TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

AKnightAlone Archive

View 1 posts and 724 comments by AKnightAlone on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

QuestionsAKnightAlone/r/MensRights26/07/15 02:13 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

More corporations would need to pick it up, otherwise nothing matters. Men aren't as attractive for advertising.
/r/MensRights26/10/21 12:42 AM
2

That's a propaganda sub. They exist specifically to make money while spreading a very toxic cultural mentality. It's like complaining about the decades of Koch propaganda that created the Tea Party and modern libertarianism in America.
/r/MensRights13/10/21 08:13 PM
5

This just reminded me of a DQ near me. Some dude running the place would coincidentally hire all hot chicks. It looked like he was collecting Pokemon, except it was every hot chick from my high school.
/r/MensRights22/09/21 05:34 PM
3

A male could do the same thing she is doing Interestingly enough, mainly only a gay guy could do that. "Toxic masculinity" and ingrained feelings of "homophobia" ensure that men have a better trust and camaraderie around one another. Plus, if a guy accidentally touches another guy in a way that seems like it could be intentional and gay, they just solve the problem with toxic masculine rage and punch each other then move past it. I'm not a big fan of sexism, but this whole comment I made upon re…
/r/MensRights22/09/21 05:30 PM
2

Glass half empty? I like it!
/r/MensRights21/09/21 12:38 PM
35

I mostly disagree. Corporations are an anti-male enterprise. They like women because women are agreeable and submissive. They fight hard to make men agreeable, submissive, and to ensure we never realize we're stronger together. Meanwhile, they unite women as a tool to shame and oppress men like we're animals that deserve nothing.
/r/MensRights20/09/21 02:34 AM
0

Buying drugs shouldn't be a crime... Unless you're buying them to fucking murder someone with them, ffs.
/r/MensRights19/09/21 07:38 PM
16

The murder happened in 1997. Shiiiit, I was playing Goldeneye back then. This ain't no news.
/r/MensRights19/09/21 07:35 PM
6

They literally linked to her e-book that I could buy for $25. I wonder how much she sold just from publicity brought about by being a psychopath.
/r/MensRights19/09/21 07:33 PM
1

You can frame in victimhood any system as exploitation, except fully robotically automatized and subsidised NEETing Correct. Almost reminds me of my sub: /r/TechnoComRenaissance.
/r/MensRights16/07/21 11:45 PM
-1

Hmm suuuree, that's why slavery was since ancient tribal times Slavery can exist for resource and power motives. Capitalism is also resource and power motives through profit motive. The only difference is everyone unconditionally accepts profit motive because it obscures the way it inspires slavery all across the planet. We keep paying shitty companies out of designed ignorance(so, yes, Americans are quite uneducated) to keep those slaves in place. Literally not slaves. As a slave you don't get …
/r/MensRights16/07/21 12:05 PM
0

What does this even mean? Slavery was directly incentivized by profit motive. There's a reason America is using prisoners for modern slavery, not to mention all the slaves the world over we exploit for cheaper production costs and more profit. More slaves today than ever in history, right?
/r/MensRights16/07/21 09:10 AM
0

Nope. That's authoritarianism or totalitarianism.
/r/MensRights16/07/21 09:08 AM
0

*authoritarianism
/r/MensRights16/07/21 09:07 AM
8

It's actually a lot more ridiculous to think people circumcise children with absolutely no idea how the unique and sensitive tissues will grow together(which can lead to more hypersensitivity in unnatural ways leading to premature ejaculation.) In my case, it's the opposite, though, and I can last too long during sex. On top of that, no random doctor or whoever they let do that to babies has any idea how that penis is going to grow over time. That means it could easily end up too tight for natur…
/r/MensRights14/07/21 09:31 PM
67

I'm a fucking loser and this shit even got me laughing. OP is a capital Douche. All power to his douchebaggery, though, I guess. Lol God damn, that's funny. I'm over here crazy enough to think you should always watch a person get inside, and he's dropping girls off in random parking lots. Oh goodness, you can't make this shit up.
/r/TheRedPill14/05/21 11:43 AM
4

That's actually a really cool chart. Helps me to understand how recently touching into some blue after years of red and orange only felt all the more crushing as I recoiled. I honestly... So back and forth... It's absolutely true about the emotions though. I've been trying to find my own motivational anger just because I naturally fall into despair and guilt. Like I try to turn negativity into motivational anger just because I otherwise sink into hopelessness. Problem being, that motivation fall…
/r/TheRedPill18/04/21 09:22 PM
1

Lemme guess... The Devil's Lettuce? Sounds like a real degenerate. But really though, sort of important to know you're not talking about something stupid.
/r/MensRights07/04/21 10:50 PM
22

Reddit LPT: Dump her ass. Get a new mom
/r/MensRights21/03/21 05:52 PM
1

Intriguing... You say that so calmly, so fluidly, as if the utterance is more natural than the words themselves. Is it perhaps because... Oh, I dunno... You've heard that exact statement from all these defenseless women you've corralled into your little private locations? Again, I'm not trying to be presumptuous about your questionable character or anything, I'm simply stringing my statements along using the depraved facts you've shamelessly and remorselessly laid bare about yourself.
/r/MensRights09/03/21 12:33 PM
1

Okay, that's fine. We'll have to agree to disagree on that one. I do recall you admitting it openly on several occasions, but you must be right. Just my ol' mind playing tricks on me. Perhaps much like these women you get alone, hm? Perhaps you gaslight them to doubt what you do to them while you've gotten them alone? Not making any claims, of course, but merely a simple question I ask.
/r/MensRights09/03/21 09:26 AM
5

It's absolutely not sus, at all. I mean... Just kinda wondering... Seems a little odd that you find it so necessary to be alone with a woman. Is there a reason for that? I suppose we may never know your mind's machinations.
/r/MensRights09/03/21 05:11 AM
14

Umm... What reason do you have for trying to be alone with a woman?? Sounds a little sus, tbh.
/r/MensRights09/03/21 04:57 AM
14

His girlfriend?
/r/MensRights09/03/21 04:53 AM
3

Men and women are different. Pretending we're equal(in clearly wrong ways) is a wrench thrown into the gears of the psychosexual dynamic.
/r/MensRights18/02/21 05:16 PM
140

FBI crime stats. Ooo... Yeah, buddy, those are actually cancelled now. Did you miss that memo?
/r/MensRights18/02/21 05:07 PM
2

I've been saying this for years. They're emasculating us specifically because male labor unity would be the greatest threat.
/r/MensRights11/01/21 11:20 PM
5

Males, at times, are victimized.
/r/MensRights14/12/20 02:47 AM
8

Oh, are we not believing in schizophrenia anymore now?
/r/MensRights09/12/20 07:07 PM
3

Why the fuck does a shitty corporation get to backpedal and retry from a new angle? They're an immense corporation. Their message is all blatant bullshit from the start.
/r/TheRedPill06/08/20 09:29 PM
11

As a far Leftist, emasculating the working class is exactly how to control society.
/r/MensRights24/06/20 03:30 PM
2

That was a thing. Some guy said he had the "key to Heaven" or some shit and he meant it was his dick.
/r/MensRights31/05/20 07:47 AM
19

Top comments say feminism is not a monolith. True. Basically no ideology is successfully defined when opinions inevitably get involved. Then they go on to explain in-fighting of all types. Seems like feminism is more like a monolith of whatever the fuck you want it to be at the time. Its like religious tribalism where you ignore the chance to think logically because you have to force any and all views you hold through the religion you're indoctrinated under.
/r/MensRights22/05/20 01:53 PM
1

Amen, sister. 😇
/r/MensRights20/05/20 03:19 PM
48

Interesting to see several people in this thread who think this example is worthless because they apparently can't figure out how to apply the idea to other persistent aspects of the sexual dynamic.
/r/MensRights18/05/20 03:35 PM
0

Beta bucks are supporters. They can have money.
/r/TheRedPill12/05/20 08:13 PM
3

A beta is a beta. More money would just make you a bigger beta. Like you could easily out-compete a bunch of other betas.
/r/TheRedPill12/05/20 07:59 PM
3

Every sub is banning everyone for anything now. Either way, you're being overtly discriminative by stereotyping women in a negative way. Women will often do the same thing about men, and they also have huge numbers of reasons for feeling that way. People, generally speaking, aren't all that great. Making assumptions beyond the given evidence is where you're showing ignorance about it. Plenty of guys can be horrible people. As I said, I think this situation implies the guy is more likely to be th…
/r/MensRights12/05/20 09:16 AM
2

The OP made it very clear the situation is open and either party could be fucked up. Hell, he could've found out, flipped out, then raped her out of some desire to "put her in her place." That's a possibility because she's only denying cheating and he's denying anything about rape. Most likely it's just one of them in the wrong, but we actually can't know with the given information. I saw that post as someone, me personally, who was accused of rape and blackmailed over it essentially, and I went…
/r/MensRights12/05/20 06:29 AM
1

Eh, I'm not so sure. She seems a little too, uhm... penis-y.
/r/MensRights09/05/20 08:15 PM
2

Are we ever gonna just let people be idiots? Is anyone actually surprised anymore?
/r/MensRights05/04/20 12:56 PM
274

Whoa. All my toxic masculinity suddenly just melted away.
/r/MensRights29/02/20 03:27 PM
1

I hate both sexes equally.
/r/MensRights27/02/20 10:18 PM
6

It's a fucking comedy routine not a Rightwing pep rally.
/r/MensRights27/02/20 02:47 AM
2

Turning into the meek gender.
/r/MensRights25/02/20 07:13 AM
1

Literal victim-blaming normalized against men. Wasted your money on someone? Don't be such a little bitch victim then! Maybe if you were valuable enough she would've stayed around for more than your money!
/r/MensRights15/02/20 01:23 PM
3

I was thinking about this last night. Males are slowly building up more and more frustration with women and general society because even respecting us is being treated like a mockery. I'm already imagining "we live in a society" jokes and envision getting posted in a dozen shame subs. Men should be respected like heroes. We're already disposable. We already dedicate our lives to making money to court women and support women. The second we imply getting taken advantage of financially, we're victi…
/r/MensRights26/01/20 03:52 PM
0

Oh, goodness. Not even worth approaching, but anyway... I didn't say the post was fake. I'm saying it's about as beneficial as the widespread propaganda that any idiotic and tribalistic Rightwinger will eat up and use to justify discrimination. Go to the RightwingNews website, which I'd guess is a .com, and lemme know how much you agree with it. I'd guess 99% just by how much low-IQ tribalism you've shown me so far. I'm not even against MRAs, I'm also against feminism half the time, and you're s…
/r/MensRights20/01/20 03:23 PM
0

You are making it out that talking about this woman is an attack on the whole gender and you are completely full of shit. This is a "Men's Rights" subreddit. In what fucking context could you mention the abuses of one woman from a fucking Facebook screenshot without there being a general nuance about "the nature of women" being involved? Saying "this is why women get away with these things" is also implying women actually get away with these things. Men get away with a lot of things too. You kno…
/r/MensRights20/01/20 02:37 PM
1

But consequences will never be the same.
/r/MensRights20/01/20 01:51 PM
-1

Then why even post in this sub? It's like the goal is just to make MRAs look like 100% sexist idiots. No one fucking supports this woman. It's like judging all women by the actions of my ex girlfriend. Only an idiot would think all women are physically and mentally abusive, so I need to keep my discrimination internalized as PTSD and social anxiety so I just get to avoid anymore harm personally.
/r/MensRights20/01/20 01:50 PM
0

Notice the reactions, you twit. Not a single one that thinks it's funny.
/r/MensRights20/01/20 12:48 PM
4

Reposted hours after the first one. What a fucking shitpost. I'll make an account on Facebook just to say something retardedly mentally-ill so it can go viral and get people to hate [insert literally any group I want].
/r/MensRights19/01/20 09:27 PM
-1

You seen any of the posts about men or women murdering people and bragging about it? What about liars? This shit isn't exactly surprising.
/r/MensRights19/01/20 05:09 PM
0

Why don’t you say that to everyone who screenshots from other places like facebook? I usually do. And for the retared comment i think everyone here begs to differ. If you started taking donations to "raise awareness" for, uh... mentally ill sexists on Facebook? Where would you send/spend those donations to benefit your cause you've decided to highlight on this fine day? Just wanna understand the angle of your positive goal here.
/r/MensRights19/01/20 05:06 PM
-3

How does it make any sense to spend time on judging and generalizing one person's fucking Facebook post? We could just as easily find one female murderer and pretend it's about feminism because she said something against men once. Maybe we could go to the incel subreddit, find one MRA, then dismiss this entire sub because MRAs are violently dehumanizing because we found one example. Childish tribalism. OP, you're fucking retarded if you think this is spreading some sort of positive initiative.
/r/MensRights19/01/20 04:48 PM
2

Try me. I've got enough praxis to have made my own sub for active discussion: /r/TechnoComRenaissance
/r/MensRights11/01/20 06:39 AM
1

I'm a progressive commie. I just asked myself.
/r/MensRights11/01/20 03:40 AM
6

Show me modern progressives supporting something like "free love" of the past. Today, supposed female sexual empowerment is tied to shaming male sexual assertiveness(#MeToo generalization to the point of many guys automatically being seen as creeps,) male sexual failures(incels,) and also an almost religious level of prudeness among women brought about by dating app and social media narcissism. This is apparently progressive reality that the liberal media is brainwashing us to accept. Progress r…
/r/MensRights11/01/20 03:38 AM
2

Also, you're right.
/r/MensRights11/01/20 03:00 AM
0

I'm a radical Leftist btw. Make more assumptions against critical thought.
/r/MensRights11/01/20 01:32 AM
437

Let's just make all restrooms sensible according to post-modern "progressive" standards. 1. Women and children 2. Men and other sexual deviants Isn't this basically what's being said by these supposed sexually progressive efforts? Why are they somehow more discriminative and sexist?
/r/MensRights10/01/20 09:55 PM
1

Why highlight stupid people? This is a waste of time.
/r/MensRights27/12/19 03:34 PM
1

I was hoping so. The sexual dynamic is always so ridiculous with how it manifests that it requires a person to think of it like a Yin-Yang and consider completely opposite ideas or you'll end up just being toxic. That, I believe, is why modern feminism is so toxic. It feels completely natural to think endlessly empowering the "weak" sex is the valid approach, except we generally have a deeply-ingrained desire to protect/support women regardless of civil rights issues. At least in first-world cou…
/r/MensRights25/12/19 04:12 PM
3

The real tragedy is when a girl pulls this shit and you ask for her number or try knocking to give her your info after she closes the door, which would be "creepy." Then you'll get criminally charged for her starting to "sexually harass" you. That's actually the more fucked up factor in the sexual dynamic. If the guy reacts, then he becomes the sexual predator, which should be insightful about the absurdity of the psychosexual dynamic, because it's technically a mirror of the same idea of "victi…
/r/MensRights25/12/19 06:49 AM
0

If I was working delivering pizza, sudden nudity would be pretty much the only excitement putting the job over suicide as a preference. Then again, I worked in fast food long enough to know the feeling of worthlessness involved. Most of the guys in this sub wouldn't understand.
/r/MensRights24/12/19 11:36 PM
198

The outrage gap. Men are fighting for change far harder than women. In fact, this is why I believe men's groups are shamed while an illogical coopted corporate version of feminism is pushed on us. Emasculate society and there will be no united and logical change possible. Men are the movers. We're the heroes being trained to feel like villains by the propaganda.
/r/MensRights21/12/19 09:03 AM
6

The real question is whether or not a straight white cis man could get a degree and teach in such a field without mansplaining to everyone in the classes.
/r/MensRights01/12/19 05:25 AM
1

And yet there's biological truth to it. Guys like the thought of fighting and being the hero, and it even comes with a short of expectation of respect and/or appreciation. Sadly, that's been drained from American culture. Now we're expected to walk on eggshells and have internal debates over whether or not it's sexist. Should I jump in front of this bullet? She's a strong woman that can handle plenty of penetration. Perhaps it's sexist if I play hero. Now we get men trained for flight over fight…
/r/MensRights29/11/19 09:46 AM
6

I'm on disability, so it really only makes sense that I'm allowed to disable people occasionally.
/r/MensRights29/11/19 01:57 AM
16

The second one appears to be sarcasm.
/r/MensRights24/11/19 01:33 PM
0

Well, speaking in the patriarchal sense. Late capitalism ends up making men equivalent to peasants in some neo-feudal state. Men are good at those productive and exploitative games though initially. Yeah, it benefits women, but what men want tends to just be higher value women, if not possessions they can gain with their capitalist winnings. All that logic is disturbingly dehumanizing though. Empowering men with money twists our value of character/self into where we're at now. Women tired of men…
/r/MensRights24/11/19 12:50 PM
-1

How does feminism exist then? Are men so weak that we didn't stamp it out and we simply fall prey to women? If so, then it's toxic masculine weakness and acceptance of these women that allowed it. Everything in a vicious cycle that's persistent is both the cause and result of its opposition. See, I'm now "victim blaming" men for our failings. Is that fair to say because men ought never accept being victims and we must return to being more dominant by some magical means, or is this truly our faul…
/r/MensRights24/11/19 12:39 PM
-7

It's not feminism. It's biological. Feminism just turned biology into a vicious cycle of exploiting sexuality to a sociopathic extent. Not always, but not all capitalists are horrible either, despite the fact that the game breeds corruption. In fact, I believe capitalism is the male equivalent of feminism according the psychosexual dynamic. It jumpstarts everything women call "toxic masculinity" because of the hyper-focus on competition. Because of the Yin-Yang of everything, that means capitali…
/r/MensRights23/11/19 10:40 PM
1

Back in my day...
/r/MensRights15/11/19 11:37 AM
1

I don't even know if I was actually banned from /r/feminism because it's been so long since I was banned.
/r/MensRights15/11/19 11:36 AM
26

Women can't wear short shorts? Or gym shorts? I thought that was pretty standard.
/r/MensRights10/11/19 08:08 AM
16

Whoa now, we're talking boxers not briefs.
/r/MensRights10/11/19 08:03 AM
1

Why even call this feminism? Anyone can make a video promoting lying. This is more like an incel version of a woman. Can always get sex but apparently gets so sick of selecting for douchebags that lie and cheat. She has every right to become what she hates. That's on her.
/r/MensRights06/11/19 10:49 PM
0

The only gap in gender is the one we generally worship between a woman's legs. We're just as much to blame, but that's because the psychosexual dynamic is a fucking objectifying battle from all angles. The supply and demand of sexuality might as well put us as the cause of all our own harms, because both sexes are fully intertwined in the purest Yin and Yang. Every abuse women feel is a polar reality of all the abuse men feel. Modern society is just demonizing men because it's an easy target to …
/r/MensRights06/11/19 06:17 AM
2

It's another man-up thing. They're weeding out the submissive nerds with warm balls and lower fertility.
/r/MensRights05/11/19 04:06 PM
1

Finally a response to the greatest injustice faced by humanity today.
/r/MensRights05/11/19 04:04 PM
2

Why aren’t men more open? Definitely probably doesn't help to jumpstart our life in a state of extreme violating pain and constant uncomfortable sexual exposure and desensitization.
/r/MensRights20/10/19 08:17 PM
3

If it's doomsday the whole world is my room.
/r/MensRights30/09/19 02:46 PM
3

I'm making a statement of empowerment. Men are powerful and we demand that power. The guys at the top just got so skilled at their exploitation that they're neutering the vast majority of us. Red, blue, black, white, whatever the fuck you want to label us as. Men should be standing up against this bullshit instead of falling for this emasculating culture that demonizes anything about us having power. Feminism won't balance things. We need strong men at the bottom to fucking fight for what is our…
/r/MensRights30/09/19 06:52 AM
7

I'm saying we should be protesting like the Chinese against our bullshit corrupt leaders who exploit our taxes and crush us with ever type of authoritarian law and propaganda to make us feel a constant state of fear about everything around us. The only thing we have to fear is fear itself, and it's put on us by the same sociopaths that are exploiting us with their theatrical gridlock.
/r/MensRights30/09/19 06:47 AM
14

Yeah, we should blame the sociopathic self-empowering women running those corporations at our expense. Men are the actors. We're running the top, and we should be running the bottom. To put it simply, stop being a bunch of fucking partisan pussies and fight against the corruption. Get a big ol' slice of that pie and make sure it's sustainable for the planet. We should be in the streets taking after the Chinese. America is the capitalist blackhole of the planet, so it should be most important tha…
/r/MensRights29/09/19 10:03 PM
1

Isn't this a positive point? Guys shouldn't have to defend themselves for having their entire penis. She probably means it as an attack on intactivism, but it's not always the guys with their "hats" complaining. I want my entire dick back.
/r/MensRights25/09/19 11:44 PM
1

Shiitake sesame dressing is what makes it so unique. Do recommend.
/r/MensRights24/09/19 03:16 PM
50

It's the devil penis that makes us the positive side of the polarity. That means our entire existence is seen as positive, which means it's literally a weak lil gay boi thing to put your positive things near the positive beanis. All men must battle to the death against all forces while we put women on pedestals and they put themselves on pedestals because the negative side of the polarity doesn't even push back against other negative forces. 👏🙊Food🍕4😤Thought🙉👏
/r/MensRights24/09/19 12:07 PM
8

Speak for yourself.
/r/MensRights03/09/19 04:47 AM
1

I wish I could say I was doing great. I like feeling as if I think for myself compared to so many people, but I think that might be my way of compensating for not feeling control in the rest of my life. It's like how anorexia is technically about control because it gives that sense to a person who's self-image might be fucked up. It's like I've gained some sort of black-pill thinking that looks behind the superficial veil of everything and sees the objectifyingly eerie reality. I want everything…
/r/MGTOW25/08/19 08:23 PM
4

Using the statement properly and in context, many modern women want to have their cake and eat yours too. There's just no valid and respectful response other than self-focus.
/r/MGTOW25/08/19 06:23 PM
4

I thought that was one of MGTOW cores. I feel like I focus so much on logic that I cut away nearly all the hypocrisy of different views in some fucked up way that automatically results in everyone on both sides of a debate hating me. It's funny I could make the same exact points and be downvoted in here and downvoted even more in some feminist/SJW sub despite the fact that people in here seem to think I'm disagreeing with them. I just follow the logic. I haven't even made some sort of fucking cl…
/r/MGTOW25/08/19 04:30 PM
-3

You think women who only go for the top 10% of men or whatever aren't as high in standards as guys that go for like the top 40% of women and send all the messages first? It's a basic matter of supply and demand.
/r/MGTOW25/08/19 02:49 PM
-19

Why couldn't he find another girl on the side? There's a reason guys have to force women into monogamy with shame tactics and whatnot. It's because average women have high standards and can still easily fill them while average men have low standards and still can't meet their expectations. A real chad would be able to get anything he wants.
/r/MGTOW25/08/19 02:19 PM
-23

Open relationships are perfectly logical for people who aren't monogamous. At least it involves honesty about partners instead of cheating and denying your nature. Plenty of men and women are in denial of the fact that they aren't monogamous. Usually because they hypocritically want a stable and devoted partner that's only with them while they inevitably end up cheating. The reality is this chick just wasn't with enough of a chad to the point that he felt the imbalance. He was the loser for stay…
/r/MGTOW25/08/19 01:31 PM
39

Male + sex = evil abuse. Female + sex = benevolent victim.
/r/MGTOW20/08/19 11:49 AM
2

What? You get in deep shit if you try to slut shame women. The fact is, women who sleep around are being sluts. You're kind of making my point. Doesn't matter whether or not it's PC to say it out loud. Hell, I support open relationships and some sort of post-modernist utopian perspective of free sexuality. Doesn't change the fact that exact copies of one women would have me choosing the one without sexual experience over the one with it(or with less experience instead of more.) Why? Because it m…
/r/MensRights18/08/19 01:36 AM
2

This is a real epic gamer move.
/r/MGTOW17/08/19 11:58 PM
1

I would get labeled as a sex offender when my boner rubs against her. Prank the pranker.
/r/MensRights13/08/19 10:57 PM
2

In conclusion, I think I can safely speak for all MRAs when I say all men should have hidden cameras in their bedroom facing their bed as an alibi.
/r/MensRights13/08/19 07:23 PM
2

I thought she was like an 8 year old kid at first. Still not sure.
/r/MensRights13/08/19 06:28 PM
1

Women generally get slut shamed while men are seen as successful, as far as sexuality goes. Obviously it's more lighthearted for a woman to admit to a cultural flaw in the same way it would be abnormally wholesome for a man to mention a reversed idea about how some sexual idea doesn't entice him and has some genuinely nice nonsexual component.
/r/MensRights13/08/19 12:38 PM
0

My guy, I am a professional of personal jealousy, growth out of it, and every aspect of what is said in that writing. She betrayed him. You're right. He needs to man up and get the fuck out at that point. Hell, call it "woman up" if it makes people think it's less sexist. His insecurity is what kept him there. His insecurity is what brings about his jealousy and control issues. Anyone in their right mind would either leave at that point, or they'd discuss it with their significant other openly a…
/r/MGTOW11/08/19 08:29 PM
4

Ironic. He could hate cucks, yet he chose to please them.
/r/MGTOW10/08/19 04:44 PM
6

and less accountability for their mistakes and fewer reasons to fall into despair. I'm literally hiding in my room every day because I made a mistake when a cop rode my ass one night, and me, being such a conscientious person, made a stupid move on the road thinking it was someone I knew following me from the bar. I'm on disability and was playing it incredibly safe that night for my standard. Logically speaking, there was no reason to punish me on the night I specifically quit drinking early an…
/r/MensRights09/08/19 04:22 AM
1

The sub has a full in-depth fucking wiki page about gendered offensive terms. I'm fairly certain you'd get a ban for saying "lesbian" if a mod feels there's a slight shade of nuance they don't appreciate. Funny how the sexes work. I think constantly about the "psychosexual dynamic." I despise capitalism for its harms, but it's full fucking masculine in its "freedom" to compete and get fucked(we've got that sperm-tier individualism ingrained in our minds,) which I'm trying to explain with a posit…
/r/MensRights04/08/19 08:18 AM
6

Lesbians have no reason to ever think about men aside from competition they can look down on. Sounds like that mod had a lil bit of bias.
/r/MensRights04/08/19 05:47 AM
2

Let's follow that to a conclusion. Since everyone is retarded except, yes, all men, regret "rape" will become a thing when women feel the man falsely implied more than just a sexual interest. I mean, doesn't that make sense? The person is being taken advantage of under a pretense of false advertising. How much do you need to know someone before their lies become 100% your fault? "Whelp, sorry, you bought a defective item, but it's your fault because the salesman advertised it over the course of …
/r/MensRights28/07/19 09:20 PM
2

This is why I'm just gonna forgo labor until it's 20 years in the future. I'll be able to make so much more money than if I have it in the bank until then.
/r/MGTOW26/07/19 05:31 PM
13

It's automatically used against us. Girls are afraid to give compliments because they'll know it'll pull in our thirst. Hell, even responding to a guy has to be ignored. I've got "friends" on Snapchat who definitely ignore my casual comments, and I know it's because they don't want to lead me on. Tricks on them, though, because I was totally ready to be led on if they responded.
/r/MensRights22/07/19 09:41 PM
33

Gotta kill off all the idols to masculinity. It's too inhumane and dehumanizing for men to have personal feelings that aren't applied to the demands of women.
/r/MGTOW14/07/19 12:20 PM
7

I went from Indiana to Colorado. In Colorado, which gave of a comparatively crazy wealthy vibe, I almost thought I was going to get treated like a bot because I started swiping right on almost everyone in this college town I was in.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/19 02:57 PM
5

Wisdom. This is the whole reason this "sexist" sub is demonized. Ironically, modern "sexual empowerment" for women is just reinforcement of ignorance and sexist standards of the past.
/r/TheRedPill09/07/19 05:26 PM
1

You seem to have missed the point.
/r/TheRedPill07/07/19 08:06 PM
1

because they are erratic and irrational Call it indecisive and emotional, instead. Those are general traits in women, and they're also pleasant to a guy that wants a follower and someone that builds them up and gives meaning. Women being indecisive and agreeable just means they empower male leadership. Being more emotional is where they build up all those ideas of "honor" and whatever else staves off the nihilism.
/r/TheRedPill07/07/19 12:17 PM
16

What if no one talks about men's issues because the discussion makes us feel weak, which gets stuck in our minds, which then comes off as less attractive to others? And we all know we can't force people to be attracted to certain things.
/r/MensRights07/07/19 05:57 AM
59

The other day I was considering a Yin-Yang thought of sexuality, so I picked a statement and tried to justify it. I said to myself: "Women are strong in weakness; men are weak in strength." I wasn't thinking this out fully at the time, but I later thought about rape claims. People generally see sex like an attack on women. "It's objectifying" and "it's all men think about" are basically euphemisms for attitudes about sex deteriorating a woman's value. People see men as these dominant beasts that…
/r/MGTOW27/06/19 06:31 AM
2

That's the sexist part. You need a little old woman with very little english to say it.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 06:50 PM
20

Seems pretty funny to me.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 02:01 PM
1

There's not even an argument here. My own personal perception of my actions is entirely separate from the asserted opinions of others toward my actions.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 01:11 PM
75

Those are some dad reflexes in action.
/r/MGTOW24/06/19 10:55 AM
0

It's not masculine enough for the look I want to have right now. Are you saying that's wrong or are you just missing my point completely?
/r/MensRights24/06/19 01:24 AM
1

Is angry recoil the best response to reduce the authoritarianism on the other side? I seem to find tribalism spawning from absolutely nothing simply because someone is angry about something. You could literally create an entire new hate movement and divisive argument just by blasting something nonsensical at people until a vicious cycle starts up and people pull it into their tribalistic set of illusory "ethics."
/r/MensRights24/06/19 01:20 AM
1

Where in the literal fuck did you get that idea? I specifically said there's nothing about this that needs to be tied to the idea of toxic masculinity. There's a difference between having likes and seeing a child with a discriminative mindset that they're asserting toward others. It's 100% logical to defend yourself as a man in that state.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 01:11 AM
1

I answered.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 12:54 AM
0

See? Masculinity can speak for itself.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 12:54 AM
1

I'm responding to the idea of this person calling it toxic masculinity. They can be right about everything else without their causal conclusion being correct.
/r/MensRights24/06/19 12:53 AM
-18

So you think the only indoctrination is what happens to be culturally normal? I've got long nails for guitar on my right hand and painted them black a couple weeks ago. I'd be indoctrinating someone by helping them to think in a more open-minded way? How does that negatively affect anyone? You don't have to label it as "toxic masculinity." The toxic generalizations speak for themselves.
/r/MensRights23/06/19 06:22 AM
18

Virginity exists for guys. It's just a mark of shame toward failure to exploit specific resources rather than an advertising term for sexual objectification.
/r/MGTOW20/06/19 07:16 AM
0

That's where you're wrong, kiddo. 😎👉👉
/r/MensRights19/06/19 06:04 AM
0

There is no complex or nuanced understanding required to dismiss socialism and communism. And I can also safely say the same of capitalism. What false wars will we justify next? Will America and our measly 300 million people end up with more than 25% of the world's prison population? You believe that? 4% of the world's population and 25% of the world's prisoners. "Land of the Free" seems a bit like like some doublethink, no? Then the dictators of our society don't even have to worry. Average peo…
/r/MensRights19/06/19 01:53 AM
1

Psychology is the underlying relative factor. Sociology, aka: things like everything MRA's argue about and discuss, is a system based on a webwork that forms from individual psychological states. Every argument about everything social ties straight back to psychology.
/r/MensRights19/06/19 01:48 AM
1

How do laws work in your libertarian paradise? Bullet to the head for stealing a pack of gum? Death sentence for all violence?
/r/MensRights19/06/19 01:32 AM
0

I'm amazingly likeable. I'm the most likeable person. I think I'm great. The only reason no one else likes me is because they don't take the time to sensually chisel through my hard outer shell.
/r/MensRights19/06/19 01:27 AM
-15

I have hundreds of razors because I was efficient enough to invest in DE razor years ago. Hear that? E f f i c i e n c y. Imagine a world where something as crazy as that was our focus, along with health and happiness. How do you make a garden flourish? You could name all the necessities after a bit of research, at most. How do you make a human society flourish? No, see, that's where so many people are naive and whining about Vuvezula!! How do you make a single human flourish? A vast majority of…
/r/MensRights18/06/19 06:54 AM
-17

I explain a complex and nuanced perspective of observable reality and the effects of a capitalistic focus on human psychology and you trundle in like a highly-trained troglodyte for Koch think-tank propaganda and tout an overplayed idea that has absolutely fucking nothing to do with anything I just said.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 06:42 AM
80

Yeah. Also about deadbeat fathers.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 05:54 AM
-22

This "humor" is what you get when capitalism is your society's true religion and profit motive is given the full go-ahead in every avenue. In what world do police specifically hunt for people like this? One where supply and demand of prisoners and criminal punishment has surpassed every nuance of justice. The only reason people don't see that is because of the religion we're indoctrinated to act under. Profit is our god. Exploitation is our doctrine. Sociopathy is our virtue.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 05:52 AM
45

Women should have all that control, just the way we should have some "MRA Kyle" tweeting and getting 12k uplikes about how men can have a full financial abortion and not be an indentured servant to that female host.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 04:46 AM
1

The ever elusive victim3 blaming.
/r/MGTOW17/06/19 03:44 AM
2

But we won't. There's the real toxic masculinity. Guys submitting their labor and love and entire being for women drinking in that emotional fix just until they want a new flavor. I don't support monogamy, but apparently without it, women just abuse their sexual dominance over men.
/r/MensRights16/06/19 10:33 PM
10

You could ask his ex girlfriend the same thing.
/r/MensRights16/06/19 09:56 AM
17

Enough that there's a solid trend and a whole cultural acceptance of different levels of this mindset. Most women have the expectation of financial support even when they aren't open about it. It's tied to courtship. The real problem is that this is blatantly toxic thinking yet there's no mainstream attacks on it the way feminism attacks everything that's perceived as toxic about men.
/r/MensRights16/06/19 09:53 AM
48

Did he actually say this or is this one of the billions of fake celebrity quotes on the internet?
/r/MGTOW09/06/19 05:01 AM
6

How can she slap??
/r/MensRights07/06/19 05:50 PM
3

As it turns out, bribing someone to like you tends to not to be the best introduction to falling in love.
/r/MensRights02/06/19 02:06 AM
8

Courtship works in mysterious ways.
/r/MensRights01/06/19 09:40 AM
-5

No reason to call this feminism. Women have had all these privileges well before feminism existed.
/r/MensRights01/06/19 01:00 AM
1

Did it actually say they were handicapped? Without more information I wouldn't assume they were necessarily her students.
/r/MensRights28/05/19 04:41 AM
17

16 is the age is consent in my state, and many states. It's abuse of authority to have sex with a student. It's not fucking pedophilia.
/r/MensRights27/05/19 03:05 PM
4

It technically doesn't specify who said he was gay. Could've been a male friend.
/r/MGTOW27/05/19 02:54 PM
1

You're right, but somehow I always find it in myself to reason for self-defeating approaches in everything. I'm probably afraid of feeling untrue to myself and failing anyway. If I hold my own values and ideas of self, at least my failure seems validated by the difficulty of being selective to my standards. If I'm completely open to getting with anyone and still fail, then I'd have to admit that my general value is much lower than I'd hope.
/r/TheRedPill22/05/19 03:29 PM
1

Nietzsche, in Beyond Good and Evil is well known for this quote: Beware that, when fighting monsters, you yourself do not become a monster... for when you gaze long into the abyss. The abyss gazes also into you. Considering my dating experiences have felt particularly futile lately, I find it to be an interesting coincidence that I set my Tinder bio as a reference to this quote: Be careful when battling monsters and while gazing long in the abyss; I'd thought I kept my feet in place, but I don't…
/r/TheRedPill22/05/19 04:44 AM
-2

Why does every masculinity-focused sub have to specifically and openly proclaim discriminative stances like this? I mean, this isn't even a matter related to frustrations toward women. It's shaming people with health issues(mental or otherwise.) For fuck's sake, Reddit has become a mirror of a toxic relationship. It's brainwashing hate and division of every fucking type.
/r/MGTOW24/04/19 11:11 AM
18

Being a successful weaner makes you a winner.
/r/TheRedPill17/04/19 08:28 AM
28

5th wave: "All men must kill all other men for us."
/r/MGTOW10/04/19 02:07 PM
9

Exactly. I'm always confused about arguments that overvalue the idea of freedom, particularly when matters of quality-of-life are involved at the expense of only minor tradeoffs. In fact, it's similar to economic libertarians proclaiming taxation is theft. Yeah, basically everything is theft. End all taxation and you'd see an increase in crime and literal theft, probably enough that you'd rethink the value of even pointing that out about taxation.
/r/MGTOW03/04/19 02:22 AM
3

I hope some day you'll join us, and the world might be somewhat fun!
/r/MGTOW30/03/19 04:51 AM
2

Sexy male penis.
/r/MensRights25/03/19 03:37 PM
1

Which is why we should automatically abort for 90% of people.
/r/MensRights24/03/19 08:41 PM
9

TIL the desire I have to jerk off every day is equivalent to signing a contract that will result in human life under my care against any other will I might possess.
/r/MensRights24/03/19 06:44 PM
1

Yeah, she should just be able to take it out of her body.
/r/MensRights24/03/19 06:42 PM
2

Uncomfortably insightful, and glaringly violating to consider the endless ways I seem to find to fail at all this. A post like this makes crystal clear the point at which I've failed in so many random situations. Somehow, insecurity just fucking dominates me. And the worst part is how perfectly I can pull the early game on occasion. There's always some key moment where I fuck up by "caring." What a bullshit term, too. It's nothing but insecurity and neediness. I make the mistake of calling it "h…
/r/TheRedPill21/03/19 03:10 AM
9

Bricks? Come on. Write it on eggs. I thought everyone agreed there's a time and place for some disgruntled egg throwing.
/r/MensRights19/03/19 09:46 AM
2

I'm just saying I'm not going to push some ad hominem bullshit at someone without expecting the same type of attack to be returned.
/r/MensRights17/03/19 09:41 AM
30

I made this exact same argument one day. Dismissing a logical argument like that would end with me laughing my way out of the room.
/r/MensRights17/03/19 09:11 AM
27

Sue? Is this New Mexico?
/r/MensRights14/03/19 12:20 AM
1

I'd just have someone take me out back at that point. Fuck that life.
/r/MensRights13/03/19 11:37 AM
1

Would you say gay conversion therapy is a sensible way to change people? What if this isn't a matter of changing culture, but a matter of changing attraction? What if the "progress" we're hoping to stimulate is actually sexist against women because most women simply aren't attracted to weak men?
/r/MensRights13/03/19 11:35 AM
0

Apparently this dude is talking about fucking theorists or something. You don't need to spend 80 hours a week to accomplish every job.
/r/MensRights13/03/19 09:30 AM
7

Not for her sexual value, i.e. relationship value.
/r/MensRights13/03/19 09:11 AM
7

Are there even that many hours in a week?
/r/MensRights13/03/19 09:09 AM
1

I'm saying your point is equally invalid. There's no value in trying to defend male victims. We're required to defend ourselves. The second someone else defends us or labels us a victim, we lose respect from people. I'm not even saying this to be sexist or to sound ignorant. I'm saying it because reality is sexist. I wish it wasn't this way, but that's how it works. It's the same reason women always seem like the victims, which is specifically why modern "feminism" feels so right. It's because, …
/r/MensRights13/03/19 08:39 AM
1

Males are the objective sex. Victimhood is invalid for us. Anything that occurs we're obliged to accept blame and move past it to success.
/r/MensRights13/03/19 01:29 AM
1

Okay... but men and women both sort of select for one another at the same time. There's obviously a genetic difference in women that pulls them toward average. Unless you think smart and stupid couples have a higher tendency to have boys while average intelligence people have more girls. Maybe my logic is off, but I feel people are carrying whole sets of diverse genes that can be applied to both biologically different sexes.
/r/TheRedPill12/03/19 12:39 AM
5

The smarter a woman is, the less likely she would be to have 17 kids, hence the reason why female IQ is more likely to be average. The smarter a man is, the more likely he is to prove his productive value and/or manipulate his way to sexual success. I always wondered why male actors always seemed much more interesting. That's probably why. We're the ones who have lives that actually involve active challenges while also expressing ourselves in ways that show our worth. If dogs are "man's best fri…
/r/TheRedPill11/03/19 10:32 PM
9

To be fair, I'm very far Left and think the vast majority of people who think they're "far Left" are toxic and naive.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 11:53 AM
5

The irony of something being too obvious like this is where it becomes the exact opposite designation hiding under that guise. You can be a full-blown communist and realize this, as is my case.
/r/MensRights10/03/19 08:17 AM
22

Yeah, but he was only the gardener/poolboy. That's not comparable to the productivity of the original man who acquired the home.
/r/MensRights10/03/19 08:14 AM
1

Yeah, I can see that. There's something pleasant about the idea of absolute submission, though. I grew up religious and now, as I mentioned, I'm basically a radical Leftist. I'm a very logical person, which is specifically why I stayed religious all the way into high school. I justified everything really well. Parts of the Bible mention all sorts of things about the man being the absolute rule of law, but the book also makes light of slavery and treats it as normal. In general, life isn't utopia…
/r/MensRights07/03/19 02:50 AM
1

That's a good question, but I think it's probably more important how well people interact. Thinking of some Jordan Peterson stuff, I know men skew much more wildly on IQ while women tend to be close to the median. That means there are a lot more high-intelligence men(judging by IQ, which plenty of people doubt the validity of, but that's whatever,) but there are also a lot more low-intelligence men. Personally, I can't imagine someone being happy being "led" by someone who is less "intelligent,"…
/r/MensRights07/03/19 01:00 AM
1

That captain/first-mate idea reminds me of a little mindblown moment I had while thinking of the psychosexual dynamic when watching, uhh, The Last Jedi, I believe. Anyway, I forget the quote, but it was something from Luke(I believe) to do with the master-apprentice relationship that struck me as exactly how a traditionalistic relationship should be. Dammit! I forget the quote and now I'm wanting to watch it again just to see if what I was thinking holds up.
/r/MensRights07/03/19 12:06 AM
3

Ah, brother! Glorious times ever since the Great Purging, truly. Carry on in your objective efforts. https://youtu.be/GKBtMLOC2oU
/r/MGTOW06/03/19 12:51 AM
6

"Reality can be whatever you make it, daddy!" Captain Marvel starts to fade into a greenish hue. Horrible. I'm horrible.
/r/MGTOW05/03/19 01:55 AM
5

I wish there wasn't so much bullshit around something like this. I'd like to see a female superhero that isn't basted in all the cultural tension that's going to make her have to represent 100% full-blast feminism, aka: probably "toxic masculinity" practiced by a woman(because everything "wrong" is okay when a woman does it.) On a less hostile-sounding note, it could definitely be cool if there wasn't all that cultural tension. I feel like it's going to end up like Black Panther, which might've …
/r/MGTOW05/03/19 01:51 AM
1

I spent all morning making an incredibly complex CMV argument about the counterintuitive nature of describing anything a "toxic masculinity" and coupled the argument with a mirrored example for why feminism is exactly as counterintuitive. I may finish it within a day or two. Maybe I'll let this sub know. I'm a strict humanist and obsess over the psychosexual dynamic. I consider myself a far Left version of Jordan Peterson and I've essentially never disagreed with the guy.
/r/MensRights01/03/19 12:07 AM
313

Imagine it being respected for men to have appearance preferences for infant vaginas.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 02:56 PM
0

Yeah, there's no way this has anything to do with feminism. It's a picture of an idiot abusing female privilege. That's not feminism.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 02:53 PM
0

The glory of capitalism has even made Bezos trans.
/r/MensRights26/02/19 11:40 AM
1

Nothing will ever exist without a government or other organization taking over. Communism could be anarchistic if we automate most of the government to retain a leaderless state.
/r/MGTOW25/02/19 09:14 PM
1

These arguments have a shade of truth. Both are about the degrading coercion of capitalism. There are other ways to move a society that exclude this sort of coercion.
/r/MGTOW25/02/19 09:12 PM
1

going back to BF Skinner and the reason behaviorism exists. You can train animals, and humans, to do what you want if you are sadistic (fucked up) enough. "Skinner box" An example, animals can be trained to sniff bombs and even walk off dangerous heights. I'm going to talk about the second part, because that's what is going to matter in this argument. Animals can be trained, slowly, to put their own lives in danger. https://np.reddit.com/r/science/comments/atcx8l/researchers_watched_in_real_time…
/r/MensRights25/02/19 04:45 AM
-5

but in the end you simply wrote the guy of as being an "idiot" for killing himself over some pussy.... Note how I said the dude was probably an idiot. And yeah, the previous part was me explaining why I don't think he's a victim. Specifically because the obvious assumption is that he's the victim. I even agree that he is. This chick should be locked up for a few solid years to think about how horrible she is. Of course, someone like her would probably just learn to hide it a little better. Eithe…
/r/MensRights25/02/19 03:47 AM
-1

If you noticed, I included a hefty amount of nuance in my statement. I'm not saying this is some obvious situation.
/r/MensRights25/02/19 03:01 AM
-10

Ignoring the degrading terms, I think I'd say I partly agree with you. A person in a weak state might just need a certain type of help to get out of it, but everyone faces a lot of threats and decisions. If someone is telling you to kill yourself and you're actually considering it because of that, you're not exactly coming off as a victim. If a girl keeps going back to a guy who abuses her(how I went back to my ex who abused me,) there's a point where it goes beyond being the victim and turns in…
/r/MensRights25/02/19 01:41 AM
1

Hey, hol' up. In the middle of making some high-quality packaged ramen on your dime, but just thought of this... You realize the FBI is being paid because of theft from you, right? You're over here whining that you don't think they deserve to be paid, then you cry out for their help without even thinking about it. I'm sure "FBI" would definitely be on your libertarian donation list, though, right? Classic economic libertarian. Not a speck of self-awareness of the reality around them.
/r/MensRights21/02/19 05:35 AM
1

LOL, good luck with that, dude. Apparently you don't understand generalized concepts. Your kid would get killed by the increase in crime. I wouldn't need to be a part of it. 👌👌👌
/r/MensRights21/02/19 04:10 AM
1

^This guy thinks he lives in a bubble. You'd get to keep every little penny and your kid would end up murdered while you're off working your 90 hour week with no over-time pay. All because you didn't realize taxation is for the sake of societal stability. You reckless economic libertarians seem to sure love the idea of neo-feudalism. Sadly, 99% of you wouldn't be nearly useful enough to end up as a lord. You'd be the desperate peasants hiding behind your plutocrat's walls.
/r/MensRights21/02/19 03:13 AM
1

Yeah, you're paying my disability income. In fact, I called up Obama on my Obamaphone speed-dial and had him put a word in so all of my check comes straight out of yours. You don't even get to pay for bombs or soldiers or anything. It's nice to know you're so selfless like that. 😝
/r/MensRights21/02/19 03:07 AM
1

Yeah, and when I can't afford an education or healthcare, you'll pay for it when I end up in your house in the middle of the night and put you in the hospital. Great logic, bud. 👏👏👏 Turns out crime actually does pay sometimes. In fact, a lot of the time crime makes totally innocent people pay. Hope that lack of taxation makes up for it for you. Being surrounded by gangs and criminals is far better than putting effort into our government so it isn't such a gang of criminals.
/r/MensRights21/02/19 03:05 AM
1

Wow you really know how to spout a lot of meaningless vocabulary words together to say absolutely nothing. I dunno, dude, but I think it's the pesticides or something. Maybe the fluoride in the water? I keep trying to explain basic logic to the people around me and it's like talking to a brick wall. Edit: Oh, an employee. Good day, sir. Enjoy your check from the American Enterprise Institute.
/r/MensRights21/02/19 02:03 AM
2

You're paying too much because of the "libertarian" ideological infection on society that has us pointlessly calling for "small government no intervention" where our government has been capitalistically commandeered toward exploitative inefficiency. Whine all you want about taxes. Won't change a thing. They've already got the money to keep the propaganda going so your half of society keeps thinking it's better to let the wealthy control our lives instead of letting the government control our liv…
/r/MensRights21/02/19 01:53 AM
0

Two things poorer countries can afford, with the healthcare one ironically being much cheaper and better quality on most metrics. America is getting fucked, and peasants whining about socialism have been trained by the decades of "libertarian" Koch propaganda that divided society over basic logic that benefits us.
/r/MensRights21/02/19 01:07 AM
1

How much of your paycheck is based on socialist overtime?
/r/MensRights21/02/19 01:05 AM
4

Half the idiots complaining about "socialism" are complaining about policies no different than those created by FDR. Guys who make half their money from "overtime" because of the "40 hour work week" that was made up at the flick of a pen sit around whining about how "socialism takes my money" and "taxation is theft," as if everything about life isn't theft.
/r/MensRights21/02/19 01:01 AM
-2

Yeah, fuck labor laws. Let the workers rot. Amirite?
/r/MensRights20/02/19 12:23 PM
3

do I want socialism You mean better labor laws?
/r/MensRights20/02/19 12:22 PM
2

Women don't love the way men do. Let's take a moment to consider this. I tend to think of things in a complex and very nuanced fashion, essentially in the manner of Jordan Peterson. One thing I've recognized is the tendency for basically everything in the psychosexual dynamic to involve a Yin-Yang battle. What this makes me wonder, as far as the idea you mention and something I haven't yet considered, would be how this would relate to the opposite of what we expect. All of this stuff is almost a…
/r/TheRedPill16/02/19 08:18 AM
1

Hey, I'm shallow in my own ways, but I don't think that changes certain things about the value I could express to the right person. Just because a pet is trained around certain factors doesn't make the experience you have with them less valuable. When it gets down to it, we're all just playing roles. Some tactics fit the part better than others. Personally, I just want to figure that out for myself, because I'd like to feel happy with myself and with a loving partner in the future, and apparentl…
/r/TheRedPill16/02/19 07:38 AM
2

I was blessed with youthful looks I'm 31 and had someone guess I was "19" at the bar(America) a few months back. I get a little frustrated with looking too young. That being said, the last two girls I was with were 21. If I could get on top of my game, I suppose that could be the norm. I'm apparently too much of a fucking pussy, though. I literally took a girl out the other night and got cucked by giga-chad when she asked if I'd be okay with her going home with him. I normally thought it was ins…
/r/TheRedPill15/02/19 09:17 AM
3

Yeah, as an apparently blatant misogynist, I see no connection between feminism and removing custody from fathers. I don't necessarily see action against that systemic undoubtedly "patriarchal" problem, which is always convenient of mainstream feminism to be strangely self-serving, but I've never seen feminists trying to remove rights of fathers.
/r/MensRights13/02/19 01:05 AM
-2

savage history and proven shortfalls I already stated this. Techno anarchy. Leaderless and ran through automation. Where's the savage dictators in a system that has no leader? We've got people currently making up wars and destroying the majority of the planet via environmental disasters and the illusion of "terrorism." This system is doing everything as bad as any other. Just because we are incredibly well distracted by the inverted totalitarianism doesn't change that.
/r/MensRights10/02/19 03:52 AM
-7

As a communism supporter(with a complex techno-anarchistic stance) that has no fucking clue what this article is implying with that title, the sexual dynamic actually mirrors the differences between the sexes and their natural strengths. Males are generally individualistic competitors not unlike the smallest cells. We're like the sperm fighting for that egg. Under capitalism, the balance ends up just about as fair. Hundreds of millions of us get fucked over to the core while very few take the po…
/r/MensRights09/02/19 08:33 AM
5

It's Vice, they're a bunch of Marxist fucksticks. Yeah, because Marxism starts with dividing the population over sexuality and exploiting them capitalistically.
/r/MensRights07/02/19 03:28 PM
5

Aren't they literally promoting toxic masculinity when using those terms? Lol. It's hilarious how often hypocrisy arises in the apparent war of the sexes that the media is creating for us.
/r/MensRights07/02/19 03:25 PM
1

So brave.
/r/MensRights06/02/19 04:59 AM
7

Animals deserve rights and protections. I don't think they should be tortured from infancy and kept in a cage until they die. I guess we should avoid doing the same to men, as well.
/r/MensRights06/02/19 03:40 AM
17

We could always trickle newborns through to pedophiles in order to safely appease them, too. Not like babies will remember anything. Guess getting a girl blackout drunk should also excuse rape. I mean, if she doesn't remember it; no harm, no foul.
/r/MensRights06/02/19 03:36 AM
4

I've listened to a lot of Peterson's lectures, but I never heard this specifically. He's one person who absolutely shocked me with how similarly he and I think. Hearing him talk was like listening to my own thought processes. I mean, I recorded long rants of my own, little "vlog" things, then right around a point where I'd really laid out a lot of my thoughts with that method, I came across something about him. I watched a short bit of a lecture, dismissed him as some standard douche libertarian…
/r/MensRights05/02/19 07:57 PM
1

Dank comment. Really shows maturity of people who are trained into the obsessive compulsions of religion when they can't even risk doubting their magical illusions that other people built for them.
/r/MensRights05/02/19 07:42 PM
2

Honestly, I probably find most women stupid and tedious because I find most people stupid and tedious. If Jordan Peterson is right about the IQ distribution, though(and I'd safely trust that he is,) I'm sure I grew up with this "sexist" view of women being generally "stupid" specifically because women have a much higher distribution toward the median IQ, whereas men tend to have a flatter bell curve, so more likely to be the stupidest and smartest people around. That would make sense, because I …
/r/MensRights05/02/19 06:06 AM
14

Well... I mean, the saying is based on the idea that everyone in a foxhole would be praying for God to save them. People in that shitty of a situation would automatically resort to hope that goes beyond what otherwise seems logical, specifically because there's very little logic in a situation where you know your existence could end in a moment for basically no reason. People in the trenches aren't thinking about how great it was that their leader made a decision to go and "save" certain people.…
/r/MensRights05/02/19 04:02 AM
7

Why is it that the only positive traits in a man are the feminine ones? Answer: Projection. This must be why men find women to be stupid and tedious 90% of the time, and also dream of finding an intellectual/competitive/[skilled] gamer/sports/[hobby] chick. Guess both sexes would do best just to be gay.
/r/MensRights05/02/19 03:47 AM
19

There's also the argument that there are no religious people in foxholes. They'd either have faith that God would protect them, or they'd have faith that Heaven is real and absolutely worth getting there ASAP. Real faith wouldn't even attempt to make jokes about life being worth living when there's absolute paradise a split second around the corner. Shit, it'd basically be that Netflix movie with that bro-comedy dude.
/r/MensRights05/02/19 03:31 AM
41

Women love guys that cry and get emotional. As long as they're like their gay friend that never ever implies any sort of expectation or hope for intimate connection with them. Generally, the only women who like men who express that sort of weakness would be women who were horribly abused and are now averse to masculinity. These would also be the women who see weak men as something they can exploit and look down upon, no doubt. Otherwise, this shit is all talk. People can say all they want about …
/r/MensRights05/02/19 03:28 AM
3

Well, he is magic.
/r/MensRights05/02/19 01:38 AM
1

We don't need anything to be hidden behind locks. We just need a lot of cameras around to make sure no one steals anything. ʕ ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°ʔ
/r/MensRights05/02/19 01:35 AM
1

I mean, I'm not trying to capture penises, tbh. I'd say that trap is horrible. I'd want traps that prevent me from capturing penises.
/r/MensRights05/02/19 01:27 AM
8

but advocating for the rights of women globally. Interesting how poorly defined everything becomes when there are massive established powers pushing "solutions." Women have problems in plenty of countries, which also coincidentally relates to how much of the world is deprived of wealth and resources because of massive imperialist countries that topple democratic governments, manipulate markets, and allow their "corporations" to extend into their territories in order to exploit their desperation.…
/r/MensRights02/02/19 11:59 PM
3

Men aren't allowed to define psychosexually objectifying/stereotyping concepts. We can define everything in the dictionary, build all the buildings that hold all those dictionaries, and even head the society that gives us this "women and children first" foundation, but the second we make a sex-related statement that's positive about men or negative about women, we're objectifying and disturbing monsters.
/r/MensRights29/01/19 10:26 PM
0

Result of indulging /r/IncelTears and /r/Braincels for a few weeks while I retained a clear empathy for incels.
/r/MensRights28/01/19 11:06 PM
1

Lukewarm anecdote, comrade.
/r/MensRights28/01/19 05:28 AM
-4

Uh oh, foun da inkel.
/r/MensRights28/01/19 05:25 AM
1

Racism isn't worse today. -isms are worse today.
/r/MensRights23/01/19 11:41 PM
4

I came up with a really awesome and edgy pun-involving quote one day at work like 4 years ago. Mentioned it to a 50 year old guy I was working with and he told me the same thing was said in some song I wasn't familiar with.
/r/MensRights23/01/19 11:37 PM
0

What the fuck did you just fucking say about me, you fucking cis-scum? I’ll have you know I graduated top of my class in Gender studies, and I’ve been involved in numerous secret raids on 4Chan and cishets like you, and I have over 300 confirmed headmates. I am trained in women warfare and I’m the top poster in the entire tumblr SJW forces. You are nothing to me but just another white male. I will wipe you the fuck out with oppression claims the likes of which has never been seen before on this …
/r/MensRights23/01/19 10:04 PM
1

Femininity is as toxic as Masculinity - that means it isn't. Alternatively, we could say it is toxic, and that humanity is just generally pretty fucked up at our core. Being completely honest and with no intent to sound edgy, I think the reason we don't see humanity(and basically everything about the psychosexual dynamic) as being incredibly fucked up is simply because our bias about our survival has filled our minds with delusions of grandeur that pacify us to the depravity.
/r/MensRights22/01/19 11:26 PM
0

Right, so do nothing and continue to allow women to act like this? I like how you need to specify "women" for some reason. Shouldn't you be witch-hunting every little twat on Youtube that tells someone to kill themself? Come the fuck on, people. This shit is laughable. It's like you're trying to be as childish as possible.
/r/MensRights22/01/19 11:22 PM
1

Someone thoughtlessly makes a shitty remark online(like basically anyone during a bad day of meaningless internet bullshit.) Let's even this out by literally trying to ruin their life! For fuck's sake.
/r/MensRights22/01/19 11:18 PM
1

Yeah, but we should also consider all the women who engineered and controlled the Titanic during its exciting first voyage.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 10:40 AM
1

You’re generalizing women. Yeah. That's why I said: a mirror into the negative general traits of women. How is it anymore misogynistic to point out generalizations about women as it is to fear male rapists? Men are occasionally harmful, and it's enough of a trend that people demonize men generally over those ideas. I don't walk around on dark streets in a ghetto because I know I might get robbed or killed, but suddenly turn the idea into a matter of rape against women and it becomes a "misogynis…
/r/MensRights12/01/19 09:56 AM
31

Any privileges men possess have been allowed by women for their own benefit. Men win at capitalism because we're naturally competitive and money is a factor in courtship that men still must display or they're at a massive competitive disadvantage. Generally, women need to see resources and power she can exploit(male objectification) or she doesn't see value in him. And ironically, women are such absolute and unconditional "victims" that even the objectification of men is twisted into a "misogyni…
/r/MensRights11/01/19 07:45 PM
9

Considering the logic that a man can be raped by a woman as a matter of equality, I'd be interested to know how "I would split her in half!!" would sound for a male writer to direct toward a female like that. It's funny that it's just never possibly sexual harassment for a woman to say anything overtly sexual like this. Not that it would be sexual harassment to say something in an article, but for fuck's sake imagine how MSM/women/feminists/etc. would see a mainstream website/magazine that had m…
/r/MensRights05/01/19 03:19 AM
1

No one needs to be a villain. It's a matter of balance. Balancing income of wealthy people with poor people is essentially about considering what should be seen as passive income and taxing it. A CEO making 400x average employee wage is irrationally. No human could work 400x a full-time employee. We should see those things as kinks in the system. It sounds reasonable to think a CEO might work 10x an average employee. If we followed that attitude across society, we'd have a functional economy and…
/r/MensRights03/01/19 11:27 PM
1

Last I heard, poverty wasn't a struggle exclusive to blacks. Being a widely hated minority is the more exclusive part to blacks. The minute you stop turning something suffered from people universally into a form of oppression Olympics Yeah, of course. I'm no opposition here. As long as you're agreeing that you support the guy that's pretty much unconditionally pro-labor. If your idea of solving poverty involves "trickling wealth down" instead of forcing a fuckload down so it can inevitably trick…
/r/MensRights03/01/19 08:56 PM
1

He never used the word "really." Oh yeah, glanced back on it and you're right. My comment was about the very clearly implied "really" going along with what he said. It was his way of exaggerating to express a more extreme concept than the average white American could easily understand. I suppose you're having an easy time dismissing that thought, though. Jeez, I'm in Men's Rights. Now that I mention it, maybe I should start thinking more about the difficulties average women face instead of being…
/r/MensRights03/01/19 08:35 PM
1

His "really" was implying being poor and black is much worse. Get over yourself. I get that you've probably got a hard-on for some anti-labor sort of bootstraps bullshit, but your argument is on par with CTR or Shareblue shills.
/r/MensRights03/01/19 07:11 PM
2

And suddenly any sex-related accusation against the DNC's chosen pawn would be lightly popped around by the MSM and called a conspiracy theory while they sow seeds of doubt about it being Russian or GOP shills. I can call all this shit perfectly. They're that easy to read.
/r/MensRights03/01/19 07:07 PM
0

I'm far Left, fully empathetic about gender dysphoria, and think you sound like an idiot, but my mind immediately jumped to this thought when I saw the post. "If I had to deal with discrimination as a woman for most of my life, you're damn right I feel entitled to be here."
/r/MensRights02/01/19 09:52 AM
2

Yep. Feminism was a valid concept in the past, but now it's treated as an unconditional and perpetual effort. I guarantee it's specifically in large part because it's been co-opted by the established oligarchs/capitalists who know it can be used to divide and exploit us in endless ways. Take Bernie Sanders as an example. He was an actual voice of pro-labor reason for the first time in a long time that almost got mainstream attention if they would've fucking given him any respect or time of the d…
/r/MensRights31/12/18 10:21 AM
5

I was actually thinking about this earlier. I can't believe I got into it at all. Makes me feel dirty. All the stupid narcissism that happens through that and Instagram... I got off Facebook to get away from bullshit like that, and now I've gotta deal with my new Snapchat use. Snapchat is just straight up trashy. Everything about using it.
/r/MensRights31/12/18 01:17 AM
2

being removed because of one out of line member. So you're telling me they can just pull an "agent provocateur" and get any sub banned as well as build up an ideology associated with the group thanks to that outlier. Well, I mean, that's literally what happens all around us all day long with the divisive media in charge of all our propaganda, but it always ends up the same way when capitalism controls anything that gains popularity. People will always control the narrative and keep people divide…
/r/MensRights31/12/18 01:12 AM
2

ONLY 1.5 YEARS? What the fuck? Men would get 50 years mininum. The prison-time gap is real.
/r/MensRights31/12/18 01:07 AM
4

Women are too afraid to apply because of rape culture. Wouldn't want to be surrounded by a bunch of big strong men. And black men are too afraid to apply because they might get shot when someone sees them breaking into their home, even if it's burning. Mexicans wouldn't want to apply because they would need their green card. All very obvious situations, really.
/r/MensRights22/12/18 11:07 PM
12

Maybe we can make female versions of tools and suits that can cater to their delicate nature.
/r/MensRights22/12/18 10:55 PM
19

Ah, yes. Being kept on a leash. That's what the last two young girls I dated pulled. It's getting more and more popular among the Post-Malonnials.
/r/MGTOW18/12/18 06:12 PM
4

Oo, yeah, gotta call 'phrasing' on that one.
/r/MensRights13/12/18 01:34 AM
9

Dominated by more than half? What a crazy turn of events.
/r/MensRights11/12/18 03:33 PM
-1

Shame and attacks are never a good thing unless you swiftly eliminate the enemy without anyone else getting wind of it. By shaming incels, we're only adding fuel to their fire. We're gaining nothing by putting ourselves on a pedestal when they're already rebels who admit they're on the ground.
/r/MensRights27/11/18 06:57 PM
124

Yeah, lemme just reverse genders annnd, holy shit! That's disgusting and degrading misogyny! Thankfully that man was fired and imprisoned for assault yesterday.
/r/MensRights27/11/18 04:38 PM
20

I'm like 90% sure it's a shill effort to incite more internal rebel groups that will grow and spread through the process. Just look at that asshat BrazilianSigma in /r/IncelTears. Creating a whole new term to mock men in sad states is pretty disturbing. They might be hostile and negative, but they're openly accepting their sad status. You don't help people in a rebellious state by demonizing them further. I swear... It's like the idiots all over this site forget bullying is what causes that weir…
/r/MensRights27/11/18 04:30 PM
19

This is just our abuse reparations. It'll make things equal after a while. /sarcasm
/r/MensRights27/11/18 04:21 PM
30

I read the title and swore it said a guy was punished for putting a woman co-worker's panties in his mouth. Then all I was seeing was bullying and harassment toward him. I was waiting for the twist that might be about him getting pissed off and doing something stupid. If he had done that intentionally, imagine how fast she could have him gone.
/r/MensRights27/11/18 04:19 PM
1

What if the final cause is the men women select for? Do we put women in hypergamy conversion therapy?
/r/MensRights25/11/18 11:33 AM
12

Maybe a big factor is that women are hypergamous and select for men who make more money at their job than they do, thus making it more sensible that the woman stay home. She could always date men who make less money. Did the chicken or the egg come first? Either one, but I bet the "gatekeeper" has a solid start in there.
/r/MensRights25/11/18 11:28 AM
3

What else could you expect when men are always predators and women are always victims? Look at male victims or female predators and you'll usually see that pretty clearly.
/r/MensRights23/11/18 09:04 AM
1

Hence my reason for just wanting to add more background to the idea. If we sit around and pull out all those typical adages about how "boys will be boys" or how "all women are crazy," or whatever else, we're just circlejerking without real discussion. I think it's pretty important to specify exactly why we believe a given generalization has truth to it. I constantly argue about trending traits that causing recurring issues in social situations. That's extremely important, but there needs to be a…
/r/MensRights20/11/18 02:58 PM
1

So he generalized the small group as opposed to the whole group. So he's pointing out a trait that he has noticed and you hate that? Context matters. Pull some meta into it. We're in a "MensRights" subreddit. Claiming "some lesbians openly hate men" is obvious. Some people always do any given thing. When someone takes the time to highlight the idea by stating and upvoting it in this sub, there's an added aura of hostility and/or reproach. That's fine and dandy when true, but generalizations of t…
/r/MensRights20/11/18 01:48 PM
3

Actually, that's a generalization of some lesbians, and my whole point was agreement with his statement, so I don't get the backlash.
/r/MensRights20/11/18 11:13 AM
75

Reminds me of Hillary a little bit. Hugely popular with soccer mom types, but also clearly so fake that it's amazing anyone falls for it.
/r/MensRights19/11/18 08:21 PM
-11

My sister is a lesbian, and I hate generalizations like this. They're generally wrong or require a fuckload more nuance than most people are willing to hold in mind. That said, I think a lot of lesbians would absolutely seem like they hate men just because men and women generally don't give a fuck about males. We're the disposable sex, so for a lesbian with sexual detachment from men, we'd only be seen as worthless competition. Gay guys have their own little world, but they're also usually cool …
/r/MensRights19/11/18 08:19 PM
1

Hey, cancer isn't all bad. My wife had it and found her reaction was not too uncommon, it woke her up. Some people say cancer is the best thing that ever happened to them Well, I was pretty much hoping I got cancer for a while. Now that my life has gotten a bit better, I'm afraid I might've succeeded in my hope. It's whatever, though.
/r/MensRights17/11/18 02:12 PM
1

That is not to say the pedo's are correct that the damage would not happen if it were legally and socially accepted. Inappropriate guilt and feelings of worthlessness are extremely common consequences of sexual abuse, and if the victim "consented" and enjoyed it that tends to make the damage much more severe. This is an incredibly complex concept, but I'm considering the perspective of society as a whole. I remember being a kid and laughing like crazy about random thoughts like "Chester the Mole…
/r/MensRights17/11/18 10:28 AM
2

Sympathy, as I said, is masturbatory. It's an expression of emotions that is self-serving. If you cry over someone's pain, you're selfishly indulging in your feelings of empathy to the point of applying the pain to your own life. Empathy is how to be proactive, but tainting it to become sympathy is where it can be useless. If I empathize with someone, I can still listen in a heartfelt way without indulging in their pain, particularly if what I'm sensing is that they just need someone to listen. …
/r/MensRights16/11/18 09:29 AM
2

Absolutely. That's what I'm getting at. It annoys me that I think you could still be labeled "rape apologist" for saying that, but I could also be labeled a "molestation apologist" with what I said. Except I'm just thinking about the results. Yeah, we want to punish people for what they do wrong, but when we demonize them and act like they're the worst monsters in existence, I think that reflects straight back onto their victims in the worst ways possible. That's one of the big things that makes…
/r/MensRights16/11/18 08:44 AM
0

Oh nO mUH cHoIR GraDes WhaT evEr wILl i dO??
/r/MensRights16/11/18 12:28 AM
21

It would probably just say "drugged" since its a scarier term.
/r/MensRights16/11/18 12:24 AM
5

You're pretty much definitely being a rape apologist, but from a psychological perspective it's completely logical. I've thought about the way we discuss children being molested and child molesters... When we act like child molesters are the most evil and destructive predators imaginable, as if they're far worse than even murderers, there's no fucking way that doesn't attach to an abused kid's mind eventually. I think it's horrifying to think our culture is what exacerbates the harm of people li…
/r/MensRights16/11/18 12:21 AM
9

They should be barred from teaching but that's it. That's fair to me.
/r/MensRights16/11/18 12:09 AM
1

Yeah, I'm pretty sure she had one abortion already and was recently afraid she got pregnant. The one day I talked to her, she was going on about how her sister said she better abort it and how she definitely agreed. Gotta say, that's one of the smartest things I've heard her say(for whatever kid's sake,) but I'm afraid she'd find some random easy idiot and decide to follow through. She's only 21, too.
/r/MensRights13/11/18 05:55 AM
5

My friend pretty much said the same thing, and I've heard a couple people say similar things. I never wanted anything bad to fall on her, but she's just a harmful person. I wouldn't be surprised if she does end up getting seriously hurt because of how she makes a person feel. I had every desire to have a simple and loving relationship, but she made me feel like a monster over and over for completely bullshit reasons. Like I showed up at a bar when she didn't want me there. We were fucked dating …
/r/MensRights12/11/18 07:58 AM
6

Regardless of the likelihood of anything, the thought of giving someone the benefit of the doubt that could destroy someone's life is incredibly frightening. Even if we're not outright talking about false accusation, sexuality can involve a lot of nuances. If a girl is drunk, like my ex was with that guy, that could technically be considered rape... Except she would get drunk every single night. And aside from that, I think she wanted someone to "rape" her. How fucked up does that sound? Incredi…
/r/MensRights12/11/18 07:51 AM
7

Yeah, that's the funny thing about it. When I first dated her, before all of this, she said she'd just gotten a restraining order against her ex because he was abusive. I hated the guy because of that, but now I realize they were absolutely abusing each other(probably because she got him normalized to the process of hurting her since she would constantly beg for it during sex.) And since I know she lies and cheats on everyone all the time, that was also another big thing she denied to me. When I…
/r/MensRights12/11/18 06:58 AM
4

It's not a simple situation whatsoever.
/r/MensRights12/11/18 06:46 AM
19

Rape is also enough of a psychological harm that it's obvious why a lot of people wouldn't immediately say something about it. I just think it's a complex and fucked up situation all around. I've dated a girl recently who essentially defamed me to so many people over some nonsense that happened between us, and I later found out she hinted to another guy that he technically raped her because they had sex while she was drunk. I think she undoubtedly cheated when that occurred, and that was her way…
/r/MensRights12/11/18 06:11 AM
2

For evil to win, it only requires good men to do nothing.
/r/MensRights10/11/18 09:33 AM
1

Tbh, I feel like I'd be willing to risk some bullshit in order to save someone.
/r/MensRights10/11/18 01:57 AM
1

My point is that there's biologically ingrained validity to a lot of traditionalistic approaches to society. I believe the reason so many men are "toxic" today is because we're experiencing the dysphoria of testosterone combined with a society that no longer provides us with feelings of power. Under capitalism, men basically need to get a fair wage and reasonable amount of time off. If they don't, they're spending 50+ hours a week slaving for some company that doesn't give a shit about them, or …
/r/MensRights10/11/18 01:10 AM
0

I'd be pretty okay with men being treated like shit like normal, as long as we aren't being treated like worthless incel rapist monsters simultaneously.
/r/MensRights09/11/18 12:57 PM
2

Culture is imprecise and not at all tailored to survival. Genocides, plagues, a lot of that is the fault of culture Okay, so genocides, plagues, etc., are factors in this scenario of survival? Interesting. So you're saying our cultures are a product of a great deal of threats. I agree. We obviously wouldn't be here if our cultures were too flawed for any of the variables you mentioned.
/r/MensRights09/11/18 12:55 PM
-8

Who was the woman that was shooting people? I don't know what story we're talking about, but I'm gonna guess it was a toxic male. We need to focus on feminism though(/sarcasm,) because that'll stop these men from nihilistic self-destruction.
/r/MensRights09/11/18 02:30 AM
44

It's almost like cultures are based on the logic that allowed us to survive and reproduce for aeons.
/r/MensRights09/11/18 02:25 AM
2

I don't believe the solution would be easy to devise, but that doesn't make it impossible(as many people seem to assert.) As it stands now, people seem to see capitalism as "freedom," like it's the logical method of natural selection that automatically has some sort of meritocratic basis. I'm sure you and I already agree that's an illusion, but I realize this system has a meta rule-set that creates that illusion of fairness. Somehow, it's so "natural" to us(and our life of training to the idea o…
/r/MensRights08/11/18 09:58 PM
2

I just see capitalism and competitiveness as being inherently masculine, and the nature of communism and inherent value as being the feminine side of the equation. I happen to believe we can retain the competitive values of masculinity under a communistic system in a way that would allow us to be freed from the constraints of the psychosexual dynamic. Men are overvalued for our productivity, while women are overvalued for their youth/objectivity and capacity to be fucked. If we want to escape th…
/r/MensRights08/11/18 10:00 AM
3

I would give up my seat for a woman. That's my point. The absurdity is that we're seeing these obvious trends that favor women while we still retain the mindset that women are always the abused and exploited sex. Why are women always seen as victims when they have so many different types of natural privilege? Women evolved to be seen as the victims, and so much of modern "feminism" is treating women like that's some sort of new concept. We don't need the label of "feminism" to push equal rights.…
/r/MensRights08/11/18 08:43 AM
8

Where being nice to a woman for any reason is evil because women are evil. I like how this is what you pick up from a situation where a woman would generally never stand up for a man unless there was an obvious reason to do so. Why is "being nice" coerced onto men when women have no such expectations? Doesn't that seem odd? Doesn't it seem like the sexes are almost different in certain ways according to the psychosexual dynamic between men and women?
/r/MensRights08/11/18 02:34 AM
1

Just reading all the stupidity going on over there and now being able to point out how retarded they were was pissing me off Pretty much exactly the ridiculousness we're going to face. I guarantee I disagree with most of the people in this sub about so many things, but I also disagree with everyone everywhere about a fuckload of things. I like to consider both sides of every balance, but the illogical reality is that every Yin/Yang argument has the majority of people yelling either White or Blac…
/r/MensRights06/11/18 11:47 PM
14

Yeah, but I tend to unsubscribe and distance myself from subs that ban me since I can't respond to anything. Kind of like what I just did with /r/news after they accused me of being an incel and banned me for defending males in positions of frustrated weakness. Makes perfect sense. They're not allowed to be weak and I'm not even allowed to consider an alternative line of thinking without being considered an abusive misogynist. This site is fucking cancerous garbage that's going to kill itself un…
/r/MensRights06/11/18 09:16 AM
6

Rejection sucks. You know what I thought about the other day, though? Rejecting sucks. I would hate to reject people constantly after overt attempts to ask me out. As much as rejection sucks, I'd probably rather stay on this side...... Well, if I wasn't rejected so often.
/r/MensRights03/11/18 07:02 PM
23

This was my ex. Since I never pushed my limits into scary areas, she abused me and made me feel like a monster. What I was apparently expected to do was rape her and push her away so she could enjoy her masochistic feelings of worthlessness. Turns out my respect and care was somehow twisted into some sort of poison for her that she couldn't handle in her state of pure self-hatred.
/r/MensRights03/11/18 06:58 PM
3

This was my ex. She'd get wasted every single night and I had problems with her making accusations about me. Later I met another guy she "dated" recently who was ready to beat the fuck out of me. We talked and I found out she was basically sort of implying he raped her too. Then I talked with her ex of 5 years who explained this is what she does to guys constantly. All to manipulate them and get us defending her and fighting amongst ourselves. It's insane what someone with a vagina can get away …
/r/MensRights01/11/18 11:03 PM
2

Yeah, I was thinking this. I bet they get a lot of responses like that. Difference being, they get dozens/hundreds of more messages than the average guy. A few judgmental ones would be wedged among hundreds of "what's up"s and "hey"s, and other nonsense chatter.
/r/MensRights27/10/18 03:06 PM
15

Whoa... I hadn't actually thought of that one. I've seen a lot of girls saying "no black guys" and even "no white guys" rarely. Can't imagine a guy saying either of those discriminative statements without it making every chick hate him. Hmph... I like blaming women for men's problems and men for women's problems every chance I get, though, so I'll blame this on us men for not being more offended and apprehensive about openly being horrible people. If a thousand thirsty dudes weren't messaging th…
/r/MensRights26/10/18 11:00 PM
3

Betwixt the butt loaves.
/r/MensRights24/10/18 03:14 PM
2

Same timezone. Yep, I, too, am an alcoholic with no problem day drinking much of the time. Too bad I ran out of my ol' bottle of fuel.
/r/MensRights23/10/18 08:16 PM
5

Warning: The following may be seen as objectifying and degrading for both males and females. It's not about failure to get rich. It's about the psychosexual dynamic. Men are seen as more valuable when they have more money or find their way into a job that gives them more power/money. Those are things women want in men, therefore it makes men happy and validated to achieve those goals. On the other hand, women are directly valued much more highly by their produced nuclear family and beyond. That'…
/r/MensRights23/10/18 08:05 PM
3

Beer?
/r/MensRights23/10/18 07:33 PM
1

Nor is your feminist agenda of disparaging MRA's. Hah. Funny. I can genuinely avoid any and all biased designations with my point and still be attached to the enemy team somehow. If you increase wages and decrease hours worked, who is going to foot the bill for the now higher priced goods? More time to spend money means more money will be spent. It's why McDonald's unions in Denmark can ensure $21/hr to their employees with the food being barely more expensive. Employees would get a bigger cut o…
/r/MensRights23/10/18 03:49 PM
3

I'm trying to focus my life around less time thinking and more time drinking, but I'll consider your idea.
/r/MensRights23/10/18 02:51 PM
5

I know how everyone loves equality among feminists and MRAs. How can we actually achieve the obvious goal of increasing female suicides to the male point? Women don't care as much about winning at capitalism, so the decline of capitalism is mainly just affecting men. If I'm right, men are objectified primarily for their labor, while women are objectified more inherently for their youthfulness and reproductive ability. That would mean we should maybe make it so women are less attractive and much …
/r/MensRights23/10/18 11:53 AM
1

I don't even know what I'm supposed to say to this. Here's me talking shit about feminism: https://np.reddit.com/r/nashville/comments/9mae5w/taylor_swift_endorses_tn_democratic_candidates/e7z5il1/ Am I on your team, or their team or what? Which flag does everyone want to give me? I was also making some long rants defending transgendered people the other day, too. So if you're an attack helicopter joker, I'm probably the other team. I also defend gun rights though, because it doesn't fucking matt…
/r/MensRights21/10/18 06:56 PM
-14

That doesn't make this woman a feminist. Anyone can say they like people being emotional. This is just making me realize how fucking stupid it is that society is being pitted against itself over ideologies. Even if this woman is a feminist, she could also just be a stupid person. That means we'd be judging a full ideology by one anecdotal example of a person. The same way a single racist/sexist/homophobic MRA commenter gets treated by outsiders like the purest voice of MRAs, then somehow people …
/r/MensRights21/10/18 06:25 PM
-58

I see no feminist designation there. Silly to hand people flags like that.
/r/MensRights21/10/18 04:43 PM
-1

How many necessary businesses are actually struggling with profits?
/r/MensRights11/10/18 03:22 PM
12

Aren't males charged more for car insurance? If so, isn't that also sexual discrimination? I mean, capitalistic exploitation is the American doctrine, but still.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 03:19 PM
1

Exactly. We're fucking humans. No sense in acting like gender matters when the problem is abuse.
/r/MensRights05/10/18 06:38 PM
12

Men being abused, devalued, and demonized is something everyone should be against. This is modern reality, and I'm fully against it as a Left-winger.
/r/MensRights29/09/18 11:33 PM
8

Now that would actually be feminism that could be appreciated. Supporting the use of femininity. Ironically, 90% of the time feminism seems to be "empowering" women to just be toxically "masculine."
/r/MensRights24/09/18 11:42 AM
16

Well, thankfully, we have those higher suicide rates we can always use to our advantage.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 09:58 PM
1

https://imgur.com/8rdFewM.gifv
/r/MensRights19/09/18 09:51 PM
13

https://i.imgur.com/9NS7XYo.png
/r/MensRights17/09/18 11:36 AM
12

This would be like a doctor mutilating the penis of a minor and then being allowed to keep his licence to practice. To be fair, mutilating the penis of an infant should actually be punished much worse than consensual sexual activities with someone that's old enough to have sexual desires.
/r/MensRights16/09/18 09:09 AM
3

Yeah, but you should already know that. Didn't your parents raise you right? /sarcasm
/r/MensRights27/08/18 10:26 AM
8

Brilliant but ignores the fact that in the US the direct victims of most rapes are men. It also ignores that dead victims aren't really around to lament themselves, tbh, but generally fuck Hillary though. She can go wipe off a few buttery males with a cloth.
/r/MensRights23/08/18 08:22 AM
2

Yeah, except it wasn't technically sarcasm. The tone was sarcastic, but the statement itself wasn't. All the guy needs to do is listen to the pseudoscientific emotional backstory and maybe he'd see sense in the other side.
/r/MensRights22/08/18 11:33 AM
2

Probably wasn't a surgery. The primary thing about transitioning is the hormones. Those will change a person's perspective regardless of gender dysphoria.
/r/MensRights21/08/18 08:10 PM
45

You're just not willing to listen to the pseudoscientific emotional backstory behind reality. /joke
/r/MensRights21/08/18 08:07 PM
4

Tbh, I think abortions are an expense we should all be gladly willing to pay. Probably one of the best bangs for the buck possible for preventing massive criminal burdens on society because of irresponsible parents.
/r/MensRights20/08/18 01:38 PM
11

I'm very far Left in most of my values, but I think JP is a great voice for logic and truth in areas that are normally ignored by the Left. Of course, I believe both halves tend to have glaring areas of ignorance.
/r/MensRights14/08/18 08:17 AM
6

Feels like I'm listening to Jordan Peterson over here.
/r/MensRights14/08/18 07:52 AM
1

I’m in a LTR with a girl 16 years my junior. I'm gonna be 31 in a few month. Was just dating a girl who recently turned 21(that ended,) went out with a 23yo and thought I was moving up(ghosted,) and went to the bar the other day to have a woman call me over to say her daughter thinks I'm attractive. The absolute prettiest girl I can imagine was sitting there with her friends, then I find out she's with her fraternal twin and they were celebrating their 21st birthday. Somehow, I'm stuck on these …
/r/TheRedPill03/08/18 03:53 PM
8

Don't be a dad, be a chad. I've gotten called "daddy" by two girls in the last month. Partly because I play a lot of things safe. Not all things, but still. Never have I heard something more apt. Being too protective and fatherly gets oppressive and boring. My only saving grace has been my unstable side that keeps me chasing addictions and passion, otherwise I'd be wayyy too safe. I do need to take a break on a lot of things though. Actual adventures can replace a lot of the indulgent bullshit I…
/r/TheRedPill03/08/18 06:48 AM
27

It's objectification, just like the horrible objectification women feel as the primary victims of war when their husbands are killed.
/r/MensRights20/06/18 07:22 PM
2

Maybe the issue is a matter of priorities. Why the fuck aren't we already using taxes to provide people with all their basic needs? Making money should get you preferences and higher quality entertainment, not basic necessities for a meager life. Title is such kneejerk shit that I wouldn't even give the site the respect of being opened with an ad blocker.
/r/MensRights19/06/18 03:12 PM
0

I wasn't saying I accept that statement, just that it's difficult on both sides. A situation where evidence is often completely limited to individual experiences is frighteningly difficult to judge.
/r/MensRights17/06/18 07:06 PM
5

Let's not exclude the the other side of the coin. Rape is a frightening idea, and it's also frightening how difficult it would be to prove. It's an all-around scary situation for people involved.
/r/MensRights17/06/18 03:54 PM
2

If being in prison and the sex offender list does not get them to think twice, why would the risk of losing their job do that? I'm not saying the incentive would be any stronger. I'm just saying all the effort they put into their career or leadership position would be ended. If we're going to punish the older person, why not also punish the younger person? There's no logic in that idea, because there's not necessarily anyone being harmed. Might as well put the student/whatever in a closed peer-b…
/r/MensRights31/05/18 01:11 PM
13

I'm also a disgusting sick fuck for thinking men deserve the same compassionate stance as women, rather than trying to enforce harsher sex laws on people. If an adolescent gets involved in a sexual situation with an adult, the only real "evil" is a "power imbalance," but since most adults(in my humble opinion) are as retarded as children, I have a hard time understanding why people deserve to be imprisoned for something that's otherwise consensual. I mean, call me crazy, but I think young adults…
/r/MensRights31/05/18 02:10 AM
11

The trans movement mos def needs a reality check. We should not be supporting mental illness. Funny. I came here to say how this clearly solidifies the reality that there are many dimensions of brain variation that trans people can be physically experiencing, therefore you're ignoring basic physical reality that differs between different people.
/r/MensRights24/05/18 05:58 PM
8

"Black guy steal your TV? Come inside and buy a new one!" God damn it, it was a white guy. Now where the hell am I gonna buy a new TV?
/r/MensRights24/05/18 03:10 AM
2

Teach me of your ways, oh sensei. Kind of not even kidding.
/r/MensRights11/05/18 08:07 PM
26

I dress nice and do my hair so I don't look like a fucking slob out in public. It's called having self respect. And men dominate capitalism because they just happen to like the feeling of being productive and powerful. Maybe the aeons of evolution happened to make us do certain things instinctually because it naturally increases our sexual value. Basically every girl I've dated has said she "just wants to feel attractive for herself" as she puts on her push-up bra, gets her eyebrows "on fleek" t…
/r/MensRights11/05/18 01:57 PM
41

I think it's because I started by envisioning a gay guy, so the "newsflash" thing comes off with a flamboyant vibe.
/r/MensRights11/05/18 01:49 PM
1

=Our=Girl=>
/r/MensRights10/05/18 11:17 AM
15

Reminds me of the lesser known documentary by the name of "The Green Mile."
/r/MensRights10/05/18 11:15 AM
0

That's why we also need to make a government program that functions without human involvement. We could already be actively creating programs to make government systems obsolete. Authoritarianism is the problem, and it will always be the result of empowering individuals. Capitalism is just inverted authoritarianism in the way it coerces people into an increasingly unfair system for the sake of even basic needs.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 01:41 AM
1

Aye aye, captain.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 01:36 AM
1

I actually agree in many ways. I'm as far Left sexually as I am economically. I support the idea of open relationships for the simple fact that I despise lying and cheating. I value real connection, and I think that requires people to be honest about their desires, even when that conflicts with the natural structure of a monogamous relationship. When it comes to marriage, I think it's ideologically a matter of possession and objectification. I used to be a jealous and controlling person, and tha…
/r/MensRights01/05/18 11:09 PM
3

I think technology is an endless slope toward automation and AI. Things as simple as Uber and Airbnb show us that labor/needs can be socially organized basically just through apps that otherwise don't really have a product or service. I imagine things like that transitioning to even more disconnected programs that allow individuals to compete with each other directly. Of course, that's still all based around capitalism. I think automation and robotics that get created in ways that allow for many…
/r/MensRights01/05/18 10:11 PM
6

I fully agree with most of what's posted in that sub, and even consider myself a supporter of technologically anarchistic communism. Authoritarianism is the real cancer. I got banned for saying feminism is harmful to men under capitalism. I believe feminism should entirely be a good thing, but it's ultimately an attack on male psychosexual value as long as we're being commodified by our labor. I actually wonder how people in this sub would consider my point. Most of the people here openly attack…
/r/MensRights01/05/18 09:15 PM
12

Sorry, but I need to know how much money these men make before I can say if the lipstick was justified. If he was wearing an expensive watch, he was just asking for the lipstick to be flaunted.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 06:09 PM
-1

I'd like "Problems caused by capitalism" for $500.
/r/MensRights24/04/18 12:26 AM
1

I actually have hemophilia and I'm on disability right now. Yesterday morning(2am'ish) I spent around 4 hours nearly crying from the pain and completely unable to even consider sleeping because of a bleed in my elbow before my friend woke up and I realized he had some illegal opioids he could give me. I know society is pretty shit to people like me, and since I look way younger than I am and I don't appear to be disabled, people automatically assume I'm completely capable. I had some Norm MacDon…
/r/MensRights23/04/18 11:34 PM
1

Logically you are also saying it is dishonorable to want to live. If living comes at the expense of the person you love, then it would be honorable not to live. If we had some system set up to ensure a person has proper care and compassion regardless, then we wouldn't have to worry as much about the individualistic honor of such a tragic situation.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 10:17 PM
1

I think it would be honorable in that situation, but also a likely desire of many people who were left in that state.
/r/MensRights20/04/18 10:14 PM
1

Same. I don't blame anyone who could live like that, but I don't believe I could accept it. I've seen people in that state. A guy who looked to be about 40 and fairly attractive with a massive bedsore over his sacrum. He was riding his bicycle and got hit and lost movement and feeling in his legs, one arm, and most of the other. He seemed like he was floating through life in a state of detachment, and I found out his accident had only been maybe a year or so earlier. Much more recent than I'd im…
/r/MensRights20/04/18 07:48 PM
1

Try spending most of your life sitting around thinking and consuming and get back to me. I've done it for like ~8 years and I'd want to die if I was paralyzed simply because I'd be a thousand times slower at typing with my eyes/mouth and barely be able to play video games anymore. What value would there be if I knew I had no relationship potential and slim to no ability to create anything as I once could? For fuck's sake, I'm not even paralyzed and I want to die. Why isn't it understood that man…
/r/MensRights20/04/18 07:35 PM
1

I completely agree, but there are very different thresholds of suffering in this matter. I believe people should absolutely have the choice of assisted-suicide. That should be a given. Whether or not we recommend it, that's very different and very unlikely. A child has more plasticity in their development, yet there would still be points that I believe dysphoria would overtake their perceived quality of life. I'd guess adolescence and the knowledge of having an incredibly unlikely chance of love…
/r/MensRights20/04/18 07:24 PM
1

Hawking was a huge exception. I love thinking and consider myself hugely focused on intellectualism and ideas, but even I would be hopeless if I was forced into a state of only having that outlet. I can't imagine the average person being able to live life reasonably like that. I'd think the humane thing would be to present assisted suicide as an option. I mean, what kind of quality of life would be possible? I'd gladly take a long "vacation" period to attempt to enjoy a few things/places before …
/r/MensRights20/04/18 07:18 PM
1

And nothing truer was ever writ in stone. "Here lies AKnightAlone. Username checked out."
/r/MensRights20/04/18 07:10 PM
0

Or the guy could actually be selfless with some assisted suicide. I mean, could you really enjoy life when all you can do is think? Particularly when you know you're dragging down the quality of life of the person you supposedly love.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 08:06 PM
-31

Nah. Should just allow him assisted suicide. That's a point where he should know the humane and caring thing wouldn't involve dragging her into slavery. Saving a person's life isn't worth much if you ruin it anyway.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 08:01 PM
26

My therapist told me to be a douchebag. Figure it's probably what I need, but I apparently prefer self-destructing under the belief that I'm a good person.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 07:59 PM
3

Depends on whether you consider a person's identity as their mind or their body.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 03:22 PM
1

We arrest male victims of DV, we put more male victims of DV on trial than female offenders, but all you can see is some sort of patriarchal conspiracy against women. I'm not in the right state of mind for this shit right now, but what the fuck are you talking about? I just said male dominance and violence should be met with weakness and acceptance, and you're telling me I'm talking about a patriarchal conspiracy. The only patriarchal conspiracy is that men have sexual advantages when they move …
/r/MensRights29/03/18 12:02 AM
1

I'm saying any ideology results in a power struggle despite the validity of the initial frustrations that led to the formation of the ideology. Often, the Yin-Yang/polarity of these situations is based around a flawed formation of ideology based on valid frustrations, except the manifestation of that ideology is directly counter-intuitive to the supposed true aim of the group. This is perfectly applicable to all the examples I mentioned. The DEA has a "valid" reason to protect people, yet the tr…
/r/MensRights28/03/18 11:12 PM
-4

They only happen to be the leaders of the movement and all the major feminist organizations. And capitalist leaders coincidentally hate communism. Let's not pretend bias for power doesn't exist. The head of the DEA is legally required to say weed is useless and incredibly harmful as part of their job description. No one who spent their life gaining power would preach the ideology that would damage their power and get them ousted.
/r/MensRights28/03/18 04:49 PM
10

https://i.imgur.com/P2SakUh.png
/r/MensRights28/03/18 04:40 PM
-1

There's no reason for me to respond to someone who thinks linking an anti-intellectual sub is a reasonable response. If you decide to post me in /r/iamverysmart for saying this, at least don't block my username. There might be someone out there willing to talk about the polarity of existence.
/r/MensRights27/03/18 09:51 PM
-1

Life has a tendency to convince people of too many straight lines. In reality, the lines look much more like this.
/r/MensRights27/03/18 03:13 AM
-16

It's very rare that a woman could be enough of a cunt to compete with high-level male politicians/oligarchs/exploiters. Being a cunt comes naturally to men. Even Hillary wasn't enough of a cunt, which says a lot.
/r/MensRights27/03/18 01:38 AM
6

Seven piles of viscera with absolutely dreamy penises - Number 6 will have you swooning!
/r/MensRights12/02/18 02:30 AM
1

Hey, I don't even disagree. I just think the media is dominating our perception of these things. The media has the ability to essentially create our culture, purely through their concerted effort to focus on certain things. How absolutely amazing that they have such an easy time championing the support of "weak" females... Particularly when their support of females divides us at our core while attacking the capitalism-designated psychosexual value of me. More labor competition means men are gene…
/r/MensRights06/02/18 08:13 PM
1

You wouldn't have to go to work, though. It would be entirely up to you how you wanted to spend your time. You would be directly free to put your labor toward whatever you would think would be best for the world or for fun, or whatever else.
/r/MensRights06/02/18 07:31 PM
1

That's not even feminism. That's post-modernism driven off the road by idiots. Of course, "feminism" is also a term that's co-opted by the same divisive media that's pushing that type of post-modernism.
/r/MensRights06/02/18 03:45 PM
1

I've got a sincere question for you. I hear what you're saying, and I'd like to know your genuine feeling toward this idea. It's hypothetical, so I need you to suspend some disbelief and think within my example, but it shouldn't be too difficult. Alright. Imagine your quality of life is just the same as it is now. Imagine everyone around you has a similar quality of life. We've all got technology in our hands, thoughts of future tech in our minds, and all kinds of hopes for how things will progr…
/r/MensRights06/02/18 03:43 PM
3

In the absence of the SRY gene, the gonads will develop into ovaries, and the wolffian/mullerian ducts will develop into the genitals/reproductive organs of the female. So, the absence of something is what makes a female? Meaning males would also require the addition of something?
/r/MensRights06/02/18 02:55 PM
5

There's that male competitive side we all love. Go get 'em, big boy. You show your boss who's boss.
/r/MensRights06/02/18 03:27 AM
9

Yeah, but we're dudes. We're used to no one giving a fuck about our problems and we're trained to feel like "pussies" if we ask for improved conditions. Meanwhile, mainstream capitalism-controlled feminism does slim to nothing to help, as far the demonization of men for being weak. I've gotten banned from communist subs for saying feminism is harmful to men under capitalism, and I consider myself a communist... But I still believe I'm right. Under capitalism, female labor and legislated "wage eq…
/r/MensRights05/02/18 09:30 PM
-5

Interesting that "man" would be the default term considering women are the default biological sex.
/r/MensRights05/02/18 09:14 PM
-10

People still think this is funny?
/r/MensRights05/02/18 09:12 PM
0

You only use your toilet once or twice a day, but it's importance and value in one's life is not dictated by the frequency of its use compared to other items. Yeah, but the toilet is accepting the poop, much like a female body accepts semen. The real question here is why we're not valuing our poop more. Sure, the toilet might appear to be in the "degrading" position of intaking the poop, but why is the pooping considered "waste" production? Why not consider it a beautiful post-food production? O…
/r/MensRights02/02/18 05:27 AM
0

you see a bull's bollocks make the sperm needed to impregnate a cow, from which we can get valuable milk. So the value of the bull sperm is because rarely it is involved with a cow, which is inherently valuable for its milk and reproduction, while a bull is unnecessary aside from its sperm and only the sperm that gets into an egg. Any other sperm is just "jerking off." It's wasted. It's meaningless. It's equivalent to masculine nature where we're essentially demanded by society to be productive/…
/r/MensRights01/02/18 04:52 AM
1

Generally speaking, that's the primary moral point. It's a flawed system that's wide open for perpetual decline as the gravity of capitalistic power slowly gets latched to more and more established powers(and those latch together to become fewer and fewer established powers, edging closer and closer to total monopoly) so the accumulation of wealth ends up in a pinpoint of kings. Otherwise, I was just explaining aspects of how these things manifest among us as psychological woes due to the otherw…
/r/MensRights31/01/18 11:01 AM
0

Why, then, did males dominate capitalism? Why do females often leave complex and arduous jobs(despite their high skills and schooling investment,) when they see the option of joining the life of a more productive and financially successful partner?
/r/MensRights31/01/18 10:54 AM
-1

so much bollocks Ironic that this is exactly how sperm are formed. I guess you find it pretty easy to demonize the unit of masculine reproduction, but I suppose that's all well and good. Those units are assertive and dominant, aggressive, even, so it's totally valid to ideologically demonize them. They're designed to be opposed. I'd think of a comparison to female organs, but you'd just dismiss that, too. Hm... Ovary well, I'll do it. Ovaries are passive, much like puns. No one ever gives a fuck…
/r/MensRights31/01/18 10:50 AM
2

Yeah, at the very least, I think it's pretty hilarious to assume this kid wouldn't ask about something. We'd have this woman going on and on about how horrible Trump is, for plenty of fair reasons, and the kid would eventually say, "Mommy, why is the bad man president?" This is the type of thing people will post "/r/thathappened" over, and I'd be posting the sub I inspired "/r/maybeitdid." I don't fucking understand how people are so fucking stupid that they act like anything normal is some sort…
/r/MensRights31/01/18 10:43 AM
-11

This stuff gets really interesting when you fully consider and critique how capitalism is involved in these things. Capitalism is all about masculine nature. A "free market" and that type of individualism goes down to the sperm unit. Every one of them intends to win thoughtlessly. Men naturally dominate capitalism because it fits our natural productive striving, which is why men are "too powerful." Capitalism creates that reality, thus making it feel sensible to demonize men perpetually. For wom…
/r/MensRights30/01/18 06:37 PM
4

Without proclaiming objectification, it leaves women open to having to decline higher numbers of unwanted males/objects.
/r/MensRights30/01/18 06:00 PM
-15

Are most people generally stupid as kids? I feel like I was more likely to just have questions my parents couldn't answer.
/r/MensRights30/01/18 05:50 PM
6

Women aren't strong enough to handle the types of discrimination men face. It's all relative. Similar to how men aren't weak enough to get any additional help basically ever. This being on a direct sexual comparison level, of course. Men over women is always wrong, even when it's a situation that we'd otherwise say is based on "merit."
/r/MensRights05/01/18 12:53 PM
2

Women are in the more "passive" position of attraction. Men are generally in the inherently "predatory" position. The strange thing about being in the passive position is that I believe this leads to females not even realizing their basic feelings are evolved to attract mates. I've heard plenty of girls and plenty of girlfriends say "I'm not dressing up for guys, it's for myself." That is truly a passive state, which is also likely the most attractive thing to a male. Trying almost naturally add…
/r/MensRights15/12/17 12:42 AM
7

I think the solution is to end the toxic femininity that leads to women objectifying themselves by wearing makeup and doing their eyebrows so they look 16. That passive competition among females where the women with highest attractiveness select for dominant men is exactly why men compete to be socially dominant. The most attractive and sexually competitive women don't care for weak men. They want muscles, confidence, and/or a man who has women all around him to make him seem more valuable. In o…
/r/MensRights14/12/17 03:42 PM
1

(2/2) But above all, I commend your initiative to discuss these ideas, as discussion is absolute key to the advancement of ideas. Thanks. The feeling is shared. And since I just brought up the internet, I should mention that I think this is one tool no past communist society has held. I think it can allow, to some extent, for instantaneous calculation of demand. At least as far as quantity and resource use and all that. I could get online and click "paper towel roll" and that could send demand s…
/r/MensRights03/12/17 03:58 AM
1

(1/2) Capitalism does not empower masculinity. The nature of human existence "empowers masculinity", at least according to what you consider to be masculinity and empowerment. It the nature of humans that men tend to overwhelmingly be stronger and the with the ability to take leadership compared to women. I don't disagree with this. Capitalism just irrationally magnifies the balance. There's absolutely no reason why people need incentives of endlessly increasing lifetimes of power in order to do…
/r/MensRights03/12/17 03:58 AM
1

The idea that men's rights activist are bad stems from the idea that all men are the oppressor and all women are the victim. Here's how my already-held complex stance applies to this: Men are arguably oppressors under capitalism. Feminism is also inherently harmful to men under capitalism. Your view might deny that men are harmful in these certain ways, yet you ignore the fact that it's capitalism that's actually making men harmful. This is also why "Cultural Marxism" is harmful via feminism and…
/r/MensRights02/12/17 10:55 AM
1

Marxism had nothing to do with this.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 02:15 AM
2

Tbh, that guy's an idiot anyway.
/r/MensRights02/12/17 02:02 AM
1

without building a giant feminist straw man Did you just assume that straw's gender?
/r/MensRights14/11/17 09:58 AM
5

Bringing race into this just makes it a shitty argument. It specifically makes Men's Rights seem similar to snide support of "white pride" as a response to blacks showing pride in themselves. That's exactly why SJWs link MRAs to being harmful.
/r/MensRights14/11/17 09:22 AM
-1

Why do gifted and talented people need more power than others? They inherently have more power. They can use those things in any part of their life to experience benefit over others. They don't need thousands of lifetimes of power added onto that. Let them use their skills for programming robots and gardening, building, or whatever other hobbies and pursuits they might enjoy. Also, monarchies are the result of ideology working like capitalism to allow people to accumulate far too much power. Oh,…
/r/MensRights04/11/17 04:17 AM
-3

You're making claims that are incredibly likely to be encouraged by bias. Humans are animals, and animals have all survived because of competition. The illogical part is that we tie natural competition to ideology. Capitalism is nonsense. Without it, we would still compete, we just wouldn't create monarchies of ideological power by letting people compile thousands of lifetimes of power. Beside that, most humans are social creatures with a clear ability and desire to cooperate. The outlier sociop…
/r/MensRights04/11/17 03:12 AM
-3

Postmodernism is the rejection of reason. It embraces feeling over objectivity. It asserts that there can be no such thing as objective truth. It draws a lot from Marxism. Great intro, horrible finish. Marxism is the logical understanding of the inevitable flaws of capitalism. If you honestly think capitalism is end-game for the planet, you're just blatantly ignorant to the human element. That must be what you're deeming "feeling." Yes, clearly, human feelings are a factor in an equation of huma…
/r/MensRights04/11/17 01:49 AM
1

As it turns out, media propaganda has decided we're all true Scotsmen. Ironically, this somehow ensures we're all rigidly divided.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 07:08 PM
0

You are these people. You're closer through your hate.
/r/MensRights22/09/17 07:14 PM
-1

The idea of hell is an escape that allows your hatred to flow freely. Harmful people need help, and often far more than we're ever willing to give. And, of course, harmful people were often harmed as kids, themselves. More reason to avoid spreading or justifying hate. It scares people, trains more people to rebel and hate, and it spreads.
/r/MensRights22/09/17 08:09 AM
1

Alright, /u/bakedpotato486 said: Behind every great man is a great woman, and behind every bad woman is a bad man. That's obviously a statement mocking the apparent cultural attitude toward these issues. Similarly, I mockingly then sarcastically said: Because our patriarchy automatically asserts control over all female decisions. Amazing how absolutely lacking in control a necessary half of humanity could be. First sentence is continued mockery of attitudes. As if females fully lack personhood b…
/r/MensRights03/09/17 12:43 AM
2

Apparently I've gotta spell all this out for you kids, so I'll have to wait till I'm at a keyboard.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 11:07 PM
-5

One half of the equation for human existence can't possibly exist without control. The only thing giving off the illusion of patriarchy is that capitalism directly and disproportionately plays into the psychosexual strengths of males.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 08:45 AM
-9

Amazing how lacking in control a necessary half of humanity could be.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 05:37 AM
-13

Because our patriarchy automatically asserts control over all female decisions. Amazing how absolutely lacking in control a necessary half of humanity could be.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 03:54 AM
5

the Hippie Movement being funded and pushed by the Communists If that isn't some fucking bourgeoisie propaganda, I don't know what is.
/r/MensRights04/08/17 04:30 AM
1

I mostly agree, but the nature of the psychosexual dynamic is rigid. We can't stop people from being gay, and any sensible person will understand that. In very much the same way, we can't stop women from being attracted to powerful men. And we can't stop men from judging women for physical factors. With that in mind, I think the only possibility is to affect the system in which the patriarchy arises. Essentially, end capitalism; end the unnatural commodification of labor and male sexual value.
/r/MensRights10/07/17 01:20 AM
0

You're right about the logic, but I don't understand what part of that is oppression aside from how males get treated. Here's another factor of the polarity you aren't mentioning: Do women want to protect men as much as they want to protect women? No. Men are in more dangerous conditions across the board. Simultaneously, women will complain massively about anything that goes against fellow females. The truth of the matter is that men and women are naturally different in ways that can't be change…
/r/MensRights09/07/17 07:36 AM
1

Oh man. Quote just gave me chills. I was just searching the sub for Dark Triad and noticed this top one mentioned Jordan Peterson, who I just found two months ago or so. I've thought intensely about polarity of existence and the psychosexual dynamic. I've even been practicing Buddhism for the last month and a half, thinking about the Yin/Yang concept. Such a perfectly concise explanation of these things. It's essentially a type of fractal idea. In order to put nature under us, we have to underst…
/r/TheRedPill22/06/17 01:56 AM
1

Adults are dead leaves floating to the ground. Children are the green leaves budding that could use water. If you want to stop terrorism, you don't end it by fighting the drones that already exist. All you can do is stop future drones from forming. Probably also beneficial to stop fucking using robotic drones to bomb and murder people with full disregard of whether any innocents are around.
/r/MensRights07/06/17 11:18 PM
1

Men are the bigger fire (i.e. they are more dangerous) thus they will need more water (i.e. restrictions on immigration, civil liberties, basic human rights, etc.) to be rendered harmless. You're misunderstanding me. Men are the attackers here, right? When you attack men, you aren't using water on them. Attacking the attackers is using gasoline on them. It's fighting attacks with attacks, fire with fire, and that only perpetuates hate and anger. Water is what women are drowning in. If you want t…
/r/MensRights07/06/17 11:52 AM
1

And more importantly, if men are overwhelmingly the problem, shouldn't any effective solution treat men more harshly than women? Clearly, you're not very aware of how human nature finds balance in polarity. You're literally saying harmful men need to be punished more harshly. Problem: Fire burns. That's harmful. Your solution: Let's add gasoline to the fire so we can burn away the harmfulness.
/r/MensRights07/06/17 11:24 AM
2

A full patriarchal system that rewards men with virgins. Interestingly enough, it's very clear to me why this would be the reward. Realistically speaking, I see religion as a mechanism for metacognitive creatures to cope with the inevitable recoil that metacognition brings about. As animals that have the primary goal of survival, the knowledge that we will die demands us to create an answer for how we will still somehow "live." The thought of virgins as a reward would be the masculine desire for…
/r/MensRights07/06/17 11:14 AM
4

Societal issue mostly experienced by men = Toxic Masculinity. All men are collectively responsible and must address it. Societal issue mostly experienced by women = The Patriarchy. All men are collectively responsible for the patriarchy (and benefit from it) and must address it. Beautifully put. I think about this shit constantly, and this is a very clear aspect of the sexual dynamic that always empowers women in weakness and always demands strength of men while demonizing them for it. Actually …
/r/MensRights07/06/17 10:54 AM
1

One man's weird is another man's normal.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 11:42 AM
1

Yin and Yang symbiosis of all this shit. White with a black dot in it, and black with a white dot. If we want to do any sort of "social engineering" to change any of these things in a beneficial way, we have to be aware of all the variables in play. The reason women would have such a high sexual value and power would be just as much because of their nature as it is the nature of men toward women. I believe we've got this toxic masculinity that makes marriage seem logical even when most people de…
/r/MensRights05/06/17 10:25 AM
1

Well... I mean, part of my problem is not really ever fitting in with anyone's tribalistic teams. I'm here because I identify more with the MRA situation, but I have to consider myself a feminist because I do want everyone to be empowered in every way that's most beneficial. That's just my stance as a humanist, though. The biggest problems I see for men and women always seem to be derivatives of the imbalanced power manifestation in the psychosexual dynamic. What leads to imbalanced power? 1.) P…
/r/MensRights05/06/17 05:44 AM
1

Read my recent large comments on the psychosexual dynamic. I'm not even sure how sarcastic I'm being here.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 04:43 AM
1

I would say I'm a "feminist" in the sense of trying to balance the naturally arising psychosexual dynamic in the most healthy and empowering way for both parties rather than by punishing people for falsely perceived abuses.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 04:08 AM
7

Humorously, I seem to notice both sides tend to focus on a sort of ignorant reversal of what should be the true problem. It's like our thoughts naturally gravitate toward the knee-jerk chances to hate things rather than the logical chances to empower natural sexual imbalances in healthy and beneficial ways.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 03:57 AM
0

I'm pretty sure the guys didn't care. This is why we need to support feminist empowerment of women. A man should be able to run out on the field and grab females while they accept it as a simple compliment. Under this patriarchal system, women are so strongly objectified that it's somehow seen as "violating" and "dehumanizing" for a simple complimentary touch to occur. Female sexual value isn't tarnished just by a little promiscuity or groping.
/r/MensRights05/06/17 03:54 AM
2

If defending something makes me into that thing, then call me humanity. I'll appreciate that you've acknowledged my lack of hypocrisy in my full approach to humanism.
/r/MensRights22/05/17 01:51 PM
3

I'm referring to adolescents, or from the evolutionary standpoint: "Adults." I also believe the age of majority should be 12/13, and sexuality shouldn't be tied to degradation. Did you miss that part? There's nothing wrong with sexuality, and a person's worth shouldn't deteriorate because they want to indulge or simply want to feel close to someone else in that manner. Half the time, I would safely argue most flaws regarding sexual abuse or exploitation are products of society's disturbed perspe…
/r/MensRights22/05/17 12:42 PM
-2

This is what feminism should be about. Feminism seeks to solidify the already inherent worth of females. It should also be seeking to solidify the inherent worth of males. This article shows a display of natural compassion for a female who gave into natural sexual desires, which aren't inherently destructive to a person's worth. A man who similarly has consensual sexual relationships with multiple teen girls shouldn't be jailed for life and labeled a "pedophile," a term that implies the victim w…
/r/MensRights22/05/17 12:03 PM
66

Hardly counts as actionable advice. Speak for yourself, buddy. http://i.imgur.com/7gYI2WZ.jpg
/r/TheRedPill18/05/17 04:46 AM
2

I blame capitalism for making feminism a bad thing, actually.
/r/MensRights05/05/17 05:53 PM
1

I've found communism to be a more reasonable thought as I've realized many of the base factors of our societies are being ignored as variables in the equation. Schooling, for one immense thing, but to the point... The imbalance of monied incentive that happens under capitalism is based on the authoritarian training we've been brainwashed to respect. I believe a functional communist society would empower all people as individuals who have strength in their voice in everything they do. Each worker…
/r/MensRights05/05/17 05:27 PM
0

Hey, I support communism. Fuck the rich at their very core.
/r/MensRights05/05/17 03:59 PM
3

Or we should end the problems extending from feminism which led to a flooded labor market. In the past, there was no need for both parents to work. Feminism has been yet another excuse used by capitalists to twist society into their favor by lowering wages and expectations. We should be fighting for better labor laws, and better methods of social support.
/r/MensRights05/05/17 01:31 PM
6

Nah. That's the consent of it. If you want a child, you'd just have to find a host willing to give you one. Women are the means of reproduction, so you just have to look for a better "employer" if that one isn't giving you the right benefits.
/r/MensRights05/05/17 01:23 PM
0

I'll say it in any sub. I don't even like claiming to be a part of any group, however much I may agree with them. Groups just allow people to stereotype over bullshit anecdotes, which is exactly what you're saying. If people actually cared about the ideas over tribalism, half the problems we face would actually have obvious solutions.
/r/MensRights05/05/17 01:18 PM
6

It's being deflowered.
/r/MensRights05/05/17 12:45 AM
67

Ah, the ol' "no taxation without representation" technique.
/r/MensRights05/05/17 12:43 AM
195

Should be a decision for a male to opt out of a pregnancy at any point when the fetus can be aborted reasonably. If a female chooses to keep the baby, then the male isn't tied to child support. Otherwise, I don't think males should have any say over whether a female can or cannot abort. That's a human parasite in a female's body, and that's a personal decision whether or not she would care to add that life to existence.
/r/MensRights05/05/17 12:42 AM
1

Exactly my point. Mainstream feminist thought is always to strengthen women who want to be strengthened, while ignoring all the women who prefer weakness. It does nothing for the men who are demanded to be strong who would also like to be weak. There is the imbalance.
/r/MensRights14/04/17 08:28 PM
3

When men die: "53 [job types] die in freak accident." When women or children die: "53 [job types] and 12 women and children drown in freak accident." Why do women get compared to children? Also, let's fuck off with the bullshit feminism that screws over men. Fuck "empowering women" to be labeled under their jobs or whatever the fuck people will say. Here's the real question: Why don't men get the respect of being valued as much as children? Even as children, we don't get the respect to retain ou…
/r/MensRights14/04/17 06:10 AM
7

You could also fuck off a little bit and gain some tact.
/r/MensRights14/04/17 06:04 AM
0

This sounds like absolute paranoia to place this on "feminism." If there was any conspiracy, it would be the establishment "feminism" that's being enforced purely to divide us. Ultimately, a force from the oligarchs who seek to divide and exploit us. They benefit tremendously from keeping us divided over concrete facts of existence like our sexuality, and also in emasculating the side that would otherwise fight for ourselves if we weren't trained into fear and servitude.
/r/MensRights12/04/17 01:28 PM
1

This is someone in a position of professional responsibility who willfully, intentionally and knowingly abuses and takes advantage of a position of responsibility. And what about the opinion of the student? Have you asked them if they feel like their trust was abused? Have you respected their values? I can see how it doesn't appear valid with how things are today, but if that is largely an illusion that's normalized. There's no reason we should have to force young adults into feeling like their …
/r/MensRights24/03/17 10:51 AM
1

That's actually exactly how I explained it on Facebook one time when I made a post about transgender issues. Oh, found the post from January 2015: It's always funny to me how American Christian culture treats free will as paramount, but we also have absolutely no respect for anyone's free will unless they constrict their lives to the social norms that most of us are lucky to be directed toward naturally. Why does religion seem to manifest as absolutely nothing useful -- Oh, and then there's tons…
/r/MensRights23/03/17 09:28 PM
2

The concept being that if you treat something as a 'big bad', it become that culturally, if you treat something as an everyday part of human existence, it becomes much less scary and damaging. Yeah, that's pretty much what I said to the user who brought up the pedophile idea. Their tone, like so many others, was just frighteningly harsh and demonizing. Not only does that obviously attack the person who may have violated someone, as well as anyone who may feel desires to do so(thus ostracizing th…
/r/MensRights23/03/17 08:59 PM
1

Where do you get your statistics that "wealth and rebellion" create crime? Because last I checked, people steal because they're broke and use drugs to escape their misery, How is this not agreement with me? People being broke is a matter wealth. People being trapped in misery is a feeling usually based on social problems that lead into their criminal rebellion. The rebelliousness is their way of trying to find acceptance with their perceived "flawed" self. If people look down on me, my way of co…
/r/MensRights23/03/17 08:30 PM
1

I agree with everything you've brought up but the designation of feminism. I don't think it's necessary to label the group. Men are automatically just seen as the aggressors, and that's beyond any label of feminism. ...It's as if there's this clashing point formed in the capitalism of sexuality. Women have their sexual commodity, and men are the buyers who need to work like drones to achieve/secure that goal. When the commodity is too young, delicate, innocent, as is the genetic strength of femi…
/r/MensRights23/03/17 06:23 PM
3

It's that punishment mentality people have. I call it a reactionary perspective. When people assume punishment or disrespect is going to help people, they're drastically ignoring the nature of rebellious people. If you pressure someone who is already stubborn and "bad," and they're some repeat offender of some crime, is that pressure going to change them? I think it's only enforcement of their rebellion. Look at blacks. You see any thread with a black criminal, look at the bottom of it. I'm not …
/r/MensRights23/03/17 06:07 PM
2

This is all a part of the authoritarian training we receive through our lives. It's the exact concept I mention in a video I just linked to someone. You can speed it up to 1.5x, but I get into a very in-depth topic fairly quickly starting shortly after my introduction into it that starts at 26:53, in case the I link isn't automatic. Actually, that video only explains the problem, again. I think it's worth watching, but my solution would be the entire restructuring of our education system. School…
/r/MensRights23/03/17 05:53 PM
1

Anyone who accepts humans for their nature without shaming their crimes is embracing evil imo. I don't believe in evil. I believe that entire concept is a religious one that latched to most cultures. Evil is an oversimplification of harmful human actions and tendencies. Even someone who has an essential lust to murder is still a human. Their brain is objectively different, whether due to pure biology or environment, but it's still unavoidable that they're a part of us. Humans exist today because…
/r/MensRights23/03/17 04:44 PM
1

TBH bro it sounds like youre a pedophile sympathizer trying to rationalize your desires. First off, pedophilia is pretty much unrelated to what I'm saying. I'm absolutely against drugging children or putting them anywhere near a place where someone would intentionally force that on them or coerce them into that. Secondly, if you would call me a pedophile sympathizer for defending one, you can call me humanity. I am all humans. I would defend any person for anything, because humans are flawed. I …
/r/MensRights23/03/17 02:37 PM
3

12 year olds have very little ability to regulate their behavior and almost none to make sound decisions. That's why they cannot consent to sexual relationships. How many 12 year olds do you know who were raised as an adult and never told any comforting lies to retain their "innocence"? People love the idea of treating children like "wuvvy-duvvy witto kyooty pies." Look at everything we do. Nothing is natural, so it's senseless to think children need to be raised like they'll be broken if they l…
/r/MensRights23/03/17 01:35 PM
9

That's one aspect I actually ignored in this specific argument, but I've argued about that idea in the past. A guy I knew in high school actually ended up being a gym teacher, and this was probably when he was maybe 23-25. He was an attractive guy, so it was nowhere near strange for younger girls to be attracted to him. He got caught in a relationship with a 17 year old student, and the age factor is entirely legal here, which most people don't seem to even realize. I was on Facebook and saw fri…
/r/MensRights23/03/17 10:30 AM
28

Lemme share my final comprehensive comment from my apparently mentally ill defense of that guy in the thread the other day. I'd like to know if MRAs would similarly conclude I'm disturbed. Full comment to the end: Laws are the obvious decision, but they should only ever be based on humanism. That would be empathy and logic. That means understanding the human animal and treating harms as punishable only for their actual harm. Even then we have to question the value of different punishments with r…
/r/MensRights23/03/17 06:01 AM
1

Eh, I'm thinking it's more of Steve Buscemi + Glenn Danzig combo.
/r/MensRights23/03/17 05:51 AM
1

Maybe I'm not in here at the right times, but I never noticed a bias against the ACA. That would go along with my psycho-sexual economic theories, though.
/r/MensRights23/03/17 05:45 AM
2

Thanks, but I'd still rather just have these scars removed and the skin returned.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 12:33 PM
9

I've been cut for 7 years and have had plenty of sex both with and without foreskin. Yes, but have you ever had your undeveloped penis head torn apart and circumcised as an infant? The only real loss I think anyone should mourn is if they lost their frenulum due to circumcision. Oh yeah, lemme know how all that goes. People in America apparently didn't seem to realize that's a thing as far as babies are concerned, so I really don't have much of that left.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 11:42 AM
6

Maybe I am a little better. I've been taping the skin over for the last two years, so I've regained a bit of the sensitivity I lost, and I still plan on finishing restoring by constantly stretching the skin. If sensitivity means I'm better, than yeah, I'd be better. It's very noticeable if I try to walk around without being taped or covered now.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 11:39 AM
8

That's not a double thought. The way the skin grows back together and leaves the head fully exposed results in an abnormal sexual experience. Even women tend to end up with vaginal discomfort from the way the penis has too much unnatural friction, but maybe that's just me. Here's a great idea! Let's cut the genitals of all male babies, even if we don't know how they'll develop later in life whatsoever.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 11:35 AM
2

A scary thing for me to imagine is the parents who would change their mind about it between sons, then force it on their younger son just because they're too afraid to accept that they made a mistake that their older son may have to face. I'm abhorrently against circumcision, and I think each individual saved from the act is like saving a life. A sex life, really, but how many sex lives do we have? Only the one.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 11:13 AM
3

My genitals are mutilated because I lack my natural foreskin. That's a very simple fact. Instead of my natural sexual cover, I've got a scar and two very separated parts of skin that awkwardly grew together.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 11:10 AM
2

Could you tell exactly when that lack of reaction was from going into shock in their likely most sensory moments of life, when absolutely every little thing is being interpreted for them to build their basic sensory illusions upon?
/r/MensRights13/03/17 11:08 AM
1

Except a piercing doesn't remove 10+ inches of pleasure organ tissue. And removing wisdom teeth or tonsils doesn't remove 10+ inches of pleasure organ tissue.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 11:06 AM
9

Circumcision was originally started in America because a douchebag thought it would help reduce masturbation. Cutting off the foreskin removes the natural masturbation device on there, and it also exposes the penis so the skin keratinizes. They put vaseline on baby penises to ease them into the desensitization. Whatever you feel is less than what you would've felt if you had all your nerves.
/r/MensRights13/03/17 10:56 AM
13

no issues with insensitivity Slim to no chance. Circumcision even destroys people's capacity to control their orgasm, so if you're judging by how immediately you ejaculate, that's wrong. And you'd realize a portion of the sensitivity you lost if you started taping or restoring. I was taping for about 2 years, and if the tape ever came undone or I slipped out of it, I'd know it instantly. Somehow, I used to just rub around in my pants all day. No wonder I used to get uncomfortable erections while…
/r/MensRights13/03/17 10:52 AM
52

At that tier, women know how to capitalize on their resources.
/r/MensRights22/02/17 02:01 AM
12

It's okay. From his post history, he vapes. He can be trusted.
/r/MensRights15/02/17 03:10 PM
16

As I see it, and I believe this is quite plainly through realism, religion is a cultural OCD. It's often maladaptive toward other cultures and philosophical perspectives at the very root. It's a vicious circle of invalid questions and their answers to these problems that don't exist in the first place. This all manifests as compulsive actions through tradition, indoctrination, repetition, etc., and other ways to pacify internalized fears and doubts, just as OCD functions in the individual. Why i…
/r/MensRights06/02/17 10:39 AM
1

Doctors actually started this problem when I was an infant. Most in America wouldn't even understand what a normal body is like, so it would be hard to convey why I don't feel normal.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 07:56 PM
6

I was uncomfortable as a kid because of a hole like a piercing I have over the scar that's similar to a skin bridge. More recently, when I researched the information and realized it's generally just idiotic to cut the pleasure organ, considering I've also felt extremely desensitized which makes sense when the most touch sensitive parts are removed, even though they protected the head's sensitivity, too. Watching porn when I was younger, I also wondered why some guys had such "healthy" looking di…
/r/MensRights31/01/17 06:51 PM
3

Glad you're at least sensible enough not to force it on anyone else. Most people get a reactionary stance to force their standards on others. I personally hate that it was done to me, and I hate that people can argue about abortion back and forth while no one says anything about forcing this on males. If a baby not remembering the pain is an excuse, who the fuck gives a shit about an unborn fetus? The only other argument is about the potential of the fetus, but every unraped woman is potential f…
/r/MensRights31/01/17 06:23 PM
4

I feel pretty violated that I'm sexually exposed 100% of the time. I've been taping my skin over the head every single day for the last 2 years or so just to regain some sensitivity. I don't feel like I'm nearly as sensitive as I would've been without the damage or scarring, but if the tape comes undone in my pants even slightly for the head of my dick to touch cloth, I instantly notice it. I can't stop taping now, just because it instantly feels annoying, and if I wait long enough to dry out, t…
/r/MensRights31/01/17 06:19 PM
13

Did you make that brave choice at the age of majority in your country? If not, it's hard to not be proud of existing if you don't know the alternative.
/r/MensRights31/01/17 05:49 PM
1

You are comparing something that is biological to something that is a choice. Technically, I'd say biological extends to both scenarios. Humanity has adapted for men to be the productively ambitious drones, while women get to live peacefully in the societies we provide. Of course, this is also my determinism speaking. I don't believe in free will, even though this is a matter of culture and "choice." The choices are actually very limited when we've largely been pressured to be productive simply …
/r/MensRights31/12/16 03:35 AM
2

What if so many NEETs exist because men have reduced the demand for labor through technological innovation, too? It would actually be the sexist stereotype to act like all men are worthless unless they're working. Women don't seem to have that stereotype. Why aren't all the voices on the internet perceived as lazy women? Probably because it's mostly men discussing philosophy and life while women are demanding more or spending their time on sites that let them advertise themselves or indulge in w…
/r/MensRights31/12/16 03:32 AM
6

Sounds more like bone policing, amirite?
/r/MensRights29/11/16 07:21 AM
2

Being drunk doesn't void a person's responsibility. Both situations you mention only treat women as incapable of making sexual decisions. Both are discriminatory and should be abolished.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 09:35 AM
2

If a person of a certain age can't consent, they can't commit the supposed crime. That's all there is to it. I can't break a law if I'm deemed incapable of making a decision.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 06:30 AM
4

GOOD point from the wife.
/r/MensRights18/03/16 06:21 AM
11

The only thing I see wrong here is a waste of time debating any of the bullshit because countries decide prohibition somehow works. Works great to drastically inflate drug prices and to make kings out of gangsters. That's about it.
/r/TheRedPill26/02/16 05:27 AM
-5

Maybe it's just because 76,000 women learned their place. Really, really wanted to leave this as a shitty joke that I'd get downvoted for, but I really want to bring up that point. It's possible reported violence could be very different than actual violence just because females would be more likely to submit. I would think males would be less likely to report violence in general, but there might be some balance issues with the fact that women are pretty much never targeted or treated as physical…
/r/MensRights24/02/16 02:14 AM
2

if we broke up the ... movements I have a feeling ideologies aren't going to be open for "breaking up" any time soon. And for that matter, ideologies formed from fair reasoning shouldn't be discredited for the actions and views of every separate individual within them. It's stupidly conservative and naive to judge entire groups according to a few people within them. Even larger groups can't be logically judged as a part of the whole when they do idiotic things during some event. People are easil…
/r/MensRights18/02/16 04:39 AM
1

The hell are you talking about? This is about corporate Dem think tanks pushing out propaganda to manipulate primarily women into feeling a tribalistic attachment to defend Hillary. And interestingly since this is being brought up, I've acknowledged the recent trend of what appears to be definitive shill posters on "liberal" Facebook pages. And I mean full-blown shills with the start of primaries. I've noticed plenty in the recent past, but it appears as if these current ones are including "like…
/r/MensRights03/02/16 07:35 PM
2

Okay, I think I found their list, but I'm pretty sure it's the one I was talking about. So it was set at a specific time. I'm on there though for this: http://www.reddit.com/r/mensrights/comments/3e2d5e/crosspost_from_8chan_if_some_study_tells_you_that/ctbd2vu Anyway, from what I'm seeing, you're not on this specific list. Ctrl+f'd your username with no results: https://gist.githubusercontent.com/anonymous/92e3e7902ec846ec82d1/raw/30f613102a45d51aeb71c8e32bdabc25b9a9852e/Final%2520Tag%2520Set Ot…
/r/MensRights08/01/16 12:04 PM
3

Nope. This one's in there. Pretty sure I can look up that list somewhere on the internet and find my username linked to a completely neutral comment.
/r/MensRights07/01/16 05:35 PM
2

I was essentially agreeing with you, just pointing out that "the patriarchy" isn't inherently favorable for men as feminists seem to concretely imply. In fact, as I said, it seems to just bowl over us with implied "respect." You want your dick cut, so we'll cut it for you. You want to be a patriotic man, so we'll just sign you up for war.
/r/MensRights26/12/15 07:18 PM
0

Being fairly above "average" and knowing how jealous and irrational I still get over stupid things, I suppose should already know.
/r/MensRights26/12/15 07:12 PM
6

If I had the ability to stab that scalpel into the neck of the person who cut me just to get out of it, I would've done it in a second. I say this as a humanist. No one has the right to butcher parts off my pleasure organ in ways that can never be reversed. It's on par with any good horror story that we don't consider this illegal. Note: I say this as a hemophiliac. They cut me against my later will, no doubt the will I would've had against the pain at the time too. They let me bleed for a week,…
/r/MensRights26/12/15 06:51 PM
3

Then your argument is that the patriarchy is sometimes based on completely disrespecting and fucking over men. Meanwhile, it treats us as if we're being 100% respected in the process. Just man-up!
/r/MensRights26/12/15 06:44 PM
2

Is a joke about the stereotype cruel? That wasn't even a direct joke, just about the stereotype.
/r/MensRights26/12/15 06:41 PM
-1

Murder leaves enough evidence that it can often disregard personal admission. Not to mention, murder removes the victim from the equation before they have anything else to worry about. With rape accusation, we have a totally valid crime accusation that can often lack clear evidence. We don't want to frighten people from admitting real rape if it's the case, either. So imagine some guy goes to prison for rape charges, the "victim" then admits it was a lie, he gets out. In a world that considers h…
/r/MensRights24/12/15 01:38 AM
1

Here's a difficult thought: If we punish someone who falsely accuses, it incentivizes future accusers to hold their ground with their lies. Wat do?
/r/MensRights23/12/15 06:43 PM
0

That's true. Tough to always remember when you're limited on feedback. I've made plenty of joke comments with imgur links in them and got hundreds or thousands of upvotes, but when I actually look at the link, it will show tens of thousands of people looked at it. Then again, sort of makes it more powerful to see how a comment is being taken. If I made some comment and got downvoted, hundreds of people are seeing that and interpreting it maybe as fringe or unacceptable. Whatever. I think too muc…
/r/MensRights22/12/15 04:16 PM
1

rape Please, no need to overwork yourself. Allow me.
/r/MensRights22/12/15 03:46 PM
0

anyone who abuses And we should also properly define abuse and not dismiss all feelings of young adults as being worthless. Edit: Ah, yes, forgot about those delicious downvotes for having respect for people. How could I forget that we need to treat young adults as objects?
/r/MensRights22/12/15 03:41 PM
1

If you're going to discount validated, peer reviewed findings simply because you disagree, or have hand-wavy biases not grounded in any understanding of the topic, there is absolutely no chance of convincing you. Hm... I suppose it's horrible that untrustworthy information doesn't convince me of anything. It'd be more productive to talk to a brick wall. This is the same mentality used by anti-vaxxers and 9/11 conspiracy theorists Being anti-vaccination is retarded because a supposed threat of au…
/r/MensRights18/12/15 02:24 AM
1

How are brain scans biased? Are you suggesting that your proposed alternative would result in different scans? Cool, where is your evidence? You can't just discount what I've said because you don't like or agree with it. You'd better be able to support what you've said, or your dismissal carries no weight. Science fails often because it doesn't account for even basic variables. This is a basic variable. More importantly, what value does "fully developed" even contain? You've stopped learning? Th…
/r/MensRights17/12/15 01:26 PM
1

the evidence does not support your anecdotal, and perceptually biased, option. Nor does your biased "brain scan" evidence deny the idea that brains could definitely develop differently if social pressures occurred earlier when people still gave a shit about anything. A perfect example of adapted maturity is drinking ages in other countries. Places that allow drinking at like 15 or so tend to see it as ridiculous that 21 year olds make a huge deal about going out and getting wasted. Our laws are …
/r/MensRights17/12/15 02:11 AM
2

If that's how you describe the organization of society, apparently everything is shit on a wall.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 01:48 AM
1

I essentially agree. If we're progressing out of that old-fashioned white picket fence family idea, it absolutely shouldn't only be benefiting women. I doubt I'd ever say I'm pro-life, but I'd definitely refuse to stop at pro-choice for females if any arguments arise.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 01:20 AM
2

Neither is removing the age of consent a reality. All this shit is made up though. I don't have to imagine a world where one law exists and another doesn't. I can mix and match however I choose to prioritize my logic and morals.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 01:17 AM
3

The argument is about consent, not people in positions of power. When talking about people who abuse power, they should lose their job and potentially be barred from getting another one with that type of power. That's all that should happen.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 12:01 AM
1

Did you know that's also fucking retarded and a male should be able to opt out of any financial force required by a pregnancy by paying half the abortion fee?
/r/MensRights16/12/15 11:57 PM
5

They lack the brain development to properly weigh decisions Speaking for yourself? I, for one, didn't suddenly go from retard to Albert Einstein at the age of 18. I just got fucked over by unknowingly signing a bunch of my life over to a contract a few years ago, then before that it was a bunch of school loans that I still have sitting there. And I'm 28 now. Why the fuck am I supposed to be considered any less retarded than I was at 17? If we made the arbitrary age of majority, say, 13 or so, ki…
/r/MensRights16/12/15 11:55 PM
1

I didn't realize men couldn't divorce for no reason. Anyway, I was mainly referring to things like the extremely popular shame and coercion about being "housewives." Stereotypical preference or not, I think it's pretty silly for MRAs to want to contain people to certain standards when we're constantly crushed into not being able to show any weakness. Then again, I suppose this is still more nuance than anything... Fuck men and women alike. I'm sick of this bullshit petty arguing.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 10:50 PM
1

Hey, buddy, go sell crazy somewhere else. Capiche?
/r/MensRights30/11/15 09:09 PM
1

I didn't say anything about divorce, so I'm sure you're talking about something close to home. Divorce law is so ridiculous that I can't actually even begin to understand the supposed logic. Marriage shouldn't be a legal issue; The End. If people want to hold hands in a church to make their relationship feel more meaningful, that's on them. I think everyone should be able to leave any situation whenever they want.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 03:36 PM
4

The owner controls every aspect of the business, so yes. Average employees are completely under the control of the leader and he can make any business decision he wants with them. The only freedom is for the employee to leave. That would be equivalent to fleeing a country. This is particularly fitting considering successful businesses are finite, and people require part of that success to even exist. So if you're on the planet, you leave North Korea, head to Mexico, shit isn't any much better, t…
/r/MensRights30/11/15 02:33 PM
-1

Why does this surprise you? He is a SOCIALIST. If you like analyzing people's writing, I think this first part of your comment was golden. It's almost like the author was attempting to self-parody every incredibly ignorant shit-post about economics befitting the status of only the most racist of 85 IQ uncles in America. You know the type. The type to follow Trump into battle against the Mexicans because his confidence is entirely more valid than basic logic, respect, and human psychology.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 02:21 PM
1

It annoys me slightly that he supports it, but I also stand by him doing it. It would be political suicide if a social revolutionary didn't speak against a widely held perception of social injustice.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 11:16 AM
7

An actual socialist is about workers owning the means of production; as in, I would be the one making extra profits when my company does well instead of investors, and this seems to kinda make sense considering it was me who put in all that extra labor. When Sanders says he's a "democratic socialist," he's implying a similar outcome, as you say, without the need to undermine the basis of capitalism. Businesses are dictatorships. No matter how long a person owns them, they hold all the power. Tha…
/r/MensRights30/11/15 11:13 AM
8

Even basic rights for women were treated as anti-family and whatever other bullshit back then. I mean, people still stand by that, they just aren't in [popular] control anymore. There's a constant war between masculinity and femininity, and I feel like it's a fucking waste of time to argue about anything related to nuances, and that seems to be the whole perspective of third wave, I guess. The more we ignore cutting baby genitals and other actual types of discrimination, the more we're going to …
/r/MensRights30/11/15 10:47 AM
0

This is pretty much why my immediate thought was whether or not this was published anywhere that isn't Breitbart. Not to say a broken clock is never right, but it's a broken clock. Most of their articles are knee-jerk conservative garbage, so I don't even want to make the effort to make any assessments of it. I know that'll piss some people off for a multitude of reasons, but it's my perspective.
/r/MensRights19/11/15 12:44 AM
15

This is pretty much all I cared to see. How am I supposed to judge this without the opposite perspective? If both sides were similar, we should probably start working to fix our fucked up society rather than the problems of one sex.
/r/MensRights02/11/15 08:11 AM
1

If you hadn't posted it, I would've.
/r/MensRights02/11/15 08:08 AM
-4

Off topic, but I've spent so much time on Reddit over the last few years that your writing is making me uncomfortable. As in, I feel like I'm almost reading my own writing style. It has that slight pretentiousness of vocabulary that almost makes me uncomfortable(when I'm doing it,) but I know I'm just trying to be succinct most of the time. Not sure why I felt the need to mention this, but I think it was a few trigger phrases in there.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 09:53 AM
-4

I dunno about that. We can think of plenty of stereotypes for either side, but I think men and women are probably pretty even on that mark. And if we include public violence with weapons, I think we'd take the cake. And, conveniently, we'd have a knife to cut slices.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 09:26 AM
1

Oh great, the only time women get a lot of money is when the male gaze is involved. It's horrible because exploiting women by exploiting men is somehow not a logical aspect of sexual polarity.
/r/MensRights24/10/15 08:05 AM
2

Alright, for some perspective, what are the accepted Men's Rights statistics for domestic violence by sex, as well as relationship murders by sex(I seem to primarily remember stories of men murdering their families and killing themselves.) I suppose we should also include general murders, too, because I'm sure men are murdering plenty of other men to fit the provider role that females demand.
/r/MensRights22/10/15 06:24 PM
2

I could tell you a fuckload of things from my personal bias. In fact, I could tell you a fuckload of things from my personal bias that also have articles and arguments to support them... No matter what they may be. It's a good thing when issues like this have a spotlight put on them. We can never truly make any valid claims until we have sufficient evidence to support them. And even then, seas of opposition arise against pretty much fucking everything that matters.
/r/MensRights21/10/15 04:32 PM
15

This is why men need #sexbots.
/r/MensRights17/10/15 04:57 PM
26

No, they can be abusers though. Both dirty gay sickos with their gross butt stuff and evil penises. Too bad they can't be more like the beautiful spiritual existence that is the lesbian passion between two female lovers.
/r/MensRights30/09/15 01:11 AM
8

And 80% of women are happy having their clits removed out of ignorance. Does that make it okay? Is destruction of a person's quality of life alright when they never know any better?
/r/MensRights09/09/15 08:44 AM
1

> There are people who think it should be illegal K. Women can opt out of motherhood whether or not abortion becomes illegal. Financially. It's like complaining to abusive parents that your sibling didn't get beaten as bad as you did. Seems a bit like all of this is financial complaints. Men are completely allowed to disappear once a woman is pregnant. Forcing a women to give birth over 9 months is like forcing someone to harbor a parasite which they then become, most likely, addicted to beyond …
/r/MensRights28/08/15 03:11 PM
0

I still stand by her statement. If abortion is illegal, yes, that's highlighted before anything else, but it's a pretty positive statement for either side of the situation. That's the type of logic needed in order to make the point that men shouldn't be financially tied to a child against our will.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 05:27 AM
-15

In what fucking sense? She's making a fair point. If people enforce anti-abortion, men should be just as chained to the child as women. The best case scenario is that abortion allows men to opt out before the child is far along. Then it removes financial burden from the male while retaining full control of the female over her own body.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 04:07 AM
-3

What part of sensitivity don't you understand? Sex with a condom on is about equivalent to no sex at all. It's like humping air.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 03:34 AM
7

Real men
/r/MensRights26/08/15 03:03 AM
-5

Pretty hard when you can't get hard because your dick was mutilated and desensitized shortly after birth.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 03:01 AM
1

Nah, don't be dramatic. We overvalue other humans in a way that makes thoughtless murder seem unconscionable. The truth is that the human mind is capable of being extreme in every spectrum of abuse. Our focus should always be to minimize those chances because we gain nothing from demonizing people after the fact of their abuse.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 03:19 PM
4

I have to say I'm consistently skeptical of either side of the "equality" movements, but there's no way a man would get his kid back if two of his other kids died under his care.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 03:16 PM
0

I suppose I was just arguing to argue, but it was based on the unpleasant thoughts I've had lately. I started by mentioning how basically everything is sociopathic, and that was what I wanted to highlight. I've been thinking I could probably make a good argument that all humans are essentially sociopaths when considering the essence of everything we do is for the self. Even love is about consumption of pleasure, attachment, control, etc. And then there's the "red pill" nature of reality that suc…
/r/MensRights16/08/15 07:00 PM
-2

The "not at gunpoint" reminded me of libertarian statements. I was drunk all day yesterday, so I don't recall specifically what I was about to get at, but judging from right now... I was probably going to say the flaw in libertarian views is that they don't account for different types of negligence. Average people aren't particularly smart, so any social evolution is going to occur in a lopsided way. If that goes unchecked and without regulation, we ultimately end up requiring violent revolution…
/r/MensRights16/08/15 03:54 PM
-5

Thanks for your opinion, but I also consider it dumb.
/r/MensRights16/08/15 12:29 AM
-12

Would you consider yourself a libertarian?
/r/MensRights15/08/15 08:43 PM
-28

I think you meant to reply to someone else.
/r/MensRights15/08/15 06:23 PM
-26

I did deal with it. I added a condescending edit.
/r/MensRights15/08/15 06:21 PM
-43

He has a skill people are willing to pay money to see. He isn't robbing people. He's not robbing people; he's manipulating large groups because of the power of popularity. That's the entire concept of acting. You pretend to be heroes and every other characterization of people. People like you even when they don't know you. The entire premise of why Hillary Clinton is winning over Sanders. A person with more money and popularity is conquering America rather than a person who's actually completely…
/r/MensRights15/08/15 05:12 PM
-51

"Earning" large amounts of money like that is usually just about manipulating large groups of people. The human standard is sociopathy. No reason why a kid shouldn't steal from his dad if his dad stole masses of cash from everyone else. Edit: Oh, yeah, I forgot this isn't Voat. We get downvoted here for having opinions.
/r/MensRights15/08/15 04:30 PM
2

Since the Puritans sowed their seed across America's slutty back.
/r/MensRights01/08/15 07:47 AM
1

Yeah, the dirty peabis goes inside and hurts the lady one.
/r/MensRights01/08/15 07:46 AM
2

Glad someone said it.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 10:02 PM
33

Sounds like a good explanation for gender dysphoria.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 10:00 PM
2

Me too.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 01:14 AM
1

what's the reason for caching a shit ton of names like this? Well, from experience, you paste it into RES obviously so you can have all those labels on all those users as you browse Reddit. I only know because I did it with SRS users in the past. Not sure how the names were gathered, but it's sometimes inciteful into why a person is particularly opinionated about something.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 01:12 AM
1

I appreciated the discussion.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 10:37 PM
1

The simple fact of the sub existing is tribalism. That's why /r/atheism gets so much negative attention. A sub that technically doesn't mean anything by itself becomes inherently anti religion in almost every manifestation. I happen to see that as a good thing, but I still find it questionable to fully demonize the word "feminism" when it's such a diverse word. I say this because a lot of MRAs seem to stand by the fact that it deserves to be fully demonized. That's the part I consider probably a…
/r/MensRights26/07/15 10:04 PM
1

Yet you complained about it I complained because it had no substance. It wound be like someone saying tips fedora in a religious argument. Nothing more than a petty way to irritate someone without direction.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 09:55 PM
1

The tribalism is there. That's not even arguable. It's just a matter of how harmful and ignorant it is. Take /r/atheism as an example. People hate on that sub more than just about anything I could imagine. The amount of shit talking I've received for claiming religion is harmful has been obscene. Is it harmful? I believe it to be without a doubt. What do I achieve by arguing? I hope at least the knowledge that people are getting used to atheism in America. I shouldn't have to feel like I'm walki…
/r/MensRights26/07/15 09:51 PM
1

I was only arguing to solidify different views. Men's rights are valid but there can be tribalism that happens to be irrelevant to the facts of different matters. It doesn't somehow undermine the importance of these things when abusive people falsely push abusive opinions under the same label. It's the same stance I take about feminism, however, I'm continuing to see fewer and fewer things outside of nuances that feminists are actually fighting for, thus making it incredibly difficult to actuall…
/r/MensRights26/07/15 08:18 PM
1

You do know that you did not refute a single thing I said right? Why would I need to refute something I agree with? You still have unproven accusations of misogyny and tribalism. You have nothing supported at all. This is probably the reason I find all these things so irritating. Even though I've more or less focused my positions with argument in this thread, it's still all open and questionable when we're looking at the tribalism among different groups. Strawmen, Scotsmen, etc. Also you really …
/r/MensRights26/07/15 07:49 PM
1

This is you trying the force tribal actions on us saying we support anything they say since they are MRA too. I mentioned a Facebook group, but it was anti-MRA. Hitler was a huge proponent of organic foods and a mixture of the occult and Christian ideals. I guess we should stop organic farming and physic hotlines. See how lazy and inept that argument is? Same for atheistic naturalism and Stalin or Zedong. Good point. You can't affect the outliers. This factor just happens to be one of the subtle…
/r/MensRights26/07/15 07:09 PM
0

My original post was nothing more than an advertisement to get a better response. It was my negative initial thought process that happened to prove successful for starting the argument. I don't care about someone insulting me, it just happened to be baseless with no contribution to the argument.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 06:42 PM
0

Au contraire, mon frère.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 06:38 PM
1

With the reality of how negative things tend to be for men, I would honestly say you're probably right that men's rights will come under a more respectable light. Men just seem to dominate most large organizations, so it seems our own ignorance and pride tends to get in the way of any positive change. As if we're stuck in the state of treating every other male as reproductive competition that we'd like to surmount at any possible chance. Oh, you came from an abusive situation, ma'am? Well, here,…
/r/MensRights26/07/15 06:30 PM
2

I've said it a few times, but my focus here is about tribalism. For the last couple days, my mind has been spinning. I overthink things a lot. In the last few days, I've been mentally caught in a pit of hatred for tribalism. People teaming up against other teams, never actually hitting any goals, an eternal battle of equally questionable studies and articles by arguably biased sources. It's draining to think about. Conservatives, liberals, men, women, blacks, whites, every other race, every coun…
/r/MensRights26/07/15 12:05 PM
0

Let me restructure this thought for you. If you're open-minded enough, it might make for an argument. Let's look at, say, /r/greatapes. It's a subreddit that's blatantly and openly racist, correct? Realistically, they also happen to include a lot of articles and information about abuses with black perpetrators. That information by itself isn't racist. The compilation of that information, honing the group's focus on the race factor, makes it extremely racist in the outcome. It has no directive, a…
/r/MensRights26/07/15 11:27 AM
-5

Yes, but as the OP I'm allowed to make generalized claims that bait people into argument if I see it as valid considering my position. I didn't specify any given person, so it leaves everything open to argument. This guy, however, made negative statements directly at me without anything of content.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 11:08 AM
2

While I believe men should be judged by the same apparently compassionate sexual standard as women often are, I see your point.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 09:21 AM
2

Valid point.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 09:10 AM
-7

In practice, it seems to be a group that was made to argue against feminism.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 09:08 AM
1

You're part of a hate movement so you assume everyone else has the same tribalist thinking. False. You're making a lot of assumptions here. My position is practically neutral.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 09:07 AM
0

I made no effort to try and see what this group was actually saying and instead looked for buzz words on the front page articles then immediately decided to tell everyone here how misogynistic they SEEMED. I'm not new to the sub. My point was about the tribalism that permeates every supposed "rights" group.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 09:05 AM
2

Ah, sorry, was about to make a response similar to my last one about the ad hominem, but apparently you're the same person. I can appreciate the consistency if nothing else.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 09:03 AM
-1

Sounds pretty emotional around here to pull out the ad hominem. You know what emotion implies? Anger without care for logic. Also a trait of people who are demonizing certain groups of people out of spite.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 09:02 AM
-1

I'm trying to think of why I consider it obsolete. For one thing, we probably aren't going to war against each other and murder off the competition. I suppose it amounts to socialized propaganda. I mean, propaganda is incredibly effective. The problem is... it seems to just successfully make new zombies to parrot certain ideas. If there's somehow a lack of care for issues affecting the opposing group, it's unconditionally harmful. I know "feminists" seem to do that quite blatantly. I think it's …
/r/MensRights26/07/15 03:30 AM
-6

Let's diversify the bias. Let me try: Sign about women. Woman arrested for being a cunt. Sexism against dads/sons - Legit. Custody issue. Situationally an obvious focus on women, but definitely still legit. Women at Comicon? Not sure what this has to do with men, but at least my quick scan decided the message was positive. Obama enforcing women and children law... Hm... Okay, so my initial scan seemed to just pick out how many times the women were mentioned. A few things pushed me to quickly mak…
/r/MensRights26/07/15 03:22 AM
-1

Constellation? I'm not seeing your point.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 03:12 AM
-10

So why isn't the sub called /r/shittywomen?
/r/MensRights26/07/15 03:10 AM
-10

In my years on Reddit, I've probably only ever downvoted everything I see about Justin Bieber and Kim Kardashian. It takes a special type of post to get me to downvote.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 03:09 AM
-4

I found an anti-men's rights group on Facebook which originally inspired my irritation. Everything they were saying was incredibly ignorant and tribalistic. It was finally my long-avoided exposure to those "Tumblr feminists" people seem to hate so much. Even if they were right about a lot of their posts, it was their tribalism that irritated me the most. Then I come here to actually compare my new thinking, entire front page seems to be putting the light on women rather than men's problems. As i…
/r/MensRights26/07/15 03:04 AM
0

Okay, this is a valid argument. I definitely wouldn't say I'm falling prey to that effect, nor do I think it's necessarily beneficial to combat a group to get your point across... Shame isn't a successful tactic, in my book. And I don't believe it is in genuine practice, either. I'd be hypocritical, though, considering I seem to take the same approach in all my anti-religion arguments. You've given me some interesting thoughts. I'll have to think about this some more.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 02:51 AM
-11

site *cite an example of women hating in question from this group? Men's rights seem desperately focused on hating women. I said seem for a reason. The entire front page isn't about injustice to men, it's about women causing problems. Rather than the immense sex-irrelevant forces against men all over, we seem a little overly focused on women. It makes this sub seem pretty misogynistic.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 02:45 AM
4

Why men even exist? Well, I dunno, maybe because "marriage" is a new social construct and it would've been pretty standard for a single male animal to reproduce with large numbers of females, thus securing his genes for the future.
/r/MensRights21/07/15 09:21 PM
1

Wonderful how all this bullshit will dissolve when driverless cars are the norm.
/r/MensRights12/07/15 08:31 AM
2

I think I'd currently have a hard time reproducing your argument, but I can say I probably agree with you. I think there's a lot of frivolous institutions and cultural practices that have no validity. I also heard an argument that a person who never went to school and suddenly goes in fifth grade, they have the same capacity to catch up to everyone else who'd been going every year, all after only a short while. The article I saw mentioned how the hundreds of thousands it costs to school someone …
/r/MensRights04/07/15 08:46 PM
2

I definitely wouldn't go quite as far as that guy, but I do believe 16 should be the age of majority. I've always found it particularly idiotic that stupid 18 year old kids can sign their lives away, but stupid 16 years olds can't. More than anything else, maturity is a matter of learning. When we treat little kids as pure little innocent angels, they learn basic truths from seamy sources or fellow naive peers. Simply by saying 16 is adulthood(drinking included,) children would undoubtedly be ru…
/r/MensRights04/07/15 09:33 AM
5

The punishment should be to no longer allow her to teach. That's the fucking end of it. Who the hell deserves 22 years for consensual sex? It's a fucking joke.
/r/MensRights04/07/15 01:10 AM
8

Correct. It's complete bullshit either way. I don't think anyone actually understands how long 22 years is. Even early parole and years of your life for consensual sex is disturbing. The only logical direction was to treat men with the compassion normally given to women, not to treat women like devil men as standard.
/r/MensRights04/07/15 01:08 AM
6

This is how I would describe my best friend. He's not a dick, he gets along with basically everyone, he's respectable, but he also has an attitude about him that seems free enough that you wouldn't want to push him. He puts up with a lot and he's incredibly selfless, but he still has full control of himself. As a beta by actions, I have a tough time deciphering how he can be so seemingly contradictory, yet make it work so perfectly. Edit: I noticed in the past that he's what I would definitely c…
/r/TheRedPill23/06/15 02:24 PM
-1

Yeah, "pill." They said 50% of men would probably use it, but it won't be me. Anything near surgery makes me uncomfortable.
/r/MensRights18/06/15 06:14 PM
40

http://i.imgur.com/otBLQ4F.gif
/r/MensRights16/06/15 03:59 PM
-12

Wow, a criminal is being prosecuted! How does this have anything to do with men's rights? The fact that she has the audacity to appeal?
/r/MensRights16/06/15 10:21 AM
1

No, you definitely can't, and I came here to say exactly that... But the point realistically stands. It's incredibly disingenuous to the concept of equality, even on the shallowest semantic basis, to call a movement for gender/sex equality "feminism."
/r/MensRights14/06/15 03:23 AM
3

If I had to fashion a guess, it would be because people are treating feminism as a means to defend their beta nature. So because TRP supports alpha thinking along with plenty of genuinely misogynistic posters and discussions, TRP appears inherently misogynistic. So what it comes down to is whether it's more offensive to shame women for "no reason"(quotation marks according to what I've already explained) or to shame fat people for, arguably, a choice. On the surface, it appears somewhat frighten…
/r/TheRedPill11/06/15 12:19 PM
1

This post just turned me gay. Wait, your name on Twitter is GayLubeOil... You officially just rekt my jokes. Here's some homosexuous humor, hopefully to your enjoyment: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LIii8wnE91w
/r/TheRedPill10/06/15 09:38 AM
12

Reminds me of how I feel arguing with Right Wingers. The majority of their opinions are based around prideful shaming of what frightens them. How do you argue with that if anything you say just makes you look weak to their bias?
/r/MensRights07/06/15 07:58 PM
5

Yeah, well isn't it Australia that doesn't allow porn of women with small boobs? I don't think their laws are going to be the most respectable or sensible regarding anything related to pedophilia.
/r/MensRights10/05/15 12:47 AM
3

Yeah, I'm actually depressed right now. I've trained myself with enough time to actually feel extremely irritated about almost everything. Everything is purposeless work. Even those extremely important things, job, relationship, school, all require chance that just doesn't seem worth it. Pick a non-STEM degree, chances are you'll be fucked. Too bad for you if you can't fit that survival standard. All this said, Red Pill is right about the strategy of attraction. It's also right about the endeavo…
/r/TheRedPill10/05/15 12:07 AM
2

Thanks for all that rehabilitation.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 09:00 PM
41

GBP Good Boy Points?
/r/MensRights03/05/15 12:33 PM
-1

That Hooters deserved the punishment.
/r/MensRights01/05/15 02:08 AM
27

TIL you're a pig if you enjoy pleasure.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 06:26 AM
1

Sounds like a personal problem.
/r/TheRedPill17/04/15 02:15 PM
4

Is it really? Because to me, sex with a condom isn't worth sex. I feel nothing. It's like looking at a girl.
/r/TheRedPill13/04/15 05:14 AM
0

Uh, no. Do you have a source on this? Basic logic. We started as amoral animals. We lived for pleasure and the wiring of our brain. Do you think a dog has sex for the sake of reproduction? Of course not. They just have the extreme urge to get off. Suddenly, puppies. They then feel a strange desire to care for the resulting pups. The fact that we feel so much pleasure makes it clear that our main incentive aside from unleashing testosterone and lust, was the physical pleasure involved. See, this …
/r/MensRights20/03/15 05:08 AM
2

It's definitely a rare feeling for me.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 10:15 PM
3

Moreover, sex organs are not "for" pleasure. They are for reproduction. False. Sex organs are specifically for pleasure. Reproduction is the unintended consequence of that pleasure that people tend to appreciate or at least deal with. The fact that the act of reproduction can be physically enjoyable is merely a side effect of evolution, wherein the proto-mammals who enjoyed sex had more of it, and were therefore more successful, biologically. As I said, you have this backwards. The animals who h…
/r/MensRights19/03/15 08:20 PM
0

Yeah, but mainly because it was dark out and hard to see while I was driving.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 03:16 PM
0

Yes, that's about the surface area of my penis that was lost. But tell me more about how sex is harmful.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 02:57 PM
2

If that's what you consider to be trolling, I agree. I enjoy trolling people regarding what I consider to be very clearly illogical moral/social norms. I like to make people think. Particularly when the suffering caused by law is far greater than any... "suffering" placed on the participants in the sex act.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 02:56 PM
1

you had to look up one of the definitions of exploitation I "looked it up" for sake of argument. If you happen to be on Chrome, check out the Google Dictionary app. It's awesome. Double-click any word and a quick definition will pop up. Did you not hear about the case of the kid who, in a similar situation is now liable for child support? I did and it's also absurd. My stance is that a male should have the right to pay half the cost of an abortion and be exempt from child support. That would be …
/r/MensRights19/03/15 02:53 PM
0

Baiting so hard that I don't even know it.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 02:44 PM
-1

Consent is implied by body language. For example, I didn't consent to having the midsection of my penis tore out shortly after I was born. I would have happily consented to touching a silly willy if that was an alternative choice, I assure you.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 02:43 PM
-2

I've forgotten your original question on why reproductive viability is a good metric for consent so instead I'm going to again attempt to change the conversation to something else. -- I realize I don't have an argument and therefore have to keep prying into something that doesn't need explanation outside of attraction and our evolved nature/tendency. I still prefer to ignore human suffering and imprisonment because people who are attracted to attractive things are grody unless their number of ye…
/r/MensRights19/03/15 02:40 PM
2

Fuck men's rights. Fuck feminism. I'm a humanist. Humanism does not disregard any humans. If people want to feel pleasure together when the younger person is still of a logical sexually active age, so what? Putting a person in prison for pleasure is needless suffering and it's disturbing that anyone of any supposed "equality" group would condone undue suffering.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 02:32 PM
-2

Trolling all the way to 165,000 karma. Your logic is sound.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 02:28 PM
-1

Just because you can doesn't mean you should. Just because someone does, doesn't mean they should be imprisoned.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 01:54 PM
0

Ironic that you can make a claim of my lack of understanding without realizing you clearly lack understanding. Consent is not tied to age. An infant can consent to things, we just obviously understand they don't have enough knowledge of sensory stimuli or outcomes to legally consent to crawl out into a warzone and fight for our freedom. When I was a teenager, I was a younger version of my current 27 year old adult self. I had certain naive traits and a lot more ignorance than I do now, but sexua…
/r/MensRights19/03/15 01:53 PM
1

Very ironic that you would say that.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 01:26 PM
-1

Why is arbitrary fear, shame, and forceful imprisonment a better replacement?
/r/MensRights19/03/15 01:25 PM
-2

I actually had sex once and almost died. In fact, I had sex with a peer when I was 16 and she was 15. I also had sex with a 16 year old when I was 21. My deceitful cunning got me in with both of them, though. There's an apparent reason men are always to blame. Men are usually the ones trying to initiate sex. We're always seen as the cunning abusers. Perhaps, considering sex might not always kill a person, we could accept that consensual sex isn't actually abuse or some form of deterioration of t…
/r/MensRights19/03/15 01:23 PM
0

"In a position of power." If you're referring to a teacher and a student, I mentioned elsewhere that the punishment should be no more than a year in prison, if that. I sincerely believe the punishment should involve barring the authority person from similar positions. That would ruin their career and everything they worked years to achieve. That's a fucking punishment enough, I have no doubt. Putting them in a cage for many years for consensual sex is absurd and proves/accomplishes nothing. If t…
/r/MensRights19/03/15 12:37 PM
-1

underage Under what age? Sex organs are specifically for pleasure. If a person wants to combine their sex organs with another person's sex organs in order to feel good, it shouldn't matter what outsiders think of the action. It's called consent. Try asking what they want. I'm sure with a little respect they would tell you.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 12:25 PM
-1

The case isn't about two kids fooling around. This case is about an adult taking advantage of a child and have no doubt, fifteen is still a child. Explain to me the difference and I promise you I'll change my opinion if I see harm that is unconditionally based on the person's number of revolutions around the sun.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 12:05 PM
-2

Children that turn into adults who can consent to go die in a war one day later. Your moral views are tied to the law, and that's a frightening concept considering how flawed our perspectives are regarding sexuality and personal responsibility. Extreme negligence toward society by a business with immense capital; okay, it's just healthy freedom. Adult who chooses to prefer drug intoxication over the absurdity of suffering and life; put them in a cage. Sexually active young adult lusts for a pers…
/r/MensRights19/03/15 12:00 PM
2

"Children." You need to look up some definitions and learn some biology, human psychology, and history. 15 is well past reproductive development for most people. As far as the averages go, a person who gives birth at the average reproductive age can absolutely not be considered a "child."
/r/MensRights19/03/15 10:12 AM
-11

I'll argue until I convince you, believe me. You would give up before then. I've fucked a 15 year old girl. Nothing bad came of it.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 09:56 AM
-1

You're right, you know. I've been trying to make the point that normal judgment of a woman is simply based on empathy. "Eh, it's just sex." But for a male, we throw 6+ years at them and it's okay, all because it isn't us. We see a male going to prison for years, and no one bats an eye. Men are the aggressors, the oppressors, the abusers. Fuck that bullshit. We shouldn't be fighting to be able to hate women as much as people hate men. We should be fighting to understand that sexuality isn't an in…
/r/MensRights19/03/15 09:55 AM
0

Realistically, the automatic sexual respect we give women is a far clearer method. People can argue that we objectify women so harshly that we consider them a silly object that needs protection from punishment, but I see it as simple empathy. People empathize with women and understand, eh, it's just sex. But men become the violent abuser. The user and destroyer of innocence. They become the enemy to men and women alike. We see "6 years" and not a thought crosses our minds, simply because we are …
/r/MensRights19/03/15 09:48 AM
2

Sex is basically a drug that's required for the survival of humanity. Everyone should enjoy it in a healthy life. Age diversity is an interesting variable, but in a situation where we're talking about a 15 year old, we're absolutely not talking about a child. I've had sex with a 15 year old and had absolutely no thought in my mind that it was unusual. I was 16 at the time, but why should our peer drug use be abuse worthy of 6 years of being in a cage? 6 years. It was totally okay for me because …
/r/MensRights19/03/15 09:42 AM
-8

ex·ploi·ta·tion The action or fact of treating someone unfairly in order to benefit from their work. Is mutual pleasure somehow an unfair benefit to one party?
/r/MensRights19/03/15 09:33 AM
-14

Next time you have a moment of consensual pleasure with someone, I'm going to lock you in a room for 6 years. Tell me if the punishment fits the crime. I'm sure your opinion might change by 2021 or so.
/r/MensRights19/03/15 09:30 AM
6

I like the uncircumcised look better myself not that it matters Personally, as a cut male, I prefer the dried out, discolored, severed veins, taut skin, scarred sorta look. /s
/r/MensRights18/03/15 06:37 AM
1

Well... I mean, it makes sense for that type of motorcyclist. It also makes sense for transgender people to primarily be the users of "cis."
/r/MensRights12/03/15 11:22 AM
1

\3. I can produce offspring. A status which grants me an “essential” status in our species that men can never have and which can never be taken away from me even in old age. This is an interesting thought, evolutionarily speaking. We automatically seem to treat men as disposable, but if we look at actual factors for survival, a male simply doesn't create life. We could have one male and a city of females, and all of them could still have children. Considering this, I have to say it reminds me of…
/r/MensRights12/03/15 11:19 AM
7

Because you don't know any better.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 04:48 AM
6

Most infants and children grow out of phimosis by the time they're old enough to have interest in sexual activity. But, please, prepare infant boys for sex as soon as possible by damaging their natural pleasure tissue.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 04:48 AM
5

Most people are more than happy with it Out of ignorance and absurd cultural norms. Did you know 80% of women who have their entire clit removed, the equivalent to the head of the male penis, are entirely happy with the procedure? Did you know over 12 inches of sensory sexual tissue can be removed in an average male circumcision? Maybe you're the Bud Light drinking Murican type who doesn't think much and prefers loud noise over classical music, but I happen to appreciate sensory diversity. Cutti…
/r/MensRights11/03/15 04:45 AM
6

As one person who doesn't want it, I think of this like the death penalty. At least one, but undoubtedly many more than one, completely innocent person was put to death while wrongly accused. That possibility is inexcusable. All people should have their complete body(and the full sensitive surface area of their genitals) to do with as they please when they please. As a fucking hemophiliac who regrets the procedure for that obvious fucking fact, I also think it's unattractive to be dried out and …
/r/MensRights10/03/15 11:43 PM
5

That's a frighteningly poignant statement.
/r/MensRights10/03/15 11:35 PM
0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IQ3jIgOjUvs
/r/MensRights27/01/15 03:38 AM
12

I've been recently called the absolute worst type of person just because I was defending this logic recently. That's right, everyone! I'm a rape defender because I understand a person is innocent until proven guilty.
/r/MensRights21/01/15 08:29 PM
1

I agree. What I don't agree with is when the same situation occurs with a student female and everyone treats her like a retarded infant. If anything, that is the "feminist" approach that should be made. Sex shaming is wrong. Consensual sex with sexually developed teens is also legal... if you're also underage or in the right state. Sex isn't inherently "wrong" nor should it be illegal in many demonized cases, but it is. I saw this post on Facebook and every comment was about the guys being lucky…
/r/MensRights21/01/15 09:50 AM
2

the man should at least get some say in the abortion, unless its horrible circumstance As far as this goes, logically speaking, I think a male should just have the option to cut ties for economical reasons. A woman should always have absolute control over her body, and therefore control of the final decision, but a male should be able to pay half or all the price of an abortion and be exempt from financial involvement as far as "child support" goes. It doesn't make sense to me when I see struggl…
/r/MensRights11/01/15 06:46 AM
0

Of the billions of lives on the planet and the immense duration of time we've experienced as a species, I can safely say this has never, ever possibly happened in all of time. Then again, /r/maybeitdid.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 01:08 AM
4

izzardsl 190 Points 22:08:28, 19 December I'm kind of needy I guess, because if a guy is genuinely nice to me, I'll immediately get a crush on him. It's really that easy. Ill_Made_Knight 93 Points 00:17:51, 20 December You sound like you'd be every neckbeards dream girl, although often their kindness isn't so genuine izzardsl 58 Points 00:19:55, 20 December Ah, that was why I specifically clarified genuine in my comment! I know a Nice Guy when I see one, and that shit does not fly. "Their kindne…
/r/TheRedPill20/12/14 08:06 PM
0

This was my first thought, but then I imagined being so close would undoubtedly involve some very obvious bonerage. Then again, I'm not very good at holding back in scenarios like that...
/r/TheRedPill07/12/14 05:13 PM
7

Are you a boy or girl?
/r/MensRights05/12/14 12:35 AM
3

If he wants it, then they wait until he's 18 and fully capable of making that type of life-changing amputation. If he doesn't want to be cut, they wait until he's 18 and capable of making that decision. See the trend?
/r/MensRights11/11/14 06:39 AM
2

That's very true. Sometimes I forget how strong that idea should be. Too many people want to claim support of women. I would honestly probably describe that fervor as a new version of putting women on pedestals.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 11:44 PM
3

because in that situation he would no longer be treated as a minor and be liable for child support. http://i.imgur.com/ghzaZ.gif
/r/MensRights30/10/14 12:57 PM
16

A circus of value.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 12:55 PM
15

It's pretty outrageous that these same people snarking about "the poor boy's plight!! (wink wink wink)" are the same ones who'd get all pitchforks and torches over a 17-year-old girl making her own sexual choices. Oh, no doubt. I hate that people are like that. In fact, the guys who are pissed off at this kid seem like the exact type of people who would act just as angry if the guy was the older one. They'd call him a pedophile and sexual predator, etc. It's disturbing. First, it's fucked up tha…
/r/MensRights30/10/14 12:48 PM
61

This pisses me off only because I think people should be neutral on either side. Girl or guy, the only thing wrong here is potential abuse of a person in a position of authority. The teacher should no longer be able to teach. That's all there is to it. There's no criminal act.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 12:34 PM
46

Ah, yes, the concealed weapon on every male. We use it to brutally stab into the female's body, thus destroying her and leaving her drained of value.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 12:29 PM
1

I had sex once. I died.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 09:23 AM
1

And that's the only problem. As I say every time this argument arises, bar the teacher from teaching. There is no crime here.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 12:17 AM
0

Says the person who demonizes consensual sexuality.
/r/MensRights23/10/14 05:33 AM
4

"You can't do this because of your skin color." "You can't do this because of your gender." "You can't do this because you're trans." Damn good point. I wish equality was a real thing, but it really seems impossible with the way so many people tend to gang up and combat out-groups.
/r/MensRights22/10/14 10:01 AM
1

Teachers shouldn't do it because they're in a position of control over education. That means they could use sex to their advantage. Someone like that should be barred from teaching. Otherwise, it should be no crime. A person should be allowed to have sex with anyone they want when they want. The only thing that should matter is consent. If parents want to protect their children, teach them to understand sex and sexuality at a much younger age than normal, then explain why they should wait. That'…
/r/MensRights20/10/14 04:15 AM
4

Sounds like a pretty logical conclusion.
/r/MensRights19/10/14 08:53 AM
1

sex with minors have implications to their health, which won't change simply because we talk more about sex. I wasn't just referring to our discussion of sex. I meant we need a paradigm shift about sexuality. Many of the problems I'm imagining are based on treating children and young adults like property until 18. That concept makes no sense to me. The entire family model seems ridiculous. We take all of society and close everyone off into tiny groups so no one can feel true acceptance and close…
/r/MensRights19/10/14 08:15 AM
1

I think our cookie-cutter education system and our religious foundation that leads to sex shaming is why none of this really matters. We're in a fucked up situation where young adults are treated like dumb animals and adults are just numbers sucking off the big ole economy. What is inherently negative about sexuality? I believe it's our perception of control and greed. We act like once the male's dick penetrates the female, he owns and dominates her body. I've even directly felt this during sex …
/r/MensRights19/10/14 05:11 AM
1

This entire post is about consensual sexuality with minors. My point is to question why any consensual sexuality is considered illegal for either sex. My statement was directly implying the matter of equality. We seem to treat sexuality like alcohol or something worse. What is it that's inherently problematic about sex? Would openness lead to sex addiction more often? If so, what would it matter? As I said, if our culture was open and respectful toward the idea of sexuality, there's really no em…
/r/MensRights19/10/14 05:01 AM
1

What if I can say I was ready? Maybe you're only thinking of how naive you may have been at that age. Also, people always see their past self as less intelligent despite how little things may have changed. Does that mean I can get my money back from when I was arrested for minor consumption and public intox when I was 20? Obviously I was pretty stupid back then. It caused me a lot of emotional harm, too. Or is the legal age the only thing that matters to you? I know some people tend to treat law…
/r/MensRights19/10/14 12:37 AM
1

My issue here is the "adults" part. That entire argument hinges on laws. Why can't an 18 year old feel emotionally abused after a relationship? I wasn't incredibly smart at 18, nor am I now at 26. I wasn't a complete idiot at 14, though. It would've been okay for me to irresponsibly sneak around and have sex with another person around my age, but an adult was out of the question. Why? Society shames the act to the point that it automatically concludes any adult who has sex with a younger teenage…
/r/MensRights19/10/14 12:08 AM
1

I think people in this sub are a bit jumpy. I was very clearly referring to general sexuality. Not just the lopsided justice system.
/r/MensRights18/10/14 11:28 PM
0

such peer pressure even if he didn't believe it himself. Isn't this a stereotype we're trying to challenge? Yes. The stereotype that sex is evil and deterioration of a person's value and "innocence."
/r/MensRights18/10/14 11:24 PM
0

the crime of harming a child in a physical, sexual or emotional way If we're referring to consensual sex, aside from the emotional abuse of having the law come in and fuck up people's lives, where is the emotional/sexual abuse?
/r/MensRights18/10/14 11:22 PM
-3

Define "child abuse."
/r/MensRights18/10/14 11:09 AM
-35

Protection. Protection from what? STDs? I rarely hear that as an issue. Births? I rarely hear that discussed either. Pleasure? I think this is the argument. We've placed pleasure and closeness on a pedestal to the point that we've criminalized it in many ways.
/r/MensRights18/10/14 11:05 AM
1

I've argued in the past that betrayal of trust is its own type of weak rape. Considering rape is a situation where physical and mental violation leads to prolonged mental anguish after the fact, betrayal of trust that involves sexuality can also be construed by feminists of this sort to evolve into a similar type of mental/physical violation. While I agree there are some philosophical issues in this idea that are really interesting and up for discussion, a world where people actually applied the…
/r/TheRedPill17/10/14 03:58 PM
1

What the fuck is this scroll bar?
/r/TheRedPill10/10/14 08:41 PM
3

I agree with some shades of the ideas you present, but I feel you're conflating TRP with some sort of conservative anti-feminist misogyny. ... On second thought, your explanation is actually fitting for why people see TRP as being so negative. I completely agree that's very odd. That said, I'm having a difficult time coming to terms with all my positions on everything. I have no desire to tie society to past techniques if I sincerely believe other approaches are for the better. The issue is how …
/r/TheRedPill10/10/14 08:40 PM
4

I got banned from /r/offmychest for vaguely defending the theory in a thread that looked like it came out of SRS. https://i.imgur.com/mDePbXR.jpg Edit: Here's the context I commented on: Seriously, is this entire sub for insecure dudes who can't handle the thought of an equal and healthy relationship? The short answer? Yes. To present an argument to that point, I would say "equal" relationships are rarely possible because most average people don't want it. People enter relationships with control…
/r/TheRedPill25/09/14 09:35 PM
2

Like more merit-based expectations, more suicide, more productivity, more homelessness.
/r/MensRights25/09/14 11:40 AM
7

Yeah, I'd never seriously used the term femnazi before that day, but that's all I could think of after how quickly I got banned for a generally positive statement. The entire thread looked like an SRS circlejerk, and our bannings confirmed it.
/r/TheRedPill15/09/14 02:18 AM
6

Well stated. I got banned from /r/offmychest for vaguely defending Red Pill theory despite the fact that I consider myself all the equality-based "isms." Apparently TRP is "a hate group." lel
/r/TheRedPill14/09/14 10:05 PM
1

I generally don't understand the mechanism that makes men seem like the predator in this situation. Cultural bias? Sure, but there has to be something added to it. The "key that opens many locks" vs "the door that opens to many keys" is in mind. Why do we see women as something that is controlled and taken advantage of? I assume because the tendency is for men to want sex more, fact. And I can only assume a tendency for women to be more likely to form emotional connection or dependence. It makes…
/r/MensRights11/09/14 09:20 AM
1

Right? I didn't realize it would be so tough. It seems like most of our stereotypical advantages come from things we actually have to do. I know. I don't do anything and I have nothing to show for it just the same.
/r/MensRights11/09/14 07:30 AM
0

It was a joke. You know, the Scarecrow from Wizard of Oz was on an adventure to find a brain. OP is the target I was referring to. The title of this post is exactly my point.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 10:28 PM
0

Are you implying OP doesn't have a brain?
/r/MensRights10/09/14 10:13 PM
1

spread nonsense, is it wrong to fight that? To the extreme disagreement of many, as an anti-theist, no. I prefer to stand up against ignorance on occasion. As far as that video, sounds good, but I don't see much importance in that issue. Rape is rape. Talking about it doesn't stop rape. I'm not sure what the goal is by anyone actually fighting the "rape culture."
/r/MensRights10/09/14 10:11 PM
-2

No, you're just explicitly perpetuating it by focusing all your attention on women.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 10:04 PM
-1

Tell me more about my fish preferences.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 08:26 PM
1

Problem is, people are denied their rights as members in a group. This is the point I'm looking at. I just sort of expressed my stance in a previous comment. Honestly, I'm better off just linking it. This massive asymmetry is why I'm pitching to you that the most egalitarian move right now is Men's Rights Activism. I can fully concede this point. And so I ask you, as an egalitarian who is committed to the ideal of individual human equality, but who also understands the very un-idealized, irratio…
/r/MensRights10/09/14 08:23 PM
1

Then it's a per issue issue. You can't argue against feminism when there are fair points within it. Argue the points that are flawed. Same with men's rights. Men have a lot of benefits, but we also have a lot of shitty standards we're stuck in. We're fucked in custody matters and forced to work our lives away. We're screwed in basically every sexual scenario imaginable. But we're normally bigger so it makes the rape game easier or something. I don't fucking know. Biggest issue, society itself is…
/r/MensRights10/09/14 08:06 PM
0

Honestly, I'm just irritated by the tribalism I'm seeing. It's become in-group wars against semantic strawmen. To me, I don't think radical or irrational feminism or otherwise(from the male side) even deserves consideration. Equality should speak for itself, but this is more complex and issues of poverty and lack of education surmount everything else.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 07:53 PM
-2

Thank you for displaying the true meaning of the MRM as a war on feminism. That's wonderfully helpful to equality. I love all my different internet tribes.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 07:47 PM
-1

Tell me more about the point I was making.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 07:45 PM
-1

Apparently I hit some nerves on a daily level. I got banned from /r/offmychest the other day for defending The Red Pill. In fact, I only vaguely defended the theory, but they apparently took that as support of a hate group and banned me. The thread I was in looked like an SRS thread, and the fact that I got banned for even the slightest disagreement just supported that view.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 05:34 PM
-5

The point I'm making is that men and women both have issues affecting equality. Words aren't relevant to that idea.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 05:31 PM
-4

And that was my point in mentioning it in the first place. It's a word. It isn't a group with a leader. If so, I'm making "The," so no one can use the word without associating with my racist hatred pygmies. Now you have to remember that. The next time you use the word, you have to think of my racist hatred for a group of people.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 05:07 PM
-3

fem·i·nism The advocacy of women's rights on the grounds of political, social, and economic equality to men.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 04:51 PM
-5

You can't make a blanket claim like that and honestly believe it's correct. I'm talking about the general concept of supporting equality for women. I've even considered dissociating from "men's rights" and just supporting masculism and feminism, both coupled deliciously in humanism. Really, it's pointless to specify the individual groups, but individual sides need attention in specific areas. The only real change will be possible by removing poverty and supporting education. Until then, people w…
/r/MensRights10/09/14 04:51 PM
-3

To me, feminism isn't anything I don't agree with. Anyone who uses it to push a shitty agenda is just doing it wrong. It's the exact way I feel about men's rights. It's 100% positive unless people try to twist it into some bullshit sexist view.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 03:28 PM
1

That's true. There's a lot of things like that... Sometimes a bit of confidence is all it takes to break through and normalize something for yourself. I had a handlebar mustache for a while that I would wax. Reddit seems to think it's pretentious, but I don't mind that. I liked the idea of doing something different. I also liked the idea of doing it every single day until people got used to seeing me like that. Being able to pull something off is a big factor, but sometimes time can improve some…
/r/MensRights10/09/14 03:24 PM
8

http://i.imgur.com/tC0ZDu7.gif
/r/TheRedPill10/09/14 09:14 AM
3

Yeah, I had a kindergarten crush.
/r/TheRedPill10/09/14 09:12 AM
2

So you mean I wasn't allowed to do this with my ex? NSFW, artistry courtesy of yours truly.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 06:14 AM
1

I was really wanting to post something about her being prosecuted for distributing child pornography. I know certain Redditors know the situation well. HOLY FUCKING SHIT THIS TOOK LIKE 45 MINUTES TO FIND: /u/applicablesonglyric. Hope she has Gold now...
/r/MensRights08/09/14 11:47 AM
34

http://imgur.com/DRteu3g
/r/MensRights30/08/14 08:31 AM
1

To put it shortly, anyone who sees sexual inside a normal picture is the one who put it there. To throw in another perspective, I can imagine people would argue about photos of this sort because they know/assume someone out there will consider them sexually. While that reasoning can be attributed to basically every aspect of life -- and sexuality technically isn't anything as inherently harmful or dirty as we force into our culture -- I can understand why people think like that because of how ou…
/r/MensRights24/08/14 06:46 PM
7

Pretty much every single thing you said pisses me off. I'm so sick of idiots, abuse, and inefficiency.
/r/MensRights23/08/14 08:22 AM
9

I think OP described Stage 3 really well. I've had a tough time respecting this community because there's a lot of pessimism and ignorance. I'm a humanist, I have ideals, but I also understand reality. In order to make reality better, we have to understand human nature. This isn't to say I promote some fucked up in-between situation that's ignorant in my own way, I just think there's better ways to do things. Better ways to organize society without fucking people over for no reason. It's absolut…
/r/TheRedPill13/08/14 06:47 AM
-4

Considering how often sexual abuse occurs in church settings and because of males, I can almost say this is sensible. I hate ignorant discrimination, but even more, I hate ignorance toward reality. I wish men weren't discriminated against regarding situations of authority involving children, but abusive men will so often specifically seek out these positions.
/r/MensRights11/08/14 10:19 AM
18

"She even let me go at it without a condom once."
/r/TheRedPill10/08/14 09:06 AM
11

He must be thinking consensual intercourse in the missionary position.
/r/TheRedPill10/08/14 08:49 AM
-16

http://i.imgur.com/pGIMRie.gif
/r/TheRedPill09/08/14 07:45 AM
0

I actually completely agree with you here. A black joke couldn't work, though, unless blacks were in the stereotypical position of power and control. In that case, it would be okay to joke that whites were "smarter, hah." Because it comes with the implication that we're struggling for equality without a very concrete basis.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 03:49 AM
2

And how much comparative volume? Sensitivity is a condition of nerve density not quantity. No doubt, but we're still talking about the most sensitive parts of the penis being removed. On top of that, the actual "volume" is almost the frightening part. We're talking about like 12 square inches of erogenous tissue being removed and two random parts of the penis being grown back together. With so much tissue removed along with the drying and keratinization, impotence is an obvious symptom. But alon…
/r/MensRights05/08/14 05:43 AM
10

Comparisons to FGM need to acknowledge that circumcision is mild MGM just as labial trimming is mild FGM. Except the foreskin has over twice as many nerve endings as the clitoris.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 07:00 AM
8

That was her role in Star Trek: TNG. Glad she lives up to it.
/r/TheRedPill29/07/14 09:44 PM
2

TIL Firehouse Effect. That's a useful term for Reddit considering it's exactly what happens whenever people recoil against the circlejerks. Ironically, I presume that's exactly how religion divides and forms more and more sects. No different from when atheists hate /r/atheism and branch off as separatists.
/r/TheRedPill27/07/14 11:58 AM
-4

I don't understand the issue in the first place. Who gives a fuck if someone is a feminist? It has no meaning other than a fight for equality. A legitimate feminist is literally just a humanist. There's no other side to it that deserves respect. It's a non-argument. I'm getting really sick of people throwing all this attention at the ridiculous Tumblr stereotype that has no validity. For anyone that wants to argue with me, females aren't dogs. We don't have to demean them and pile into a big dou…
/r/TheRedPill16/07/14 08:40 AM
-2

This is why we can have nice things. All sincere fetish moments are treated as taboo. But... I suppose that's what makes them even more fun.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/14 03:10 PM
128

As sly as a sack of bricks.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/14 05:16 AM
3

Part of social learning is through mockery observation of flaws. I know pride tends to flow into the conversation, but mockery is a pointlessly immature approach.
/r/TheRedPill15/05/14 07:32 PM
6

Firstly, this dude is clearly pushing an anti-gay agenda. Secondly, slippery-slopes can happen, but they usually make sense. Thirdly, pedophiles are likely born that way, and if not, it's due to environmental factors. Fourthly, goats and rocks? Poe's Law is strongly in effect. I honestly can't tell if you're completely ignorant or joking, but since this is the sub it is, I can safely assume many of the most ignorant males will be attracted to it -- but you were probably born that way, so I'm not…
/r/TheRedPill10/05/14 01:31 PM
1

The case bears similarities to Her, a Spike Jonze film in which the protagonist, played by Joaquin Phoenix, falls in love with his operating system (voiced by Scarlett Johansson) TIL that computer was voiced by Scarlett Johansson. I was close to looking up who it was, but I was totally confident it was Rashida Jones.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/14 01:27 PM
5

That looked like the start of a porn video.
/r/TheRedPill09/05/14 01:42 AM
-3

Came here to upvote this.
/r/TheRedPill08/05/14 10:13 AM
1

Good point.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 01:45 PM
-3

They silence those who believe that men have important issues, too- either by banning them, deleting the offending post, or trying to send them to /r/masculism. Remember, all it would take is one mod to ban you. You can't really generalize from the actions of one person, nor can you generalize by the actions of one sub. Like when people reply to a post I make with "/r/atheism is leaking!" No, fuck you. I'm leaking and I'll leak wherever I want. Anyway, generalizations can be helpful at times, bu…
/r/MensRights25/04/14 10:04 AM
-1

I can't defend my position because I'm not in those minorities. This sub promotes confidence largely based on enforcing our natural testosterone. There's value in that, but there's also value in understand diversity. It's great to promote self-confidence, but there's no necessity to shame neutral differences in the process.
/r/TheRedPill20/04/14 01:02 AM
0

Stricken by the black knight, once again.
/r/TheRedPill20/04/14 12:59 AM
-11

I agree, but minorities are already in a position under a lot of scrutiny and abuse. If transgender people were the majority, these types of jokes simply wouldn't be funny. It would be normal. It's a weird situation, though. Mocking someone for things they can't change is always negative. I just think there's a lot more constant pressure on different minorities. I can't even defend my own position here because I'm a white male. I don't know what they go through, but I like to assume empathy is s…
/r/TheRedPill20/04/14 12:24 AM
1

I skimmed over that article and it seems legit to me. I've only seen like one of the Ashton Kutcher episodes to know that it sucks enough not to watch it, but I guarantee the sentiment of that writer is easily defensible. Since it's an obvious abnormality, they're clearly going to treat it as the butt of the jokes. That's not a big deal if you aren't living the situation, but disregard for such people is simple discrimination. Simultaneously, it's normalizing the public to differences like that …
/r/TheRedPill19/04/14 11:01 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter