TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

AAtvasshole Archive

View 0 posts and 56 comments by AAtvasshole on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

You're the only one making that equation, and you should know why that equation is false. A multitude of studies aren't relevant to any arguments and apparently don't think death is an adverse effect which I find strange. And nobody is talking about adults, except you, which is specifically not part of any arguments. So out of the 3 things that you mentioned, none of them are relevant here.
/r/MensRights27/08/20 10:49 PM
17

Well you know how it is, innocent till proven man.
/r/MensRights26/08/20 04:51 PM
2

The main argument being that it would be bad for those women to be near men in general? So lesbians should be denied but gay men should be allowed, and if not then it's their own choice to interact with the abusive sex not because the shelter's policy in which case there's no reason to deny straight men. And this is all a bit confusing, upsetting and convoluted you could instead go against feminism and fight against the roadblocks that prevent shelters for men.
/r/MensRights23/08/20 03:25 PM
1

I've read your comment a couple times and I'm not seeing what you're trying to argue especially when you're saying you're being neutral and balanced. Your entire comment has 2 relevant lines to what I assume is your main point and that part is poorly worded and unsupported by anything valid and cohesive. I don't know if what you wrote is correct but it doesn't matter because it's not relevant.
/r/MensRights23/08/20 10:51 AM
3

Congrats you are a snowflake if you feel the need to make posts like this.
/r/MensRights22/08/20 07:43 AM
11

Long day at the animal shelter?
/r/MensRights20/08/20 06:08 PM
7

For 1 and 2, the penetrated party did consent so rape won't be considered. For 3, there will be a backlog of unpaid cs on his doorstep the day he turns 18 which gives him a month or 2 to pay or jail. Male privilege eh?
/r/MensRights20/08/20 01:03 PM
13

I'm in Europe, if I do the spectrum for my country I'd end up central-conservative, if I take one for the US with similar questions I end up far left
/r/MensRights20/08/20 09:40 AM
3

Custody is a result of feminist legislation, traditionally the child went to the richer parent. Unless ofc you're willing to come forth and admit feminism is a tradition in our legal and social system. To which I'd say gosh it's so silly to hear feminists claim to want to get rid of gender roles when they're the ones that advocated it so anti feminism is the best form of feminism.
/r/MensRights19/08/20 03:48 PM
4

Harassment is more about behavior and the way you interact with someone. You can call someone on their phone 10x in a day that can be considered harassment if it's unwanted.
/r/MensRights19/08/20 03:40 PM
0

Unless you're trying to go the feminist route and try to reach equality of outcome, this picture is pointless on its own
/r/MensRights10/08/20 09:50 PM
1

I'm not going to look up the studies today because it's too hot but the response to that would be; Women already have that power, except injuries it's X incarcerations per year and Y suicides.
/r/MensRights09/08/20 04:36 PM
4

Why exactly 1k?
/r/MensRights05/08/20 12:14 AM
1

It's probably a plea deal, not much to talk about if it is.
/r/MensRights03/08/20 04:44 PM
4

Raped by men out of prison compared to people prosecuted for allegations. Yeah.... And then there's the tweet that says sexual assault when that's not considered in the numbers.
/r/MensRights03/08/20 02:01 AM
2

There's a hidden message to it and it's quite revealing. The analogy of boss and employee seems out of place at first because it would imply all men have it better within certain parameters to all women. Which in context of comedic success would have very little value as there wouldn't be as many bosses as employees at a show, similar with the ratio of men and women. But if I look at the ratio of bosses and employees, in most places 10:1 is very common for this hierarchy. And we know them rad fe…
/r/MensRights02/08/20 10:30 PM
4

Maybe r/maleinfertility can help you better with this?
/r/MensRights02/08/20 10:00 PM
3

Fine I'll humor you some more, let's completely ignore that dictionaries such as Cambridge, Webster, dictionary.com specifically say it is men benefiting in at least 1 of their definitions, as well as the way feminism describes it in a very similar way. So according to you it's just a system, neither good or bad, but mandatory male leads. There shouldn't necessarily be anything wrong with that. But then you say it could be a little bit more good than bad, or just entirely bad. Not for reasons th…
/r/MensRights01/08/20 11:32 PM
3

No no not so fast, let's hear them I'm mighty curious. I really want to find what the actual ratio is between all the good things we get and the few things we need to sacrifice for it. And I'm not doing it to put you in an impossible situation I really do want to know
/r/MensRights01/08/20 10:41 PM
5

Imma tell you a little secret, what you're saying isn't what's described as patriarchy. Unless of course you planned on adding a bunch of stuff that supposedly greatly benefits men, 51/49 good bad at least...
/r/MensRights01/08/20 10:22 PM
5

It wasn't the police.
/r/MensRights01/08/20 04:01 PM
2

It looks like you're trying to equate sex trafficking to kidnapping, even in the article you link it says at least 79% is not about people in basements, yet you claim nearly half were in bondage as in locked in basement and having things done to them. So why you come across as video games cause violence is because you're zoning in on an undefined small portion of victims that fall under the definition of sex trafficking and apply that to everyone while even you source that the vast majority isn'…
/r/MensRights30/07/20 12:17 AM
1

The 50/50 women think women are going to antagonize men for.
/r/MensRights29/07/20 12:21 PM
1

This post would be far more appropriate in a anti sjw/(rad)fem sub, and in that regard I would find it advisable for men and straight women as you say to stick together.
/r/MensRights28/07/20 11:45 PM
5

Nvm
/r/MensRights28/07/20 11:16 PM
2

I've seen more focus on the discrimination at the getting in the workforce part than the actual workforce itself and that's why they feel heavy hiring compensation is needed along with the gender quota nonsense. The argument being that women stop working for years due to offspring causing employers not wanting women at all. But you can just as easily manipulate people by saying that over an entire career of a man and woman at the same job at the same pay she makes less by conveniently leaving ou…
/r/MensRights28/07/20 09:01 AM
1

I went through chapter 5 to look for anything that would support 2:1, the worst is 69.4 in Columbia, but that's not representing the overall averages.
/r/MensRights28/07/20 12:36 AM
13

So how do you respond to them?
/r/MensRights28/07/20 12:11 AM
2

I can't even imagine the women's pedophilia support groups getting shut down let alone a self worth group
/r/MensRights27/07/20 11:39 PM
1

It's missing the first 2 panels
/r/MensRights24/07/20 02:08 AM
1

If we're going to post insane shit, female rats having access to their children releases more dopamine that cocaine. Should we therefore take children away from women because it normalizes drug addiction? Thought so.
/r/MensRights20/07/20 10:13 AM
8

All these specific things as long as emotional abuse isn't mentioned so women are safe from being called abuser
/r/MensRights18/07/20 03:06 PM
1

They're starting to take the boys are disfunctional girls sentiment a little too serious.
/r/MensRights16/07/20 10:10 AM
4

There's also a factor of trying to make others unsuccessful which would also shift the balance.
/r/MensRights15/07/20 07:24 AM
5

I'm fascinated how you managed to imply men are overly involved in the outcome and not at all involved in 3 sentences.
/r/MensRights14/07/20 09:23 PM
2

Haven't you heard, women are angels and can do no harm.
/r/MensRights13/07/20 11:06 PM
3

His mother
/r/MensRights13/07/20 11:00 PM
5

Where are you seeing mras claiming to have a monopoly on equality? Because I'm only seeing people say that it's a possible approach towards equality, not the only one and definitely not that no one else is allowed to either.
/r/MensRights13/07/20 03:56 PM
4

I think it would be far more likely that they're doing it as a joke or out of spite because things like boy scouts have hit the news.
/r/MensRights12/07/20 10:42 PM
19

So we're going from 50% earnings while married to 50% while married +50% expected future, for X time, earnings calculated out of current value...
/r/MensRights10/07/20 03:45 PM
3

The closest thing humans do that would compare to your examples is "why do girls like bad guys"
/r/MensRights10/07/20 02:34 PM
3

I find it strange she'd say she's not ovulating at the end. I can understand she'd say on bc while claiming to be 35 instead of 40 because you'd obviously still be able to get pregnant at that age if you're not infertile, and you wouldn't tell anyone you're infertile straight away if you don't know that person. But afterwards the claim of not ovulating is made which seems both redundant and in that sense a contradiction to the previous claim of being infertile. So to me it sounds like she thinks…
/r/MensRights10/07/20 11:46 AM
11

It's that mindset that disgusts me so much, anything that isn't exclusively for women is exclusively for men by default.
/r/MensRights09/07/20 09:30 AM
2

I thought they wouldn't mind global warming, since men like to use the ac which is sexist.
/r/MensRights09/07/20 09:12 AM
5

What about that makes that the "other side"
/r/MensRights06/07/20 12:26 PM
2

Calling feminist legislation archaic, love it
/r/MensRights04/07/20 01:57 PM
7

These are the things I want in a man, therefore men want these things in other men. And this is what I have to offer men in return, therefore this is what men want from women. -whoever wrote that garbage.
/r/MensRights04/07/20 10:01 AM
6

It wouldn't have happened
/r/MensRights01/07/20 01:29 PM
41

Well no because they say it doesn't matter, women attempt it more.
/r/MensRights30/06/20 11:25 AM
19

Well not anymore
/r/MensRights29/06/20 09:24 PM
12

Can't wait for the articles to make it somehow about white men controlling women's bodies or whatever
/r/MensRights21/06/20 10:28 PM
26

What are you doing filtering by totals and not % of the population?
/r/MensRights12/06/20 07:38 AM
6

Can someone do a summary of that book, post it here and someone else summarize the comment?
/r/MensRights04/06/20 11:31 PM
5

Comments there are spicy
/r/MensRights04/06/20 08:29 AM
5

Well it's been policy for years that no men are allowed in women's centers as victims or employees. I'm surprised they didn't immediately apply it to reporting stations, but...you could easily solve the issue by asking for a woman at the desk if you call 5 minutes ahead. It's not that hard, as long as there's 1 woman on each shift.
/r/MensRights04/06/20 07:33 AM
23

Because they're well aware no one likes a pedo and it's infinite ammo to demonize men.
/r/MensRights30/05/20 03:03 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter