TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

999papercranes Archive

View 1 post and 190 comments by 999papercranes on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
490

999papercranes/r/MensRights06/09/13 04:52 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-2

Only speaking to this article and case, every course of action being taken against this police officer is perfectly just. I don't see anything about female teacher trysts in this article.
/r/MensRights29/09/15 03:14 AM
-2

Do you think a 51 year old police officer having sex with a 16 year old he met at a "police-organised event for youths in a safe, alcohol and drug-free environment, designed to improve relationships between police and youth" is really "consensual" and not predatory as fuck? Daily mail can feel free to call this rape. Fuck that guy!
/r/MensRights29/09/15 01:37 AM
7

Please don't murder your wife, abandon your newborn, and move with your mistress to Brazil. You could also put up the baby for adoption.
/r/MensRights12/07/15 02:21 PM
9

That is completely subjective, and I think you are just trying to be a contrarian to the points I've made. Regardless, Adams had a bigger role than Cooper with more screen time.
/r/MensRights23/02/15 05:44 AM
8

Adams had more screen time than Cooper. Cooper and Lawrence were both supporting characters, but Cooper got as much as Bale. Also it isn't just about the role, but star power and the value they add to the movie marketing wise. Adams and Lawrence are very hot commodities.
/r/MensRights23/02/15 05:27 AM
6

Can you please elaborate on how Hollywood is run by women?
/r/MensRights23/02/15 05:12 AM
8

As your linked article stated, Daniels was not an established comedic actor. As the article I linked to stated: For their work in the movie “American Hustle,” male actors Christian Bale, Bradley Cooper, Jeremy Renner, and the director David O. Russell all got 9 percent of back-end profits, while Amy Adams and Jennifer Lawrence, the movie’s two female leads, were each getting 7 percent. (Lawrence was originally going to get 5 percent but her pay had been raised.) At the time, Adams had been nomin…
/r/MensRights23/02/15 05:08 AM
-1

Np. It's pretty crazy!
/r/MensRights23/02/15 04:45 AM
4

Yeah, well, free speech.
/r/MensRights23/02/15 04:44 AM
-2

I think if it is an actor who gets paid less, it is the agents fault, but if it's an actress who gets paid less, it's their fault or maybe they have agents who are also women who don't negotiate well?
/r/MensRights23/02/15 04:37 AM
13

Here you go: http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2015/01/12/3610424/charlize-theron-pay-gap/
/r/MensRights23/02/15 04:00 AM
1

Yeah...not going to happen. Looks like he is following the advice to immediately assume she is trying to extort money, and/or is lying, and to hire a lawyer. It sounds like a situation of two young teenagers who are both petrified about something potentially life changing, but instead of advising to show a smidge of compassion, all the other advice is perpetuating paranoia and victimhood. :(
/r/MensRights25/07/14 06:49 PM
15

I don't know how old you are, but if you are under 18, it may be worth speaking to your parents about this. I know that can be a scary prospect, but they might help you navigate all of this. I also wouldn't be quick to demonize the girl you got pregnant because I'm sure this is an equally scary and confusing time for her. I think you both need to be there for each other and keep an open conversation about your futures and what decisions would be best for you both; not just you and not just her. …
/r/MensRights22/07/14 12:51 AM
2

You owe me a lobster tail after getting me all worked up like this.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 03:50 PM
0

Whatever. You can rationalize this all you want. This story is far more complex and more a miscarriage of justice inflicted on minority youths, but you want to narrowly pigeon hole and package it as simply a false accusation. I came here civilly, but you're so unwilling to view this critically that you are quick to try to discredit my point with saying it is "illogical", "emotional", and that I'm making a fool of myself. I'm not against men having rights, I'm against ignorant people like you.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 03:42 PM
2

In the context of this sub reddit, false accusations are not referring to those done by law enforcement. Look at the top rated comment in this post, implying the woman was drunk. Because that is the context in how "false accusations" are perceived here, so excuse my knee jerk reaction, but I find referring to this as a false accusation in the tag as wholly inappropriate.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 01:56 PM
-4

The tag does not say "false conviction"
/r/MensRights21/06/14 12:49 PM
6

This post is tagged as "false accusations"
/r/MensRights21/06/14 12:47 PM
3

The post is tagged as "false accusations"
/r/MensRights21/06/14 12:45 PM
3

She wasn't drunk. She suffered such severe trauma that she had no memory of the event. At the time, this became a huge phenomenon in NYC. The victim was never able to identify her attacker, but the police instead pinned on these 5 innocent men. This was not a false accusation in the typical sense as to how it is discussed here. Instead, a result of a wrongful conviction due to mounting racial tension at the time. There have been plenty of documentaries about this, and I really need to point out …
/r/MensRights21/06/14 09:50 AM
2

I'm going to copy and paste from the other thread where this is discussed because it is in such poor taste to call this a false accusation, and I want you to know why. I recommend you acquaint yourself with this story before making such sweeping generalizations about a horrific crime. Horrific for the rape victim, and also horrific for the young minority men who were falsely convicted. This is disgusting. This is not a false accusation, but false convictions due to racism and mismanagement of th…
/r/MensRights21/06/14 09:45 AM
-8

I'm going to copy and paste from the other thread where this is discussed because it is in such poor taste to call this a false accusation, and I want you to know why. I recommend you acquaint yourself with this story before making such sweeping generalizations about a horrific crime. Horrific for the rape victim, and also horrific for the young minority men who were falsely convicted. This is disgusting. This is not a false accusation, but false convictions due to racism and mismanagement of th…
/r/MensRights21/06/14 09:43 AM
2

I'm going to copy and paste from the other thread where this is discussed because it is in such poor taste to call this a false accusation, and I want you to know why. I recommend you acquaint yourself with this story before making such sweeping generalizations about a horrific crime. Horrific for the rape victim, and also horrific for the young minority men who were falsely convicted. This is disgusting. This is not a false accusation, but false convictions due to racism and mismanagement of th…
/r/MensRights20/06/14 10:35 PM
2

What do you mean that I think the harm is done to the accuser? When I referred to victim I meant the woman who was brutally raped. Originally the post had the tag "false accusation" instead of "discrimination", and I pointed out how it was in extremely poor taste to refer to this case as a false accusation. The victim of this rape never was able to identify her attacker and the incarceration of these men is a result of complete ineptitude and racism among the investigators, jurors, etc at the ti…
/r/MensRights20/06/14 04:23 PM
4

Though semantically correct, I have never seen it used in that context here hence my reaction.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 10:42 AM
0

No thanks
/r/MensRights20/06/14 09:51 AM
12

This is disgusting. This is not a false accusation, but false convictions due to racism and mismanagement of the investigation. I am sick to my stomach this is labeled as a false accusation as if the victim is somehow at fault. The 28-year-old investment banker Trisha Meili was violently assaulted while jogging in the park. She was raped and beaten almost to death. When found about four hours later at 1:30 am, she was suffering from severe hypothermia and blood loss from multiple lacerations and…
/r/MensRights20/06/14 03:34 AM
1

I'm reading and I don't get it. You say the comments are mad the media doesn't care about the deaths of these men, but the comments themselves don't even care about the deaths of the men. They are mostly cheap shots at the "patriarchy" and jokes made in poor taste implying that the murdered men were rapists (? Seriously? Gross.) The actual loss of male life seems inconsequential here except as a tool to show outrage that media outlets report stories about women getting killed and kidnapped.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 03:36 AM
-2

For such a horrific act of violence, all the comments here so far are mostly lacking a shred of empathy or mourning for those who lost their lives.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 12:36 AM
1

Relationships are hard. I can't even imagine trying to maintain one while in the army. I hope you find someone who is more understanding of your commitments.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 12:07 PM
1

haha well here's hoping to objective answers
/r/MensRights26/04/14 08:09 AM
1

How will they look into it objectively? Will they track down the female co-workers and interview them?
/r/MensRights26/04/14 07:35 AM
1

Well, I don't see it anywhere in the article so it looks like it is an unknown, and really doesn't take away from this court victory. I also hope no one takes your question as a cue to surmise and assume the worst about this unknown group of women.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 06:51 AM
7

Does it matter in the context of this story or is this just an effort to demonize women?
/r/MensRights26/04/14 06:29 AM
1

What woman?
/r/MensRights26/04/14 06:25 AM
1

Yeah it feels pretty good, but no need for the name calling.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 06:19 PM
1

Did you know that the Titanic sunk over 100 years ago?
/r/MensRights25/04/14 05:03 AM
3

I don't know. Uhm brain storming...maybe start with some ass kissing about why you love being a Canadian because Canada always sticks up for what is right or how your mp has some great track record for good public policy. Give some examples. Politicians love having their egos stroked. Then interject that despite all the good being done how troubling it is that every year x amount of boys are being hurt by an antiquated and dangerous practice which has gone unnoticed. Then the rest of your letter…
/r/MensRights10/04/14 05:42 AM
2

Well your last paragraph reads as reactionary too about it just being a "female" right.
/r/MensRights10/04/14 05:27 AM
7

It is great you are taking initiative for something you believe in. I think it would be helpful to get rid of comparing it to FGM because it immediately makes your letter seem reactionary. Maybe do without any mention of FGM and let your argument stand on its own.
/r/MensRights10/04/14 05:11 AM
36

Bradley Bleimeyer, already out on bail for a burglary arrest, was held without bond. Sounds like the mother didn't have any priors, but in my opinion neither should be out on bail. Doing this to a child is horrific.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 12:32 PM
6

I still hope someday you find a more evolved relationship.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 06:01 PM
8

LOL!!! Damn it, you're right! Implying that a woman's worth in a relationship is mostly related to her looks and fertility is a total healthy way of viewing and respecting them.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 05:46 PM
8

Not virgin shaming, more like bitter misogynist shaming!
/r/MensRights10/03/14 05:35 PM
8

Women really don't contribute much to relationships other than their looks/wombs I hope you find a healthy relationship someday.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 05:04 PM
2

You could also try ripping up some paper like this little guy to cheer up: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RP4abiHdQpc
/r/MensRights03/03/14 07:33 PM
2

That's a personal choice and that's ok. So is it ok or not?
/r/MensRights02/03/14 05:22 AM
5

I guess I am failing to see how the comments are funny. I don't think this is a threat to mens' senses of humor. I've seen and heard a lot better material out there.
/r/MensRights02/03/14 05:21 AM
2

The order came after Khatoon's husband Rakesh filed a petition seeking to produce her before the court, contending that her father had illegally detained her in their house as she had married outside her faith. Attempting to justify herself, Khatoon claimed that Rakesh flashed the information about their marriage to her parents without intimating her and she came under tremendous social pressure. Khatoon submitted that she had not made the false statements "intentionally," but was in a state of …
/r/MensRights22/12/13 12:56 PM
1

"It is apparent that the remarks, which are general in nature, are not based on the evidence on record, appear to be the result of the experience of the judge... The judge has imparted his personal knowledge pertaining to females in the decision making," the bench said. So, a judge, in his ruling, was letting his own bias against women inform his verdict instead of the evidence in the case. That would be unacceptable if a judge, by the very nature of his job, let his prejudices for any other gro…
/r/MensRights22/12/13 12:32 PM
0

Yup, that's what he's saying. Clearly. You cracked the code! Bravo!
/r/MensRights17/12/13 09:33 PM
2

Teens may engage in risky behavior, but in this case, an adult man was there to victimize and exploit their naivete. There is a big difference in maturity level and world experience at 13 and 19. You are sickening for defending a rapist. I would like to again reiterate my point that it was not consensual because children cannot legally consent. Where do you draw the line of when they "knew what they were doing"? Would it be okay if he had sex with a 12 year old? an 11 year old? 10? 9? 8? Come on…
/r/MensRights20/11/13 04:35 AM
0

Why don't you reverse the genders now? What if a 19 year old woman raped a 13 year old boy? Would you be splitting hairs over whether it was 'consensual' or not? Would you say the boys are 'putting up a victim mask'? That is the point of statutory charges. Children are too young to consent. You are sickening.
/r/MensRights20/11/13 03:08 AM
1

Then do it. Take action.
/r/MensRights29/10/13 03:58 AM
2

http://www.radiolab.org/blogs/radiolab-blog/2013/may/30/adoptive-couple-v-baby-girl/ Radiolab recently did a piece on this, and I highly recommend you listen to it. It is an incredibly complex and interesting case. The father originally signed away his parental rights.
/r/MensRights24/09/13 03:52 PM
1

So you know the context in which this video was made but are choosing to be offended anyways? Nothing on that page is advertising it about rape in general; even the video mentions Indian culture and bollywood and some suggestion about calling your attacker an Indian word which I'm not sure how to transcribe. It is pretty clear what the subject matter is about.
/r/MensRights24/09/13 02:48 PM
0

Do you live in India?
/r/MensRights24/09/13 12:59 AM
2

http://www.radiolab.org/blogs/radiolab-blog/2013/may/30/adoptive-couple-v-baby-girl/ Radiolab recently did a piece on this, and I highly recommend you listen to it. It is an incredibly complex and interesting case. The father originally signed away his parental rights.
/r/MensRights24/09/13 12:56 AM
-8

Why didn't the article mention circumcision?
/r/MensRights18/09/13 03:14 AM
1

Why did you post it then? In the article, she said it felt like rape, not that it was rape.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 08:41 PM
-3

What if the genders were reversed? A man has filed a lawsuit against Advocate Condell Medical Center in Libertyville, Ill., claiming that a colonoscopy he received there made him feel like he “was being raped,” Medical Daily reported. Mark Keith, 52, said he came to the medical center in February with severe stomach pain, and the doctors recommended he have the procedure done in order to look for potential abnormalities in his intestines. Colonoscopies are frequently utilized during cancer scree…
/r/MensRights16/09/13 08:14 PM
1

?
/r/MensRights09/09/13 03:06 AM
3

You didn't block out two of the women's names involved in this conversation.
/r/MensRights08/09/13 09:19 PM
1

No, the comments on the original post. Actually, the only insinuations are made here! I think it is good news that the engrained stereotypes of men as predators is not being perpetuated by the reddit community at r/aww.
/r/MensRights08/09/13 08:19 PM
39

He's going to have a hard time substantiating that claim if no one confronted him or said anything directly.
/r/MensRights08/09/13 07:42 PM
8

FYI scanned through the comments and haven't found a single one insinuating this man is a pedophile.
/r/MensRights08/09/13 11:19 AM
7

Are you seriously defining rape as the use of body parts as nature intended? You do realize that there have been quite brutal rapes...for example the girl that was raped on the bus in Delhi and was penetrated so severely with a metal rod that when they pulled it out, some of her intestines came out in the process. As nature intended. And that is also discounting the psychological effects that being attacked may have eg PTSD.
/r/MensRights07/09/13 02:13 PM
4

There's also the tragedy that someone may have been raped. Double tragedy.
/r/MensRights07/09/13 03:34 AM
3

I think the implication was incarceration...
/r/MensRights07/09/13 12:57 AM
1

What the fuck!!!
/r/MensRights04/09/13 10:39 PM
8

I think the greater and sadder question is: What are the chances of a man going to the police about being raped by a woman? Step 1 is to go to the authorities, but due to embarrassment and social prejudices, men often don't do that.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 06:47 PM
0

Please don't go.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 06:44 PM
0

I'd go harass feminists, but I don't want to be accused of rape.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 05:30 PM
0

Incorrect! I upvoted it here: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1lcrfz/women_selling_positive_pregnancy_tests_for_other/
/r/MensRights04/09/13 04:48 PM
0

Hahaha is this for real? This was on the front page a few days ago and was just submitted AGAIN for the fifth time 20 minutes before you.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 04:01 PM
4

Because I want to trick you into marrying me! No, but really: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1lcrfz/women_selling_positive_pregnancy_tests_for_other/ This was on the top page a few days ago and has been reposted here at least 4 times!
/r/MensRights04/09/13 03:40 PM
3

YES WE KNOW
/r/MensRights04/09/13 03:13 PM
5

There's a big difference between your grandmother who you 1) know and 2) presumably care about than a complete stranger on the street. Offering a critique on someone's appearance who you don't know ("you'd be so much prettier if you smiled!", etc.) is rude and annoying.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 03:03 PM
-1

Just because you don't like or agree with what is being said, does not mean it is an attempt to troll so don't be dismissive like that.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 08:38 PM
-1

As far as I have ascertained, visitors here are more comfortable ignoring this instead of acknowledging the leniency that was given to a man. I tried discussing this case here: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1lk6xx/12_month_jail_sentence_for_female_teacher_raping/cc074x4
/r/MensRights03/09/13 07:48 PM
3

Because it shows there has been leniency for both men and women. My theory is that people here like to be "hypothetical" victims, with leading statements like if "Well, if a MAN did that...". Well, here is a very recent example of a startlingly similar case that had a male teacher and female student, but it was heavily downvoted and most likely ignored.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 11:59 AM
5

I guess we are interpreting this differently. I don't believe she is literally talking about teenage girls nor access in the literal sense. I think this is clearly alluding to the trend of anti birth control legislation that has been proposed in Congress that limits its coverage by insurance thus making it harder for women to pay for while Viagra, vasectomies and other forms of male sexual health aids and surgeries have coverage. Limiting women's access to affordable birth control for women is a…
/r/MensRights03/09/13 01:25 AM
6

Vasectomies are a form of birth control available to men, and Viagra is a form of reproductive healthcare though. I don't think the comparison is malicious, ill founded or misandrist in nature.
/r/MensRights03/09/13 12:44 AM
3

Why?
/r/MensRights03/09/13 12:32 AM
4

Well, no. His original sentence was actually much lighter than 30 days. This meant that all charges against Rambold would be dismissed if he completed a sex-offender treatment program and met other requirements. One of them was to have no contact with children. Rambold admitted to one of the rape charges. But the ex-teacher fell short of the agreement. "He had some contacts with nieces and nephews in a family setting and other adults were present," Baugh said. He also had relationships with wome…
/r/MensRights02/09/13 08:34 PM
5

I know it doesnt fit into the narrative here, but that doesn't make these stories not comparable. Both are statutory rape. Both teachers created and fostered sexual relationships with their underage students. Both got off with lenient sentences: The defense argued that Rambold has suffered enough. His lawyers said he lost his career and his marriage and has the "scarlet letter of the Internet" due to the publicity surrounding the case, the Billings Gazette reported. And: He found that the teache…
/r/MensRights02/09/13 03:53 PM
1

You only get a 30 day sentence. Oh, but she was 14. http://www.cnn.com/2013/08/28/justice/montana-teacher-rape-sentence/
/r/MensRights02/09/13 01:51 PM
2

Can you explain the context of this to me? She is carrying a whip. I really don't understand the verbal assault going on. This is a reality show?
/r/MensRights02/09/13 03:51 AM
1

Check out all this cuteness: http://www.tumblr.com/tagged/father-and-baby
/r/MensRights02/09/13 02:40 AM
2

I wish factual falcon used the MLA referencing style.
/r/MensRights02/09/13 02:15 AM
-2

I bet she was a feminist.
/r/MensRights02/09/13 02:09 AM
-8

I get it. Women's gyms exist. This article doesn't mention them anywhere. I'm not protecting women's rights to have a woman only gym because that notion is absurd too.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 07:53 PM
-17

A men's haircut takes what, like 15 minutes? It is not like she wanted a lather and shave and spend the whole day. I think her reaction is over the top, but the whole thing seems silly to me.
/r/MensRights26/08/13 06:47 PM
-6

If she had a gift certificate for a men's haircut and wanted a men's haircut, what's the big deal?
/r/MensRights26/08/13 06:35 PM
5

As a female muay thai fighter, I am participating in a sport I love, not glorifying or emulating masculinity.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 05:42 PM
3

Not trapping. Seeing if the general feeling is if female privilege does exist, is it so beneficial that is it preferable to be female over male? If things are better off for women as ashtone claims above, why wouldn't you want to be a woman? Seems like the best alternative to me!
/r/MensRights23/08/13 05:28 PM
2

No, your age and experience is completely relevant to forming how passionately you feel about this subject. An 18 year old intern complaining about healthcare subsidies is very different than a 34 year old worker.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 04:56 PM
2

How old are you? Genuinely curious. And saying that the burden of the spouse care is falling on the employees and not the employers is political double speak.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 04:52 PM
2

Okay, but to the question, would you rather have been born female in this current social climate?
/r/MensRights23/08/13 03:43 PM
2

I don't think I'll be lauding companies' decisions to cut back on employee benefits to save money.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 03:28 PM
3

Dump the daughters!
/r/MensRights23/08/13 03:26 PM
5

Given these inequalities that you have witnessed, do you think your life would be easier if you were a woman? If you could have chosen your gender, based on your life experience, would you choose male or female?
/r/MensRights23/08/13 02:53 PM
-1

MAN, WHAT CUNTS!!
/r/MensRights22/08/13 02:14 PM
2

I don't think adultery is a racial attribute. Your Taiwanese girlfriend could be cheating on you right now !!!
/r/MensRights21/08/13 08:52 PM
-17

Thank you. I don't think half the people who comment on these or even the person posting it actually reads these damn articles. The willful ignorance and not seeing past male victim, female attacker is maddening.
/r/MensRights20/08/13 03:53 PM
6

Uhm...what? I don't get what you are insinuating. Look at title of this post: ...screaming woman who mistook him for someone that "threatened" her with rape. So it is blaming the woman and the idea of rape culture (a talking point of feminism), but if you actually read the article, the woman is clearly paranoid and mentally ill. Isn't that misplaced blame similar to what you are saying feminists would do?
/r/MensRights20/08/13 03:47 PM
13

Johnston, who is receiving treatment at Hellesdon Hospital, Norwich, for mental illness, was well enough, according to doctors, to attend court and plead. Dave Foulkes, defending, said: 'She fully accepts the victim was not known to her. 'She was taken to Hellesdon Hospital where she was sectioned under the Mental Health act. 'More recently she has been staying at the hospital voluntarily. 'She's receiving treatment and feeling well. Poor guy. I hope he recovers quickly. Sounds like this woman i…
/r/MensRights20/08/13 01:56 PM
6

No, but he can split custody of the child. I knew a woman who moved from Utah to New York with her child. The son's father (they were never married) stayed in Utah, and the son spends the entire summer with him.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 03:43 PM
2

Said by Roseanne Barr. She is an idiot. Everyone educated lift entire communities.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 02:26 PM
7

I think you are looking at this from a very Western point of view. In countries like Afghanistan, girls are physically prevented from going to school either by militant attacks (bombings, poisonings, acid thrown in their face, etc.), their parents' reluctance to break from tradition or lack of schools that are open to them. In rural Kazakhstan and other caucus countries, young girls are often kidnapped on their way to and from school as part of traditional "bride kidnapping" where they are liter…
/r/MensRights19/08/13 02:23 PM
1

bought me one Ugh that word choice makes me cringe. Like she is an object picked up at the store, not a human being that was hired for a service.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 03:09 AM
3

Ooh you sound like you have a chip on your shoulder when it comes to women.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 03:04 AM
1

Regardless, I think a prenuptial agreement is far more realistic and less offensive way of getting peace of mind than having a secret cabin in the woods and not having your mail conveniently delivered to your home address.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 02:56 AM
2

Don't live with her if you don't trust her. Hell, don't date her.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 02:47 AM
4

http://www.forbes.com/forbes-400/ Koch brothers are tied for #4. Results of nepotism from their father who founded Koch industries. 7 and #9 are both Waltons. Inherited wealth. Wealthy families tend to stay wealthy.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 02:38 AM
0

The website was also redesigned according to the nypost article, and the logo redesign was part of that updating of the college's image. This is a problem of graphic design and how our brains understand and contextualize things based on what we already know. You don't want to be the boob school or the school who's logo looks like a vagina or a puppy or anything that is not representative of the school. Because you want to consciously or subconsciously be taken seriously. The designer here was tr…
/r/MensRights19/08/13 02:23 AM
6

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_United_States Percentage of the US population that is white - 72.4% Percentage of the US population that is male - 47.8% 72.4% * 47.8% = 34.6% (Estimate of percentage of the US population that is white and male) 100%-34.6%= 65.4% (Estimate of percentage of US population that are women and/or people of color) 80% may tip the favor towards women and minorities (but you aren't negotiating from a clear 50/50 split), but that is what they are catering …
/r/MensRights16/08/13 05:53 PM
2

I'd be a little offended...I mean, who is this person to tell me what my problems REALLY are? I'm sure a lot of feminists feel the same way about MRAs.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 02:23 PM
6

Good for this guy, I hope he can fuck his girlfriend to his heart's content now.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 02:19 PM
1

http://stream.aljazeera.com/story/201308122356-0022973 There are some good examples of "feminists" who are willing to recognize their faults. Fellow white feminists: #SolidarityIsForWhiteWomen is not for us to defend, explain, protest. It's time for us to take a damn seat & listen. Wow, this hashtag. Fellow white women, we need to be better and we need to do better. #SolidarityIsForWhiteWomen
/r/MensRights16/08/13 02:07 PM
1

After leaving jail, Boyd returned home and once against locked her roommate in his bedroom. Police were against called to the house, but this time they left with Boyd in custody. She was charged with false imprisonment, obstructing an officer, and bail jumping.
/r/MensRights15/08/13 06:57 PM
2

Can you provide sources for this or are you talking about in movies?
/r/MensRights15/08/13 05:36 PM
16

Because subverting the meaning of something to fit your argument ultimately weakens your argument.
/r/MensRights15/08/13 05:28 PM
4

Yes, this is my point.
/r/MensRights15/08/13 04:04 PM
8

He might have not intended it, but he used the word "man". I think part of your interpretation which takes it from "American Worker Privilege" to a comment on "Male Privilege" is that it was taken out of context. I'm sure plenty of people haven't read the book to begin with, so there's not going to be a full contextual interpretation, but even adding the beginning part of the paragraph: “It was true that I didn’t have much ambition, but there ought to be a place for people without ambition, I me…
/r/MensRights15/08/13 03:58 PM
166

Do you mean being forced to make money for a woman and feel grateful? I interpreted this as being a corporate shill; being a cog in the system to make money for the people at top (CEOs, etc) and the idea that you should be happy to work for them and grateful you have a job. I think it can be applied to either gender. The rest of the quote: “It was true that I didn’t have much ambition, but there ought to be a place for people without ambition, I mean a better place than the one usually reserved.…
/r/MensRights15/08/13 03:31 PM
1

Aaron Roland, 29, of Mesa, and Joscilin Smith, were arrested and booked into jail on child abuse charges. Both were booked for child abuse charges.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 08:01 PM
1

Was it too long that you didn't read it? I read it, and you have skewed the facts. I think great decisions were made "on the lower levels". Thank god their children are with CPS. The mother was charged with domestic violence. Both were arrested for child abuse because they left their child, with severe burns, untreated for 2 weeks (despite the father getting treatment himself). Leaving your child with second degree burns all over his body when you need treatment for yourself most certainly quali…
/r/MensRights14/08/13 07:24 PM
2

So you haven't even familiarized yourself enough with the story to know the baby's gender before forming an opinion? The child was adopted, and the father, who signed away his parental rights (which needs to happen for the adoption to legally happen, and if you have a problem that it is without the child's consent, then I guess the whole adoption process would be messed up in your mind) was petitioning to get his daughter back by enacting the Indian Child Welfare Act, even though he and the baby…
/r/MensRights14/08/13 02:05 PM
1

http://www.radiolab.org/blogs/radiolab-blog/2013/may/30/adoptive-couple-v-baby-girl/ Radiolab recently did a piece on this, and I highly recommend you listen to it. It is an incredibly complex and interesting case. He originally signed away his parental rights.
/r/MensRights14/08/13 03:28 AM
0

Yah dude u showed her what's up!!!
/r/MensRights14/08/13 03:22 AM
2

yah it is really sicekening that these white knight shit heads are rtrying to make us feel guilty for likng comics. like am i now a rape apologist mysogynist because i like spiderman??? get real dude im never going to be critical of anything i like because i like it and feminists wont ruin that for me. just because a chick gets killed to help the story of a male character doesnt mean her only purpose was for him she does a lot of cool shit like date other guys, get with him, break up with him, g…
/r/MensRights13/08/13 04:32 AM
4

Defriend her.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 10:25 PM
2

He intentionally is drawing that comparison to compare feminists to Nazis. He could have used any other analogies, but chose that one. Regardless, this is also in his words: Anyone who criticizes the radical tactics, rhetoric, and ideology of the movement is condemned as complicit in rape, enabling feminists to terrorize their critics in much the way the Ku Klux Klan terrorized its foes a century ago. Please explain to me how that is not hyperbolic.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 10:22 PM
0

Yes, doxed just like in the Holocaust.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 08:40 PM
-3

That's obviously not what I meant because I was talking in the context of feminism, but let me correct: Men aren't being lynched, burnt at crosses or thrown into gas chambers BY FEMINISTS
/r/MensRights12/08/13 08:19 PM
-3

I'm pretty sure there needs to be evidence for a conviction. Women don't accuse men, and they just miraculously go behind bars. There are trials, with plenty of men involved. Furthermore, can you find me a statistic with the number of false rape accusers that are also active feminists? You're equating one type of woman with another. All men aren't rapists. All women don't make false rape accusations.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 08:17 PM
3

1) I'm glad he spent the time to judge all the women and find the best looking one to talk to. Also glad he makes time to describe protesters' breasts. 2) Comparing feminism to Nazism or the Klu Klux Klan is a tad hyperbolic. Men aren't being lynched, burnt at crosses or thrown into gas chambers. Let's stop the fear mongering and keep the discussions / arguments intelligent.
/r/MensRights12/08/13 07:53 PM
1

Because feminists.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 07:48 PM
2

No, I addressed that earlier.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 05:44 PM
2

which just means kowtow to our sensibilities or we wont' give you our money. What modern economists refer to as "capitalism" or the "free market"
/r/MensRights09/08/13 04:25 PM
2

Okay, so you are quibbling over the definition of what a video game is. In fact women have been playing the more modern accessible version of video games (home consoles) for ages (25+ years since Atari?). So they became more involved due to a change in the culture and advancements in technology. There are a lot of young gamers who were born after this shift. How did they elbow in? By being interested in it? Is it their fault they weren't born at a time when they'd have to go to an arcade? If you…
/r/MensRights09/08/13 03:52 PM
2

I don't know, I remember early days of Atari / Nintendo, playing with my mom and sister. Neither were very tomboyish, but my sister and I would have epic Punch Out battles. We actually made fun of my mother because she was obsessed with both Donkey Kong and Aero the Acrobat. My father never played video games with us. But I'm sure your anecdotal and personal experience in arcades is somehow truer than my anecdotal and personal experience? But whatever, the notion of all boys who play video games…
/r/MensRights09/08/13 03:30 PM
-5

Murder is murder unless the bitch deserved it.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 03:17 PM
3

"Does anyone care?" Guess OP didn't care enough to simply google it.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 02:27 PM
1

Really? You think for 10 years no women played video games? And that they are so disillusioned by the idea of rape culture that they in fact can not separate actions online from real life sexual trauma? This is incredibly exaggerated, childish, and a dangerous attitude for MRAs to endorse.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 02:21 PM
0

This is really childish and sexist.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 02:12 PM
13

Sorry should have been more specific. A feminist lying for attention? SURPRISE OF THE CENTURY /s
/r/MensRights09/08/13 03:45 AM
8

A woman lying for attention? Surprise, surprise.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 02:12 AM
2

EW, I couldn't even get through the video. Hurt my eyes.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 02:01 AM
0

Seems to me that you have your own set of prejudices that you are projecting onto your neighbor.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 01:54 AM
6

Well, if we use that logic, what does that say about women choosing lower paying jobs? Could there be other underlying factors there?
/r/MensRights09/08/13 01:36 AM
4

Well, it isn't institutionalized misandry. It is kind of like women choosing lower paying jobs. Men are choosing not to apply to college.
/r/MensRights08/08/13 10:33 PM
9

What the fuck is wrong with people in this day and age? Posting a picture of a murder scene on facebook? What the fuck?What the fuck? What the fuck? What the fuck? What the fuck? What the fuck? What the fuck? What the fuck? What the fuck? What the fuck? What the fuck? What the fuck? What the fuck? What the fuck? What the fuck? What the fuck? What the fuck? What the fuck? What the fuck? What the fuck? What the fuck? What the fuck? Also: What the fuck? What the fuck? What the fuck? What the fuck? …
/r/MensRights08/08/13 10:11 PM
2

Got you. I totally misread what you were saying and thought you were being sarcastic initially. The judge did fail to uphold the law. He had sex with a 13 year old and is also guilty of being an idiot for not realizing it.
/r/MensRights08/08/13 08:56 PM
6

Sure, it is legal, but I will reiterate that I highly doubt that he "loved poorly". He is a 41 year old man that knowingly fucked a young teenage girl because he wanted to fuck a young teenage girl not because he fell in love. Since I am surmising, let's also surmise about what a 41 year old and a "16" year old would have in common to talk about and bond over? Does he share her love for One Direction? Did she give him good advice on whether he should roll over his roth IRA? Further speculation: …
/r/MensRights08/08/13 08:48 PM
6

I seriously doubt any love was involved.
/r/MensRights08/08/13 08:33 PM
26

41 and 16 is still a pretty cringe worthy age difference.
/r/MensRights08/08/13 06:51 PM
2

I think it is way more of a race / socio-economic issue. It is a pretty crappy and oppressive way of further fining and collecting money off of the poor. This is in an area that according to wikipedia is 75% black and 19.3% is below the poverty line.
/r/MensRights08/08/13 04:15 PM
4

The name calling wasn't appropriate, but why didn't you ask someone who worked there? Maybe it is because I am a New Yorker or an introvert, I would have never approached a fellow shopper like that, and I would have been weirded out if someone approached me like that. Granted, I'd probably mumble something awkward and walked away instead.
/r/MensRights08/08/13 04:10 AM
1

I'm writing in response to the massive amount of responses telling her not to continue the relationship. The original writer of the letter makes up a very small percentage of women's opinions I see at that link.
/r/MensRights08/08/13 03:57 AM
2

You want equality for men. Here is an example of women not taking advantage of men, but instead of lauding them, this kind of speculation is further demonizing them. It creates a damned if you do, damned if you don't situation. Women treat men with respect? Feminist PR campaign! This really creates a losing battle for everyone instead of working towards progress.
/r/MensRights08/08/13 03:47 AM
6

That is some wild speculation.
/r/MensRights07/08/13 05:52 PM
27

All the advice seems to say "no." A lot of those ladies have good non man hating/using heads on their shoulders.
/r/MensRights07/08/13 05:03 AM
0

That's kind of insane of you to suggest. Black people have so many extra rights it has alienated white people from the civil rights movement. Black panthers and race riots made sure of that, pushing white people out of cities, fleeing for safety. Just look at what happened to newark Nj in the 60's. innicent white people were brutalized and victimized. You think if I apply to the same job as a black man with less qualifications? No because of affirmative action. So many deserving white male stude…
/r/MensRights07/08/13 04:58 AM
1

I don't get it. I read the whole thing and didn't see Anita's name once. I just went back and ctrl f-ed to be sure. no mention.
/r/MensRights07/08/13 03:44 AM
0

Is he unattractive? I just see a red blob on his face.
/r/MensRights07/08/13 03:31 AM
2

I hope neither she nor Hillary run because they'll definitely lose, and feminists will be all up in arms that it is the patriarchy not the fact that these women are unfit to be president! And even if they do win, feminists will still be whining that women aren't equal. It is the same shit as people saying there's still racism. We have a black president for christ's sake.
/r/MensRights07/08/13 03:28 AM
5

What the hell am I doing here? (no, seriously)
/r/MensRights06/08/13 09:27 PM
10

Great radiohead song.
/r/MensRights06/08/13 08:19 PM
-2

Oh you trickster! Falling into your trap! Let's attack the credibility of a study done by FRANK'S HOT SAUCE. Furthermore, I never attacked your credibility. I said speaking in hyperbole might discount your credibility. I didn't say it did. I also never said you said, "the single work of genius by a single man". Actually, I typed that! But you did say these advancements were created, designed and built by men, when in fact these advancements are achievements of a collective whole over time includ…
/r/MensRights06/08/13 06:41 PM
-7

Refuting a knee jerk emotional response with proof? DOWNVOTE.
/r/MensRights06/08/13 05:59 PM
1

I guess I don't understand either side; the people really pushing for a female and those who are vehemently opposed to it. Is it really that big of a deal either way?
/r/MensRights06/08/13 05:30 PM
-7

I think the insinuation that women had no part in any of these technological advancements is pretty misguided. Modern innovations like the internet/computers/browser were results of collaborative efforts not single works of genius by a single man. You might want to check your word choice and "research" before your hyperbolic speech discounts any credibility you might be looking for in your arguments. Also, speaking as a female architect, YOU might be typing this from the safety of your office or…
/r/MensRights06/08/13 02:49 PM
12

A spokesman for Frank's Red Hot, a sauce brand which carried out the survey, said: 'Our research shows many men are lacking in skills which they were better at many years ago. Yeah because Frank's Red Hot and the Daily Mail are really bastions of intellectual research and reporting.
/r/MensRights06/08/13 02:05 PM
6

Oh god, I hope website comments aren't really that big of indicators of our culture or else we are doomed just based on youtube comments alone.
/r/MensRights05/08/13 01:49 AM
-3

"101 Everyday Ways for Men to be Allies to Women" NOT "101 Everyday Things Men Must Do or Else They are Misogynists" I don't think her tone was that defensive. Even her wording "by doing something as simple as crossing the street at night, you could help put that fear to rest" is pretty neutral in that it is a choice not a requirement.
/r/MensRights04/08/13 10:00 PM
3

Typical radfem feminazi scientists, manipulating human DNA like this. I bet they are even funding the research! Look at this white knight researcher: http://www.lsa.umich.edu/eeb/directory/faculty/jianzhi/ I'm not really sure how this article implicates males as "chromosomal degenerates", but I guess it makes sense that human DNA would have an effect on other human DNA...I mean it does take a man and a woman to make a new man. I think that's how procreation works.
/r/MensRights04/08/13 05:16 PM
2

Dude, get real. They already referred to the woman as "the/a woman" two times before in this 5 sentence write up (3 times if you include the title). It is poorly written, sure, but I think you are making a huge jump here. I think the conclusion was already reached. There's no case. No proof. One person who happens to be a woman's word against the complainant's. She probably swallowed the evidence. (RIM SHOT!)
/r/MensRights03/08/13 03:09 AM
2

I don't see any evidence for "disparaging portrayals of white men" only those words quoted and then the writer having a hissy fit. It seems to me that the show is trying to say hey we're not racist even though in our commercials we have the asian woman dressing up as school girl because it is about the white men, not lazy jokes about minorities. From what I've seen, the show seems like the most tired, hackneyed comedy writing, and it is easier and "edgy" to say that it is about "disparaging port…
/r/MensRights03/08/13 03:01 AM
11

I don't know, when I've been drinking I try to avoid talking to two types of people: 1) Sober 2) People who are drunker than me You broke my cardinal rules.
/r/MensRights03/08/13 02:50 AM
0

Canada's mistreatment of First Nations People is so heartbreaking from forced integration, rehousing and atrocities such as this. The sad thing is that authority figures could get away with this with no fear of persecution, and for the Canadian government to throw him $12 k how many years later? OH WOW thanks. Racism, man.
/r/MensRights03/08/13 01:30 AM
-2

I think subservient/timid might be better. Emasculation still has the context of anti-male. Sorry to hound you about this, but I think it is important to stress that these traits are not inclusive to just females, and that every human being has the potential for any type of personality, not one that is predefined by cultural stereotypes eg what is "masculine" or "feminine".
/r/MensRights03/08/13 01:22 AM
3

I'm not sure if you understood the article then. If they both came clean to their parents, the mother would probably be listing the father on the birth certificate. They are trying to enact this legislation for cases where a young mother WILL NOT disclose who the father is (under the assumption she either does not know, was the victim of a crime, or does not want to incriminate an older man if the relationship constitutes statutory rape).
/r/MensRights03/08/13 01:15 AM
-4

I'm questioning the OP's rhetoric, not the writer of the article. She is dumb.
/r/MensRights03/08/13 01:08 AM
-1

I'd like to think that a given characteristic of a "natural born masculine identity" would be kindness. That seems like a negative stereotype that encouraging her son to be kind and compassionate is being feminine. Only females are nice? Are all men Neanderthals who grunt and take whatever they want?
/r/MensRights03/08/13 12:59 AM
5

Not sure why this is posted here. Do you think this is good? Bad? Yes underage males get raped too, but in turn should nothing be done to prosecute male rapists? I'm trying to figure out the motivation for posting this and in what context I should be thinking about it in. MEANWHILE... I'm going to get my tin foil hat on and say I am more concerned about the government legally finding a way to mine and create a database of DNA samples without these people's (the babies' consents).
/r/MensRights03/08/13 12:47 AM
7

Unfortunately that's how the law works. There needs to be proof to convict someone or else I could accuse you and have you go to jail for murdering Michael Jackson.
/r/MensRights03/08/13 12:36 AM
-7

What do you mean by "feminized"?
/r/MensRights03/08/13 12:25 AM
10

Statutory rape is referred to differently depending on the jurisdiction. So why wasn't rape mentioned? She isn't charged with rape, technically she is charged with "aggravated criminal sexual conduct." If it was in another state, maybe it would be "corruption of a minor". Using the word rape, though in this case yes it is definitely deplorable and rape of a minor, would be incorrect. Compare:36 year old male teacher and 10 year old student. No use of the word rape. http://newyork.cbslocal.com/20…
/r/MensRights03/08/13 12:08 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter