TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

AManIsBusy Archive

View 7 posts and 64 comments by AManIsBusy on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

That's sad. You should do a write up on this or interview with a journalist who will do it for you. Those fuckers should be outed.
/r/seduction23/03/19 03:43 AM
9

You're asking if it's cool to be polygamous. No, it's not cool. That shit doesn't work in our type of society, except for liars, cheaters, and manipulators. So, what you're really asking is if it's cool that you're attracted to someone who's manipulative, which is why I'm guessing you're calling him a RP man. You're a fool.
/r/RedPillParenting15/10/18 02:54 AM
1

I don't accept that everyone is the same or that they always act on base instincts. That's dumb. How would you ever be intimate with anyone if you believed that? Your relationship would mean nothing because you'd be merely playing out instincts. I accept that women have certain prototypical behaviors, but that's not literally AWALT.
/r/askTRP15/08/18 07:26 PM
3

I mean, you're essentially communicating what you think will be attractive. Men want loyalty, so we tend to communicate that we are loyal, assuming that's what women want, but it's not really what women want at their core.
/r/TheRedPill14/08/18 07:17 PM
12

Men expect women to communicate to men with male language. It's the cause for almost all male/female misunderstandings.
/r/TheRedPill14/08/18 03:28 PM
0

There are alpha females. A leader is a leader, male or female. A 'strong' woman is not an alpha female though. That's just some bullshit.
/r/TheRedPill14/08/18 07:37 AM
2

As if men aren't solipsistic about this stuff too?
/r/TheRedPill14/08/18 07:36 AM
1

Bro, consolidate your points. Ain't nobody got time for that. That being said, I like arguing when numbers are used poorly. Do you think the chance of a failed marriage is random, or do you think you can control it? And do you think your knowledge as maybe slightly more enlightened than average might put you in a different category as well? I think marriage is definitely the most masculine path, although I know it's not for everyone.
/r/askTRP03/08/18 07:55 AM
1

A couple more thoughts... There may be something genetic to the r/k selection concept. It seems like families very typically have similar generational gaps. Some families have less years between generations, and some have more. Granted, having kids later in life is not the same thing as r/k, but maybe it's relevant enough to draw some hypotheses from at least. I also realize that having kids later could be due to socioeconomic conditions more than anything. When I look at my own struggles with w…
/r/askTRP22/07/18 08:03 PM
1

I was still adding stuff to my post when you replied. I have a bad habit of submitting posts before I've exhausted all my thoughts. TRP is about communication more than anything else. For instance, when people talk about frame, they're referring to the expression of emotions during conversation. These emotions do not have a logical basis (e.g. it should be good to lack a certain amount of confidence in thought, so you question things and find better answers); they have a strategic basis. This ap…
/r/askTRP19/07/18 12:59 PM
1

I think you're definitely on the right track, but I disagree with this one part: >Spinning plates through 20s and 30s sounds like a good strategy for an R type of man. However in my opinion the stratey for K type of man would be to date up to 3 women of K type and help her to develop into an Alpha K type woman. Why would you date someone so that they can become an alpha female? I do think the alpha/beta article on women that you linked is full of issues, so maybe that's where your logical fallac…
/r/askTRP19/07/18 12:41 PM
3

I agree, on the condition that God means any sort of morals, monotheistic or polytheistic or atheistic.
/r/askTRP18/07/18 04:45 AM
3

Sounds like nothing is challenging you. Work dogs go crazy when they don't have work to do. Don't ever try to play the psychologist for yourself. Pick yourself up and do something. To be fair, I didn't read your entire wall of text, but I think I get the gist. Another thought is that you need to find morality. If you don't live your life by a code, what are you? Flesh?
/r/askTRP18/07/18 04:42 AM
1

Let me get this straight... You want to be a sociopath?
/r/askTRP18/07/18 02:03 AM
1

The problem with your line of thinking is this: you're worried about what their actions say about YOU. In fact, this probably accounts for a large percentage of people who lose confidence in social situations. The bottom line is that, if your judgments are true (that these people are pieces of shit), then their actions should have no bearing on who you are. Stop it there.
/r/askTRP18/07/18 01:24 AM
1

Talking is overrated.
/r/askTRP15/07/18 06:09 AM
2

Go to a smaller gym with competitive people to surround yourself with. Don't go to a globogym like Planet Fitness or 24 Fitness. You need to have good programming laid out for you, and you need help getting started. Look for powerlifting, Olympic weightlifting, and barbell clubs in your area.
/r/askTRP15/07/18 06:08 AM
2

Why do you want to "go out" but never have? Sounds like fear of missing out, not real interest.
/r/askTRP15/07/18 06:05 AM
1

Are they really forced to become their own man? I'd say the easier way out is to live life not as a man, but something less instead, and there's little in society that would tell someone that this is bad.
/r/TheRedPill13/07/18 12:33 AM
3

Who in the fuck cares. Just don't have grandma sheets on your bed with flowers or something; those are kind of gay.
/r/askTRP12/07/18 08:23 PM
5

Probably because they themselves reason by anecdote. I take these books exactly as you do; occasionally, you come across something that sparks an idea of your own. That being said, this is a pretty famous author in a space that doesn't have a lot of work, so I'm definitely intrigued by this.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/18 12:58 PM
1

The cervix should move out of the way if the girl is aroused enough
/r/askTRP08/07/18 04:34 PM
4

I heard an interesting theory about sexuality one time. Instead of being naturally attracted to a specific thing, we're just naturally prone to be pleasured and essentially attracted to anything, and the shaping of sexuality is through learned disgust (normally for your own sex). I'm not sure how to apply this to this context, but I definitely believe sexuality is both: a) changeable and b) undesirable to change, as it's an essential part of your identity, and core identities don't normally chan…
/r/askTRP07/07/18 02:51 AM
1

You should be amoral in studying and accepting scientific type facts, but that's different from acting amorally, which what was meant in context of the post saying "preaching amorality".
/r/askTRP04/07/18 04:34 PM
0

I'm not telling you what to do. I came up with a theory, and I'm posting it as an idea to be accepted/rejected/debated on. I'm not trying to 'save the sub' or even caring what any of you do with this. I'm not complaining either. I'm also not trying to gain support... I just asked for others to look at my logic and see if it's sound. That's how people have discussions and improve their own logic. This is clearly a theory post because I'm putting forward a theory. It's like you didn't read past th…
/r/TheRedPill03/07/18 11:22 PM
3

To be fair, not everyone can be an alpha (a leader), and if they tried without eventually submitting, society would be a shitshow.
/r/TheRedPill03/07/18 07:46 PM
4

TRP preaches amorality Shit like this is why I can barely spend any time in these subs, despite it being an interesting topic. The red pill is about succeeding in ways that both the pop culture and the pickup culture failed. This comes down to having a more science-based and rational approach. This does not mean morals have no place.
/r/askTRP03/07/18 12:01 AM
2

I think this is intellectualizing the problem without actually solving it. I think this problem is common in young people, and it's due to all the technology that lets you disconnect from the world (a modern phenomenon, to be sure). Dopamine, our motivation system, doesn't recognize real vs fake. It sees these new things and gives them equal importance. Being a subconscious system, you suddenly feel at the whim of your dopamine system that is like a crack-addicted fiend with some of the products…
/r/askTRP02/07/18 01:16 PM
1

You have habits that wreck havoc on your dopamine levels. Someone mentioned porn, and that's probably part of it. Someone mentioned building logical discipline over temporary motivation, but I think that's bullshit. The instability you're experiencing is emotional, and you don't fix that by ignoring the cause (emotions). You fix it by addressing why your emotions are out of whack. There are lots of things that affect dopamine. Essentially, anything addictive and anything that pulls you away from…
/r/askTRP02/07/18 01:12 PM
9

has one long sex session goes to /r/asktrp to talk about is lack of sleep that night
/r/askTRP01/07/18 09:24 AM
4

Like I can confidently lead a group of low SMV males and get them all together and having a great time, often the best night of their lives. Dude, listen to yourself talk...
/r/askTRP28/06/18 07:21 AM
3

If your entire goal is to get laid, why do either? Just approach girls at a coffee shop during the day, make plans for the evening, and skip the bar all together. But if you want to go out, just go with the group you like more. Nothing is more beta than making all of your decisions on the slight difference in probability for sex.
/r/askTRP28/06/18 07:21 AM
0

That's just part of Anglo culture. You see it in the UK and all of her former colonies, including the US, Australia, etc.
/r/askTRP25/06/18 03:36 PM
1

There's a difference between acting tough when you're in the line of fire and staring it down and when you're out at the bar and chilling with a bunch of casuals. Toughness isn't perceptual; it's a real trait. Don't kid yourself if you think you can build it by acting tough in all the scenarios where it's not necessary.
/r/askTRP25/06/18 09:55 AM
2

No, it's not. Acting tough doesn't make you tough. Acting like a badass and distant doesn't make you a badass. You have to be who you are. If you want to actually be tough and a badass, then earn those stripes. Then, he won't be asking "if it's good". Or is that what everyone is about here? Just pretending to be cool people, so they can gain some popularity for a night or two until they're figured out? The shortcut is not learning what women like. It's learning that you need to be a man in this …
/r/askTRP23/06/18 11:33 AM
1

If you act stoic as fuck, then you are not stoic at all... You are acting. Stop being a shell of a person and actually be yourself.
/r/askTRP23/06/18 09:00 AM
1

I don't think that's usually an issue
/r/askTRP22/06/18 12:01 AM
3

Maybe you're putting sex or women on a pedestal, and you need to learn to appreciate more varieties of women. Or, maybe you're in the right, and you should just look for better women. Context clues tell me it is more of the former. I think a lot of guys develop an ego over the consensus attractiveness of their mate. In other words, you're afraid of what being with a particular girl says about you.
/r/askTRP21/06/18 04:43 PM
2

"If only people were better" is almost never the right answer with any sort of cultural movement.
/r/MarriedRedPill05/06/18 08:33 AM
5

Really bro?
/r/askTRP01/06/18 02:51 AM
1

Learn how to dance. Take classes. That nervousness means you don't know what you're doing. You don't fix that by getting some liquid courage and magically transforming into Kevin Bacon from Footloose. If you think you need to not give a fuck, you actually need to give more of a fuck.
/r/askTRP20/05/18 09:29 AM
3

The 'peak' is different for everyone. It might be 21, 18, or 28. Some people might not even peak until their thirties, although I guess that peak would be different from a 'peak of youth' that you're talking about. You can hold yourself to any standard that you want. You can go easy, apply consistent effort, and expect to be decent off in 5 years. Or, you can go hard and see just how far you can get at a young age. Both are good options; it just depends on your temperament. My advice is to be mi…
/r/askTRP19/05/18 04:06 PM
1

This might not be helpful, but here's one example. I think I sell myself short a lot because I do the right thing, but I don't necessarily know why I did it or if it was in fact right. At least, if you questioned me on something that I did, I'd genuinely think about it before coming back with a confident response. That might take 5 seconds, 5 minutes, or 5 hours. But since people normally expect an answer to their question immediately, I might just make something up to satisfy their need for an …
/r/askTRP19/05/18 02:01 PM
1

Ya, but are these shit tests? I think they're just misunderstandings or disagreements.
/r/askTRP19/05/18 04:10 AM
3

Good point. I guess you win some and you lose some.
/r/askTRP18/05/18 07:13 PM
8

Not foolproof, but the higher her number, the lower the chances
/r/askTRP18/05/18 07:06 PM
1

I guess my point is that if you aren't alpha simply because you check all these boxes. Even if you are light years ahead of everyone else (wealthy, attractive, fit, etc), if you have a blue pill mentality, you will easily get walked over, especially by women that are more used to certain things that I will call 'alpha', even though they don't even register on my radar for that definition. The problem people here have is that they're trying to be dominant. Most of them are not very dominant at al…
/r/TheRedPill01/05/18 10:32 AM
1

My point is that we're overthinking a lot of this. There's a lot of shit here that really isn't very relevant.
/r/TheRedPill01/05/18 09:31 AM
1

Very well could be. I read them at the same time and get them confused.
/r/TheRedPill22/04/18 09:56 PM
1

It's been a while since I read it, but the single interesting idea from it, for me, was 'transmuting the sex drive' into other activities. He talks about how people become successful when they take their sex drive and start doing everything with it. So, Jack Nicholson, if he always acts like he does around women, is using that energy for all of his pursuits. This increases his success, and it naturally builds up a stronger energy that helps his pursuits with women too.
/r/TheRedPill22/04/18 05:17 PM
1

Today you’ve got endless women in their 20s and 30s who don’t know if they want to be a mother, have lunch, or be secretary of state. Can we get a sidebar quote of the day going? That's fucking great. All the rest of us were two guys: one, as it were, by day, and another when we were thinking about or near women. Jack is always the second one.” This is classic "How to Win Friends and Influence People" material.
/r/TheRedPill22/04/18 04:31 PM
1

Oneitis comes from wanting to be in a mother/son relationship type. It is overcome by wanting to be in a father/daughter relationship. Not in terms of incest; in terms of the type of emotions and where the power resides.
/r/TheRedPill22/04/18 12:43 AM
1

Just because you don't have the same formal theory, that doesn't mean they aren't reading people and understanding their motives. You're underestimating 'dumb confidence'.
/r/TheRedPill21/04/18 05:14 PM
1

I'm going to disagree with you totally. I don't exactly understand this ideal 'Chad' you're referring to, but I'm pretty sure whoever it is, they don't have puny intellects compared to your massive brain that understands female psychology like no other. You claim that there are no naturals. If you're talking about babies, perhaps. But even at very young ages, personality traits emerge, such as being someone who wants to be in charge, be a leader. That's certainly one way of stating what women wa…
/r/TheRedPill20/04/18 09:39 PM
1

It sounds like you're full of yourself, and you haven't developed a long-enough track record to have much of a reputation yet, or to benefit in any other way from the hard work you're putting in currently. People aren't put off by motivated people. They're put off by needy people. Nobody wants to be around the person that constantly reminds everyone else how great they are, how smart they are, and how hard they work. With that being said, you may also be right. I don't know your story. Some peop…
/r/TheRedPill20/04/18 06:44 PM
1

I'm glad you said this because I think I have a good response. I've been there. For one, this is not meant to be inclusive of society. This is personal, not communal capital. For two, when you live for society instead of yourself, you are sacrificing yourself. This makes you happy, increasing your bodily capital. Granted, the uptick in mood is potentially rather small and infrequent, and it has no easy conversion to other forms of personal capital most likely, so it's not a very good transaction…
/r/TheRedPill20/04/18 07:20 AM
1

I'll use an example to maybe explain the balance you need to find. If you do some hard work in the field, and you come inside, you say the work was hard and move past it. You've expressed yourself. You don't go on and on about 'gee, that work was so hard... how long can I keep it up?' or 'my back is killing me... I can't move!' because either a) the other person works hard too and already knows your condition or b) the other person doesn't know hard work and will think you're just soft. It's not…
/r/TheRedPill20/04/18 02:21 AM
1

I haven't worked out my neck specifically since my wrestling days of more than 10 years ago, but I have a huge neck. I would say stick to compound lifts and not worry about small muscle groups like that. Show me a strong person at compound lifts who has a small neck.
/r/TheRedPill20/04/18 01:36 AM
1

I really don't understand couples who do this. I guess working out is just a casual affair? For me, I try to bring the same intensity that I always have, going back to when I was a competitive athlete. There's a little bit of that which is kind of 'ugly' from a personality perspective, if you're for someone to be nice to you. I really think that if I worked out with a partner, I'd make them lose interest in me or ever working out with me again, unless they too were a seriously competitive athlet…
/r/TheRedPill20/04/18 01:09 AM
1

A man can accordingly choose a woman of low education (nurses can work in any hospital, clerks in any store in any town, ...) A career woman can't. I feel sorry for them. Technically, why can't they? I bet, in the cases where a woman did make such a decision, you'd find the instances of cheating are at baseline or perhaps even lower. I think the decision is more on the man's side. Do I want to pursue someone with high career standing any more than a woman with a lower career standing? If I said …
/r/TheRedPill20/04/18 12:29 AM
1

As much as you want to demonize them based upon their lacking 'game', you have to at least appreciate that these are the people upon which society is built. Maybe getting a better deal for people who work hard is something we can improve as a society. I think that's what the conservative movement is often based upon.
/r/TheRedPill20/04/18 12:23 AM
1

It's amazing what kind of world you open up where women start demanding you. It sounds like I'm about in line with how he is, the one exception being dress (which since digesting TRP, I've already started fixing). I would have natural game (I think that's the term) in the past, but I was a straighttalker that could not understand the games being played around me. How did he struggle before he figured it out, and what was the motivating factor for him to take the red pill?
/r/askTRP06/04/18 08:08 AM
1

Ah. Maybe she has a low sex drive? Or you're not hitting it hard enough?
/r/askTRP06/04/18 04:56 AM
1

Unless you have more details, I'm inclined to believe her. Tell that bitch to fix her diet and exercise, so she has more energy.
/r/askTRP06/04/18 03:54 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter