TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ALTSuzzxingcoh Archive

View 9 posts and 335 comments by ALTSuzzxingcoh on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

You should probably know that those standard surgical masks that are a loosely-covering blue/white paper sheet are not the best thing to wear because covid spreads through aerosol-containing air instead of mostly "just" droplets like the flu and the N95 masks people should be wearing that prevent aerosol exchange between the out- and inside do not work with facial hair.
/r/MensRights01/03/21 10:23 AM
1

Fun fact: /r/HistoryPorn banned me some time ago for mentioning the men forced into the military in the comments of a picture of female medics arriving in europe.
/r/MensRights20/02/21 08:52 PM
4

It's just corporate oligarchs pushing a narrative Like Trump? Like every TV station around the world says of Trump, publicly or state-owned, asia, oceania or europe?
/r/MensRights11/02/21 09:43 PM
3

Any thinking person by now should have come to the conclusion that we will have to approach historical persons differently in the future. We will have to face the spectrum of left and right, of nice and evil, of liberal and conservative, of democratic and tyrannical, in which people act and have acted and be selective of the qualities we want to cherish and remember them for, and stop this traditional extremist view of good and bad. Of course, nobody in their right mind would propose naming some…
/r/MensRights29/01/21 12:43 AM
-2

As another non-american, please go away with your fascist apologism. You have no basis on which to assume the american left "would" have done anything, but you have tons of evidence of what the right DID. Stop distorting reality. Trump is responsible for a federally uncontrolled epidemic and for instigating the storming of a government building as well as five deaths during that. The summer riots were due to the murder of a man through an officer captured on video, the capitol storming based on …
/r/MensRights22/01/21 08:55 PM
9

"Yeah but women have it bad, too" "It's not a competition, boooooth sides have it bad* From a european adult male, shut the fuck up. No they don't, yes it is because you make it one, no they don't. Can women and their apologists not have the attention focused on them for just once? This isn't about you.
/r/MensRights17/01/21 02:20 PM
3

https://old.reddit.com/r/CapitalismVSocialism/comments/9zxewz/anti_capitalists_whats_so_bad_about_capitalism/ https://old.reddit.com/r/Capitalism/comments/6gxxcn/freedom_under_capitalism_is_an_illusion/
/r/MensRights13/01/21 06:57 PM
2

My egalitarian principles have lead to me being MRA, although I'm also anti-capitalist. I do, however, have my own ideas on social liberalism and would say I think for myself - I do not consider the 3+ gender identity legitimate, do think adoption is best between heterosexuals, am strongly anti-islam, while I generally support the feminist causes put in relation to the discrimination men face when discussed - equal pay, parenthood leave, employment protections for mothers.
/r/MensRights13/01/21 08:16 AM
10

Swiss MRA here. Jeeesus, just had a look at "our" site...what a load of shit. Most of it is covid denialism and then they talk about "other" objectives like abolishing mandatory TV and radio fees and motorway speed limits. Seems this group is useless.
/r/MensRights11/01/21 05:59 AM
23

Stumbled across this and thought it was...interesting just how casual the dummy editor writes about vaccinations and genital cutting in the same sentence. Look at those pictures. It's like a photo gallery of hell on earth, might as well be the mass rapes of nanking or the deportation to a concentration camp. Disgusting how that's the way it's portrayed in a newspaper - as some curiosity to be gawked at. Imagine this but with girls getting their labia cut or even just their virginity checked.
/r/MensRights03/01/21 02:21 AM
10

Uncircumcised labias are gross.
/r/MensRights31/12/20 12:23 PM
7

Please explain why you should be allowed to have your children's bodies altered for "benefits" that come automatically with living in any non-third-world country and that completely ignore the partial amputation of some of the most sensitive parts of their body and the destruction of a part of a man's sexuality. Please. Please explain it in terms that can be applied in a non-sexist way (meaning that value male sexuality unconditionally) and that do not also support surgeries such as preventative…
/r/MensRights06/12/20 01:22 AM
3

The deleted comment was It is a false equivalence as female genital mutilation pretty much completely removes the clitoris - if circumcision c9mpletely removed a man's glans, I would be very likely be against it, but that is no the case. From the European persoective, both practicess are unnecessary and barbaric, but even still, they are not the same. They just are not. As for your second example, it is another false equivalence and the risk of getting an STD. It is similar to the way that we gi…
/r/MensRights05/12/20 11:10 PM
5

So if studies supported it (without factoring in the downside of missing part of your body), would you defend either genital cutting of women or preventative appendectomies?
/r/MensRights05/12/20 10:48 PM
5

That's what I said. Every "benefit" can not only be gained through other means, but this procedure destroys part of a man's sexuality - which proponents never even seem to register as a negative. As if male sexuality had no value. You certainly don't seem to think it did.
/r/MensRights05/12/20 10:26 PM
7

I'm european and have an intact penis. You don't seem to think that ALL men deserve to have a whole and sexual sensation, which I find tragic. I don't need a justification for NOT performing surgery.
/r/MensRights05/12/20 10:23 PM
7

Why do you feel that men's sexuality is worth that little that "benefits", not only questionable but perfectly attainable through safe sex, for example, outweigh the amputation of some of the most intimate body parts and the restriction of male sexuality? Why don't men have a right to a whole body?
/r/MensRights05/12/20 10:14 PM
10

Because most cut men don't realize that they've actually LOST something. You really need to be culturally indoctrinated to believe removing part of a child's genitalia is okay because "hygiene". In short, penis cancer is ridiculously rare, safe sex needs to be practiced anyway, shower regularly and you're fine. You know, like most europeans are. What your side never considers is that this procedure is removing an entire part of these men's sexual experience and robbing it from them forever. No, …
/r/MensRights05/12/20 10:12 PM
7

Well, since you think you're allowed to alter and cut your children's bodies, surely anybody can do that to anybody? Unless you don't respect bodily integrity or think chidren are lower or worth less than you. Why shouldn't we prophylactically remove every child's spleen, one kidney, appendix and gall bladder? You know, things that can totally kill you.
/r/MensRights05/12/20 10:08 PM
3

We downvote you because we feel like r/mensrights is the last bastion of the not entirely brainwashed group that still feels like men have goddamn rights and we refuse to have them denied to some of us because of "hygiene" non-reasons in a world where condoms exist. Because we don't want this sub to become full of yes-men and because we feel like having a whole body supercedes any "benefits" any genital cutting could ever have. Much like the right to have ones whole body does supercede the "bene…
/r/MensRights05/12/20 10:05 PM
11

Hope someone stabs you in the street, then. You know, making decisions for other people's body. Oops, I forgot, all those HIV-suffering, cancerous, infected europeans with their dirty intact penises.
/r/MensRights05/12/20 10:02 PM
17

"Are you a feminist?" "No, but I do believe in equal rights" Murdered.
/r/MensRights24/11/20 05:35 AM
5

Just wanted to say there's no way I believe that women would ever ask out men or ask men for sex on a level anywhere near to where the reverse happens right now. I refuse to believe it is anything but biological fact that this doesn't happen. And I think a lot of progressive men (like I am, just not naive) delude themselves and think that "if only" feminism "succeeded" in all of their goals, they'd be getting laid left right and center. Nah. I doubt I'm that much of an outlier, and having been a…
/r/MensRights23/11/20 01:19 AM
9

I think I last watched the Atheist Experience in 2013 after the guys suddenly seemed to all have girlfriends and hopped onto the retarded atheism+ express. At the same time, they had segments criticizing non-indicated circumcision, segments talking about their family's past involvement in the military and segments making fun of the men's rights movement - just how dumb do you need to be? Are they still like that?
/r/MensRights22/11/20 03:28 AM
7

Can somebody finally outlaw infant genital cutting first instead of arguing over fucking fishing rights or privacy on facebook?
/r/MensRights16/11/20 01:22 AM
-1

Disagree fundamentally with both. Am an anti-capitalist, atheist leftie. Shapiro is a complete joke, Peterson has some points but is also covertly misandrist. No, some of us actually have no desire to be a traditional non-"pathetic", non-"weak" male and some of us see no point in getting married or taking on useless responsibility, thank you. Plus he's a semi-climate-change denier and he camouflages his conservatism and religiousness with the pretense of being the devil's advocate or "both sides…
/r/MensRights15/11/20 05:22 PM
1

Boo, wendy. Boo.
/r/MensRights14/11/20 02:04 AM
1

Boohoo you lost and are in denial. Why don't you throw some more whataboutisms my way? Yeah trump's an ass, but what about stale bread though? Answer this you libtards! Bread is fake news!
/r/MensRights13/11/20 08:43 PM
0

Did Obama "not accept" trump's win? Did Obama have a history of crookery and admire dictators? Did Obama go on a rant of lies to press in the midst of the election and throw a tantrum like a kindergartener on drugs?
/r/MensRights13/11/20 06:39 PM
-3

Yeah guys, totally doesn't try to be dictator. Just really loves putin's dick, hates the press asking him "not nice" questions and doesn't acknowledge the country voting him out. Totally, like, democratical you guys. In b4 "but the electors haven't voted yet", to be read in "tuk mah jobs" voice.
/r/MensRights13/11/20 05:04 PM
-12

But we’re just supposed to believe it now because the Dems supposedly has won. But we're just supposed to have an issue with mailing now because the Dems actually won? In Biden's words (who I, as a european, wouldn't have voted for if there had been an alternative to dictator wannabe trump, take that for your partisanship mind games), you're a clown.
/r/MensRights13/11/20 11:57 AM
-22

European redditor here. Kindly fuck off and take your proto-fascist reality distortion generator with you. The people have declared Biden the winner (as happens in a vote) because trump is a clown. Where were you when more actual people voted for Clinton in 2016? Exactly.
/r/MensRights13/11/20 11:26 AM
6

Why would you not put your strongest and most able-bodied? Because my life has bloody value god damnit!
/r/MensRights11/11/20 05:32 PM
5

Good thing you support going around and sawing people's arms off since, obviously, "outright murder is much worse than assault".
/r/MensRights10/11/20 07:18 PM
1

If the people don’t like it they stop buying it. Doesn't work. Only works with an ideal, rational, thinking, option-having consumer, which we aren't. Neither climate change, nor human rights shitholes, nor animal maltreatment, nor palm oil, nor big plastic, nor big pharma, nor gambling in video games and a thousand others can be solved by the consumer. The consumer doesn't, CANNOT (too much data) behave in a rational, enlightened manner. That's exactly the reality distortion the elite wants you …
/r/MensRights11/10/20 11:01 AM
1

How do you explain my government having made health insurance not only mandatory but also mandatory for the insurance to give coverage? Or regulation prohibiting discrimination in employment? How do you propose any infrastructure gets built without a government? Would you rather facebook, microsoft and google were in charge instead of our governments - because they would be once those'd gotten removed? Who's gonna protect me from having to join the darwinian slave labour market they'd establish?…
/r/MensRights11/10/20 12:15 AM
2

You realize that there are other options, right? Companies having to be employee-owned, basic income in relation to maximum income, automation's generated value actually being transferred to minimize work hours for humans? All libertarians argue for is for the economy to be that one field of society to be as lawless as possible. Who would say such a thing as "crimes happen anyway, no need for laws"? "People are gonna die, what good are drugs?" That's essentially what you do. The spectrum you thi…
/r/MensRights10/10/20 11:03 PM
0

You "how the world actually works" guys are so cute. I guess you'd have told me people owning other people or kings being in control through hereditary power is just "how the world works". Flip burgers while others financially rape you and make bank off you? "Just how the world works". All libertarians want is an infinite darwinian power struggle, no thanks.
/r/MensRights10/10/20 08:07 PM
1

So let me get this straight. You're an american "minimum wage" worker who's liberterian and believes (american) government isn't the solution because (american) government is incapable? Dude, you're just on the other end of the american lower class extremist spectrum. The other one's called proud boys.
/r/MensRights10/10/20 04:31 PM
2

Okay, well I disagree with all of it then. Your government being "racist" doesn't explain why others aren't. A lot of us (r/antiwork) are sick of society being about working for status at all. The rich only exist because we collectively let them and because they funnel our collective labor's worth into their hands without doing proportional work. I see the consequences of a rich elite being out of touch with normal folk and letting things like infrastructure, education and such degrade (yes, gov…
/r/MensRights10/10/20 01:38 PM
-3

So tell me, what more is libertarianism other than let the rich do whatever they want because they deserve it and guvment evil!!!?
/r/MensRights10/10/20 01:16 PM
-2

Hating the rich is just jealousy of the successful. You know what gets people rich? The consumer. Don’t consume things you don’t like and it will disappear! LOlolol just don't use or eat or rent or buy anything guys!!! So simple lololol!!!! See these leeches? You're just jealous because you wish you were one!!!! Upon finishing said work you give him 50% of your dirt... did he earn it? Nope. You think you're talking about governments? Because you aren't.
/r/MensRights10/10/20 12:31 PM
-6

Yeah, sorry guys, as a european mra, not gonna let this stand unquestioned and unopposed. Libertarianism is a retarded idea and capitalism makes it so dozens of millions of americans barely survive working "freely" chosen jobs or two or three of them. I'm a liberal (with terms and conditions) and I refuse to be told what politics I'm into just because I'm also an mra. Equal pay for equal labor, hard ceiling on top wages relative to minimum income.
/r/MensRights10/10/20 11:51 AM
1

Very left on financial and social safety. Generally left on individual freedom, including sexual and lifestyle. Right on islamic and non-westernized immigration. I do sympathize with anarchism, distributism and certain socialism and I am anti-capitalist and anti-work.
/r/MensRights09/10/20 08:24 PM
4

Nothing a bit of pill dust in your morning coffee couldn't fix. Immoral? Nah, entrapment, rape and betrayal is.
/r/MensRights05/10/20 07:35 PM
1

Go away, saboteur.
/r/MensRights02/10/20 12:30 PM
3

Hint: Forcing half the population (or any members belonging to that group) to do slave labour because they've had the bad luck of being born with a penis IS "UNFAIRLY BIASED"!
/r/MensRights20/09/20 02:16 PM
2

We cannot expect gender equality for the sake of equality alone. Then what the hell are you doing in this subreddit?
/r/MensRights20/09/20 01:47 PM
3

Right, so you're in r/mensrights saying that people who happen to be born with male genes and a penis deserve to be forced to work slave labour for the state, to be trained in becoming cannon fodder, and to be forced to get maimed and killed on any possible battlefields because "it makes sense". You see the issue there? Highly sexist and not what you'll get support for on here. That is, of course, unless you're also in favor of women being forced to get themselves pregnant and become good little…
/r/MensRights20/09/20 12:32 PM
3

Either that or neither.
/r/MensRights20/09/20 12:01 PM
3

No he did not talk about equalising military service. I personally take pride in being able to serve as a male in the military. I think it's an honorable duty, and yes I would be willing to protect the women in this country despite what they may throw at us. I think it's great that men gets to perform this duty, so while I know it is technically unfair, I am perfectly proud to make this sacrifice. I think there are also many women out there who respects that, just like how men also respects the …
/r/MensRights20/09/20 09:45 AM
7

Not that I'd support it anyway, but your "version" of corporal punishment sounds like ritualized sexual abuse of the entirety of male students for the sadomasochistic titillation of adults.
/r/MensRights20/09/20 09:42 AM
3

#SacrificeTheOnePercent
/r/MensRights08/09/20 05:35 AM
1

Eagerly awaiting the day financial rape of men and dating older boys and men for financial gain (edit: also entrapment) becomes a crime investigated by the likes of FBI, interpol etc.
/r/MensRights07/09/20 11:56 AM
26

Mandatory paternity tests without exception for every child at any father's age!
/r/MensRights07/09/20 06:47 AM
1

Laura Bates Low effort, I realize, but...I'm sure she does. :)
/r/MensRights03/09/20 12:09 PM
1

Uncut women be like: "Natural is beautiful!" https://www.suttonpda.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/turkey-neck.jpg
/r/MensRights31/07/20 03:03 AM
1

Extremes on bell curves. Dictators are probably very focused and sort of sociopathic, and in a way the other end of those spectra is living without clear goals, mental illness and being out-performed by the work-addicted and the sociopaths doing whatever they have to to dominate the market both financially and power-wise. Whatever spectrum there is, men are usually way more represented on the extremes.
/r/MensRights24/07/20 11:48 AM
2

So, I'm not an american, but...would you say the same about obama to black people? Germans to nazis? The chinese americans to Xi? "Hold other people of the same group responsible"? Would you really dare speak those words - and if not, why is it acceptable towards men? Men are traditionally in charge because the bell curve for traits such as intelligence, psychopathy and different extremes spans further across the spectrum than it does for women. The origin of there being fewer homeless women and…
/r/MensRights24/07/20 08:12 AM
2

You don't see the issue with YOU being ok with something we consider a crime having been done to you and you thus being ok with that thing being done to others?
/r/MensRights20/07/20 03:37 PM
8

The downside is It's his body and surgery removes a part of ones body. That simple. You get the "benefits" (that aren't) from circumcision from practicing safe sex and showering like any normal person would do. Who in their right mind would agree to, and read this closely now, cut a part of a child's genitalia off so he's less likely to catch HIV and less likely to smell (while being unsafe sexually and not practicing basic hygiene)? That's literally the retarded "benefits" they're advocating. A…
/r/MensRights20/07/20 08:27 AM
9

Obviously murder is worse than breaking people's arms, therefore it's fine to walk around the streets with a baton and just thrash bystanders.
/r/MensRights20/07/20 08:22 AM
8

Please don't use "amp" links, they're an attempt to further wall-garden the open internet by google. https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2020/jul/06/upward-thrusting-buildings-ejaculating-cities-sexist-leslie-kern-phallic-feminist-city-toxic-masculinity
/r/MensRights06/07/20 10:28 PM
17

Don't_mention_tunnels!
/r/MensRights06/07/20 10:27 PM
1

How about...get this...we just have "crimes" and "non-crimes", ever thought of that? "Hate crime"...you mean like any actual crime against someone? What a fundamentally moronic concept.
/r/MensRights06/07/20 03:48 PM
1

I think this whole "private companies can do whatever they want" spiel is a load of crap. They've now gotten so big that limitations on speech on these websites ARE limitations on free speech. What would have been censorship of letters, phone calls, newspapers or direct conversation IS censorship of social media now. Now, I do not make excuses for and am in no way supportive of the trump regime, or feminazi subs, and I refuse to ally with Peterson or Trump or the new alt right just because moder…
/r/MensRights30/06/20 07:36 PM
8

No horror movie script could make it up. Literal frankenstein gulag practices, selling of amputated human meat, and celebrities using mutilated babies for their skin care. The whole cell business with foreskins should be made illegal and these people should rot in jail. Also look up the recent "skin graft string" articles, they use mutilation cultures as well.
/r/MensRights20/06/20 07:34 AM
3

In case you wanna change professions, r/askwomen is < that way.
/r/MensRights16/06/20 11:40 AM
3

You do realize some of us are liberal leftists and anti-capitalist, right? This isn't a nazi-tree hugger divide and there's more to politics than that.
/r/MensRights11/06/20 05:22 PM
4

The fucking BBC now wants me to create an account? Madness.
/r/MensRights01/06/20 03:30 AM
1

Good mod. Here's cookie. (::)
/r/MensRights22/05/20 09:43 PM
3

What's with all the people in this thread? I don't know what fucking wave of apologists has come over this sub. Stand up for your rights.
/r/MensRights16/05/20 10:30 AM
2

PragerU is a fake "university" and conservative spam. Don't like these a-holes. We're not all Jordan Peterson in here.
/r/MensRights01/05/20 11:30 AM
9

Ultimate mom pandering. And, might I add, such an americanism. "We're talking about genital cutting, so please "respect" the parents' choice". Why don't you go talk to some african tribespeople, I'm sure they'll be glad to hear this.
/r/MensRights30/04/20 08:51 PM
2

You are like a textbook example of a willingly ignorant person. Shame 300 million people have to suffer because of it.
/r/MensRights14/04/20 12:43 PM
-2

RT is russian state-financed propaganda. Don't link to them.
/r/MensRights13/04/20 03:50 PM
7

STOP ruining this sub with fake-news-ish clickbait bullshit. There's circumcision, conscription, alimony, reproductive rights, suicidality, life expectancy and hundreds of other little issues to worry about and to become active for. Stop this useless shite.
/r/MensRights13/04/20 12:43 AM
0

So what? "Let's make it worse" then?
/r/MensRights28/03/20 01:45 PM
-2

Fucking don't. Wikipedia should be a source of objective, unidealistic knowledge, not a playground for internet kiddies and power fantasies. Just because feminazis do it doesn't mean it'll not just make the internet a worse place if you do as well.
/r/MensRights23/03/20 11:51 PM
1

Give lazy response, get nothing productive in return.
/r/MensRights23/03/20 09:49 PM
1

Good thing nazism isn't by definition conservative...wait.
/r/MensRights17/03/20 07:46 AM
3

European guy here. I don't believe there will be critical food shortages - unlike after massive catastrophes or wars where the actual infrastructure is damaged mid-term. But believe you me, if it ever comes to that, I WILL get my ration and if it means overpowering and robbing a 20-year-old woman with a baby in her arm, so be it. This guy will not perish in the name of chivalry.
/r/MensRights17/03/20 07:44 AM
3

Can we make this go viral, please? Don't care how. That crazy mutilation cult has got to go.
/r/MensRights25/02/20 10:59 PM
2

Honestly, as a fan of horror books and movies, I couldn't come up with this disgusting, perverted filth if I tried to. I mean...INFANT GENITAL CUTTING AND ORAL SEX? These people have gone through that and they prey to a god so they don't go to hell - which is what exactly if not a death cult that cuts around on babies and sucks their penises?
/r/MensRights25/02/20 10:55 PM
7

There's a danger in confusing the two and becoming the next LGBTQI+-we-stand-for-everybody-and-nothing movement. If you're discriminated against because you're a male homosexual (illegality where there isn't for lesbians, for example), then yes, this is also about your rights. If you're discriminated against solely because you're A homosexual, then no.
/r/MensRights22/02/20 03:51 PM
6

I'm sure the germans will be glad to hear that you consider them nazis.
/r/MensRights15/02/20 01:49 PM
5

Reading some headline on reddit's frontpage about the holocaust and the important thing being "not showing indifference"...well, whenever I don't show indifference, they call me antisemite and islamophobe.
/r/MensRights28/01/20 03:31 PM
7

Go away.
/r/MensRights22/01/20 06:07 PM
23

Funny how nobody ever "identifies" HAVING LESS GENITALIA as a downside. It's always "benefits". Why don't they ever "identify" breast amputation in girls as a successful way to prevent breast cancer?
/r/MensRights21/01/20 12:44 PM
6

I also commented about this on the JR subreddit. What a joke. Making fun of "MRA assholes" and in the next sentence switching over to supporting basically everything an MRA stands for - except of course anti-circumcision stances, can't do that if both are cut and one's a judaism apologist (or was).
/r/MensRights19/01/20 02:49 AM
14

Move along, troll, you won't be fed in this city.
/r/MensRights12/01/20 01:56 AM
15

Yang said that if elected, he would make sure to “inform parents that it is entirely up to them whether their infant gets circumcised, and that there are costs and benefits either way.” He added: “The more choice we give parents, and the more we diminish the possible preconceptions or misinformation various parents are receiving, then the better off we’ll be as a society.” One hell of an MRA we got there. The usual drivel of "make an """informed""" choice" - yeah, like the informed choice of afr…
/r/MensRights27/12/19 11:57 PM
3

While you're so far up your asses lefties, might as well do your yearly checkups and save on bills.
/r/MensRights21/12/19 11:28 PM
7

"Being nice" causes parents to spew the "at least make an informed decision" bullshit. You don't win shit being nice. Politicians need to be stood up to to fight climate change and parents need to be told that they're abusing their kids if they make "an informed" decision.
/r/MensRights18/12/19 02:57 AM
8

Jesus fuck, talk about a derailment followed by a mutual jerk.
/r/MensRights18/12/19 02:43 AM
1

That's the thing with being an uneducated 3rd world country shithole. They become hodgepodges of cults, sects, maniacs, corrupt politicians, predatorial businesspeople and they don't even start to question any of it.
/r/MensRights17/12/19 10:53 PM
14

So you think a loss in sensation of your genitals for all your life is worth the...benefit of not needing to spend an additional 15 seconds in the shower every day?
/r/MensRights17/12/19 10:51 PM
-10

Please enlighten us as to how 60-year-old business farts whose interests include business, libertarianism, tax cuts and baby jeesus will help us avert climate change.
/r/MensRights12/12/19 07:35 PM
40

I would point out that boys' rights to have complete genitalia overrides their rights to be scripturally deluded fucktards and they can either deal with it, continue cutting and serve prison time or fuck off.
/r/MensRights08/12/19 04:18 PM
8

What about the Cult of Cleptomaniacs' rights to assault and steal children? RACISM!!! They've been doing it for thousands of years!!!
/r/MensRights07/12/19 11:55 AM
12

According to american circofetishists, we're all running around smelling like smegma with our dicks rotting off from penis cancer that we got because our intact penises didn't shield us from getting AIDS. No soap for wash peepee - murica, hülp pliis!
/r/MensRights05/12/19 11:28 AM
5

You, too, can be a shitter if you believe hard enough.
/r/MensRights07/11/19 03:24 AM
59

The elite that 99% of men don't belong to and never will. Or are you suggesting every german alive right now is a nazi?
/r/MensRights04/11/19 11:50 AM
7

You're taking away the religious freedom of jewish and muslim boys, you anti-semite circofetishist.
/r/MensRights04/10/19 10:34 PM
-2

Why can't the movement just reverse the religious freedom argument and start yelling at jews and muslims that they violate their children's? Argue that children aren't their possessions?
/r/MensRights04/10/19 09:50 AM
6

Poor infrastructure doesn't seem to deter them from housing homeless women there. So what, they are fine but the poor men would'nt've had a hospital nearby, so out of pure compassion, they now accommodate women only? Right.
/r/MensRights01/10/19 01:15 PM
0

I'm swiss and face a similar problem. I think the highest priorities right now should be global issues, mostly climate change, then antibiotic resistances and so on, but I also think women are comparatively overprivileged, islamophobia is totally legitimate looking at how much of a shithole the islamic world is and circumcision, practiced almost entirely by muslims and jews, needs to be outlawed. So who do I vote for? Environmentalist cultural relativists or cultural realists that are also mafio…
/r/MensRights25/09/19 08:44 PM
13

theater curtains Wind test tunnel entrance Butcher's backroom Rottweiler's snout Salami factory Jumbo's engine cowling Used, deflated airbag Toilet mop
/r/MensRights25/09/19 07:58 PM
83

Yeah well, I'm a non-american MRA and I don't think any of your soldiers overseas (unless for aid purposes) have done any good in the last 50 years. Vietnam was lost, iraq was built on bullshit, afghanistan is a clusterfuck. Ignoring all the little shenanigans that include invasions, coups, torture, the occasional mission in africa and the middle east. Nah, the last time american soldiers have defended western "common" interests was world war 2. It's not anti-military people's fault that uneduca…
/r/MensRights17/09/19 05:19 AM
3

Oh absolutely, but there should be precautions. Stuff like signing a document that the man is doing it voluntarily, laws against forcing your kids to undergo it, the offer of help/shelter if your parents are insisting on getting it done. You know, basic stuff we already provide for female victims of domestic violence. I think it's a shame we just ignore genital mutilation when we do so much for DV and female sexual health. Really, I think parents doing this to kids - even as adults - deserve pri…
/r/MensRights14/09/19 12:26 AM
7

We need to be careful with that. A lot of the time, religious minorities live in their own little bubble and their children remain in a close, often dependant, sometimes abusive relationship with their parents. Giving them the OK to mutilate at 18 will just mean they force their sons to get it done "themselves".
/r/MensRights14/09/19 12:09 AM
8

Yes. Much in the same way as cutting out your lungs reduces the risk of lung cancer. I'd much rather be able to breathe, or enjoy my foreskin. Any cells you have are at risk of becoming cancerous at any time. What's your solution? Cut anything non-critical? One kidney, breasts, earlobes, one testicle, the appendix, the spleen, one lung?
/r/MensRights10/09/19 03:45 AM
9

Ignoring the "risk" of not having a huge part of ones penis any more, like the "benefit"ers always do. Cutting off a breast reduces the chances of breast cancer. Is the logical conclusion to this routine infant mastectomy?
/r/MensRights10/09/19 03:26 AM
49

This is double misandry: Not imprisoning a woman for being deceitful and it being legal to carry out circumcisions in the first place. "Without parents consent"? The real scandal here should be "Legal to circumcise minors because brainwashed, degenerate parents want them to be".
/r/MensRights04/09/19 02:58 PM
7

What is it with american women's arrogance over their offspring's bodies? They talk like they've been promoted in the military. Your child doesn't belong to you. It's not a flashy car you own as a breast replacement or a job promotion into a more privileged, more powerful position. You're supposed to be their guardian, not tyrant-in-charge.
/r/MensRights03/09/19 09:10 PM
1

So, I thought this was just another BS headline and looked into the tweets. These people are so far up their own asses, they're at danger of being invaded by the us armed forces for finding oil.
/r/MensRights29/08/19 06:21 AM
1

Don't care for appropriateness: I hope she dies in a car crash.
/r/MensRights21/08/19 10:13 AM
7

Nah, GenderCritical is basically MaleHolocaust.
/r/MensRights11/08/19 08:44 PM
1

It doesn't, OP. https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/directories/policy/annual-2019/114-annual-2019.pdf RESOLVED, That the American Bar Association urges legislatures and courts to define consent in sexual assault cases as the assent of a person who is competent to give consent to engage in a specific act of sexual penetration, oral sex, or sexual contact, to provide that consent is expressed by words or action in the context of all the circumstances, and to reject any requirement that se…
/r/MensRights11/08/19 01:32 AM
18

FGM is also cultural. One might argue that genocide in the third reich was part of their "culture". As we all know, doing anything is fine if "always did it this way".
/r/MensRights06/08/19 04:28 AM
6

Still, as a non-american..."assault" seems a bit much. The dichotomy of how americans cuddle their kids and how they can have them judged for adult crimes is astonishing.
/r/MensRights01/08/19 11:04 PM
11

There is: Prosecutors said that the incident between Lindley's son and the other boy happened after the students had stopped playing the game. Lindley's son allegedly "took the ball and intentionally threw it with force" at the other boy, Worthy said in a statement Wednesday. https://www.nbcnews.com/news/nbcblk/assault-charge-dropped-against-10-year-old-boy-over-injury-n1037181
/r/MensRights01/08/19 10:53 PM
1

UKayistan is progressing fine, I see.
/r/MensRights28/07/19 04:50 AM
3

So, maybe I'm the weird one, but...and it's not an equality issue, I support fully equal sentencing between men and women...I just for the life of me can't - honestly - justify such a sentence for such an act. Imagining my hypothetical self at 13, there's just no way a sexual act with an adult - especially since they had what you might call (missiles incoming) "consensual" conversation - should've resulted in my adult opposite getting sentenced to two freaking decades in jail. I see myself poten…
/r/MensRights28/07/19 01:21 AM
1

Kinetic energy mate?
/r/MensRights21/07/19 03:34 PM
8

Then how dare you be anti-slavery, even the old egyptians had slaves, you egyptophobe self-righteous prick.
/r/MensRights18/07/19 01:28 PM
41

Are you saying girls' breasts should be carved out at birth because they might develop cancer as a woman?
/r/MensRights14/07/19 08:40 PM
4

So you're saying we should cut girls' breasts off? Do you notice how logically inconsistent and dangerous this all sounds? Can you really not understand how taking a part of somebody's body away is just flat-out, indefensibly wrong?
/r/MensRights14/07/19 12:12 PM
3

They've been robbed of a part of their body. There's also a high number of women out there with amputated breasts that are enjoying their lives. They'd still like to have their complete body back.
/r/MensRights14/07/19 11:59 AM
4

"Genital cutting" is pretty much the definition of "harm", I don't know what else to tell you. "They fuck it up too often"? - like when they succeed in cutting a part of a child's genitals off?
/r/MensRights14/07/19 11:24 AM
7

You know who gets appendicitis? People with appendices. You know who gets breast cancer? People with breasts. You know who has to take showers? People with bodies. Would you advocate removing infant girls' breasts so they can't get breast cancer later on? They don't "need" all the breast tissue anyway. A lot of animals don't have visible boobs. Why shouldn't we remove one of kids' kidneys so those can never get cancerous?
/r/MensRights14/07/19 08:21 AM
1

The issue is that adults in those countries can't just magically turn "mature" at 18. They're still forced to behave as their parents, grandparents, circle of relatives, teachers, bosses, and culture as a whole wants them to behave. Saying that getting circumcised at 18 is fine is just putting off the inevitable. Look at how many 18-year-olds in the west still HAVE to live with their parents and are, by and large, not actually behaving as independently as a mature adult would.
/r/MensRights13/07/19 01:03 PM
3

Good luck convincing the millions of muslims that they've been mutilated and convincing their leftie friends that anything they do isn't just doodly-doo awesome because of white self-hatred.
/r/MensRights06/07/19 11:55 PM
5

Louis did nothing wrong.
/r/MensRights26/06/19 05:56 PM
76

Funny how, still, "not having part of his genitals any more from an operation without any medical indication" is never part of the argument against circumcision. It's always some secondary, abstract effect of it that gets discussed. Pain, autism, trauma, women's health, cancer, whatever. How about waking up to the fact that hundreds of millions of boys alive right now have had parts of their genitals removed while you lot bitch and moan about every cent some waitress makes less than a waiter? I …
/r/MensRights24/06/19 06:59 PM
7

It's not two years in switzerland. You sure you didn't confuse the video with one about singapore or south korea?
/r/MensRights18/06/19 08:27 PM
3

113 killed...of which ? male?
/r/MensRights12/06/19 08:17 PM
1

I've seen this many times with finnish men. You're somehow in denial when it comes to what military service is to you. You spew this egalitarian stuff and then turn around and make up excuses for your own discrimination. As a guy from Finland. I dont really experience situation where women or men are treated badly due to gender! I mean...self-reflective skills and memory = 0?
/r/MensRights09/06/19 11:01 AM
4

Imagine Married With Children, The A-Team or Californication being made right now ...
/r/MensRights06/06/19 08:43 PM
2

What happens when old farts in wigs that weren't democractically elected into power control your sex and speech laws.
/r/MensRights06/06/19 10:31 AM
2

Oh cuuuuuuuckada!
/r/MensRights04/06/19 07:49 PM
15

I mean, I see the "doing the best" for people as telling them truths about reality, as giving them the option to review reality based on facts, as making them enlightened, capable adults. Not treating them like retarded toddlers that need to be protected from any bad feelings. Yes, if that involves incriminating and shunning a bitch that has cheated on her man, lied to him, committed fraud and continually lied to her own children about their heritage, then that "trust" to her can gladly be ruine…
/r/MensRights01/06/19 12:38 PM
23

Excuse me? "Cause rifts"? That's exactly what the feminazis in countries where paternity tests are illegal want. Not to "rock the boat". Fuck that. Rock the boat full of fraudster women until it sinks. We're talking global paternity fraud on a massive scale. People need to wake up to this reality. Mandatory paternity tests after birth and criminalization of accusing somebody wrongly of fatherhood. Can't believe I encounter willing victims on a sub such as this one.
/r/MensRights01/06/19 12:17 PM
26

Wouldn't you sleep well knowing your children are safe from the violence of the black ghetto in every major american city in their new non-coloured taxis and public transport? Just a protection measure for white america.
/r/MensRights29/05/19 12:15 PM
9

Anybody care to enlighten me why this thread has been overrun by circofetishists?
/r/MensRights21/05/19 02:32 AM
11

A right to one's own body. Your natural body doesn't need "health benefits". You don't go around cutting babies' appendices, girls' breasts or removing a kidney just "on the off chance" that they could develop a health issue at some point. Literally no european you'd ask this would quote "health" benefits; this is a made up post-facto justification from americans.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 02:31 AM
22

Print it out and put it up on billboards around american towns; it might just change some minds. I really think if people were confronted with images of this bullshit, at least a percentage might realize what dumb idiots they've been for supporting this. You know the graphic images of lung cancer and rotting teeth they have on european cigarette packages? Might just need some rotting, bleeding and half-cut penis with some laughing nurses around for good measure for intactivism to succeed.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 07:38 PM
1

I mean, let's be honest and cut the bullshit. Short of either russia, china (lol), the US or EU threatening with a war and massive economic sanctions - which won't happen because thanks to globalization, we've all become a pathetic bunch of interdependent pussies -, nothing'll change.
/r/MensRights10/05/19 10:12 PM
2

We're discussing (some rightfully) the implications of killing crustaceans, of paying for STD tests and contraception for young adults, of the unfairness of different incomes, insurance rates, political representation, ageism, "privilege" of all different kinds, high speed rail financing, what kind of toys you should get your child, how you should protect them from predatory internet celebrities and microtransactions...and we let monsters like this person roam free? People are in prison for inha…
/r/MensRights10/05/19 10:08 PM
3

Five-second rule? What, are they trying to lick their face?
/r/MensRights30/04/19 11:39 AM
5

Wonder if you'd have the balls to tell that to finnish women as well ...
/r/MensRights23/04/19 09:26 AM
9

Jeff Goldblum - joked about son's circumcision, although might've changed his mind since then. Christina Aguilera - joked about holding a circumcision party. 200% disgusting. Bill Maher - said something along the lines of that intactivists are anti-semite (I think) and "what's the deal?"
/r/MensRights23/04/19 08:55 AM
5

If we force people into slave labour based on biological ability, should we not force women to attend childcare classes and force them to have children in war time?
/r/MensRights23/04/19 08:52 AM
6

Funny, for how enlightened nordic people supposedly are, I stumble across a lot of seemingly self-hating misandrist finnish men on the web. And I DO mean it's almost always the finnish with this mentality of "well yeah it's discrimination but not really, plus russia, so that's ok".
/r/MensRights23/04/19 08:50 AM
1

Don't be islamophobohatin', now ...
/r/MensRights14/04/19 04:58 PM
10

Good for him. He has THAT body, probably spends at least an hour every day destroying himself, adhering to a strict diet, being modest with sugar, alcohol and other drugs - if he consumes them at all. You invest so much of your life into a goal, you deserve to get the perfect version thereof. You learn every day for years, you expect and deserve to graduate with a degree. Same with any trade, education, craft, job, pilot's license or whatever. You put in, you deserve an output. It's not his faul…
/r/MensRights10/04/19 01:46 PM
2

I know, I'm just saying that if I were in charge, both situations wouldn't result in a ban.
/r/MensRights05/04/19 12:35 AM
2

So, I'm all for pushing back against man haters globally and not letting them get away unpunished and all, but in the interest of free speech - yes, even on a corporate platform where they can do whatever the hell they want -, I disagree with banning people unless they directly incite violence, i.e. tell somebody to hurt someone else or similar. I realize those quotes come close to that but I still disagree.
/r/MensRights05/04/19 12:10 AM
4

Saboteur, we're on to you ...
/r/MensRights03/04/19 12:41 AM
2

Funny how both sound like a nutjob conspiracy theory...except true.
/r/MensRights02/04/19 05:13 PM
6

Come to #outragefest19, where there's no music (cultural appropriation), the audience are clearly seperated by gender for their own safety and use of any urinal is strictly forbidden because that's manshowing and toxic. EDIT: Jesus the comments on there. I hope these people never have kids.
/r/MensRights30/03/19 07:44 PM
7

Virginity for eternity Dry spell until heaven or hell Solo action without satisfaction Manual labor for your dangly neighbors
/r/MensRights30/03/19 01:50 AM
4

All those well-educated syrian doctor immigrants with "just a different culture" at it again, hm?
/r/MensRights24/03/19 05:45 PM
1

That's because...she loves lamp, not you.
/r/MensRights15/03/19 09:29 AM
4

I think the disconnect happens way earlier and is perpetuated by most of all of civilization. Western civilization, anyway. It's that we truly have indoctrinated ourselves into believing that the female sex drive is anywhere close to as strong as the male one. That's the core issue. Plus men allowing women to judge them for their objective-based, animalistic sexuality that women have no way of understanding. Or alternatively, ask a gay man how much flirting he needed to do and wants to have done…
/r/MensRights04/03/19 07:18 PM
2

Hey now, wouldn't want to be "offensive" or "indecent" now, would we? Close your potty little mouth and go hug somebody now! Or we'll taser you
/r/MensRights11/02/19 07:48 AM
11

"It's easier to clean when changing his diaper." What a waste of oxygen.
/r/MensRights10/02/19 02:11 PM
2

Guys, just use this easy rebuttal: Following the "A is worse than B, therefore B is fine" logic, why is breaking somebody's arm or punching somebody in the face illegal if murder is, since the latter is clearly worse? If the person responding tries to counter with "Those aren't even remotely similar", ask: How much of a penis is "fine" to cut off a child according to their logic? And how much of a set of female genitals? You'll soon find that they can't pinpoint when exactly mutilation, cutting,…
/r/MensRights07/02/19 11:07 AM
8

Well - here's a fun thought for you. Preventative breast amputation may save your daughter from breast cancer. Since what tissue you don't possess can't damage your other tissue any more. So why not give that a try? Or prophylactic appendectomy? Or removal of a kidney or lung? Since nobody needs both of those!
/r/MensRights06/02/19 05:10 AM
15

People defending circumcision because FGM is worse is like people defending breaking someone's bones because outright murder is worse.
/r/MensRights06/02/19 03:16 AM
7

And calling breaking somebody's arms assault is normalizing the brutality of murder; they're both still illegal.
/r/MensRights06/02/19 03:14 AM
13

No, cut foreskin can't actually be regenerated. Vaccinations are a centralized effort to eradicated deadly diseases, circumcisions are - at most - done in a belief that you don't have to wash your penis that often any more. Don't quote the HIV studies, you wouldn't cut your daughter for that, either.
/r/MensRights06/02/19 03:14 AM
8

Yes. Other than having money to invest in big blingy skylines, they are. They're uncultured, uncivilized, barbaric, corrupt, tribal, warmongering, despotic shitholes.
/r/MensRights02/02/19 11:52 PM
9

There's a reason the middle east is one huge shithole. That reason is being stuck in the pre-middle ages. edit: Remember, the real tragedy is women earning some unexplainable percentage less than men.
/r/MensRights02/02/19 11:34 PM
4

Go back to being a stuck-up, prude, tea-trading empire with a queen and an impoverished underclass already, we know you want to!
/r/MensRights29/01/19 01:37 AM
28

What a biggotted thing to say! You sure are an angry white alt-righter off the internet!
/r/MensRights15/01/19 05:51 PM
10

Nah, don't even need that. All you have to do is make them work in an office job all day, only to come home to their husbands who complain of all the stress they had all day watching and playing with their kids, asking why she never participates in doing any of the chores and why he's gotta do all the emotional labour by himself.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 12:11 AM
6

The danger is always that the movement becomes, internally as well as represented outwardly, about anything other than problems the male gender faces. It's fine if supporters of it are lgbt or women or chinese people or dolphins or whatever else, but it's important to remind people that this is about OUR problems because of having a penis, testicles and certain chromosomes. It's not a trans-right movement, not a sex-friendly movement, not a homo-acceptance or gay rights or self-acceptance or wha…
/r/MensRights13/01/19 10:47 AM
1

He's not your partner, dude.
/r/MensRights05/12/18 12:08 PM
6

I don't feel the slightest bit inclined to get myself shot at, stabbed, maimed, mutilated or killed, and I can decide for myself what's my nature and what's forcefully imposed upon me by a misandrist culture, thank you.
/r/MensRights15/11/18 12:18 PM
0

Fuck them. Anytime you talk to a finn online, it's freaking sexist apologism galore. They are spineless sufferers of a feminist victim complex. Probably the least egalitarian-minded of the nordics.
/r/MensRights11/11/18 06:25 PM
2

That's, like, data rape ...
/r/MensRights10/11/18 05:26 AM
2

ffs
/r/MensRights24/10/18 12:22 AM
2

It's like when people get addicted to video games (because they are THAT good nowadays) or men that bulk at the gym because they idolize some ripped actor in a superhero movie. So what? If you're that easily influencable, you need to deal with it, because the modern world shouldn't cater to weak-willed victims that ruin it for the rest of us - and yes, with stuff like OP's, you ARE ruining our fun. Not reflecting reality and display an idealized, fake, romanticised version of it is the point of …
/r/MensRights23/10/18 06:54 PM
1

Their politicial circle has officially lost it. You know what, maybe join the saudis in one happy little conservative muslimistan union, it's what you wanted all along. Then you can have your nanny censorship police state that you've been dreaming of.
/r/MensRights23/10/18 06:48 PM
12

What's really worrying, too, I think, is that when you look at the countries where these things are practiced - whether it's basically billions of muslims, jews or hundreds of millions of americans -, how astonishingly few people ever make the mental connection to FGM or rather come up with the idea that this might not be morally right on their own. How basically everybody needs to be told by the few in the MRM and the doctors that this is bullshit and how people just go with "well that's the wa…
/r/MensRights17/10/18 10:26 AM
1

Further down the article, the description to an image: Prof Strumia claimed there were examples where men were discriminated against Fuck off. Just fuck off with your brainwashing, your fascistic removal of "undesired" celebrities, your disdain for anything other than black, asian and muslim young, pretty women, your prudish, grey, political elite stuck-up-ness masquerading as a desire for equality, your pretending that you've never heard of "such a thing" as anti-male discrimination. Your gover…
/r/MensRights02/10/18 03:06 AM
6

Never any quotas for street cleaners, sewer workers, soldiers, construction and roadside workers, huh?
/r/MensRights01/10/18 09:43 AM
0

MensLibTards
/r/MensRights25/09/18 06:13 PM
12

"Why don't the lights work?" Because screwing in light bulbs is a metaphor for cis-nominative sex and therefore constitutes a micro aggression. Geez, get with the program!
/r/MensRights02/09/18 01:16 AM
6

Oh so it's ok to beat people up, right? Since murder is illegal and assault isn't on the same level, it's obviously fine then. Like tax evasion is ok because complete financial fraud is illegal. Like drunk driving is ok because driving drunk AND under drug influence is worse. Like beating your wife is ok because beating your whole family is illegal. Like the holocaust was fine because that's just fascistic culture at work and communist genocide killed way more people What are you even saying you…
/r/MensRights29/08/18 07:44 PM
3

I'm not gonna use any misplaced and inappropriate feeling-sparing language here: If your husband is jewish and religious and you intend to have a baby, leave him. The end. Even if he is just "fine" with not doing it (which you can't depend on, look at florida woman's case), how can you have a child with someone who doesn't respect that child's right to his own body (more or less the prime right that exists)?
/r/MensRights24/08/18 11:35 AM
7

Failure to apply retrograde, time-warping telepathy. Failure to anticipitate future quantum states. Failure to properly register penis and acquire carry license. Obscene display of unveiled male face. Attempted mansplaining.
/r/MensRights27/07/18 08:51 AM
5

Imagine the scandal if an article depicted a peach and a vegetable peeler beside it when discussing FGM.
/r/MensRights24/07/18 11:27 AM
74

As somebody living in a culture where circumcision isn't the norm, the strength of the cultural brainwashing evidenced in comments like yours is astonishing. So somebody knows what a penis looks like, they know what the part being cut off looks like, and they just think that if there's no blood and it's a "clean" procedure, involuntary genital cutting is a-ok or what? Like, how have these people been trained to not apply their critical thinking and ask "Wait a minute, what exactly is the reason …
/r/MensRights22/07/18 07:08 AM
7

No source, no name, no data. What a load of bullshit. Instead of getting enraged over volatile fluff, let's focus on the innumerable occasions of true misandrist discrimination. A side effect of which will be the world taking us just that little bit more seriously.
/r/MensRights22/07/18 04:40 AM
12

To reverse the situation, would you then be okay with female babies having their clitoral hoods removed in a sanitary hospital?
/r/MensRights21/07/18 01:39 AM
5

Look, I don't care about the legalese apologists in here, the fact is a man has his life ruined for doing absolutely no harm to absolutely no-one. The fact that recording something that you're already doing on its own can destroy a decade of your life while also complelety reversing/distorting the protective function this law is supposed to have is a farce on its own. This is a brilliant example of destroying lives for doing things "by the book".
/r/MensRights26/06/18 01:10 PM
2

Oh fuck off. You're not defending free speech if you prosecute evil "offensive" speech. Slippery slope to becoming a hypocrite.
/r/MensRights23/06/18 08:09 AM
62

Sandra Bullock uses children's genitals in her cosmetics. Fuck her and every business that pays her.
/r/MensRights21/06/18 05:13 PM
3

There are so many to choose from, too. What about ancient american sacrifice rituals? Shouldn't we allow natives to comply to their ancient traditions? Why do expect them to culturally appropriate christianity? Shouldn't we remove a newborn's organs because they might get infected or cancerous at some point? A kidney, half of your lung, the frontal lobe, the outer ear, most toes and fingers, the spleen are all about as "unnecessary" pieces of meat as the foreskin is. Should we recommend teenage …
/r/MensRights08/06/18 06:26 PM
9

Even better: Ask them why the religious/ritualistic custom argument doesn't legitimize FGM Ask them why religious freedom should apply when it has effects on a human other than the one practising his right to said freedom Ask them why, following this logic, we shouldn't then also permit the stoning of adulterers, apostates, homosexuals, infidel slaves and why men shouldn't beat their wives. All of which occur somewhere in either islam, judaism and christianity.
/r/MensRights08/06/18 05:02 PM
1

Your own fault for sending your kids to schools that force them to wear specific clothing. There's nothing wrong with a t-shirt and shorts or jeans, unless you're a stuck-up old puritan or think that lowering your child's status and robbing him of his freedom to appease to poor people that can't be bothered to wash their clothes and take a shower is ok. If you live in an area that homes people who can't afford to dress their children, you're in much bigger trouble than kids getting bullied becau…
/r/MensRights05/06/18 09:57 AM
-12

Is that what beating somebody's head is supposed to stop? Just another case of fat stupid american cop on a nazi power trip. Btw, you're not doing MRAs any good filling up /new with this kind of bullshit.
/r/MensRights28/05/18 05:26 PM
3

sex or a beating Por que no los dos?
/r/MensRights22/05/18 05:08 PM
5

Aguilera's. They we laughing about her huge tits and then she says something about "haha, we bought those funny penis-shaped balloons, then he got cut".
/r/MensRights19/05/18 05:27 PM
20

There was a video many years ago of her laughing with christina aguilera about her son's circumcision (jewish)...so it's not exactly a new trend. Plus, this is "other side" internet content, hardly any downvotes, most of YT comments are about anything BUT the circumcision etc. A new flavour of soda is more important to those people than fighting the ingrained cultural acceptance of ritualistic genital cutting.
/r/MensRights19/05/18 07:26 AM
5

The same happens everywhere in north america and europe. What if I'm pro gay marriage and do not identify as feminist or think "xenophobia" is a joke? Who do I vote for? Ah yes, the nazis or the alt-right. Thanks lefties, it's already a fragile political position, let's just split it up even further so you can push your femilogic ideology of the week that your wife has forced you to adopt/your lgbt environment thinks is looking out for your interest/your white knight friends have stockholmed you…
/r/MensRights30/04/18 10:12 AM
9

How about you don't defend forcing half the population to get themselves trained in becoming battle drones due to the what the rest of the population forces on them?
/r/MensRights18/04/18 05:56 PM
25

I was about to say, "Women to only live as long as men by 2032; why fighting the patriarchy will help women's health and in turn lead to more sexually satisfied men".
/r/MensRights26/03/18 11:00 AM
3

I realize that and said as much in my own post. What I mean is that the idea of assaulting someone for the sake of their religious integrity is paradoxical in its very principle. They harm a child in order to make it one of theirs in order to be better than non-believers. This, of course, is one of the finest existing examples of religious brainwashing making otherwise decent people do ghastly, otherwise inexplicable things through pure disinformation.
/r/MensRights02/02/18 07:48 PM
6

The real problem with people like you that support this position - and sadly, I've seen a lot of those out there in the interwebs - is that you never consider the rights of the JEWISH CHILD. Somehow, magically, sexual (1.) assault (2.) on minors (triple barbarity) should be tolerated because outlawing it "limits" the non-concerned, not-operated on religious adult? Just what the fuck kind of mental acrobatics do you have to do to arrive at this conclusion, other than of course the usual "they're …
/r/MensRights02/02/18 04:22 PM
9

Guys, actually read the text this one time; the worst isn't even the stephen king-level horror movie-worthy cannibaloid infant genitalectomy for our corporate show whore overlords inspiring to be USprez, it's this: The Canadian Foreskin Awareness Project is not happy about this. They protested her appearance in Vancouver on Thursday. Glen Callender, the group’s founder, told the local Vancouver news, “Imagine how Oprah would respond if a skin cream for men went on the market that was made from p…
/r/MensRights12/01/18 05:00 AM
6

I thought I was hallucinating when I saw that episode. There we have a quasi-satirical, weird-funny non-kids cartoon show that mixes current affairs with memes, geek culture, the weirdest of storylines and daily school life of overdeveloped 4th graders, and there's an episode devoted to "it's just a bit of skin". Are you fucking serious? I've never had such a culture shock, such disassociation with the worldview, the type of humour, the content of a TV episode as I had there. I instantly lost an…
/r/MensRights10/01/18 03:25 PM
2

I can't imagine this being compatible with a healthy psyche of the kid.
/r/MensRights03/01/18 04:02 PM
0

Would never happen between gay or bi men. Why? Because they actually want sex for the sake of having sex. Not a power play, not "giving it to somebody", not "good sex", sex. Feminists, explain to me why heterosexuals don't fuck all the time when women want sex "just as much (except if a, b or c and only when x, y and z)".
/r/MensRights15/11/17 08:08 AM
1

Mmm...apple pi! My favourite!
/r/MensRights12/11/17 04:48 AM
2

Sounds dangerously similar to invalidation ...
/r/MensRights01/11/17 10:20 AM
2

Yeah, no. I'm done listening to "objectification" talks. Hardly anybody makes a woman into an "object". Most men will want to lead normal conversation and do things with women that are not sexual; it's just that male sexuality requires for the sex drive to be satisfied before that and it just happens that a lot of women are sexy to us, their looks is the only thing you see out on the street and my instinct makes it so I look at all of them. It's precisely because sex shouldn't be a shameful, pro…
/r/MensRights01/11/17 10:17 AM
-1

Well you did write "our choice" ...
/r/MensRights21/10/17 11:14 AM
-5

Elect-by-definiton, not -votes, remember that. Plus he doesn't give a shit about your country, remember that. He is an overpaid, egocentric kindergartener that could start a nuclear war or fail to help millions of you at any moment. Public danger is what he is. A psychopath waiting to lose it.
/r/MensRights21/10/17 11:03 AM
2

He's since been in therapy for "sex addicts" and has "a sickness"? Yeah, it's called being a man. Please, SRS, feel free to quote me. I'm sure the 15-year-old is so traumatized, like what? I saw a nudie pic and now I'm in an existential crisis? Men find me attractive, how can I live with myself? I see things I deem "disgusting" or "inappropriate" every day, everybody does. Where's the actual trauma? It's because of innocent little girl privilege, innit? Guys, when have we started watching porn? …
/r/MensRights25/09/17 05:45 PM
6

Can I lick your asshole Can you hold my beer?
/r/MensRights30/07/17 10:17 PM
2

How about posting https://digest.bps.org.uk/2017/07/11/sexual-offending-by-women-is-surprisingly-common-claims-us-study/ or http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359178916301446?_rdoc=1&_fmt=high&_origin=gateway&_docanchor=&md5=b8429449ccfc9c30159a5f9aeaa92ffb&dgcid=raven_sd_via_email for the summary instead? Much more professional sites and also much more respectable for non-MRAs. Don't make the mistake of thinking people disagree with a point just because its presentation is crap.…
/r/MensRights14/07/17 01:30 PM
2

For fuck's sake OP, link to the actual source, not one every user from outside this sub will laugh at. No, this and breitbart aren't "sources". Wanna get taken serious? Stop this bullshit.
/r/MensRights14/07/17 09:20 AM
6

Who thinks it's appropriate to let a dog chew into a person because they suspect he might have done something? Are you defending yourself by inflicting harm on others? Or just too stupid to use a taser or gun to make someone lie down? No, I disagree, the usage of police dogs should be illegal in all cases. If not for police, only the lowest, most incapable and most asocial groups of people use dogs as a mean to threaten others.
/r/MensRights13/07/17 04:31 PM
8

That's nice and all. However, this asshat is not who we want to be associated with or should feel defended by. He's an attention whore making up BS and any accidental agreement on certain topics must not be confused with ideological agreement.
/r/MensRights29/04/17 01:12 PM
9

Hoi/salut fellow swiss fellow :) As I've previously written in a comment regarding this topic in /r/europe, with the biological argument, we could also search for the few black people there are in switzerland and conscript them before we do it with any white man. Couldn't imagine anyone having a problem there, could you? Surely if they're ok with sexism in order to feed an institution that has as its only goal the training of young people as potential worthless cannon fodder, they must be ok wit…
/r/MensRights04/03/17 10:53 AM
2

I really hope I'm not the minority when I say that actually, I think the practice of having children without contact to their biological father and men supporting this with sperm donation is kind of fucked up. Tell me what you want, what does it do to someone's identity if either their dad or mom aren't their biological parent? And why should a child's psychological welfare be infringed upon just because a human is infertile? Then just don't have kids. Yes, this is absolutely misandrist politics…
/r/MensRights01/03/17 09:31 AM
4

MY health is not for YOUR benefit Thanks. A viewpoint way too often ignored. It's not my job as a man to make you healthy or safe. Why would I want to be with a woman that wants me to have less penis?
/r/MensRights14/02/17 02:07 PM
5

Yeah sure, cut a part of my dick off so women get a bit less cancer. Fuck you. I hope this sort of effort dies down, india has enough problems already, they don't need the problem of being a pro-circumcision country as well. There are enough non-thinking, going-with-the-flow/muslim/jewish/american-influenced penis cutters out there.
/r/MensRights05/02/17 02:04 PM
9

It's funny nobody ever considers not having a part of your penis to be a breach of your right. Even if the whole HIV and cancer BS were true (the probabilities are ridiculous), do they realize there's "cutting of a minor's genitals" on the other side to weigh against? No, they don't. They never do, they never get that having a complete body is probably the most important right in every country (for adults) and every law and every constitution ever. Remember murder and assault?
/r/MensRights18/12/16 07:02 PM
11

The same shit the krauts pulled, isn't it? Ah, we can't let rationality and CHILDREN'S RIGHTS TO THEIR BODY stand in the way of 6000-year-old desert scrolls that say to cut their penis. I think this is a perfect example of even the most moderate, humanistically-thinking people committing logical errors and more importantly, actually neither thinking nor attempting to use logic when finding solutions to a conflict. "Religious freedom versus right to own body? What, you said HOLOCAUST? Right, poor…
/r/MensRights18/12/16 06:58 PM
1

Still seems like the same old story. Bla FGM is evil bla men's rights radicals bla circumcision is normal bla but FGM is worse therefore MGM is ok. Bla ...
/r/MensRights16/12/16 08:49 PM
2

Doch!
/r/MensRights13/12/16 05:57 PM
6

Is that really too much? I'm gonna go with "yes". Violence in general is a male problem and the environment in which it takes place is generally more taxing on men than girls. Yes, men are the primary victims and yes, in the widespread absence of articles discussing the impact of events on men and boys, yes, one such article is too much.
/r/MensRights10/12/16 11:49 PM
3

That was my point.
/r/MensRights08/12/16 07:18 PM
13

Imagine no religion. Now imagine a club of people who want to see a naked child. Now imagine that these people want to cut a part of the child's genitals. Now imagine that in some cases, they perform fellatio on the child. This is your "harmless" religion. A sect of genital-cutting, sex with children having barbarian perverts, in the truest sense of the word. Imagine the outcry were it not for "Ah but Holocaust!" "Ah but religious freedom (for whom?)" "Ah but antisemites"! "Members of obscure cu…
/r/MensRights08/12/16 06:24 PM
10

That's just the new wave of internet reporting and community building. Get out your opinion and then have no way for people to post theirs other than with their real name over facebook or some shit or shut down the comments as soon as they get "offensive".
/r/MGTOW06/12/16 05:14 PM
3

It's just such a joke. If you kill yourself, you're not at risk of dying anymore. There's their "argument" for suicide.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 01:11 PM
1

Well yeah? The problem is that although they're then an "equal" couple, the male party is always held to responsibility. Have we ever heard of "Girlfriend sends nude pics and is accused of child pornography possession" or "Boyfriend's dad threatens girlfriend with a shotgun" or "Girlfriend was arrested for indecent exposure but boyfriend let go" or "Couple kills own kids, wife on trial for murder, husband given suspended sentence"?
/r/MensRights17/11/16 06:10 PM
3

Could I also remind everybody that since men usually are the older party in a relationship, the law and very society itself are actually sexist in that they magically only concern themselves with men. The law might say "consent", "mature" or "position of authority", but means female consent, male maturity and male position of authority. Women are never the responsible party, whenever some crime of equal moral character is committed by both sexes, it's always men that get the resulting legal prob…
/r/MensRights17/11/16 04:49 AM
3

Look guys, this is a non-article. Photographing someone, especially naked and focused-on/portrait, without their consent should be punishable. I say this as a swiss guy, thank god they're american so anything other than blatant threats of murder, invasions of privacy/non-consent and child porn is legal to do/say. The BBC made a wrong, attention-seeking headline out of it. From a european point of view, the headline might be normal. It isn't and shouldn't be. "Body-shaming" could never be a crime…
/r/MensRights05/11/16 09:10 PM
6

The hell is it legal to fertilize a single woman anyway? Just as with two gay men wanting to have a child (make, not adopt), the potential child's welfare should weigh as more important than an adult's "wishes". Your being in an unlucky position breeding-wise doesn't give you a right to create a being that's gonna be alienated from the reality of normal sexual reproduction on this planet. How this is legal is beyond belief.
/r/MensRights04/07/16 10:37 PM
2

Well that's the nice thing about not being P.C., I don't need to mention every little absurdity, abnormality, statistical anomaly and minority. Most men like attractively thin women and that's that. But what's more is the dangerous path society is headed down on with this image polishing tactic of the obese. Overweight is unhealthy and once someone "looks" fat, they're guaranteed to be in the upper BMI range and very unhealthy with all the known long-term risks linked to cancer, MIs and strokes …
/r/MensRights17/06/16 08:02 AM
11

Men want sex. Sex with attractive women. Fat people are unattractive. Deal with it. That's just what we need. Healthy-looking (shut up "she's ten pounds too light" most people are over ten pounds too fat) people to be told they're "hurting" fatasses' feelings. Shut up you PC patrol, free speech stifling, overpaid legalese speaking reality-alienated politicunts. If you wanna help, clean up your muslim ghettos, get the rich russian and arab fucks out of the UK and outlaw the dozens of genital cutt…
/r/MensRights16/06/16 05:26 PM
58

From an askwomen topic's mod comment right now: Hey folks. Just as a reminder, we will continue to remove islamophobia and hateful, disrespectful commentary as we always do. Askwomen is not your soapbox to concern troll over the religion of two billion people because of an asshole born in New York.
/r/MensRights13/06/16 10:01 AM
1

Wow. Movie industry people up their own arse? What hot news!
/r/MensRights11/06/16 10:20 AM
1

That flyer looks like shit. Mixed fonts - also too many -, dumb arguments ("It's the law? Then why try to convince me with "It's easy"?), what's with the redundancy in "selective service system"?, and an arrow made by a 12-year-old that just discovered photoshop or some 90s gif collection. Also, what's with that americanism "Do the right thing"? It sounds like some big moral decision "Put down the dog or keep him alive?" or "Give aid to dictatorships or help local businesses?" Then again I guess…
/r/MensRights26/04/16 06:37 AM
3

Does removing a finger reduce the amount of skin you have? Does removing a part of the stomach reduce the amount of food you can digest? Does shaving reduce the amount of hair you have? These people are so brainwashed they don't even understand basic logic. The foreskin is part of the penis, you morons. There are no separate things "skin" and "meat/actual penis". You're culturally indoctrinated to the point you no longer make sense. "If I get all my teeth pulled, will the food I eat still taste …
/r/MensRights22/04/16 10:32 AM
3

I'm gonna be not even the devil's advocate but the counter voice on this. Actually NOT having read the article, a mandated leave for a certain period is clearly a dumb idea, the possibility to take sick days because you're in a miserable state is not. I don't think it's unreasonable for people to be at home because they're having cramps and pain all the time - sue me. There are obviously enough women for whom periods are a prolem and I don't think you should be expected to be on medication just …
/r/MensRights06/03/16 06:57 PM
11

Has anyone ever suggested a sterilization bill for female offenders? Guess not. Wouldn't want to be publicly known as the woman mutilator. Can do it with men, they're victims enough.
/r/MensRights05/03/16 11:11 AM
1

No I mean I get that a lot of people have a problem with this but don't just say "sex", actually think about it. What's wrong with teenagers having sex? They're two years apart which is ridiculous, it's legal where I live, anyway, and what happens if they have sex? I know the more conservative-minded think their lives are destroyed, their sanctity and innocence lost and their psyche traumatized for life, but be realistic, young people fuck all the time and nothing happens. Unless of course you'r…
/r/MensRights15/02/16 01:07 PM
3

I don't get it. 12 and 14 - so?
/r/MensRights15/02/16 12:54 PM
5

She was 12 and he 14 - do americans think once you're 18 you're magically all-knowing and wise? Or do you think puberty starts at 18? The funniest thing I read on reddit was a person who thought it was strange to be attracted to people of the same age when you're a teenager. Grow up and stop making up crimes!
/r/MensRights15/02/16 11:59 AM
3

The fuck custody issue are you even talking about? All I know is that where I went to school, we had no passes, no plaque signaling "I'm allowed to chaffeur around kids", no person making sure we got or didn't go anywhere after school was out and definitely no "school cops", armed or not (what a sad world this even needs to be specified). The only police involvement in school from another student I just heard about; I never saw a police officer in school other than for traffic safety classes. Ma…
/r/MensRights06/02/16 05:01 PM
10

her pass a thing to hang on your rear view mirror She is suppose to make sure kids go into the cars and safe cops Strange country you're living in.
/r/MensRights06/02/16 07:57 AM
1

Oh please. Maybe if american police had any balls, they'd realize their job contains some risk and wouldn't shoot at any rock "resisting". Only fatass dumbfuck brutalos manage to convince themselves they're in danger by an unarmed "window banger" and manage to kill what turns out to be an accident victim. Maybe if the standard reaction to danger and confusion weren't to shoot, none of these cases would happen. You aren't a kindergartener, you're a cop. You aren't supposed to live risk-free, you'…
/r/MensRights17/01/16 08:49 AM
7

No, and what a dangerous thought, illogical at that. Just because you oppose our opposition doesn't mean you're our friend. Faith, circumcision, stoning and the absolute prohibition of free thought can certainly not be our future.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 03:12 AM
3

Trust me, I don't want to make anybody feel bad about themselves. But the thing is that once we start saying that it's "ok" how they're circumcised and once we start relativizing the foreskin's function, its looks, supposed "benefits" (which, seriously, are a freaking joke) of circumcision, once we start generating positive feelings towards all of that and once MR becomes a support group, we risk becoming a sink for the popular opinion where viewpoints might shift and suddenly, we're anti-men'sr…
/r/MensRights12/12/15 07:38 PM
3

No, because it isn't in the interest of men as a group to downplay cutting off a part of their genitals so they can have sex for longer.
/r/MensRights12/12/15 07:08 PM
7

Yea, it's not like orgasming is some biological function or something. Let's cut off men's genitals so they can please women for longer. You sure you're on the right subreddit? This isn't let's-discuss-unindicated-operations-and-the-connected-and-uncalled-for-risk or r/seduction.
/r/MensRights12/12/15 06:47 PM
4

Having no gall bladder or appendix does as well. Should we operate on every baby just because it might have an appendicitis later in its life? And die from it, nonetheless.
/r/MensRights12/12/15 06:32 PM
6

You know, having like a .01% smaller chance of some 1/200.000 cancer in adults is totally worth cutting off a part of your baby's genitals. No, I won't have that. This subreddit is about our rights and we have to kill any notion of ridiculous "benefits" of MGM at the root or this crap feel-good-tolerate-what's-happened-to-you will spread and possibly turn into an MGM support group. Negative.
/r/MensRights12/12/15 06:30 PM
5

We already know your "country" is stuck in the 1920s. And when I say "country", I mean dirty corrupt little dictatorship that survives off of being a corporate slavery.
/r/MensRights30/10/15 04:13 PM
5

Absolutely agree. What do they think, a guy looks at a girl and thinks "Woah, I bet she has a degree in environmental sciences and a working homelife as well as enjoys painting, I'd so hit that"? Of course sexuality comes down to the body itself. There's no other way. If you ask a teacher or a doctor something, do you "intellectualize" him? All sexuality is based mainly on corporal attraction. But I've noticed women are good at pretending character is more important or they're not "one of those"…
/r/MensRights19/09/15 12:51 AM
4

I don't agree with making children that won't get to know their father just so someone is being "helped" because they've drawn the biological shit card. As with gay couples using a woman to have a child, both practices should be outlawed because the psychological well-being of the potential child is more important than a few adults' wishes of parenthood.
/r/MensRights01/09/15 02:16 AM
-1

"Civilian" means "female or child" for anyone wondering. There are no "innocent civilians" in wars. The difference between soldiers and "civilians" is being forced to get yourself killed or being forced to work in a factory or stay at home. Every soldier ever killed was a civilian; only the powerful few are true instigators and the true evil.
/r/MensRights11/07/15 02:32 AM
10

I've now several times read that people getting erections is shunned upon amongst nudists. No wonder it's stereotypically practiced by old people and feminist lefties. The gall these people have against an involuntary bodily function is astounding. If nipples getting hard were actually visible, these bike rides would be out of participants. I've often read of nudists claiming that getting an erection just isn't a thing, but I'd bet that most men just don't enjoy having to actually focus on not g…
/r/MensRights01/06/15 11:08 AM
44

What a hideous cunt of a father.
/r/MensRights22/05/15 05:09 PM
8

It's non-proven pseudoscience. Billions of people have penises but somehow, there are still those of them who believe that getting an erection is proof of sexual arousal. It's the same as with lie detectors. Hogwash.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 05:46 PM
2

But you have to understand that having the ability to potentially become pregnant should relieve you of all obligations and restrictions put upon members of society! Prison? Could have a child! Military? Could have a child! Not receiving alimony? Could have a child! Consent? Could get pregnant! Homeless woman? Could have baby! Medical research for men? What about the babies!
/r/MensRights08/04/15 11:24 PM
10

You should know by now that no major newspaper, online or real life, would ever have the guts to publish an article covering men's rights without appending "but wait, 'tis about the womenz, also!" somewhere in it.
/r/MensRights02/04/15 04:01 PM
23

Imagine the outcry if there were any men who had a preference for cut clitoral hoods or labia. You know, they're just gross, overhanging "skin" anyway.
/r/MensRights28/03/15 08:15 AM
9

You do realize removing an 18-year-old woman's breasts is a guarantee that she'll never have breast cancer, yes? And that some people die after a burst appendix that could have been removed as a child? And that you don't really need your spleen?
/r/MensRights19/03/15 01:25 AM
2

You know why that is, right? P.C. person's dilemma. Never mind muslims, no chance they'll fight something practiced by jews. That would be like, "literally", hitler. Of course, if muslims and jews both had limitless religious freedoms, the jews would have long bordered themselves off the rest of the UK into an exclave where women would not be allowed in the same part of the bus as the men are and the more radical muslim part, several dozens of % according to some studies, would have called for a…
/r/MensRights14/03/15 11:24 AM
2

Wasn't there this hypothesis that said that dictators love illegalizing porn and "abnormal" sexual behaviours so that imprisoning opposition would become a trivial and arbitrary thing? Everybody does it, but the societal climate dictates that it is viewed as disgusting and thus easily to pin onto someone you want removed.
/r/MensRights01/03/15 08:35 PM
3

To all those citing countries or instances where some women are forced to do some work: unacceptable. The only acceptable resolution of the conscription problem is either for both sexes to be unobliged to serve or for both sexes to have to do the same category of work, at the same risk, the same pay, the same danger to life, the same mortality and the same potential for trauma. Having women serve as nurses, doctors or warehouse keepers is unacceptable in the view of a true egalitarian. Being for…
/r/MensRights25/02/15 10:22 AM
7

It's just a piece of skin anyway. While we're at it, mandatory infant appendectomies and tonsillectomies. Couldn't risk the 1‰ that will have to get it done later on in life.
/r/MensRights16/02/15 09:25 AM
1

What a sexist cunt.
/r/MensRights27/01/15 02:05 PM
12

This is so sad. Seriously. Allowing a minor to read such trash should be given capital punishment. The sun? Go read an actual newspaper.
/r/MensRights20/01/15 07:03 PM
10

The answer, of course, is A), "yes".
/r/MensRights03/12/14 10:13 PM
13

What he said. To expand, though, it morally judges male sexuality as criminal and worthy of prosecution, while it raises the female prostitute - the actual criminal - to a sort of above-the-law untouchable status, a corporation if you will that can literally fuck you for your money and then sue you for the transaction you made in favor of the accuser.
/r/MensRights10/11/14 08:50 AM
0

Ah yes, typical SVP/UDC voter, "voice of the people", Volkswille and such. Strange how it's always men, isn't it? How WOMEN NEVER need a lesson in how to behave, how to build their character, how there's a military career waiting for them with open arms, how they are selfish egoists if they don't serve. I could go on, but to be honest, I don't care about your political leanings or about what I just wrote, too tired for this. Instead, I want to focus on your second paragraph which contains this a…
/r/MensRights11/09/14 05:25 PM
2

So forcing any group to do labour just because they're in this one group is okay, then?
/r/MensRights11/09/14 02:31 PM
1

My dad refused to carry a gun, easy enough, they made him a medic. Another guy refused to run, he didn't want to sweat for 'religious' reasons. Well, chapeau to them, then. More for defense against invasion it's necessary if. Women are pretty useless in combat roles. If you give them the same physical requirements as men the vast majority will be filtered out before they can join, which ends up just being a waste of money at the recruitment level. See, I can't believe anyone thinks all of this i…
/r/MensRights11/09/14 02:23 PM
2

Interesting. You didn't actually say whether you were female, but instead (tried) to insult me (not taking it personally), probably not understanding what I intended to say (that men mostly wouldn't complain vis-à-vis a woman because misandrist culture has told us that that's unmanly). Your quote "Not exactly forced, you can refuse to do anything in the army that you don't like, and they can't punish you for it." is ridiculous, since it clearly doesn't work like this and any other forced labour …
/r/MensRights11/09/14 01:42 PM
2

I'm Swiss. As am I. I know zero men who complain about military service. Guess you never read any newspaper, blog or forum comments sections then, never mind a lot of r/switzerland. Or asked people on the street or in schools. It's an opportunity to network with other men from other economic strata Ah yes, infallible argument in favour of sexist forced labour laws. it's an unassailable male safe space. Which leads me to believe you're female, which would explain quote #2. There's a good reason e…
/r/MensRights11/09/14 01:15 PM
1

Bern. As for your first sentence, not true. Pension age would be a further example. Many others, though similar in law to other countries, could be listed (circumcision, fathers' rights ...).
/r/MensRights11/09/14 01:05 PM
1

equality, justice, [finances,] military Haha, you do realize which subreddit we're in and that only men are obliged to do military service, right?
/r/MensRights11/09/14 11:06 AM
2

Ever seen "The Atheist Experience", by the way? Atheism+ has ruined them.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 01:26 PM
2

Appendix? Gall bladder? Earlobes?
/r/MensRights05/04/14 08:36 AM
1

Ah, yes, of course not. Not with even the middle-right parties believing strongly that it is only the female sex that is being discriminated against. It's actually quite funny; we've had several 1-hour-long talk-panel-shows concerning this matter over the last few years, some around the time the swiss voted on the abolishment of conscription (last year). The discrimination of men as is was basically never brought up, instead they went on about how it's damaging the economy, how it's an archaic i…
/r/MensRights13/02/14 03:29 AM
1

Well, I'm swiss, absolutely against any kind of sexist military service like we have now, and I think I can be quite reasonable to talk to. Regarding OP's question, because people are equally lazy, can't actually think of their own, have been brainwashed into believing it isn't sexist and because a lot of the population actually believes it's a good system.
/r/MensRights12/02/14 06:52 AM
2

For one, how old is the author and is she maybe swiss? As a swiss guy, this one hit very close. On the other hand, conscription still is legal and men only, so fuck it.
/r/MensRights30/01/14 01:53 AM
2

Never mind all of this. Everytime someone falls in love with somebody, they're falling for their facial structures. Every mother who thinks their baby is the cutest one on the planet, every woman talking about "handsome" men, every friendship you form, all in big parts thanks to attraction to good-looking people, i.e. "objectification".
/r/MensRights29/01/14 05:13 PM
2

Why do all of those internet feminists have to be fake-nerdy and wear these horrible thick-framed glasses?
/r/MensRights29/01/14 05:10 PM
0

Ok, could we all just take a step back, take a deep breath and think about if we really want to censor/make untrue an apparent textbook because we'd prefer it to teach fiction instead of facts? It's a textbook, fucking christ, it doesn't have an opinion, it teaches what is. It doesn't matter if we're offended by reality and it shouldn't.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 06:58 PM
3

Of course they won't mention that. The UK public & politicians might realize that the immigrants they've welcomed for the last half a century are spreading the very problem they're accusing african countries of - mutilation. Wouldn't want to stir up the "ethnic" population with their culturally "enriching" practices, would we?
/r/MensRights04/11/13 05:41 AM
10

I don't mean to subconsciously advertise it, but if anyone is a regular listener of the Non-Prophets Podcast or viewer of The Atheist Experience, you'll sadly know by now that the ACA and grand parts of the atheist movement have been swallowed by atheism+ and brainwashed into equating feminism with equality and the MRM with hate speech. Just in the last three episodes, the Non-Prophets literally laughed at the idea of "men's rights". AronRa has some connection to these people and I'm not sure, b…
/r/MensRights21/10/13 01:33 PM
1

Personally, I prefer ironed-flat breasts. You know, it's their culture in these african tribes and I think we can all agree that their right to tradition outweighs girls' right to their own body. I think flat breasts are a lot easier to clean; now that I think about it, I'd rather have them removed. Girls with breasts are gross. Did you know that all the flesh is useless fat, anyway?
/r/MensRights16/10/13 08:28 AM
-2

What an asshole of a person. Whether or not you are it, denying a child contact to its father should be punishable with imprisonment. edit: I meant whether or not he is the father is irrelevant; the mother is an asshole.
/r/MensRights12/10/13 04:34 AM
1

Care? 1. Wash regularly. 2. Don't use knife. Done.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 10:09 PM
1

Next up: All tunnels to be demolished, replaced with bridges.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 06:09 AM
6

Jesus christ, we don't have to tolerate sexual abuse just because it's a religious tradition. It's the muslims' and the jews' luck that this is about as brutal as their rituals go; don't tell me we allow this due to "religious freedom"; we wouldn't allow american indians to slaughter their children to appease to gods, we wouldn't allow muslims to behead atheists. All perfectly fine in their own cultural context. This whole idea is a sham. The health benefits or circumcision are laughable and if …
/r/MensRights28/09/13 06:06 AM
2

It's funny how things work out if you don't own anything of value, your soil is mostly unusable mountain rock, you refuse to participate in other countries' shinanigans, your banks store billions in foreign fortunes and instead of threatening nazi germany, you shut up and let their machinery work while selling them a few items every now and then. But you're right, it's our superior army that has kept us at peace for centuries.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 06:36 AM
1

How come you aren't downvoted?
/r/MensRights03/08/13 04:03 PM
5

2006!
/r/MensRights09/07/13 11:44 AM
1

Swiss here. Signed. Now what? Edit: Correction: Half a year in the military!
/r/MensRights01/06/13 08:48 AM
1

Are we talking about the conscription-possessing Norway?
/r/MensRights09/05/13 04:55 PM
1

Arguing that "non-civilian" nazis were mostly fighting due to coercion and only the microscopical minority through their own will. As in any other war. No normal human willingly, voluntarily shoots at others.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 09:25 PM
1

Which in itself is a farce, because basically any- and everybody male in a dictatorship, fighting on the government's side, is being forced by conscription to risk their life. The distinction of "civilians" and "soldiers" in the media and in history is basically a lie. So what, you're being threatened with being shot in the head, given an assault rifle and loaded into a truck/tank/ship, and you're now worthy of being eliminated because you're not "a civilian" anymore? What a joke. Nazi germany? …
/r/MensRights03/05/13 05:47 PM
2

Swiss man here. It's all very easy; in order for true equality to exist, women have to be held to the same standards as men. As for your points, it really all boils down to when to join/start a war. All your "issues" are irrelevant if we're talking about a full-on, potentially world-changing event like ww2 or the cold war. Basically, if there ever were a reason to drag humans into a battlefield against their will, the occasion should be of such an importance that minors being left at home alone,…
/r/MensRights30/04/13 03:01 PM
1

Of course it isn't. In every country except Israel and China, men are the only sex being conscripted. Israel doesn't treat women the same way it treats male soldiers; I'd be surprised if China did.
/r/MensRights23/04/13 06:46 PM
3

I'm not american, but going to say this anyway. The discrimination involved with conscription is obviously not limited to work done by the conscripted. In a war, the main discrimination lies in sending one sex to go die on the battlefield. Personally, I don't really care about what women would do differently than men; I want them to be required to work their asses off where men have to and I want them to suffer the same risk in the case of war. It's not acceptable for women to sit at home or wor…
/r/MensRights07/04/13 09:37 AM
6

I'm equally appalled by "soldiers in uniform". Because soldiers are known to be completely violence-free. It's not like they're trained to kill. This mixed with the abortion issue makes Ireland appear like a macho 1950's country.
/r/MensRights09/02/13 07:40 PM
4

Cheap post. The reason this /r/ is going downhill.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 06:19 AM
2

It's all relative. Ask any pro-castration individual what they'd do with female sexual criminals. If they get an outburst of rage and disassociation, they're misandric. Sure, testicles aren't in any celebrated position in this society; it's easy to shout "cut their balls off!". The next time, suggest - even if scientifically nonsensical - sterilizing a woman offender; see how the crowd likes it.
/r/MensRights31/12/12 04:04 PM
10

I'm constantly amazed how the discussion is shipped around the elephant in the room when it comes to men's issues: This is actually about a human's right; not about "the jews", not abound freaking religious rights and not about not being the one country to step out of line. But I guess the appeal to tradition is good enough a fallacy for the chancellor of 80 million people.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 01:01 PM
2

More importantly, why make crappy kiddy versions of actually useful products? As in, also usable for children.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 11:42 PM
11

It's all very simple, really. Do you think a 12-yr-old girl should be free to get breast implants? I don't. I think we'd be doing well by outlawing unindicated surgery until 18; having said that, I'm ok with piercings and tattoos being done on oneself at a younger age. I think that should be legal from 14 upwards, no earlier. Not, however, if it's forced by parents (southern europe, latin america).
/r/MensRights29/11/12 03:54 PM
1

To be honest, I think it's because this subreddit is gaining users and slowly going the way of r/atheism. I think I remember just a few weeks ago r/MR having about 40k members and now look at the count. Facebook posts and anecdotes are ever-increasing. EDIT: As for the being feminist or not, I wouldn't call myself one but you decide after I'm telling my viewpoints.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 10:14 AM
1

The "ban" that'll supposedly now get overturned by a planned law explicitly allowing MGM?
/r/MensRights24/10/12 03:24 AM
2

Switzerland here, same (old). It's astonishing how politicians and interest groups beat around the bush and evade talking about the main argument against conscription as currently practiced. We had debate/discussion shows on the national tv channels where they manage to talk for one hour about how it doesn't "suit the nation's threat situation" and how it "keeps young men out of the workforce", but seldom does anybody, male or female, bring up the equality argument in public. It's different on t…
/r/MensRights19/10/12 09:50 AM
3

Switzerland says hi. Fuck us. Luckily, polls show ~50% rejection of conscription.
/r/MensRights16/09/12 01:35 AM
2

From my european perspective, it's the same with the anti-american atmosphere and the people that regurarly "don't support the war, but will always support the troops!" The truth is, you can't generalize that a certain group will have strongly opposing views: It's much more probable that on topics like circumcision, there is a "pro", a contra, and an in-between group and in "pro" circumcision topics, for several reasons (like being too offended, "sick" to ones stomach), the contras and in-betwee…
/r/MensRights15/09/12 09:33 AM
3

And again, instead of arguing, you're retreating to legal ground, your own stance and your own preference.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 11:40 AM
3

What you and the pro-circ people don't understand is that for us, even (or especially) the uncircumcised people, your opinion isn't just "an opinion" like "I'm a vegeterian" or "I don't like republicans". It will likely have an impact on your future children and for some of us - please try imagining - what you're advocating is genital mutilation. The often-displayed "It's the law, everything's fine"-kind naivity doesn't help a bit. Imagine female genital mutilation having benefits - really, any,…
/r/MensRights27/08/12 11:04 AM
5

Here we go, once again... All the "benefits" come into play once one is sexually active. You're letting doctors amputate part of a child's genitals for such absurd reasons as "Once he'll be 16 and have sex and do it without a condom, the HIV transmission probability is reduced by x percent". It's just ridiculous. You wouldn't take out the appendix or the tonsils prophylactically (because other than risk/gain, there's also a thing called the ethics of medicine), but for such an intimite part as t…
/r/MensRights27/08/12 10:37 AM
4

What people like you don't get is that it's our opinion that it's not your right to decide over circumcising or not circumcising a boy because there's no legal decision to be made. I'm "afraid" of your opinion because it's a threat to your potential child(ren) and their bodily integrity. But after reading your reply's following answers, I see that you're one of those that argue with "it's the law because it's right because it's the law" and obviously on this train of thought will never understan…
/r/MensRights27/08/12 10:18 AM
6

Yeah, stupid "maintenance", I'd rather go a week without showering; should have amputated all the sweat glands, too.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 09:03 AM
2

No, I mean because most people will always have their appendix, except for the few that get an infection. Should we get them out of every newborn? As in, does the harm and potential danger of surgery justify the benefit of no risk of appendicitis in the future?
/r/MensRights31/07/12 01:31 PM
1

Hmm...what about appendectomies? Justified on non-consenting minors?
/r/MensRights31/07/12 01:16 PM
3

Pointing out that even if absolutely true, preventative effects don't justify cutting part of a child's genitals off.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 08:39 AM
9

As a sane person, might I suggest you take an STD serious, get treated immediately and handle your wish of infertility by possibly getting a vasectomy?
/r/MensRights30/07/12 04:56 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter