TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ASexualSloth Archive

View 0 posts and 404 comments by ASexualSloth on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

Forcing someone into the meat grinder that is war against his will isn't anti men?
/r/MensRights06/11/24 02:24 AM
0

https://theweek.com/politics/kamala-harris-nato-ukraine Harris has also been steadfast in backing Ukraine. Now start acting in good faith. Your trolling is bad.
/r/MensRights06/11/24 02:23 AM
2

Pro war = pro draft = anti men. But then I doubt you're arguing in good faith, so I don't expect you to listen.
/r/MensRights05/11/24 09:34 PM
10

Who's in a bubble? She's establishment property. That alone is enough to draw this conclusion. To claim anything else is either ignorance or cope.
/r/MensRights05/11/24 08:39 PM
3

It's because they follow the standard toxic female strategies of shame and blame. Politics is such a gong show, all you can do is laugh.
/r/MensRights04/11/24 06:06 PM
1

Trump has openly acted in racist ways. 🤣 The only candidate I could consider voting is Chase Oliver of the Libertarian Party. Dude, I could go on for hours why the US libertarian party is hot garbage, and I'm more libertarian than anyone I know! My point is, you'll never find a politician that fits your ideals, because the world doesn't work that way. The closest you'll get is if you run yourself, and then you'll REALLY learn the world doesn't work that way. So focus on what you can influence. I…
/r/MensRights04/11/24 11:46 AM
12

An interesting point that was bright up this past week was how the Harris campaign has made a last minute pivot to try to appeal to men because of polling. Meaning that unless you already support what they plan to do, you're only useful when you're needed. I think this is just more indicative of how legacy politicians view people as voting blocks to be pandered to, only when they need your vote. The sooner people learn that, the better.
/r/MensRights04/11/24 01:15 AM
2

And you won't ever see one, either. Real life will never come anywhere close to the ideals you've listed. It's best to focus on those closest to you, and keep enough tabs on the world to be able to adjust your life accordingly.
/r/MensRights04/11/24 01:12 AM
31

I work in construction manufacturing, and we were bought out by another company recently. They've brought in a lot of corporate crap, including a lot of policies that are, quite frankly, tone policing. I'm very careful about who I discuss this with at work, but it's all very condescending. Promoting feelings and inclusivity and the hr definition of 'support', all while enforcing insanely low pay grades. It's incredibly hypocritical, and often times in direct conflict with it's own internal messa…
/r/MensRights03/11/24 02:18 PM
11

Haha what? Must be a squirrel on a phone cause you're nuts.
/r/MensRights14/10/24 03:11 AM
1

If you're looking for a single male role model, you'll probably never find one good enough. It's likely best to observe good behaviors from multiple men. Take Tate for example. I disagree with him on most subjects he's talked about, and definitely disagree with most of his actions. But he is right about a few things. As long as you take a nuanced approach, there's nothing wrong with taking singular good examples and building your own ideal.
/r/MensRights29/08/24 02:02 PM
4

I've been banned from my provincial and national subs for political dissent. While I may get snarky and make highly uncomfortable points, I do my best to follow the 'no personal attacks' rules and keep it civil. I'm fairly certain that at this point many subs just have no issues with banning people who don't agree with what the mods think, which results in just a bunch of echo chambers. This is how you get people with wildly different political views.
/r/MensRights29/08/24 12:00 PM
2

No, but it applies to women against trans women who are actually men. Gotta get the terfs too, you know.
/r/MensRights28/08/24 12:15 PM
4

by definition can’t be restricted to one gender It's their political movement, they can do whatever they want, including restricting it to a single gender. We'll just make our own political movement. With blackjack. And hookers.
/r/MensRights20/08/24 01:38 PM
2

I was under the impression only Pokemon could use z-moves.
/r/MensRights13/08/24 04:55 PM
3

I've found that the neuroticism that women tend towards is actually a good thing, when applied in an advisory role. A second check, a verification redundancy. Their tendency to focus on the random small stuff means that you can take the time to plan the primary details needed first, then consult anything your wife/gf wanted to contribute, and you can add as you see fit. The issue is that women aren't taught to support, so they go nuts because even the concept of doing the dishes is mentally anch…
/r/MensRights05/08/24 04:18 AM
0

There is no point in debating someone who doesn't want to debate in good faith. I fully agree. You're interested in pushing racial narratives instead of having an actual conversation about why women in the general military fails. Congrats, you've fully lived up to my expectations, and this conversation is now over. Bye! :)
/r/MensRights25/07/24 01:42 AM
0

The Roman Empire no longer exists Neither do the people who 'colonized' the US. Comparing the actions of the Roman Empire in its conquest of Europe to the colonization of the Americas and subsequent enslavement, genocide, forced removal, forced assimilation, and oppression of Amerindian peoples is ridiculous and shows a clear ignorance about the history and prehistory of the indigenous peoples of the Americas. I'm sorry, are you implying that the settling of the Americas was far worse than what …
/r/MensRights24/07/24 07:46 PM
-1

Stereotypes exist for a reason. I greatly enjoy when someone breaks a stereotype, as it means they have chosen individuality instead of just going along with how things are. Much like how people who fall into the same stereotype as you react exactly the way you are reacting, and instead of arguing via logic, and addressing the points that are brought up, you instead focus on the emotional arguments and make personal attacks. So far, you're about 50/50 for a match. Let's see how that changes afte…
/r/MensRights24/07/24 06:43 PM
0

So why shouldn't she be drafted into militsry service? Answered in my previous comment regarding brutal efficiency. Comparing the severity of the xenophobia... Then shall we compare all the people groups that the Romans oppressed? How about the various eastern European convicts around people groups? The multitudes of African tribes, and the atrocities they forced on one another? My point is that to choose to focus on something simply because they happen to be the most recent example seems foolis…
/r/MensRights24/07/24 06:39 PM
1

Before I make my counterarguments, which will be very strong Hilarious. Is it ethical to draft only men and not women into military service I don't think you should be starting from an ethical point of view, but from a realist one. Women, generally speaking, are blatantly worse in performance in most direct combat positions. The military isn't about equality, representation, or fairness. It's about brutal efficiency. Also it is a strawman argument and wrong of you to assume that I will call you …
/r/MensRights24/07/24 06:12 PM
2

Was looking for this comment.
/r/MensRights24/07/24 05:39 PM
1

Why should a Native American man, whose ancestors were forcibly removed and slaughtered by the U.S. Army and a government built by White Americans for White Americans, be forced to fight, die, and kill in war for this same government in the same armed forces that committed heinous actions against his ancestors while a White settler colonizer woman is exempt? Because that native American man is just as much an American as any other citizen of the country. If you wish to use this logic, then you m…
/r/MensRights24/07/24 05:14 PM
1

A solution, and here i'm thinking out loud, maybe its pure garbage, would be to allow voting only for employed people, so people actually paying taxes. I've had a similar thought, but a bit more specific. In order to qualify to vote, you must meet two criteria. First, you must be a citizen of the country, and second, you must have been a net taxpayer for the entirety of the previous term. Of course, this would be incredibly hard to facilitate, but if you are receiving more money from the governm…
/r/MensRights06/07/24 12:13 PM
1

Corporatism
/r/MensRights05/07/24 10:02 PM
0

Unfortunately, progressivism is now defined as progress at the cost of anything else, including tried and true traditions that were built over centuries of survival. And it's not just at the cost of, as it actively seeks to 'dismantle' and 'reconstruct' everything. We've been propagandized out of being able to instinctively recognise that society was originally built for the family. Now it's largely treated as a zero sum divisive game played by those in power, to maintain power.
/r/MensRights12/04/24 08:56 PM
1

The difficulty for men vs women is in different places for dating apps. Men struggle to get matched at all. Women struggle to sort through the massive deluge of likes they get. I found apps like CMB to be better, strictly because they limit your matches so you don't get as swamped. Doesn't mean I found success there or anywhere else, just that I appreciated the time gated structure.
/r/MensRights23/03/24 09:59 PM
5

It's because every time money changes hands, the government gets a cut. It's all about the money, not what is just.
/r/MensRights25/12/23 07:32 PM
3

Heh, I've tagged temp bans from the site for posting on this sub about the realities of G.D. on this subject. Pretty sure the two words in conjunction actually trigger a site bot, hence the acronym.
/r/MensRights15/12/23 04:37 PM
7

First you need a history lesson. Are you the one teaching? thank you for providing me an example! Your hatred is enough. Your comments are "Far right" and you seem to be bashing on trans, trying to prove your not. I'm reporting that comment, hopefully Moderators will remove it. I can only hope this is high grade sarcasm. To think my comment is hatred when it is clearly the most mundane take on the situation would pretty much only illustrate my point to the t. without these off topic comments tha…
/r/MensRights21/11/23 01:34 PM
3

[ Removed by Reddit ]
/r/MensRights21/11/23 12:59 PM
42

When you're far enough to the left, everything becomes right wing. And when Reddit mods get in the habit of banning people who don't align with the leftist groupthink, any subs who don't do that seem dominated by non-leftist people due simply to the fact that they're not banned there. It's all rather hilarious to watch, but it does drive leftists further left by creating what is largely an echo chamber across most of the site.
/r/MensRights21/11/23 12:56 PM
6

There's a reason we have the saying "Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned".
/r/MensRights10/09/23 08:01 PM
2

Naw, they just delete it.
/r/MensRights31/08/23 12:05 PM
1

It's the 'no true Scotsman' fallacy. They don't have to bear any responsibility for the actions of others that claim their belief system because they're not really following that belief system. It's just a way to say not my problem.
/r/MensRights25/07/23 02:02 PM
1

He is always making comments about how women are sexist, how there are no good women out there to date anymore, that none of them have the emotional maturity to date him, etc. He hasn’t had a girlfriend since the bad one, and refuses to look inwards and admit that his sh*t stinks. Flipped the genders. If it sounds like cutting off a man that behaves this way is good, it's likely the same for a woman. She's family. You may have to love her, but you don't have to like her, or even associate with h…
/r/MensRights21/07/23 12:34 PM
23

Women often encourage men to be vulnerable next to them and often it's either used as ammo for future manipulation or same women leave their men. This is a defining trait of toxicity femininity, and one that I have seen pointed out a few times by those 'women who advocate for men' influencers. They may have mixed reasons for taking the side they're claiming to, but it is being talked about at least a little.
/r/MensRights14/07/23 11:55 AM
5

It's largely because they're marginalized by government sanction here. The way the government of Canada treats native Americans ensures very few of them succeed, and they so often fall victim to criminals from within their tribal groups, or criminals who see them as an easy target. Add in the difficulties if living further and further north, and their communities are barely functional in many regards. My brother works as an EMT up north, and the number of calls he responds to that are native Ame…
/r/MensRights15/06/23 12:00 PM
41

Old school feminism was about women’s want too have equal rights and opportunities as men then. I wish this propaganda would die already. Feminism has never been about equality. It was started as a movement by rich women who wanted the same freedoms and powers as their rich husbands, with none of the responsibility. Has it done some good things for women? Debatable. But it has never been about equality. If you don't believe me, look at the attendees and subjects discussed at the famous 'birth of…
/r/MensRights14/06/23 03:15 PM
5

I feel like no matter how clear the data, how well documented the research most people will just point to some fucking tweet that states the opposite and be validated in their believes. I attribute this to the proliferation of the feminist ideal 'the personal is political'. It opened the door to validating every single opinion and belief, and combined with the pandemic, has clearly divided the populace in two. You used to be able to lead someone through a line of logic to help them at least unde…
/r/MensRights09/06/23 04:54 PM
15

An easier question is why wasn't there outrage about the boys that were straight up murdered the same time they took those girls?
/r/MensRights31/05/23 06:02 PM
1

The article links directly to a pdf download of it. https://media.deseret.com/media/misc/pdf/afs/2022-american-family-survey.pdf?_ga=2.111126725.1920361153.1669614471-836100798.1669614471 Take the link at your own risk.
/r/MensRights31/05/23 02:15 PM
7

I would disagree that feminism has ever been about equal rights. Feminism has always been about garnering additional privileges for some women, with none of the responsibility typically associated with them, under the guise of equal rights.
/r/MensRights30/05/23 02:02 PM
2

I find this is because far too many people in general have farmed out the responsibility for their own lives to others. They don't like the idea of personal responsibility, because then it means that a good chunk of the crap in their lives is their fault. Not all of it, mind you. There is still plenty of messed up stuff that happens. It's just not an excuse for everything.
/r/MensRights15/05/23 12:00 PM
2

This is just a result of the combination of the devaluation of sex, and feminist supremacy ideology. If society still valued sex, this wouldn't be a thing. If feminism want actively trying to give women all the power, and none of the accountability, it also wouldn't be a thing. At the end of the day, the solution is take responsibility for your own actions. Protect yourself. Nobody else can be trusted to if you don't do it yourself. If you insist on having sex with women outside of a relationshi…
/r/MensRights14/05/23 02:16 PM
3

women go through similar things like this, albeit not on the same level as men. Exactly. They go through similar things, but you cannot compare an inability to find a mate within your standards with the inventory to find a mate at all. but that's only because they outnumber women on dating apps Historically, women have far more consistently reproduced than men. I don't know the actual %s off the top of my head, so I won't pull a number out of thin air, but I can try to find it if you want.
/r/MensRights11/05/23 06:33 PM
3

What exactly is the point of the article you linked? When I put out a call for stories from women who’d felt undateable, more than 200 women responded to me. Some were “late bloomers” who’d either lost their virginity at what felt like an advanced age, or were still virgins well past their late twenties. Others had had a few isolated sexual experiences that punctuated a largely dateless existence, or felt themselves slipping into unfuckability as they entered middle age. This does not describe i…
/r/MensRights11/05/23 05:31 PM
2

what will really happen will be that the transgenderism will become mainstream, and everyone will be able to choose a body Except that isn't how it works. Unless you're pulling some scifi body transfer shenanigans, and literally grow the body someone wants, you can't just 'choose a body'. Just like how you can't just automate power line maintenance, for example. Robotics has to cross a massive hurdle to even come close to a human with a 5 hour training course and some PPE. Technological progress…
/r/MensRights11/05/23 05:28 PM
0

Eh, you're going to have to go really really far into the automated worker future to get to the point where that's actually the case across the board. To be fair, women will be boned by that before men. After all, it's not like one gender will reign in the future. It'll be the same as now; a select few live in tremendous wealth, and the rest of us are left to fend for ourselves.
/r/MensRights11/05/23 03:55 PM
4

It's not like all women don't have to try. When it comes down to the way incel is used, all a woman must do is walk into a bar, loudly proclaim she is looking for a shag, and she is getting laid 99% of the time. You have to be so far down on the sexual town pole as a woman for that to not work the first time. The key point here is that that isn't the standard women operate at. They are selective with who they are intimate, as they should be. However, as I'm sure we all are aware of, that selecti…
/r/MensRights11/05/23 03:52 PM
2

I like to think that at some point in the future, when the pendulum has swung back, that 'pick me' women will be the female collective. Assuming the pendulum doesn't just fall off soon.
/r/MensRights11/05/23 11:56 AM
7

And I believe the point is likely to have been made elsewhere already, but it is damn near impossible for a woman to be an incel. Volcel, sure, and quite commonly at that, but in regards to the base definition of inability to gain access to sex, for women it's a joke.
/r/MensRights11/05/23 11:54 AM
5

I’m not trying to wrap my identity into a group of people I don’t know, trust, or care about. I’m not ‘men’. I’m just a person. While I agree with you regarding having no interest in identifying with a random group simply based on physical characteristics, you are still a man. There are inherent biological drivers we all have, just like women. Honestly, your comment seems like a personification of the rat universe 'beautiful ones' outcome. Which is not a particularly good thing, if you're alread…
/r/MensRights06/05/23 12:35 PM
1

Refuse to acknowledge? It's celebrated here.
/r/MensRights04/05/23 07:34 PM
2

This is why I watch anime. Plenty of fun to be made in both directions. I can think of two great examples where you have a competent male lead with at least 1 wildly incompetent female lead just off the top of my head, and I can think of a few where the opposite is true. I can also think of lots of examples where both are morons, and where both are fantastic, flawed human beings. Western media is garbage. Don't keep looking for something in it that won't exist.
/r/MensRights03/05/23 07:37 PM
1

People have rioted over what he had done, they've just been cracked down on hard. Just wait until they start leveraging C-11 against online dissent, claiming it isn't 'Canadian'.
/r/MensRights30/04/23 12:58 PM
17

He couldn't implement policy if his life depended on it. Wow, you're incredibly ignorant of what is going on in Canada. Just a few things Trudeau has done while in office.. Outlawed using prior communications as evidence in sexual assault cases. Unilaterally, without going through the legislative process, banned thousands of guns. Passed an internet censorship bill China would love. Openly marginalized and punished people for a medical choice, while calling them racist and misogynistic. Invoked …
/r/MensRights29/04/23 12:51 PM
28

This is assuming they even know who he is. The poor kid now has an extremely rough start in life thanks to these actions.
/r/MensRights20/04/23 11:55 AM
13

Ok, but could you list a specific example please? He has a bias, and his bias is much stronger when it’s more difficult to pin down the variables. You just described every human, unfortunately.
/r/MensRights17/04/23 05:18 PM
16

but I didn’t agree with many of his other pieces. Could you articulate a particular example that you disagree on? It's rare to find someone who disagrees but is possibly willing to explain their reasoning, and I'd like to hear your perspective.
/r/MensRights17/04/23 02:05 PM
4

Money isn't being printed as much anymore, in fact, its basically stopped. Yeah... Not in my country. It's the complete opposite here. you cannot forget how expensive labor is I'm not. My goal includes operating a lean company than can afford to pay the few employees well. This company isn't about making me money, it's about improving my local community while generating enough profit for me to support myself and my employees.
/r/MensRights14/04/23 11:56 AM
3

Fertilizer alternatives. With all the climate fear mongering, a natural, affordable fertilizer alternative might have a chance.
/r/MensRights14/04/23 11:54 AM
8

I know. I didn't say anything about my plan was?
/r/MensRights14/04/23 02:04 AM
8

Good luck!
/r/MensRights14/04/23 02:03 AM
74

I've begun what is hopefully a 5 year or less plan to starting my own business. I don't expect it to be lucrative, but I would like to have it be successful enough that I can support myself, my employees, and take care of my parents during their retirement.
/r/MensRights13/04/23 08:17 PM
3

the media overvaluing femininity as a socially desirable characteristic. Not correct. The media overvalues women, not femininity. They've been trying to destroy femininity since feminists decided it was 'oppressive' to be feminine.
/r/MensRights03/04/23 03:07 PM
48

Then I figured, why am I with this person? Honestly, the worst part about this is that it took you 3 years to reach that conclusion. Too many of us are afraid of being single and lock ourselves into bad relationships just to avoid that.
/r/MensRights28/03/23 10:08 PM
8

Men have a reason they don’t talk about it. As you elaborated on, multiple reasons. My primary two are I derive worth from being of use, and I don't want to drag anyone else down with my burdens. I've seen and heard so many problems other men have. My life is blessed by comparison. The burdens I carry are so light, I have no right to complain. The least I can do is help others carry their burdens, and work to enrich the lives of those I care about.
/r/MensRights23/01/23 05:47 PM
2

Bit of a problem with relying on an 8 year old comment thread; a lot of the links and references are busted. Not to mention the things that have happened since the thread was made. It had quite a lot of false equivalencies made as well. My personal favorite was their choice to say that the constitution says there's no gun or military service required to vote. There was also never anything in the constitution saying women couldn't vote either, which makes it a pointless statement, as you are goin…
/r/MensRights19/01/23 09:51 PM
1

It's a deleted post. What an I supposed to do with it? I am just pointing out this sub treats male feminists as gender traitors yet have no qualms conveniently about female mras. Perhaps that has to do with feminism actively working to harm men, for the benefit of women, under the guise of equality? If you're familiar with KS, then I would assume you've at least heard her summarize how feminism was born at Seneca Falls. Or are you going to claim that's a lie as well?
/r/MensRights19/01/23 08:35 PM
2

Karen straughan was proved wrong by various historians Oh really? I haven't seen anything on this. Mind directing me to one of the historians so I can check it out? facts aren't her strong suit. Seems like a rather biased opinion, considering she explicitly discusses facts. Perhaps you intended to say truth, as somebody passing off lies as fact would be a liar. It's so very interesting to me that male feminists here are treated as soys/filth here Ahhh, now I get it. This sort of thing is rather …
/r/MensRights19/01/23 08:25 PM
20

Ultimately, it really does depend on the person. I am willing to overlook body count more, depending on where she was in life and what progress she's made. Though if I were able to control that part of a fantasy woman's live, I would simply want someone with around the same count as me.
/r/MensRights19/01/23 03:00 PM
3

Maybe it's based on life experience?
/r/MensRights19/01/23 12:02 AM
14

All my life I've been told by my aunt and grandma that men are dangerous, never get married, you'll get kidnapped/sa. So you've been trained into your fear. If you recognize that it is on fact not the correct way to view half our species, have you taken any steps to moving past it? If it's an unconditional, irrational response, have you considered seeking therapy? Do you even want to move past your fear, even? Thank you for your honest response, by the way.
/r/MensRights18/01/23 11:59 PM
24

To me, the online feminism movement is something I feel needs a reform. It's not just online feminism. It is specifically all feminism. If you seriously believe that feminism is at it's core, a good ideology, I would recommend you look into Karen Straughan. She very specifically explains exactly why feminism is, in fact, not nor ever was about equality. Here is her YouTube channel. https://youtube.com/@girlwriteswhat The kicker: I have androphobia Question: Does this extend to all male family me…
/r/MensRights18/01/23 10:20 PM
33

So you don't care at all about the story content, you just want to voice your opinion on an outlets inaccuracies. Good for you.
/r/MensRights16/01/23 08:22 PM
28

I'm confused. What does this have to do with the story? Is any of what it reported verifiably false?
/r/MensRights16/01/23 07:03 PM
34

The original reference that discovered this hypothesized that maybe men miss their children more than society thinks. Don't forget the state sanctioned financial slavery they're often saddled with. Can't see your kids, but you better pay for them.
/r/MensRights10/01/23 06:29 PM
4

We have gone from 0-28,500 members in just over 50 days. So in other words you're saying the sub is going to get quarantined soon? In all seriousness, good luck.
/r/MensRights07/01/23 03:51 AM
4

True. "What if I had a foreskin" is preceded by "What if I was born intact in the first place", is all. Guess that offends a few people here, for whatever reason.
/r/MensRights06/01/23 10:21 PM
4

Due to a birth defect, circumcision was a prerequisite to the corrective surgery needed, so I'm not terribly bothered by that specifically. But I'm also not a usual case.
/r/MensRights06/01/23 07:32 PM
1

How so? Pretty sure everyone would be in agreement that he's a douche. Or is this month old Necro comment in relation to the recent allegations filed against him?
/r/MensRights30/12/22 11:38 PM
5

So much for til death do we part.
/r/MensRights24/12/22 03:07 PM
4

Ok. It just seemed like they flipped things halfway through the comment, and I want sure if it was a garbled opinion, a troll, or something else.
/r/MensRights15/12/22 07:06 PM
9

Uh...?
/r/MensRights15/12/22 05:15 PM
1

Refer to your previous reply to my comment.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 02:40 PM
1

So you have a he said she said situation, without the she said?
/r/MensRights01/12/22 02:39 PM
1

I also think two different quotes got mixed up. One where he said women are status symbols, and one where he said women are the property of their husbands. Because I know the property comment was in the context of him talking about his sister and her husband. The status symbol comment I haven't watched in context.
/r/MensRights28/11/22 08:38 PM
1

It is my understanding that the woman in question is his wife, so it's not a different subject. If that is not in fact the context here, then I will happily retract my statement.
/r/MensRights28/11/22 06:26 PM
1

Then he's wrong about that part. He's twisted something to take advantage of it, like most influencers today.
/r/MensRights28/11/22 12:00 PM
1

Then you don't understand the implications of being someone's property. It means they are responsible for you. And as it is mutual, the reverse is also true. You are a married couple. You are responsible for each other. It has nothing to do with the modern implications of the word property.
/r/MensRights28/11/22 11:57 AM
4

He did say he considers women as a status symbol. And he's right. As I've said, in the world he wants to live in, the person you're with is a status symbol, man or woman. A woman who managed to marry a rich man also considers that man to be a status symbol. There's nothing misogynistic about that. It's just the reality he lives in.
/r/MensRights28/11/22 12:18 AM
3

I agree. Though this goes back to my original point. He's a dickbag, but he's not a misogynist. That term had been used by feminists over the past 40 years that it's come to mean pretty much anything any singular woman doesn't like.
/r/MensRights28/11/22 12:12 AM
2

Well, some people like to take the heavily boiled down evolutionary biology argument to justify their opinions and behavior. Thank the scientists that like to think that human behavior can be entirely reduced to base biological urdges.
/r/MensRights28/11/22 12:01 AM
3

Just as he is her property. Is there something wrong with that?
/r/MensRights27/11/22 10:12 PM
0

The threads in here have plenty of quotes from him if you care to look. Yes. And they're all lacking context. I don't agree with most of the points he makes when it comes to women, but all the 'gotcha' quotes are terribly cut. Hell let's not play the only reason Tate can say the things he does and get away with it with his ladies is because he makes enough money that it doesn't matter for the women he's with. All they have to do is listen to it and their lives are taken care of. Exactly. Which i…
/r/MensRights27/11/22 10:06 PM
3

From an evolutionary perspective, the goal of males is to make with all many females as possible. The goal of females is to secure a male to provide/protect them and their offspring. Therefore, in the examples he has given, a man that sleeps around but always comes back to his main woman is not cheating, because her evolutionary objective is still fulfilled. I don't agree with that viewpoint, but that is what it is.
/r/MensRights27/11/22 10:01 PM
3

That's because to him, in his desired area of existence, women are. Just like men. From an evolutionary perspective, he's not wrong about cheating. I don't agree with it at all, but if that's the belief you subscribe to, then he's merely stating fact.
/r/MensRights27/11/22 05:43 PM
0

His views from a modern societal stand point can be seen has misogynistic for sure. Yes. Because the modern societal usage of the term is far too broad and watered down. That's my only real point. I feel like you can still like some of what he says and still criticize the bad takes. Just like everyone else. You should never fully agree on everything with anyone. Not even yourself, in my opinion.
/r/MensRights27/11/22 05:41 PM
30

he's such a misogynistic douchebag Except he's not misogynistic. He's just a douche canoe. Saying that you don't like certain aspects of what many 'modern women' are is no more misogynistic that woman saying they don't like weak nice guy behavior is misandrist. The guy's an egotistical asshat, sure. But misogyny has been completely devalued into meaning anything negative said about any woman ever. It's best if we at least try to use the term correctly.
/r/MensRights27/11/22 02:51 PM
2

Bruh ya'll are the ones stirring the pot, getting voluntarily enraged over obvious shit. I'm sure if you bothered to pay more attention, you'd find that much of the frustration here is well warranted. But like I said before, I don't think you're willing to try to understand the why. I think we've both communicated our points by now. There's not much left to say.
/r/MensRights25/11/22 04:40 PM
1

Using that as an arguement is cope. You are free to believe that, just as I am free to believe that being unwilling to understand the why, especially when it comes attached to believing that Reddit is a fair and correctly enforced platform, is somewhere between willfully ignorant and hilariously naive. One other thing I'd like to put forward is how this sub is run. You're still here, still replying on a thread that isn't locked, and you aren't banned. Have you tried taking this approach with any…
/r/MensRights25/11/22 03:06 PM
2

So this justifies knowingly engaging in toxic behavior? I never said it justifies it. I said it explains the frustration around it. I sort my shit out by hot And that explains it. Try sorting by top of you want to know what this sub is about, not the piddly little rant posts that pop up as fast as they go away.
/r/MensRights25/11/22 02:59 AM
4

one wrong doesn't negate the other. I agree. It's the uneven enforcement of the rules that's the issue here. However, the amount of stuff that gets censored on the male side of things is rather disproportionate compared to what women get away with. It's certainly a source of frustration for lots of people here. I will reiterate, maybe I commented this on this thread or another thread in this post, I'm not telling people to stop from doing it. I'm just calling out on the bs. As somebody who frequ…
/r/MensRights25/11/22 12:22 AM
4

And none of ya'll who have come forth so far have given me anything valid. Then allow me to present this. Why were these subs banned, when the same exact behavior exists on plenty of feminist subs, perpetuated by women instead of men?
/r/MensRights24/11/22 11:12 PM
3

There's a difference between blowing off steam and engaging with something you know is going to get you outraged and then engage in it anyway, and then get outraged and complain about how bad it is. Oh, I agree. But there's no longer ready any place for men to do that on Reddit anymore, now that most men oriented subreddits have been banned. Wtf are you saying in those subs then? I get the impression that you've mistaken my comment. I'm not saying that I've been banned from those subs, I'm sayin…
/r/MensRights24/11/22 10:36 PM
3

Perhaps it has to do with all other subs that men had to rant and let off steam being banned? Women have their choice of subs where they can do just that, but men don't really have anywhere anymore. Is that something worth considering in your opinion?
/r/MensRights24/11/22 09:32 PM
11

Let me ask you this. Why do you think this sub has a decent number of rant posts? Why would they be here, and not anywhere else?
/r/MensRights24/11/22 04:45 PM
52

They've been proving the wage gap, or lack there of, since last century. You have clips of Thomas Sowell from like the 70s debunking it to feminists. They don't care about what The truth is, only Their truth.
/r/MensRights22/11/22 08:07 PM
8

Sounds to me like you just have a convenient stat you like to throw out and have never considered the rest of the numbers relevant to that stat. Your argument would be so much better if you actually cared about the rest instead of just the cherry picked part that serves your personal interests.
/r/MensRights20/11/22 07:52 PM
15

And what % of reported rape allegations are confirmed to be true through a court of law? What % are never confirmed to be either?
/r/MensRights20/11/22 06:23 PM
10

I think this is an unprovable claim, since so much abuse perpetrated by female teachers is likely not even reported.
/r/MensRights23/10/22 11:30 PM
1

Female accountability? Personal responsibility? A razor?
/r/MensRights11/10/22 02:27 AM
1

You know, misogyny used to be about things much more serious. Now, it's an edgy wannabe acting like a dick. Meanwhile, celebrity women brag about drugging and robbing men, and are celebrated for it.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 02:26 AM
1

Definitely. It's somewhere between 'mad max sure economic anarchy' and where we are now. Obviously you need to have some regulatory options to prevent certain predatory practices, but that's definitely a discussion I wish I had thought of having when I was in University.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 02:43 AM
5

I'd say we're in an alternative now. We've got stories posted on Reddit about how community organizations built on sharing and exchanging home grown produce is shut down due to regulations. Overregulation is not a good thing in a capitalist society. It results in a closed market with few competitors, such as say, our telecommunications industry(I'm in Canada).
/r/MensRights05/10/22 12:02 AM
8

Capitalism is the idea of capitalizing on work you aren't doing by using a market Uh, no. It's not. In fact, nothing about what you just said makes sense.
/r/MensRights04/10/22 08:19 PM
12

But is it really capitalism, and not corporatism? There is far too much capitalism blame, when every day we move father away from capitalism and closer to fully captured corporatism.
/r/MensRights04/10/22 05:41 PM
1

The point I was trying to make was not detrimental. We are all contradictory in some way. I just find that his clinical approach to the philosophical idea of small g god and the effect of has had on religious developments is strangely divorced from what he has briefly touched on in the past in regards to his personal beliefs and big g God. I understand that as a scientist, he wishes to put forward only the most clinical reasoning and data, but it's important to understand an individuals faith as…
/r/MensRights01/10/22 01:16 PM
1

I suppose the real question is whether or not you believe the actions he takes because of those beliefs are correct.
/r/MensRights01/10/22 12:21 AM
5

It's definitely a blight on our collective intelligence.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 01:58 PM
55

He has an odd mix of religious conservative and evolutionary biologist views that I believe create some moral and theological inconsistencies, but his focus on personal responsibility, and the active choice to take on personal responsibility as men and boys is very important. He is rather prone to getting sound bited, which is unfortunate since his long form verbal essays and discussions are often deeper than what a 20 clip can reveal.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 01:40 PM
1

Sounds like a whole lot of effort. If you're going to be that serious on that, then just pay someone to be with you, film it, and put it on your OF. You will never reduce risk to zero. Mitigate it to what you believe is an adequate level. You can do everything you can to reduce risk with women you interact with, yet still be accused by some random women you've never even met.
/r/MensRights24/09/22 01:31 PM
8

Just keep in mind that the best revenge of all, is to be happy and live an amazing life. Make it so what they did registers so low on your list of important things in your life, that they're below your notice. Learn and adapt from it, but use that to build yourself higher.
/r/MensRights23/09/22 06:50 PM
30

I do find it amusing how these feminists often conflate self help and improvement with their political opponents, yet are obviously attracted more towards men who put in the effort to take care of themselves physically. Such an interesting denial of psychology and physiology.
/r/MensRights20/09/22 11:59 AM
14

Seems a bit hyperbolic. Mind backing that up with anything?
/r/MensRights15/09/22 10:34 AM
1

I've accepted that as reality. I put in effort for people I think I might be able to make a positive difference in their life. It helps that I'm invisible to society though. One of the benefits of being a social pariah, I guess.
/r/MensRights04/09/22 02:45 PM
5

Oh, I know just how lucky I am, no need to tell me.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 04:20 PM
15

About 900$. I was damn lucky in that her conscience ate her alive since I didn't react in a way that she could have blamed me. Allowed me to do all the work on the divorce, had a free consultation with a lawyer who told me if things were non-contentious I could do all the paperwork and file myself. So I did just that. It also helped that we had next to nothing worth mentioning.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 11:58 AM
74

Anecdotal, but married just shy of 6 years, she initiated the separation after cheating on me. Take that as you will.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 02:25 AM
2

Lack of centralized categorization of issues with resources and lack of academic authority to put feminist theory under scrutiny. How would you suggest we go about this? Every academic that opposes feminism is basically destroyed and kicked out. You can watch old Thomas Sowell debates with feminists. Their talking points haven't changed, despite constant, scientifically authoritative evidence disproving them.
/r/MensRights28/08/22 06:21 PM
4

The only caveat to that is that women are more likely to be the victim of a sexual related crime, IF you don't account for prison statistics. But as far as violent assault, yep, you got it bang on. "Oh, but men also perpetuate the most violence" obligatory feminist talking point. As if that detects from the victims existence.
/r/MensRights26/08/22 02:17 PM
2

You know, so many of these laws in theory don't affect men in committed relationships, just casual hookups. In practice, these laws incentivize women to destroy a man's life. The sad reality is that no matter how upstanding and trustworthy a woman is, she will always have the option to abuse this. My time playing card games had taught me that despite what am opponent says, if they have an easy button and feel any stress, they will use it. Even if they said they won't.
/r/MensRights26/08/22 01:52 PM
1

The more I look into this, the more a certain passage of the Bible makes sense. Women's curse is to covet control over her husband. That's long ago been extended to men in general.
/r/MensRights25/08/22 03:15 AM
4

Often "sex" in this context is a very shorthand way of (unclearly) conveying an absolute lack of intimacy and even friendship. This is true, and likely one of the major contributors to the common problem of depression among that group.
/r/MensRights24/08/22 11:31 PM
20

The definition of incel is somebody who cannot achieve a sexual relationship or interaction through any means other than force or paid services. The feminist definition of incel is a man that believes any woman he wants should just drop her pants for him any time he wants, regardless of any other circumstances, and that women are subhuman subservients that need to be put in their place, preferably violently. The incel definition of incel is a man that due to circumstances out of his control, he …
/r/MensRights24/08/22 05:30 PM
2

I have an idea. How about instead of whatever we have going on now, women enforce a commitment from the man before sex. You could even have a court official put it down into a legal contract. Oh course, since this is a great thing for the woman, she could even make it a party! I'm flabbergasted that we've lived this long, and none of those amazingly smart feminists have come up with an idea like this yet!
/r/MensRights21/08/22 02:18 PM
1

They're not incels in the original definition of the word, since obviously any woman can get laid if she wants. But the perceived attitude of entitlement for the stereotype is similar. They're both results from a very 'me' focused worldview.
/r/MensRights21/08/22 02:01 PM
1

I don't disagree with your second paragraph, I just find it interesting how when you make the comparison, I realize that feminism has less worth than the other two. Christian morals are sorry of the basis of western civilization, after all. The distortion of some, such as male disposability, are obviously bad, but unlike feminism the other two at least have some sort of moral standards.
/r/MensRights18/08/22 10:37 PM
2

We're just causing ourselves emotional agony, by pining away for a Utopia that's free of not only feminists, but folks who cling to ideologies that we personally find objectionable I do find it rather interesting that you chose to equate feminism to those two religious sects specifically, and then voice your personal objections with them as if they are just as much to blame for current society as feminism is.
/r/MensRights18/08/22 09:35 PM
2

One of the pianists I enjoy listening to actually had his camera set up so all you can see are his hands, with the rest of the frame being the piano. Much preferred over the idea that you have to expose yourself to get engagement, in my opinion.
/r/MensRights18/08/22 04:11 PM
32

"Men can't flee the war in Ukraine" - yet no acknowledgment of the fact that in eastern European countries women are expected to do all the housework and childcare, that there are very traditional gender roles there. There are so many more examples of this and I don't understand why people are trying to have these conversations when they're choosing to be blind to context and nuance. Very disingenuous. How exactly is comparing forced military service to perceived domestic issues in any way equiv…
/r/MensRights14/08/22 02:29 PM
1

What a state this world is in.
/r/MensRights10/08/22 02:09 PM
3

Funny. My ex did the same thing, only she was banging her friend instead of me. One of the reasons why if I ever get married again, I will not rely on her to do her part. Oh, and your friend's friend is part of the problem.
/r/MensRights10/08/22 01:58 PM
5

I wouldn't say that birth control is something that falls squarely on women. Both the man and the woman should behave responsibly in a way that their partner agrees with, after discussing the topic. But I'm old fashioned and think you shouldn't be hooking up with every Jane, Nick and Harry.
/r/MensRights10/08/22 04:44 AM
4

Marriage is a religious tradition. Government has no place in it. Let the couple involved observe their personal beliefs regardless of gender, and keep the paper pushers out of it.
/r/MensRights01/08/22 12:26 AM
2

No problem, just letting you know that it's normal and not to get discouraged.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 10:36 PM
32

2X is at war with themselves, and everyone else they think opposes their views, which is pretty much everyone else. This is old news.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 10:25 PM
2

You as well. Being able to hold a conversation without getting emotional these days is rare and valuable, even if you disagree.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 07:36 PM
1

How recently are you talking about? I would say about the 90s or so. The key takeaway here is about whether or not a single woman in the working class made enough to support herself And her parents. There were some, but not most. And that's excluding the peasant class of people who still live in relative poverty all across the country. No, anybody could do this, if they choose. Ok, then why didn't more women do this? Ooh, extended contact with immigrants? You do know that immigrants are not repr…
/r/MensRights31/07/22 07:35 PM
2

historically pheasant women would help sometimes in agriculture. Oh, absolutely. And they worked hard for it. But agriculture without modern equipment is not exactly just easy. It was done by family and village units. A single woman in a feudal village simply would not be able to work enough to provide for her aging parents. This boils down to a combination of cultural expectations and practicality. It seldom had to do with straight up sexism.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 07:30 PM
2

Not sure, though I heard making rape a gender neutral crime is a good way,a nd spreading awareness. But how would you craft a law that makes it a gender neutral crime? I don't expect an answer, but if this is something you believe in supporting, I recommend you think about it. It's important to understand what you believe and why, not just that you believe it.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 07:27 PM
2

Why not? Because until fairly recently, employment available was physically hard and demanding. Excepting things such as prostitution, women had very few financial options that were viable. Why? Is there a reason the daughters husband couldn't move in with her to her parents home and look after and provide for them? Yes. It's because he's taking care of his own parents. Sure, richer couples could do this, but that's not the majority of the population. Also, I'm interested in how much time you've…
/r/MensRights31/07/22 07:19 PM
3

I support the movement of making domestic violence less of a gendered crime. It already isn't a gendered crime, on the books. It's policies and training that exist outside of the laws that largely affect that. I also support the recognition of rape done be women on men Ok, how exactly would you rectify this? I also support the deconstruction of the man being seen as a predator or less likeable, example: men can easily be seen as pedos. This isn't a legal issue so much as a social one. Not nearly…
/r/MensRights31/07/22 07:14 PM
3

Up until recently, with the advent of modern technology, yes, women were largely unfit for the work available. Hard labor. Have you ever performed hard labor? It's not easy (obviously).
/r/MensRights31/07/22 07:11 PM
2

You didn't read my comment.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 05:49 PM
4

First about the burning's I was already pointed out to be in the wrong and I accept that. Cool, moving on. Second Men have much less rules that restrict them in ways like a women When you have less options, you need less rules. Third, yes there is a flip side, but I was not talking about Africa was I, though that is a good point Unless you choose to qualify the scope of your example, it's easy to consider it cherry picking. Being more specific in the future can help you convey your argument. Fou…
/r/MensRights31/07/22 05:48 PM
9

This is Reddit. You could be reported for hate speech for a cute pet comment. This sub will never ban people based on anything other than banable offences inside this sub. To do so would be to stoop to the same level as the subs that do.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 02:27 PM
8

burning of witches There were plenty of men who were killed during that era, not just women were advised of being witches. And it was women that did the majority of the accusations then as well. infanticide of females in china I addressed this in another reply, but how about the mass killing of young boys in Africa by people such as Boko Haram, while letting the girls live? There's always a flip side to consider. islamic teachings of women having to be perfect for the man What about the Islamic …
/r/MensRights31/07/22 02:17 PM
4

If you are going to bring up China's one child policy, then you're going to have to understand the cultural reasons behind the desire to have a make child over a female one. In many non-western cultures, homes are multigenerational. You have parents living with children living with grand children. They also don't have a retirement pension system as robust as the west, meaning they require somebody to take care of them. Because income up until extremely recently had been dependant on physical lab…
/r/MensRights31/07/22 02:08 PM
4

So which state do you live in? Which laws have been passed to infringe upon what you consider to be a right?
/r/MensRights28/07/22 02:55 PM
2

Hey, 5 bucks is 5 bucks..
/r/MensRights28/07/22 11:59 AM
11

I always thought that calling somebody a derogatory term based on an immutable characteristic, such as sex or race, was inherently abusive. If calling a woman a sexually derogatory name is abusive, why wouldn't calling a man one be any different?
/r/MensRights27/07/22 09:39 PM
1

And that's good for you. Is it too much to ask for everyone else to be as responsible as you?
/r/MensRights24/07/22 02:18 PM
1

You're right, it's not any of my business what you do. It's just that I expect you to take responsibility for your actions, and the results that come after.
/r/MensRights24/07/22 03:18 AM
0

Why can't everyone just abstain from sex until they're with somebody they're willing to have a child with, and both people are on the same page? Makes everything so much simpler.
/r/MensRights24/07/22 02:56 AM
1

For example, most feminists I have spoken to would absolutely be in favour of equal rights in family courts, support male SA/domestic abuse victims and do not hate men. Then why haven't these feminists done that?
/r/MensRights17/07/22 03:31 AM
12

Which is why it's such a difficult subject. There is no easy solution for all innocent parties.
/r/MensRights12/07/22 05:29 PM
64

This highlights how paternity fraud isn't just something that affects men. It also affects the children in the situation. The child may be the product of what the mother did, but they are all innocent of the situation. It's not an easy subject.
/r/MensRights12/07/22 11:55 AM
2

It is not her fault what happened to her as a child, but it is very clear she has many deep seated issues that she has not been able to resolve. You are not her therapist. It is not your responsibility to fix her. I, personally, could never associate, let alone be in a relationship with somebody that tells me they hate me to my face. No matter what happened to them in the past. You already know what you should do.
/r/MensRights12/07/22 10:42 AM
1

Ask her what right that is codified in law, that you have and she doesn't.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 02:40 PM
5

I am not banned here. I am banned on the feminism subreddit. Draw your own conclusions.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 03:42 PM
1

spending monthly memberships... and $100 on random people they met online.... Dating apps are a business. And unlike matchmaking services, which were much more analogue and had to maintain a visible success rate to stay in business, apps don't have to. Because there are guys who will pay. It's just like clubs and bars promoting ladies night. Who pays? The men. Learn to recognize when a business profits off your failure, and take your money elsewhere.
/r/MensRights04/07/22 11:59 AM
1

Heh. 'neurodivergent' is just the politically correct way to say retarded. No, I have never been diagnosed with any sort of mental issues. It's difficult to have a proper communication of ideals over short text replies, so I'll try and summarize my beliefs on feminism thusly. Feminism is a religion in how it is practiced. It is derived from the core tenants of Marxism, and focuses on the impossible duality of women being simultaneously strong, perfect queens, and oppressed and abused by the evil…
/r/MensRights04/07/22 02:51 AM
2

Interesting. I'm being told by feminists that having preferences is wrong, because it ends up being racist, homophobic, transphobic, and bigoted.
/r/MensRights03/07/22 06:38 PM
1

Oh, so you know about the information you have access to, but still defend it. Ok, cool.
/r/MensRights03/07/22 04:38 PM
4

Don't YOU DARE tell me there was not something feminists had legit complaint about. I lived it. Oh sure, feminism has had legit complaints. But it would seem that you're mistaking things that have happened with historical precedent. I would recommend you watch some of the earlier videos from girlwriteswhat, otherwise known as Karen Straughan. She covers how most of those 'historical issues' are actually not how society worked prior to roughly the mid 1900s. She also goes over the founding of fem…
/r/MensRights03/07/22 02:27 PM
4

Former male friends of mine were like this and claimed that because they follow Men's Rights, that they were more than happy to identify as an incel and disregarded serious issues like rape-culture, misogyny, and found out that some of them followed anti-women groups online. Heck, they were horribly sexist to me and I cut them off due to sexual harassment and far worse of that nature. I have a question. Is our not possible that these former male friends have given up and just decided that they a…
/r/MensRights03/07/22 02:06 PM
16

Which is exactly why I hated being in sales. I'd help a customer, and get comments from some co-workers and bosses that I'm not doing it right. I chose to take a customer needs first approach instead of a company profit first approach. My goal was to end with a well informed, happy customer that doesn't feel like they got bullied into spending a bunch more money than they wanted, so they actually want to come back. Building customer relationships so they like to buy from you send become return c…
/r/MensRights02/07/22 02:15 PM
2

Thank you.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 10:15 PM
7

I fulfill my employment obligations. No overtime, no busting my ass. I have bills to pay and things I would like to buy. I don't need to make 6 figures to fulfill that. Heck, I don't even need to leave the lowest tax bracket in my country. And I like it that way.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 12:01 PM
1

Yep, you're not genuine. I didn't say any of what you just said I did. I gave an in depth explanation at your request of a trend I and hasn't others have observed. It's not the rule, I don't think everyone fits into this, and I never said anything about controlling women's choices. Get out of here with your 'prejudice' crap.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 10:45 AM
3

It's the same as any other sex strike. The only women that are going to participate likely only would have sex with men that already share their political opinions, so it's only punishing men that are already on their side. It won't change anyone's mind. Though interestingly enough, it's also a commentary on how despite these women being up in arms about how they are more than just sex objects, sex is still the ordinary thing they weaponnize.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 10:38 AM
1

Based on the 80/20 rule, and by broader scope, hypergamy itself, women want to obtain a relationship with the best man they can. With both control and social media, it's extremely easy for the men many women perceive wrongly as 'high value' to get what they want, obtaining sex with a large swath of women. Except they're assholes about it, coloring the opinions and experiences of the women they sleep with. Women experience this, first hand or by shared experiences, and since they naturally target…
/r/MensRights28/06/22 01:52 AM
1

Let's just say there's a reason they choose to stop teaching civics in schools.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 10:11 PM
3

If you genuinely are curious, you could start with the 80-20 rule, as that generates a 'crap pyramid' where the bad actions of a few at the top slide down and mess everyone else up.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 10:09 PM
7

I don't care if you support or are against abortion. This decision isn't about abortion, it's about rectifying an overreach of the judicial branch of the government. Abortion is not a codified right in the constitution. Therefore, it is up to each state to decide. That's all there is to it. You don't like it? Pursue a constitutional amendment to have it added.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 12:38 PM
1

I wish I wasn't. https://youtu.be/Vx5QKTY-3MY That's the specific quote I'm referencing. You're free to look into it further from there if you want.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 02:46 AM
3

Sounds like a good reason to support people moving to states that have politics they agree with. And not for people to destroy one state(California) then for to neighboring states and ingredient start voting for the same exact crap that destroyed their gone in the first place.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 07:03 PM
7

Just listening to the one politician that advocates for post birth abortion is rather sickening.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 07:01 PM
8

Out of curiosity, how many states do we expect to or know will pass blanket abortion ban laws, excluding exceptions?
/r/MensRights26/06/22 02:25 PM
1

Eh, I would disagree. Many feminists claim that the point of feminism is specifically to disadvantage men, to the benefit of women. A lot of what I see is very similar to the crab pot analogy.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 02:22 PM
9

I just find it hilarious that everyone is going on about death in childbirth when even as a rather high MMR country, the actual MMR % for women in the states is less than 0.05% if you go by the worst possible metrics. If you go by the most recent statistical average, which is from 2018, it's 0.017%. Like seriously, what the hell?
/r/MensRights26/06/22 02:06 PM
5

Why do this, when we could instead just house all men on one continent, and all women on another. A third continent can be reserved for families. No cross-pollination means no unwanted pregnancies. Hey, if we're suggesting impossible solutions, I want my say.
/r/MensRights25/06/22 10:07 PM
1

This is fair. I wish you luck, you'll need it far more than I.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 05:08 PM
5

It really is just a sucky world out there for gender relations now. Oh well, at least I don't have any children to worry about their future. That's one concern I'm not envious of.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 02:59 PM
4

Well, you have to admit that there are a lot more women today that are thrown off kilter by feminist ideals than men who oppress women because 'misogyny'. I've pretty much accepted after my marriage ended that I will likely be single forever, not because I hate women, but because I will never be able to live up to the standards most women expect now. There's always the chance I meet somebody with a brain that actually finds me attractive. I just don't believe that to be a chance common enough to…
/r/MensRights24/06/22 02:32 PM
2

what feminism claims to be about. This right here is the clincher. It's just important to draw the distinction between what feminism Claims vs what feminism actually Is. Past that, there's nothing anyone reasonably could complain about, I think.
/r/MensRights20/06/22 04:52 PM
6

If you can yourself an MRA, then you cannot be in support of feminism simply based on definitions alone. Feminism is entirely about female supremacy. It is inherently incompatible with any ideology or movement that has anything to do with equal rights. Sure, there are some good things that feminism takes credit for, but if you study history, there is very little of positive substance that feminism can be called the major driving factor in facilitating. By all means, you can call yourself an MRA …
/r/MensRights20/06/22 03:21 PM
2

At this point I'm surprised nobody has seriously started pushing reparations for women.
/r/MensRights13/06/22 04:14 PM
1

Well, then it seems you may need to do more research into feminism then, if you want to truly understand the answer to your original question. Good luck!
/r/MensRights13/06/22 02:55 PM
1

It would seem that you're not from North America or western Europe. Are you familiar with what mainstream feminism is like in those countries? If you consider that, the answer to your original question may be more obvious than you think.
/r/MensRights13/06/22 02:20 PM
1

Are you familiar with the works of famous feminists Gloria Steinem and Valerie Solanas?
/r/MensRights13/06/22 02:10 PM
2

So based on that response, why is your reaction to people calling feminism misandrist disbelief?
/r/MensRights13/06/22 01:21 PM
2

I have a question. Do you think men define misogyny? Or do you think women do? Now switch it. Do you think women define misandry? Or do you think men do? Do you listen to the person claiming to be abused? Or the person being accused of abusing?
/r/MensRights13/06/22 11:58 AM
3

So if I'm mugged by somebody trying to feed their family and end up severity injured because it is, it's better than being mugged by somebody that just wants my stuff?
/r/MensRights11/06/22 01:08 PM
3

I would say that's not far enough. It's institutionalized sex based supremacy.
/r/MensRights24/05/22 03:20 PM
12

For those is you unfamiliar with this situation, it comes down to differences in contracts. The men's contracts stipulate that they only get paid if they play, and the amount is performance based. The women's contracts were less risky, ensuring a minimum wage regardless of if they played, will less 'victory cup' money. Due to the pandemic shutting down games, the men didn't get paid at all for the duration, while the women maintained their income despite not playing a single game. Despite this, …
/r/MensRights20/05/22 01:39 PM
3

Seems like a good majority of these stores being shared never made it to court, with some explicitly never even going to the police. In fact, the only reason many of these stories were cleared up was the threat of police. Hey interesting, as it actually coincides with your opinion of women not wanting to go through court for a lie.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 03:50 PM
7

Why would they willingly let off their most productive employees early? Heck, to make up for been doing earlier, they should pass laws that require men to find a job earlier than women. /S
/r/MensRights13/05/22 03:21 AM
4

This is why I have an account I use for anything political, and an account for everything else normal. It's literally their slogan; the personal is political. So you need to ensure that you keep politics and personal separate, because they Will ruin your personal business because they disagree with your politics.
/r/MensRights12/05/22 03:11 PM
2

I'm not dismissing your points, as you are correct in recognizing the reality of most situations today. However, (because you brought it up), as an Intj with a chosen interest in individual perspectives, you have to start from the assumption that everyone there more or less equally wants to work, work well, and be productive. If you manage to build a team foundation on that premise, remove people who don't fit that, and treat people with respect, then new ideas and suggestions tend to be made wi…
/r/MensRights12/05/22 11:15 AM
6

Keep in mind that part of what is seen as creativity is the uniqueness of a perspective or idea. If you have a predominantly right brained workforce, a few left brained ideas injected into the mix and appropriately addressed and implemented can be seen as valuable creative input. However, feminism had certainly capitalized on the 'women are wonderful' effect to paint a flawless picture of goodness that simply cannot hold up to any level of scrutiny. Which is why they respond so vehemently to any…
/r/MensRights11/05/22 12:29 PM
2

You know what I find funny about this sort of thing? They claimed loud and far how a sec strike would work against trump as well. The only sort of women that would be of that opinion are women with left leaning beliefs. Odds are likely that the kind of men they sleep with are also left leaning. So in order to punish the 'misogynistic white men' that are their scapegoat for this, they so having sex with leftist men? Hey, I'm all for it.
/r/MensRights09/05/22 05:49 PM
2

I don't think that's what he said at all. Greta herself is just a figurehead for a movement that has zero interest in actually doing anything for the environment. You want to make a change? Start recycling more, and repair, don't replace your stuff for as long as it is economically feasible and safe to do so. Giving more money to politicians will only ensure they can afford even more things you could only dream of.
/r/MensRights09/05/22 05:45 PM
9

"The better of the traditional concepts". Better for him, or better for her? I wonder what traditional concepts she follows to enrich her relationship.
/r/MensRights26/04/22 11:59 AM
16

Men are actors, women are acted upon. 'He knocked her up' 'She fell pregnant' If you are a man, you will bear the burden of responsibility, whether you feasibly can or not. This has been pushed to the extreme in current culture.
/r/MensRights24/04/22 12:41 AM
3

Ok, what would you suggest they do?
/r/MensRights23/04/22 02:49 PM
3

And women get upset when non-criminal men no longer intervene when they're attacked on said transport in front of them..
/r/MensRights23/04/22 02:39 PM
1

At the end of the day, if you consider that killing unborn children is a viable alternative to people being held responsible for their choices, then you hold a reprehensible position. It's that simple.
/r/MensRights20/04/22 02:44 PM
1

I don't really hate anyone. Closest I've gotten to that is the man that my ex left me for. I've since come to understand that even if he hasn't done what he did, my ex would have just found another guy, so I've moved on. Hate takes too much effort in an already draining world.
/r/MensRights19/04/22 04:02 PM
1

Education can only do so much, especially with the state of sex Ed in many countries as it is Which is why I specifically said proper education. if we get to a point where the rate of accidents falls What is the % of abortions that result from contraceptive failure? Not improper use, actual failure of the method involved! And finally, if permission was given in cases where responsibility isn’t a factor such as rape, incest etc, I’d be more open You want to have reasonable exceptions for abuse an…
/r/MensRights19/04/22 03:57 PM
1

Yup, because straight up eliminating a life causes the least amount of harm. Expecting an adult to take accountability for their actions is not something you should be defending women against. Not unless you think women aren't capable of making good choices. Proper education as children, at the appropriate age, will go much farther than any sort of implementation at a later stage. An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. Teach kids to respect themselves, to be responsible, and what tools…
/r/MensRights19/04/22 12:01 PM
4

See that's the type of belief you don't want to carry around It's not a belief so much as an observation about my life. I'm average looks, like most guys. I take care of myself relatively well. I'm not ripped, and I could stand to lose some fast around the middle, but I'm comfortably around average weight for my height. I'm slightly above average height for my country, nothing major. I'm a fairly reserved person that would rather listen than talk. I understand that I won't 'stand out' unless I c…
/r/MensRights18/04/22 05:28 PM
3

I fear many proponents of MGTOW and similar will end up if they waste their youth. It's certainly a possibility, but living alone is different for a man than a woman. A lot of us have already resolved to either bust ass for a solid and early retirement, or don't plan to retire at all. It's not a full replacement, but I have nieces and nephews I can appreciate at least. I actually was married at 19 to my highschool sweetheart, and it lasted 6 years before she left. I've not completely written off…
/r/MensRights18/04/22 04:25 PM
9

Considering historically a tiny minority of men were able to reproduce, but a large majority of women did, it's not surprising. It is fighting against your nature, but I'd rather work to reconcile my single life rather than deal with the crippling depression of the dating market today. Besides, there's always the chance I attract a woman that actually wants to be with me, not what I produce. However small a chance that may be.
/r/MensRights18/04/22 02:50 PM
1

So we must give women bodily autonomy. Except when they're inside another woman. 👍
/r/MensRights17/04/22 04:08 AM
1

I don't believe I do. Abortion should not be a form of contraception. If your decision making ability is so poor that the literal smorgasbord of birth control available to women isn't good enough, then knuckle up, and put the kid up for adoption. There's plenty of people who can't conceive that would love that kid alive more than the cosmetic companies would love it dead.
/r/MensRights17/04/22 02:12 AM
3

My preference is a walk in a park and we each bring something light to share. Added bonus of early discovery of food allergies and taste preferences.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 02:22 PM
1

So because people make bad choices, you want to enable those bad choices so they don't have to face the consequences of their actions. Did I get that right?
/r/MensRights13/04/22 02:30 AM
5

Well, female is part of the gender binary. Perhaps she got upset you were excluding biology deniers?
/r/MensRights10/04/22 01:34 PM
2

Hmm. Child support: If you don't want it, don't have sex Abortion: Same root cause. You can claim it's a reductive statement, but ultimately it boils down to take responsibility for your actions, legislation aside.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 01:24 PM
1

True, voting the same option just because is never a good thing, but since most people disregard the possibility of more than 2 pairs, it's all they think they can do to 'fight'.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 01:21 PM
2

Or, and hear me out on this one. People take responsibility for the consequences of their actions.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 12:23 PM
8

I'm not sure why, but from where I'm standing that's one heck of a big if. It's more likely that they end up being replaced by a newer party that does a better job of representing what they claim to represent.
/r/MensRights07/04/22 12:21 PM
3

Well, when you're raised being told your country and by extension, you yourself are racist, sexist, etc and that the system you live in must be dismantled, why would you sick around to sacrifice yourself for it? At least in the past sacrificial men received some sort of imitation of respect for making this choice. Now even the illusion of that is gone, and it shows.
/r/MensRights06/04/22 01:17 PM
20

I'd disagree. You don't want a slave that's given up, because then they have to reason to work. You can't threaten then with anything, as they no longer hold value in the world.
/r/MensRights05/04/22 06:05 PM
10

Many of us, especially as adults, find ways to deal with it appropriately. Somebody at work? Transfer or find another job. Somebody you encounter during your daily routine? Adjust accordingly. Your girlfriend or wife? Good luck.
/r/MensRights03/04/22 02:08 PM
5

You have people who have built their entire financial lives on feminism. They aren't going to just give that up, hence the lack of 'pulling back'. Not justification, just a simple explanation.
/r/MensRights01/04/22 08:31 PM
1

It's a lot easier when you stop caring about other options standards, and just live your best life. I have a fairly average body fitness level, but I carry most of my fat in my core, since my daily activities don't exercise that part of my body. I recently found a simple workout that is core centric that I don't hate(like crunches), which makes me happy because I'm not pleased about my core fitness. Not other people, me. Doing things for others can be fine, but when it comes to lifestyle and sel…
/r/MensRights01/04/22 02:37 PM
5

I follow both. I've been banned from the feminism sub, I haven't been banned here. If you want a deeper understanding of feminisms roots If You want a better understanding of feminisms roots, I would suggest reading about the difference between the suffragettes and the suffragists. That's not to say that feminism hasn't made some good points in it's history. But those few good points do little to drown out the overwhelming destruction of society and the lives of men, women and children that it h…
/r/MensRights01/04/22 02:30 PM
1

It take depends on your personal definition of misogyny. Legitimate hate against someone because of their genitalia? That's obviously not a good thing. Calling out bad things women do, or ways that the system benefits women at the cost of men? If you consider such things misogyny, you might have a hard time here.
/r/MensRights31/03/22 07:26 PM
3

It seems you're unaware of the reality of dv, and how this understand that they Can't take any action. If you are interested, perhaps start with the stigma make victims of dv face.
/r/MensRights31/03/22 06:32 PM
3

Majority of insurance claims for vehicles are from women, since they get into more accidents than men. However, male drivers are the ones involved in the majority of major accidents resulting in serious injury or death. Does that mean that we should judge someone based on the averages of their gender group? How many ex marines have been physically abused by their wives? I'd hazard a guess and say more than the number of success killed by their ex marine husband due to a domestic dispute. There i…
/r/MensRights31/03/22 04:18 PM
3

And I think that the idea you have about capitalism is inherently wrong, but this is neither the time nor place for this discussion. What I think we can agree on is that a person is entitled to the fruits of their labor.
/r/MensRights31/03/22 12:03 PM
2

Here's the funny part. Communism, Socialism, and Capitalism are all inherently perfect systems, until you add live humans. Feminism? Hardly functional in it's strongest areas. At best.
/r/MensRights30/03/22 11:05 PM
2

It's normal. People don't want to consider that they might be wrong, so they will go to extraordinary lengths to protect their ego. Reddit just enables that for a particular segment of the userbase.
/r/MensRights30/03/22 06:28 PM
2

At the rate I'm going, should only take about 2000 years to put away that amount. Guess it's a good thing that women already don't see me as attractive in any way, otherwise that would be extremely difficult!
/r/MensRights27/03/22 02:12 PM
1

That's because it's one of the inherent tools women have. Bad faith use of the natural ingroup bias that exists for women. It's one of the reasons they see men checking out of society as an attack on them, as it weakens that ability.
/r/MensRights26/03/22 02:03 PM
10

To be fair, this is just a gendered version of what's always been happening. There's always been the good ol boys club, filled with toadies that ride off the success of actual workers. Just now it's being turned into the good ol girls club instead. The men and women that actually keep the company afloat will continue to get screwed.
/r/MensRights25/03/22 02:36 PM
37

Oh, the wage gap absolutely exists. Comparing male CEO earnings to female dance instructors, there is clearly a discrepancy!
/r/MensRights25/03/22 02:21 PM
1

I would argue that not being a doormat keeps you in the game. Mostly since the idea of finding a girl that reciprocates is a bit... unlikely for a lot of us today.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 08:05 PM
2

Yep, was just curious on the one part. Have a good day!
/r/MensRights24/03/22 08:04 PM
1

Eh, I think it's at best a minor contributor when put in the context of women that don't see value in you in the first place. It is certainly the healthy reaction, and other men might see it and respect you for it. I just don't see how it affects interactions with women that have already written you off.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 06:37 PM
1

I understand that, I just don't understand how that translates into an advantage in sexual competition is all.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 06:34 PM
1

I'm confused. How is walking away from disrespect = sexual success? If you're already an undesirable man by the standards of these women, then removing yourself won't change that. I absolutely agree that a lot of people that claim to be nice are actually doormats. I just don't understand the second part of your comment.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 03:06 PM
1

Of course it isn't. Which is why I have made the specific comment that I hate when people fall into bad stereotypes. That would mean I've already taken the time to learn enough about the individual to determine that they do meet the criteria needed.
/r/MensRights19/03/22 10:26 PM
15

There is when the people in power say there is. That's the unfortunate reality of today's world.
/r/MensRights19/03/22 02:28 PM
3

Unfortunately, stereotypes exist for a reason. I cringe every time somebody falls into a negative one, and I've found that even intelligent, logical women fall into that kind of stereotype unless they are naturally very introspective and Not prideful. The education system makes sure that as many women as possible take at least part of that ideology with them. It can be brought to their attention, but only by somebody they respect.
/r/MensRights19/03/22 02:23 PM
4

So I don't understand why feminist are so offended by being a house wife? You have to look at the founders of the feminist movement. They were all wealthy, predominantly white women who were jealous of the power their husbands had, financially and politically. They coveted that power without understanding the responsibility that came with it, and so they made moves to gain that power while avoiding the accompanying responsibility. A good era relevant topic to this is the vote being given to the …
/r/MensRights19/03/22 02:19 PM
10

Feminism wants equality of authority and outcomes without the equality of responsibilities. Eh, not quite. Feminism is exclusively a supremacist movement. Anything that is 'good' for women they want. Anything that is 'bad' for women they want made illegal. Example: Removing the condom during sex is considered rape now in many places, but lying about birth control is perfectly legal, even though they are both conditions upon which consent is based.
/r/MensRights19/03/22 02:12 PM
1

Just keep in mind that continuing to insist on calling yourself a leftist will not result in being welcomed by anyone to the right of yourself. Even liberals are growing more hostile towards people who last claim to that term. For good reason. Ultimately, all I can say is the same thing I say to everyone in this sub. Be the change you desire.
/r/MensRights15/03/22 09:42 PM
2

Since you are obviously well rooted in your new belief system, then yeah, this isn't going anywhere. You came here to tell people you're right, not actually have a debate. By all means, make your own efforts to create some sort of leftist push to co-opt some part of the MRM. I'm sure you'll find out why it inherently will fail if you do. Good luck.
/r/MensRights15/03/22 10:40 AM
1

Isn't that kind of the same as saying anti-racist movements are really just "reverse racist"? Not really, since there isn't actually any such thing as reverse racism, just racism. I don't disagree with right wingers because I'm a leftist. I'm a leftist because I disagree with right wingers. I'm open to hear whatever they have to say. But I used to be a right winger myself, I know the talking points, it's unlikely they'll say anything surprising. And to be honest, right wing politics survive on i…
/r/MensRights14/03/22 05:49 PM
5

Really?? Because it seems to me questioning you guys here triggered a lot of you. Have you read the comments?? Absolutely. And the fact that you're getting engagement in the comments instead of having your post deleted and your account banned from the sub shows how different this sub is from the feminist one. If your don't know that already, I recommend you go try it out. MRA should position itself on the left instead of going to the right Gender problems aren't inherently tied to political affi…
/r/MensRights14/03/22 01:28 AM
3

If you don't think MRA leans to the right and feminism leans to the left why would you make that comparison? Because I never said anything about where I think feminism leans. It's mostly pointing out that you can come here and question people here, but good luck doing that there. In other words, it largely justifies being anti-feminist. So here's a question. What pro-MRA talking points from the 'left' would you like to see used? Why do they have to be talking points at all, instead of legitimate…
/r/MensRights13/03/22 10:07 PM
6

It would appear that if you have them opinion that men's rights are an inherently conservative stance, then it would seem that you have a rather feminist view of the movement. If you look at prominent MRA advocates, you will find that most of them are definitely not people who vote conservative. You have extremely liberal men like Warren Farrell, former feminists like Cassie Jay, and decidedly Not conservative advocates such as Karen Straugn. Besides, you're somehow of the opinion that one side …
/r/MensRights13/03/22 02:44 PM
1

I'm sure you're not saying that capitalism is more likely to generate war, sweat ships, and dangerous jobs just to have basics than communism. Because that would be the exact result of communism. The problem with capitalism, back then and now, is that what we have is crony capitalism, not free market capitalism. I would recommend looking into the difference.
/r/MensRights13/03/22 12:42 AM
1

Don't engage with them. Unless you're confident you can hold yourself to a higher standard, it's not worth your time to reply to obvious trolls. Unless you're like me and enjoy fighting the toxicity too much :p
/r/MensRights11/03/22 04:15 PM
1

Dude. Really? 1: I'm a guy. 2: I'm about as anti feminist as somebody can get. 3: Bringing in random politics to make a personal attack using your emotions as a basis is exactly what many here accuse feminists of doing. Check yourself. 4: Nothing you said refuted anything I said. It just makes you sound like a stereotypical butthurt dudebro.
/r/MensRights11/03/22 02:08 PM
1

so now this bitch A relationship needs to have a foundation of mutual respect. Obviously, you don't have that for her, so no, this is not a healthy foundation.
/r/MensRights11/03/22 12:58 PM
3

I genuinely feel that Men's Rights and Liberation benefit from feminism, and I don't understand why so many MRAs disagree. Ok, let's assume you're simply ignorant of the actions feminists have taken against MRAs, and genuinely want to try to expand your horizons. I would recommend starting here. https://youtu.be/3WMuzhQXJoY It is a talk presented by a former feminist documentary film maker, and the journey she went through when she decided to make a film about the MRM. This presents a very basic…
/r/MensRights09/03/22 06:41 PM
3

It might have to do with the push for equity or even female majorities in basically every profession that isn't hard or dangerous. Most of the men that do these dangerous jobs do it to provide for their families. They are willing to sacrifice their bodies for their wives and children. Being told by the media that women are oppressed after running a 14 hour shift laying fracking pipe where a single mistake could cost you or your coworkers your lives doesn't exactly sit well.
/r/MensRights09/03/22 01:41 PM
1

You're welcome to pm your question lost to me here, and depending on your questions I may participate.
/r/MensRights08/03/22 04:43 PM
1

This is exactly why I avoided as many subjective classes as possible during my degree. Was forced to take art electives, but at least those professors were more interested in my twisting of the parameters of the assignment than in politics. Apparently as long as you can justify something as new and experimental you get a decent grade.
/r/MensRights08/03/22 03:36 PM
6

If you would like a real world example you can experiment with yourself, try making a post on the feminism subreddit asking if there can be an attempt to find a less offensive term for toxic masculinity that still encompasses what your definition of it is. Then compare the reception you get there with the replies on this post. You may be surprised.
/r/MensRights08/03/22 01:01 PM
1

Thanks for the offer, man. I've had years to process what happened, so I've just come to accept how my actions and life state resulted in that, and am striving to become a better person.
/r/MensRights08/03/22 03:07 AM
7

That's how I found it. The content has been [removed] and you cannot comment on it.
/r/MensRights07/03/22 03:29 PM
3

Being a toxic asshole isn't limited to a single gender. While there are toxic tendencies either gender may trend towards, neither gender has a monopoly on a specific action. So maybe instead of trying to make it a gendered issue, we just call them a toxic asshole and move on with our lives?
/r/MensRights07/03/22 03:27 PM
5

So wait, we're trying to use toxic masculinity to explain women's actions now? Or is that just a bit of a garbled sentence?
/r/MensRights07/03/22 03:24 PM
6

So your question was removed from the feminism subreddit I see. I'm curious what reason the admins gave you for removing it, if you wouldn't mind sharing.
/r/MensRights07/03/22 02:59 PM
1

At this point I'd you want a male only space, you're pretty much limited to whatever you manage to eke out yourself. Be the change you desire in the world, however small and seemingly insignificant.
/r/MensRights07/03/22 03:44 AM
3

Yeah, dealing with my depression was one of the reasons my ex decided to cheat then leave me. It's interesting to think about whether I'll ever have the heart to fully open up to another woman again. Ah well, that at least has the prerequisite of a woman being attracted to me, so I guess that's a concern I may never have to face.
/r/MensRights07/03/22 03:40 AM
6

You never know how much you'll miss them until they're gone. Always cherish those around you, you never know how long you'll have them.
/r/MensRights03/03/22 10:50 PM
254

This is one of the reasons why I have dinner every weekend with my parents. It's the only place, especially over the past two years, where I get to hug somebody. I'm not a very physical person, so a few hugs once a week is perfect for me, but I don't discount the importance of having that. I'm very grateful for my parents.
/r/MensRights03/03/22 04:17 PM
2

Thanks for your suggestion. Maybe I'm getting caught up in semantics, but I believe that emotional availability isn't what you should try to exhibit, but rather emotional maturity. I wouldn't even try to limit interactions with women with those terms either, as you come off as two-faced if you act differently with men vs women. I've always treated people the same regardless of gender, I've just found that my tendency to be a serious, factual person scares off a lot of people. I've always been di…
/r/MensRights01/03/22 02:43 PM
3

Don't let feminists browbeat you over making your choices. Replace feminists with other people, and you've got it right. As for the definition of good, it is a largely subjective thing. People aren't taught anymore how to recognize what they want and expect in a relationship, so when the inevitable breakup happens, they just blame the other person and refuse to learn and grow. I've accepted that I'm likely going to be single the rest of my life simply because I find myself in an environment wher…
/r/MensRights01/03/22 01:42 PM
15

I wouldn't disagree that men have options, but I will say that for most men, vast majority of options available to them are not good ones. I mean, if you're hungry you Could eat mud. It's an option, just not a good one. It's less about understanding that you have more options, and more about being able to recognize a good option from a bad one.
/r/MensRights01/03/22 01:01 PM
1

The only point of contention here is whether you made your intentions with the first girl clear before bedding her. If not, then you're in the gray area that potentially makes you a jerk, and if you lied about your intentions, then you're definitely a jerk. I don't know the details of what actually happened, just my 3 cents
/r/MensRights20/02/22 02:19 PM
0

I could go on a whole sarcastic super straight rant, but instead I'll just say this. I want somebody that shares my personal values. I'm not saying it's impossible, but the odds of me finding a trans individual that matches that is rather.. Unlikely. That, and I hope to have kids.
/r/MensRights15/02/22 09:41 PM
1

By that definition, covid deaths are rare. Note: apparently the site I pulled that info from has an issue with proofreading. At one point it starts it's 20/1000 women, and then it states 20/100 live births. https://www.statista.com/topics/3218/abortion-in-the-us/#topicHeader__wrapper https://www.statista.com/statistics/185286/legal-abortions-per-100-live-births-in-the-us-since-2000/ Rather interesting way of obfuscating the numbers. So no, ~18% is not rare.
/r/MensRights14/02/22 04:53 PM
2

Based on US numbers, there are approximately 20 abortions per 1000 women per year. There is somewhere between 600000 and 1000000 abortions performed each year. Perhaps your definition of rate differs from mine. You also still haven't explained how your original question relates to my post.
/r/MensRights14/02/22 04:06 PM
2

Once again, what does that matter? Is that the only argument you have?
/r/MensRights14/02/22 03:55 PM
1

I fail to understand how that has any bearing on the content of my post. If that is the stance you want to take though, then it would be extremely easy to disqualify any number of people from weighting in on things they personally haven't experienced. Like mothers circumcising their sons.
/r/MensRights14/02/22 03:47 PM
0

There are extenuating medical circumstances where the procedure may be needed, as without it both the mother and child will die. There may be some ethical arguments regarding the aftermath of rape as well, especially when the victim is a child. But that is not anywhere close to the majority of abortions. I'm old enough to remember the 'safe, legal and rare' argument. It most certainly is not rare. It has become a sort of birth control, and is a massive business for those involved. If you want to…
/r/MensRights14/02/22 12:14 PM
-2

When done women device canoe from their sexuality, men that aren't affected by their sexuality are the biggest threat to their method of power. Antisocial female behavior tends towards psychological methods, such as reputation destruction. Draw your own conclusions.
/r/MensRights12/02/22 06:25 PM
2

Silly MRA, cis males aren't part of humanity! /S
/r/MensRights08/02/22 10:42 PM
4

The Catholic establishment is just as corrupt as any other government entity. Only difference is they aren't beholden to voters.
/r/MensRights01/01/22 03:35 PM
17

This individual is an account that exclusively trolls this subreddit. They aren't arguing in good faith.
/r/MensRights12/12/21 01:58 PM
7

My point is the vast majority of them in power aren't shitty. I don't care if they themselves aren't actively working to do extremist things. They enable the extremists by not using their power to disown, shame, and kick out the extremists. This goes for every other identity group as well, not just feminists. You're welcome to come hang out in Canada a while and see what having a political hack of a feminist prime minister is like. He's made it illegal to use several forms of evidence for self d…
/r/MensRights11/12/21 06:53 PM
8

Yeah, you're obviously a troll account based on your post history. Every single one of these points get heavily reposted here. Dice you've been active exclusively on this subreddit for the entire 7 months your account has existed, you would have seen the proof put forward by people much better educated on these subjects than I. I recommend you check out the pinned FAQs if you legitimately want to know.
/r/MensRights11/12/21 03:02 PM
5

So it's not the extreme radicals blocking family court reform. It's not the extreme radicals pushing companies that cater surgically to men(Gillette) to alternate their core customer base for political reasons. It's not the extreme radicals that lobby governments to enshrine a woman's word as truth, capable of jailing a man with no due process with naught but an accusation. Look at where the west has gone since the early 2000s with the gay marriage debate. Look at how institutions, education, go…
/r/MensRights11/12/21 02:40 PM
3

Here's the rub though. Feminism encompasses a wide range of individuals, but it's the extreme radicals that make the policies and push the hardest for insanity. It's like saying you can't criticize Catholics just because the Pope is advocating for complete genocide of all LGBT individuals. Obviously he isn't, but I hope my point is clear enough.
/r/MensRights11/12/21 02:30 PM
4

If you know the air of crowd your freaking with for that sort of interaction, and can accept that, then sure, casual sex isn't impossible to find. But if you're like myself, am highly monogamous and have no interest in anything outside of a committed relationship, then it's a different story. You tend to hear a lot about how bad incels are, because it's easy to villainize then. You can't really do that to volcels.
/r/MensRights08/12/21 02:12 PM
3

Sounds more like it has to do with specifically Thanksgiving dinner, and depending on your family's standards for it, it's not something you can just throw together the day before. So sounds like she just did that to be a dick.
/r/MensRights26/11/21 02:18 PM
3

The problem is, that outside of people who call themselves make feminists, and those in power who benefit from collaborating with the feminist activists, nobody supports feminism. There's a reason feminists have had a popular culture stereotype of being man hating lesbians. Because majority of culture understands that's a trend within the movement. Despite this resistance by majority of the population, it hasn't done anything to stop them. I do agree that we should focus on supporting men. Unfor…
/r/MensRights20/11/21 07:01 PM
4

This follows a similar vein of thought to 'not all Muslims are Islamic terrorists, but all Islamic terrorists are Muslim'. For some people, that inherent risk of interacting with women isn't worth it. Sadly, a small number of activist women, combined with a media and government that sides with the activists, takes that small risk, and escalates it to life destroying if a man gets unlucky. The only way 'maning up' will do anything is if we man up enough guys into positions of power to change the …
/r/MensRights20/11/21 02:58 PM
12

No, I don't 'feel'. I think. There is no such thing as toxic masculinity, it's just toxic behavior that both men and women can and do engage in. Gender dynamics and such are just another way for the people in power to keep the masses divided. You could be working to build up everyone around you. Instead, you make it a competition, a race to the bottom of the oppression hierarchicy.
/r/MensRights04/11/21 09:45 PM
13

Just because something was built by SOME men does not mean it benefits ALL men. I'm genuinely curious how a group of people can't understand this.
/r/MensRights04/11/21 09:23 PM
2

i just belive what they wanted is more reasoanble an ask like the right to vote And sending letter bombs to Parliament is a justified means to that end. Feminism has accomplished some good things in its history. That doesn't change the fact that it is an ideology based on jealousy and coveted privileges, and is heavily based on divisive Marxist rhetoric. Just by trying to say 'good causes often have bad things happen in their pursuit' you undermine your entire attempted argument.
/r/MensRights15/10/21 10:40 AM
3

True, but it's becoming obvious that men suffer less from aging as a single person than women do. It's a pendulum swing, and with the growing amount of women who are single and post wall telling younger women feminism is a bad deal, it's only a matter of time before it swings back. Also, women are much more likely to be interested in older men than vice versa, so it's not nearly as hopeless for older men than older women.
/r/MensRights12/10/21 11:08 AM
3

Are you suggesting that anti-male culture and examples of systemic anti-male culture like biased Title IX kangaroo courts, are not alienating young men? I am not. I'm just saying they are not the only reasons at play here. You also seen to believe that going into an unskilled labor market is immediately a dead end. Having a university degree is not a guarantee of employment nor high wages. I myself have a bachelors in a very jack of all trades degree, but I have had to resort to retail and manuf…
/r/MensRights11/10/21 02:39 PM
15

Men that do not go to university do one of three things. They go into the trades, they go into unskilled labor like retail or other service industry positions, or they are not part of the job market at all. It's a week known fact that unless you're going into a highly specialized field that requires education from a university, you'll make more money off a 2 year college degree and an apprenticeship. It is no myth. You can't try to refute the cost issue as a myth, then go on to acknowledge schol…
/r/MensRights11/10/21 03:36 AM
39

Multiple reasons. Some notable ones are the devaluation of degrees, the demonization of men in academic feminism and title 9 suits, the increasing demand for tradesmen, and decreasing scholarships for men paired with an increasing tuition cost. It's not a simple issue.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 10:37 PM
18

Try probation and time served.
/r/MensRights06/10/21 02:57 PM
6

It would appear you have failed to do independent research on the truthfulness of your education. They have a tendency to lie by omission and whitewash the history of feminism, so even people who claim to be an MRA like you are suckered into believing that at the very least, the first two waves were good. I highly recommend that you watch the early videos for Karen Straughn, aka Girl Writes What. She covers all the subjects pertinent to the start of feminism that isn't taught. Like the mail bomb…
/r/MensRights02/10/21 11:24 PM
1

There is no join. You just do what you want. Focus on self improvement, and leave women alone.
/r/MensRights01/10/21 12:09 AM
1

Probably because it studies has to do with merit. If the politicians who were best for the job for elected, we'd be in a much better place. If you think that's what happens, you may need to pay closer attention.
/r/MensRights26/09/21 01:32 PM
1

You seem to be talking about old testament while I'm talking about the current legal system. Not exactly the same thing.
/r/MensRights22/09/21 05:22 PM
2

I already know the difference, and it's an ideological interpretation. Besides, if that's your argument, maybe we should get on changing the laws that make killing a pregnant woman a double homicide. Or that you can be charged with murder for inflicting harm upon a woman that results in a miscarriage. If you'd rather argue ideological over legal, just say so. But they are two separate things.
/r/MensRights22/09/21 03:29 PM
5

General difference there is that buying tobacco doesn't involve directly ending another humans life. But hey, since the baby gets sold for spare parts, that makes it ok.
/r/MensRights22/09/21 02:50 AM
12

I remember when even the left was fighting to have abortions 'legal, but rare'. Outside of sexual abuse and rape victims, we all already choose when we become parents. This entire sexual liberation movement has done it's best to obfuscate that unless one of the two people is literally infertile, no matter what kind of contraceptive you use, the is Always a chance of getting pregnant when you have sex. If people were smart, they'd understand that every time they bang a stranger, there is always t…
/r/MensRights21/09/21 10:53 AM
2

20 is, as everyone is saying, very young to actually do it. But that doesn't mean you can't start preparing and researching. Some legal advice wouldn't be a bad place to stay, just know that while it's possible, out will be incredibly hard to be approved.
/r/MensRights18/09/21 01:37 PM
1

'If it saves even a single life...'
/r/MensRights11/09/21 01:07 AM
21

Real men this, real women that. Just leave each other alone and try to find someone that matches your values. All this real whatever usage is nothing more than shaming language, regardless of gender.
/r/MensRights09/09/21 06:34 PM
3

I believe it originates in genealogical studies about bloodlines. The scientists came to the conclusion based on chromosomal variation that sobering like 80% of women historically had children that survive, while only 40% of men did. Since this is based on people who live today, you do have to remember that the key caveat here is "had kids that survived". Odds are it's higher than 40% and 80%, but considering how common it was in the past to kill the men and boys you conquer, but absorb the wome…
/r/MensRights01/09/21 02:32 PM
0

Women are more likely to get into car accidents than men, but they are more likely to be minor things like fever benders and paint exchanges. Men are less likely to get into an accident, but when they do it trends towards being a more serious accident that results in a larger claim. At least this was the case 10 years ago when I last talked to an insurance agent about the subject. This is also subject to change depending on the country or region.
/r/MensRights20/08/21 02:08 PM
1

Irrelevant first part. I'm saying that if someone states their political and religious beliefs consistently over years, odds are pretty good it's the truth. Besides, you're the one implying that literally everything coming out of a feminists mouth is a lie. Thanks for playing though!
/r/MensRights19/08/21 06:09 PM
1

Ok, just making sure you wouldn't believe a feminist if she came into your house sopping wet and told you it was raining outside.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 05:53 PM
2

I'm not sure I follow your train of thought. I state that BLM is run by communists, therefore being communist in nature. You say it isn't. I respond with the leaders and founders own self declared stances on the master, and you say that because since feminists are apparently all liars, that makes them saying they're communist a falsity?
/r/MensRights19/08/21 03:02 AM
3

Patrisse Cullors : cites Carl Marx, Vladimir Lenin, and Mao Zedong as "providing a new understanding around what our economies could look like." Communist. Taken from her Wikipedia page Alicia Garza : "It is not possible for a world where black lives matter if it is under capitalism." Anti capitalism generally means communist. Taken from a YouTube video of her titled Left Forum 2015: Alicia Garza. Opal Tometi : I believe she is the only one that isn't outspoken about her views on this, but she i…
/r/MensRights18/08/21 09:55 PM
2

Absolutely. I'm not discounting that. I'm just staying that trying to get more focus on it as an issue by associating in any way with BLM will not be productive.
/r/MensRights18/08/21 09:39 PM
7

BLM was founded by three black women, two of which openly worship communist ideals. They are feminist through and through, and explicitly have excluded men from their mission statements until recently. Now they have edited it to only implicitly exclude them. They also state the feminist goal of destroying the nuclear family. While I agree that there is a gender sentencing gap that needs to be addressed, choosing to associate with anything BLM related will not yield the results you desire.
/r/MensRights18/08/21 07:54 PM
1

If you simply focus on improving yourself in any way you can, and slowly building up your community, in big or small ways that suite you, them the worst case scenario is you're a healthy, successful individual who lives in a good area and are able to say you played a part in all of it. If you end up in a situation like above, you may begin to attract women, and at that point you can focus on what you may or may not want out of a relationship. Until a woman indicates interest in a real way to you…
/r/MensRights11/08/21 04:10 PM
2

I made a comment that I was able to make surprisingly gender neutral, and even frame it using their own types of terms. Haven't been banned yet, comment is still up with no replies, and only -1 karma. I'd say go for it, just put your argument in as neutral of a format as possible with zero blame. You might be surprised. Or be banned, but what do we care anyways? :P
/r/MensRights07/08/21 01:13 PM
2

Unfortunately, there's only so many times an individual can be slandered before they decide that is they're going to be treated that way, might add well embrace it. Heck, Feminism has already reached that point anyway with slut walks and such. Doesn't make it the right choice, just one with precedent.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 08:33 PM
2

You have to keep in mind that your friend who is a feminist =\= social media activist feminists. All you need to do is go visit the celebration thread over in AHS, and read how they are rallying behind this action with TRP, KotakuinAction, and here being next on their docket. You should default to treating people as individuals, but when you are dealing with a group of people who's only identity is the group they are part of, well... 'Nuff said.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 08:26 PM
1

Not what I said, just interested in what led someone that posts primarily about daytime tv shows to take such a difficult topic, is all.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 08:22 PM
1

Random question: What part of Ru Paul's Drag Race gave you the motivation to come here and ask?
/r/MensRights04/08/21 06:34 PM
7

It's anecdotal at best, but even anecdotal evidence is irrefutable in a large enough quantify. I'm not a good example for this, as I'm not someone who has ever approached a woman, and has only every had 1 relationship. It ended with her cheating on and leaving me. I was lucky we had nothing, and that she was feeling guilty enough that she didn't pursue any legal action. I did all the divorce papers and paid the total of 650$ myself. I've tried dating apps since, to zero success, and I don't cold…
/r/MensRights31/07/21 01:38 PM
36

"Feminism is a range of social movements, political movements, and ideologies that aim to define and establish the political, economic, personal, and social equality of the sexes." Taken right from the first paragraph of wikipedia's article of feminism. Which is now notoriously edited to be in favor of feminism. Your first sentence is hilariously false, according to the official narrative. Now, I'm not disagreeing with you. Feminism is in actuality a female supremacy movement, but when the leade…
/r/MensRights24/07/21 01:55 PM
54

Gonna feed the troll on this one. 1: If a man would be crucified for doing this, then feminists in support of equality should do the same to her. It's a disgusting action regardless of the genders involved. 2: I seen to recall feminists trying to claim terms such as slut to mock those that call them that, and gain power over the word. Turns out, you can do that with terms like incel as well. I'd prefer if people just stopped trying to devalue others based on sexuality, but that's not likely to h…
/r/MensRights24/07/21 01:14 PM
20

It's also likely been less time since he took a grammar course than you :p
/r/MGTOW222/07/21 05:35 PM
1

Going to have to go digging for any cave diving footage of the place when I get home.
/r/MGTOW22/07/21 05:33 PM
2

Assuming you can actually get approved for adoption as a single male. From what I hear they try very hard to make the process incredibly hard.
/r/MGTOW18/07/21 01:09 PM
3

While there are some issues that have seen a small amount of cooperation, most of the attempts MRAs have made to build their own systems and programs have been met with full opposition from the feminist establishment. I have no doubt there are individual feminists that do help, but the track record for the establishment, aka those with actual power to help or hinder, is not supportive of the claims you make.
/r/MensRights15/07/21 06:33 PM
1

I disagree. We all also bear the responsibility to minimize our own risk. People who rape do so because they are sick individuals. Doesn't matter the gender, no amount of 'education' will prevent rapists from committing rape, murderers from committing murder, etc. No matter how hard people try to relieve the victim of all responsibility, the fact remains that there are always things you as an individual can do to mitigate the risk to yourself. Does it suck that done women feel they have to alway…
/r/MensRights14/07/21 05:55 PM
1

So because more men are murdered each year than women, that makes those murders more important, right? Stop trying to quantify and compare bad behavior. OnlyFans exists because there is a market for it. It doesn't exist because 'single mothers' need the money. A product existing doesn't mean there is demand for it. It exists because of the gender disparities in society today, created by feminism and is just another way to orchestrate civil upheaval to do exactly what you said; keep the lower 'cl…
/r/MensRights12/07/21 03:03 AM
1

So pretty much the day it was invented then.
/r/MensRights11/07/21 12:46 PM
2

So the intent behind the illegal acts determines whether it is illegal then? This thread is discussing the double standard between a man sending unsolicited nudes to an underage girl, vs a woman sending nudes to an underage boy. If the guy is sending nudes to underage girls, it's suddenly ok as long as he's advertising his own sexual content, according to your logic. How about we stop sending pictures of our junk, regardless of gender, to anyone? No nuance needed. Just stop.
/r/MensRights11/07/21 12:45 PM
2

If I'm only allowed to want one thing, it's not going to be sex. Heck, it isn't even going to be anything to do with a woman. It'll be the peace of being left to my own devices. If you ever have daughters, it'll be your responsibility to ensure they don't grow up thinking the same thing you did. Good luck.
/r/MensRights06/07/21 03:32 PM
1

If you are capable of triggering change from within, by all means. Unfortunately, your change from within is going to be about as effective as this non existent social movement. Why? Because those in power and control will ignore, demonize, and otherwise you for your ideas and opinions, like they do to everyone else that tries to oppose them. You dare question them here? Banned. You try to have talks in an academic setting? Cancelled. You call them out in social media? At best, you're shadow ban…
/r/MensRights05/07/21 10:41 AM
1

Another typically unrecognized point is the original goal of feminism, when it was coined and founded. It is not originally about equality. That is a smokescreen used to deceive people into supporting the monolith of feminism, while remaining ignorant of the selfish, destructive goals of the core extremists. If we had the feminism all of these milk toast feminists claim to support, there wouldn't be any problems against the movement. Feminism exists in a quasi-religious state. Unlike most religi…
/r/MensRights29/06/21 12:26 PM
6

This is true for those that are solidly within the feminist movement, that are happy driving for more and more power. You'd be surprised just how many people think they're a feminist just based on the 'I want equality' tagline, and if you can find a way for them to look at the reality of what is done under the name of feminism, they will often drop the label on their own. Or, you know, try to fight back with their own brand of feminism, get rejected, blocked, ostracized, and Then drop the label.
/r/MensRights28/06/21 08:03 PM
10

Odds are you're calling yourself a feminist because of them perceived social value you expect to receive by calling yourself such. I've come to find that most people who call themselves feminists because they believe in equality of opportunity, and a level playing field for the two genders call themselves feminists because they're unaware of the real damage feminism had done to family and relationship dynamics the world over. Until people drop the feminist label and begin using egalitarian ones,…
/r/MensRights28/06/21 04:15 PM
14

Do they explain how they gauged suicidal tendencies? Was it by attempts made, hospital trips after an attempt, number that call help lines? Considering known issues regarding male suicide, none of the above are accurate indicators of 'suicidal tendencies' in men and boys. The metrics used to measure women cannot be used to measure men, as men are actively discouraged from seeking help in many countries and cultures.
/r/MensRights14/06/21 04:08 PM
3

While I agree that these people shouldn't shame men just because they won't have sex with them, there's really no benefit to boiling someone's identity down to whether they can get laid or not. The feminists on that side of the line so it all the time, there's no need to stoop to their level and in doing so, prove their points.
/r/MensRights10/06/21 05:54 PM
7

Count yourself lucky you've never had to deal with it. If you want to learn more about it, it's a simple search away. If you want even more, look into how it is used to dismiss the not all men response to the typical talking points that say 'all men are ____'
/r/MensRights26/05/21 04:04 PM
18

Interestingly enough, you'd be banned off any feminist space instantly for saying something like that, only about men. They even have a tag and campaign name for it, which I'm sure you've heard of. YesAllMen So I would suggest that until a woman proves that she does not agree with literally anything the feminists establishment is doing, and renounces the label, it's safe to assume that she at least turns a blind eye to the hatred, fear, and destructive tendencies feminism had been built on since…
/r/MensRights26/05/21 02:41 PM
2

It's more that herbivore men have paralleled mgtow in their own culturally relevant way, not that they have an incel complex. They look at the current culture, at their parents and the expectations of society, and say 'why should I practically kill myself at work and be unhappy? I could instead just work enough to support me and my interests, hang out with my buddies and enjoy life.' A lot of them are almost a sort of new monk in the way they live their life, in the traditional sense of the worl…
/r/MGTOW21/05/21 10:45 AM
3

Correct. Rates of suicide, number of adults that just drop out of society, as well as an increasing number of (usually young men) people are not even entering society as adults. They recognize the severity of the problem, but due to what I believe to be a generational gap driven by tradition, the government has had little success addressing the issues. Only significant difference between there and western nations that are experiencing similar things is that they're not importing economic migrant…
/r/MGTOW20/05/21 11:57 AM
3

Pretty sure the WHO didn't need to conduct a study to find that out. They could have just asked a Japanese or Korean salaryman/woman.
/r/MGTOW19/05/21 10:18 PM
6

You're assuming that school even had any male teachers. They're beginning to go extinct.
/r/MensRights15/05/21 12:53 PM
1

It has nothing to do with my agenda, as that would require me to have one. Just keep in mind the term had become popularized by feminists as an insult, making any use of it outside of a very carefully worded address on the actual issues of incels pretty much an offensive remark. Besides, trying to qualify someone's argument by how much sex they have is only ever good as a personal attack, and can never result in any positive responses.
/r/MensRights11/05/21 07:40 PM
5

Weinstein, Cosby, and number of young men in post secondary education. But because someone they don't like 'got away with it', it's all terrible!
/r/MensRights11/05/21 03:42 AM
1

And assuming the definition you found was correct was your first bad assumption.
/r/MensRights11/05/21 03:40 AM
1

Am I classified as an incel if I'm unable to find a woman that meets my standards though? Most so called actual incels are like that because the only attention they get, if any, is from the literal bottom of the pile. Unrealistic standards are one thing, but many of us bachelors simply are unable to find a woman that meets our most basic of standards, assuming we are even visible to them at all.
/r/MensRights10/05/21 07:34 PM
5

Hence the *free tag.
/r/MGTOW10/05/21 06:05 PM
24

They are also more likely to quit their jobs to care for family at home. Especially when the government is happily paying people to do exactly just that. Why work when you get a government check every month for *free?
/r/MGTOW10/05/21 05:45 PM
1

We want government to stay out of our bedroom! Also to get into Your bathroom!
/r/MGTOW03/05/21 10:17 PM
1

I wish I could be as optimistic as you are. Just like how if all the guns are taken away, criminals will still find some other method to rob and assault people, if a woman truly wants to destroy a man socially, she doesn't have to have ever had any physical, or even direct digital contact with him to do it.
/r/MGTOW29/04/21 03:19 PM
4

I was always partial to parent/child terminology, mostly because then my classmates and I could reference things in other ways, like saying two objects are cousins. Our password for getting into the lab was also dongle, guess we were all sexist :p
/r/MGTOW26/04/21 07:30 PM
3

I'm not going to tell you it's better being single or in a relationship, because it varies for each individual, and it changes often over time. It's normal to want companionship. I'm in a similar situation as you, only I have had 1 relationship. Ended badly, was extremely lucky I got away unscathed. I would still like to find someone. Thankfully, finding the mgtow community has allowed me to educate myself on all the red flag behaviors, and combined with my own personal standards I've always had…
/r/MGTOW25/04/21 01:26 PM
1

Not that I disagree with your again that the most vocal people who are against homosexuality turn out to be secretly gay Enough of the time to make a point, but that's not how it is used anymore. Just because I believe homosexuality is morally wrong doesn't mean I am afraid of them or if my own sexuality. It also doesn't mean that I am actively fighting against them. We have free will for a reason. As long as 'the gays' don't affect me or my own, I don't care what they do. Of course, in this day…
/r/MensRights24/04/21 10:19 PM
25

I never understood why they took to using the term phobia to describe everything. I'm not fearful of fat people, gay people, people of a different religion. I'm fearful of falling from a high enough height to hurt myself.
/r/MensRights22/04/21 04:21 PM
4

That's because tattoos used to mean something. Culturally, they were a big deal in some places, because it was almost a sort of resume.
/r/MGTOW17/04/21 01:51 PM
5

'We will be launching it with the best product...' If they ever use the word product, they're trying to sell you something.
/r/MGTOW17/04/21 01:48 PM
3

It should be on the person who wants things to change. Be the change you want in the world, even if it only extends to your social media experience. I get an excessive number of scam emails, messages, matches, and profile contacts targeted at me as a man. I block, report, and sort as junk. Besides, asking why you should have to wall yourself off from people who are obviously harassing you is not an intelligent question.
/r/MensRights17/04/21 03:08 AM
8

I wouldn't. I also wouldn't have that problem with my hypothetical daughter, seeing as how Facebook has profile settings that prevent you from viewing, let alone messaging someone, unless they're a friend or a friend of a friend. If you're getting that many a day, either you're 'friends' with far too many people you don't actually know, or you need to change your profile settings. I fully understand the sheer amount of messages a woman can receive in a day. That doesn't mean we don't have the op…
/r/MensRights16/04/21 06:08 PM
5

I do understand that depending on what accounts you have on what sites does result in a seemingly endless stream of them, but most big apps these days have a lot of privacy options. As to why they don't, I ascribe no motives.
/r/MensRights16/04/21 04:16 PM
5

It's almost like you react the same way as men who say 'not all men'. The day we all can be cognisant of all the double standards we indulge, and stop trying to demonize the 'other side', would be a magnificent day.
/r/MensRights16/04/21 04:11 PM
15

Report, Block, Delete. Curate your own content experience to your tastes. We have the technology!
/r/MensRights16/04/21 04:05 PM
3

Objective reality: California wants to tax non-residents simply for being in the state for a certain period of time, as well as trying to back tax former residents. Michigan and New York have some of the most draconian lockdown mandates in the country, as well as OFH scandals. Texas and Florida have lifted all restrictions, and leave businesses to make their own choices. These are all objectively true. What are the objective facts you would like to share to back up your comments?
/r/MensRights16/04/21 02:56 PM
2

If I recall correctly, the 2% statistic originates from an anecdote put forward by a female judge when asked how many of the cases she presides over turn out to be falsely accused. I don't believe it was an actual statistic from her, more like an approximation of 'it had happened more than once, but so infrequently I'm not bothered to remember more than that'. Considering very few cases are followed up on, let alone charged, it's not an easy metric to track and is heavily underreported. Because …
/r/MensRights13/04/21 07:34 PM
15

The infographic mentioned race once. To compare sentencing bias between black Americans and male Americans. They do this because people are willing to riot in the streets over 'systematic racism', yet nothing is done over an even greater disparity. Every single one of these stats include non white men. I might recommend that you at least get your insults checked for accuracy before you pour them out of that can.
/r/MensRights03/04/21 01:53 PM
1

While it's nowhere near 50%, research has shown that sperm count and viability in western men has decreased significantly in the past few decades, which is linked to a significant decrease in testosterone. It's at a rate that is significant enough to be an alarming trend, but you know how it's being handled? No one cares.
/r/MensRights21/03/21 02:06 PM
3

'Justine Castro' Fixed it for ya.
/r/MensRights01/03/21 06:24 PM
9

True gender equality advocate Kazuma would like a word.
/r/MensRights01/03/21 06:22 PM
8

If the literal definitions of laws worked, gun control laws would actually do something. In reality, child support is given to the mother. She is not beholden to anyone on how she spends that money. Some women need it to get by. But some also do just fine without it, and use it to pamper themselves while the child doesn't see a cent.
/r/MensRights21/02/21 03:12 PM
4

If a teacher raped a 12 year old boy, she'd maybe go to a soft jail for a few months, get to keep her teaching license, and if she gets knocked up by the kid, she can sue him for back child support the day he turns 18. The problem is that men accused of sexual misconduct if any kind now are deemed immediately guilty, thanks to the believe all women MeToo slogan. The law is a problem, but not nearly as big of a problem as the culture surrounding it. That gets lost sometimes because people just ge…
/r/MensRights16/02/21 07:09 PM
1

1: Cishet is not a word, and the terms you abbreviated to create that abomination of the English language are simply incorrect. The term you're looking for is biologically Normal. It is normal for humans to be heterosexual. It is normal for humans to behave according to gender lines. I'm tired of this gendered language that is being made up in an attempt to marginalize the very default nature that has resulted in all of us being born. 2: Simple question for you. If the majority of 'feminists' th…
/r/MensRights08/01/21 12:59 PM
8

Yet the problem is that said 'true' feminists who comprise the 'majority of the cause' let the extremist nutjobs run the entire movement, make the policies, publish the stories, etc. It doesn't matter how much you preach about equality if you end up just standing by and watching others in your group continue to do this sort of thing.
/r/MensRights07/01/21 09:42 PM
1

I've actually discussed it a little with my mother in passing. I don't actually identify as or claim the label, it's just my current lifestyle drawer a lot of parallels with the basic idea. Technically I'm probably more of a volcel, since I have standards, and I simply don't expect to ever meet a woman that clears majority of them, while also being interested in me. Ah well, my fish keep me company anyways.
/r/MGTOW221/07/20 07:46 PM
2

Talent only affects what you have a natural advantage over the average person in. Hard work and hours logged are more important in most things. At is one of those things where this line gets fuzzy, but so do any other subjective subjects. Don't limit yourself to one or two things, try out lots!
/r/MGTOW17/07/20 02:05 PM
2

It's one of the main points of the show, actually. Of course, a narrative as complex as GITS would be completely lost of someone like this :p
/r/MensRights16/03/20 07:18 PM
1

100% that was the reality for many men, and in some sad places in the world it still is. If you think war is as simple as valuing mens lives more though, I have some sad reality checks to cache. It would certainly be effective at reducing the wasted lives thrown away by those in power, but it wouldn't stop or even slow conflicts driven by greed, hate, racial and religious differences, and an often long forgotten slight against someone too long ago. I really wish things were that simple, man.
/r/MensRights13/03/20 01:00 PM
1

For sure, but you also discount the historical wars where men had no choice but to fight because if reasons as simple as they'd be killed by the enemy anyways. Forced conscription is a thing. But it's not always the only reason men fight and die is all.
/r/MensRights12/03/20 07:17 PM
-6

I'd say don't insult the brave servicemen who volunteer to go and fight for our countries willingly. Whether you agree with the rain for the conflict or not, nowadays these men choose to, and in return they get very little.
/r/MensRights12/03/20 04:29 PM
1

I totally agree that it's not a feminists 'job' to fight for mens rights. Just like it's not an mra's job to fight for women. In a perfect world, feminism and mens rights are different faces of the same coin, both striving for equality by raising their demographic up. Sadly, as someone above already mentioned, feminism today had been largely turned into a female supremacy movement. It focuses more on giving women power over men, and treating me down, than improving areas women are lacking. An ea…
/r/MensRights14/02/20 10:04 PM
2

You could start by dropping the 'male feminist' tag. There's no such thing as equal rights feminism, because feminism will never advocate for men. There is certainly feminism that gears to equality of opportunity for women, but there will never be feminism that campaigns for improving mens opportunities/rights/societal expectations. If you're for equality of opportunity for both sexes, you're an egalitarian. If you start there, you'll likely be more understood by members of both camps. At least …
/r/MensRights14/02/20 08:48 PM
1

Mostly savings at this point, but I've been getting into low level aquariums. Lots of fun!
/r/MGTOW28/01/20 08:20 PM
1

I've recently gotten into aquariums, and some of the more social fish can be really friendly. Not the same as a fuzzy animal you can directly interact with, just different. Plus building the aquarium is super fun.
/r/MGTOW24/01/20 08:18 PM
3

I got banned for pointing out that one bad apple ruins the barrel. If anyone even hints at breaking the echo chamber narrative, they're gone.
/r/MensRights14/01/20 10:17 PM
1

Do you know the number one reason why people like me look into mgtow content? Because of the posts demonstrating there's life to be enjoyed past the anger, depression and hurt many of us go through, and that it is entirely up to me as an individual not only to achieve it myself, but to choose what it is I achieve in the first place. After all, everyone should choose to go their own way, not be told how, where, or what. It sounds like you're angry that people don't always share your definition of…
/r/MGTOW29/11/19 05:21 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter