TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

73Scamper Archive

View 0 posts and 144 comments by 73Scamper on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

21, never really had any issues with women personally, just with how society views relationships and such
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/22 06:01 AM
-1

People here probably won't like it but you're right. You very clearly stated a direct comparison of marital rape being legal in parts of the US 20 years after the last person was drafted in the US, not even mentioning that marital rape is still an ongoing issue, and they came back with some bullshit even saying that issues that feminists tout as areas that need progress are just as outdated as the draft when you had already shown that not to be true.
/r/MensRights28/11/21 06:43 PM
1

I dunno, I'm a fan of cutting taxes and limiting government, we just need to start in the right place with getting corporations out of legislation, moving money to where it's really needed, then cutting down the fat to try to get as many Americans in a position to be starting their own businesses and buying into infrastructure to try to grow the whole country evenly. With that we need to make sure those businesses can and do pay their employees fairly. There's no reason for prices to go up and u…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/11/21 02:23 AM
4

I feel like both sides have gone so extreme. All I want is a candidate who will address class issues and fight lobbyists for the interest of the people, I just doubt that will ever happen.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/11/21 01:47 PM
12

Idk, I was a big fan of most of yang's policies. Also got very upset that Biden was forced as our nominee when his entire platform was 'Im not trump and you remember me from Obama.' If the only way you can get your own party to vote for you is getting other politicians to give you their support, maybe you don't really represent the party. He's almost exactly what I would expect from a middle of the road republican to be honest. I guess that's what we get for liking Bernie.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/11/21 01:16 PM
33

Honestly I'm pretty central and only slightly left leaning, don't give a fuck about politics when it comes to supporting men's rights, I just like this space because it works to have a focus more on bettering people in general instead of playing the same gender politics game a lot of extreme feminists do. My opinion of it is if we can help boys grow up with healthier mindsets clear of gender insecurities and this idealist machoism, we're helping create a better next generation of men that will t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/11/21 06:53 AM
6

I've gone through the same shit with people on both sides, there's just some real fucked up people who can't see reason beyond the ideologies they subscribe to. They'll twist your words and no matter how much you simplify what you're expressing they just don't get it. It's not everyone, but you'll always see it. Those are very different things and it's important to seek out and engage with those who can be reasonable and talk on a level playing field.
/r/MensRights11/10/21 08:39 AM
4

I feel like the 'gentleman' trope just ain't it. It seems best to just do good by other people for yourself and stick by the ones that appreciate and reciprocate it. It's not worth it trying to be proper for everyone, just be you and see how that plays off other people
/r/MensRights02/09/21 06:47 AM
4

Apperently it's pretty standard for lawyers to work on contingency where they only take a portion of the winnings for whistle blowers. Here's a whole firm that specializes in whistle blower cases on contingency: secwhistleblowerlawyers(dot)net "In the United States, many whistleblower lawyers work for a “contingency” fee. If the whistleblower loses his or her case, the whistleblower does not have to pay the attorney any money. But if the whistleblower wins the case, their attorney will generally…
/r/MensRights24/08/21 12:07 PM
32

Honestly I wouldn't be surprised if a lawyer wouldn't take it on for their fees to be paid by the suit itself.
/r/MensRights24/08/21 06:35 AM
4

Yeah it'd be pretty horrifying for an 80% infant mortality rate, let alone that all being maternal infanticide
/r/MensRights23/08/21 12:48 AM
46

Scholarships are ridiculously biased against men anyway with dozens of very high dollar, some publicly funded, scholarships being exclusively available to women meanwhile just two of those are worth more than every single scholarship available to just men, some of which limited to specific locales and all of which are privately funded.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/21 04:38 PM
3

Good point, thanks for the thought.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/08/21 05:11 PM
3

If we're gonna call it out in feminist subs/echo chambers we have to call it out in our own.
/r/MensRights06/08/21 11:17 AM
33

Do you think they realize saying that white people and men are not vulnerable like women and other races is actually racist and sexist against women and people of color? Just because you're trying to proactively support those groups doesn't mean the ideology isn't against them. Asian people see the opposite a lot (from what I understand) as because they are seen as disciplined and smart or what have you they are treated differently and held to higher expectations which hurts many in the long run…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/08/21 02:52 AM
-5

I mean mgtow had a lot more than just men's rights support. Lots of these subs have little pockets of genuinely misogynistic people who see these subs as safe spaces for them.
/r/MensRights06/08/21 01:10 AM
11

Society is and has been collapsing because of men suffering emotionally. The more men we have suffering, and lacking the emotional support and health to cope with that, the more men are going to lash out in their lives. Domestic violence, sexual assaults, shootings, et cetera. These issues need to be addressed but helping victims and trying to minimize the damage from them is just a bandaid and not a solution. We need to focus on men's health not just for the sake of men's health but for society…
/r/MensRights04/08/21 03:16 AM
5

I mean this is just the most basic principle of credit. If it's in your name you assume the risk but also the benefit of increased credit if you pay on time and all that. If you have worse credit you'll get worse interest rates on loans. This is just a PR move obviously but it's not bad advice or some illegal conspiracy or something.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/21 07:35 PM
2

Bruh it's a group of people that includes both sexes. Peoples really isn't much of an issue, and men have been dying at disproportionate rates for millenia; it's something we should work on but do you really expect a news organization whose sole goal is to get people's attention and make money to be taking a leap in supporting men's rights when it is just barely starting to gain traction?
/r/MensRights31/07/21 09:44 PM
0

It's about what you expect, the main focus is men's rights but a lot of people have biases against women here. That said the original post is dumb as hell. "think about all the suffering, reliving trauma, that one would have to go through to make up that trauma and lie about being raped."
/r/MensRights28/07/21 11:54 PM
1

I did, I intended to. 3rd wave feminism isn't about equality at all and the only people pushing that still believe women are paid less because businesses think women do worse work. Side note: I'm not the kind to totally dismiss the wage gap any more, but about 1/2 of it is simply in where men works vs women and how much money those areas pull in and another 10% or so is from men working more overtime as they compare full time men to full time women when full time men work more hours on average. …
/r/MensRights08/07/21 05:30 PM
1

We being MRA's, not feminists lol. I do play both sides but that's just from caring about people in general. There are many, many men's rights issues I advocate for more for than most feminist issues.
/r/MensRights08/07/21 05:21 PM
0

It's really just about protecting women, and sometimes that pushes the boundaries on other's rights. It's not as evil as most MRA's make it out to be, we're mostly just upset about our issues being shoved to the side no matter how dire. You can't attack a movement specifically centered around one gender by saying 'what about the other ones.' you have to bring these conversations to individuals and what they value, but then again you can't tell someone they have to value something. It's a tough b…
/r/MensRights08/07/21 01:30 PM
2

I think that feminism is pretty overreaching in modern America, but it's not redundant. There are women's issues to still address, even if we think men's issues at this point are more pressing and would benefit society as a whole more. As long as there are specific women's issues feminism should still exist to some extent or another, same with any movement to protect and support any group of people.
/r/MensRights07/07/21 03:29 PM
1

It's fair to draw a line from one to the other but it's not fair to put sole or even majority blame on feminism, just my two cents though.
/r/MensRights06/07/21 01:07 AM
1

Nope. People suck it goes across all groups. if you're that focused on one group you're one of the people that suck.
/r/MensRights05/07/21 11:27 PM
9

I entirely agree with you, but you do realize that treating women as not having agency or responsibility for themselves is also really bad and even dangerous for them right? This isn't feminists going 'muh patriarchy' it's deeply engrained sexist beliefs that effect everything from gender roles to prison sentences. No one wins here except for pieces of shit, ones like this woman who managed to abuse those beliefs.
/r/MensRights05/07/21 09:09 PM
1

I wouldn't put that past them, like I said I just looked through their page once and have been following men's rights for years.
/r/MensRights25/06/21 09:47 PM
1

All good but just to respond to what you brought up: You are defending the the articles language by introducing a totally different theme of 1st and 2nd wave feminists supporting men's rights and removing themselves from 3rd wave feminism. I am much more likely to agree with those people, but the article you originally shared shows some definite signs of just being a hate piece by a guy who has an instant disdain for feminism. You also then defend the article as I took it by saying there's a rea…
/r/MensRights24/06/21 03:30 AM
1

And yet you replied four times. You have my two cents three times over at this point and this comment doesn't present anything different so I'll leave you with what I have left already.
/r/MensRights24/06/21 02:55 AM
0

Article is against feminism. Article uses language associated with offensive representations of women to attack feminism. This is not me saying feminism = women, it is me assuming that the language was chosen with intent, that intent being to insult feminism using an insulting analogy to women.
/r/MensRights24/06/21 02:53 AM
1

The quote I used is using stereotypical language used to demean women. I am not saying feminism is a representation of women, I dislike the language of the article using that offensive representation of women as a point to attack feminism. Is it an extreme distortion or exaggeration to say that an article attacking feminism using language associated with offensive representations of women would be using an offensive representation of women as an attack on feminism?
/r/MensRights24/06/21 02:50 AM
1

Lol I've been in this and other Mra subs for a few years now and just saw that sub today. I like to get both sides and figured I would leave this take up on both to see how it's reacted to. So far this sub is a bit disappointing in how it handles contrary ideas but nowhere near as bad as promalecollective. Personally I don't like the personification of the feminist movement as a whiny woman. I also hate articles like these, from both sides mind you, where the other side is dismissed in it's enti…
/r/MensRights24/06/21 02:43 AM
1

"feminists show the movement as stubborn-minded and prejudiced, acting upon illogical, biased and, therefore, extremist values." Lol in this one sentence it shows exactly why feminism is necessary. As long as we continue to view women in general as illogical and stubborn among other things we are not equal. Women are not children, they're not irrational or need to be coddled and cared for. They're people, they have agency is their thoughts and actions. That said, there is also a need for men's r…
/r/MensRights24/06/21 12:52 AM
0

I agree with both you and the post you link
/r/MensRights09/05/21 08:25 PM
-1

This isn't how you undo the financial harm. You undo it by just eliminating alimony and creating a precedent to be able to sue for any financial damages incurred by previously paid alimony. To cover the cases where alimony would actually be nice, allow a spouse to sue the other for any damages incurred directly following a divorce due to reliance on the other's financial support. Does this mean a gold digging wife can live her luxurious lifestyle after divorcing the husband? No, she could probab…
/r/MensRights18/04/21 12:09 AM
4

So white people and men don't have vulnerabilities? Sounds like what a misogynistic white supremacist would say lol I don't get how people can say stuff like this and not understand how backwards it is.
/r/MensRights14/04/21 10:07 AM
4

Old spice gave me and apperently many others some pretty serious chemical burns, not a big fan.
/r/MensRights07/03/21 10:48 PM
2

I think you might be right in that I support some of that propaganda that villainizes masculinity, but only because I relate to those kernels of truth and found that addressing them helped me personally, while they may harm others or even be intended to harm others. I appreciate the empathy in looking past ideology into what I am personally trying to support. I want to get rid of some of the negatives masculinity brings and shine a light on the positives, but that ideology is really hard to pinp…
/r/MensRights07/03/21 05:40 PM
1

Self hate isn't a way of acceptance, I feel like that's what many feminist views push and I absolutely refute that. There are absolutely things for us men to work on with ourselves and what we teach our son's, but demonizing men is super counter productive and doesn't get the change we want to make. We want men to be able to express themselves and their feelings better, we want men to be more empathetic. Saying men are bad at those things doesn't help, but guiding men to reflect and come to thei…
/r/MensRights07/03/21 03:42 PM
1

Used to have a pretty sexist/racist friend but he got worse after joining the marines so dropped him, otherwise my friends are extremely tolerant. One is becoming a teacher, another a cook and he's real nice, a few new friends from my new job who all have their issues but seem generally pretty cool. A guy I always thought was a bit off from there also told another friend from work to straight up rape me since she has a crush on me so that's pretty uncool. Used to give him rides from work since h…
/r/MensRights07/03/21 03:28 PM
1

Maybe I only find it as an accepting place because I'm feminine, that's quite possible. Like I said, maybe I just don't 'get it.'
/r/MensRights07/03/21 02:38 PM
1

Obviously not as a rule but you can have a conversation with her, she'll straight up admit that she has an emotional and sexist response to men, but in a serious and rational conversation she agrees on men's issues being real and something to work on. It's definitely an odd case but I find it more palatable than those who simply deflect or deny men's issues outright.
/r/MensRights07/03/21 02:36 PM
2

Definitely seeing more of that self flagellation as it was so kindly worded now that I'm being shown it, but for the majority of my viewing of the sub I've just latched on to the acceptance and opening up of men as individuals and equals kind of thing.
/r/MensRights07/03/21 02:31 PM
1

That's a very good example of something harmful to men in suppressing their frustrations and venting not having any psychological benefits it just some grade a bullshit, if I was reading that scrolling through I would absolutely be arguing it with you. I guess it's all about finding a balance. I like MensLib because it doesn't have the anti-women sentiment, but in that it can have an anti-male sentiment. Not trying to say it's the best pro-male sub or anything, but I do like it for not having th…
/r/MensRights07/03/21 02:27 PM
1

Damn never experienced anything like that, but they likely thought you were just being antagonistic. Hopefully I don't come to realize it's a bunch of hot garbage but for now I enjoy the conversations hosted there.
/r/MensRights07/03/21 02:17 PM
1

I'll check it out! Thanks
/r/MensRights07/03/21 02:12 PM
1

If you think accepting your flaws and constructively working on yourself as a man is self flagellation then good for you. I'm personally a pretty feminine guy so maybe I just don't 'get it' but I think it's a great thing when I can talk one on one with someone in a vulnerable way and get genuine feedback and support.
/r/MensRights07/03/21 02:11 PM
-1

I just think it's more productive to try to work with feminists to get men's issues into the public mind than work against them like most have been and just have mra's be seen as women hating incels. On top of that we are already all just fighting for gender equality, it's just time for that to include bringing men up as well. Most feminists I'm friends with do genuinely sympathize with men, even one who actively teaches children boys bad and to shove them, yell ew and run away (she's a bit of a…
/r/MensRights07/03/21 02:07 PM
-12

To each their own, for me it's a place free of the normal male stigma where guys can talk to eachother as guys without fear of traditional male values being pushed on them. Definitely a lot of 'oh my male toxicity' but instead of being told it's a bad thing and they're bad people it's either about acceptance or how to constructively change something you don't like. The biggest thing to me is it's constructive and not demonizing, which to me is where we want men's issues. When it goes so far as m…
/r/MensRights07/03/21 12:22 AM
-18

I like MensLib, I don't always agree with it but it filters out a lot of the bullshit anti-women crap I find in other pro-men forums, and they're almost always up to have an actual conversation rather than just yelling and downvoting you to oblivion if you say anything against a well like post.
/r/MensRights06/03/21 11:07 PM
3

You're just willfully being an ass at this point, and only 32 states actually terminate parenthood, the rest just restrict it and even at that level it's not specified that that it applies equally to men as the national law clearly doesn't. If 32 states terminate parenthood and only most of those are gender neutral, we're looking at about half of the US actually ratifying that men should be able to terminate the parenthood of a woman who raped them and had their child. This still doesn't address…
/r/MensRights21/02/21 03:05 PM
3

Looping all the way back to my original comment: that nationally that's irrelevant, that there's no reason for you to be pedantic about what is and is not a national standard when you are blatantly wrong. There is a clear distinction from a national standard and what actually happens, like weed being nationally illegal, despite starting to be well accepted in quite a few states. We still want progress to eliminate any sexist national laws and standards, although at least in america men can actua…
/r/MensRights21/02/21 02:52 PM
9

https://www.ncsl.org/research/human-services/parental-rights-and-sexual-assault.aspx Nationally only women can terminate parental custody of a child's father when the kid is created through sexual assault or rape. State by state it may be referred to as rapists in general, allowing men to maybe have an avenue to terminate the mother's parenthood, but at the national level a boy being raped would still have custody and be required to pay child support until that precedent is overturned.
/r/MensRights21/02/21 02:38 PM
13

But that is still addressed at a state level no? That was my point that even if every state had a contradictory law, it would still technically be a national standard
/r/MensRights21/02/21 02:25 PM
23

It did set a nationwide precedent, meaning if there are no state laws contradicting it, that is the law. Some states may have made laws that rapists can't have custody, but there is still a nationwide precedent of if a female rapist has custody she can sue the raped boy for child support. https://www.ncsl.org/research/human-services/parental-rights-and-sexual-assault.aspx Here's a source letting us know that this right to terminate the parenthood of a sexual assailant is only extended to women, …
/r/MensRights21/02/21 02:19 PM
7

There should be but due to the way sexism is quantified it is often literally impossible to prove sexism against men. The only exception would maybe be an institution sticking to it's guns saying men must perform x amount better and pay x amount more or something. Any sane one would just give a leniency program to boost female enrollment or some bullshit like that isn't the same thing.
/r/MensRights20/02/21 04:04 PM
3

Here's one for you, luckily nothing came of it but I know others are not so fortunate, even the emotional distress with no legal or social repracussions was horrible; it was the only time in my life I ever threw up from emotion.
/r/MensRights19/02/21 09:46 PM
7

I have a screen cap from a friend of mine who babysits kids. She was literally training them to say ew a boy, shove them down, and then run away. Disgusting
/r/MensRights18/02/21 05:14 AM
3

Did this at an ex's college, in the gender neutral stall on a window sill. I still kind of feel bad for using it for that considering the safe space it's supposed to be
/r/MensRights15/02/21 08:46 PM
5

Piggy backing to bring awareness to the fact they have a private sub you can get into if you prove you're a woman called r/darktriadwomen Look up what the dark triad is in psychology and then apply that to female dating strategy.... It's literally about abusing and controlling men for their personal gain.
/r/PussyPass14/02/21 03:57 PM
-1

The analyses which are compiled in one book aka one perspective which to me makes it not objective
/r/MensRights13/02/21 12:57 AM
-1

There absolutely are lots of consistency errors in iq tests vs real world success, everywhere from rider to Yale have done research and written articles on it. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29911926/ ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5479093 here's a government article on how education effects intelligence, here's another on how environment also impacts iq. If you can't see that these issues are correlated you are wilfully ignorant to support the perspective you already hold. As far as your article, it…
/r/MensRights12/02/21 11:58 PM
-2

Like I said, read up on black american leaders in history and do some critical thinking. Learn some empathy, these are people just like anyone else and the major discrepancy is in how they have been treated and how that effects people down the line. Show me a study that describes who and how it polled, where,and when and I'll read it and think on it. As far is controlling for IQ, not only are the tests not well standardized and inconsistent, but lower income areas have significantly worse educat…
/r/MensRights12/02/21 10:42 PM
-1

You are absolutely racist if you think black people commit more crimes because they are black. In the past 3 generations black people were born into poverty having to build themselves and their family from nothing, politicians were lobbied by racist parties like the kkk to isolate and worsen the living conditions of black people, the government in all its layers then targeted these isolated areas with abuse from Jim crow laws to introducing drugs. After all this systemic abuse, you see a much la…
/r/MensRights12/02/21 10:11 PM
1

And it's not that people don't think like this, even in extreme cases as I'm dealing with in another mens' rights sub, it's that you spend so much energy creating an enemy out of the other group that you forget they are still human, they're not totally insane and have reasons behind their thoughts and actions. Even if you disagree with it it's important to understand where the emotions come from that drive their movements and address them, as when you don't it just becomes combative. Reddit has …
/r/PussyPassDenied07/02/21 12:29 AM
5

Absolutely agree, this is what I try to advocate in any discussion pitting two groups of people against eachother. It's not about hurting the other side, it's about elevating both of us to the standards we often both want.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/02/21 10:52 PM
4

Gotcha, glad to see. This sub and quite a few other men's rights ones like r/menkampf fall into the same trap that fds does where the echo chamber of it all radicalizes people to be against things without really knowing or fully understanding them just because you know most of the others will agree with the mentality rather than the message. r/MensLib is a good one that avoids that and keeps conversations open to both sides imo.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/02/21 08:57 PM
0

'all they talk about is books to empower women' 'yeah it's not even that bad' I do not understand you but yeah, it seems like a pretty productive sub, especially compared to shit you see on subs like r/femaledatingstrategy
/r/PussyPassDenied06/02/21 08:46 PM
1

Just stopped by, first couple posts had some good conversation on the normalcy of the pill as birth control without addressing the many side effects it can have. Also I wasn't banned despite frequenting here.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/02/21 08:43 PM
1

That rad v2
/r/MensRights31/01/21 12:19 AM
4

I was not aware v for vendetta was from a comic. That's pretty rad.
/r/MensRights30/01/21 11:58 PM
28

I mean yeah, but at least some had good intentions at the beginning.
/r/MensRights24/01/21 06:45 AM
0

Thank you, but even presenting your views as truths can be problematic, it may be true for you, but it is also important to take into context the lens which the person you're talking has. In my experience quite few people are actually unreasonable, but rather the circumstances of their life and often nowadays the haunting of like-minded outlets causes what seems to be unreasonable to an outsider to simply be life.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/01/21 03:29 AM
12

Okay community with a lot of pent up anger leaning towards disgust towards men. Basically just a echo chamber of women with bad experiences with men causing radicalization and that kind of femcel mentality. Same thing with pussy pass denied and the like. r/MensLib is imo the most neutral sub, about promoting men's issues without getting into that anger against women. We have a lot to be frustrated about. They have a lot to be frustrated about. Best thing we can do is listen, learn, and teach. If…
/r/PussyPassDenied24/01/21 03:09 AM
3

They have a private sub called the dark triad or something which is reserved for 'dating strategies' focused on manipulating and abusing men emotionally for their own gain. Genuinely. To get in you have to join their discord, prove you're a woman, then you're in. It's fucking horrifying. I think it was hidden in the sub info or rules or something? Have avoided the sub for a while now.
/r/PussyPassDenied24/01/21 03:04 AM
1

Don't see any others sorting by new either... I'm confused
/r/PussyPassDenied24/01/21 03:02 AM
5

"This thread has been removed because it contains misinformation about feminism." That's just blatant censorship at that point. wow.
/r/MensRights19/01/21 06:00 AM
1

I agree, but as long as her case is legally in dispute I'm pretty sure they can't report her raping him as a fact. You'll notice in pretty much all immediate news following someone committing a crime they will say the person was charged or arrested with something rather than that they did it.
/r/MensRights29/12/20 11:21 AM
1

Not if her defense admits to a sexual interaction though, which I assume they already have that established and are simply debating whether that sexual interaction constitutes rape or not.
/r/MensRights29/12/20 04:26 AM
-1

They can't say she raped him until she is convicted and found guilty or else she could pursue legal action.
/r/MensRights29/12/20 12:10 AM
44

They have an even worse private subreddit and discord if you look into the sub info. Darktriad or something of the sort. That sub is for women who are willing to abuse their potential partners for their own gain.
/r/PussyPass27/12/20 01:28 AM
16

The proper term for rape by a woman in the uk is "causing sexual activity." It's a catch all kind of crime which covers everything from non consensual sex (not committed by penis) to making someone watch porn. It's supposed to be treated equally to rape in the courts but come on, even the name already puts it in a better light.
/r/MensRights02/12/20 03:11 AM
31

I apologise I remembered incorrectly. The definition is penetration by PENIS in the mouth anus or vagina. So even a strap-on is not rape, legally.
/r/MensRights02/12/20 03:08 AM
16

Or finger or tongue or anything really, just has to penetrate the mouth, anus, or genitalia
/r/MensRights02/12/20 03:01 AM
30

Under uk law it isn't rape. A woman can not rape a man without penetrating him.
/r/MensRights02/12/20 02:35 AM
3

Aren't enough rich guys to go around is exactly why r/femaledatingstrategy exists. There are the kind of women with this mentality who have just a dream of what they want from life with no dose of reality to get them to wise up, and those that have that dose of reality and wise up to either find a way to get or find a way to train the kind of guy they want to fulfill their toxic fantasy. You could call it toxic femininity just as much as any trait of toxic masculinity, but it hurts both sides. I…
/r/PussyPassDenied02/12/20 01:28 AM
29

There were some feminists years ago that were hosted in a UN meeting to advocate for international regulation against men criticizing women online.
/r/PussyPass22/11/20 12:51 AM
2

Just popped in to say you're right, she's still shitty but under those laws she didn't rape him.
/r/PussyPass17/11/20 12:13 AM
25

Looking up conviction and sentence differences between genders is one of the main things that drew me towards rejecting modern feminism for humanitarian and true equality efforts.
/r/MensRights17/10/20 03:42 AM
35

Google wants to boost the number of women they are hiring to look better because the public is sensitive to the gender difference in stem. Women are offered so much extra shit for stem jobs and education because of it.
/r/MensRights28/09/20 07:49 PM
1

Maybe 10-1, not 10k-1
/r/MensRights22/09/20 11:34 PM
1

Just had my friend telling me this when I said I was working out and my ex also really liked it, although I am trying to get in better shape.
/r/MensRights22/09/20 10:31 PM
2

Hey man, dad bods are in and it's just the radical incel women who are fat as fuck.
/r/MensRights22/09/20 04:26 PM
1

That sounds ideal
/r/MensRights22/08/20 01:55 PM
2

I can get where you're coming from, but I wouldn't make excuses for racists having bad experiences with someone of that race. I have a friend who openly says sexist things, and admits they are horrible to say, due to past experiences with that sex in relationships, but that is much different than genuinely seeking out how to manipulate and abuse that sex in the real world through deliberate actions and decisions. Once you're at that point, no I don't have to feel sorry for you and I won't. I hol…
/r/MensRights20/08/20 09:40 PM
37

You're treating them like victims. They literally have a private sub (check through their info, I forget where it's posted) dedicated to using and abusing men, regardless of the harm that comes to them, for their own financial gain or entertainment.
/r/MensRights20/08/20 11:03 AM
1

Yeah, that was just an example of something significantly predating feminism that is a contributor to the issues men face today.
/r/MensRights31/07/20 10:37 PM
3

And to clarify, by reproductive abilities I mean one man with 50 women can make 50 children in a year, where as one woman with 50 men can only make one a year. Men are simply less valuable as far as continuing a population goes, but that no longer applies to society.
/r/MensRights31/07/20 09:26 PM
1

You can't say feminism is responsible for all men's rights issues. Men were being used as cannon fodder well before feminism was popularized, and the idea of men being disposable is a simple byproduct of our reproductive abilities, but the continuation of such idealogy is unacceptable. Many of the social ideals and norms that feminism opposes hurt men just as much if not more. There's no need for us to be anti-feminist, but there is definite reform needed to the feminist movement to be more huma…
/r/MensRights31/07/20 12:44 AM
18

You're telling me some people think the idea of a free and unregulated market oppresses women? Isn't that a bit sexist against women as their inherent value as humans would have to be lower than men in order for the majority to be oppressed in a free market?
/r/MensRights01/07/20 02:34 AM
2

That was a hell of a confusing read. It's hard to understand the statement that poor people commit crime more is presented as fact, while it not being true that large groups of poor people commit more crime than large groups of middle-upper class citizens. The article relies heavily on a large variety of studies who basically all show that poverty increases crime to some extent, while discrediting them for not having poverty increase crime terribly significantly (50% or more?). It ends up making…
/r/MensRights24/06/20 05:11 AM
2

Where are the studies disproving the relationship between poverty and crime in the US? I always thought that population density and poverty were two given contributors to crime.
/r/MensRights24/06/20 12:13 AM
1

If you'll notice I said looking from the outside in, not you saying it or anything from your perspective but someone just scrolling through reading exclusionary comments like the one I originally replied to, again not you.
/r/MensRights16/06/20 08:15 PM
0

Looking from the outside in I'm sure a lot of people would see this as a white men's sub from exclusive commenters like the one I replied to originally.
/r/MensRights14/06/20 10:26 PM
10

Race does not mean nothing, simply less than gender in most cases. Seeing how massive sexism against men is in the real world does not make race nor sexism against women nonexistent and it's counterproductive to address them as such.
/r/MensRights14/06/20 02:04 PM
38

You dropped this /s
/r/MensRights03/06/20 03:10 AM
1

My apologies, borderline underweight, and I'm not arguing 140 is skinny for short girls, just average to a bit chubby, or as it's called nowadays thicc.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/05/20 03:20 PM
1

140 would be overweight for like 5' but underweight for 6'. It's a perfectly average weight for an average height woman, so just a bit heavier than average for a shorter woman, aka pretty average.
/r/PussyPassDenied17/05/20 02:16 PM
-1

140 is pretty average for shorter women I think.
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/20 11:37 PM
2

Tldr on this is women take on more child rearing tasks making up the large majority of the wage gap and the extremely large gap for women in their 20's and 30's (when they first have kids). It also mentions how the wage gap is larger in jobs where a strict schedule is necessary and working extra hours nets you large bonuses in pay (business jobs). The big point to be made in favor of the wage gap being unfair to women is that they simply have less time to work due to societal expectations. On th…
/r/PussyPassDenied09/04/20 11:43 PM
2

As a capitalist country we care more about the enginerd than the teacher. Sucks but it's true. And women have more support than any other group to become engineers, they just don't.
/r/PussyPassDenied09/04/20 11:04 PM
84

So when you look at this Stat you have it right from the dept of labor statistics that it's comparing full time men to women. Full time men work more hours, that accounts for about 5-10% of the disparity, then you look at the top paying jobs in America, all engineering and male dominated despite hundreds of thousands of dollars (if not more) in support for women to get in this careers, that accounts for around 70 or 80% of it just in the top ten jobs, then you have all the dangerous jobs men do,…
/r/PussyPassDenied09/04/20 08:43 PM
35

Hahahaha hah... Oh you're not joking?
/r/MensRights25/03/20 03:55 PM
60

You seem to be missing the necessary /s
/r/MensRights25/03/20 03:55 PM
77

It's not women, it's just people who love being in the role of victim. Man, woman, child, it doesn't matter. They get in this mindset of victimization and after a while will develop a genuine fear for whoever they make the villain. It's a horrific thing to see as a part of someone, truly a disgusting bit of humanity.
/r/PussyPass16/02/20 07:25 AM
7

I honestly can't believe r/FemaleDatingStrategy isn't quarantined yet. It is so incredibly sexist and just a disgusting idea of a sub to begin with. Oh and apperently r/darktriadwomen is a thing and now I want to vomit.
/r/MGTOW08/02/20 08:52 AM
10

Took another stroll through there, a little more in depth this time. It seems like the whole sub is dedicated to doing exactly what women think men do: objectifying them as nothing more than sexual objects, not caring about their emotions or mental health, and putting them down for their physical appearances. I wonder if the whole sub is just a power trip for them. I just wish it would stay out of reality as a lot of this shit is just morally disgusting and the way that things are presented as e…
/r/PussyPass19/12/19 09:10 AM
12

Check out lostallhope(dot)com it's a sobering site about genuine methods of suicide and how they work. I recommend anyone contemplating suicide to take a look as often it's enough to snap them out of the 'I want to die mentality' and into a 'I want to get help' mentality. It seems like you've already looked around for such information but if you're having an off day take some time to read about it, maybe take a look at some of the survivor's thoughts and see what applies to your life. I wish you…
/r/MensRights10/12/19 03:18 PM
6

Tagged humor.
/r/MensRights09/12/19 04:43 PM
15

I mean at least in the states that's not an opinion that is just fact. Any case in which sex (gender) is a factor influencing the outcome of the trial goes against the 14th amendment and is straight unconstitutional.
/r/PussyPass24/11/19 11:09 PM
51

What the actual fuck?
/r/MensRights11/11/19 03:19 AM
1

Exactly!
/r/MensRights06/11/19 08:34 PM
-3

The key point here is their definition. To anyone who doesn't already hold their views it's obvious what you mean, but if you believe in widespread sexism affecting pay, which it does in certain areas both against men and women, then someone saying the wage gap is a myth is just stupid since we have a large amount of real evidence showing men make more money than women. The focus should be diverted to why men make more money than women, including everything from working more hours to working mor…
/r/MensRights06/11/19 06:25 PM
-3

It's not a myth, it's a real thing but it's easily explainable by reasons other than sexism. Saying things like this is what causes issues between mra's and feminists, it's important to clarify our meaning and not represent anything easily dismissable.
/r/MensRights06/11/19 05:46 PM
1

I like to lead with information and guide that into the main idea of men's rights, like start with an issue for women, relate it to a similar or worse issue for men, reaffirm the women's concern while also pushing that men have issues. Once you establish with them that, conversations about our rights can open up. The biggest thing to the continuation of conversation is to reaffirm your interest in women's rights as well, if given the chance many will fill in that because you're talking about men…
/r/PussyPass05/11/19 03:09 PM
3

Very true, very sad. Thankfully a lot of femenists can also be persuaded to support mens rights when shown the facts.
/r/PussyPass05/11/19 03:04 AM
18

I get that the focus is on UN women and honestly just putting the number of women who died as journalists for their profession wouldn't bother me as it would put a representative number of women who sacrificed themselves for the profession, and disregarding the men wouldn't be that bad due to the focus of the organization. Using a percentage, however, is disgusting for that blatent disregard of male life.
/r/PussyPass04/11/19 06:43 PM
178

Wow how the hell did that genuinely get looked at as a bigger concern than the men that were killed? Sexism at its most blatent.
/r/PussyPass04/11/19 06:31 PM
2

You're antagonistic about it. While you have a point that posts would be more comprehensive if they included everything from the opinion of op and similar cases and a whole PowerPoint of facts and statistics to prove they are right, that is simply more effort than most people are willing to put for little benefit. We all have access to Google, and can do our own research. We also all have a similar viewpoint in which the opinion of the op should be fairly obvious. The large majority of posts are…
/r/MensRights02/11/19 03:28 AM
6

Any one else seeing the blonde as being a guy?
/r/PussyPassDenied01/11/19 05:01 AM
16

I mean you can tell he wasn't throwing hard punches, just enough to tell them not to fuck with him and put the lady on her ass. Looked like if he wanted to he could have left them both bloody. Smart guy.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/10/19 05:16 AM
1

Here's my take on that, with hundreds of years of support creating a movement that did a lot of good, why should we fight it rather than utilize that support to try to help everyone? Femenism was a movement about women being men's equals in society, but now America is in a matriarchy for the most part, political elites and other 1%ers being an exception. There are a lot of issues with how society treats and raises men and it causes a lot of issues, everything from suicide and violence to homeles…
/r/MensRights17/09/19 02:58 PM
1

That's totally fair, and if I was a less of a bitch and more committed to my morals I would agree, but there's a lot of good people who strongly hold on to views I disagree with. I'm content having civil discussion with those I trust to stay civil, but don't think it's worth it to publicly set myself against what most people believe because the people that I could talk to and convince wouldn't give me the time of day and the people that would talk to me about it likely hold their values too deep…
/r/MensRights17/09/19 02:06 PM
32

I'm too scared to say it irl tbh. Brings a whole shit storm I don't want to be a part of.
/r/MensRights17/09/19 12:36 AM
1

I don't care is most definitely the wrong response for an 11 year old girl opening the hood of a mustang. My little sister is 3 and already has a better reaction than that to cars lol
/r/PussyPassDenied16/09/19 03:13 AM
0

Tbf the cop didn't have to slam her. Like if you watch the full video she is so drunk she has trouble standing up, and there's another cop almost to the stairs she's going to when this happens. She never tried to hit him or anything. She was pretty psycho, but up to this point she wasn't really doing anything wrong besides trying to walk away because she thought he didn't have any right to detain her in her drunk stupidity. The cop came to investigate her trying to get in her boyfriend's truck w…
/r/PussyPassDenied15/09/19 02:33 PM
3

The shovel was accompanied with a post about digging up the truth, the guy was being stupid but it's pretty clear to me the system is using him as an example and that's pretty fucked.
/r/PussyPass09/09/19 07:13 AM
1

I'm not trying to be devil's advocate here, I know the cop was within his rights and she should have done things differently, but in my opinion she was drunk as shit and the cop should have taken her down a little more gently. Just my opinion and you're free to disagree but considering she could hardly stand, the cop should have expected her to just fall to the ground in the takedown and should have made at least an attempt to prevent her from being hurt. The cop's job there was to detain her, n…
/r/PussyPassDenied07/09/19 09:36 PM
1

Yes, actions have consequences, but no on deserves permanent consequences unless their actions had permanent consequences on someone else.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/09/19 08:54 PM
1

She definitely seemed like she slipped, but the cop definitely should have been prepared to slow her fall, she may deserve what she got but no one deserves brain damage. Even mild concussions can cause lifelong brain damage.
/r/PussyPassDenied07/09/19 08:43 PM
1

I don't think this was about the public defender, I had just read that comment from the original post a little bit ago and I think it might have had some kind of reference to a lawyer, I forget now.
/r/MensRights05/09/19 02:02 PM
3

The cop was within his rights to put her down, but she was drunk as hell and could hardly stand, that takedown was excessive as fuck. He definitely could just put her the fuck down like he did to not have to deal with anything or in case she had a weapon, but he also could have just grabbed her arms, kneed the back of her legs and brought her down in a miriad of other ways that didn't result in a concussion. She wasn't being that unruly up to the point of the takedown, just generally not complyi…
/r/PussyPassDenied05/09/19 04:12 AM
2

They were calling the lawyer a cunt for blatant sexism in how they viewed fights.
/r/MensRights03/09/19 04:16 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter