TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ATMinotaur Archive

View 0 posts and 117 comments by ATMinotaur on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Not much difference between the two then :)
/r/MensRights05/08/25 02:24 PM
2

That depends on the type of snake
/r/MensRights05/08/25 01:27 PM
5

There will still be issues, as they can say they were forced to consent before the recording. It may sound unlikely but there will be cases of this happening even if it's few and far between.
/r/MensRights14/06/24 02:36 PM
5

From what I remember see some time a go it's men are more likely to be convicted and also have longer sentences when both genders are convicted. I don't remember the stats of hand, the longer sentences one might be 60% longer for men. Don't quote me on the stat I'm probably way off.
/r/MensRights08/06/24 10:19 AM
-3

Average person would not matter as you need to meet the standards to be a soilder, and those standards from what I've been told eliminate all but a very few women. Which us why they have to be lowered to get more women in
/r/MensRights31/05/24 06:46 AM
1

I agree we all lack information to know truthfully what happened. Puberty is the first thing that crossed my mind. If he had, then all other questions can come in. If you've been told stuff that leads to her pulling the rape card, hopefully that comes out in trial. Hopefully the what ever the truth is it come out, ending the matter once and for all.
/r/MensRights22/04/22 06:00 PM
2

There one issue is whether he's gone through pubity or not seeing as he's 11. It possible he had but not definite.
/r/MensRights22/04/22 04:54 PM
5

Take it a step further and identify as black too
/r/MensRights29/12/21 05:26 PM
3

In that case I agree
/r/MensRights03/09/21 12:12 PM
3

That does sound weird, though it is possible he meant 16+ years old, which is illigal depend ING on where you live, still uestionable depending on the guys age even if not illegal
/r/MensRights03/09/21 11:58 AM
2

I wouldn't want her to get a dog, the dog doesn't deserve a owner like her. She should just die alone
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen22/08/21 05:43 PM
1

' if you need sex, just do escorts. ' Less your on about male escorts, thats gonna make staying away from women a bit difficult.
/r/MensRights18/04/21 02:47 PM
39

And obviously marked with the number of the beast
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/04/21 02:06 PM
1

may be she ate the homework, and the books, ect ​ Edit Spelling
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/03/21 05:04 PM
3

Heard isn't either, and she was hired
/r/MensRights22/02/21 09:45 AM
2

Depends some times their in a no win situation. I wouldn't blame men, it'll be women in higher positions too
/r/MensRights27/01/21 11:28 AM
8

Most people would agree, but that doesn't stop the crazies ignoring facts and blaming it on sexism.
/r/MensRights27/01/21 10:54 AM
8

Don't remember what all the studies say, men are in general more work focused and work more hours and want to progress. Which can be said as men as harder workers. Unfortunately that won't stop some questioning it as it'll still be seen as sexist.
/r/MensRights27/01/21 08:56 AM
16

If I remember correctly studies show blind hiring ends up favouring men. So they'd still end up being questioned.
/r/MensRights27/01/21 08:28 AM
1

The Uk A paternity test does mean something "If you are going to use your legal DNA testing results in court you will need a DNA testing company that the CSA or Child Maintenance Service has approved. You need to make sure that your test is done through an approved company as otherwise; you risk your legal results not holding up. Moreover, everyone involved in the test must agree that all steps were followed and that the results thus reflect the true relationship (or absence thereof) between the…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/01/21 09:03 PM
1

This was mentioned elsewhere, it was mentioned she was raped, just not by him. Not sure how true that is as it was about a year a go and don't remember where I read it, but it was on reddit somewhere.
/r/PussyPass10/05/20 06:19 PM
3

This ones a bit different, its covered by abuse of trust, which includes people up to 17. It'll be the teacher student part thats the issue her.
/r/PussyPass28/04/18 02:56 PM
2

He possibly isn't doing it because he needs to, he may be doing it because he wants to.
/r/MensRights16/01/17 08:47 AM
1

Found on another thread theres a placeholder for the film on google play
/r/MensRights04/12/16 08:44 AM
4

Not remembering the pain, is not a valid reason for it happening. Whilst I've not been circumcised, I have had 7 operations between the ages of 4-5 and 15, and guess what, I don't remember the pain from those either. Also 6 of those operations were unnecessary as well, and 3 of those happened because the doctors got their information wrong and thought I was deaf, when I wasn't, I had a submucous cleft palate. Another one was to remove my adenoids, at around the same time I was in hospital as whe…
/r/MensRights27/11/16 09:36 AM
11

Only if you want to ignore all the scandals around her. Then she's at least as bad as he is, or worse, not to say he's great.
/r/MensRights08/11/16 08:59 AM
6

might not be that isolated this case or similar was talked about on uk tv some time ago as well.
/r/MensRights01/11/16 11:06 PM
1

In part it is down to them, in how they follow their religion. But if the religion didn't have these rules on how to be a good little believer in the first place, the follower would be put in the position on whether to follow the rules or not in the first place, and thus rusk losing their job.
/r/MensRights31/10/16 07:59 AM
1

They should only lose their job if their religion interferes with the job severely enough. Eg being unwilling to handle alcohol if your job is to serve customers (theres possile ways around it, if others are serving, but it can be restrictive depending on the store).
/r/MensRights30/10/16 09:00 PM
3

The problem with not remembering, you can say that about anything done to a baby. That not a valid excuse to do something to anyone, of any age, especially a baby.
/r/MensRights17/10/16 05:05 PM
1

Fair enough, I know fair few don't like it, but if you ok with it, cool.
/r/MensRights04/09/16 09:59 AM
1

You may want to think twice about dolphin browser, they collect data, though it depends on if you are bothered about that or not.
/r/MensRights04/09/16 09:36 AM
1

There is this article which talks about what op is on about.
/r/MensRights31/08/16 08:07 AM
5

This was provided by someone else all but the first are actual negatives, the first shows that there are women who do prefer men uncut 1: Women prefer intact penises. And elsewhere you can find men do as well! Source: http://www.healthcentral.com/drdean/408/60750.html http://www.cirp.org/library/anatomy/ohara/ 2: Masturbation feels better. Source: http://www.cirp.org/pages/anat/ 3: Circumcision significantly reduces sensitivity. Source: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006…
/r/MensRights28/08/16 09:35 PM
6

I'm not a lawyer, so don't fully know the law, age may be part of it, but not the be all end all of it, thats more statutory rape far ascI know. Other factors would be leqrning disabilities, autism and other mental factors. Also it's not just teacher / pupil, but stuff like lawyer/ client, prison guard/prisoner, doctor/patient, amonst others.
/r/MensRights23/08/16 04:04 PM
66

It's probably to do with abuse of position.
/r/MensRights23/08/16 08:17 AM
1

For me its because their in general unnecessary, want to introduce people to ghostbuster, show em the original, and if they don't like it, fine, like any other thing some will like it some won't. Use the money making a reboot, to do something that not been shown before on screen.
/r/MensRights02/07/16 08:59 AM
1

Well on calling it rape, they don't just call it rape, its staturory rape which hasva different meaning and then there's abuse of power/position, it's unfortunatelybon herevitvseems most just say rape.
/r/MensRights04/06/16 05:31 PM
2

It is in the Uk, you can go to prison up to 5 years, though I wouldn't expect it least not for women.
/r/MensRights29/05/16 07:22 PM
1

Thats fair enough which is why I thought its more likely than which sex is more skilled than the other, as neither sex competes against each other in a competitve way in sport far as I know, though the nearest is mixed doubles in tennis.
/r/MensRights29/05/16 04:30 PM
2

I not bothered one way or other, its not something I care about one way or other. I way just pointing out how he got his powere was a bit different from the others. Though if I were to decide on him to be a shitlord, he's probably higher ranking than the other seeing as the others had no choice in having powers where he did. Edit If you look at another way caps a feminist, he had no agency till it was given to him by the government.
/r/MensRights28/05/16 11:42 AM
1

You missed the point, the rest didn't choose to have powers, cap had the choice to be given the drug or not.
/r/MensRights28/05/16 09:35 AM
2

Well Cap did choose to take the drug that gave him the powers, least that's how I remember it.
/r/MensRights28/05/16 08:41 AM
1

Thanks, didn't think much before reading, think less now.
/r/MensRights26/05/16 06:03 PM
1

Thats fair enough, I've heard it in relation to tennis, and see it extending to popular sports, and see the point, not sure it applies to all sports though. Not heard Hope Solo's argument, and will take your word on it, and sounds retarded, I'm no fan of her anyway.
/r/MensRights26/05/16 05:05 PM
-3

Well normally males and females don't normally compete against each other, and until they do, the pay side is a non issue. For me the issue is stuff like in tennis where the the women play less sets than men and get the same prize winnings. But on the wage side as long as their playing the same length of time, same distance, using the same rules ect, they should be paid the same. The other possible issue is bringing people in to watch the sport, as supposedly male sports are more interesting to …
/r/MensRights26/05/16 08:06 AM
2

As there's goingvto be a retrial l think he's not out of the woods yet if he is innocent (I don't know enough to know if he's guilty or not, which is why I'm saying if), he may yet end up in jail.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/04/16 06:45 PM
1

Theres alredy an app called alibi that supposedly does that, though looking at the reviews still needs work as people have problems with it.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 11:42 AM
4

I see what your getting at, and you have a point. I rather not have it at all either.
/r/MensRights17/04/16 08:37 PM
9

I think it would be better to have an option to request the driver be same sex as the user (if the app has a user profile, and driver profile type thing)
/r/MensRights17/04/16 12:25 PM
3

Usually it's said men are more likely to get prostrate cancer than women.
/r/MensRights30/03/16 08:29 AM
1

It might be fairly leanient all round least in the UK, unfortunatly no evidence, but has been mentioned in the news, and on talk shows here very occasionaly. Nearest story I remember involving a man is one where he kills the parents and brother of a young girl and only serves about 6 months for drink driving. I remember it as he tries suing the girl for loss of earning for whatvwas his own damn fault.
/r/PussyPass10/03/16 06:19 PM
1

I presume the thinking is rape is worse than murder/killed, as once your dead your dead, you can't exactly be murdered/killed again, where as you can be raped multiple times, and the psychological effect can be lasting. As for the rest, I don't know, what the thinking there would be. I'd put rape as equal to the stuff you mentioned, as each can have lingering physical, emotional and psychological effects, and how long they last depends on the person.
/r/MensRights28/02/16 09:54 AM
2

The bbc had a segment on the Daily Politics show today on this, had someone pointing out some of the myths about the pay gap like it being the average of jobs, and saying younger women are paid more than men. So least there's one thing on the bbc thats going partially to addess the balance on the subject.
/r/MensRights12/02/16 12:38 PM
2

Whist that is more likely an explination, the guy just might be just a grade A cunt. I remember a story I heard aclong time a go, and don't remember the full details, about a guy who drink drives and ends up killing the parents and brother of a young girl. He only does 6 months, this shit, tries to sue the girl for loss of earnings. I've no idea if he succeced, probably didn't, but it goes to show some people are just cunts through and through and don't need any reason to be a cunt.
/r/MensRights06/02/16 05:50 PM
3

If you look further up theres a post with lots of links as to why it shouln't happen
/r/MensRights25/01/16 11:36 PM
2

He one thing to be thankful for, in that he hasn't got an ex trying to take most of it, for child support he supposedly didn't pay whilst locked up, like a couple of others cases that got brought up in this sub.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 09:36 AM
3

Probably not, it's not the first time it's happened. Someone posted something similar a few years ago. And I think his wife was dating the prosecutor at some point as well, or something like that (not sure on the facts of this bit as it was quite a long time ago I read it)
/r/MensRights04/09/15 12:29 PM
2

Other countries have no bearing, as you use the law you live in, till the law changes to match those other countries.
/r/MensRights07/06/15 08:29 AM
3

I would presume it's because she lied. But as you said, he still threw a brick at her.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 04:32 PM
6

If he's paying for a gym membership and being told he can't enter the gym at all during certain hours, then I can see his point. Listening to what he says, that's what their doing, stopping him from using the gym at certain times, and from what he says the most convenient times for him to use the gym.
/r/MensRights07/01/15 10:31 PM
4

I agree, I didn't mean to say he couldn't respond the way he did. I was refering in general terms not specifically about what happend in the article.
/r/MensRights03/01/15 12:14 AM
9

There is in the UK, it's called Reasonable Force.
/r/MensRights02/01/15 10:39 PM
3

Ok, thanks, I've been meaning to look more in kotakuinaction, I should have thought of that.
/r/MensRights17/11/14 05:13 PM
3

Would that be amrsucks? I've seen it there not sure if its marked as unverified, though I'm not using the website and not sure if that sort of thing comes up on reddittsync. I and the few others who have commented aren't sure if its true, and are hoping to see more info on it.
/r/MensRights17/11/14 04:24 PM
3

I would see your point if all were promoting an ideology that has a certain morality. As they don't, their not exactly in the same boat.
/r/MensRights02/11/14 01:34 PM
3

Bringing up a differing age of consent is of no use, as they do not live there, they have to go by the laws in the country or state they live in. If you go by that, we might as not bother with laws at all, as we'd just pick and choose what laws from what country we wish. Or not bother at all, seeing as there are no laws outside the planet earth.
/r/MensRights07/10/14 09:51 PM
1

That sound like it probably emotional abuse, or at least as GenderNeutralLanguag says controlling. And not cool either way. Hopefully again as GenderNeutralLanguag get counselling if you can. Otherwise, you probably need to get out of there and take your daughter with you. Or least start getting it documented to be on the safe side for possible problems in the future. Hopefully it won't come to that, hope for the best but expect the worst.
/r/MensRights02/09/14 09:56 PM
1

May be some MAY think she's trying to blame people for harassing her, and those people are men. But thats only a guess, and what validation there is to anyone claiming that is up to them.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 04:04 PM
1

Ok, wasn't sure if you got paid over there. Not sure if it's a racket over here. But there's a chance it can be abused here as well.
/r/MensRights11/08/14 07:32 AM
1

I would imagine only if the child ended up in a state run orphanage (if such places still exists). Or possibly in foster care, foster cares can get financial help in the Uk, not sure else where.
/r/MensRights10/08/14 09:28 PM
1

I can only speculate myself, but you just said my general line of thinking. I'm pretty sure on what would happen to pedo's, but I don't think anyone one else would fair better doing anything else to kids.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 09:59 PM
3

I thought even general prisoners don't like people people doing things to kids or is that just pedo's. If its not just pedo's, I doubt they'd be any safer.
/r/MensRights06/08/14 09:14 PM
2

Probably not a mens rights issue. As for Thor here's what I find silly about it, they already have a character called Thor girl, so theres no need to change Thor into a Woman. And for Capt America., they already did that if I remember a long time back, They put Steve Rogers on Ice and had about 3 or 4 other people be Capt America, one being Black, who eventually became I think the Falcon. And theres nothing stopping them from crating new characters with similar power to existing characters, hell…
/r/MensRights28/07/14 09:38 PM
2

I can agree with this. It would make more sense. Also a fair few already have female versions of them, aka Hulk, Spiderman, The Thing. And theres already been a thor girl and I think a black version of Captain America. There already a fair few female superheroes. There does need to be more black superheroes least there was when I read them about 15 years ago, not sure if things have changed since though I doubt they have. They need more that aren't overly muscle bound or have big tits and beutif…
/r/MensRights28/07/14 08:52 PM
2

I was thinking she is oxxy as well, seems to have a similar face.
/r/MensRights22/07/14 10:45 PM
1

Agreed
/r/MensRights07/07/14 08:06 AM
1

He pretty much admitted he let his dick do his thinking for him.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 07:54 AM
1

What if he really raped her and another person ? The other person sees him on tv, and gives their testimony as well. Well in that case, if he did rape 2 people chances are he'd be found guilty of the first, his name can then be released and the second can come forward and he can be put on trial for that at a later date. The only problem would be if there is insufficiant proof of guilt for the first case. Also theres nothing to stop the just giving out a general discription of the accused without…
/r/MensRights29/06/14 08:29 PM
1

The first thing I thought is why the hell is the person who uploaded the video recording some random stranger, as it starts off with her just sitting there going through her bag. Also theres no discription on youtube to give reason as to why they started filming. Something makes me think it might be a set up. I hope it not, but its sure seems a coincidence the person happens to be filming.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 11:17 AM
1

You might like this then, though it is a comedy program. But shows why we shouldn't always trust serveys or government www.youtube.com/watch?v=G0ZZJXw4MTA Though I probably don't quite mistrust government as much you. I have some leaning in that direction.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 11:25 AM
1

Fair enough, it was your call.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 09:41 PM
9

I would have done the #yesallchildren instead if the m&m or maybe both.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 05:41 PM
2

Yes there was shows that way, dads army wasn't one of them. That joke was funny not cause of the supposed inference, but because of the character, which you'd know if you watched the show.
/r/MensRights15/06/14 10:55 PM
2

Its obvious to you, cause thats what you want it to be. Words and phrases have multiple means, some change over time. Take gay, a word that once ment happy, now is refered to someones sexuality, and least in the uk, starting to mean wrong or bad. So don't presume the conitation must be sexual. When it could simply mean sticking it in someones guts at an upward angle, at least in reference to that tv show. My point is you are puting the reference there as thats how your mind works. The shows crea…
/r/MensRights15/06/14 10:20 PM
2

I don't suppose anything. If someones wants to presume it means ass that up to them. But as I said I've only seen it in a comedy, that has no or next to no innuendo. I'm not going automatically put any sexual meaning to it. If the program was known for it, then yes, I'd agree. I suggest you watch the program Dad's Army if you haven't already, and see how much sexual references there are in it.
/r/MensRights15/06/14 09:51 PM
2

Only time I've heard the phrase is exactly where the guy says its from, aka Dads Army, which is a comedy about the home guard. And I'm 99.99999999999999% there is no metaphor intended by it. Although my world war 2 knowlege is limited, it may well have been used in real life. Even though it more than likely about killing germans/nazis and not rape.
/r/MensRights15/06/14 08:52 PM
3

Ideally yes it should be just a "parent" role. Unfortunately we don't have a day that just celebrates parents no matter what their gender. So when either fathers or mothers day rolls round it nice to appreciate the single parent who for whatever reason fills what is considered both roles.
/r/MensRights15/06/14 11:24 AM
6

Or go off by pure faith, no evidence required there either.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 05:02 PM
0

Be careful you ain't doing this to the other poster www.youtube.com/watch?v=G0ZZJXw4MTA
/r/MensRights14/06/14 02:44 PM
3

On the other hand, basically no Americans at all post 2001 experience violence at the hands of Muslims (in America at least), so it's not a good analogy. Whist your probaby right about that. I have heard reports of americans being afraid of muslins in general purely down to 9/11, and this is what the op is refering to least I assume so. And this is why the analogy is used. It doesn't matter if what you say true or not to someone who believes that all muslims are terroists and some of them will b…
/r/MensRights14/06/14 11:53 AM
3

I didn say americans do fear all muslims. The point being made is americans fearing all muslins is wrong and anyone that does shouldn't, and likewise women fearing all men is equally wrong and any woman that does shouldn't.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 11:18 AM
5

I don't think he does as there are still terrorists out there, just like there are still rapists. And as you said we don't fear all muslims, women shouldn't fear all men.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 10:47 AM
1

You just have to laugh at both the article and comments there. Seems people would rather react, before engaging their brains.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 10:28 PM
2

The only thing it proves is, the note was left by someone. Beyond that it could be anyone. And most likely some form of troll who thought it would be funny to leave a note like that and get a reaction, and they got the reaction they wanted
/r/MensRights13/06/14 07:22 PM
2

I would say it depends on two things One. If the is a requirement that he must be there at a designated time no matter what. Then being tbere late is unfair. Two. Is he required to work x number of hours, if he fullfils it even though he's a bit late, then it's fair and the employers are being a bit shitty. If he's not then he's the one not being fair. Basically it depends on the situation, there should be some leeway, less theres a justified reason for there not being one.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 05:10 PM
1

No I'm just not a nutter who treats everything as black and white like you do. Seems your the one with a morality problem, not me
/r/MensRights13/06/14 10:18 AM
1

Going off just the image we don't know how the strippers were caught out. Most likly the men realised it was due to more than drink, and pointed the finger at the right people or guessed who it was. The way you were replying I doubt you'd have done anything, as you come across as beliveing the strippers didn't do anything wrong. As you presumed they'd have taken cash ect if they intended on commiting a crime.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 10:32 PM
2

Your still not getting it are you, the point is to make it look like it wasn't a crime, when in fact it is. Taking cash rings, ect makes it obvious that a crime was committed. And obviously the way they did it if you were in charge of the case, it would have worked. Fortunately for the men you weren't.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 09:51 PM
2

If they got drugged why didn't the strippers took the cards, keys, wallets and everything they could? That would have been more obvious. The idea I presume is to make it look like the men were ok with spending the money on the strippers, which is to hide the crime. Which do you think is easier to spot, someone with a credit card in someone else's name, or having it look like the person who's card it is, willingly use it? No ones claiming rape, except you, the are calling it a scam, and rightfull…
/r/MensRights12/06/14 09:19 PM
1

Yes you read it right. You have to look at it like this, if they weren't drugged, the chances are the men wouldn't have spent so much on the strippers, or have gone with them in the first place. Of course no one can say what the men would have done. But by strippers doing it the way they did they were trying to cover up their wrong doing by making things look normal.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 07:29 PM
1

So their not good cause you say so?
/r/MensRights12/06/14 11:43 AM
1

There are medical reasons for abortions, two being a danger to the mother and anothervis where the baby has died in the womb, I'm pretty sure there are others. Just don't presume there are no good reasons when there are.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 09:38 AM
1

That's fair, I don’t spend that much time on MRA forums, just an occasional lurker. But I still feel like I have an idea about it in general. That's probably why you mistrust MRA's then, till now you've formed your opinion on from what probably most people see (me included), basically nothing, or possibly what you've heard from others, and the problem is if they aren't actual MRA's, the chances are your on the end of a game of Chinese Whispers, in that the message you got has been twisted out of…
/r/MensRights11/06/14 08:53 AM
3

I spotted this as a comment on youtube, I know, shouldn't read the comments there. Most are reasonable on this (well of the one I read), then I came to this one: Is this really that big of a deal? I mean its just a trim like a haircut for your penis. Idk i want to spend my time trying to figure out how to get it bigger rather reflecting if it should be outlawed or what ever. And I think WTF how can anyone compare it to a hair trim, he/she/it can't be that stupid.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 08:31 AM
1

My meaning is/was boys aren't supposed to wear dresses, not girls. Thats the nearest thing I can think of relating to the provocative thing that was mentioned, to be clear I'm not saying the two are the same.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 10:44 AM
1

Well school dress code is part of it, my point includes parents and work as well. Girls/women are supposed to wear dresses.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 07:52 AM
0

The nearest parallel of dress code for boys I can think of is they aren't taught its ok to wear a dress. The next one being wearing make up, which is somewhat changing least in adults.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 07:50 PM
1

Till I started reading this sub, this is what I've always been told about rape. Rape isn't about the act of sex, it's about power, and having power over another. So it doesn't matter about if the other wants it, or enjoys it, it also doesn't matter about penetration either, as the person can be castrated (chemically or otherwise), a rapist can and do still repeat it.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 02:28 PM
1

The thing I have when people talk about this, is it comes across as a game of one up manship of which sex as it worse. I know thats not the intention, but thats now how I see it. It got to the point it looks like the 4 yorkshiremen sketch monty python do. Link as follows http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x6auco_monty-python-four-yorkshire-men-liv_fun
/r/MensRights08/06/14 10:35 AM
3

Not to much I can say, most of it is I agree, least in principle, I don't fully agree with how bad you seem to be making it out. Though it could well be as you say, I've not experienced what you have, to say your wrong with any conviction. The videos you mention, if you mean the ones showing the different reactions when its men on the receving end being different to women, then yes. Again I agree, and being staged shouldn't matter, the reactions should be the same no matter the gender. As for yo…
/r/MensRights07/06/14 04:36 PM
4

An add directed at males would be exacty the same as this one, as acceptable/unacceptable as the viewer sees it. The last bit of your first paragraph (on a tablet so not sure how to quote propely with the app I'm using) is the ideal, ie gender neutral. I don't think anyone is suggesting its speading hate. Just missing the other side of the coin, in that it happens to men. And as for the lying bit, I see where the the other poster is saying in that by not mentioning men, it can be seen as lying i…
/r/MensRights07/06/14 12:13 PM
9

I think what is ment is the advert is lying by omission. In that the only gender that get mentioned is the female one, and therefore by omitting reference that it also happens to males as well they are therefore lying.
/r/MensRights07/06/14 11:36 AM
3

I think somewhat the same, but I think they would work as well as a pre-nup (sp?), in that they don't or didn't stand up in court. So for this thing to work, the law would have to be altered so they do, otherwise, there'd be no point in having them.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 05:31 PM
2

It's not so much thinking your a jerk, but doing the age old assumption thing. In this case because most people are in a sexual relationship, therefore everyone will be in one. But most people make assumptions, me included, we all need to think more before jumping to conclusions.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 12:38 PM
2

It happens because you know life, and things don't always happen they way you want it to, and you can't always make it happen.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 10:56 AM
1

I don't know if he was half jewish or not. The general point of the post is that there are people making other false statement, you might as well make other false statements.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 10:01 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter