t even explain how to do that or when it crosses into being a dick territory.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 04:00 PM
1

My point exactly. You can’t even explain it or understand without legal training.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 03:13 PM
2

And who is this reasonable person they use as a yardstick?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/06/26 11:20 AM
3

So then as long as they don’t notice it’s fine to look at them as long as you want? Ah, I see the word persistent is used. That indicates continuing an action over a period of time. So how long can you look at someone before it is leering?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/26 08:21 PM
5

So how long can you look before it becomes a stare? How do you define leering?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/26 07:08 PM
–

Do or don’t. We don’t care.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/26 06:55 PM
1

What is “grey area assault”?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/26 06:52 PM
4

Only place my eyes have ever been was inside my head. Never seen a human with them located on the outside. If you feel uncomfortable with people looking at you then you probably shouldn’t be dressing in provocative ways that will obviously draw attention to you….
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/26 06:26 PM
4

No it isn’t. It’s just saying that I think what you’re doing is wrong and my way is better. That’s not saying my will overrides yours. That would only be the case if I was actually trying to force them to do something against their will physically.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 05:42 PM
9

No. Completely disagree. You can definitely hold an opinion of what people should be doing without advocating force be used to compel them.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 05:24 PM
1

Never good faith lol
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 12:45 AM
1

lol. You never any intention of a good faith conversation. Starting it off with a lie was a great indicator of that.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 11:27 PM
1

What mirror image?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 09:00 PM
1

What discourse is to be had on something we can’t reference the source material on? And especially when the source material came from someone who doesn’t even believe what they wrote.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 07:50 PM
1

Because of the implication.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 06:03 PM
1

Apparently the mods disagreed with you as they removed your post lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 06:03 PM
1

Ah. So you don’t even believe your own post. It is in fact just shitposting.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 05:39 PM
1

Is this a shit post? Obviously straight men are not gay. That would be gay men. Are you straight or gay?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 05:31 PM
–

I’m fine with the logic used in the post. Just apply the same thing to women. If you’re a woman, you’re fit, well groomed, well dressed, have a job, and are mentally stable…you’re average. If you don’t meet those criteria you’re below average. All overweight women, below average. All women who don’t put a lot of time into their hair and makeup, below average. All women with a mental health condition, below average.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 02:44 PM
1

Humans are a species of animal. Here are some basic examples from biology literature. “Yes, in standard biological classification, humans (Homo sapiens) are animals.  Biologists place humans in the kingdom Animalia (along with all other multicellular, eukaryotic, heterotrophic organisms that typically ingest food and develop from a blastula stage). This is a foundational fact in taxonomy and introductory biology, based on shared traits like lack of cell walls, motility in at least one life stag…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 02:35 PM
1

You didn’t answer the question.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 02:20 AM
1

Still not sure what your point is. If humans aren’t animals then what are they?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 12:55 AM
–

Ok
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 12:55 AM
1

Ok
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 12:54 AM
1

Old way did seem to end up with higher marriage rates and higher birth rates so it’s hard to argue with results.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 12:30 AM
1

So do dogs? They’re still animals.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 12:08 AM
–

That’s not what I said. I just acknowledged your statement.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 12:08 AM
1

Just because it isn’t a legal defense doesn’t make it not true. I’m not sure what point you’re making?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/26 12:03 AM
–

Ok
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 11:58 PM
–

Ok but just because women don’t want to participate in the old system doesn’t mean it didn’t work better. Which is exactly what I’m saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 09:52 PM
–

That’s still only 1 data point on the person though. Just because both people say they’re on the app for the same reason doesn’t make them a good match.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 09:44 PM
3

We are animals. Why do you think we aren’t? What are we then? We have a lot of brain parts, yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 09:26 PM
–

I am serious. I think it’s a fairly good metric for successful relationships. I guess I don’t understand. How many other variables are there exactly? I am in fact trying to have a good faith conversation. That’s why I’m not talking down to you and acting like you’re a moron. Which seems to be your preferred method. To be clear, is this you attempting a good faith conversation? I would prefer less government. Not more.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 09:25 PM
–

Well, the divorce rates for eharmony were much lower than the overall average so agree to disagree. You’re never going to remove the incentive for a business to turn a profit….
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 09:05 PM
-1

Yes
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 08:54 PM
1

I mean, I feel like you left out that there was a couple billion years of biology that made a lot of male mammals crave sex….
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 08:53 PM
–

I don’t think anyone argues that meeting a partner online is inherently bad. I think they all argue the same thing you’re saying which is currently, online dating as it exists is a bit broken for most people. They’re designed to maximize engagement. Not get you into a relationship and off the app. It was eharmony or match that actually used to have really good results for getting people into long term relationships. But they also had like a 100-200 item questionnaire that people filled out and t…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 08:49 PM
1

Ok
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 07:05 PM
1

I wouldn’t be attracted to men period. If I suddenly became a woman then I’d still be attracted to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 05:43 PM
–

Idc about any of that. I didn’t do any of that to you and I have never done that to any women. So for you to treat me like I have with absolutely zero proof in a day and age where a simple accusation could ruin my entire life…..yeah I’m out dawg. That’s why men view it as a big deal. I may not expect strangers to be nice to me but I also don’t expect them to react in a completely non proportional way to me asking them a basic question or introducing myself. Especially when it could lead to job l…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 05:42 PM
2

Just out of curiosity. How many genders are there? How many sexes are there? Speaking specifically about humans of course.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 05:33 PM
1

Any proof of that?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 05:31 PM
1

Absolutely not holy god. Left leaning liberal women are insufferable. Not interested at all in a typical modern feminist. Hates capitalism? What better ideas does she have? No. I’m not waiting weeks. If you’re actually into me then why don’t you want to sleep with me? Clearly it’s not a moral issue for her. Earns how much less? How does she determine which chores are equal to others? What’s the value of each individual chore in this home labor economy? I’m fine with her preferring benevolent sex…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/26 05:27 PM
12

Rules: Be attractive. Don’t be unattractive. They tell you this on like day one of dating. Can’t believe ya missed the class.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 06:00 PM
0

What a completely useless non answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 05:56 PM
1

Never said they have it the same. Just said we can’t alter biology to somehow change it. You haven’t offered any solutions whatsoever. I wouldn’t still be talking to you if I didn’t care. “The idea you could do anything to improve the way women experience romantic relationships is ridiculous and unrealistic. Not a single thing comes to your minds” I think this is the bottom line. You can’t point to anything specific. You don’t even know what would sweeten the pot. I’ve been asking for specifics …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 05:18 PM
1

Interesting deflection. Can you just actually answer what I asked you though? Also, you’re framing this in the most disingenuous way possible. The child is also the woman’s lol. And she also chose to have it. And most women who do this say they love their child more than anything in the world and wouldn’t trade them for any amount of money. Another deflection with no answer. It was meant to be more of a general “you” but I apologize for any confusion. And I agree. That’s why I keep asking you qu…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 04:05 PM
1

Interesting. You think men should be spending more money on women? One follow up question. How much do you think it costs me to take a woman out to dinner and a movie? On childcare, what do you mean exactly? Because there is no shortage of very involved fathers. Not sure how we are supposed to speed up your recovery. Like I said, there are simply medical and technological limitations to what we can currently do. If we could just snap our fingers and have you fully recovered, we would. This isn’t…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 01:51 PM
3

Kylie Jenner and Alex Cooper? Those are the examples you’re gonna choose? That’s like saying you don’t see any issues with men’s dating because Leonardo DiCaprio and Cristiano Ronaldo have always done just fine lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 01:41 PM
1

I see that you listed pregnancy related concerns and I’m sorry, while men are capable of a lot of stuff, we don’t currently possess the knowledge or technology to completely change biology. Although, many men have worked very hard to make it a far safer experience than it used to be for both mother and child. Are you referring to the orgasm gap you mentioned? Please actually tell the man you’re with how to please you. It can change dramatically from woman to woman. Pretty much all dudes cum the …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 12:04 PM
1

So why don’t you help me and other men be less delusional and actually answer my questions so we can give you what you want?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/26 11:23 AM
2

Leave immediately.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 07:55 PM
2

No, I am not leaving. Because I don’t want anal anyways and idc that she tried something once and didn’t like it. It would only be a problem if it was something she had a pattern of doing over a period of time potentially with multiple people but now changes the game for me. Like if she always sucked her boyfriend’s dick every morning and did this across her last 5 boyfriends then tells me that she’s giving up blowjobs forever now that she’s with me…..then yeah I’m gonna have an issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 05:43 PM
-1

I’m sure it is for some. This whole comment chain seems to be completely ignoring the fact that there are indeed women who do enjoy it themselves though. It’s not all just dudes trying to humiliate women. I’ve had a girl ask for it completely unprompted by me.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 05:31 PM
6

If those are the only two options then yeah I would much rather not be alone. Even if she doesn’t put out.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/26 05:26 PM
3

I agree. I’m ok with no longer being her priority once we have kids. The kids will be my priority as well. And whatever has to happen to make sure they are healthy and happy is what we will do. Regardless of if it makes me personally happy or not. What I am not ok with, is literally never having that time where we are each other’s number 1 priority. Especially over some other guys kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/26 06:43 PM
6

So just to start off, men need to fix all of societies intimacy and reproduction issues……and that’s just the start. Did I understand that correctly? It still won’t be a sweet enough deal after that? What else will we have to do? Can you be more specific? What exact issues do you see with intimacy and reproduction that men need to fix? To answer your question though, no I do not. I actually think women have had some really sweet deals in the past but now they all seem to think it was all terrible…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 09:41 PM
2

It’s not a lie. It’s just only half the story. It will also be terrible for men. As populations are getting older and older while having less and less children, we will not have enough people to care for our elderly. We will not have enough people to maintain the infrastructure that enables modern life. All the young people that work at your favorite bars and restaurants serving you will be gone. These are just a few examples of what a declining population could lead to. So go ahead. Enjoy your …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 07:51 PM
8

What do you want from us? Honest question. You say we aren’t willing to sweeten the deal. What do you think would sweeten the deal enough to completely counter the growing trend of “fewer women dating, marrying, having children, having sex at all”?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 07:46 PM
2

No.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 07:42 PM
3

I can’t answer for most. But for me at least, yes I do.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 07:42 PM
7

🙄
/r/PurplePillDebate13/05/26 05:58 PM
–

I don’t even know what this is supposed to mean.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/26 08:02 PM
–

Ok
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/26 08:01 PM
–

You either didn’t read or didn’t comprehend my comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/26 08:01 PM
–

So just naked people walking around everywhere in public…..you don’t see any potential problems?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/26 08:00 PM
–

Eh there’s plenty that try to police thought.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/26 07:57 PM
-1

A woman who can’t relate to men’s issues?!?! I am Jack’s complete lack of surprise.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 07:40 PM
-1

So like when a female politician goes on the house floor and she’s pretty well endowed and apparently it’s pretty chilly on the house floor that day……..its my fault for seeing it and being turned on?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/26 07:31 PM
1

And you continued to talk about it after the topic changed and only now you have a problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/26 03:07 AM
1

Actually we are talking about normal looking now. Go reread the comments you’re responding to.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 09:43 PM
1

Once again. I’m not talking about just staring at people. You are intentionally mischaracterizing what I am saying yet again. No it’s not. It’s not part of typical manners to ask someone for permission to gaze upon them before starting a conversation. You must be a very strange and very scared person. I wish you the best but you clearly have no intention of engaging in a productive conversation as you ignore half of what I ask and intentionally mischaracterize the rest. Best of luck out there
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 09:33 PM
3

That’s not what I’m talking about. I never said “stare at strangers” and you are intentionally mischaracterizing what I actually said in an attempt to make it sound like something it’s not and something that I never said. You said you try not to look at anyone. Why? What gives you the right to look at them in the situation you mentioned? You didn’t get their consent so how is it different? Also, you didn’t answer most of what I asked you.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 08:42 PM
3

Wait a minute. This makes no sense. Do you just close your eyes during conversations? Do you just stare at the ground whenever you have to have a human interaction? Where do you look when you’re just walking in like a semi crowded place? Do you begin every conversation by asking for consent to view the other party you’re talking to? Honestly, how do you move through life trying to avoid looking at another person?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 08:19 PM
3

What gives you the right to look at anyone in anyway?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 08:03 PM
2

Ah, well you listed it in the same paragraph that started with “As for dates,”. Sure seemed like you were lumping it into the same category. If they asked, yeah.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 08:03 PM
2

Gets smaller everyday.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 08:00 PM
1

No it doesn’t stop her from doing her job. Just stopped her from being as fun to look at while she did it. Call it whatever you want. I just call it preference. Some guys like their woman to show off the goods, some don’t. I would just say wife material and everyone else. There’s plenty of women who aren’t whores but still aren’t wife material for various other reasons.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 07:59 PM
2

For now you can. Ok, but that doesn’t really change my point. I don’t want to post on insta. Having a girlfriend that doesn’t care about it either would be a huge plus. I actually do like to get out of the house a lot. We would go out and do a lot of fun stuff. Just not what people typically refer to as a “date”. Like come on, you listed hanging out with family as an example. I do that all the time but even when I have a gf to bring we do not refer to hanging out with our families as a “date”. I…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 07:55 PM
2

You didn’t actually read my response did you? “If she is convincing enough that I can’t tell the difference, then yeah I’m bringing her to work holiday parties and to meet my family.” You’re baking in a whole lot of assumptions. Who’s to say it won’t be able to “eat” so it can pass as human? Who’s to say there won’t be standard procedure for getting them on aircraft? We already have IDs for items. Titles, deeds, VINs. Genuinely, think this through.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 07:49 PM
2

I might be interested in one once they are convincing enough. It has absolutely nothing to do with making you or any other woman jealous though. Not everything is about you and women. Robot woman wouldn’t need dates. Just happy doing whatever we want together. Robot woman wouldn’t have this psychotic need to make our entire life public and posted on the internet for others to review and judge. If she is convincing enough that I can’t tell the difference, then yeah I’m bringing her to work holida…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 06:35 PM
1

Obviously incorrect as the entire premise was flawed from the beginning. A Hooters waitress primary function is to be a waitress. She could wear the outfit and be super hot and the guys might like to look at her, but if she isn’t serving food and beer and collecting payments then she will be fired shortly. Second, the waitress at hooters is not just interchangeable. We went to a Twin Peaks (same idea as a hooters but more common here), and when our waitress showed up fully clothed and about 8 mo…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 06:19 PM
1

Works great when you’re famous enough and rich enough though.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/26 06:07 PM
–

Why
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/26 10:44 PM
0

What is the hypocrisy exactly?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/26 12:23 PM
1

Your last sentence shows how little you comprehend. Have a long list of expectations and requirements, you’re controlling and weird. Very little expectations and open to new experiences, you’re an inexperienced virgin I won’t wast time on. I see both sides of the coin in this sub constantly.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/26 06:50 AM
2

I don’t think you know how quotes work. I never said that. But generally speaking, yes. If a girl is attractive to me, easy going, and has a similar sense of humor to me, then I’ll probably be down to at least go on a couple dates and see if we vibe. I’m not sure you’re understanding how much that list actually narrows it down for most men. The vast majority of women fall out of contention for most men based on the minimal criteria I have given you. Of course, we all have different definitions a…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/26 06:40 AM
22

“It’s weird so many guys are desperate for female attention, but they can’t even answer what type of women they want and why they want from them.” Sweet, easy to get along with, enjoys similar humor to me, physically attractive to me. I want this because it makes me happy. I’ve seen long term marriages around where this worked out extremely well for the couples in my own life. All available data says that a happy and well functioning relationship leads to a longer and happier life. Does that ans…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/26 05:00 PM
1

That’s not what OP said though.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/26 05:26 PM
1

Not all, but like 95%+ of all infrastructure is provided by men.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/26 05:25 PM
1

Yeah and when I was in the hospital those female nurses called a male nurse to come move me. I only weighed 200 at the time……not exactly a big ol guy. Either way, it’s still a job where 95%+ of their day isn’t hard physical labor. So why don’t they?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 08:21 PM
0

I’m not sure what your point is.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 06:16 PM
1

I literally never said every single individual person needs to get married.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 05:15 PM
1

Ok? I never said women needed to marry men…..
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 05:14 PM
1

Yeah, I mean I feel like this is old and common knowledge right?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 05:11 PM
0

It is still provided by men even if they are paid to provide it. They don’t pay as well generally.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 04:50 PM
1

Ok it seems we agree. Men and women do in fact need each other. Have a wonderful day
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 02:30 PM
0

They are provided by men. Why don’t women do them then?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 02:28 PM
-2

Precisely. At least not near to the extent that it is now.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 04:39 AM
0

Right but they also need things like power, roads, roof, and sewers…all of which are provided by men. Regardless of whether they marry or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 04:36 AM
-1

Oh I think a woman could do my job. My job doesn’t have that much to do with physical labor. It has nothing to do with complication. Mainly physical labor. Most average women pale in comparison to average men when it comes to physical labor. And infrastructure has a whole lot of physical labor.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 04:18 AM
1

Ok but you see how that distinction makes it a completely nonsensical statement correct?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 04:01 AM
2

Ok
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 04:00 AM
-2

I do.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 03:59 AM
1

I’m sorry but you’re full of shit. • Workforce participation: Before U.S. entry into WWI (around 1914–1917), women made up roughly 20–24% of the total labor force. During the war, their numbers grew modestly (to about 20–25% in manufacturing overall), with temporary gains in some war industries like aircraft (~19% women) or clerical/government roles—but they never approached dominating production.  • “Women’s war work” scale: Women filled some vacated jobs (e.g., railroads, streetcars, munition…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/26 03:58 AM
0

It’s only a problem because the initial premise is completely wrong. Women only think they no longer need men. See how long your infrastructure and society lasts without us.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/26 02:50 PM
–

Easy target. Fat men also get made fun of by men and women all the time. As far as your first paragraph, it basically comes down to saying the internet is mean. Like, duh. lol, I’ve called my fat male friends literally every insult you listed as an example of what men don’t call each other. I’ve heard multiple other men do it as well. As far as everything after that, congratulations. You managed to find an asshole in the internet.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/26 03:03 PM
3

I don’t think women should change anything. If yall are happy with the current status quo then by all means let it continue. I would say I definitely hear women complain about things in dating that they do in fact have control over. Like the approaching thing for instance. I’ve seen plenty of Tik Toks where a woman is at a club somewhere or even just walking down the street and complaining that no men are approaching them to hit on them. I’ve read multiple articles about singles events actually …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/26 05:19 PM
3

Gentleman, if sex is something you can’t go without and women seem to be driving you insane making your life worse instead of better, just start seeing professionals. It will be far cheaper in the long run and you don’t have to put up with any bullshit to bang them. Just a quick negotiation up front and you’re in the bedroom.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/26 05:13 PM
1

Ok, but he’s still in jail in England for a social media post after you lied and said not a single person is in jail for a social media post. Oh really? You’ll have to educate me on that. When did our president get sentenced to 18 months in jail or any jail time for a social media post? You’re talking about people on like visas? Yeah, they can be removed at any time for any reason. They are not citizens….they are guests. You can’t name a single right that men have in your country that women don’…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/26 04:52 PM
1

That’s a lie. Luke Yarwood. And that’s not even counting the people that are arrested and fined simply for having an opinion that your government doesn’t like. Citizens aren’t removed from the country for posting anything. Only illegal aliens (criminals) are removed. Not sure what your point is on it being written or enforced or whatever. You still haven’t listed any rights that men have in your country that women don’t. Which ones specifically don’t happen to men as often?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/26 04:14 PM
1

So not a single person is currently in jail for a social media post in the UK? None of the things you listed are rights or exclusive to women. Men also get raped. Men also get threatened with murder. Men also get stalked. Men also get harassed. Men also get trafficked. Men also suffer domestic abuse. Men do not have a right to an abortion. Try reporting domestic abuse from a woman as a man and see how seriously that is taken. You still haven’t listed any rights that men have in your country that…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/26 02:03 AM
1

Exactly. You guys are currently importing the third world as fast as you can it seems and the place is a shithole. You guys put more people in jail for social media posts than like Russia and China and it’s not even close…. I’m still curious though, what rights do men in England have that women in England do not?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 05:07 PM
1

Ah fair point. If you live in a third world shithole then yeah, rights may not be even. Fair enough and best of luck getting out of there.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 04:56 PM
1

Oh equal rights movement, ok. In America, what rights do men have that women do not have?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 04:53 PM
3

Ok
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 11:41 PM
4

Ok
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 11:06 PM
8

Same reason so many women are fat…. They eat too much.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 11:05 PM
13

Yes. You’ve noticed the double standard. It’s ok when women do it. It’s not ok when men do it. Make fun of a guy for being bald. No ones cares. Make fun of a woman having a bad hair day. You’re a horrible person. Make fun of a guy for his height. No one cares. Make fun of a woman for her weight. You’re a horrible person. Even though the guy has no control over his height and the woman has complete control over her weight. No one cares. Still a double standard. Make fun of a guy cause he has a sm…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/26 02:20 PM
1

I disagree. I think the majority of men know they want these things. They just don’t list them when asked because none of those things are going to be what gets a man to approach a woman because we don’t know if this particular woman possesses any of those qualities yet. Then it basically just comes down to the physical.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/26 06:04 PM
1

That still leaves plenty of room for some female votes.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 11:14 PM
3

I don’t even know how that’s supposed to be a good faith response to what I asked.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 09:14 PM
3

Birds aren’t real lady.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 07:39 PM
2

Those both sound like turning women away? How is that more efficient than at least giving a bunch a shot?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 07:32 PM
5

There are plenty of men who do childcare and household management… some of them still get left anyways. This an incredibly reductive argument. You don’t think there are any other factors to the divorce rate?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 06:25 PM
2

What methods do you suggest then?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 06:15 PM
0

I’m not questioning your faith. I’m denying that you’re catholic as they’ve been pretty clear in this topic for a long time now. As far as the original topic, it seems like you were in fact warned that casual sex can have potential consequences. You just decided you disagreed or didn’t like that message, then you found out that it was right and casual sex can indeed have downsides. That was my whole point and I’ve yet to see you make an argument that disproves it.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 02:23 PM
1

If you’re not following the teachings of the catholic church, not repenting for it, and openly rejecting their ideology then yeah. You’re not actually catholic lol
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 01:21 PM
2

There are no shortage of jokes on tv about the guy finishing before the woman and just rolling over. I mean I guess no one knows they’re allergic to something before they have a reaction to it? So that was gonna happen regardless the first time you tried it. I said sexual skill has to be learned through experience. Not general knowledge about sex and human relationships. You can pick up a lot of that through collective knowledge.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 01:18 PM
2

Ok but that’s still on them and their decisions.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 01:06 PM
1

Then you’re not a catholic cause that’s not how it works lol
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 01:04 PM
1

Is that how Catholicism works? You just get to pick and choose the bits you like?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/26 11:56 AM
2

Sex is a skill that has to be learned. Don’t know what else to tell ya. It’s not a secret and never has been. Kama Sutra dates back as far as the 3rd century. TV and movies also made plenty of jokes and drama about how fast men cum and how selfish they can be in bed and the orgasm gap…often in the same shows. Sensitivities to lube? You didn’t know different people could be allergic to different things?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 11:59 PM
3

No, I don’t expect mothers to warn their daughters of the scourge of rotten male bed wenches. The enjoyment of the sex is also not the only listed reason from OP. Mothers are far from the only source of information preaching all sorts of reason to wait. I also don’t see the other side of this argument ever brought up by women. You were also a young and inexperienced teenager at the time. You really think you were putting on a pornstar level performance?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 11:27 PM
2

Eh as far as most religions that preach celibacy until marriage the expectation is on both parties. I was just perusing some bible verses on it and they all seem to apply to men and women both. I don’t hear about any churches telling all the women to be virgins and for the men to go out and spread their seed… if the women are supposed to be virgins…then who are the men supposed to be having sex with? This is just flat out wrong. There are multiple reasons given for why men and women both should …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 11:17 PM
1

Comparing which two societies?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 10:22 PM
2

I’m not really questioning why women engage in this behavior. I already said obviously they enjoy it enough to outweigh the potential negative consequences. Drinking doesn’t negate any of this. If going out and getting drunk enough to hook up with random guys is something you aren’t enjoying, then just stop those behaviors.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 10:20 PM
2

Ok? I’m not sure what your point is. Do you have some disagreement with what I’ve said?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 10:00 PM
1

I’m not arguing they don’t. Ok? Women also get raped in extremely sexually permissive societies as well though? Ok. Ok. Ok. I don’t necessarily disagree with any of this and it isn’t what I was arguing. Assuming they are of legal age, women are free to do whatever they want and I have no interest in trying to legislate changing that(only applies to my country, can’t speak for others). I simply have an issue with them seeing the downsides of casual sex and acting like no one warned them or there’…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 09:01 PM
3

Ok but that has nothing to do with the post 😂. Breaking News: Drunk people are bad at decision making!
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 08:20 PM
1

And the price of sin without repentance is eternal damnation to hell…..you didn’t see that as a warning?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 08:19 PM
1

I’m a little confused then. What exactly did you disagree with on the comment from me that you originally replied to?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 07:46 PM
3

lol ok, you seem really fun to talk to! Have a wonderful day!
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 07:41 PM
2

Which part are you confused on specifically? And millions.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 07:40 PM
4

I disagree. They also taught men to remain pure for their future wives…. In fact they still teach both of those things to this very day and have for thousands of years. Ok. Even if that’s how you perceive it, which many would disagree with, that still doesn’t mean women weren’t told this could have potential negative outcomes so I’m not sure how it’s an argument against my point. Many people have presented casual sex as harmful to women. I’ve seen it done multiple times. They usually get called …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 07:38 PM
5

Ok? Thats still on them. You’re responsible for your own actions while intoxicated.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 06:48 PM
2

Ok, but you don’t get to claim you didn’t know and weren’t warned then. You just chose to ignore it and do what you wanted instead.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 06:24 PM
3

A lot of them and ok.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 06:23 PM
2

Then how do you know their methods? Is it because you just spent enough time in the same culture and were able to pick up on some of the lessons they were teaching even if you weren’t directly involved? Congratulations. That’s my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 06:09 PM
3

From you OP: “Well I had no idea about this honestly or I'd not of bothered.” You have now completely shifted the goal posts. You went from complaining no one told you to now admitting people were telling you but you didn’t listen because I guess you didn’t like what they were saying or how they were saying it. Seems like we finally agree now.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 05:56 PM
1

From you OP: “Well I had no idea about this honestly or I'd not of bothered.” You have now completely shifted the goal posts. You went from complaining no one told you to now admitting people were telling you but you didn’t listen because I guess you didn’t like what they were saying or how they were saying it. Seems like we finally agree now.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 05:55 PM
2

I gave the exact same amount of proof for my claim they have as you did for your claim they haven’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 05:50 PM
3

From OP: “In conclusion women are better off not engaging in casual sex and rejecting male advances for casual sex, rather than deal with male sexual incompetence.” Certain religions have been telling women (and men) that they are better off without casual sex for literally thousands of years. That’s my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 05:31 PM
5

I agree. I don’t have any expectations of them other than don’t complain about the consequences of your choices when you were amply warned in the front end. Depends on how you define repressed and taught. Ok. You’re basing that opinion on what? Women did not have to do it. They all chose to. No one made them have all that casual sex and the one night stands. Those were their decisions. I’m not sure where you got the idea that average men at any point history were all just fucking all these women…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 05:30 PM
4

Yes they have.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 05:16 PM
9

From OP: “In conclusion women are better off not engaging in casual sex and rejecting male advances for casual sex, rather than deal with male sexual incompetence.” Certain religions have been telling women (and men) that they are better off without casual sex for literally thousands of years. That’s my point.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 05:16 PM
11

This is just not accurate. There are literally decades of media in basically every form warning women about this. Religion has been warning women not to be promiscuous for literally thousands of years. There were plenty of people in the 2000s saying this era of sexual liberation for women was going to come back to haunt them. Most of them were labeled misogynists or controlling by the women they were trying to help and educate. To frame it as women are just now figuring out actions have conseque…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 04:17 PM
10

I’m sorry, but we’ve literally had tv shows, movies, books, songs, podcasts, religions, social circles, every form of media basically has been saying stuff like this for decades. Of course, a lot of these people were labeled misogynists or controlling for pointing out that this behavior was in fact bad for the women themselves. It is common knowledge and if you weren’t aware of it then that’s on you.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 04:10 PM
16

lol, they do know. This information isn’t hard to come by. Every woman knows there’s a good chance this random bar hookup isn’t gonna be great in bed and is probably gonna cum fast and probably isn’t gonna call them again and probably is going to be selfish in bed because once again, not intending to ever call them again. There is no shortage on information on this out there and no shortage of other women around them warning about these things. A lot of them still continue to do it anyways. Obvi…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 03:01 PM
1

How do you know some of these downvotes aren’t women?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 02:56 PM
21

I agree. And women know all this, yet they continue to engage in the behavior. If yall don’t like it, then just stop.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/26 02:55 PM
6

Sex work does not inherently promote misogyny or objectifying women. A man can hire a male sex worker. No women involved whatsoever. Has nothing to do with misogyny or women at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/26 06:42 PM
1

Oh, well I specifically said this only applies if you’re taking traditional vows which it sounds like you aren’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/02/26 05:45 PM
1

I do.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 05:39 PM
1

Well how about you tell us things you would absolutely refuse to compromise on ever?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 04:50 PM
1

Oh that’ll vary for everyone. Not yet.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 02:17 PM
1

Ok and what happens when something comes up that neither of you will compromise on?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 01:17 PM
1

Great. Seems like you’re admitting you’d let your partner decide anything but your values.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 01:01 PM
1

It makes complete sense. That’s what you vowed to do if you took traditional marriage vows.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 12:58 PM
2

Right but, if you took traditional vows, then you stay married even if you aren’t happy… "for better, for worse, for richer, for poorer, in sickness and in health, until death do us part”
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/26 12:02 AM
2

Why would they get divorced if the marriage is benefitting both parties? That doesn’t make sense. That’s great. That’s great.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/26 08:11 PM
1

Ok, you’ve flipped the coin. You both still agree and one refuses to abide by it. Now what?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/26 08:09 PM
1

If that’s your opinion then none of this matters. But if you’re in a marriage and took traditional vows then that’s not an option. Of course you shouldn’t be married in the first place if you have different values and principles.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/26 05:56 PM
1

That’s between the two people in the relationship. Gonna be different couple to couple. Well yeah if that’s the way you see it then none of this matters. But if your in a marriage and took traditional vows then that isn’t an option. Same answer as your second point.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/26 05:54 PM
1

Both adults. Both people can be the decision maker. Only if they agree or are ok with ending the relationship over it if they don’t. Compromise. Or both do what they want. Or neither options. First and last are only fine if both parties agree to it. Otherwise the relationship can end. If you’re ok with that, then that’s fine. Both can only do what they want if the decisions won’t cause the relationship to end or if they are ok with that option if it does. An easy example is a big career change i…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/26 11:46 PM
0

Then there’s your answer. If there’s no hierarchy and no decision maker, then when something like this comes up the relationship will end. If you’re ok with that, then more power to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/26 11:39 PM
-1

The default before a conversation? Did you even read the comment you’re replying to? I literally said you’ve already discussed it and now you have two options. Doesn’t always have to. You have two options. No one said you have to sacrifice anything. You have two options.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/26 07:00 PM
-1

Someone has to be a decision maker. When you two disagree on how something should be done, who decides? I’m sure you’re gonna say something along the lines of me and my partner would just talk it out. Ok sure. You guys have talked it out. He still doesn’t see it your way, and you still don’t see it his way. You now have two options. You can either end the relationship and go your separate ways to do individually what you both think is correct. Or you go with the decision of one person and both d…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/26 06:49 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter