TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

89peters Archive

View 10 posts and 501 comments by 89peters on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
2258

Unconfirmed89peters/r/MensRights14/08/18 01:27 AM
347

Social Issues89peters/r/MensRights10/08/18 09:27 PM
158

Feminism89peters/r/MensRights04/09/18 08:55 PM
104

Feminism89peters/r/MensRights03/09/18 07:48 PM
99

Edu./Occu.89peters/r/MensRights10/08/18 10:35 PM
81

Discrimination89peters/r/MensRights26/08/18 09:16 PM
51

Edu./Occu.89peters/r/MensRights15/08/18 08:30 PM
46

Discrimination89peters/r/MensRights17/08/18 09:53 PM
43

Anti-MRM89peters/r/MensRights11/08/18 01:56 AM
27

Anti-MRM89peters/r/MensRights17/08/18 07:13 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Unfortunately stay at home dads (who are awesome) are significantly more likely to be divorced. Most (not all, but most) women become resentful because the dad gets to spend time with the kids while they work. It's a failed experiment. Until we create a voluntary socialist/mutualist society we're stuck with traditional gender roles. Feminists have done absolutely nothing to help matters, and in fact are doing the exact opposite.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 04:39 AM
1

These hard left/anti-capitalist types have infilitrated every part of our society And yet society remains staunchly capitalist. Corporations are more powerful than ever, and wealth inequality is worse than during the gilded age. You are so dumb it almost beggars belief. It's absolutely astonishing that people are so stupid that they can be so easily manipulated. Yes, our staunchly PRO-CAPITALIST society is being undermined. LMAO
/r/MensRights05/09/18 04:30 AM
1

Turns out working isn't all fun and games lol. Rich feminist spoiled brats decided they wanted "careers". Unfortunately 99 percent of the population doesn't get to have a "career," they have to fucking work. And even rich female bankers like OP are starting to realize that they had it much, much easier prior to the whole "feminism" and "strong and empowered" thing. Hilariously, according to The Economist, the "new American dream" for women is to become a housewife. LMAO.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 04:19 AM
5

Ahem, feminism disagrees with you. Female choices are caused by the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 04:15 AM
1

Um, women said they wanted this. They supposedly wanted the hard work at the office and the overtime and as much work hours as possible etc. Because strong and empowered. Turns out even high paying jobs suck ass. Who could have possibly imagined that work actually isn't a fun, great time? Feminists got what they wanted. And I'm supposed to -- what -- feel sorry for them? Fuck right off. Enjoy the work, you stupid dipshits.
/r/MensRights05/09/18 04:10 AM
69

Be gentle, folks. Remember that this is a WOMAN not a man. Ideally this woman should be given a ticker tape parade, certainly not punished or "incarcerated." In fact, I wonder if that husband of hers was so innocent after all, and maybe a man with toxic masculinity bought her this crossbow? Inquiring minds would like to know. I'm also starting to wonder if this victim had a son. Could her son have imparted a certain degree of toxic masculinity on his mother? We all know how fucking annoying litt…
/r/MensRights05/09/18 03:13 AM
4

You have been banned from R/Feminism.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 11:54 PM
14

I would go further, much further. I believe that most "feminists" who have taken the time to read eg Stanton, Greer, Steinem etc. literally hate men and boys. It's not a comforting conclusion, because we all want to help women and believe that they are not capable of evil. We all want to help our mothers and daughters. But feminists are really, really hateful. They despise men and boys. What are we supposed to do with this? Well women need to step up, and as Jordan Peterson said, "control their …
/r/MensRights04/09/18 11:42 PM
7

However, humans consider freedom more important than contentment. Are humans the same? Or are men and women different, on average? I think that's one of the reasons male-female relations are so fucked up. Think of it this way: feminists are demanding that "free speech" be curtailed lest it hurt people's feelings. According to polls, most women -- but not men -- agree with this: feelings are more important than free speech. Well from there you can already recognize my conclusion. We need a better…
/r/MensRights04/09/18 11:24 PM
6

Well to borrow the feminist phrase literally Hitler, ironically the feminist website Jezebel itself applies. Yes, their hate speech closely resembles that of Hitler etc. Just change "Man" to "Jew." Actually I think there's even a sub that does that, ManKampf or something.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 11:19 PM
8

even stormfront, doesn't have a 100% violence against jews rate lol. I know this isn't intended to be funny but yes, it's hilarious. I literally spat out my coffee. I also love the politically incorrect humor of the Jew Larry David: ​ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0zret7O8YoU ​ Jews are just normal people. Monothesim is not a Jewish invention, despite what jews will tell you. But it's true that Jews have been less parochial, and therefore more universal, presumably because they "wandered." So …
/r/MensRights04/09/18 10:54 PM
10

As someone whose posts are usually too long, even I'm saying: this is too long. You're making it impractical to actually try to respond This is the lamest excuse ever. IMO we should use sentencing disparities to reduce men's sentences and make things better for men generally. So where are you? Where are you supposed "gender-equal" feminists? The UK government is demanding that women be granted even more privilege in the criminal justice system. Where the fuck are you supposed "gender equal" femi…
/r/MensRights04/09/18 10:39 PM
4

Yes. And this shouldn't even be controversial. It is a fact that the richest men in the world have supported feminism. And the richest men in the world continue to support feminism. Indeed the richest men in the world are supporting feminism with increasing fervor, to the point where a lot of media is just feminist propaganda. Now the question naturally arises, "why"? Well I think it was summed up well in a 1969 FBI report, mentioned by a (fucking straight white male) scholar during Occupy Wall …
/r/MensRights04/09/18 10:17 PM
32

First let me say that I think you're awesome. I love MensLibWatch and SRSwatch etc. BTW I demand that you update MensLibWatch more often. Second I think "MensLib" is probably the most toxic site on Reddit past and present. Yes, I'm including "coontown" etc. It's unhealthy to hate an out-group, but it's extremely unhealthy to hate yourself. IMO the easiest way to expose the lie that feminism is trying to help men too is to ask what they're doing for issues where men are behind. Didn't you hear? W…
/r/MensRights04/09/18 10:01 PM
5

Not sure where you're going with this, but 2 of 3 college students are now women, when is feminist equality going to kick in It's called sarcasm. Look into it. they agreed to a woman I don't buy that. Most women? Sure, I'd buy that. But all women? I had a casual conversation with my sister about gender and she agrees that modern-day feminists are borderline insane. Feminism is more about hurting men than helping women, the suffragettes were no different, this is nothing new. I absolutely agree w…
/r/MensRights04/09/18 09:54 PM
1

Well that's...more tricky than it at first sounds. I guess just the mere idea that women are capable of being extremely violent and fucking your life up. One of the most interesting aspects of that film is that feminists alternately condemned it and supported it; some feminists argued that it was "misogynist" because it portrayed a woman as an hysterical, violent nut; but other feminists argued that it showed how women are oppressed by the patriarchy and sometimes righteously become violent. In …
/r/MensRights04/09/18 09:51 PM
7

Indeed.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 09:20 PM
2

Well, if there is, it wasn't intentional. The Sally Miller Gearhart thing is known, accepted. I recently came across the name Lois Waisbrooker, googled her, she has a wiki. But perhaps someone created an elaborate hoax. I'm not sure why they bothered, if that's the case. Ultimately it doesn't really matter whether a first wave feminist suggested reducing males to ten percent of the population; the fact that the literal founder of gender studies supported such an idea is damning enough.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 08:37 PM
3

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1pkqtn/the_global_gender_gap_report_it_aint_about/
/r/MensRights04/09/18 07:47 PM
56

Amazing that that song was written about men. To be fair, Otis loved Aretha Franklin's version about women (on the other hand, what was he supposed to say? "No I hated it"). I'll do you one better: the song "girls just wanna have fun", which became an unofficial feminist anthem, was originally a bitter song written by a man about female frivolity.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 07:24 PM
1

lol! That's...grimly hilarious.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 07:12 PM
2

The Hunt is a masterpiece. Someone else mentioned Gone Girl, what about Fatal Attraction? The best film about prisons is probably Ghosts of the Civil Dead.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 07:08 PM
8

I'll do you one worse. Rwanda was listed in the top five most "gender equal" countries in the world after the genocide. Why? Because most men and boys were dead. Since most men and boys were dead, women were more likely to occupy governmental positions. The World Economic Forum (WEC) explicitly states on their "gender inequality" webpage that they don't include male disadvantage in their index; if males are behind in some area, it is measured as neutral; if females are behind, it is measured as …
/r/MensRights04/09/18 07:01 PM
4

You have a good day too :)
/r/MensRights04/09/18 01:33 PM
1

Well, Milano has great tits. As that un-pc to say?
/r/MensRights04/09/18 01:29 PM
3

Meh. She was a pacifist. Is, actually. She advocated a sort of soft eugenics. Terrible idea, but not really malicious or man-hating That would require mass murder. We're done here. You're sick.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 01:22 PM
3

In fact, the founder of the first gender studies course advocated genocide against men and boys. That's where the phrase "the future is female" came from. You have it exactly backwards: young, dumb, nice people are naive enough to support feminism. Brutal old hags who hate men develop the theory.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 01:18 PM
5

Okay well this is getting into some apparent sexual fetish stuff, which is boring, but note that you yourself note that you give him power. So that only demonstrates my point: that sexual relations and inter-sex dynamics are more complex than commonly recognized.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 01:10 PM
2

Sure. But remember that arguing on an MRA board will get you nowhere. Feminists have profound institutional power, MRA's have none (which is odd for an alleged "patriarchy"). Tussle with your fellow feminists, and see what they have to say. You may be surprised.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 12:55 PM
8

I even get told I must be weak for submitting to men. Not even close to weak. The exact opposite in fact. Females are not submissive, even when they pretend to be. There's a great paper on this titled "The Myth of Male Dominance." Essentially, most women prefer to exercise power indirectly, because they are more risk-averse. Societies consistently fail to recognize female power, because it is not expressed in the manner of male power. Female power is indirect; male power is direct. On average. O…
/r/MensRights04/09/18 12:51 PM
4

I'm not a MGTOW. I'm married.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 12:45 PM
1

Well, that's a step up from the average. Good luck.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 12:42 PM
2

You may want to consider that you're a patsy. Just a thought.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 12:27 PM
8

I think OP is incredibly disturbing. I feel like I've woken up in some really bad (nice?) but semi-charming 50's horror flick. Yes, we've reached the point where...being nice, is an indicator of something bad. Nice = bad. Bad = nice. Shoot me now. Edit: and I'm going to tell you exactly how this happened, and I say this as a married man. All men are nice to almost all women. So women need to differentiate, in order to select the best male. So women conclude that the men they find attractive are …
/r/MensRights04/09/18 12:14 PM
9

Are "we" acting in bad faith, or are the people with power? I'm sorry you got banned, but it happens to everyone who speaks truth on R/Feminism. You're intelligent enough to recognize what is going on here. And the bottom line is that harming men and boys also harms women and girls. That's really all there is to it.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 10:54 AM
1

also, she didn't founded metoo. she simply hijacked it with her hollywood fame. Nope. She was one of the founders, along with Rose McGowan and Milano. Doesn't exactly fit with the narrative, but true.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 10:46 AM
2

It's fine. Great website BTW, I wish you good luck :)
/r/MensRights04/09/18 10:13 AM
3

Well, I hope you're wrong. ​
/r/MensRights04/09/18 10:11 AM
3

Feel free.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 09:20 AM
4

There's a third option, women take over and send us all to die in a pointless war. If we manage to take power back I hope we go twice as hard on them as they did on us. They won't, and I genuinely believe they'd run the world into the ground to hurt us. Being angry toward women is like being angry at a cat for killing a mouse, or an orca for playing with seals. Yes, the cat is really fucking cruel, but is it really worth your time to get enraged at the cat's behavior? The cat has to eat too. It …
/r/MensRights04/09/18 09:05 AM
7

They will lose, and I'm 100 percent certain of this. Not 99 percent. Not 98 percent. 100 percent. Trump? Largely irrelevant in the scheme of things, at least when it comes to gender. It's not like he's some avid MRA or something. True that his education secretary has thrown some sand in the gears of college kangaroo courts, but that's about it. No this is a much, much larger issue. In the early 20th century an Oxford anthropologist named JD Unwin studied gender. The foreword to his book ("Sex an…
/r/MensRights04/09/18 07:33 AM
1

Great job.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 06:57 AM
5

The only reason feminism has been permitted to exist is because billionaire males gave you power. Again, it's not a question of "if" feminists will fail, it's a question of when. In the near future, feminists will be recognized in the same way we recognize the Ku Klux Klan. You will suffer enormous social shame, and rightly so. I realize this seems improbable to you, but remember, again, that rich men are the only reason feminism became a thing in the first place. No powerful man (or woman) is d…
/r/MensRights04/09/18 05:36 AM
4

(Shrug). That about sums it up. I'll be frank: we don't want or need feminist participation in the MRM. We have accurately diagnosed feminism as a hate movement, and we consider self-aware feminists scum. You hate men and boys, we get it, even if you don't. Now here's something you can do: go hang out on a feminist sub, talk about "toxic masculinity" etc. Leave men and boys alone, stop pestering us, stop impeding progress. But recognize this: you WILL fail. There is absolutely no question about …
/r/MensRights04/09/18 05:24 AM
13

Dude, make a logical remark or go home. Your comment is all over the place. And your latter comment, "teh gays, Muslims", well I have nothing against either Muslims or gays either.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 01:57 AM
1

You are a dishonorable man. You are a piece of shit. That's it.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 12:47 AM
1

OP? No. Show respect when it's due, lil' grasshopper.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 12:26 AM
1

Man, as much as I'd like to..."Can you show us the extract from the Book where Waisbrook said in A Sex Revolution that she wanted "genocide of men to reduce them to 10 percent of the human population."...I just can't to it. For one, I'm too lazy. For another, well lazy works here as well, but I simply refuse to manufacture evidence.
/r/MensRights04/09/18 12:14 AM
4

No offense Doug you seem to do good work but I shall not "tweet with you to seek justice." Twitter, sometimes described as Twatter, is a complete cesspool. I don't even want to dip my toe into that hot steaming pile. Twitter does have one useful function: people can retweet vides/articles/etc., and if there are "followers" (jesus what a loathsome term) they can learn something. So maybe you're right after all, depending on what you meant. But Jesus, Twitter...
/r/MensRights03/09/18 09:35 PM
3

The quote is from Gearhart; the argument is from Waisbrook. I thought that was obvious. Wikipedia notes: [Waisbrook] is perhaps best remembered for her 1893 novel A Sex Revolution in which she advocated mass genocide of men to reduce them to 10 percent of the human population." Lest anyone be confused by this guy's post, Waisbrook absolutely argued that males should be reduced to ten percent of the population; as did Gearhart. But to avoid confusion I'll edit OP.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 09:18 PM
3

Yes, fair point. There's an awful lot of money in the divorce industry.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 07:37 PM
18

Notable that it was a Republican governor who blocked reform after pressure by NOW (the National Organization for Women). Feminists are happy to work with right wing politicians, and apparently right wing politicians are happy to work with feminists. Notable also that a strong majority of the Floridian population, both Republicans and Democrats, supported the would-be reforms. I think this demonstrates more than anything that toxic feminists have become an extremely powerful lobby. I mean at thi…
/r/MensRights03/09/18 06:18 PM
1

Sure you are. I know a lot of trans folks claim that as part of their therapy. Yes, you too are "a guy", yes I agree.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 12:08 PM
10

Getting married has tons of benefits. The thing is, it all depends on "you" lol. You are a funny girl.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 08:29 AM
1

I'm sorry but this is a clear case of toxic masculinity -- the male should hand over all his assets. WTF this is not even controversial. Boys, it's the law. WTFR.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 08:13 AM
58

Be gentle.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 08:14 PM
5

There is no "rape crisis" on Australian universities. The very idea is absurd. The fact that Australian feminists insist that there is such a crisis is rather disturbing. It suggests two possibilities: They know that rape hysteria increases their influence and power, so they are terrorizing women and demonizing men to maintain/expand their influence and power. Terrorizing women and demonizing men are goals in and of themselves. Probably both. Either way feminists are terrorists. Instead of using…
/r/MensRights02/09/18 06:55 PM
7

It's female privilege, full stop. Women have sexual power over men, therefore they can sexually select for men who earn more than they do, therefore men try to earn more than they do. If for whatever reason they are unable to achieve a high paying job in a non-dangerous profession they will have to work a dirty/dangerous one. Assuming they want to have a relationship and/or be respected in the broader community (men are judged based on their earnings). Moreover, if a divorced man has children, h…
/r/MensRights02/09/18 06:40 PM
7

No this is highly relevant. We are living in a time when feminists are publishing articles in mainstream newspapers arguing that we should eliminate female prisons. The UK has made it official policy that only violent female criminals be incarcerated. All of this despite the fact that women already receive extreme institutional privilege in the criminal justice system. This means that their predominantly male victims are being denied justice. Katharine Quarmby, author of The Women that kill, abu…
/r/MensRights02/09/18 06:31 PM
2

Stop abusing men and boys by using terms like "toxic masculinity." Feminists like you are the equivalent of an abusive spouse, and one of the main reasons so many men commit suicide. If you don't have the decency to stay in your feminist hate cult subs, remain silent and just listen to what men are saying for a change. And for Pete's sake don't link to feminist trash like Wikipedia if you're trying to make an argument.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 10:02 AM
1

Would love to read that thread, as well as the research in question, if you have a sec. Thanks.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 09:57 AM
11

Look sicko, I wouldn't care if hundreds of studies hadn't shown circumcision to be harmful, and if hundreds of boys didn't die from the procedure every year, I'd still be opposed to mutilating babies because it's a grotesque violation of bodily autonomy. Does not help your cause You're the one who brought up that neocon twerp, not me. In 2003 Shapiro advocated the “transfer [of] the Palestinians and the Israeli-Arabs from Judea, Samaria, Gaza and Israel proper.” “the Palestinian Arab population …
/r/MensRights02/09/18 07:52 AM
17

and there are many redpilled Jews: just go to Shapiro's Daily Wire, a pro-MRA site on Due Process issues. Shapiro's not pro-MRA. He's just a far right quack. He also advocates war crimes against Palestinian civilians. Why does intactivism talk attract allegations of anti-Semitism? Because some Jews have a bad habit of screaming "anti-Semitism" to deflect negative press. It's a pathetic weasel technique similar to feminists yelling "misogyny!" For every "study" claiming "health benefits" there ar…
/r/MensRights02/09/18 07:39 AM
5

"And you're just like, bitch? What do you know?" That about sums it up, yes. "Very similar to how feminism started" Wrong. Feminists was started by rich women who hated men. "Now feminism is about equality of outcome" Wrong again. If feminism was about equality of outcome they would be seeking equal treatment by the criminal courts. "MRA's...puts us into opposing sides." False dichotomy. MRA's do not pretend that "women oppressed men through all of teh history!" or that "women oppress men as a c…
/r/MensRights02/09/18 07:14 AM
1

This was not "Men banding together." It was male workers and their housewives (the majority of the female population) banding together. Both were worried about female workers driving down male wages. Incidentally bachelors were also subject to discrimination, in addition to eg being forced to fight and die in wars. The vast majority of men didn't attend universities either. The major changes in the workplace occurred due to automation, safer work environments and the birth control pill; all crea…
/r/MensRights02/09/18 04:00 AM
1

Feminist trolls upvoting OP.
/r/MensRights02/09/18 03:08 AM
3

Hell, even with all the female centered programs and outright discrimination we have today we don't have equality of outcome. I assume you're talking about discrimination against men and boys, because females are now privileged in all major institutions. Women work less hours in less difficult jobs so naturally we're not gonna see equality of outcome. We don't have equality of outcome in prisons either, because women are institutionally privileged in the criminal justice system as well. Women ha…
/r/MensRights02/09/18 12:09 AM
1

When you say against women the implication is that the majority of women wanted to eliminate the traditional male and female spheres and meld them together. I see no evidence for this and a ton to the contrary. You should read The Myth of Male Dominance by Susan Rodgers. Terrorist attacks are obviously awful whether committed against males or females or both, but terrorists are a tiny segment of the population and do not represent all men "banding together." Men definitely band together to prote…
/r/MensRights01/09/18 11:21 PM
39

Until blacks learn to stop stealing they should not be welcome in stores. Until women learn to stop throwing their babies in dumpsters then custody should always go to the man. In fact we could turn the feminist's argument on its head using the same criteria she did: women are just as likely to sexually assault men as vice versa -- men just hardly ever report it -- therefore according to her logic men would be justified in banning women from eg the workplace. The problem with feminists is that m…
/r/MensRights01/09/18 10:37 PM
1

Women were pregnant much of the time and someone had to raise the kids. It was simply more efficient to have separate spheres of influence and separate roles. The majority of both men and women agreed. If you're asking me to feel sorry for rich women who ate caviar and had male servants, well, let's just say there were far worse forms of oppression among both sexes.
/r/MensRights01/09/18 10:23 PM
1

Higher education for women in general has been a really really rare thing for women. Ditto men.
/r/MensRights01/09/18 09:44 PM
1

"We work exclusively with women, non-binary and transgender persons," the first-time festival host told Euronews. "This ranges from artists to catering to security personnel." Oh yeah? Does that include the people who built the stages and lugged in the heavy equipment and designed the equipment and who are going to clean up the garbage you leave behind? I call bullshit. Such discrimination is, on paper, against the law in Sweden from what I understand Let's see if there's one man in Sweden with …
/r/MensRights01/09/18 09:39 PM
55

Not exactly. They are demanding women only spaces but eliminating male only spaces. Eventually men will start demanding the return of male-only spaces, and we'll be right back where we started. Feminism is proving itself to be a failed experiment. As for the concert, unless the women had demanded female-only workers, audio engineers etc. it's nothing but a celebration of female privilege and female supremacy. Hard to believe Swedish men aren't taking them to court. I mean surely even they have t…
/r/MensRights01/09/18 08:06 PM
3

In certain extreme cases you could make an argument that it is. For example if life is at stake. Combat units that include women are less effective, putting everyone's life at greater risk, so it could be argued that it is justified to exclude women. Or in cases of basic social health. Warren Farrell has argued that what feminists call "positive discrimination" would be justified in the teaching profession, since many children are being raised without any male influences at all, which is extreme…
/r/MensRights01/09/18 06:55 PM
14

The train manager is a woman. Well, I travel a lot by train and maybe one in 50 train managers is a woman, so fair enough. A terrorist scenario develops involving a woman in a suicide bomb vest. Armed police are called. The team’s leader is a woman. A police sniper takes aim – a woman. An explosives expert arrives – a woman. The situation defused, the Bodyguard is congratulated by his boss – a woman – and assigned to protect the Home Secretary – a woman. Needless to say the Bodyguard has a faili…
/r/MensRights01/09/18 06:03 PM
54

I saw an identical argument to OP put forth in a major US newspaper (can't remember which) regarding MeToo. The author said that men who label their accusers "liars or gold-diggers" "make women more frightened of coming forward". So evidently innocent men are supposed to pretend to be guilty when accused of a serious crime by a woman. This is the level of irrationality and hysteria we're dealing with. Feminists are taking us back to the dark ages. They have demonstrated conclusively that they ar…
/r/MensRights01/09/18 05:48 PM
3

Women suffer less violence than any other group. Less violence than men and less violence than children. Indeed women commit the majority of violence against children. They are also more likely to initiate domestic violence. This law therefore makes no sense.
/r/MensRights01/09/18 03:54 AM
33

Pretty fair article. However: Since equality of the sexes is now enshrined in law, Karen argues that it’s time for men and women to stop bickering and start building bridges. Equality of the sexes is not "enshrined in law." Females literally have more rights than males. Eg it is illegal to mutilate their genitals, they can abandon parenthood if they so wish, and they have no civic obligations in exchange for voting. However it is true that the biggest problem is institutional discrimination agai…
/r/MensRights31/08/18 11:17 PM
1

As someone who has worked both in a fairly dangerous factory and in a female dominated office environment -- trust me, you'd rather risk your life in construction ;)
/r/MensRights31/08/18 08:47 PM
7

without evidence that a man has 'hunted down food at risk to himself' he is worthless, because that imbues him with value. Not sure what your point is. And in fact hunter-gatherer societies do take care of injured men and continue to respect older men who are no longer effective hunters. However it's true that a young injured man who is not an effective hunter and has no other talent will have a lower degree of social status. birth control didn't 'free women to go to work and be men's equals fin…
/r/MensRights31/08/18 08:44 PM
11

Not only does misandry exist, it is institutionalized in every western country. Misandry is the core belief system of feminists. If it doesn't exist neither does feminism, and I'm pretty sure feminists are now running a large number of institutions. There is a reason that misandry does not exist. Women, especially feminists, simply do not have the resources, the sufficient power or the time to impose such a discriminatory system. I can't believe the author wrote this with a straight face. This a…
/r/MensRights31/08/18 08:36 PM
3

Outstanding piece.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 08:27 PM
9

It's not a one way street. The lives of women are perceived as being much more valuable, but men are perceived as being more competent and authoritative. According to anthropologist Christopher Boehm, in hunter-gatherer societies it is universally true that men have a higher degree of status than women; he hypotheses that this is because they risk their lives to bring home meat. The higher status comes with a cost, however, in that males are much more likely to be killed (either while hunting or…
/r/MensRights31/08/18 08:20 PM
1

Check out the links on the sidebar.
/r/MensRights28/08/18 05:37 AM
8

A study in the UK determined that if women were treated like men in the criminal justice system, roughly have of all people incarcerated would be female. And that didn't even include arrest rates. Also, guys get conscription, but women have to make babies so it makes up a bit, right? Wrong. Women are not forced to have babies, and having a baby is not comparable to dying with your guts blown out in a trench. Moreover, while women can choose not to have children, men are not allowed to abandon pa…
/r/MensRights28/08/18 05:21 AM
15

Women were once unable to vote Most men couldn't vote either. The majority of the European men were forced to fight and die in WWI weren't enfranchised. Women were simply given the vote without any obligations (eg conscription). That's not equality. They were given it as soon a majority of women said they wanted it. There were huge all-female anti-suffrage groups in the 19th century. In New York alone 25,000 women joined one. unable to have property and bank accounts Where did you get that crazy…
/r/MensRights28/08/18 03:44 AM
2

lol. Brilliant rebuttal. Next time just admit you've been savaged in an argument, it makes you look more adult.
/r/MensRights28/08/18 02:14 AM
2

Another article on the issue: http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/50129.htm The main source of Labour’s current woes looks to be Israel’s strategic affairs ministry, which has been headed by Erdan since 2015. It was set up in 2006, mainly as a vehicle to prevent far-right politician Avigdor Lieberman from breaking up the governing coalition. Lieberman and his successors used it chiefly as a platform from which to stoke concerns either about Iran building a nuclear bomb or about a supposed p…
/r/MensRights28/08/18 01:44 AM
-2

It was their own party members who started it you moron It was the Blairite faction of the labor party, ie pro war, pro corporate, and pro Israeli war crimes. Post links to your sources https://cst.org.uk/public/data/file/7/4/JPR.2017.Antisemitism%20in%20contemporary%20Great%20Britain.pdf Psst, hey, Russia did it. Ironically Corbyn is also being smeared as "pro-Russia" because he opposes escalating the new cold war.
/r/MensRights28/08/18 01:32 AM
3

There is "anti-Semitic" crisis in the British labor party. It's a silly smear by far right wing groups who think criticizing Israeli policy is the same thing as hating Jews. In fact Anti-Semitism is much more prominent on the far right than the far left: The report in question, Antisemitism in Contemporary Great Britain: A study of attitudes towards Jews and Israel, was clear: “Looking at the political spectrum of British society, the most antisemitic group consists of those who identify as very…
/r/MensRights28/08/18 01:14 AM
1

Sorry, but you'll actually have to make a logical argument if you're seeking to refute my claims.
/r/MensRights28/08/18 12:29 AM
8

Doesn't it sort of "reinforce traditional gender roles" to portray men who speak up about their issues as weak? ;) (In reality it's the opposite of weakness: it requires great courage for men to stand up for their rights as men; the easy thing to do is to place women and children first or fight on their behalf; men have been doing that since forever). Article is lazy and dishonest. Of course a rally of this nature will attract some people from the far/alt right. That doesn't mean everyone attend…
/r/MensRights27/08/18 10:44 PM
22

Yeah. This is different than most MeToo allegations because there is actually evidence.
/r/MensRights27/08/18 10:30 PM
26

Unfortunately feminism has failed miserably to expand gender equality. They have done the exact opposite. If feminists supported gender equality they would demand that eg the criminal justice system treat women as harshly as it does men (or that men be treated with the same degree of leniency). What are they doing instead? In the UK they have actually established a legal precedent that women -- but not men -- should not be imprisoned unless it's a violent crime. If you look at what feminists act…
/r/MensRights27/08/18 10:24 PM
3

The idea that women were ever treated like "property" is utterly absurd. Somehow this "property" was valued so much that when ships sank, men made sure that it was placed on the life boats first while men drowned. Suffrage? The majority of European men who were forced to fight and die in WWI did not have the right to vote as they didn't own enough property. Women were simply given the vote with no corresponding civic obligations. I'm not opposed to female suffrage, but it was not actually a move…
/r/MensRights27/08/18 10:10 PM
1

The feminist side. The KKK actually had a huge women's auxiliary. Women wielded enormous power within the KKK. Anyone who pretends that the KKK was simply a "male" experiment is either a liar or a dolt.
/r/MensRights27/08/18 08:01 AM
0

Bitch, it was a smashing success. Just absolutely fantastic. And you racist sexist bigots, you're next. We're coming for you. You have no place to hide. You will be destroyed in your professional career. You know how it's really harmful when an employee is revealed to have racist sympathies? Well you will suffer the same fate. You will be disgraced, as you deserve. You are going to be completely destroyed. Hopefully, at that point, you will reconsider your life choices ("How could I have become …
/r/MensRights27/08/18 07:19 AM
6

When two guys get into a fight, they start screaming at each other, beat the shit out of one another, but the next day, they're playing basketball together like nothing happened. Didn't understand it then; still don't. Are you male or female? Because I think most men understand this. A strange thing happens with men: when we fight with one another we are likely to increase rather than decrease the level of respect we have for our foe. If he fights back. Doesn't matter whether he wins or loses. D…
/r/MensRights27/08/18 06:07 AM
2

You did the right thing.
/r/MensRights27/08/18 02:27 AM
2

Mozart was an idiot in other ways. Indeed. As mentioned, most geniuses are mentally ill. You haven't countered any of the facts. So your post is useless. Watch the video.
/r/MensRights26/08/18 11:06 PM
6

236 to 1, according to Cronin. So that is not only "vast" but extreme. You should watch her speech, which I linked to. She's not a misogynist, she's a biologist. She fully support women's rights. But she also recognizes that the sexes are different.
/r/MensRights26/08/18 10:46 PM
3

You even go so far as to say the most extreme geniuses are all men. Obviously that's not a claim we can properly claim to know, but more than that I take issue with the word "vast." The word "vast" was entirely appropriate. And no I didn't claim that all geniuses are male, just the vast majority. This is noted by Helena Cronin in her speech on biological differences between males and females, viewable here. Note that 99 percent of men don't get to share in this glory, and that there is a corresp…
/r/MensRights26/08/18 10:16 PM
22

It is more than slightly ironic that in this "patriarchy" of ours we require women to speak on our behalf. I think a lot of this comes down to apex fallacy and female in-group preference. We look at society and note that most CEO's and politicians are male. Ergo, men are more "privileged". This is hogwash. The majority of homeless people are also male. First-wave feminists noted that women have significantly more "social influence" than men. Mother nature compensated for female physical weakness…
/r/MensRights26/08/18 07:52 PM
39

Australia hosted the first ever large MRA rally a few days ago. Hundreds of men and women attended. Subjects discussed included the demonization of men, discrimination against boys in school, discrimination against male victims of domestic violence, and the importance of recognizing that males and females should not be at war with each other; nature designed us to be symbiotic. If you harm men you harm women, and if you harm women you harm men. That was the message. How did feminists respond? Th…
/r/MensRights26/08/18 07:19 PM
5

A false rape accusation is one of the most violent crimes imaginable. It's akin to defamation, assault, psychological torture, and forcible confinement for potentially decades. Alleged rapists are treated very poorly in prison. They are at the bottom of the prison hierarchy, just above pedophiles. Many alleged rapists are themselves raped by other inmates and otherwise tortured. My opinion is that a false accusation of rape is a far, far worse crime than rape itself. I know that statement will r…
/r/MensRights26/08/18 07:02 PM
49

Feminists are trying to make it a felony to hurt a woman's feelings. Additionally, they are trying to portray any attempt by a man to court the opposite sex as sexual assault. Ideally, in feminist land, only a man that a particular woman finds attractive will hit on said woman. If the man isn't sufficiently attractive he should have his life destroyed. Feminist logic. Here's the problem: everything in feminist land is subjective and based on a woman's feelings. The behavior itself is largely irr…
/r/MensRights26/08/18 06:33 PM
58

The competency level of teachers is wildly divergent. I wonder whether anyone is NOT hired as a teacher if they apply. Apparently you can be a drooling maniac wearing your pants on your head and still get the job. Everyone gets a gold star. I say this because about half of the teachers I had growing up were complete weirdos; the other half were sensible, nice people. So the whole "teacher" thing was troubling to begin with, and now about two-thirds of these maniacs are feminists whose life goal …
/r/MensRights26/08/18 06:21 PM
1

Stop trying to derail the conversation. We're talking about the female rapist/pedophile and feminist Asia Argento.
/r/MensRights26/08/18 06:13 PM
1

Sure, go nuts.
/r/MensRights26/08/18 11:30 AM
2

I'm saying having reasonable concerns gets you called whatever-ism and fascist if you keep defending your ideas. Okay fair enough. But I'm extremely skeptical that you or I can do anything about this. Corporations want cheap labor --> ergo they import people willing to work for pennies. Capitalists love immigration because it drive down labor costs. The left loves immigration because they are terrified of being viewed as "racist." etc. So we're stuck with it. At the end of the day, if you actual…
/r/MensRights26/08/18 10:12 AM
-3

? Drink less booze. That's good advice for us all.
/r/MensRights26/08/18 09:59 AM
3

An equal outcome in a free market Alas, "free markets" -- by which corporations come to dominate the market -- is the exact opposite of freedom. As Proudhon noted hundreds of years ago, "competition kills competition," resulting in monopoly. then Adam Smith would be an idiot Um, okay? You have nothing, all of your arguments are easily dismissed. You're a sad fellow, who wants other people to dominate him. People with self-respect do not desire "superiors" to tell them what to do, they desire age…
/r/MensRights26/08/18 08:40 AM
2

artifical imposition Now here's where you go gravely wrong. In case you haven't' noticed, western society is stacked in favor of super rich people, not working class people. Your opinions are manifestly absurd. then Adam Smith would be an idiot, because things become more lopsided the longer truly free markets go along, not less. Adam Smith was an idiot? Um, okay? Now look, dummy, there is no such thing was "equality of opportunity." The very idea is so ridiculous as to be comical. It's just com…
/r/MensRights26/08/18 07:41 AM
3

it's something to rise above rather than to rationalize On the other hand, and as the Israeli Kibbutz and Scandinavian examples demonstrate, most women may prefer "traditional gender roles." Work is not a "privilege", it's a burden, and unless you happen to be upper middle or upper class work sucks. It's not surprising that even Forbes magazine noted that the "new American dream" for women -- even rich women -- is to become a housewife. If men were afforded that opportunity they would seize it i…
/r/MensRights26/08/18 06:02 AM
3

Fashion differences between men and women feel so intuitive as to be hard-wired, yet they aren't at all. I agree. The color pink used to be associated with male fashion; proto-feminists appropriated the color as a sort of "fuck you" -- WE'RE going to wear pink to buck your traditional gender roles, you patriarchal bastards. Now feminists complain that too many female toys are pink and too many male toys are blue. This suggests that feminists will never be happy, and will always find something to…
/r/MensRights26/08/18 05:01 AM
9

I understand your argument, but I think the gender imbalance has become so severe that it makes sense for men and women to organize around the issue of...men's rights. Men are fed up after a hundred years of feminism and are finally ready to fight back. This was demonstrated by the Australia march; for the first time the MRA's (which included plenty of women) outnumbered the SJWs. I'll give you an example of the complexities involved here: father's rights groups would probably be far more effect…
/r/MensRights26/08/18 04:30 AM
2

No I don't mean the Russians. There is as yet no compelling evidence that Russia played any significant role in the Hillary vs. Trump contest. Julian Assange strongly suggested that some of the leaks came from the DNC staffer Seth Rich, who was murdered (Assange was a little coy about it, but in an interview he basically said "our sources face enormous risks...and BTW, A DNC staffer was murdered recently, and we're offering a whole bunch of money to find his killers"). One country does play a si…
/r/MensRights26/08/18 04:11 AM
4

Do we agree in principle that we shouldn't try to enforce gender norms on people, and let people be who they are without holding them accountable to whether that fits what we hold to be generally true of their gender? Yeah, I agree with that. I also support world peace and the end of poverty. But solutions cannot be reached unless we value truth above feelings, and feminists do the exact opposite. And that's not even getting into the minor problem of feminism being a hate movement against men an…
/r/MensRights26/08/18 02:56 AM
2

Yet another problem with our "representative democracy" is those fucking voting machines. Easily hackable, and the media pretends that huge discrepancies in exit polls vs. official results are irrelevant. Bernie vs. Hillary was a complete farce. At a base level the entire act of voting every year or two to elect someone to make decisions for you is pretty insulting, when you really think about it. Delegation is fine, but when it comes to really important issues the public effectively has no say.
/r/MensRights26/08/18 02:52 AM
2

If a man is suppressed from achieving 'dominant male' status, that is not egalitarianism, because he's being prevented from pursuing all he can and wants given equal rights and opportunities. Ah, okay now I understand. I guess it comes down to how we define freedom. Some people would argue that a man who has plentiful access to food, shelter, sex, playtime, etc., who has a high degree of agency over his life in terms of decision making power, and who isn't being oppressed by a centralized author…
/r/MensRights26/08/18 01:37 AM
4

Sorry, not trying to be combative but I honestly don't understand your argument.
/r/MensRights26/08/18 12:55 AM
2

Nope. The anthropologists (ie experts on the subject) all agree with me. Nomadic foragers simply do not allow one man or a minority of men to dominate either resources or sexual access. Indeed, egalitarianism is their "defining ethos", in the words of Christopher Boehm. Nomadic foragers (ie how we have lived for 95 percent of our history) are small communities where any man who attempts to become an "alpha male" will either be ostracized or, if that fails, murdered. There is no disagreement abou…
/r/MensRights26/08/18 12:50 AM
8

You see how that heavily implies that we're disadvantaging men by not privileging them in their traditional spheres? Work is not a privilege except for upper middle class and rich people. Males simply excelled at certain tasks. Women were pregnant much of the time because men hadn't yet freed women from their biology by inventing birth control and safe abortion. Females have always worked, but at certain times in history they had the privilege of not having to. As noted by Baumeister in the same…
/r/MensRights26/08/18 12:39 AM
11

This is technically not correct. In egalitarian societies pretty much every man has sex: Nomadic hunter-gatherers have nevertheless been uniformly egalitarian, seemingly for thousands if not millions of years. Boehm explains this seeming contradiction with the claim that hunter-gatherers have “reverse dominance hierarchies”: the adult males in the society form a general coalition to prevent any one of their number, alone or with a few allies, from dominating the others. Male egalitarianism is no…
/r/MensRights25/08/18 11:48 PM
63

It doesn't matter what issue you focus on, they'll still label you a nazi misogynist. The absolute worst thing to do would be to retreat now that we're finally gaining momentum. Every positive civil rights movement in history suffered continual media attacks during its early stages.
/r/MensRights25/08/18 11:36 PM
3

Excellent title and article. We can see this reflected not only in real life but art. Imagine a gender reversal of Tarantino's Kill Bill. A man slicing down hundreds of women with a sword. It would be condemned as the most appalling film ever made. (I'm not suggesting we start criticizing filmmakers about "gender roles" etc., just pointing out that art reflects life).
/r/MensRights25/08/18 11:33 PM
2

Yep. However overall this is shockingly neutral compared to most media coverage of MRA's. It's noteworthy that they don't bother to list any of the issues affecting men. Can't reveal too much truth...
/r/MensRights25/08/18 11:29 PM
7

Smashing success. And yes, feminists are hateful bigots, as they demonstrated clearly at rally.
/r/MensRights25/08/18 11:23 PM
3

You're a racist, sexist bigot pretending to be opposed to racism and sexism. Mind-bending stuff.
/r/MensRights25/08/18 11:21 PM
9

Feminists have created a hostile work environment for all men.
/r/MensRights25/08/18 11:19 PM
8

The same website (which is left-libertarian, a refreshing contrast to the authoritarian feminists/SJW's that are dominating leftist discourse) published an essential essay on the parallels between the KKK's "war on rape" and the feminist "war on rape". Automatic belief of rape accusations was a central principle of the KKK’s war on rape, too. This was one of the things that most shocked Ida B Wells, the early twentieth-century African-American journalist and civil-rights activist. ‘The word of t…
/r/MensRights25/08/18 11:16 PM
15

The problem is that we're not treating people equally. We're privileging females in the traditional male sphere. Female teachers mark down boys by an average of 20 percent for the same work -- possibly due to the delusion that females are oppressed. Boys are also being drugged and otherwise punished for natural boyish behavior. This effectively hamstrings males, and has led to young men now constituting a shrinking minority of college students. Most honest academics agree that we're discriminati…
/r/MensRights25/08/18 10:49 PM
15

Divide et impera. Divide and rule. It's the oldest trick in the book. The most vivid demonstration of this is election night in America. Everyone turns on the idiot box and waits with baited breath to see which state is blue and which state is red. Red vs. blue. American vs. American. In fact both political parters primarily represent one and only one constituency: billionaires. This has been confirmed by a few honest academics. Eg Thomas Ferguson, who wrote the Investment theory of party compet…
/r/MensRights25/08/18 10:24 PM
7

No part of it. But feminists are perennial liars. They constantly refer to far/alt right types like Roosh V as "MRAs", so it's not surprising that a lot of kids are misinformed. Ultimately it's the fault of the gender studies professors and the feminists in the media for lying to the pubic.
/r/MensRights25/08/18 06:03 AM
24

Unfortunately the zombie feminazis have now shown up chanting trying to drown out the human rights activists. This could get interesting... Edit: The zombies are chanting "Racist sexist anti-queer, MRA's not welcome here!" And "Racist sexist anti-queer, fascists are not welcome here!" These idiots haven't even bothered to research any of the issues and know nothing about the MRM. Feminists: some of the most bigoted people in history who have the audacity to accuse everyone else of being bigoted;…
/r/MensRights25/08/18 05:20 AM
4

Sorry to hear that. It's telling to me that people are worried about losing their jobs over opposing feminism.
/r/MensRights25/08/18 04:11 AM
26

It bears repeating: if she said those things about any other identifiable group she would have already been fired. Apparently the university did not respond to a complaint by a professor from another school, and no male (or female) professor at the school in question had the balls to demand an investigation. NCFM President Harry Crouch told Campus Reform that NCFM filed the complaint after receiving feedback from its members on the East Coast. The complaint was sent to the Boston regional office…
/r/MensRights25/08/18 04:10 AM
4

Feminists oppose father's rights.
/r/MensRights25/08/18 04:03 AM
4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iCObZzQvCgk&feature=youtu.be Seems to be technical issues at the moment, prolonged buffering. A few minutes ago the camera swiveled to another much smaller gathering a fair distance away, I'm assuming that was the counter-protest. They're way outnumbered and are basically just embarrassing themselves. 2 minutes away? Get out there! Updated stream: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h59lPrlRu8s Huge line of cops, several hundred people marching.
/r/MensRights25/08/18 03:41 AM
2

heh
/r/MensRights25/08/18 03:33 AM
7

We lost the war a long time ago. On the contrary, we've only just just begun to fight. The moment men decide they've had enough the "gender war" will be over in about five minutes. We won't even need a majority, as there are plenty of women with sons and other loved ones who support men and boys. Most people are just ignorant of the issues, that's our biggest problem. That and the fact that almost the entire corporate media is against us (thanks to feminism). But that was also true of all almost…
/r/MensRights25/08/18 03:31 AM
2

Equally radical is the idea that it is the responsibility of men as a group to protect women. Such an idea never even occurred to me. I mean all these centuries of women being sent into battle while men stayed home and took care of the kids, men and children being placed in the lifeboats first etc. What if we...placed some sort of value on female life, even more so than male life? The mind boggles. You also have to give her credit for going so sharply against the grain of elite opinion by sugges…
/r/MensRights25/08/18 02:33 AM
3

Truly a courageous stance. Whereas most people (or men at least) take great satisfaction in the idea that some women are afraid while walking home at night, this brave soul is suggesting that society should try to protect women more. A truly radical, subversive position. It's almost incomprehensible to my toxically masculine ears.
/r/MensRights25/08/18 01:58 AM
5

Imbecile, men are much more likely to be attacked and killed by strangers than women. And the only men who feel "entitled" to women's bodies are men like Leonardo Dicaprio. Women do, however, seem to feel awfully entitled to male protection, provision and special treatment. How about thanking the men who risk their lives to protect women on a daily basis? If you're interested in stopping misogyny and violence against women, which includes rape, the best place to start would be to address female …
/r/MensRights25/08/18 01:16 AM
1

tldw?
/r/MensRights25/08/18 01:07 AM
3

There's no dissonance. Quite the opposite. Leftists have been criticizing ID politics since they started to gain prominence. It's not exactly mysterious why corporations and capitalist foundations like Ford, Rockefeller etc. would given lavish support to ID politics, especially feminism, while simultaneously attacking labor unions and the anti-authoritarian left. Marx didn't come up with the idea of "class warfare." Class warfare was created by the first states, which were all slave states. You …
/r/MensRights24/08/18 11:47 PM
7

We're moving in two opposing directions at once (and, as the saying goes, the center cannot hold). The billionaire class has decided that feminism and ID politics (both on the right and left) are the ideal way of keeping western populations divided and conquered. This didn't happen via a single group of men sitting around a table in a dark room. It's just something they seem to have more or less intuited. A handful of corporations control most of the media you consume. Divide and conquer is the …
/r/MensRights24/08/18 10:19 PM
12

*cough AIPAC *cough ADL. Also see: where "hate speech" laws came from...
/r/MensRights24/08/18 09:22 PM
13

Good point. Or their size in terms of weight ;) Now THAT would have made for quality television, assuming the interviewer got out alive.
/r/MensRights24/08/18 09:20 PM
17

lol this is gold. Edit: Curb your enthusiasm did a whole bit on this that is equally hilarious. clip 1 clip 2
/r/MensRights24/08/18 09:01 PM
8

I can't even be bothered to read Guardian pieces any more. Patriarchy, misogyny, privilege, entitlement, white men, alt-right, did I miss anything?
/r/MensRights24/08/18 07:33 PM
7

The lack of awareness is astonishing. The bigotry and hatred is so ingrained and second-nature they don't even realize their own staggering hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights24/08/18 07:31 PM
4

Superb post. Everyone should click on the blog post and bookmark it. Will come in handy in future debates.
/r/MensRights24/08/18 07:29 PM
8

Yep. We're somewhere in between the "laugh at you" and "attack you" phase. In fact we've mostly moved onto the latter, so this is a bit of a throwback. The attacks in this case have come in the form of disinformation and other propaganda spread by the feminist media; we should consider ourselves lucky that we haven't been subjected to more severe forms of attack, such as black propaganda (eg a fake MRA starts advocating for killing women); provocation (a fake MRA/informant encourages a mentally …
/r/MensRights24/08/18 07:22 PM
72

It's a contradiction. Never should be believed until evidence is presented.
/r/MensRights24/08/18 10:01 AM
6

Another victim of the patriarchy...
/r/MensRights24/08/18 08:50 AM
1

She'll be out in a few months. This is a travesty.
/r/MensRights24/08/18 07:07 AM
2

You're such a dishonorable, execrable slug, and your spamming of this board so tiresome that I'm going to do something I've never done before: block you. Life is too short to read posts by neocon filth.
/r/MensRights24/08/18 05:14 AM
1

Honestly, I think you're lower than dogshit. Or a troll. We're done here.
/r/MensRights24/08/18 04:40 AM
0

Er, he advocated forcibly removing the civilian population of the West Bank, and carpet bombing the gaza strip, which is made up of 40 percent children. Those are both crimes against humanity according to the geneva conventions, which my grandfather fought for during WWII. But yeah, laugh it up you piece of excrement.
/r/MensRights24/08/18 03:55 AM
2

Ben Shapiro advocates war crimes against Palestinian children. Think I'll pass.
/r/MensRights24/08/18 03:10 AM
8

If a man is falsely accused and convicted of rape the crime is akin to: Defamation, assault, psychological torture, and forcible confinement for potentially decades. Indeed male rapists are treated like shit in prison and often themselves raped, repeatedly. We treat it like a kid stealing a candy bar. It's rare to see women imprisoned for this act of extreme violence at all. Madness.
/r/MensRights24/08/18 01:24 AM
2

Good documentary online on American prisons titled "Torture, Inc." Worth checking out. Amnesty International has repeatedly condemned the US for using torture within its prisons, not only internally but in CIA "black sites" where people who have merely been accused of crimes or swept up in some counter-insurgency campaign are subjected to the most barbaric treatment imaginable. Almost all of these victims are men and boys. Torture is the most despicable activity human beings are capable of, and …
/r/MensRights24/08/18 12:31 AM
15

I don't want to spoil anything Go ahead and spoil it, because unless it's pro-MRA I doubt anyone here is gonna waste their time watching it. We're accustomed to being constantly lied about in the media.
/r/MensRights23/08/18 11:14 PM
4

liberal bias SJW's are not liberals. The closest analogy to another political ideology is fascism. They are obsessed with racial identity, they scapegoat specific identity groups (particularly straight white males), they portray the primary victim group (females) as simultaneously oppressed and superior, they are obsessed with culture, they oppose free speech and assembly, and they support an authoritarian state. Recently they've even even taken to celebrating increased power by corporations (pr…
/r/MensRights23/08/18 10:45 PM
32

Women are much more likely to engage in controlling behavior in relationships. It's basically a cliche: when you ask a married men if he wants to go do something he'll often say things like "I'll have to ask the wife" or "I'll have check with the boss". The latter is supposed to be funny, but hints at something deeper and more disturbing. Feminists are well aware of this, but they are also aware that men rarely report their wives for physical violence let alone relational aggression (the female …
/r/MensRights23/08/18 10:03 PM
2

reduce the number of traumatized, dispossessed children. I guess that means we'll have to end the single mother experiment.
/r/MensRights23/08/18 09:05 PM
81

Keep it up feminists. Every word you write is a new shovel full of dirt in your own graves.
/r/MensRights23/08/18 08:55 PM
14

I would have no problem with Cenk's argument if he applied it equally to both genders. I mean Jerry Seinfeld dated a sixteen year old and I don't consider him a monster (it was legal in the state he lived in). If it's legal and no one is being harmed then go nuts. Asia's case is different not only because it was illegal but because she appears to have groomed him from a young age and literally called him "son". So there's definitely some unsavory pedophilia vibes going on there. The biggest prob…
/r/MensRights23/08/18 08:16 PM
20

Men also work...I think an average of fifteen hours (?) more per week and perform most of the dirty jobs and almost all of the dangerous jobs. That alone justifies an earnings gap. Feminists sometimes whine that "women's work is devalued"; however it would be completely unfair (whether you're on the left or right) to pay a woman working in a comfortable office the same amount as a man who works longer hours and/or literally risks his life on the job. Even in a hypothetical purely voluntarist soc…
/r/MensRights23/08/18 08:00 PM
7

This is the face of the traditional left. Before it was overtaken by bourgeois feminists and identarians who spit in the face of working class white males.
/r/MensRights23/08/18 07:51 PM
1

More black men died premature deaths under the prison leasing system than while living as slaves on plantations. Plenty of poor white men too. This actually makes "sense": slaves were valuable "property" so it was in the best interests of the slave owner to make sure they were kept alive. This is why Irish men in early American (who were called "white niggers") were forced into the most dangerous jobs. They were more free than black men but they were also more likely to die young. These are the …
/r/MensRights23/08/18 07:43 PM
14

It must be really tempting for immature, irresponsible teenage girls to pull the sexual assault card when they get in trouble. The adults who are supposed to be teaching these kids right from wrong are instead telling them that men are rapists and that we should "listen and believe" all females. What's more, young girls must surely be noticing that "survivors" are achieving praise and celebrity for "coming forward" and proclaiming their victimhood. It's like putting a machine gun in the hands of…
/r/MensRights23/08/18 10:35 AM
41

Great piece. From my experience anti feminists know far more about feminism than most feminists, and have a stronger belief in gender equality than most feminists. I've noticed this too. MRA's tend to be far more knowledgeable about the history of the feminist movement (as well as the hard data on various gender issues) than feminists themselves. Indeed many MRA's used to consider themselves feminists before they actually studied gender issues. This is a rather uncomfortable truth for SJW's, bec…
/r/MensRights23/08/18 10:15 AM
14

Interestingly all the YT fans are calling Cenk a sick degenerate lol. A whole lot of women pushed the MeToo bullshit so they're all trying not to look like hypocrites. Lots of fake virtue signaling going on, as though these people actually care about male victims of anything.
/r/MensRights23/08/18 09:36 AM
2

Neo-Marxism very much is a real social phenomenon. You just linked me to wikipedia article. That wouldn't even be accepted in a college course. The page even labels the anarchist Noam Chomsky as a "neo-Marxist" even though he completely rejects Marxian theory. It's simply not credible. SJW's are mostly useful idiots and overpaid gender studies professors. They've been given a shitload of funding by (capitalist) billionaires precisely because they mostly reject class analysis and instead obsess o…
/r/MensRights23/08/18 08:53 AM
11

I myself like a lady around it's really nice. As do I, I just prefer someone who doesn't hate my sex.
/r/MensRights23/08/18 08:24 AM
3

There's no such thing as "neo-Marxism". It's a silly term that no one educated on the subject takes seriously (whether Marxist or anti-Marxist). Just giving you some friendly advice. Even terms like "SJW" have more credibility. It is the isolation, the shame, the lack of family, community, religion, identity and meaning, I agree these are important factors (RESPECT being another big one) but including religion may turn off some people. I mean if that's your opinion fair enough, but I think there…
/r/MensRights23/08/18 08:21 AM
8

I don't date people who belong to hate groups, even if it is due to ignorance rather than malice. Call me crazy but I'd rather date someone who doesn't blame all of the world's problems on my gender. Plus dating a feminist is like begging for a false rape accusation. Feminists are a shrinking minority and will eventually be recognized in the same way we now recognize members of the Ku Klux Klan. Have some dignity, have some self-respect, don't date a feminist :)
/r/MensRights23/08/18 07:59 AM
9

My advice is to not attack immigrants as an aside, it makes you look foolish. And don't use terms like "neo-marxist", it makes you sound ill-informed. Easy way of rebutting the narrative is simply to point out that male suicide rates were much lower in eg the 50's, when we celebrated masculinity. Also there are plenty of potential solutions: No more discrimination against boys in school, no more demonizing masculinity, no more banning of male-only groups/spaces, no more divorce rape and unfair c…
/r/MensRights23/08/18 07:51 AM
4

Lemme guess -- men need to abandon toxic masculinity, cry more and talk more about their feelings? There was a post here from psychology today about a month ago dissecting this viewpoint. It argued persuasively that this amounts to victim blaming and basically just makes things worse. Wish I had saved it. Not sure if that's what the program claims, but since it's the feminist BBC it wouldn't surprise me. The first and more important way of curtailing the male suicide epidemic is to support men's…
/r/MensRights23/08/18 06:28 AM
2

Laugh now, cry later.
/r/MensRights23/08/18 05:51 AM
14

From Donald Trump to Bill Cosby, powerful men accused of sexual misconduct, or their representatives, have frequently chosen to respond by denigrating their accusers. By smearing the women who have accused them as liars or gold diggers, these men damage the reputations of their accusers and contribute to a climate in which survivors of sexual misconduct are afraid to come forward. Um, what happens if their accusers are lying? This nitwit is basically arguing that if someone accuses you of a crim…
/r/MensRights23/08/18 04:43 AM
2

Thanks for this. It's really hard to find statistics about "gender equality" in non-western countries because pretty much every single international body and NGO is run by man-hating feminists. The World Economic Forum explicitly states that they don't include areas when males are worse off in their "equality" metrics.
/r/MensRights23/08/18 03:03 AM
4

Female teachers are the new Catholic priests. The difference is that we don't seem to care about the crimes of the former. If only there were some way of describing how male victims of sexual assault are treated in our society...hmmmm...rape culture? The irony is that the term doesn't remotely fit for females. We are so hyper-sensitive about male on female sexual assault that men are getting fired for telling bawdy jokes in the workplace.
/r/MensRights23/08/18 02:06 AM
22

These quotes by Rose McGowan, Sorvino etc. are fantastic. They show the rank hypocrisy of these degenerate scum. Edit: the celebrity list is actually in support of Argento after she supposedly suffered "cyber-bullying" (boo hoo) after the death of Bourdain, not her rape of the kid.
/r/MensRights23/08/18 01:15 AM
3

lol. That man was a genius.
/r/MensRights23/08/18 01:12 AM
1

Acquitted of rape from convicted of sexual assault, apparently.
/r/MensRights23/08/18 01:10 AM
8

Honestly a lot of the #Metoo leaders who couldn't give a fuck about #Metoo allegations from men a few months ago or so They're opportunists worried about being labeled hypocrites. That's it. As you say, if they had any empathy for men they wouldn't have started this witch-hunt to begin with. And if they cared about boys being raped in Hollywood (including pre- pubescent boys -- see the documentary An Open Secret) they would have made it a centerpiece of their campaign. Indeed they would have spo…
/r/MensRights23/08/18 12:33 AM
6

I'm a fan of Alison but this is a strange speech. Half of it is devoted to some CEO who improved workplace safety rules at ALCOA after several preventable deaths. The implication is he did this out of the kindness of his heart rather than PR concerns and pressure by unions. The other implication is that we don't care about about male workplace deaths. This is false. We certainly care far more about female safety, but average working men have fought and died by the thousands to establish workplac…
/r/MensRights22/08/18 09:44 PM
7

The other day a lesbian told me that toxic femininity doesn't exist. It's staring us right in the face. It's called "feminism." Karen Straughan made this argument explicitly in a lecture at SFU. Her arguments were compelling.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 09:15 PM
14

Across cultures, races, religions, etc women are murdered, raped, or assaulted for refusing a man. A common occurrence is it? Men get rejected frequently. If men were being "socialized" into reacting violently to rejection women would be dropping like flies. Incidentally, does anyone there think women are better at taking rejection? It doesn't happen to them often, but when it does they can react in violent says. Not usually by assaulting you, but by using their specialty, relational aggression.…
/r/MensRights22/08/18 09:04 PM
0

Maybe. Or maybe social shaming will work where logic and empathy for men failed.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 08:40 PM
7

When it doubt, blame the nearest man. The feminist M.O. First it was her dead husband, now it's her alleged victim. I also like that she used the word "froze". "Affirmative" and "enthusiastic" consent models suggest that women are rather like fawns encountering the headlights of a car. They are weak and frightened little creatures and can't be expected to register their dissatisfaction and say "no" if they don't want something. (Also, women are strong and empowered and should be firefighters!) F…
/r/MensRights22/08/18 08:09 PM
14

True enough. But she still deserves the public humiliation. Not because we know with certainty that she did it, but because she is merely being subjected to the same standards she applied to men. It's poetic justice, and was explained well by /u/foot_kisser in another thread: No, actually. She deserves to go down for advocating for judgment without evidence. That's what the metoo campaign is about, making it possible to take someone down without evidence or a court proceeding. She created a mons…
/r/MensRights22/08/18 10:25 AM
6

Says they were convicted but released early.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 09:54 AM
1

It says it's for "men's studies" rather than gender studies. It sounds like it might be positive? Rather than the Michael Kimmel stuff? "We live in a time when fraternal associations are often not understood, where gender differences in communication and behavior are not well known, where the qualities of manhood are discounted in areas as important as fatherhood, male role modeling, social responsibility, family and community leadership."
/r/MensRights22/08/18 08:43 AM
4

Spot on.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 08:39 AM
9

Begone bigot. You belong to a hate movement.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 07:42 AM
1

The UK is growing more retarded by the second...
/r/MensRights22/08/18 07:37 AM
23

Wouldn't surprise me. Some suffragettes made that argument explicitly.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 03:40 AM
62

This is the exact opposite of reality. Non-rich men earned their voting rights with blood. In Europe for example the majority of men who fought and died in WWI were not enfranchised. After the war the franchise was expanded to include non-property holding men because, it was argued, it you're going to be obligated to fight for your country you should have a say in its running. Women were simply given the vote with no corresponding civic obligations, and they were given it as soon as a majority o…
/r/MensRights22/08/18 02:41 AM
1

but what about the women who aren't out to destroy us? They should start vigorously supporting the men's rights movement. March in the streets, lobby politicians etc. Time for women to get to work. You said you wanted equality, now prove it.
/r/MensRights21/08/18 11:13 PM
-2

Turnabout is fair play. Feminists have been waging war against men and boys for a century. Men have finally decided they've had enough. We are going to give feminists exactly to they claim to want: gender equality. It will be an enormous step down for women, but so it goes.
/r/MensRights21/08/18 11:03 PM
61

Or alternatively, we could treat men with the same level of compassion as women (to the extent that we are able; females will probably always be favored in some ways, nature of the beast). Ideally it would be somewhere inbetween: treat men with more compassion, and treat women more like the adults they are. But yeah I agree with you that the feminists are, as always, being duplicitous. It's one thing to SAY you want men and women to be treated equally, it's quite another to actually work towards…
/r/MensRights21/08/18 10:58 PM
7

Garbage article. Women are hypocrites. Women are opportunists. Women are liars. They are abusers and bullies and manipulators. They are capable of cruelty, callousness and evil. Yes, we are all well aware of this. In the months that followed, Ms. Argento was rightly hailed for her bravery in speaking out publicly against a serial assaulter. Yeah that required real "bravery" lol. Given that Mr. Bennett seems to have been financially strapped when he made the accusation against Ms. Argento, there …
/r/MensRights21/08/18 09:32 PM
3

A disgusting display by everyone involved.
/r/MensRights21/08/18 09:27 PM
4

I think it's pretty rare these days. My sister's fairly attractive and I asked her whether anyone had catcalled her while growing up (she's 40 now); she said no. Not once. We grew up middle class in Vancouver, Canada. When women go around complaining about it I think it's more a form of "bragplaining", ie "I'm so attractive that men can't control themselves around me." If you look at that "20 hours walking as a woman" video, the only place the woman was subjected to catcalling (which mostly amou…
/r/MensRights21/08/18 08:31 PM
2

This doesn't surprise me one bit, it kinda goes along with the fact that female judges give tougher sentences to females than male judges. Actually I read a study a few years ago suggesting the opposite: that female judges are even more lenient on female criminals (it wasn't a huge difference, but it was there). Unfortunately I can't seem to find it. Perhaps someone else can dig it up.
/r/MensRights21/08/18 08:22 PM
13

"that doesn't invalidate her report about Havey Weinstein" Um, doesn't it draw in to question her reliability as a witness? Oh I forgot: BELIEVE ALL TEH WOMYNZ! Because women never lie. Or something. I don't think anyone's disputing that Weinstein is a gigantic douche bag and completely unethical, but I have yet to see any actual evidence that he raped anyone.
/r/MensRights21/08/18 08:19 PM
3

I've heard numerous stories from this sub and various "AskReddit" subs of women falsely accusing men who rejected them of rape (or in lesser cases, sexual harassment). Women are not accustomed to rejection and often don't handle it well. So not even "MGTOW" types are safe from this madness. I wonder if this was the cause of many false accusations against black men in the old south. A white woman came onto a black man, he was scared shitless so declined, and she then condemned him to death.
/r/MensRights21/08/18 08:06 PM
11

Reddit is being astroturfed to death. Governments and corporations view the internet as a massive psychological warfare arena. Political parties, PR companies, even intelligence agencies funded by the taxpayer employ people to argue all day online and push certain narratives.
/r/MensRights21/08/18 08:00 PM
13

What a classy woman.
/r/MensRights21/08/18 07:56 PM
11

Yep, female officers are less likely to be charged with using excessive force, but more likely to discharge their weapons and actually shoot civilians. They are also more likely to be themselves assaulted. "Additionally, female officers tend to treat women’s complaints differently. They are more likely to pursue cases involving intimate partner violence against women, which make up, according to the police, up to 40 percent of calls made to their departments." Given what we now know about domest…
/r/MensRights21/08/18 07:54 PM
21

I didn't think even feminists would go this far. Yes, let's ensure a 50:50 male/female ratio of firefighters. We'll have to lower the standards, but protecting women's feelings is more important than human life. Feminists are a fucking public safety hazard.
/r/MensRights21/08/18 07:29 PM
2

You're wrong on all counts. It's a DEEPLy meaningful...
/r/MensRights21/08/18 05:44 AM
3

You're....incorrect. yes.
/r/MensRights21/08/18 05:18 AM
1

/u/girlwriteswhat knows where the bodies are buried. Metaphorically, of course.
/r/MensRights21/08/18 05:02 AM
2

We're witnessing it right now. This is a matriarchy. Enjoy.
/r/MensRights21/08/18 04:14 AM
7

I'll clear it up: Women are just as likely to abuse children as men. Understand? Good.
/r/MensRights21/08/18 03:38 AM
1

I mean socially. Obviously she won't suffer any legal penalties. That goes without saying.
/r/MensRights21/08/18 03:00 AM
2

I draw the line at "xey". Sounds too Canadian, and I'm a (Colombian) patriot. The broader point, in case everyone missed it, is that it's wrong to force people to say certain words under threat. SJW's have been afforded a bunch of power by the billionaire class, and they are abusing it, as expected.
/r/MensRights21/08/18 02:17 AM
1

Didn't you hear me? I said "tarantula-like." This is a clear and present danger.
/r/MensRights21/08/18 02:07 AM
3

Xer fat ass. Or Zir fat ass. Good enough?
/r/MensRights21/08/18 02:04 AM
14

Incredible. Feminists have a remarkable ability to destroy and corrupt once reputable institutions within mere months. I mean, the NY Times has always been a corrupt mouthpiece for the US ruling class, but its editors were careful to censor by omission and maintain some sort of semblance of objectivity. With feminists in charge, they are sinking faster than a fat man on thin ice.* *sorry, I should be gender neutral. "A fat man or a fat woman on thin ice."
/r/MensRights21/08/18 12:17 AM
1

Exactly. Feminists only care about presumption of innocence and due process rights when a woman is affected. Fucking hypocrites. Edit: Although I do think they'll throw Argento under the bus, precisely due to the mounting criticism of their staggering hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights20/08/18 11:31 PM
17

He was a creep because he sexually harassed a lot of people. So you claim. A top PR firm dumped someone accused of rape? Wow, that's shocking. Your other arguments actually undermine the feminist position that we should "believe all survivors." If they don't remember things correctly they shouldn't be trusted as credible witnesses.
/r/MensRights20/08/18 10:37 PM
3

Ordinarily I'd say she they're right. The alleged victim was seventeen. However the history of this particular relationship does have an air of pedophilia about it, since they were apparently close from the time he was a boy, she played his mother in a film, and they literally referred to each other on social media as "mother" and "son."
/r/MensRights20/08/18 09:54 PM
25

Maybe you could post a link? Check out Diana Davison's work on the subject. She runs the Lighthouse Project, for Canadian men falsely accused of rape. Just Google her name plus Ghomeshi's. Lots of info about his lying, conspiring accusers. He dumped them after consensual BDSM, they felt jilted. I have trouble believing in 16 jilted lovers coming forward. Check out the history of witch hunts. As in the actual witch hunt. Or the Satanic Panic. Yep, it happens. The situation is especially dangerous…
/r/MensRights20/08/18 09:50 PM
3

Fair enough.
/r/MensRights20/08/18 09:02 PM
4

This issue is less about crime & punishmen Tell that to the four men who have committed suicide and the scores who have had their lives destroyed over potentially false accusations or trivial behaviors.
/r/MensRights20/08/18 09:01 PM
13

"What is perhaps most egregious, is the timing, which suggests that at the very same time Argento was working on her own secret settlement for the alleged sexual abuse of a minor, she was positioning herself at the forefront of those condemning Mr. Weinstein, despite the fact that her sexual relationship with Mr. Weinstein was between two consenting adults which lasted for more than four years," the statement continued. Four years!? What the fuck. There is no possible way she was unaware of Harv…
/r/MensRights20/08/18 08:55 PM
4

That's kind of what gathering evidence is. Right. So you were wrong to suggest that the police should begin by believing the accuser and thereby assume the accused is guilty.
/r/MensRights20/08/18 08:14 PM
176

Little known fact: over half of the people released under the Innocence Project were men falsely accused of rape. And most of those weren't even he said/she said but cases of mistaken identity. Meanwhile feminists claim that rape conviction rates are "too low" (they are completely unconcerned about conviction rates for women accused of various crimes, and indeed seem to welcome the institutional privilege afforded women in the criminal justice system). In the UK, political pressure by feminists …
/r/MensRights20/08/18 08:07 PM
2

Derp.
/r/MensRights20/08/18 07:44 PM
4

Nope. Most first wave feminists were rich racist white women who despised the poor, not "socialists". Indeed the first major critique of feminism was written by a socialist named Earnest Belfort Bax.
/r/MensRights20/08/18 07:44 PM
8

I think it's prudent and not unreasonable to believe an accuser when it comes to getting prompt medical and psychiatric care, as well as gathering evidence. No. This means that the police will begin from a position of faith that the accused is in fact guilty. The first task is to determine whether a crime even occurred at all.
/r/MensRights20/08/18 07:40 PM
2

I don't think it's that much of a problem for us men though. We're often the perpetrators, and being penetrated is far more painful than being enveloped, even if we ignore that men are often the ones raping other men You're an idiot. I'm not gonna waste precious seconds of my life debating you. Bye.
/r/MensRights20/08/18 07:34 PM
6

I've watched tons of shit Corey Fieldman has put out. Have you hard from the hundreds of other victims? Have they been featured in thousands and thousands of international news articles? I didn't think so. An Open Secret was made by an academy-award nominated filmmaker but received almost no publicity and most major news outlets neglected to even review it. we're using this asia chick as some sort of vindication when it's not here. Vindication for what? MeToo is a witch hunt and moral panic root…
/r/MensRights20/08/18 07:15 PM
10

It's only here where I've read that #metoo was for women only.. Any word on the institutionalized rape of boys in Hollywood? It has received about one/one-thousandth of the media attention as the casting couch crew. And I haven't seen anyone here claim that Harvey isn't a gigantic sleazeball. Whether he actually committed rape is another matter.
/r/MensRights20/08/18 07:02 PM
20

This MeToo casting couch bullshit is nothing but a grand distraction from Hollywood's real dark secret: pedophilia.
/r/MensRights20/08/18 06:56 PM
2

"All hail the rise of cat men, an antidote to toxic masculinity" What idiocy is this? Some of the biggest badasses in history (men feminists would undoubtedly label toxic) were cat lovers.
/r/MensRights20/08/18 06:51 PM
1

I see right wing news outlets condemning Muslims all the time. They seem to get away with it alright. [edit: and Christians seem to be fair game as well for atheists]. Now try doing the same with Jews...
/r/MensRights20/08/18 06:49 PM
1

But I'm white, that would help a lot. It may or may not. Poor white men are brutalized and killed by the police all the time. In my experience most middle and upper class whites misattribute their class privilege to their race. Having worked as a cab driver and frequented poor white communities I can tell you with certainty that cops have no compunction about engaging in police brutality against working class white men. Including black cops. This has always been true. My class privilege is the b…
/r/MensRights20/08/18 06:44 PM
2

Technically androcide.
/r/MensRights20/08/18 08:08 AM
22

Indeed I have. Though I can't take full credit. About a hundred years ago, the socialist Earnest Belfort Bax observed the same: "[Feminism] means unlimited licence for women in their relations with men, and unlimited coercion for men in their relations with women. To men all duties and no rights, to women all rights and no duties."
/r/MensRights20/08/18 06:44 AM
24

Because feminism gained equal rights almost 100 years ago. Really? Women were forced fight in WWI?
/r/MensRights20/08/18 04:16 AM
24

To top it all off she played his mother in a film.
/r/MensRights20/08/18 03:31 AM
1

Yes I fully agree.
/r/MensRights20/08/18 03:24 AM
1

Yet you think you know what most gender studies programs teach because of a dated list of non-representative quotes? If you'd like more recent quotes just surf this sub more often. Like I said, third wavers are at least as hateful. Probably more so. At least during the second wave there were a few prominent feminists like Karen DeCrow who weren't complete hypocrites and supported eg father's rights and male parental surrender. And you're citing Canada, Australia, the UK, New Zealand and the Scan…
/r/MensRights20/08/18 02:55 AM
7

lol. At what point do we acknowledge these feminist "academics" are certifiably insane? It's like they literally stay awake at night brainstorming new things to blame on men. lying in bed, scans room. "Hmmmm, could I blame my alarm clock on men? What about the implications of heteronormative masculinity on the nature of time-keeping? And what about time itself? Wasn't the big bang just a big, godly, patriarchal ejaculation?" looks down at feet. "Shit, I haven't cut my toenails in two weeks. I'm …
/r/MensRights20/08/18 02:43 AM
17

If this law were applied equally a whoooooooole lotta women would be going to prison.
/r/MensRights20/08/18 02:10 AM
4

I prefer the basic definition of patriarchy: "a system of society or government in which men hold the power and women are largely excluded from it." Yeah, homeless men have a great deal of power, while the PM of the UK is excluded lol. You'd have to be completely delusional to believe we live in a "patriarchy" that privileges men and boys. And if anything, third wave feminists are even more hateful and nutty than second wave feminists. But thanks to progress brought about largely because of femi…
/r/MensRights20/08/18 02:07 AM
161

Men are not "entitled" to anything. But women are entitled to everything. This the logic of a spoiled child, and the essence of feminism.
/r/MensRights20/08/18 01:37 AM
1

Karen stated in her interview with YTY that most men had more autonomy historically and that women did suffer their own forms of discrimination. So you may be misreading her. But they enjoyed quite a bit more freedom. This is actually debatable, and veers into political and metaphysical territory concerning what actually constitutes freedom. For example DNA studies show that throughout history females have been much, much more likely to survive to adulthood and reproduce. Is being alive a form o…
/r/MensRights20/08/18 01:30 AM
5

It wouldn't be that hard to compile a list of things prominent MRAs said that were shitty and even outright sexist, I don't think there's any comparison, personally. Paul Elam has engaged in borderline misogynistic rhetoric, but no MRA (to my knowledge) has ever said that women are inferior as a sex, that women should be subject to genocide, that they are the product of a "defective" chromosome, that "women oppressed men throughout all of history", that women are all rapists and child molesters …
/r/MensRights20/08/18 01:22 AM
8

Roosh V. advocated for rape being legal on private property. He also doesn't speak for most people who advocate men's rights. Roosh V. is not an MRA and has in fact written anti-MRA screeds. We're talking about the literal founder of the discipline you're defending. If you'd like to see what they teach in gender studies courses here's a sample. Note that about half of the quotes come from highly respected mainstream feminists.
/r/MensRights20/08/18 12:29 AM
10

It was just a politically motivated move by a socially conservative government to scapegoat an easy, uninfluential target. If true that still doesn't change the fact that it was the right thing to do. I think this is too much a mischaracterization of gender studies in general to even really be productive to address. The founder of the first gender studies course, Sally Miller Gearhart, literally advocated genocide against men and boys. She's the one who coined the phrase "the future is female" -…
/r/MensRights19/08/18 11:45 PM
1

Sorry, but I find some of your arguments aggravating. Comparing all women to slaves? Does that include the women who themselves owned slaves? -- both male and female? Like most MRA's I concede that women suffered some institutional discrimination historically. However unlike feminists I also acknowledge that males too suffered institutional discrimination. When you take both sides into account this is the only rational position. I also acknowledge that women have always had their own forms of po…
/r/MensRights19/08/18 11:42 PM
2

Male institutional oppression/female institutional privilege in the criminal "justice" system is confirmed by statistical data. There is no debate to be had. I would only qualify this by saying that extremely rich men are often treated with the same leniency as women. So if you're a man and want to be treated with compassion, better start earning that cash.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 11:26 PM
25

I originally felt the same way until I learned that Hungary had merely defunded gender studies, rather than banning it. The same thing happened to "Eugenics studies" in the mid twentieth century. It was defunded because in addition to being hateful it was basically just quackery with little basis in science. As Fiamengo notes: Students aren’t made aware of the hundreds of studies that have revealed significant biological differences between men and women. They’re not even told that there is a de…
/r/MensRights19/08/18 11:02 PM
1

There were barriers to women owning any property Look up Feme Sole. Women could own property. In England during the enclosures the richest woman in the country was a woman. In marriages the man was responsible for providing for his wife, therefore he had legal control of the finances; if he failed to support her he was subjected to punishments ranging from whipping to imprisonment. He even had to pay debts his wife accrued of her own volition. If anything this was a raw deal for the man, which i…
/r/MensRights19/08/18 10:51 PM
1

You're acting like work is a privilege. This idea can only come from a bourgeois imagination. Most of the housewives who toiled in factories during WWII hated and it and were thrilled to return home to their safe, comfortable, rewarding life. Then men invented time saving devices in the home, so many got bored. Turns out the grass wasn't greener: the "new American dream", even for rich women, is to become a housewife. In any case I already addressed this point. One additional factor is that both…
/r/MensRights19/08/18 10:02 PM
1

... you expect me to take a marxist article seriously? lol. Oh yeah, you're the paranoid schizophrenic who thinks there's a communist hiding behind every tree. Dispute the statistical data or acknowledge you lost the debate as per usual. I find it quite pathetic that you used the second google result. Would you have preferred if I had used the third? It's common knowledge among people who are educated on the subject that high intelligence often correlates with mental illness. You're the one usin…
/r/MensRights19/08/18 09:07 PM
1

You: Men don't have power, even though they are in the positions of power, because most men aren't in those positions of power. No, "they" are not in those positions of power, other men are. It's amazing that you aren't capable of grasping something this simple. It's like you view society in the manner of bee in a bee colony. Does the average man have no power whatsoever? Well, in the case of poor men I think it comes pretty close. A poor man has the power of eg being able to use his muscles to …
/r/MensRights19/08/18 09:01 PM
17

Nah. Most women who become doctors do it because they...want to become doctors. My sister is a physician and she certainly wasn't looking for a surgeon to marry (her description of the average surgeon is "arrogant and often borderline-psychopathic"; evidently there is a useful role for psychopaths in society). She married a real estate agent. The problem is that women are not being taught that it is very, very, very difficult to "have it all." Once they have children they often find that they pr…
/r/MensRights19/08/18 08:53 PM
4

Well that was many well spent...How much does it cost to train a doctor? Must be several hundred thousand dollars.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 08:50 PM
1

You are doing exactly what she is doing. Its a double standard. If men do it, its because women somehow make them. If men don't do it, its because women somehow make them. If women do it, its because they secretly want to. If women don't do it, its because they don't want to. Evidently you have reading comprehension problems. I never claimed that women have all the power, or that men never act in service of their own sex. Indeed I just said the opposite: that one of the reasons men have dominate…
/r/MensRights19/08/18 08:45 PM
1

That's actually not even remotely close to true. Uh, yeah, it is. The data on this is absolutely clear: "Most of the Forbes 400 have benefited from a level of privilege unknown to the vast majority of Americans. The study concluded that more than 60% of those on the list all grew up in substantial privilege with inheritances up to $1 million, and 11.5 of those on the list have inheritances well over $1 million. Seven per cent of those on the list had inherited wealth over $50 million. As for IQ:…
/r/MensRights19/08/18 08:39 PM
2

How many US presidents were born poor? Not many.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 08:12 PM
1

I'm using her logic. Why would her logic stop the moment we get to the men bucket instead of the female bucket? Anytime someone blames a group for "manipulating" as a way to assert causality, you should be suspicious. Why aren't you? Why would I be? It would be like denying gravity. Study the history of propaganda. It's no secret that governments manipulate the masses into war, and the "masses" include females. When we talk about the draft, do you notice how you must time travel to talk about is…
/r/MensRights19/08/18 08:10 PM
6

Western women literally have more rights than men and are privileged in every major institution starting in grade school. Yes, women do suffer some sexism, but it's basically the princess and the pea compared to the institutional oppression suffered by modern males. This doesn't mean women are happy and content; quite the contrary female happiness rates have been sharply declining since second wave feminism. Unfortunately many women misdiagnose the culprit and blame a non-existent patriarchy rat…
/r/MensRights19/08/18 07:30 PM
2

How many non-US president kids got lobotomized in the same period? Plenty. Just read a book on the history of psychiatry and/or eugenics.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 07:15 PM
-1

then all you're saying is that those that inherit are likely to be intelligent. No. My point was that inheritance is by far the most important factor in "success", regardless of intelligence. Thus claims about "equality of opportunity" are manifestly absurd.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 07:14 PM
1

When a country goes to war, who is almost always leading those governments and making those decisions? Well, men are. Irrelevant. If a black police officer kills a black inner city youth, that doesn't mean blacks don't suffer institutional discrimination in the criminal justice system. Your problem is that you view men as a borg hive collective; in fact, the lives of rich men couldn't be more different than the lives of poor men. Ditto rich women and poor women. Moreover, there is no evidence th…
/r/MensRights19/08/18 07:12 PM
6

Eventually they give up, "decide" they wanted to be child-free all along and won't shut up about how horrible children are. And how horrible men are. Look at eg Ashley Judd. She began as a kind-hearted, ravishingly beautiful woman and a decent actress. Now she's an embittered, man-hating radical feminist. This is gonna sound a little red-pillish but there is more than a grain of truth to their arguments on this subject: by encouraging women to be promiscuous and wait until their thirties to have…
/r/MensRights19/08/18 07:02 PM
9

They are literally demonizing males for their natural, healthy, sexual instincts. This is no different than demonizing gays for being attracted to men. Masculinity in crisis? No. This is femininity in crisis. Men are attracted to young women because young women are more healthy and fertile. Older women are more likely to give birth children who have disorders of one kind or another. Eg Down Syndrome: "Some parents have a greater risk of having a baby with Down syndrome. Risk factors include: Adv…
/r/MensRights19/08/18 06:55 PM
38

For far too long men have been absent from the discussion of social equality This is hilariously ahistorical. Men have been at the FOREFRONT of "social equality" movements since forever. And unlike most women they have literally fought and died to achieve it.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 06:24 PM
27

Indian MRA's are putting the rest of us to shame.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 06:16 PM
6

I read the other day (not sure if the stat is accurate) that 70 percent of married women over thirty met their spouses in the workplace. This means that the number of single women in their thirties is going to skyrocket even farther.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 06:15 PM
9

Yep. This is hilarious. By all means, fall on your sword because a man didn't have his life destroyed over an unsubstantiated allegation. I encourage every SJW to do this. :)
/r/MensRights19/08/18 06:12 PM
-8

You know what is much more strongly correlated with success? Inheritance. That's how a borderline-retarded man, George W. Bush, ended up President of the United States. Additionally, though it is true that genius correlates with success, it can also correlate with lack of success. Geniuses have a higher probability of being mentally ill.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 06:10 PM
6

You jest but in "patriarchal" societies (which, as it turns out, are not that different from feminist societies) men are often punished for their wives' crimes. Indeed first feminists sometimes deliberately refused to pay debts they ran up and sent their own hapless husbands to prison as a "protest" for female suffrage. How brave of them.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 06:04 PM
2

Kill people. Attempt to kill people. Probation. Yep, that's totally not insane at all.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 06:02 PM
1

lol did you think you were making a salient point? This would be like me pointing to some outlier case of a female criminal being treated the same as a man and saying "a-ha! see? There is no institutionalized discrimination against men in the criminal justice system!"
/r/MensRights19/08/18 06:01 PM
8

5 Because MGM is an industry. Cutting up boys in Africa is actually helping to spread the transmission of disease. There have been reports revealing that some men mistakenly believe that being circumcised means they no longer have to wear condoms.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 09:42 AM
3

The premise of your argument in that instance was the idea that men and women are "the same" and should be treated the same. No, I never made that claim. Once again you're letting your imagination run away with you. Try to stay focussed. Am I right to assume you think female and male rapists should be treated differently?
/r/MensRights19/08/18 09:06 AM
1

What's your point?
/r/MensRights19/08/18 08:38 AM
1

Some nations do not recognize your tabula rasa nonsense because they do not adopt tabula rasa. I didn't say a single word about tabula rasa, troll. Try to concentrate and not let your mind wander to other topics.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 08:35 AM
5

Men struggle in life too, it’s okay to tell someone you find something hard, joke about it, ask for advice, seek support. What’s important is to keep working on bettering yourself, talking about issues as a way of keeping yourself down helps no one. Sure, I agree with that.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 08:30 AM
18

Don't forget "I'm so weak I can't even handle someone disagreeing with me, but I'm also strong and empowered."
/r/MensRights19/08/18 08:07 AM
1

Firstly, there is only one rape culture in this world, it's called islam (a) Jesus you're stupid. (b) Muslim regimes often punish male rapists with the death penalty. However they typically do not recognize female on male rape or even female on boy rape. (c) the term "rape culture" was originally described to describe the culture of male prisons, where male prisoners are routinely raped. (d) As in Islamic countries, some Western nations do not even recognize female on male rape, and women who ra…
/r/MensRights19/08/18 08:06 AM
3

why has veterans had such hard times coming back, why aren’t men better at seeing the doctor and why are men topping the suicide rates? Veterans often have severe emotional problems. So that's a separate issue. Suicide? No one cares about the male suicide epidemic enough to determine what is going on. But there is no evidence that if a man cries more about his situation in life it will improve. He will simply be viewed as more of a burden by others. Men understand this. If "toxic masculinity" or…
/r/MensRights19/08/18 07:21 AM
34

I have no problem with that, provided men are treated the same way. This is not currently the case.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 06:14 AM
7

A woman studied this issue for ten years and came to the following conclusion: What Brown also discovered in the course of her research is that, contrary to her early assumptions, men's shame is not primarily inflicted by other men. Instead, it is the women in their lives who tend to be repelled when men show the chinks in their armor. "Most women pledge allegiance to this idea that women can explore their emotions, break down, fall apart—and it's healthy," Brown said. "But guys are not allowed …
/r/MensRights19/08/18 05:53 AM
13

You misunderstood me. I didn't suggest that men were in the habit of going around crying and emoting with their friends. My point was that male friends, young or old, do support one another, and yes will talk about problems affecting them -- usually to help find a solution. Men and boys don't need advice by women or feminists on how to behave.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 05:39 AM
101

Holy shit. This is extreme even by typical pussypass standards. I wonder if we'll reach a point where the female victims of female killers/mollesters etc. will start demanding equal punishment. Evidently we don't care about the victims of female criminals so long as they are men or children. Keep in mind that we're now at that point where major news publications are printing editorials sincerely arguing that female prisons should be eliminated entirely. Unfortunately reform doesn't seem likely a…
/r/MensRights19/08/18 03:28 AM
5

It's false. The film doesn't "concede" this point. And it's not remotely propagandistic. In fact Cassie not only lets feminists have their say she goes pretty easy on them. She could have spent half an hour talking about the countless bills feminists have blocked that would have made society more gender equal.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 02:16 AM
56

dropped the manly facade I don't know when this myth came about. I was a jock in high school/college and I never had any problems discussing my problems with my male friends. Nor did they judge me for it or go around gossiping. Seems to me that the claim that "men don't know how to express their feelings" blah blah blah is feminist propaganda or derives from men who didn't really have strong friendships with other boys growing up. Also, it's more rare for boys and men to talk about their problem…
/r/MensRights19/08/18 01:24 AM
14

"Making" anything "socially accepted" is what SJWs/feminists do The stupid. It hurts.
/r/MensRights19/08/18 12:04 AM
2

I would like to see a national inquiry into the rape of male students by female teachers. These stories are coming out every day now and no one seems to give a shit. Why is it only men that are deemed "dangerous" around children -- especially when women are more likely to engage in other forms of abuse against kids? And are even more likely to murder them? Also, I recall a would-be scandal of female prison guards in the US raping juvenile inmates in several different boys' detention centers. I s…
/r/MensRights18/08/18 08:23 PM
1

Exactly.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 07:51 PM
10

Good on you for your tenacity. If I remember this correctly, the feminist who runs the organization didn't disavow Ford's views at all, and instead basically said he didn't want to deal with the hassle, so cancelled it. Is that about right?
/r/MensRights18/08/18 09:41 AM
2

Pretty much.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 08:40 AM
83

Feminists believe that men should act like perfect gentlemen, and that women should act however they please. The idea that women have any sort of obligations toward men in exchange for their sacrifices is anathema. This would entail responsibility, which feminists regard in the same manner as arachnophobics regard spiders. Incidentally, children feel the same way. Feminists literally believe that women should have more rights than men yet less responsibility than children. Hyperbole? Consider th…
/r/MensRights18/08/18 06:09 AM
2

in what majority muslim country to you think women are free to to whatever they like in the same way they are in a western democracy? Of course women aren't "free to do whatever they like." Nor are men. My point is that the claim that women are treated like "property" is completely asinine.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 06:03 AM
1

If you think women are treated as "property" in Muslim nations you should probably start by just reading any basic, introductory textbook about whatever country you have in mind. Like the kind they give to little children in elementary school to introduce them to other cultures. Sounds condescending but I'm not sure how else to respond.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 05:00 AM
1

They are. Yeah? Have you ever lived in a Muslim country? Because I have. And you're full of shit.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 02:36 AM
17

Well done feminists! By destroying the "patriarchal" family; by blocking shared parenting bills; by portraying father's rights groups as "abusers lobbies"; by refusing to acknowledge let alone draw attention to the prevalence of false accusations against men during divorce proceedings; by portraying domestic violence as a patriarchal conspiracy even when women commit the majority of child abuse; by valuing fathers only for their wallets; you have caused immeasurable harm to untold millions of li…
/r/MensRights18/08/18 02:33 AM
6

Nah, it's just standard masculine behavior due to teh patriarchy!!
/r/MensRights18/08/18 12:55 AM
1

Iran Palestine Indonesia But but, women are mere PROPERTY in Islamic societies! Ben Shapiro told me so!
/r/MensRights18/08/18 12:53 AM
2

the ideology of feminism is fundamentally incompatible with business or career success. I don't agree. How many women have been given jobs over more qualified men due to affirmative action? How many women have earned sweet cash by playing the victim? I will say this though: feminism is incompatible with living a happy, meaningful, rewarding life.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 12:52 AM
4

A foundational tenet of academic feminism holds that alleged differences between males and females are socially constructed. This credo usually maximizes the opportunities for charging sexism, yet it will be discarded in an instant if acknowledging the innate biological and psychological differences between men and women yields an additional trove of feminist complaint. I've been pointing this out for years. It's nice to see an article address the subject. Feminists embrace a dual strategy by si…
/r/MensRights18/08/18 12:44 AM
5

Globally: for example it was only recently that women were allowed to drive in Saudi Arabia Are you aware that until recently in Saudi Arabia boys as young as five were forced to work as camel jockeys, causing many to be maimed or killed as a result? I didn't think so. This is the problem with feminist analysis. They do not seek "gender equality", they only look at the female side of the equation. The same is true of almost all international human rights organizations (insofar as they focus on g…
/r/MensRights18/08/18 12:23 AM
29

Yep. They'd rather lose than give up the gravy train of corporate cash. Bernie isn't even radical, basically just a social democrat. But since he isn't a complete and utter lackey for the establishment he is unacceptable. Joe Biden lol? I knew they were gonna run him when that Share Blue "BidenBro" astroturf campaign popped up on Reddit. Biden is arguably the worst candidate possible for MRA's -- worse even than Hillary. He actually takes credit for the Kangaroo courts on college campuses, and h…
/r/MensRights17/08/18 11:16 PM
4

She's a typical leftist/marxist She doesn't say a single thing about "Marxism" in the video. She criticizes feminists and feminism, and acknowledges false accusations and male victims of domestic violence. I agree that there is nothing positive about MeToo, but most of the video is fine. You should seriously consider seeking psychiatric help. You appear to be obsessed to the point of mental illness/paranoia about alleged communists hiding behind every tree. Your posts here -- which almost invari…
/r/MensRights17/08/18 10:42 PM
172

Hate speech against men and boys is now ubiquitous in most major media institutions. I can't imagine how boys feel growing up in this environment. White men come under particular attack, but that doesn't change the fact that feminist policies harm all men and poor men in particular (regardless of race). For example rich men who get divorced can hire high priced lawyers and get relatively fair custody arrangements; parents of rich boys can hire tutors to offset gynocentric education models, or ju…
/r/MensRights17/08/18 09:20 PM
7

Well, we agree about one thing: the appeal is a quixotic effort. Courts in Canada are mostly run by feminists so there isn't much hope of justice when one of their kind is in the cross hairs.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 08:11 PM
12

Here's Karen Straughan discussing the verdict. Judge is either senile or was politically motivated. From a poster on KIA: The most damning parts, IMO: The judge said the audio recording of Alison at the panel was not heard in full at the trial and it was unclear who is talking. The reason for the first part is that the judge himself did not allow the full recording to be played and the reason for the second part is that he is rather old and has poor hearing. The judge said the FBI report on Game…
/r/MensRights17/08/18 07:37 PM
5

but the truth may be that as a culture we're simply less tolerant to women outside the norm of acceptable behavior, and we don't see men as "needing" help. LMAO. The second part of this sentence is certainly true, but the first? It's the complete opposite of reality. This is why feminism is absolutely useless as a social "science": they must always portray women as the victims relative to men.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 07:30 PM
3

Props to the feminist for at least showing up and admitting that men are being discriminated against in family courts and the domestic violence industry. Although naturally she was wrong about the causes. Must have been difficult to bite her tongue when the feminist started rambling on about social constructivism. Props to Alison Tieman for talking some sense about gender differences (happens midway through).
/r/MensRights17/08/18 07:08 PM
8

The very idea that men have sexual power over women is completely insane. If that were true then most prostitutes would be male. Feminists are so hellbent on portraying themselves as helpless victims they are rejecting basic biological realities.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 07:04 PM
8

It's nothing new. One of the most common propaganda techniques is to claim that the enemy group treats their women badly. This goes back thousands of years. There are actually leaked CIA documents talking about the need to highlight female suffering in Afghanistan, for example. I guess the five year old boys who have to go out and risk their lives to support their mothers after dad gets killed don't generate as much sympathy. We hear alot about the plight of women in Iran. We don't hear about th…
/r/MensRights17/08/18 10:39 AM
5

society expects of men. This is another way of saying "women expect men." A woman who studied gender based shaming for ten years found this it is "primarily women" who enforce the male gender role. This should have already been obvious, since much of male behavior is geared toward appealing to female sexual selection. If women found the act of men emoting attractive then men would emote more. The phrase "toxic masculinity" could therefore also be called "toxic femininity"; indeed this would make…
/r/MensRights17/08/18 10:29 AM
8

Meh, they're alright. Many the commentators clearly haven't bothered to study the history of feminism. So a lot of them are the typical "hurr durr first and second wave feminism were awesome because before that women were treated like teh property and had no rightz!, but now it seems like they're getting a little anti-male" BS. Not entirely their fault, as that's what they teach in school after all. Interestingly I've noticed that more (mis)"educated" people (ie the types who read the Economist)…
/r/MensRights17/08/18 07:43 AM
6

You give Marx way to much credit lol. He barely even talked about gender issues. First wave feminists were mostly rich, Christian, racist women who despised the poor. Second wave feminists were bankrolled by capitalists philanthropic foundations, notably Ford and Rockefeller. And third wave feminists are supported by everyone from Conservatives in the UK to Goldman Sachs to JP Morgan.
/r/MensRights17/08/18 03:39 AM
21

That place is a toxic shithole. Check out /r/MensLibWatch for the lowlights. While the MRM is able to call attention to some gender disparities that negatively affect men (suicide, workplace fatalities, lack of concern male rape and abuse victims, etc.), where they falter is who and what they identify as the root cause of these issues and how best to rectify them. Gynocentrism is the root cause, insofar as we're talking about gender disparities. It is perpetrated by both conservatives and femini…
/r/MensRights17/08/18 03:00 AM
7

I agree with the sentiment but it's too little too late. Perhaps they should have considered this before destroying the lives of who-knows-how-many innocent men, driving some to suicide, and poisoning the relationship between the sexes. And if you're going to advocate "restorative justice" outside of the state apparatus you can't support or remain silent about attempts by feminists to criminalize normal interactions between the sexes and diminish due process rights for men accused of sexual crim…
/r/MensRights17/08/18 02:05 AM
4

Part of my feels sorry for them -- imagine having that little self-respect -- but the greater part of me regards them with contempt. If you want to act like a slug with no spine then go right ahead, but they also demand that decent honorable men follow in their footsteps (or slime trail, as it were). They throw other men under the bus just for a pat on the head by people who loathe them -- not even that, in fact, more like a kick to the balls.
/r/MensRights16/08/18 11:50 PM
10

She pulled those stats out of her ass. Girls are slightly more likely to be molested* than boys, and boys are more likely to be penetrated/raped. *The stats shouldn't be taken as gospel, because boys are less likely to report sexual assault, and both girls and boys are less likely to report being abused by a woman. Also, feminists have a habit of using extremely broad definitions of "sexual assault." Eg some "studies" characterize an "unwanted kiss" as sexual assault. Well, since males are the o…
/r/MensRights16/08/18 10:54 PM
7

Unreal...
/r/MensRights16/08/18 10:14 PM
11

Yeah Hollywood is notorious for rewriting history. It's not a new thing either.
/r/MensRights16/08/18 08:10 PM
12

It's also irrelevant. It wouldn't matter if the presenters were green reptilian aliens from another galaxy. The arguments are what matter, not the physical characteristics of the participants.
/r/MensRights16/08/18 09:53 AM
7

Damned if you do, damned if you don't. There is no logical consistently in what feminists demand of men. Everything is based on the subjective feelings of individual women. This makes it literally impossible for men to act in the "right" way.
/r/MensRights16/08/18 09:08 AM
2

Probably best to actually read a book or two about basic political theory. You come across as really, really uninformed, which when combined with arrogance is a cringey combination.
/r/MensRights16/08/18 09:05 AM
5

The guy you're talking to is a complete quack.
/r/MensRights16/08/18 09:03 AM
5

This is really troubling. Feminists are applying intense political pressure to the judiciary to increase the conviction rates for alleged rape cases. And they are now publishing "reports" in major newspapers basically accusing police of being "soft on rape." This is almost certain to increase the number of innocent men who end up in prison over false accusations. In the UK it has been revealed that in dozens (hundreds?) of cases police with-held exculpatory evidence in rape trials, leading to th…
/r/MensRights16/08/18 08:54 AM
30

My take on this: whether it's control over women's bodies, the sexualisation of women, the gender pay gap, harassment walking home at night, domestic homicide, or child marriage, it's clear that male privilege is an essential building block of most societies. Male privilege? No. Male corpses? Yes. Gender pay gap = female privilege. Women work less hours and spend 80 percent more than they earn. The other stuff also affects males. That said, rigid norms which enforce a gender binary or toxic masc…
/r/MensRights16/08/18 08:10 AM
5

Common stereotypes about men hold that they show ambition at work and focus most of their energy on promoting themselves and their own accomplishments. In contrast, stereotypes about women involve emphasizing other people’s feelings and welfare above their own. lol wut? Then why is it when I see a video of someone risking their life to save others they are all men?
/r/MensRights16/08/18 07:28 AM
10

Nah, MeToo was garbage from the beginning. Any "movement" based on destroying people's lives over unproven allegations is extremely sinister. From there it's only gotten worse. Four men have already committed suicide over allegations that were never proven, men have lost their jobs for making bawdy jokes etc. And now the basic human interactions that make work more tolerable are disappearing. MeToo represents a return to sexual puritanism combined with a dark ages attitude toward presumption of …
/r/MensRights16/08/18 03:48 AM
8

You gotta be kidding me...
/r/MensRights16/08/18 03:01 AM
4

Nah, the right is just as bad in my experience.
/r/MensRights16/08/18 02:59 AM
18

Patriarchy means rule of the father. The idea that we're currently living in a patriarchy is pants-on-head retarded. If feminists didn't keep blocking shared parenting bills (fucking hypocrites) a lot more fathers would be spending more time with their kids. What feminists are doing is not only abusive toward men but children. It's disgusting.
/r/MensRights16/08/18 02:57 AM
17

I don't have a link handy but Warren Farrell talks about this in his book The Boy Crisis. Statistically children raised with stepdads don't fare nearly as well as children raised with their biological fathers. Doesn't meant step-parents can't be great though. One of the big problems is that women are not being exposed to any of this data. Many mothers are convinced that fathers are only useful for their wallets. A study in the UK found that 50 percent of mothers didn't feel it necessary for the …
/r/MensRights16/08/18 02:52 AM
3

"These instances are rare, and probably very rare." [false accusations, or a woman being oversensitive/misconstruing intent] Oh really? How we know they're rare compared to actual harassment? We don't. Hell half of the MeToo stories are for trivial behavior and don't constitute harassment; that's why they had to come up with the new Orwellian term "sexual misconduct." Tim has a tendency to play it a little safe imo, as though he's bending over backwards not to offend anyone.
/r/MensRights16/08/18 02:11 AM
10

If males are having problem: males must fix it. If females are having problem: males must fix it. Females suffer minor irritation: we need massive structural changes. Males suffer major institutional discrimination: man up and solve it yourself. (this even extends to boys). This is the feminist position in a nutshell. Unfortunately tradcons aren't much different.
/r/MensRights16/08/18 12:15 AM
1

Obscene.
/r/MensRights16/08/18 12:08 AM
9

Yep, that will be the next step. Feminists will start suing their employers for "discrimination" because they are not receiving the same networking opportunities, or because a boss will meet with male employees one on one but not female.
/r/MensRights15/08/18 10:42 PM
1

There are probably about three dozen "strong independent women" living today, in the entire world, and all of whom rely on inventions created by men to retain their "independence." The other X billion women rely on men to survive. And don't you ever forget it, ladies.
/r/MensRights15/08/18 05:26 AM
53

Umm...suspended? Why wasn't she fired? What the hell is going on here!? :( How long are we going to tolerate this sexual predator preying on her male students -- tarantula like?
/r/MensRights15/08/18 05:17 AM
2

Yeah, he owned the debate. Indeed.
/r/MensRights15/08/18 02:26 AM
4

Even if what you claim is true -- it still perfectly describes the crazy attitudes of gender studies majors.
/r/MensRights14/08/18 09:54 PM
23

Woman has vagina cut out -- hilarity ensues! Edit: this film will no doubt be labeled transgressive or daring or some such nonsense, but it barely even qualifies as edgy. It fits perfectly within the misandric culture we now live in. The degradation and sadistic humiliation of men and boys is so common as to be background noise at this point.
/r/MensRights14/08/18 05:27 PM
1

That's one possibility. Another is that due to their proximity to female feminists -- who regard everything as RAPE!!!! -- they are more likely to get burned. Probably a bit of both.
/r/MensRights14/08/18 05:16 PM
11

The hypocrisy and lack of integrity is simply mind blowing. You'd think they'd have some degree of shame, but nope.
/r/MensRights14/08/18 07:43 AM
17

women bad Lemme guess, gender studies graduate? ;)
/r/MensRights14/08/18 07:11 AM
5

I'm probably not the best person to consult. There are other posters here who are experts on the subject. Maybe start a new post? Also I've heard good things about the documentary "American circumcision."
/r/MensRights14/08/18 04:19 AM
27

Heh, it literally happens every day: feminist professors who avoided STEM like the plague because they had no interest in those fields portraying misogyny as the culprit for gender disparities. If you think OP is somehow an unlikely occurrence you obviously haven't spent much time around gender studies graduates.
/r/MensRights14/08/18 04:17 AM
7

Nope. This has occurred at an institutional level, organized by feminist groups like NOW. It's not my fault man-hating psychos run the feminist movement and craft public policy. Perhaps spend more time time criticizing your leaders and intellectuals rather than defending the brand? MRA's don't criticize feminists just for the hell of it. Every time we try to do something there's a feminist blocking our way.
/r/MensRights14/08/18 03:52 AM
113

This sub is 90 percent negative news about discrimination against men and boys. A little humor is fine now and again.
/r/MensRights14/08/18 03:14 AM
9

By institutional power do you mean media presence? The media and every other major institution, from the education system, to the criminal courts, to the family courts, corporations etc. Feminists consistently fight against the human rights of men and boys. They are responsible for boys being discriminated against in schools; for children being denied access to their fathers; for eliminating or lessening presumption of innocence and due process rights; for causing discrimination against males in…
/r/MensRights14/08/18 02:57 AM
1

What a joke. Yes, you are a joke. I've sent you links where you can learn more about the US subversion of Venezuelan democracy. Until you have a base level understanding of this stuff I don't see the point in continuing. Bye now.
/r/MensRights14/08/18 01:25 AM
10

Most feminists who are educated on the topic are wholly against the practice And yet not enough to talk about it more than, say mansplaining. It's a shame, because feminists have great institutional power and could actually do something about it, unlike MRAs.
/r/MensRights14/08/18 01:19 AM
1

No need to apologize. No sane leader would ever tolerate a political party being backed by a hostile foreign power with a clear record of financing, arming and training fascist governments/death squads in neighboring countries, and indeed which funded previous attempts to destabilize/overthrow that government. The US certainly wouldn't tolerate it. Like I said, elections were transparent, observers agree. Given that the US is already spending mountains of cash to overthrow the government of Vene…
/r/MensRights14/08/18 01:12 AM
64

This is marvelous. No one wonder they never talk about class issues lol.
/r/MensRights14/08/18 12:15 AM
1

I don't blame blame him for trying to prevent yet another coup by "opposition" parties financed by the CIA. International observers said the election was legit. I'll take their word over CIA/corporate media in the US. Frankly I'm not sure why you're so interested in overthrowing Venezuela's democratically elected government anyway. Perhaps you should concern yourself with the 73 percent of the world's dictatorships that the US government arms and supports.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 11:57 PM
3

These "sources" are basically the equivalent to anti-vaxxers scources. lol. We're done, sicko.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 11:32 PM
10

https://www.psychologytoday.com/ca/blog/moral-landscapes/201109/myths-about-circumcision-you-likely-believe Links to tons of studies there. Honestly I'm not really comfortable talking to someone who advocates mutilating babies. You guys make my skin crawl, like pedophiles. So I'll probably just leave it there.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 11:21 PM
2

Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting (FAIR) summarized the biased and inaccurate media coverage, writing, Western media have taken an entirely different outlook to the [elections], unanimously presenting them as seriously flawed, at best, and at worst a complete sham presided over by a dictator. The New York Times (5/20/18) presented the election as ‘a contest that critics said was heavily rigged in his favor,’ Huffington Post (5/21/18) christened it ‘a vote denounced as a farce cementing autocrac…
/r/MensRights13/08/18 11:18 PM
10

You're simply an apologist for the sexual mutilation of babies. Actual reputable medical scource Others reading this can simply scroll to the bottom of the link I posted. They will note that the sources are almost all reputable medical journals and mainstream news sources.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 10:45 PM
14

It's actually probably more like thousands. Links to mainstream sources here: Several doctors have given estimates of the number of deaths that occur each year. Douglas Gairdner reported 16-19 actual deaths a year in England and Wales from neonatal circumcisions in the 1940s.10 Sydney Gellis believed that "there are more deaths from complications of circumcision than from cancer of the penis.11 There are various figures for the number of deaths from penile cancer ranging from 200 to 480 deaths p…
/r/MensRights13/08/18 10:37 PM
2

I'm not a fan of Maduro, but he's basically a saint compared to any number of right wing death squad regimes backed by the US. Maduro is a dictator Nope. Democratically elected. You need to be very careful about imbibing info about Venezuela from the corporate media.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 10:28 PM
3

Nimrod Reitman accused his former N.Y.U. graduate school adviser, Avital Ronell, of sexually harassing him, and the university found her responsible. But some leading feminist scholars have supported her in ways that echo the defenses of male harassers. alleged male harassers. Unless there is compelling proof then no one should be getting fired, period. I'm not familiar with the specifics of this case, but feminists acting like gigantic hypocrites is not exactly revelatory. It's only surprising …
/r/MensRights13/08/18 10:11 PM
2

Doesn't really change what I was saying. Agree with you about the Hungarian government, but "defunding" is not the same thing as banning. In the case of "gender studies" it's sort of like defunding astrology.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 10:08 PM
2

Err, Venezuela has some of the most transparent elections in the world, according to international bodies. Meanwhile its neighbor Colombia has been for several decades a far right death squad regime that routinely murders journalists. Strangely we never hear about that from the US State department (which has backed said regimes), which is supposedly oh so concerned about "democracy" even though the US supports and arms 73 percent of the world's dictatorships.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 10:06 PM
12

"I would like to unreservedly apologize for any hurt and distress caused by a quote in a recent interview with The Times," Lohan, 32, told People on Sunday. "The quote solely related to my hope that a handful of false testimonies out of a tsunami of heroic voices do not serve to dilute the importance of the #MeToo movement, and all of us who champion it. However, I have since learned how statements like mine are seen as hurtful, which was never my intent. I’m sorry for any pain I may have caused…
/r/MensRights13/08/18 09:23 PM
7

The idiots cheering on social media bannings over "offensive speech" don't realize they're next on the chopping block. Already we are seeing whistleblowers like Peter Van Buren getting banned, in his case for making a "violent threat" which was actually a zombie joke.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 08:27 PM
8

Right, I agree.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 08:19 PM
4

There is a terrific documentary about the institutional rape of boys in Hollywood titled An Open Secret. The female director was previously nominated for an Academy Award for her documentary about child abuse in the Catholic church. Lo and Behold, the hypocrites in Hollywood essentially buried the film about the sins in their own house. It was only reviewed by a few publications and couldn't find a distributor. It is available to watch on youtube. It says alot that we care more about the "power …
/r/MensRights13/08/18 08:18 PM
33

Some feminists oppose MGM. But they clearly don't care enough about the issue to do anything about it, even though hundreds of baby boys die from the procedure every year. They're clearly more concerned with human rights atrocities like catcalling and the pink tax. Still, although feminists should be condemned for their hypocrisy, they're not the driving force behind keeping it legal. That would be Jewish groups.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 08:05 PM
3

Spiked, World Socialist Website, Counterpunch, Information Clearing House, for starters. Edit: I mean Chomsky, the world's most famous leftist, has condemned violence by Antifa and just condemned the censorship of Alex Jones by Tech companies. The problem with righties is that they don't actually read leftists. They get all for their info from people like Ben Shapiro, and they mistake Democrats and liberal rags like Huffo for the left.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 07:58 PM
3

It's completely obvious! Just be a psychic and know how to read a woman's mind!
/r/MensRights13/08/18 07:25 AM
57

And I'm supposed to care about this...because? The strong majority of women, or at least those with power, decided that it was acceptable for men to have their lives destroyed over a mere accusation. In many cases the alleged bad behavior was completely trivial. Basically, "Hurt woman's feelings = life destroyed." What's incredible is that men haven't reacted to this insanity in a much more dramatic way, eg become a bunch of MGTOW's or demand increased sex segregation. Feminists have made intera…
/r/MensRights13/08/18 12:59 AM
3

Ironically alot of the SJW/man-hating feminist/pro-censorship garbage comes from pro-corporate pro-war liberals, whereas there is a great deal of criticism of these policies on "radical leftist" websites. Unfortunately anti-authoritarian leftists (including those on the "radical left") don't get promoted by billionaires, whose main goal is to divide and conquer and keep the focus off of class issues. I've seen much more criticism of identity politics on anarchist and socialist websites than I ha…
/r/MensRights13/08/18 12:19 AM
-1

There are one billion Muslims in the world. You sound like Adolph Hitler talking about Jews.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 12:11 AM
4

Kimmel is not an honest person. It's not a question of ignorance. We know this for a fact because in his Salon interview he blatantly and shamelessly conflated MRA's with incels. Kimmel has seen The Red Pill -- he even appears in it -- so he knows damn well that one group has nothing to do with the other. He's an unprincipled liar and charlatan.
/r/MensRights12/08/18 08:48 PM
1

Is that true? I haven't been keeping up with the latest Kimmel news.
/r/MensRights12/08/18 04:47 AM
1

Well fascism is authoritarian nationalism That's another element, yes, in addition to the merger of state and corporate power. More sniff tests: Canada has never had GS like legislation Um, what? Canada has extensive regulation of banks. http://www.nber.org/digest/dec11/w17312.html "Canada set up a concentrated banking system that controlled mortgage lending and investment banking under the watchful eye of a single, strong regulator. The United States allowed a weak, fragmented system to develop…
/r/MensRights12/08/18 02:59 AM
1

It's best not to rely too much on argument from authority True enough, but many of the people arguing this are themselves bankers. They're basically saying, "this is monstrous and profoundly unethical, and if you don't put a leash on us we're going to do even more damage, and more financial collapses will follow." Capitalists during the great depression made the same arguments; about half of them supported regulation, the other half supported fascism. In a way our societies are already quasi-fas…
/r/MensRights12/08/18 02:05 AM
1

"For several years, it was hotly debated whether speculation in food commodities drives up prices. But the evidence now firmly says it does, and that there's little correlation between rising prices and actual supply and demand. There are now well over 100 studies which agree (pdf), from sources as varied and valuable as Harvard University, the Food and Agricultural Organisation and the United Nations." http://www.ctema.com/press/Press_2012/evidence_on_impact_of_commodity_speculation.pdf When 99…
/r/MensRights11/08/18 11:29 PM
4

Are you functionally retarded? Are you actually arguing that people haven't been bartering on their own terms since the prehistoric era? Okay. I said I was done with you but I'll try to teach you something before I go. The term "capitalism" was coined by Karl Marx. He described it as a system whereby people have to sell their labor power in exchange for money. Its defining feature is the commodification of human labor. This system arose during and after the violent expropriation/theft of communa…
/r/MensRights11/08/18 11:12 PM
1

You either don't understand derivatives markets or you're lying through your teeth. Another good article on the subject is How Goldman Sachs Gambled on Starving the Poor – And Won by Johann Hari. https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/commentators/johann-hari/johann-hari-how-goldman-gambled-on-starvation-2016088.html "It starts with an apparent mystery. At the end of 2006, food prices across the world started to rise, suddenly and stratospherically. Within a year, the price of wheat had shot up by…
/r/MensRights11/08/18 10:33 PM
1

i agree.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 10:07 PM
1

Capitalism has been a thing since the dawn of time lol. We're about done here. The government is heavily restricted and it is largely the neo-liberal left that has rallied behind big government. False. The right supports big government when it comes to eg corporate subsidies, war, intelligence bureaucracies, prisons, foreign aid to dictatorships and human rights abusers like Israel etc. The US actually props up and provides military aid to 73 percent of the world's dictators. Capitalism in actio…
/r/MensRights11/08/18 10:05 PM
1

I'm not going to go buy two separate socialist propaganda books and read them And herein lies your problem. Instead of reading material by actual academics you get your information from Alex Jones and Rush Limbaugh. Hurr Durr anything that contradicts my worldview is propaganda. Hitler himself was a socialist, he centralized government power and sought to quote "Socialism the people". I suggest Centralization of power has nothing to do with socialism. Socialism does not even require a state. Ind…
/r/MensRights11/08/18 09:13 PM
2

Interesting argument. I think there's another factor: people are pretty miserable under consumer capitalism. Just look at the anti-depressant usage rates. There is no sense of community let alone purpose. Having a decent standard of living is not enough. Unhappiness breeds resentment and rage. That rage finds expression in scapegoating.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 08:57 PM
1

Yes, it's a diabolical conspiracy against Goldman Sachs! Here's another article with more detail: https://foreignpolicy.com/2011/04/27/how-goldman-sachs-created-the-food-crisis/
/r/MensRights11/08/18 08:51 PM
2

You didn't give any hard data I gave you two books containing hundreds of studies. Read 'em, refute 'em. The Nazi party (they were socialists as much as it pains you to hear it Heh. Not a single reputable historian agrees with you. Socialists and trade union members were their first targets. An argument from authority, I can find a wide number who agree with me. Oh yeah? Let's hear is then. Gimme their names. we saw it Venezuela Venuzuela is capitalist. 80 percent of property is privately owned.…
/r/MensRights11/08/18 08:42 PM
1

Nope. "Financial speculation is fuelling food price spikes and Goldman Sachs is the No 1 culprit."
/r/MensRights11/08/18 08:25 PM
23

Something tells me they'd change their tune if their house was on fire and they needed someone to put it out. The only reason these spoiled twits are able to even have a roof over their heads is because of men and masculinity.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 08:15 PM
1

You'll have to actually counter the hard data. Not just say "that feels wrong to me." Germany became a super-power through warfare - not fascism. Unfortunately command and control economies tend to be pretty efficient. I don't support them, mind you. And yes imperialism played a role, as it did in the rise of Britain, the US etc. Communism and Socialism go hand in hand Again, because something feels true to you doesn't make it so. Political scientists disagree with you.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 08:10 PM
1

I fear you have no idea what you're talking about
/r/MensRights11/08/18 07:54 PM
2

I think you mean communism. Socialism works fine. Indeed the less inequality in a society the better better people fare on pretty much every quality of life indicator. Additional research reveals that cooperative enterprises are at least as efficient as competitive enterprises: “The research evidence runs contrary to popular assumptions. Kohn cites one review of 122 studies on the question: 'Sixty-five studies found that cooperation promotes higher achievement than competition, eight found the r…
/r/MensRights11/08/18 07:52 PM
4

Feminists have successfully portrayed women (all women) as historically oppressed in the same manner as eg black and Irish people in the early US. That's insane. I mean are we really arguing that rich women were as "oppressed" as some 19th century straight white male coal minor who earned a dollar a day and died of black lung disease at age 30? Rich women had male servants for Christ's sake. I was watching a documentary the other day on the industrial revolution. It had a segment on the first "l…
/r/MensRights11/08/18 07:42 PM
1

I know Cenk is their best debater Huh? Cenk is a corporate democrat SJW, not a leftist. Put Benji up against someone like Noam Chomsky and he'd be crushed like an ant.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 07:35 PM
2

So when bankers at Goldman Sachs speculate on food commodities, drive up the price of wheat and cause mass starvation in the third world among people who actually work for a living, is that an example of smart people earning their keep? Sounds more like robbery to me.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 07:34 PM
2

Venezuela is not a socialist country. 80 percent of property is in private hands. The US has also spent hundreds of millions of dollars trying to subvert their economy (The CIA actually has an entire floor at Langley devoted to economic subversion). And I say that as someone who is not a fan of their current government. It's odd to me that people point to Venezuela as some sort of "gotcha" while ignoring eg nearby Argentina, whose economy completely collapsed after the introduction of Chicago sc…
/r/MensRights11/08/18 07:31 PM
1

But look up that interview on Ocasio-Cortez and her opinions on Israel. Um... In 2003 Shapiro advocated the “transfer [of] the Palestinians and the Israeli-Arabs from Judea, Samaria, Gaza and Israel proper.” “the Palestinian Arab population is rotten to the core” “Collective choices require collective treatment.” "We should carpet bomb Gaza" [40 percent of the population is made up of children] Note that Shapiro's recommendations are considered crimes against humanity according to the Geneva con…
/r/MensRights11/08/18 07:27 PM
2

And it's not like Ben Shapiro is a psycho, extremist, or bigot, he's just a staunch right winger. In 2003 Shapiro advocated the “transfer [of] the Palestinians and the Israeli-Arabs from Judea, Samaria, Gaza and Israel proper.” “the Palestinian Arab population is rotten to the core” - Ben Shapiro “Collective choices require collective treatment.” - Ben Shapiro "We should carpet bomb Gaza" [40 percent of the population is made up of children] - Ben Shapiro Note that Shapiro's recommendations are …
/r/MensRights11/08/18 07:24 PM
0

People as dumb as you only come along once in a while...
/r/MensRights11/08/18 05:13 AM
1

That's code for too pussy to grab hold of a spray can.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 04:32 AM
1

Indeed.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 04:30 AM
1

Nope, no it hasn't. Though feel free to post a postcard doueche. heh.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 04:26 AM
1

That's pretty basic and a completely different scenario entirely. Yeah? I look forward to your travelling to France to make sure no one get accused of holocaust revisionism, as Chomsky did many years ago. He argued that no man should ever be tried for supposed "violations" of free speech. In truth, you're a pathetic little weasel.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 04:17 AM
1

You crazy sonnofabitch, you sound like sneaky feminist. If only there were a non-feminist person to bring me a burger and frie3s...
/r/MensRights11/08/18 04:12 AM
4

SJW barbarians sounds like a fun script. You should write it.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 04:10 AM
-6

globalist communism Let me know when our dear leaders start supporting work co-ops lol. So your overall theory is obviously retarded, but you do introduce an interesting point: what if leaders actually supported men? it's a radical idea, and I think its time has come.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 04:05 AM
1

Traditionally its the job of the father of the family to provide to the rest of the family. Yep. You feminists are literally painful. I can't imagine that level of idiocy.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 04:03 AM
8

Still, wet dogs have a certain charm, if they are emerging from rivers or oceans... Edit: and even lakes...
/r/MensRights11/08/18 03:50 AM
7

In general, male animals are built for hunting; so it would make some sense that there wouldn’t be a focus on learning capacity. Wrong, wrong, wrong. In fact you're so wrong it's almost unbelievable. You would think young men would learn this, but no. Here's a hint, genius: scene of men walking UPRIGHT and stealing the lion's kill, to bring back to their m'ladies. Well shit, shouldn't those patriarchs have eaten the kill themselves?
/r/MensRights11/08/18 03:00 AM
2

Depends on your worldview. I'll give you an example from someone you hate: Noam Chomsky. He travelled to France and tried to prevent a guy from getting imprisoned for holocaust revisionism. Chomsky argued that free speech should be the foremost concern on both the left and right. "If you believe in freedom of speech, you believe in freedom of speech for views you don't like. Goebbels was in favor of freedom of speech for views he liked. So was Stalin. If you're in favor of freedom of speech, tha…
/r/MensRights11/08/18 02:57 AM
6

They're posted here at least once every five hours or so.
/r/MensRights11/08/18 02:46 AM
1

That guy is just a bullshit artist. Indeed. But more insidious than usual. As mentioned he's the go-to-pseudo-academic when feminists want a man to speak about men and masculinity. And he's utterly shameless. If you've seen the Red Pill documentary, he actually appears in it. He's not an idiot. He knows that almost everything he says his bullshit, but he's happy to play along for a fat paycheck and a pat on the head and apparently, some sweet young female flesh. Recently Kimmel has been accused …
/r/MensRights11/08/18 02:18 AM
6

I stand corrected. Well in the case of the public university I entirely support the decision.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 10:46 PM
6

That wasn't the literal title (title is not in quotes), but it's clearly implicit in the excerpt I quoted.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 10:44 PM
10

It's obscene. It really is. And strongly reminiscent of fascism: "Fascist ideology always incongruously asserts to its audience, its chosen people, that they are at one and the same time oppressed and superior..." (Bob Black, Feminism as Fascism) Whenever people encounter one of these bathroom situations they should tell the manager that they will no longer be giving them any business, and tell them why. If you're too timid to do it in person then send an email.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 09:18 PM
42

Paul Elam has already said he would vote "not guilty" in any rape trial due to rape shield laws. At the time I considered that an extreme position, but in Canada at least it's the only justifiable course of action for anyone sitting on the jury. You will never know whether crucial evidence is being withheld. Remarkably, this law was sparked by the trial of media personality Jian Ghomeshi, who was himself a victim of false accusations. Several women conspired to frame him after he dumped them. Th…
/r/MensRights10/08/18 09:09 PM
16

We're not. Canada has some of the best MRA groups (eg CAFE), some of the most vociferous and eloquent MGTOW advocates (eg John the Other), some of the best feminist critics (eg Jordan Peterson, Paul Nathanson, Katherine Young), and an increasing number of female MRA's (eg Karen Straughan, Alison Tiemen, Diana Davison. The problem is that both the corporate and state media are run by feminists (occasionally the National Post will publish something sensible about gender, but that's about it). So t…
/r/MensRights10/08/18 08:57 PM
4

Can you give me a reason that isn't racist? Just to play devil's advocate, Asian people (on average) earn more in the US than white people, and Jews more than Christians. Does that mean we should be talking about Asian and Jewish privilege? I don't think "privilege" is a helpful way of discussing these issues because (a) it has the effect of obscuring class issues (b) it comes across as an accusation (you didn't earn what you have), which for working class whites in particular is likely to cause…
/r/MensRights10/08/18 07:14 PM
42

Gender studies should not be receiving government funding. It is obscene that (mostly male) tax payers are being forced to subsidize indoctrination centers that teach hatred against half of the population. However According to the commentators at OP's link gender studies does not receive government funding in Hungary. So this could legitimately be seen as an attack on free speech by the right. I do understand the opposing view. Would we tolerate "nigger studies" or "kike studies"? Because if you…
/r/MensRights10/08/18 06:48 PM
3

Violations of disclosure rules by police are occurring in 40.7% of cases, according to Inspectorate reports. Police failing to share key information from their investigation is the number one cause of miscarriages of justice. We do not believe that all police officers are cheating to win cases – often its matter of lack of resources or training. However, we do believe that the police should not be the ones to decide what gets turned over to the defence, as their job is to put together the case a…
/r/MensRights10/08/18 11:43 AM
3

femsplaining lol. Hey what's good for the gander...
/r/MensRights10/08/18 11:37 AM
1

My sentiments exactly.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 11:35 AM
1

The party supporting this is far right.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 11:33 AM
2

The party sponsoring the bill are not feminists, they are right wing tradcons.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 11:32 AM
3

Aren't stay at home dads like three times more likely to get divorced by their wives? While they should of course be supported I don't think we should be encouraging men to follow this path. Most women clearly become angry and resentful when they have to be the primary breadwinner. It runs contrary to their hypergamous instincts and they also resent not being able to spend more time with the kids.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 11:29 AM
8

This is just getting completely and utterly insane....
/r/MensRights10/08/18 11:24 AM
2

I'm pretty sure Ben Shapiro is a jew himself. It's a bit different. As were most of the people who signed the PNAC documents, and its predecessor, Securing the Realm. They are loyal alright, just not to the United States. I'm not talking about Jewish people generally, just far right neocons. If Israel really wanted to, it could send the IDF out and destroy all of the combatants in the area without a problem. It doesn't need the U.S. , your argument is garbage. LMAO. Yeah, let's risk annihilation…
/r/MensRights10/08/18 08:52 AM
2

Benji is like all neocons, "Israel first". They seek to use American blood and treasure to eliminate Israel's regional revivals. I'm not in interested in your hare-brained opinions on Israel-Palestine. You don't even understand basic political theory, I don't think you have anything to teach me about geopolitics lol.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 08:25 AM
1

In any case, no one on the right, by definition, supports government subjugation of the citizenry. lol. You're a laugh a minute. Maybe you should stop watching The Young Turks and Kyle Kullinski, Corporatist Democrats? No thanks. And never heard of the other guy.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 07:43 AM
2

Huxley was a leftist, FYI.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 07:40 AM
2

grossly abused and mistreated by a leftist government that destroys him in favor of benefitting a woman lol you think merely "leftists" are responsible for maintaining alimony, child support, unfair custody arrangements, "violence against women" acts allowing false accusations etc? You have no idea what you're talking about. Indeed it was Republicans in the US who blocked a bill that would prevent men who fall behind in child support from being sent to jail. You need to stop getting all your ide…
/r/MensRights10/08/18 07:38 AM
18

No worries. She has in fact mentioned her boy numerous times in the context of men's rights, but claims to be driven mostly by the commitment to do what is right and just. Which is admirable.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 07:30 AM
25

Surprisingly fair article. It even mentions that that the march is bipartisan. On August 25, a group of people will march shoulder to shoulder through the streets of Melbourne to demonstrate that “men matter”, that modern feminism is futile False. MRA's and anti-feminists believe that feminism has become an incredibly destructive movement spreading hate and discrimination against men and boys. If it was merely futile we would be thrilled. So far some 530 people have clicked ‘attending’ on Facebo…
/r/MensRights10/08/18 07:28 AM
32

Karen Straughan has sons and claimed that they are the reason she realized that so many things were bullshit scenarios stacked against men That's not accurate. She claims to have come to her conclusions simply on a logical basis. And also because she realized during her divorce that she could have destroyed her ex husband and denied him contact with his children on a whim.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 07:23 AM
14

Ever wonder whether feminism is just a gigantic exercise in projection? They mistakenly attribute their own attitudes and behaviors onto men. Consider patriarchy theory itself. Women have in group bias and therefore try to privilege other women; they assume men think/feel the same way, even though it's clear (or at least should be at this point) that men in power are far more likely to privilege females than males. Or "objectification". According to Briffault's law females do not "love" a man un…
/r/MensRights10/08/18 02:43 AM
4

Great to hear.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 02:31 AM
3

I've heard it described as bragplaining.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 12:13 AM
2

This is why I always say I'll bring the hood and rope if they find a good tree Great retort; gets right to the point.
/r/MensRights09/08/18 10:56 PM
16

lol. I like the woman with the jackhammer. The truth, of course, is that the women who complain most adamantly about "sexual harassment" are the least likely to be sexually harassed, let alone pursued. HL Mencken noted this a hundred years ago: “The woman who is not pursued sets up the doctrine that pursuit is offensive to her sex, and wants to make it a felony. No genuinely attractive woman has any such desire. She likes masculine admiration, however violently expressed, and is quite able to ta…
/r/MensRights09/08/18 10:53 PM
1

Nope. There are all sorts of factors at play: lower health care spending for male-specific ailments; workplace death rates, often caused by lax safety standards; hours worked; suicide rates etc. Women have to work much harder in poor countries in more dangerous conditions, and in eg China the female suicide rate is similar to the male suicide rate (China also ranks very low on the alleged "gender equality" index -- they need to up their male suicide rate).
/r/MensRights09/08/18 10:01 PM
-2

What is this The_Donald? Benji Shapiro is a sniveling little neocon pygmy rat. He has literally advocated war crimes against Palestinian civilians, including the carpet bombing of Gaza (one of the most populated areas in the world, made up of 40 percent children) and the forcible removal of Palestinians from the West Bank. These are crimes against humanity according to the Geneva Conventions. Get this filth out of here.
/r/MensRights09/08/18 09:09 PM
2

Are MRA friendly voices in OZ promoting this? What about anti-feminist conservatives? There needs to be a big push because if this thing fails it will discourage MRA's in other countries from taking it to the streets...
/r/MensRights09/08/18 08:13 PM
4

Feminism is a billion dollar industry. A large number of people literally "earn" their living by demonizing men and boys and portraying women as helpless little damsels in distress. Many middle aged/older women and academics have spent their entire lives pushing a theory that turns out to be completely bogus. When ideologues are presented with contradictory information they tend not to change their mind but double down. For many women, it hurts their feelings to imagine they're are not oppressed…
/r/MensRights09/08/18 07:57 PM
6

He's probably talking about the earnings gap. Men earn more on average because eg they work on average 15 hours more per week, perform more difficult and dangerous jobs etc. So the majority of taxes are paid by men. A study in New Zealand determined that "only men pay taxes" because women take more out of the tax coffers than they put it (women also spend much more money than they earn). Whatever we want to consider "just", we should acknowledge these facts when we talk about the "pay gap."
/r/MensRights09/08/18 07:47 PM
6

Feminists view "oppression" in a strictly binary fashion. Since they think the sexes are "at war" with one another (they're wrong, only one side is fighting), they are incapable of even conceiving of the idea that both sexes could suffer discrimination. Thus when MRA's try to talk about our issues, they immediately revert to the snarky refrain "Men are the reeeel victims". This is essentially projection. It's also incredibly childish.
/r/MensRights09/08/18 07:32 PM
11

Feminists are literally trying to prevent any possibility of acquittal in alleged rape cases. There is no doubt in my mind that if they could get away with it they would get rid of the formality of a trial entirely and go straight to lynching just like the KKK in the antebellum south.
/r/MensRights09/08/18 07:28 PM
6

My favorite examples of this hypocrisy: (1) Following the genocide in Rwanda, that country shot up the rankings in the UN "gender equality" index. Why? Because most of the men and boys were dead! Let’s start with the economy. At 86%, Rwanda has one of the highest rates of female labour force participation in the world. In the US, for example, that figure stands at 56%, and has even been declining since the turn of the millennium. Not only are participation rates high, but the wage gap is narrowe…
/r/MensRights09/08/18 07:20 PM
18

Let me know when feminists embrace rationality on some other issue. I'll be the first to congratulate them.
/r/MensRights09/08/18 07:37 AM
738

Surreal reading. A woman had to go through what men go through every day? OH THE HORROR. And yes, it is horrific. Perhaps it's time to start empathizing with the opposite sex, ladies? Men don't seem to have a problem doing so...
/r/MensRights09/08/18 04:07 AM
79

So we've reached the point where Lindsey Lohan is more sane, adult and rational than feminists...
/r/MensRights09/08/18 03:15 AM
19

False rape accusations -- if proven beyond a reasonable doubt -- should be punished exactly the same as rape itself. It boggles the mind how many people don't understand just how violent a false rape accusation is. It's literally an attempt to destroy a man's life, and in some cases have him forcibly confined and tortured for potentially decades. This is akin to those sadistic psychos we occasionally hear about who kidnap some teenage girl and keep her locked up in the basement for 20 years. Yet…
/r/MensRights09/08/18 03:11 AM
9

Or, as a man I know put it: “The homeless are overwhelmingly male. As we all know, under-representation means discrimination. I for one am outraged that women are systemically denied the opportunity to be homeless.” Perhaps the first step could be an initiative where the state takes homes away from white women. Nice. The paper in question is a new low for feminists. I would even say they have reached rock bottom (rather like the homeless men this woman exploited and degraded) but there appears t…
/r/MensRights08/08/18 11:46 PM
1

No actually you're an idiot who doesn't understand what science or research is. Exactly. Hence why I called you an idiot. To be fair, you may simply be ignorant, ie no one's ever taught you about what the scientific method entails.
/r/MensRights08/08/18 09:02 PM
18

Feminists already have a billion dollar lobby working for them. Pretty sure they can handle this sort of thing without our help.
/r/MensRights08/08/18 09:18 AM
10

Meh.
/r/MensRights08/08/18 05:07 AM
0

Obvious troll is obvious. Yes, you are.
/r/MensRights08/08/18 05:06 AM
3

Why not both?
/r/MensRights08/08/18 05:05 AM
44

The woman is clearly insane. How the fuck did she get custody in the first place?
/r/MensRights08/08/18 05:04 AM
7

I can't really find anything super offensive from the excerpts in the article You may want to to consider that you're just as sick as she is. We should really save the irrational outrage over scientific research for the feminists. "Scientific" research? Lol. You're an idiot.
/r/MensRights08/08/18 05:02 AM
8

Religious fanatics have long understood that you gotta get 'em while they're young. Teaching feminism in schools is no different than teaching creationism. It's arguably child abuse, insofar as feminism demonizes males and masculinity. The only way it would be remotely acceptable is if it were supplemented by actual science, actual history, non-feminist academics etc., and even then the subject is not suitable for little kids. Moreover, the first area of discussion should be female teacher bias …
/r/MensRights08/08/18 01:40 AM
8

Yep. I've had very similar arguments. We're not allowed to say that there is anything positive about men and masculinity. But female superiority is hunky dorry.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 10:58 PM
16

On the other hand, if we ever see blade runner type sexbots even high status men may start shunning women -- assuming feminists keep poisoning the relation between the sexes. When the actor who plays "Superman" is expressing discomfort at the idea of approaching women, you know something has gone very, very wrong.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 08:34 PM
8

There are plenty of anti-authoritarian leftists who reject SJW's and their quackery. The problem is that feminists/SJW's are given huge amounts of money and influence by the billionaire class. Honestly I think there's a certain "divide and conquer" strategy going on here; if everyone is fighting over race, sex etc. it's difficult to accomplish anything positive.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 08:24 PM
19

Yep. I travel in pretty leftist circles and I've never met anyone who thinks gender is just a "social construct"; granted these are more old school leftists not SJW's. Ironically, the less "educated" they are the more likely they are to admit that men and women are different (and I'm not just talking about genitalia or physical strength). When it comes to Jane Q. public, the problem arises when you start actually talking about those differences. If you say "men, on average, are better at X" peop…
/r/MensRights07/08/18 08:19 PM
1

He just put in a masterful performance in "First Reformed", a film by legendary writer/director Paul Schrader (Taxi Driver, Last Temptation of Christ, Raging Bull, Mishima).
/r/MensRights07/08/18 08:02 PM
16

Meaningless distinction. Her "argument" is retarded and nothing more than an attack on these men. She claims, "she learned that many aspire to “hegemonic masculinity,” which she defines as the type of masculinity that serves to “fortify the dominance of men” and ultimately “subordinate women.” So she's essentially accusing these men of being raging misogynists who want to abuse women. I will be reading the essay when it becomes available. It will be interesting to see how she justifies this calu…
/r/MensRights07/08/18 11:26 AM
1

Thanks...
/r/MensRights07/08/18 10:14 AM
3

Most here would probably agree that some feminists are simply ignorant. They've never been exposed to any contrary information and have been living in a bubble. So no, not every single self-described feminist on planet Earth is a terrible person. However in current year it's becoming increasingly difficult to maintain the "ignorance" defense. It's not like the misandry is hidden away some where, it's being spewed forth constantly in mainstream media. If a "feminist" watches the documentary The R…
/r/MensRights07/08/18 10:13 AM
1

What about the two others you posted? Just out of curiosity...
/r/MensRights07/08/18 10:05 AM
1

Finale image claims "these associations are not driven by implicit assumptions."
/r/MensRights07/08/18 10:00 AM
9

If we look at the wikipedia entry Probably best to avoid Wikipedia. It's not a credible source and gender studies students are literally given extra credit to edit it. Men predominantly hold the positions of leadership in western countries. Look at the number of female CEO's, Board Members, Politicians, etc, compared to those held by men. You cannot possibly argue that women are equally represented in political leadership positions. Women are far better represented than men. Males have out-group…
/r/MensRights07/08/18 09:36 AM
92

This surely ranks among the most vile works ever created by a feminist. And that's saying something. I never do this sort of thing but I intend to contact the ethics board at Laurier. I encourage other Canadians to do the same. I also encourage people to spread this article around to all and sundry. Keep in mind that some homeless shelters and most DV shelters exclude men -- men make up the vast majority of rough sleepers, no doubt due to their "hegemonic masculinity" and not because no one give…
/r/MensRights07/08/18 08:32 AM
2

It doesn't? Feminists (or at least those with power) do not believe in due process rights for men accused of rape. When men are exonerated, they literally describe this as a failure of the legal system. Indeed this is where the "only 2-8 percent of rape accusations are false" myth comes from. When emails and text messages revealed that Jian Ghemoshi was innocent, and that his accusers conspired to frame him, feminists did not accept the verdict. They didn't say "we're so sorry Mr. Ghomeshi for a…
/r/MensRights07/08/18 08:18 AM
10

Perfect example of how -- when feminist researchers encounter information that contradicts their worldview -- they twist themselves into pretzels trying to make the new info accord with patriarchy theory. This is a fallacy known as begging the question. They begin with a premise (men and oppress women) then try to "massage the facts" to fit their narrative. Actual science does the opposite: when compelling evidence arrises that draws into question an hypothesis, they adjust the hypothesis. We no…
/r/MensRights07/08/18 08:08 AM
5

It would be better suited for r/tumblrinaction . It would be...if the view satirized in OP was limited to fringe elements of the feminist movement. However as noted below, for years now feminists in Britain have been lobbying politicians claiming that "rape conviction rates are too low." The head of CPS then publicly stated that they she would increase said conviction rates. Lo and behold, it has now been revealed that police have been withholding exculpatory evidence in rape trials and sending …
/r/MensRights07/08/18 07:51 AM
6

Only submental retards would hate MRA's for some post on a webforum. Either the issues are legitimate or they're not. Moreover the cartoon points to a very real problem. For years now feminists in Britain have been lobbying politicians claiming that "rape conviction rates are too low." The head of CPS then publicly stated that they she would increase said conviction rate. Lo and behold, it has now been revealed that police have been withholding exculpatory evidence in rape trials and sending inn…
/r/MensRights07/08/18 07:48 AM
20

Feminists don't fight against those sorts of things. We have known since the 90's that between 60-80 percent of male rapists were sexually abused by women as children. If feminists were concerned about stopping male-on-female rape they would never stop talking about female pedophilia. Instead they ignore it entirely. Domestic abuse? Same deal. We have known for decades that women initiate most unilateral abuse; that lesbians have the highest rates of DV; that women are the majority of child abus…
/r/MensRights07/08/18 05:12 AM
7

No, it's not remotely the same thing. Feminists hate men because of the way they were born. Similar to the way Nazis hate Jews. Hating an ideology is not comparable. As soon as feminists start speaking out against misandry and working to end (rather than encourage) discrimination against men and boys I will stop calling them malicious scumbags.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 03:08 AM
7

Professor Dej declined to comment. According to her CV, she has been awarded at least $185,000 by the Canadian government to research homelessness since 2009, and she notes that this new study is an outgrowth of her previous research. This hideous bitch is literally being financed by the male tax payer to write hate speech about the most vulnerable men in society. I don't think I've ever been this pissed off about a feminist "paper". She may also have run afoul of the ethics board: While researc…
/r/MensRights07/08/18 03:03 AM
3

Simply appalling.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 02:58 AM
5

but I am not wrong, or at least I am very rarely wrong. spits out drink. Fatuous would be the best way of describing you, which is to say pompous and unconsciously foolish. Most people are laughing at you, but you don't have enough self-awareness or social skills to realize it. You should also check out the Dunning–Kruger effect: a cognitive bias in which people of low ability have illusory superiority and mistakenly assess their cognitive ability as greater than it is. Another way of putting it…
/r/MensRights07/08/18 02:57 AM
1

at least upholds the rights and individual freedoms of its people. The NDAA allows the President to literally kill American citizens without trial. And you may want to read up on any number of humans rights reports concerning police brutality in the US and torture/murder in American prisons. The NSA has effectively eliminated the "right" to privacy in the US. Patriot Act. I could go on.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 02:50 AM
6

I have no idea what you're talking about.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 02:41 AM
50

Yep. While feminists focus on burning issues like the pink tax and manspreading, MRA's deal with trivialities like male genital mutilation, boys suffering discrimination in schools, men being denied due process rights, a suicide epidemic, higher rates of unemployment, being denied access to their children, suffering 60 percent longer prison sentences, receiving less health care funding, receiving little or no support when they are victims of sexual assault and domestic violence, relentless demon…
/r/MensRights07/08/18 01:30 AM
23

I've never once seen a feminist of any note condemn misandry. Not even the most extreme "put all men in concentration camps" stuff. They'll debate all day about who is higher on the progressive stack (intersectionality) and even de-platform other feminists if they are TERFS but no level of misandry will earn their condemnation. They'll either claim the woman was engaging in "ironic" misandry or that she's "not a real feminist." Apparently not even Hillary "the primary victims of war are women" C…
/r/MensRights07/08/18 01:11 AM
1

"Christian" is a broad term, but generally refers to a couple of branches of the general religion (For ex: Evangelicals) but almost never refers to Catholics. You're legitimately insane. If anything it proves my point even more; A very practical way of discovering what a person or a group truly are is to give them power. Muslims have consistently failed this test. No. "Muslims" have not been empowered. Extremist Muslims have been empowered. By people who called themselves Christians. Muslims tri…
/r/MensRights06/08/18 10:37 PM
1

Muslims are very different from Christians or Catholics. Catholics are Christians, genius. islam is the only major leftist religion ROFL. Muslims believe in Sharia law, which means that things like apostasy (leaving Islam) is something that is to be punished with great severity. Correction: some Muslims believe in Sharia Law. Other Muslims think religion should not be enforced at the state level. Same as Christians, same as Jews. Ironically the West has consistently funded and armed the most ext…
/r/MensRights06/08/18 10:07 PM
3

It's always been a dubious proposition that females are more oppressed in Islamic societies than males. The main difference is that we are hyper-senstitive to female suffering. So we will often see a post on the front page of reddit of a woman being stones to death for adultery in some super-impoverished backward tribal region. We don't hear about the 50 men stoned to death for every woman. Another problem is that the "plight of women" has long been used as a propaganda technique in times of war…
/r/MensRights06/08/18 10:00 PM
21

mostly male predation I call bullshit. Haven't there been studies showing that women are just as likely to coerce men into sex as vice versa? The difference is that men seldom complain 'cause no one gives a shit. In fact when I attended college I found it much more common to see drunken girls groping guys. Hell, not even female pedophiles are routinely held accountable for their actual predation. Feminists are steaming mad because they are increasingly being held to their own standards. Since th…
/r/MensRights06/08/18 09:44 PM
9

It's really quite simple. Feminists have institutionalized the idea that only a woman's subjective feelings matter, rather than objective behavior. Thus, what is "appropriate" has no actual definition; there are no "rules" for men to fellow, unless you include the Pence rule. The clearest example of this is the old man from PBS who was fired for putting a hand on a woman's back when they posed for a photograph. This made her feel "uncomfortable", so the man had his life destroyed. Would she have…
/r/MensRights06/08/18 07:39 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter