TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ARecipeForCake Archive

View 0 posts and 81 comments by ARecipeForCake on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

Grow the fuck up brat
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/24 10:19 PM
0

Tell me how it’s a privilege to be disrespected by society broadly so much so that the rate of violence and sexual assault and suicide and drug abuse and a number of different negative attributes are all dramatically higher for this specific demographic. You just described being a man lol we're talking about real issues in here lady not your dramatized twitter bio
/r/PurplePillDebate14/10/24 10:17 PM
2

I will simplify this for you. If all women opposed men's rights, men would still have men's rights. If all men opposed women's rights, you would have something more like Iran, where the sum of your rights are product of your actual ability to assert them, or more specifically, you might have to wear a bedsheet to step outside. Lets take this in another context. 1-person-1-vote. Sounds fair right? But men take on the vast majority of mortal risk in society from dying in war to working dangerous b…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 12:40 PM
4

As if the vast majority of women's rights and protections arent functionally the result of whining? Are you supposing that there might have been some real chance that the women of Iran during the revolution might have actually stood some chance fighting the men who no longer supported their equal rights? Well, now they can't go outside without wearing a bed sheet. This notion of yours about "whining about the world not being fair" can really be taken in a lot of contexts. Lets keep going down th…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 12:12 PM
2

You're the only person in here insisting on some sort of deranged model-view of the situation where somebodies life can only be ruined "through the legal system". You point to the fact that "neither of his examples" satisfy the arbitrary qualifiers you've set but you have yet to even justify them in the first place.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/10/24 11:54 AM
–

Lol, you argued against your own point. Men and women have been and are dependent on each other for any and all of society to function You admit that the equation of women's rights cant be quantified without men being a part of it. What the person you're replying to was alluding to was the fact that its not a big mystery and we already know what societies without/with fewer men who support women's rights look like.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 11:24 PM
–

Sure, within a democratic framework. Outside of one, might is right.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/09/24 11:14 PM
1

Well you can't thumb through it from a 40 yard distance either.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/09/24 11:34 AM
13

I thought we were saying that women's attraction was more complex than just looks. What, is that not a convenient excuse right now? What is so complex about your attraction if it is set in stone without even having met somebody? Whats the phrase about books and judging them by the cover? I ferget but the gist was, you're supposed to fuckin' read it. Y'all actin like the cover art is the most complex part of the book. But then again, women aren't really well known for their ability to understand …
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/24 11:13 PM
1

Well there was a discourse to be had until somebody decided it was more important to bicker about the 1 possible hypothetical exception to the generalization we all tacitly accept as being generally true because we all leverage that same generalization in other arguments that do benefit us, but that discourse never happened.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/24 01:21 PM
–

That you don't just show shit initiative in dating and romance, that you show shit initiative in friggin lots of stuff that isn't laid out on a silver platter with a few clear concise choices, and that this 1 simple fact when applied across population sets explains things like "pay gaps" more than most of you will ever be comfortable admitting.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/24 01:04 PM
–

I can ask you anything, but if your reply is just word salad and whataboutisms, then it isn't worth the bandwidth it took to display it on a screen. You want to generalize when it benefits you, but you demand that we hyperfocus on the singular solitary hypothetical exception to the same generalization that you assume must exist when it doesn't benefit you. There is simply no cross-section for productive discourse. You are a brain-leach, and you make the conversation dumber by being a part of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/24 12:52 PM
–

Aint nobody got time to play ball with some brain dead cat lady's ever-moving goalposts. You can rub a second brain cell together with a few of those thoughts before expecting others to engage with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/24 12:40 PM
3

Can I get the name of the manufacturer of the conveyor you use to mount your goalposts on?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/24 12:28 PM
5

Why do women act like they reserve the right to be awkward and timid and shit and leave all the scary risk taking behavior to men, but then immediately 180 and whine how that results in minor pay gaps and such? You seem to thoroughly enjoy the benefits of being the "selector" while resenting any benefit a man might enjoy as the initiator.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/24 12:01 PM
2

I'm willing to take a lady on a "high-effort date", it's just not something that i owe women. Let me be perfectly clear, you absolutely are not worth a "high-effort date" from me if you are the sort to to spend that date judging how much "effort" I put into it, especially if your only contribution to the night remains your judgmental self. That's why your first date with me is going to be a fun, cheap, cutesy low-effort date where you pay for your own ticket/admission or refreshments. Because it…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/24 12:06 PM
–

Good thing men are all a monolith so you're not a sexist for treating them that way or anything and stuff.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/24 12:31 AM
–

They were more serious about those things back when you were less serious about those things. You took your time making sure everything was perfect, and he got exhausted and isn't sure he still wants it at all anymore. My recommendation if you want kids and not fun is to actually look younger and find somebody with good trajectory rather than somebody older with established stats. If they are older with established stats and still don't have kids, and are giving you this "just looking for fun" v…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/08/24 12:23 AM
5

I don't really have a horse in this race, but i think the population of dudes talking these points are suggesting something along the lines of single life for men & women(they mostly refer to women) needing to entail more friction than married life with children or else the birthrate will always fall regardless of available amenities. I think their default premise is therefore more along than lines of single life currently being easiest and so that's what proverbial "everybody" is doing. I don't…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/24 12:34 PM
11

Pretty unhinged of you to expect this dude to have a database of redditors he argued with. Feds should inspect your hard drive or something
/r/PurplePillDebate25/08/24 01:14 AM
–

They do. You can look up any of the studies any of these hypothetical conversations you're positing might be referring to and those studies will explicitly define those criteria. You actually display that you have fundamentally not familiarized yourself with any of these statistics in any way, as you seem to be framing them as "X% of Y-Age women are only attracted C% of age A-B men which only represent D% of men", when in actuality most of the studies are along the lines of "X% of women ages B-C…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/24 12:30 PM
–

I hate to be the one to break it to you girls but nobodies including old grampa bill in the lineup when they talk about what % of men women find attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/24 11:22 PM
2

Congratulations! You scored 0 out of 3(0%) correctly!
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 09:55 PM
1

Is that your genuine summary of a scientific study that concludes women have a 4.5x internal bias rate, or are you just displaying a 4.5x internal bias rate by refusing to allow this or any other criticism of women without labeling it sexist?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 01:46 PM
1

Oh, just normal 4.5x internal bias rate then, my bad.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 01:37 PM
1

You're just white-knighting. Painting criticism of women for needing men to "be their rock" as some sexist generalization is the sort of "ignore the evidence of your eyes and ears" rhetoric that is disaffecting male youth at an outsize rate and will cause uncountable damage to women over time, and you are simply not realistic or responsible enough to stop worshiping them long enough to see it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 01:12 PM
1

I don’t know how to argue against your perception that women are bad and ruin relationships. ‘Women bad men good’ is just not a point worth debating.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 12:54 PM
-1

Interesting definition. I think women are less capable of managing this, and therefore would experience this point before men. Women who need a man to be her "rock" are really just telling on themselves what an anxiety riddled mess they are deep down inside, and are offloading being in control of their own emotions to their partner who then bares the weight of being in control of both parties' emotions without being controlling, whilst these women essentially contribute 0 emotional labor and bor…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 12:46 PM
1

He's making a rhetorical point but it went over your head. The absurdist and contrarian nature of it was intentional. Shocking, i know. This might come off as somewhat of a controversial take, but perhaps he was trying to draw attention to the absurdity of another somewhat equivalent and more commonly held perspective being debated in this thread?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 12:43 PM
10

Way to not explain why men should care beyond just that it makes you and other western women seeth. You ladies keep painting this like it's some kind of inherently exploitative thing like western women themselves aren't notorious for attempting to fuck upwards and pursuing men for their status. Why do some of you care so much anyways? You're simply not compatible with the men who do this. Go find men who like meeting your opaque and never ending gender role expectations.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/24 02:10 AM
6

Sure, it only takes a second brain cell to rub together. "When the ship goes down, they herd the _____ and the _____ to the lifeboats and let the _____ all drown." Could you please fill in the spaces with the correct multiple choice answers without using duplicates? Bonus pts 1/2 for explaining which party(ies) should have an equal vote in this decision. Bonus pts 2/2 for explaining how this can be interpreted as a metaphor for voting in society in general a.) Men b.) Women c.) Children d.) Drag…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 11:38 PM
1

So what you're saying is that the entirety, every single bit, of "equal space" that men have made for women in society was in error, and that you are fundamentally our adversary and that what we can take from you through might is justified through might? Being as how whenever men "need help" thats going to be an issue for women, i'm struggling to draw the lines here why men in general should ever care again if women find themselves "needing help". Is the entire range of our potential relationshi…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 01:01 PM
1

You sure that parts difficult? Sounds like itd be pretty profitable for real estate investors if they imported labor from populations already accustomed to multi-generational 10+ person households. You can afford a whole fuck of a lot of mortgage when your choices are to split it ten ways or else somebody else will. What can you personally afford? 1500 bucks? That's a 15k/mo mortgage efficiency price for the smallest house you can cram 10 desperate workers into who probably don't even get their …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/08/24 12:39 PM
–

Who said mature? Are you dense? It was one category. You probably suck more at something to do with shapes or something for christs sake. Jeez. The fuckin nerve on you derps.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 07:41 PM
1

Lady, not all fucking help needs to be "taken up". You'd be surprised how much youve been helped from simple tax incentives you've never heard of. Stop desperately trying to contrive this as "its mens fault men have mens problems" like some kind of sicko reverse rape apologist.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 07:36 PM
-1

Why are they being disruptive? This sounds pretty sexist, ngl. Maybe we should keep the girls who complain and nag too much away from the smart boys? You don't really seem smart enough in general to have actually had this problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 07:30 PM
1

I say we stop having kids and let billionaires decide our immigration policies based on whats profitable thus redefining western values along whats politically expedient to the capitalist class because who cares anymore
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 07:16 PM
–

There's also a getting-killed-or-maimed-at-work gap, there's also a dying-from-stress-induced-heart-failure gap, there's also a suicide gap, theres also an overall life expectancy gap, theres also a college admissions and graduation rate gap, there's also a dying-to-drone-dropped-grenades-and-artillery-in-a-trench gap, are we going to talk about that too or just compartmentalize everything to women's obvious benefit and selectively ignore whatever isn't?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 01:42 PM
1

So, which type of vehicle that women often drive should we be fairly mocking as roast beefmobiles?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 12:58 PM
3

This question to me is kind of exceptionally revealing of women's privilege. How "safe" do you need to be used to being, to not realize that matters of necessity preclude matters of morality? If you were being raped, would it "be bad to cause harm" to the rapist? Exactly how "protected" of a creature do you need to be to not realize that men evolved the strength to cause harm out of necessity? You seem to have the moral philosophy of a tree. It doesn't seem very applicable to humans on earth.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 12:12 PM
14

I mean if you're the only one replying pushing back against it, and you haven't substantiated your claim that it's bogus, why would it stop?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 12:03 PM
1

I'm not. Women don't "empathize" with men according to your definition. They sympathize with them. There may not be the exact study i asked for, but there is a study demonstrating a 4.5x internal bias for women, so how you think such a creature is better poised to "understand not sympathize" seems completely unsubstantiated by actual data. Of course a woman, with a 4.5x internal bias rate would say "yes" if you asked her if women "understand men". Where are all the men who feel so understood by …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/24 10:16 AM
1

Wondering if there are concurrent studies that explore how much empathy is shown to women vs men and how big of an effect being shown empathy has on the ability to show it to others. These "Study confirms women are more empathetic" arguments always seem so willfully obtuse. My own anecdotal experience is that both women and men trend towards being empathetic of women, but that there is a lower incidence of women being empathetic of men, and among men you might only expect empathy from those that…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 10:08 PM
17

Ya, you gals win this one. OP has lost the plot as they say.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 09:26 PM
2

Op has made a point in one of his comments to reassure us all that he is indeed a 100% Certified Adult Man that is Conventionally Attractive and Financially Successful, so we can all rest easy knowing that we're definitely not arguing with an idiot teenager who is actively mishandling words like "anecdote" in his own thread while waxing softly about his innate skills in "material analysis from a dispassionate viewpoint". What is it about people who have 0 experience in a subject trying to cospla…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/08/24 01:09 PM
1

Maybe in a tight enough model view, sure. But the relationship between one race and another isn't the same and doesn't have the same consequences as the relationship between men and women so in a broader model view it's not a very apt comparison. Ideology is ultimately just as subject to natural selection as any physical trait. What that means, and what the poster above you is ultimately alluding to in some capacity, is that modern progressive values regarding women are also subject to natural s…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 11:24 PM
1

Usually facts are supported by evidence, so i'll thank you to leverage your very profound powers of "material analysis from a dispassionate viewpoint" to materially analyze what a fuckin opinion is and explain precisely for me what is so "dispassionate" about an opinion you refuse to substantiate besides just your unearned superiority complex and low energy condescension?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 10:58 PM
0

The only other person i've seen on the internet who wields logic so poorly with such high regard for their own intellect is probably Elon Musk. I think you've sealed my conviction that the world can't possibly get better until it gets much worse first. Naivety like yours just isn't sustainable. People like you need to be tested by harsher environments. The world has become a padded room for idiots like you.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 10:47 PM
2

Do you know what an anecdote is? The person you're replying to linked you to a government archive of banking documents from 1873. Just sell me on it, go ahead. I'll wait. I'm popping my fucking corn here waiting to hear what you think an anecdote is.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 10:41 PM
2

Be honest. How many times did I get you to refresh that smiley face before I finally edited it for you?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 12:48 PM
1

=)
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 12:27 PM
1

Buddy I typo enough that I've simply no shame, and also the reddit post-box is ass for editing anything longer than three sentences. You're grasping at straws here because the discourse has exited your depth.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 12:23 PM
1

Lol did you really just plug your ears and say lalalala through text?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 12:14 PM
1

Don't forget to look up, that's where the point will be going by.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 12:06 PM
1

They're a minority voting class until they achieve suffrage within a given society, but sure lets split ends here.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 11:49 AM
3

Lady, I don't know how to break this to you but women having to pursue their rights in society is something that was always going to happen. Some of you ladies treat school and university and women's performance in them like it's some sort special indicator that your potential was always suppressed, that these systems and institutions are fundamentally a precursor to a built society rather than a result of it. I'm sorry, but there was never going to be a classroom where you could sit still, do a…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 11:06 AM
8

You're just laying blame at our feet. You didn't communicate a reason why any men should care. Might is right =)
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 10:19 AM
7

Why should men care?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 10:05 AM
2

Seriously? You're 30 years old, as in you're not even old enough to have experienced any of this phenomena yourself, and the experience you're drawing upon is, what? 5 years as an accountant? You sound like such an insane dipshit right now that you absolutely must be "late blooming" even as we speak.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/08/24 02:09 AM
3

Honestly dude you sound like you were a loser who never improved himself or accomplished anything of note and are now upset that you are in your 30s or 40s and are still a loser and some magic switch didn't flip that made you attractive for doing nothing lol. I don't know if you need to hear this or not, but if you were a loser when you were 20 and now you're a 40 yearold uber driver in debt up to his eyeballs, there was never going to be any change for you.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/24 11:31 PM
–

This is pure delusional cope lol. Men are not a monolith, sis. "Good" men absolutely do push back against "bad" men regardless of if you're too bitter of a cat lady to afford them that credit or not. I can see that you must be one of the "bad" feminists however since you're clearly not the one providing any push-back.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/24 10:46 PM
8

This is just pure delusion lol. Your logic hinges on some absolutist notion of the "late bloomer" having had 0 earlier success, and that "success" in a relationship solely hinges on the man's action and qualities or lack thereof, when in actuality either party can sabotage growth in a relationship. It also hinges on the absolutist logic that "the chad" is always "the chad" which is absolutely not true. "The chad" in my local social circle when I was 19 played guitar beautifully and made the girl…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/24 01:43 PM
12

Think it's less of a revenge fantasy in most cases and more of a waiting-at-the-finish-line "I had to do 90% of lifes hard shit on my own, why would I need a partner now?" type energy. They see these women didn't have attention for them during the "uncertain" phases of their trajectory in life, and now that it is measurable that they are a "winning lottery ticket" these women who never would have believed in them before or have ever been a partner worth a shit throughout the journey, suddenly wa…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/24 12:50 PM
1

You're right, I should not debase myself by stooping to her level of bad faith rhetoric.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/24 12:25 PM
–

Crying victim and strawmanning his argument into a "threat" is not very "equal gender" of you. Is this the energy we can expect from a woman president over the next 4 years?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/24 10:45 AM
7

One bad apple spoils the bunch. The "majority" of feminists who don't push back against "bad feminists" are not good apples. They are bad apples.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/24 10:42 AM
3

Not to mention the ideological can of worms he's opening. His logic basically boils down to if men can strategize an extra judicial method of ruining women's lives, it would not only not be wrong, it would be fundamentally moral.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/24 10:38 AM
5

Big upvote. Many seem to think just showing clear interest in our advances constitutes the entire female emotional labor-set when it comes to "romance" in a relationship. Bonus if they also think women toil most of the emotional labor in a relationship. That is so often just pure cope for the fact that it's actually measurable when they don't contribute equal physical labor. I'd love to hear the stories of all the women who broke their backs falling off the roofs of their houses doing something …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 01:26 PM
-1

Should he? What have you said to fellow women of yours who filter men for princess treatment? It's fair for women to reduce men to what they can do for them but it's not fair for men to reduce women to what they can do for them? If i'm nothing but a vehicle for your princess treatment fantasy, why should you be anything more than a vehicle for some base selfish fantasy of my own?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 01:19 PM
–

"wOmEn'S aTtRaCtIoN iS sO cOmPlEx" "So what do you do for a living" says the woman to the guy she prescreened by height and ethnicity.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 11:26 AM
3

Right. You get what you pay for. You don't do those things, so you limit your options to the men that have successfully given you all of the reasons you have for complaining about men. Your life is a self-fulfilling prophecy of treating men poorly and getting treated poorly by men. What came first? The chicken or the egg? Guess what, the man you wouldn't complain about doesn't care.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/08/24 02:12 AM
7

This is just a contradicting fantasy hypothetical scenario. You are describing two situations. One in which both parties know eachother and one in which both parties don't. It's falsely equivocating the risk inherent to staying adjacent to ones own social group with the risk inherent to finding a strange man alone in an alleyway after dark. The fact is these two situations carry entirely different risk factors and most situations fall somewhere inbetween the two. The hypothetical man who "would …
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 06:50 PM
–

You better hop the fuck on over to that subreddit yourself if you genuinely think your argument hinges solely on logic and no evidence, but i guess wikipedia makes you think you took philosophy 101 because you're a brain dead brick wall dip shit. You are fundamentally claiming that your argument is a priori, that is, that it relies solely on logic, like math, and is entirely surmisable without the evidence of your 5 senses. You wouldn't even know what the concept of "male" is through a priori me…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 06:08 PM
13

You do not get to loftily redirect people to "disclaimers" or "google" or tell them to "watch this youtube video" or "read this book". You made this thread. You defend your point.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 05:55 PM
2

Exactly, men are the same way about emotions, trust, and bonding the way women are about sex and physical intimacy. Women who try to get men to open up on the first date and rush the bonding stages are basically looking for the male equivalent of a "slut". Some women might need months before they are comfortable exploring physical intimacy, some men might need months before they are comfortable opening up with you. Some women might fuck on the first date and some men might open up on the first d…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 05:50 PM
–

He asked WHY you think that, you brain dead idiot.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 05:46 PM
8

"Society. If it was incorrect it wouldn't have held for so long" Hm, this magical group called "society" you brazenly cite sure just sounds like "women". Y'know whats also "held for so long"? Domestic Violence. Kinda sounds like fucking around and finding out exploiting your position as the "selectors" to select for aggressive traits in men, getting patriarchy'd for a few millennia and needing to have a decades long national conversation about how unhappy you are with men's behavior, but what do…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 05:44 PM
7

Nah, bein as how I'm of the apparently contentious opinion(For men in general) that I actually have something of value to offer a woman, I think it's me who's gonna be needing this proven by her, at least insofar as much as it constitutes a mutual and equal effort. Huh. Sounds like the sort of thing that would be easy to figure out if you were willing to put a mutual effort into getting to know me. Not sure why this is a "burden" that is on a "side". If you think i'm inclined to date a woman who…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 05:15 PM
–

"Guys only want one thing" ...a classic heart-wrenching societal double standard, from the producers of "Attraction is non-negotiable" and "The 666 rule" and director of the academy award winning biopic "So what do you do for a living?" comes a new method in deciphering compatibility instantly from a 50 foot distance called "being a trashy shallow bitch who be projecting"
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 04:39 PM
–

Can you just google the fucking fallacy you goddamned braindead idiot? You are having this same exact back-and-forth with literally like ten people instead of just fucking googling the term. You: [No True Scotsman Fallacy] Commenter: Hey OP, it looks like you're leaning on a No True Scotsman Fallacy, perhaps you should look that up! You: But [No True Scotsman Fallacy] Every. Fucking. Time. You fucking brick wall dipshit.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/08/24 04:27 PM
0

Calling it a hate movement without any kind of meaningful elaboration kind of makes you guilty of the same loading that you're complaining about, dontcha think?
/r/MensRights06/01/14 12:47 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter