TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

AKADidymus Archive

View 0 posts and 17 comments by AKADidymus on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

I think these are fundamentally different situations. It's hard to compare the two, or to use one as an argument for the other. I don't really have a well-formed opinion on the most egalitarian policy here. I'd prefer that men shouldn't have to pay all that money because women have the sole decision, but on the other hand, it's too easy for a man to impregnate a woman and leave. It's a biologically unbalanced situation, which makes equalizing responsibility problematic.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 05:26 PM
1

Correlation is not causation Indeed, as I have said. They do things because it's trendy and feel-good, not because they reason it out. Exactly. It's really frustrating.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 05:32 PM
3

Hear, hear!
/r/MensRights25/10/12 05:11 PM
7

As a liberal myself, I see this happen a lot. Vegan brain rot. They're not getting enough protein, and so they go off the deep end. I recently had an argument with a guy I used to think was reasonable. Then I realized that we were on the same side only incidentally. He did not reason to his opinions. He picked them, and he stuck to them unthinkingly. He's one of these people who thinks that just because a group is privileged, they cannot be discriminated against. "the nonsense of anti-male sexis…
/r/MensRights25/10/12 04:08 AM
2

But it is good to communicate with people who may not be convinced about which side are the dingbats. There are always people who are undecided. Bystanders, lurkers, new discoverers of the group. We lose nothing by making the statement, but we stand to lose good people by letting dingbats go off unrebutted.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 12:05 PM
1

Because the point of the sub is to foster communication, and if we let the dingbats go and think that, the sub is not doing its job.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 11:50 AM
5

I think "specifically-targeted 14-year-old activist" has at least as much to do with it as her being a girl.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 11:49 AM
0

Perhaps you should take a nap.
/r/MensRights17/09/12 05:18 PM
0

Okay, so you didn't like my joke. That's good for you.
/r/MensRights17/09/12 03:48 PM
7

A tip for finding out who's a vegan: don't worry, they'll tell you.
/r/MensRights17/09/12 03:18 PM
3

I haven't heard them say it, either. Actually, I don't think I've ever heard anything but cynicism about the courts from anyone and everyone I've ever heard discuss them.
/r/MensRights12/09/12 12:27 PM
4

Who says that? Where are you getting this idea?
/r/MensRights12/09/12 11:42 AM
1

I absolutely agree with you. I was just joking around about word choice.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 02:46 PM
2

The tenant should sue her panties off But that could make the landlord retroactively justified! Better to sue her into the ground.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 02:16 PM
12

That's much better!
/r/MensRights27/08/12 07:08 PM
19

That goes right into the first category. But I think he's referring to withdrawal of consent after the fact, i.e.- regret.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 04:47 AM
7

Although never part of international maritime law, the phrase was popularised by its usage on the RMS Titanic,[6] where, as a consequence of this practice, 74% of the women on board were saved and 52% of the children, but only 20% of the men.[7] Some officers on the Titanic misinterpreted the order from Captain Smith, and tried to prevent men from boarding the lifeboats.[8][9] It was intended that women and children would board first, with any remaining free spaces for men. Because so few men we…
/r/MensRights27/08/12 04:40 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter