TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

78stickup Archive

View 5 posts and 146 comments by 78stickup on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Indeed. Truly the most awful site around.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 04:33 AM
2

Honestly, I think most of the downvotes came from gay/lesbian people who didn't realize that I wasn't condemning lesbians/gays in general; that was my error. On the other hand, some supposed mod told me not to upset him/her? Anyway, I guess I may repost, not sure if there's any point. In point of fact I can back up every claim I made. I DO think there is a legitimate and intriguing contradiction here: third wave feminists mostly support radical feminist ideas, but they mostly reject the radical …
/r/MensRights16/09/18 02:31 AM
3

Yeah. That's the argument Janice Fiamengo made about why feminists are so opposed to sex segregation in schools. My "if women did strike out on their own and create a female-only society, it would fail miserably" may cover that; but you're right. I hate to use something as dumb as realty TV shows as proof (and it isn't), but we have vanishingly few examples of males and females being raised apart -- for good reason -- because most people aren't insane feminists or psychotic "blank slate" behavio…
/r/MensRights16/09/18 01:33 AM
2

Jesus. I didn't think even a feminist would stoop this low. Well after a minute's research it turns out that Karla did help kill at least one of the victims -- her own sister (whom she drugged and offered as a "birthday present" for Paul), though in Karla's "defense" she didn't realize the child would choke on her own vomit. She also knew in advance that the victims she raped with Paul (with great joy and enthusiasm) were destined to die, and nevertheless lured them into a van. Twelve years? Men…
/r/MensRights16/09/18 12:43 AM
16

"I'm not a mind reader" is a strawman defense. Actually studies have repeatedly shown that women (on average) are indeed better at reading body language and facial expressions than men. This is often described as "having more empathy"; on the other hand, psychopaths (on average) are also better at reading body language and facial expressions, so I'm not sure B follows from A. And 99 percent of the people who risk their lives to save others are, in fact, male. What is abundantly clear is that fem…
/r/MensRights16/09/18 12:25 AM
0

Wall Street Journal. Chomsky once said that the WSJ was the only [mainstream] newspaper that tells the truth. This was because, he argued at the time (this was during the 80's), that its upper class clientele actually wanted to know what's going on instead of being fed bullshit like the readership of 99 percent of other papers. It's not that he agreed with their editorials, but you would find facts there that were selectively omitted from other corporate rags, he claimed. The WSJ seems to have b…
/r/MensRights15/09/18 11:42 PM
53

This psycho's rantings are rooted in the feminist delusion that "men are trying to control women's bodies" and that "only women are held responsible for pregnancy." Both delusions are just that. The percentage of women who want to increase abortion restrictions is roughly equal to that of men, and some polls actually have it higher. Moreover, women are the majority of voters. So there goes argument 1. Argument 2: "only women are held responsible for pregnancies." How women can even imagine this …
/r/MensRights15/09/18 11:26 PM
23

Yep. It's a sexist slur designed to silence people. It also functions as a sort of mini temper tantrum for overly sensitive/fragile women who feel oppressed when they don't know something and are educated by a man.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 11:06 PM
2

Fuck off. You're not a child (I assume) and I'm not your tutor. If you can't muster up a single coherent complaint about a single point then you're just being disingenuous.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 10:43 PM
1

I don't have all day here. Pick something.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 10:29 PM
5

Do you think they might not be advocating for that because it is ridiculous? Try think about it before you answer. This doesn't require a source, ie it's not something I "made up". It was the "solution" advocated by political lesbians during second wave feminism, who in turn came up with most of the theories advocated by gender studies professors and third wave feminists. The truly ridiculous notion is all of the ideas advocated by political lesbians were sound, but that their solution was wrong…
/r/MensRights15/09/18 09:43 PM
2

Well, you guys are going to have to be more specific. If you're skeptical about a claim, cite it, and I'll respond the best I can.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 09:17 PM
4

lol. Tell me exactly where I "made shit up", and I'll educate you.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 09:16 PM
2

Edit: cite a specific claim that you're skeptical about.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 08:23 PM
2

Feminists have an extremely shameful history, and the more oppressive they become, the more people are going to take the time to actually look at it.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 07:48 PM
4

Yes, she participated in the rapes and helped dispose of the bodies (with a big smile on her face). I can't remember if she helped kill them.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 07:20 PM
9

I don't get the pseudo-outrage. Ask the family members of the victims why they might suffer from "pseudo outrage" over the fact that a woman who participated in the rape and murder of their daughters (and greatly enjoyed the experience, according to witnesses who saw the video tapes) is living a free, happy life after spending only 12 years in prison.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 05:48 PM
6

JudgyBitch came up with a solution to this: segregated combat units. Since women are exactly equal to men feminists shouldn't a problem with it ;)
/r/MensRights15/09/18 09:03 AM
5

While none of this would surprise me this is not a reliable and source. And all of the alleged witnesses are anonymous.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 05:45 AM
1

It's one of the worst forms of torture. There's actually a really good Law and Order SUV episode about this, believe it or not.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 05:43 AM
11

From the comments: The point she is making is that men never have to be responsible and that we should make them all as responsible for their sexual behavior as we make women responsible. Yes, there are good men out there, but when 51% of the population is female and 49% male, you see how it can be difficult for many to find them. I am absolutely speechless. The truth is that only men are responsible for pregnancies. A woman can abort or give up the child at a safe haven. Women have reproductive…
/r/MensRights15/09/18 05:40 AM
62

Wait, you mean they allow coaching for women but not for men? WTF.
/r/MensRights15/09/18 05:24 AM
2

Why do you believe we need to fix x, y, z before tackling mental health issues and treatment for men to reduce suicide deaths? Well, I don't really, but I'm concerned that (a) current treatment models may not be taking into account how men and women are different (b) the focus, as always, is on how men themselves need to change, rather than actually helping men and (c) focussing so extensively on "mental illness" rather than institutional discrimination may have us treating the symptoms of the p…
/r/MensRights15/09/18 05:08 AM
2

A problem with a lack of mental healthcare for everyone. I think you'll find these two articles of interest: It's time to stop blaming men for their mental health woes Men Won't Talk About Their Feelings Because They Don't See The Point, Study Says IMO the current "mental health" approach for men often does more harm than good. And like I said: first things first. We must eliminate institutional oppression against males in the education system, employment, family courts, criminal courts, health …
/r/MensRights15/09/18 03:57 AM
227

Katrina Adams should be fired. Notable also that there's one area in which women are penalized more often -- coaching violations. And wouldn't you know it? Katrina wants to get rid of the rule lol. Apparently women aren't capable of thinking on their feet? Or something?
/r/MensRights15/09/18 02:27 AM
66

If women had been forced to serve throughout history the number of wars would probably have been cut by about 90 percent. A thousand dead men and people go "meh." Female bodies piling up = diplomacy time. Imagine a gender reversal of the movie "Kill Bill"...
/r/MensRights15/09/18 01:26 AM
1

Source?
/r/MensRights15/09/18 01:13 AM
8

Women attempt suicide more often This is a myth, and for Pete's sake don't cite Wikipedia as a source. Taking a few pills and calling 911 or a friend is not a "suicide attempt." Nor is cutting one's wrist (in a non-lethal way) as a form of "self harm". That's where those statistics come from. Men don't see the point in reaching out for help because society doesn't give a shit about male problems. This is plainly evident in your own post, which seeks to minimize the problem and say "but look -- w…
/r/MensRights15/09/18 01:08 AM
1

I mean in a sense it is. The term toxic masculinity is used to denote a society in which the concept of masculinity becomes toxic and oppressive into men And yet oddly in the 1950's there was no male suicide epidemic....
/r/MensRights15/09/18 01:02 AM
3

There's a difference between having a "victim complex" and being a victim. Eg a man who is forcibly separated from his children after a false accusation is a victim. I don't consider myself a victim, I merely support gender equality and justice. That's why I support the men's rights movement. You seem to be more concerned with not offending people. Good luck with that, as SJW's are offended by literally everything. And frankly you don't seem to care about men's rights at all, only potential hurt…
/r/MensRights14/09/18 11:43 PM
3

So if I may ask, your answer then becomes to become a movement to tear down women rather than build up men? No. This is mere projection. MRA's have no interest in "tearing down" women or harming them in any way. And yes, feminists are ideologically similar to the KKK, though most people aren't aware of this because they haven't bothered to study the history. Their violence comes in the form of proxy violence by the state and other institutions against men and boys. They also employ a great deal …
/r/MensRights14/09/18 10:46 PM
9

It's not merely "some feminists." It's the leading lights of the movement, past and present, and their support or rather lack thereof for the rights of men and boys. The woman who created the first feminist conference in the US: “We are, as a sex, infinitely superior to men.” – Elizabeth Cady Stanton The woman who created the first gender studies class: “The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately 10% of the human race.” – Sally Miller Gearhart ("The Future if Female…
/r/MensRights14/09/18 10:14 PM
6

Women and the KKK arent analogous for many reasons. Where did you get "women" lol? I said feminists, not "women." Most women aren't feminists. feminist man hating conspiracy There's no "conspiracy" afoot. It's all being done right out in the open for anyone who cares to look.
/r/MensRights14/09/18 09:17 PM
7

This sub however is more about hating women and ragging on 'feminism' than actually helping men I read this sub frequently and you're full of shit. There's a lot of ragging against feminism, true; but demanding we avoid that issue would be like demanding civil rights activists in the 50's avoided discussion of the KKK. Feminists/man-haters are firmly in charge of gender policy at the state level in most western countries as well as international bodies. If you're more offended by people making s…
/r/MensRights14/09/18 09:06 PM
15

It's not a dig against women. It's a dig against feminists who only seem to care about a problem if it affects women. There are posts here every week linking to mainstream articles lamenting eg that the female prison population is too high, even though women are already institutionally privileged in the criminal justice system. Or that one in four homeless people are women, etc. etc. MRA's take the position that men and boys are just as important as women and girls. Feminists decidedly do not ta…
/r/MensRights14/09/18 08:27 PM
3

things designed by women for women Uhhh, no one's stopping you. Go design something. Don't just sit on your fat ass and whine at men's designs.
/r/MensRights14/09/18 07:21 PM
12

You must not visit Reddit often. I've seen lots of posts like this make it to R/all. The "women behaving badly" posts are typically used to highlight lack of justice for eg male victims of domestic violence, female pedophilia etc., or to expose the institutional discrimination against males in the criminal justice system (six times larger than the racial gap). care about men's rights more than you care about complaining about women. Feminists do not equal "women." Many feminists are male, and on…
/r/MensRights14/09/18 06:54 PM
5

Is it just me or is this happening literally every day now? What the hell is wrong with these women? And yet it's men that are worried about working with children because we are all portrayed as pedophiles in waiting....
/r/MensRights14/09/18 06:00 PM
1

Simply read an introductory anthropology textbook. I'm not sure what else to say. If you're looking for a more advanced treatment I'd recommend Hierarchy in the Forest by Christopher Boehm.
/r/MensRights14/09/18 03:56 AM
0

You haven't the faintest idea what you're talking about. The defining ethos of nomadic foragers is egalitarianism. There is no such thing as "rich" men in these societies. Anyone who attempts to hoard wealth or dominate sexual access will be quickly ostracized and if necessary killed. There is zero controversy about this. Literally every anthropologist in the world agrees with me.
/r/MensRights14/09/18 02:39 AM
1

hypergamy only exists in hierarchical societies, which have only been around for about 5 percent of our history. [edit: in egalitarian societies]: "the adult males in the society form a general coalition to prevent any one of their number, alone or with a few allies, from dominating the others. Male egalitarianism is not necessarily extended to females—the degree to which females are subject to male despotism varies, even among hunter-gatherers. But the reverse dominance hierarchy prevents the m…
/r/MensRights14/09/18 12:25 AM
5

You're much less intelligent than I thought you were. That is all.
/r/MensRights13/09/18 04:30 AM
1

Serena locked herself in her panic room when a drug tester came to her door. I think that says it all. As for women's tennis, it was much more enjoyable in the era of Hingis. Female tennis players would make extensive use of drop shots, lobs etc.; then Serena came along and it's all BASH BASH BASH. Male players like Federer now make more extensive use of drop shots and other non-power-derived shots. It will be a shame when Federer retires...
/r/MensRights13/09/18 03:26 AM
5

Wow. That's an awful lot of words to say, "woman acts like spoiled brat, abuses ump who earns a thousand times less than she does, threatens his career, uses gender card, media laps it up."
/r/MensRights13/09/18 03:19 AM
5

She had one bad game She has a history of abusing umps and acting like a spoiled brat. What was it she said to that (female) line ref? "I'm going to shove this ball down your fucking throat?" Or something? Look: I'm not saying she's a completely awful, irredeemable person. She overcame great obstacles to achieve greatness. But if you act entitled and superior and abuse people who earn about a thousand times less than you do, then try to deflect blame from your own bad actions by crying "sexism" …
/r/MensRights13/09/18 02:59 AM
4

She's being painted as a crazy person in the media. Whose fault is that? Men? The patriarchy? She had a ten minute temper tantrum because she was losing. If you don't want to be viewed as a petulant child/spoiled brat/crazy person don't act like one. If anything the media has been shameful in its support of her antics; about 90 percent of the articles about Serena have cited "sexism" or some other nonsense in attempting to excuse her obnoxious behavior. They threw the ump under the bus simply fo…
/r/MensRights13/09/18 02:13 AM
29

In my humble opinion Norm MacDonald is the greatest comedian alive. Although his humor's not for everyone. He's highly respected by other comedians ("a comedian's comedian", as they say). He's been described as "the smartest guy in the room pretending to be the dumbest."* He's also utterly fearless. He makes jokes about 9/11, pedophilia, you name it. And he isn't afraid to bomb; in fact he seems to relish bombing. Check out his roast of Bob Saget. I was sad to see that he offered an apology afte…
/r/MensRights13/09/18 01:26 AM
4

It's not my fault that you incapable of comprehending advantage/disadvantage. Perhaps someone else can give you an ELI5 explanation.
/r/MensRights13/09/18 01:19 AM
8

They pointed out a higher number of penalties, not a higher rate per offense. Nevertheless, the evidence suggests that men are punished more often. I linked to the story of Fabio Fognini, who was ejected last year from the US open after verbally abusing an ump. I also mentioned McEnroe, who was ejected from the Australian Open for verbal abuse (which wasn't nearly as bad as that of Serena). If anything this demonstrates that women are treated with more leniency than men (indeed it would be surpr…
/r/MensRights13/09/18 12:04 AM
7

You didn't disapprove a single logical argument I made Actually, you didn't disprove a single argument I made. You just listed a bunch of non sequiturs. You don't even appear to have understood most of my arguments. If you're looking for the data about males receiving more punishments in tennis, just look in any threads on the R/tennis forum. They're all over the place in the Serena threads. Here's an infographic from an Aussie newspaper dealing with this US Open in particular.
/r/MensRights12/09/18 11:05 PM
1

All civilized societies, it should be stressed. Egalitarianism is the defining ethos of nomadic hunter-gatherers, which is how we lived for 95 percent of our history. They don't tolerate the existence individuals who monopolize resources or sexual access. It's also at least theoretically possible that we could replicate economic egalitarianism in civilized societies, but if there is we haven't figured out how to do it yet. There have been numerous anarchist societies that were internally functio…
/r/MensRights12/09/18 09:33 PM
40

She's wrong. (a) males receive a higher number of punishments/fines etc. than females. This was true even during this tournament. In cases of extremely egregious behavior, women are also treated more leniently. Eg when McEnroe behaved similarly during the Australian open he was booted from the match (if anything his behavior was much less egregious). This doesn't just apply to tennis: eg women are treated much more leniently when they commit crimes. (b) you can't point to another match and say "…
/r/MensRights12/09/18 09:26 PM
1

Well will you agree with the idea that - at the very least - these people should be encaged?
/r/MensRights12/09/18 02:36 AM
0

Btw, many muslims literally have slaves right now. Well, that seems like good reason to enslave them all! Uh, no, there are actually almost 2 billion. 2 billion what? Jews? No I'm sorry but frankly I don't consider that very likely lol.
/r/MensRights12/09/18 02:32 AM
1

Sure. I'll get back to you.
/r/MensRights12/09/18 02:15 AM
1

There a billion Muslims in the world. If you want to condemn one-seventh of the human population to slavery, go fuck yourself.
/r/MensRights12/09/18 02:13 AM
2

The wording doesn't make it clear WHO will be punished. Interesting point. No I can't say for certain. I haven't seen the source documents.
/r/MensRights11/09/18 06:42 AM
-12

Derp.
/r/MensRights11/09/18 05:19 AM
-23

Jesus, you sound like someone from Storm front. Fucking fascist fruitcakes.
/r/MensRights11/09/18 04:08 AM
206

The first domestic violence law in the US was gender neutral: The Massachusetts Bay Colony prohibited wife-beating as early as 1655. The edict states: "No man shall strike his wife nor any woman her husband on penalty of such fine not exceeding ten pounds for one offense, or such corporal punishment as the County shall determine." Like all hate movements feminists engage in historical revisionism. They claim that everyone used to be fine with the idea of a husband beating the shit out of his wif…
/r/MensRights10/09/18 11:40 PM
1

lol wut.
/r/MensRights10/09/18 11:25 PM
12

Yep, ironically, by trying to shift the blame from Serena onto men, feminists disempower women and offer a horrible lesson to little girls. The lesson (which feminists have successfully repeated over and over again) goes something like this: "the path to achievement is to whine and cry until men give you want you want", not "suck it up and overcome adversity -- this will earn you respect and character." They have an actual example of a "strong empowered woman" (her opponent) staring them right i…
/r/MensRights10/09/18 11:12 PM
13

mix up lol.
/r/MensRights10/09/18 06:19 PM
-1

I have no problem with this idea in principle. The real Orwellian language comes from the war-makers. The US Department of Defense used to be (accurately) called the Department of War. I can't remember who said it, but it went something like "as soon as they renamed it the Department of Defense I knew we would never see the end of aggressive war." The problem is in labeling this a "feminist" foreign policy. It suggests that women cause less conflict than men, which is absolute bullshit. In the f…
/r/MensRights10/09/18 05:56 PM
33

I was reading a woman's tennis forum (interestingly, they all agreed that Serena acted atrociously and this wasn't about "sexism") and one comment actually suggested that male umps would no longer want to officiate high profile female games and may even demand as much. I certainly wouldn't. Who wants to be accused of being a sexist asshole just for enforcing the rules fairly?
/r/MensRights10/09/18 05:30 PM
25

Both because that rule is apparently almost never upheld, It is by this ump. He's given the same warnings to eg Novak. But yeah, let's condemn an ump for actually doing his job.
/r/MensRights10/09/18 05:22 PM
38

"She gets drug tested more than others." If that's true (and I doubt it is), it may be because she once locked herself in her panic room and refused to get tested.
/r/MensRights10/09/18 05:21 PM
34

Women are almost never penalized more harshly than men. Just look at the criminal justice system. A study in the UK determined that if female criminals were treated as harshly as males, roughly half of all prisoners would be women. The only area I can think of where women are treated more harshly by societies are in cases of adultery. Not in the current day west, but in the past and in religious fundamentalist communities. This probably arose due to the uniquely male fear of unwittingly raising …
/r/MensRights10/09/18 05:15 PM
1

They have the same basic philosophy when it comes to the womynz -- protect and provide! Damsels in distress! Women have no agency!
/r/MensRights10/09/18 02:36 AM
-4

I'm a radical leftist and agree with OP.
/r/MensRights10/09/18 02:33 AM
20

Who cares? I can't stand Owens but the statement itself is 100 percent accurate. If Trump says the sky is blue that doesn't make it pink.
/r/MensRights10/09/18 02:33 AM
29

Your argument is garbage. The same ump has given a Nadal time code violations and Novak a coaching violation. He's known as being strict. You can't catch everything, and no Rafa doesn't get coached on "every point." If something is blatant and the ump sees it (they're usually not looking at the box), they should call it; the fact that many other umps are more lenient is irrelevant. This would be like getting caught for speeding then throwing a tantrum to the cop and saying "but I've seen other p…
/r/MensRights10/09/18 02:21 AM
3

I don't believe her. In fact, this is a textbook example of why the fourth-wave feminist notion that we should automatically believe all victims is pernicious. Um, this didn't start with "fourth" wave feminism. Ever heard of lynching?
/r/MensRights09/09/18 08:19 PM
9

Apparently this ump is known for being a stickler (ie actually enforcing the rules). There's footage from other matches where he made the same call (coaching) against Novak, and another where he called a time violation against Nadal. In both cases the players got a little pissy because they weren't used to being penalized for those rules, but they then proceeded to STFU and continue playing. Like, you know, adults. Serena proceeded to have a temper tantrum for about ten minutes and repeatedly in…
/r/MensRights09/09/18 05:59 PM
6

Christ, is that woman roided up or what? She once locked herself in her panic room when the drug tester came to her door. You do the math.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 05:53 PM
26

From the tennis sub: Yes, there is a double standard. If Nick Kyrgois did what Serena did today nobody would give a flying fart and would have accepted that he was in the wrong, they wouldn't be making excuses left, right and centre for him and would tell him he needs to grow up, which is fair.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 07:41 AM
2

Um, people, this is supposed to be a joke. Stop being such a bunch of tight-ass fools.
/r/MensRights09/12/17 04:52 PM
1

There's a great film called "And now for something completely different," with Steve Martin introducing the Python crew.
/r/MensRights09/12/17 02:45 PM
1

To be honest, I'm refreshed by your brutalism. But I'd still like it if you liked Candy. :)
/r/MensRights09/12/17 02:42 PM
1

And for the record I do find the dart at head bit funny. Just don't tell anyone.
/r/MensRights09/12/17 02:37 PM
1

And yes I'll use the John Candy card.
/r/MensRights09/12/17 01:08 AM
1

Well Pigman I suppose so. But do you like any of those softer films like Trains, Plains and autos?
/r/MensRights09/12/17 01:06 AM
1

No matter HOW drunk I was I would certainly never claim that the porr wittle Jewx are being pwosecuted. That's just dumb beyond belief. And yet here you are.
/r/MensRights09/12/17 12:35 AM
1

Sweetie, the only person who needs to put on her big girl pants is you. Stiffen that upper lip and STFU pussy.
/r/MensRights07/12/17 01:22 AM
0

YOU look like a baby, no one else. Now go get your soother or whatever.
/r/MensRights07/12/17 01:21 AM
-1

Don't be such a pansy.
/r/MensRights07/12/17 01:20 AM
0

Boom
/r/MensRights07/12/17 01:19 AM
8

Obama’s right, women are superior to men. Let me count the ways That is the actual title. That was published in Guardian, mind you. Idiocracy.
/r/MensRights07/12/17 01:18 AM
2

Stop the world men want to get off? Hehe. Yes yes capitalism free market blah blah blah. No I'm talking about something much more dramatic than lad's mags -- even though I think lad's mags are awesome -- I'm talking about boobs. Wonderful, miraculous boobies. And also don't forget that bit about prudish women trying to outlaw the leisure activities of the male working class.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 11:54 PM
2

the facts are hilarious. You have a very dark sense of humor.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 11:51 PM
1

Heh. Have you read "Stand by your Manhood"? There's a whole section on "lad mags". There's a very interesting history of prudish women trying to ban such publications. Feminists are old hat in that respect. In fact, there's a very disturbing history of prudish women trying to police and outlaw the "leisure activities of the [male] working class," in the words of Kristian Williams, who wrote a remarkable history of policing in the United States. They even managed to outlaw booze at one point (edi…
/r/MensRights06/12/17 11:40 PM
5

Kemper was very, very intelligent, so he easily snookered his shrinks. "One thing the show seems to have gotten right is that his mother was grossly abusive." Unfortunately you sort of have to read between the lines in the TV show. The actor playing Kemper mentions his mother's abuse but unless you've actually read about what happened you could miss it. Fincher does an okay job. There's a line "it's always the mothers," but that could also be construed as misogyny rather than bitter truth. And i…
/r/MensRights06/12/17 11:33 PM
1

Still. Nice tits. I'm sure you'd agree ;)
/r/MensRights06/12/17 11:27 PM
3

Also -- about abortion. Well there's literally nothing you can do about that. A few morons have assassinated doctors, but has that actually helped? No. IMO the best way of ending abortion is to create a society where we actually care about children. That is the ONLY solution. Domestic violence? Yes we need to recognize that women abuse children. That means opposing feminism. Women are not evil. Women are just human beings.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 11:25 PM
2

Well, everyone has the capacity for evil. And men are no angels. To be honest I think you should seriously consider anger management. I know that probably sounds ridiculous if not hilarious to you, but I've found martial arts to be quite stimulating. The bottom line is that anger should be directed toward something useful.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 11:19 PM
1

Hmmm, that's seems like a pretty big generalization. My mom is a complete sweetheart, for example. I just think we tend to overlook how these monsters are made.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 11:10 PM
4

No this is funny. Grimly funny, but still funny. It would be better with "Hey Dodgson raped me! Dodgson everyone!"
/r/MensRights06/12/17 10:49 PM
2

lol
/r/MensRights06/12/17 10:47 PM
0

Also, I have another idea
/r/MensRights06/12/17 10:30 PM
1

Meh, I tried. Can't be bothered to try again. If you are a real hero, you will re-submit this awesome boobs, sorry, post.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 09:55 PM
1

Okay I'll try again. I really think this is an important post.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 09:51 PM
1

Can I submit this brilliant post in another foremat?
/r/MensRights06/12/17 09:45 PM
1

GRRRRR
/r/MensRights06/12/17 09:44 PM
-3

You're wrong. "Left wing" = feminism plus "people of color." And a whole bunch of those folks.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 09:41 PM
1

This was another brainstorm of mine. I swear to God -- I'm a genius!
/r/MensRights06/12/17 09:39 PM
1

I was brainstorming in my office, and I came up with what I consider a brilliant idea. What if we showed tits on magazines? It's just crazy enough to work!
/r/MensRights06/12/17 09:38 PM
1

Elon Musk is a sexual harasser beast? Well I never. No wait, I was thinking of Mel Gibson. Carry on.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 09:24 PM
3

What about tits!? Like, literally, tits. We forget the wisdom of our ancestors :(
/r/MensRights06/12/17 09:22 PM
4

Yeah that sucks. I would be much more happy of the NYTimes fell. Because let's be honest, that's mostly propaganda too.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 07:17 PM
3

Nope. Vice needs to die.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 07:15 PM
2

Religions tend to have a dual morality. Feminism is not a religion. It is just hate.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 06:44 PM
4

Wow. Just...Yow.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 06:43 PM
2

There is a HUGE difference between left and right libertarians. Right libertarians support fruit cakes like Milton Friedman. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
/r/MensRights06/12/17 06:22 PM
6

Really glad to see the "old left" surging with Spiked. Rock on O'Neill.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 06:15 PM
2

Actually /u/girlwriteswhat is far right. Just look at her twitter. She'll agree. I'm not talking about social issues like eg gay marriage; I'm talking supporting the far right on economic issues. She's even spoken fondly of the deranged far right fruit cake Milton Friedman lol.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 06:07 PM
6

Cracked is dogshit. Bubye douche bags. See you in Hell :) Next up: Vice
/r/MensRights06/12/17 05:39 PM
1

As funny as it seems, it's also profoundly creepy. Everyone knows that no one has sex like feminists demand: Can I do X? Can I do Y? So what is left? The only thing left is that every single man (and woman, for that matter) is a rapist. Not even your lovely old grandmother has sex in the way feminists demand. So yeah it's really creepy. It's hard not to come to the conclusion that a certain faction of man-hating feminists want every man to be de facto "guilty." It reminds of the "Damocles sword"…
/r/MensRights06/12/17 01:41 PM
2

Thank you :) I appreciate it.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 01:33 PM
1

And yes I absolutely disagree with her.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 01:20 PM
0

Karen is the most interesting and intelligent MRA. I'm breaking her balls. That's about it. I do think she should show more appreciation for leftists, but that's just my opinion.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 01:17 PM
1

Now this is fucking lame. Hundreds of baby boys die every year from having their genitals slashed, but I'm supposed to care about this douche bag on "spotify".
/r/MensRights06/12/17 12:08 PM
2

YOu ablesit sexist racist cantaker-ist mmmmmist (fuck it I give up). ;)
/r/MensRights06/12/17 12:06 PM
3

Bottom line: workers need support/unions. Even the toughest worker needs a dude who will back him up.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 08:54 AM
7

Well, every young boy can recount the first time he witnessed a feminist rocket-surgeon. To say there was a "party in my pants" would be an understatement. Her beautiful glasses, her exquisite capacity for numbers and logic... On the other hand a big titted broad with a killer ass strode by, and I was completely unimpressed.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 07:52 AM
20

Umm...with the exception of a few men like Leonardo DiCaprio, don't women have sexual power over men? I thought that was the view among anthropologists... So in other words, isn't this woman full of shit?
/r/MensRights06/12/17 07:14 AM
-18

Indeed. This is lame as fuck. Edit: minus four? Nice. You goofy little simps.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 07:12 AM
2

BTW, I am only too aware that unions can become corrupted -- eg when managers get in bed with the capitalists. My first job was in an underground shit hole; the "real Canadian Superstore." My first day on the job a co-worker got his face splashed with battery acid. They used Taylorist principles, and the union "leadership" were a bunch of paid lackeys for the corporation. That isn't a fault of unions per se. It's a fault of people like you who insist that unions aren't necessary, and that we sho…
/r/MensRights06/12/17 06:59 AM
3

There are a few things here. It always amazes me that right wingers (not you, evidently) fail to recognize how men and boys in the past sacrificed to give you the goodies you now enjoy. Four-year-old boys don't have to work now -- at least not in the West (they do in Afghanistan). It's actually pretty incredible to go back and read the original liberals like Locke -- they supported child labor. Not ruling class child labor, mind you, but child labor among the poor. Not their own children, but th…
/r/MensRights06/12/17 06:12 AM
1

Okay I finally figured out your thought process (such as it is). People also need to fight for union rights in the now. Get i? So eg if some poor guy is dying in a coal mine, hopefully he has a union to protect him. Get it? Now when you support far right douche bags, you disempower working men. Again, hopefully you are able to understand this basic concept.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 03:22 AM
-1

Sounds gay as hell.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 02:49 AM
0

Um, look up the great depression. Men fought to secure Union rights. I'm not sure why you consider that controversial.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 02:33 AM
0

lol you're like an old woman. Lighten up little douche.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 01:59 AM
-10

No. This topic will be fiercely disputed among right wing Americans, but American citizens fought back during the Great depression and achieved basic human/union rights. They fought against all odds -- police, vigilantes, even the National Guard -- and won the right to organize. Don't let right wingers like /u/girlwriteswhat define you. Men have always had to fight to secure their basic rights.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 01:51 AM
2

Hear hear.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 09:59 PM
10

Neither. They are co-conspirators in absurdity.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 09:47 PM
31

That isn't unusual, at least among MRA's. Many of used to be feminists before we started studying the history of the movement. I'm an anti-feminist precisely because I believe in gender equality.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 09:00 PM
16

I didn't say they were all powerful. Just powerful. And yes the bill in Canada will likely be passed.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 08:58 PM
21

Oh yeah? Well, make sure to ask her every time you escalate a sexual encounter ("can I touch your boobs? Can I touch your nipples? Can I lick your nipples? can I keep thrusting?" etc.) otherwise -- it's rape. Edit: just to be clear -- the feminist "council" hasn't yet determined how often a man should ask for permission. This is a big problem. Is it every ten seconds? Twenty seconds? Etc. And what about the deaf or blind? Needless to say this raises all sorts of new issues, which feminists shoul…
/r/MensRights05/12/17 07:09 PM
57

Do you really think they represent any real group of people? In Canada, feminists are trying to make it more difficult for men accused of rape to introduce exculpatory evidence like text messages and emails. The bill (C-51) was introduced after media personality Jian Ghomeshi was proved innocent of rape through text messages and emails revealing that his accusers were conspiring to frame him. The bill will most likely pass. Feminists are also trying to make "enthusiastic consent" the law. It wil…
/r/MensRights05/12/17 05:32 PM
2

Inverted totalitarianism Revolution - While the classical totalitarian regimes overthrew the established system, inverted totalitarianism instead exploits the legal and political constraints of the established democratic system, and uses these constraints to defeat their original purpose.[12] Government - Whereas the classical totalitarian government was an ordered, idealized and coordinated whole,[15] inverted totalitarianism is a managed democracy which applies managerial skills to basic democ…
/r/MensRights05/12/17 04:12 PM
2

From a casual observation it seems both these subs are just bitching about women. I don't know what to tell you. Apparently you don't know how to read. It's understandable that there will be a certain amount of anger in this sub as it deals with some pretty profound injustices, however very few of us "blame women" as a demographic; we do blame feminists since they are responsible for many of said injustices at the policy level. Most of us here have girlfriends or wives (some have gone through bi…
/r/MensRights05/12/17 04:07 PM
7

“First of all, it didn’t happen, the way she reported,” the actor said, according to Deadline. To which Oliver replied, “It’s that part of the response to this stuff that pisses me off. It is reflective of who you were. You’ve given no evidence to show that it didn’t happen. [see apparently men have to prove their innocence now, rather than vice versa.] There was a period of time when you were creeping around women. It feels like a cop-out to say, ‘Well, this isn’t me.’ Do you understand how tha…
/r/MensRights05/12/17 04:03 PM
8

Except for the assumption of incompetence those things apply to both genders. And the former derives from affirmative action, which feminists support.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 09:09 AM
5

lol @ this dork getting triggered over a cartoon. There's nothing controversial about it guy. On average men work longer hours in more difficult and dangerous job. If you can't deal with reality then maybe you should go visit a feminist sub.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 09:07 AM
7

Nothing about this post "belittles" women. It simply demonstrates that women are privileged. On average they have a better life/work balance, they are favored by affirmative action and they work less hours in less difficult and dangerous jobs. Not sure why you're getting your panties in a twist over facts. If you get triggered by something this benign you might want to head on over to R/MensLib or some other feminist circlejerk.
/r/MensRights05/12/17 09:06 AM
12

What the fuck does involuntary celibacy have to do with the earnings gap. Are you a feminist troll or something?
/r/MensRights05/12/17 08:02 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter