TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

AScamWithCorndogs Archive

View 0 posts and 71 comments by AScamWithCorndogs on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

In my opinion what gay men need the most is their own masculinity movements, albeit less decadent and nasty than some current ones. Bisexuals and gays were quite prevalent in places such as Athens, Thebes, China, India, Persia, Rome and Assyria. Many of these men were masculine, such as Hadrian and Sulla. But ever since the 1800s it's taken on a very feminine form. Not sure why. Sadly many gay men have embraced a feminine identity. Even the pride flag reeks of this. They seriously need some refo…
/r/MensRights10/04/23 12:42 AM
2

Exactly
/r/MensRights10/04/23 12:34 AM
4

It isn't just traditional preferences either. Stuff men are into that many women can be into are given double standards. Stuff I and my friends have noticed include: Dudes who are into feet? If they're into women's it's weird and disgusting. If they're into men's or if a woman has one it's never commented on. Men want to sexually dominate a woman? He's a sadistic psychopath. Man wants to be sexually dominated or switch it up? He's weak or mentally insane (this also may translate if non-consensua…
/r/MensRights10/04/23 12:26 AM
1

And that's my main issue. Casual sex itself is bad. In my experience from what I've seen it leads to empty shells of men who have no real worth so they try to use sex to cope with it and gain self-worth through hedonism. It very frequently leads to infidelity and other issues long term. To me all this left right red pill bread tube yadda-yadda stuff is just further proof of a lost generation and a rotting society. Many men feel they don't have a place in life, aren't accepted or good enough so t…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/22 12:18 PM
1

You're saying that to the wrong person, friend. If you read it, you wouldn't be who you are
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/22 08:58 PM
1

Useless as a description in general, but I would agree it's especially useless for me since I defy most categorizations period, for better or for worse. Presuming is my middle name. Anyways I would hope that it would make you a better person, help you find some answers and meaning in life while providing lessons and cautionary tales that would grant you some perspective and morals that are good, rather than secular Social Darwinist stuff
/r/PurplePillDebate31/01/22 07:55 AM
1

That's what im doing am I not? Correcting as well as providing my opinion. Whether they want to take the correction or not it's up to them I prefer descriptions of dominance hierarchies that are far older yet are simpler while still acknowledging nuances and realities Nobody is saying dominance hierarchies don't exist other than far leftists. Only on how to categorize it
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/22 05:52 PM
1

It assumes according to most people I've seen using it. Again it's describing a dominance hierarchy as well as a personality type. I'll provide examples about the situationalism and how some folks defy categorization period if you're interested
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/22 05:39 PM
1

It alone proves how being black and white is foolish. Plus alpha and beta categorization ignores any and all situational stuff and assumes it to be static
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/22 05:36 PM
1

Weird strawman fallacy on your part Alpha and beta are almost useless since it's so entirely black and white and so entirely situational that there are far better categorizations for the dominance hierarchy. I can provide several examples as to why it's so situational and some people defy categorization from it
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/22 05:21 PM
1

This is pretty anecdotal but to be fair not like I've provided any sources either. From what I've seen most bisexuals aren't all that feminine, no more than straight men. Probably helps that most bisexuals started straight then became bisexual later on. As for gay feminine men, I found an ABC article that showed feminine behavior is sort of more prevalent in gay men and they tend to pursue "feminine" professions as well as for some reason developing the lispy talk, but obviously there were excep…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/22 07:50 AM
1

There's a chart on the internet in several variations that show the differences between aggressive, assertive and passive. They're simply not the same. There is no assertive unassertive dichotomy even within this pseudoscience, you just made that up lol. There is, at the very least, three different forms of it. For example, where would live and let live but stand my ground if pushed people fall? They're not passive, but not aggressive either. I say it's useless even in navigating folks. It maybe…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 11:35 PM
1

The best response to the first part is "The Bible doesn’t say that the earth is only 6000 years old. This is the dating (I've heard others too) that one gets if you try to follow back the dating of humanity and creation by counting the generations in Genesis. The people who do this kind of counting are assuming that the book of Genesis is some kind of actual history of creation in a scientific sense. Since this wasn’t the intent of the authors, it becomes quite an assumption. The intention of th…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 11:27 PM
1

I'd have to see statistics to back that, that being said I notice there's not many feminine bisexual men in comparison. Femininity and homosexuality haven't always been intertwined. Just look at Ancient Greece, Rome, China, Persia, India, homosexuality was very different then than it is now. Then again, a lot of that can be argued to be bisexuality. But homosexuality being intertwined with transexuality is more a modern thing popping up since the Stonewall riots
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 11:00 PM
1

My apologies for griping at you then. Disregard everything I said
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 07:23 PM
1

Past Exodus the Bible has a lot of accuracy especially post Babylonian exile. Watch Casual Historian's history of the Jews The Bible never said the earth is 6k years old. That's taking Evangelical biblical literalism and trying to apply it to the Bible. That's a minority reading Caring for the poor, the sick, the weak is part of human nature and has been a tradition since prehistory. Trey the explainer has a good video on this. Is it any coincidence our uncaring elites are so morally rotten? Not…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 06:51 PM
1

Felt like you were making that argument. Sure got close to it The maps are interesting, and supports what I was saying. Again I highly recommend 1491 just on principle alone
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 06:36 PM
1

Hey that's the plan. Thank you
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 06:23 PM
1

I'll chalk up the nature argument to agree to disagree then Many Amerindians had agriculture... I recommend the book 1491. Many African countries too. It wasn't all hunter gatherers I doubt Chinese folk religion and Buddhism will take off in Africa seeing as 1. Chinese influence there is less direct in comparison to what Europe had 2. Christianity and Islam are having tight grips. 3. Han Chinese are largely atheistic I'm saying it was the very nature of Christianity itself that made it so rife f…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 06:18 PM
1

The truths are the human condition, much of history, the truth about the pantheon, about morality, about caring for the weak, the poor and the crippled, many many truths Oh god not the opiate of the masses argument I agree with your last sentence.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 06:12 PM
1

You asked for it CEO who dominates the workplace and bangs girls daily. Gets arrested and imprisoned where then he is raped daily by Tyrone and Chavez. Where does he fit in? Soldier who is confident, brave and strong but blindly follows orders. Where does he fit in? Mentally insane man who is animalistic and eats people and diddles kids. Where does he fit in? He literally can't even speak Soldiers with PTSD. Where do they fit? Military general who on the side submits in bed. Where does he fit? I…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 06:10 PM
1

Guess I misread. My mistake
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 06:02 PM
1

Also, for jokes sakes, the real hierarchy is this https://youtu.be/32iCWzpDpKs
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 05:33 PM
1

Caveman times is literally just a catch all term for prehistoric humanity. It doesn't literally mean we all lived in caves. Your example on eastern Europe and the west doesn't really prove anything on prehistoric humanity. It's apples to oranges weird example. All it shows is humans will be humans no matter their race or ethnicity. If anything we behave the most unnatural today. Very unnatural. Are you trying to pull the opposite of Ted Kaczynski lmfao Many of those lessons well apply with or wi…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 05:32 PM
1

No isn't a real response
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 04:20 PM
1

Naturally people don't really behave that way either. This ain't caveman times and even then it wasn't that simplistic as the leader of the tribe tended to shift a lot since it was generally more egalitarian rather than functioning in strict alpha beta dynamics. It also varied from society to society. Source: Industrial Society and It's Consequences and Sapiens by Yuval No doubt the Bible takes inspiration from Mesopotamian myth but it's not what im saying. I'm saying the Bible contains many tru…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 04:19 PM
1

https://youtu.be/uc6QxD2_yQw https://youtu.be/3LtqdsihXPI https://youtu.be/90uhXRQJVcI Preying on the weak instead of helping tends to lead to extremes. One must be like Jesus, who aided the poor, the blind and the crippled. Never said there wasn't a hierarchy. Simply said alpha and beta are too black and white, too simplistic to be useful. It doesn't account for situations either The Bible, whether you believe it or not, still contains a lot of truths regardless of how you feel about the supern…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 04:04 PM
1

Then you ain't very bright. We already have had ways of organizing it. Religious, clergy, aristocracy, poor (the class of Christ), the monarchy, the lords, the barbarians, the emperor, the president, the fuhrer, the rich, the strong, the weak, rebels and tyrants, etc. All far more complex than a simple two system dichotomy. Your country of origin, India, has one. Caste system, and a very unjust one too. All that red pill stuff just like feminism is secular nonsense. Read the Bible
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 03:59 PM
2

Man it says a lot how much Poe's Law has genuinely fucked me. Even the craziest seemingly joking positions seem real because somewhere I have seen it spoken unironically. God give me strength
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 02:50 PM
1

Except you can leave the army without getting shot. Captivity is basically imprisonment. You can leave the army through honorable or dishonorable discharge but rare is the firing squad. Meanwhile actual captivity, prison, you ain't gonna leave the prison unless 1. Your sentence is up 2. You're being transferred Ain't no honorable early discharge there.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 02:49 PM
1

Usually friend groups that toxic lead to evil things. It's why so many devolve into raping the man who is the butt of the jokes. So many cases of it. So much of this BS is laden with homosexuality and sin. It's all secular hogwash that prioritizes degenerate sex over monogamy and aiding the weak and the poor for "Muh grindset". Read the Bible friend.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 02:46 PM
1

And can you being forth evidence? The red pill and the leftists are both results of a secular rotting society that prioritizes degenerate sex with strangers over monogamy. Read the Bible
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 02:43 PM
1

Alpha and beta are useless for describing human dominance hierarchies. That's the issue. Iirc I've already provided you the example but ill run it through again if needbe. It's too black and white and society doesn't function like that Average dudes aren't betas. Betas according to your logic would be a minority since learned helplessness is rare. There are a lot of people pleasers but almost nobody fits into one or the other perfectly. There are alpha dudes who submit in bed and beta assholes w…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 02:42 PM
1

Many try to defend it as scientific lol Anything outside of monogamy is sinful. Read the Bible We go into hierarchies but real life ones are far more complex than a two system black and white dichotomy. It's like saying all politics is either democrat or republican. Short hand expression? Parasitic, evil, pedophilic, satanic, that's the men who rule the world.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 02:36 PM
1

Issue being alpha and beta are too black and white to be useful in describing human dominance hierarchies. Here's an example showing just how situational it is A CEO who bangs girls daily goes to prison and gets banged by Tyrone and Chavez. Where does he fit in the hierarchy? Where does David the soldier who is confident, strong and brave but blindly follows orders fit in? Where does a CEO who dominates the workplace but like to submit in bed fit in?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 02:33 PM
1

If you consider army, jobs to be captivity, then you're going further than most leftists do lmao. It only applies to prison. How is sigma male anymore cope than alpha or beta? Alpha and beta is a useless black and white dichotomy that is far too simple to describe human behavior society wide
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 02:30 PM
1

Issue is it's black and white and thus becomes pretty useless
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 02:28 PM
1

It's far too black and white to be useful. Humans are far more complex than a two side dynamic. As for your example, most women would obviously squeal (though some wouldn't care) but I got an example of my own that proves how stupidly situational the dynamic is. Say a CEO who dominates the workplace and bangs girls daily gets arrested. He gets banged daily by Tyrone and Chavez. Where tf is he supposed to fit in such a uselessly black and white dichotomy?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 02:27 PM
1

Both are bullshit. Alpha beta are far too black and white to be useful in describing human dominance hierarchy. I can provide examples that blow it out of the water
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 02:24 PM
1

Issue is it's far too black and white to be a nuanced description of dominance hierarchies. These terms haven't existed throughout all of history because this dominance hierarchy is one that hasn't existed in humanity since Sumer. It's all situational too. Say there's a CEO who dominates his workplace and he bangs girls daily but then he gets put in prison and is banged daily by Tyrone and Chavez. Where does he fit? Where does a soldier who follows orders to a T fit? See the issue? Were you the …
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 02:23 PM
1

Sigma and beta aren't the same lol. Sigma is just an introverted alpha. Omega isn't either. God damn you people can't even keep your own terms straight Alpha beta is a useless dichotomy for describing dominance hierarchy in humans due to being too simplistic. Let me give you examples A CEO who dominates his workplace and bangs girls daily is arrested and put in prison where he gets banged by Tyrone and Chavez and Cletus daily. Where does that fit in the hierarchy? How about David the soldier who…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 02:16 PM
1

I'd love to see where you're living then cause most men I see aren't in tribes or packs foraging for food but are mostly independent or marriage dependent men who aren't hunting for shit. Seriously where do you live, Detroit? Alpha beta dynamics are far too simple to describe human dominance hierarchies
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 02:13 PM
1

And alpha beta shit is dudebro mumbo jumbo. Real chads use "Christian" and "heretic"
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 02:10 PM
0

You clearly never read the Bible. Humanity is naturally monogamous. Why else would it be so common
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 02:07 PM
1

Thing is though most primates are still very much different from humans and within humanity we are far more monogamous, "homophobic" and structured than the simple alpha beta dynamic of most primates, making it far too black and white and overall useless in comparison to other ways of organizing it
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 02:06 PM
1

But not the ones listed. It's too black and white to be nuanced.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 02:04 PM
1

Even then us humans are very much different from primates, for one, we are far more monogamous and "homophobic" than most primate species. So it still doesn't really apply. It's too black and white you see
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 02:03 PM
1

Except most men don't. It's very situational and far too black and white to be useful for describing dominance hierarchies. Phrase it like this. Where does a domineering CEO who screws women on the daily but ends up in prison and gets screwed daily by Tyrone, Cletus and Chavez and gets broken end up on the hierarchy?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 02:02 PM
1

What?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 02:00 PM
1

Okay, and who's saying that? The issue is is that to describe dominance hierarchies, alpha and beta are useless since they're too black and white.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 01:59 PM
1

I don't overall disagree but man can people go back to reading the Bible and perhaps not glorify polyamory. Thanks
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 01:58 PM
1

That's cause he's pulling an Epstein lol
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 01:56 PM
1

I see that point used for race a lot. Funny thing is black race and white race don't exist. In reality, it's West Eurasian and for black people there's so many races. Khoisan, Bantu, Kushite, Nilote, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 01:56 PM
1

Pretty false equivalence. There's a big difference between something that you can literally witness and a fake dominance hierarchy that is far too black and white to be useful and was disproven by its own author. Can it serve to describe certain personality traits? Sure, but we already have those terms. Weak, strong, assertive, passive, gentlemanly, selfish, etc. all far less cringe
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 01:54 PM
1

Yeah fuck asking for sources. Tell people talking to whatifalthist to suck it
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 01:50 PM
1

Any man preaching polygamy ain't no friend of mine. Monogamy is a traditional value I support
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 01:49 PM
1

Shit like this is why so many men are hyper insecure lol I'm intelligent and tall (though not particularly muscular) but man I can see why so many men are insecure lol. That being said, dominance hierachies exist but alpha and beta are far too black and white to be nuanced.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 01:48 PM
2

An alpha in the corporate office definitely ain't gonna be an alpha in the prison lol. You right
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 01:45 PM
1

Nobody is denying that. What folks take issue with is that alpha and beta aren't accurate in describing human hierarchy or even wolf hierarchy and are way too black and white to be nuanced. Also you're mistaking aggressive with assertive
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 01:44 PM
1

You got fucked
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 01:43 PM
1

You told him off lol
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 01:42 PM
1

Many gay men aren't feminine... how did gay and trans culture get so intertwined in folks minds to where being gay is like being feminine...
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 01:40 PM
1

Thing is wolves aren't even that hierarchical at least not in the way of alpha and beta. For one, alpha and beta aren't even used in the context anymore since beta instead of a second in command now is a catch all for a weak man. Secondly, the wolf study has been debunked by its own author and real wolf packs function more like a family unit
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 01:34 PM
1

Sources and evidence of alpha beta pseudoscience being like astrology?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 01:31 PM
1

Young men are struggling now more than ever but you're struggling more than most lmfao
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 12:17 PM
1

Issue is, that isn't really accurate 1. Aggressive people exist, and are an extreme on assertive. 2. Assertive is actually more a middle when considering that 3. People pleasers do exist but are, like the assertive, are the "moderates" when compared to literal doormats who have learned helplessness 4. There is a lot in between aggressive and literal doormat. To pretend otherwise is stating humans aren't complex. You're throwing away centuries of psychology for astrology for men
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 12:00 PM
1

You sure about that?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 11:55 AM
1

A guy who accuses people of being hedonistic, preaching hedonistic BS. Is this what they call hypocrisy?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 11:55 AM
1

You're a walking mommy issue case lol. I guess I was right about the repressed femdom fetish If the second half is true, no wonder your dick is so dry.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 11:50 AM
1

I agree. God can forgive us all not having to appreciate you. You're an incel post meeting boomer post
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 11:48 AM
1

All that shit, and not a single person read it. Is typing paragraphs of nonsense a hobby of yours or is it a job? Either way you're doing excellent boring people to death
/r/PurplePillDebate29/01/22 11:45 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter