| Upvotes | Title | Category | Author | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 104 | Thought this belonged here | ABitterSatireHeWrote | /r/MGTOW | 30/05/19 07:50 PM | |
| 25 | [Citation request] Head of Canadian feminist domestic violence shelter network refuses debate on male victims because it would lend credence "to the idea that they exist" | Anti-MRM | ABitterSatireHeWrote | /r/MensRights | 26/06/19 12:02 AM |
| 11 | Male proletarianization, the disintegration of the family, and the roles of traditionalist and feminist ideology in attempts to recapture and neutralize the male sex. [From a work in progress] | Social Issues | ABitterSatireHeWrote | /r/MensRights | 15/06/19 09:15 PM |
| Upvotes | Comment on | Subreddit | Date (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Any fellow Stirnites/Egoists on this sub?For sure! :) | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 26/11/20 11:16 PM |
| 1 | Any fellow Stirnites/Egoists on this sub?To say the politiburo specifically owned the means of production makes as much sense as saying Stalin personally did or Gosplan. The state did. Either way, if the state (or some section of it) privately owned the means of production (meaning only a section of society has exclusive ownership), then that leaves the laboring population dispossessed of their means to life and thus forced to work (the state mandating work at that point is simply redundant in that sense). There is thus a working class… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 24/10/20 01:54 AM |
| 1 | Any fellow Stirnites/Egoists on this sub?Leftcom/ultra here. Interested in what you think the problems are. Perhaps I can clarify some stuff? Also I really liked The Right To Be Greedy. But more simply as a description of how we might think in communism, and some parts of how I see things now, but not as a real current revolutionary perspective. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 16/10/20 08:39 AM |
| 2 | Judges are being told to discriminate against menOld news fam | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 02/04/20 11:06 PM |
| 3 | QUESTION FOR TRANS-MEN & TRANS-WOMEN: What have been your experiences pre- and post-transition as both AMAB/AFAB and men/women?Fucking, that sucks m8. What a piece of shit | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 02/04/20 02:13 AM |
| 5 | Malaysia tells its women to not nag their spouses during the COVID-19 epidemic.Legitimately gross tbh | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 02/04/20 02:03 AM |
| 3 | What’s your opinion about hazing deaths ?A few months ago a fascinating evo-psych paper came out discussing hazing as an evolved mechanism to prevent free-riding. We report the first cross-cultural and cross-organizational evidence for an evolved hazing motivation. Using experiments performed in the United States, Japan, and among members of a hazing and a nonhazing organization, we demonstrate an invariant set of core hazing predictors. In particular, we show that the perception of near-term group benefits, which would have been ances… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 28/03/20 06:31 AM |
| 1 | What of left winger are youNot really. Fourier really put it on the map. But Engels theorized and laid out its development in "The Origin of the Family, Private Property and the State". Most of which remains correct to a great extent. Not to the same extent everywhere and throughout all time, but overall, yes. However, female power still remains largely not understood, with some really interesting details in peasant societies. My thesis is simply that what was described finished development in the 19th century and transfo… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 26/03/20 04:48 AM |
| 1 | What of left winger are youI'm not a leftist/left-winger (read: more or less some version of social democrat). I'd for the most part fall into the "ultra-left" umbrella, am a Marxist. Economics: The abolition of value and the division of labor and the re-establishment of the material human community. Production put under the control of the entirety of humanity, the development of a common plan, and the end of production as a separate category of life. The over-arching principle would be "from each according to their abili… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 25/03/20 08:58 PM |
| 1 | 'Bourgeois' liberal feminism and the libertarian masculinism of the MRAs are like Batman and Joker, caught in an eternal struggle which will bring us all down if we're not carefulAbsolutely nothing...well except to deplatform, doxx and crush \ Yep *sighs* I agree, it's a chimera which mutates. We can no longer control it. Fascism is always popular since it promises the illusion that we CAN take back control, lol We never really did (control it). The nature of capital is one that is self-perpetuating/expanding. Once "value" (abstract, socially necessary, human labor) became "capital" (the *self*-expansion of value), and capital became a socially relevant force, then the d… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 17/03/20 11:22 PM |
| 1 | 'Bourgeois' liberal feminism and the libertarian masculinism of the MRAs are like Batman and Joker, caught in an eternal struggle which will bring us all down if we're not carefulGoddamn we agree again...this is rather depressing Sorry about that… Not the most optimistic view The left cannot in my experience listen to a description of a situation which has even the potential to be 'resolved' by reactionary backlash. If we’re being so flexible/generous with the words “potential” and “resolved” that we break their meanings altogether, then sure, haha. But yeah, I get your point. I think this is why they try and suppress speech on such maters esp. And suppress they do. We h… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 17/03/20 11:03 PM |
| 1 | 'Bourgeois' liberal feminism and the libertarian masculinism of the MRAs are like Batman and Joker, caught in an eternal struggle which will bring us all down if we're not carefulNot exactly. I’m not a fan of the “privilege” phraseology, but that first part is kind of true. Female sexuality has been more alienated, but has been – finally – brought back under their ownership. This does give them an edge, is the material basis for their increased power relative to men. This does NOT make them “bourgeois”. If you want to draw a comparison, the closest is probably land ownership. They are not accumulating capital through it (there is no M-C-M’, no expanded reproduction). And… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 17/03/20 11:00 PM |
| 1 | 'Bourgeois' liberal feminism and the libertarian masculinism of the MRAs are like Batman and Joker, caught in an eternal struggle which will bring us all down if we're not carefulYeah man. I hear you. I've listened to some FAR right MRAs, understand where the reactionaries are coming from, essentially alienation and a distrust that socialist revolution will ever bring them the happiness they seek. I wouldn’t call it “happiness” per se, but control and some promise of material security. And leftists don’t give them any reason to trust it, those who truly believe they can appeal to someone’s self-interest in any convincing way don’t use moral bludgeons. In many ways, this … | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 17/03/20 10:57 PM |
| 1 | 'Bourgeois' liberal feminism and the libertarian masculinism of the MRAs are like Batman and Joker, caught in an eternal struggle which will bring us all down if we're not carefulTo me those three things are essentially synonymous. It’s just a range from the center- to far-left of capital. Social Democracy, or “Social Democracy at the barrel of a gun”. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 17/03/20 10:54 PM |
| 1 | 'Bourgeois' liberal feminism and the libertarian masculinism of the MRAs are like Batman and Joker, caught in an eternal struggle which will bring us all down if we're not carefulThis is all a really good analysis. There's a lot we agree on and I understand these arguments/the rationale of the 'bootlickers'. Thanks! And sorry if my following responses are poorly written. I’m running off like one night worth of sleep for the third or fourth day. Just figured this responses was late enough as it was. Perhaps it's ultimately nothing more than moral philosophy which decides whether we choose left or right. I think the science is pretty clear certain personality traits natura… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 17/03/20 10:54 PM |
| 1 | 'Bourgeois' liberal feminism and the libertarian masculinism of the MRAs are like Batman and Joker, caught in an eternal struggle which will bring us all down if we're not carefulYou're right, lol. Sorry about that! Brainfart. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 17/03/20 08:06 PM |
| 12 | The role that feminism plays in driving boys and young men towards the alt-right... and how to bring them back.ContraPoints couldn't understand "reaction" if her life depended on it. She does the opposite of "engage". She puts on a superficial facade of giving two shits about the other side, but it's obvious she doesn't mean it or draw any theoretical lessons/conclusions from it. Her "understanding" that reaction comes from "problems" people face is that of a bourgeois academic/sociologist and that's where it stops; it's totally intellectual, and has no emotional underpinning or proletarian class basis. … | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 13/03/20 08:51 PM |
| 2 | 'Bourgeois' liberal feminism and the libertarian masculinism of the MRAs are like Batman and Joker, caught in an eternal struggle which will bring us all down if we're not carefulI'm too depressed :/ I've posted my thoughts in r/mensrights before and intended to write like a pamphlet explaining all this shit for like half a year. Then when ContraPoints "cancel culture" video came out I wanted to make a YouTube video critiquing that (I'm sure you can see where I would be coming from given her videos completely dismissing right-winger's complaints about leftist's disdain for "freedom of speech"). However much I sympathize with her, she really drew no lessons from her exper… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 09/03/20 08:09 AM |
| 1 | 'Bourgeois' liberal feminism and the libertarian masculinism of the MRAs are like Batman and Joker, caught in an eternal struggle which will bring us all down if we're not carefulDoes the obsession with the generalised shittiness and entitlement of middle class women identifying as progressive, liberal, feminist cause the assumption that we need to do away with progressivism to resolve it? Or is it the innately authoritarian tendencies and/or, well...dogmatically liberal (capitalist/meritocractic) way of looking at the world that they brought to the movement, the reason why their solution to progressive women, feminism, misandry is reactionary and 'negative equality' bas… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 09/03/20 01:17 AM |
| 1 | 'Bourgeois' liberal feminism and the libertarian masculinism of the MRAs are like Batman and Joker, caught in an eternal struggle which will bring us all down if we're not carefulI haven't quite figured out what it is: Does the MRM attract right wing men because critique of feminism/gynocentrism is forbidden on the left? Or is the MRM actually making men more right wing? To what extent is feminism itself responsible for reactionary politics? That’s certainly part of it. But that phenomenon is most certainly not limited to men’s issues. The function of the left of capital / leftism is the prevention of radical activity and consciousness by the proletariat against capital … | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 09/03/20 01:16 AM |
| 2 | 'Bourgeois' liberal feminism and the libertarian masculinism of the MRAs are like Batman and Joker, caught in an eternal struggle which will bring us all down if we're not carefulThe, for example, lack of interest in the violation of male sexuality can only be understood in this context. From female pedophilic predation on boys to how gay men complain how women feel entitled to simply grab their genitalia (or use some of the mental components of their sexuality as tools for their [the women’s] beautification [intra-sexual competition, before even as a means to attract a mate]). And how does feminist theory respond? Is it an example of female power or a superior position?… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 09/03/20 01:15 AM |
| 1 | 'Bourgeois' liberal feminism and the libertarian masculinism of the MRAs are like Batman and Joker, caught in an eternal struggle which will bring us all down if we're not carefulMore than that, there is a certain humanity – entirely missing in our oppression by capital – we, mostly viscerally, see in past oppressive systems. The “First Reich” was the Holy Roman Empire, and the Holy Roman Empire (remember what Voltaire commented on the name) thought of itself as Roman for a reason. This is the crux which the vast majority of the left will never understand about “reactionaries”. The slave is less free, but more human, than the worker. The serf is near-godly in comparison.… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 09/03/20 01:14 AM |
| 3 | 'Bourgeois' liberal feminism and the libertarian masculinism of the MRAs are like Batman and Joker, caught in an eternal struggle which will bring us all down if we're not carefulLong, thoughtful post, deserves long thoughtful response. Below is the results of my own attempts I’ve had over the past couple years since I’ve been “red-pilled” to synthesize various viewpoints with my unabashedly Marxist (in the ultra-left umbrella) perspective and address what you brought up here. You seem to be a social-democrat, so fair warning, this very much will not align with your politics. And this touches on so many topics, that quite a bit of background explanation is going to need … | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 09/03/20 01:11 AM |
| 1 | 'Bourgeois' liberal feminism and the libertarian masculinism of the MRAs are like Batman and Joker, caught in an eternal struggle which will bring us all down if we're not carefulI'm working on an answer to this, but it's long, I'll probably have it finished by tomorrow, sorry! | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 08/03/20 09:33 AM |
| 1 | The narrative of universal historical female oppression is quite insulting to menThere are and have been societies where women are oppressed (not necessarily synonymous with "patriarchies"). I do not believe that the advanced capitalist countries can be included in that category. The error in the analysis you presented here though regarding past and present is (mostly) two-fold: Less oppressed = better life 1a) Assuming that those higher up in the food-chain / those with more power / etc. have a better/longer/healthier/happier life. If I were to pick at random who I would be… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 15/02/20 09:38 AM |
| 5 | How should we make sure that we don't take on an irrational victim complex?Distinguish between: a) Direct social relations underneath gendered phenomena, their most immediate manifestations, and the coercive structures that reproduce them. b) The general social attitudes and actions which are consequences of it and may serve supplementary roles in the reproduction of the above but are not themselves essential. c) Phenomena you can't put into either of the above, probably means that it is unrelated. Anytime you evaluate how big a deal to make of something, first ask you… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 15/02/20 08:46 AM |
| 2 | How should we make sure that we don't take on an irrational victim complex?niggardly adopting the other sides views and vocabulary So I assume you got this by debating with racists? Lol, nice meme. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 15/02/20 08:31 AM |
| 3 | New Article By Cathy Young: Johnny Depp and the Other Side of Domestic ViolenceYou can look it up by name using Sci-Hub. Isn't that just for academic papers and science journals (I use it for evo-psych and quantum mechanics stuff all the time). Tried what you said, got nothing. Signed up for the account (not the subscription though), and got mostly stuff like: From a policy standpoint, the emphasis should be on battered women, because women suffer by far the most injuries, So, basically what I expected. Are you really going to fixate on and discuss only the single remotely… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 12/02/20 05:05 AM |
| 4 | New Article By Cathy Young: Johnny Depp and the Other Side of Domestic ViolenceAre there reasons, overall, to treat male violence toward women as a more serious matter than female violence toward men? Of course (as Straus, the pioneer in research on partner violence by both sexes, repeatedly stressed) . Which are? Got paywalled trying to read the article linked in the quote. Or is this just the necessary women worsting and pandering to female victimhood necessary if she wants any of her plea to be heard at all? Does she actually believe it / is she just gynocentric (she do… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 12/02/20 02:00 AM |
| 1 | The Johnny Depp case is giving men a rare opportunity to talk about their experiences and actually be taken seriouslyHoly shit. Well, uh, I guess you're just going all in, showing your cards right off the bat. So, I was gonna ask if you hate poor people or just the black ones? But then I saw some of your post history. You didnt really post responses or even coherent arguments/responses to what I said, just hateful screeches. So 1) Are you just trolling? 2) If not, what, exactly is your line of reasoning as a "tankie" who defends the police in what every tankie in the world would agree is a capitalist country (… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 10/02/20 09:38 AM |
| 1 | The Johnny Depp case is giving men a rare opportunity to talk about their experiences and actually be taken seriouslyKay, you're a communist. Cool? It means I’m for the abolition of property and for the organization of life to be taken into the control of individuals themselves, by the violent overthrow of capitalism and the bourgeois state by the working class. That still doesn't give anyone the right to destroy things that innocent people worked to create I disagree that property is created by the free actions of “innocent people”. Commodities are overwhelmingly created in the capitalist production process w… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 06/02/20 02:23 AM |
| 0 | The Johnny Depp case is giving men a rare opportunity to talk about their experiences and actually be taken seriouslyCan you point me to the evidence that Brown had a knife and initiated the encounter by threatening the officer's life? And how it was "well known"? I'm only seeing a knife in a shooting that came after and the best case for "self-defense" being that Brown charged the officer after being assaulted by him. And before any bullshit accusations I'm not requiring it be left-wing media. Also, literally no one claimed the term was neutral before this one incident and became racially charged because its … | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 05/02/20 03:46 PM |
| 2 | The Johnny Depp case is giving men a rare opportunity to talk about their experiences and actually be taken seriously"Can't" is a strong word. Perhaps they will miss the opportunity, but they have a basically unparalleled spin machine. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 05/02/20 03:34 PM |
| 1 | The Johnny Depp case is giving men a rare opportunity to talk about their experiences and actually be taken seriouslyHey, just a thought, maybe address the sentence literally directly after the one you quoted. I'm a pretty strong defender of free speech. Although not out of a fetishization of freedom nor simply as a mere tactic until "my side is in charge". I'm not saying he shouldn't have been allowed to say it, nor that he should be assaulted for doing so. Although when it comes to someone as high in the food chain as Obama they aren't exactly my biggest concern. All I'm doing is analyzing and criticizing it… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 05/02/20 12:06 PM |
| 1 | The Johnny Depp case is giving men a rare opportunity to talk about their experiences and actually be taken seriouslyI was talking about the party apparatus/functionaries/politicians/donor/etc. Not the voters per se. I'm anti-idpol and all attempts at fractuting the working class. And my criticism of proletarians who are racist is not a moralistic one, but one of attempting to demonstrate to them why unification and liberation is what's truly in their interests and the only path towards true control over their lives and avoiding pauperization, complete loss of control, the ravages of war, and the eventual comp… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 05/02/20 12:03 PM |
| 2 | The Johnny Depp case is giving men a rare opportunity to talk about their experiences and actually be taken seriously"Thugs" is an extremely racially-charged term. It isn't necessarily always. But in that context it was pretty clear that was how it was meant, to pander to racism. And "WTH?" They're "thugs" because they destroyed THINGS in response to one of the democratic state's most repressive arms KILLING a HUMAN BEING?! And, IIRC, "armed" with the gun that killed him, and that the police officer who shot him put into the evidence bag - later received as an unsealed envelope - on his own? And a witness who … | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 05/02/20 11:24 AM |
| 0 | The Johnny Depp case is giving men a rare opportunity to talk about their experiences and actually be taken seriouslyHow is it racist in the slightest? I didn't imply he was "affirmative actioned" into the presidency, he was a perfectly competent figurehead of the bourgeois state. More competent than many, probably most. Nor am I implying he began his presdency with malintent. Or that most people voted for him simply because he was black. Many did in spite of it who would've preferred a white version of him. Where is the racism in my statement? You're putting a lot of weight into that "only" that you used that… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 05/02/20 11:08 AM |
| 4 | The Johnny Depp case is giving men a rare opportunity to talk about their experiences and actually be taken seriouslySure. Just don't get your hopes up. Nobody cares. Most women certainly don't, and men who's future relationships are or they believe to be conditional on them also not giving a shit, and want relationships, also won't give a shit or will at least try and fake they don't. After a few days they will stop "faking" and also not give a shit. If they are abuse victims themselves, they will almost certainly shut the fuck up and not impinge on this arrangement with women and other men. Nobody will give … | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 05/02/20 03:57 AM |
| 7 | The Johnny Depp case is giving men a rare opportunity to talk about their experiences and actually be taken seriouslyNever underestimate opportunism and selective short memory | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 05/02/20 03:39 AM |
| 3 | The Johnny Depp case is giving men a rare opportunity to talk about their experiences and actually be taken seriouslyRemember when obama called black kids in Ferguson "thugs"? That's not racially-charged. Not at all. Or Stop-and-Frisk. Or dumping all the remaining money in the inner cities after they cut vast swathes of the welfare system into the police departments? Etc., etc., Not that the police are being treated well either. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 04/02/20 11:51 PM |
| 7 | The Johnny Depp case is giving men a rare opportunity to talk about their experiences and actually be taken seriouslyOr when Democrats do it. Like that whole Obama thing | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 04/02/20 11:44 PM |
| 22 | The Johnny Depp case is giving men a rare opportunity to talk about their experiences and actually be taken seriouslyNo it isn't. It's a chance for Feminists to say "look we actually have men's best interests in mind too" and then shut everything up. #CheckYourOpportunism | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 04/02/20 11:11 PM |
| 2 | A great illustration of why this sub is needed. Even self-identified lefties on allegedly leftist subs deny the harm of indefensible legal doctrines.Ah gotcha | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 04/02/20 02:04 AM |
| 2 | A great illustration of why this sub is needed. Even self-identified lefties on allegedly leftist subs deny the harm of indefensible legal doctrines.I might literally have never seen so much idealism in one post. material relations and state policies to reproduce them and the ideologies associated with it are irrelevant because look over here at the least putrid parts of some descendant ideology. Nevermind, "idealism" is too generous. At least idealism makes some sort of logical connection. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 03/02/20 02:25 AM |
| 1 | Why is it men killing themselves in greater numbers is proof of toxic masculinity but women....No it isn't. It's phrased in a way I wouldn't prefer, but the spirit of it isn't wrong. Men use more violent methods because they actually intend to die. I was talking about this with a therapist who identifies as a feminist, the topic came up and all I got out was the difference in methods before she outright said "because they intend to actually kill themselves". One could even argue "from a feminist perspective" that this supports the idea of "himpathy" and that women have to threaten suicide… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 03/02/20 02:12 AM |
| 1 | Is prostitution sex work or exploitation?You say that as if work and exploitation are mutually exclusive rather than work being the dominant form of exploitation in capitalism. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 03/02/20 01:59 AM |
| 1 | How much income and wealth inequality would you accept in your version of the best possible society?wages post-capitalist The best emetic is always leftism -_- Wage labor is literally what defines capitalism. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 03/02/20 01:54 AM |
| 16 | A great illustration of why this sub is needed. Even self-identified lefties on allegedly leftist subs deny the harm of indefensible legal doctrines.I don’t think any men have been sent to jail unjustly because of the Duluth Model ? Like in any way? Or do you mean solely because of the Duluth model? I'd argue that the Duluth model was the theoretical expression of the relations which entail men who were abused going to jail. So if you are saying that it isn't the root of the issue that's fine, but if you're saying it hasn't played a role in the arrest of men who were abused that's retarded. | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 02/02/20 10:00 PM |
| 1 | It turns out that at least for Alcoa Aluminum, reducing worker accidents actually results in employee engagement and more value for stockholders."Should belong to the labourer"? Marxist theory is very clear that according to the rules of capitalism, surplus value rightfully belongs to the capitalist (in this day and age, usually the company or state). You sell your ability to work in general. The capitalist owns the results of the labor performed. It's exploitation, but a "should" doesn't really mean anything. Even more so because of the way surplus value is distributed through the market, it's not specifically the surplus labor of their… | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 02/02/20 09:46 PM |
| 2 | It turns out that at least for Alcoa Aluminum, reducing worker accidents actually results in employee engagement and more value for stockholders.Help capitalism to more efficiently exploit the working class Kill me | /r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates | 28/01/20 11:05 AM |
| 1 | [Citation request] Head of Canadian feminist domestic violence shelter network refuses debate on male victims because it would lend credence "to the idea that they exist"I think we're all better when we have time to formulate what we want to say. Yeah, I'd agree to that. And for those of us who have "processing speed" related disorders, the difference is particularly marked. I have moments when I look in the mirror the next day and come up with the perfect comeback. For instance, in the Wolf example, what I should have said was, "You're a best selling author who was married to a Clinton speech writer. I'm a waitress. Perhaps we'll have to agree to disagree on th… | /r/MensRights | 27/06/19 10:59 PM |
| 1 | [Citation request] Head of Canadian feminist domestic violence shelter network refuses debate on male victims because it would lend credence "to the idea that they exist"Oh, OK. Thanks so much for responding! I, for personal purposes at least (if not rhetorical ones), accept it; from what my quick browsing on the topic has informed me about Reimer's character, her saying the line in question is totally believable. I was just wondering if there was a source I could point people towards, like something Silverman wrote somewhere (the original comment of yours which and the one [also yours] which spawned the "You the random person on the internet are the true femini… | /r/MensRights | 26/06/19 11:34 PM |
| 2 | Marxists and MRA'sOh... Well, that's not a response one gets particularly often, I assumed from the "bow" that it meant you were being sarcastic, lol. RIP me. well, sorry then. My apologies! | /r/MensRights | 26/06/19 05:14 AM |
| 2 | Marxists and MRA'sDo you have an argument against the reasoning I gave, or some way you think it doesn't hold up? The usual (and rather grossly overused) charge of a "No True Scotsman" fallacy I don't think can be applied here at all. Neither can the "you just think everything would've worked out if you were in charge". If you've seen any of my other posts, you're probably aware that I'm not exactly typical for the "Marxist" traditions. But the comparison between Marxism and feminism given doesn't really apply ev… | /r/MensRights | 26/06/19 04:38 AM |
| 5 | [Citation request] Head of Canadian feminist domestic violence shelter network refuses debate on male victims because it would lend credence "to the idea that they exist"Yeah, I saw that one before but somehow didn't pick up the implication that he personally told her. Thanks for pointing that out! | /r/MensRights | 26/06/19 01:05 AM |
| 4 | [Citation request] Head of Canadian feminist domestic violence shelter network refuses debate on male victims because it would lend credence "to the idea that they exist"Ditto and agreed that she's terrible | /r/MensRights | 26/06/19 12:57 AM |
| 3 | [Citation request] Head of Canadian feminist domestic violence shelter network refuses debate on male victims because it would lend credence "to the idea that they exist"Thanks! So that's where it's from! I'm still having trouble finding a source though, neither Google nor Bing is being of much help. She doesn't give one in the comment that was in. You have any ideas? Edit: The friend she speaks of was Earl Silverman, who is apparently the source, but I can't find where he stated that the producers told him this after Jan Reimer refused to go on. | /r/MensRights | 26/06/19 12:21 AM |
| 7 | Men's fertility irreversibly damaged by age of 18 thanks to Western junk food diet, study finds - A groundbreaking investigation has established that teenagers who favour high-fat and processed foods like pizzas, chips and snacks are killing off sperm-producing cells that can never be replaced.Pizza > Vasalgel > Nachos > Vasectomy Fight me | /r/MensRights | 26/06/19 12:08 AM |
| 10 | Sponsor dumps streamer after she insults and discriminates against the entire male gender. If only justice were this unbiased in the north.They targeted gamers Lol | /r/PussyPassDenied | 25/06/19 06:46 AM |
| 0 | Socialist Mens rights people, is there a socialist community online that isn't totally co-opted by feminism?If by "socialism", you mean "wealth redistribution" (and by "socialist" those for it), and/or the state or workers owning the means of production in and of itself, or any other superficial changes to capitalism, initiated by peaceful reform or otherwise, then no, not particularly, at least not any with any significance or size. And that is perfectly appropriate to the role of the left in locking down, dividing, and immobilizing the working class, especially during capitalist crisis. | /r/MensRights | 25/06/19 05:39 AM |
| 2 | Marxists and MRA'sTheir use as "workhorses and disposable producers" is precisely some of the most important secondary features of the proletariat (the primary being what centrally defines it - the lack of property and thus being forced to work for a wage). Men, at least in the advanced capitalist countries (and the distinction is maximally wide, at any given point in time, in urban metropolises), are more proletarianized, and they are seen and treated accordingly. This, of course, will take advantage of capaciti… | /r/MensRights | 25/06/19 05:28 AM |
| 0 | Marxists and MRA'sThis line is regurgitated by MRA's all the time. It doesn't make any sense. It is, to an extent, accurate in terms of what they tried to do in some cases. But this, insofar as it gained any mainstream feminist acceptance, was only really around 2nd wave and later. But the line also exposes a rather complete ignorance of Marxism by the utterer, as it implies that the attempt to do so is in any way coherent or meaningful, or even accomplishment, that the relation between proletariat and bourgeoisi… | /r/MensRights | 25/06/19 03:57 AM |
| 1 | Male proletarianization, the disintegration of the family, and the roles of traditionalist and feminist ideology in attempts to recapture and neutralize the male sex. [From a work in progress]Gender roles have both biological and cultural components No. They have are set upon biological (sex) differences, but the "roles" are socially determined, founded upon and informed by those biological differences. Sex is a biological reality, but gender is socially created (albeit not a "social construct" in the sense used today, meaning an ideological construct). The cultural "component" derives from their social definition and is shaped by our biological reaction to the already-existing socia… | /r/MensRights | 16/06/19 02:19 AM |
| 1 | Male proletarianization, the disintegration of the family, and the roles of traditionalist and feminist ideology in attempts to recapture and neutralize the male sex. [From a work in progress]You should probably establish that either of these things are true By "relative preponderance" I didn't mean to say that the majority of the MRM is right-libertarian, but that a much higher percentage than the average population. I probably could've phrased that better. Just So story explaining them In the larger work I'm also using evolutionary psychology (unless you're going to make the same criticism of that). It'll have tons of statistics and be making, and Marxism isn't "just so stories", i… | /r/MensRights | 15/06/19 11:55 PM |
| 2 | Partner wealth predicts self-reported orgasm frequency in a sample of Chinese women (Pollet & Nettle, 2009)http://www.sciencedirect.com.secure.sci-hub.tw/science/article/pii/S1090513809000646?via%3Dihub "Correction to Pollet and Nettle (2009): 'Partner wealth predicts self-reported orgasm frequency in a sample of Chinese women'" As they show, the effect of partner income is no longer significant once the control variables have been accounted for. We therefore wish to correct the conclusions of our article. The association in the CHFLS data between partner wealth and self-reported orgasm frequency is … | /r/BlackPillScience | 10/06/19 11:28 PM |
| 1 | Revisiting the Central Park Five case in the #MeToo eraWSWS and the affiliates of the IFCI are consistently some of the least obnoxious leftists when it comes to gender issues. To even state that the presumption of innocence should be a thing in accusations of sex crimes, or even more, admitting that it is in fact being violated and that is a bad thing, is really swimming against the current to say the least, and takes some actual courage. It must be stated, though, that on their part a substantial amount of the concern emanates from a fetish of dem… | /r/MensRights | 09/06/19 05:42 PM |
| 1 | In what exact way is FGM supposed to be "far worse" than MGM?oh to clarify, this was comparing, with the exception of the first list of [relatively] minor modifications, each side taken as a whole/combined, and with no implication of frequency, unless otherwise specified so it was, for example: Complete removal of the exposed clitoris + labia + infibulation Sorry, should've been more clear (Did you include subincision when you wrote "circumcision"?) I did, on accident. I just fixed it, thanks for pointing that out Third, Subincision is easily worse than a… | /r/MensRights | 07/06/19 08:30 PM |
| 1 | In what exact way is FGM supposed to be "far worse" than MGM?From memory: Piercings, scrapes, pricks, tattoos, etc. on any part of the exposed female genitalia = similar procedures on male genitals (probably moderately worse on female genitals because this typically targets the clitoris where the nerves are very densely distributed, comparable to the frenulum, but that isn't a common location for [involuntary or culturally pressured] modifications besides complete removal) Complete removal of clitoral hood = not as bad as complete removal of male foreskin… | /r/MensRights | 07/06/19 08:23 PM |
| 6 | #MeToo Has Shaken Up Men’s Rights Activism in India, and The Result is #MenTooIt was 53%, and it's a bit more complicated than that: https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-38796457 From what I gathered skimming the article, it's like the 8% number used here, but just the inverse. The 53% is just cases that were dropped. That doesn't anywhere near prove that they were in fact false. Just like 8% of cases being proven false doesn't anywhere near show that all the rest were true. The evidence from the Commission for Women is in fact far from conclusive. It classes as "false" all … | /r/MensRights | 07/06/19 01:01 PM |
| 1 | A list of men's many responsibilities during the act of sextl;dr: It's time to give up the means of reproduction /s? | /r/MensRights | 07/06/19 11:49 AM |
| 3 | How the War on Drugs Kept Black Men Out of CollegeThis really needs more upvotes :/ Like, really bad. 88% upvoted? That's fucked. | /r/MensRights | 07/06/19 04:58 AM |
| 1 | How the War on Drugs Kept Black Men Out of CollegeI think he's referring to you assuming that it is wholly their fault that, for example, they "formed the lowest socioeconomic tier in their community". Blacks habitually inhabited right next to other races Geographical proximity doesn't necessarily mean that the circumstances are the same, that they are treated the same, have the same opportunities, etc. habitually inhabited choosing...is a choice There's a g[iTch in the matrix | /r/MensRights | 07/06/19 04:54 AM |
| 9 | USAID - Even more pushing for en masse MGMFucking sickening | /r/MensRights | 07/06/19 04:40 AM |
| 1 | How the War on Drugs Kept Black Men Out of Collegechoosing to break the law is a personal choice choosing...is a choice Nice meme. is a choice, not a result of social forces Those are not mutually exclusive. To demonstrate the false dichotomy here, let's look at one of the go-to MRA examples to show the position fathers who are trying to protect their kids and themselves from an abusive mother are in: You can stay and continue to subject yourself and your kids to the abuse. You can leave, in which case you, in the eyes of the law, will have imm… | /r/MensRights | 07/06/19 04:31 AM |
| 2 | She said what?Haven't read the article, but I'm 99% sure they're talking about HPV, not rim jobs -__- Anyone remember how it took a fucking decade for the UK's NHS to start giving the vaccine to boys, instead of only girls? And the exploding rates of throat cancer in young men (from getting infected by HPV when performing cunnilingus [throat cancer usually only affects older men]). Cervical cancer does not affect boys and men because they do not have a cervix. But other cancers that can affect men, such as … | /r/MGTOW | 07/06/19 03:06 AM |
| 1 | Jordan Peterson / Richard Wolf debate MarxismRichard "Workers' Self-Directed Enterprises" Wolff Marxism Pick one | /r/MensRights | 05/06/19 09:10 AM |
| 2 | Dodgeball isn't just problematic, it's an unethical tool of 'oppression': ‘researchers’(crosspost from my comment on this in r/MGTOW) resident soft boi here: This is fucking stupid Also, resident revolutionary communist: Capture the Flag is nakedly militaristic Is the dumbest thing ever written by a human | /r/MensRights | 05/06/19 02:54 AM |
| 1 | A Feminist Calls for 'gestational communism' and the 'elimination of the family'Our psychological functions and faculties are determined by hundreds of thousands of years of evolution The nuclear family is natural and the best environment for raising children Pick one | /r/MensRights | 05/06/19 02:51 AM |
| 6 | The fact that men's rights movement is debunked by the mainstream media and is protested against by feminists proves that men are being oppressed today.men's rights movement is debunked by the mainstream media debunked I don't think that word means what you think it means | /r/MensRights | 05/06/19 02:48 AM |
| 1 | Those darn numbers and stuff. It’s almost like this was planned......this is truer than the general case, but the meaning of"influence" becomes pretty murky at that point. it is unlikely that there are 0 male teachers at the school, so, while it may be very little "influence" it is more than the 0% required for a 100% female influence. in fact, from the stat in the OP, we don't know the distribution of male vs female teachers across different grades. But, in general, its true it wont be very much. Actually. IIRC, there is a higher percentage of male teachers in h… | /r/MGTOW | 04/06/19 07:57 AM |
| 1 | Dodgeball isn’t just problematic, it’s an unethical tool of ‘oppression’: researchersresident soft boi here: This is fucking stupid Also, resident revolutionary communist: Capture the Flag is nakedly militaristic Is the dumbest thing ever written by a human | /r/MGTOW | 04/06/19 06:42 AM |
| 4 | Those darn numbers and stuff. It’s almost like this was planned......~80% of teachers are female so an 8 out of 10 chance of 100% feminine influence at school That's perhaps the most badly hidden attempt to deceptively reword/spin something to make it sound worse I've ever seen. Or, "best"-case scenario: the author's fucking stupid and doesn't understand the difference. This is "60% of the time, it works every time" but even dumber | /r/MGTOW | 04/06/19 12:59 AM |
| 1 | The death of a woman and the wholesale hatred of menthis should be mandatory reading for anyone interested in gender issues | /r/MensRights | 03/06/19 10:34 PM |
| 0 | Refreshing honesty as women openly admit they would not help a man in medical distress- woule be outrage if men said this about women.Dude. Their name is "non-troll_account" Pause think about it really hard | /r/MensRights | 03/06/19 08:21 PM |
| 26 | Feminist needs you all right now.It isn't a "great" personality trait to be "loyal" when there is no benefit being offered to him, only pain and suffering, and yet he has been brainwashed and had the idea instilled into him that he must stay anyway. I think you should really ask yourself how you and the surrounding culture have raised and continue to influence him in such a way that would lead to him being unable to leave and be "disloyal" even in such a situation. If people are being rude to you, that's only because there is n… | /r/MensRights | 02/06/19 04:16 AM |
| 1 | Why some corporations are so left leaningWasn't that "women control 80% of domestic spending" stat debunked? https://blogs.wsj.com/numbers/do-women-really-control-80-of-household-spending-1054/ | /r/MGTOW | 30/05/19 07:28 PM |
| 2 | The heartbreaking story of a guy whose daughter's mother and the sexist court made him a "slave" | Sexism against men at the highest levelThis is pure, abject, inarguable proletarianization and transfer of labor from one class to another. "Socialists" covering their eyes and plugging their ears on this issue and ones like it really says a lot about the nature of the left and the class contradictions behind it. "In all revolutions up till now the mode of activity always remained unscathed and it was only a question of a different distribution of this activity, a new distribution of labour to other persons, whilst the communist re… | /r/MensRights | 30/05/19 06:40 PM |
| 1 | New findings offer a neurobiological explanation for the difficulties some teenage girls have in controlling their emotions. Teen girls with problematic social behavior display reduced brain activity and weaker connectivity between the brain regions implicated in emotion regulation, research finds.Ah, that clears things up | /r/MGTOW | 30/05/19 05:55 PM |
| 1 | Feels odd but good to hearThey'll hide all their sufferings and pain not letting their loved ones know. That's a bad thing. Men bottling up their pain and trauma and not telling anyone, causing trauma and damage to themselves on behalf of others, as dictated by their gender role, is not something to be celebrated. The circumstances around it are to be abolished, and the obligation, men are to be released from. Imagine some white bitch saying that "Not all Hispanics are trash and we should take some time out to appreciate… | /r/MensRights | 30/05/19 06:38 AM |
| 2 | Feminism lies. Statistics don'tAdding on top of what everyone else has already said: Bourgeois science, academics, and media of course portrays "paid work" with a briefcase, as if everyone is the imaginary all-expansive middle-class white-collar 50's office worker. Look at those graphs and then replace the briefcase icon with a shovel, a pickax, a chainsaw, a hardhat, a drill, a garbage truck, a wrench, a blowtorch, etc. Even more the "housework" that men in a relationship do are usually the things that are a bit harder than … | /r/MGTOW | 30/05/19 04:28 AM |
| 1 | New findings offer a neurobiological explanation for the difficulties some teenage girls have in controlling their emotions. Teen girls with problematic social behavior display reduced brain activity and weaker connectivity between the brain regions implicated in emotion regulation, research finds.drawing out their nature This is the same argument as when someone is drunk that you are actually getting a truer look at who they are. That this "true" nature is usually locked inside, is now being expressed uninhibited. It's a chapter out of the feminist handbook (well, at least by particularly inept ones), treating someone who is an "angry" drunk as evidence that men are actually "aggressive" and "mean", but that it gets covered up. It makes no fucking sense. If evolutionary psychology and co… | /r/MGTOW | 30/05/19 04:13 AM |
| 0 | WHY???high-end school with families who teach their kids right and wrong Subtle Get fucked | /r/MensRights | 30/05/19 12:57 AM |
| 2 | Let's discuss the idea of looksmatch. Any science behind it?I wouldn't be surprised if it was related to some of the same neural circuitry as the, I can't remember the name of the effect of the top off my head - the effect where males actually went more for non-conventionally attractive females, because they thought they would be the only ones going for them, or at least would have a better chance. The issue is that so do all the other males, resulting in females lower in "looks" receiving more matches and having a higher average (but much more polarized… | /r/BlackPillScience | 28/05/19 08:55 PM |
| 9 | any famous mens rights activists that are female?yep. There are more, but these are just by far what is "the face of the MRM" (and it's earned [in the good way]) And I'm not even an MRA, lol | /r/MensRights | 28/05/19 04:38 AM |
| 22 | any famous mens rights activists that are female?Look up "The Honey Badgers" https://honeybadgerbrigade.com/ These are by far the most famous MRA's, the majority of them are women Two of them are also here on reddit, on this sub often: u/girlwriteswhat (Karen Straughan) u/typhonblue (Alison Tieman) | /r/MensRights | 28/05/19 04:34 AM |
| 1 | Patton nailed it!Google the phrase with quotes around it Or did you already know, comrade? | /r/MGTOW | 27/05/19 11:05 PM |
| -1 | Patton nailed it!fUn sCiEnCe fACt: This is the most cucked sentence ever spoken in the English language. | /r/MGTOW | 27/05/19 07:59 PM |
| 1 | There should be equality in parentingP.S. I've bookmarked you as someone who would be interested in forming a group to create these changes. A “group to create these changes”. With what? Let me guess, the state, backed by some cultural movement of “the people”? Or some anarchist “definitely not a state” state? And “a group”. Like a party? Or some anarchist “definitely not a party” party? The communist party doesn’t “create the changes”, neither do “the people”. The working class does. The party guides them but can’t do anything on … | /r/MensRights | 26/05/19 04:44 AM |
| 1 | There should be equality in parentingrather than insisting on one revolutionary push (a desire, imo, that has more to do with one's ego than any true commitment to the betterment of humanity). A gradual reformist way path from capitalism to communism is impossible on every level of analysis. Economically – Capitalism is rule by capital (exchange-value), Communism is the conscious human production of life (broken into objects and activities, use-values). One cannot gradually turn into the other. It is commodity production, or it isn… | /r/MensRights | 26/05/19 04:43 AM |
| 1 | There should be equality in parentingAlso, I firmly believe that we should consciously transition from capitalism I’ll come back to this “conscious transition" at the end (of part 3). before the roboticization of the workforce encourages the wealthy elite to slough workers off the earth like the chaff they think we are. The links I gave before to the economist talked about how that is impossible. Or rather, it is, but not in the way you are thinking. The economy doesn’t the work the way it does because “haha, rich people bad”. Neit… | /r/MensRights | 26/05/19 04:42 AM |
| 1 | There should be equality in parentingHow does that differ from anarchism? In many (but not all) aspects of these descriptions of the resulting society, they appear on the surface to be the same. The differences, however are rather vast: Anarchism, while it has had much proletarian influence in it it, remains a collection of petty-bourgeois, essentially liberal ideologies. In the most modern incarnation (save the post-modernist variations) they see “irrational, oppressive” hierarchies and power which is unjustified and therefore, in… | /r/MensRights | 26/05/19 04:41 AM |
| 2 | Alabama Passing Law to Make False Rape Accusations a CrimeIf feminists really do accept that men can be raped, like they say they do. And men under-report being raped at however many times the rate of women. Then how does one come to the conclusion that fighting false rape accusations is a "war on women" (rather than a war on rape victims full stop, if it is a war on any at all)? H M M M M M M M | /r/MensRights | 24/05/19 11:10 PM |
| 1 | There should be equality in parentingI would respond to all this tonight, but I haven't slept in two days, lol. For now, though I will recommend (he's a demsoc, but the rest of it is good stuff): https://thenextrecession.wordpress.com/2015/08/23/robots-and-ai-utopia-or-dystopia-part-one/ https://thenextrecession.wordpress.com/2015/08/29/robots-and-ai-utopia-or-dystopia-part-two/ https://thenextrecession.wordpress.com/2015/09/24/robots-and-ai-utopia-or-dystopia-part-three/ "Let me sum up the conclusions of my posts on robots and AI.… | /r/MensRights | 24/05/19 11:53 AM |
| 5 | There should be equality in parentingBy definition, a parasite has to be of another species. hence the "basically". and the absence of a "literally" or "actually" If we think of all animal offspring as a parasite, we may as well end it all with this generation and say goodbye. That doesn't follow. Parasites are bad because of what they do, which was the basis for the analogy, not because of how define them | /r/MensRights | 23/05/19 10:45 PM |
| 2 | There should be equality in parentingYou’re a moron. I try. Communism is far left If by that you mean that many far-left ideologies call themselves and their glorified make-overs for capitalism "communist", then yes I agree with that. If you mean that what I'm laying out is also leftist simply because I speak of replacing capitalism with this "communism" then that does not logically follow in light of the argument I just made. You could argue that the premises and explanations of the nature of leftism offered are wrong, but that is… | /r/MensRights | 23/05/19 09:43 PM |
| 2 | There should be equality in parentingInteresting. A good explanation I tried my best to condense both the explanation of the usual understanding and the critique into a few paragraphs! The base concepts aren't particularly complicated, but there is a ton of background info which is hard to sum up in that short a space. But thanks! I'll take that to mean I succeeded at least to some extent! but I don't think many share that interpretation with you That would be absolutely correct. The umbrella categories of theories and movements/or… | /r/MensRights | 23/05/19 09:22 PM |
| 2 | There should be equality in parentingLeftism = the left wing of capital. Leftists essentially seek nothing more than a change in management, not in the system of production. State-owned enterprises don't change anything fundamental. Neither do syndicates, neither do co-ops. The expansion of economic value, by value - ultimately, money turning into more money - which is called "capital" (which is also the separation of humans from the means of life), is still the ruling force in all of them. Such situations involve: workers, enterpr… | /r/MensRights | 23/05/19 06:11 PM |
| 1 | There should be equality in parentingJust because it's inconvenient doesn't mean it's not your responsibility Just because something is convenient doesn't mean it's right Woah, that was like, totally my entire argument! You defeated it so well bro! https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/strawman | /r/MensRights | 23/05/19 05:43 PM |
| 9 | Two-tiered justice system in the UK- Men are sent to prison for being homeless and asking for food, while women are exempt from many crimes, including assault and theftAll of the parties of the world are as bad as one another. Workers: do not vote for any of them FTFY | /r/MensRights | 23/05/19 05:24 PM |
| 3 | There should be equality in parentingI'm not right-wing either lol (nor centrist, nor "third position")... Google my username with spaces between the words and the whole thing in quotation marks for a hint stop and smell the communism | /r/MensRights | 23/05/19 05:13 PM |
| 7 | There should be equality in parentingI'm not a liberal (nor any kind of leftist). And fetuses are not conscious, so they are not "babies". | /r/MensRights | 23/05/19 04:46 PM |
| 8 | There should be equality in parentingthe pain of getting their son aborted so it doesn't hurt when their daughters get aborted? even when they wanted the pregnancy to go full term right, and it sucks, and if they believe in "life at conception", then it must be really traumatic But it isn't their body, and it shouldn't ultimately be up to them, nor should they get an "equal say". It's a really shitty situation, but that's the way it has to be. Whether or not the fetus is "alive" and has its "own" body doesn't really matter, what ma… | /r/MensRights | 23/05/19 02:26 PM |
| 7 | There should be equality in parentinganother tweet by that account says rape victims shouldn't get an abortion because abortion won't erase the trauma that is actually nauseating | /r/MensRights | 23/05/19 02:00 PM |
| 137 | There should be equality in parentingTradcucks GTFO. Her point was that both men and women should be "held accountable" for their own actions. A woman being forced to bear what is basically a parasite for months and a man being nearly a slave for two decades is "holding adults accountable". How liberating and supportive of both. | /r/MensRights | 23/05/19 12:12 PM |
| 3 | New law in North Carolina will make change to consent regarding sexThis is obviously absolutely horrific. One must be able to revoke consent at any point before or during any sexual activity. HOWEVER, it is telling how something which limits the withdrawal of consent is seen as an attack on women. The only reason it could possibly be reasonably interpreted as this to any extent at all, is because, as other users in this thread have pointed out, there is no protection or ability to not give consent at any point for men, not just a revocation during the sex act. … | /r/MensRights | 22/05/19 09:53 AM |
| 2 | The myth of the tyrannical fatherI don't use this phrase often, but here it applies: Turns out, the description of the all-pervasive abuse by fathers before feminism was and is literally bourgeois propaganda. | /r/MensRights | 22/05/19 09:29 AM |
| 1 | Women can sexual assault men. I’m a woman who has been the victim of the sexual assault of a woman. If I was a man, society would take my situation even less seriously.What happened to you was awful. And I'm sorry that happened to you. But I would criticize one thing:You shouldn't be "checking/acknowledging your privilege". While what you said about how boys/men would be treated might be - or rather, is - true, there is no reason to minimize what happened to you or draw attention away from it to what happened to someone else. It's okay to be upset about something that happened to you. Just because you don't go out of your way to make note of the fact that it c… | /r/MensRights | 13/05/19 09:57 PM |
| 1 | Man talks about his negative experiences when being emotionally expressive in a relationship. As men do you think this is common?I was literally sobbing the first time I read this, and so I instantly remembered this story when I read OP's question. | /r/MensRights | 09/05/19 03:29 AM |
| 3 | Man talks about his negative experiences when being emotionally expressive in a relationship. As men do you think this is common?"My wife walked in and caught me crying, She was concerned and immediately came over to hug me, but her entrance was like a finger in the dyke. All of a sudden everything stopped. No emotion at all was spilling out, like a door had slammed shut. We hugged, I said thank you and I thought that was all it would be. She was visibly upset that I had shut the door on 'an intimate moment'. She came at me with 'why don’t you love me, is this relationship going to continue without any emotion?' Why did I… | /r/MensRights | 09/05/19 03:23 AM |
| 2 | Daily reminder that the Right is not on the side of menimho, the communist movement is barely re-awakening after being dead since 1924ish and dominated by counter-revolution since 1921. The movements since then i don't see as anything else than attempts at reorganization of capital (which is what I would argue leftism is). They all wish simply to put the state and/or workers in charge of capital, without transforming the relations which make it capital, leaving capital, to, by definition, stay the dominating force. | /r/MensRights | 08/05/19 12:22 AM |
| 1 | Daily reminder that the Right is not on the side of menah, leftcom here. What parts do you still find useful/agreeable? | /r/MensRights | 08/05/19 12:09 AM |
| 1 | Daily reminder that the Right is not on the side of menmaterial conditions username checks out. So what were ya before? trot, ML, some other tankie, demsoc, (old-style) socdem, leftcom, ancom or other libsoc? If you don't mind my asking | /r/MensRights | 08/05/19 12:05 AM |
| 2 | Males may be more vulnerable to stressors in social environment, toxins in physical environment, leading to autism, schizophrenia, ADHD and conduct disorders (Schore 2017)Literally this. Males = evolutionary vanguard (higher phylogenic variance, lower ontogenic variance) Function is to gain and transfer information from the environment to the species' genome through selection. Other structures with the same meta-function: forebrains, heterogamety, homosexuals, cancer | /r/BlackPillScience | 07/05/19 11:21 AM |
© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter