TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

AHAPPYMERCHANT Archive

View 1 post and 204 comments by AHAPPYMERCHANT on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

AHAPPYMERCHANT/r/askTRP19/09/18 06:32 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Fair enough
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/20 06:57 PM
1

She’s hated by the anonymous and praised by the named.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/20 08:41 AM
18

Yes, high value people like us on PPD on the other hand...
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/20 08:39 AM
3

They’re pathetic too ofc but I sub to inceltears for that content
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/20 08:35 AM
6

Even smart people fall into delusion all the time, I’m afraid
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/20 08:34 AM
2

Mantrums is a great insult that should be used more often. Obviously sexist or whatever, but very effective.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/20 05:14 AM
1

Yeah the “multi-dating” stuff is batshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/20 02:29 AM
2

This might be the first time I've heard someone say 'sure you're'. Very interesting.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/20 10:14 PM
1

Man you did more work to discredit a secondary source than just finding the primary source for yourself and analyzing that. Just argue in good faith. It's not like testosterone/sperm levels dropping is some huge revelation. We've known about that since the 90s at least.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/20 09:16 PM
1

It's perhaps better than previous times when they more or less had no dating scene to speak of, but the modern age has unique problems that plague women and men in unique and specific ways. Men lament about not finding a virgin, but at least such men exist. A woman literally cannot find a man who hasn't watched porn; it is outright impossible.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/10/20 09:06 PM
3

Perhaps to some extent, but men seem to change less.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/20 10:56 PM
1

Bro you posted the same beta shit twice? lmao
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/20 03:23 AM
11

I don't understand why men like you get so angry about it. I'm a HVM and can meet their standards, so it doesn't bother me at all that they want to raise them. In fact I'm glad they're practicing more chastity and saving themselves for the right man. Only a LVM would complain about such things, because he would be denied sex on the basis of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/20 03:21 AM
4

No it is straight up just scientific fact. They have conducted studies and men are more responsive than women to visual stimuli.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/20 03:19 AM
0

No just embrace the sexual dichotomy and hold women to a higher standard. It's absurd to compare men and women this way.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/20 01:49 AM
-5

Sure but TRP definitely reinforces it, which is OP's point. Of course people getting dating advice on a misogynistic shitposting board are losers, but we already knew that.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/09/20 02:58 AM
1

Even if TRP didn't exist the stigma would exist. Besides, TRP likely has a lot of prejudice against such practices. They think men must be "alpha," in-charge, financially independent, and provide for the wife and child(sen). It's in opposition to it.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/20 01:54 AM
1

Now you’re just rambling.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/20 05:49 PM
1

That's great and all, but I'm wondering why you said that men weren't "doing it" then. The rate of SAH husbands is only increasing and you seem to have personal experience with multiple.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/20 05:01 PM
4

Assuming there's no divorce, it's an acceptable price for offering your kids a full time, fully dedicated caretaker, a homemaker, and access to your wife that isn't inhibited by her career. It's also one that not everyone can afford to make, especially younger men.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/20 04:59 PM
1

I would be fine with it, but social pressures make such a situation impossible. An inverted dichotomy is certainly preferable to no dichotomy at all. The issue is that women don't favor men who want to become SAH parents and will slowly grow to resent any SAH husband. Dick is disposable so there's no reason for a woman to settle for one who won't work for you and the family. I want one of us to be a SAH parent above all else, because I think that's very important for raising children. I am fine …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/20 04:55 PM
1

The only women who get hurt are degenerates who don't practice such basic policing of partners. They can seethe all they like. If they choose to put out with minimal commitment or literally zero, it's asinine to complain about men taking them up on it.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/20 04:45 PM
1

You're reducing our symbiotic social roles to silly platitudes. There's nothing dishonorable about being a supportive SAH mom. Similarly there's nothing wrong with women pursuing men who can financially support them and a family, or at least offer quality sex. It's only natural that we both care for the other in a manner best suited to our gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/20 04:41 PM
1

What is the behavioral difference between “manipulating women” and “having game”? Whether you're talking to a woman or a man, respectively.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/20 04:39 PM
1

>NOOOOOOOOOOO you can't just marry someone who is already financially stable and become a SAHM
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/20 04:37 PM
10

OP also forgets that the Internet makes everything private. You can fuck as many dads as you want and never tell a soul if you'd like. If her group generally considers it creepy, my guess is anyone who did it would just keep it secret.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/20 04:36 PM
6

As if they would. Obviously this law would only apply to men.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/09/20 05:06 PM
1

It's certainly dull, but a lot of people find it helps with stress or other emotional issues. Plus distancing yourself from the worldly aspects of life tends to make people more frugal, more responsible, and develop more realistic + sustainable life goals. I don't think stoicism itself is really a sexual strategy. If you took its lessons to heart, you simply wouldn't be the type to utilize sexual strategies because you'd recognize the fleetingness of sexual gratification and all that boring shit…
/r/TheRedPill02/09/20 05:01 AM
2

And obesity is the leading comorbidity. Of the nearly 200k deaths in the US, less than 10k were from people without at least one comorbidity.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/20 12:59 AM
2

Obesity is literally the worst thing to ever happen to our society, and it will happen to yours soon enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/20 12:44 AM
1

wut
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/20 12:42 AM
1

I don't know how much I buy sex being dramatically riskier for women than men. The assault issue isn't as bad (although it'd be pretty easy for some dude to make a fake account and jump anyone who came to his place), but the pregnancy issue is far worse because it's entirely out of their control. Sure, he could use birth control but the woman could also always demand birth control. Women can both use birth control and can abort the child if they get pregnant. Men could use birth control but have…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/20 10:42 PM
10

Almost like there's more men looking for sex than women so it's easier for them to find an attractive partner
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/20 10:40 PM
4

Backpage wasn't about selling nudes.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/20 10:37 PM
7

Probably already happening, but the thing is that it's far easier to track down than backpage. Plus the pimp has no purpose in OnlyFans. For backpage, you might need the muscle to collect from customers or protect the whore. By contrast, OnlyFans creators collect automatically online to a secure account and aren't really in any danger (at least no incidents that I've heard of yet). The lack of anonymity, the legality of the enterprise, and the absence of any need for pimps in the business practi…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/08/20 09:46 PM
1

Health and fitness in a pre-agricultural context I mean
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/20 10:57 PM
1

Remember that the goal isn't to get any specific type of girl or anything, just to get laid as much as possible. Perhaps you and all your friends do swipe left, but some girls don't. Those girls are the ones most likely to put out quickly.
/r/TheRedPill24/08/20 09:24 PM
2

When cliche advice is taken literally or applied universally (ex. “be yourself”), then it doesn’t seem to work out for the majority of men. Nuance is needed. Even if a lot of the cliches aren't very useful, we can identify various things that should be done in relationships universally and we can offer useful prescriptions for those with issues in dating. For instance, any man can hear that (most) women prefer stronger men and decide to work out and he will see improvement with women if he does …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/20 04:46 PM
1

I think it's more that guys offering a romantic relationship are more willing to express their misfortune (no one will cry over a guy not getting casual sex) and also more hurt by the experience ("I lost the love of my life" vs. "I'm horny af"), and thus willing to seek consolation.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/20 04:42 PM
1

It's a little more complicated than that. Men are less likely to orgasm during casual sex than in relationships too. Also the orgasm imbalance still exists in relationships, it's just reduced. Here's a chart.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/20 04:40 PM
1

It's absolutely true that we need to distinguish between sex drive and the mechanisms of erection, but I am unsure which estrogen is vital to or if it's vital to both.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/20 04:36 PM
1

I agree. However, I would note that "relationship experience" doesn't translate to high n-count. A woman could be an astute manipulator having only experienced a handful of serious relationships. I would also add that they're more willing to manipulate the man. The more men they've had access to, the less likely they are to value their current relationship and therefore are more willing to jeopardize it through manipulative/exploitative practices. Additionally the fact that they have so much exp…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/20 04:32 PM
1

Not necessarily, sure, but it usually does. Hook ups just don't give you enough opportunities for sex to really work on and develop your skills. Even if you hooked up twice a week (which is laughably generous for most people), that's barely more than a hundred sexual encounters a year. Comparatively, a young adult relationship can easily have a sex encounter every day.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/20 04:31 PM
1

You're lying to yourself, then. Obviously the increase in quality from knowing a 3rd language vs. a 2nd is modest, but it's still there. If you had a button that gave your LTR another language, I can't imagine anyone wouldn't push it no matter how many languages they already knew.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/20 04:25 PM
9

It's silly as all hell to decide who you'll spend your life with solely by "he makes me happy" or "I like being with him." Obviously these things are important, but they're just a few of many requirements that should be in place. Why shouldn't a woman expect to marry a man without a criminal record? Why not put their foot down on a man with baby mommas? These are very basic requirements that any good man can make. Men should similarly have a set of standards for their partners.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/20 04:21 PM
9

FDS gets hate both from BP (for trying to identify and exploit the undeclared rules of relationships) and TRP for trying to stick up for women and offer them some direction. Ultimately it's not a bad system at all. Most of it boils down to basic prereq's like financial/emotional stability, a healthy sex life, and a genuinely loving relationship. When men do something "right" by their standard, they're far more eager to amplify that than TRP is for women. It's not quite there on the issues of hyp…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/20 04:16 PM
1

If you prefer someone who speaks an additional language, that is by definition a preference.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/20 04:09 PM
1

Yeah, but he doesn't call them a requirement. He says they're 'preferences,' which we both agree they are. As you say, it's a bonus to have a nice house and therefore you have a preference for that. That's not a bad thing, of course, just common sense. nor would the absence of them have any negative effect on my attraction towards someone Sure, but whether not having a house hurts a person's prospects or simply fails to increase them is a distinction without a difference in my mind. Either way, …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/20 03:58 PM
1

You literally have no clue what you're talking about and could just google it and inform yourself. Why are you even posting about topics you don't know?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/20 03:55 PM
2

She can testify that they did/didn't have sex, under threat of perjury charges.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/20 03:53 PM
1

Probably the opposite of that, tbh
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/20 03:49 PM
2

Literally every sort of man can do the same thing they just aren't idiots who tell everyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/20 03:48 PM
1

Even if you "don't care," it's still obvious that social status and finances are positives that will make a man (or woman) more desirable to anyone.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/20 03:47 PM
1

It's a silly phrasing because "attraction" is just a proxy for perceived health and fitness and therefore ability to gather resources/protect. Even if the direct impetus of the relationship is sexual, it's ultimately about their more desirable genetic material and the traits that entails.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/20 03:44 PM
1

Both are probably true.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/20 02:17 AM
1

I don't reject any of that at all. Violence and strength are clearly desirable traits that outweigh others. Your secondary source citing the study really takes the implications too far, much like TRP does most of the time. For instance, think about the women that MIT grads will associate with compared to the average gang member. Naturally the latter's women will be more willing to put out, and this is at no fault of the MIT grad. Who has more free time to pursue women, a gang member or an MIT st…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/08/20 02:10 AM
1

You can find a source in many ways, but the way it was first introduced to me was this video https://youtu.be/3IaYhG11ckA
/r/PurplePillDebate22/08/20 02:36 PM
1

It's just burying your head in the sand. It's a waste of time to live in deliberate ignorance.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/20 08:51 PM
6

Especially if it's married for 5 years or some other time qualifier. Financial issues are one of the leading causes of divorces, so naturally poorer men would be divorced more.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/20 08:46 PM
1

Except the service/good isn't sex, it's marriage or a committed LTR. In such cases the good is essentially the woman and her value as a person, holistically, determines how much men are willing to invest to acquire that commitment. Remember that the n-count is irrelevant for ONS/casuals. It's just a metaphor anyway. Don't read into it too much.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/20 08:43 PM
1

You know you're right when you find yourself saying "fuck studies"
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/20 08:38 PM
1

Men cum less too in ONS/very casual relationships. Of course the partner is better, but the people using TRP would never place their lives in the hands of a woman by getting into a serious relationship with one. It's a tool to maximize set output. This is first and foremost a numbers game. The more girls you proposition, the more likely you are to get laid. A 3 date rule just keeps you from wasting time trying to convince the girl into sex when you could be chatting up Tinder matches and having …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/20 08:29 PM
4

It doesn't ruin the LTR, it just exposes the vapidity of it. It's not like fucking Chad is some transformative experience. Those relationships can be fragile for non-hormonal reasons, like her clearly not being attracted to the guy enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/20 08:25 PM
29

Men also are more likely to die in of natural causes in their youth and are also less likely to be born during times of hardship. As in, literally the proportion of women born will be higher (modestly).
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/20 08:20 PM
2

I agree entirely (tho ofc I haven't seen any studies like that so idk about that), I just think there are some shit tests that aren't worth passing.
/r/TheRedPill21/08/20 05:52 PM
3

Fair enough then I guess it's not hypocritical. I just don't understand why you wouldn't rather find someone whose sexual interests more closely aligned with your own.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/20 05:51 PM
1

The hard part is to understand that ALL women are turned on by this stuff and and turned off by beta behaviors. Agreed. The differences don't matter in the sense that the things that the find sexually attractive and make them develop feelings for you are the same. The differences you describe are about the way they conciously choose partners and other superficial details. If you want to get the Muslim girl ,you'll do the same things you would do for the art slut but repackaged in a different way…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/20 05:42 PM
1

Animal cruelty is a whole other level
/r/TheRedPill21/08/20 05:35 PM
8

Everyone has tried something in sex that they don't want to repeat, even though other people might enjoy it. For my part, I tried giving it once but it's just not for me. If a girl told me she was really into anal, we would legitimately just be sexually incompatible and not a good match, at least in that respect. If her own comfort and sexual satisfaction doesn't matter to you, why should yours matter to her? You demand that the woman like and respect, but you very clearly don't offer her the sa…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/20 05:32 PM
2

Of course, but my post was already like 2 paragraphs. I'll try to watch the video some time later but my guess is much of what they say I actually do agree with, especially based on the line that "being an asshole isn't optimal for most guys."
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/20 05:23 PM
11

Sure but they would just blend in anyway even if you hid that "soft spot," right?
/r/TheRedPill21/08/20 05:21 PM
2

I think you really underestimate the amount of nonsense there is on TRP, if only because it's a decentralized subreddit where anyone can contribute. Again, much of it has value but an equal portion just leads men astray.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/20 05:21 PM
2

Unfortunately I have to agree with him that it's most women, at least on a sexual level. Studies suggest that it's at least most women, and I haven't seen anything suggesting there's some disparate group of women who (for whatever reason) are turned off by it (although I'm sure it exists). Really though, it's not illogical for them to do so. The men who are perpetually unobtainable, have their shit together, and are attractive are naturally going to be the most preferred. Think back to pre-neoli…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/20 05:19 PM
1

There are alpha traits women find attractive that are unintuitive and plain counterproducrive. That women are sexually attracted to men that are selfish, dgaf about them, are aggressive, dominant, display likelihood to cheat etc. isn't the most apparent thing in the world. Fair enough. Maybe I've just been involved in this community for so long it's hard to remember a time when I didn't know about the Dark Triad. Plus it's all so obvious to me now, at least from a sexual attraction perspective. …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/20 05:14 PM
29

It also 100% doesn't matter to the female psyche. It's not necessarily something they think about consciously. No, it absolutely does. If you can't cry for your own dad (assuming you were close), how can she ever expect commitment in the long term? You clearly aren't attached to anything, at least from her perspective. It's toxic for an LTR to act like that. Might emotionlessness help in more casual relationships? Sure, but you shouldn't be airing your business in those relationships anyway. You…
/r/TheRedPill21/08/20 05:01 PM
32

Genuinely might want to keep telling them so you can weed out the sociopaths like that.
/r/TheRedPill21/08/20 04:57 PM
19

I think it has more to do with that just being their S.O.P. than any malicious attempt to "weed out" undesirables. Of course that secondary effect still holds in most cases though. But life wise if a close friend dies you are going to feel anguish and letting it out will feel good and healthy. Keeping that shit bottled up because "hur dur I need to be an alpha male" is pure ego. I wish TRP talked more about the "life wise" aspect of this whole dynamic. Even if being pretending to be stoic is eff…
/r/TheRedPill21/08/20 04:54 PM
5

Was it patriarchy that improved our wellbeing? Or simply the way we've adapted our societies to evolve at any given time? I'd argue both, but primarily adaptation. Patriarchy did further women in a few modest ways, but ultimately it was revolt against the patriarchy that helped.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/20 04:48 PM
3

Irrelevant, AWALT. You seem to be confusing Like That for Are That. Being universally attracted to some characteristics (which are frankly ones that any idiot should know are attractive) doesn't mean they operate the same way. How does that make it not a universal good? They just didn't try it. Because they overdose on red pills and get into a tailspin? Because I wasn't content with the sex frequency and relationship quality blue strategies offered. I wasnt lonely however, I just wanted more fro…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/20 04:44 PM
2

No, TRP merely has elements of truth. A few things it preaches (fiscal responsibility, career-oriented mindset, long term planning, working out) are universal goods, but much of it is just silly fairy tales. Half the posts - mostly the examples and often the theory - on TRP are genuinely insane schizo shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/20 04:34 PM
5

Because other men might have different objectives. They might pursue different types of women disproportionately. They might simply not need TRP at all. Shit, how many people delve into TRP and just get black pilled? There's no reason to assume it's a universal good. These are blue pill fantasies of how the world should be. Nonsensical buzzwords I've never been particularly lonely by the way so I don't see how that would apply in my case. I don't see why anyone would care to follow TRP if they w…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/20 04:28 PM
7

Perhaps it only works for a specific type of man, the type which is so mired in loneliness that they actively seek out and adopt those methods.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/20 04:17 PM
1

Both are coercive, however one is necessary for society to function and the other is not.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/20 04:16 PM
1

Thats just refering to any pressure or boundaries as "coercion" Sure, and coercion can be good in some circumstances. For instance, you might coerce a drug addict by threatening them with legal action. Coercing them to maintain your own boundaries is also reasonable. Using it to get more sex? Not so much. Im allowed to break up with you if youre not pleasing me You're allowed to do a lot of things.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/20 11:48 PM
0

If that's all marriage is to you, I'd wonder why you got married in the first place
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/20 09:38 PM
1

It's not a boogeyman at all. You can go on Google Scholar and read the Dark Triad/attraction literature yourself if you'd like. Of course it's also overstated here. Obviously stable LTRs with sociopaths aren't very common.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/20 09:28 PM
3

Congrats on being a normal person
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/20 09:20 PM
5

Coercion can be used outside of legal contexts. You are demanding something and threatening to do something to them if they don't obey. That's coercive by definition.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/20 09:18 PM
0

The "right thing" is to repair the marriage for the sake of your family even if it hurts you personally.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/20 09:09 PM
2

If you stress about that too much any data will become irrelevant because it all has to be survey based. It's just something to keep in mind.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/20 08:59 PM
1

I’ve never blocked or ghosted. No point. I’ll just let the relationship slow down to nothing naturally. It's faster and more convenient? If you're just going to break her heart anyway, why take it slow?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/20 08:55 PM
3

You're using coercion to get laid.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/20 08:52 PM
0

However, I believe sex pests and dead bedrooms should be solved by breakups wayyyyyy more often. Why do people do this to themselves? Because you have a kids, house, and life together? And you made a vow to stay together forever in front of all your friends, family, and (theoretically) God? It's not exactly easy to walk back. Plus you presume these people have lives to fall back on. It's not that easy to adjust after spending a decade married or something. I think divorce might be one of the wor…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/20 08:50 PM
1

Many fuckboys
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/20 08:45 PM
2

Fair enough. I suppose it would be interesting to know more details about when ghosting might be appropriate. I've only ever done it with a couple of ONSs that I had no intention of seeing again.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/20 08:44 PM
1

He's on PPD so...
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/20 08:36 PM
5

Sorry if I'm being unclear. I didn't mean to come off as bragging about having a huge rotation or whatever. I'm actually in an LTR right now. I mean with the one girl specifically. If you're already at the point where you're getting laid, why bother with this blocking/ghosting stuff? Sure, it might make you more attractive to her, but it also limits your ability to actually have sex. Furthermore, her additional attraction seems to offer little to no benefit because you're already having sex, whi…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/20 08:33 PM
1

Even if no relationship could truly be equal, they could be equivalent enough such that they are effectively equal and operate as though they were truly so.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/20 08:30 PM
6

That promiscuity usually creates more trauma for them since they have to deal with the rollercoaster of dating/hooking up + are put in more positions where sexual assault can occur. It's a positive feedback loop of sorts.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/20 08:28 PM
0

Yeah, but why do it? Presumably she was already into you if the block impacted her in any way. Otherwise she'd just laugh it off as a bitter reject. Why not just continue at the current course and continue having sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/20 08:25 PM
1

I don’t really see how it makes the casual sex easier. Even if the inaccessibility makes you more attractive, you are just that - inaccessible. If you are blocking her, odds are you could also just have regular sex with her already. Agreed that it’s terrible for LTRs, of course.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/20 08:19 PM
6

You say that, but I’ve seen men get clowned on for wanting chaste women even when they themselves were also chaste. In fact it seems to be even worse if the guy is a virgin because he gets mocked ruthlessly for it. This is in subs like r/Christianity mind you.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/20 08:14 PM
3

I wish I had saved my virginity for someone who mattered to me tbh
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/20 08:11 PM
3

Appeal to the majority
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/20 08:10 PM
1

It’s a Tweet not Shakespeare. You can’t read that level of implication into it.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/20 08:12 PM
6

Yes you do
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/20 04:20 PM
1

At the end, they do a long fight where we switch controllers, but the one who fights right before you press the decision between them in Marcus, so he just shot Connor and won. But without Connor and with a violent Marcus no one really gets a happy ending.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/20 06:42 PM
1

The first time I played this game, I was playing with two other friends and we all had our own roles. I had Connor, and my friend playing Marcus was just being an asshole and killing as many humans as possible. I decided to shoot her for the information to stop him. Hank afterwards literally fucking killed himself. RIP my boy.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/20 02:52 AM
1

The fact that you even have the option definitively proves that Connor is sentient and thus she is sentient and thus it’s wrong to shoot her. That’s one of the problems w the format of the video game imo
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/20 02:49 AM
0

Waco is fake news and you’re insane for believing a second of what Netflix puts out. Literally brain damage tied to fall for it
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/20 02:46 AM
1

Yeah this man hasn’t nut in 600 years
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/20 02:41 AM
4

Feels bad when women are simultaneously having sex with everyone (besides me REEEEEEE) but also turn to dogs for sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/20 02:34 AM
10

Autistic
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/20 02:32 AM
6

Do most guys never have to put out for a girl when they don’t want to? I’ve done it to keep her happy plenty of times even if I was drunk or something and just wanted to sleep. It’s not like I can’t say no and I do sometimes, but I don’t want to blue balls her
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/20 02:31 AM
0

The one where median income for 25-34 year olds is 45k/yr.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/20 12:57 AM
4

Yeah, because suburbs are typically just bedroom communities for urbanites and are thus culturally similar.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/20 11:58 PM
7

These studies are certainly useful, but they're not going to tell you anything when comparing between vastly different cultures/income levels/education. Taking a step back, there's an ongoing debate as to whether greater sexual promiscuity is symptomatic or causative. That is, are shitty women (more likely to divorce, more likely to cuck) just more likely to sleep around or does sleeping around make them shitty? We don't know definitively. Additionally, you have no way of knowing the person's se…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/20 11:57 PM
1

They're not less common (pre-Corona), just less desirable. No one wants to spend 8 hours a day sweating over a welder when they can make just as much by getting their college degree and pretending to do work in the office. These jobs are (were) actually experiencing a bit of a shortage of workers. but as wages stagnate and prices climb Wages were actually growing at a record rate before the downturn, especially among low-income earners. Prices always fall, or at least have for literally centurie…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/20 11:53 PM
8

The kind of girls who are ok with dropping everything and moving to the US for the money are probably just as bad as the sluts in the West, even if they haven't taken as many cocks.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/20 11:46 PM
0

With these couplings, they're either so poor that they don't consider buying a house to be a realistic option or they're in rural areas where housing is relatively cheap (referring to the US). Similarly, they either don't value education or don't need it to maintain jobs in the area. If you're living in small town Kansas, a college degree isn't nearly as useful as a trade school, which can be easily afforded on a single income. A hypothetical case might be two young adults in rural Illinois, say…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/20 11:41 PM
-1

Working-class women work in America too generally. At the start of the parents' careers, two incomes is just a necessity these days, especially with kids. Usually by about 25-30 though, the father will make enough that the wife can stay at home or only work part-time. Sometimes if the father makes less he'll become SAH, but that's much less common especially in these relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/20 11:36 PM
6

Yeah it's literally the same thing and why TRP is fundamentally depraved and unsustainable. They're more of an "enjoy the decline" crowd than one that wants to resolve our society's issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/20 11:27 PM
3

Only in cities, and even then only if you're not in the lower class. Poor and rural people still get married quite young.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/20 11:25 PM
18

Fathers have extremely high standards. It's not "any man" so much as only extremely good men. Fathers are liable to overestimate their daughter's value (not a bad thing) and demand the best for her that she can get. Older men are likely to be somewhat more depraved, but this is more of a stereotype. The reality, however, is that health is a huge attribute to weigh in any relationship. How would you feel about starting a serious relationship with a cancer patient, for example? Older men will die …
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/20 11:22 PM
0

It’s 95% people under 25.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/20 09:07 PM
8

The point is being unable to be validated by partners from puberty till mid-20s. It’s both a crucial decade of development missed and bound to cause deep seeded insecurities on top of whatever issues they already had (and they’re likely to have issues). The sex isn’t the point at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/20 09:45 PM
12

Because they actually have a set of principles
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/20 09:33 PM
8

Everyone agrees rape is bad, but you all seem eager to dismiss their crushing loneliness as nbd.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/20 09:27 PM
1

Visuals work but it’s not all visual. Obviously 4 of the 5 senses (not taste) can induce horniness to some extent.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/20 11:14 PM
2

You have no clue how science works then. N=250 is fine for a sociology study, even quite good and reliable. I’m gonna tag your username just so I know to disregard your opinion in the future.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/12/19 07:37 PM
3

Totally normal and healthy thing to say fam. Therapy is for losers anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/19 04:07 AM
13

TRP is, at the very least, atleast has principles that is grounded in reality and peer review studies atleast 90% of the time. This is totally delusional.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/19 02:41 PM
1

I don't think that's entirely true. Someone who treats women well would be mad too the same way a good woman would be mad at TRP. It's more or less just TRP for women. No man wants to read about how women are conspiring with each other to exploit men.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/19 02:40 PM
7

This is pathetic.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/19 02:38 PM
14

It's honestly incredible. The TRPers are too delusional to see their own ideology reflected back at them and the Blue Pillers are mad because they're committed to fantasies. I'm more confused than anything. I don't really see the benefits to it besides the confidence to reject scummy men and the free dates.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/19 02:38 PM
0

Yeah, but who cares? Big purchases require the input of both partners (in a stable relationship), and small ones are insignificant. The one who makes the money will ultimately control it, though laws are in place to mitigate this.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/19 02:34 PM
2

Yes, but primarily due to the commitment to child-rearing. If men were to take on a woman's position they would no longer have the upper-hand, and women can prevent losing it just by using birth control.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/19 02:33 PM
9

>Women can never understand men, but I – a man – understand women perfectly
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/19 02:29 PM
2

Narrative factor? What the fuck are you babbling about? They're just more picky. It's basic evolutionary psych fam. You have (female) friends you wouldn't date too, just less because men are less picky.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/19 02:09 AM
1

Very different things. One of the biggest things in relationships is compatibility. It would be like having a business-minded friend who has made millions offering to hook you up with a great deal, only to turn him down for the latest get-rich-quick scheme. Sexual + Romantic compatibility =/= Platonic compatibility Women desire commitment from men, they say they want men who listen, understand them and care about them. Who else but their best male friend? Women have sexual wants too that don't n…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/19 02:07 AM
1

I think you know the answer lol
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/19 02:03 AM
6

Or men could just try. It's not that hard to please a woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/19 02:01 AM
0

Psychotic, to be honest.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/19 01:59 AM
3

Looks like you made the right call rejecting them.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/19 01:58 AM
5

"And I’m pretty sure she’d be less attracted to someone who’s a 100% remorseless psycho (but I could be wrong)." - You are. That's your logical interpretation as a man. Women work in a different way. The attraction benefit isn't serious enough to be worth the effort of putting on such a performance, let alone making it who you really are.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/19 01:57 AM
3

I haven't seen his content, but if you just treat her right and don't mess up, you should be fine. Once the relationship is established and you want to keep it serious, all you have to do is keep the boat on course. It's ok to show emotion and compliments and stuff when it's appropriate. There's a medium to these things. It's true you want to be as tough because that's a trait that is desirable, but being under emotional will hurt you as well in the long-run because it will stunt the relationshi…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/19 01:54 AM
6

I honestly haven't noticed guys making too many or too few compliments to women. In fact I rarely see guys compliment their girlfriends unless they did something that warranted it.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/19 01:52 AM
1

Lurk more.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/19 01:47 AM
2

I have no fucking clue what point this bullshit rant is supposed to prove. "My love"? What are you even going on about? Normal, healthy people don't fall in love with random strangers. If you do so, you are deranged. If that's how you feel love, you are deranged. Of course, I don't think you do fall in love with strangers. I think you just got wrecked in this comment chain and are trying to back out of it with semantics.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 09:26 PM
1

My scenario is far more disturbing because it's actually realistic. Yours is just mentally deranged ravings. Do yourself a favor and learn to lurk. Maybe you'll actually learn something about women.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 09:22 PM
4

You don't expect to be treated as significant by your SO. It honestly hurts how low your expectations for romance are.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 09:17 PM
1

Obviously you're not actually just going to say that. You're going to say more or less that over the course of about 45 minutes. I've never felt like I'd ever be the one to do that. I just can't walk out on a person because I wouldn't want anyone to do that to me. Then you're weak and relationship troubles lie ahead unless your first girlfriend happens to be perfect (or you somehow drive off all your partners).
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 09:10 PM
1

I think you're seriously overestimating the men here. They put on a show of bravado and being alpha and aggressive and all that, but really most of them are awkward and nervous. It's difficult for them to confront a person about anything, let alone something serious like a break up.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 09:08 PM
-1

People will shoot for partners with an attractiveness they think is obtainable. If they let a single experience inflate that, they're liable to stunt their potential. I don't think the sexual attraction itself is manipulated so much as the expectation of attraction they should feel to their partner. It also pertains to the concept of "alpha widow" I guess. Bitter losers on the Internet will come up with anything to pretend that Becky is secretly worse off for getting with a hot guy somehow. I kn…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 09:02 PM
1

No, it's more like I cheated on one of my girlfriends because I was insecure about myself and horny and could do so. You need to sort yourself out though. You have serious issues.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 08:57 PM
1

Lamenting is a state of mind. You can convince yourself to move on if you're strong enough. Burning a friendship (likely more than one, since you presumably have to leave the friend group too) is way worse for you than just fixing this emotional flaw.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 08:55 PM
5

I think it has more to do with just sexual experience with the same partner. Even if it's platonic, time spent with each other will improve the sex. I think the orgasm rate for women in a hook up is only like 20% whereas it's around 60% for relationships. Same trend exists for men, something like 40% vs. 80%.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 08:45 PM
0

You would be peeved if he did only as much for you as he did with the past 12 partners. You'd be no more special to him than any of them, so how could you not see yourself being discarded for a new girl like they were?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 08:42 PM
4

No. They're grossed out by virgins because it's so fucking easy to get laid at least once in today's world that if you haven't done it by 30 then you must be truly defective. It has less to do with them being a virgin and more the circumstances that made them one. And they don't like to pursue virginity for casual hook ups because 1) bad at sex and 2) they want that person to lose it to someone meaningful. They don't get as much of a thrill out of being the first.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 08:38 PM
1

Cheating has less to do with sex or attachment to your own partner and more to do with personal insecurity and lust.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 08:35 PM
4

You have to see how silly this comment is man. Like read it objectively and earnestly tell me you think your train of thought makes senes here. Telling a girl you love her is romantic. You can't love someone casually unless you're mentally unstable.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 08:33 PM
2

Yeah, but even loser women have vaginas. The end goal of TRP is sex, so even low quality women will do. I have no idea what FDS is trying to get.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 08:31 PM
2

Yeah more or less. Turns out there's not really any cheat codes to making a healthy, long-lasting relationship with your partner. You just have to be a genuine match for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 08:28 PM
6

I would never ask her to split the check, but if I did and she pitched a fit I'd be out.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/19 08:24 PM
2

It makes you more attractive in the short term too, just with a reduced effect. More wealth is always good and it can be subtly expressed as better fashion, better food, etc. All ways that make you directly more attractive. Otherwise, European and North American women wouldn't go to Africa and the Caribbean to have sex with big-dicked black men much poorer than them. Big brain post right here. I hope you’re black at least, friend. Otherwise you fell hard for the memes
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/19 08:31 PM
9

Women are certainly generally more attracted to traditional, masculine traits. The inverse is true for men, being attracted to feminine traits. Of course there are outliers and exceptions, but the rule is rooted in our biology. Men should use resources other than TRP to pursue this ideal. TRP has a handful of good points and can be a resource for some advice, but it's clouded in so much nonsense that it's liable to misdirect men and make them worse off. This is saying nothing of its morality (no…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/19 02:31 PM
9

Just because it’s not a big deal doesn’t mean they don’t want it. Porn isn’t a big deal for men but propose banning it to a room full of guys and you’ll see them circle the wagons.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/19 02:01 PM
2

Relationships based on sex are doomed and any man doing that is a total fool who women don’t want to be with (or rather, wouldn’t if they knew it was the only reason).
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/19 01:58 PM
1

It’s a self-concerned way to look at the issue, but the core is there. Lower quality women can get sex from high quality men and will pursue them. Low quality men will pursue high quality women but won’t get sex or a relationship from them, at least on average. Low quality men are more inclined to settle because they aren’t given sex, and face different social and hormonal pressures than women.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/19 01:55 PM
3

I think you’ll seriously regret choosing the “fun” job, especially at this age. Most women in your age group will prefer wealth>fun.
/r/askTRP19/09/18 07:10 PM
3

Bitches love the word debauchery and all its derivatives
/r/askTRP19/09/18 06:52 PM
9

There's a lot of MRAs and MGTOWs here too, though.
/r/TheRedPill26/10/16 01:48 PM
0

MRAs are just feminists for the other side. Absolute filth.
/r/TheRedPill26/10/16 12:23 PM
-2

Shit like this makes me think the Muslims have it right.
/r/TheRedPill25/10/16 03:27 PM
39

Lol I'm glad they let haters post and make asses out of themselves instead of just outright banning them. "Fuck you for wanting to marry a homemaker" hahaha
/r/TheRedPill25/10/16 02:22 AM
1

Whether you know it or not, other things like make up seriously affect your perception of them and how attractive you find them. It's a complete package. Might as well be a girl saying you don't care about muscle.
/r/TheRedPill23/10/16 03:39 PM
1

the west will crumble unless it takes in millions of Islamists We can do just fine on our own. I'd hardly use colonialism as an example of immigration working out for the native population.
/r/TheRedPill23/10/16 03:24 PM
23

It's a good experiment to preform if you're on the fence. Tinder experiments will reinforce AWALT, destroy your faith in marriage (and women) overnight, and give you more incentive than you could ever need.
/r/TheRedPill22/10/16 06:14 AM
4

Maybe Methodists are like that. The solution is be an actual Christian and don't give in to Protestant emasculation.
/r/TheRedPill21/10/16 05:28 PM
5

Jesus dude just watch the video. The shit they confess to is horrible.
/r/TheRedPill20/10/16 08:54 PM
1

That's like overnight collapse, which is literally unheard of in the history of mankind.
/r/TheRedPill20/10/16 03:25 AM
1

Bitcoin to exchange for good currency then buy.
/r/TheRedPill19/10/16 11:25 PM
0

Men do all those things all the time. Beating your wife makes you a scummy person just as much as divorce-raping a man makes you a scummy person. You don't go around saying all men are evil because it's in their nature to be violent.
/r/TheRedPill19/10/16 06:08 PM
-1

People are scared of Islam, but at least it's reversing the trend towards degeneration in the West. That's something. At least I can respect Islamism.
/r/TheRedPill19/10/16 04:12 PM
1

That's what I was thinking as well. Get a western education, then set up in the Middle East. Marry some low n-count native girl, kids will be practically natives themselves.
/r/TheRedPill19/10/16 04:08 PM
6

We're going to see herbivore men pop up all over the place.
/r/TheRedPill19/10/16 04:06 PM
3

Luckily, in the modern world, you can just buy a plane ticket to a better country and be just as well off. It sucks the US is dying, but you and I will live on.
/r/TheRedPill19/10/16 04:03 PM
1

Women are hardly aware of why they act like this. It's in their nature. It's not evil to act in your nature.
/r/TheRedPill19/10/16 04:00 PM
13

Holy fuck dude. I advise men to reject sex twice a year or so and you act like I want them to beat their wives. All human interaction is mind games. The only discrepancy is whether you are conscious of those games or not.
/r/TheRedPill17/10/16 12:13 PM
12

Only if you blow them off too much or too consistently. You still fuck them, you just semi-irregularly pass up for "no reason".
/r/TheRedPill17/10/16 04:12 AM
1

Instead, I will initiate a conversation with a joke related to the woman's interests, or a meme she may enjoy, or a news article relevant to her. Please God never send a girl a meme.
/r/TheRedPill16/10/16 08:54 PM
1

This is generally a good rule of thumb. You should only be communicating if you have very clear goals and a short phone conversation is far better for that than a text. A text is easy to blow off, a vocal command is not. Plus it makes interacting with you far more impactful since very few people call anymore. She'll remember you called her far better than she'll remember some randie texting her (and she's probably texting 5 such randies while you're courting her).
/r/TheRedPill16/10/16 08:52 PM
2

Mystery is one of the most powerful weapons a man has. Never explain yourself if you don't have to.
/r/TheRedPill16/10/16 08:50 PM
25

It's good to reject sex every once in a while though because it demonstrates that they can't fully control you with it. That sort of independence is very attractive to women. The fact that you (obviously) are still into sex but don't want it with them at this moment makes them insecure about themselves and will cause them to work harder in the relationship, whether they realize it or not. Plus turning down something you enjoy is good for your own mental state just as a matter of restraint. You s…
/r/TheRedPill16/10/16 08:45 PM
10

Of course, I'm not pretending to know anything about Mormons I'm just using them as an example because they tend to be harder to bed and more successful as wives. Honestly, I'd like to make a point that marrying a hot wife isn't necessarily a good thing entirely. A hot wife is more likely to cheat on you since she can attracted higher quality men than a more plain one. I'd rather have an 5 who's loyal than an 8 who's not.
/r/TheRedPill16/10/16 08:43 PM
22

Red pill is helpful for the second aim as well, since it gives so much insight into the nature of women. The issue is that most of the content here is from men who only want sex. Selecting for a sex puppet and selecting for a wife are two very different tasks, but the underlying basis is the same: be fit, successful, and alpha. TRP often focusing on pursuing bar sluts and the like for easy sex, but you could just as easily pursue a good Mormon girl or something. It will take different tactics an…
/r/TheRedPill16/10/16 06:06 PM
8

Essentially you shut down a "valid point" by making a joke and agreeing to the point of parody is the easiest, simplest way to do it, but theoretically other things could work too.
/r/TheRedPill16/10/16 06:02 PM
1

All polls create ad revenue, otherwise no one would pay to run them.
/r/TheRedPill14/10/16 11:39 PM
1

I'm sure there's a round about explanation about privilege and gender norms that proves women can't sexually assault men.
/r/TheRedPill14/10/16 11:37 PM
1

Clinton is a literal criminal. The climate is secondary to her being worse in literally every other way. Especially since green energy is going to start out competing fossil fuels on its own in 10-15 years simply due to increases in technology. Factor in the rise of nuclear fission in 50 years or so and environment will resolve itself regardless of who's president.
/r/TheRedPill14/10/16 11:35 PM
6

They wish they could do the deplorable things to women that Trump does. The jealousy is palpable.
/r/TheRedPill14/10/16 11:07 PM
15

It's a very accurate parallel. Women used to be slut shamed just as much as we "shame" the beta providers that allow themselves to be taken advantage of so easily. The lack of social pressure keeping women from acting sluttily as well as social pressures now further encouraging and enabling men to be exploited is what is causing the current breakdown in the sexual marketplace.
/r/TheRedPill13/10/16 07:33 PM
0

I wonder how much of that "repressed girls are all sluts" thing is a stereotype, though. It sounds like one of those things people say that's not really true.
/r/TheRedPill12/10/16 07:37 PM
9

3x a day is addiction level. Nofap is an absolute necessity at that point.
/r/TheRedPill11/10/16 10:49 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter