TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

A-Queef-In-The-Night Archive

View 0 posts and 182 comments by A-Queef-In-The-Night on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

The statistic in question is significant. Various studies look at custody-seeking rates but still highlight the bias present. For example, fathers who actively pursue primary or joint custody in contested cases only succeed about 35-45% of the time, often due to ingrained judicial stereotypes like the "tender years" doctrine that favor mothers. A review from Florida State University reveals this persistent gender bias, even in states that claim to be gender-neutral. The cultural assumptions unde…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 04:18 PM
–

Your comment basically seems to come down to it’s ok to cold approach as long as you’re good at it or can convince the woman it’s not really a cold approach. Did I understand that right?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 02:41 PM
1

I disagree that women are unaware that their male friends are usually attracted to them. We have a name for this and it’s literally called the friendzone.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 02:38 PM
1

Trying to change the argument again I see.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 11:30 AM
–

While it’s true that suicide prevention is a stated priority for the NIMH and receives dedicated research funding, the allocation is relatively modest, only about 4% of the NIMH’s budget in 2020 was spent on suicide studies, despite rising rates. Indicating it’s not as “heavily funded” as implied when compared to the institute’s overall $1.5-2 billion annual budget. Moreover, NIMH’s suicide prevention efforts are largely gender-neutral, with no explicit focus on men despite males accounting for …
/r/PurplePillDebate23/07/25 12:42 AM
–

Ok
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 10:01 PM
–

Yo teach me your ways lol
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 07:22 PM
–

Who called them a whore?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 07:20 PM
1

I never made any claim about why they said it. I simply agreed with the comment you originally responded to that claimed women can and do say things such as men should be killed or sterilized publicly and suffer little to no consequences. I then provided a public video of a woman saying this, to which you responded that isn’t evidence that some women are saying it…. You’re the one who has brought in all the qualifiers unprompted and tried to shift goalposts and the original argument to fit your …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 06:46 PM
1

You are. I already provided evidence. I’m going to ask this again and I would really appreciate it if you actually answered this time. How is a video of a person doing a thing not evidence that they did the thing? It’s held up in court for quite a long time now that video is indeed evidence of what a person has done.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 06:03 PM
–

Ok? I’m not sure what this has to do with the claim made by me or GofukYourselves. All we said was women can publicly call for the death and sterilization of men publicly and suffer little to no consequences while the same is not true in reverse. You don’t seem to be disputing that so much as saying you just don’t care.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 06:01 PM
2

I never made any claims of motivation. You’re once again moving goal posts.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 05:59 PM
–

It doesn’t matter where the evidence is located. It’s still evidence that it does in fact happen.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 05:58 PM
2

How is a video of someone doing something not evidence that they did that thing? I’m really gonna need an explanation on that one. Like if your friend said their dog barked at the mailman everyday. And then showed you multiple timestamped videos of their dog barking at the mailman across multiple days. Would you tell your friend you still don’t believe it happens because no scientist has submitted a peer reviewed journal article for it? Or no one has published anything about it in the newspapers…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 05:37 PM
2

Ok? What’s your point? I am saying that women do say these types of things and suffer little to no consequences for it. You are now admitting that they do in fact say these things publicly. And random people condemning something on tv is not a consequence for individuals or groups saying these things. You just keep moving goalposts.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 05:30 PM
1

Oh, you are referring to the comment I made completely separate from the thread you’re responding in now that did not even mention this topic? WTF am I backtracking on? You just want to insult me and pretend like you’ve said anything that makes any sense whatsoever while you pretend to be above it all by trying to peace out. It’s pathetic.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 05:25 PM
2

You don’t think there are hundreds of examples of tweets from women saying #killallmen? Would you like me to find you multiple examples of that?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 05:17 PM
1

I wasn’t responding to OP and neither was she. You’re off base here.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 05:16 PM
3

How is video evidence of a woman calling for the death and sterilization of men not evidence enough for you that it does in fact happen? It is literally right in front of you and you have now seen and heard it happen. What science would prove to you more that it does happen than video of it happening?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 05:11 PM
1

So you need three million examples of something before you believe it is real?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 05:10 PM
–

Bias Toward Mothers Despite Shared Parenting Requests: A Florida State University Law Review article critiques pervasive gender stereotypes favoring mothers (e.g., via doctrines like “tender years”), even in states with gender-neutral laws. It analyzes a Massachusetts Gender Bias Study, revealing that when fathers actively seek custody (including shared), they obtain primary residency in only 29% of cases and joint in 46%, far below the study’s claimed 70% success rate, indicating bias as cultur…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 05:09 PM
–

And it’s simply a fact that some women post this kind of stuff online and say it in public with very little to no consequences. Once again, how many examples do I need to provide you to convince that this is in fact real and does happen?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 05:02 PM
–

That’s why I was asking how many examples it would take. So I could show multiple women doing it. She never gave me a number. Can you provide a number that would convince you?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 05:00 PM
2

This doesn’t indicate he doesn’t care about romantic relationships. Just that he doesn’t want to be involved in someone else’s romantic relationship. In other words, he minds his own business. Which used to just be the default and I wish we would get back to it. That or you annoy him and he is intentionally shutting down the debate so he doesn’t have to discuss it with you. P
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 04:46 PM
–

I literally provided you video evidence of exactly what the original comment claimed. A woman calling for the death and sterilization of men in a public place. What exactly is an article going to do for you that video evidence of it happening won’t? What science is going to disprove that this did in fact happen? I go back to my original question that you did not answer. How many examples of it happening do you need to be able to admit that it is happening?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 03:23 PM
2

I can open my own bottles and jars.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 03:19 PM
–

It is evidence that you requested. A woman calling for the death and sterilization of men in a public place. How many examples do you need to take it seriously?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 03:09 PM
–

Legal Bias in Family Courts: Men are awarded primary custody in only about 10-15% of U.S. divorce cases, with studies showing bias toward mothers despite shared parenting requests. Education Disparities: Boys lag behind girls in high school graduation rates (84% vs. 90% in the U.S., 2023) and college enrollment (41% male vs. 59% female), with few initiatives addressing this gap. Workplace Policies: Affirmative action and diversity quotas in corporate hiring often prioritize women, reducing oppor…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 03:06 PM
–

They are being serious. Here is an example. https://x.com/godlovesusa1/status/1160132037954551809?s=46
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/25 03:00 PM
1

If it’s men’s fault or women’s fault or if it’s men or women with standards that are too high. Neither side gives an inch. It serves no purpose other than to piss people off and drive the wedge further between them. Neither side thinks they’re wrong and we aren’t gonna change that. We should be debating solutions that actually have some basis in reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/25 06:11 PM
-2

Can we just stop with this fucking bullshit?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/25 02:16 PM
1

You think that just because I don’t want money taken from me under threat of imprisonment to pay for someone else’s kids that I hate single moms?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/25 02:39 PM
1

I mean, I think that’s just wrong. High school, at least in the USA, is laughably easy regardless of your gender. It is literally designed for the average person to be able to comprehend. They had to make it that way because it is legally required for almost all people unless they choose homeschooling or private schools. I do somewhat agree with your point at the end though. I think a lot of boys struggle in school not because they are not capable of comprehending the topics of study. But becaus…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 05:01 PM
3

When you say academia, are you referring exclusively to college and beyond?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/25 03:39 PM
1

I already won the argument? You admitted I was right about the healthcare not being free… that was my only point lol. You literally don’t even know what is being discussed 😂 Never said women were my enemy. Never called you a name. lol, you’re just making shit up now. What attack did I make against you exactly?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 07:56 PM
1

Damn. You are so unfortunate that you live in a time before Women’s goal post sprinting made it into the Olympics. You’re such a strong woman you’d bring home the gold to your beloved backstabbing blighty bog known as Britain for sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 07:36 PM
1

Ok, you clearly didn’t read a word of my comment so I’ll just post the exact same one again below. Please actually respond to the question I am asking. “And you do realize this is in no way “a health care system that is free to absolutely everyone” right? Can you just admit that? You are just laughably horrible at defending your own positions. But god damn do I admire how much of a strong woman you are. Just running ultra marathons with all the damn goal posts right on your back. Bravo ma’am.”
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 07:19 PM
–

And you do realize this is in no way “a health care system that is free to absolutely everyone” right? Can you just admit that? You are just laughably horrible at defending your own positions. But god damn do I admire how much of a strong woman you are. Just running ultra marathons with all the damn goal posts right on your back. Bravo ma’am.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 07:09 PM
–

Ok. You are just laughably bad about moving goalposts 😂. You realize this is in no way free healthcare right?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 06:52 PM
–

Can you name a single country on earth with “a health care system that is free to absolutely everyone”?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 06:34 PM
1

Ok, that didn’t answer my question or address anything I said in my comment. You seem a bit off. Have a wonderful day.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 03:16 PM
1

Gentleman is one word bud. And you think a man who isn’t religious is a de-man? Which seems like something you’ve made up as I’m not finding anything on it. It also seems to be a tongue in cheek way to call a non religious man a “demon” as I assume it is pronounced very similarly.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 03:12 PM
1

I have no idea what a de-man is but ok bud. At least we agree on the no benefits for a secular man part.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 03:04 PM
4

lol, well luckily I don’t have to be patient anymore. She has since stopped replying to me. I guess she finally realized how moronic her argument was.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 02:11 PM
5

Selective Service Act - Requires men aged 18-25 to register for potential military draft, impacting male bodily autonomy. Drug Testing Laws - Federal and state laws mandate bodily fluid tests for certain jobs or legal situations, affecting men and women. Public Intoxication Laws - State and local laws criminalize excessive alcohol consumption, governing behavior and bodily state for all. Sterilization Laws - Some states regulate voluntary sterilization procedures (e.g., vasectomies for men), req…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 01:29 PM
4

I literally just gave you an example of a law that governs men’s bodies. You’re full of shit and refuse to acknowledge reality. I gotta say though. You must be one strong woman. Because you have been picking up those goal posts and sprinting with them this whole conversation.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 01:07 PM
4

Once again, this has absolutely fuck all to do with your claim that there are no laws governing men’s bodies. Do you still believe that?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 12:38 PM
–

This has fuck all to do with your original claim that there are no laws governing men’s bodies.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 12:29 PM
7

What are you talking about? You cannot be this unaware of the world around you. I had to sign up for selective service when I registered to vote in 2012…. It’s still around. And idk what any of this has to do with your original claim that there are no laws governing men’s bodies.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 12:28 PM
–

Ok, so now that you’ve been proven wrong you’re moving the goal posts from there are no laws governing men’s bodies to saying that there are laws governing men’s bodies but it’s their fault. I find this to be an extremely disingenuous tactic but I will go ahead and address your new argument as well. How many men in America today got to vote on the draft? Oh that’s right, none of them. Men don’t get to decide if they are eligible to be drafted or not. The government does. And I’m sure you are goi…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 12:08 PM
–

The draft. This a braindead take.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/25 11:52 AM
2

It’s not subtle but I rarely see it called out as a red flag. Mine would be a man who is obese and not doing anything about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/25 02:34 PM
2

The children thing would only be a benefit to men if the overwhelming majority of women were not willing to have children outside of marriage. Currently about 40% of babies in the United States are born out of wedlock.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/25 07:15 PM
2

I think it’s still a cop out to claim you really value the institution of marriage and can’t explain why it’s beneficial to both parties. I think you’re not answering because you are ware that the answer is there are no benefits.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/25 06:49 PM
2

Frankly, that seems like a cop out answer from a “woman who really values marriage”. It doesn’t seem like you’ve put any thought into why it’s actually valuable to you. A man can absolutely love you without being married to you. A man can absolutely be committed to you for the rest of your lives without being married to you. So neither of these are good reasons to get married for a secular man. You’re the one who wants a man to marry you so bad. I’m simply asking, what benefits does a secular ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/25 05:55 PM
2

The only issue I see with this is leading someone on. As long as you’re up front about not wanting to get married ever then it’s a non issue. Serious question. What benefits does marriage have for a secular man?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/25 05:44 PM
5

It really is incredible. I work in a completely different industry but we also have robots for certain tasks. The amount of precision and repeatability is orders of magnitude better than human hands.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/25 01:08 PM
15

Why do you think that? We already have surgical robots such as the da Vinci surgical system. It seems to me that if we have robots with the necessary dexterity, and we combine it with an AI that has full access to all of humanities medical knowledge, and it can remember every detail of every single patient and condition it ever worked with, and it can actively use this knowledge to inform future decisions on what works and what doesn’t, and it never makes the mistake of grabbing the wrong syring…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/25 11:46 AM
3

If my entire life experience stopped lining up with a lot of what red pill points out then I would stop believing it. But currently it does.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/25 04:21 AM
1

My buddies wife will drink straight after me out of the same glass or straw if all of us are out together and she wants to try my beer or something. Also hits the same vape as me all the time. Fuck. This is gonna destroy him.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/25 07:21 PM
1

Hmmmmm no. Your argument commits a hasty generalization fallacy. You took my general statement (“cohabitating mother and father produce the most well-adjusted and successful children in general”) and applied it rigidly to a specific case (abusive cohabitating parents) without considering exceptions or nuances. You imply that because cohabitation is generally correlated with positive outcomes, it must always hold true, ignoring that abuse or other factors can negate this trend. This oversimplifie…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/25 06:34 PM
1

lol, you argue like a child. “No I’m not, you are!” Once again, if you actually read my responses, I already granted they don’t have to be married. Just cohabitating in a monogamous fashion. Do you realize two things can be true at the same time? Good parents raise good children and intact households have the best outcomes. Both of those are generalized statements. Those two things are not mutually exclusive. Can you actually tell me what a generalization is? How about the hasty generalization f…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/25 05:47 PM
1

Literally in the first comment I left you, I said there are exceptions to this. As in, yes, sometimes a cohabitating mother and father will produce a child that later goes on the have trouble in life. I think you have trouble with reading comprehension or you are just choosing to misinterpret me on purpose because you want to disagree. You’re currently guilty of the hasty generalization fallacy. Or strawman fallacy. Take your pick.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/25 04:53 PM
2

Because all available data points to the fact that a cohabitating mother and father produce the most well adjusted and successful children in general. It in no way implies that. Why do you keep focusing on specific exceptions? I’m speaking in generalities. Do you understand that?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/25 03:56 PM
2

That doesn’t make sense that my logic indicates that. Can you explain it to me?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/25 03:13 PM
1

Well you have an answer. Just wasn’t answering the question I asked. The one I asked requires a yes or no at some point, even if you would like to include more explanation before or after that. You are once again pointing to an exception that is in no way the norm to justify your position. But to actually give you a straight answer to your question, a courtesy you don’t seem to want to return, no. Doesn’t really seem germane to the conversation though.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/25 02:56 PM
–

No you didn’t. It was a yes or no question and you have not said yes or no. True. I guess the marriage itself isn’t important. But the data is clear that a cohabitating mother and father produce the most well adjusted and successful children in general.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/25 02:49 PM
–

You didn’t answer my question.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/25 02:42 PM
–

You don’t think seeing a loving mother and father being together and raising children together has any positive effect on a child?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/25 02:40 PM
–

Right, that’s technically true. But all available data points to the fact that kids raised by a married mother and father in the same home tend to perform the best. Are there exceptions to this? Yes, of course. But that’s exactly what they are. Exceptions.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/25 02:30 PM
–

Only caveat I would add is that it is completely possible to express your intentions to a woman in a respectful manner. If she isn’t on the same page, respectfully inform her that isn’t what you’re looking for and move on.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/25 05:17 PM
7

How did you come to this conclusion? What do you think they are unhappy about when it comes to the current state of men protecting women specifically?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 10:06 PM
18

I read the article. I still choose man every time. I don’t even get how it’s a debate.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 10:02 PM
1

Bud. There are questions in several of the comments that you just don’t address. I’m not making anything up. Just go back and read them.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 04:51 PM
1

See, once again, just not addressing or engaging with almost anything I said.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 04:48 PM
2

I was making an analogy. It does. Especially on public buildings. Those of us with working legs have to help bear the additional construction costs associated with making buildings handicap accessible even if we get no benefit from it. How so? It wasn’t a metaphor. It was an analogy. You still didn’t address my other question.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 04:37 PM
1

Just go read what I said. You didn’t address any of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 04:26 PM
1

Just go read what I said. You didn’t address any of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 04:22 PM
2

I agree. You clearly don’t understand.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 04:21 PM
1

Ok, you’re clearly not even trying to understand what I am saying. Have a good day pal.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 04:12 PM
0

You seem to be coming at this from a very selfish point of view. I’m sure you don’t have this problem. That doesn’t mean it isn’t a problem for other people. For instance, if someone in a wheelchair was complaining that there was no ramp access to a public building, and I said there wasn’t any problem here because I can walk up the steps just fine……you don’t see the issue with that? Would you admit this was an issue if women were complaining about not being able to find someone to have sex with?…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 03:16 PM
1

Right, so you are talking about sexual assault and rape? Because I covered that. No one is seriously talking about lining women up to present to these men against their will. That would be abhorrent. Yes I know you can find someone saying almost anything on the internet, but do you have anyone that actually has a decent audience pushing this? Once again, you’re refusing to acknowledge the other side even has an issue. And I’m not sure how you’ve come to the conclusion that the only solution to t…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 03:11 PM
4

Right, so you are talking about sexual assault and rape? Because I covered that. No one is seriously talking about lining women up to present to these men against their will. That would be abhorrent. Yes I know you can find someone saying almost anything on the internet, but do you have anyone that actually has a decent audience pushing this? Once again, you’re refusing to acknowledge the other side even has an issue. And I’m not sure how you’ve come to the conclusion that the only solution to t…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 02:59 PM
4

There’s no debate to be had here. Your original post already refuses to acknowledge the other side’s issue. You put the word problem in quotes and then in parentheses just straight up said it’s not a problem. And yet your entire point seems to be that people should sympathize more with the other side…….. If you don’t want to have sex with someone then you shouldn’t be dating them or marrying them as everyone is aware, sex is gonna be an expectation in the relationship. As far as other instances …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/25 02:51 PM
0

Can you name a few that men in general would agree with?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 07:14 PM
3

Yeah I already said that in another comment. OP seemed to be talking to MEN though. Not a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/25 12:29 AM
2

And there it is. Proof you can’t defend your own position as you would rather resort to personal insults. Have a wonderful day.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 09:02 PM
3

Ok, that didn’t answer my question.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 08:47 PM
2

What more meaningful pursuit is there for men than chasing women and passing on their genes?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 08:34 PM
1

What more meaningful pursuit is there for men than pursuing women?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 08:34 PM
3

You still haven’t addressed the issue. How are men supposed to just ignore the fact that they are unbelievably horny simply as a consequence of biology? I get that a handful can pull it off but to expect society at large to adopt this is lunacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 07:59 PM
11

Society didn’t brainwash men to be horny. You act as if a young man can just turn off his hormones and ignore the fact that his dick gets harder than diamonds 10 times a day.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 07:16 PM
26

Man, I don’t think age has anything to do with it. OP is essentially telling young men to quit being so desperately horny. I wonder if he’s tried asking the birds to quit flying?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 06:51 PM
54

It’ll never work.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 04:56 PM
1

I’m not sure I understand. Who is actually arguing the opposite?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/25 01:51 PM
1

Ok
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 02:49 AM
1

Just not true. I live in somewhat of a tech hub.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 02:45 AM
1

I have no idea where most of them grew up. I match with them on dating apps. But if you wanna start lobbing personal insults then I’m done here. Have a good one
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/25 02:37 AM
1

lol ok
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 08:43 PM
1

You think the only explanations for being a single mom are being poor or old? I gotta say, I interact with a lot of single moms in their 20s and 30s. Seems pretty common actually. I’m certainly solidly middle class. Many of these women also have college degrees and jobs.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 08:28 PM
1

Because you said it was an obsession. And I haven’t heard it brought up anymore than the other reasons I listed. I also think your argument isn’t based in reality. I think any single mom looking to have a long term monogamous relationship with a man is going to expect him to contribute in some way to the raising of her child, regardless of her financial status as middle class or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 08:13 PM
1

Why do you think my comment suggests that’s what I think? At no point did I make the argument you were telling me to date single moms. I simply offered some other reasons I’ve heard from the “manosphere” that were not included in your post.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 07:47 PM
1

I mean I feel like you left out some of the reasons regardless of what “type” of single mom they are. I wouldn’t consider a serious relationship with a single mom because I am inevitably going to have to interact with the child at some point. I don’t want to as I don’t even want kids of my own. Much less someone else’s. If the child does have a deadbeat dad and you are dating for serious commitment or marriage, you really think I’m not gonna end up helping to raise and provide for a kid that isn…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/25 06:00 PM
2

I’m afraid I do not see the contradiction. I’m also not sure why it’s irresponsible for a psychologist to tell someone they might be the source of their own problems. Can you explain this to me?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/25 08:22 PM
5

The whole point of the original post was being able to do it in secret.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/25 12:32 AM
2

Usually the dad signs the birth certificate before leaving the hospital…… how would you go about not doing this in secret?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/25 12:14 AM
7

Yeah I think all of that is wrong. No child that isn’t yours is entitled to have you providing for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 11:07 PM
8

I always see this point left out of this discussion when the response is just do it in secret.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/25 10:53 PM
1

Oh man at least a couple more decades I’d say. We have certainly made some strides in robotics in my lifetime. But I’ve still never seen anything close to the full dexterity, precision, and capability of an actual human hand. Same thing with like micro facial expressions. That would be tough to pull off with current tech but absolutely necessary if you don’t want humans to be able to pick this thing out immediately. As far as the personality and conversational skill, current AI still has a ways …
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 10:57 PM
2

Keep in mind, it’s a robot. So current Megan fox is just an aesthetics choice. Of course they can make one of her in her prime as well. Also, the thing that is most important is that it is not a sexbot. You can take it out in public and it can have conversations with your friends and otherwise interact. It can also keep your house in perfect condition. It can teach you new things and have actual conversations and remember things in your life to discuss. I think it’s gonna be a problem for societ…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 10:19 PM
2

Basically AI sex robot. Indistinguishable from a human as far as physical interaction goes. Obviously in the movie things go awry because it’s a movie and you have to have a plot. Goes a bit further though. The robot can be your driver, maid, chef, handyman, security, travel agent, etc……. In addition, it will always think your joke is funny, always think you’re right, and always do what you wanna do. Unless you actually want it to challenge you, and then it will. Oh, and lastly, it looks like Me…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 09:10 PM
1

Yes but not by much. I think the real worry should be a Subservience scenario if you’ve seen that movie. Yeah, I think if that was an option then large scale groups of men would leave the dating market.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/25 07:50 PM
2

Do you have any statistical data to prove that?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/25 02:44 PM
–

Highly disagree. Gold diggers are real. Not in any way saying that’s every woman, but they are real. See Bill Belichick. He is 72 years old and dating a 24 year old who I think just about any straight man would consider extremely attractive. Certainly far more attractive than him. Ralphy May was a standup comedian. He is pretty widely regarded as a very funny gentleman. I think if you look at him and his spouse, you’ll agree that she was far and away out of his league when it comes to looks. But…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 10:52 PM
1

It’s not irrelevant. If the women in the military aren’t actually on the front lines then his point stands. Why do you think the percent of special forces who are women is zero? And of course, as we both know, military and police both are overwhelmingly men. And I’m sure you’ve seen the same videos I have of male police officers having to take over for female officers who cannot restrain male and even sometimes female suspects.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 07:47 PM
1

It’s not irrelevant. If the women in the military aren’t actually on the front lines then his point stands. Why do you think the percent of special forces who are women is zero? And of course, as we both know, military and police both are overwhelmingly men. And I’m sure you’ve seen the same videos I have of male police officers having to take over for female officers who cannot restrain male and even sometimes female suspects.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 07:46 PM
0

What percentage of front line combatants and special forces in the military are women?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 05:51 PM
–

Very fair point. Edit: username was Glowupgirl111 since it is not showing up top and she is not marked as OP in the comments anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 03:11 PM
–

As the other person responding to me pointed out, the main pic on her profile is of her ass. So I’m going with option 1. Edit: username was Glowupgirl111 since it is not showing up top and she is not marked as OP in the comments anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 02:31 PM
–

Wow. Another low effort bait post. You are well aware that most men view sex as very important in a relationship. You are well aware that most men would in fact prefer sex more often than once a week. You are well aware that we find the exercise involved fun. And you are well aware that most men would be very hurt to hear their partner describe sex with them as a boring and tedious chore. What was the point of this exactly?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 02:06 PM
1

True
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/25 01:16 AM
1

At no point did I claim it was easy. Life is always hard. But you get some choice on when and where it is hard. Bust your ass and become top 1% in your profession, and you will never have any of the dating problems of poor men or any of the financial problems. If you get sick, you can afford that experimental treatment that might save you. You can afford extra physical therapy to recover faster. Your parents will not have to live in some state run nursing home while you cry that you can’t put th…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 11:06 PM
1

Disagree that it’s unrealistic. Most people can do it. They just won’t. But ok then.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 10:58 PM
1

Ok?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 10:44 PM
–

At no point did I claim every profession is difficult or demanding. Beyond that your comment looks like you’re finally starting to get it.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 10:39 PM
–

Didn’t say everyone could be the top. Said everyone could be in the top 1%. It in no way means everyone is the same. Obviously the top 1% would be very different as they’re the only ones willing to do what it takes. Doesn’t mean other people can’t do it. Just that they won’t. “What one man can do, another can do.”
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 10:21 PM
–

It actually is a realistic goal for 99%. Just 99% of them won’t do what it takes. Complain about what specifically?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 10:17 PM
–

Yeah but yourself probably is not currently in the top 1% of your chosen profession and in decent shape. That tends to help. Care to address any of the other points?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 08:47 PM
1

Fair point.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 08:42 PM
–

Id say stop doing those things. If you bust your ass to become competent enough to be top 1% in your chosen profession financially……then you won’t have to fake anything. You’ll be able to get women. Especially if you just workout a bit and are in decent shape. “Try harder”. I’m going to assume you mean being a try hard? Trying hard isn’t bad. I might need some more explanation on that one Cringe is very relative and I’ve noticed that men who are very attractive or very successful tend to be affo…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 08:41 PM
–

No. You’re wrong. Don’t stop saying it. If more men wake up to this fact and actually start improving themselves then we are going to have a lot more competition lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 08:34 PM
1

No and yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 07:36 PM
4

I’ve literally never heard any one claim “sperm is better than uteruses”. Can you cite some prominent red pill people who claim this?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/25 03:45 PM
2

Idk what HTH means and I didn’t reduce anyone to just appearance. Loves me has a whole lot that goes with it. I’m not sure why that’s icky to you but ok. Have a wonderful day.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/25 07:17 PM
1

I don’t want kids. I would still like to have a hot woman who loves me in my life. To be clear, that gives you the ick?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/25 07:11 PM
2

So the women told you it was their personal preference and you’re still choosing to infantilize them by saying actually it’s not their fault and they shouldn’t have any accountability for it? I seem to notice that when men have a problem, it’s generally regarded as men’s fault. When women have a problem, it’s generally regarded as someone else’s fault. Idk why this is but I see the same logic everywhere and I don’t think it is very rational.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 07:09 PM
1

Definitely don’t want it then.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 03:01 PM
2

There wouldn’t be a business for them to work at without the founder or leader lol. A country is a terrible example as is a king. A company and the leader only have power over as long as you choose to let them. That’s not how kings and governments authority works. Do you believe in private ownership of anything?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 11:17 AM
1

Why would the employees have the right to oust the owner of a private business? That makes no sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 02:30 AM
1

How so?I don’t think you really told me what workplace democracy laws are. Leadership is accountable to the employees currently as they are free to leave at anytime for essentially any reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/25 01:32 AM
1

What are workplace democracy laws?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/25 03:34 PM
20

They are not morally wrong for asking. You are free to say no. Asking is not “evil and disgusting”. If they do not accept your no respectfully or try to guilt you into it by insinuating trust issues simply because of the fact that you want to be in control of when YOU reproduce, then they are morally wrong. By the way, accepting your no respectfully does not necessarily mean she agrees with you and still has sex with you. Also, I don’t think feminism is the reason we do not have discrete male bi…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/25 01:30 PM
–

This sub is devolving into nothing but rage bait gotcha bullshit. Don’t base your self worth or opinion of yourself off of some bullshit a woman said. Prove to yourself every day you’re worth something. Once you’re at a level where others also notice how competent and impressive you are, you’ll have access to plenty of women who won’t give a flying fuck about your dick size. This is all on you bro. Man up.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 11:28 PM
–

Not many. I’ve heard politics described as Hollywood for ugly people.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 09:22 PM
–

I don’t consider myself a conservative but I definitely disagree with AOC on most topics. I wouldn’t call it an obsession and I don’t really consider her intelligent but, she is hot. That’s about it for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 06:49 PM
–

Bullshit. You’re using a very tiny percentage of the population who takes a shortcut to make money as a representation of the whole. I also noticed you didn’t say all fitness influencers. So it can be done naturally. I get that just because I start working out that I’m not gonna look like Arnold Schwarzenegger in 6 months. Doesn’t mean I can’t look far better with way more muscle than I currently have in a couple of years. You don’t have to have a Kim Kardashian ass to have a great ass.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 12:06 PM
–

One thing I would say is women greatly underestimate how much a woman can change her butt naturally.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 11:56 AM
–

Body hair: doesn’t bother me at all Saggy boobs: don’t bother me at all Stretch marks: don’t bother me at all. I got em too from when I used to be obese Wrinkles: bothering me less and less the older I get but you’re right that as someone who dates in the late twenties to mid thirties I don’t want someone with a 70 year olds amount of wrinkles if that’s what you mean Pimples and blemishes: I’m not in middle school anymore. I don’t care if you get a zit every now and then. So do I. Gray hair: alr…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 11:51 AM
1

Glad we agree you shouldn’t have.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/25 01:20 AM
1

Because that’s literally the only thing I stated and everything else you’re saying is just your attempt to assign opinions or thoughts to me that I never said and you have no evidence I believe.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/25 10:09 PM
1

Glad we agree I’m right then.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/25 01:16 PM
3

I’m not arguing that it’s over in a moment. I literally never said that. I also never said women dump a man 30 seconds after they find out he got fired. You’re trying to put words in my mouth. I don’t know why you’re stating that I have this notion when I literally never said anything like that. I simply said, you don’t get fat in a moment. Which is 100% factual and you have offered nothing to dispute it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/25 01:10 AM
1

That’s all well and great and it has nothing to do with what I said. So far you have not made a single argument against what I originally stated.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 10:49 PM
8

The importance of a timeline is in the original comment. She said, “Many men lose interest the moment their wife gets fat.” It is not a “moment” where you just go from a healthy weight to obese. Usually it is years of a person being lazy and refusing to take accountability for what they decide to put in their mouths. As far as your last sentence goes, I’m not sure what that has to do with what I said.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/25 05:05 PM
6

lol you don’t get fat in like a day.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/25 02:21 PM
1

Beats me. Women have a tendency to find shit out. Idk how they do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/25 04:30 PM
1

I disagree. I think it would be better to be open about this early on as it is clearly a dealbreaker for many women judging by this thread. I’d much rather get rejected in the first couple of dates than potentially years down the line after they somehow find out. Same thing if you’ve banged like 300 dudes. You really think hiding that and having your man find out later has no potential consequences? Sure, some won’t care at all, but many would have a huge problem with it.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/25 11:49 AM
2

Very important. If you can’t walk at a normal pace for an hour then me and you won’t work. And yes, slim and fit women are way more physically attractive than obese women. All men think this outside of fetishes.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/25 12:32 PM
1

Would have been clarified if you started by reading the article the debate and post was centered on…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/25 03:18 AM
1

Then why comment in a debate thread about the article?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/25 10:36 PM
1

Because the entire debate thread is literally about the article? It’s pretty hard to debate without knowing what you are debating.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/25 10:36 PM
1

Oh interesting. So you do want to talk about the article now? Because the other comment you left said you didn’t even read it and your original reply to me wasn’t based on it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/25 10:30 PM
1

I know. I’m the person you responded to. And I was clearly referencing the article if you continue reading up to my original comment. And you were commenting on a debate thread about the article. Why would you comment on a debate thread about the article without reading the article?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/25 10:27 PM
0

There is literally a woman complaining about her divorce in the article.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/25 11:54 AM
2

I agree with you but make sure you throw in birthdays a well. I’ve talked to multiple girls that talk about what they’re doing for their birthday MONTH. It’s just fucking ridiculous.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/25 06:20 PM
1

Fair enough. But then you don’t get to complain if you’re more miserable afterwards because now someone else isn’t funding your lifestyle since you chose this. This is of course assuming you aren’t divorcing for abuse or infidelity.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/25 05:32 PM
3

This is a very disingenuous way to present this information. It makes it sound like a man gets a 25% raise the second he becomes single again as like a congratulations on being single from wherever he works. It also makes it sound like a woman immediately gets a pay cut from wherever she works as some sort of punishment for being single. Neither of these things happen. Your pay doesn’t change because of a divorce. A man might now have more disposable income because he is not supporting another p…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/25 05:12 PM
2

Maybe for some but not all. I lost my virginity at 24. I was nervous around women and just didn’t shoot my shot like I should have. I was also a fat ass. I got in decent shape (not great but at least I’m not shaped like a potato anymore). This led to me feeling far better physically and mentally. Really increased my confidence. Finally lost my virginity at 24 simply due to being far more physically attractive and far better at talking to women due to my newfound confidence. At this point I’ve ha…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/25 09:00 PM
1

True. But no matter how much two chicks may like rubbing biscuits together, neither is gonna end up pregnant. And no matter how much cum you pump into a dude, he ain’t getting pregnant either.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/25 09:50 PM
–

Heterosexuality is literally the only type of relationship that is sustainable…..
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/25 09:42 PM
0

I say don’t get one. I personally just use a condom.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/25 12:48 PM
1

I’d say the last two count as cheating but all 4 would end the relationship for me.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/25 10:13 PM
-3

In response to your red pill advice for women and with the caveat that this only applies to women who want children and are interested in high value men with multiple options… Multiple scientific studies have shown that men of all ages generally find 21-24 to be the most attractive age for women. Is it not good advice for women who are interested in a husband and family to secure that when they are at their most attractive and most fertile? Since they will be competing with other women for these…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/02/25 07:25 PM
4

You missed my other comment where I made it clear I never even asked to finish in her mouth. So no I can’t take it but I also don’t give it.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/25 11:33 AM
3

I didn’t want my own cum in my mouth. And to be fair I never asked to put it in hers either.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/02/25 12:55 AM
15

A woman once stopped talking to me because I informed her I would not be cumming in her mouth so she could then spit it back into mine. That was her dealbreaker.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/25 11:56 PM
5

I know I’m agreeing with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/25 01:56 PM
15

You have to be misunderstanding this intentionally right? You can’t possibly think that’s the point of the comment you were replying to right?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/02/25 12:37 PM
25

Women are obviously entitled to say no to a prenup. You are obviously entitled to not marry them without one. I think your lack of understanding stems from the fact that you expect the world to be perfectly equal, rational, and just. It never has been and it never will be. Stop looking for it as it is a waste of time. Just accept reality. This goes for men and women. Draw your line in the concrete. If someone asks you to cross it, they aren’t for you, and that’s ok even if it hurts.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/25 08:57 PM
–

I had this exact thought when I watched the movie Subservience. They had an AI robot in that movie that could cook, clean, run all your errands, have natural conversations, do home repairs, never talks back, always laughs at your jokes if you want, interested in talking about anything you’re interested in, and of course was much stronger and more physically capable than humans so you now have your own private security as well. Oh, and the robot in this scenario looks just like Megan Fox and is d…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 08:28 PM
1

From what I can tell, the modern dating environment isn’t what anyone wanted.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/25 02:30 AM
1

This is true. Usually the person most holding someone back from their full potential is themselves. Of course this applies to men and women equally.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/25 09:31 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter