TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

AFlatCap Archive

View 1 post and 47 comments by AFlatCap on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

<toofs>: m..mens rights doesn't like me? MY HEART
/r/MensRights17/04/12 11:15 PM
2

Casual bigotry is important to combat, as it creates a cultural atmosphere which allows for the development of blatant bigotry (and institutionalized bigotry). Jokes (like on Top Gear) are a bullshit excuse to justify this. Satire (as shown in that video) requires context. Compare say, Tracy Morgan. He's a comedian who's joke amounted to 'gay people should die'. He didn't get away with the 'it's just a joke' routine either. There is a difference between making a joke towards a group and making a…
/r/MensRights09/02/12 05:11 AM
3

Yes. Regardless of that report's flawed results (for one, its worker sample was different than the standard, I could go on but I'm on lunch break so I'm making a quick reply), I find the arguments that it proposes to point to other gender issues, which don't account for the gender gap, but rather give it substance.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 06:13 PM
1

It's almost like I'm mocking him self-conceptualizing as an atheist because the way he argues goes against what most atheists are about. (Atheist myself, btw)
/r/MensRights08/02/12 03:34 PM
5

That CBS News piece puts the incredible value on agency, when it should be asking why women don't diversify into those fields. It's one of those 'misses the point of noting the gender gap' articles I was referring to earlier. Patriarchy is a descriptor of a social construction, and says nothing about its formulation. It's propagation is another matter, but it does not mean you, as a man, are a propagator of patriarchy. Your actions decide that. Women who perpetrate sexist attitudes have what we …
/r/MensRights08/02/12 12:51 PM
7

'The paygap thing has actually been refuted by some pretty reputable sources with no connection to MRA whatsoever.' Not that I have seen (all the ones I've seen have been very poor or don't consider intersectionality or miss the issue entirely (make assumptions about women's agency when it's been proven that minority groups treated as a collective construct negatively have a negative effect on that groups performance)). If it were, it wouldn't be a huge academic and media discussion. If you have…
/r/MensRights08/02/12 07:00 AM
14

Fair. Are talking by definition or do you want me to go deep with this? "Patriarchy is a social system in which the male gender role as the primary authority figure is central to social organization, and where fathers hold authority over women, children, and property. It implies the institutions of male rule and privilege, and entails female subordination." Just a quick grab from wikipedia for a definition. Now, just to begin to explain this from a point of view from which you can sympathize, a …
/r/MensRights08/02/12 06:38 AM
25

First of all, what you're experiencing there is a combination of homophobia and bi erasure. Feel for you. But as for 'picking on the majority', you have to consider the sociological idea of a majority and the sociological idea that you must factor in prejudice plus power when looking at discrimination. For women, there are a minority in a sociological sense and are brought down by a patriarchal society (not that a patriarchy can't be bad for men too, but the concept of a patriarchy does apply to…
/r/MensRights08/02/12 06:02 AM
5

Thank you. I'm going for my PHD and am hoping to help militant atheists recover from twit-like symptoms.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 04:02 AM
11

P.S. I hate women obviously and I'm glad when they die --TAA
/r/MensRights08/02/12 04:00 AM
30

Whoa, married, after all you've read here in bastion of knowledge r/mr? Good luck with the alimony payments, bro.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 03:49 AM
57

You're revolutionary TAA. Fighting against the gynocracy! Now if only you could learn to read sidebars, you'd get somewhere.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 03:46 AM
5

Irrelevant points. That's how a true atheist argues.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 03:42 AM
16

Darwin speed, TJ. Darwin speed.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 03:35 AM
8

Reminder: this is you. A grown man. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lQNiOrUbuCU&list=UUjNxszyFPasDdRoD9J6X-sw&index=3&feature=plcp
/r/MensRights08/02/12 03:31 AM
8

A very rational argument. Subscribed.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 03:23 AM
37

I don't 'get' satire. God, I'm such an AMAZING atheist. smug
/r/MensRights08/02/12 03:18 AM
0

A victim's mentality, huh? http://derailingfordummies.com/#enjoyit First all, it's BECAUSE you haven't said a single thing about the LGBT community. You're not including a wide group of women who are attracted to women and men who are attracted to men in your analysis, thereby ignoring that maybe this attraction isn't innate to gender and maybe that your evopsych is bullshit. As for you bailing out to get away from the fact that you MIGHT be wrong about your beliefs and may have to change them (…
/r/seduction19/01/12 10:49 PM
-1

First of all, cut out the 'calm down, lighten up' bullshit. It is not helping your case: http://derailingfordummies.com/#overemotional And just a quick glance at r/ladyboners reveals bald dudes, not so muscular dudes, asian dudes (also not as tall dudes)... once again, you are full of shit. Please stop being full of shit. Thank you. Now as for 'patterns in what the two genders are attracted to', once again ignoring your blatant ignorance of the LGBT community, some people are attracted to 'mascu…
/r/seduction19/01/12 09:46 PM
2

I actually prefer women with a moderate bust, not too skinny, and more rounded hips. And I know many men who prefer the same. In fact, the liking of a larger bust is generally considered a western phenomenon (with high variability of the breast size men like across cultures). That aside, is it so wrong to think that you are full of shit? That said, let's look at your supposed list of characteristics women are attracted to (putting aside lesbian women, who you conveniently forget). First and fore…
/r/seduction19/01/12 06:50 AM
4

No, I'm just calling you out on what you said. Problem?
/r/seduction18/01/12 05:30 AM
1

Tell me more about how women are hardwired. Tell me more about how 'dominance' is a synonym for self-respect. Tell me more about how seddit isn't misogynist and that saying 'don't be a pussy, be a man' implying the hierarchy of man above woman (who is objectified as a pussy) is totally cool. In short, stop being so seddit.
/r/seduction18/01/12 12:34 AM
3

Then you should say 'be confident in pursing those you're attracted to' not 'women like men who pursue them because evopsych gender roles blah blah blah'. It's patronizing.
/r/seduction17/01/12 08:53 PM
9

In summation: "Men are from North Dakota, Women are from South Dakota."
/r/seduction17/01/12 07:57 PM
5

Also if you're gay/bi, I would date you too OP. For real.
/r/seduction17/01/12 07:52 PM
-9

let me play for you the world's smallest violin it's so hard being a man~ but I do what I can~ i'm trapped in the friendzone~ won't you throw me a bone~ i am on one knee~ it is so hard being... me...
/r/MensRights16/01/12 04:40 AM
-5

This is good advice FAs. Don't listen to seddit, you'll only end up being that creepy guy at the bar when you're in your mid-30s.
/r/seduction12/01/12 06:03 AM
0

"Very last post, as promised." I'll miss you, snookums. "You have got to have the thinnest skin imaginable. Jesus christ, no wonder you are hanging around in r/SRS, you definitely belong there with the other vaginas. You know life has become too easy for people when you try to make issues out of stupid shit like this. You know who you are? You're one of those pencil-necked tards that have so few issues in your life that you're make them up by thinking somebody saying ANYTHING even remotely non-P…
/r/MensRights30/12/11 07:57 PM
1

"Alright tampon-dribbler, this is these 2 last posts I'm making to you and your army of non-issue crusaders." Awwwww, but I was having so much fun. :) "No. The issue with 'liberal arts' is that it is NOT in demand, you nitwit. Engineers and doctors are more important than some bitch that feels that sits on her ass all day bitching. Any moron can do their job and it is not a job that is in high demand. THAT'S WHY the engineers/doctors have jobs and these worthless femicunts are making my sandwich…
/r/MensRights30/12/11 07:46 PM
1

"Not very many, which is probably why you only know a 'few'. You know what majors I know who have the worst job search? Liberal arts. And so do most people. Exceptions to the rule do not make the rule untrue." And so do most people is key here. The only 'issue' with liberal arts is that most universities don't have a firm co-op plan in place, so it's harder to make connections. This doesn't speak to the worthlessness of a liberal arts degree, but rather a traditionalist mindset in universities t…
/r/MensRights27/12/11 03:44 AM
0

"OMG I SAID 'SHE-MALE'! That clearly means I hate all transgendered people! I mean, all those men that use the word 'fag' and 'gay' in an insulting manner are clearly referring to gays, you know! THEY'RE ALL ANTI-GAY!!!!1111 Call the FEMPIRE!!!!11111" The reason why using She-Male as a term for trans people or as an insult in a society which uses it as a term for trans people as 1) it portrays trans people in a matter through which they are 'half man half woman', which degrades their gender iden…
/r/MensRights27/12/11 03:19 AM
0

Difference between SRS jokes and the common Reddit joke is the point of a SRS joke is not an offensive comment about a marginalized group.
/r/MensRights27/12/11 01:50 AM
1

Ha ha ha ha ha, she-male. I thought Men's Rights was anti-transphobia (pfff), are they gonna let this fly? I'm not trans, btw. Anyway, judging by your argumentative style, I would say no, you don't have any idea how to argue. This is evidence in you saying I am a censor and a fascist when I have not censored you but if anything have promoted you. Of course, you wouldn't know anything about censorship, as judging by your emotional use of fascist, you haven't read any of Orwell's pieces on the use…
/r/MensRights27/12/11 01:03 AM
2

Well aren't we persnickety. Where to start... First of all, all of the 'morons' who are $50,000+ in debt includes a number of people with biochem degrees and other STEM majors (I mention biochem because I know a few). The reason degrees are becoming less worthwhile is because of rapid tuition inflation with a background of an increasingly dysfunctional first-world economy. The economy has many issues outside of debt, including but not limited to the absurd political situation in America along wi…
/r/MensRights27/12/11 12:48 AM
2

A university degree isn't always so much about the exact things you learn but rather the skills you pick up by learning. Engineering is a field that moves so fast that not everything you learn will hold up (you are expected to educate yourself), so being an engineer isn't so much about the content as the way of thinking and your fundamental understanding. Liberal arts majors generally have similar qualifications (not to an engineer, but to each other) across the board and can get jobs in many fi…
/r/MensRights26/12/11 09:20 PM
1

Sorry, but most do require a degree, but thanks for trying . I think you have trouble understanding this whole arguing thing, or maybe I lost your point under all that smug.
/r/MensRights26/12/11 09:11 PM
4

Unfortunately, an economy based solely on STEM majors wouldn't work out very well. And I've read up on basic economics, thanks for being patronizing.
/r/MensRights26/12/11 09:07 PM
1

I do make fun of Cain's supporters directly, because supporting Herman Cain is reflective of them, which is funny and worth mocking; it's political humour in a sense, and this is similar. Replies are trying to start a conversation with a person and downvote brigades were proven non-existent by a fellow gynocrat. Can't speak for PMs. Answer all your questions?
/r/MensRights26/12/11 06:43 AM
1

Can you link me to this so I can get a direct look?
/r/MensRights26/12/11 05:30 AM
1

If you think anger and hate are the only things that come from SRS, you clearly don't know us very well. SRS is very welcoming so long as you are open-minded and willing to learn. Also, I don't think I've been very hateful to you, have I? If I have, I'll try to correct it. (And as for anger and hate being the exception in r/atheism, again, you should look at the SRS posts for r/atheism. Hint: there is quite a few)
/r/MensRights26/12/11 04:40 AM
2

As a man who considers himself a part of SRS, do I hate all men? As for r/atheism discussing views based on logic and fairness, I see r/atheism come up in SRS a lot. Maybe SRS can bring more attention to what I mean for you (nice to hear from a fellow atheist, btw :) ).
/r/MensRights26/12/11 04:30 AM
0

Well, I've been lurking SRS since around the start of it (got there through SA), so I kind of watched the persona develop. That's how it's deliberately satirical: it deliberately tries to mimic the image of the 'feminazi foreskin cutter', so to speak. The tone is apparent to me more than you. Once you lurk SRS for awhile, you figure this stuff out too. When I said 'consider', I meant of it in the literary sense. It's blatantly satirical. As for it being funny, maybe it isn't your kind of humour …
/r/MensRights26/12/11 03:53 AM
3

If you don't think r/atheism does things through low, quasi-satirical bullying, then you don't read a lot of r/atheism (and from your history it seems you post there, so maybe you're just in the bubble about it. Maybe reading SRS could do you some good there). I say that as an atheist: r/atheism is a circlejerk and isn't very respectful to religious people (I know a scientist who is quite religious, so it upsets me). That said, while I'd love to have an intelligent discourse with every person on…
/r/MensRights26/12/11 03:45 AM
1

I would define a worthwhile degree as a degree someone who, on reflection, thought the degree was worthwhile getting. Who are you to police what is worthwhile?
/r/MensRights26/12/11 03:15 AM
1

It's not so much that SRS is trying to be misandric, but they exaggerate their feelings for effect (not to say that they can't have hard feelings towards privileged; I know very well that privileged people have trouble understanding sometimes). r/mr, for instance, is fearful of women taking their sperm, talks about the issues of male circumcision (which I agree with, my foreskin is rad, but to put it on the same level as critical women's issues is laughable), false rape (statistically low, thoug…
/r/MensRights26/12/11 03:13 AM
-1

I was just challenging the presumption that the subreddit is composed of a certain type of person and the belief that social sciences and liberal arts are useless. If you want me to talk about SRS, I will now Roflcopter the 4th (I didn't know Roflcopter was such a popular username!). SRS is meant to draw attention to the hateful behaviour on reddit in the realm of sexism, racism, homophobia, fatphobia, transphobia, ableism, etc. In fact, they took a tack back awhile back on the word neckbeard be…
/r/MensRights26/12/11 02:27 AM
3

As an electrical engineering student who reads SRS (and as such know to avoid this reddit usually), liberal arts/social sciences majors, including Women's Studies/Sociology, are not useless degrees. Let me demonstrate: with a sociology degree, you can get the following jobs: Community Development officer International Development Worker Public Relations Officer Research Assistant Victim Services Coordinator Community Support Worker Residential Treatment Worker Survey Research Technician Voluntee…
/r/MensRights26/12/11 02:05 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter