TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ACoderGirl Archive

View 0 posts and 26 comments by ACoderGirl on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

I mean, who hasn't made such a mistake before? A little weird that they never got noticed when putting them up, but presumably nobody paid much attention or the people putting them up were not the people creating them.
/r/MensRights04/09/16 08:57 PM
29

I imagine no sane person opposes circumcision as a whole. It's medically necessary in some cases. All opposition I've seen is against parents choosing to have it done when not medically necessary. I've never seen anyone opposed to the idea of a consenting adult having it done for non-medical reasons, either (I personally think that's weird, but it's your choice).
/r/MensRights27/08/16 11:37 PM
1

It's not the safest if the kid is trans. Gender dysphoria can be extremely potent. We're talking severe depression up to the point of suicidal thoughts. Puberty blockers do a lot of good to alleviate that (although it's really just a placeholder for HRT). I mean, anti-depressants have a lot of side effects too, but nobody is proposing we don't treat depressed people with them. Even more applicable to conditions like borderline personality disorder, which has no direct treatment, but rather its v…
/r/MensRights25/07/16 07:19 PM
1

Studies aren't worth much to me anymore. In academia, often there is only one 'acceptable' outcome to a study. Leftists use science to confirm their political beliefs, not challenge them. So if scientific studies aren't worth listening to, what is? Your feelings? Can't you see how hypocritical that sounds? And just blaming things on "leftists"? Come on, mate. That being the case, I don't agree that when your brain thinks it is in the wrong body, we should mutilate the body so that the brain may …
/r/MensRights25/07/16 04:19 PM
0

Transpeople are only a tiny percentage of the population. It seems extremely unlikely that this is a natural case of transgenderism. It's extremely unlikely for any particular individual to be trans, yes, but why does that make it unlikely that there must be cases of transgenderism? Using the most commonly cited number of 0.3% of the population being trans, that means that nearly a million trans people exist in the US alone. This isn't like winning the lottery. They're not that rare. Using the U…
/r/MensRights25/07/16 03:47 PM
3

Actually, you can get tattoos as a minor with parental permission. It depends on the state. See here. Some states do not have a minimum age. In my country of Canada, it's up to even more local law, but many places have no law on this or simply require parental permission. Usually the tattoo artist uses their judgement.
/r/MensRights25/07/16 04:09 AM
2

You mean a doctor that follows the WPATH guidelines, which are the most well known and widely accepted guidelines for how to treat trans people? Or the Endocrine Society's guidelines, which is the leading organization for the very field that specializes in all things hormones? What medical guidelines (not just your personal beliefs) are you expecting doctors to follow for the case in question? It seems to me you're simply upset because your personal belief conflicts with medical consensus.
/r/MensRights25/07/16 04:05 AM
-12

If you read this story [..] the quotes from the children sound exactly like the quotes from the children raised in the westboro baptist church Your argument does not make sense. The (poorly written and heavily biased) article contains only one quote from the child, an "I am a girl" at age 3. That's it. I don't see how you conclude that this means the kid has been brainwashed. The article gives absolutely nothing to give the impression of brainwashing. You're extrapolating from nothing. Is it pos…
/r/MensRights25/07/16 04:01 AM
8

That's not a reported side effect of puberty blockers (and it should be made clear that blockers are not the same as HRT, as some seem to be mistaking). Here's a good article on blockers and their issues. The main issue is that they are so new that they aren't well studied for long term effects. However, what studies we do have show them to be quite effective and safe. Certainly organizations like the Endocrine Society (the leading organization for endocrinology, which is everything hormone rela…
/r/MensRights25/07/16 03:55 AM
3

It's a kid! Come on! Plenty of people are ugly kids and become attractive adults. Who hasn't seen the famous examples of celebrities who were ugly as children?
/r/MensRights25/07/16 03:40 AM
1

Except for trans people (or possible trans people), transitioning is the treatment (and one that's backed by numerous studies). Delaying puberty is not necessary for transitioning, but it makes it much easier and avoids the dysphoria that comes from experiencing the wrong puberty. And for children, therapy is almost always included here (particularly since diagnosis of trans children is held to much stricter standards than adults). Plus, there's the fact that the kid is however old he is now (to…
/r/MensRights25/07/16 03:38 AM
1

The vast majority of pre pubescent children with gender dysphoria grow out of it. That's not necessarily true. Although as far as I know, there's been no good studies on it. The only study I'm aware of (and is often used as an argument against trans children transitioning) is deeply flawed. They claimed a large percentage of trans children detransitioned, but that's because they counted everyone that they couldn't find as having detransitioned (even though it's logically quite likely that someon…
/r/MensRights25/07/16 03:30 AM
2

The child seems to be going through hormone therapy that delays puberty You're correct, but as a terminology thing, one would not typically call puberty blockers "hormone therapy", since that term usually is used to indicate that the actual primay sex hormones (namely estrogen and testosterone) have been supplied. For trans people, hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is what actually changes things for them. It would usually be started at 16, at the earliest (based on WPATH guidelines). Although m…
/r/MensRights25/07/16 03:25 AM
11

You're thinking of the David Reimer case. It's an excellent example of how gender is innate and not learned. It's not applicable to trans people, though, since nobody does irreversible stuff until the person is much older. HRT is typically delayed until 16. SRS is 18+. Prior to that is simply a puberty blocker so that no irreversible change occurs (namely the "normal" puberty that occurs without the blocker). It's usually considered to be the best of both worlds, since the child doesn't go throu…
/r/MensRights25/07/16 03:16 AM
14

Agreed. This is a pretty shitty article that shows the sub's true colours. Seriously, do you guys not notice how completely and utterly biased this article is? It's a really shitty source. Now, obviously such a mislead article is not going to give truthful or accurate information. I note that it seems to confuse puberty blockers with HRT, for example. It claims the kid was on "hormone treatment" (which implies HRT), but it also says "to delay puberty", which implies blockers. And for such a youn…
/r/MensRights25/07/16 03:00 AM
-2

Do gay bars mean something different in England? Because in my area, gay bars are inclusive to both gay men and gay women. I don't really follow why you're so vehemently against the idea that there's women in gay clubs. And besides, even for straight women (and let's not erase bi women, either, who fit in perfectly fine in a gay bar), they often have the very valid excuse of going out for drinks with friends. While I frown on groups of straight women taking over gay bars, there's no reason that …
/r/MensRights16/07/16 10:04 PM
-10

Terrible idea. Can't speak for the bar in question or your favourite bars, but the gay bars in my city are gay bars, not gay male bars. Gay/bi/etc women also use them. Lesbian bars practically don't exist, and the term "gay" is used for both genders anyway (if more commonly for men). It's admittedly a problem that straight women will use those bars for various reasons. I've never heard of the problem from the article, though. More common is the issue of simply going to gay bars to avoid being hi…
/r/MensRights16/07/16 09:53 PM
3

There's already plenty of studies that shows transitioning helps and earlier in this chain someone mentioned various social issues related to transitioning that increases suicide rate (eg, unsupportive family).
/r/MensRights15/07/16 03:31 PM
2

I suspect gender differences here are quite different. I've seen a lot of men who are so desperate for sex that they'll happily do countless chores or whatever for the mere implication that they might get sex out of it. Most women I know never seem that desperate for sex. There's obviously variance between individuals, but as an anecdotal generalization, I think that mostly holds. Either due to differences in sex drive or availability of sex. There's also social aspects here. Getting sex is more…
/r/MensRights11/07/16 06:40 PM
2

You can ask the same of anyone, really. Tinder isn't exactly that great for people of either gender. I think most people stick around with the hope of it working out well. And that means wading through a lot of shit. That includes things like men who are assholes or women who are just trying to get free labour.
/r/MensRights11/07/16 06:11 PM
1

Do men use the term so much in that way? Entirely anecdotal, but I don't often see men call each other sluts in either a playful or not-playful way. It seems like a term that's mostly directed towards women.
/r/MensRights08/07/16 11:34 PM
6

Eh, in all fairness, when there's 3 answers and 2 genders, 2/3 being men could be coincidental. The pessimist in me thinks not, though.
/r/MensRights25/06/16 02:14 AM
10

Not true at all. Sexist jokes are still sexist. Being jokes doesn't invalidate that. However, in the right circumstances, sexist jokes aren't a bad thing. It'd be a mistake to think that just any circumstance is appropriate, though.
/r/MensRights25/06/16 01:58 AM
-1

To be fair, I've never seen a sane feminist say "all men are xxx". Usually it's along the lines of "too many men are xxx".
/r/MensRights13/06/16 06:56 PM
4

I assume it's probably in both bathrooms? It's beneficial for everyone. Mostly for general public awareness, particularly at the scope of the issue. Particularly useful for helping get funding. It's hard to have a prostate compete with boobs, so awareness of the severity is important.
/r/MensRights03/06/16 04:40 PM
17

As comes up in every thread about an acid attack, it's pretty darn easy to get your hands on acid. It's used for things like cleaning pools. While not something just anyone usually uses, it's not really a controlled substance. I would think that even drain cleaner could cause a lot of damage (although I don't think that one's quite as concentrated as some acids). It's a bit crazy to me how so many people can be so fucked up to attack with acid. I view it as even more fucked up than shooting or s…
/r/MensRights18/05/16 01:10 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter