TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

AEHIILRS Archive

View 2 posts and 1,028 comments by AEHIILRS on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,028 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

So you want a couple where the woman wants to abandon the baby and the father wants to raise it, where they're willing to work together but she's not willing to simply surrender the child to the (purported) father? No.
/r/MensRights06/10/19 11:56 PM
1

Undermining the free market conditions of the local labor market is definitely still an important function, but that particular corpse has already been looted.
/r/MensRights06/10/19 11:04 PM
1

Half of them go to university just to find a "suitable husband". That's not what I'm talking about. Women who go to uni with the primary intention of getting an education and/or marketable degree will still most likely get married and/or have children. it is likely a huge waste of societal resources Analyses of cummulative fiscal incidence have shown that women are not net productive members of society at any point in their lives. (Fig 17, pg 24 of PDF, numbered pg 22 of paper). This is why atta…
/r/MensRights06/10/19 10:51 PM
1

Most likely, this would be arranged as a test case. So you'd find an eligible couple that wished to participate, they'd take the kid in to an approved "Safe Haven" location, the father/mother would perform the necessary actions meeting the statutory definition of surrendering the child to an approved "Safe Haven" reciever, then he/she'd depart the location without communicating any intent to return for the child (seems to be a common oolie in the statutes, for some reason), the mother/father wou…
/r/MensRights06/10/19 10:35 PM
1

The ponzi mythology of "sustainable growth" requires a constantly increasing consumer population to keep the scheme functioning. Dey tuk er jerbs! is misdirection. UN "Replacement Migration" is about shoring up failing demand by importing third world consumers, not workers. That this is detrimental to the quality of life of the regions is irrelevant, as implosion of the ponzi scheme is inevitable, anyway, and the soon-to-be-majority migrants (or "refugees", as many nations were able to lock down…
/r/MensRights06/10/19 05:24 AM
-1

Found the antisemite.
/r/MensRights06/10/19 05:11 AM
6

Right. When you find out your child is transgender, you go slash the tires of their LGBT friend's car and intimidate them into never talking to, or about, your child again.
/r/MensRights06/10/19 02:08 AM
1

It is by no means clear that a second party that did not surrender the child could then immediately claim custody, especially if that person is male. My assessment is that this will never happen. Most states would rather give a child to foster parents than the father. This is a matter of meeting all the statutory requirements. If a couple is in the hospital shortly after birth and one parent hands the child off to a nurse and walks away without explanation they may have met the statutory require…
/r/MensRights06/10/19 01:49 AM
4

From the comfort of my imaginary armchair.
/r/MensRights06/10/19 01:21 AM
0

Methods used in suicide attempts differ by gender. Given a null hypothesis that men and women are equally suicidal, and men choose methods that are 3x as likely to be successful compared to women (i.e., 75% of suicide fatalities are male), then having ~75% of the survivors (i.e., people able to respond to a survey and report a prior attmpt) being female is not especially surprising. It's the expected result.
/r/MensRights06/10/19 01:18 AM
5

Look into starting some other, innocuous, student group to familiarize yourself with how the process should work, what sort of funding should be available, etc. Perhaps start a "Round Earth Society", so it's even putatively adversarial to an existing advocacy group on campus. Keep exhaustive records of this process and your experiences/impressions of it. Then try it with your men's advocacy group. Ideally model it directly on one of the existing women's advocacy groups. Make note of any differen…
/r/MensRights06/10/19 12:43 AM
1

¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Jurisdiction shopping is an option, due to the various differences in statutes. District of Columbia is interesting as termination of parental rights/responsibility is mechanical at the moment of surrender, rather than upon some notification filed by the reciever. So, it leads to a situation where a couple could go in, one surrenders the child, the other immediately objects and gets the child back, then they go on their separate merry ways. But, by statute, the first parent has legally…
/r/MensRights06/10/19 12:33 AM
1

There is no paperwork by design and intent. There is no required paperwork, yes; the process can literally be "no questions asked" (or no questions answered, anyway). They give you a numbered armband, that's it. You seem to be confusing safe haven abandonment with adoption. While every state has a "Safe Haven" abandonment statute, they are not identical in wording, policy, or practice. It may be the case in your jurisdiction that they give the abandoner a tracking number and "that's it". In most…
/r/MensRights06/10/19 12:06 AM
1

Touching a dude's chest probably would not be considered sexual harrassment most places. It would fall under simple assault/battery, though.
/r/MensRights05/10/19 11:52 PM
3

You could report the customer and try to press charges for assault/battery/whatever-equivalent-in-your-jurisdiction. This may result in you being beaten/murdered somewhere not on camera once word gets around the neighborhood. And I'd think "I shouldn't have to ask my manager to stop and/or prevent customers from fondling my body." would pass the Reasonable Person test, so you can definitely go directly to suing the customer, manager, and/or owner of the convenience store for various things. This…
/r/MensRights05/10/19 11:49 PM
1

There is usually no required paperwork, but there may be optional paperwork that the would-be abandoner can fill out. I'd expect you to be able to obtain some sort of record acknowledging that you attempted to access the provided Legal Parental Surrender process to terminate your legal rights and responsibilities. You probably still end up in the shakedown, of course, but it could be an interesting court case.
/r/MensRights05/10/19 11:22 PM
2

So... their school loan debt may then be attached to male net productivity and be siphoned to pay off the massive goverment subsidies to the banks. It also increases the educated/skilled labor supply and helps artificially suppress labor prices in these markets. This undermining of free market capitalism also benefits the banks and other corporations.
/r/MensRights05/10/19 11:11 PM
6

Misandry has seen men dehumanized, so that when men have been raped, murdered, hindered, abused, sexualized, enslaved, objectified, and denigrated you didn't even notice.
/r/MensRights05/10/19 11:00 PM
9

Calling genital mutilation what it is should make people who mutilate children's genitals feel ashamed. If someone's talking about it in a way that shames the victims of genital mutilation, they can still do that while using the mod-approved euphemistic terms.
/r/MensRights05/10/19 10:53 PM
2

Kinda weird to refer to the media team bankrolled by the billionaires at the ONE Foundation as "her".
/r/MensRights05/10/19 10:38 PM
7

Because many of these women will go on to get married and/or have children, and their school loan debt may then be attached to male net productivity and be siphoned to pay off the massive goverment subsidies to the banks.
/r/MensRights05/10/19 10:33 PM
1

Curious how it would go if you just went in to file the paperwork, absolving yourself of all rights and responsibilities, but had no newborn on hand.
/r/MensRights05/10/19 10:31 PM
2

Presumably the large piles of cash the ONE Foundation has from the several billionaires bankrolling the Thunberg prop can afford more than a few reddit moderators. Tenuous connection to the topic of this sub, though.
/r/MensRights05/10/19 10:28 PM
3

Curious if someone in this scenario could sue for violation of their equal rights to access the "Safe Haven" abandonment process. Further, does police complicity in this violation constitute racketeering, due to their foreseeable enrichment via the money extracted by child support?
/r/MensRights05/10/19 10:25 PM
1

Complained to who? Because if you reported her to HR for sexually assaulting you and their response was to fire you, that sounds suspiciously indistinguishable from retaliation against the reporting employee.
/r/MensRights05/10/19 06:48 AM
1

You don't get a "bakery" from anal either, bb. 😎
/r/MensRights05/10/19 05:53 AM
2

Imagine you give a neighbor a cup of flour. Later on, you learn they started a bakery. You learn this because the neighbor lacks sufficient resources to run a bakery, recieved government assistance, and the state is coming after you to recoup the cost of the benefits your neighbor recieved. You are further expected to continue supporting your neighbor's choice to run a bakery from now on. No, you may not be involved in the bakery in any way, because all you did was give them a cup of flour. They…
/r/MensRights05/10/19 05:42 AM
4

I vaguely remember a poster talking about how he'd gotten approved as a subnational/regional advisor to some UN working group involved with the GEI and was planning to suggest adding metrics where men/boys were the disadvantaged gender. I told him that GEI is designed to be incapable of measuring gender inequalities that disadvantage men, due to women's advantages being capped at 100. There could be a related "gender inequality index" that is similar in methodology to GEI, but used women's posit…
/r/MensRights05/10/19 04:37 AM
4

If you're in the US, Title IX applies to any organizations that receive federal funding.
/r/MensRights05/10/19 02:56 AM
3

The far-right slogan “Feminism is Cancer” appeared often. *clicks on link to Reddit thread* *Ctrl+F "cancer"* One result. Two net points. "appeared often" *clicks on link to pluralist article* *Ctrl+F "cancer"* One result. Zero net points. "appeared often"
/r/MensRights05/10/19 02:08 AM
1

If you combine paid and unpaid work into total hours worked per week, men work more hours per week on average than women, as well.
/r/MensRights05/10/19 01:56 AM
1

Note: the "gender equality index" is based on measurements of men's position in society taken as 100%, and then women's position in society expressed as a ratio to men's position capped at 100%. So, if women are doing better than men, this is recorded as 100. A country with extremely high gender inequalities, where women are doing much better than men in every possible metric, would be given a score of 100% perfect gender equality. If women are behind men in a single metric (despite, or possibly…
/r/MensRights05/10/19 01:26 AM
19

People pushing muh wage gap focus on "men and women work different jobs" because if you focus on "men and women work different numbers of hours" it disappears completely. Women work ~44% of total hours worked. Women are paid ~44% of total money paid. This is so straightforward and easy to understand, that the discussion usually no where else to go. If you're feeling antagonistic, you can note this and then pointedly ask muh wage gap speaker if they're calling women lazy.
/r/MensRights05/10/19 01:06 AM
1

Wasn’t that like a long time ago? It's continuous via an inflationary monetary policy.
/r/MensRights01/10/19 11:17 PM
1

I died F
/r/MensRights01/10/19 12:44 AM
1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermesmann_v._Seyer
/r/MensRights30/09/19 11:36 PM
3

It's neat how they unironically refer to this behavior by a fun-sounding name like "foodie call". Maybe we can petition RAINN to start referring to sexual assault as a "nope grope".
/r/MensRights30/09/19 07:35 AM
3

I can’t remember the exact stat but I think it’s at least 66% of women date purely for the free food "We found 23–33% of women surveyed had engaged in a foodie call."
/r/MensRights30/09/19 07:31 AM
1

AFAIK I came up with it independently, but I suppose I may have seen it around before. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ How about this: You go to a car dealership with a friend. Friend buys a car. Nine months later, they're in a traffic collision. You're sued for the damage/injuries to the other car/driver your friend hit. It's hard to come up with analogies because the scenarios are so ridiculously nonsensical from a normal perspective.
/r/MensRights30/09/19 07:16 AM
7

they consistently reject or friendzone these men for jerks Don't be silly. Women fuck "decent men" in their 20s, too.
/r/MensRights30/09/19 05:08 AM
3

Risk mitigation analysis of pregnancy vs child support.
/r/MensRights29/09/19 11:51 PM
6

Traditionalist/feminist gender roles both reinforce gender malagency (e.g., male hyperagency and female hypoagency). Neither is a way forward.
/r/MensRights29/09/19 11:29 PM
1

a woman who decides to have a child against the wishes of the man who has unwittingly fathered it is deliberately dooming that child to a bad start in life Given the recent filing by ONE Foundation (the billionaires bankrolling Greta Thunberg) trying to frame various nations failing to meet carbon emissions goals, and the predicted climate consequences of that failure, as a human rights violation under the UN Rights of the Child treaty... I'm curious if a similar argument could be made that sing…
/r/MensRights29/09/19 11:13 PM
1

Karen DeCrow, feminist activist Karen DeCrow was a bit more than a "feminist activist"; she was President of N.O.W. from 1974-1977. A woman can also unilaterally decide to give a newborn child up for adoption in many places, and thereby relieve herself of any further responsibility for the child. There are "Safe Haven" abandonment laws in every US state. So it's completely unreasonable to make her share his punishment for actions that he alone decided to take. The cliche response to this is "chi…
/r/MensRights29/09/19 11:05 PM
1

Yeah... No drugs in Colombia.
/r/MensRights29/09/19 10:41 PM
21

Reminder: a man being forced to use his body to support an unwanted child by selling his life&labor to pay 18+ years of child support has a higher associated risk of death than pregnancy and childbirth.
/r/MensRights29/09/19 10:49 AM
1

Where is "here"?
/r/MensRights29/09/19 10:45 AM
1

Drug related, usually.
/r/MensRights29/09/19 09:43 AM
1

Note: the majority of his face is a prosthetic, held in place by the glasses.
/r/MensRights29/09/19 05:32 AM
3

Give them more rope to hang themselves. Mea culpa and ask when the event is scheduled exclusively for men accounting students addressing issues that apply to men entering the accounting field.
/r/MensRights29/09/19 02:41 AM
6

It's those that completely lack common courtesy that have to point out the obvious. e.g., the person in the screencap
/r/MensRights29/09/19 12:34 AM
14

Toxic femininity.
/r/MensRights27/09/19 04:03 AM
2

I haven't interacted with British women and would be curious about the age range he has in mind. I've definitely talked to more than a few women in their 30s-40s who fell for the "You can have it all!" meme and/or who didn't seem willing to accept that their choices and actions matter.
/r/MensRights26/09/19 11:36 PM
7

Well, /MensLib moderation, by explicit policy, aggressively shuts down any relevant conversation about banning genital mutilation, so you might not be too far off the mark.
/r/MensRights26/09/19 11:26 PM
2

Huh. I saw this a couple days ago and as we were walking out I said "Hey! Let's make a movie about deep space exploration, antimatter 'explosions, extinction of all life on Earth, but BUT let's make it really boring."
/r/MensRights26/09/19 07:32 PM
2

I wonder if we'd see suicide and fatal occupational injury statistics fall at similar rates.
/r/MensRights26/09/19 07:26 PM
23

Men have problems, they deserve to be fixed. MensRights: "they" refers to the problems. MensLib: "they" refers to the men.
/r/MensRights26/09/19 07:23 PM
1

I kinda want that pillow.
/r/MensRights24/09/19 05:15 AM
1

It's usually more helpful to ask them to explain what they mean and let them generate the cognitive dissonance internally rather than cause it externally by pointing out their hypocrisy.
/r/MensRights24/09/19 04:54 AM
6

The idea is to put The Fear into whatever middling supervisory type was about to be mad at you for taking down their sign, so they suddenly want it to all quietly go away.
/r/MensRights23/09/19 08:04 PM
1

I'm curious how many of the returmed matches were on the "victims".
/r/MensRights22/09/19 05:24 AM
4

they have everyone's DNA Whether an amorphous "they" has everyone's DNA doesn't change that the database they were comparing against does not. I've never consensually given it to anyone anywhere for any reason. >consensually That's a pretty weird hedge.
/r/MensRights22/09/19 05:22 AM
5

More than 80% of cases returned no match in whatever DNA database they're comparing against. Not getting a match (or getting a match, for that matter) in whatever DNA database they're comparing against has no definitive bearing on whether the accusation is true or false
/r/MensRights22/09/19 04:53 AM
2

They've been "openly admitting" this kinda shit for 50 years. To what do you think "The Future is Female" refers?
/r/MensRights22/09/19 04:15 AM
9

Probably OSHA, ADA, and municipal building code violations. Just take the sign down. If anyone of importance brings it up to you, state that, due to the above, you doubted it was officially sanctioned and were trying to protect the office from being cited/fined/sued.
/r/MensRights22/09/19 04:10 AM
2

Next up? Banning genital mutilation! /s
/r/MensRights21/09/19 10:48 PM
2

Given the small percentage of transgender individuals, and the way data are reported, we expect the difference between the two concepts to be so small they would not impact analysis. The main thing I'd be concerned about is that it may make people who are transgender statistically invisible, thereby making it impossible to examine whether a given crime is differentially prevalent in its commission by or against that specific community.
/r/MensRights21/09/19 06:58 PM
1

Not sure what a question "directed towards conservatives" has to do with this subreddit or Men's Rights more generally. Did you fall for the Septembering or are you attempting to enforce it? Anyway. Traditionalist/feminist gender role constructions are both embedded in gender malagency (i.e., male hyperagency and female hypoagency). This is a large part of why Feminism has been able to grow mostly unimpeded: it is fundamentally unchallenging to traditionalism.
/r/MensRights20/09/19 11:23 PM
1

Just asking the concern trolls for links to examples is often sufficient to get them to delete their threads. Recent example. You don't need to be a mod to call out bullshit.
/r/MensRights20/09/19 01:19 AM
1

Regular subreddit mods and user accounts don't have the backend data to identify when this is happening, so sock puppet comments would appear to be posted by authentic users. And if the moderators try to respect free and open communication, some amount of questionable content is unavoidable (whether trolls or idiots), so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
/r/MensRights20/09/19 12:08 AM
1

Oh, neat. Can you quote the OP where he says the things you've read?
/r/MensRights19/09/19 11:40 PM
1

You think people would really do that? Just go on the internet and tell lies?
/r/MensRights19/09/19 11:24 PM
1

If you read the actual post in the OP it’s clear this was not what happened "I was refused even an application because, according to their policy which is completely news to my ears, the daycare is only available to single women [....]"
/r/MensRights19/09/19 11:14 PM
1

It may be the case that the school's daycare on paper has an unbiased means-based qualification process. That doesn't mean anything if parents, who would have otherwise qualified, are told "We don't serve your kind around here." by the people representing the administration.
/r/MensRights19/09/19 11:01 PM
1

Unintended consequence: Rather than just making baseless false accusations, they'll create accounts to make offensive posts so they can link to the comments they've made as "evidence", resulting in even more crap in the subreddit. (This was the usual MO laid out in ModTalkLeaks.)
/r/MensRights19/09/19 08:24 PM
–

It's interesting how a handful of comments suggesting /u/DearListen contact the Title IX coordinator and file a discrimination complaint have been marked "controversial". I'd much rather see the school's gender discriminatory policy ended. Getting back $350 doesn't solve the childcare problem for either the OP or for any other parent who might find himself in a similar position.
/r/MensRights19/09/19 08:18 PM
2

constantly denying actual facts and coming up with our own lies no examples Thank you for your concern.
/r/MensRights19/09/19 07:56 PM
1

"Controlling women's sexuality" is something women need(ed) to feasibly convince a man to support her and her children.
/r/MensRights19/09/19 04:21 AM
1

Many restraining orders are reciprocal, in which case she has violated it by sending this to you. Assuming you've moved over the past four years, that it was mailed to you (i.e., "I know where you live.") makes it especially threatening. Take it to the police.
/r/MensRights18/09/19 06:38 PM
3

The calculations would be changed so you'd pay the same amount whether it uses gross or net income. The constants/factors would be adjusted so you'd still be paying the same absolute amount, it would just be a larger fraction of net income than it was of gross income. also if she is claiming child tax benefits why is not considered as part of her income. Noncustodial parents are generally in a higher tax bracket than custodial parents, so the government is able to tax if at a higher rate they ca…
/r/MensRights18/09/19 05:30 AM
3

There have been a couple cities who have worked through their so-called "rape kit backlog" and produced data on serial offenders. IIRC, something like 50% of the kits contained DNA from the same 5% of the individuals identified as offenders. There was a lot of coverage of that for a bit, then there was a result showing that a similar one-to-many relationship existed for individuals identified as victims as well. Since then it seems to be backburnered as far as popular press goes.
/r/MensRights18/09/19 05:14 AM
-1

Is that lede graphic intended to evoke goatse?
/r/MensRights16/09/19 03:39 AM
1

I've seen people do a Gender Inequality Index type calculation country-by-country where they take the length of retirement (i.e., life expectancy - retirement age) and divide it by the number of years in the workforce. Making a further adjustment for workforce participation rates, differences in average hours worked, etc. would be interesting, but I'm not sure a lot of countries have that data.
/r/MensRights15/09/19 09:45 PM
1

they claimed I was downplaying female harassment They don't take sexual harassment seriously when it happens to men, so they perceive bringing up men being sexually harassed as downplaying sexual harassment. The same thing happens if you approach sexual assault, rape, genital mutilation, etc. in a gender neutral fashion.
/r/MensRights15/09/19 02:47 PM
2

I feel no regret for what I did. I don’t like violence however she never did it again afterwards. You may have saved that girl's life.
/r/MensRights15/09/19 02:41 PM
1

When you have so many other options and chose the worst one, you still don't face the consequences of your choices and actions... because oppression, supposedly.
/r/MensRights15/09/19 12:23 AM
1

Female perpetrated intimate partner violence is generally not recognized as such, so the killers are likely shielded by laws intended to protect victims of abuse. Proxy violence is also a common tool of abusers, so the cases that are adjudicated as murder may fall into "love triangle" type stories where a woman induces a new boyfriend to kill the current/old boyfriend, or other similar scenarios where the women has the victim killed via manipulating someone into doing it for her.
/r/MensRights14/09/19 02:32 PM
1

You could write the law to give police the authority to detain an individual who [has committed no crime]. You cannot give an authority you do not have. What you're describing is merely abuse of power.
/r/MensRights14/09/19 09:45 AM
1

I am not sure you realise just how big and complicated a question that is. Definite this-natural-person-does-not-consent-to-contract-with-you vibes.
/r/MensRights14/09/19 09:41 AM
1

Interesting. Out of curiosity, can you paraphrase what you think it says?
/r/MensRights14/09/19 09:39 AM
1

Getting gold-fringe-on-a-flag vibes from this question.
/r/MensRights14/09/19 03:38 AM
1

From a positive-spin perspective, making suicide a criminal act creates the legal justification to force a suicidal person onto treatment, or at least to put them in a controlled environment where it would be more difficult to carry out.
/r/MensRights14/09/19 01:32 AM
1

Free the Nipple Penis!
/r/MensRights14/09/19 01:17 AM
9

Median-mileage-between-claims is lower for female drivers, but males tend to drive longer and more often, so on a timewise basis, female drivers are cheaper to insure despite being worse drivers.
/r/MensRights14/09/19 01:12 AM
1

It's not. Did you mean to reply to a different comment before, then?
/r/MensRights13/09/19 11:46 AM
1

As for your second paragraph, you have essentially formed a hypothesis for why you think the change in language would be harmful. How is (male) suicide prevention by making it less appealing (to men) harmful?
/r/MensRights13/09/19 09:11 AM
1

People think this is bad or stupid, why exactly? You can't come up with why adjusting language with the intent of helping people feel more positively about suicide is a prime facie bad or stupid idea on your own? It may be that the change in language does help reduce suicide, but this could also be attributed to "committed suicide" appealing to male hyperagency, while "died by suicide" is hypoagent phrasing. Men do something, they don't have something done to them, so the modified phrasing makes…
/r/MensRights13/09/19 07:25 AM
5

He noted that suicide is a leading cause of death in the United States. “Suicide is a serious public health crisis. More people die by suicide than by homicides and car accidents and breast cancer,” he added. “Suicide is a real issue that must be taken seriously all of the time.” But don't ever mention that it's a real issue that primarily affects men.
/r/MensRights13/09/19 07:05 AM
4

TL;DR: You should say "died by suicide" because saying "committed suicide" might lead people to associate suicide with bad things (i.e., people also commit crimes and sins) and then think suicide is bad. Honk Honk
/r/MensRights13/09/19 06:55 AM
1

You lawyer may be able to put you in touch with a colleague that can evaluate whether you should bother going after her for emotional distress, defamation, or whatever else may apply if there are further developments. Just get your documents and such organized and then try to realize that worrying about it isn't productive.
/r/MensRights12/09/19 12:34 PM
1

Might be she's just trying to get back at you for fading on her and has no intentions of taking this false accusation beyond the two of you. Save and back-up any and all communications you've had with her. Sit down and write out everything you can remember of any in-person interactions you've had or anything you may have already deleted. If you've had relevant conversations about this with anyone else, save those, too. If you know someone who could be a witness, you can try talking to them to ge…
/r/MensRights12/09/19 12:07 PM
8

It's interesting to note that this means virginity, chastity, fidelity, "controlling women's sexuality" is something women need in order to feasibly convince a man to support her and her children (i.e., by assuring him that her children are also his children). Social attitudes about rape being a serious offense also can be seen to flow from the effect they have to undermine the ability of women to offer these assurances of paternity. TL;DR; "The Patriarchy" is a tool of the matriarchy.
/r/MensRights12/09/19 08:52 AM
1

She said this to who?
/r/MensRights12/09/19 08:36 AM
3

Seems pretty unlikely that Disney is doing this as a result of True Scottish Feminism rather than it being a product of the academically, politically, and socially powerful mainstream version.
/r/MensRights12/09/19 06:38 AM
1

This is the plan for a Genocidal Feminist utopia outlined by founders of Gender Studies 40-50 years ago: The Future is Female. Every culture must begin to affirm a female future. Species responsibility must be returned to women in every culture. The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately 10% of the human race.
/r/MensRights12/09/19 05:53 AM
1

I would say a dinner date falls under 'informal/friendly'. It's not formal or unfriendly. Yes. That's the point. Unless you sent 'round your liveried courier to present her with a bespoke calligraphed invitation to dinner on artisanal handcrafted cream linen cardstock (my god, it even has a watermark!), the shit about "the person who asks should pay" is a misleading dodge.
/r/MensRights12/09/19 04:48 AM
1

I remember seeing a comment thread a while ago discussing a gender-politics monopoly thing where they had two different tracks. So, for instance, men might get $240 for passing Go! rather than the usual $200, but the male/outer game track has 48 total spaces rather than 40, so this doesn't give them a real advantage in the game. The usual 40 spaces were on both tracks. And most of the thread was about what to put on the extra eight spaces on the outer track.
/r/MensRights12/09/19 04:07 AM
1

I can understand the mindset of not bothering to make a person's past offenses widely known if it seems like karma is doing its job. It's also possible to convince yourself that you got over it until externally confronted with reminders (e.g., hearing about the offender in the news, a friend pointing out the coverage and asking you about them, etc.), at which point you have to reevaluate whether you're really okay. But given the anonymous receipts about someone trying to extort/blackmail him and…
/r/MensRights12/09/19 01:24 AM
1

I learned how to quote on Reddit Are you sure about that? Put a > before each block of text you wanna quote. > Quoted Text ...becomes... Quoted Text
/r/MensRights12/09/19 12:44 AM
1

The Koss survey is the "Ms. Magazine Campus Project on Sexual Assault", but I have not found a direct link to the primary source. There is a retrospective article by the national coordinator of the survey which confirms the 1-in-4-of-1-in-4 figure. Interestingly, the wikipedia page for "I Never Called It Rape", a 1988 book on the 1984-85 study, cites 27%, which perhaps is a typo of 72%, a reversal/misstatement of the correct statistic, or perhaps deliberate misinformation by one of the feminist …
/r/MensRights11/09/19 11:45 PM
1

But...why? A lot of reasons that have more to do with large events, many of which no longer apply to most situations even for large events, much less small one-on-one type situations. If a friend asks me out for dinner, I don't expect them to pay for me. Covered literally the next, unquoted, sentence after the one you quoted. Why should a date be different? A purpose of courtship is for the suitor to demonstrate his ability to support the doe-eyed maiden until she dies tragically in childbirth o…
/r/MensRights11/09/19 11:08 PM
1

As a matter of etiquette, whoever formally invites should expect to do the paying unless otherwise stipulated. Informal/friendly invitations, OTOH, tend to be a pay-your-own-way or tit-for-tat. Also as a matter of etiquette, it would be understood that a man and a woman going out alone together is courtship and if she does not reciprocate his interest she should not accept the invitation. People may certainly initially share this unspoken interest, but over the course of the date change their mi…
/r/MensRights11/09/19 09:24 AM
1

You'd list the responsibilities and obligations placed on the father as a result of the abortion and demand to know why his (lack of) consent to those imposed duties isn't relevant.
/r/MensRights11/09/19 08:42 AM
4

Most people will read "passed out and unable to consent" as a single item in the list of conditions, not read "and unable to consent" as a scope modifier of the entire list of conditions. Similarly, most people will answer laundry-list question formats via short-circuit evaluation. So if "while drunk" (or "while high" or "while drugged" or "while passed put and unable to consent") is true for the scenarios, they answer "yes".
/r/MensRights11/09/19 08:33 AM
1

Mary Koss, who pioneered this type of laundry-list question in creating the "1-in-4" woozle, found in post-survey interviews that about 75% of respondents coded by the researchers as having experienced rape or sexual assault disagreed with the coding. This statistic was presented in discussion as proof that far more awareness-raising was needed (i.e., those poor dumb girls didn't even know they had been raped). It was also suggested (and implemented) that the check of coding accuracy be omitted …
/r/MensRights11/09/19 08:22 AM
2

It's unlikely it would occur to me to initiate (or reciprocate) anything much beyond professional-friendly, regardless of their gender (or attractiveness). I've had a few of the female summer engineering interns over the years get unnecessarily and uncomfortably close the first time or two I've worked with them, but they've all stopped getting in my personal space on their own before anything needed to be said.
/r/MensRights11/09/19 07:50 AM
1

Pew Research has a recurring survey product about online harassment, which may not fit what you're looking for as it's not sexual harassment specifically (though that is covered, IIRC) and is focused on online-only stuff.
/r/MensRights11/09/19 02:09 AM
5

Maybe talking to some of the women in your life if they would feel comfortable saying no to a stranger that can physically overpower them in seconds might be interesting to do. This is basically a dysfunctional rape fantasy. You aren't that irresistible.
/r/MensRights11/09/19 01:21 AM
13

I'd wonder how many of these "broke men" are broke because of divorce and/or child support.
/r/MensRights07/09/19 04:41 PM
1

Why don't the women just play in the NBA if they want NBA money?
/r/MensRights07/09/19 04:36 PM
2

I've had a couple SOs over the years where we'd sleep with hands on boobs, butts, crotches, simply because that's where it was comfortable to put them. Is he touching you sexually, or do you just assume that if he's touching your butt or your "private area or around it" that it's necessarily sexual? If you only sleep with him "like once a year" it sounds like this touching doesn't usually go anywhere, but you're not speaking up and shutting it down... so how does that usually play out?
/r/MensRights07/09/19 02:07 PM
-3

What part of "No means No" was confusing for you?
/r/MensRights07/09/19 01:45 PM
1

I'd posit that what's "masculine" or "feminine" is defined by what men and women do, not the other way around.
/r/MensRights06/09/19 12:49 PM
2

Honk Honk
/r/MensRights06/09/19 07:59 AM
4

Informal poll: How often have you been helping a female coworker or intern or underling with something like explaining a system drawing or going over some data/graph, and when you look up or turn to her to check whether she has any questions, she's gotten significantly closer than you'd expect a person to normally be in this situation?
/r/MensRights06/09/19 03:17 AM
2

Karen DeCrow, president of N.O.W. from 1974-77: The courts have properly determined that a man should neither be able to force a woman to have an abortion nor to prevent her from having one, should she so choose. Justice therefore dictates that if a woman makes a unilateral decision to bring pregnancy to term, and the biological father does not, and cannot, share in this decision, he should not be liable for 21 years of support. Or, put another way, autonomous women making independent decisions …
/r/MensRights06/09/19 01:53 AM
-6

Poe's Law is in effect.
/r/MensRights05/09/19 12:06 PM
1

Why are you making excuses for the Nazi-lovers, bruh? Not a good look.
/r/MensRights05/09/19 11:50 AM
4

No, silly. You see, murder is unlawfully killing someone, plus power... /s
/r/MensRights05/09/19 07:14 AM
6

The mods there liked it so much they made it a pinned post. I suppose that type of post is a valid strategic move if you're a lesbian trying to improve your chances by damaging other women's chances of successfully dating men.
/r/MensRights05/09/19 07:06 AM
3

I can’t imagine safe haven laws are common Is "every state" common? nor do I believe that women can get out of child support if a man wanted to have custody of the baby From the Census.gov's Custodial Mothers and Fathers and Their Child Support: 2015: "Custodial mothers were more likely to receive full child support payments in 2015 (44.9 percent) than custodial fathers (35.5 percent). A larger proportion of custodial fathers did not receive any child support payments in 2015 (41.3 percent) than…
/r/MensRights05/09/19 02:32 AM
3

The ACLU backing away from maintaining a principled/universalist stance on civil and human rights really puts their choice to defend neo-Nazi groups in a somewhat different light.
/r/MensRights05/09/19 01:32 AM
1

Analyze the 2015 CDC NISVS State Report for the rape stats. Women perpetrate a majority of domestic violence.
/r/MensRights05/09/19 01:26 AM
3

Gender equal reproductive rights. Better checks&balances and protection for children's relationship with both parents during and following divorce or separation. Awareness, recognition, and adequate support services for all victims of domestic/sexual abuse, regardless of the genders of the victims and perpetrators. Elimination of the large gender biases in law-enforcement and criminal justice. The right to vote, unencumbered by submission to military service or the risk thereof.
/r/MensRights05/09/19 01:19 AM
2

I suppose the 1.42 million rapes each year by female perpetrators are committed by transgender "sons". I suppose the 56% of intimate partner violence perpetrated by feeeeeemales is committed by transgender "sons". I wonder how many of the men and women charged with murder each year are similarly misgendered.
/r/MensRights05/09/19 01:09 AM
3

Usually men who get raped, get raped by other men. 70+% of male rape victims report female perpetrators. the consequence of sex is having to pay child support Every state has "Safe Haven" law where a woman can feasibly legally abandon an unwanted child, no questions asked, no further obligations or responsibilities, no "best interests of the child" handwave to try to justify violating her reproductive rights and force her to use her body to support the unwanted child. But how is it fair that a w…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/19 12:41 AM
1

There's no reason to bring abortion into this discussion at all, other than maybe to off-hand acknowledge that, of course, gender equal reproductive rights would still include acess to abortion. Every state already has "Safe Haven" law where it's feasible for a woman to legally abandon an unwanted child, no questions asked, no further obligations or redponsibilities, no "best interests of the child" handwave to try to justify violating her reproductive rights and force her to use her body to sup…
/r/MensRights04/09/19 11:48 PM
2

You are assuming that the child does not feel a bond with the man. It is in the first case that the State engineers a condition where this bond is denied. That is why it's worse from the child's perspective.
/r/MensRights04/09/19 12:04 PM
6

Or it's a matter of greater male variability, so, as a result of the wider/flatter statistical distribution of traits in men compared to women, the further you get into outliers (e.g., CEOs) the more the population will skew male. Or a bit of both.
/r/MensRights04/09/19 09:26 AM
33

Ya, but you're forgetting that girls go to schools!
/r/MensRights04/09/19 09:23 AM
2

From the father's perspective, the second one. From the child's perspective, the first one.
/r/MensRights04/09/19 06:59 AM
3

a higher suicide attempt rate in women suggests a higher rate of depression, does it not? It does not. Read the second link, too.
/r/MensRights04/09/19 06:48 AM
1

Men are geting getting treated horribly horribly. we We need to fix it. here's Here's one of the unfair laws laws: Then you appear to be plagiarizing an article in a series from somewhere else. You could just link to the article. This is just one one. their There are many more . Laws more laws even worst worse then than this this. come Come on let's make a change change.
/r/MensRights04/09/19 01:22 AM
1

Men are geting treated horribly we need to fix here's What. Fix the multiple grammar, spelling, and formatting errors before you post things like this. As mentioned in the comments when you posted this two hours ago, you can post the rough draft of the text here and people will help you correct the wonkier bits. Then you can recreate the corrected petition/campaign.
/r/MensRights04/09/19 12:55 AM
1

I just find it bizarre to be presented with a dry statistical scenario that in a given hypothetical time period... 1400 women attempted suicide. 1000 men attempted suicide. 700 of the men died. 200 of the women died. ...and be outraged that someone would dare to "stupidly" suggest focusing suicide prevention resources on men more than women.
/r/MensRights04/09/19 12:48 AM
9

Adult male circumcision associated with greater sexual satisfaction Neat. What are the comparable figures for women? For instance, cosmetic labiaplasty is considerably more common than elective adult male circumcision, so by this we may assume you would be logically consistent and agree that cutting up little girls genitals is even more justified than cutting off pieces of little boys genitals? Or would you have an epiphany that, hmmm, maybe we shouldn't be cutting up/off any children's genitals…
/r/MensRights04/09/19 12:40 AM
1

that's where the problem is This? Or maybe stupidity like this?
/r/MensRights04/09/19 12:32 AM
3

Folks tend to get mad at the people who defend genital mutilation.
/r/MensRights04/09/19 12:00 AM
2

The {breadwinner,homemaker} division of labor in human pairing seems to go back even further than the invention of agriculture, but I don't agree that it's necessarily a 1:1 bijection with {husband,wife}. Thus, in a case where a woman is the (or a) financial support for the spouse, partnership, and/or family, what it means to be a "good wife" is not to have traditional homemaking skills, but to have the selfless net-provider mindset that makes for a good breadwinner (i.e., "good husband", tradit…
/r/MensRights03/09/19 11:50 PM
1

It's interesting that they handwave away demographic trends in crime statistics with "purely socioeconomic factors", but don't actually pursue what happens to the demographic trends when you control for socioeconomic factors. If these trends were totally erased, possibly reversed, or even just significantly reduced, you'd think that would be a point worth stressing. For instance, when muh wage gap needs debunking, I'm happy to cite Bureau of Labor Statistics data to show that even the simplest f…
/r/MensRights03/09/19 10:59 PM
2

Multiple spelling, grammar, and formatting errors in the text of the petition.
/r/MensRights03/09/19 10:33 PM
1

No, the DNA of a cancerous cell is YOUR DNA and scientists can still tell that it's yours. Sorry for the confusion, I'm talking about the subset of tumors who have DNA that differs from the host organism and are thus uniquely identified human people (according to your arguments as thus-far stated). They aren't, So, it's not a individual person, despite having human DNA?... when does it become a person? Is it a person when it's two cells? What if those cells separate and become single-cells? Are …
/r/MensRights03/09/19 07:27 AM
15

It's just cognitive dissonance messing with them. Try not to take it personally. Figure out the necessary mental gymnastics to present whatever you wish to bring up under the guise of it being a feminist issue. If you're lucky, they'll still experience the cognitive dissonance, but you'll have put them in the position of having to attack feminism to make it go away.
/r/MensRights03/09/19 07:16 AM
1

Thus: the unique human DNA of a cancerous tumor identifies it as a person. Or you've left something important out of your argument and you are not proposing such an obviously ridiculous outcome. Feel free to clarify. Also, don't forget your "humans aren't single celled organisms" claim!
/r/MensRights03/09/19 07:03 AM
1

I'm assuming you dodged this question because you're incapable of honesty I'm just not reading your replies that closely since you seem to have trouble distinguishing between the conversation about DNA evidence as actually (mis)used by courts and the theoretical capabilities of arbitrarily advanced DNA analyses. None of which has any relevance to the original topic of discussion, of course, which is why I'm not paying it much attention. "If all the black fetuses were eliminated would that be an …
/r/MensRights03/09/19 06:58 AM
1

> being this bootyblasted because someone pointed out you fell for the DNA-as-incriminating-evidence meme K. Human DNA uniquely identifies an individual. Human DNA cannot exist without belonging to a person, we are not single cell organisms. Interesting. So you argue a single-celled zygote is not a person, but a multicellular cancerous tumor (whose DNA differs from the person it's growing inside) is a uniquely identified individual. Compare this to using "personhood", or using quality-of-life me…
/r/MensRights03/09/19 06:33 AM
4

Meh. The relationship advice subreddits often jump directly to "Dump them!" for even the most minor problems, but in this case it's probably the correct advice.
/r/MensRights03/09/19 12:56 AM
2

Seems kinda weird for the first bullet point to talk about male perpetrators when male rape victims have 71.1% female perpetrators.
/r/MensRights03/09/19 12:13 AM
1

Creepers gonna creep. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
/r/MensRights02/09/19 11:11 PM
8

Don't forget that girls watch porn, too, and might have their expectations of what is acceptable bedroom behaviours distorted as well. Boys will be very quick to learn from their partners what is and isn't acceptable, but not if those partners' expectations are just as skewed. You are unlikely to find a complete solution if you only consider half of the problem.
/r/MensRights02/09/19 10:49 PM
5

Many states have statutes that define certain parental rights, which may include a right to being informed in a timely manner about the child's health. Depending on circumstances, that right may be exercised by you being able to contact the healthcare provider to get such information on your own, rather than establishing any basis to expect the other parent to inform you. Contact a legal professional qualified to give legal advice in the relevant jurisdiction(s) to get a more complete answer of …
/r/MensRights02/09/19 10:41 PM
5

This is the plan for a Genocidal Feminist utopia outlined by founders of Gender Studies 40-50 years ago: The Future is Female. Every culture must begin to affirm a female future. Species responsibility must be returned to women in every culture. The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately 10% of the human race.
/r/MensRights02/09/19 10:31 PM
1

The level of stupid here is astounding, I guess we'll have to let everyone convicted by way of DNA evidence off the hook. It's not my problem that you fail to state your claims precisely and they are thus easily debunked. DNA evidence is the backbone of nearly every criminal justice case in the modern world. Mainly because juries do not understand it, and thus do not understand its limitations or potential irrelevance to establishing guilt. Or its definite irrelevance to establishing personhood.…
/r/MensRights02/09/19 08:38 PM
1

Understanding why dress codes exist and who they benefit would hugely undermine the "teach boys not to rape be distracted" gaslighting.
/r/MensRights01/09/19 01:49 AM
2

it already exists. This part's false. No, it exists. It's just the methods are currently only effectively accessible to women. This is an important rhetorical and conceptual position to maintain: there are no "new rights" being demanded. Every state in the US already has a legal process by which a woman can abandon her supposedly irrevocable, paramount over all things, responsibilities and obligations to a child, no questions asked. Every state already has a legal process by which a woman can pu…
/r/MensRights01/09/19 01:30 AM
2

I had an SO/ex who cyberstalked me on reddit for a few years. I just got in the habit of regularly deleting old account activity, and then changing to a new account periodically. There's not much else you can do with creepy people like that.
/r/MensRights29/08/19 08:07 AM
1

Here's some data on Australian labour force participation by gender or age if anyone would like to have a go.
/r/MensRights29/08/19 02:15 AM
–

Based on occasionally looking into what "incels" talked about when their threads drifted through the /all/top?t=hour feed (usually linked to via one of the hate subreddits, incidentally), the underlying origin story is that these are young adults who have been unable to overcome the dysfunctional coping strategies they needed in order to survive childhoods with abusive single mothers. It is a normal human reaction for survivors of abuse to have anger at their abusers. Often they've had so few op…
/r/MensRights29/08/19 02:10 AM
5

She can falsely accuse you of rape whether you have sex with her or not. Someone inclined to such a thing might falsely accuse you of rape because you refused to have sex with her. should I be worried because of this? Nah. Worrying won't help you and there's not really any reasonable steps you can take to 100% protect yourself. Assume good faith and proceed as you would if she was a normal well-adjusted person. She probably is.
/r/MensRights29/08/19 01:18 AM
5

I bet he gives out safety goggles and other PPE, too, the fuckin' weirdo!
/r/MensRights29/08/19 01:10 AM
1

Keep in mind this only accounts for hours worked by women who do work. Labor force participation of women is lower than men by similar margins, too. Men work more and longer hours to support women working less (or not working at all).
/r/MensRights29/08/19 01:07 AM
5

You may be able to obtain your own official copy of the birth certificate from "Vital Records" or similar office wherever the child was born. You may have certain parental rights explicitly defined by statute. Find out what those are and exercise them. Many define some minimum level of contact. Keep a logbook/record of how you attempt to maintain the child's relationship with both parents and how the mother interferes with the child's relationship with you.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 08:37 AM
5

Men's suits with short sleeves and short pants also exist, so there are equivalents. Even if they were available in non-clown-like patterns and formal fabrics, you'd still never mistake them for serious business attire.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 03:27 AM
1

I think the disorder is more prevalent than you think it is The clinical definition of "disorder" has a significant socialization component, though, and it is entirely legitimate to view the prevalence of "disorder" to be the result of social environments that are dysfunctional and hostile to mental health rather than a product of individual mental illness or misbehaviour. I.e., "disordered" individuals are healthy, it is society that is sick.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 02:10 AM
5

Pregnancy/Childbirth leave is often a separate medical benefit in addition to maternity/paternity/parental/family leave.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 01:48 AM
1

PSA: clicking google drive/docs/sheets links while logged in to google services may reveal your account details (e.g., username, geolocation data) to the owner of the accessed document. Malicious actors have used this to collect personally identifying information of users of targeted communities and used it for real-world harassment and attacks.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 01:44 AM
7

Doesn't criminal polygamy technically invalidate and annul subsequent marriages? In which case, how does one enforce a divorce decree against someone who was never legally married?
/r/MensRights28/08/19 01:39 AM
1

In the cases of children experiencing severe enough mental illness that they are incapable of engaging with and benefitting from nonmedical therapies, sure, drugs may be appropriate to get them stabilized to the point that working on the problem is made possible. But, as you seem to agree, this is often not what's happening in the case of routinely drugging "problem children" (i.e., boys) into docile zombies.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 01:23 AM
19

It's kind of weird actually looking into some of the claims. E.g., Rosalind Franklin. Claim: Watson&Crick stole the discovery of the structure of DNA from her! If a male x-ray crystallography tech in the lab had processed the provided sample you likely would never have heard of him at all, much less had people claiming he should've been included on the Nobel. What's funny is that there are women who have made important contributions to science and technology (e.g. McClintock, Curie, Hopper, etc.…
/r/MensRights28/08/19 01:12 AM
1

What do you think of some feminists who may say that false accusations are less important than unreported rapes or sexual harassments? I think you should respond to this question without allowing it to be derailed to talk about female victims. Men who do not report the women who rape or sexually harass them may allow these predatory women to go on to victimize other men (and woman, for that matter), but threats of false accusation are a common m.o. for rapists to coerce compliance and/or silence…
/r/MensRights28/08/19 12:48 AM
1

Family Court is kind of bizarre in that there are statutory guidelines that are often pretty straightforward... but the judge can completely ignore them and order whatever they want. Usually the difference between a good lawyer and a bad lawyer isn't knowledge of law but of the judge. So a less expensive local lawyer who appears in the local courts regularly may be a better choice than a more expensive lawyer from out-of-town.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 12:10 AM
1

Children should not be routinely medicated in this fashion. They have the neuroplasticity to learn different behavioural coping strategies before they reach adulthood. If you instead force their brains to adapt to the presence of externally dosed drugs, you end up with adults who can never regain normal function, are permanently mentally disabled, and are lifetime drug users.
/r/MensRights27/08/19 11:52 PM
3

Jaaam
/r/MensRights27/08/19 07:55 AM
1

Pretty good chance someone will cut off the most sensitive parts of your genitals without anesthesia before you're even a week old. It gets worse from there.
/r/MensRights27/08/19 05:36 AM
1

By your Scottish criteria, perhaps.
/r/MensRights27/08/19 03:19 AM
–

Am I? No. There's psychology research showing that lack of gender bigotry that benefits women is often incorrectly percieved as sexism/misogyny.
/r/MensRights26/08/19 11:54 PM
14

You tried to be nice and set it at a lower-than-usual amount and she's exploiting your willingness to do her favors to further harm the child. You cannot rely on her to have the child's best interests in mind, and must use the established process to try to protect the kid. If the calculation ends up being more than the kid needs on a routine basis, just put away the extra as a college fund or something.
/r/MensRights26/08/19 11:50 PM
8

Sample size is adequate, but it's an online poll of YouGov users... so there may be some problems other than sample size. OTOH, it's comparing two YouGov polls to each other, so unless there's been a sneaky feminist conspiracy to infiltrate and damage YouGov in the past two years (as has been done with Wikipedia for a while, for instance), those sampling errors would presumably exist in both surveys and the relative change would nevertheless be relevant even if the absolute results were worthles…
/r/MensRights26/08/19 09:29 AM
2

It's a fairly standard child abuse strategy in the family courts to arrive at a schedule of visitation that requires single-parent flexibility in the non-custodial parent's work hours, but combine it with a child-support order that requires abject wage-slavery to not go into arrears. Eventually one or both of these obligations starts to slip and any informal "I'll work with you." promises get overwhelmed by the temptation of cranking the ratchet to get more money "for the child".
/r/MensRights26/08/19 03:33 AM
3

Old 'n' Busted: "Toxic Masculinity BAD!" New Hotness: "Toxic Masculinity GOOD!"
/r/MensRights26/08/19 03:09 AM
1

Joe Rogan will always and forever be, to me, that guy who repeatedly brought up that he was a supporting character on a TV sitcom in an IRC channel where I used to hang out and no one ever cared. It's bizarre to me that anyone takes him seriously.
/r/MensRights26/08/19 02:00 AM
4

/pol/ also engages in meta-false flagging where they claim responsibility for ridiculous shit that, perhaps surprisingly, is the authentic work of real people. The whole "If a straight cis male isn't attracted to a transwoman, he must be trans-/homophobic!" canard is something that existed in the wild long before that /pol/ thread.
/r/MensRights26/08/19 01:31 AM
1

How so e.g.,: "I'm a Christian, but don't think the entire bible is truth." "No true Christian would deny the entire bible is truth!" what's your point? Your example of NOT a NTS appears to be a NTS of the Gatekeeping variety.
/r/MensRights26/08/19 12:53 AM
1

Gatekeeping is arguably a form of No True Scotsman.
/r/MensRights26/08/19 12:26 AM
1

acceptance of the entire bible as a truth IS a qualifier for being a Christian Except for all the Christians who disagree that biblical fundamentalism is a necessary qualification to being a TRUE SCOTTISH Christian.
/r/MensRights26/08/19 12:18 AM
1

DNA uniquely identifies a person. Almost every living organism on Earth has DNA. Nearly 100% of them are not persons. So that's false. Our Legal systems universally rely on this. Look up thee FBI forensics lab scandal where much their "expert" trial testimony was found to have greatly overstated the evidentiary value of their findings. DNA testing of they type generally used in law enforcement is basically only useful for exculpatory purposes, it usually cannot differentiate between close relati…
/r/MensRights23/08/19 07:18 PM
1

Nah, just seems like you'd fit in better there. Maybe try /TheRedPill, too.
/r/MensRights23/08/19 07:10 PM
2

They pretend that the PUA cargo cult is relevant because it's somewhat harder to make fun of children who barely see their fathers due to institutional and systemic biases against men.
/r/MensRights21/08/19 08:18 AM
12

https://www.debates-debats.ca/ is the organizational website. They have social media presence, so those various accounts may be a good place to message to complain or to ask where complaints should be directed.
/r/MensRights21/08/19 12:11 AM
1

OkTrends had a bunch of article about who men and women messaged based on various demographic factors. The OkTrends article on age preferences may be most relevant to the "where have all the good men gone"/"can't handle a strong independent woman" cope articles. In short: successful career-oriented women are cannibalizing irrecoverable attributes that matter to mate selection and maxing out a dump stat.
/r/MensRights21/08/19 12:00 AM
21

Where might concerned members of the public register their complaints over this lack of diversity and inclusion?
/r/MensRights20/08/19 11:22 PM
1

Gynocentric privilege from the 7th century.
/r/MensRights20/08/19 07:39 AM
1

If it was recent, you may be thinking of this? I've always enjoyed the annual Canadian dress code stories that occur in spring because they almost never point out that the (equal or greater number of) boys who were sent home for violations would have been allowed to stay under the more-lenient girl's dress code. And then the obvious plant parent reciting "maybe we should teach boys not to be distracted" type lines, ignoring that attention-seeking behavior is more disttracting to the person perfo…
/r/MensRights19/08/19 07:31 PM
9

You read that right, more men are emotionally abused than are women. The majority of rape victims are men, not too surprising that the majority of abuse victims would be men, too. While it is true that women are more likely to be physically abused than men I'd be unsurprised if it turns out that's not true, either, but simply that physical abuse against women occurs mainly in reciprocally abusive relationships and the injuries of male victims are simply unrecognized as being the result of abuse …
/r/MensRights19/08/19 11:36 AM
32

Toxic masculinity is: Heroic self-sacrifice Their conversation always seems to leave out the "toxic masculinity" that benefits others at the expense of men.
/r/MensRights19/08/19 07:32 AM
6

> I mean, say what you want about the tenets of National Socialism, Dude, at least it's an ethos.
/r/MensRights19/08/19 04:20 AM
16

Skimpy clothing is a distraction to girls & damages their education. Any given onlooker might spend a few moments reacting to an inappropriately dressed classmate, but the student in the thot costume is constantly distracted by evaluating whether their attention-seeking behaviours are succeeding and how people are reacting to their appearance.
/r/MensRights19/08/19 04:14 AM
6

Never once have I heard any sane woman claim that the population of men should be reduced to 10% This doesn't really dispute the point, though, does it? how does it show up in modern acedemia, genuinely curious The field of Gender Studies.
/r/MensRights19/08/19 04:04 AM
11

that extremist view >mainstream academia >mainstream politics Yep. Absolute tinfoil fringe, not like True Scottish Feminism.
/r/MensRights19/08/19 03:52 AM
5

In case you're wondering what I'm quoting in the last bit, it's part of the planned Genocidal Feminist utopia laid out by Gender Studies founders 40-50 years ago: The Future is Female. Every culture must begin to affirm a female future. Species responsibility must be returned to women in every culture. The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately 10% of the human race.
/r/MensRights19/08/19 03:42 AM
4

I'm a guy, let me put that out there real quick. How do you do, fellow kids? I believe that a person can fight for both men’s and women’s rights and equality. I’m a centrist in nearly every sense. I have very few strong political beliefs except for an egalitarian treatment of everybody. Gender, sex, sexuality, race. Everything. And I think that men and women both have issues, and almost more importantly there are issues in how these problems are discussed. K. There is a severe sense of “Us Vs. t…
/r/MensRights19/08/19 03:34 AM
0

making it a gender issue is nonsense https://www.news-press.com/story/news/2019/07/10/suicide-gun-range-prevention-shooting-sports-florida/3365448002/
/r/MensRights19/08/19 12:47 AM
3

Then we have some gun ranges around here that must be getting a few million customers per year.
/r/MensRights19/08/19 12:41 AM
1

It's been a thing for single adult men to rent a gun and then commit suicide.
/r/MensRights18/08/19 10:43 PM
1

Reminder. Discrimination on the bases of race, national/ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age, or mental/physical disability is explicitly legal in Canada, per 15(2) of the Charter.
/r/MensRights18/08/19 10:39 PM
1

also grants a power to the States (to regulate their own militia) "Well-regulated" simply means "trained". There were Militia Acts passed in the first couple decades following the American Revolution that tried to stipulate how State militia should be trained, organized and equipped, specifying how many men should be assigned to infantry, cavalry, artillery, etc. and that that each man should appear as required by schedule with such-and-such personal weapons, and such-and-such quantity of ball a…
/r/MensRights17/08/19 11:48 PM
0

I've found that a lot of times when you bring up reproductive rights, particularly gender equal reproductive rights, "pro-choice" people want to talk exclusively about abortion instead.
/r/MensRights17/08/19 05:47 PM
5

"A well-balanced breakfast, being necessary to the start of a healthy day, the right of the people to cook and eat food, shall not be infringed." As we can see, cooking and eating food is a right of well-balanced breakfasts, not people.
/r/MensRights17/08/19 05:28 PM
3

nah, "spurgled" works just fine for rape-resulting-in-pregnancy regardless of gender
/r/MensRights17/08/19 02:18 PM
2

It's part of the planned Genocidal Feminist utopia laid out by Gender Studies founders 40-50 years ago: The Future is Female. Every culture must begin to affirm a female future. Species responsibility must be returned to women in every culture. The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately 10% of the human race.
/r/MensRights17/08/19 02:16 PM
8

So long as law enforcement remains just another tool in the abuser's toolkit, there's not much you can do for the victims beyond help them to recognize that it is abuse and they need to get out before it escalates.
/r/MensRights17/08/19 02:13 PM
1

Male hyperagency; female hypoagency. Gender malagency is the foundation of traditionalist/feminist gender roles.
/r/MensRights17/08/19 01:42 PM
1

Did you mistype /MensLib or something?
/r/MensRights17/08/19 01:41 PM
1

the DNA is that of a unique human being. No, it isn't, unless you completely gut the definition of "human being" to the point where it's referring something a person would be justified in killing for any (or no) reason.
/r/MensRights17/08/19 01:40 PM
16

When you suggested that all victims should be recognized and treated with equal seriousness, what these bigots heard was you telling them they should think of female victims the same way they think of male victims. This is why these bigots view bringing up male victims as derailing or minimizing or belittling discussion of female victims.
/r/MensRights13/08/19 05:53 AM
1

It seems like The Bloodstained Men have been getting pretty fair coverage over the past couple of months.
/r/MensRights13/08/19 01:53 AM
1

She also used her position as a judge on American Idol to coerce an uncomfortable teenage male contestant into kissing her on the lips about a year and a half ago.
/r/MensRights13/08/19 01:34 AM
14

Using data from the 2015 CDC NISVS State Report: 97.3% of 1.473m female victims of "Rape" have only male perpetrators. 86.5% of 0.219m male victims of "Rape" have only male perpetrators. 78.5% of 1.715m male victims of "Made-to-Penetrate" have only female perpetrators. (The 12-month estimate for number of female victims of "Made-to-Penetrate" is zero.) From this we can see that 50.3% of rape victims fall into "Made-to-Penetrate" and are thus excluded from the CDC's NISVS discussion of "Rape". Fr…
/r/MensRights13/08/19 01:10 AM
1

LURK MOAR
/r/MensRights12/08/19 06:27 PM
4

Sure we do. Just look at the bang-up job May did.
/r/MensRights12/08/19 06:48 AM
2

Starting amount of Total Support is taken from look-up table based on the parents combined gross income and various government reports on the median costs and spending of similarly situated parents. Ordered Support for each parent is based on their relative share of income. Each parent is required to pay their Ordered Support in an account specifically for supporting the child. The amount each parent is authorized to use from the child's support account is based on their relative share of parent…
/r/MensRights12/08/19 06:42 AM
1

Is it usually your habit to reply with verbose non sequiturs, or is there some chance you'll address anything I've written? I don't do one-night stands. Translation: you don't fuck on the first date. Which is fine. I find one-night-stands generally pointless, too, but if you do fuck on the first date, you're going to have some girls who were just tryna get laid and the occasional ONS is inevitable. I've found I prefer relationships with people who are DtF, though, so it's an acceptable trade-off…
/r/MensRights12/08/19 03:53 AM
3

My ex mostly just used custody exchanges as her opportunity to try to fuck with me in one way or another since I otherwise minimized contact with her, but she definitely had no qualms about targeting the kids if she wasn't satisfied with the results she was getting. Would she murder them? I don't know. I'm not going to pushback hard enough to find out, because what do you do with that information? If I'm not sure how far she'd go, I can pretend she's just a terrible person taking out her frustra…
/r/MensRights12/08/19 02:45 AM
1

You know that we can think that both can be wrong at the same time right? This is not a zero sum game. Here's a thing, though. I definitely, probably axiomatically, disagree with the overall "pro-life" position, but it is (or can be, at least) an internally consistent argument. So while it's "wrong" in the "disagree" sense, it's not provably wrong. "Pro-choice" opposition to reproductive rights, otoh, is a self-contradictory shitmess that is incorrect on fundamental level that renders it logical…
/r/MensRights12/08/19 02:26 AM
1

Vasectomy doesn't take away your cum. Vasectomy doesn't take away your ability to contract STDs. Or to infect others, for that matter. Maybe you don't feel like having a risk-factors conversation with a one night stand begging you to come inside her rather than just using a condom.
/r/MensRights12/08/19 02:12 AM
1

The risk to the daughter may be a concern. It's all well and good to say "know your rights, refuse manipulation, and find the funds for a court battle" and then, months later and k$ poorer, she murders your kid because if she can't have her, no one will.
/r/MensRights12/08/19 01:59 AM
6

Why are men excepted to be more open about their feelings "Be more like women." is not necessarily a solution, much in the same way that not being like women is not necessarily a problem in the first place.
/r/MensRights12/08/19 01:43 AM
5

"found the incel" Are you sure it wasn't just a mirror?
/r/MensRights12/08/19 01:37 AM
1

By ''folks'' I meant the people who wants to take women's rights for abortion to make things ''equal''. Why not mean the folks who want to prioritize "women's rights" over gender equality? They jeopardize both in their selfish irresponsibility, after all. Male victims of female on male rape are not recognized by law in many countries for example, but that doesn't mean that we should work to make female victims of rape unrecognizable by law too. Smashing the Patriarchy means ending Rape Culture, …
/r/MensRights12/08/19 01:31 AM
1

just for clarification I figure a goodly amount aren't aware they're supporting and normalizing a genocidal hate ideology. But, as I mentioned, you also see Der Endlosung Die Judenfrage The Future is Female in contexts (such as major party presidential campaigns) where simple ignorance is unlikely.
/r/MensRights12/08/19 01:08 AM
6

Users may not wish to waste metered/mobile data on videos. Users may not wish to give views to random YouTube videos. Users may not wish to devote their time to high-attention/low-content media like videos. Thus: summarize the video if you want feedback from everyone who isn't going to watch it.
/r/MensRights12/08/19 12:58 AM
1

Summarize whatever "this" from the video you're asking about.
/r/MensRights12/08/19 12:33 AM
1

Technically, "vasectomy reversal" only means the separated ends of the vas deferens can be reattached to each other. It does not mean effective fertility has been restored. All these folks telling dudes they should get the snip in highschool because they can just get it reversed when they're 30 and ready to start a family are so grossly misinformed (and oddly so abruptly ubiquitous) that I'm curious if it's a deliberate op.
/r/MensRights12/08/19 12:32 AM
1

I think that we can agree that those folks are wrong, right? The folks who maintain that it's justifiable to force people into nonconsensual parenthood? Absolutely. However, opposition to reproductive rights is one of the few areas where "pro-choice" and "pro-life" people agree. Having less rights shouldn't mean that we should take the rights of other people, we should only fight for our rights. The risk of women's rights being made equal to men's is an expedient means to get people to agree men…
/r/MensRights12/08/19 12:19 AM
1

Why would you not tell them? Lotta girls fucking love it when a dude comes inside them and will become petulant, and probably offended, if you deny them this because you'd prefer to use condoms for sexual health reasons. Leaving the spectre of unwanted pregnancy on the table keeps them on your side, so you don't have to fight them to continue practicing safer sex.
/r/MensRights12/08/19 12:08 AM
9

There's the Richard O. Phillips v. Sharon Irons case where it's not disputed that she inseminated herself without his knowledge or consent using semen she obtained from him through oral sex. There are way too many hits of people telling stories on social media about girlfriend or female roomates getting caught doing weird shit with used condoms pulled out of the trash to find a specific court case mentioning it. Did see a result where it appeared the plan was to falsely accuse the victim of rape…
/r/MensRights11/08/19 11:57 PM
4

No adjustment for hours worked. Confusion of cohort effects with causal effects.
/r/MensRights11/08/19 11:38 PM
1

Sure. No one should be forced to use their body to support an unwanted child and we should respect that every person has the right to choose to be, or not to be, a parent. Unfortunately, so long as society continues to maintain that it's justifiable to force people into nonconsensual parenthood, there will be "pro-life" folks who say that applies in a gender equal manner. Don't like it? Stop opposing reproductive rights.
/r/MensRights11/08/19 11:26 PM
1

There is no way to create equity in every one. Nor should there be. Go read Harrison Bergeron. The existence of a given disparity does not per se justify a specifically targeted equity program to address each and every individual disadvantage a person may experience.
/r/MensRights11/08/19 11:15 PM
1

Oh, I agree that feminists, racists, and other bigots will try to undermine the integrity of the "reasonable metrics" so it will produce a desired result (or at least not produce an undesired result). You can already see that conversation happening when, e.g., an AI that doesn't know anything about sex or gender determines that the best way to boost future productivity is to stop hiring women. It's possible the AI is just replicating existing biases in the system. It's also possible the AI is ju…
/r/MensRights11/08/19 10:57 PM
1

Sorry what? Genocidal Feminism? Wipe out 45% of population? It's part of the planned utopia laid out by Gender Studies founder Sally Miller Gearhart: The Future is Female. Every culture must begin to affirm a female future. Species responsibility must be returned to women in every culture. The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately 10% of the human race.
/r/MensRights11/08/19 10:45 PM
1

The next step if they don't respond to demands doesn't need to be "violent revolution", but peaceful protests can and will be ignored indefinitely unless/until it's hurting them. Bad publicity, boycotts, etc. are all steps that can by tried before you even get to sabre rattling. But, yeah, The People having the will, and means, to change things by force is a necessary part of the system of checks and balances.
/r/MensRights11/08/19 10:40 PM
1

Children MUST come first. So, once the child is born, then whoops, all your rights are forfeit, so too bad for you. Elective (de facto unilateral) adoption and every state's "Safe Haven" abandonment law determines this is a lie. If this was a true claim, it would be logically consistent to hold women who use these methods of exercising their reproductive rights responsible for paying child support. Pretty sure a case could be made to require child support to be paid in the case of abortion, too.…
/r/MensRights11/08/19 11:44 AM
1

Cryogenic gamete storage has shelf life issues and is not feasible for longer term preservation of fertility. Most labs will quite happily continue accepting your monthly payments to keep your eggs or sperm in liquid nitrogen, though. They'll even let you waste tens of thousands of dollars on in vitro treatments that will never work with your haploid cells that probably died in stasis after less than a decade.
/r/MensRights11/08/19 08:48 AM
4

The thing about "equity" that Gender Studies does wrong is using it to justify discrimination on the bases of sex, race, gender, etc. You can implement an "equity" program to offer extra help and resources to anyone and everyone who has some measurable disadvantage. If a particular identity group is disproportionately disadvantaged, the equity program will automatically disproportionately help them without undermining equality. If you make the mistake of codifying discrimination into your equity…
/r/MensRights11/08/19 08:32 AM
5

Restoring and protecting the free market and reestablishing the philosophy of derived authority flowing from the people to the organizations they create sounds nice on paper but it will always and constantly be undermined by the ratcheting accumulation of power enabled by unregulated capitalism and goverment by mob rule. For a time, people will remember the strife of recovery and securing their free state, but eventually we forget and it takes so long for authoritarians and capitalists to topple…
/r/MensRights11/08/19 07:57 AM
2

The only time it ever has was Gandhi Not then, either. Those in power chose to elevate Gandhi because Ghadar and Jugantar were the alternatives. The thing that differentiates him from (arguably) MLK and (definitely) later nonviolence fluffers is that Gandhi very much understood the reason and context for being given his position and what role he needed to play.
/r/MensRights11/08/19 07:27 AM
7

Men trying to restore balance and fairness to divorce? Virgins. Fathers trying to protect their children's best interests? TOTAL virgins. Boys who have been raped by women and want justice? Fuckin' incels. People who don't think that genocide of 45% of humans is a good idea? Sexually frustrated Nazis, obviously.
/r/MensRights11/08/19 06:46 AM
1

I do it to make the pedants twitchy.
/r/MensRights11/08/19 06:20 AM
1

YOU are not the issue. She is. Being platonically, romantically, and/or sexually incompatible with someone doesn't mean either of you is "the issue". If a square peg doesn't fit in a round hole, the time you waste trying to decide if "the issue" was the peg being too square or the hole being too round is time you could've spent looking for a square hole and/or a round peg. The Issue is y'all'ren't compatible. It's not that she's not good enough for you, or you're not good enough for her, or she …
/r/MensRights11/08/19 06:17 AM
5

Sounds like the type of girl that would be elated if her ex's new girlfriend was uglier than her, not having the self-awareness to realize that the abject horror of her personality is what finally broke him of prioritizing appearances.
/r/MensRights11/08/19 05:53 AM
3

I think too much progress has been made towards recognizing all victims (and perpetrators) of abuse for Feminists to try to pull that kind of wildly unbalanced bullshit. They know it would put them at risk of being held accountable for the harms they cause, and you can't have that, oh no...
/r/MensRights11/08/19 04:47 AM
1

which doesn't have any translation for men The physical toll of selling your life&labor to pay 18+ years of child support.
/r/MensRights11/08/19 04:07 AM
1

> She made the decision to put his dick in her. Smh the child didnt make the decision to be born. The child is the important part of this. If you don't want children use contraceptives. If your spouse or fuck buddy decides to pull the wool over your eyes. It's your fault for putting crazy's dick in you. Please stop opposing reproductive rights like a forklift-driving maga-hat-wearing fuck.
/r/MensRights11/08/19 03:46 AM
1

There are other bills that popped up when looking for the repeal that did seem to contain various bits and pieces of the 2000 Act, but I didn't dig into them. That may be what your "previous reading" is talking about. But the Domestic Violence Provention Act of 2000 was repealed and replaced by the introduction of the bill for the Lori Dupont Act... which looked to be much of the same verbiage, just rebranded to exploit a popularly known death, and stipulated to come into force upon Royal Assent…
/r/MensRights11/08/19 03:34 AM
1

This Act comes into force on a day to be named by proclamation of the Lieutenant Governor. Executor not proclaiming a date an act comes into force has an effect similar to the US presidential "pocket veto". Acts in "upon proclamation" limbo are tracked. In theory, anything still active in that list can come into force if/when the Lt. Gov proclaims a date for them. The Act in question does not appear in that database based on my searches. It was presumably repealed by subsequent legislative actio…
/r/MensRights11/08/19 01:50 AM
4

I'm not sure women being bad at sex is something men could fix even if it was their responsibility.
/r/MensRights11/08/19 12:35 AM
1

Opposition to reproductive rights is one of the few areas where "pro-life" and "pro-choice" people agree.
/r/MensRights11/08/19 12:27 AM
5

I wouldn't describe that reaction as "respecting". But the exchange ignores that men are much more likely to use humor to approach discussion of uncomfortable subjects. "I don't like it when you joke about that." without further justifying context gives the impression she believes she's entitled to dictate how people discuss things (e.g., traumatic experiences) solely on whether she "likes" it. In short: she said a ridiculously entitled thing, hypothetical person responded by ridiculing the ridi…
/r/MensRights11/08/19 12:21 AM
4

Using data from the 2015 CDC NISVS State Report: 97.3% of 1.473m female victims of "Rape" have only male perpetrators. 86.5% of 0.219m male victims of "Rape" have only male perpetrators. 78.5% of 1.715m male victims of "Made-to-Penetrate" have only female perpetrators. (The 12-month estimate for number of female victims of "Made-to-Penetrate" is zero.) From this we can see that 50.3% of rape victims fall into "Made-to-Penetrate" and are thus excluded from the CDC's NISVS discussion of "Rape". Fr…
/r/MensRights10/08/19 10:55 PM
4

If you're talking about "The Future is Female" style plans to eliminate 45+% of the human population, comparisons to similar identity politics hate ideologies are appropriate. Since the Genocidal Feminists of the 1970-80s went on to found "Gender Studies" and their slogans and signaling started plopping out of the mouth of a major party presidential candidate and other figures since 2016, it's reasonable to observe that Genocidal Feminism is the mainstream paradigm for feminist approaches to gen…
/r/MensRights10/08/19 10:38 PM
6

"Everything I hate is everything else I hate." ~some clever idiot
/r/MensRights10/08/19 05:14 PM
–

I'm surprised they didn't irrelevantly shoehorn GamerGate in there somehow. edit: It happens lower in the article. Those nazi misogynists and their *shuffles deck* belief that women shouldn't feel like how "friendly" they're willing to be with men in power affects whether their projects will suceed.
/r/MensRights10/08/19 09:10 AM
1

So far the only "credible research" you've put forward appears to be pulled from an article substantially devoted to debunking the credibility of the statistics you've cited. Thus why I asked if you bothered to read your article before linking it. It appears you still haven't. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
/r/MensRights10/08/19 09:01 AM
7

I want to first say that I'm a anti feminist trump supporter who happens to be a woman. How do you do, fellow kids? anyone stayed friends with a feminist? if you have how did it work out? anyone in a similar situation have any tips? The girl I was seeing from 2012-2016 asked if I "identified as feminist" the first time we went out. I wouldn't say we're "still friends", but that's mostly due to generic post-relationship bidness. She'd occasionally bring up things she'd read online that had been a…
/r/MensRights10/08/19 07:39 AM
1

Some statistics > no statistics. Well, the "three million uses" number comes from Axon promotional materials, so why not use their preferred fatality numbers, too? They say TASERs have only killed 24 people! So safe! Non lethal! All those other people who died after being shot with a TASER died due from inadequately trained police officers shooting people one of our CYA disclaimers says they shouldn't shoot! Not liable! Some statistics (e.g. my reply above) > no statistics (e.g. your opinion tha…
/r/MensRights10/08/19 06:32 AM
1

Generally the courts presume each parent has the child's best interests at heart and there is unfortunately not much in the way of checks and balances to protect children if this presumption is violated. Issues with child support calculations are numerous. Some states do not take into account differences in income or share of parenting time: they take the father's gross income and order some percentage of it be paid to the mother. I've yet to find any state that takes into account that single pa…
/r/MensRights10/08/19 06:13 AM
1

The bulk of that article is about how the available statistics are bullshit. Did you not read it?
/r/MensRights10/08/19 05:31 AM
1

the right sob story You can also just tell the sob story to that one scary guy friend girls seem to keep on call and then be shocked and appalled when he beats your intended target to death for m'lady.
/r/MensRights10/08/19 05:05 AM
1

The marketing-speak is 'less lethal', not "non-lethal". As you may imagine, "less lethal" does not mean the people who are killed by being shot by TASERs are less dead that people shot by other guns, it means that the percentage of people who die when shot by a TASER is lower than the percentage who die when shot by other guns. But, due to mistakes of fact such as the "non-lethal" belief, TASERs are used in situations where other lethal force would never have been accepted. Bottom line figures: …
/r/MensRights10/08/19 04:49 AM
2

There's a huge potential sampling error there as cases where "men who request equal parenting time" will probably be made up of cases where the mother is egregiously unfit to be a parent (and thus the lawyers actually agree there's a chance of winning) or where the fathers have deep enough pockets to fight a battle their lawyers advise them they will probably never win. Neither of those case types is representative of the majority of custody arrangements and ignores the problem of "dad's aren't …
/r/MensRights10/08/19 04:34 AM
2

Many jurisdictions only recycle when it's profitable to do so, otherwise the household recycleable waste just went back into the general waste stream. The real kicker is that having sanitation workers sort the whole garbage stream for profitable recyclables is generally as cost effective as having them sort the household mixed-recycleables stream. Household recycling, multicolored curb bins, et al. is just a politically popular boondoggle that let's people feel like they're doing something (and …
/r/MensRights10/08/19 04:23 AM
1

They also do toothpaste tablets and body wash and lotions that aren’t scented so anyone can use them Uh, I have no problem smelling like a cinnamon sugar cookie, tyvm. soap. Not soup *stops slicing celery into the bath* god damn it.
/r/MensRights10/08/19 04:09 AM
1

"Stop resisting!" should not be accepted as a justification for using lethal force (which is what a TASER is.).
/r/MensRights10/08/19 03:59 AM
2

HHS produces a statistical document on parenting time and child support as part of their annual reporting obligations, but with no fine-grained breakdown of the visitation categories, the highest being simply 52+days/year. Presumably the quantity of arrangements giving children better than "every other weekend" with the noncustodial parents isn't statistically significant.
/r/MensRights10/08/19 03:54 AM
0

So they continue faking being a fully grown human. No one is under any obligation to express emotion in the narrow ways you find "appropriate" or else be dehumanized. It's no mystery these friends don't discuss their feelings with you.
/r/MensRights10/08/19 03:22 AM
1

No. Traditionalist/feminist framing of gender issues tends to reinforce gender malagency (i.e., male hyperagency and female hypoagency) so neither is a good foundation for approaching gender equality. However, sort of like how the Democrat's refusal to address the socioeconomic concerns of the majority of the working class lost them the 2016 election, it's often the case that the only people in the corporate media willing (or able) to acknowledge men's issues per se are Republican-identified. Ki…
/r/MensRights10/08/19 02:47 AM
1

The success of "Kentucky Fried" chicken isn't about the secret blend of eleven herbs and spices, it's about using a giant pressure cooker so it can be fried rapidly enough to fit the workflow timing of "fast food". But their pressurized deep friers are designed to account for boil-up when pressure is released so they can start a new batch. You'd probably get the overboiling problem as soon as you put the frozen turkey in the pot before you could get the lid on. If you manually released pressure …
/r/MensRights10/08/19 02:15 AM
2

I'd expect a "White House Counsel on Boys and Men" to be primarily focused how boys and men could be better girls and women, rather than how to help boys and men.
/r/MensRights10/08/19 01:51 AM
1

The reason deep frying frozen turkeys fucks people up is because the ice on the turkey is rapidly melted and boiled by the hot oil. This sort of explosive overboiling would not happen if you brought both up to temperature at the same time. It also will not heat the oil to +350F while in pressure-cooker mode as done with normal deep frying. And if you followed the recommendation to let the pressure cooker cool until it had pressure equalized, you wouldn't have a boil-up event at the end of cookin…
/r/MensRights10/08/19 01:47 AM
1

I think alimony and child support orders are the government's way of forcing men to "share" Don't forget the various analyses showing that, as a group, the only net taxpayers are men. Something to think about when there's political chatter about UBI, nationalized healthcare, student loan forgiveness, subsidized college tuition, etc.
/r/MensRights10/08/19 01:26 AM
2

There are also various states that make SS registration a condition of receiving government issued identification documents. Want to vote? Sign up to die.
/r/MensRights10/08/19 01:04 AM
1

Boil-up on rapid pressure release is a legitimately exciting event, particularly if you're not anticipating it. Live steam also isn't something most people deal with day-to-day. The number of CYA liability warnings in the Instant Pot instruction manual would probably give a lot of people pause if they'd never used a pressure cooker and/or didn't grok the operating principles. Then juxtapose all this "product may explode and burn your house down" doom&gloom with the ideal use case of throwing eve…
/r/MensRights10/08/19 12:40 AM
1

Wonder where it came from? Kid wants to get back at dad for slights, real or percieved, and this is a way to do it. Mad that they got "the worst room" in the new house, mad that the five year old step-sibling requires more attention, etc.
/r/MensRights10/08/19 12:14 AM
1

I hate that I have pack all my stuff every goddamn week. My ex used to come out of the house to do custody exchanges with bags packed for the kids. They didn't need them, usually they sat dropped by my front door, untouched, ready to be carried to the car when it was time to switch back. It was just a subtle signal that staying with me was merely a temporary vacation, like visiting the grandparents or having a sleepover at a friend's house. I get punished for forgetting things at the other house…
/r/MensRights10/08/19 12:08 AM
11

The most cited reason for believing men have it easier is because men work more and longer hours than women. Neat.
/r/MensRights09/08/19 10:56 PM
1

The "manifesto" attributed to El Paso says in the first sentence that he agrees with Christchurch... that alone makes it incompatible with Trump. That arguably makes it incompatible with the Left/Right false dichotomy used to divide&conquer the US electorate in general, but trying to claim "environmental socialism" is a Republican thing strains credulity.
/r/MensRights09/08/19 10:48 PM
1

Plainly describing feminism's accomplishments and aims is not "hating".
/r/MensRights07/08/19 12:33 AM
0

There is so much piss-n-shit in the news about how "white men" are always the ones who become mass shooters. https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/mass-shooter-shooting-mugshots/
/r/MensRights07/08/19 12:11 AM
3

Out of everyone I've known (wink wink, nudge nudge) over the course of my life, I can recall exactly one who made any effort to ensure she had my consent. The spook about how justice for victims of false accusations might discourage other victims from reporting rape is a mere shadow compared to the potential deterrent effect of being charged because you cannot show the steps you took to obtain and ensure the rapist's ongoing affirmative consent.
/r/MensRights07/08/19 12:05 AM
1

Why are young men so angry. Because their primary childhood role model for conflict resolution and emotional regulation was an irresponsible and selfish single mother. Because during the period of their lives when they had the neural plasticity to lay down healthy coping mechanisms, they were instead heavily drugged into compliance and are now permanently emotionally disabled. Because constantly telling someone they're angry prompts them to examine their lives and discover they have legitimate g…
/r/MensRights03/08/19 11:40 PM
1

eliminate no fault divorce I don't think "no fault" is the problem, per se, rather it's that many of the judicial and cultural norms and expectations around divorce are leftover from the "at fault" era. If your spouse was "at fault" in some way, it made sense for the courts to award you more than your fair share of the marital assets to compensate for the wrongs done to you. It's the same as if you were in a business partnership that was dissolved due to malfeasance of the other partner: you can…
/r/MensRights03/08/19 11:26 PM
4

Imagine being such a gender bigot that someone saying "this problem is bigger than just women" is viewed as minimizing the problem or belittling female victims.
/r/MensRights03/08/19 11:06 PM
11

If someone protests that raising awareness of all victims "invalidates women", what they're telling you is that they don't view victims of other genders as "valid". Don't let their bigotry derail the discussion.
/r/MensRights03/08/19 10:59 PM
1

I haven't been paying a whole lot of attention to the Democrat debates because I fully expect the DNC to have learned nothing and do a repeat of 2016.
/r/MensRights03/08/19 12:09 AM
1

There's an app called Buycott that will allow you to scan a product's barcode and it'll give you information about the parent company and occasionally specific issues with that particular product. WIPO also maintains a global brand database.
/r/MensRights02/08/19 11:42 PM
3

A low effort meme can result in high quality comments. But generally does not. And, over time, as the low-effort-content hollows out the community, this result becomes less and less likely.
/r/MensRights02/08/19 12:46 PM
1

How do you respond to just "hi"? I've never been especially invested in or frustrated by online dating, so YMMV, but I responded with as much effort as they put into it, e.g., "hi" right back at 'em, and wrote them off as a match.
/r/MensRights02/08/19 12:41 PM
1

Content that can be rapidly consumed and reacted to (i.e., "low effort content") will accumulate upvotes faster that equal (or higher) quality content that must be read/understood prior to engaging with it (i.e. "high effort content"). This inevitably reduces the quality of the content of a sub, both in terms of submissions and comments, and has been implicated in the slow death of several communities. It also facilitates topic dilution, forum sliding, and several other methods for controlling d…
/r/MensRights02/08/19 09:45 AM
3

I'm curious of those blurred out pics return anything if you throw them into a Reverse Image Search engine.
/r/MensRights02/08/19 08:23 AM
1

There's layers upon layers of social conditioning to disentangle in figuring out why a person might "just like how something looks y'know". Male or female, mind you.
/r/MensRights02/08/19 08:00 AM
1

Except there's whole categories of fashion intended to be provocative. I don't feel like I care what anyone chooses to wear, but I'm reflexively going to devote a couple thought cycles to why they chose it. And some reasons are more annoying than others.
/r/MensRights02/08/19 07:53 AM
1

What about when a woman wears a suit? Etc Is this woman wearing a men's suit or a women's suit? You may or may not be able to explicitly describe the differences between these, but if you were given sets of pictures of a woman wearing each, you'd probably be able to pick out which was which even if you didn't know why. I feel like you're the exact target audience of this movement tbh. I'm not. People who care about these sociocultural conventions on a visceral level are your target audience.
/r/MensRights02/08/19 07:35 AM
1

My "passion for equality" in this area manifests primarily as apathy. Wear a skirt, dress, kilt, pants, flak jacket, makeup, dangly earrings, cargo shorts, combat boots, high heels, whatever. Unless there's reason to suspect we're going to be fucking later, your sex, gender, and/or sexual orientation are irrelevant to me.
/r/MensRights02/08/19 07:21 AM
1

It might be possible to take a pair of men's baggy shorts and modify them to be a skirt by undoing the inner leg seam. So you'd end up with a skirt that is made of shorts fabric and has shorts pockets. This is called skorts or a skort (i.e. skirt/shorts) and has been a thing for decades.
/r/MensRights02/08/19 07:12 AM
1

I really doubt there are people who want you to assume their gender based on their clothing. What clothing someone chooses to wear is a signifying behavior. Someone who has chosen to dress in "men's clothes" or "women's clothes" doesn't want you to "assume their gender", they're broadcasting their gender loud and clear so you don't have to assume. And you can signal a bunch of other things, too, often unintentionally.
/r/MensRights02/08/19 07:10 AM
1

Golf shirts, FTW.
/r/MensRights02/08/19 06:41 AM
3

The feminist position derives from traditionalist ideas about the importance of women's chastity (or virginity, in extremis) in providing assurances of paternity. It's necessary to control women's sexuality if a woman hopes to convince a man to support her and her children.
/r/MensRights02/08/19 06:36 AM
1

From what I've learned, at birth, both parents have 50/50 custody in NC. I could have done what she did and even left the state and SHE would have to be the one filing for custody. Until there's a court order stipulating otherwise, it's may be more useful to think of the default as 100/100 custody rather than 50/50. This is how parental abductions are not considered kidnapping, and the police generally won't do anything, unless/until it violates a binding custody agreement.
/r/MensRights02/08/19 06:24 AM
1

Every bumble match I got was "hi" and then I was expected to take the lead. I think I had Bumble installed for less than a day before deleting it because the women who used it, ironically, somehow put in even less effort than the users on other apps/sites.
/r/MensRights02/08/19 06:17 AM
1

In theory, it's in the child's best interest to have a relationship with both parents and if one parent is undermining that, then primary custody should be granted to the other one. In practice, granting primary custody to the lesser-earning parent gets the state more federal money under 42USC658a and associated racket, and they can engage in all the shenanigans they want without any meaningful checks or balances to protect the child from this type of abuse. But if she keeps failing to respond o…
/r/MensRights02/08/19 05:58 AM
2

The basic right of all individuals to decide, free of discrimination, coercion and violence, the number, spacing and timing of their children and to have the information and means to do so.
/r/MensRights02/08/19 12:55 AM
1

Or they borrowed a page from Hollywood, were expecting this loss of value, and made the ad to fabricate an external scapegoat. /tinfoil
/r/MensRights31/07/19 01:33 AM
1

the new partners of her children’s fathers It took me a while to parse this. During those years, Ashley had almost no contact with her children. She made tiny contributions to child support when she could, but could never afford the full $1,100 monthly payments. So how long did she spend in jail for contempt of court? A justice gap kek. I wonder how long they had to wait before this happened to a woman who wouldbe a sympathetic defendant.
/r/MensRights29/07/19 06:47 AM
1

There was also #GamerGate in 2014 raising the same issues about people in power in the games industry having inappropriate relationships with people they had power over.
/r/MensRights28/07/19 01:17 AM
4

Using data from the 2015 CDC NISVS State Report: 97.3% of 1.473m female victims of "Rape" have only male perpetrators. 86.5% of 0.219m male victims of "Rape" have only male perpetrators. 78.5% of 1.715m male victims of "Made-to-Penetrate" have only female perpetrators. (The 12-month estimate for number of female victims of "Made-to-Penetrate" is zero.) From this we can see that 50.3% of rape victims fall into "Made-to-Penetrate" and are thus excluded from the CDC's NISVS discussion of "Rape". Fr…
/r/MensRights28/07/19 01:09 AM
1

the human subjects are the journal's reviewers/editors that select articles, and their responses to stimuli were the subject of the project This is something that happens with every article that is submitted to a journal. The alleged "research" imposed nothing on the human subjects and is no different in practice from an unobtrusive observational study. Anyone in academia probably has notes from when they've submitted to journals and talked to referees... have all of them been conducting unautho…
/r/MensRights28/07/19 01:05 AM
1

I had actually posted there several times but I deleted them all once I found out that I had been banned. I don’t want to be associated with that hateful sub anymore i.e., you may have been banned for something else or for a pattern of behavior, but you've destroyed the evidence and we should all just believe you.
/r/MensRights28/07/19 12:43 AM
1

How are the UK's "Hate Crime" laws phrased?
/r/MensRights27/07/19 06:36 AM
3

Okay, pretend the victim doesn't use any tools to hyperextend her wrist until it breaks and then twist until the soft tissue separates. Now it's justified in your opinion?
/r/MensRights27/07/19 12:05 AM
3

Rei isn't a shy introvert. She's an empty vessel into which others may pour the strongest parts of themselves. This is why her interactions with Shinji build him up, while her interactions with Asuka tear her down.
/r/MensRights26/07/19 11:44 PM
1

Ah. No. No more, thank you. I've had an elegant sufficiency.
/r/MensRights26/07/19 10:26 PM
3

Tax cuts disproportionately benefit tax payers. *surprised pikachu*
/r/MensRights26/07/19 07:46 AM
9

Haters gonna hate.
/r/MensRights26/07/19 06:04 AM
3

Feminism is not a gender. It is a hate ideology.
/r/MensRights26/07/19 06:01 AM
1

First and foremost, I am in a committed loving relationship with a man. We split our housework 50/50.We both work. We are very happy. ma'amsplaining Off to a great start. Im curious to where the idea stems from that feminists hate men, or have to hate men to adhere to a philosophy. In the context of the larger conversation about gender equality issues, gender bigotry and misandry are major differentiating characteristics of feminist framing to these issues as compared to non- or anti-feminist ap…
/r/MensRights26/07/19 05:58 AM
1

Growing vegetables and other plant based foods is far more damaging to the environment than raising cattle in a field. How does it compare to how cattle are actually raised in practice?
/r/MensRights26/07/19 01:25 AM
2

Consent is important but a lot of these new rules seem to lose sight of the forest for the trees. You're misunderstanding what's going on. "The forest" is to bring all-sex-is-rape feminist bigotry into reality. If this harms victims in the process, well, that's a price they're willing to (have other people) pay.
/r/MensRights26/07/19 01:21 AM
1

Unless and until we have gender equal reproductive rights, these sort of complaints that men should help mitigate the harms caused by women's choices and actions are merely an example of gender malagency.
/r/MensRights26/07/19 01:14 AM
0

Purchasing Power Parity adjustment for India is a factor of ~18. So, something like $650k if you take that into account. But cost-of-living varies wildly across India, so living in a nice urban area might knock the PPP adjusted value down a good bit from the national-level adjustment. It's still a significant amount being denied to half the population on the basis of gender.
/r/MensRights26/07/19 12:53 AM
1

If the $5k gets clawed back, the server will still be out the taxes until filing time.
/r/MensRights25/07/19 09:23 AM
1

The ₹2.5M works out to about $36k.
/r/MensRights25/07/19 06:04 AM
3

It's incredibly chilling when you realize a reason most of the first-hand testimony about the horrors of human trafficking comes from women is because of survivorship bias.
/r/MensRights25/07/19 04:50 AM
1

I for one want to appolagize for my gender I am a feminist Feminist isn't a gender, it's a hate ideology.
/r/MensRights25/07/19 01:56 AM
1

Found it.
/r/MensRights25/07/19 01:32 AM
1

Are you familiar with the phrase "grassroots movement" or "grassroots advertising"? If not: basically, where normal everyday people have come to the same observations and conclusions about something and it's spreading by word-of-mouth and people are taking individual action on their own uncoordinated initiative. It can be compared to the concept of something "going viral" in more recent internet times. This is in contrast to deliberate "top-down" organized movements or advertising. Anyway, when …
/r/MensRights25/07/19 01:26 AM
1

Imagine being such a gender bigot that you think acknowledging intimate partner violence is perpetrated against people other than just women diminishes the seriousness of the problem.
/r/MensRights25/07/19 01:14 AM
2

The FBI has a FAQ about the revised rape definition detailing how agencies should update their data reporting to handle male victims in a compliant way: In the NIBRS, 11A = Rape includes female victims of male offenders, and male victims of female offenders. Rape in NIBRS includes male victims of male offenders as long as there is also at least one female offender. 11B = Sodomy in NIBRS includes male victims of male offenders or female offenders, and female victims of male offenders or female of…
/r/MensRights21/07/19 03:11 AM
1

it should only be if they are proven false Yes, people who make false accusations would have a right to due process, too, the same as their victim did. not if their is not enough evidence Most of the conversations I've seen, even in the case were the accusation is proven false and the victim is absolutely innocent, that's not necessarily what would carry the same sentence as if their victim had been falsely convicted. That particular extreme is reserved for people who knowingly and intentionally…
/r/MensRights20/07/19 11:31 PM
7

They could also take the route to clarify that the existing 2012 redefinition does include, e.g., a rapist penetrating her vagina with the victim's penis without his consent.
/r/MensRights20/07/19 01:41 PM
1

posted it on TwoX It's on TrueOffMyChest.
/r/MensRights20/07/19 09:31 AM
1

"The Future is Female" references an essay by Gender Studies founder Sally Miller Gearhart, outlining a Genocidal Feminist utopia. Every culture must begin to affirm a female future. Species responsibility must be returned to women in every culture. The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately 10% of the human race.
/r/MensRights20/07/19 03:31 AM
3

Do you know what sort of process exists in your area for reporting an employer who fails to maintain a safe and healthy workplace for their employees after they have been made aware of a problem?
/r/MensRights20/07/19 01:58 AM
1

Sounds like she's creating a hostile workplace. Do you have an official reporting policy you should follow when you observe a worker engaging in this sort of harassing behavior?
/r/MensRights20/07/19 01:17 AM
1

The pushing of their sister subs as alternatives is a nice touch.
/r/MensRights20/07/19 12:58 AM
2

I'd rather live in a world where men and women could trust each other not to violate their reproductive rights... but that's not the current world, unfortunately.
/r/MensRights20/07/19 12:14 AM
6

Your orchard grows red apples and green apples. You do a rough quality grading because only the top 50% of the crop is sold as whole apples for direct consumption. The bottom 50% is juiced or processed into cider, applesauce, etc. If your crop consisted of 10k of each type of apple, this first pass leaves you with 5k red and 5k green apples, because on average red and green apples are equally good. But then this trend of avocado toast and pre-sliced apple wedges and the raiding of consumer savin…
/r/MensRights19/07/19 11:34 AM
1

Pennsylvania has no minimum age and judges are strongly encouraged to consider the child's preference, though "best interest" is still the driving factor.
/r/MensRights19/07/19 01:49 AM
3

Ah. I thought you already lived in PA for some reason. If you're moving to PA with your daughter once this is signed off, "everything goes back the way it was" has some pretty glaring deficiencies regardless of whether you can figure out some fancy lawyerin' phrasing. Whatever custody and parenting time agreement you currently have now is going to be infeasible and non-applicable when y'all go from living in the same town to living thousands of miles apart in different states. I'll assume all th…
/r/MensRights19/07/19 01:41 AM
1

/r/legaladvice might also be helpful.
/r/MensRights19/07/19 01:07 AM
1

Has the mom been the one to insist on including this GPA business in the modification order, or is this your idea to keep an official explicit record of the agreement? Because this sort of condition is possibly unenforceable due to arbitrariness (the daughter's grades do not neccesarily indicate whether someone is a good or bad parent) and being outside of the parents' control. So you could put it in the modification order, but it won't mean anything if she decides to go teenage-boy-crazy and de…
/r/MensRights19/07/19 01:06 AM
2

Evokes a "peoplekind" level of ignorance about "man" having an originally gender-neutral usage, but I'm not especially inclined to go full-1984 New Speak euphemism treadmill slippery slope about this.
/r/MensRights18/07/19 11:33 PM
1

Ah, so where the brigading feminist trolls end up. I'm wary of you for even asking for examples like you did. It's a quick way to separate concern trolls from people who might have a legitimate misunderstanding. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ If you're not aware of the hate on here, then maybe your viewpoint is part of what people criticize about the "movement" Many people end up here because they've tried to share and talk about their experiences with divorce, child custody, violence-against-men, sexual abuse, etc.…
/r/MensRights18/07/19 11:25 PM
2

"Paper abortion", "financial abortion" and other such false-equivalent terminology is of decades-old Feminist origin. Go look up Karen DeCrow, Frances Goldschieder, etc. For a time, women's rights advocates and some feminists did appear to be genuinely pro-choice and supported gender equal reproductive rights. But using the term "abortion" to describe men having equal effective access to the relevant methods of Legal Parental Surrender women currently enjoy leads people to thinking gender equal …
/r/MensRights18/07/19 11:11 PM
1

The bottom of comments is where the feminist trolls end up. 🤔
/r/MensRights18/07/19 10:53 PM
1

Does the video actually use a respectable definition of "emotional labor" or is it the feminist pants-on-head opposite-day version?
/r/MensRights18/07/19 09:06 AM
1

LMGTFY
/r/MensRights18/07/19 09:00 AM
1

FYI: There is no "men's league". Players of any gender can tryout for the NBA.
/r/MensRights17/07/19 11:27 PM
2

Hell, the people who I'm concerned about this on are so much about affirmative consent that they should be on my side. Feminist rape culture does not challenge gender malagency. So, in the context of male-hyperagency/female-hypoagency, the function of affirmative "enthusiastic" consent is to further shift women away from personal responsibility, reinforcing the tradcon/feminist idea that sex is something men do and women have done to them. What's kind of ironic, given that the complaints about t…
/r/MensRights17/07/19 11:20 PM
1

A big trap I see MRAs fall into is the grouping of all women into a group and all men into another. Because of this, the narrative shifts from being against misandry and stereotypes against men to being against women, and that is very dangerous. Can you link to some examples of this happening?
/r/MensRights17/07/19 01:56 AM
1

"You have a right to your own opinion. You do not have a right to your own facts." ✌
/r/MensRights17/07/19 01:46 AM
1

Fair, however what I'm trying to say is that that term is not inherently tied to genocidal feminism, not in concept & not in usage. The term is straight out of "gender studies", which is a direct product of Genocidal Feminism. (although the latter is probably because genocidal feminists are not very common) Genocidal Feminism is the mainstream institutionally-powerful one.
/r/MensRights17/07/19 01:41 AM
1

I have no way of verifying your claims about your "content creators", even if they did seem relevant to the conversation.
/r/MensRights17/07/19 01:31 AM
4

what are your thoughts on abortion rights? Should abortion be restricted? Support for abortion access would be logically subsumed within gender equal reproductive rights, IMO. What about free birth control programs? Less expensive for taxpayers than social programs to assist unprepared parents or deal with unwanted children. Ideally, more funding for research into not-hormonal, reversible, obstructive birth control for males (e.g. RISUG/Vasalgel) would be the low-hanging fruit in this area, part…
/r/MensRights17/07/19 01:26 AM
1

I consider Genocidal Feminism a primitive hate ideology. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
/r/MensRights17/07/19 01:11 AM
1

It's a primitive iteration of the gender malagency concept of "male hyperagency".
/r/MensRights17/07/19 01:07 AM
6

Are you not one of the usual trolls and we have an authentic bigot for a change?
/r/MensRights17/07/19 12:40 AM
1

*holds up spork* LOL SO RANDOM But I appreciate your ham-fisted attempt to provide a further argument against your sister's imaginative point of view.
/r/MensRights17/07/19 12:24 AM
1

Sound like feminist projection. MRM doesn't have the sort of institutional access to vulnerable populations (e.g., domestic and sexual abuse programs) to undermine helping these people in order to push a hate ideology.
/r/MensRights17/07/19 12:15 AM
2

Men have always occupied virtually every position of political power Due to gender out-group bias in men (and gender in-group bias in women), men in positions of power use that power to benefit women (and women in positions of power use that power to benefit women). Broadly, these two (or three) observations are summed up by saying we live in a gynocentric patriarchy. men possess the majority of wealth Men posses the majority of poverty, too. Or would, rather, of they didn't die of it, tying to …
/r/MensRights14/07/19 03:33 PM
5

A Mistake? What were the other three seven or eight times?
/r/MensRights13/07/19 09:21 PM
1

https://cordellcordell.com/
/r/MensRights13/07/19 02:48 AM
5

By by pretending we live in some extreme world where we deflect everything, nothing will ever change. Except the question was answered: because they thought they could get away with it.
/r/MensRights12/07/19 06:06 AM
1

The trend was for them to file an action against the institution for due process, but along the way, we started seeing them not just going to file action against the institution, but also civil actions against the victims. They're filing a civil action against themselves?
/r/MensRights12/07/19 05:35 AM
2

If the number of female suicides increased from 1 to 3 and the number of male suicides increased from 5 to 10, the coverage would be about for the suicide rate for women has tripled and was increasing so much faster than men's and that more resources needed to be redirected specifically to addressing this women's mental health crisis. That's what a "gender-neutral standpoint" looks like in a gynocentric society.
/r/MensRights11/07/19 11:19 PM
1

I remember thinking this looked like it could be good when I saw the previews in theaters. Thank god these outrage bait articles are coming out to inform me the studio thinks it's gonna suck and I should save my money.
/r/MensRights11/07/19 01:53 PM
6

20% of Iraqi men said that they had experienced physical sexual violence, compared with 17% of Iraqi women. It's interesting that this figure from Iraq (54% of victims are male) is so similar to US rape statistics (56.8% of victims are male).
/r/MensRights11/07/19 02:21 AM
4

Playing and winning 20 games in the men's league is somewhat more difficult than playing and winning 20 games in the women's league. Here's an idea: have USMNT vs. USWNT games, and then they can split the share of revenue based on the ratio of wins when they play against each other in a direct apples-to-apples comparison of "equal work" and "equal quality of play"!
/r/MensRights11/07/19 02:02 AM
9

Women's football brings in about 131 million. Men's football brings in about 6000 million, 6 billion. Men's pay and prizes are about 7% relative to revenue. Women's pay and prizes are about 23% relative to revenue. edit: sauce
/r/MensRights10/07/19 11:46 PM
2

https://www.greensboro.com/ex-hostage-jailed-in-child-support-case/article_1fed687a-38e8-55c9-ab2f-411f82a525fa.html edit: Wait, fuck, is that a different case?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen10/07/19 12:45 PM
5

Feminism: "Women's choices and actions should not matter."
/r/MensRights10/07/19 08:46 AM
1

Note: Tesla buyers have the same gender ratio as any other car buyers.
/r/MensRights10/07/19 08:43 AM
3

You could pretty easily talk for 20 minutes about how the FBI/CDC started using a new definition of "rape" in 2012 and how it still doesn't account for the most common type of rape (i.e., made-to-penetrate).
/r/MensRights10/07/19 02:52 AM
3

I dated a self-identified feminist for several years and it was kinda weird when she'd try to start fights with me about some gender equality issue (because I refuse to identify as a feminist) and then find out that, oh, hey, we agree on the issue (and often did not agree with what various mainstream feminists had written or said about the topic). But if I was just a regular dude who knew about as much about feminism as she did, I'd have totes accepted that since we agreed with each other and sh…
/r/MensRights10/07/19 12:22 AM
2

Provided you use the FBI/CDC definitions that places the majority of rape victims in a category called 'made to penetrate' and ignore those victims and perpetrators when discussing 'rape', then, yes, male rape victims of 'rape' report 86.5% male perpetrators. The other 88.7%% of male rape victims of 'made-to-penetrate' (which the CDC/FBI ignore when discussing 'rape') report 78.5% female perpetrators. If you include all rape victims, male victims report a female perpetrator 71.1% of the time.
/r/MensRights09/07/19 11:55 PM
1

Judicial norms regarding divorce evolved under an "at fault" scheme: the person who filed for divorce wished to end the marriage as a result of articulated wrongs they had suffered. It was thus seen as acceptable for the person suing for divorce to be award a more-than-equitable share of marital assets as compensation for the damages the ex-spouse had caused them. Enter "no fault" divorce. Though the most commonly cited reason women file for divorce is, no shit, "boredom", the norms in how the d…
/r/MensRights09/07/19 11:48 PM
1

Male rape victims report having a female perpetrator 71.1% of the time.
/r/MensRights09/07/19 11:27 PM
4

https://childsupportcalculator.dhs.state.mn.us You can guess at your ex's income and get an idea if it's hugely out of whack. If you use your ex's last recorded/official income and you're overpaying by some %, that's usually grounds to request review and adjustment.
/r/MensRights09/07/19 11:08 PM
1

Considering how feminism views men, if a man reads that and finds it to be an accurate description of himself, he's probably not any kind of guy you'd want alone with your daughter. Or son.
/r/MensRights09/07/19 11:01 PM
3

I was talking about the explicitly stated goals of mainstream feminism (i.e., what it wants). Genocidal Feminism obviously hasn't achieved "the future is female" type elimination of 45% of the global population, but your question is interesting. In terms of what mainstream genocidal feminists aims have been actually achieved, at least in part, the first thing that comes to mind is the control of the growth of the African-American population via abortion.
/r/MensRights08/07/19 11:12 PM
3

The genocide, mostly.
/r/MensRights08/07/19 10:55 PM
1

It's a viglante mob with "brooms" in India that attacks and beats men accused of Violence Against Women™
/r/MensRights04/07/19 12:14 PM
2

Have an prior SO who found it delightful when we first started dating to send me pics from when she was a teenager, wait for the fished-for compliment, and then pretend to be outraged that I was attracted to a picture of her when she was 14 or 17 or whatever under-age it happened to be. She's 27 now and other than having adult fashion sense still looks pretty much the same from the recent-ish pics I've seen.
/r/MensRights04/07/19 07:24 AM
1

Eh? Multi-user gender neutral facilities usually have better provisions for individual privacy and to the extent I care one way or another it's due to not liking weird-ass open bay designs where I get to see some octogenarian luxuriantly blow drying their dangly bits with the shamelessness of someone who has accepted that they are an assembly of slowly breaking down meat machines, hung on a spooky scary skeleton, driven by a ghost.
/r/MensRights04/07/19 07:12 AM
4

they aren't entitled to whatever they want and they have to share They do not have to share, since whoever wants some of what they've got is not entitled to whatever they want. Kids will still choose to share most of the time in my experience.
/r/MensRights04/07/19 06:49 AM
5

the parents threatened that if they said anything to police, social services would take them away and rape them b-b-but I heard false rape accusations doesn't real
/r/MensRights04/07/19 03:47 AM
4

First off, we're going to ignore the majority of rape victims by not acknowledging that a woman having sex with a man without his consent is rape. Secondly, we're going to ignore that weaponizing the violence of state via credible threat of false accusation is a common MO for women who rape men, used to coerce compliance during the rape itself or silence after the fact. Thirdly, having cinched the belt in our trousers firmly around our foreheads, we'll confidently assert that we don't consider s…
/r/MensRights03/07/19 11:24 PM
11

Oh my god! They talk to people?
/r/MensRights03/07/19 05:39 AM
1

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_Culture_(film)
/r/MensRights03/07/19 12:25 AM
1

Why does recognizing that rape culture affects men just as much as women make me a feminist? For much the same reason that "recognizing that the Elders of Zion control the global financial system" would also out you as an adherent/advocate of a hate ideology. Acknowledging that Feminist conspiracy theories are harmful to people of all genders is one thing. Presenting it in a way that lends credulity to the hate ideology is another.
/r/MensRights03/07/19 12:16 AM
2

97.3% heterosexual rape for female victims. Previous post where various CDC NISVS numbers have been cross-referenced to account for the majority of rape victims being ideologically categorized under "made to penetrate".
/r/MensRights02/07/19 11:28 PM
5

I would be perfectly fine for the police finding the woman and her being legal-saavy enough to say she was protecting her friend from the imminent attack of the random stranger who assaulted them. And then the white knight gets charged.
/r/MensRights02/07/19 04:07 AM
8

Rape of men is mostly (70+%) perpetrated by women.
/r/MensRights02/07/19 03:55 AM
2

Is the judge talking about "rape of men" in a way that includes the most common way men are raped (i.e. "made to penetrate"), or is the judge only talking about forcible sodomy? It's been a pretty longstanding legal/judicial practice to view raping a woman anally (or orally, for that matter) to be a more harmful than raping her vaginally. Since feminists refuse to recognize a rapist penetrating her vagina with the victim's penis without his consent as "rape", it does follow that rape of men is w…
/r/MensRights01/07/19 01:41 AM
4

MBTI is astrology for people who think they're too smart for astrology. If this Green/Blue/Red/Yellow thing helps you to realize when you're communicating ineffectively with someone due to differences in rhetorical styles, yay, but you can just as well explicitly learn rhetoric (e.g., logos/ethos/pathos, connotative bias, syntactic bias, etc.) and not do this quasi-astrology bullshit.
/r/MensRights01/07/19 12:52 AM
6

The pair were sentenced to a community order to complete 70 hours of unpaid work over the next 12 months and also partake in a ten-day rehabilitation requirement. I cannot figure out what might've led to these girls believing they would face no more than a slap on the wrist if they assaulted someone on a public street.
/r/MensRights01/07/19 12:38 AM
1

In case this is unclear, you can use it; just anonymize it and don't credit me.
/r/MensRights27/06/19 11:45 AM
1

Still the same answer as before.
/r/MensRights26/06/19 11:46 AM
5

Not if he's a bottom. I said "plays", not "pitches". He probably has rape fantasies as well. LOL Not really "LOL" territory.
/r/MensRights26/06/19 09:21 AM
1

Or she knows false accusations rarely result in consequences for the perpetrators, doesn't care whether it has consequences for victims, and it's an effective way to get free publicity for her book.
/r/MensRights26/06/19 04:11 AM
4

Daughters can inherit BRCA mutations from their fathers. Sons can inherit BRCA mutations from their mothers. Both men and women who have inherited BRCA mutations are at higher risk of certain types of cancer.
/r/MensRights26/06/19 04:02 AM
1

Someone should let her know Cooper plays for the other team.
/r/MensRights26/06/19 03:38 AM
5

Strong gender differences in reproductive success variance, and the times to the most recent common ancestors. Genetic evidence for unequal effective population sizes of human females and males. Sex-specific demographic behaviours that shape human genomic variation.
/r/MensRights26/06/19 03:18 AM
1

I s'pose it depends on how significant the difference between "I'm not having kids right now." vs. "I'm not having kids ever." is considered to be. If you know someone would find the latter a dealbreaker, and so you leave it ambiguous or pretend it's the former so they'll stay in the relationship, that's asshole behavior. Similarly, if someone is explicit about wanting to stay childfree, and you prolong the relationship thinking you'll change their mind (and/or violate their reproductive rights)…
/r/MensRights26/06/19 02:44 AM
1

Oldest instance of the claim I've found. Appears to be based on personal conversations with Silverman.
/r/MensRights26/06/19 01:03 AM
1

Been throwing terms into search engines for a while and all sources for this particular claim seem to lead back to /u/girlwriteswhat comments. That said. My god what a piece of shit. Jan Reimer has probably killed dozens of women by refusing to help them escape the cycle of (reciprocal) violence.
/r/MensRights26/06/19 12:56 AM
6

Context link to source comment.
/r/MensRights26/06/19 12:18 AM
3

/TheRedPill was started as a feminist LARP project by SA goons and associates. The basis of the original "Red Pill Theory" is translating Feminism 101 into PUA cargo cult jargon. It is a satirical lampoon, much like Meninism. It's growth and popularity is substantially attributable to it being fundamentally concordant with the dominant ideological paradigm (i.e., feminism). Note: I got bored of this project before the end of 2013. I do not closely track how it has mutated since becoming a self-l…
/r/MensRights25/06/19 11:33 PM
1

If the problem was with another co-worker and talking to them didn't work, sure, then you go to the supervisor and they help you document a written complaint (or maybe even before that you give them a chance to correct their behavior after the supervisor gives 'em a talkin' to, too). However, when the problem is with the supervisor, it's nonsensical to go to the supervisor to make a complaint about the supervisor and have any expectation that the supervisor will handle the complaint properly. Pa…
/r/MensRights25/06/19 10:45 PM
1

From this discussion: 97.3% of 1.473m female victims of "Rape" have only male perpetrators. 86.5% of 0.219m male victims of "Rape" have only male perpetrators. 78.5% of 1.715m male victims of "Made-to-Penetrate" have only female perpetrators. (The 12-month estimate for number of female victims of "Made-to-Penetrate" is zero.) From this we can see that 50.3% of rape victims fall into "Made-to-Penetrate" and are thus excluded from the CDC's discussion of "Rape". From this we can see that 56.8% of …
/r/MensRights25/06/19 12:02 PM
1

The fact that the media is so been far gone for so long at this point that I reflexively give Trump the benefit of the doubt as a form of critical thinking fucking infuriates me. Honk honk.
/r/MensRights25/06/19 08:56 AM
1

A 16 year old should be able to do this. Which he did. When it didn't work, reasonable escalation occurred. When that didn't work, further reasonable escalation occurred. Then it was satisfactorily resolved.
/r/MensRights25/06/19 08:53 AM
1

One only has to look at t.v. shows ,movies,commericals etc to see how much everything is leaning toward females and the empowerment of females. These things are marketed to women because, despite only earning 40-45% of income, women direct 85-90% of household/consumer spending. There are very few product or service sectors that are predominantly, or even disproportionately, bought by men. In some cases, advertising for these products is restricted or banned (e.g., cigarettes and alcohol), so adv…
/r/MensRights25/06/19 08:47 AM
6

I think everyone is so used to internet discussion being adversarial that everything comes across as disagreement.
/r/MensRights25/06/19 07:32 AM
1

Women on reddit (yes, I'll generalize the hell out of this one, it seems rampant as fuck on here...) HATE to lose their reproductive rights Not being able to violate your partner's reproductive rights is not 'losing your reproductive rights' 😂 in the future where men can keep the "aborted" baby and get child support from the "deadbeat mom." If that ever comes to pass, you're going to see women suddenly realize how terribly unfair it is to force someone to support an unwanted child, and child sup…
/r/MensRights25/06/19 07:06 AM
1

I mean...we do have someone who at least thinks like a sexual predator in the White House. We've got that on audio record. Are you talking about the starfuckers conversation where Trump observes that some women will consent to anything you might want to do to them? Or is there some other audio record that actually shows what you're claiming? It's almost become entertaining to hear what outrageous nonsense the internet game of telephone produces from nearly every Trump tweet... and then go see wh…
/r/MensRights25/06/19 07:01 AM
2

"Women's choices and actions should not matter." Wow. Such feminist. So equality.
/r/MensRights25/06/19 06:41 AM
1

If you state unambiguously and without equivocation that you do not want, intend, or plan to have any children, NTA. That is all a partner needs to know to determine if this is a dealbreaker. If the partner chooses to continue the relationship under the misguided hope that you'll change your mind, that sucks for them, I guess, but you didn't lead them on or string them along. NAH. If they have a back-up plan if you don't change your mind to "oops" you, then they are the asshole. But OP over ther…
/r/MensRights25/06/19 06:32 AM
9

men are generally net producers, and women generally net consumers The real "pink tax".
/r/MensRights25/06/19 01:47 AM
1

You should have been able to handle this yourself, directly with her, He did his part: "i told her i feel very uncomfortable when you joke with me by touching my butt." And, I agree, that should have handled it. But it did not, because she persisted in her inappropriate behavior. At that point you escalate the complaint. Iterate until it is resolved. Men don’t cry to mommy, big brother or anyone else. Bullshit. Being so insecure you're afraid to ask for help is not a role to emulate.
/r/MensRights25/06/19 01:34 AM
6

Gynocentrism and gender malagency. Any political movement, ideology, or philosophy that challenges those will have trouble gaining traction over those that do not challenge (or better yet, do reinforce) the status quo.
/r/MensRights25/06/19 01:10 AM
3

Provide examples of "unrelated culture war" posts you'd like censored from the sub, so we may discuss specifics.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 11:28 PM
9

What the fuck is the comparison in this title.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 11:10 PM
3

*laughs in Millennial* *laughs harder in Zoomer* *dies laughing in political cohort studies*
/r/MensRights24/06/19 11:06 PM
9

"23% of women in this first group revealed they’d engaged in a foodie call. Most did so occasionally or rarely." "The second study analyzed a similar set of questions of 357 heterosexual women and found 33% had engaged in a foodie call." "A foodie call" i.e., at least one not "only" 23-33% of women "occasionally or rarely" taking advantage of men to exploit them for free food is arguably still high enough to carefully consider picking up the tab on a pricey first date. There is no need to falsel…
/r/MensRights24/06/19 11:01 PM
1

Canned response to the 2-10% woozle: "By equivalent reasoning, only 3-5% of rape accusations are true."
/r/MensRights24/06/19 10:48 PM
2

If the concept is some kind of generation ship, the rate at which you can grow the colony population when you reach your destination is limited by the number of females available. For genetic diversity reasons, you'd probably want to use embryos (so every new child could be completely unrelated to all others), rather than sperm (where children of the same mother are half-siblings). Using embryos also lets you sex-select, so the first generations have far more than ~50% females, further improving…
/r/MensRights24/06/19 07:43 AM
19

r/2rMC1RallelesOnChromosome11
/r/MensRights24/06/19 03:09 AM
1

Be careful that all your careful documentation of her history of abusive behavior isn't twisted into proof of you getting away with it for years.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 02:49 AM
3

I'll ask people if they're doing okay. It's subtly different from offering to help, or asking if they need help. A lot of it depends on what sort of schedule I'm on, though. If I'm passing time walking laps around an airport terminal during a layover, I'd probably ask and help if they wanted. If I have something to do, though, I'll pass them by. And in the first case, I'm probably going to walk off and resume laps as soon as their suitcase is at the top of the stairs. There's a third case where …
/r/MensRights23/06/19 11:22 PM
1

If this is a real court decision and not a LARP, I doubt it's going to stay (sub-)local news for long.
/r/MensRights23/06/19 02:56 AM
3

So you are making the feminist argument. Again, go try it in /MensLib, I'm sure your ideas about kiddie diddling will be far more popular there.
/r/MensRights22/06/19 01:27 PM
2

You see how that is like saying all men are potential rapists? From a certain dumbshit perspective, I can see the argument you're trying to make. For instance, if all men did want to rape people, and the only distinction was that some had already raped and some had yet to rape, you'd have a point. But by and large, most men have no interest in raping anyone, and the few that do probably lack the will to go through with it even if a situation arose where they could. So when you say shit like... I…
/r/MensRights22/06/19 12:03 PM
3

When it comes to people who are sexually attracted children, telling me that someone hasn't been caught molesting a child yet isn't going to convince me to hire them for a job involving children. There is no ordinary circumstance outside of a criminal proceeding where this topic would come up where distinguishing between people who want to molest children by whether they done it yet seems like an especially pressing concern.
/r/MensRights22/06/19 11:27 AM
2

Does the logical progression of "equality" lead to the genocide of 45% of the population in your mind? I'm not following what point you think you're making.
/r/MensRights22/06/19 08:09 AM
7

Next up: calls for funding to review why female fire fighters have such a high rate of injury and death relative to male fire fighters.
/r/MensRights22/06/19 06:55 AM
2

I'm fine with thinking of it like the way public bathrooms usually have toilet paper available. Which, surprisingly, does not appear to be a legal requirement, so, in that vein businesses or other facilities with public restrooms would have the option to provide these things on a voluntary basis. Which is already the case.
/r/MensRights22/06/19 06:03 AM
2

How important is the distinction between people who have molested children and people who want to? It's just an o observation and this is the only place I can think of to voice it. Try it over in /MensLib.
/r/MensRights22/06/19 05:34 AM
5

Sexual arousal and orgasm in subjects who experience forced or non-consensual sexual stimulation - A review
/r/MensRights20/06/19 12:53 AM
1

Reddit’s men’s rights community (/r/MensRights) has been criticized for the promotion of misogynistic language, toxic masculinity and discourses that reinforce alt-right ideologies. Conversely, the men’s liberation (/r/MensLib) community integrates inclusive politics, intersectionality and masculinity within a broad umbrella of self-reflection that suggests toxic masculinity harms men as well as women. wewlad
/r/MensRights19/06/19 05:21 AM
1

So what did he win? £1000 Dr Bower said: "After taking into account my costs, I donated equal amounts of this award to the Young Women's Trust, which aims to help women negotiate for better pay, and the Campaign Against Living Miserably, which runs a male suicide prevention line, among other things."
/r/MensRights18/06/19 04:52 AM
1

I wonder if the Pink IPA, besides having a 20% lower prices, is also in a 20% smaller bottle to highlight the gender work gap.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 04:47 AM
1

Reject all emotions except anger Despise all that is feminine Be in complete control Make no mistakes Always be in the dominant position Use aggression to assert authority Be overtly and aggressively sexual Jesus. What kind of absolute scum of a person reads that list and says "Oh, that is so me."? Oh, right, male feminists. Anyway... Reject all emotions except anger There are a couple things going on here, both relating to the large biological disparity in physical strength (e.g., a 5th percent…
/r/MensRights18/06/19 04:04 AM
1

OkTrends Your Looks and Your Inbox
/r/MensRights18/06/19 02:47 AM
1

It's kind of interesting that women at MIT report feelings of inferiority or "impostor syndrome" at over double the rate of male undergraduates, too. I wonder if the two stats are related. 🤔
/r/MensRights17/06/19 01:50 AM
23

“When I applied for government assistance, I ended up getting a letter from the state that said I owed child support for Emma,” he says with a slight laugh. Ha! It's funny because it's harmful institutional bias!
/r/MensRights17/06/19 12:03 AM
3

WHY is it when women lose custody of a child in a situation like this, that the women are not forced to pay child support like men? It's less common for custodial fathers to request that the non-custodial parent be forced to support her children. Government assistance programs are less accessible to men in practice, so cases where the State itself initiates child support actions against the non-custodial parent are also less likely to arise. Though due to structural and institutional biases, the…
/r/MensRights16/06/19 11:17 PM
10

A military contractor had his tractor trailer ambushed and was held hostage in Iraq for about a year. When he was finally released and returned to the US, he was met at the airport to be arrested and jailed for contempt of court due to his unpaid child support arrears that stacked up when he wasn't working... i.e., due to being held hostage in a warzone.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/06/19 10:22 PM
1

Look at the sign the little girl is holding up. "The Future is Female" comes from an essay by Sally Miller Gearhart, one of the founders of the field of "gender studies", about a Genocidal Feminist utopua where nales are maintained at less than 10% of the population. boy sexes should be equal (the primary belief of feminism) I guess the secondary belief of feminism is the one about the systematic elimination of 3.5 billion people? Honk honk. The difference between misandrists and feminists is th…
/r/MensRights16/06/19 06:36 AM
1

We noticed you're using an ad-blocker. Those most responsible for the gender pay gap are women. That’s the conclusion of a new study by Harvard researchers looking at data from the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority. The authority is a union shop that pays employees based on seniority, not merit. A sexist boss can’t depress the wages of women. Yet female workers make just 89 cents for every dollar made by their male colleagues. The researchers used “confidential administrative data” to d…
/r/MensRights16/06/19 04:05 AM
1

i.e. be friendly to customers i.e., continue killing the enemy as your friends die screaming around you On some level, I enjoy the ridiculousness of the way so much of the military clinical PTSD vocab has been appropriated by the SocJus crowd to give borrowed gravitas to their mundane bullshit.
/r/MensRights16/06/19 03:45 AM
1

They have are set upon biological (sex) differences, but the "roles" are socially determined, founded upon and informed by those biological differences. Those sound like probable characteristics of successful gender roles, the kind that persist over long timescales, that present as similarities repeated across civilization around the globe, etc. On short timescales and/or in limited areas, though, the biological/darwinian component can be outcompeted by the memetic/lamarckian component. Much of …
/r/MensRights16/06/19 03:21 AM
1

Gender roles have both biological and cultural components, thus undergo both genetic and memetic evolution, and that evolution is both darwinian and lamarckian. There's also mixed scales of selection. The rise and endurance of civilizations behaves more like the evolution of eusocial colonial organisms, rather than having individuals as the unit of selection. The processes are further complicated by the possibility of memetic adaptations working against biological proclivities to improve the fit…
/r/MensRights16/06/19 12:45 AM
1

explaining the relative preponderance of right-libertarianism in the MRM and the current influx of traditionalists You should probably establish that either of these things are true before jumping to a Just So story explaining them. Notably absent from your sketch out is any explicit discussion of gender malagency (i.e., male hyperagency and female hypoagency) and how traditionalist/feminist framing of gender relations both reinforce gender malagency. You may also want to look up the propaganda …
/r/MensRights15/06/19 11:18 PM
1

It might be temporarily expedient (if it was some kind of secret passcode to the Ol'Girls Club, which is doubtful, the history of feminist organizations is littered with excommunicated or marginalized folk who advocated for gender equality) but in the longer term I suspect it would help feminism and harm gender equality more than the reverse.
/r/MensRights15/06/19 10:50 PM
1

Contact his command. Be very clear that you're hoping they'll take care of it so you don't have to get civilian law enforcement involved and make everything more complicated. The number of dumbshit grunts doing dumb shit for a crumb of pussy already has his chain of command tired of this nonsense before they even get into ripping him a new asshole. And that's assuming he actually is a Ranger. Which is doubtful.
/r/MensRights15/06/19 09:10 AM
11

Gender malagency at work. Male hyperagency, female hypoagency; men do things, women have things done to them. Since feminism does not challenge gender malagency (to the contrary, its core tinfoil conspiracy theory about The Patriarchy™ reinforces it) it cannot help because it is fundamentally incapable of correctly understanding the problems of men (or women, arguably). I don't know if gender malagency is something that can eventually be overcome, but in the meantime accounting for it to tailor …
/r/MensRights15/06/19 08:08 AM
1

the way men and women approach communication about difficult issues or problems they may have faced or be facing are often different. These differences stem from gender malagency (e.g., male hyperagency and female hypoagency). In the context of male hyperagency, usually what a man is seeking is confirmation that he's correctly identified and described the problem and, bonus, that there is nothing more he could do (or have done differently). In the context of female hypoagency, the socialized com…
/r/MensRights15/06/19 06:37 AM
12

It's not my job to redeem or reclaim "feminist" for the greater gender equality movement. I also do not think it's possible for mainstream Genocidal Feminism to be "allies" with the greater gender equality movement. Their mish-mash of conspiracy theories and hate ideology is conceptually, fundamentally, incapable of engaging with gender equality advocacy in anything other than a dysfunctional divisive counterproductive way.
/r/MensRights15/06/19 05:33 AM
1

Making aborting or gestating a fetus a condition of criminal sentencing would almost certainly be challenged on 8th amendment "cruel and unusual punishment" grounds. Though since women are advocating for meddling with the reproductive systems of men as conditions of criminal sentencing, the groundwork is being laid for a somewhat repugnant gender equality argument, similar to how "pro-life" and "pro-choice" opposition to reproductive rights undermines women's acess to abortion when applied gende…
/r/MensRights15/06/19 05:23 AM
1

he's the only one that has made that claim and it hasn't been backed by anyone else Check out #5. Besides the article in The Guardian mentioned at that link, you can find similar hand-wringing about men's reproductive self-determination removing women's ability to violate men's reproductive rights in The Independent and Daily Mail. I'm not going to wade through the wretched hive of scum and villainy that is mumsnet to hunt down the word on the street, but you're welcome to do so. If you Google a…
/r/MensRights15/06/19 04:40 AM
3

There are a lot more "men going their own way" who have never heard of MGTOW than there are men who talk about it online and join "MGTOW" communities and self-identify as "MGTOW". The small subset of men who explicitly self-represent MGTOW do oftentimes seem to have weird fuckin' ideas about gender relations, but a lot of that ironically comes from feminist LARP subs like /TheRedPill.
/r/MensRights15/06/19 03:25 AM
5

Just spraying hairspray into someone's face/eyes would probably be pretty effective at disrupting an attack even without the flamethrower aspect. You can jam a pin in the nozzle and wiggle it around to widen it so it shoots as a stream rather than a mist, too. Get some distance. Though I've seen a stories about dudes being out jogging or walking to an evening class and having some woman passer-by unexpectedly attack them with pepper spray or similar chemical weapon.
/r/MensRights15/06/19 02:59 AM
1

Birth control is only so effective. If takes multiple forms of protection to reduce the chance to practically zero. Yep. Is there a point to this thread of conversation? Feminists aren't trying to prevent [those] technologies. https://youtu.be/JymN5yu-K_o If you want to find out who is attacking those technologies, the largest anti-contraceptive groups are religious organizations and conservatives. Since "pro-life" and "pro-choice" opposition to reproductive rights substantially align in the cas…
/r/MensRights15/06/19 02:43 AM
2

So it seems women when they're talking to each other prioritize looks more than ability. So much for men being to blame for objectification. A similar observation can be made about men-complimenting-men having a relatively disproportionate focus on possessions and thus (financial) objectification of men is also same-sex driven. dem y-axes, tho Which means women compliment men on their possessions as often as men compliment men on their possessions.
/r/MensRights15/06/19 02:00 AM
1

I mainly take issue with the more common proposal to afford a specific, new legal right to fathers only, under the guise of “equality”, as if an abortion and a “paper abortion” are the same thing. Having spent the better part of a decade paying attention to this kind of thing, all I've ever seen are calls for giving men equal effective access to the methods of Legal Parental Surrender that are currently feasibly accessible only to women. This formalization of the de facto status quo and making i…
/r/MensRights15/06/19 01:31 AM
1

So how are you going to justify anti-abortion laws? I'm not. And then are you really going to force a woman to have an abortion at the same time? No. You do realize this could all be prevented by the man taking precaution, right? Yes. Could all be prevented by the woman taking precaution, too. Most likely, I expect people will continue to take these precautions. And since women will no longer be able to control men's bodies, there will be no further reason for feminists to fight against technolo…
/r/MensRights15/06/19 01:23 AM
1

Ideally both people involve have gotten on the same page and clearly understand each other's intentions before they have sex. Especially cautious people can have whatever opt-in or opt-out paperwork completed and signed at this point. But assuming they don't talk at all beforehand, contraception fails or is not used, and a pregnancy results. The woman may choose to abort, adopt, or abandon an unwanted child just as she can do now (actually somewhat more above-board since some states technically …
/r/MensRights15/06/19 12:39 AM
1

My question is, should the reverse be acceptable as well? Should a woman have the right to a paper abortion, unilaterally foisting the entire financial responsibility onto the father if he wanted the child? Yes. And this is an outcome that is not currently possible under "pro-life" and "pro-choice" opposition to reproductive rights. A woman stuck in such a situation might have an abortion she would not freely choose because that is currently the only way for her to avoid being forced to use her …
/r/MensRights15/06/19 12:09 AM
1

You can’t give a right to a “paper abortion” to people on the basis of gender. Would women also have this right? Yes, under gender equal reproductive rights women would still have access to Legal Parental Surrender via adoption/abandonment. All that's changed is that men have equal effective access to LPS, too. Would a woman be able to unilaterally say “I also do not want to consent to supporting a child for 18 years but will not/cannot have an abortion, I forfeit all parental rights and am free…
/r/MensRights15/06/19 12:04 AM
1

Giving the option to opt out places the burden on society and punishes the child. And it's terrible that some women would be so selfish and irresponsible as to force a child into existence under those circumstances, but we cannot hold the position that a woman's choices and actions matter and simultaneously hold a man responsible for mitigating the harms her choices and actions cause. In any case, I don't think women would continue abusing children like you fear if the current economic incentive…
/r/MensRights14/06/19 11:54 PM
1

Talking about MRA, if you store wealth in a privacy oriented crypto like Monero, the accountants/lawyers won’t be able to trace or extract those funds in the event of Divorce/alimony etc. The laws of math trumps the laws of men. As long as you hide your keys well/memorize them in your head, they can never take your wealth away from you. Have a convincing (and provable) explanation for where the money went because the "laws of man" can just see you were the last one in control of marital assets w…
/r/MensRights14/06/19 11:40 PM
1

The Women’s World Cup brought in almost $73 million, of which the players got 13%. The 2010 men’s World Cup in South Africa made almost $4 billion, of which 9% went to the players. The men’s World Cup in Russia generated over $6 billion in revenue, with the participating teams sharing $400 million, less than 7% of revenue. Meanwhile, the Women’s World Cup is expected to earn $131 million for the full four-year cycle 2019-22 and dole out $30 million [23%] to the participating teams.
/r/MensRights13/06/19 05:30 AM
1

What are the comparative numbers for mothers? Is this a case of people criticising fathers specifically or disproportionately, or a case of people in general needing to shut the fuck up about how they think other people should raise their kids?
/r/MensRights13/06/19 12:33 AM
4

Naw. The jokes were on the women. It was kind of like social commentary too. Audience members were supposed to feel bad for Schmidt. Alrighty, may get a pass. Still sexual harrassment or naw? Being "kind of rapey" during a hiring interview is probably going to run afoul of most company's policies for dealing with sexual harassment, yes.
/r/MensRights12/06/19 10:06 PM
30

Are we doing the regular deconstruction of edgy humor already? You can make fun of a perpetrator. You can find humor in the act itself being contextually absurd. Don't make fun of a victim. We can laugh at edited youtube videos featuring Hitler complain about sports teams losing Yes, making fun of Hitler by putting ridiculous subtitles on a video of a historical speech or movie scene hits both of the first two and is potentially good comedy. we can't laugh at situational comedy featuring a man b…
/r/MensRights12/06/19 08:19 PM
13

Note that referring to the gay Latino journalist by his preferred adjectives as "gay" and "Latino", they've engaged in the same sort of harassment alleged against Crowder.
/r/MensRights12/06/19 07:36 PM
–

regularly, aggressively sexually harassed This is situational comedy in your culture?
/r/MensRights12/06/19 07:29 PM
3

Speaking of "the world runs on money", what of the value of the room&board provided to the non-working partner for however many years? I've had SOs live with me from time to time and, while it only costs me a couple extra hundred per month to have another person, they saved over a thousand each month by having room&board provided for them. At the dissolution of the partnership, should they be responsible for restoring to me only the marginal cost of several hundred per month, or should they owe …
/r/MensRights12/06/19 06:15 PM
1

Again with the failure to make any substantive response. Since that last throw-away sentence seems to be helping you remain distracted, try this: Sometimes it'll make sense for one to work while the other stays home So is the one for whom it "made sense" to work compensated by the other marital partner when the marriage has failed and the reasons that "made sense" no longer apply?
/r/MensRights12/06/19 04:27 PM
1

Other than acknowledging reality in the last sentence/question, I didn't use any gendered pronouns, either.
/r/MensRights12/06/19 04:01 PM
1

Sometimes it'll make sense for one to work while the other stays home So is the one for whom it "made sense" to work compensated by the other marital partner when the marriage has failed and the reasons that "made sense" no longer apply? Or is it only women's choices and actions that don't matter?
/r/MensRights12/06/19 03:26 PM
2

What would be the topic of debate? It's unclear that there'd be any significant disagreement with most of the people here.
/r/MensRights10/06/19 12:03 PM
-7

I'm sure racial supremacists, nationalists, separatists, etc. have their disagreements, too, but I don't see a need to pay close enough attention to tell them apart.
/r/MensRights10/06/19 10:13 AM
1

Obligatory Risk Mitigation Analysis of Pregnancy vs. Child Support link.
/r/MensRights10/06/19 09:26 AM
1

Note: the "GC" in the text is "Gender Critical". Basically, imagine taking all the most ridiculous aspects of critical theory, genocidal feminism, and gender essentialism and rolling them all into one hate ideology. Alternatively, picture the boogeyman "incel" caricature and then imagine their moms made their own subreddit.
/r/MensRights10/06/19 08:16 AM
7

Sounds like they want every accusation prosecuted, without regard for how much of a waste of resources it would be or the harm it would cause to victims.
/r/MensRights10/06/19 08:09 AM
1

The Women’s World Cup brought in almost $73 million, of which the players got 13%. The 2010 men’s World Cup in South Africa made almost $4 billion, of which 9% went to the players. The men’s World Cup in Russia generated over $6 billion in revenue, with the participating teams sharing $400 million, less than 7% of revenue. Meanwhile, the Women’s World Cup is expected to earn $131 million for the full four-year cycle 2019-22 and dole out $30 million [23%] to the participating teams.
/r/MensRights10/06/19 01:52 AM
1

Will it stop others from speaking out? Ideally, it will set an example to inspire other victims of false accusations to come forward Oh, my bad, they were pearl clutching about the perpetrators being discouraged.
/r/MensRights10/06/19 01:25 AM
5

Pretty sure "incel" has been septembered at this point, but back before it was the media darling boogeyman it's become, the common thread I observed was that these people tend to have been raised by an abusive single mother. Their socialization problems are substantially a result of being unable to overcome the coping mechanisms they needed to survive their childhoods "Incels" are a scathing indictment of the feminist insistence than women's choices and actions shouldn't matter.
/r/MensRights10/06/19 12:10 AM
1

"All the more reason men shouldn't be promoted to management." ~a bigot somewhere
/r/MensRights09/06/19 11:52 PM
1

I'd probably put lack of reproductive rights, homelessness, suicide, child custody, violence against men in general, conditional suffrage, workplace fatalities, gender biases in criminal justice, genital mutilation, etc. before "White Knights", but I guess everyone can have their own priorities
/r/MensRights09/06/19 11:50 PM
3

Isa joke, ye, but would it still be accepted as light-hearted sketch comedy scripted the other way around.
/r/MensRights09/06/19 11:45 PM
2

Kinda close to the deadline, but this article is worth including.
/r/MensRights09/06/19 10:37 PM
1

For future reference, no one is likely to demand to see proof that you got an urgent message and need to leave to address some life event. If you wanna be ironic, describe the exact situation you're in and say you have to go rescue a friend from it... or just say you've gotta go and then go. As for the GF... I'd be tempted to see what exactly you wrote to her to see if there's some potential misinterpretation or miscommunication about tge seriousness of your situation, but even it was just "thes…
/r/MensRights09/06/19 08:26 AM
3

Should get ASVAB, SAT, ACT, etc. proctors to record room temperature when administering standardized tests. Massive replicability proof with not-very-much effort.
/r/MensRights09/06/19 07:32 AM
1

Might want to include a caution about checking local laws before carrying around a box cutter in your pocket.
/r/MensRights09/06/19 07:27 AM
8

Repost from a previous thread. As much as I enjoy hearing random perverts sharing their hot-for-teacher child rape fantasies, there is a difference between fantasy and reality. The mild potential harm to a child who does want to fuck their teacher, but is told firmly that such a relationship would be inappropriate, is insignificant compared to the harm caused to the child groomed and exploited by a sexual predator in charge of their classroom. Whether "kids lusting after sexy teachers" is unavoi…
/r/MensRights09/06/19 06:22 AM
1

The political purpose of this issue seems to be to undermine the national sovereignty of indigenous tribes.
/r/MensRights09/06/19 01:23 AM
5

Eh, every product in a store that can be fit in a pocket or purse will eventually get stolen by somebody. It's less about absolute rates of theft and more about the ratio of sales to "shrinkage". Suppose you sell 1000 blue widgets and people steal 10 blue widgets and next to it on the shelf you sell 100 red widgets and people steal 2 red widgets. Even though the blue widgets are stolen 5x as often in absolute terms, theft has a 2x greater impact on the red widgets, so the red widgets get the ant…
/r/MensRights09/06/19 12:46 AM
5

Cultural attitudes about sexuality, from monogamy and chastity to infidelity and rape, are largely based on addressing uncertainties about paternity. A 25-30 year old woman who is still a virgin presumably has sufficient self-control that you're not going to end up wasting your life&labor raising another man's children. The sex-shaming men face, OTOH, seems to be a more recent invention, largely predicated on spurring men to be complicit in the exploitation of their excess productivity.
/r/MensRights09/06/19 12:24 AM
1

Why does Wal-Mart have the men's razors locked up, but the women's aren't. Because their stock tracking and loss prevention algorithms have determined one is shoplifted significantly often enough to require additional measures to prevent theft. It's no different than the algorithms detecting, e.g., certain colors of hair dye require anti-theft devices while others do not.
/r/MensRights09/06/19 12:05 AM
2

we should support abortion rights because it helps men who want an abortion with their partner "Oh em gee, MRAs want men to be able to force women to have abortions!" LPS helps men since, whether his partner wants an abortion or not, he won't be forced to use his body to support an unwanted child (and neither should she, of course).
/r/MensRights08/06/19 11:56 PM
1

If "pro-choice" opposition to reproductive rights continues, I can see little reason to support its approach. Abortion access still remains in a tenuous position 50 years after Roe v. Wade largely because "pro-choice" opposition to reproductive rights leaves abortion as a contradictory exception to the status quo of violations of reproductive rights being seen as justifiable and unproblematic. If "pro-choice" wanted to readjust and actually be pro-choice, I have no problem welcoming them back in…
/r/MensRights08/06/19 11:31 PM
1

Women's options for excersising reproductive rights, to avoid being forced to support an unwanted child, include abortion, adoption, and abandonment. Equal effective access to methods like adoption and abandonment regardless of sex/gender have nothing to do with abortion and continuing to use feminist-coined terms like "financial abortion" unecessarily confuses the issue. Since women's expanded access to de facto unilateral adoption and abandonment is largely a result of "pro-life" efforts to of…
/r/MensRights08/06/19 11:03 PM
1

Meh. She got the free food and blog content she was after, so I don't think it was a terribly effective jab at wasting her time. To the extent I gave thought to the greater impact of what I was doing, it didn't go much further than knowing that any day she spent with me was one less day she spent messing with someone else... so not really getting back at her, either. If I'd matched with her unknowingly, I can't say it would've turned out the same way, but if she'd contacted me again about doing …
/r/MensRights08/06/19 12:57 PM
1

Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.
/r/MensRights08/06/19 11:43 AM
1

There was a local golddigger strong independent woman who had a food critic type blog with a side theme of her always getting a "date" to pay the bill. I eventually matched with her on OkCupid (?) and since she generally picked interesting restaurants and seemed entertaining, I figured it was a fair trade and played along. I basically went in thinking of it as having a personal assistant who'd set up dinner reservations for me and worked for food. She was pleasant enough, we could hold a convers…
/r/MensRights08/06/19 09:42 AM
2

Picture the type of guy who would read all the things feminists have written imagining how men think of women and say to himself "Oh, that is so me!" It's the same pattern as the closeted evangelical Republican who speaks of the homosexual agenda tempting honest men to sin, or the gun control nut who has fantasies of murdering someone in a grocery store parking lot.
/r/MensRights08/06/19 07:36 AM
6

I've told one-night-stands not to put their hands on my face during sex because the rapist made-to-penetratrix who raped made-to-penetrated me covered my mouth and, ayy, reactions can be unpredictable. How in the fuck do you get to being married to someone without sharing that you may violently lash out at otherwise-innocuous triggers?
/r/MensRights08/06/19 04:35 AM
3

LPS is an adequate solution to the current problem of nonconsenting parents being forced to use their body to support an unwanted child. In a perfectly ideal world, every new person forced into existence would be the wanted result of a fully informed consensual agreement between eager and willing parents. Perhaps with the advent of ubiquitous, long term, effective, reversible, contraceptive/obstructive polymers like RISUG/Vasalgel (adapted for unisex use) that will be achievable and there will n…
/r/MensRights08/06/19 04:01 AM
1

So... the prison is working as designed? Or are we supposed to care that convicts are "struggling and terrified" of the consequences of their choices and actions in this case because ... what? women are inherently less capable than men?
/r/MensRights08/06/19 03:28 AM
2

In a way you can trace this back to the foundations of gender roles in the division of labor in hunter-gatherer tribes. If you are a hunter and you sabotage someone else in the pack, the hunt fails, the prey escapes, and no one eats. If you are a gatherer, though, lying about what you found, where you found it, or how much you collected allows you to eat while others go hungry. If you are a hunter, everyone knows when the hunt succeeds. If the game is large enough, the meat will spoil before you…
/r/MensRights08/06/19 02:52 AM
12

gender-swapped "pro-life" arguments Stop. Opponents of abortion don't realize you're a gender bigot, and will apply these arguements equally to both men and women. You're normalizing violatons of reproductive rights every time you do this. Stop. If a woman is doing it it is a totally different story Because she had a choice. When the choice she's made is selfish and irresponsible, condemnation isn't an unreasonable social reaction. A reason "everyone wants to pin a medal" on a single father is b…
/r/MensRights07/06/19 07:53 AM
1

I would like someone who shares my moral values and is about as successful as myself. I don't know your moral values or how successful you are, so your question is unanswerable with the information you've provided.
/r/MensRights07/06/19 02:13 AM
3

The Statistics Canada official figure for the wage gap is that for every $1 paid to men, women are paid 87¢.^1 Average weekly hours: Men: 38.3 Women: 32.1 83.8% as many hours. 87% as much of the pay, 83.8% as much of the hours. Women recieve 46.5% of the pay and work 45.6% of the hours. Thus, after the most basic first-pass adjustment for hours worked, for every dollar-hour paid to men, women are paid $1.02.
/r/MensRights07/06/19 02:07 AM
50

What about a woman who doesn't want a child but got pregnant? Abortion, adoption, and abandonment. She's the one who has to give birth to that child Relevant only to the abortion/gestation choice. She's the one who has to [...] deal with how incredibly expensive and difficult it is to raise one... by themselves. No she isn't. See: adoption and abandonment. I don't understand why you believe that just because you didn't want the kid, you shouldn't have to bare the same responsibilities as a woman…
/r/MensRights07/06/19 01:26 AM
1

Even a debate which changes no one's mind can still be a positive thing by increasing everyone's understanding of each other.
/r/MensRights06/06/19 11:08 PM
1

The primary source is provided. A write-up for a wider audience than a random comment on reddit should probably have a more careful breakdown of how the UCR does not adequately capture statistics on the majority of rape victims. I also delete comment history and change accounts periodically due to a cyberstalker from a previous relationship, so any content I produce is intended to be ephemeral.
/r/MensRights06/06/19 10:54 PM
1

It's more like you agree to sex, signed a contract that you agree to sex, and then someone else is masturbating for 2 hours, for the 100th time that year, and you revoke your consent to sex. But I see what you're getting at. I suppose it depends whether the ex-husband would have been held responsible for the ex-wife's second child.
/r/MensRights06/06/19 03:42 PM
1

Use of in vitro embryo without consent (3) No person shall make use of an in vitro embryo for any purpose unless the donor has given written consent, in accordance with the regulations, to its use for that purpose. This decision apparently relies on the idea of consent being revocable after-the-fact and/or that (explicit written) consent should be disregarded if someone changes their mind later. I'm having a hard time reading this court ruling as a positive.
/r/MensRights06/06/19 01:42 PM
6

what would you call this? I'd call it "Felony Parental Interference", but check your local laws.
/r/MensRights06/06/19 12:18 PM
6

I'm not sure if I've spent any time looking at /MGTOW. Looking at their front page just now, it appears to be mostly a support-sub, so I'd be unsurprised if there are some comments here&there where people who are sharing harmful experiences they've had come might across as overgeneralizing what life has taught them. Do you have any specific examples you'd like to discuss?
/r/MensRights06/06/19 12:14 PM
3

Since /u/problem_redditor has already covered the NISVS, I suppose I'll talk about the UCR. The 2012 definition change gives us "Penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim." which seems like it should cover the scenario where a rapist penetrates her vagina with the victims penis without his consent, but the FBI UCR Summary Reporting System User Manual gives 16 scena…
/r/MensRights06/06/19 11:53 AM
1

That isn't entirely why. That is sufficient.
/r/MensRights05/06/19 03:13 PM
5

The way the UN measures gender equality is to assume men's position in society for whatever metrics they choose to include is 1.00, and then express women's position in society as a ratio to that capped at 1.00. So a society with extreme gender inequality, where women are far ahead of men on every possible metric, except one, would still be scored as needing to do more to help women achieve equality.
/r/MensRights05/06/19 04:10 AM
1

Alright. Lets hang out.
/r/MensRights04/06/19 03:23 PM
1

You probably didn't even realize you were being offered it, and the rejection you gave them was a result of your unwavering faith in your own unworthiness rather than a conscious deliberate act. But the people you reject don't know that, so they accept it and move on.
/r/MensRights04/06/19 02:22 PM
1

People like this are just as likely to be loved just as much as anyone else. But if you reject people's love within the first few weeks or months, they're not going to keep hanging around so you can drag them down with you. They'll go find someone else who is willing to be loved.
/r/MensRights04/06/19 01:52 PM
2

Maybe if Indonesia banned genital mutilation, that might help?
/r/MensRights04/06/19 10:37 AM
1

Appears to be more of a self advocate than a men's advocate. You can read the reaction the last time she posted.
/r/MensRights04/06/19 10:10 AM
7

As much as I enjoy hearing random perverts sharing their hot-for-teacher child rape fantasies, there is a difference between fantasy and reality. The mild potential harm to a child who does want to fuck their teacher, but is told firmly that such a relationship would be inappropriate, is insignificant compared to the harm caused to the child groomed and exploited by a sexual predator in charge of their classroom. Whether "kids lusting after sexy teachers" is unavoidable or not is irrelevant. The…
/r/MensRights04/06/19 09:37 AM
1

One of the key goals of the essay is to "make clear to the reader whether the text is or is not effective in persuading an online audience to side with the author in his or her argument/message/advocacy, however overt these may be". It sounds like the purpose of the assignment is for you to analyze the argument on it's own turf, so to speak, and point out contradictions, rhetorical deficiencies, or logical errors. Not to do your own research and rebut the article's arguments. For instance: women…
/r/MensRights04/06/19 09:15 AM
1

I'm unworthy of [love] and defective in many ways. Loving someone like this is exhausting.
/r/MensRights04/06/19 07:23 AM
0

So you'd rather smash capitalism, comrade? I'd prefer to restore and protect the free market, comrade. 😂 Both you and the other guy are approaching economics like it's a sportsball rivalry and it's hilarious.
/r/MensRights04/06/19 07:21 AM
1

If you have a good knowledge of investing and have a large inheritance your wealth wouldn't be very hard to grow. It also helps if you can arrange monetary policy to be inflationary so (your) investment risk is passed on to everyone who "works hard" by robbing their savings of wealth. I'm fully supportive of free markets but ideally a free market should be as free of regulation as possible. Kind of like the communist fantasy, unregulated free market capitalism looks great in theory, but once peo…
/r/MensRights04/06/19 07:18 AM
1

"Wealth never lasts for three generations" because so many people who inherit money do not understand the value of money and do not know how to manage it. Or simply a matter of math: ancestral wealth divided by children, then grandchildren, then greatgrandchildren, leaves the greatgreatgrandchildren in no significantly different position than anyone else. Or because luck that depletes wealth is more common that luck that enriches it. It is interesting to examine the exceptions and see what condi…
/r/MensRights02/06/19 09:45 AM
1

If you don't like being a wage slave then go start your own business. If you don't like being a slave, start your own plantation. If you don't like slavery, buy some slaves. That's a step that really sorts the men from the boys. It's probably the step where, through good/bad luck, the business succeeds/fails that this man/boy distinction arises. Nobody asks the unsuccessful businessboy to share the secret to his failure. (Maybe it's hard work! 😲) Granted there is the "You have to keep failing un…
/r/MensRights02/06/19 08:26 AM
0

What I'd prefer is that you kept your bullshit to yourself and I didn't have to encounter it or think about you at all. This is a lot of hostility. What about 'my bullshit' do you find so threatening? No one is saying that there's no inherent unfairness in the world. Conversely, people who benefit from unfairness in the world will tell you it's inherent. You just have to work hard (for them) and it'll pay off (for them)! Success is inevitable (for them). small or mid-size business How many of th…
/r/MensRights02/06/19 07:52 AM
1

While it's true that some people will fail in life due to bad luck, Alternatively phrased that some people will fail in life even with hard work. it's also true that you cannot succeed without working to achieve goals. Win the lottery. Inherit from a wealthy relative. Witness a gangland shooting and make off unobserved with a bag full of cartel drug money (and remember to check it for a tracking device). Pick up a giant gold nugget while out for a walk in the park. Place a bet on the winning tea…
/r/MensRights02/06/19 07:16 AM
1

Straight up, the worst part of this subreddit is all the blackpilled defeatist manchildren, sucking around and pouting in every fucking thread. I have a very comfortable life. No unsecured or negative equity debt, high income, currently in a relationship, good health, etc. Why do you suppose you prefer to believe I'm a blackpilled defeatist manchild, sucking around and pouting? The single most influential factor in the lives of 99% of people is their own decision making. This is hyperagency. It'…
/r/MensRights02/06/19 06:05 AM
5

There are basically zero checks&balances in the Family Court system to prevent this sort of child abuse by a custodial parent nor any effective ways for a non-custodial parent to protect his children. It's disgusting that NOW defends the status quo.
/r/MensRights02/06/19 05:38 AM
4

Exploitation of others has a very strong tendency to be rewarded. The "hard work pays off" line isn't a lie, but it is being peddled by those who want you to work hard to make whatever they're currently selling.
/r/MensRights02/06/19 05:23 AM
1

The 666 schedule is certainly about hard work, I'll give you that much. And the employers who enforce it are certainly more successful. So, I suppose "hard work pays off" is technically true.
/r/MensRights02/06/19 05:13 AM
1

The Mythology of Hard Work encourages risk-taking behavior due to belief that you can work your to the top (or work your way back to where you were, rather). If you have good luck, the resulting sucess is generally attributed to hard work. If you have bad luck, the resulting failure may be attributed to just bad luck and belief in the myth continues, or if a loss of faith occurs the resulting failure may be misattributed to "this negative attitude". The mythology is further reinforced by the ape…
/r/MensRights02/06/19 04:55 AM
6

I've had a girl I didn't know corner me in the mailroom of my apartment building demanding to know "Why do you hate me?" because apparently when she left for classes at a nearby university and when I got home from work happened to coincide, but as we'd pass each other I almost never acknowledged her. That was it. A few days pass and maybe I was a little earlier or she was a little later, but it happens that I'm unlocking my front door as I get home as she's walking by to leave. I say "Hello." Sh…
/r/MensRights02/06/19 02:40 AM
1

She is angry guys put her into the friendzone after she mentions her BF. No. If anything, she's angry guys don't put/keep her in the friendzone after she tells them she has a boyfriend.
/r/MensRights02/06/19 02:10 AM
3

Seems like a result of women using "I have a boyfriend." to soft-reject male interest. In any case, women are not entitled to stay in the Friendzone any more than men are entitled to get out of it (via escalation to a relationship, anyway).
/r/MensRights02/06/19 02:06 AM
1

Hard work generally does not result in success. The primary determinant of success is good luck. The Mythology of Hard Work is popular mainly amongst wealthy people (of any race) and white people (of any wealth).
/r/MensRights02/06/19 01:49 AM
5

I hadn't seen a pop-up ad in literally years, then I remembered this is the same site that begged users to disable their blocking plug-ins and then served them malware. Get your shit together, Forbes.
/r/MensRights02/06/19 01:41 AM
1

I fell down this particular rabbit hole a few days ago related to the UN policy of denying food aid to men. Basically, UN gynocentrism improves "gender equality" metrics because gender inequalities that benefit women are disregarded by the scoring process. This feeds back into furthering even more extreme gender inequalities, like fathers and their children starving to death on the basis of the parent's gender.
/r/MensRights02/06/19 01:35 AM
1

Given that the UN methodologies for scoring "gender equality" on a zero-to-one scale caps subscores at 1.0 (i.e., a score >1 indicates an inequality that favors women over men), this would be a potential confounding factor as two cultures with low and high gender equality may both be given a high score of 1 and two cultures both with low gender equality may each be given a high and low score. I also find it odd that the rating scale they used provides no capacity to measure if traits were undesi…
/r/MensRights02/06/19 12:02 AM
3

An interesting effect of the black&white thinking of feminists, that nonconsensual sex is necessarily rape, is that things couples may explicitly give permission for their partners to do, things they might both enjoy immensely, are rape. I have an ex who most mornings the summer we lived together would avail herself of the morning wood. It's an extremely fondly remembered time, that period of several months where my partner raped me on a near-daily basis. Go visit nearly any thread in a relation…
/r/MensRights01/06/19 11:37 PM
3

Feminist counter-advocacy of male supremacy is a product of their ideological failure to recognize or challenge gender malagency (i.e., male hyperagency and female hypoagency). This is how it's possible to present a scenario in which two drunk college students have sex and a feminist will automatically asserts that it is his responsibility to ensure she consents. Note that the scenario makes no specifications about consent, it could be the woman raping the man, but it is automatically the rape v…
/r/MensRights01/06/19 11:17 PM
1

conservative millennial
/r/MensRights01/06/19 11:01 PM
1

Think about the term "deadbeat dad" for a moment. Think about all the scorn and vitriol heaped upon men who avoid being forced to support an unwanted child. Realize that women who take their own steps to avoid being forced to support an unwanted child are at least as deserving of the same perception.
/r/MensRights01/06/19 10:58 PM
1

What happens from 0835 to 1230?
/r/MensRights01/06/19 08:47 AM
3

This probably is not even the weirdest tattoo that a "whore/prostitute" will ignore while working.
/r/MensRights01/06/19 08:11 AM
1

Changed in 2008 from the latter to the former.
/r/MensRights01/06/19 03:58 AM
1

> National Coalition For Men > National Coalition of Free Men 🤔
/r/MensRights01/06/19 03:51 AM
3

I have several more-or-less identical coffee cups I've acquired from Waffle House over the years. I almost always use the one that somehow has a rust stain under the glaze because it's not like the other coffee cups. I do not have "generally low regard" for the other cups; in every relevant functional capacity they are just as good as the one I like. In terms of cosmetic appearance, the other cups are objectively higher quality than the one I like. It is not different because it's better, but it…
/r/MensRights01/06/19 03:46 AM
1

Equal treatment for all, regardless of sex or gender, would presumably include combinations of sex&gender that are not the usual two.
/r/MensRights01/06/19 03:20 AM
2

ma'amspreading
/r/MensRights31/05/19 02:24 PM
0

There’s also probably going to be some mental issues as the child grows up wondering why it’s father didn’t want to raise it. If the child grows up wondering why it was unwanted, this is a product of its caregiver(s) and/or the state making the child aware of this reality. A child who has its parent(s) died in a tragic zamboni mishap still exists, needs to eat, etc. A child who is told its parent(s) died in a tragic zamboni mishap is in the same situation. Is it in the second child's best intere…
/r/MensRights31/05/19 08:42 AM
1

We can agree life begins at conception, but it does not follow that ending that life is forbidden or unjustifiable. Pigs, cows, wheat, tomatoes, cucumbers, onions, lettuce, etc. have begun life, but desire for bacon cheeseburgers is widely accepted as sufficient justification for killing them all in droves.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 07:58 AM
1

Search Suggestion Ban And you can bounce between his "Tweets & replies" page and the threads where he's replied to see his posts often disappear when you aren't viewing them from his own account feed. Perhaps twitter is feeding malformed results to requests from shadowban.eu to undermine anti-censorship efforts?
/r/MensRights31/05/19 12:11 AM
–

Unless they follow him or go directly to his account, most/all of his tweets will be invisible to other users. His account doesn't show up as a search suggestion unless you type out the entire account username or handle. Basically, Twitter has deplatformed a congressional candidate and made him invisible to most voters and constituents.
/r/MensRights30/05/19 09:04 AM
–

I wonder if that guy knows twitter has shadowrealmed him.
/r/MensRights30/05/19 08:18 AM
–

Because men don't get pregnant. Which has zero relevance to the portions of Legal Parental Surrender tgat would be made effectively accessible to men, too Gender equal reproductive rights would not prevent women from continuing to have acess to abortion, abandonment, or adoption to avoid being forced to support an unwanted child.
/r/MensRights30/05/19 07:56 AM
3

Someone I follow on twitter posted about this and the comments pretty much completely ignored (or were completely unaware) that social attitudes about sex and sex work are slightly different in China and a western/feminist interpretation of this project's aims and intents probably does not apply.
/r/MensRights30/05/19 01:05 AM
7

The word for this is "portma'amteau".
/r/MensRights30/05/19 12:18 AM
5

I'm curious how many women have similar "What is this bullshit?" reactions to articles about the newest fabricated portma'amteau offense.
/r/MensRights29/05/19 08:54 AM
1

From what I'm looking at, California doesn't allow changes in custody via ex parte orders except under very specific circumstances. So either it will most likely be summarily rejected, or she's about to make this really ugly for your kid.
/r/MensRights29/05/19 08:47 AM
1

I don't care if your pet peeve has anything to do with the MRM or is a "right-wing feminist".
/r/MensRights28/05/19 03:19 PM
1

You do this thing where you say one thing that's probably wrong but not really worth engaging, then jump to some totally unrelated conclusion.
/r/MensRights28/05/19 03:08 PM
1

So you have no solutions or alternatives and are just sowing discord against this Sargon guy for whatever reason?
/r/MensRights28/05/19 02:57 PM
1

A copy of the questionnaire would be nice.
/r/MensRights28/05/19 02:11 PM
1

Who is?
/r/MensRights28/05/19 02:03 PM
2

That's not much different from any other political party in that respect, so I'd find no cause for that to be a problem with UKIP rather than just another example of the general trend. UKIP might be a useless shower of bastards otherwise, I don't know. I don't pay much attention to foreign internal politics.
/r/MensRights28/05/19 02:02 PM
3

They are addressing quite a few women's issues (some of them made up), mostly related to their old obsessions, grooming gangs, supposedly rampant FGM, ... Don't rape children. Don't prejudge rapists by their skin color. Don't mutilate children's genitals. I see. Very controversial positions they've taken on these "women's issues". Considering that Sargon has never to my knowledge criticized his party's orientation How is this supposed to be a bad thing, given the above? I think that MRM (or Badg…
/r/MensRights28/05/19 01:37 PM
3

There's a potential sampling error where normal guys who might've been interested in them pick up that the interest is not reciprocated and so they move along before anything memorable happens. Thus the only guys they ever realize were showing interest are the occasional weirdos. Might just be trying to bad mouth the competition because they tryna to get into your pants themselves. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
/r/MensRights28/05/19 03:24 AM
3

It's the perspective of a woman who have never been in a relationship with a man who loved them. The common element in all these relationships was not the various men, but rather her, so you might want to take her dating advice with several grains of salt. I will agree that men are often pretty careful about getting too deeply involved with someone. A bad relationship is worse than being single, so keeping a partner at arms length until you're sure compatibility is high and there aren't any majo…
/r/MensRights28/05/19 02:10 AM
1

why not just go ahead and make their own movie? Maybe they have a couple different times and no one noticed or cared.
/r/MensRights27/05/19 01:54 PM
9

When I was in high school I worked for a guy who put out a newsprint magazine for the QUILTBAG community. I'd go deliver stacks of the current issue to the various bars and clubs around town and, if the bar/club in particular had contracted to advertise, pick up their proofs and payment. As a lanky 18 year old kid with, often, unnaturally colored hair hanging out in gay and lesbian bars quietly reading a book while I waited, I am not at all surprised or offended that people would often try to ta…
/r/MensRights27/05/19 12:40 PM
5

The ones I still don't understand though are male feminists. Picture the type of man who would read all the things feminists have written imagining how men think of women and say to himself "Oh, that is so me!" It's the same pattern as the closeted evangelical Republican who speaks of the homosexual agenda tempting honest men to sin, or the gun control nut who has fantasies of murdering someone in a grocery store parking lot.
/r/MensRights27/05/19 03:41 AM
1

Your negative feelings about discovering that the caricature you've been fed isn't real have nothing to do with me. I understand your desire to lash out, though, as it can be upsetting.
/r/MensRights27/05/19 01:38 AM
1

Hmm, yeah good point, I guess according to the person who assaulted her And multiple witnesses at the party, but why let facts interfere with what you want to believe.
/r/MensRights27/05/19 01:03 AM
2

Romp Culture.
/r/MensRights26/05/19 10:48 PM
1

You left out the part where he found her on the ground behind a dumpster. You left out the part where they'd been talking at the party for a while beforehand and apparently chose to sneak off together. If anything it just discredits your point of view.
/r/MensRights26/05/19 10:45 PM
2

Section 1(4) "A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable, on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for life." Section 2(4) "A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable, on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for life." Section 4(4) "A person guilty of an offence under this section [...] is liable, on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for life." It may be the case that the sentencing in practice for Section 1 is stiffer than the gender-swapped equi…
/r/MensRights26/05/19 07:03 AM
1

Actually "kir" in Farsi means penis. ACKSHUALLY. But yes, you figured it out My name has an "a" on the end of it. Thus diminutive. Kireh would also work and would be a great name for a ladyboy. "Kira" means "sun" in Persian. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ JLawOkay.gif 😂
/r/MensRights26/05/19 06:06 AM
1

Men value what I bring to the table, images or not. Other than this cacophony of grifteresque self-promotion... what do you bring to the table? I'm not some dumb model who just posts sexy photos on their IG page with the caption "peaches!" You caption sexy photos with fatal occupational injury statistics? It's been done. I'm the only woman that will listen to them, understand and support them, and make it my business to raise awareness for men's rights. This is Hard Sell 101 and it makes you sou…
/r/MensRights26/05/19 02:35 AM
1

I don't know of any woman that actually advocates on behalf of men Then, you should probably take a seat and read/listen a bit more.
/r/MensRights26/05/19 02:16 AM
1

I wanted to name a daughter Kira, but it was pointed out it's homophonically a diminutive of penis in Farsi. Ended up only having boys, anyway. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
/r/MensRights26/05/19 02:15 AM
1

Ah, yes, convicted of raping a child, but given a slap on the wrist because a child rapist needs to spend time around children. Honk honk.
/r/MensRights26/05/19 02:09 AM
1

It's in the best interest of the child the State.
/r/MensRights26/05/19 02:06 AM
4

Go skim Title IV.d.458 "Incentive Payments to States" for the bit about how the amount of child support the States have on their books influences the size of their piece of the $XX Billion available in Federal grants. This is a racket scheme operating in the "best interests of the child the State".
/r/MensRights26/05/19 02:02 AM
1

If he is able to be with his kids 50% of the time and mom doesn't work, he should pay full support for a set period of time while maintaining 50% physical custody so Mom can look for a job. If you want to see a real push to reform the abuses of Title IV.d, you're going to need to treat women as equals. Mom doesn't work and can't support her kids? Throw her in jail. Revoke her driver's license. Revoke her business licenses. revoke her passport. Etc.
/r/MensRights26/05/19 01:57 AM
2

This thread on a different site discussing this story has other pictures of her from when she hasn't recently had her face wrestled to the ground for "resisting arrest".
/r/MensRights26/05/19 01:31 AM
2

That is Yamile Uribe's mugshot, from an unrelated incident in Texas where a woman tried to rape a man at knifepoint.
/r/MensRights26/05/19 01:25 AM
2

Ah. Yeah. That would seem like a pretty glaring problem. Little light googling, though, and it looks like the association is intentional, so fuck that, I guess.
/r/MensRights26/05/19 12:20 AM
1

White Ribbon? They named a (supposed) domestic abuse organization after the campaign by women to shame young men into dying in war?
/r/MensRights25/05/19 09:32 PM
5

Subsampling is also used on objectively measurable things (e.g., mass manufacturing quality control). 1000+ is usually a good sample size, unless there's a methodological error in sample selection, the results can be considered generalizable.
/r/MensRights25/05/19 09:29 PM
1

Dang. What the hell is happening in Australia that 1/3 of men have the lived experience to have developed this belief?
/r/MensRights25/05/19 12:00 PM
8

Based on what I recall from various psych papers on the topic... There's generally a history of childhood physical and/or sexual abuse by women, so what makes these men think it's "OK" is it being demonstrated at a very young age that this sort of behaviour was "OK" when it was done to them. Solution? Treat women as equals. For instance, when a woman in a drunken rage attempts to murder someone in the street because he didn't respond to her lewd catcalls... maybe give her more than a $100 fine. …
/r/MensRights25/05/19 11:48 AM
1

Dude. Let's set aside your opposition to reproductive rights and focus solely on abortion for a moment. The position that a fetus, at some point, has rights that supersede a woman's "bodily autonomy" is the "pro-life" position. You are making a "pro-life" argument and defending a "pro-life" position. I get that within the context of your opposition to reproductive rights, it totally makes sense to you that it's justifiable to use a woman's body against her will and force her to support an unwant…
/r/MensRights25/05/19 07:52 AM
1

and learn to understand (constitutional) law, maybe that would help understand why bodily autonomy isn't a "supportive argument" but the ONLY argument for abortion. that's why roe v wade is so important. Roe v. Wade hinged on medical privacy, not "bodily autonomy". 😂 To the extent Roe v. Wade addressed bodily autonomy it was to not that it is not an absolute right and may be violated by the State. abortion rights is about when the fetus is to be considered "human enough" to have its own rights a…
/r/MensRights25/05/19 07:19 AM
2

Thing is, the adult victim might want to spend his time on his own future children rather than his ex-wife's kid. By all means, celebrate a man who does what he can to protect the child from the harm it's own mother has perpetrated against it, but if he can't do it, that's understandable: he's one of her victims, too.
/r/MensRights25/05/19 07:05 AM
6

But is not the kid's fault. People enjoy saying this, as if anyone on any side blames the kid. Yes, the kid is a victim of the mother, too. That doesn't mean it makes any sense to force one of her other victims to mitigate the harm she's caused, or to shame them for being unable or unwilling to attempt it.
/r/MensRights25/05/19 06:58 AM
1

Most legal codes have something like that, I had to go hunt it down for the UK.
/r/MensRights25/05/19 06:18 AM
28

That is the female assailant, not the victim.
/r/MensRights25/05/19 06:05 AM
1

oh no, committing crimes has negative consequences. the horror.
/r/MensRights25/05/19 02:49 AM
2

Did you know the rich are made of delicious meat? It's true!
/r/MensRights25/05/19 01:11 AM
1

Due to decades of "tough on crime" political nonsense and the associated ever-growing prison budgets, many correctional facilities no longer have the medical staffing to adequately handle significant health events, so prisoners must be securely transported to and held at normal community hospitals for treatment. Since normal community hospitals are generally not designed to be high security facilities, steps must be taken to protect the medical staff and surrounding community from the criminal p…
/r/MensRights25/05/19 01:08 AM
11

A spokesperson for the student activists explained: “We believe that this space should not be given over to dangerous hate-groups that pose a threat to the security and well-being of members of the Cambridge community.” Next picture: spokesperson for the student activists standing with a bullhorn next to a sign explicitly advocating criminal assault. Cambridge should take the student activists' beliefs to heart and expell them from the campus for their calls to violence.
/r/MensRights25/05/19 12:52 AM
1

"he" is defined to be presumptively gender neutral
/r/MensRights25/05/19 12:43 AM
1

ok, bodily autonomy is a shitty argument? so it would be OK if I came along and just hurt you physically? chained you to a wall against your will? just kept you hostage for almost a year, because apparently bodily autonomy isn't that big of a deal and unnecessary. Take a moment and see if you can figure out how all of your examples fundamentally differ from how "pro-choice" people frame abortion as a bodily autonomy issue (but don't differ from how "pro-life" people frame it). I'm amazed how lit…
/r/MensRights24/05/19 11:32 PM
1

This is a poorly written petition since people can point out that while, sure, Section 1 "Rape" doesn't apply, the offense described could still be charged under Section 2 "Assault by penetration" or Section 4 "Causing a person to engage in sexual activity without consent" and the victim would still be recognized. There is an interesting issue that a person who commits such an offense could presumably have charged laid under multiple sections, so it would be interesting to find example cases wer…
/r/MensRights24/05/19 01:30 PM
1

I am in no way anti abortion You sure make a lot of boilerplate anti-abortion arguments... I'm 100% pro choice, but do not agree with what some people call "financial abortion". Sounds like you're about 50% pro-choice then. Maybe. "opting out" of parenthood by signing a piece of paper is in no way comparable with "opting out" of a pregnancy by terminating it. Another excellent anti-abortion argument. Reproductive rights for men would just be "signing a piece of paper" and people oppose that, jus…
/r/MensRights24/05/19 12:45 PM
1

you entirely disregard that men have to take 50% responsibility for what happens if a pregnancy occurs Of course. I support gender equal reproductive rights. If you ascribe 50% responsibility, they can assert 50% right to choose what happens if a pregnancy occurs. Sweet anti-abortion argument, bro. This is why "pro-choice" people need to stop opposing reproductive rights. they know before engaging in sex that a pregnancy could occur, Sweet anti-abortion argument, bro. Have you tried not opposing…
/r/MensRights24/05/19 07:01 AM
3

Incentive Payments to States under Title IV.d.458. How big a piece of $XX Billion in Federal grant money States recieve is calculated in part based the amount of child support they have on the books.
/r/MensRights24/05/19 05:09 AM
3

True! Even if she had reasonable ideas there still would be no pay gap.
/r/MensRights24/05/19 04:36 AM
1

it is highly reversible though, there's studies about it Depends what you mean by "reversible". Yes, you can go get an expensive microsurgical procedure to reconnect what was separated, and that's technically a reversal, but you're still probably going to be infertile. And the probability of remaining infertile increases with the time between the original vasectomy and the reversal. men are basically always fertile and women only 3 days a month there should be something done about that So. When …
/r/MensRights24/05/19 04:01 AM
1

vasectomy could be a viable option since the procedure is highly reversible Vasectomies should not be considered reversible. I have a suspicion the sudden ubiquitous popularity of this talking point is intended to misinform people to go get themselves permanently surgically sterilized.
/r/MensRights24/05/19 03:22 AM
10

Why do women carry the baby but men don't! Listen here, transphobe...
/r/MensRights24/05/19 03:10 AM
2

Hypothesis? You're describing Title IV.d.458.
/r/MensRights24/05/19 02:54 AM
1

This metanalysis of Paternal Discrepancy puts the rate at about 4% in cases where it's not specifically suspected.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 07:42 AM
3

Don't be gross, Tammy.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 04:44 AM
-10

Don't rape or sexually assault or harass anyone. I was doing my part before the hashtag was even a thing! (Can't say the same about the main promoters of #MeToo, ironically.)
/r/MensRights23/05/19 03:08 AM
1

Everybody loves a firm BBC.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 03:03 AM
1

And, per The Vagina Monologues, even if it is rape, it's good rape.
/r/MensRights22/05/19 10:59 PM
2

It's a side-effect of greater male variability: the further out you go from the population average, the more the gender ratio skews male. So when you look at competitive situations like sports or gaming, the top ranks are going to become more and more male the more elite the level of competition. Conversely, if you have a situation that would rank the worst of the worst, this could also reasonably be expected to skew male.
/r/MensRights22/05/19 12:05 PM
1

Under "explicit consent" conditions, no, you can not, under any circumstances, assume consent. That's kind of the point. The perhaps-not-completely-batshit-insane-sounding rationale is that even reasonable assumptions about consent may none-the-less be incorrect and the result of assuming consent is nonconsensual sex. In feminist rape culture, all nonconsensual sex is rape, and I think you know the rest of the script.
/r/MensRights22/05/19 11:48 AM
6

What reproductive organs are at risk of being destroyed? What stitches do you need? What physical pain threshold are you feeling in your genitals during, after & months ahead? You have some extremely regressive ideas if you think theses are necessary elements. If you're sober and fully alert, how do you not have the strength to walk away from a physically weaker person? The recurring AskReddit posts requesting people share their experiences with female perpetrators often has several reports in w…
/r/MensRights22/05/19 09:18 AM
1

For those wondering: it's the "Rape is sincerely hilarious." video.
/r/MensRights22/05/19 08:13 AM
1

Stopped reading somewhere around the "sitting around in your mother's basement" point. Men are overwhelmingly, nearly exclusively, the net-producers in most economies. Exploiting mens' excess productivity is vital to maintaining the ponzi mythology of "sustainable growth". As more men are becoming comfortable living their own lives, working only as hard as necessary to support their interests and hobbies, this excess productivity shrinks. Thus we have these sorts of sex-shaming "incel" narrative…
/r/MensRights22/05/19 08:11 AM
1

Hasn't California already had a case where explicit consent standards have been turned against people claiming assault because by their own statements they made no effort too verify the accused was a freely consenting, willing participant, and thus the accuser's report amounted to a confession of rape?
/r/MensRights22/05/19 07:56 AM
1

Pretty sure eSports follow the same model as most other sports competitions: There's an open league that can be entered by any and all genders (often incorrectly percieved as the men's league), and then theres a women's league (which may allow only women, or may exclude only men, depending how they handle transgender competitors).
/r/MensRights22/05/19 07:29 AM
1

Depends to what extent natural sex-influenced proclivities are still relevant to differential mortality and fecundity in a given society and how the gender roles affect them. In this scenario, relaxing gender roles has no significant negative putcome. There is also a potential dynamic where gender roles function to moderate or work against natural proclivities (rather than with them) to produce a more harmonious social order that improves mortality and fecundity for the group. In this scenario, …
/r/MensRights22/05/19 05:12 AM
7

Probably these poor misguided young people learned these silly ideas when it happened in their own lives by a woman, against a man, and no one acknowledged it as abusive behavior or intimate partner violence. Much as the article perpetuates these same gender bigoted ideas.
/r/MensRights22/05/19 05:03 AM
3

Given women are only fertile about 20% of the time and about 60% of conceptions end in spontaneous abortion, a guy would need to have sex with several times more than 100 women for there to be 100 pregnancies in a year.
/r/MensRights22/05/19 04:39 AM
11

Ah, Tolkien fandom. A wretched hive of scum.and villainy.
/r/MensRights22/05/19 04:26 AM
1

Slightly more than half, actually.
/r/MensRights22/05/19 04:22 AM
3

But what if the way you're "not like other girls" is in not having a bizarre Us-vs-Them conspiracy theory perspective on gender relations?
/r/MensRights22/05/19 02:48 AM
50

Parallel construction to various "yas queen! 💅💅💅" type twittering, I assume.
/r/MensRights22/05/19 02:39 AM
4

Bruh, fuckin' termites have social order. The idea that humans invented social constructs is absurdly moronic.
/r/MensRights22/05/19 02:32 AM
8

A recurring flaw in many of these approaches is the presumption that the problem is men are not enough like women and/or that men being more like women would be helpful. Thus you have approaches that encourage men to "open up" by imposing expectations that they be "emotionally vulnerable" and that emphasizing that their feelings are "valid" is the best thing you can do. A man describing a problem to you in a dispassionate way is "opening up". The way you help is by pointing out potential flaws i…
/r/MensRights22/05/19 01:19 AM
1

Pretend for the sake of argument that gender roles could be completely arbitraily constructed by society to be anything people agreed they could be. Societies that constructed gender roles that significantly conflicted with the biological differences between the two sexes would presumably not fare as well as societies that constructed gender roles that were less conflicting. These more successful societies would flourish, and have more children, and indoctrinate those children into the gender ro…
/r/MensRights22/05/19 12:38 AM
5

A zygote, embryo, fetus refer to the organism in utero, they describe different stages of development. Calling them "unborn babies" isn't describing what they are. "Unborn baby" is the commonly used umbrella terminology for all stages of pre-natal development. It may not be as specific as the scientistic/medicalized terms, but that level of specificity is generally unwarranted in the casual conversations expected on news and talk radio. Fundamentally, heart cell activity, lung surfactant concent…
/r/MensRights21/05/19 11:37 PM
1

Just because you and all your friends have a hot-for-teacher child rape fantasy doesn't mean we should make it okay for schoolteachers to rape children. It is bizarre this needs to be said.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 11:07 PM
7

Neato. Maybe they'll take this time to update some other criminal code so that if a rapist penetrates her vagina with the victim's penis without his consent she can finally be charged with rape.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 11:05 PM
1

Mmmm.... semantics. "Interest or concern" have a more specific connotation due to the "especially a business" part. What does a man risk on the venture of pregnancy/childbirth? Note: Not what is at risk based on the outcome, due to cultural or legal attachments. What has a man directly contributed to the venture that he will lose only if it doesn't go his way. The only thing contributed is a few mL of his semen, which he will not be getting paid back, with or without interest, in any case; it is…
/r/MensRights21/05/19 08:39 PM
1

Man! Crime definitions are hard! If only there was some investigatory bureau that had a sort of federal program for collecting and reporting crime statistics in a uniform way... We could call it Uniform Crime Reporting. Maybe they could even have a user manual for it that gave a bunch of different example scenarios!
/r/MensRights21/05/19 12:43 PM
1

UCR statistics are a major driver of federal funding for various individual and community support programs. To quote the FBI's own vision for their statistical programs: "to become the law enforcement community’s standard for quantifying crime, which will help law enforcement and communities around the country use resources more strategically and effectively" So imagine that the "standard" for how to "use resources more strategically and effectively" defines a crime, the perpetrators, and their …
/r/MensRights21/05/19 05:56 AM
6

The US hasn't fixed it. The 2013 definition change gives us "Penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim." which seems like it should cover the scenario where a rapist penetrates her vagina with the victims penis without his consent, but the FBI UCR Summary Reporting System User Manual gives 16 scenarios meant to illustrate what is, or is not, rape under the revised …
/r/MensRights21/05/19 02:31 AM
1

charges of sexual misconduct and endangering the welfare of a child NY State has a series of criminal offenses called "rape", and this teacher was not charged with any of them. She was charged with sexual misconduct and the NYPost's lawyers are not going to to be thrilled with their reporters accusing people of rape. Let the police accuse them of rape, and then the reporters can report on that. Why wasn't Lindsey M. Halstead charged with Rape in the Third Degree? Well, maybe they didn't have "se…
/r/MensRights21/05/19 12:18 AM
7

It seems to be the current trend, if a movie with prominent female actors does poorly with test audiences but it's too late to fix it, to ignore the criticism of the film's flaws and accuse the critics of sexism. Maybe if you can stir up enough recreational outrage and parrot thinkpieces, you can cut down the film's promotional budget and squeeze out a profit.
/r/MensRights20/05/19 11:44 PM
2

The mainstream narrative will still be that abortion is about men controlling women and pro-life women will be completely ignored. It is just giving ammunition to man-haters. And when they do this, you can point out that the State legislator who proposed the Alabama Bill (Terri Collins) and the governor who signed the Alabama Bill (Kay Ivey) are both women. If abortion is nearly banned, then we can say goodbye to the possibility of legal parental surrender for men. The dream of the possibility o…
/r/MensRights20/05/19 10:49 PM
2

we can't say that it is pro-life because there is no life to defend You're going to have to be more careful/tactful about how you approach that particular axiomatic disconnect if you're authentically hoping to help people with "understanding what the real problem is".
/r/MensRights20/05/19 10:12 PM
0

Everyone here would like to co-sign abortion procedures Pardon? I think you need to spend more time reading the subreddit if you think "everyone here would like to co-sign abortion procedures". No one should be forced to use their body to support an unwanted child. We should respect that every person has the right to choose to be, or not to be, a parent. IMO, abortion access is logically subsumed within these principles of gender equal reproductive rights. criticizing women about their oppositio…
/r/MensRights20/05/19 10:01 PM
2

With a system of gender equal reproductive rights, she could follow the steps for Legal Parental Surrender and the father could become the sole custodian, caregiver, and parent. But, currently, no. The only way she can 100% protect herself if she doesn't want the baby is to abort it. Even if the father agrees not to come after her for child support, this agreement has no legal standing (i.e. he could just wait until some later date when the mounting arrears becomes too tempting) and if the fathe…
/r/MensRights20/05/19 09:39 PM
3

Imagine that, feminists opposing reproductive rights and gender equality.
/r/MensRights20/05/19 08:26 PM
7

Tip: United States law, even US federal law, does not apply in Canada.
/r/MensRights20/05/19 08:12 PM
2

Even if you get caught, what are the likely charges and, if convicted, what are the possible costs? Looks like it would be summary "Assault Causing Bodily Harm" which is a maximum 18 months custodial sentence. Alternatively: We could have gender equal reproductive rights.
/r/MensRights20/05/19 08:09 PM
1

The support for genocide. The support for genital mutilation. The opposition to reproductive rights.
/r/MensRights20/05/19 07:43 PM
1

Children cost more than the welfare minimum. Yes? Are you forgetting that women have an equal responsibility to support their children, too? I suppose when it's tracked and both parents are required to pay, we can ensure that 100% of the projected/calculated cost of raising a child is provided to the child. But if this is implemented under the current system of wealth transfer from one parent to the other, it would presumptively cap at 50%. Wouldn't you want to provide more for your child if you…
/r/MensRights20/05/19 07:17 PM
2

A universal system to provide for children is fair. Who pays for it?
/r/MensRights20/05/19 07:04 PM
5

Is this legislation gender-neutral; meaning, would companies also be fined if it was found they were paying women more than men? Well, you see, "wage gap" is pay discrimination + power... It's going to be like the "Gender Inequality Index" where gender inequalities that benefit women improve the score.
/r/MensRights20/05/19 06:57 PM
3

As a full time single parent I don't always agree with these opinions. It's often hard to agree that a system that benefits you is unfair. As per Upton Sinclair: "It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends upon his not understanding it!" However the child came into existence it deserves and needs the support of at least two parents, be they biological or not. So if a woman has a child she lacks the resources to support, do we take that child from her and give i…
/r/MensRights20/05/19 06:44 PM
1

A plant is a plant even when it's just a germinating seed. Feel free to try to built your house out of an acorn, or do you recognize that an oak tree and an oak tree seed have significant differences? A human is a human when it's a developing fetus. In a rhetorical sense that's irrelevant to this debate, sure. State of development doesn't take away what it is. I look forward to seeing your acorn house. I've already explained to another guy in this thread that the self defense argument doesn't ho…
/r/MensRights20/05/19 04:09 PM
1

The other creatures aren't humans. Ah, like a fetus. Unless you use some facile definition of "human" that glosses over the important things and gets you into all sorts of logical trouble. They don't have the same rights as humans. Like a fetus. You're talking about killing another human in one scenario, but not in the others. No humans are killed in any of the scenarios. But even if we pretended that a fetus was human, then you get into one of those situations where you would be justified in us…
/r/MensRights19/05/19 12:06 AM
1

Are you a vegan?
/r/MensRights18/05/19 09:01 PM
0

why would that not be an option for a woman who does not want a child but the man does? Because she doesn't want to use her body to support an unwanted child, by being forced to sell her life and labor to pay child support.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 08:58 PM
1

In one scenario, a defenseless and innocent being is murdered. They've had no opportunity to live life and do good or bad. So what? We kill "defenseless and innocent beings" all the time for reasons far less compelling than violations of bodily autonomy. Rabbit in your vegetable garden and you don't want it there? Kill it. Ants in the kitchen and you don't want them there? Kill them. Fetus in your uterus and you don't want it there? Kill it. Weeds growing in the cracks in the patio? Kill them. D…
/r/MensRights18/05/19 08:52 PM
2

why can’t we use that same exact argument? Because I, at least, support gender equal reproductive rights. Thus I reject the argument when "pro-life" people use it in a gender neutral way, just as I reject it when "pro-choice" people oppose reproductive rights.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 08:42 PM
1

The dialogue in question was specifically some guy talking anxiously about how some of the fission products would take 50 million years to decay. Which is to say: some of the fission products are basically stable and harmless. But it sounds scary and dramatic! 50 million years! But if you're in a room full of other nuclear-trained personnel, they all know the practical implications of half-life. I remember one of the alpha surveys we had to do for evidence of mechanical wear of a plutonium-beryl…
/r/MensRights18/05/19 08:34 PM
1

any other situation where a human being has the reasonable potential to life, that potential is protected Sure, because there we're talking about a (former) human being. Any other situation where a human being has the reasonable potential to have their body used against their will, lethal force to stop that nonconsensual use is justified. Also, again, we're not even talking about a human being when dealing with the threat.. It's like a person killing a dog that was attacking them. Less than that…
/r/MensRights18/05/19 08:10 PM
3

Some people I work with have been watching this series and a couple times per night will ask me about some technical detail. On one occasion I've overheard the scientistic dialogue and interrupted to point out that the argument sounded scary and dramatic but doesn't make sense from a health physics perspective. Based on that, I'd put it more in the "entertainment" than the "history" category.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 10:30 PM
1

The rapist should have no rights to the child and the victim, presumably, does not want it either. In the case where the victim does want to keep the child, yes, that should be an option for the victim, but presumably the child should be put up for adoption.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 10:17 PM
1

With reproduction, the contract is quite clear, we are having sex, and we jointly assume responsibility for the outcome of that decision, regardless of what happens Assuming people had reproductive rights, they would make their agreement to the contract conditional regarding what happens and how that is handled. Regarding child support, since courts view it as the child's right, this creates a liability that both parents should be jointly and equally responsible for. If both parents jointly and …
/r/MensRights17/05/19 10:01 PM
1

It teaches you what women find attractive and how you can be like that. That's not very useful information unless you're attracted to the women who find that attractive and/or the women you find attractive are attracted to what you're trying to be like. I wonder who does it distract and from what. It distracts from the slog through the rejection. For instance, if you hit on a girl who is not attracted to the things PUA has told you women find attractive, you can tell yourself that her lack of in…
/r/MensRights17/05/19 01:41 PM
3

I'm pretty sure she got the job because she's probably the smartest person I've ever met, but that didn't make it any less exhausting to reassure her that she's not just a diversity token. And it's Canada, so that kind of patronizing discrimination is explicitly legal under Article 15.2. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
/r/MensRights17/05/19 07:16 AM
1

White people will always be seen to have "power" over everyone else because "reasons". *raughs in Mandarin*
/r/MensRights17/05/19 05:23 AM
3

A friend's dad is a first generation immigrant from India and her mom is jewish. She was doing an CompSci internship at GDMS in Ottawa a few years ago and her having an crippling attack of Impostor Syndrome, that she'd only been hired because she can tick several boxes on an HR "diversity" checklist (and still be, or pass as, a pretty freckle-faced white girl), was an at least weekly event.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 05:22 AM
25

Which "men's laws about women's bodies" would she like to get rid of first? Roe v. Wade? Laws against raping women? ACA coverage for women's health? VAWA?
/r/MensRights17/05/19 04:52 AM
3

Need to edit out the exBF's @ and repost.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 03:21 AM
1

Don't touch the poop.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 01:54 AM
1

If there was a bill or law that proposed fining women $100 whenever they ovulated (and didn't get pregnant), then, yes, it could be called satire. But there isn't, so it's just attempted satire. Anti-abortion people would prefer to just make killing a fetus a crime like murder. But the current legal precedents in effect don't allow that direct approach so instead you get weird shit like requiring transvaginal ultrasounds. If "pro-choice" people really supported reproductive rights, they'd lampoo…
/r/MensRights17/05/19 01:52 AM
4

Oof, that's gonna be a lot of lady bullet sponge extras getting unceremoniously dead in their two seconds of screentime. Oh, she meant "gender parity" that gets her paid.
/r/MensRights17/05/19 01:23 AM
1

I think both parties should have to be consenting to an abortion I think only one party should want to have to grow through with an abortion [...] And if neither consent to abortion or custody, the kid could be put up for adoption, what currently happens when people don't want to keep a child but don't morally agree with abortion. Which is not one of the scenarios being put forth. If they both agree to abort, yay, abort. If they both agree to gestate, yay, gestate. How about the cases where they…
/r/MensRights16/05/19 12:46 PM
1

If she believes it a child, she's entitled to WIC. WIC functions more as an agricultural subsidy than a food assistance program. IIRC, one WIC entitlement was four gallons of milk per week. More than half a gallon of milk per day. For an infant. Who can't have any. But you try ending that as an obvious dairy industry boondoggle and, OMG, why do you hate women, infants, and children, you monster? Most of the rest of your comment seems to be addressed by your own "covered under disability law" sug…
/r/MensRights16/05/19 12:36 PM
1

PUA is a cargo cult that provides a distracting framework to allow men to slog through the rejection it's A LOT more than "slog through the rejection", it actually teaches you tons of useful things noone else does. You're describing the "distracting framework". there's no woman on earth whose favored type is unattractive Girl with a rape fetish: The less attractive the guy is, the less she feels like she'd ever willingly have sex with him, the more turned on she is. Girl who is super insecure: T…
/r/MensRights16/05/19 12:20 PM
3

If you have gender equal reproductive rights, I doubt you'd see as many unwanted children being raised by selfish and irresponsible single mothers, since it would no longer be the case that a man would be forced to mitigate the harm caused by her choicrs and actions.
/r/MensRights16/05/19 08:20 AM
3

I disagree. With what? We agree: Banning abortion is a step towards gender equality. A step backwards, IMO, but a step towards gender equality none-the-less. But it doesn't improve or increase men's rights, and so I don't think it can be considered a MRM position. Gender equal reproductive rights is a MRM position. Gender equal bodily autonomy/integrity is a MRM position. Arguably abortion access would be logically subsumed within those positions, and so it's also a benefit to women's rights (co…
/r/MensRights16/05/19 08:15 AM
1

But it's ok to take his money, no problem there right? No. He earned that money by selling his life and labor, i.e., by using his body. If it's unjustifiable to force a woman to use her body to support an unwanted child it's unjustifiable to force a man to use his body to support an unwanted child. Either they both have a choice or neither does. Sure. If one is justified, both are. If one's unjustified, neither are. Father, legally speaking, should be able to opt out. If a woman wants to continu…
/r/MensRights16/05/19 07:40 AM
1

I view a ban on abortion as closer to an MRM position Dragging women's rights down to be equal to men's is, at best, tangential to a movement for men's rights. Point out that banning abortion is a step (backwards) towards gender equality. Maybe it will lead to some folks having an epiphany that they need to stop opposing reproductive rights.
/r/MensRights16/05/19 07:33 AM
1

Dating advice in general sucks because 99% of the time people talk about the specific things they personally find attractive, or the things that have been successful in relationships with the specific type of person they personally find attractive... but they talk about their personal specific preferences and experiences as if they're universal generalities. PUA is a cargo cult that provides a distracting framework to allow men to slog through the rejection until they've played the numbers game …
/r/MensRights16/05/19 07:10 AM
1

I think both parties should have to be consenting to an abortion for the woman to go through with it. How do you feel about requiring both parties to be consenting to a pregnancy for the woman to go through with it? Aw shit, son, but what if they don't both consent to abortion AND they don't both consent to pregnancy? Also, since the man will neither be responsible for gestating nor aborting the fetus, what the fuck is he "consenting" to anyway?
/r/MensRights16/05/19 06:41 AM
1

Lotta post lately that seem to be farming for quotes to take out of context for an upcoming "Alt-right incel MRAs oppose a woman's right to choose!" hitpiece.
/r/MensRights16/05/19 06:28 AM
2

When counterproductive, dysfunctional, zero-sum Feminist thinking is the only way you know how to frame gender issues, equal protection for boys looks like an attack on women.
/r/MensRights16/05/19 04:09 AM
5

I'm sure the global economic downturn over the period of study had no effect on men's desire to support a larger family. Just like I'm sure the global economic downturn over the period of study had no effect on women's desire to be supported by a man as she tends children. Nope, it's definitely that women are bad at parenting being a mom is the hardest job in the world!
/r/MensRights16/05/19 04:02 AM
1

Sucks for the kids. Pity the courts have basically no checks and balances to protect them from this sort of abuse.
/r/MensRights16/05/19 03:49 AM
5

I guess Nike expects everyone to forget that this hobby horse was beaten to death after Naomi Osaka won the US Open.
/r/MensRights16/05/19 03:44 AM
7

Add it to the list: Walter Scott. Thomas James Ball. ...
/r/MensRights16/05/19 03:22 AM
49

PSA: Vasectomies are not reversible. With sufficiently advanced microsurgery... ...in some cases... ...it may be possible... ...for a vasectomy to be reversed, but it should be approached as generally permanent surgical sterilization.
/r/MensRights16/05/19 03:09 AM
2

Good job defending your argument. 😂
/r/MensRights16/05/19 03:02 AM
1

As a matter of biological reality (), women are the sole stakeholders in pregnancy and childbirth. Men do not gestate the fetus. Men do not give birth. Men do not undergo the procedure to terminate an unwanted pregnancy, either. A man may want to be a parent and thus want the pregnancy to continue until a child is produced, but it's just as unjustifiable to force a woman to use her body to support an unwanted child because the father wanted to keep it as it is to force a man to use his body to s…
/r/MensRights16/05/19 02:49 AM
1

Because it is, supposedly, "literally separate".
/r/MensRights16/05/19 02:34 AM
1

Then there should be no issues in separating it from the mother's body.
/r/MensRights16/05/19 02:23 AM
3

I'd pick the former. As you should. Obligatory Risk Mitigation Analysis of Pregnancy vs. Child Support link.
/r/MensRights16/05/19 02:18 AM
1

cannot be logically justified without applying a double standard What's the double standard? I view abortion access to be logically subsumed within gender equal reproductive rights.
/r/MensRights16/05/19 02:10 AM
2

Search term: gossypol. It's a phytochemical found in cotton plants, identified to have potential male-contraceptive properties when feeding cotton-plant-based silage to bulls resulted in no calves being born. The same opposition to reproductive rights then still persists today.
/r/MensRights16/05/19 02:01 AM
2

saying that abortion should be banned in order to make things "equal" is the totally wrong approach Will the possibility of a shift towards making women's rights equal to men's finally spur some "pro-choice" people to stop opposing reproductive rights and support making men's rights equal to women's instead? If so, it might be the wrong approach, but it would be effective in finally moving people towards supporting gender equal reproductive rights. And I don't think I've encountered anyone sayin…
/r/MensRights16/05/19 01:45 AM
0

And those people generally still acknowledge that the vast overwhelming majority of people fall into one or the other of man/male or woman/female. Just as you acknowledged the point that a small minority of people do not fall into those two categories.
/r/MensRights16/05/19 12:54 AM
5

But when the baby is born, the man is always liable for the kid’s and even mother’s expense. If both genders are equal, man should at least have a say in whether or not they want this child to be aborted. Alternatively, we could have gender equal reproductive rights.
/r/MensRights15/05/19 12:38 PM
2

https://nypost.com/2019/05/09/maya-mckinney-second-colorado-shooting-suspect-identifies-as-male-named-alec/
/r/MensRights15/05/19 12:04 PM
5

I suppose technically it just creates the system of perverse incentives for states to deprive men of life, labor, and liberty by violating their reproductive rights. As I've said, I'd prefer folks recognize that as unjustifiable, but if you and others who oppose reproductive rights insist that there's nothing amiss, the outrage at lesser impositions on women seems out of place. Gnome saiyan?
/r/MensRights15/05/19 12:00 PM
4

Oh, you mean like Title IV.d?
/r/MensRights15/05/19 09:04 AM
5

look at the bill passed in Alabama So... women in Alabama may end up with the same reproductive rights as men? The horror. imagine being told by a bunch of old men what you can’t and can do with your body What, ya mean like drug laws, sex work laws, euthanasia laws, child support laws, etc.? You didn't really think this argument through, did you? "What you can't and can do with your body" gets told in circumstances far less fraught than abortion. in that sense they are fighting for equal rights …
/r/MensRights15/05/19 08:50 AM
1

One of the perps is female (and transgender).
/r/MensRights15/05/19 03:33 AM
–

I don't think even fanatical transgender activists dispute that the vast overwhelming majority of people fall into either man/male or woman/female. That there are, to use your 99.999% figure, several million people who don't is the point where distinguishing gender and sex as separate things becomes useful.
/r/MensRights15/05/19 03:26 AM
2

Nothing comes to mind. I have no expectations that being accused of sexism/sexual misconduct will have anything to do with me doing, or not doing, something in a way that is improper or inappropriate. I suspect it will be motivated substantially or entirely by the unpredictable dysfunction of the false accuser. Going about the unavoidable tasks of everyday life exposes me to the risk of unknowingly interacting with one of these dangerous people. I do not believe that attempting to modify my cond…
/r/MensRights15/05/19 02:15 AM
1

I don't know who "Daisy Cousens" is, or is trying to be, but suggesting that men are choosing celibacy undermines the sex shaming "incel" narrative that's supposed to spur young men back into being exploitable lil' workhorses.
/r/MensRights15/05/19 01:49 AM
4

NOT CEOs of Fortune 500 Companies: Women: 99.99999931% Men: 99.99998640% Given greater male variability and a charitable assumption of perfectly unbiased meritocracy in the selection of F500 CEOs, what is the expected gender ratio above the 99.9999th percentile?
/r/MensRights15/05/19 12:18 AM
20

It needs to be made gender equal/neutral, regardless, whether that's by abolition or by subjecting all genders to the same obligations and coercions. Making the draft gender equal/neutral would do more to ensure it is not used again rather than (temporarily) abolishing it.
/r/MensRights14/05/19 11:42 PM
3

Selene? edit: Nope, just a troll.
/r/MensRights14/05/19 08:34 PM
15

I think my favorite conspiracy theory AgainstHateSubreddit has is that it's feminists LARPing as PUA cultists LARPing as misandrists. That just sounds like "feminists as misandrists" with extra steps.
/r/MensRights14/05/19 08:24 PM
2

A couple can draw up a pre-sex declaration, describing the particulars of the planned interaction, both sign it, have it witnesses, and he can claim that as soon as the notary placed their seal on it he changed his mind and then she raped him. They could draw up a post-sex declaration, describing the particulars of the interaction and agreeing it was all consensual, both sign it, have it witnessed and notarized, and he can claim that he signed while under the same coercive fear that caused him t…
/r/MensRights14/05/19 08:05 PM
1

So we agree the answer to your earlier question is "No."
/r/MensRights14/05/19 07:36 PM
1

Personal responsibility?
/r/MensRights14/05/19 07:08 PM
7

Example 3: Common situation. When you were married (and she sat at home on her ass doing fuckall), you worked full-time, maybe with some OT, maybe night shift, trying to nake ends meet, but now that you're a divorced single parent you need flexible part-time hours that are mostly when your kids are in school.
/r/MensRights14/05/19 08:51 AM
0

VAT on robotic labor.
/r/MensRights14/05/19 07:43 AM
1

If you recall from ModTalkLeaks, the folks who run these types of hate subreddits have no compunction about posting bullshit in the targeted sub so they can link to it and justify their hate sub's existence.
/r/MensRights14/05/19 07:41 AM
1

Don't really need to know the sordid details of ritualistic genital mutilation to oppose it purely on the basis of violating the bodily integrity of the child. Not your body. Not your choice.
/r/MensRights14/05/19 07:36 AM
5

The person you replied to said "feminism" because that kinda repugnant hateful shit isn't something you find being presented as justifiable in any approach to gender equality outside of feminist ones.
/r/MensRights14/05/19 06:11 AM
4

Due to the varying, usually large, amounts of overlap between feminist, non-feminist, and anti-feminist approaches to gender equality, essentially no one attacks "the entirety of feminism". The specific parts of feminism "that don't belong in a functioning society" seem to be the parts that differentiate feminism from other approaches to gender equality.
/r/MensRights14/05/19 05:54 AM
11

The single largest risk factor for severe violence in a relationship is female perpetration of abuse. Meaning the most effective strategy to reduce the incidence and severity of domestic violence is to get women the help they need to stop abusing their partners before it escalates. The Duluth Model and its derivatives have denied women their best bet to escape the cycle of violence.
/r/MensRights14/05/19 05:46 AM
4

I wouldn't be so quick to assume you're the father. Maybe she's somewhat less than "95% sure" based on a few timeline events she didn't share with you. In any event, it doesn't sound like she wants to have her life intertwined with "one of her dates" because of a contraceptive failure. If you have no legal responsibilities, I'd say see the first point again, convince yourself you're the 5%, and go your separate ways. And if you've realized maybe you would like to have children, choose your futur…
/r/MensRights14/05/19 05:24 AM
2

Opposition to reproductive rights is one of the few areas of the abortion debate where "pro-choice" and "pro-life" people more-or-less agree. Difference is "pro-life" people take a gender-equal/neutral stance in this area.
/r/MensRights14/05/19 04:52 AM
2

Why is half of the article discussion of song lyrics? Bizarre. That aside, GMP still commits the fatal error of assuming what's good for men is for them to be more like women.
/r/MensRights14/05/19 04:48 AM
9

Putting the barrel of a gun in your mouth and discovering that today is not the day you pull the trigger is "attempted suicide"... but then you put it back in the drawer of the bedside table and go to work like any other day. This doesn't appear in any statistics. If the day finally comes, there will be no record of prior attempts.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 10:33 PM
2

Tiny Rick!
/r/MensRights13/05/19 08:22 PM
3

I've never paid enough attention to Elam to know, or care, about his personal life. The things that eventually led me to skimming and then stopping was the presentation of Manboobz as some sort of authoritative chronicler of Men's Rights, mentioning a book I've never read as "the Bible" of Men's Rights, and then the piece about how due process has been undermined to the point of no longer being able to determine a verdict based on testimony or evidence and thus Presumption of Innocence determini…
/r/MensRights13/05/19 05:34 PM
2

Women's choices and actions should matter.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 12:42 AM
10

So men doing 35% of the domestic work felt, of all the people in the study, that things were most fair. But the thing that was even perhaps more interesting and also disturbing was women basically agreed with them. Women who were doing 66% of their household's labor felt like they had the fairest arrangements of all the women in the study. I wonder if this, roughly, 33:66 split in domestic participation has any relation to the, roughly, 66:33 split in workforce participation.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 12:11 AM
12

Men still have creeps hitting on them at work, there's just no socialization encouraging them to worry about it.
/r/MensRights12/05/19 11:29 PM
2

Modern women don't want that boring, purposeless lifestyle anymore. Soon, women's suicide and occupational fatality rates can equal men's. Yay, feminism! why don't you do it instead? We'd still have to wait for women's attitudes to catch up to not only being responsible for themselves but also for supporting a househusband and his children... but meanwhile do you mean advocate for default joint custody in divorce, against alimony, in favor of reproductive rights, et al.? Y'know, like we do?
/r/MensRights12/05/19 11:23 PM
5

OKLAHOMA CITY, Oklahoma - In 2017 News On 6 spoke with a man highlighting a legal flaw when it came to men being ordered to pay child support, even when DNA proved the child wasn't theirs. That law has now been changed. Thomas Coleman's high school sweetheart got pregnant. They got married and had a son, but when the marriage fell apart about three years later, he got a paternity test and learned he wasn't the boy's father. He was devastated, then confused when the judge ordered Thomas to pay ne…
/r/MensRights12/05/19 11:10 PM
1

Next step: Recovering damages from the perpetrator of the fraud.
/r/MensRights12/05/19 06:05 PM
5

portma'amteau
/r/MensRights12/05/19 04:20 AM
1

#ma'amspreading
/r/MensRights12/05/19 02:00 AM
12

It was a spin-off of 2XC when moderators there started banning certain types of repetitive low-effort content.
/r/MensRights12/05/19 01:44 AM
1

The position that neither men nor women should have "the right to choose" is an example of gender equality. I agree gender equal reproductive rights would be a much better outcome, but that's not the only gender equal outcome.
/r/MensRights11/05/19 11:44 PM
7

Milano's Going Their Own Way.
/r/MensRights11/05/19 11:38 PM
6

Due to women directing 85-90% of household spending, almost all consumer marketing is tailored towards being appealing to women as primary purchasers. When trends in consumer buying habits change and it becomes more sensible to target men as primary purchasers... you get things like the Welch's "Tough as Grapes" series of advertisements, which are delightfully bizarre in the context of the women-aimed ads you're conditioned to expect.
/r/MensRights11/05/19 08:39 PM
2

Looks like their content has been memory-holed with false copyright complaints.
/r/MensRights11/05/19 08:11 PM
2

have you ever had a run in like that? Other people's kids wanting to join in on whatever I was doing with my kids? Pretty regularly. Most often the reaction is that mom just comes and drags her child away and makes them play alone. At least I assume it's their child, maybe I should've asked. If they were off doing their own thing and I was just watching to make sure they didn't edge over into murdering each other, I would get the "Which one is yours?" question with varying levels of hostility. H…
/r/MensRights11/05/19 08:02 PM
1

A problem with playing with your kids in a public setting is that other people's kids don't give a shit and want to play, too. And then eventually mom glances up from her her phone and, OMGWTFBBQ, a stranger(danger!) is playing with her child. A pretty large proportion of them assume you must be single if you're out with your kids without their mom... and that assumption often gets pretty weird and gross.
/r/MensRights11/05/19 07:07 PM
1

Imagine if a child fell at the playground and started crying from the pain, and the parent just stared from a distance and did nothing. That's not doing things in a masculine way, that's just being a bad parent. Indeed. Because if you paid attention to children at playgrounds you know the ones that fall down and start crying immediately are actually hurt. Or, even more generally, the ones that fall down and don't quickly look at their parent(s) for cues probably actually need to be checked on. B…
/r/MensRights11/05/19 06:50 PM
1

Perhaps men would still do these things in a masculine way, but in general they just don't really do them. Or perhaps you don't recognize when these things are being done unless they're done in a feminine way, due to the "men are broken women" trap. Two children fall at a playground. A mother rushes over in a panic, her child sees her coming and begins crying histrionically. A father makes eye contact with his child from a distance, everything is fine, his child resumes playing. Both of these ar…
/r/MensRights11/05/19 06:26 PM
1

Theoretically, these guidelines, if followed (and the gender bigotry in #3 was fixed), would apply to minimizing those types of articles, too. edit: Though given the research showing that the single largest risk factor for intimate partner homicide is female perpetration of abuse (usually in the context of a reciprocally abusive relationship), an abusive woman reading an article about a domestic killing that doesn't acknowledge that it's most likely the final chapter of an escalating feedback lo…
/r/MensRights11/05/19 05:59 PM
1

An activity being "largely female-dominated" doesn't mean that the ways men would participate in these activities would be to "express their femininity". The idea that men secretly desire, or should, to do these things in a feminine way sounds like you've fallen into the "men are broken women" trap.
/r/MensRights11/05/19 05:44 PM
1

I think you have to have a pretty rigid and inflexible construction of gender roles for this question to begin to make sense.
/r/MensRights11/05/19 04:58 PM
2

Why are cases with no evidence being tried by prosecutors in the first place?
/r/MensRights11/05/19 04:42 PM
6

Opposition to reproductive rights is one of the few areas of the abortion debate where "pro-choice" and "pro-life" people more-or-less agree. Difference is the "pro-life" people take a gender equal/neutral stance.
/r/MensRights11/05/19 04:27 PM
4

Since I've seen this argument getting covered in the news being made by several different people over the past couple weeks... Praise them for pointing out that while the ACA does cover these sorts of reproductive health procedures for women, it does not cover them for men. Perhaps if they supported gender equality this plan could work on a voluntary basis. Praise them for pointing out how men have to surgically sterilize themselves to have the same self-determination over their reproductive rig…
/r/MensRights11/05/19 04:25 PM
2

There are various non- and anti-feminist approaches to gender issues that are "about equality", so that's hardly a unique or defining characteristic.
/r/MensRights11/05/19 03:48 PM
1

Impartial juries would be nearly impossible to achieve. Impartiality is feasible in a criminal trial because most people will go their entire lives without being a target of any crime, much less have personal experience relevant to a specific offense in the case at trial. Now find me twelve people who are not married, divorced, and don't know anyone close to them who has been married or divorced.
/r/MensRights09/05/19 12:06 PM
8

Besides, there’s a person better placed to make such a complaint than you, namely, the husband she’s divorcing. A neutral third party with neither animus nor stake is "better placed" to make a complaint if the hope is to have it believed so it may help protect others from the abuser. But there's also the rub that the husband does not necessarily know that this was the soon-to-be-ex-wife's plan all along. Gender malagency, gynocentrism, etc. as axioms explain the wrongness of the conclusions (gar…
/r/MensRights09/05/19 11:53 AM
24

The perpetrators are sometimes (rarely) charged under things like "making a false official statement" or "misdirecting police resources", but these are a poor fit for the actual and potential harms caused by the offense.
/r/MensRights09/05/19 08:23 AM
1

This is horrible. Even moreso when you consider that at no point did it occur to her that someone might not see this as a funny story suitable to share with her students.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 06:11 AM
7

gr8 b8 m8. i r8 8/8.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 01:10 AM
2

The qualities and positions which distinguish "the Feminist movement" from other approaches to gender equality are broadly repugnant and counterproductive.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 12:01 AM
1

Anti-vax?
/r/MensRights07/05/19 01:30 PM
2

The technological changes, the unprecedented year-over-year rises in productivity, etc. allowed for many dumbshit boomer policies and life choices to none-the-less have the myopic appearance of success: They took two steps back, but society as a whole was thrust three steps forward... they saw they were one step ahead and patted themselves on the back for their cleverness.
/r/MensRights07/05/19 01:29 PM
1

I wonder how much of that skew is due to using restrictive diets as window dressing for disordered eating.
/r/MensRights07/05/19 12:30 PM
1

Why's that?
/r/MensRights07/05/19 12:16 PM
5

"\/r\/reddit.com" will produce \/r\/reddit.com rather than /r/reddit.com Lately I mostly just do a single slash, people know the rest.
/r/MensRights07/05/19 08:59 AM
21

When people experience something that is fundamentally incompatible with their current worldview, they are susceptible to updating their perspective with whatever explanation they encounter that can satisfactorily account for what has happened to them. Mom&Dad couldn't or wouldn't provide an explanation, so he searched until he found one elsewhere. And then brought it back to give them a chance to help incorporate it into what they'd taught him and they couldn't or wouldn't do that, either. It's…
/r/MensRights07/05/19 08:30 AM
1

It creates dependency on the status quo and reduces risk of revolution by making poverty more tolerable. Did you know the rich are made of delicious meat? It's true!
/r/MensRights07/05/19 05:55 AM
5

The payor of alimony and child support is usually in a higher tax bracket than the payee. Counting the wealth transfer as regular income and taxing the payee v. payor would result in less total tax collected to fund your suicide hotline.
/r/MensRights07/05/19 05:47 AM
1

ma'amsplaining ma'amspreading This sort of casual bigotry isn't worth the effort of coming up with a punchy counterterm. The sheer unadulterated laziness of s/man/ma'am reflects this.
/r/MensRights06/05/19 11:10 PM
-2

Are you male or female, OP?
/r/MensRights06/05/19 11:07 PM
1

Other than cases involving minors, who have specific legal protections in many countries, whether or how the identities of people involved in crimes are reported is usually a matter of editorial policy.
/r/MensRights06/05/19 11:04 PM
1

The strange thing is that they are concluding that the universities have a "unsafe working environment" and have concluded the solution is "more diversity of gender, ethnicity, and age"... but at no point does it seem that these surveys tried to identify the demographics of the people who engage in the complained-of hostile behaviours. I do recall one study that identified bias against women in hiring for laboratory research positions... which was due exclusively to female lab hiring managers, m…
/r/MensRights06/05/19 12:28 PM
5

"She needs to be censored." Censured. I'm not particularly interested in the political slapfights of people who oppose reproductive rights (whether they're "pro-life" or "pro-choice"), especially not ones that start due to a bit of "at least it started a conversation" legislature-as-performance-art.
/r/MensRights06/05/19 08:48 AM
8

Here's the thing, though, associating the "right wing" with free speech, gender equality, antibigotry, due process, etc. doesn't appear to be doing much more than improving to acceptability of the "alt right". It really only seems to make sense if the aim of the "smear" is to prevent historically "left wing" voters from leaving the plantation.
/r/MensRights06/05/19 04:43 AM
1

Pfft. Her kids probably aren't that sexy anyway.
/r/MensRights06/05/19 02:35 AM
20

When did /MensRights shift to having a "majority right-wing" community? 😂
/r/MensRights06/05/19 01:27 AM
17

No. And I'll take that as a "No." to my question as well.
/r/MensRights06/05/19 12:00 AM
1

Thank you for repeating parts of my comment. Did you have anything to add to the conversation?
/r/MensRights05/05/19 11:55 PM
1

You can't really prove that someone intentionally caused a condom to break or slip-off, either. It would be an impossible-to-prosecute crime. But now every woman who has ever had a condom break or slip off during sex can have her very own traumatizing rape story.
/r/MensRights05/05/19 11:54 PM
2

Women have several options of their choosing to mitigate the POTENTIAL outcomes. If a man and a woman both poke holes in the condoms they each use with their partners with the aim of causing unwanted children, the arguments about increasing STD risk, etc. apply to both, but only one of these perpetrators will be able to succeed in their primary goal (without further cooperation from the partner) Also, a penis isn't a weapon. Username does not check out.
/r/MensRights05/05/19 11:41 PM
2

It's kind of like the people who defend genital mutilation derailing the conversation into which types are worse.
/r/MensRights05/05/19 11:28 PM
2

I'd occasionally bop into \/r\/incels when a meta-post from a hate subreddit drifted it across my feed and click into the occasional incel thread on the chans. The general "incel" origin story is someone who grew up in an abusive household, raised by a single mother, who has been unable to overcome the dysfunctional coping mechanisms they needed to survive their childhood.
/r/MensRights05/05/19 11:15 PM
1

It's kinda like that article a while back where patients who saw a female doctor had a (slightly) lower 30-day re-admission rate and most of the coverage would go on about how this was due to women being better listeners, spending more time with patients, patients being more comfortable sharing their health concerns with a female doc, etc. A couple went off on "if we had all female doctors" hypotheticals. None brought up that male doctors saw, iirc, 35-50% more patients on average... and thus in…
/r/MensRights05/05/19 10:46 PM
1

It had been most of a year aince I'd broken up with her. It had become a LDR after she changed universities, we were only able to see each other a few days per month and it was obviously not enough time together. She had a semester of co-op/internship as part of her major, and for whatever reason had taken a position at a company that was nearby-ish. We got back into contact and it took about a week before she asked if I'd come visit her for a day. Which turned into the whole weekend. And then n…
/r/MensRights05/05/19 10:34 PM
3

I looked up the Varsity facebook page and found the article post and the associated comment threads. Here are the replies she received: "Hi. Wondering why you think our advocacy is so beyond the pale that malicious libel is warranted? And why you have no faith in the intellectual resilience of the Cambridge community to accept our presence on campus?" "your expensive and privileged education is obviously being wasted on you." "do you have any men that are important to you in your life? If you do…
/r/MensRights05/05/19 08:26 PM
4

You don't let the workhorses go play in the meadow once they're old enough to draft.
/r/MensRights05/05/19 07:27 PM
9

The distinction is clear... one inflicts bodily harm and risks death, the other doesn’t. Yeah, about that...
/r/MensRights05/05/19 06:24 PM
21

Feminists should stop opposing reproductive rights and then acting shocked that the "abortion debate" continues.
/r/MensRights05/05/19 05:52 PM
1

I am not your lawyer. This is not legal advice. Consult with a licensed professional in your area familiar with the laws and courts relevant to your case prior to relying on anything you read on the internet. And I'd think looking it up online should count as service and start the 30 day clock. I doubt they'd be able to prove that's how it happened, so if you tried some "wasn't me" shit in court they'd probably accept that and move on, but make a mental note that you'll lie about stupid shit for…
/r/MensRights05/05/19 02:47 PM
1

Looks like you can request a hearing within 30 days of being served (that clock may have started ticking depending on what the detective gave, told, or showed you... or it may still be "not served") and the hearing will be held within 30 days of the request being made. There's a lot of talk about a searchable online database that Indiana maintains, You can probably look yourself up and get a copy that way. Note: This may qualify as the order being "served" and start that clock ticking if it's no…
/r/MensRights05/05/19 01:49 PM
1

Talk to a lawyer licensed to practice in your area and familiar with the laws involved to help you figure out what exactly is going on, what may happen next, and how you should proceed. Meanwhile, you can read how the Indiana protection order process works. Page 5 is probably of particular interest in your situation. There is no requirement for you to have a day in court or be notified in any way before having a protection order issued against you.
/r/MensRights05/05/19 01:30 PM
1

Background: I have an anatomical skeleton model that, for whatever reason, my oldest son enjoyed having in his room as a small child. When his mom bought him a smartphone, the occasional conversations we'd have over text became far more frequent as he had emojis and could send me memes and such. One day I ask what he's up to and he sends me a pic of a syndaver chillaxin' as a reply. I remark that the skeleton is gonna be so jealous. At some point over the years he'd become unsure that the skelet…
/r/MensRights01/05/19 09:04 AM
1

TL;DR: If male earnings decline, how will women be able to direct 85-90% of household spending while only earning 40-45% of the household pay?
/r/MensRights01/05/19 07:25 AM
1

I don't understand, where exactly is the lie? Sargon did in fact tweet that he "wouldn't even rape" her, he admits (nay, embraces) that fact. The other dude's apparent opinion that his mate's sister is "good enough to rape" is immaterial to other people having no interest in raping her.
/r/MensRights01/05/19 07:20 AM
3

Opposition to reproductive rights is one of the few areas of the abortion debate where "pro-choice" and "pro-life" people substantially agree
/r/MensRights01/05/19 05:58 AM
2

Other's have mentioned keeping men for breeding farms, either as stud work or merely as sperm donors. I'll add that it's possible to keep a healthy testicle chugging along in vitro, though, so you'd only need to grow the males until puberty and then you could dispose of the unnecessary parts. Both of those have the problem of continuing to produce gametes with Y-chromsomes, so to solve that the method advocated in The Future Is Female is ova fusion. Other techniques that probably could not be en…
/r/MensRights01/05/19 05:51 AM
1

Is it sexist to ask man senior executive to serve the cake at a company function? It's been a thing at most jobs that had a company picnic/BBQ/whatever for the executive/management team to man the buffet line serving food, flipping burgers, etc. for the workers. Thusly... "Humiliated, Ms. Saltzman was forced to walk across the room to cut and plate slices of cake for the Company's male employees," court documents recount, "the vast majority of whom were subordinate to her in rank." ...is an asto…
/r/MensRights01/05/19 04:59 AM
2

There are a bunch of things that are required to be explicitly calculated or officially declared that are ultimately included in the final determination of the ordered child support obligation (which is $0 in y'all's case). Also we split work related childcare 50/50. She didn't pay me anything for childcare during summer break last year These considerations were taken into account and are included in the $0/wk. She paid you in full for her 50% by remaining current on the $0/wk. So in our agreeme…
/r/MensRights01/05/19 01:38 AM
1

I pay for healthcare controlled expenses first 6% of medical Bill's every year and also she doesnt reimburse me her half. The first 6% (ordinary healthcare expenses) are included in the "Basic Child Support Obligation" from the look-up table in the Guideline Schedules. "Her half" is included in the calculation of the weekly obligation. If she's stayed current and paid her $0 in full every month, she doesn't need to reimburse you for anything for the first 6%. If the kids have annual healthcare e…
/r/MensRights30/04/19 04:35 PM
4

It's an Alphabet start-up, i.e., Google. It can hemorrhage money for years with no sign of stopping.
/r/MensRights30/04/19 02:19 PM
1

You are obligated to pay her the amount calculated pursuant to the Child Support Obligation Worksheet, subject to any noted deviations, and so ordered by the court. Not a dollar more. Not a dollar less. Controlled Expenses are accounted for in the calculated support obligation. Controlled Expenses are not a collection of on-going itemized transactions for coats or shoes or shirts or pants that the parents get into nickle-and-dime bullshit squabbles about who payed for what and how much they're o…
/r/MensRights30/04/19 02:11 PM
1

[Relevant bits from the primary source:]((https://www.in.gov/judiciary/rules/child_support/) Controlled Expenses. This type of expense for the child(ren) is typically paid by the custodial parent and is not transferred or duplicated. Controlled expenses are items like clothing, education, school books and supplies, ordinary uninsured health care and personal care. For example, the custodial parent buys a winter coat for the child. The noncustodial parent will not buy another one. The custodial p…
/r/MensRights30/04/19 01:22 PM
1

I prefer the epithet "scurrilous bard", tyvm.
/r/MensRights30/04/19 09:20 AM
1

*stops creepily comment stalking* Okay. First off, your mom's pretty hot and I did not mean anything personal by the video link, but holy shit is it doubly hilarious now. Secondly, you have an R4R personal ad from two years ago as a pinned post. Baby, what is you doin'? Thirdly, Okay, <GonewildPosterName>, I'm sorry I have to be the one to tell you this but, and I think I speak for all of your NON-American-followers here, honey--when you post a pic of yours and then remove it within, like, "3-or…
/r/MensRights30/04/19 09:16 AM
1

You sound like a supreme gentleman.
/r/MensRights30/04/19 08:52 AM
17

Huh. You'd think the NAACP would be against young black men being harmed solely on the say-so of white women, but welcome to clowntown. Honk honk.
/r/MensRights30/04/19 07:04 AM
1

If I were a woman working there then I'd be looking for a new job. How insulting.
/r/MensRights30/04/19 06:53 AM
61

Sorry, Illinois Democrat Legislator, the ACA's reproductive health section does not cover those types of procedures for men. It does cover them for women, though! Women aren't lifetime net-taxpayers, though, so that part won't work out.
/r/MensRights30/04/19 06:37 AM
-3

You know what happens to women on extended combat exercises? They get pelvic infections due to inadequate hygiene facilities and die at a much higher rate than men. Swamp-ass is not generally a life-threatening condition for men. Gender scientists have studies the issue extensively and believe it may be related to menstruators having a front hole (you transphobic shitlord). I'm not kidding, though. Several women embedded with field units have ended up infertile after being rotated out ahead of s…
/r/MensRights30/04/19 06:28 AM
10

For the rape issue : without stats it's hard to argue against. But 51% is the majority too, I guess. Mainly depends whether you count a rapist penetrating her vagina with the victims penis without his consent as rape or fabricate some euphemisms (like "made to penetrate" or "unwanted contact") to efface male victims and hide female perpetrators. The stats are available, though. The number of men raped by rapists who are men is a fraction of the number of men raped made-to-penetrate by rapists wh…
/r/MensRights30/04/19 06:16 AM
1

I think you have no idea what you're talking about, and are just assuming that the thread I'm referring to was one in which there was a lot of back-and-forth going on... I actually happened to be the only one she had replied to, after which I ended up replying to her. K. I am not attracted to you. Please do not PM me seeking a deeper connection because we're having this public conversation. I don't think you've read anything I've said so far, and if you have you've failed to understand any of it…
/r/MensRights30/04/19 06:00 AM
1

I am not your lawyer and this is not legal advice. Consult with a professional licensed to practice in your jurisdiction and familiar with the laws in question before relying on anything you read online. This appears to be an Indiana thing. In that case, it looks like the default case is for the person who controls the expense to be the person responsible for paying. e.g., if she can't afford to take the kids on shopping sprees, she has the control to simply not take the kids on shopping sprees.…
/r/MensRights30/04/19 05:19 AM
1

Laws vary. What is your location? What exactly does your divorce decree, parenting plan, etc. say? Note: I'm not asking you to explain what you think it means, I'm asking for the verbatim text. Depending how "controlled expenses" is defined in law and/or your court order, you may be obligated to reimburse her or maybe not. No one here can possibly know your statutory or contractual obligations based on the information you've provided so far.
/r/MensRights30/04/19 04:44 AM
2

It is arbitrary It may not always be as explicitly calculable as in the case of car rental policy but it is not an arbitrary process. compounded because they ignore it a bunch of the time anyways It's already acknowledged that people mature at different rates and that its a threshold process. That exceptions can still be made for these exceptional cases is in no way a problem for the non-arbitrariness of the process. especially if you are male Could be based on solid actuarial data. Could be gen…
/r/MensRights30/04/19 04:30 AM
1

Do you mean from the same sub-reddit? No. I doubt she could've confused my name with someone else's It's pretty common to see a seemingly back-and-forth thread, but if you look at the usernames it's not two people, but just a bunch of different folks posting their individual rebutttals and counterpoints at each level and the algorithm has sorted the best ones to form the visible thread. You'll see comments about "but earlier you said..." with a reply pointing out that's a different account. Lott…
/r/MensRights30/04/19 03:55 AM
1

Age laws are all arbitrary Not really. It's true that there's no real difference beween a 17 year old the day before their birthday and an 18 year old on the day of their birthday, it's true that there are some children more mature than some adults, it's true that people mature at different rates, etc.... but that's not how these ages are chosen. The idea is that, before age X, the fraction of the population that is "old enough" (in terms of maturity) is too low... underage people participating …
/r/MensRights30/04/19 03:28 AM
15

Victims of rape, paternity fraud, and similar offenses should be able to seek relief by suing the mother for damages (at least) equal to the amout of child support ordered as a consequence of her choices and actions.
/r/MensRights30/04/19 03:02 AM
1

You look at your inbox and see a string of orangereds all from the same account, but from their perspective they may have been browsing and replying to comments and not paid any attention to usernames. In a subreddit with a relatively small active userbase, it's not even rare to keep running into the same people. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
/r/MensRights30/04/19 02:45 AM
1

You post a lot about suicide. You doing okay? edit: Guess that's a "no". 😔
/r/MensRights30/04/19 02:04 AM
1

Replying to several of the same user's comments may be purely coincidental and is no indication of interest.
/r/MensRights30/04/19 01:53 AM
1

I'm pretty sure getting shot is not good for his health.
/r/MensRights29/04/19 10:31 PM
1

After a spate of accusations in the adult film industry, several studios have begun to record the actors beforehand describing the planned scene, and then a follow-up where the actors confirm that everything that happened was consensual. Some of the studios include these segments as part the released videos. I doubt you'll be able to pull something like that off without it being kinda weird and awkward, but having text (or sext) sessions with any hook-ups before they come over and after they've …
/r/MensRights29/04/19 08:01 AM
1

False accusers don't care about the direct harm they cause to their own targeted victims, it's a bit much to think they're going to care about how their actions indirectly harm rape victims.
/r/MensRights29/04/19 06:44 AM
3

They're "the same" in the sense that genital mutilation is presumably unjustified regardless of the specifics what or how much tissue is destroyed or amputated. This compare/contrast thing people do to is a product of people, often feminists, trying to defend genital mutilation. Stop cutting up/off parts of children's genitals.
/r/MensRights29/04/19 01:56 AM
2

Yes, taxes--->entitlements function as a massive transfer of wealth from men to women. Unfortunately, suggesting that women can pull their own weight is an uphill battle with traditionalists/feminists in office effectively insisting they're little more than children in adult bodies who cannot be responsible for their own affairs and need men to supervise, administer, or support them (directly or indirectly).
/r/MensRights28/04/19 11:53 PM
2

For example? Oh, dude, India's criminal code was a clusterfucked mish-mash of pre-colonial, colonial, and post-colonial jurisprudence even before Western feminism started "reforming" isolated sections of it without understanding how the various bits and pieces interacted to function as a whole. It's like how the code dealing with resolving dowry disputes was removed wholesale, leaving families who had been ripped-off in marriage negotiations no legal avenues to seek justice, consequently resulti…
/r/MensRights28/04/19 11:40 PM
1

Since the ACA mingles gender risk pools, you'd probably see the same sort of savings effect as when subsidizing (cheap!) contraception reduces (expensive!) unplanned/unwanted pregnancies. It also help keeps women in the workforce, paying taxes, helping to carry more of their share of the costs.
/r/MensRights28/04/19 11:18 PM
1

That is certainly how it's often used in feminist hate ideology. It's probably not worth trying to salvage as the connotations make the term counter-informative, but it's sometimes helpful to trot it out under it's original academic meaning in cases of "toxic masculinity" being presented as a positive behavior and then provide the less-designed-to-be-a-mock-innocent-YouGoGirl-slur and more-specific terminology developed by other less-bigoted approaches to gender equality (e.g., male disposabilit…
/r/MensRights28/04/19 11:06 PM
2

This does not apply to any court case. The judge instructs the jury to make the decision based only on the evidence presented at that trial. Juries are empowered to disregard the court's instructions and try the case, or the law, according to whatever criteria they desire. In practice, you have no way of knowing if a woman is telling the truth or not. And the making an accusation does not grant anyone credibility, it's disturbing that you seem think so. wewlad, good thing I'm not talking about w…
/r/MensRights28/04/19 05:03 PM
2

I don't see how, no rape accuser has any credibility to begin with, their case does not stand or fall on other rape accusations, it stands or falls on it's own. Go read the fable of The Boy Who Cried Wolf. And by using the term "rape victims", you are prejudging that they are victims. I'm using the term "rape victims" because I'm talking about people who have truthfully been raped, who are unfortunately subjected to doubt because of false accusers undermine the credibility of both victims and li…
/r/MensRights28/04/19 04:07 PM
1

"I can see why someone might be angry about such blatant bigotry/discrimination/misdirection/etc, but I think it's more productive to identify and resolve issues relying on reasonable discussion. Did you have some coherent criticism of my comment, or just your anecdote about imagining an angry person?"
/r/MensRights28/04/19 02:48 PM
1

False accusers undermine the credibility of rape victims. So long as false accusation remains a low-/no-risk gambit to cause harm, it continues to be a plausible alternative explanation for any accusation, true or false. By correctly recognizing that false accusations harm not only the intended victim, but indirectly harm other real victims of the alleged crime, and treating the offense with the gravity it deserves, both types of victims will be helped. There is no way (except confessions or wit…
/r/MensRights28/04/19 02:33 PM
1

Incels are well known for wanting to spend more time with their children after divorce...
/r/MensRights28/04/19 02:17 PM
2

Gosh, feminists getting it wrong? Again? I am shocked and appalled, I tell you.
/r/MensRights28/04/19 01:15 PM
2

Male disposability doesn't necessarily manifest in prosocial ways (e.g., heroic protection), which leads me to doubt your confident assertion that this is an immutable aspect of the human condition. A school shooter rejecting the socialization that his only value is in service to others is "toxic masculinity" but the 'hero' boy accepting his disposability and shielding classmates with his body as he holds a door open for them to escape is also "toxic masculinity". It's easy enough to note the bi…
/r/MensRights28/04/19 08:59 AM
6

This is another tongue-in-cheek, "at least it started a conversation", legislature-as-performance-art piece. Now, I've been told it's a bit radical, but if we allowed men to be castrated, took the sperm to the bank, collected tax dollars on it for storage, then when it's time, to have the man decide he's ready to begin a family.... well then problem is solved! Sorry, Diane, healthcare regarding reproductive rights is not covered by the ACA when it comes to men. I actually would not mind if the A…
/r/MensRights28/04/19 03:05 AM
8

Male disposability and male hyperagency are "toxic masculinity". Not being comfortable ordering a fancy cocktail or buying a pink shirt is small beans compared to 90-95% of fatal occupational injuries or 60+% longer prison sentences or 95+% of combat deaths or a number of things where men suffer from greater rates of death, disability, and/or deprivation. But behaviors and expectations that are harmful to men, but beneficial to others/society, are rarely acknowledged as "toxic masculinity" withi…
/r/MensRights28/04/19 02:45 AM
2

They had sizes from XXS to XXL. Runners were able to pick whatever size they wanted from a table across the finish line. It doesn't seem like they ran out of shirts in sizes that fit women or anything, it's just a handful of bigots mad that the same shirts in a variety of sizes were available to all genders, not explicitly designated as women's shirts.
/r/MensRights28/04/19 02:25 AM
5

Don't know what's going on with the claims in the submission title: In response to the criticism, a London Marathon spokesperson said: "We have sizes XXS – XXL at the finish. Runners select the size they want, and if they want to exchange after they get home they can contact us and we will endeavour to help." Pretty sure they mean from XXS to XXL, inclusive, not just those two individual sizes and no others. I think the complaint is that the same range of sizes of shirts was offered to all gende…
/r/MensRights28/04/19 02:19 AM
10

Note: North Carolina does not recognize a rapist penetrating her vagina with the victim's penis without his consent as rape.
/r/MensRights28/04/19 02:05 AM
1

This is, unironically, an example of toxic masculinity. Male disposability.
/r/MensRights27/04/19 05:50 PM
3

Making the draft gender equal would probably be more effective in ensuring it is never used again than (temporarily) abolishing Selective Service. I also quite enjoy the idea that, once made mandatory for women, a lot of them would refuse to register as a form of protest. And then find their eligibility for student aid revoked, be unable to obtain a driver's license or other government-issued ID, be denied security clearances, etc.
/r/MensRights27/04/19 05:38 PM
15

It's hard to comprehend the level of entitlement necessary to look at men literally killing themselves with work in order to support women and their children and complain that women are the real victims because that man heartlessly gave them the option to work less and have kids.
/r/MensRights27/04/19 04:26 PM
4

With the way the administration of child support is currently structured there are basically zero checks and balances to protect the interests of children and ensure they receive the full benefit of the support to which the courts have decided they are entitled.
/r/MensRights27/04/19 09:37 AM
1

"Smart girl" articles are the opposite of "sleeping beauty" articles. It was not offered as an alternative, it was cited as a second example of "inappropriate sexualising".
/r/MensRights27/04/19 09:29 AM
1

Do 3/4 "women's rights issues" (e.g., 1:4 homeless people are women, 7% of occupational fatalities are women, women and their victims receive less criminal justice than men, etc. Just a bunch of stuff where it's blatantly obvious that the problem has been turned on its head.) and then the remaining 1/4 can be the stuff where it's harder to pull the ol' gender switcheroo.
/r/MensRights27/04/19 09:19 AM
2

This is a valid concern for the health and safety of the newborn. Uneducated parents can cause pain and injury unnecessarily trying to clean the baby's penis.
/r/MensRights27/04/19 09:01 AM
3

It wasn't me, it was the one armed man.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/04/19 08:14 PM
7

Teach women not to rape, of course.
/r/MensRights25/04/19 05:28 PM
1

I thought I recognized you when you replied to multiple comments in the same thread. You're the guy whose attempts at arguments consist of intentionally sloppy terminology to create semantic false equivalencies and then pretend that because you used the same word to describe two different things, those two different things are the same thing. And then when this is pointed out to you pretend that it's a rebuttal or counter-argument. It's like playing chess with a pigeon.
/r/MensRights24/04/19 03:39 PM
1

Humans regularly and routinely kill living organisms with the similar capacities and abilities as babies. As already noted, though, since it's feasible to transfer responsibility of care to a willing person, it's not necessary to kill a baby simply because someone doesn't consent to being its parent. It's similar to the arguments for animal cruelty law.
/r/MensRights24/04/19 02:42 PM
1

You'd have to spit in the face of science to deny that a baby is both A) Alive and B) Human ergo the baby is a living human. A tumor removed from a person is both A) Alive and B) Human by sufficiently facile definitions of those words, but it is not a "living human" unless you render that term devoid of significance. If you say the baby "isn't human" you'd also have to say that sex/race based genocide in the womb is acceptable. It's not my concern what people do with their own bodies provided th…
/r/MensRights24/04/19 02:38 PM
1

Exceptionalism and special pleading is not a persuasive form of argument outside of pathos.
/r/MensRights24/04/19 02:26 PM
1

It's not a right, it's murder. How so? It should be criminal as it dehumanizes the unborn and leads to the legalization of prenatal child abuse. You can't "dehumanize" something that is not meaningfully human.
/r/MensRights24/04/19 02:07 PM
1

It's debatable whether "babies are humans" in anything more than the most facile sense, but transferring responsibility for their care to a willing person is relatively straightforward so it's more difficult to make a case that killing it is an necessary or unavoidable outcome.
/r/MensRights24/04/19 02:03 PM
1

No. English is ambiguous sometimes.
/r/MensRights24/04/19 01:44 PM
1

Possibly not as a victim next time, either.
/r/MensRights24/04/19 05:09 AM
2

By the standards of feminist rape culture [this is an example of rape made-to-penetrate](https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=coyote ugly). It's also the name of a bar in NYC. It's also the name of a movie set in that bar. The film is a comedy. I'd say "imagine if you swapped the genders", but I don't even know where to begin, since women don't seem to have created cutesy euphemisms for when a man rapes them so they can laugh about it. Or at least so they can pretend to join in when t…
/r/MensRights23/04/19 01:31 PM
69

Are the relative widths meant to represent the 2:1 bias in favor of women for STEM positions?
/r/MensRights23/04/19 12:42 PM
2

Given the story patterns of GoT, she'll get over-confident, say something sassy to someone who doesn't care, and then she will be unceremoniously murderaped and her broken corpse tossed aside to feed wild dogs.
/r/MensRights23/04/19 08:22 AM
4

It's crab buckets all the way up.
/r/MensRights23/04/19 08:17 AM
1

It may have been certified delivered to a competent adult at his last known address of record, and thus legal service was satisfactorily accomplished.
/r/MensRights23/04/19 08:07 AM
5

Yesterday I get a call from the police department thae they won't handle it because she lives in another town. I call the other town, they tell me that since it didnt happen in their town they wont deal with it. Then you contact the next higher level of jurisdiction. If the township police are trying to mom&dad you, get the State Police involved. If any of these agencies have an ombudsman, call them. Get the mayors of the towns in the loop. Get your state representatives in the loop. Get you fed…
/r/MensRights23/04/19 07:55 AM
7

I have an vegan, feminist, self-identified "SJW" ex who stopped shaving during a period while we were broken up. After a week or two into seeing each other again, she went back to grooming all the things as she'd usually done during the time we'd been together and I remarked on that when it happened. She said the fact that I didn't react negatively (or at all) helped her realize she preferred keeping things shaved/trimmed and had only been growing it out to annoy other people, most of whom proba…
/r/MensRights23/04/19 04:00 AM
1

Whether you're "brainwashed by society", were molested as a child by a woman with armpit hair, have noticed a correlation between armpit hair and women you do not find attractive for other (i.e., not necessarily physical) reasons, or whatever the reason the preference still exists regardless. You might be able to spend a lot of time deeply pondering over your preferences and figuring out why you have them, you might even come to the conclusion that it's an irrational and baseless prejudicial rea…
/r/MensRights23/04/19 03:48 AM
6

"You need to choose better friends if you think that's a reasonable thing to say to anyone. What the fuck is wrong with you?"
/r/MensRights23/04/19 01:44 AM
2

Most people's eyes are full of shit when it comes to laying a hot steaming pile of "should" on other people's behaviour.
/r/MensRights22/04/19 12:23 PM
2

I realize that the source provided is several dozen pages, so it would be unrealistic for me to expect you to read all of it, but, being several dozen pages, it is quite exhaustive. It's not about a few hundred "DNA rape acquittals" over three decades in a single organization that was mentioned in passing as a gratuitous example. The 19 laboratories reported that, since they began testing, they had received evidence in 21,621 cases for DNA analysis, with the FBI accounting for 10,060 cases. Thre…
/r/MensRights22/04/19 12:16 PM
1

Absent a voluntarily accepted duty to act, not to do something requires no justification.
/r/MensRights22/04/19 11:34 AM
1

I know what it means. "giving students accused of assault equal rights", "stopping students accused of assault from having their rights violated", "restoring the rights of students accused of assault", etc. would avoid the potential misinterpretation.
/r/MensRights22/04/19 04:23 AM
1

It's probably just a misalignment of incentives. e.g., the people above her are making hiring decisions that will maximize their bonuses, but she has to actually manage the resulting "diversity and inclusion" employees and that cuts into her bonuses for on-time/first-time product delivery since vaginas/melanin have zero relevance to whether your code compiles. If she was getting adequately compensated for having a team selected based the shape and color of their organs, too, you probably wouldn'…
/r/MensRights22/04/19 04:16 AM
2

Way to derail the meme train. 😠😡😾
/r/MensRights22/04/19 03:48 AM
5

RP is "anti-feminist" in the sense that it was started as a satirical lampoon (similar in concept to Meninism), but "Red Pill Theory" is substantially Feminism 101 translated into PUA cargo cult jargon. A big reason it grew the way it did is because it is fundamentally unchallenging to the dominant cultural paradigm (i.e., feminism), but presents feminist ideas in language camoflaged as subversive/hostile to it. "incel" was coined by a QUILTBAG tumblrina whining about how she couldn't get laid. …
/r/MensRights22/04/19 03:45 AM
1

I doubt TRP has moved away from its goons-LARPing-as-feminists-LARPing-as-PUAs roots enough to be called anti-feminist, but I got bored of that op by mid-2013. Incels are also pretty firmly entrenched in feminist gynocentrism due to their childhoods. I doubt they'd identity as incels if they had the wherewithal to be anti-feminist and overcome their dysfunctional survival strategies. MGTOW who actually self-identify as MGTOW and talk about it may be anti-feminist, but most MGTOW have probably ne…
/r/MensRights22/04/19 03:21 AM
1

If you're including day laborers, paid in cash, hired each morning in the Home Depot parking lot, yeah, it might average out to that.
/r/MensRights22/04/19 02:34 AM
1

Knives fit inside 6'7" and realky strong men, too.
/r/MensRights22/04/19 02:24 AM
1

Those were Mongospherians. I think it's an old device for measuring air pressure via a liquid level in an open tube attached to a sealed volume.
/r/MensRights22/04/19 02:03 AM
2

The term for managing your internal and external mental state and expression in order to function, often for the benefit of others, is called "emotional labor". You may have heard it. It's another bit of military clinical PTSD terminology that the feminists have recently appropriated and used in almost exactly the wrong way than how it would be applied/approached if the intent was to help people.
/r/MensRights22/04/19 01:56 AM
1

What the fuck is a "manospherian"? It appears to be a term that lumps together mutually exclusive and antagonistic ideas and individuals under the same umbrella, which would lead me to conclude it's a term invented to confuse the issues and fabricate guilt-by-association.
/r/MensRights22/04/19 01:40 AM
1

only 2-10% of rape accusations are proven to be fake only 3-5% of rape accusations are proven to be true, by an equivalent metric When DNA evidence first became available, FBI crimelab analyses excluded the primary suspect 20-25% of the time. Results from private labs (e.g., Innocence Project) had a similar 20-25% exoneration rate. These numbers remained remarkably stable year to year. Note that this measured and repeatable 20-25% rate arises at a point well into the investigation of accusations…
/r/MensRights22/04/19 01:30 AM
1

"giving students accused of assault more rights" is a pretty weird phrasing. More rights than who? 🤔
/r/MensRights22/04/19 12:54 AM
3

It depends on how we're defining "effective", I guess. It reduces the number of reported rapes, it reduces the number of false accusations, and maybe helps puts more rapists in jail due to the crime being unambiguous. Does it "make women safer"? Not really. Women weren't particularly "unsafe" to begin with, and the unfortunate few who do find or put themselves in unsafe situations (perhaps as a result of the false sense of security engendered by "empowerment self defense") are going to have a wo…
/r/MensRights22/04/19 12:11 AM
4

The "no hispanics" in OP's title amuses me. I've seen hispanic women who look like everyone on that crew.
/r/MensRights21/04/19 01:46 PM
-17

Any or all of those women could be hispanic.
/r/MensRights21/04/19 07:00 AM
12

In some cases, taking an issue that primarily affects men and framing it as a women's issue can be the only way to get people to acknowledge that there is a problem. Pointing out how the Duluth Model and derivatives deny abusive women the help they need to learn how not to escalate interpersonal conflict to physical confrontation and give them a chance to escape the cycle of violence before a partner kills them has given a few feminist bigots brainlock. That the sources to back this up show that…
/r/MensRights21/04/19 06:53 AM
1

Which one is she? The captain. Four stripes on the epaulettes.
/r/MensRights21/04/19 03:56 AM
1

For some reason reading that reminded me of the time my exwife refered to deployment as "getting to go on a six month vacation with all of your work friends".
/r/MensRights21/04/19 03:48 AM
1

My mistake, you're apparently advocating for destroying the universe to prevent all future suffering. I have no way to argue with someone like that. It's a pisstake, broheme. When not taken to the extreme, considering merely that "the gift of life" is not axiomatically a positive thing, that forcing a new person into existence is a fundamentally selfish act, etc. it does put an interesting perspective on things. They do that of their own free will so it's their problem. Indeed. It's not your pro…
/r/MensRights21/04/19 03:13 AM
4

Criminals do not know whether someone has self-defense training. People who have and people who have not had self-defense training show the same rates of targetting by criminals for most categories of crimes-against-persons. Self-defense programs do not make women safer. Self-defense programs help women feel safer. But it is true that college women with self-defense training do report significantly fewer incidents of rape and sexual assault. How can this be? Women who feel safe, who believe they…
/r/MensRights21/04/19 02:55 AM
14

I enjoyed the example where a neural network was given post-employment performance metrics and the associated employee resumes as training data and the recommendation it came back with to improve productivity at hiring was to reject almost all identifiably female applicants. It doesn't know that the underperforming employees were women. It doesn't know that the similarities it found in the resumes of underperforming employees were gender related. It just recognized a pattern and made the best re…
/r/MensRights21/04/19 02:22 AM
1

every successful abortion results in death And thus in the prevention of a lifetime's worth of suffering, demonstrating that abortion is an Absolute Good. legal abortions aren't all that safe for women either Would be relevant if I were advocating for forced abortion, I guess?
/r/MensRights21/04/19 01:41 AM
1

They may or may not be found guilty. They may or may not recieve a length custodial sentence. BUT. They have to be caught first. If the criminal believes they will get away with it (and they overwhelmingly do, even if this belief is objectively idiotic), all that deterrence lives in Shit That'll Never Happen Land and has no effect. To people who believe they will be caught, though, they probably won't do it on that basis alone, so a deterrent effect making sure they doubleplus won't do it is sim…
/r/MensRights21/04/19 01:25 AM
2

Let be clear! There are only two reasons for punishment: retribution or rehabilitation. Custodial sentences in criminal justice serve one primary function: to separate criminals from the rest of free society so they cannot perpetrate further harm to innocents for the duration of that sentence. Punishment, retribution, rehabilitation, restoration, etc. are all secondary. How the fuck is this about mens right? [...] The article is about a woman who fucked up on accident. It is an example of how th…
/r/MensRights21/04/19 01:14 AM
1

It's been done.
/r/MensRights21/04/19 12:54 AM
1

Violation of people's reproductive rights does impose a risk of fatality.
/r/MensRights21/04/19 12:53 AM
1

Any one want to put odds on the chances of the author having a moment of self awareness and pondering why equality feels like a loss?
/r/MensRights21/04/19 12:42 AM
2

It's clearly different if the child [...] is given away. "Why should the taxpayer be responsible to cover your half of a careless mistake?"
/r/MensRights20/04/19 05:02 AM
1

Prostitution being a crime is a significant source of police leverage used to get women to testify against human sex traffickers. Decriminalizing prostitution removes this leverage. Keeping solicitation illegal, OTOH, keeps Johns who may see something that raises red flags from reporting it out of fear of prosecution. Legalizing only the selling side of the transaction is quite possibly the worst model for addressing concerns about general safety and human trafficking.
/r/MensRights20/04/19 01:30 AM
1

only around 2-8% of rape accusations are false only around 3-5% of rape accusations are true, by an equivalent metric Correct most rape accusations are false. That's not what that says. whoosh.gif
/r/MensRights19/04/19 10:52 AM
1

only around 2-8% of rape accusations are false only around 3-5% of rape accusations are true, by an equivalent metric
/r/MensRights19/04/19 07:39 AM
1

If I'm quoting your words, I'm responding to them. Really though, you want to go with at least 6mil just in case the backfill sand has any stray clinker.
/r/MensRights19/04/19 06:51 AM
1

Men don’t love condoms. Women don't love condoms. In fact, it’s very, very common for men to pressure women to have sex without a condom. In fact, it's very, very common for women to pressure men to have sex without a condom. It’s also not unheard of for men to remove the condom during sexwithout the women’s permission or knowledge. (Pro tip: That’s assault.) It's also not unheard of for women to tell a partner they're on other forms of birth control to get them to agree to unprotected sex. (Pro…
/r/MensRights19/04/19 02:57 AM
1

An actually kind of interesting design for this game concept would be to have two tracks. An inner track with 30 spaces and an outer track with 40 spaces. If you play on the inner track, you only get $150 when you pass "Go", while if you play on the outer track you get the usual $200. Most of the tiles overlap on both tracks, but there'd be a few that don't. The outer track would have a couple high-risk/high-reward tiles that the inner one does not. A couple events would appear on both tracks, b…
/r/MensRights18/04/19 07:16 PM
1

Hello, AntiLowEffortBot. It appears that you have broken Redditquette, which states not to leave comments that add nothing to the conversation. Please do not comment "Hello, shit-zen-giggles. It appears that you have broken Redditquette, which states not to leave comments that add nothing to the conversation. Please do not comment "This", as it adds nothing to the thread. If you agree with a post, use the built in upvote system made for this exact purpose.", as it adds nothing to the thread. If …
/r/MensRights18/04/19 06:14 PM
8

I don't know how things are in the UK, but in the US men's voting rights are de facto conditional on signing up for the military draft. You'll be taught about Men's Suffrage when it finally happens.
/r/MensRights16/04/19 09:01 PM
1

Something that I've found is a kind of nice side effect for people starting to think about designing PPE and safety gear with women in mind is that it's all so much less heavy because women can't lift or carry as much weight. Modern SCBAs are positively comfortable compared to the first few generations. But sometimes the fundamental design constraints are not for humans, but for the materials, chemical, process, etc. and you can't make it any lighter/smaller/thinner without compromising safety, …
/r/MensRights16/04/19 08:38 PM
6

Not your body. Not your choice. Not your body. Not your choice. Not your body. Not your choice. Not your body. Not your choice. Not your body. Not your choice. Not your body. Not your choice.
/r/MensRights16/04/19 06:44 AM
1

I suppose he is creepin' on the creepy dude.
/r/MensRights16/04/19 06:40 AM
1

What do you think? Looks like it's two competing ideologies trying to get men to behave in ways that conform with those ideologies, neither of which respects the ways a man might choose or want to behave, both of which are toxic. Boys are not defective girls. Men are not defective women.
/r/MensRights16/04/19 04:34 AM
3

Sure. For example, when a rapist penetrates her vagina with the victim's penis without his consent it's "a sexual act that involves the penetration of humans holes without consent".
/r/MensRights16/04/19 04:14 AM
2

Does the assertion "men are more privileged than women" make any claims coherent enough to be falsifiable?
/r/MensRights15/04/19 09:22 PM
1

You make no mention of \/r/\FeMRADebates in your post. Can you explain what you plan to do differently?
/r/MensRights15/04/19 08:45 PM
3

http://www.consad.com/content/reports/Gender%20Wage%20Gap%20Final%20Report.pdf Link is dead. Working Link. Ah, the report that started it all. And such a delight to read! Intro: "the raw wage gap continues to be used in misleading ways to advance public policy agendas without fully explaining the reasons behind the gap" Conclusion: "it is not possible now, and doubtless will never be possible, to determine reliably whether any portion of the observed gender wage gap is not attributable to factor…
/r/MensRights15/04/19 08:31 PM
3

Tell me more about how the male bystander who intervenes is portrayed as a creep.
/r/MensRights15/04/19 08:21 PM
1

Have a link to the ad?
/r/MensRights15/04/19 09:00 AM
7

Pretty sure things are still in the "raising awareness" stage as far as advancing gender equality for men (and women). Securing funding and support for unbiased gender neutral research into domestic abuse, intimate partner violence, sexual assault, etc. is a vitally important. A replicability initiative would also be useful. Every time the standard feminist woozles come up, being able to point to research using the same methodology that studied/surveyed women and men so an apples-to-apples compa…
/r/MensRights15/04/19 01:45 AM
1

shoutout to the boys who like camo shoutout to the boys who wear steel-toed boots shoutout to the boys whose fingernails are rarely clean shoutout to the boys who like being masculine You are not "toxic" for liking these things
/r/MensRights15/04/19 12:49 AM
5

The increasingly male skew in gender ratio as you move higher into an organizational structure (even ignoring greater male variability effects) is from female employees having a higher rate of attrition due to their greater quantity of choices and options for life path. This means that advancement decisions based on seniority, qualifications, work history, merit, etc. will not only tend to favor male candidates, it may have only male candidates as would-have-been female candidates opted to do so…
/r/MensRights15/04/19 12:38 AM
2

I'm not from the UK and am not especially familiar with the process.
/r/MensRights14/04/19 03:24 AM
1

hirra, is you retahded? We're discussing your argument, not arguing. Most likely we agree in principle, your argument for the principle is just an incoherent pile of shit. Your argument is poorly structured and begins with an obvious absurdity. That you may subsequently roll back the stupidity doesn't help as you've already lost the provisional good will of the reader and it comes across as floundering.
/r/MensRights14/04/19 03:21 AM
5

And you'll have so many opportunities to demonstrate those "much better ways" to express the "much more important" points. Feel free to start at any time.
/r/MensRights14/04/19 03:15 AM
3

IIRC they have a quasi-referendum process where if enough people raise an issue via official petition the parliament is compelled to address the concerns.
/r/MensRights14/04/19 03:00 AM
1

It's not terribly difficult to find examples of men and women facing oppression. In the context of group oppression if your two groups encompass the entire population and you would describe both their situations as equally bad then neither is oppressed. Or when the chosen two groups do not reasonably biject to oppressed vs. oppressors this is not a proof that neither is oppressed, it's a sign that the chosen two groups are the wrong ones. The conceptualisation of it as men vs women is the bloody…
/r/MensRights14/04/19 02:51 AM
1

Oppression necessitates one group oppressing another. Speaking of falling for feminist mythology... If men and women are "oppressed" then neither are. Or both are, and the conceptualization of it as "men vs. woma" is the source of your error.
/r/MensRights14/04/19 02:25 AM
1

women [were] never oppressed Sure they were. So were men. Men and women had different roles in society that had pro's and cons and both faced different forms of sexism. Which is not incompatible with "women were oppressed", it just offers the clarification that the "oppression" faced was not a unique or remarkable grievance against society. Opening the way you have, with a patent absurdity, loses much of your audience.
/r/MensRights14/04/19 02:00 AM
8

it really seems like such an irrelevant and off-topic issue to be concerned about, especially considering there are much more important posts to occupy the valued space on the sub These types of posts are a regular reminder that gynocentrism, gender malagency, prejudice in criminal and family courts, etc. are not merely theoretical suppositions and that the structural and institutional gender inequalities have real world consequences. There are many posts of this type, which is many opportunitie…
/r/MensRights14/04/19 01:38 AM
8

You'll notice a large fraction of "Romp Culture" articles come out of the UK. The main two reasons for this are UK libel laws and that a woman who rapes a man, woman, or child cannot be charged with the offense of "rape", as that is specifically defined to require a male perpetrator. People will sometimes try to defend this by pointing out there's another offense of "unlawful sexual contact" (IIRC) that has equivalent sentencing guidelines as "rape" and would apply to a woman who rapes a man, wo…
/r/MensRights14/04/19 01:21 AM
1

If it's got two, it depends on a host of factors. Such as...
/r/MensRights13/04/19 11:33 PM
3

A key factor in understanding this concept is that gynocentrism/androcentrism and patriarchy/matriarchy are not competitive social constructions. Observing or asserting that we live in a patriarchy (i.e., lineage/inheritance is traced along paternal lines, most positions of power are held by men, etc.) does not bolster a case for "male privilege" as a patriarchy can still be gynocentric. It does not matter if the tiny fraction of the population in positions of power happen to be male if they use…
/r/MensRights13/04/19 11:26 PM
2

I've yet to encounter this in the wild. I've seen cases where both have become an "all gender" restroom (e.g., Starbucks seems to have this as policy), but not one where they've only eliminated the men's restroom. Frankly, if we're talking single-occupancy restrooms with a lockable door I see no reason to have them be gender limited (other than women often being inconsiderate users of public facilities).
/r/MensRights13/04/19 11:01 PM
2

There's a kinda weird dynamic developing where my ex has had a kid with their new spouse and their kid wants to come hang out with me and my kids when I pick them up for custody exchanges. (\/s\/kidsarefuckingstupid) There was also a moment a couple years into the first serious/longterm relationship I had after the divorce where I realized I wanted to have kids and raise a family with this person... and never really had wanted that with my ex. And never would be able to have the family I wanted …
/r/MensRights13/04/19 09:04 AM
3

An common characteristic of successful cult is the isolation of its victims from any outside perspectives that might lead the victims to question the cult's ideology. The banning of people for having (even innocuous) activity in other subreddits isn't about "keeping out the trolls". Trolls can just make new accounts, so such an explanation doesn't make sense at even a cursory level. But if you look at such policies as intended to serve to socially isolate victims of the cult and excommunicate an…
/r/MensRights13/04/19 02:20 AM
2

Gender malagency. Female hypoagency, specifically (or male hyperagency, for the comment that a man would be off to a cell). Not a justification, but more of an explanation for what's going on.
/r/MensRights13/04/19 01:15 AM
4

Is it strange that I kind of enjoy reading people flounder around in Gender Equality 1.0 conversations? It would be untroubled enjoyment if their hate ideology didn't have so much institutional power and continue to jeopardize the safety and well-being of men, women and children, but ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
/r/MensRights13/04/19 12:27 AM
2

surprised_pikachu.jpg HOW DARE THOSE SEXIST TROLLS NOT REDUCE PARTICIPANTS TO THE SHAPE OF THEIR GENITALS! What we need is more feminism to make sure people remember what's important: some scientists have holes. /s It sucks that anyone on the EHT collaboration has had to deal with the distractions created by what the gender bigots did to Bouman or from the pushback from normal people trying to get the target off her back and recognize contributors based on their contributions rather than their r…
/r/MensRights12/04/19 11:34 PM
1

Sure, banning sex might prevent harm to people who aren't "ready for sex", but it would not minimize harm due to the large number of people who are "ready for sex" who would end up having their harmless behaviours with each other criminalized.
/r/MensRights12/04/19 08:57 AM
1

Pretending that everyone is the same at every given age is just a delusion. And we get insanely high and mighty based on those delusions. I don't think this is the pretense, more that an age has been chosen that minimizes the ocurrence of harmful edge cases. And if you're in your mid-20s and happen to know one of those edge-case hypermature 15 year olds, you're not significantly harmed by not being permitted to fuck them.
/r/MensRights12/04/19 08:24 AM
3

Article is from 2009... Men with the highest rate of recieved replies (white men 29.2%) still have a lower rate than the lowest female group (black women 34.3%). A similar observation can be made about sending replies, highest female rate (34.1% black female) is still lower than the lowesr male rate (40.5%). So if we're gonna conclude "white guys suck" from this data, then we must acknowledge that women suck even harder. Or it's just a matter of the more messages you receive, the more you can be…
/r/MensRights12/04/19 02:13 AM
2

Yes. That is what the statistics provided show. Do you have a more relevant response than bigoted incredulity?
/r/MensRights09/04/19 01:32 PM
1

I hope its not a part of patriarchy propaganda No ma'am, it's produced by the shapeshifting reptilian overlords.
/r/MensRights08/04/19 12:44 PM
1

I have to deal with lower wages, while being well educated, than a blue-collar man doing pretty basic work. How is that fair? Because "blue collar" men willing and able to do that work for that pay and "well educated" women are not. the sexual crimes committed against women are a higher priority Most rape victims are male. Its simple, men are given promotions, raises, jobs and opportunities that we are not. Sure, men earn more than women. This is why women demaning to be given these things witho…
/r/MensRights08/04/19 12:38 PM
2

34% of non-custodial parents (NCPs) have not seen their child for over a year. Presuming no additional gender bias, that's also 85% fathers... so 29% of all fathers. Note that an additional 30% of NCPs seem to be on the "every other weekend" plan. Be nice if it was separated out by gender of the NCP. This isn't necessarily as bad for dads as it seems. If the child is a result of the violation of the man's reproductive rights, for instance, he may have zero interest in visitation. It's still bad …
/r/MensRights07/04/19 08:51 AM
4

I am not your lawyer and this is not legal advice. Is "Man" the ex-husband or the person with whom the mother was cheating? If "Man" is the ex-husband, he will be ascribed legal paternity per ORC3111.03 regardless of his biological relationship to the child. If "Man" is the sidedick, he would first have to rebut the presumed paternity of the ex-husband and legally establish his paternity in stead. If he could, he would go for full custody, but there aren't grounds to merit this. He does want to …
/r/MensRights07/04/19 06:55 AM
2

You can file an online report to the Notre Dame Office of institutional Equity to alert them to, for instance, a member of the faculty or staff stating that they intend to base hiring decisions on the shape of applicants genitals, despite this not being a bona fide occupational qualification.
/r/MensRights07/04/19 05:01 AM
2

It's generally beneficial to demonstrate that your idea or philosophy can withstand scrutiny. There was a feminist in a couple recent threads around here and it was kind of delightful how ignorant and unprepared they were to deal with defending their hate ideology when challenged.
/r/MensRights07/04/19 04:29 AM
1

Seems like the Office of Child Support Enforcement should have relevant statistics. Or whatever agency/office/goonsquad is currently tasked with Title IV.d.
/r/MensRights06/04/19 11:55 AM
1

https://www.jstor.org/stable/27752564 does not appear to explicitly address the specific case of court assisted parental alienation, but does show that various living situations likely to result from this type of partner and child abuse are observed to correlate with a higher suicide rate.
/r/MensRights06/04/19 10:29 AM
2

'Respiration': Neo-Nazi bigots, Feminists breathe air.
/r/MensRights06/04/19 06:18 AM
1

The accused person would also necessarily be an alleged witness...and thus protected from the university taking action against them. 🤔
/r/MensRights06/04/19 06:13 AM
2

https://www.bls.gov/cex/ should have consumer expenditures broken down along various demographic axes.
/r/MensRights06/04/19 05:46 AM
2

Germany let 1 million Syrians in because they could not fill the jobs. Declining native/domestic populations would lead naturally to declining demand as the number of new consumers decreases. The jobs do not need to be filled. Replacement migration is needed to prop up consumption, not production. Without a continuously increasing population, the generational Ponzi mythology of "sustainable growth" collapses.
/r/MensRights06/04/19 03:18 AM
1

You wouldn't be the first self-identified feminist who kind of has no idea what they're talking about.
/r/MensRights05/04/19 02:43 PM
1

> goes to hate sub > receives hate surprised_pikachu.jpg
/r/MensRights05/04/19 01:42 PM
2

Are men having less sex? I've seen reports that fewer men are having sex, but recall none that indicated there's less sex being had overall.
/r/MensRights05/04/19 01:38 PM
7

If you've ever gotten to the occasional \/r\/AskReddit post about male victims of rape before the comment deletions have started, the threat of false accusation is a pretty standard tactic of rapists.
/r/MensRights05/04/19 01:35 PM
1

Reminder: \/r\/TheRedPill was started as a goon LARP translating Feminism 101 into PUA cargo cult jargon.
/r/MensRights05/04/19 01:21 PM
1

Reminder: "The Future is Female" is a reference to a genocidal feminist utopia where men are maintained at less than 10% of the population.
/r/MensRights05/04/19 01:20 PM
23

You have an orchard that grows 10000 red apples and 10000 green apples. For reasons of nature, red apples are more variable than green apples. Any apples that are less than median quality get juiced. After this step you have only top half, 10000 table quality of apples, which is made up of equal numbers of red apples and green apples. You also sell a superior grade, which is the top 10% of the whole apples. Due to that aforementioned greater variability, the top 1000 apples are 80% red and 20% g…
/r/MensRights05/04/19 01:09 PM
1

If you placed a value added tax on automated labor equivalent to the net-incomes of all the workers the robots replaced, corporations would still be more profitable than they were with human labor. It's probably the least disruptive way to handle the transition to post-scarcity.
/r/MensRights05/04/19 09:01 AM
9

I can think of about 36 billion reasons.
/r/MensRights05/04/19 08:48 AM
9

Neuroplasticity in children means that sensory perception and processing will adjust and recalibrate for damage or loss of nerve tissue. If the damage or loss occurs early enough, the neurological remapping can become irreversible even if the sensation can be restored. For example, profoundly deaf children who have cochlear implants installed later in life are still unable to hear because the relevant portions of the brain never learned to process auditory sensory data. Even in cases where impla…
/r/MensRights05/04/19 08:40 AM
1

I'm curious if the gender disparity in number of miles driven annually has started to close, so now women's lower mean-miles-between-claims is no longer offset by a fewer miles per year.
/r/MensRights05/04/19 07:43 AM
1

This story has a disjointed quality, as if something important has been left out. The lines about "one-upping" or putting your words back in your face seem to relate to nothing in the story as told. How hard OP is suckling his own dick about being "confident" and "physically intimidating" is also kinda strange. Nobody ever asked me my side of the story. Or even what happened. Probably because they were there and, unlike random strangers on the internet, know what you've left out.
/r/MensRights05/04/19 07:33 AM
2

Sure: "Children aren't old enough to understand gender.", Ergo, these things are a manifestation of the adults asserting their will on the child in a dysfunctional way. Do you have a good reason to pathologize the kid's behavior as "child gender dysphoria"?
/r/MensRights05/04/19 06:51 AM
1

I was pretty unhappy for a while when a LDR fell apart because we couldn't afford the travel expenses to see each other often enough. I'm still kind of annoyed that I'm throwing money down a hole on rent every month because saving up to buy house is taking so much longer. Just the raw calculated transfer of wealth exceeds a quarter of a million dollars, but the true lifetime cost is much higher. One thing that I kind of enjoy is that her ability to financial plan remains as bad as ever. Possibly…
/r/MensRights05/04/19 06:40 AM
1

Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy is a complex issue, too.
/r/MensRights05/04/19 06:14 AM
2

I've had women hold a door for me, but the examples I can distinctly recall were women I knew. I can't recall any glaring examples where I thought someone should have held a door, but didn't, so I'm pretty sure women I don't know have held a door under the usual circumstances... but I also don't pay enough attention to the gender of the other person in this scenario to say with certainty whether it's men or women holding doors or men or women for whom I'm holding doors, y'know? I do have one ins…
/r/MensRights05/04/19 06:06 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter