TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

A-Leaf_On-The_Wind Archive

View 0 posts and 58 comments by A-Leaf_On-The_Wind on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Second of all, you are trying soooooo hard to sound smart. It's cringe. The irony of you making this statement is hilarious.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/26 02:10 AM
–

So you've ignored my first 2 points, how convenient for you. Also the point you did address, your response is so wrong it's actually laughable.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/25 02:32 PM
2

Who are you to decide if it's healthy or not? This is from your earlier comment replying to someone saying it was unhealthy. You trying to say this is how you agree that it's unhealthy? I pointed out how seriously it’s been taken and how rare it actually happens So now you're argument is too suggest that men do it more so it's OK when women do it. And are you saying that sexual assault against men is taken more seriously than sexual assuaging against women?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/25 12:47 PM
1

You can spin it any way you want. Bottom line is the post talked about a community of women who sexually assault men and your response it to argue this community is healthy and say that these women are doing fine. When called out on it, you basically say men do it too (I wonder if you also think this is healthy and fine) and try and pivot to talking about the loneliness epidemic for side reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/25 12:21 PM
3

I realise I'm very late to this but I can't let this go. Women are not the ones having problems, women are doing just fine I wonder if there was a situation where a community of men were sexually assaulting women who were performing at a convention, if you'd be fine with men having the attitude of 'men are not the ones having problems, men are doing just fine'?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/25 09:45 AM
2

If you're comfortable with that. It's not how I'd want to be known.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 10:25 AM
2

Men do that all the time And you're the woman equivalent of a man who does that.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 10:21 AM
1

OK let's flip this around. Every woman has given a bj sometime, or would for Chad. I want that too. I assume you want him paying for the first date, so I'd expect the bj on the first date too. Also it seems you're not selling to pay for dates, so flipping that too I'm not willing to reciprocate oral. Tell me, if a man applied the same standards to you that you're applying here, would you date them? If no, why would you expect anyone to date you?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/12/25 10:15 AM
3

I think emotional ties matter to the point that a man couldn't cut financial ties while keeping emotional ones. This would essentially be saying to the mother that I'll keep being the child's father, but you have to pay for everything because they're not biologically mine. If you want to cut financial responsibility, then you cut all ties.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/25 11:21 PM
11

You're right, the opposite of girls would be boys. So it's lucky that men having a night out together is never described as a boys night. A group with male members isn't called anything like a boys club. Also imagine if Amazon ever made a show about a group of men with a common goal called 'The Boys'. Both are used quite commonly.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/01/25 12:05 AM
7

Perhaps you are a woman who didn't realise your opinions are not universal as there are many women who actively seek pregnancy because they want kids. In both my comments I've said people have different reasons to want to end pregnancy, but I'm not sure you realise that your reasons aren't necessarily the same as others.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/25 11:12 PM
3

As I said above, I'm not saying there aren't abortions for those reasons, however i highly doubt most aren't for avoiding parenthood.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/25 02:06 PM
16

within the timeframe that women are allowed abortion. I've had this debate a few times and thus sit if thing is always a sticking point. I agree it needs to happen early so the woman can make an informed choice, so then you also need to ensure that the man is notified of the pregnancy early so he can make his choice. Otherwise he can be kept in the dark until it's too late and is financially responsible. So then you've got the case where the woman isn't aware she's pregnant within these the fram…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/01/25 08:05 AM
1

So you can't differentiate between facts and opinions...again. Until they're proven they're not facts notice how you have already misused that term in bad faith multiple times. Take responsibility. You've offered no proof that i have misused the term, if you do i will but until then the responsibility is on you to provide proof. The UDHR was already brought up so... A very broad document that doesn't specify your 'facts', you haven't even quoted an article of the UDHR which backs them up so this…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/24 08:53 AM
1

OK, one more. There are a number of facts i can assert. I can prove definitively that there are any infinite number of primes in the real numbers. I can use data to show that an increase in interest rates will put downward pressure on inflation. These are either provable or demonstrable facts. The 'facts' you've asserted are different. They've come about because a group made some very specific definitions made with the purpose of fitting the 'facts' they want to be true. They have then run with …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/24 05:51 AM
1

I said in my first reply to your first comment that I could tell there was no point in engaging in a discussion with you, i did it fiora bit but this comment proved that initial impression to be true. You're so convinced that you're correct that anything that slightly disagrees with your viewpoint is false and you state your opinions as facts, telling me i don't understand simply because i disagree with your 'facts'. I've got no doubt you've got a group of 'experts' who you consider to be expert…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/24 04:57 AM
1

Just say you don't understand bodily autonomy... Not agreeing with your views on body autonomy doesn't automatically mean a lack of understanding. You don't have the right to do whatever you want with your body, whether abortion should be included isn't a black and white issue. Remember noone can use or be inside you against your will. You can use minimum force necessary to stop said violation which is abortion in this context. If you have consented to having someone ejaculateinside you, then yo…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/24 03:05 AM
1

Basic rights like bodily autonomy I talked about this in my original reply, you don't have body autonomy when you're actions impact others. Whether abortion does or not and should be a right isn't a black and white issue so you can't say it's a basic right in this case. Since morals are subjective, it's better to vet a right by checking of it's ethical. So who decides if it's ethical? This will once again depend on the individual. The laws of a democracy are supposed to aim towards equality and …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/24 02:19 AM
1

Rights are supposed to be above laws. Now there's an interesting discussion point. I assume you're talking about rights like food, shelter, clothing. Do you put elective medical procedures in this category? Outside of the basic rights, what should be included is up to your own moral code, we all have different opinions on what should be included. Laws are then put in place to protect what the governing body considers to be the rights of the population. So in our society the laws are in place to …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/12/24 01:03 AM
1

So I can tell based on this reply there's absolutely no point engaging in a discussion with you. I've said elsewhere in this thread that this is an incredibly nuanced topic that many, on both sides, see as black and white and I can see you've got your mind completely made up and everyone who even slightly disagrees is wrong. But then again, sometimes i just can't help myself. Nope. Can't turn it around to a non analogous situation. Is it exactly the same? No, if course not, but it is comparable.…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 10:41 PM
1

I dont treat people differently based on their gender. You say this, then the next line. The sexes are not the same. That is undeniable. You cant treat something the same when it's not. Reflect on this.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 09:38 AM
1

OK, one more. I think you are also convinced you are right and everyone else is wrong So I've talked about the different options and the merits of each, never actually starting what my opinion is. I've been focusing on the hypocrisy of telling men they shouldn't get someone pregnant while being angry if the other side says the same thing to women. But you take any opposition to your opinion as me being completely the other side and convinced I'm right. Also I said outside of assault, either part…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 06:01 AM
1

So there are other choices, but you've completely closed your mind to then because you're so convinced you're right and everyone rise is wrong. Very dangerous way of thinking. And barring any assault scenario, the woman chooses to let ejaculation occur in her just as much and the man chooses it, however you want to put it on the man. Anyway, it's blindingly obvious this isn't going anywhere so I'm done here.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 05:25 AM
1

The thing is both could have choice, you just don't want it to happen. You want one to have full choice while the other just had the choice of prevention. Pro lifers are similar, the difference is they want everyone to only have the choice of prevention. Not saying I agree but at least it's equitable for everyone. Men have much more say about the first bc they choose where to cum Honestly, this says a lot about you and your views on sexual dynamics between men and women. It's very close to the '…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 05:01 AM
1

Both situations are saying 'if you don't want kids, don't get pregnant' but to you one is OK and the other isn't. Of course they're not the same, but it's the most equitable comparison. You want choice for one group but not the other, however you try to justify it to yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 04:28 AM
–

How exactly? Either through raising the child or paying child support, both require the use of the body. Yes, both parties are responsible for their child But one group you're saying if you dint want the responsibility, don't initiate pregnancy. With the other you get angry if pro lifers say the same thing. So you're basically saying 'you can't say this, but it's OK when I do'.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 04:24 AM
1

I haven't talked about the morality of abortions or paper abortions, or the debate between the child and a foetus, these are all things you're attempting to use as justification. What I am saying is that you get upset at someone saying something, then go 'well it's different when i say it'. Historically, those that think this way haven't been in the right.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 04:17 AM
1

There are biological differences yes, and each plays a different role in the conception process. But the end result is the same. The thing is, if you're against paper abortions and tell men if you don't want a kid then don't get someone pregnant, but get upset if an pro lifer tells a woman if you don't want a kid then don't get pregnant then you are applying double standards. Try and justify those double standards ask you want, they're still there.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 03:53 AM
–

Apart from taxes, no one is forcing you to pay rise things. I'd highly suggest you choose to if you want to survive, but it's not a legal requirement. But with pregnancy you are forcing payment, saying you must use your body to generate income for this child. At the end of the day I'm not arguing for or against abortion, or paper abortion. I'm pointing out the hypocrisy of telling men if you don't want a kid don't get someone pregnant but not applying the same standard to women.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 03:29 AM
–

So how are you expecting a man to raise a kid, or money for child support, if not through use of their own body?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 03:11 AM
1

the conditions are not the same This is what you tell yourself to justify your hypocrisy. Are they exactly the same? No, but they're comparable. The end result, not wanting a kid despite initiating a pregnancy, is the same. You treat people differently based on their gender. I know you're not going to change your mind, the lies we tell ourselves are the hardest to see, but it is the case none the less.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/12/24 02:31 AM
2

OK, one more even though I said i wouldn't. Sure I do. In an ideal world no one would get pregnant unless they wanted to. We dont live in an ideal world and abortion is an option for women. If an accidental pregnancy occurs, you give women an option to avoid parenthood with abortions but don't give men an option with paper abortions. This is not holding them to the same standard. This doesn't make sense Pro lifers, tell women if they don't want a kid then don't get pregnant. You, tell men if the…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/24 10:39 PM
2

What standard have I applied? This started because you stated that if men don't want kids then don't initiate pregnancy, you don't apply this same standard to women (changed the wording to make it applicable to both genders). I didnt dismiss it. It certainly an option. You didn't dismiss it as an option, but as an argument against abortion, despite using the same argument against paper abortions. That is most certainly hypocrisy. Anyway, I'm done here. I've got shit to do today and an going to g…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/24 10:27 PM
–

But you are applying standards. Both abortions and paper abortions are a legal issue, with divided opinions on whether they should be legal or not. Your argument against paper abortions is if you don't want a kid, don't get someone pregnant. But when that same argument, if you don't want to give birth don't get pregnant, is used against abortions you dismiss it. Deny it all you want, I've no doubt you will, but this is hypocrisy.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/24 10:06 PM
–

You can try and justify it however you want, but you're applying different standards to some people but not others based on gender, there's a word for that. This is a very nuanced issue, purely black and white thinking on either side tends to miss that nuance.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/24 09:56 PM
–

Then you're a hypocrite if you don't apply the same standards to women that you do to men in your original comment.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/24 09:48 PM
–

Yes, what's your argument here?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/24 09:34 PM
–

I'm not arguing for or against abortion, just pointing out the argument against paper abortions used above is a pro life argument against abortion.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/24 09:33 PM
–

If men don't want to pay for a kid, don't get anyone pregnant. Sorted So, if we turn this around we get a pro life argument. If women don't want to give birth, then don't get pregnant. Sorted So the question becomes, are you pro life or a hypocrite?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/12/24 09:26 PM
1

Nope, still not working for me. Oh well, was with a try. Cheers.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/24 09:27 AM
5

With your point about hoodies, you might be interested in this post from a while ago. So many comments defending her. https://np.reddit.com?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android_app&utm_name=androidcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=1 Also one of my comments on the thread. https://np.reddit.com/j0rmk9y?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android_app&utm_name=androidcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=2 So links don't seem to be working for me, but was a story about a guy finding about 50 hoodies in his gfs closet. Turned …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/24 09:13 AM
1

Because if you haven't heard of it that means it hasn't happened. Anyway, I'm done here, I can only recycle the same responses so many times.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/23 09:49 AM
1

Well I'm not going to repeat myself again regarding your flawed argument that there's nothing to be done. You says the mods don't allow it, the comment linked below shows that's not always the case. https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/comments/11tdnrj/the_narrative_behind_are_we_dating_the_same_guy/jciof3s?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share&context=3 I've already said that if they were just used for that purpose I'd be fine with it, the problem is that not all of them do.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/23 09:36 AM
1

So you admit there's a problem, well that's a good start. You do realise you can take down toxic Facebook groups without deleting all ofFacebook right? You're right, you should be able to say anything about anyone you want and the consequences are because there were problems there already.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/23 09:12 AM
1

I comprehended what you wrote, but considering I'd already addressed that by saying we shouldn't make it easier which you didn't comprehend so I didn't bother addressing it again. Didn't say he'd be on tinder, could have a woman who likes her co-worker but he rejects her because he's married. She then decides to take revenge by posting a lie on this site. There are lots of ways it could happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/23 08:54 AM
1

Interesting that your example of a lie which is OK because it won't ruin his life is body shaming man for his dick size, once again speaks a lot to the integrity of your character. What about a lie saying a man had a affair which ends up ruining marriage, you fine with that too? I've admitted there are bad guys out there, but your continued insistence that if a guy lives above reproach then he will be fine is so naive it's getting sad.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/23 08:08 AM
1

You admitted some women might lie but are fine with it because others won't, even if I can't prove it you're fine with slander. This isn't a court of law, but your attitude towards women trying to destroy men's lives says a lot about your character.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/23 07:40 AM
1

And you really think all statements on those sites are true?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/23 06:59 AM
1

You do realise slander isn't protected by free speech?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/23 06:46 AM
1

Once again your argument is if a woman wants to ruin your life she's going to do it anyway, so let's provide a Facebook site to make it easier for her to do so.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/23 06:35 AM
1

Your continued insistence that as long as men don't do anything wrong then women won't talk badly about them is really showing your bias. There are bad men out there, if these sites were only used to warn women about those men I would be all for it. However there are also bad women out there, whether you like to admit it or not, and their use of these sites to spread lies is the issue.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/23 06:28 AM
1

Never said it was, I think any place where lies are spread like this should be shut down. Guns aren't the only weapons used to murder people, I don't use that as an argument to say we should allow gun murder. Just because it happens in other places doesn't mean we should let it happen here.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/23 06:09 AM
1

And I don’t think the would be unfairly slandered. Don’t be a prick and it’ll be ok. So we're back to your initial argument that there are no vindictive women out there who will lie about these men. What if a guy is trying to live his best life but is stopped because of a lie someone told about them on one of these sites?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/23 05:58 AM
2

How is creating a group which is used to spread lies about men (not its only function but a big part of what goes on for a lot of them) living your best life? I've been married 17 years and have never been on any type of dating site so I'm not worried in the slightest. Doesn't mean I think others should have to put up with being unfairly slandered.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/23 05:47 AM
1

We can't stop you, so I'm going to provide a platform to make it easier for you to do it. I can't stop you from murdering someone, so I might as well give you a gun. That is just a terrible argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/23 05:36 AM
1

Please point out where I said you should act like a dick. So you're saying that it's OK if some women post lies about men because others might post a correction?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/23 05:22 AM
3

If you don't do anything illegal you'll never have any issues with law enforcement and they'll leave you alone. If you think that there are no vindictive women out there who will use a site like this for revenge then you're very naive.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/23 05:08 AM
6

That doesnt mean that ALL of these groups operate like hers did. Yet it does indicate that not ALL the groups operate in the strictly moderated manner your post suggests. I have no doubt that some of these groups stick to their intended purpose as your post suggests, but you imply that they all do and any criticism my men is inaccurate. This is just a bad ad suggesting they're all toxic.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/23 05:03 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter